Next Article in Journal
Advantages and Limitations in the Evaluation of the Neurological and Functional Deficit in Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries
Previous Article in Journal
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted?
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Quality of Care Means? Exploring Clinical Nurses’ Perceptions on the Concept of Quality Care: A Qualitative Study
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Depression in Male Inmates

Department of Nursing, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Clin. Pract. 2023, 13(1), 1-13;
Received: 20 November 2022 / Revised: 18 December 2022 / Accepted: 22 December 2022 / Published: 27 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Nursing and Quality of Healthcare)


Introduction: The prevalence of psychiatric morbidity is high among incarcerated individuals. Severe mental disorder is five to ten times higher among prisoners compared to the general population. Several factors are held to be responsible for the high prevalence of depression in prison: mainly poor living conditions (narrow room, loss of privacy), limited interpersonal relationships, and lack of mental health access. Inmates are at increased risk of all-cause mortality, suicide, self-harm, violence, and victimization while those with mental disorders are involved in conflicts and are more likely to be charged with prison rules. Purpose: To explore depression among male inmates. Methods and material: In the study, 101 male inmates were enrolled. Data were collected by the completion of a “self-rating depression scale (SDS)-Zung” which included participants’ characteristics. The statistical significance level was p < 0.05. Results: Of the 101 participants, 51.4% of inmates were under 40 years old, 54.5% were married, 45.6% had been convicted of homicide and 38.6% had a life sentence. Normal depression levels were experienced by 62.4% of the participants, while 21.8% were mildly depressed, 14.9% were moderately depressed and 1.0% severely depressed. Foreign prisoners had statistically significant higher scores of depression compared to Greeks (median 48 vs. 45, p = 0.012); those suffering from a chronic disease compared to those who did not (median 48 vs. 45, p = 0.038); those who had spent time in solitary confinement compared to those who had not (median 46 vs. 43.5, p = 0.038) as well as those who had not considered harming themselves compared to those who had thought of it (median 46 vs. 44, p = 0.017). Conclusion: Given that prison populations are marginalized and deprived of the rights that people in the community benefit from, establishing the prevalence of depression in male inmates and its associated characteristics may help to formulate recommendations for future prison health care services. Clinical, research, and policy efforts are needed to improve prison mental health.
depression; Zung; inmates

1. Introduction

During recent years, the number of people incarcerated has reached more than 10.35 million worldwide. Since 2000, this number has been increased by 30%, a rate higher than the general population, which globally increased by 20% in the same period. In greater detail, from 2013 the prison population has increased in the USA, Asia, Europe and Oceania [1].The USA has reported one in five of the approximately 11 million incarcerated in 2019 globally [2].
Inmates are at greater risk of mental illness due to several factors such as loss of personal freedom and privacy, prison violence, social isolation, lack of or diminished access to mental health care, substance abuse, chronic health problems, family history of mental illness, overcrowding, and memorizing illegal acts that make them feel guilty [1,3,4]. Mental illness may be present at the time of admission to prison or develop during imprisonment and deteriorate due to the prison environment and conditions of detention [5].
According to worldwide estimates, one in nine prisoners experiences a mental disorder, mainly depression [1]. The prevalence of depression among prisoners was 42%, 43%, 81%, 85%, 35.3% and 37% in Iran, New York, India, Pakistan, Nepal, and Nigeria, respectively [4] as well as 19.2% in Norway and 57.4% in Turkey, respectively [3].
Men with depression experience behavioral problems which create difficulties in adaptation to prison and may in turn deteriorate their mental health state. For example, men tend to be more irritable and aggressive, engage in conflicts or risky activities, and have alcohol use disorder [6]. Mental disorder is three times higher in male prisoners than in the general Greek adult population [7]. Greek male inmates are more likely to report getting into a fight [5].
One of the important reasons to screen depression is the danger of suicide [8,9,10]. Self-harm is a leading cause of morbidity in prisoners with an annual presence of 5–6% in men. Prisoners who self-harm are at a six-to-eight-times increased risk of suicide while incarcerated and this persists after release [8]. Among Greek male prisoners, psychiatric condition, illicit substance use and aggression were significant risk factors in self-injured behavior [9].
Understanding the profile of male inmates with depression contributes to the identification of demands in treatment and rehabilitation. Thus, the aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore depression among male inmates and the associated self-reported characteristics.

2. Methods and Material

2.1. Design, Setting, and Period of the Study

In the study, 101 male inmates were enrolled in the prefecture of Attica during the period January–February 2021. This was a cross-sectional descriptive study. Participants were selected by the method of convenience sampling.

2.2. Sample: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Criteria for inclusion of participants in the study were: (a) to understand the Greek language and (b) to have a translator available in the case of a non-Greek participant. Exclusion criteria were inmates: (a) not cooperating in data completion, (b) being kept in solitary confinement for the past six months and (c) being transferred recently from another prison unit.

2.3. Data Collection and Procedure

The collection of data was performed by the method of interview using a research instrument designed to serve the purposes of the study. To prevent potential interference, inmates were invited to a private office room and assessed separately. Completion of each questionnaire was carried out in the afternoon, when participants had no other activity. The duration of each interview was approximately 45 min.

2.4. Research Instrument

The instrument used was a questionnaire, which included self-reported characteristics and the self-rating depression scale Zung (SDS).
In terms of demographic characteristics, the following data were collected: age, marital status, education level, job, residency, nationality, the existence of children or siblings and whether they had served in the military.
Regarding characteristics related to prison, the following data were recorded: reason for imprisonment, length of sentence, visits by family and friends, ways of spending free time, work at prison, solitary confinement, desire to be isolated from other prisoners, satisfaction with health state in prison and major stress.
The following clinical characteristics were reported: chronic and communicable disease, psychiatric history, history of substance abuse, alcohol consumption before prison and current smoking. With reference to suicidality, it was recorded if they had attempted suicide and if they had ever self-harmed themselves.
As far as characteristics of abuse before imprisonment is concerned, the following were recorded: physical, psychological and sexual abuse and memory of anxiety-, anger-, or sadness-inducing events.

2.5. Assessment of Depression

The “self-rating depression scale (SDS)-Zung” was used to assess depression in psychiatric male inmates. The SDS scale consists of 20 questions that evaluate how respondents felt during the previous week. Respondents have the ability to answer each question on a four-point Likert-type scale. In five questions it is first necessary to reverse the scores. The scores attributed to the questions are summed up leading to a final score ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression [11,12].

2.6. Ethical Considerations

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee where it was conducted. Inmates who met the entry criteria were informed by the researcher of the purposes of this study. All inmates participated only after they had given their written consent. Data collection guaranteed anonymity and confidentiality. All subjects were informed of their rights to refuse or discontinue participation in the study, according to the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki (1989) of the World Medical Association.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Categorical data are presented with absolute and relative (%) frequencies, while continuous ones are presented with mean, standard deviation, and a median and interquartile range (IQR). Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were performed to evaluate the association between depression and the inmate’s characteristics. Normality was tested with Kolmogorov–Smirnov και graphically with histograms. Reliability was assessed with a Cronbach’s a estimate. In addition, multiple linear regression was performed to assess the impact of an inmate’s characteristics (independent factors) on their depression. Results are presented as β coefficients and a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The observed significance level of 5% was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with version 25 of the SPSS statistical program (SPSSInc, Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Sample Description

Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of the sample. A total of 51.4% of inmates were under 40 years old, 54.4% were married, 57.4% had a secondary education, 19.8% were unemployed, 43.6% lived in Attica, 84.1% were Greeks, 60.4% had no children, 85.1% had siblings and 65.3% had served in the military.
In Table 2, the data presented concern the characteristics related to prison. The main reason for imprisonment was homicide (45.6%); 38.6% had been sentenced to life, 62.4% were able to visit their environment, 50.5% spent their free time watching television, 39.6% worked during prison hours, 24.8% were very satisfied with their health state, 74.3% spent time in solitary confinement while 40.6% wanted isolation from other inmates and 50.5% acknowledged the future after leaving prison as their major cause of stress. Of the 101 participants, 38.6% had attempted suicide, while 41.6% had harmed themselves.
In Table 3, the data presented concern clinical characteristics. Specifically, 14.9% suffered from a chronic disease and 11.9% from a communicable disease, while 74.3% had a history of psychiatric problems, 58.4% had a history of substance abuse and 35.6% and 85.1% were consuming alcohol before prison and were current smokers, respectively. Moreover, 38.6% had attempted suicide and 41.6% had harmed themselves.
In Table 4 are presented data concerning any type of abuse before prison. Of the 101 participants, 54.5%, 12.9%, and 59% had been physically, sexually, and psychologically abused, respectively.
From Table 5, concerning depression, we observe that at least 50% of inmates scored below 45 (median) on the Zung depression scale. In addition, 25% of inmates scored below 42. The average score on the Zung scale was 45.1 ± 4.1. Reliability of participantss answers was estimated as high (Cronbach’s a: 0.840).
Normal depression levels were experienced by 62.4% of the participants, while 21.8% were mildly depressed, 14.9% moderately depressed, and 1.0% severely depressed.

3.2. Factors Associated with Depression

Table 6 shows the association between depression and inmates’ characteristics.
A statistically significant correlation was observed between the inmates’ depression score and their nationality (p = 0.012), whether they suffered from a chronic disease (p = 0.038) and whether they spent time in solitary confinement (p = 0.038). More specifically, foreign inmates experienced higher levels of depression (median 48) than Greeks (median 45). Inmates suffering from a chronic illness experienced higher levels of depression (median 48) than those who did not (median 45). Inmates who spent time in solitary confinement experienced higher levels of depression (median 46) than those who did not (median 43.5).

3.3. Impact of Inmates’ Characteristics on Depression

Multiple linear regression was performed to assess the impact of inmate characteristics (independent factors) on the depression they experienced (dependent variable).
In Table 7, we observed that foreign prisoners had a 2.8-point higher depression score than Greeks (β = 2.77, 95% CI: 0.65–4.88, p = 0.011). In addition, inmates with a chronic disease had a 2.9-point higher depression score than those without (β = 2.85, 95% CI: 0.61–5.09, p = 0.013).

4. Discussion

The present results illustrated that 21.8% and 14.9% were mildly and moderately depressed. In Brazil, Andreoli et al. [13] showed that among 1192 male prisoners the lifetime and 12-month prevalence rates for severe mental disorders (psychotic, bipolar disorders, severe depression) were 12.3% and 6.3%, respectively. In Ethiopia, (Amhara Region), Reta et al. [14], in a sample of 336 prisoners (98% men), showed that 44% experienced depression. Similarly, in Ethiopia (Bahir Dar city), depression accounted for 45.5% among 402 prisoners, of whom the majority were men (n = 394) [1]. In India, among 146 male inmates, 25.7% had moderately severe depression and 27.6% severe depression [15]. In China (Guangdong), depression rates were 28.8% among 1484 male prisoners [16]. A relevant study in Greece of 495 male prisoners indicated that 223 (45.06%) were diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder with the most prevalent reason for imprisonment being non-violent crimes (40.7%) [7].
All aforementioned results demonstrate that depression in prison varies globally, which is attributed to socioeconomic and cultural discrepancies between countries, to medical and judicial systems, to levels of prison infrastructure and health care delivery as well as to differences in the methodology of research studies (screening tools for assessing depression, sample size and study period) [3,10].
Psychiatric morbidity rates underscore the need for delivery of effective mental health care to the incarcerated population. Although depression is a treatable condition, in some countries it is doubtful if the majority of mentally ill inmates receive any treatment [10].Additionally, the present results showed that foreign prisoners, those suffering from a chronic illness, or those kept in solitary confinement were more depressed. Relevant studies have shown several other factors related with depression. For example, there were higher levels of depression among inmates who were divorced, had graduated from higher education, experienced major stressful events, were sentenced to five to 10 years, or those with a history of suicide attempts or chronic illness [14].
In addition, higher education, being accused of a crime, and low social support were predictors of depression [15]. Furthermore, a history of drinking problems and gambling addiction were related to depressive symptoms [16].
Though chronic medical illnesses, such as hypertension, epilepsy, asthma, cancer, tuberculosis, hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), can be managed they cannot however be cured and this puts prisoners at a disadvantage. Additionally, more, inmates with chronic diseases are in need of a diet tailored to the illness’s specific needs but in some countries they may receive only one meal a day [17]. Moreover, prisoners may suffer from chronic diseases due to adverse living conditions. For example, the density of the prison population is responsible for certain diseases, mainly infectious ones [17]. Meanwhile, depression is more commonly encountered in people with a chronic physical illness [18,19,20,21].
Participants who had been kept in solitary confinement experienced higher depression levels (significant association only on univariate level). Individuals in solitary confinement experienced isolation, sensory deprivation and inactivity [22]. Additionally, results indicated depression among participants who did not have Greek nationality. A possible explanation for this finding is that this group face language or cultural barriers, or worries about family and separation. Migrants experience psychological distress when prisons are not safe and when they do not have trusting relationships with fellow inmates [23].
According to the descriptive results, 38.6% of participants attempted suicide and 41.6% had harmed themselves. In North-Eastern Italy, data from 16 prisons with 3900 inmates during the period 2010–2016 showed suicide and attempted suicide rates of one and 15 per 1000 inmates, respectively. More than 90% of suicides and attempted suicides were of men between 21 and 49 years old, with most having committed violent crimes. Further, 14% of suicides and 19% of attempts had a previous history of suicide attempts and self-harm [24]. Inmates who attempted suicide reported higher levels of depression, hopelessness, impulsivity and aggression and lower levels of self-esteem and social support [25].
Zong et al. [26], exploring studies from 27 countries, including 35,351 suicides, demonstrated the suicidal ideation during the current period in prison, a history of attempted suicide and current psychiatric diagnosis as the strongest clinical factors associated with it. Institutional factors associated with suicide included occupation of a single cell and receiving no social visits. Criminological factors included remand status, serving a life sentence and being convicted of a violent offence, in particular homicide.
Suicidality may reflect an underlying vulnerability as defined by biological and psychological characteristics that increases under stressful situations in prison, which include general issues such as adaptation to prison, intense stress due to environmental factors, loss of liberty, withdrawal from a familiar environment as well as more specific aspects, such as violence, victimization, mistrust in an authoritarian environment, shame or guilt for wrongdoing, lack of control over the present and future, and absence of purposeful activity (work or education) [25,27]. Single-cell detention is the riskiest housing, with a suicide rate more than 400 times the rate of suicide in double-cell housing [28]. However, near-lethal attempts occur in early periods of custody, with hanging and ligaturing as the most prevalent methods used. Improved screening of suicide risk is required on arrival [29].
Moreover, descriptive results demonstrated sexual abuse in the case of 12.9% of participants and physical abuse in 54.5%, mainly by the father (49.1%). A relevant study in Canada showed a 21.9% prevalence of sexual abuse among male inmates [30]. The first episode of childhood sexual abuse among male inmates began at a mean age of 9.6 ± 2.4 years and ended at a mean age of 13 ± 2.3 years [31]. A relevant study in Greek showed experience of violence in parental relationships, mainly by the father and secondarily by the mother in 308 males in prison aged between 18 and 77 years [32]. Interestingly, incarcerated individuals often have a history of childhood abuse (physical and sexual) [30,33]. People abused in childhood are at a higher risk of perpetrating violence in adulthood and at higher risk of substance use, which could result in imprisonment. Unmet mental health needs associated with childhood abuse may exacerbate during imprisonment [30].
Furthermore, 35.6% of the present sample consumed alcohol prior to detention and 58.4% had a history of substance abuse. Growing up with a caregiver who used drugs or alcohol was a consistent predictor of increased risk of substance misuse [34]. Among male prisoners, drug abuse prevalence ranged from 10 to 48% and alcohol abuse disorders ranged from 18 to 30% [35]. Prisoners who committed homicide were likely to claim that it occurred under the influence of a substance. Meanwhile, one of the reasons people used substances was to increase their confidence in committing a crime [36]. Depression in male prisoners was strongly affected by the consumption of drugs in prison and by the absence of visitors. Consuming drugs while in prison was found in 41.4% (n = 390) [37].
In the present study, 62.4% of the participants stated that someone was visiting them. The more a person feels connected to the social environment, the less likely they are to engage in self-destructive behaviors and suicide. Increasing social support may improve their ability to cope with stress that occurs during incarceration [37].
Finally, 50.5% of the sample studied reported future after prison as their major cause of stress, but this finding was not associated with depression. Considering life to be difficult after release from prison was associated with depression among 332 prisoners, of whom the majority were males (n = 311, 93.7%) [38].
Apart from a psychiatric unit that is sufficiently equipped with materials and personnel, to detect and treat mentally ill inmates, equally important is the need to follow up in the community, after release. Mentally ill prisoners are faced with a double stigma after release, the one of imprisonment and that of a mental illness. After release, the unmet needs of this group may increase their risk of recidivism unless community psychiatric services are effective [10].

5. Strength and Limitations of the Study

The main limitation of this study is that it is a single-center study in Greece with a relatively small sample size which consists solely of male prisoners. The method of the present study was convenience sampling and therefore was not representative of all inmates in Greece. Additionally, it was a cross-sectional study, thus not allowing the emergence of a causal relation between depression and patients’ self-reported characteristics. It would be interesting if there was a first evaluation of depression on admission and then periodically during the prison stay. Future research should take all of these limitations into consideration.
The strength of the study was that the Zung depression scale is a standardized and internationally recognized screening tool. This instrument may permit comparisons between inmates all over the world.

6. Conclusions

The results showed that foreign prisoners, those suffering from a chronic illness, or those kept in solitary confinement (only on an univariate level) were more depressed.
The results of the present study will contribute to a deeper understanding of male inmates’ profile and suggest recommendations for interventions targeting the alleviation of depression. It is important to have an updated picture of mental health needs for the organization, planning, and delivery of services to this population as well as for informing policy and practice.
Inmates are a marginalized population who do not have the same benefits as individuals in the community, including health care. However, inmates ought to have access to available health services without discrimination, according to the universal basic principles of health. Prison staff training and the acquisition of behavioral skills to deal with the population is an urgent demand.
Future studies need to be conducted in a large sample size to assess the determinants of depression.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K. and M.P.; Methodology, D.K., E.D. and M.P.; Software, E.D. and N.P.; Validation, E.D. and A.K.; Formal analysis, E.D. and G.T.; Investigation, D.K., A.Z., N.P. and G.T.; Resources, N.P. and V.T.; Data curation, A.Z., A.K. and V.T.; Writing—original draft, D.K. and M.P.; Writing—review & editing, A.Z. and M.P.; Visualization, A.Z. and A.K.; Supervision, M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Alemayehu, F.; Ambaw, F.; Gutema, H. Depression and associated factors among prisoners in Bahir Dar Prison, Ethiopia. BMC Psychiatry 2019, 19, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Holder, J.; Calaff, I.; Maricque, B.; Tran, V.C. Concentrated incarceration and the public-housing-to-prison pipeline in New York City neighborhoods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2123201119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bedaso, A.; Kediro, G.; Yeneabat, T. Factors associated with depression among prisoners in southern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Res. Notes 2018, 11, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Welu, S.G.; Aregawi, D.H.; Gebreslassie, H.T.; Kidanu, K.G. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Depressive Disorder among Prisoners in Mekelle General Prison Center, Tigray, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study Design. Depress. Res. Treat. 2021, 2021, 1942674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Togas, C.; Raikou, M.; Niakas, D. An assessment of health-related quality of life in a male prison population in Greece associations with health-related characteristics and characteristics of detention. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 274804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Santos, M.M.D.; Barros, C.R.D.S.; Andreoli, S.B. Correlated factors of depression among male and female inmates. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2019, 22, e190051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alevizopoulos, G.; Igoumenou, A. Psychiatric disorders and criminal history in male prisoners in Greece. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 2016, 47, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Favril, L.; Yu, R.; Hawton, K.; Fazel, S. Risk factors for self-harm in prison: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 2020, 7, 682–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sakelliadis, E.I.; Papadodima, S.A.; Sergentanis, T.N.; Giotakos, O.; Spiliopoulou, C.A. Self-injurious behavior among Greek male prisoners: Prevalence and risk factors. Eur. Psychiatry 2010, 25, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Osasona, S.O.; Koleoso, O.N. Prevalence and correlates of depression and anxiety disorder in a sample of inmates in a nigerian prison. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 2015, 50, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zung, W. Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale and Depression Status Inventory. In Assessment of Depression; Satorious, N., Ban, T., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fountoulakis, K.; Iacovides, A.; Kleanthous, S. The Greek translation of the symptoms rating scale for depression and anxiety: Preliminary results of the validation study. BMC Psychiatry 2003, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Andreoli, S.B.; Dos Santos, M.M.; Quintana, M.I.; Ribeiro, W.S.; Blay, S.L.; Taborda, J.G.; de Jesus Mari, J. Prevalence of mental disorders among prisoners in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Reta, Y.; Getachew, R.; Bahiru, M.; Kale, B.; Workie, K.; Gebreegziabhere, Y. Depressive symptoms and its associated factors among prisoners in Debre Berhan prison. Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, 0220267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tripathy, S.; Behera, D.; Negi, S.; Tripathy, I.; Behera, M.R. Burden of depression and its predictors among prisoners in a central jail of Odisha, India. Indian J. Psychiatry 2022, 64, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Geng, F.; Tu, L.; Zhan, N.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Associations of substance abuse histories and gambling addiction history with post-traumatic stress symptoms and depressive symptoms among Chinese prisoners. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 2021, 12, 1906022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Elbek, O. COVID-19 Pandemic Threatening Prison Population. Turk. Thorac. J. 2020, 21, 433–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alexandri, A.; Georgiadi, E.; Mattheou, P.; Polikandrioti, M. Factors associated with anxiety and depression in hospitalized patients with first episode of acute myocardial infarction. Arch. Med. Sci. Atheroscler. Dis. 2017, 2, e90–e99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Polikandrioti, M. Quality of life of patients with cardiac pacemaker: Levels, associated characteristics, and the impact of anxiety and depression. Folia Med. 2022, 64, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Polikandrioti, M.; Goudevenos, I.; Michalis, L.; Nikolaou, V.; Dilanas, C.; Olympios, C.; Votteas, V.; Elisaf, M. Validation and reliability analysis of the questionnaire “Needs of hospitalized patients with coronary artery disease”. Health Sci. J. 2011, 5, 137–148. [Google Scholar]
  21. Polikandrioti, M. Perceived Social Isolation in Heart Failure. J. Innov. Card Rhythm Manag. 2022, 13, 5041–5047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Reiter, K.; Ventura, J.; Lovell, D.; Augustine, D.; Barragan, M.; Blair, T.; Chesnut, K.; Dashtgard, P.; Gonzalez, G.; Pifer, N.; et al. Psychological Distress in Solitary Confinement: Symptoms, Severity, and Prevalence in the United States, 2017–2018. Am. J. Public Health 2020, 110, S56–S62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lutz, M.; Streb, J.; Dudeck, M. Living Conditions Influence Psychological Distress of Migrants in Long-Term Imprisonment. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Castelpietra, G.; Egidi, L.; Caneva, M.; Gambino, S.; Feresin, T.; Mariotto, A. Suicide and suicides attempts in Italian prison epidemiological findings from the “Triveneto” area, 2010–2016. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 2018, 61, 6–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rivlin, A.; Hawton, K.; Marzano, L.; Fazel, S. Psychosocial characteristics and social networks of suicidal prisoners: Towards a model of suicidal behaviour in detention. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhong, S.; Senior, M.; Yu, R.; Perry, A.; Hawton, K.; Shaw, J.; Fazel, S. Risk factors for suicide in prisons: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 2021, 6, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Radeloff, D.; Stoeber, F.; Lempp, T.; Kettner, M.; Bennefeld-Kersten, K. Murderers or thieves at risk? Offence-related suicide rates in adolescent and adult prison populations. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Reeves, R.; Tamburello, A. Single cells, segregated housing, and suicide in the New Jersey Department of Corrections. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 2014, 42, 484–488. [Google Scholar]
  29. Marzano, L.; Hawton, K.; Rivlin, A.; Smith, E.N.; Piper, M.; Fazel, S. Prevention of Suicidal Behavior in Prisons. Crisis 2016, 37, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bodkin, C.; Pivnick, L.; Bondy, S.J.; Ziegler, C.; Martin, R.E.; Jernigan, C.; Kouyoumdjian, F. History of Childhood Abuse in Populations Incarcerated in Canada: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Public Health 2019, 109, e1–e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Johnson, R.; Ross, M.; Taylor, W.; Williams, M.; Carvajal, R.; Peters, R. Prevalence of childhood sexual abuse among incarcerated males in county jail. Child Abuse Negl. 2006, 30, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Apostolopoulos, A.; Michopoulos, I.; Rizos, E.; Manthou, V.; Tzeferakos, G.; Kalemi, G. Prisoners in Greek prisons: Correlation of demographic and psychosocial data with committed crimes. Psychiatriki 2018, 29, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cantürk, M.; Faraji, H.; Tezcan, A.E. The Relationship between Childhood Traumas and Crime in Male Prisoners. Alpha Psychiatry 2021, 22, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Μarotta, P. Childhood Adversities and Substance Misuse Among the Incarcerated: Implications for Treatment and Practice in Correctional Settings. Subst. Use Misuse 2017, 52, 717–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fazel, S.; Hayes, A.J.; Bartellas, K.; Clerici, M.; Trestman, R. Mental health of prisoners: Prevalence, adverse outcomes, and interventions. Lancet Psychiatry 2016, 3, 871–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kinyanjui, D.W.; Atwoli, L. Substance use among inmates at the Eldoret prison in Western Kenya. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Benavides, A.; Chuchuca, J.; Klaic, D.; Waters, W.; Martín, M.; Romero-Sandoval, N. Depression and psychosis related to the absence of visitors and consumption of drugs in male prisoners in Ecuador: A cross sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 2019, 19, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abdu, Z.; Kabeta, T.; Dube, L.; Tessema, W.; Abera, M. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Depression among Prisoners in Jimma Town Prison, South West Ethiopia. Psychiatry J. 2018, 2018, 5762608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of inmates (n = 101).
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of inmates (n = 101).
n (%)
Age (years)
>60 4(4.0%)
Marital Status
Single 20(19.8%)
Living Together1(1.0%)
Education Level
Primary School22(21.8%)
High School58(57.4%)
No education6(5.9%)
Civil Servant5(5.0%)
Private Employee29(28.6%)
County capital20(19.8%)
Small Town16(15.8%)
Other 5(5.0%)
No of children
Siblings (yes)86(85.1%)
Served in military (yes)66(65.3%)
Table 2. Distribution of the sample according to characteristics related to imprisonment (n = 101).
Table 2. Distribution of the sample according to characteristics related to imprisonment (n = 101).
n (%)
Reason for imprisonment
Drug trafficking7(6.9%)
Attempted murder11(10.9%)
Migrant Trafficking1(1.0%)
Sentence (years)
Under trial21(20.8%)
Life Sentence39(38.6%)
Visited by someone (yes)63(62.4%)
Who visits you?
How do you spend your free time?
Physical exercise9(8.9%)
Do you work during prison time (yes)40(39.6%)
Satisfied with your health state?
A little27(26.7%)
Not at all7(6.9%)
Have you been in solitary confinement?
Do you desire isolation from other prisoners?
What is your major cause of stress?
My health21(20.8%)
Relationships with other prisoners11(10.9%)
Relationships with family
Future after prison
Table 3. Distribution of the sample according to clinical characteristics (n = 101).
Table 3. Distribution of the sample according to clinical characteristics (n = 101).
n (%)
Do you suffer from a chronic disease (yes)15(14.9%)
Do you have a communicable disease (yes)12(11.9%)
What communicable disease do you have?
Do you have a psychiatric history (yes)75(74.3%)
Do you have a history of substance abuse (yes)59(58.4%)
Smoker (yes)86(85.1%)
Consuming alcohol before prison
Have you attempted suicide?
Don’t want to answer5(5.0%)
Have you ever harmed yourself?
Table 4. Distribution of the sample according to abuse before imprisonment (n = 101).
Table 4. Distribution of the sample according to abuse before imprisonment (n = 101).
n (%)
Have you been physically abused? (yes)55(54.5%)
Who physically abused you?
How many times were you physically abused?
More than twice40(72.7%)
Have you mentioned the physical abuse to someone? (yes)12(21.8%)
Have you been sexually abused? (yes)13(12.9%)
Who sexually abused you?
How many times were you sexually abused?
More than twice5(38.5%)
Have you mentioned the sexual abuse to someone? (yes)4(30.8%)
Have you been psychologically abused? (yes)59(59.0%)
Who abused you psychologically?
How many times were you psychologically abused?
More than twice48(81.4%)
Have you mentioned the psychological abuse to someone? (yes)15(25.4%)
Table 5. Measuring the depression of inmates (n = 101).
Table 5. Measuring the depression of inmates (n = 101).
Mean (SD)Median (IQR)Cronbach’s a
Depression (Range 20–80)45.1(4.1)45(42–48)0.840
Depression Levelsn (%)
Normal (score < 50)63(62.4%)
Mildly Depressed (score 50–59)22(21.8%)
Moderately Depressed (score 60–69)15(14.9%)
Severely Depressed (score ≥ 70)1(1.0%)
SD: Standard Deviation, IQR: Interquartile Range.
Table 6. Factors associated with inmates’ depression.
Table 6. Factors associated with inmates’ depression.
Mean (SD)Median (IQR)p-Value *
Age 0.537
Marital status 0.759
Single 45.6(4.1)46(43–48)
Education Level 0.221
No education/Primary School46.1(3.3)46(44–48)
High School44.7(4.6)45(41–48)
Job 0.392
Residency 0.541
County capital44.4(4.0)44.5(41.5–46.5)
Small Town/Village44.8(3.9)45(43–48)
Nationality 0.012
Children 0.360
Siblings 0.333
Yes 45.0(4.3)45(42–48)
Served in military 0.113
Yes 44.6(4.1)44(42–48)
Reason for imprisonment 0.660
Financial/Theft/Robbery 45.6(3.9)46(42–48)
Drug trafficking/Migrant trafficking46.0(5.0)48(41.5–49.5)
Attempted murder/Homicide44.9(3.8)45(42–47)
Sentence (years) 0.686
Under trial45.8(4.8)45(43–48)
Life Sentence45.4(4.4)46(42–49)
Visited by someone 0.520
Yes 45.3(3.9)46(42–48)
How do you spend your free time? 0.737
Physical exercise45.6(6.0)49(43–49)
What is your major cause of stress? 0.583
My health45.7(4.9)44(43–47)
Relationships with other prisoners46.1(2.8)46(43–48)
Relationships with family45.4(4.8)47(42–49)
Future after prison44.6(3.8)45(42–48)
Are you satisfied with your health state? 0.764
A little/Not at all45.0(4.5)45(42–48)
Have you been in solitary confinement? 0.038
Do you desire isolation from other prisoners? 0.301
Do you work during prison? 0.558
Yes 44.7(4.1)44.5(42–48)
Do you suffer from a chronic disease? 0.038
Yes 46.9(3.0)48(44–48)
Do you have a communicable disease? 0.992
Yes 44.8(3.5)46(43–47.5)
Do you have a psychiatric history? 0.211
Yes 44.9(4.2)45(42–48)
Do you have a history of substance abuse? 0.838
Yes 45.1(3.7)45(42–48)
Current Smoker 0.625
Yes 45.0(4.3)45(42–48)
Consuming alcohol before prison 0.435
Remember an event of anxiety/anger/sadness 0.111
Yes 45.5(4.3)45(42–48)
Have you been physically abused? 0.529
Yes 45.3(4.3)45(42–48)
Have you been sexually abused? 0.525
Yes 45.8(3.3)45(44–48)
Have you been psychologically abused? 0.204
Yes 44.8(4.3)44(42–48)
Have you attempted suicide? 0.857
Have you ever harmed yourself? 0.342
* p-values were estimated using Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests.
Table 7. Impact of inmates’ characteristics on their depression.
Table 7. Impact of inmates’ characteristics on their depression.
β Coefficient (95% CI)p-Value
Do you suffer from a chronic disease?
Have you been in solitary confinement?
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kastos, D.; Dousis, E.; Zartaloudi, A.; Pavlatou, N.; Kalogianni, A.; Toulia, G.; Tsoulou, V.; Polikandrioti, M. Depression in Male Inmates. Clin. Pract. 2023, 13, 1-13.

AMA Style

Kastos D, Dousis E, Zartaloudi A, Pavlatou N, Kalogianni A, Toulia G, Tsoulou V, Polikandrioti M. Depression in Male Inmates. Clinics and Practice. 2023; 13(1):1-13.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kastos, Dimitrios, Evangelos Dousis, Afroditi Zartaloudi, Niki Pavlatou, Antonia Kalogianni, Georgia Toulia, Vasiliki Tsoulou, and Maria Polikandrioti. 2023. "Depression in Male Inmates" Clinics and Practice 13, no. 1: 1-13.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop