Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
  • Editor’s Choice
  • Case Report
  • Open Access

8 April 2026

7 Pages

Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy in AIDS: The Diagnostic Role of PET Imaging

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
2
Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
3
Infectious Diseases Unit, Livorno Hospital, 57124 Livorno, Italy
4
Nuclear Medicine Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy

Abstract

Introduction: The majority of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) cases is still represented by patients affected by acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Diagnosis of PML relies on histopathological findings or by the combination of clinical signs, radiological evidence, and molecular positivity of the JC virus in cerebrospinal fluid. However, AIDS status predisposes to various diseases involving the brain, testing the diagnostic ability of the clinician. Case description: We describe a PML case in a patient with AIDS, in whom lumbar puncture was initially impossible for severe thrombocytopenia and magnetic resonance showed an hyperintense lesion and was unable to distinguish between PML and lymphoma. In this case, [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET imaging showing a hypometabolism of the lesion helped to initially orient toward PML, as diagnosis was later confirmed by lumbar puncture. We collected 21 cases in the literature in which [18F]-FDG-PET was helpful in cases of PML. Discussion and Conclusions: PET imaging is not considered a standard diagnostic tool for PML. However, in selected cases, it may provide valuable information to direct the diagnosis towards PML.

1. Introduction

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is an opportunistic infection of the central nervous system (CNS) caused by the polyomavirus JC (JCV). The virus is frequently contracted during childhood where it causes asymptomatic infections, then remains latent in the lungs, kidneys and reticulo-endothelial system. Under conditions of immunosuppression, the virus may reactivate, reaching the CNS, where it replicates within oligodendrocytes leading to cell death and progressive demyelination [1]. The current diagnostic criteria for definite PML are stringently based on the demonstration of JCV in brain tissue by biopsy or, in the context of a typical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical presentation, the demonstration of JCV-DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [2,3].
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy symptoms depend on the locations involved, but the most common include cognitive and behavioral abnormalities, sensory and motor deficits, ataxia, aphasia and cortical visual changes [4].
On brain MRI, the typical lesion is hyperintense on T2-weighted FLAIR sequences, involves subcortical and juxtacortical white matter, and usually (but not always) appears sharply delineated at the cortical border [5,6]. Brain MRI is also crucial for monitoring the disease; in patients with partial or complete immune reconstitution, PML lesions tend to expand slowly for weeks to months, after which PML immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) may develop. In PML-IRIS, lesions undergo rapid expansion, accompanied by signs of inflammation (e.g., perilesional edema, mass effect, enlargement of perivascular spaces, and contrast enhancement) [1].

2. Case Description

On 30 June 2024, a 29-year-old man went to the emergency department for persistent difficulty in concentration, weakness and onset of slurred speech for about 10 days. Blood tests showed pancytopenia characterized by severe thrombocytopenia (15 × 109/L), anemia (hemoglobin 11.5 g/dL), and leukopenia (white blood cells 3.6 × 109/L). Brain CT scan showed white matter hypodensity in the right nucleocapsular site with extension to the corona radiata, semioval center, and in subcortical white matter in the frontal site with preserved grooves. He was admitted to internal medicine. On day three after hospital admission (D3), he tested positive for HIV with HIV-RNA 3,700,000 cp/mL, CD4+ 130/mmc (5.6%), and CD4/CD8 ratio 0.1. On D5, the patient was admitted to the Infectious Diseases Department and on D6, antiretroviral therapy with bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate was initiated. On D4 he underwent a brain MRI showing a lesion, hyperintense in T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and hypointense in T1 sequences, in the right frontal subcortical white matter descending caudally through the ipsilateral capsular–lenticular region up to the level of the anterior thalamus. Other areas of abnormally hyperintense signal in T2/FLAIR sequence in bihemispheric subcortical location and in left parietal cortico-subcortical location adjacent to the corpus callosum were documented (Figure 1). The report, in agreement with the neuroradiologist, did not allow us to distinguish between PML and lymphoma; both diagnoses were therefore possible, but considering thrombocytopenia, the patient had a contraindication to lumbar puncture. In order to differentiate the diagnosis and better characterize the lesions, a [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography scan ([18F]-FDG-PET) was performed, with the evidence of diffuse hypometabolism in the right frontal brain and right basal nuclei, without any other encephalic area involved. Moreover, diffuse hypermetabolism involving the left ethmoidal and maxillary sinuses was detected, with concomitant hypermetabolic activity in the left axillary and retromandibular lymph nodes (Figure 1). Due to persistent severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <10,000/mm3) requiring repeated platelet transfusions, low-dose corticosteroid therapy was initiated after hematology consultation. However, platelet levels remained critically low despite corticosteroid treatment, necessitating intravenous immunoglobulin infusions (IVIG), escalation of corticosteroid therapy to prednisone 1 mg/kg, and the addition of romiplostim. These interventions ultimately resulted in a platelet count sufficient to safely perform lumbar puncture. On D12 the procedure was performed: on physical–chemical examination, the cerebrospinal fluid was clear and colorless, with a protein concentration of 0.59 g/L, 1 cell/µL, and normal lactate and glucose levels; JCV-DNA (813 cp/mL) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-RNA (552,000 cp/mL) were detected, while Ebstein Barr virus (EBV)-DNA was negative. A repeated encephalic MRI at 26 days showed an increase in the lesion without lesional edema, compatible with evolution of PML in a patient on prednisone 1 mg/Kg therapy for thrombocytopenia of undetermined etiology (Figure 1). Moreover, on D31, considering the presence of hypermethabolic lesions in paranasal sinuses, a biopsy was performed. Since the patient decided to be treated in another hospital center closer to his usual residence, the patient was discharged on D34 with the following blood test results: CD4+ 280/mmc (13.7%), HIV-RNA 1630 cp/mL, serum JCV-DNA detected (<306 cp/mL). At the time of discharge, the patient’s neurological symptoms had improved, with a platelet count over 10.000/mm3 not requiring additional transfusion; the result of biopsy was still in course. After the discharge, the result of the biopsy showed the presence of plasmablastic lymphoma of maxillary sinus (immunophenotype: CD138+, CD38+, c-Myc+, Bcl2+, CD45+/−, CD117−/+).
Figure 1. Timeline of encephalic radiological assessments performed in 2024. FLAIR: fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; [18F]-FDG-PET: fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; RM: magnetic resonance.
Hence, in September 2024, he was admitted again in another hospital to undergo radiotherapy sessions. During this period of hospitalization, an additional MRI scan was performed, showing further progression of the brain lesion (Figure 1). At present, clinical follow-up is ongoing. The patient remains clinically stable, with near-complete remission of the symptoms documented at onset. Furthermore, a contrast-enhanced brain MRI performed in September 2025 demonstrated a slight reduction in the lesion (image not available).
We collected 21 cases form the literature in which [18F]-FDG-PET imaging was used to characterize PML (Table 1).

3. Discussion and Conclusions

In our case report, the most likely diagnosis was PML, based on the suggestive clinical presentation and radiological findings. Positron emission tomography scan imaging was performed primarily to support the differential diagnosis—particularly to distinguish PML from CNS lymphoma—and to avoid an invasive procedure such as lumbar puncture and brain biopsy in a thrombocytopenic patient. The documented hypometabolism of the brain lesion allowed us to reasonably exclude a diagnosis of lymphoma. Moreover, a subsequent lumbar puncture was performed, confirming JC virus positivity in the CSF.
In the literature, PET imaging use in PML is limited to a small number of case reports and series, with a total of 21 cases documented, including the present case (Table 1). These studies suggest that PML is typically associated with reduced [18F]-FDG uptake (indicative of hypometabolism) in contrast to healthy brain tissue [5]. Notably, 16 cases (76%) have reported decreased [18F]-FDG uptake in the affected regions. However, it should be noted that in cases of PML-IRIS, intralesional hypermetabolism may instead be observed. Consequently, PET imaging may not always be reliably helpful in the differential diagnosis of cerebral lesions in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome [7]. A recent study by C. Mahler et al. proposed the use of [18F]-GE-18, a translocator protein radioligand that binds to activated macrophages, microglia, and astrocytes, and demonstrated promising results for detecting IRIS in eight patients with natalizumab-associated PML [8].
Although PET imaging is not considered a standard diagnostic tool for PML, it may nonetheless provide valuable information in selected clinical cases, as illustrated in ours.
Table 1. Cases described in the literature of patients with PML in which FDG-PET was used to characterize the lesion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization was contributed to by V.D. and R.P.; data curation was contributed to by V.D. and R.P.; writing—original draft preparation was contributed to by V.D. and R.P.; writing—review and editing was contributed to by V.D., R.P., A.B., A.F., C.M., E.T., C.C., S.S., and L.Z.; supervision was contributed to by A.B., A.F., C.M., E.T., C.C., S.S., and L.Z.; the imaging study was conducted with the contribution of M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Pursuant to Tuscany Regional Decree No. 348 of 25 March 2024 regarding the functioning of the Tuscan Ethics Committees, case reports as well as case series are exempt from Ethics Committee approval.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the personnel of our outpatient clinic, including nurses, doctors and residents.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
PMLprogressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy
JCVpolyomavirus JC
CNScentral nervous system
FDG-PETfluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
MRImagnetic resonance imaging
CSFcerebrospinal fluid
HIVhuman immunodeficiency virus
IRISimmune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome
PLTplatelets
IVIGintravenous immunoglobulin
ATLacute T-cell leukemia
CCScorticosteroids
CLLchronic lymphocytic leukemia
DMdermatomyositis
HBVhepatitis B virus
HCChepatocellular carcinoma
LCCchronic lymphocytic leukemia
MSmultiple sclerosis
SLEsystemic lupus erythematosus
MALTmucosa-associated lymphoid tissue

References

  1. Cortese, I.; Reich, D.S.; Nath, A. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and the spectrum of JC virus-related disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2021, 17, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Berger, J.R.; Aksamit, A.J.; Clifford, D.B.; Davis, L.; Koralnik, I.J.; Sejvar, J.J.; Bartt, R.; Major, E.O.; Nath, A. PML diagnostic criteria: Consensus statement from the AAN Neuroinfectious Disease Section. Neurology 2013, 80, 1430–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Swinnen, B.; Saegeman, V.; Beuselinck, K.; Wouters, A.; Cypers, G.; Meyfroidt, G.; Schrooten, M. Predictive value of JC virus PCR in cerebrospinal fluid in the diagnosis of PML. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 95, 114859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Zhai, S.; Brew, B.J. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. In Handbook of Clinical Neurology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 152, pp. 123–137. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baldassari, L.E.; Wattjes, M.P.; Cortese, I.C.M.; Gass, A.; Metz, I.; Yousry, T.; Reich, D.S.; Richert, N. The neuroradiology of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: A clinical trial perspective. Brain 2022, 145, 426–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Horger, M.; Beschorner, R.; Beck, R.; Nägele, T.; Schulze, M.; Ernemann, U.; Heckl, S. Common and uncommon imaging findings in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) with differential diagnostic considerations. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2012, 114, 1123–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Chiba, Y.; Kawakita, R.; Mitamura, K.; Takahashi, K.; Suzuki, T.; Nakamichi, K.; Suzuki, K.; Morishita, A.; Kobara, H.; Deguchi, K.; et al. 18F-THK5351 Positron Emission Tomography Clearly Depicted Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy after Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treatment. Intern. Med. 2024, 63, 2325–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Mahler, C.; Schumacher, A.-M.; Unterrainer, M.; Kaiser, L.; Höllbacher, T.; Lindner, S.; Havla, J.; Ertl-Wagner, B.; Patzig, M.; Seelos, K.; et al. TSPO PET imaging of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Brain 2021, 144, 2683–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Kiyosawa, M.; Bosley, T.M.; Alavi, A.; Gupta, N.; Rhodes, C.H.; Chawluk, J.; Kushner, M.; Savino, P.J.; Sergott, R.C.; Schatz, N.J.; et al. Positron emission tomography in a patient with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Neurology 1988, 38, 1864–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  10. Hoffman, J.M.; Waskin, H.A.; Schifter, T.; Hanson, M.W.; Gray, L.; Rosenfeld, S.; Coleman, R.E. FDG-PET in differentiating lymphoma from nonmalignant central nervous system lesions in patients with AIDS. J. Nucl. Med. 1993, 34, 567–575. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pierce, M.A.; Johnson, M.D.; Maciunas, R.J.; Murray, M.J.; Allen, G.S.; Harbison, M.A.; Creasy, J.L.; Kessler, R.M. Evaluating contrast-enhancing brain lesions in patients with AIDS by using positron emission tomography. Ann. Intern. Med. 1995, 123, 594–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Heald, A.E.; Hoffman, J.M.; Bartlett, J.A.; Waskin, H.A. Differentiation of central nervous system lesions in AIDS patients using positron emission tomography (PET). Int. J. STD AIDS 1996, 7, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Ochi, H.; Yamada, T.; Hara, H.; Yoshimura, T.; Iwaki, T.; Nagashima, K.; Yogo, Y.; Kobayashi, T. A case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy with methionine uptake demonstrated by PET. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 1996, 36, 858–863. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. O’Doherty, M.J.; Barrington, S.F.; Campbell, M.; Lowe, J.; Bradbeer, C.S. PET scanning and the human immunodeficiency virus-positive patient. J. Nucl. Med. 1997, 38, 1575–1583. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Mertens, K.; Acou, M.; Van den Broecke, C.; Nuyts, R.; Van Roost, D.; Achten, E.; Goethals, I. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) mimicking high-grade glioma on delayed F-18 FDG PET imaging. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2012, 19, 1167–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Thaker, A.A.; Schmitt, S.E.; Pollard, J.R.; Dubroff, J.G. Natalizumab-induced progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2014, 39, e365–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Shirai, S.; Yabe, I.; Kano, T.; Shimizu, Y.; Sasamori, T.; Sato, K.; Hirotani, M.; Nonaka, T.; Takahashi, I.; Matsushima, M.; et al. Usefulness of 11C-methionine-positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. J. Neurol. 2014, 261, 2314–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Ishibashi, K.; Miura, Y.; Matsumura, K.; Kanemasa, Y.; Nakamichi, K.; Saijo, M.; Toyohara, J.; Ishii, K. PET Imaging of 18F-FDG, 11C-methionine, 11C-flumazenil, and 11C-4DST in Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy. Intern. Med. 2017, 56, 1219–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Kamourieh, S.; Gananandan, K.; Raffel, J.; Nicholas, R. Natalizumab granule cell neuronopathy: FDG-PET in diagnosis and immune reconstitution with G-CSF. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2017, 4, e384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Baheerathan, A.; McNamara, C.; Kalam, S.; Rane, N.; Barwick, T.D.; Grote, H.; Nicholas, R. The utility of FDG-PET imaging in distinguishing PML-IRIS from PML in a patient treated with natalizumab. Neurology 2018, 91, 572–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Barritt, A.W.; Das, E.; Morley, N.; Seymour, M.; Saha, R.; Vera, J.; Vundavalli, S.; Dizdarevic, S.; Nicholas, R.; Berger, J.R.; et al. Management approach including pembrolizumab for fingolimod-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in a patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2023, 29, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.