Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Association Between Gut Microbiome Alterations and Hypertension-Related Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Pulmonary Cryptococcosis in a Diabetic Patient Without Severe Immunosuppression: Case Report and 25-Year Literature Review

1
Postgrado de Neumología, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa 11101, Honduras
2
Instituto de Investigaciones en Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa 11101, Honduras
3
Pathology Department, Hospital Center of Institute of Tropical, Medicine “Pedro Kouri”, Havana 11400, Cuba
4
Departamento de Microbiología y Patología, Instituto de Patología Infecciosa y Experimental “Francisco Ruiz Sánchez”, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44100, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microbiol. Res. 2025, 16(11), 245; https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres16110245
Submission received: 23 September 2025 / Revised: 28 October 2025 / Accepted: 10 November 2025 / Published: 20 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Host–Microbe Interactions in Health and Disease)

Abstract

Pulmonary cryptococcosis is an invasive fungal infection usually linked to severe immunosuppression, particularly HIV/AIDS, but is increasingly reported in immunocompetent hosts, including those with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM). We describe a 51-year-old woman with poorly controlled type 2 DM and no other immunosuppressive conditions who developed pulmonary cryptococcosis. Diagnosis was made by microscopy, India ink, cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay (CrAg LFA), and ITS sequencing; culture was negative. Despite treatment with deoxycholate amphotericin B and fluconazole, the patient died 36 days after admission. A systematic literature review (2000–2025) identified 40 cases of pulmonary cryptococcosis, with 17.5% occurring in patients whose only comorbidity was DM. Cryptococcus neoformans was the most frequent species. Non-culture-based methods, especially CrAg detection, were widely used, underscoring their value for rapid and sensitive diagnosis. Pulmonary cryptococcosis should be considered in diabetic patients even without classical immunosuppression. Broader use of non-culture-based diagnostic tools may enable earlier intervention, which is particularly relevant in resource-limited settings such as Honduras.

1. Introduction

Cryptococcosis is an opportunistic mycosis caused by yeasts of the genus Cryptococcus, which include approximately 70 species widely distributed across various natural environments. However, only two species complexes, Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, are responsible for the majority of human infections [1,2]. Other species, such as Cryptococcus laurentii and Cryptococcus albidus, have been reported less frequently, although their incidence appears to be increasing [2].
Infection by Cryptococcus primarily occurs through the inhalation of desiccated yeast cells or basidiospores, which establish in the lungs. Without treatment, or following a prolonged period of asymptomatic latency, these organisms can proliferate within pulmonary tissue and disseminate via the bloodstream [1,3]. To a lesser extent, cases of infection through direct inoculation have also been documented [4]. Both C. neoformans and C. gattii exhibit a marked tropism for the pulmonary parenchyma and the central nervous system, which are the primary sites of infection. However, to a lesser extent, they may also affect other organs and tissues, including the skin, prostate, eyes, and musculoskeletal system [1]. In patients with severe immunosuppression, systemic dissemination of Cryptococcus can involve multiple organs, establishing infectious foci in various anatomical sites and potentially leading to a fatal outcome [3].
The C. neoformans complex is the primary causative agent of cryptococcosis worldwide, with most cases attributed to C. neoformans var. grubii (serotype A). In contrast, C. gattii is a relevant pathogen in specific regions such as Australia, Papua New Guinea, and certain areas of the United States and Canada [5]. This complex is found mainly in vegetation, especially in association with trees and soil rich in organic matter; it was first identified in eucalyptus trees but has since been reported from various other tree species and ecological niches, and has been responsible for outbreaks on Vancouver Island and in the northwestern United States [6]. Although it was initially considered to be restricted to tropical and subtropical regions, its distribution is now recognized as much broader [5]. While C. neoformans infections occur predominantly in individuals with HIV or other immunodeficient conditions, C. gattii infections have more frequently been reported in apparently immunocompetent individuals [1,3,6].
Mortality associated with C. neoformans ranges from 41% to 61% in patients with HIV and from 8% to 20% in HIV-negative individuals [6,7]. For C. gattii, reported mortality across different clinical manifestations ranges from 21% to 43% [6]. Due to their high lethality and global burden, particularly among patients with HIV, both species have been recently included in the World Health Organization (WHO) fungal priority pathogens list [8].
Pulmonary cryptococcosis is a common manifestation of Cryptococcus infections, particularly among immunocompromised patients [6,9]. In recent years, it has been recognized as an emerging disease in immunocompetent individuals, highlighting the importance of its study and surveillance across different population groups [6,10]. Unlike cryptococcal meningitis, pulmonary cryptococcosis remains underdiagnosed due to limitations in available diagnostic tools. Its clinical and radiological presentation can mimic conditions such as lung cancer, pulmonary tuberculosis, bacterial pneumonia, and other pulmonary mycoses, complicating early identification and timely treatment [9,11,12].
In this context, we present the case of a patient with type 2 DM who developed pulmonary cryptococcosis in the absence of severe immunosuppression, highlighting the need to consider this mycosis in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary lesions in diabetic patients. The case also underscores the importance of optimizing diagnostic strategies for early detection and timely management.
Given that culture-based methods using respiratory samples such as sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage have low sensitivity for identifying species within the Cryptococcus complex, this report further advocates for the use of non-culture-based diagnostic tools that allow for faster and more accurate detection—particularly in settings with a high prevalence of invasive mycoses.
As a complement, we include a literature review on the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of, and therapeutic options for, cryptococcosis in patients with diabetes mellitus, based on case reports and case series published over the past 25 years. This case reinforces the need to consider pulmonary cryptococcosis as a possible diagnosis in patients with type 2 DM, even in the absence of apparent immunosuppression, to support early clinical intervention. Additionally, it provides evidence suggesting a potential association between diabetes and susceptibility to invasive fungal infections—an area still not fully understood.
Finally, to the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first molecular characterization of Cryptococcus species associated with infection in Honduras, contributing to epidemiological and microbiological understanding of this mycosis in the region.

2. Case Description

2.1. Prior Medical History

The patient was a 51-year-old female patient with a history of decompensated type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed 7 years ago, which was managed with pharmacological monotherapy consisting of metformin once daily, and uncontrolled arterial hypertension treated with amlodipine 10 mg once daily, with poor adherence to both treatments. The patient presented to the emergency department after a four-month history of respiratory symptoms and multiple medical consultations, during which she received various antibiotic regimens for suspected pneumonia and pulmonary tuberculosis. However, diagnostic tests for tuberculosis were negative, and no significant clinical improvement was observed. Poor adherence to the prescribed treatments was also documented.

2.2. At Admission

The patient had a history of decompensated type 2 DM treated with Metformin 850 mg once daily with inconsistent adherence, and uncontrolled arterial hypertension managed with Amlodipine 10 mg once daily, also with irregular adherence. She presented to the emergency department (Day 1) with a four-month history of respiratory symptoms. The illness had an insidious onset with a non-productive cough lacking a specific pattern, which worsened with physical exertion, and was accompanied by progressive dyspnea with use of lower intercostal accessory muscles, noticeable tachypnea, and intermittent subjectively high fevers partially relieved by antipyretics.
On physical examination, the patient was in poor general condition but fully alert (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15/15). Her vital signs were a blood pressure of 140/80 mmHg, heart rate of 112 bpm, respiratory rate of 30 breaths/minute, temperature of 37 °C, and oxygen saturation of 95% on 36% FiO2. Pulmonary auscultation revealed decreased breath sounds in both lung bases without crackles or wheezing. The remainder of the examination was unremarkable.
Laboratory findings revealed leukocytosis (15.0 × 103/µL), hemoglobin at 11 g/dL, blood glucose at 191 mg/dL, HbA1c at 9.5%, and creatinine at 0.8 mg/dL. Liver function tests and electrolytes were within normal limits. Additional biochemical and hematological parameters recorded throughout the patient’s clinical course are detailed in Table 1. HIV serology was negative, and the GeneXpert® molecular test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis was negative. Chest imaging revealed multiple cavitated consolidations with bilateral distribution (Figure 1).
The transthoracic echocardiogram revealed no structural abnormalities. Empirical antibiotic therapy was initiated with vancomycin 500 mg every 6 h and ceftriaxone 2 g daily.
In addition, subcutaneous NPH insulin was initiated at a dose of 30 IU in the morning and 15 IU in the evening. On the third day of hospitalization, due to the lack of clinical response and the suspicion of a fungal etiology underlying the slowly resolving pneumonia, a bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage was performed. The samples were sent to the Pathology and Microbiology Departments for further evaluation. On the same day, an infectious diseases consultation was requested, and empirical antifungal therapy was initiated with amphotericin B deoxycholate at a dose of 60 mg daily (1 mg/kg/day) for a planned 14-day course, together with intravenous fluconazole 200 mg daily as part of the induction phase.
Laboratory studies performed on the bronchoalveolar lavage sample (Day 4) included a wet mount and India ink staining, both of which revealed abundant yeast cells. The India ink stain demonstrated structures consistent with encapsulated yeasts. Additionally, a lateral flow assay (LFA) for cryptococcal antigen detection yielded a positive result with a titer of 1:32. The samples were also cultured at 37 °C for 48 h.
Simultaneously, in the Pathology Department, histological analysis of the bronchoalveolar lavage was conducted. Cytopathological examination revealed a severe, organized chronic inflammatory response associated with recent hemorrhage. Papanicolaou (PAP) staining revealed numerous large yeasts with a clear halo and single budding, which were morphologically consistent with Cryptococcus spp.
On Day 6, culture plates were examined, and no growth was observed. Therefore, incubation was extended for an additional three days (until Day 9), but cultures remained negative. Since both microscopic and serological findings suggested the presence of an encapsulated yeast, DNA was extracted directly from the sample following a previously published protocol [13], and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA was subsequently amplified using the ITS1 and ITS4 primers.
Briefly, PCR reactions were carried out in a final volume of 50 μL, consisting of 25 μL of PCR Master Mix (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA), 1 μL of each primer ITS1 and ITS4 (10 μM; 5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′/5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′), and 1 μL of DNA (20–40 ng/μL). The thermal cycling program included an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 37 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Amplicons were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. The ITS (Internal Transcribed Spacer) region was amplified and sequenced bidirectionally following the protocols of Psomagen (https://www.psomagen.com, accessed on 2 January 2025).
Amplification of the ITS region produced a 535 bp product, which was subsequently sequenced. The resulting sequences were trimmed and edited using Geneious® software version 2024.0.5 and subsequently deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) under accession number PV710882. Sequence analysis performed with the NCBI BLAST tool identified the isolate as Cryptococcus neoformans (Figure 2). A phylogenetic tree was constructed from our sequence following the methodology described by Weiss et al. 2022 and compared with previously deposited sequences in GenBank, as well as with representative strains from the Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes [14]. This analysis positioned our isolate within the C. neoformans VNII molecular type.
Despite supportive measures, including adequate hydration and administration of amphotericin B deoxycholate, the patient developed renal impairment, as evidenced by a progressive rise in nitrogenous waste markers: serum creatinine increased to 2.5 mg/dL, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declined to 23 mL/min. After consultation with the infectious diseases team, antifungal therapy was discontinued due to suspected amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity, and fluconazole was initiated at a dose of 400 mg IV every 12 h. This change stabilized renal function, although hepatic transaminases (AST, ALT) progressively increased. On the eighth day of fluconazole therapy (Day 17), gradual improvement in renal function was noted, with eGFR rising to 43 mL/min and bilirubin levels decreasing. Given this favorable clinical evolution, amphotericin B deoxycholate was reintroduced at a daily dose of 1 mg/kg/day. However, metabolic and inflammatory abnormalities persisted, including leukocytosis (WBC: 11.07 ×103/µL) and elevated blood glucose (289 mg/dL). The induction phase with amphotericin B deoxycholate was completed by Day 30, and maintenance therapy with fluconazole at 400 mg IV every 24 h was initiated. Despite comprehensive management, the clinical course remained unfavorable. The patient developed persistent hyperglycemia and ongoing metabolic and inflammatory dysregulation, and eventually presented with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and seizures, culminating in death on Day 36 of hospitalization.

3. Materials and Methods

Review of the Literature

A bibliometric search was performed in the Scopus database (https://www.scopus.com) to compile clinical case reports of pulmonary cryptococcosis published between 2000 and 2025. The search strategy employed the terms “pulmonary cryptococcosis” OR “lung cryptococcosis” AND “case report” OR “case study”, limiting the results to studies conducted in humans. Publications corresponding to case series, epidemiological studies, or those not available in open access form were excluded.
The initial search was performed on 13 January 2025, yielding a total of 298 publications. Retrieved articles were subsequently reviewed to select only those that described individual cases and included detailed information on the following: patient characteristics (age, sex, country of origin, comorbidities, and immune status); infection features (symptomatology and identification of the etiologic agent); clinical interventions (medical or surgical treatment); and patient outcomes (complete recovery, clinical improvement, and follow-up duration). Ultimately, only 40 articles met the established inclusion criteria for this review.

4. Discussion

Several studies have demonstrated that infectious diseases represent a significant cause of mortality in individuals with DM [15,16,17,18,19]. In the United Kingdom, they are estimated to be the third most common cause of death in this population, following cardiovascular diseases and cancer [15]. This highlights the clinical impact of the immunological alterations associated with this condition. Although DM does not cause direct immunosuppression, as seen with certain diseases or immunosuppressive therapies, it does lead to significant immune system dysfunctions that increase susceptibility to infections [16,20].
Particularly in patients with poor glycemic control, chronic hyperglycemia has been shown to impair both innate and adaptive immunity [21]. The described alterations include impaired phagocytic function of macrophages, monocytes, and neutrophils; reduced antimicrobial activity; and increased oxidative stress and systemic inflammation; as well as disruptions in cell signaling and cytokine production [20,22]. These immunological dysfunctions weaken the host response against various pathogens, including fungi, although the exact mechanisms are not yet fully understood and further studies are needed.
In this context, DM has emerged as a significant risk factor for the development of invasive mycoses, such as candidemia and mucormycosis [23,24]. It has also been increasingly associated with infections caused by species of the Cryptococcus genus [25]. However, further systematic studies are still required to confirm and more precisely characterize this association.
Traditionally, infections caused by Cryptococcus spp. have been associated with patients with HIV/AIDS; however, recent reports highlight a growing proportion of cases in HIV-negative individuals [10], particularly elderly patients with chronic comorbidities such as renal failure, liver disease, hematologic malignancies undergoing chemotherapy, lupus, or Cushing’s syndrome [25,26,27]. This shift in the epidemiological profile highlights the need to consider diabetic patients as a vulnerable population, even in the absence of classical immunosuppression [27].
In this context, we conducted a review of case reports published over the past 25 years with the aim of exploring a possible relationship between pulmonary cryptococcosis and DM. In total, 40 clinical cases documented in the literature were analyzed, offering detailed insights into predisposing factors, clinical characteristics, therapeutic management, and outcomes, as summarized in Supplementary Table S1.
In this series, a slight male predominance was observed (57.5%), with a mean age of 53.6 years (range: 13 to 84 years). This pattern is consistent with previous studies suggesting increased susceptibility to invasive fungal infections among older adults, likely related to immunosenescence and the higher prevalence of comorbidities in this age group.
The most frequently identified risk factors were immunosuppressive conditions (62.5%), including HIV infection, neoplasms, autoimmune diseases treated with immunosuppressants, transplants, and hematologic disorders. A particularly relevant finding was the presence of DM in seven patients (17.5%), most of whom were over 60 years of age. Although these cases did not involve pharmacological immunosuppression or primary immunological diseases, diabetes as a chronic condition can impair both innate and adaptive immune responses, thereby increasing susceptibility to opportunistic infections. Notably, one patient with multiple comorbidities had a fatal outcome, underscoring the potential clinical impact of this metabolic disease on the progression of invasive mycoses.
From an etiological standpoint, C. neoformans was identified as the causative agent in 75% of cases. Infection with C. gattii was confirmed in two patients, both of whom were immunocompetent and presented with severe clinical manifestations. This finding is consistent with studies suggesting greater virulence of C. gattii in individuals without immunosuppression. In the remaining 20% of cases, the diagnosis was limited to the genus level (Cryptococcus spp.), highlighting the need to strengthen species-level mycological identification methods, both to guide appropriate treatment and to improve understanding of epidemiological patterns.
Regarding antifungal treatment, fluconazole was the most used agent, administered in 85% of cases, generally at a dose of 400 mg/day (range: 200–800 mg/day), adjusted according to clinical severity and the patient’s immune status. Liposomal amphotericin B was used in 13 cases (32.5%), sometimes in combination with flucytosine (8 cases, 20%), primarily in immunocompromised patients or those with disseminated disease. Voriconazole was employed in five patients (12.5%), and one case required isavuconazole, reflecting the diversity of antifungal regimens applied on an individualized basis. One case was resolved surgically without the need for antifungal therapy, suggesting that in selected scenarios with localized disease, surgical management may be a viable alternative. These studies highlight the importance of standardizing treatments for Cryptococcus spp.
In terms of clinical outcomes, most patients (92.5%) experienced complete recovery or significant improvement with the instituted treatment. In two cases, pulmonary lesions persisted without progression or clinical relapse during follow-up. The only fatal case involved a patient immunocompromised due to HIV and active tuberculosis, reflecting the severity of this infection when severe and poorly controlled immunosuppressive conditions coexist.
In this context, we report a fatal case of pulmonary cryptococcosis caused by Cryptococcus neoformans in a patient with DM, accompanied by a review of the literature published over the past 25 years. To the best of our knowledge, only the study by Nsenga et al., 2021, has explored the association between disseminated or systemic cryptococcosis and DM [27]. However, cases of pulmonary cryptococcosis (PC) and their specific risk factors have not been thoroughly examined, highlighting the importance of case reports from different geographic regions. Such reports contribute to building a valuable chain of clinical and epidemiological knowledge; in this regard, our review helps fill an existing gap in understanding this relationship.
A previous review analyzing the association between disseminated or systemic cryptococcosis and DM reported a frequency of PC in diabetic patients of 14.9% (n = 7) [27]. However, our findings suggest that this proportion could potentially double, indicating a stronger link between DM and pulmonary cryptococcosis. This observation underscores the possibility that many cases of PC in diabetic patients remain underdiagnosed due to the broad spectrum of pulmonary manifestations that can mimic other respiratory conditions. These findings emphasize the need for additional clinical studies to determine the true magnitude of this association and its relationship with other opportunistic mycoses, in order to establish standardized, evidence-based diagnostic and management protocols.
Regarding diagnostic methodologies, our results show that more than 60% of cases were identified through non-culture-based techniques. This may be related to the inherent limitations of culturing respiratory samples [28,29], which often exhibit lower sensitivity than immunological or molecular assays [29]. Previous studies have demonstrated that non-culture-based methods provide higher diagnostic sensitivity and enable earlier initiation of antifungal therapy [30,31].
Nevertheless, culture of biological specimens remains the reference “gold standard” for diagnosing systemic fungal infections due to its low cost and its ability to assess antifungal susceptibility of the causative agent. However, the limited sensitivity and prolonged incubation and identification times of culture methods can delay appropriate treatment initiation and, consequently, increase the risk of mortality [32]. Although one limitation of our study is its focus on pulmonary infection without an in-depth evaluation of possible hematogenous dissemination, our findings underscore the importance of incorporating non-culture-based techniques—such as cryptococcal antigen detection—as complementary diagnostic tools, particularly in low- and middle-income settings where diagnostic capacities for fungal diseases remain limited. In this context and considering the inherent limitations of culture-based methods, the absence of growth in bronchoalveolar lavage samples—despite the observation of yeasts in the India ink stain and a positive result for cryptococcal antigen detection—prevented the performance of antifungal susceptibility testing. This limitation precluded establishing a correlation between the patient’s lack of clinical response to fluconazole treatment and the possible presence of resistant phenotypes. Such a constraint is particularly relevant given that the molecular type VNII of C. neoformans identified in this case has generally been described as more susceptible to fluconazole than the VNI type. Taken together, these findings underscore the importance of maintaining microbiological cultures as an essential tool in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of cryptococcosis, even when their sensitivity and yield may be limited.
Finally, regarding treatment, the therapeutic regimens of choice include flucytosine and liposomal amphotericin B. However, in Honduras, flucytosine is not available and access to liposomal amphotericin B is limited [33]. In the present case, amphotericin B deoxycholate was administered in combination with vancomycin, both drugs known for their nephrotoxic potential, which likely contributed to the patient’s renal function deteriorating [34,35]. Therefore, it is imperative to promote the implementation of liposomal amphotericin B and the inclusion of flucytosine in national treatment guidelines in order to improve clinical outcomes and reduce mortality associated with pulmonary cryptococcosis.

Implications in the Honduran Context

In Honduras, the epidemiological situation of DM is particularly alarming. It is estimated that more than 1.5 million people are affected, with a considerable number of cases remaining undiagnosed, making this condition a growing challenge for the national healthcare system [36]. An evident example of the impact of DM on public health was the COVID-19-associated mucormycosis outbreak that occurred in 2021, during which 17 cases were reported over a period of just four months, with 70% of those cases associated with DM [37]. This event underscores the role of DM as a key predisposing factor in the emergence of invasive fungal infections.
On the other hand, a regional study on the implementation of rapid diagnostic tests for histoplasmosis and cryptococcosis in patients with HIV/AIDS—conducted in the two main hospitals in the country, located in San Pedro Sula and Tegucigalpa—revealed that Honduras had the highest positivity rate for Cryptococcus in the Central American region using the CrAg LFA test, with a rate of 16% [38]. This finding suggests a high environmental burden of this fungus and reinforces the need to expand such evaluations to populations with other forms of immunosuppression beyond HIV/AIDS.
Specifically, regarding pulmonary cryptococcosis, data from the WHO Global Tuberculosis Report (2022) estimated that the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in Honduras was 33 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2021—one of the highest rates in the region. Given that pulmonary TB can present with clinical and radiological features similar to other diseases, it is likely that numerous cases of pulmonary cryptococcosis are being underdiagnosed or misidentified as TB. This situation is further exacerbated by the high prevalence of diabetes, limitations in diagnostic infrastructure, and the potential for undetected coinfections—suggesting that many invasive fungal infections may go undiagnosed or be diagnosed late.
Our analysis underscores the need to strengthen fungal infection screening in individuals with diabetes, particularly those with poor glycemic control. Moreover, expanding access to sensitive and rapid diagnostic tools—beyond conventional culture methods—is essential to reduce the time to treatment initiation and improve clinical outcomes, especially in resource-limited settings such as Honduras.
Until 2021, a total of 106 publications reported the major molecular type of 5686 isolates of C. neoformans and C. gattii from Latin America, identified predominantly by RFLP (57.1%) [39]. In the present study, we used ITS gene sequencing, a method considered more informative than RFLP-PCR. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA comprises the partial 18S rRNA, the complete 5.8S rRNA, and the partial 28S rRNA genes, including the two variable non-coding regions known as ITS1 and ITS2. This highly polymorphic region serves as a key genetic marker for the identification, classification, and phylogenetic analysis of fungal species and their diversity [40,41].
According to molecular data from 5686 clinical, environmental, and veterinary Cryptococcus isolates from member countries of the Latin American Cryptococcal Study Group, C. neoformans molecular type VNI is the most frequent cause of cryptococcosis (76%) among HIV-infected individuals [39]. In contrast, our phylogenetic analysis showed that the Honduran isolate clustered within molecular type VNII. This finding suggests that, unlike the predominance of VNI reported across Latin America, VNII may also be circulating in the Honduran population and could represent a relevant genotype associated with infection in this region.
In summary, to the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first molecular characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans associated with infection in Honduras.
Finally, it should be noted that flucytosine is not available in the country, and access to the different formulations of amphotericin B is limited [33]. Considering the high rate of cryptococcosis reported in the country [38,42], it is imperative that policymakers actively work to ensure the timely availability of essential antifungal treatments in Honduras.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this analysis underscores the need to consider pulmonary cryptococcosis in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary lesions, even among immunocompetent individuals. It also highlights DM as a relevant comorbidity and emphasizes the importance of species-level identification to guide appropriate antifungal therapy. Moreover, the findings advocate for the integration of non-culture-based diagnostic tools to facilitate earlier detection and prompt treatment initiation—particularly considering the limited sensitivity and delayed turnaround time associated with conventional culture methods.

6. Take Home Messages

  • Pulmonary cryptococcosis may mimic TB and other pneumonias, leading to underdiagnosis.
  • Non-culture-based methods (CrAg LFA, India ink) are essential due to low culture sensitivity.
  • Diabetes is an emerging risk factor for invasive mycoses in Honduras beyond HIV.
  • Limited access to amphotericin B and lack of flucytosine remain critical therapeutic gaps.
  • This is the first molecular isolation of C. neoformans genotype VNII reported in Honduras.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microbiolres16110245/s1, Table S1: Summary of published case reports of pulmonary cryptococcosis (2000–2025): Clinical characteristics, diagnostic methods, treatment, and outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S. and B.O.; methodology, S.S., M.F.M., and D.R.; formal analysis, S.S., D.R., G.F., Y.d.A., and A.V.-B.; investigation, S.S., M.F.M., D.R., and A.V.-B.; resources, G.F.; writing—original draft preparation, B.O., D.R., A.V.-B., Y.d.A., and S.S.; writing—review and editing, S.S., M.F.M., D.R., A.V.-B., G.F., Y.d.A., and B.O.; visualization, B.O.; supervision, S.S. and B.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported with funds and reagents provided by the Instituto de Investigaciones en Microbiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras (IIM-UNAH).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Consent was obtained from the closest relative of the deceased patient. Nonessential details that could lead to the identification of individuals were omitted from the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the valuable support and collaboration of the staff from the Postgraduate Program in Pulmonology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, whose commitment and dedication greatly contributed to the development of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Maziarz, E.K.; Perfect, J.R. Cryptococcosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. 2016, 30, 179–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morales-López, S.E.; Garcia-Effron, G. Infections due to rare Cryptococcus species. A literature review. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Fraser, J.A.; Doering, T.L.; Wang, Z.A.; Janbon, G.; Idnurm, A.; Bahn, Y.-S. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 4, a019760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Noguchi, H.; Matsumoto, T.; Kimura, U.; Hiruma, M.; Kusuhara, M.; Ihn, H. Cutaneous Cryptococcosis. Med. Mycol. J. 2019, 60, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Firacative, C.; Trilles, L.; Meyer, W. Advances in the understanding of the Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii species complexes and cryptococcosis. Microbiol. Aust. 2017, 38, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dao, A.; Kim, H.Y.; Garnham, K.; Kidd, S.; Sati, H.; Perfect, J.; Sorrell, T.C.; Harrison, T.; Rickerts, V.; Gigante, V.; et al. Cryptococcosis—A systematic review to inform the world health organization fungal priority pathogens list. Med. Mycol. 2024, 62, myae043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhao, Y.; Ye, L.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, L.; Lu, Z.; Chu, T.; Wang, S.; Liu, Z.; Sun, Y.; Chen, M.; et al. Cryptococcus neoformans, a global threat to human health. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2023, 12, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. World Health Organization. First Meeting of the WHO Antifungal Expert Group on Identifying Priority Fungal Pathogens: Meeting Report; WHO: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. Setianingrum, F.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R.; Denning, D.W. Pulmonary cryptococcosis: A review of pathobiology and clinical aspects. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Denning, D.W. Global incidence and mortality of severe fungal disease. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, e428–e438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Howard-Jones, A.R.; Sparks, R.; Pham, D.; Halliday, C.; Beardsley, J.; Chen, S.C.-A. Pulmonary Cryptococcosis. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jarvis, J.N.; Harrison, T.S. Pulmonary Cryptococcosis. Semin. Respir Crit Care Med. 2008, 29, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Montes, K.; Ortiz, B.; Galindo, C.; Figueroa, I.; Braham, S.; Fontecha, G. Identification of Candida species from clinical samples in a Honduran Tertiary Hospital. Pathogens 2019, 8, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Weiss, Z.F.; DiCarlo, J.E.; Basta, D.W.; Kent, S.; Liakos, A.; Baden, L.; Brigl, M.; Kanjilal, S.; Cañete-Gibas, C.; Wiederhold, N.P.; et al. Hidden in plain sight: Urinary Cryptococcus neoformans missed by routine diagnostics in a patient with acute leukemia. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2022, 21, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Carey, I.M.; Critchley, J.A.; Chaudhry, U.A.; DeWilde, S.; Limb, E.S.; Bowen, L.; Audi, S.; Cook, D.G.; Whincup, P.H.; Sattar, N.; et al. Contribution of infection to mortality in people with type 2 diabetes: A population-based cohort study using electronic records. Lancet Reg. Health–Eur. 2025, 48, 101147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Holt, R.I.; Cockram, C.S.; Ma, R.C.; Luk, A.O. Diabetes and infection: Review of the epidemiology, mechanisms and principles of treatment. Diabetologia 2024, 67, 1168–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bertoni, A.G.; Saydah, S.; Brancati, F.L. Diabetes and the risk of infection-related mortality in the US. Diabetes Care 2001, 24, 1044–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zoppini, G.; Fedeli, U.; Schievano, E.; Dauriz, M.; Targher, G.; Bonora, E.; Corti, M.C. Mortality from infectious diseases in diabetes. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2018, 28, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, K.; Lansang, M.C. Diabetes Mellitus and Infection; NCBI: Bethesda, MA, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nishad, S.; Dongare, D.; Tripathi, A.C.P.; Tripathi, T.; Tripathi, P. Deciphering the intricacies of immune system dysfunction and its impact on diabetes mellitus: Revisiting the communication strategies to manage diabetes mellitus. Health Sci. Rev. 2024, 13, 100201. [Google Scholar]
  21. Daryabor, G.; Atashzar, M.R.; Kabelitz, D.; Meri, S.; Kalantar, K. The effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus on organ metabolism and the immune system. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alexander, M.; Cho, E.; Gliozheni, E.; Salem, Y.; Cheung, J.; Ichii, H. Pathology of Diabetes-Induced Immune Dysfunction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wolfgruber, S.; Sedik, S.; Klingspor, L.; Tortorano, A.; Gow, N.A.; Lagrou, K.; Gangneux, J.-P.; Maertens, J.; Meis, J.F.; Lass-Flörl, C.; et al. Insights from three Pan-European multicentre studies on invasive Candida infections and outlook to ECMM Candida IV. Mycopathologia 2024, 189, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Prakash, H.; Chakrabarti, A. Global epidemiology of mucormycosis. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. O’Halloran, J.A.; Powderly, W.G.; Spec, A. Cryptococcosis today: It is not all about HIV infection. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 2017, 4, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kiertiburanakul, S.; Wirojtananugoon, S.; Pracharktam, R.; Sungkanuparph, S. Cryptococcosis in human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2006, 10, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nsenga, L.; Kajjimu, J.; Olum, R.; Ninsiima, S.; Kyazze, A.P.; Ssekamatte, P.; Kibirige, D.; Baluku, J.B.; Andia-Biraro, I.; Bongomin, F. Cryptococcosis complicating diabetes mellitus: A scoping review. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, 20499361211014769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, L.; Lu, F.; Wang, Y.; Ji, J.; Xu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Li, M.; Xia, J.; Wang, B. Methodological comparison of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid-based detection of respiratory pathogens in diagnosis of bacterium/fungus-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1168812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mei, J.; Chen, Y.-S.; Tian, H.-X.; Wang, L.-Y.; Zeng, J.; Wang, L.; Rong, D.-C.; Wong, R.C.; Gao, Y.; Guo, C.-X.; et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF): Clinical applications for present and future. Innov. Med. 2025, 3, 100115-1–100115-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dantas, K.C.; de Freitas-Xavier, R.S.; Spina Lombardi, S.C.F.; Júnior, A.M.; da Silva, M.V.; Criado, P.R.; Freitas, V.C.T.; Almeida, T.M.B. Comparative analysis of diagnostic methods for the detection of Cryptococcus neoformans meningitis. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2023, 17, e0011140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jiang, Z.-J.; Hong, J.-C.; Lin, B.-W.; Zhang, W.-Q.; Fan, Q.-C.; Yang, B.-H.; Yao, X.-P. Comparison of mNGS with conventional methods for diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis: A retrospective study. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abassi, M.; Boulware, D.R.; Rhein, J. Cryptococcal meningitis: Diagnosis and management update. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2015, 2, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ortiz, B.; Varela, D.; Fontecha, G.; Torres, K.; Cornely, O.A.; Salmanton-García, J. (Eds.) Strengthening Fungal Infection Diagnosis and Treatment: An In-depth Analysis of Capabilities in Honduras. In Open Forum Infectious Diseases; Oxford University Press US: New York, NY, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  34. Aguirre, J.P.B.; Hamid, A.M.R. Amphotericin B deoxycholate versus liposomal amphotericin B: Effects on kidney function. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 2015, CD010481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kan, W.-C.; Chen, Y.-C.; Wu, V.-C.; Shiao, C.-C. Vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury: A narrative review from pathophysiology to clinical application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. OPS Honduras. IV Congreso Nacional de Diabetes. Available online: https://www.paho.org/es/historias/atencion-pacientes-diabeticos-personas-con-problemas-salud-mental-tiempos-covid-19 (accessed on 13 January 2025).
  37. Mejía-Santos, H. Notes from the field: Mucormycosis cases during the COVID-19 pandemic—Honduras, May–September 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 1747–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Caceres, D.H.; Arauz, A.B.; Flores, C.; Santiago, E.; Montoya, S.; Saenz, C.; Torres-Meneses, F.A.; Peralta, H.; Zuniga-Moya, J.C.; Lainez Arteaga, I.Z.; et al. Implementation of rapid diagnostics assays for detection of histoplasmosis and cryptococcosis in central american people living with HIV. Mycoses 2021, 64, 1396–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Firacative, C.; Meyer, W.; Castañeda, E. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes in Latin America: A map of molecular types, genotypic diversity, and antifungal susceptibility as reported by the Latin American Cryptococcal Study Group. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. DeSalle, R.; Goldstein, P. Review and interpretation of trends in DNA barcoding. Front Ecol Evol 2019, 7, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc. A Guide Methods Appl. 1990, 18, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zuniga-Moya, J.C.; Romero-Reyes, L.E.; Saavedra, E.B.; Montoya, S.; Varela, D.; Borjas, M.; Cerna, A.; Bejarano, S.; Martinez, P.; Lujan, K. (Eds.) Prevalence of Cryptococcal antigen and outcomes in people with human immunodeficiency virus in Honduras: A cohort study. In Open Forum Infectious Diseases; Oxford University Press US: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Diagnostic evaluation of a case of pulmonary cryptococcosis. (A) Chest X-ray showing bilateral pulmonary opacities. (B) Chest CT scan revealing multiple bilateral cavitary consolidations. (C) India ink staining of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid demonstrating encapsulated yeasts compatible with Cryptococcus spp. (D) Agarose gel electrophoresis showing ITS region amplification product (~535 bp). (E) Positive result for cryptococcal antigen using lateral flow assay (CrAg LFA) with a visible test line.
Figure 1. Diagnostic evaluation of a case of pulmonary cryptococcosis. (A) Chest X-ray showing bilateral pulmonary opacities. (B) Chest CT scan revealing multiple bilateral cavitary consolidations. (C) India ink staining of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid demonstrating encapsulated yeasts compatible with Cryptococcus spp. (D) Agarose gel electrophoresis showing ITS region amplification product (~535 bp). (E) Positive result for cryptococcal antigen using lateral flow assay (CrAg LFA) with a visible test line.
Microbiolres 16 00245 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed from the alignment of 20 ITS sequences, including an outgroup (Cryptococcus luteoulus, Acc. No. AJ493576), using the Neighbor-Joining method and the Tamura–Nei genetic distance model, with 10,000 bootstrap replicates in Geneious Prime® 2024.0.5 software. The orange star indicates the sequence obtained in this study.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed from the alignment of 20 ITS sequences, including an outgroup (Cryptococcus luteoulus, Acc. No. AJ493576), using the Neighbor-Joining method and the Tamura–Nei genetic distance model, with 10,000 bootstrap replicates in Geneious Prime® 2024.0.5 software. The orange star indicates the sequence obtained in this study.
Microbiolres 16 00245 g002
Table 1. Serial laboratory parameters during hospitalization in a patient with pulmonary cryptococcosis (November–December 2024).
Table 1. Serial laboratory parameters during hospitalization in a patient with pulmonary cryptococcosis (November–December 2024).
Date
Laboratory Value2 November 20259 November 202411 November 202415 November 202419 November 20247 December 2024
White blood cells15.06 × 1039.08 × 10310.05 × 10313.07 × 10311.07 × 10314.07 × 103
Hemoglobin11.4/dL10.8/dL11.2/dL10.3/dL10.6/dL9.3/dL
Platelets243 × 103278 × 103208 × 103251 × 103209 × 10372 × 103
Glucose191 mg/dL293 mg/dL301 mg/dL254 mg/dL289 mg/dL45 mg/dL
Urea48 mg/dL48 mg/dL87 mg/dL81 mg/dL51 mg/dL98 mg/dL
Creatinine0.8 mg/dL1.4 mg/dL2.5 mg/dL2.5 mg/dL1.7 mg/dL2.6 mg/dL
Total bilirubin 2.61 mg/dL1.2 mg/dL8.9 mg/dL
Direct bilirubin 1.9 mg/dL0.9 mg/dL6.6 mg/dL
AST28 U/L35 U/L38 U/L38 U/L76 U/L38 U/L
ALT34 U/L28 U/L36 U/L36 U/L77 U/L48 U/L
Na136 mEq/L135 mEq/L137 mEq/L132 mEq/L135 mEq/L132 mEq/L
K3.8 mEq/L2.4 mEq/L3.4 mEq/L2.8 mEq/L3.6 mEq/L3.1 mEq/L
HbA1c9.50%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sosa, S.; Manzanares, M.F.; Rivera, D.; Villeda-Barahona, A.; Fontecha, G.; de Armas, Y.; Ortiz, B. Pulmonary Cryptococcosis in a Diabetic Patient Without Severe Immunosuppression: Case Report and 25-Year Literature Review. Microbiol. Res. 2025, 16, 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres16110245

AMA Style

Sosa S, Manzanares MF, Rivera D, Villeda-Barahona A, Fontecha G, de Armas Y, Ortiz B. Pulmonary Cryptococcosis in a Diabetic Patient Without Severe Immunosuppression: Case Report and 25-Year Literature Review. Microbiology Research. 2025; 16(11):245. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres16110245

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sosa, Suyapa, María Fernanda Manzanares, Daniel Rivera, Asly Villeda-Barahona, Gustavo Fontecha, Yaxsier de Armas, and Bryan Ortiz. 2025. "Pulmonary Cryptococcosis in a Diabetic Patient Without Severe Immunosuppression: Case Report and 25-Year Literature Review" Microbiology Research 16, no. 11: 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres16110245

APA Style

Sosa, S., Manzanares, M. F., Rivera, D., Villeda-Barahona, A., Fontecha, G., de Armas, Y., & Ortiz, B. (2025). Pulmonary Cryptococcosis in a Diabetic Patient Without Severe Immunosuppression: Case Report and 25-Year Literature Review. Microbiology Research, 16(11), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres16110245

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop