Review Reports
- Neo Jacqueline Ramutumbu,
- Dorah Ursula Ramathuba* and
- Maria Sonto Maputle
Reviewer 1: Susie Yoon Reviewer 2: Anonymous Reviewer 3: Annah Mosalo
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
It is considered a well-developed research paper. I would like to give you some comment, so please reflect on it and revise it.
1. Please indicate which country Limpopo Province is in the title as well.
2. Please describe how you selected the subjects to prevent sampling bias.
3. Please explain why you chose Limpopo Province. It would be nice if you could add the characteristics of the area and its relevance to the research topic.
Author Response
Thank you very much for the comments
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
Dear authors, i have enjoyed reading your research. I appreciate the importance of qualitative research in medicine. I would recommend another study, focused on the patient, although the health workers are important, it is the patient that also has a deserving voice to be heard. The methodology is okay, but should be detailed more, especially how did you conduct the focus group, and the scientific basis for the importance of a focus group.
Author Response
Please receive the revised manuscript
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
The study could lend apprpriate improvements based on its content. Suggest the authors re-work the document and adress suggestions made. As for themes they need tp be re-worked for the scientific merit to adress issues of concern.
Participant quotes needs to adress what it intended as some seem not in correct place based on the headings.
Suggest that the manuscrpt be resubmitted after adressing the comments
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Thank you for the comments. The table for effected corrections has been uploaded. Please also find corrected manuscript.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
The suggested corrections were effected and highlighted
Author Response File: Author Response.docx