Next Article in Journal
Sodium Nitroprusside as a Xenobiotic Model of Oxidative and Nitrosative Stress in Cellular and Zebrafish Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Exposure to Endocrine Disruptors and Stress Hormones Across Pregnancy Trimesters: Links with Maternal Telomere Length
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic and Environmental Factors Shaping Hearing Loss: Xenobiotics, Mechanisms and Translational Perspectives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Genetic Modulation of Mercury Exposure on Perinatal and Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Gene-Environment Interactions

by
Aqsa Aufa Syauqi Sadana
1,
Saekhol Bakri
2,3,
Shinji Tokonami
4,
Eka Djatnika Nugraha
5,
Hasnawati Amqam
6 and
Muflihatul Muniroh
3,7,*
1
Master’s Program in Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
2
Department of Public Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
3
Center of Clinical Toxicology and Environmental Health (CCTEH), Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
4
Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki-shi 036-8560, Japan
5
Research Center of Nuclear Safety, Metrology and Quality Technology, Research Organization of Nuclear Technology (ORTN), National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), South Tangerang 15314, Indonesia
6
Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia
7
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Xenobiot. 2026, 16(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16010028
Submission received: 29 December 2025 / Revised: 22 January 2026 / Accepted: 31 January 2026 / Published: 6 February 2026

Abstract

Genetic polymorphisms can modulate susceptibility to mercury (Hg) toxicity by altering metabolic and detoxification pathways. This review evaluated the association between genetic variants, Hg exposure, and obstetric outcomes. A systematic search of Scopus, PubMed and ScienceDirect through May 2025 identified 12 eligible studies (n = 4995), conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, with methodological quality assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was selectively performed only for genetically and methodologically comparable studies. The most frequently examined genes were GSTP1, GCLC, GCLM, GPX1, MT1A, ALAD, and APOE. Meta-analysis of GSTP1 rs1695, showed no statistically significant association between the Val105 allele and hair mercury concentrations (MD = −0.08 µg/g; 95% CI: −0.18 to 0.02; p = 0.13), although the direction of effect suggested a potential protective trend. Polymorphisms in other glutathione-related genes (GCLC, GCLM, and GPX1) were consistently associated with increased risks of small-for-gestational-age infants, preeclampsia, and impaired neurodevelopmental outcomes in offspring. In contrast, the APOE ε4 allele appeared to be associated with reduced fetal mercury burden, whereas polymorphisms in ALAD and MT1A were linked to higher mercury levels and adverse pregnancy-related outcomes. By integrating epidemiological evidence with mechanistic insights within a gene–environment interaction framework, this review helps to address important gaps in the existing literature. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating genetic susceptibility into Hg risk assessment and precision-based prenatal interventions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Mercury (Hg) is a toxic heavy metal and has multiple multisystemic effects on human health [1,2]. Hg, which is frequently in the shape of methylmercury (MeHg), may accumulate in humans because they consume contaminated seafood, particularly fish, as well as through direct exposure to the environment, for example, through contact with air pollution and the skin [3,4,5]. Hg is now considered one of the top three substances of public health concern due to its effects, especially in vulnerable populations, including pregnant women and children [6]. Increased consumption of fish and marine animals by pregnant women is associated with elevated Hg levels in their hair and blood [4]. Pregnant women residing in lowland areas tend to consume fish more frequently and exhibit higher Hg levels compared to those living in highland areas [7].
Pregnancy is a time of increased susceptibility to exposure to environmental pollutants, including Hg [8]. Pregnant women exposed to Hg are at higher risk of suffering from obstetric complications, such as preeclampsia, preterm labor, and affected growth of the fetus [9,10]. The studies have reported on the effect of heavy metals such as Hg and found the influence of exposure on fetal growth, including fetal heart rate, risks of preterm birth, and low birth weight [6]. Low-dose MeHg exposure has been linked to neurotoxic effects, such as neurobehavioral parameters (fine motor function and verbal memory in children) [11], and to long-term, chronic risks in adults, including elevated chances of suffering cardiovascular and respiratory diseases [6,12].
MeHg has various cytotoxic mechanisms, animal studies have reported that MeHg increases oxidative stress by inhibiting the antioxidant capabilities of the body, increases the generation of free radicals, and leads to neurotoxicity via the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, MIP-2, and MCP-5 [13,14]. Genetic factors contribute to heavy metal exposure [15]. Genes with SNPs encoding differences in proteins are important for toxicokinetic modulation, including absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of Hg, and toxicodynamic modulation, representing interaction with molecular targets and side effects [16,17,18]. Genetic polymorphisms can modulate the enzymes’ production, efficiency, and effectiveness within the MeHg metabolic pathway, which can act as the determining factor of susceptibility or resistance of the individual to Hg toxicity [19].
GSTP1 rs1695 (Ile105Val) is a functional genetic polymorphism in the GSTP1 gene, which encodes the phase II detoxification enzyme glutathione S-transferase pi 1 [20,21]. This polymorphism may interfere with the body’s ability to clear harmful substances such as Hg and is likely to be associated with increased susceptibility to Hg toxicity [11,22]. These polymorphisms are associated with higher or lower levels of enzyme activity and may explain differences in susceptibility to Hg exposure [23,24,25]. In addition to GSTP1, several other genes involved in mercury toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic have also been identified. Polymorphisms in the GCLC, GCLM, GPX1 and APOE genes can affect antioxidant capacity and Hg conjugation efficiency [19], while variants in the metallothionein genes affect metal binding and tissue retention [18,26,27]. SNPs in the MT1A rs8052394 (Lys51Arg) gene have been related to raised Hg concentrations in tissues and the risk of biological effects, namely neurotoxic effects such as neurocognitive impairment in children and increased mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in pregnant women [26].
There are a variety of environmental and socio-economic factors that can affect Hg exposure, whereas genetics represent non-modifiable susceptibility factors [28]. To our knowledge, no studies have specifically examined a possible association between the genetic variation in the Hg detoxification pathway and pregnancy outcomes or risk of obstetric complications, nor have any shown the toxic pathway. This review aims to identify and map the synthesis of scientific evidence on the association of genetic polymorphisms with Hg detoxification pathways and obstetric outcomes in populations exposed to Hg. This review may also contribute additional information to public health policy aimed at minimizing Hg exposure in pregnant women.

2. Methods

This review was performed by utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) to maintain comprehensiveness and accuracy of reporting [29,30]. This review was written based on a previously published review protocol, registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under number CRD420251016754. During the initial literature search, the researchers used the Boolean Operators (AND, OR) to combine the keywords to maximize the search and get the most relevant literature.

2.1. Sources of Data and Search Strategy

A search of literature was performed in Scopus, PubMed and ScienceDirect databases from January 2015 to 31 May 2025. The search terms were conducted by using the MeSH and free-text words. The keyword combination used was as follows: (mercury exposure OR methylmercury OR mercury levels) AND (genetic polymorphism OR single nucleotide polymorphism OR SNP) AND (pregnancy outcome OR obstetric complication OR low birth weight OR preterm birth OR preeclampsia). In accordance with the PROSPERO registration, GSTP1-specific terms (GSTP1 polymorphism OR glutathione S-transferase pi 1) were additionally applied during screening and data extraction to identify studies focusing on mercury detoxification pathways. Supplementary Material Table S1 provides the detailed search strategy.
Two reviewers (AASS and SB) independently selected studies using predefined criteria. Any discrepancies in the process of selection were settled by discussion between the two reviewers until consensus was achieved. Eligible articles were included in the meta-analysis. Retrieved articles that satisfied the eligibility criteria were then screened to identify additional relevant studies through manual citation screening (snowballing) that had not been identified in the original search, which was conducted to complement the database search strategy. All citations were solicited for management with Mendeley Reference Manager, followed by the process of eliminating duplicates.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

The eligibility criteria were observational (cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional) studies that analyzed the association between Hg exposure under biomarker blood, hair, urine, or cord tissue and genetic polymorphisms. We included studies published in English from January 2015 to March 2025, and excluded articles published before 2015. In addition, studies that applied both acceptable techniques for measuring the Hg levels (for example, PCA-RFLP, qPCR, or DNA sequencing) and genotyping, as well as reported the frequencies of genotypes, were included in the review.
Studies that did not measure body burdens of Hg in individuals or did not report genotype information were excluded. Also, animal studies, in vitro studies, and experimental models were excluded. Review, meta-analysis, case report, editorial, conference abstract, and studies with unextractable or insufficient data were also excluded.

2.3. Study Process

After finishing the initial search, three reviewers (AASS, SB, and EDN) screened the studies through titles and abstracts for those meeting the inclusion criteria. Full texts of the articles that passed the first stage were searched. Any discordant views during the screening process were resolved through discussion or the opinion of MM and ST. The PRISMA flowchart of studies, including the number of identified records, screened records, eligible for full-text review, excluded at the full-text level, and included in the meta-analysis, is depicted in Figure 1.
A total of 145 articles were found, as shown in Figure 1. There were 34 duplicative studies and 9 additional records identified through citation searches. During the screening phase, 111 records from the databases were screened by title and abstract, resulting in the exclusion of 79 studies. Thirty-two reports were sought for retrieval, of which two could not be obtained, leaving 30 reports assessed for eligibility. Most research was disqualified for not addressing the genetics of participants. Finally, studies that did not report data on SNPs or Hg exposure were excluded. Twelve studies were considered eligible for the inclusion review, and three were included in meta-analyses. Detailed database search results are available as Supplementary Files S1–S3.

2.4. Extraction and Quality Assessment

After the final selection, the full-text articles were retrieved, and the desired data was collected. The recorded data included first author names, years, countries, population, methods, and key findings. The data also included population characteristics, such as the number of populations, sex ratio, average age of subjects, body mass index (BMI) and Hg exposure sources. Furthermore, gene types, SNPs, obstetric outcomes, and Hg levels were also recorded. For each study (where the mean was obtained from the geometric mean), data were extracted or transformed to mean difference (MD) with standard deviation (SD), and the transformation was mathematically applied based on statistical techniques [31].
The methodological quality of the included studies was measured by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies [32]. Study quality is assessed using the NOS, focusing on three key points of selection, comparability, and result. Studies with a score ≥ 7 were regarded as high-quality, and studies with a score < 7 were all considered as high-risk of bias and were removed from the analysis of sensitivity.

2.5. Meta-Analysis

RevMan 5.4 was used to perform a meta-analysis of Hg levels between genotype comparison by MD and 95% CI [30]. If there was no significant heterogeneity (I2 < 50%), the fixed-effects model was chosen, and when there was high heterogeneity (I2 ≥ 50%), the random-effects model was chosen. Between-study heterogeneity was tested by the I2 statistic and the Cochran’s Q test, with I2 values < 25% and 25–50% representing low and moderate, and > 50% representing high between-study heterogeneity. Publication bias was determined by performing the funnel plot and Egger’s test (p < 0.05 suggested potential publication bias).

3. Results

3.1. Identification and General Characteristics of the Selected Study

Based on the search results in 3 databases, 12 articles were included based on the selection criteria and the contained data with n = 4955 participants who were predominantly from Brazil (4 studies, including Brazilian Amazon, Brazil, South America), Italy (2 studies), and other countries, Thailand, USA, Seychelles, China, Jamaica, Austria, Slovakia, and Africa, one study each. The populations were pregnant women, children, rural and riverine communities, and urban workers. The most utilized study design was cross-sectional (seven studies), followed by cohort (five studies), and 1 case-control study. Hg exposure is predominantly via consumption of fish and, in part, through dental amalgam or occupational exposure (Table 1).
The NOS was used to evaluate the quality and eligibility of the included studies. Methodological quality, which scored between 7–9 out of a possible maximum of 9 stars, was similar. General strengths included well-defined exposures, outcome assessments, and cohort representation. These benefits include an easy identification of Hg levels. Nevertheless, several studies were unclear in adjusting for potential confounding and describing the amount of follow-up. The NOS scores for each of the studies are shown in Supplementary Material Table S2.

3.2. Genetic Polymorphisms Associated with Hg Levels and Obstetric Outcomes

Biomarkers used to measure Hg levels are blood, hair, urine, and umbilical cord. The threshold level is different for each biomarker [42,43]. In rural villages, Hg levels have been found to go well beyond the limit. Pareni et al. (2021) found high Hg levels in the Brazilian population above the hair biomarker cut-off for the WHO (>2 µg/g) [37]. On the other hand, populations living in cities usually have low levels of Hg [4,44], and a few individuals are at risk when they present some sensitive allele or genotype [26,39]. The Hg contents and SNP data of genes in each study are presented in Table 2.
The genes summarized in Table 3 represent key components of the mercury toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic pathways. Glutathione-related genes are involved in antioxidant defense and phase II detoxification, while metallothionein genes function as metal-binding proteins that regulate intracellular mercury sequestration. ALAD participates in heme biosynthesis and heavy metal binding, while APOE is involved in lipid transport and placental mercury transfer.
The correlations of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and obstetric complications are summarized in Table 3. Eighteen SNPs in 14 genes, identified in the present study, were correlated with Hg. The studies were classified depending on the pathway mediated by their activity, with those including the glutathione pathway, the metallothionein (MT) pathway, and the activity of transporters and other metabolic enzymes. SNPs in GSH and MT pathways presented significant associations with Hg levels in blood, hair, and urine [21,26,35] Three SNPs (GSTP1 rs1695 (Ile105Val), MT1A rs8052394 (Lys51Arg), and MT1M rs2270836) were repeatedly related to high Hg in all studies [5,26]. In pregnant women, the presence of the APOE ε4+ allele is associated with reduced fetal Hg accumulation, suggesting its role as a protective allele [38]. In addition, gene-obstetric complication interactions were also identified in the ALAD rs1800435, and pregnant women carrying this gene were correlated with placental transfer efficiency and susceptibility to SGA [38]. The SNPs in GSH and MT detoxification genes were significantly related to higher Hg accumulation and adverse fetal outcomes (lower child cognition), while it depended on the specific allele or genotype [22].

3.3. Associate of GSTP1 rs1695 Polymorphisms and Hair Hg Levels

Three studies reported the same results regarding the GSTP1 rs1695 (Ile105Val) gene and Hg levels in hair [11,33,36]. The studies were also selected for a second meta-analysis to investigate the relationship of the GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism with hair Hg levels. All three studies compared individuals with the GSTP1 rs1695 Ile105/Ile105 (AA) genotype to Val105 allele carriers (Ile105/Val105 and Val105/Val105; AG/GG), with air as well as hair as a biomarker for MeHg exposure and thus capture the response on a similar biological background. The number per genotype in the Parajuli et al. (2016) [33] study was calculated assuming HW and a Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) of 0.33. This estimation was predicted because the real data were not provided by the authors. The random-effects meta-analysis yielded a non-significant MD (MD = −0.08 µg/g; 95% CI: −0.18 to 0.02; p = 0.13).
The results were not statistically significant but indicated an inverse trend for hair Hg levels and the AA (Ile105) genotype compared to individuals carrying the G (Val105) allele. There was some heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 41%, p = 0.19). The meta-analysis results of the GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism and hair Hg levels (µg/g) are presented in Figure 2.

4. Discussion

Mercury is a well-documented environmental toxin that has neurotoxic, immunotoxic, and reproductive effects [45,46,47]. Its distribution in the biological system depends on its chemical form (elemental, inorganic, or methylmercury) and on the exposure route, such as dietary intake (mainly fish consumption), occupational sources, and dental amalgam [48,49]. Hg exposure in humans due to the gastrointestinal route occurs during eating seafood [7]. Recent research, however, underscores the importance of genetic factors, particularly polymorphisms in genes involved in Hg transport, detoxification, and cellular response, in accounting for the significant interindividual variability observed in Hg metabolism and toxicity [50,51,52].
This systematic review and meta-analysis emphasize that polymorphisms contribute to Hg uptake and the toxicity effects, especially during pregnancy and birth. The studies that were part of this systematic review were conducted in different geographical areas, including Brazil, Italy, Vietnam, China, Jamaica, Austria, and the USA, and had various populations. This review concentrates on genetic polymorphisms related to the Hg detoxification pathways, especially the glutathione (GSH) and metallothionein (MT) pathways [11,35] Genes including GCLC (rs17883901), GCLM (rs41303970), and GSTP1 (rs1695) have been implicated in modifying blood or hair Hg concentrations [36]. The GCLM gene TT allele is linked to less Hg than CC or CT, suggesting enhanced detoxification capability [36].
The GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism reveals intriguing yet conflicting insights. According to Silva et al., there is a correlation between blood Hg levels and a reduction in neurological symptoms [5]. In contrast, Wahlberg et al. (2018) identified a link between Hg levels and decreased mental development in children [36]. These findings highlight a complex relationship between detoxification capacity and developmental disorders. The GSTP1 rs1695 (Ile105Val) gene serves as a representative example of a phase II detoxification enzyme, which plays a crucial role in the conjugation of glutathione to MeHg [53,54,55]. The G (Val105) allele has been associated with decreased Hg levels in previous studies, a finding that this meta-analysis supports [53]. While the effect has not yet achieved statistical significance, its direction remains biologically plausible. The enzyme activity altered by this polymorphism plays a role in mediating the extent of Hg elimination via bile and urine [56,57,58].
Meta-analysis indicated that there was no significant association between the G allele of GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism and lower Hg levels in hair [11,33,36]. The results indicate that GSTP1 is responsible for MeHg conjugation via the glutathione pathway before excretion [22,59,60,61]. This lack of significance may be confounded by variation in fish consumption, or exposure to other heavy metals, the nutritional status represented by selenium intake, and differences in MAF among populations. The moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 41%) found is also a sign of uncontrolled confounding. Moreover, differences in the exposure to other heavy metals (lead and cadmium) or nutritional status (selenium and omega-3 fatty acids) can be additional confounders that are not always properly considered in the primary studies [33]. The comprehensive mechanism of genetic modulation of Hg toxicity causing perinatal complications is summarized in the flow diagram in Figure 3.
Figure 3 illustrates the mechanisms by which genetic polymorphisms influence individual susceptibility to MeHg during pregnancy. Toxicity is determined by the interaction between toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic pathways. Other glutathione-related pathways and included in the toxicodynamic pathway, GCLC and GCLM were also identified as potential modulators of Hg levels [36]. These genes encode the catalytic subunit of the most critical enzyme in controlling tissue levels of GSH as an antioxidant and detoxification substrate, glutamate-cysteine ligase [62,63]. Specific genetic polymorphisms such as GCLM rs41303970 contribute to the reduction of fetal GSH levels [36], increased oxidative stress enhancement, and the magnification of Hg accumulation. This effect is particularly significant during pregnancy due to the increased demand for antioxidants, which impacts placental function and may elevate the risk of obstetric complications such as preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) [64]. The rs1050450 of the GPX1 gene involved in reducing ROS by converting H2O2 to H2O, is important [20]. The mutations of GPX1 can, to some extent, decrease the antioxidant defense ability of the organism and aggravate oxidative damage by Hg, which may lead to placental dysfunction, endothelial damage, and inhibited fetal growth [65,66].
Apart from the GSH pathway, metallothionein families were also known to be important for heavy metal ion binding and detoxification, which were mostly encoded by genes like MT1A, MT1M, and MT2A [26,27]. In addition, MT genes, such as MT1M (rs2270836) and MT1A (rs8052394), in the metallothionein family also affect Hg levels and neurological symptoms [26]. MTs combine with heavy metal ions, decrease their bioavailability, and are vitally involved in low-dose chronic exposure [10,25]. This is relevant, especially in human low-dose chronic exposures, as in people living in coastal communities or among fish consumers in inland areas [67,68]. MT has also been shown to be involved in the antioxidant defense system, as well as playing a significant role in protecting placental cells against injury caused by heavy metals, which is important for pregnancy [69].
Additionally, metallothionein (MT) serves as a repository for heavy metals such as Hg2+ and Cd2, and it is instrumental in maintaining Zn/Cu homeostasis, a function that is particularly vital during pregnancy [70]. The MT1A rs8052394 polymorphism (Lys51Arg), particularly the MT1A 51Arg variant, is associated with decreased metal-binding capacity, which then results in increased Hg load and systemic oxidative stress [26]. The variant rs8052394 at MT1A was related to elevated Hg and higher neurological symptoms [26]. It is linked to fetal neurodevelopmental disability and the risk of mothers’ mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and children’s neurocognitive impairment [71].
The ALAD rs1800435 polymorphism (Lys59Asn), encoding the enzyme, which is a critical enzyme in heme biosynthesis (catalyzing the conversion of ALA to porphobilinogen), is also associated with the removal of heavy metals [38]. The ALAD isoenzyme exhibits a pronounced affinity for Hg, particularly among individuals carrying the Asn59 variant of ALAD (ALAD-2) [32]. This interaction leads to the inhibition of heme synthesis, reduced oxygen delivery, and an increased metal burden. During pregnancy, these impairments adversely affect placental efficiency in oxygen transfer and are associated with an elevated risk of small for gestational age (SGA) infants and fetal neurotoxicity [72,73] The ALAD gene (rs1800435), previously studied mostly in native populations, demonstrated a raised blood ratio of Hg and a greater risk of neurotoxicity in carriers of the ALAD Asn59 variant [38].
On the other hand, the APOE ε4 allele in pregnant women was found to influence Hg retention and its potential risk for the fetus, thus possibly protecting mothers from Hg transfer through the placenta [38,74]. Palir et al. (2023) demonstrated that ε4 carriers presented reduced fetal Hg levels, possibly because of the efficiency of lipid transfer and the protective effect against oxidative stress [38]. This discovery suggests a potential systemic biomarker of fetal susceptibility to the impact of Hg [16,19].
Other xenobiotic metabolism and transplacental transfer-related genes, including ABCG2, UGT2B15, and CYP3A family (CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP3A7), can be interesting [75]. CYP3A gene SNPs can influence Hg and even children’s MDI scores via putative interplay in fish nutrient metabolism and heavy metal detoxification [39]. An efflux transporter, ABCG2 rs2231142, can influence Hg excretion from placental cells, whereas UGT2B15 rs1902023, by conjugating the toxic compounds introduced in the placenta, modifies their effect on the fetus [76].
Overall, the research results demonstrate the importance of not only the exposure level, but also the individual genetic predisposition to Hg, in relation to metabolic pathway, oxidative stress, and excretion efficiency [77,78]. In pregnant women and other vulnerable groups, these effects compound to increase the risk of pregnancy-related complications and long-term adverse pregnancy outcomes such as fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, and neurodevelopmental deficits in offspring [47,79]. Therefore, genetic and molecular strategies are very much needed for early screening of high-risk populations and personalized public health strategies, including genotype-guided screening and individualized recommendations for fish consumption.
The biological functions uncovered also support the roles of the systemic axis, including heme biosynthesis, GSH metabolism, metal binding, and xenobiotic excretion [22,46]. The interactions of genes with toxic substances, such as Hg, are complex and context-specific, and they are addressed using a transdisciplinary approach cutting across the disciplines of molecular toxicology, fetal medicine, nutrigenomics, and environmental health policy. During pregnancy, many investigations, including those of Gundacker et al. (2021) and Palir et al. (2023), have reported an influence of maternal genotype on the transfer of Hg to the fetus and obstetric outcomes, such as SGA birth [38,41]. Wahlberg et al. (2018) demonstrated that variations in the GSH pathway of the mothers can modify the kinetics of Hg, as well as influence the neurocognitive development of the child [36]. These findings highlight the need to consider gene-environment interactions when evaluating obstetrical complications and their long-term effects for children.
The present review is the first to demonstrate the relationship of genetic polymorphisms and Hg exposure in various populations and biomatrices (blood, hair, urine, and umbilical cord). This comprehensive framework can facilitate the initial step for characterizing at-risk populations and establishing genomics-based preventive interventions. Yet there are a few shortcomings in this study. Heterogeneity of biomarker categories, units of measure, and SNP reporting has impeded our ability to generalize findings. Most studies used were cross-sectional in design, and a small sample size precluded their potential to infer a causal relationship. As such, prospective large longitudinal cohort studies with standardized methods of biomarker measurement and consistent genotyping are needed.
Beyond genetic susceptibility, environmental exposure itself remains an important determinant of health risks. Mercury has long been known for its adverse health effects, particularly among vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, necessitating comprehensive and collaborative strategies to address environmental contamination. Dietary exposure through seafood consumption represents a major pathway of chronic heavy metal exposure during pregnancy [80], especially in coastal populations. Currently, environmental contamination is not limited to mercury. Other environmental pollutants, particularly in mining areas, have been reported to pose long-term public health risks [81,82]. In Indonesia, chronic low-dose environmental exposure may contribute to adverse health outcomes through mechanisms such as oxidative stress [83,84], potentially exacerbating risks during pregnancy. This context underscores the importance of an integrative approach in evaluating environmental exposures and their impact on maternal health.
An important finding from this review is that GSTP1 rs1695 consistently showed a trend toward a protective association against Hg retention. This trend, although not statistically significant, has clinical and toxicological importance. In-depth studies in relation to dominant vs. recessive genetic models, adjusting for exposure via fish consumption, and functional outcome quantifications (neurocognitive injury, complications in pregnancy) in the context of gene-environment interactions are warranted in the future. Integrating these analyses can significantly assist precision public health, especially with respect to pregnant women and children, who are the most susceptible to Hg exposure.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, genetic variations within the glutathione detoxification pathway, heme biosynthesis, metal binding, and xenobiotic metabolism, specifically involving the GSTP1, GCLM, MT1A, ALAD, and APOE genes, significantly influence Hg accumulation and its effects on obstetric health. Certain polymorphisms may modulate detoxification efficiency, antioxidant capacity, and transplacental transfer efficiency, thereby elevating the risk of pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, small for gestational age (SGA), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and neurocognitive developmental issues in offspring. Although not all effects reached statistical significance, the consistent direction of these effects underscores the importance of genetic factors in Hg susceptibility. Consequently, it is imperative to incorporate genetic information into prenatal screening and environmental health models to mitigate the long-term effects of heavy metal exposure, particularly in high-risk subpopulations, such as pregnant women and their fetuses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jox16010028/s1, Table S1. Literature search strategy; Table S2. The NOS scores for each of studies; Table S3. PRISMA 2020 for abstracts checklist; Table S4. PRISMA 2020 checklist; Detailed database search results are available as Supplementary Files S1–S3.

Author Contributions

A.A.S.S. conceived the study, designed the methodology, curated data, performed the formal analysis, and prepared the original draft. S.B. and H.A. contributed to methodology, validation, and manuscript review and editing. S.T. carried out formal analysis and writing—review and editing. E.D.N. and M.M. contributed to data curation and investigation, supervision, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This review paper is a product of research funded by the Indonesian Collaborative Research Grant, Institute for Research and Community Service, No. 325-22/UN7.D2/PP/V/2025; LPDP–BRIN RIIM-16 (Eka Djatnika Nugraha); and the Degree by Research Program, BRIN (Grant No. 93/II.5/HK/2025).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

ALADδ-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase
APOEApolipoprotein E
ASDAutism Spectrum Disorder
Cd2+Cadmium ion
CIConfidence Interval
CuCopper
DNADeoxyribonucleic Acid
GCLCGlutamate-Cysteine Ligase Catalytic Subunit
GCLMGlutamate-Cysteine Ligase Modifier Subunit
GPX1Glutathione Peroxidase 1
GSHGlutathione
GSTP1Glutathione S-Transferase Pi 1
HgMercury
Hg2+Mercury ion
HWHardy-Weinberg equilibrium
MAFMinor Allele Frequency
MCIMild Cognitive Impairment
MDMean Difference
MDIMental Development Index
MeHgMethylmercury
MT1AMetallothionein 1A genes
MT1MMetallothionein 1M genes
MT2AMetallothionein 2A genes
NOSNewcastle–Ottawa Scale
PCRPolymerase Chain Reaction
PRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
RFLPRestriction Fragment Length Polymorphism
qPCRQuantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
SDStandard Deviation
SGASmall for Gestational Age
SNPSingle Nucleotide Polymorphism
ZnZinc

References

  1. Basu, N.; Bastiansz, A.; Dórea, J.G.; Fujimura, M.; Horvat, M.; Shroff, E.; Weihe, P.; Zastenskaya, I. Our evolved understanding of the human health risks of mercury. Ambio 2023, 52, 877–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Aubrac, G.; Bastiansz, A.; Basu, N. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mercury Exposure among Populations and Environments in Contact with Electronic Waste. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Machado, C.L.R.; Crespo-Lopez, M.E.; Augusto-Oliveira, M.; Arrifano, G.P.; Macchi, B.M.; Lopes-Araújo, A.; Santos-Sacramento, L.; Souza-Monteiro, J.R.; Alvarez-Leite, J.I.; de Souza, C.B.A. Eating in the Amazon: Nutritional Status of the Riverine Populations and Possible Nudge Interventions. Foods 2021, 10, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rumiantseva, O.; Komov, V.; Kutuzov, M.; Zaroual, H.; Mizina, K.; Belova, M.; Nikitin, I.; Stolyarova, A.; Mashin, D.; Vilkova, D. Hair Mercury Levels in Pregnant Women: Fish Consumption as a Determinant of Exposure. Toxics 2024, 12, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Silva, M.C.; Oliveira, R.A.A.; Vasconcellos, A.C.S.; Rebouças, B.H.; Pinto, B.D.; Lima, M.O.; Jesus, I.M.; Machado, D.E.; Hacon, S.S.; Basta, P.C.; et al. Chronic Mercury Exposure and GSTP1 Polymorphism in Munduruku Indigenous from Brazilian Amazon. Toxics 2023, 11, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zinia, S.S.; Yang, K.H.; Lee, E.J.; Lim, M.N.; Kim, J.; Kim, W.J.; Park, C.; Kim, H.J.; Jung, S.W.; Hong, S.; et al. Effects of Heavy Metal Exposure during Pregnancy on Birth Outcomes. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 18990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Muniroh, M.; Bakri, S.; Gumay, A.R.; Dewantiningrum, J.; Mulyono, M.; Hardian, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Koriyama, C. The first exposure assessment of mercury levels in hair among pregnant women and its effects on birth weight and length in Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rani, P.; Dhok, A. Effects of Pollution on Pregnancy and Infants. Cureus 2023, 15, e33906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ni, M.; Li, X.; dos Santos, A.P.M.; Farina, M.; da Rocha, J.B.T.; Avila, D.S.; Soldin, O.P.; Rongzhu, L.; Milatovic, D.; Aschner, M. Mercury. In Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, 2nd ed.; Gupta, R.C., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 583–594. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pan, K.; Xu, J.; Li, F.; Yu, H.; Yu, J. The Association between Mercury Exposure during Pregnancy and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Environ. Res. 2025, 264, 120357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chan, P.H.Y.; Chan, K.Y.Y.; Schooling, C.M.; Hui, L.L.; Chan, M.H.M.; Li, A.M.; Cheung, R.C.K.; Lam, H.S. Association between Genetic Variations in GSH-Related and MT Genes and Low-Dose Methylmercury Exposure in Children and Women of Childbearing Age: A Pilot Study. Environ. Res. 2020, 187, 109703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Reducing Prenatal Exposure to Toxic Environmental Agents. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 138, 832. [Google Scholar]
  13. Muniroh, M.; Gumay, A.R.; Indraswari, D.A.; Bahtiar, Y.; Hardian, H.; Bakri, S.; Maharani, N.; Karlowee, V.; Koriyama, C.; Yamamoto, M. Activation of MIP-2 and MCP-5 Expression in Methylmercury-Exposed Mice and Their Suppression by N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine. Neurotox. Res. 2020, 37, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. David, J.; Nandakumar, A.; Muniroh, M.; Akiba, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Koriyama, C. Suppression of methylmercury-induced MIP-2 expression by N-acetyl-L-cysteine in murine RAW264.7 macrophage cell line. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2017, 22, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Joneidi, Z.; Mortazavi, Y.; Memari, F.; Roointan, A.; Chahardouli, B.; Rostami, S. The Impact of Genetic Variation on Metabolism of Heavy Metals: Genetic Predisposition? Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 113, 108642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fonseca Arrifano, G.D.P.; de Oliveira, M.A.; Souza-Monteiro, J.R.; Oliveira Paraense, R.S.; Ribeiro-dos-Santos, A.; dos Santos Vieira, J.R.; da Costa Silva, A.L.; da Silva Filho, M.; de Matos Macchi, B.; do Nascimento, J.L.M.; et al. Role for Apolipoprotein E in Neurodegeneration and Mercury Intoxication. Front. Biosci. 2018, 10, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kolbinger, V.; Engström, K.; Berger, U.; Bose-O’Reilly, S. Polymorphisms in Potential Mercury Transporter ABCC2 and Neurotoxic Symptoms in Populations Exposed to Mercury Vapor from Goldmining. Environ. Res. 2019, 176, 108512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Crespo-Lopez, M.E.; Barthelemy, J.L.; Lopes-Araújo, A.; Santos-Sacramento, L.; Leal-Nazaré, C.G.; Soares-Silva, I.; Macchi, B.M.; do Nascimento, J.L.M.; Arrifano, G.P.; Augusto-Oliveira, M. Revisiting Genetic Influence on Mercury Exposure and Intoxication in Humans: A Scoping Review. Toxics 2023, 11, 967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arrifano, G.P.F.; Martín-Doimeadios, R.C.R.; Jiménez-Moreno, M.; Fernández-Trujillo, S.; Augusto-Oliveira, M.; Souza-Monteiro, J.R.; Macchi, B.M.; Alvarez-Leite, J.I.; do Nascimento, J.L.M.; Amador, M.T.; et al. Genetic Susceptibility to Neurodegeneration in Amazon: Apolipoprotein E Genotyping in Vulnerable Populations Exposed to Mercury. Front. Genet 2018, 9, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, W.; Dai, J.; Hou, G.; Liu, H.; Zheng, S.; Wang, X.; Lin, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, M.; Gong, Y.; et al. SMURF2 Predisposes Cancer Cells toward Ferroptosis in GPX4-Independent Manners by Promoting GSTP1 Degradation. Mol. Cell. 2023, 83, 4352–4369.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Elofey, S.G.H.; Shafik, N.F.; Radwan, N.H.; Mansour, O.M.; Allam, R.M.; Shouman, S.; AbdelGawad, I.A. Relation between GSTP1 Polymorphism and Oxidative Stress in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J. Egypt. Natl. Canc. Inst. 2020, 32, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zaman, S.F.; Samms-Vaughan, M.; Saroukhani, S.; Bressler, J.; Hessabi, M.; Grove, M.L.; Pellington, S.S.; Loveland, K.A.; Rahbar, M.H. Factors Associated with Blood Mercury Concentrations and Their Interactions with Three Glutathione S-Transferase Genes (GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1): An Exposure Assessment Study of Typically Developing Jamaican Children. BMC Pediatr. 2024, 24, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tietjen, M.; Perez de León, A.A.; Sagel, A.; Skoda, S.R.; Phillips, P.L.; Mitchell, R.D.; Caruth, J.; Durán, U.; Musai, L.; Tortosa, S.; et al. Geographic Population Genetic Structure of the New World Screwworm, Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae), Using SNPs. J. Med. Entomol. 2022, 59, 874–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zakariah, H.A.; Rahman, N.N.S.N.A.; Seng, W.Y.; Wahab, S.; Rashid, R.A.; Shin, S.M. Association Analysis of a GSTP1 Functional Polymorphism with Methamphetamine Dependence and Associated Symptoms in a Multiethnic Malaysian Population. Sains. Malays. 2023, 52, 3211–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, J.H.; Gunathilake, M.; Lee, J.; Choi, I.J.; Kim, Y.-I.; Kim, J. Dietary Mercury Intake, the IL23R rs10889677 Polymorphism, and the Risk of Gastric Cancer in a Korean Population: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study. Epidemiol. Health 2024, 46, e2024051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sirivarasai, J.; Chaisungnern, K.; Panpunuan, P.; Chanprasertyothin, S.; Chansirikanjana, S.; Sritara, P. Role of MT1A Polymorphism and Environmental Mercury Exposure on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2021, 17, 2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, R.; Roshani, D.; Gao, B.; Li, P.; Shang, N. Metallothionein: A Comprehensive Review of Its Classification, Structure, Biological Functions, and Applications. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ke, T.; Junior, F.B.; Santamaria, A.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Genetic Factors in Methylmercury-Induced Neurotoxicity: What Have We Learned from Caenorhabditis elegans Models? Adv. Neurotoxicol. 2023, 9, 271. [Google Scholar]
  29. Aromataris, E.; Lockwood, C.; Porritt, K.; Pilla, B. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis; Jordan, Z., Ed.; JBI: Adelaide, Australia, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  30. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Myles, P.; Kasza, J.; Turner, T. Credibility of Subgroup Findings in Clinical Trials and Meta-Analyses. Br. J. Anaesth. 2021, 127, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stang, A. Critical Evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for the Assessment of the Quality of Nonrandomized Studies in Meta-Analyses. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 25, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Parajuli, R.P.; Goodrich, J.M.; Chou, H.-N.; Gruninger, S.E.; Dolinoy, D.C.; Franzblau, A.; Basu, N. Genetic Polymorphisms Are Associated with Hair, Blood, and Urine Mercury Levels in the American Dental Association (ADA) Study Participants. Environ. Res. 2016, 149, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Silva, M.C.; Basta, P.C.; Hofer, C.B.; Oliveira, M.A.F.; Kempton, J.W.; Oliveira, R.A.A.; Vasconcellos, A.C.S.; Perini, J.A. The GSTP1 rs1695 Polymorphism Is Associated with Mercury Levels and Neurodevelopmental Delay in Indigenous Munduruku Children from the Brazilian Amazon. Toxics 2024, 12, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rahbar, M.H.; Samms-Vaughan, M.; Saroukhani, S.; Bressler, J.; Hessabi, M.; Grove, M.L.; Shakspeare-Pellington, S.; Loveland, K.A.; Beecher, C.; McLaughlin, W. Associations of Metabolic Genes (GSTT1, GSTP1, GSTM1) and Blood Mercury Concentrations Differ in Jamaican Children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wahlberg, K.; Love, T.M.; Pineda, D.; Engström, K.; Watson, G.E.; Thurston, S.W.; Yeates, A.J.; Mulhern, M.S.; McSorley, E.M.; Strain, J.J.; et al. Maternal Polymorphisms in Glutathione-Related Genes Are Associated with Maternal Mercury Concentrations and Early Child Neurodevelopment in a Population with a Fish-Rich Diet. Environ. Int. 2018, 115, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Perini, J.A.; Silva, M.C.; de Vasconcellos, A.C.S.; Viana, P.V.S.; Lima, M.O.; Jesus, I.M.; Kempton, J.W.; Oliveira, R.A.A.; Hacon, S.S.; Basta, P.C. Genetic Polymorphism of Delta Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase (ALAD) Gene and Symptoms of Chronic Mercury Exposure in Munduruku Indigenous Children within the Brazilian Amazon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Palir, N.; Stajnko, A.; Snoj Tratnik, J.; Mazej, D.; Briški, A.S.; France-Štiglic, A.; Rosolen, V.; Mariuz, M.; Giordani, E.; Barbone, F.; et al. ALAD and APOE Polymorphisms Are Associated with Lead and Mercury Levels in Italian Pregnant Women and Their Newborns with Adequate Nutritional Status of Zinc and Selenium. Environ. Res. 2023, 220, 115226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Llop, S.; Tran, V.; Ballester, F.; Barbone, F.; Sofianou-Katsoulis, A.; Sunyer, J.; Engström, K.; Alhamdow, A.; Love, T.M.; Watson, G.E.; et al. CYP3A Genes and the Association between Prenatal Methylmercury Exposure and Neurodevelopment. Environ. Int. 2017, 105, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Barcelos, G.R.M.; Souza, M.F.; Oliveira, A.A.S.; Lengert, A.V.H.; Oliveira, M.T.; Camargo, R.B.O.G.; Grotto, D.; Valentini, J.; Garcia, S.C.; Braga, G.U.L.; et al. Effects of Genetic Polymorphisms on Antioxidant Status and Concentrations of Metals in the Blood of Riverside Amazonian Communities Co-Exposed to Hg and Pb. Environ. Res. 2015, 138, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gundacker, C.; Graf-Rohrmeister, K.; Gencik, M.; Hengstschläger, M.; Holoman, K.; Rosa, P.; Kroismayr, R.; Offenthaler, I.; Plichta, V.; Reischer, T.; et al. Gene Variants Determine Placental Transfer of Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), Mercury (Hg) and Lead (Pb), and Birth Outcome: Findings from the UmMuKi Bratislava–Vienna Study. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 664946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. WHO (World Health Organization). Guidance for Identifying Populations at Risk from Mercury Exposure; UNEP DTIE Chemicals Branch and WHO Department of Food Safety, Zoonoses and Foodborne Diseases: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  43. Rice, D.C. The US EPA reference dose for methylmercury: Sources of uncertainty. Environ. Res. 2004, 95, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Barros, B.; Oliveira, M.; Morais, S. Biomonitoring of firefighting forces: A review on biomarkers of exposure to health-relevant pollutants released from fires. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 2023, 26, 127–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gassim, F.A.-Z. Mercury Pollution: Dangers and Treatment. In Marine Pollution—Recent Developments; Mancuso, M., Bottari, T., Abdelhafez, A.A., Abbas, M.H.H., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2023; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rahbar, M.H.; Samms-Vaughan, M.; Lee, M.J.; Zhang, J.; Hessabi, M.; Bressler, J.; Bach, M.A.; Grove, M.L.; Shakespeare-Pellington, S.; Beecher, C.; et al. Interaction between a mixture of heavy metals (lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, manganese, aluminum) and GSTP1, GSTT1, and GSTM1 in relation to autism spectrum disorder. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2020, 79, 101681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fadhila, A.N.; Pramono, B.A.; Muniroh, M. Mercury and cadmium-induced inflammatory cytokines activation and its effect on the risk of preeclampsia: A review. Rev. Environ. Health 2023, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fawwaz, M.; Labasy, L.; Saleh, A.; Mandati, S.S.; Pratama, M. Determination of mercury (Hg) and lead (Pb) content in selected milkfish from fishponds around Pampang-Makassar River. Int. Food Res. J. 2019, 26, 689–693. [Google Scholar]
  49. Khan, K.; Rafiq, M.T.; Bacha, A.U.R.; Nabi, I.; Irshad, M.; Faridullah, F.; Younas, M.; Khan, M.D.; Aziz, R.; Amin, M.; et al. Assessment of heavy metals and associated oxidative stress in occupationally exposed workers from Bannu and Karak Districts in Pakistan. Environ. Geochem. Health 2023, 45, 5915–5925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Andreoli, V.; Sprovieri, F. Genetic aspects of susceptibility to mercury toxicity: An overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Espitia-Pérez, L.; Brango, H.; Peñata-Taborda, A.; Galeano-Páez, C.; Jaramillo-García, M.; Espitia-Pérez, P.; Pastor–Sierra, K.; Bru-Cordero, O.; Hoyos-Giraldo, L.S.; Reyes-Carvajal, I.; et al. Influence of genetic polymorphisms of Hg metabolism and DNA repair on the frequencies of micronuclei, nucleoplasmic bridges, and nuclear buds in communities living in gold mining areas. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen 2024, 897, 503790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Julvez, J.; Davey Smith, G.; Ring, S.; Grandjean, P. A birth cohort study on the genetic modification of the association of prenatal methylmercury with child cognitive development. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 188, 1784–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, G.; Cao, Y.; Hu, T.; Cai, Z.; Chen, C.; Geng, Q.; Luo, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Jin, J.; et al. A mutual interaction between GSTP1 and p53 improves the drug resistance and malignant biology of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Sci. 2025, 116, 1268–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lv, N.; Huang, C.; Huang, H.; Dong, Z.; Chen, X.; Lu, C.; Zhang, Y. Overexpression of glutathione S-transferases in human diseases: Drug targets and therapeutic implications. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Saravanan, R.V.; Pandi, A.; Murthykumar, K.; Selvi, S.G.A.; Arumugam, P.; Jayaseelan, V.P. Genetic association between rs1695 in glutathione S-transferase P1 and risk of periodontitis: A pilot study. Mol. Biol. Res. Commun. 2023, 12, 133. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bocedi, A.; Noce, A.; Marrone, G.; Noce, G.; Cattani, G.; Gambardella, G.; Di Lauro, M.; Di Daniele, N.; Ricci, G. Glutathione Transferase P1-1: An Enzyme Useful in Biomedicine and as Biomarker in Clinical Practice and in Environmental Pollution. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rahbar, M.H.; Samms-Vaughan, M.; Kim, S.; Saroukhani, S.; Bressler, J.; Hessabi, M.; Grove, M.L.; Shakespeare-Pellington, S.; Loveland, K.A. Detoxification Role of Metabolic Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) Genes in Blood Lead Concentrations of Jamaican Children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder. Genes 2022, 13, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kim, W.; Cho, Y.A.; Kim, D.C.; Lee, K.E. Association between Genetic Polymorphism of GSTP1 and Toxicities in Patients Receiving Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Fujimura, M.; Usuki, F. Methylmercury-Mediated Oxidative Stress and Activation of the Cellular Protective System. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Farina, M.; Aschner, M. Glutathione Antioxidant System and Methylmercury-Induced Neurotoxicity: An Intriguing Interplay. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Gen. Subj. 2019, 1863, 129285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hirota, Y.; Yamaguchi, S.; Shimojoh, N.; Sano, K.I. Inhibitory Effect of Methylmercury on the Activity of Glutathione Peroxidase. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1980, 53, 174–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wijaya, L.S.; Rau, C.; Braun, T.S.; Marangoz, S.; Spegg, V.; Vlasveld, M.; Albrecht, W.; Brecklinghaus, T.; Kamp, H.; Beltman, J.B.; et al. Stimulation of De Novo Glutathione Synthesis by Nitrofurantoin for Enhanced Resilience of Hepatocytes. Cell Bio. Toxicol. 2022, 38, 847–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kalinina, E. Glutathione-Dependent Pathways in Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Georgiou-Siafis, S.K.; Tsiftsoglou, A.S. The Key Role of GSH in Keeping the Redox Balance in Mammalian Cells: Mechanisms and Significance of GSH in Detoxification via Formation of Conjugates. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Forman, H.J.; Zhang, H. Targeting Oxidative Stress in Disease: Promise and Limitations of Antioxidant Therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 689–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Handy, D.E.; Loscalzo, J. The Role of Glutathione Peroxidase-1 in Health and Disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2022, 188, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Balali-Mood, M.; Naseri, K.; Tahergorabi, Z.; Khazdair, M.R.; Sadeghi, M. Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 643972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zheng, Y.; Cui, M.; Ni, L.; Qin, Y.; Li, J.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, X. Heterologous Expression of Human Metallothionein Gene HsMT1L Enhances Tolerance of Nicotiana nudicaulis to Zinc and Cadmium. Genes 2022, 13, 2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Navarro-Sempere, A.; Martínez-Peinado, P.; Rodrigues, A.S.; Garcia, P.V.; Camarinho, R.; Grindlay, G.; Gras, L.; García, M.; Segovia, Y. Metallothionein Expression in the Central Nervous System in Response to Chronic Heavy Metal Exposure: A Possible Neuroprotective Mechanism. Environ. Geochem. Health 2023, 45, 8257–8275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Espart, A.; Artime, S.; Tort-Nasarre, G.; Yara-Varón, E. Cadmium Exposure During Pregnancy and Lactation: Materno-Fetal and Newborn Repercussions of Cd(II) and Cd–Metallothionein Complexes. Metallomics 2018, 10, 1359–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Salacheh, M.; Jalali, A.; Babaei, J.; Galehdari, H.; Saki, A. MT1A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism and Blood Mercury Levels. J. Curr. Oncol. Med. Sci. 2022, 2, 249–256. [Google Scholar]
  72. Sahu, M.C.; Upadhyay, K.; Gupta, S.; Chanania, K.; Pati, S. DNA Damage and ALAD Polymorphism in High Blood Lead Levels of Pregnant Women Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. X 2024, 22, 100300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Herbert, M. Metallothionein Genes Research Literatures. Rep. Opin. 2021, 13, 23–160. [Google Scholar]
  74. Niedzwiecki, M.M.; Eggers, S.; Joshi, A.; Dolios, G.; Cantoral, A.; Lamadrid-Figueroa, H.; Amarasiriwardena, C.; Téllez-Rojo, M.M.; Wright, R.O.; Petrick, L. Lead Exposure and Serum Metabolite Profiles in Pregnant Women in Mexico City. Environ. Health 2021, 20, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Jin, W.; Zhang, Z.; Jin, L.; Qian, J.; Zheng, L. CYP3A4 and CYP3A5: Crucial Roles in Drug Metabolism and Implications of Genetic Polymorphisms. PeerJ 2024, 12, e18636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Barrett, E.S.; Rivera-Núñez, Z.; Getz, K.; Ohman-Strickland, P.; Zhang, R.; Kozlosky, D.; Doherty, C.L.; Buckley, B.T.; Brunner, J.; Miller, R.K.; et al. Protective Role of Placental Efflux Transporter BCRP/ABCG2 in the Relationship Between Prenatal Cadmium Exposure and Birth Outcomes. Environ. Res. 2023, 225, 115567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wu, Y.S.; Osman, A.I.; Hosny, M.; Elgarahy, A.M.; Eltaweil, A.S.; Rooney, D.W.; Chen, Z.; Rahim, N.S.; Sekar, M.; Gopinath, S.C.B.; et al. The Toxicity of Mercury and Its Chemical Compounds: Molecular Mechanisms and Environmental and Human Health Implications. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 5100–5125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. de Melo, M.S.; Das, K.; Gismondi, E. Inorganic Mercury Effects on Biomarker Gene Expressions of a Freshwater Amphipod at Two Temperatures. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 209, 111815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Aneman, I.; Pienaar, D.; Suvakov, S.; Simic, T.P.; Garovic, V.D.; McClements, L. Mechanisms of Key Innate Immune Cells in Early- and Late-Onset Preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 567532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Muniroh, M.; Nugraheni, A.; Mulyono; Nindita, Y.; Swastawati, F.; Bakri, S.; Gumay, A.R.; Amqam, H.; Nugraha, E.D.; Marchianti, A.C.N.; et al. Estimating Daily Intake of Heavy Metals from Fish Consumption and Its Association with Hemoglobin Levels in Indonesian Pregnant Women. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nugraha, E.D.; Hosoda, M.; Kusdiana, K.; Winarni, I.D.; Prihantoro, A.; Suzuki, T.; Tamakuma, Y.; Akata, N.; Tokonami, S. Dose Assessment of Radium-226 in Drinking Water from Mamuju, a High Background Radiation Area of Indonesia. Radiat. Environ. Med. 2020, 9, 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sime, F.K.; Gondji, D.S.; Rosianna, I.; Nugraha, E.D.; Modibo, O.B.; Kranrod, C.; Omori, Y.; Akata, N.; Hosoda, M.; Saïdou; et al. Ecological and Health Risks from Trace Elements Contamination in Soils at the Rutile Bearing Area of Akonolinga, Cameroon. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yamaguchi, M.; Tatara, Y.; Nugraha, E.D.; Tamakuma, Y.; Sato, Y.; Miura, T.; Hosoda, M.; Yoshinaga, S.; Syaifudin, M.; Tokonami, S.; et al. Oxidative Modification Status of Human Serum Albumin Caused by Chronic Low-Dose Radiation Exposure in Mamuju, Sulawesi, Indonesia. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yamaguchi, M.; Tatara, Y.; Nugraha, E.D.; Ramadhani, D.; Tamakuma, Y.; Sato, Y.; Miura, T.; Hosoda, M.; Yoshinaga, S.; Syaifudin, M.; et al. Detection of biological responses to low-dose radiation in humans. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2022, 184, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram. Flow diagram of the study identification and selection process. PRISMA 2020 checklists are provided in the Supplementary Materials Tables S3 and S4.
Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram. Flow diagram of the study identification and selection process. PRISMA 2020 checklists are provided in the Supplementary Materials Tables S3 and S4.
Jox 16 00028 g001
Figure 2. Forest plot of GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism and hair Hg levels (µg/g), comparing GSTP1 Ile105/Ile105 and Ile105/Val105 genotypes. Mean differences from individual studies and the pooled estimate (diamond centerline), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, are depicted. References: Chan (2020) [11], Parajuli (2016) [33], Wahlberg (2019) [36].
Figure 2. Forest plot of GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism and hair Hg levels (µg/g), comparing GSTP1 Ile105/Ile105 and Ile105/Val105 genotypes. Mean differences from individual studies and the pooled estimate (diamond centerline), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, are depicted. References: Chan (2020) [11], Parajuli (2016) [33], Wahlberg (2019) [36].
Jox 16 00028 g002
Figure 3. Genetic modulation pathways and Hg toxicity on perinatal outcome interactions.
Figure 3. Genetic modulation pathways and Hg toxicity on perinatal outcome interactions.
Jox 16 00028 g003
Table 1. General characteristics of the included studies.
Table 1. General characteristics of the included studies.
NoCountriesPopulationnSexAgeBMI
(kg/m2)
MethodsKey FindingsRefs.
1BrazilAdult Rural10747.6% Male23.2 ± 6.13(12–35)23.7 ± 3.08Cross
Sectional
Carriers of the GSTP1 rs1695 Val105 (G) allele showed lower Hg levels and milder neurological symptoms.[5]
2USAUrban adults38062.6% Male54.8 ± 11.4-Cross
sectional
GSTP1 rs1695 Val105 allele carriers have lower blood Hg concentrations.[33]
3Brazilian AmazonRural Children8240% Male0–11 a35 (89.7) bCross
sectional
The GSTP1 rs1695 Val105 allele was associated with lower Hg levels and a reduced risk of neurological symptoms[34]
4JamaicaUrban children26681.6% Male2–8 c-Case-controlIndividuals with the GSTP1 rs1695 Ile105/Ile105 genotype showed higher Hg concentrations (0.73 µg/L) compared with Val allele carriers.[35]
5AfricaMaternal1536FemaleNot stated-Cohort StudyMaternal GSH-pathway genes influence MeHg metabolism and may modulate developmental outcomes[36]
6BrazilRural Children10139.6% Male6.4 ± 4.4 (0–14)18.8 ± 1.9 d; 16.0 ± 1.3 eCross
sectional
Children with ALAD rs1800435 CG genotype have high Hg levels and chronic neurological symptoms.[37]
7ItalyPregnant Women873Female32.7 ± 4.6 (18–44)22.5 ± 0.1Cohort StudyAPOE ε4 allele protects the fetus from Hg accumulation.[38]
ItalyNewborn61952.3% Male39.5 ± 1.4 weeks--
8SeychellesUrban children21148.8% Male2.3 ± 1.2-Cohort StudyCYP3A family (CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP3A7) variation affects cord Hg-induced neurodevelopment.[39]
9ThailandUrban adults10665.1% Male58.8 ± 3.024.8 ± 3.7Cross
sectional
MT1A rs8052394 (Lys51Arg) is associated with MCI and high Hg level[26]
10ChinaUrban children17954.3% Male4.6 (4–5.3)14.9 (14–16)Cohort StudyMinor alleles GCLC rs17883901, GPX1 rs1050450 (Pro198Leu), and MT1M rs9936741 were associated with lower Hg levels.[11]
11Brazil (South America)Riverine-Adults395Not Stated40.5 (18–87)24Cross
sectional
Polymorphisms in detoxification/antioxidant genes modulate Hg/Pb burden and oxidative stress[40]
12Austria
(Vienna)
Pregnant women f100Female31 (18–43)28 (20–37)Cohort StudyGene variants influence placental transfer efficiency and the risk of SGA birth.[41]
SlovakiaPregnant women g100Female31 (18–43)27 (20–39)
a 48% of study participants were 0–4 years old; b BMI eutrophy with Z-score obtained for BMI for age measure in children older than 5 years; c 30% of study participants were older than 3 years; d Including children older than 10 years; e Referring to the 6–10 years age group; f 100 mother-child pairs in Bratislava; g 100 mother-child pairs in Vienna.
Table 2. Genetic polymorphisms and Hg levels.
Table 2. Genetic polymorphisms and Hg levels.
NoGenesdbSNP IDHg LevelHg
Category a
Refs.
Umbilical Cord (µg/L)Blood (µg/L)Hair (µg/g)Urine (µg/L)
1ABCG2rs22311420.41 (0.31–0.45)---Low[41]
2ALADrs1800435--10.9 ± 5.6-High[37]
-39.8High[40]
0.41 (0.31–0.45)---Low[41]
3APOErs7412-1.95 (1.62–2.34)--Low[38]
rs4293583.35 (2.83–3.96)---Low
4CYP3A4rs274057439.3 ± 25-5.8-High[39]
5CYP3A5rs776746--8.3-High
6CYP3A7rs2257401--5.43-High
7GCLCrs17883901-3.7 ± 3.90.6 ± 1.01.3 ± 1.8Medium[33]
rs17883901--0.97 (0.62–1.51)-Medium[11]
rs76114234.44 (32.43–36.45)18.43 (17.51–19.35)4.12 (3.83–4.42)-High[36]
8GCLMrs4130397034.84 (33.13–36.55)18.28 (17.50–19.06)4.07 (3.82–4.32)-High[36]
9GPX1rs1050450--1.02 (0.66–1.51)-Medium[11]
10GSTP1rs1695--≤6.0 (34.4%) b--[5]
-3.6 ± 3.70.6 ± 0.91.3 ± 1.6Medium[33]
--≤5.5 (40%) c--[34]
-1.0 (0.7–1.5)--Low[35]
33.75 (31.54–35.95)18.44 (17.44–19.44)3.82 (3.50–4.14)-High[36]
rs11382720.56 (0.05–5.68)---Low[41]
11GSTT1Deletion1.33 (0.52–3.78)---High[41]
12MT1Ars8052394-6.3 (0.8–27.6)--High[26]
13MT1Mrs2270836--1.02 (0.70–1.52)-Medium[11]
14MT2Ars10636 1.00 (0.65–1.50)-Moderate[11]
15UGT2B15rs19020231.25 (0.63–4.05)---High[41]
a Categories of Hg levels based on established safe limits based on each biological matrix: blood ≥ 5.8 µg/L is categorized as high based on US EPA, hair >2 µg/g is categorized as high based on WHO, and urine >4 µg/L is categorized as high based on WHO guidelines; b The researchers grouped Hg levels ≤ 6.0 µg/g vs. ≥6.0 µg/g; c The researchers grouped Hg levels < 5.5 µg/g vs. ≥5.5 µg/g.
Table 3. Hg detoxification gene pathway linked to obstetric and birth outcomes.
Table 3. Hg detoxification gene pathway linked to obstetric and birth outcomes.
NoGenesdbSNP IDGene Activity PathwayOutcome of Obstetric/BirthRefs.
1ABCG2rs2231142Xenobiotic transporter (efflux)Not Reported[41]
2ALADrs1800435, rs1800436Heme biosynthesis, heavy metal detoxificationIncreased risk of Small for Gestational Age[37,40]
3APOErs7412, rs429360Lipid metabolism & neuroprotectionPotential fetal protection from Hg if the mother carries the ε4 allele[38]
4CYP3A4rs2740574Cytochrome P450
(xenobiotic metabolism)
Effects on children’s neurocognitive response[39]
5CYP3A5rs776746Cytochrome P450Fixed association with Hg neurotoxicity[39]
6CYP3A7rs2257401Cytochrome P450Fixed association with Hg neurotoxicity[39]
7GCLCrs761142, rs17883901Glutathione (GSH) synthesisNot reported[11,36]
8GCLMrs41303970Glutathione (GSH) synthesisAffects Hg levels and oxidative stress[11,36]
9GPX1rs1050450GSH-peroxidase (antioxidant)Not Reported[11]
10GSTP1rs1695GSH transferase
(phase II detoxification)
Decreased children’s MDI score[5,36]
11MT1Ars8052394Metallothionein
(heavy metal binder)
Modified MCI & increased Hg tertile[26]
12MT1Mrs9936741, rs2270836MetallothioneinNot Reported[11]
13MT2Ars10636MetallothioneinNot Reported[11]
14UGT2B15rs1902023Glucuronidation
(phase II metabolism)
Effects on placental transfer and risk of SGA infants[41]
MDI: mental development index, MCI: mild cognitive impairment, SGA: small for gestational age.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sadana, A.A.S.; Bakri, S.; Tokonami, S.; Nugraha, E.D.; Amqam, H.; Muniroh, M. Genetic Modulation of Mercury Exposure on Perinatal and Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Gene-Environment Interactions. J. Xenobiot. 2026, 16, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16010028

AMA Style

Sadana AAS, Bakri S, Tokonami S, Nugraha ED, Amqam H, Muniroh M. Genetic Modulation of Mercury Exposure on Perinatal and Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Gene-Environment Interactions. Journal of Xenobiotics. 2026; 16(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16010028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sadana, Aqsa Aufa Syauqi, Saekhol Bakri, Shinji Tokonami, Eka Djatnika Nugraha, Hasnawati Amqam, and Muflihatul Muniroh. 2026. "Genetic Modulation of Mercury Exposure on Perinatal and Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Gene-Environment Interactions" Journal of Xenobiotics 16, no. 1: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16010028

APA Style

Sadana, A. A. S., Bakri, S., Tokonami, S., Nugraha, E. D., Amqam, H., & Muniroh, M. (2026). Genetic Modulation of Mercury Exposure on Perinatal and Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Gene-Environment Interactions. Journal of Xenobiotics, 16(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16010028

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop