Next Article in Journal
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and/or Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Peripheral Facial Paralysis: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
fMRI Insights into Visual Cortex Dysfunction as a Biomarker for Migraine with Aura
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Pituitary Spindle Cell Oncocytoma: More than a Grade 1 Tumor?

1
Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada
2
Department of Pathology, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada
3
Department of Neurosurgery, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Neurol. Int. 2025, 17(2), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17020016
Submission received: 31 December 2024 / Revised: 18 January 2025 / Accepted: 20 January 2025 / Published: 22 January 2025

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Spindle cell oncocytomas (SCOs) of the pituitary gland are rare tumors often misdiagnosed for nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas. Although classified as grade 1, they are often challenging in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Pituitary SCOs harbor peculiar features such as hypervascularity and stronger adherence to surrounding structures, with increased risk of hemorrhage, partial resection, and significantly higher recurrence rate. Almost 100 cases have been reported so far. The role of surgery is still crucial for the decompression of the optic chiasm as well as for achieving diagnosis. However, given the higher tendency of recurrence, the role of postoperative radiotherapy has been investigated over the last few years. Case presentation: Here, we reported a case of a 48-year-old female with a pituitary SCO treated at our institution, in which we focused on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Conclusions: This type of tumor presents a challenge related to its higher vascularity and strong adherence to the surrounding structures. Adjuvant radiotherapy is something that should be considered, especially when gross total resection is not achieved, and finally, SCOs require diligent follow-up to monitor for any signs of disease recurrence or progression.

1. Introduction

Spindle cell oncocytomas (SCOs) are rare non-neuroendocrine tumors arising from the pituicytes of the posterior pituitary gland. They were included in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors in 2007 after being first described by Roncaroli et al. in 2002 [1,2].
SCOs were previously thought to stem from the adenohypophysis; however, more recent research identified that SCOs are positive for thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1) which is only found in pituicytes and not in the folliculostellate cells of the adenohypophysis [3]. In our search from 2002 to 2024, there were only 98 cases published in the literature that highlight the rarity of this type of tumor.
SCOs are often misdiagnosed as pituitary adenomas; nevertheless, they are important to distinguish as they usually have higher vascularity as well as an increased tendency to invade the surrounding structures [4]. This results in a higher recurrence rate, thus requiring more frequent follow-ups. If gross total resection (GTR) is not achieved, 50% of tumors show significant progression requiring extra treatment by two years, recurrence occurs in 20% of people, and even distant metastasis has been reported [4].
Despite these factors, the WHO considers pituitary SCOs a grade 1 tumor with benign behavior [5]. Moreover, although this tumor is considered grade 1, it is important to understand these critical features as it guides treatment and follow-up and will improve patient outcomes.
Due to the low incidence of this neoplasm, the definitive knowledge of the unique clinical signs and symptoms, diagnostic imaging (DI), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and treatment is lacking. In this report and literature review, we aimed to provide further knowledge on these factors to improve the identification and treatment of individuals with SCO. In addition, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy is not fully understood in the treatment of pituitary SCO. However, recent literature demonstrated radiotherapy to be safe and effective for residual SCO after surgery [6]. Radiotherapy will be further assessed in our review of the literature to also help establish a comprehensive understanding of its potential role in the treatment of SCO.

2. Case Presentation

We present the case of a 48-year-old female with a two-month history of persistent headaches, mental and physical fatigue, and light sensitivity. Her past medical history includes chronic migraines, fibromyalgia, psoriasis, anxiety, obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea. When looking back, the patient realized that her headache symptoms had changed from her normal migraine symptoms to more frequent albeit less severe frontal pain and aching in the previous months.
Given the persistence of the above-mentioned symptoms, she was investigated with a head computed tomography (CT) scan, which showed a pituitary lesion with sellar and suprasellar extension. For further investigation, she underwent a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan that demonstrated a homogenous mass in the pituitary gland (Figure 1). The MRI also showed that the mass was compressing the optic chiasm and was encasing both internal carotid arteries. These findings were thought to be compatible with pituitary macroadenoma.
On physical examination, the patient had no cranial nerve deficits, and her pupils were equal, round, and reactive to light and accommodation. She did not have any focal motor or sensory deficits. She also underwent an ophthalmological assessment that ruled-out papilledema and confirmed normal bilateral visual fields. Lastly, a thorough endocrinological assessment was completed, including a full hormonal panel that demonstrated only mild hyperprolactinemia.
Given the clinical and radiological findings, an elective surgical treatment was recommended and carried out using an endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach. Intraoperatively, the tumor had the usual soft consistency, but it presented stronger adherence with what was thought to be the normal pituitary gland and, therefore, required extra work to separate it. Although no major bleeding was identified, an unusual constant tumor oozing made the procedure more challenging. An apparent GTR of the tumor was achieved and confirmed by the direct visualization of the suprasellar cistern coming down into the sella turcica. For this reason, no adjuvant radiotherapy was performed.
The patient had an uneventful postoperative period. She spent two days in the intensive care unit and was then transferred to the floor, where low levels of cortisol and mild diabetes insipidus were diagnosed and treated medically. Post-operative MRI ruled out intraoperative complications and confirmed the decompression of the optic chiasm (Figure 2). She was discharged home on postoperative day seven, neurologically intact.
She was reassessed in the follow-up four weeks after surgery, and no obvious focal deficits were identified. Her headache and light sensitivity had notably improved. A repeat MRI was completed three months postoperatively, and it confirmed the GTR of the SCO; the patient scheduled their next follow-up with repeat MRI at the sixth month mark.
The microscopy examination of the specimen demonstrated fascicles of spindle-cell tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and elongated nuclei showing moderate pleomorphism (Figure 3). Other areas of tumor cells showed more eosinophilic cytoplasm with clear borders and contained round to oval nuclei with mild pleomorphism. Granular cytoplasm was not seen; however, mitotic figures were present. No tumor necrosis was noted. The tumor cells were diffusely positive for TTF-1, S100, CD56, and synaptophysin (Figure 4). They were also focally positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), CD68, and beta crystallin. There was no immunostaining for pituitary-specific transcription factor-1 (PIT-1) or steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1).

3. Discussion

SCOs are very rare tumors of the posterior pituitary gland that originate from the pituicytes located in the neurohypophysis. They are called SCOs because their cells are spindle shaped under microscopic examination and contain many mitochondria in their cytoplasm [7]. Oncocytomas can occur in many different areas of the body, including kidney, breast, prostate gland, thyroid, and salivary glands [7]. However, they are often only called oncocytomas in these locations as they lack spindle-shaped cells, which are characteristic of the pituitary SCO [7,8].
Unfortunately, pituitary SCOs appear very similar to non-functioning pituitary adenomas in clinical presentation and diagnostic imaging. Yet, they require unique care because of two specific features: increased vascularity and increased fibrotic adherence to surrounding structures.
Additionally, SCOs’ increased vascularity has the potential to cause significant bleeding during surgery. Borges et al. described a case of recurring subclinical tumor bleeding that happened in a recurrent SCO [9,10]. In the same manuscript, Borges reported that nearly one-third of assessed cases showed significant intraoperative bleeding, and almost half of these cases demonstrated that the tumor was highly vascular [9,10]. Cases of spontaneous tumor hemorrhage were also described.
Careful tumor dissection and the strategic use of cottonoids with hemostatic agents is crucial when dealing with any tumor of the posterior pituitary gland, especially SCO. Also, SCOs have an elevated risk of progression or recurrence because of the adherent characteristics of the tumor. In a study by Hasegawa et al., it was found that GTR was only achieved in 24% of cases mainly because of those tumor features [5]. These characteristics make the recurrence of SCOs very likely, with 50% of tumors showing significant progression if GTR is not attained and radiotherapy is not added [5].
There are also case reports of SCOs managed transcranially. In fact, in cases with extensive suprasellar extension, this approach can allow for more intraoperative maneuverability to deal with significant bleeding and provide better accessibility to all areas of the tumor [10].
Oftentimes, partial resection is all that can be accomplished, leading to the growth of any residual tumor. In cases like this and with general tumor recurrence, interdisciplinary support should be pursued and thought given to both reoperation as well as adjuvant radiotherapy [10].
The role of preoperative radiotherapy is still being debated; Hasegawa et al. found in their meta-analysis that preoperative radiotherapy did not have an impact on those who achieved GTR [5]. There was also no statistical difference between the non-GTR group that received preoperative radiotherapy and the non-GTR group that did not receive preoperative radiotherapy. However, in patients who do not achieve GTR, postoperative radiotherapy should be considered as it has shown promising results in controlling tumor progression [11].
In our review of the literature (Table 1), we performed a search from 2002 to 2024 using databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect to identify all published articles reporting pituitary SCO, which totaled 98 cases. Primary search terms included pituitary spindle cell oncocytoma, pituitary tumors, and posterior pituitary tumors. Case reports, case series, and original articles were included, whereas articles not presenting new cases or unpublished material were excluded. Article references were also hand searched to ensure no reports were missed. Each case was then analyzed for specific data points, including age, sex, clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging, IHC, surgical approach, use of adjuvant radiotherapy, and general outcomes. The data were then summarized into a structured table which was used to draw conclusions on significant topics like recurrence rates and the effectiveness of radiotherapy, as well as to present all cases reported in the literature thus far. All articles were screened for relevance by the authors, and any discrepancies were resolved through collaborative discussion.
The mean age of all the patients with pituitary SCO was found to be fifty-seven years. Regarding any difference between sex, forty-seven patients were female, and fifty-one patients were male. Of particular importance, we found that there was recurrence or tumor growth in 31% of patients with pituitary SCO who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy. Meanwhile, only 18% of patients who did receive adjuvant radiotherapy experienced tumor recurrence or progression. This information on adjuvant radiotherapy shows that it has the potential to be very useful in achieving tumor stability and decreases the chances of progression and need for further operations. Akyoldas et al. reported five cases that utilized radiotherapy, all of which showed the tumors to be stable at follow-up. Also, in this study, gamma knife radiosurgery was used each time and reported a median tumor margin dose of 12Gy and a median maximal dose of 24Gy [6].
These rates of recurrence/progression underscore the importance of continued surveillance with these tumors. Many of the reports noted how partial resection was all that could be achieved due to the highly vascular nature of the tumor. However, recurrence was even found in cases that appeared to achieve GTR.
Our case specifically highlights the importance of being aware of the high vascularity of these tumors due to their increased risk of bleeding during surgical resection. If a SCO is suspected/identified, measures can be put into place to prepare for increased bleeding, such as careful tumor dissection and strategic use of cottonoids with hemostatic agents in addition to blood products typed and matched if they are needed. Special consideration is also needed regarding the follow-up plan for patients with SCO due to their increased rate of recurrence.

4. Conclusions

SCOs are rare tumors of the posterior pituitary gland that have many unique features that require specific treatment and follow-up. Although this tumor presents similarly to a pituitary adenoma, there are marked differences in the physical appearance of the tumor, IHC, and follow-up required. From a surgical perspective, the challenge is related to higher vascularity and stronger adherence to the surrounding structures. This makes the surgery itself more difficult and a GTR less likely, with a higher recurrence rate.
To date, the use of radiotherapy was not well established. However, our review does provide encouraging results that post-operative radiotherapy has the potential to minimize tumor progression and increase tumor stability. Only 18% of the patients who had a pituitary SCO and received adjuvant radiotherapy developed recurrence/progression compared to 31% of patients who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy.
In our opinion, radiotherapy should definitely be considered, especially when GTR is not achieved. In our case, a GTR was achieved; thus, we decided to proceed without radiotherapy and with closer follow-up appointments to identify any early sign of recurrence. Closer follow-up appointments are also very necessary as many patients develop recurrence or tumor progression, sometimes despite GTR. These high rates of tumor recurrence/progression underscore the need for careful and frequent monitoring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.P. and J.H.; Data Curation, J.H.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, J.H. and Z.G.; Writing—Review and Editing, S.M.P. and B.M.; Visualization, J.H. and B.M.; Supervision, S.M.P.; Project Administration, S.M.P. and J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This case report was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was not required for this case report, as it involves a single patient and does not include any experimental procedures.

Informed Consent Statement

The authors confirm that patient consent is not applicable to this article. This is a retrospective case report using de-identified data.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
IHCImmunohistochemistry
SCOSpindle-cell oncocytoma
CTComputed Tomography
MRIMagnetic resonance imaging
TTF-1Thyroid Transcription Factor-1
EMAEpithelial Membrane Antigen
NVDNausea, vomiting, and diarrhea
F/UFollow-up
VSVision
VDVisual defect
PIT-1Pituitary-specific positive transcription factor-1
PTTG-1Pituitary Tumor Transforming Gene-1
GFAPGlial Fibrillary Acidic Protein
Gal3Galectin-3
Bcl2B-cell lymphoma 2
TSRTranssphenoidal resection
GKGamma Knife
GyGray
NDNot described
AMAAnti-mitochondrial Ab

References

  1. Roncaroli, F.; Scheithauer, B.W.; Cenacchi, G.; Horvath, E.; Kovacs, K.; Lloyd, R.V.; Abell-Aleff, P.; Santi, M.; Yates, A.J. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis: A tumor of folliculostellate cells? Am. J. Pathol. 2002, 26, 1048–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Joshi, S.; Krishnamurthy, B.; McKelvie, P.; Dhillon, R. Case report of pituitary spindle cell oncocytoma concurrent to growth-hormone secreting pituitary adenoma. Interdiscip. Neurosurg. Adv. Tech. Case Manag. 2024, 36, 101971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guerrero-Pérez, F.; Vidal, N.; Marengo, A.P.; Del Pozo, C.; Blanco, C.; Rivero-Celada, D.; Díez, J.J.; Iglesias, P.; Picó, A. Posterior pituitary tumours: The spectrum of a unique entity. Endocrine 2019, 63, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kunihiro, J.; Inoue, A.; Miyake, T.; Ohno, T.; Kitazawa, R.; Kunieda, T. Clinicopathological features and endoscopic findings of spindle cell oncocytoma: A case report and review of the literature. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2023, 109, 108536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hasegawa, H.; Van Gompel, J.J.; Oushy, S.H.; Pollock, B.E.; Link, M.J.; Meyer, F.B.; Bancos, I.; Erickson, D.; Davidge-Pitts, C.J.; Little, J.T.; et al. A Comprehensive Study of Spindle Cell Oncocytoma of the Pituitary Gland: Series of 6 Cases and Meta-Analysis of 85 Cases. World Neurosurg. 2021, 149, E197–E216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Akyoldaş, G.; Hergünsel, B.; Özdemir, I.E.; Şengöz, M.; Peker, S. Gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary spindle cell oncocytomas. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2019, 187, 105560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hodzic, Z.; Rowan, N.R.; Kashiwazaki, R.; Willson, T.J.; Wang, E.W.; Lee, S.E. A systematic review of sinonasal oncocytomas and oncocytic carcinomas: Diagnosis, management, and technical considerations. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017, 7, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hsieh, Y.-Y.; Chien, S.-C.; Tsai, H.-C.; Wei, K.-C.; Chuang, C.-C.; Jung, S.-M. Pituitary spindle cell oncocytoma: Two cases report and literature review. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2024, 124, 110328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Borges, M.T.; Lillehei, K.O.; Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B.K. Spindle cell oncocytoma with late recurrence and unique neuroimaging characteristics due to recurrent subclinical intratumoral bleeding. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2011, 101, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Larsen, A.M.G.; Cote, D.J.; Zaidi, H.A.; Bi, W.L.; Schmitt, P.J.; Iorgulescu, J.B.; Miller, M.B.; Smith, T.R.; Lopes, M.B.; Jane, J.A.; et al. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the pituitary gland. J. Neurosurg. 2018, 131, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chang, C.N.; Shen, C.C. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the pituitary tumor: A rare case report and literature reviews. Front. Surg. 2023, 9, 1021680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shimizu, A.; Nonami, Y.; Kanamuro, T.; Masui, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Amano, K.; Kawamata, T.; Ichihara, A.; Nagashima, Y. Pituicytoma with pleomorphism: A case report with cytological findings. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2022, 51, E1–E5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tena-Suck, M.L.; Hernández-Pacheco, A.A.; Rocandio-Hernández, D.; Salinas-Lara, C.; Sánchez-Garibay, C. Spindle Cells Oncocytoma and Rathke’s Cyst; A Collision Sellar Tumor– Brief Communication & Case Report. Med Clin. Case Rep. 2022, 2, 1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abdulrazeq, H.; Anderson, M.; Poggi, J.; Sampath, S.; Kanach, C.; Dellale, I.; Sampath, P. Management of pituitary spindle cell oncocytomas: A case report and review of the literature. Interdiscip. Neurosurg. Adv. Tech. Case Manag. 2021, 23, 100972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, D.J.; Lee, S.; Kim, M.-S.; Hwang, J.-H.; Hahm, M.H. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the sella turcica with anaplastic features and rapid progression in short-term follow-up: A case report with proposal of distinctive radiologic features. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 2021, 55, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kottangal, G.V.; Madhavan, L.; Kuruvilla, S.; Parameswaran, K.K.; Kollathodi, S.B. Spindle cell oncocytoma, a misdiagnosed rare entity of the pituitary—A case report with review of literature and special emphasis on the morphological differentials. Indian J. Pathol. Oncol. 2021, 8, 533–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Taka, T.M.; Yang, C.Y.; Limbo, J.N.; Chan, A.Y.; Davies, J.; Kuan, E.C.; Turner, S.G.; Hsu, F.P.K. Pituitary spindle cell oncocytoma: Illustrative case. J. Neurosurg. Case Lessons 2021, 2, 21356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Leonardo, T.; Antonio, A.; Giorgio, F.; Giulio, B.; Giorgio, C.; Aldo, P.; Emanuele, F.; Giovanna, M.; Marco, L. Arterial Embolization and Second-Look in Spindle Cell Oncocytoma of the Pituitary Gland: Case Report and Review of Literature. World Neurosurg. 2020, 142, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Samadian, M.; Mousavinejad, S.; Khoshsirat, S.; Dehghan, M.; Sharifi, G.; Ebrahimzadeh, K.; Rezaei, O. Trans-nasal trans-sphenoidal endoscopic resection of spindle cell oncocytoma of adenohypophysis: The first case report in a child and a review of literature. Asian J. Neurosurg. 2020, 15, 210–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Borg, A.; Jaunmuktane, Z.; Dorward, N. Tumours of the Neurohypophysis—One unit’s experience and literature review. World Neurosurg. 2020, 134, E968–E978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Chen, S.H.; Sheinberg, D.; Buttrick, S.; Levine, C.G.; Bhatia, R.G.; Lam, B.L.; Pasol, J.; Ayala, A.R.; Starke, R.M. Imaging Characteristics of a Hypervascular Pituitary Spindle Cell Oncocytoma on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Digital Subtraction Angiography. World Neurosurg. 2020, 133, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chainey, J.; Chan, V.K.-Y.; Au, K.; Das, S. Multiple recurrences of spindle cell oncocytoma: A case report and literature review. Clin. Neuropathol. 2020, 39, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sollfrank, L.; Lettmaier, S.; Erdmann, M.; Uslu, U. Panniculitis Under Successful Targeted Inhibition of the MAPK/ERK Signaling Pathway in a Patient with BRAF V600E-mutated Spindle Cell Oncocytoma of the Pituitary Gland. Anticancer. Res. 2019, 39, 3955–3959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yip, C.-M.; Lee, H.-P.; Hsieh, P.-P. Pituitary spindle cell oncocytoma presented as pituitary apoplexy. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2019, 2019, rjz179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cole, T.S.; Potla, S.; Sarris, C.E.; Przybylowski, C.J.; Baranoski, J.F.; Mooney, M.A.; Barranco, F.D.; White, W.L.; Eschbacher, J.M.; Little, A.S. Rare Thyroid Transcription Factor 1–Positive Tumors of the Sellar Region: Barrow Neurological Institute Retrospective Case Series. World Neurosurg. 2019, 129, e294–e302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Witte, H.M.; Riecke, A.; Saeger, W.; Hackenbroch, C.; Mathieu, R.; Mauer, U.M.; Schulz, C. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the neurohypophysis with metastasis to the sphenoparietal sinus and immunohistochemical negativity for S100 and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). Br. J. Neurosurg. 2018, 37, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Batra, V.V.; Gupta, R.K.; Singh, D.; Sharma, M.C.; Kumar, V. Is spindle cell oncocytoma a true entity or a variant of pituicytoma? A case report with review of literature. Neurol. India 2018, 66, 1413–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yoshida, K.; Toda, M.; Akiyama, T.; Takahashi, S.; Nishimoto, M.; Ozawa, H.; Ikari, Y.; Yoshida, K. Combined Endoscopic Endonasal and Video-microscopic Transcranial Approach with Preoperative Embolization for a Posterior Pituitary Tumor. World Neurosurg. 2018, 119, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nagata, Y.; Inoshita, N.; Fukuhara, N.; Yamaguchi-Okada, M.; Nishioka, H.; Yamada, S. Low-Grade Glioma of the Neurohypophysis: Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2018, 114, e1225–e1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sosa, S.; Danilowicz, K.; González Abbati, S.; Sevlever, G. Pituitary spindle cell oncocytoma: A case report with review of literature. Medicina 2018, 78, 33–36. [Google Scholar]
  31. Xie, J.; Silverman, J.F.; Pu, C.; Graner, S.; Storto, P.; Donangelo, I.; Jasnosz, K.M. Spindle cell oncocytoma of adenohypophysis: Cytogenetics and β-catenin findings with pathology differential diagnosis and review of the literature. Hum. Pathol. Case Rep. 2017, 9, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rafiq, N.M.; Kuniak, M.; Anichini, G.; Togersen, A.; Kamel, M.H. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis: 2 case reports of unusual radiological and intra-operative findings. Interdiscip. Neurosurg. 2017, 10, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Osman, M.; Wild, A. Spindle Cell Oncocytoma of the Anterior Pituitary Presenting with an Acute Clinical Course Due to Intraventricular Hemorrhage. A Case Report and Review of Literature. Am. J. Case Rep. 2017, 18, 894–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Aamodt, W.W.; Siegler, J.E.; Viaene, A.N.; Rubenstein, M.N. Late onset progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in Hodgkin lymphoma. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 43, 134–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sali, A.; Epari, S.; Tampi, C.; Goel, A. Spindle cell oncocytoma of adenohypophysis: Review of literature and report of another recurrent case. Neuropathology 2017, 37, 535–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Billeci, D.; Marton, E.; Giordan, E.; Carraro, V.; Ronzon, M.; Rossi, S. Spindle cell oncocytoma: Report of two cases with massive bleeding and review of the literature. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 39, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kong, X.; Li, D.; Kong, Y.; Zhong, D. Malignant adenohypophysis spindle cell oncocytoma with repeating recurrences and a high Ki-67 index. Medicine 2017, 96, e5657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hagel, C.; Buslei, R.; Buchfelder, M.; Fahlbusch, R.; Bergmann, M.; Giese, A.; Flitsch, J.; Lüdecke, D.K.; Glatzel, M.; Saeger, W. Immunoprofiling of glial tumours of the neurohypophysis suggests a common pituicytic origin of neoplastic cells. Pituitary 2017, 20, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Custodio, P.J.P.; Jho, D.H.; Pu, C.; Gordon, M.B.; Donangelo, I. Spindle Cell Oncocytoma of the Pituitary Presenting with Severe Hyponatremia. AACE Clin. Case Rep. 2016, 2, e237–e243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hasiloglu, Z.; Ure, E.; Comunoglu, N.; Tanriover, N.; Oz, B.; Gazioglu, N.; Mihmanli, I. New radiological clues in the diagnosis of spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis. Clin. Radiol. 2016, 71, 937.e5–937.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guadagno, E.; Cervasio, M.; Di Somma, A.; Califano, M.; Solari, D. Del Basso De Caro, M. Essential role of ultrastructural examination for spindle cell oncocytoma: Case report of a rare neoplasm and review of the literature. Ultrastruct. Pathol. 2016, 40, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vuong, H.G.; Kondo, T.; Tran, T.M.; Oishi, N.; Nakazawa, T.; Mochizuki, K.; Inoue, T.; Kasai, K.; Tahara, I.; Jieying, W.; et al. Spindle cell oncocytoma of adenohypophysis: Report of a case and immunohistochemical review of literature. Pathol. -Res. Pract. 2015, 212, 222–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zygourakis, C.C.; Rolston, J.D.; Lee, H.S.; Partow, C.; Kunwar, S.; Aghi, M.K. Pituicytomas and spindle cell oncocytomas: Modern case series from the University of California, San Francisco. Pituitary 2015, 18, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mu, Q.; Yu, J.; Qu, L.; Hu, X.; Gao, H.; Liu, P.; Zheng, X.; Sun, Y.; Huang, H. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis: Two case reports and a review of the literature. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 871–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rotman, J.A.; Kucharczyk, W.; Zadeh, G.; Kiehl, T.-R.; Al-Ahmadi, H. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis: A case report illustrating its natural history with 8-year observation and a review of the literature. Clin. Imaging 2014, 38, 499–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fujisawa, H.; Tohma, Y.; Muramatsu, N.; Kida, S.; Kaizaki, Y.; Tamamura, H. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the ade-nohypophysis with marked hypervascularity. Neurol. Med. Chir. 2012, 52, 594–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alexandrescu, S.; Brown, R.E.; Tandon, N.; Bhattacharjee, M.B. Neuron precursor features of spindle cell oncocy-toma of adenohypophysis. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2012, 42, 123–128. [Google Scholar]
  48. Singh, G.; Agarwal, S.; Sharma, M.C.; Suri, V.; Sarkar, C.; Garg, A.; Kale, S.S. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis: Report of a rare case and review of literature. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2012, 114, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chandler, J.; Ogiwara, H.; Shafizadeh, S.; Dubner, S.; Raizer, J. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the pituitary and pituicytoma: Two tumors mimicking pituitary adenoma. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2011, 2, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Romero-Rojas, A.E.; Diaz-Perez, J.A.; Amaro, D.; Lozano, J.M. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis: A rare tumor mimicking pituitary aden. J. Of. Clinical. Pathol. 2011, 64, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vajtai, I.; Beck, J.; Kappeler, A.; Hewer, E. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the pituitary gland with follicle-like component: Organotypic differentiation to support its origin from folliculo-stellate cells. Acta Neuropathol. 2011, 122, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mlika, M.; Azouz, H.; Chelly, I.; Ben Saïd, I.; Jemel, H.; Haouet, S.; Zitouna, M.; Kchir, N. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis in a woman: A case report and review of the literature. J. Med. Case Rep. 2011, 5, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Matyja, E.; Maksymowicz, M.; Grajkowska, W.; Olszewski, W.; Zieliński, G. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adeno-hypophysis—A clinicopathological and ultrastructural study of two cases. Folia Neuropathol. 2010, 48, 175–184. [Google Scholar]
  54. Demssie, Y.N.; Joseph, J.; Dawson, T.; Roberts, G.; de Carpentier, J.; Howell, S. Recurrent spindle cell oncocytoma of the pituitary, a case report and review of literature. Pituitary 2011, 14, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Borota, O.C.; Scheithauer, B.; Fougner, S.L.; Hald, J.; Ramm-Pettersen, J.; Bollerslev, J. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis: Report of a case with marked cellular atypia and recurrence despite adjuvant treatment. Clin. Neuropathol. 2009, 28, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Coiré, C.; Horvath, E.; Smyth, H.; Kovacs, K. Rapidly recurring folliculostellate cell tumor of the adenohypophysis with the morphology of a spindle cell oncocytoma: Case report with electron microscopic studies. Clin. Neuropathol. 2009, 28, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Farooq, M.U.; Bhatt, A.; Chang, H.T. Teaching NeuroImage: Spindle cell oncocytoma of the pituitary gland. Neurology 2008, 71, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vajtai, I.; Sahli, R.; Kappeler, A. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis: Report of a case with a 16-year follow-up. Pathol. Res. Pr. 2006, 202, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dahiya, S.; Sarkar, C.; Hedley-Whyte, E.T.; Sharma, M.C.; Zervas, N.T.; Sridhar, E.; Louis, D.N. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis: Report of two cases. Acta Neuropathol. 2005, 110, 97–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kloub, O.; Perry, A.; Tu, P.-H.; Lipper, M.; Lopes, M.B. Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis: Report of two recurrent cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005, 29, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Preoperative MRI scans demonstrating a homogenous mass in the pituitary gland. The MRI also showed that the mass was compressing the optic chiasm and was encasing the carotid arteries. (A) T1 MRI sagittal view; (B) T1 MRI coronal view; (C) T2 MRI coronal view.
Figure 1. Preoperative MRI scans demonstrating a homogenous mass in the pituitary gland. The MRI also showed that the mass was compressing the optic chiasm and was encasing the carotid arteries. (A) T1 MRI sagittal view; (B) T1 MRI coronal view; (C) T2 MRI coronal view.
Neurolint 17 00016 g001
Figure 2. Coronal reconstruction of the pre-op (A) and post-op (B) post gadolinium T1-weighted images. The post-operative MRI confirms that optic chiasm has been decompressed and gross total resection obtained. There is evidence of minimally enhancing intrasellar material that is likely gel foam used for skull base reconstruction.
Figure 2. Coronal reconstruction of the pre-op (A) and post-op (B) post gadolinium T1-weighted images. The post-operative MRI confirms that optic chiasm has been decompressed and gross total resection obtained. There is evidence of minimally enhancing intrasellar material that is likely gel foam used for skull base reconstruction.
Neurolint 17 00016 g002
Figure 3. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) 20× showing spindled cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm arranged in nests and short fascicles.
Figure 3. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) 20× showing spindled cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm arranged in nests and short fascicles.
Neurolint 17 00016 g003
Figure 4. IHC: The neoplastic cells are positive for (A) TTF1 (10×), (B) synaptophysin (10×), (C) CD56 (10×), and (D) S100 (10×).
Figure 4. IHC: The neoplastic cells are positive for (A) TTF1 (10×), (B) synaptophysin (10×), (C) CD56 (10×), and (D) S100 (10×).
Neurolint 17 00016 g004
Table 1. Review of the literature (2002–2024).
Table 1. Review of the literature (2002–2024).
AgeSexClinical PresentationDiagnostic ImagingIHCSurgeryPost-Op RadiotherapyOutcomes
Hsieh et al., 2024 [8]69MaleFacial pain and mild decrease in visual acuity Sellar and suprasellar lesionS-100 protein, EMA and TTF-1Transsphenoidal partial resection
Tan-pink, soft, and well-circumscribed mass
Not described (ND)Uneventful post-op period, follow-up ND
68FemaleBi-temporal visual defectLarge sellar mass with mass effect over brainstem and optic chiasmS-100 protein, EMA(E29) and TTF-1Transsphenoidal partial resectionYes
500 ×5 cGy
2-year follow-up MRI showed partial size decreased of the tumor
Joshi et al., 2024 [2]71MaleNDSellar mass, 4 mmNDTranssphenoidal resectionND8-week follow-up no headache or visual disturbances
Chang et al., 2023 [11]31MaleBilateral vision loss—temporal defectSellar mass with suprasellar extensionEMA, S-100, and TTF-1Transsphenoidal total resection, mass was yellow and soft with easy bleedingNDND
Kunihiro et al., 2023 [4]53MaleHeadache and diplopiaSellar mass with suprasellar extensionS-100, TTF-1 and vimentinTranssphenoidal total resection, mass was yellow and soft
significant bleeding
NoNo enlargement of residual tumor at 1-year follow-up
Shimizu et al., 2022 [12]40sFemaleHeadacheLesion with cystic area in the intra-suprasellar regionTTF-1, S-100 protein, vimentin, GFAP, EMATranssphenoidal resection, tumor was fibrous and easy to bleedNDNo recurrence at 3 years
Tena-Suck et al., 2022 [13]66MaleHeadache, chiasmatic syndrome, and bitemporal hemianopsiaSellar lesion and a left frontal cystic lesionImentin, pit-1, PTTG-1, TTF-1, S100NDNDND
Abdulrazeq et al., 2021 [14]74FemalePersistent headaches and vertigoSellar mass with lateral extensionVimentin, annexin A1, S-100, and TTF-1Transsphenoidal partial resectionNoNo progression at 6-month follow-up
Hasegawa et al., 2021 [5]49FemaleGalactorrhea, numbness, headacheSellar mass with slight suprasellar extensionS-100, TTF-1, and GFAPTranssphenoidal partial resection
Grayish, firm, markedly adhesive
NoRadiosurgery at 20 months for slight tumor progression, MRI at 39 months showed tumor stability
55MaleFatigue, muscle
weakness, weight loss
Sellar mass with suprasellar extensionS-100 protein, TTF-1Transsphenoidal partial resection
Firm, hypervascular
NoGK at 12 months for residual
78MaleFatigue, visual deficit, hyponatremiaSellar mass with suprasellar extensionS-100 protein, TTF-1Transsphenoidal partial resectionNoGK at 7 months for residual
59FemaleFatigue, hyponatremiaSellar mass with suprasellar extensionS-100 protein, TTF-1Transsphenoidal partial resectionNoGK at 7 months for residual
56MalehyponatremiaSellar mass with suprasellar extensionS-100 protein, TTF-1Transsphenoidal partial resectionNoTranssphenoidal surgery at 77 months for recurrence
66FemaleNausea, vomiting, weight lossSellar mass with suprasellar extensionS-100 protein, TTF-1Transsphenoidal gross total resectionNoGK at 31 months for recurrence
Kim et al., 2021 [15]42FemaleBitemporal hemianopsiaSella mass with suprasellar extensionVimentin, EMA, S-100 protein, TTF-1, and galectin-3Transsphenoidal partial resection
Highly vascular, pale-yellow and solid
NoRegrown mass at 4 months requiring a second surgery
Kottangal et al., 2021 [16]61FemaleHyponatremia and temporal field cutSellar mass with suprasellar extension EMA, S-100 protein, TTF-1Transsphenoidal resection
Grey-white, friable, and soft
NDND
Taka et al., 2021 [17]75MaleBitemporal hemianopsiaSellar mass with suprasellar extension NDTranssphenoidal gross total resectionNDFollow-up on the eighth postoperative day showed improvement of peripheral vision.
Tariciotti et al., 2020 [18]64FemaleBitemporal hemianopia, hyposmia, headacheSellar mass with suprasellar extension causing hydrocephalusS100, neuron-specific Enolase, TTF-1Transsphenoidal partial resection heavy intraoperative bleedingNDRecurrence at 5 months, partial resection surgery again with close follow-up
Samadian et al., 2020 [19]8MaleVDSellar and suprasellar massEMA, vimentin, and S-100Transsphenoidal gross total resectionNoNo signs of progression at 2 year follow-up
Borg et al.,
2020 [20]
55FemaleDizzinessSellar mass with suprasellar extensionTTF-1, EMA and S-100Subtotal transsphenoidal resectionNoProgression at 8 years requiring radiotherapy
71MaleIncidentalSellar massTTF-1, EMA, S100Subtotal transsphenoidal resection
Tough, grey and gelatinous.
NDResidual remained stable in size for four years
Li et al.,
2020 [21]
57MaleVisual defect and neck pain Sellar massEMA, TTF-1, S100, vimentin, annexin1, and SSTR2Total transsphenoidal resectionNDPatient recovered well and had return of normal vision
Chainey et al., 2020 [22]49MaleConfusion, memory loss, and increased drowsinessSellar mass with suprasellar extensionNDNDNDRecurrence/growth at 4 and 5 years requiring two further resections
Akyoldas et al., 2019 [6]55FemaleVDSellar massNDTranssphenoidal resectionYes
14 Gy
Stable at 84 months
41MaleLoss of body hair, infertilitySellar massNDTranssphenoidal resection Yes
12 Gy
Stable at 51 months
61MaleHeadache—VDSellar massNDTranssphenoidal resectionYes
14 Gy
Stable at 47 months
50MaleVDSellar massNDTranssphenoidal resectionYes
14 Gy
Stable at 41 months
56MaleVDSellar massNDTranssphenoidal resectionYes
14 Gy
Stable at 36 months
Sollfrank et al., 2019 [23]38FemaleNDMass in right parasellar regionNDHistory of six surgical excisions, radiation and chemo radiation for local recurrence of SCO.
Most recent treatment was vemurafenib (BRAF inhibitor)
NoStable—no progression on BRAF inhibitor at two-year follow-up
Yip et al., 2019 [24]28FemaleSevere headache and blurred vision, decreased right visual acuity, visual field defects, low cortisolSellar mass with suprasellar extensionTTF-1, EMA, Annexin A1Transsphenoidal total resection
mass was yellow and soft
NDND
Cole et al., 2019 [25]64MaleHeadache, fatigue, vision changes, Endocrine abnormalitySellar massTTF-1, EMA, GFAP, S100Transsphenoidal total resectionNDNo recurrence at follow-up
70MaleHeadache, fatigue, vision changes, Endocrine abnormalitySellar massTTF-1, EMA, GFAP, S100Transsphenoidal total resectionNDNo recurrence at follow-up
27FemaleEndocrine abnormalitySellar massTTF-1, EMA, GFAP, S100Transsphenoidal total resectionNDNo recurrence at follow-up
Guerrero-Pérez et al., 2019 [3]74FemaleVDSellar massTTF-1, S100, VIMNoneNDND
69FemaleWeaknessSellar/suprasellar massTTF-1, S100, VIM, CD56Total transsphenoidal resectionNDND
74FemaleNausea, vomiting and confusion Sellar/suprasellar massTTF-1, S100, VIM, GFAPSubtotal transsphenoidal resectionNDND
60MaleVDSellar/suprasellar massNDSubtotal transcranial resectionNDND
60MaleVDSellar/suprasellar massNDSubtotal transsphenoidal resectionNDND
62FemaleVDSellar mass NDTotal transsphenoidal resectionNDND
Witte et al., 2018 [26]61MaleHeadaches, bilateral retrobulbar pressure sensation, light sensitivity, and drowsinessSellar massVIM, Gal3, Bcl-2Transsphenoidal partial resectionNoThree reoperations were required for multiple tumor reccurences along with radiation and chemotherapy
Larsen et al., 2018 [10]66FemaleDizziness, nausea, diaphoresisSellar massEMA, TTF-1, S100Transsphenoidal partial resectionNDStable residual tumor at 100 months
50MaleDizzinessSellar massEMA, TTF-1, S100Transsphenoidal partial resectionNDStable residual tumor at 30 months
63MaleVDSellar massTTF-1, S100Transsphenoidal partial resectionNDRepeat resection (3 months after surgery); craniotomy for further progression (42 months post repeat procedure)
59FemaleVDSellar massEMA, TTF-1, S100Transsphenoidal partial resectionNDRecurrence at 6 years, treated w/ repeat resection, GK; stable at 79 months
77MaleVDSellar massEMA, TTF-1, S100Transsphenoidal gross total resectionNDStable after GTR (12 mos)—no complications
56FemaleEyeball heaviness, nausea, dizzinessSellar massEMA, TTF-1, S100Transsphenoidal partial resectionNDRadiotherapy for residual tumor; stable at 38 months
Gupta et al., 2018 [27]28FemaleBilat vision loss, headaches, amenorrhea, galactorrheaSellar mass with suprasellar extensionEMA, S-100, and TTF-1Transsphenoidal resectionNDAt 7 month follow-up, she was free of headache and galactorrhea and had a normal vision
Yoshida et al., 2018 [28]69FemaleBitemporal hemianopsiaSellar tumor with suprasellar extensionTTF-1Subtotal transsphenoidal resection. Tumor was extremely hypervascularNDNo regrowth found at 6 months
Nagata et al., 2018 [29]40FemaleVDSellar and suprasellar mass.EMA, S-100, TTF-1, GFAB, VimentinTotal transsphenoidal resection
Hypervascularized lesion
NoND
Sosa et al., 2018 [30]60MaleVD, fatigue, decreased libido, and erectile dysfunction for the past 8 monthsSellar massVimentin, S100 protein, and TTF-1Transsphenoidal partial resectionNoRadiotherapy after 5-month follow-up
No residual or recurrent tumor was observed at 4-year follow-up
Xie et al., 2017 [31]60MaleNausea, vomiting, fatigue and syncopal episodesSellar and suprasellar massVimentin, S-100, EMA and TTF-1Transsphenoidal surgical resection
Vascular whitish-yellow mass with soft consistency
NoNo evidence of tumor recurrence after 18-month follow-up
Rafiq et al., 2017 [32]61MaleVD, fatigue and weight lossSellar lesion with compression of the optic chiasmVimentin, S-100, EMA and TTF-1Subtotal trans sphenoidal resection
Firm, fibrous and greyish
No3-year follow-up, scan showed tumor progression requiring surgery, GTR was achieved
69FemaleRapidly progressive visual deteriorationLarge sellar tumor with a suprasellar extensionS-100, EMA and TTF-1Transphenoidal resection
Firm, greyish in color, moderately vascular
NoAfter 6-month follow-up, no progression
Osman et al.,
2017 [33]
56MaleHeadache, vomiting, neck pain, back pain, and reduced level of consciousnessSellar and suprasellar massVimentin, S-100, EMA and TTF-1, GFAPSub-frontal craniotomy.
Profuse bleeding limited the surgical resection.
Yes No tumor recurrence at six-month follow-up
Manoranjan et al., 2017 [34]60MaleTemporal loss in both visual field quadrants of his left eyeSellar and suprasellar mass S100, Vimentin, Bcl2, CD56, TTF-1Subtotal transnasal transsphenoidal resectionNDNo tumor progression at most recent follow-up
Sali et al., 2017 [35]64MaleDrooping of the left eyelid for 2 months and left temporal hemianopiaSellar and suprasellar lesionS100, synaptophysin, EMA, TTF-1Transsphenoidal resectionNDND
Billeci et al.,
2017 [36]
61MaleHeadache and clinical signs of mild hypopituitarismSellar-suprasellar mass involving the sphenoidal sinus and chiasmatic cistern.Vimentin, S-100, TTF-1Subtotal transnasal transsphenoidal resection.
Tumor was firm and highly vascularized
NDAfter 14 months from the second surgery, no increase in residual tumor size has been documented
65FemaleVD and severe headachesellar-supraasellar mass with a size ofVimentin, S-100, TTF-1Subtotal transnasal transsphenoidal resection.
The tumor was firm, fibrotic and highly vascularized
NDNo documented recurrences after 28 months of follow-up
Kong et al.,
2017 [37]
30MaleHeadaches, fatigue, diplopia, and impaired visual field and acuity for 6 monthsSuprasellar and parasellar lesonVimentin, CD68, CD34, Nestin, GFAP, Desmin, SMA, AE1/AE3, and S-100 proteinSubtotal transnasal transsphenoidal resection.
Hypervascular
NDTwo more resections were done for tumor recurrence/progression
Hagel et al.,
2017 [38]
65FemaleNDNDS100, CD68,
TTF, Vimentin, neuron specific enolase
NDNDND
41FemaleNDNDS100, CD68,
TTF, GFAP
NDNDND
64FemaleNDNDVimentin, EMA, S100, TTFNDNDND
53MaleNDNDVimentin, EMA, MAP2, S100, CD68,
TTF
NDNDND
Custodio et al., 2016 [39]60MaleNVD/Fatigue, hyponatremia, panhypopituitarism, low cortisolSellar mass with suprasellar extensionVimentin, EMA, S-100, and TTF-1Transsphenoidal partial resection
yellow white mass
significant bleeding
NDNo growth at 18 months
Hasiloglu et al., 2016 [40]40MalePanhypopituitarismIntra-suprasellar mass and enlargement of the sella turcicaVimentin, galectin-3, EMA and S-100Transsphenoidal partial resectionNoRecurrence after one year, repeat surgery
60MaleHeadache, visual blurringIntra-suprasellar mass and enlargement of the sella turcicaVimentin, galectin-3, EMA and S-100Transsphenoidal partial resectionNoND
55MaleHeadache, visual blurringIntra-suprasellar mass and enlargement of the sella turcicaVimentin, galectin-3, EMA and S-100Transsphenoidal partial resectionNoND
Guadagno
et al., 2016 [41]
77MaleHeadache and temporal hemianopsia of the right eyeSellar mass with suprasellar extension EMA, Vimentin, S100 protein, Galectin-3, and TTF-1, and focal positivity for Bcl-2Transsphenoidal total resectionND14-month follow-up with no evidence of recurrence
Vuong et al., 2016 [42]70MaleVisual disturbance and headacheSellar-suprasellar
lesion
Vimentin, TTF-1, EMA and galectin-3Transsphenoidal partial resectionNDTumor recurrence not detected at first follow-up exam
Zygourakis
et al., 2015 [43]
55FemaleHeadachesSellar massAMA, EMA, S100, GFAP, TTF1Transsphenoidal resectionNDNo reccurence on follow-up
31FemaleBitemporal hemianopsiaSellar and suprasellar lesionTTF1, EMA and AMATranssphenoidal partial resectionNoMRI at six months showed stable residual tumor
Mu et al.,
2015 [44]
35FemaleAmenorrhea, lactation, decreased visual acuitySuprasellar round massVimentin, EMA, S-100 and TTF-1Frontotemporal craniotomy, complete removalNDNo recurrence at 21 months
62FemaleNo clear symptoms or signsSuprasellar massVimentin, EMA, S-100 and TTF-1Right trans-pterional craniotomy, complete removalNDNo recurrence at 15 months
Rotman et al.,
2014 [45]
88MaleFatigue and decreased vision2-cm intrasellar mass with suprasellar extensionVimentinTranssphenoidal partial resectionNDND
Fujisawa et al.k., 2012 [46]68MaleUnsteady gait, malaise, depression, panhypopituitarism and visual field defectsSellar mass with suprasellar extensionEMA, S-100, and vimentinTranssphenoidal partial resectionYes
50 Gy
1.5-year follow-up showed tumor progression, partial resection again with close follow-up
Alexandrescu et al., 2012 [47]24FemaleHeadaches, amenorrhea and left superior visual field disturbance of the left eyeSellar massEMA, S100, vimentinSublabial trans-septal approach, total resection
Yellow and more firm
NDNo recurrence at 6 months
Singh et al., 2012 [48]68MaleHead and visual deficitsSellar–suprasellar mass Vimentin, S100, and EMASublabial transsphenoidal partial resectionNDND
Ogiwara et al., 2011 [49]39MaleHeadache,
loss of stamina and libido, bitemporal hemianopia, and polyuria
Suprasellar lesion with the compression of the optic nervesTTF-1, EMA, S-100, and galectin-3Transcranial
partial resection
Yes
5040 cGy
Recurrence at 9 months requiring repeat surgery. Transsphenoidal resection for second recurrence.
No evidence of recurrence at 1-year follow-up since last surgery.
Romero-Rojas et al., 2011 [50]42FemaleOligomenorrheaSellar massVimentin, S10, EMA, and antimitochondrial antibody MU213-UC clone 131Transsphenoidal resectionNDND
Vajtai et al., 2011 [51]55FemalePanhypopituitarismIntra- and suprasellar tumor S100 protein, vimentin, Bcl-2, and TTF-1Transsphenoidal total resectionNDND
Mlika et al., 2011 [52]45FemaleHeadache and visual deficitPituitary mass with suprasellar extensionVimentin, S100, EMA and TTF-1Transsphenoidal total resectionNoNo recurrence at 3 months
Borges et al., 2011 [9]70FemaleVisual deficit in left eyeIntrasellar and suprasellar massVimentin and S100Sublabial gross total, transsphenoidal resectionNDRecurrence requiring second transsphenoidal subtotal resection
Matyja et al., 2010 [53]63FemaleHeadache, vertigo, fatigue, bitemporal hemianopsia, nausea/vomiting and sleepinessPituitary mass with suprasellar extensionVimentin, S100, EMATranssphenoidal total resectionNDNo recurrence at 28-month follow-up
65FemalePituitary hormone insufficiencySellar mass with suprasellar extension Vimentin, S100, EMA and galactin-3Frontal right craniotomy gross sectionNDNo recurrence at twenty months
Demssie et al.,
2011 [54]
59MaleBitemporal hemianopsia, panhypopituitarism, weight loss, vomiting and tirednessSellar mass with suprasellar extensionS100 and EMATranssphenoidal partial resectionNDRecurrence at 9 months requiring repeat surgery with radiotherapy
Borota et al., 2009 [55]55FemaleWeight loss, headachesSellar massVimentin, S100 and galactin-3Transsphenoidal partial resectionNoGrowth of the tumor at 1 year requiring radiotherapy
Coiré et al., 2009 [56]63FemaleWeight loss, anorexia, fatigue, headaches, visual deficitsLarge sellar and suprasellar lesion, 3 cm in diameterS100, vimentin, EMA and gal-3Transsphenoidal resectionNoGrowth at five months requiring second surgery and radiotherapy
Farooq et al., 2008 [57]76MaleWeakness and headacheSellar massS100 and EMATranssphenoidal partial resectionYesNo growth at 2-year follow-up
Vajtai et al., 2006 [58]48FemaleFatigue, exercise intolerance, and visual deficitsSellar mass with supra and parasellar extension S100 protein, vimentin, and EMATranssphenoidal total resectionNoNo recurrence at 16-year follow-up
Dahiya et al., 2005 [59]26MaleHeadache, blurred vision in the right eye, nausea, vomiting and impotenceSellar massS100 and EMAPterional craniotomy with subtotal resectionYes
54 Gy over a period of 2 months
No growth over 7 years
55FemaleHeadache and visual deficits6.5 × 3.3 × 4 cm sellar and parasellar massS100 and EMATranssphenoidal total resectionNDNo recurrence at 6 months
Kloub et al.,
2005 [60]
71FemaleBilateral vision lossSellar massVimentin, S-100 protein, neuron specific enolase, and EMATranssphenoidal resectionNDRecurrence at 3 years
76MaleEpistaxisSellar massEMA and S-100Transsphenoidal resectionNDRecurrence at 3 years (repeat surgery and radiotherapy) and 10 years (third resection surgery)
Roncaroli et al., 2002 [1]Mean age was 62FemalehypopituitarismSellar mass with suprasellar extensionS100, vimentin, EMA and gal-3Transsphenoidal gross total resectionNDNo recurrence at follow-up (average follow-up of 35.4 months)
-FemalehypopituitarismSellar mass with suprasellar extensionS100, vimentin, EMA and gal-3Transsphenoidal gross total resectionNDNo recurrence at follow-up
-MalehypopituitarismSellar mass with suprasellar extensionS100, vimentin, EMA and gal-3Transsphenoidal gross total resectionNDNo recurrence at follow-up
-Malehypopituitarism, visual deficitSellar mass with suprasellar extensionS100, vimentin, EMA and gal-3Transsphenoidal gross total resectionNDNo recurrence at follow-up
-Malehypopituitarism, visual deficitSellar mass with suprasellar extensionS100, vimentin, EMA and gal-3Transsphenoidal gross total resectionNDNo recurrence at follow-up
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hammond, J.; Gagne, Z.; Mitrovic, B.; Priola, S.M. Pituitary Spindle Cell Oncocytoma: More than a Grade 1 Tumor? Neurol. Int. 2025, 17, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17020016

AMA Style

Hammond J, Gagne Z, Mitrovic B, Priola SM. Pituitary Spindle Cell Oncocytoma: More than a Grade 1 Tumor? Neurology International. 2025; 17(2):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17020016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hammond, Jonathan, Zacharie Gagne, Bojana Mitrovic, and Stefano M. Priola. 2025. "Pituitary Spindle Cell Oncocytoma: More than a Grade 1 Tumor?" Neurology International 17, no. 2: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17020016

APA Style

Hammond, J., Gagne, Z., Mitrovic, B., & Priola, S. M. (2025). Pituitary Spindle Cell Oncocytoma: More than a Grade 1 Tumor? Neurology International, 17(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17020016

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop