Next Article in Journal
Further Validation of the Crohn’s and Ulcerative Colitis Questionnaire-32 (CUCQ-32) to Measure the Quality of Life in Patients Treated with Biologics Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Serial Liquid Biopsy in the Management of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Assessment of Dynamic Knee Valgus between Lateral Step-Down Test and Running in Female Runners with and without Patellofemoral Pain Using Two-Dimensional Video Analysis

Clin. Pract. 2022, 12(3), 425-435; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract12030047
by Diego Protasio de Vasconcelos 1,2,*, Felipe J. Aidar 1,*, Tarcisio Brandao Lima 3, Flavio Martins do Nascimento Filho 3, Igor Leonardo Alves Mendonça 4, Alfonso López Díaz-de-Durana 5, Nuno Domingos Garrido 6, Michael Silveira Santiago 2 and Walderi Monteiro da Silva Junior 1,4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Clin. Pract. 2022, 12(3), 425-435; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract12030047
Submission received: 15 May 2022 / Revised: 7 June 2022 / Accepted: 8 June 2022 / Published: 10 June 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Respected Authors,

I congratulate you all for your contribution to the scientific community. After reading the manuscript, I feel that this version of manuscript must be enhanced. Eventhough the quality of the content, especially in the literature review, method, results, discussion, and conclusion are good, the way they are presented to the readers are quite complicated.

In several places I noticed that the scentences are long, extending more than 3, 4 lines. In order to understand that, I had to re-read it multiple times. Such long sentences can be broken down to simple sentence. Eventhough the concept and aim of this manuscript is simple, the way it is presented might make the readers to get exhausted.

Apart from few minor grammer corrections and loooong sentences, this manusript shall be accepted for publication.

 

Regards.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We are very honored by your compliments and thank you for your valuable contribution in reviewing this manuscript. We reviewed the article seeking to correct long and difficult to understand sentences. As suggested, we have broken these sentences into shorter sentences to make it easier for readers. As well as, we corrected minor grammatical errors throughout the text. Attached, we send a PDF file with the corrections made.

Please see the attachment.

Kind regards

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

It is my pleasure to review your study but I have a lot of doubts.

General information:

-references could be newer

Introduction:

-line 47: "Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is the most common cause of knee injury in runners " to state that it is the most common, please provide newer reference. 

-line 51: Its etiology is still not 51 fully understood and has been described as multifactorial" please describe it more precisely.

-Patellofemoral pain (PFP) should be accurately described, symptoms etc.

M&M

- line 115: "...or had knee pain related to running" and line 122 "PFP diagnosis is clinical, based on clinical history and physical examination, and does not require imaging tests". imaging diagnosis was not performed, and if the pain was caused by bone changes? Osteoarthritis? e.t.c. This very important. 

-the inclusion and exclusion criteria should be described in more detail.

-"Frontal plane knee projection angle" did all participants have the same shoes? foot defects? this could have influenced the measurements

Results

-you should change commas to dots in numbers (in tables 1-3)

Discussion

 -references could be newer.

-it is worth mentioning Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We really appreciate your valuable observations and suggestions to our study. We are certain that they will contribute substantially to our manuscript. Attached, we send the answers to all your questions and suggestions. We sincerely hope that we have met all of them in the revised manuscript.

Please see the attachment.

Kind regards

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop