Next Article in Journal
Novel Battery Module Design for Increased Resource Efficiency
Previous Article in Journal
Path-Planning Strategy for Lane Changing Based on Adaptive-Grid Risk-Fields of Autonomous Vehicles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research on Micro-Mobility with a Focus on Electric Scooters within Smart Cities

Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 708 33 Ostrava, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
World Electr. Veh. J. 2022, 13(10), 176; https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj13100176
Submission received: 17 August 2022 / Revised: 2 September 2022 / Accepted: 13 September 2022 / Published: 22 September 2022

Abstract

:
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, an increasing number of people prefer individual single-track vehicles for urban transport. Long-range super-lightweight small electric vehicles are preferred due to the rising cost of electricity. It is difficult for new researchers and experts to obtain information on the current state of solutions in addressing the issues described within the Smart Cities platform. The research on the current state of the development of long-range super-lightweight small electric vehicles for intergenerational urban E-mobility using intelligent infrastructure within Smart Cities was carried out with the prospect of using the information learned in a pilot study. The study will be applied to resolving the traffic service of the Poruba city district within the statutory city of Ostrava in the Czech Republic. The main reason for choosing this urban district is the fact that it has the largest concentration of secondary schools and is the seat of the VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava. The project investigators see secondary and university students as the main target group of users of micro-mobility devices based on super-lightweight and small electric vehicles.

1. Introduction

The main objective of the article is to investigate the current state of the research, analysis, and design of a solution for the maximally efficient and comprehensive concept of urban E-mobility based on small lightweight passenger vehicles (including the possibility of transporting smaller loads). This would bring a qualitatively new level both in terms of the design and in terms the parameters of the vehicles themselves and, at the same time, in terms of their operation, charging, and management.
With the transition to the urban Micro-Mobility (MM) model in Smart-Cities (SCs)-as-a-service with sharing systems, Personal Lightweight Electric Vehicles (PLEVs) are becoming a popular means of transport in cities [1]. Micro-mobility affects first- and last-mile travel in urban areas [2]. In the aftermath of the emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, it has become clear that urban mobility plans need to be modified to reduce the use of public transport and the crowding of people in traffic and, at the same time, avoid traffic congestion by, among other things, encouraging urban residents to stop using private motor vehicles. From this perspective, a reorganization of cities (e.g., Milan) is recommended, both in view of unpredictable environmental sustainability requirements and new mobility needs that require the promotion of bicycles and PLEVs, e.g., electric scooters [3]. PLEVs are a phenomenon that can be currently observed in cities and are intended to be an environmentally friendly form of transport. Analyses conducted show that the dynamic growth of PLEVs in cities will result in an increased demand for electricity distribution, which cities that are developing according to the concept of sustainable development must take into account [4]. Ciociola proposed an approach that uses open data to create a demand model for e-scooter sharing and charging (a flexible, data-driven demand model using modulated Poisson processes for time estimation and Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) for spatial estimation). This approach uses, together with a configurable e-scooter sharing simulator, other input information such as the effect of the number of scooters and the cost of managing their charging in the cities of Minneapolis and Louisville, USA [1]. However, E-Scooters (ESs) face challenges in urban management, such as traffic regulations, public safety, parking regulations, and liability issues for their operation [2]. The rapid infiltration of stand-up ESs as a mobility option has left cities in a quandary, as they must deal with regulating them and planning for their sudden abandonment at unreserved locations [5]. Garikapati introduced a new paradigm for evaluating mobility options in an urban area using the Mobility and Energy Productivity (MEP) metric. The MEP measures accessibility and appropriately weighs it against the travel time, cost, and energy of each mode of transportation that provides access to options in a given location [6]. In the face of new “disruptive” mobilities, there is a need to (a) build on existing evidence to develop new regulations that address the “who, when, and where” rules for the introduction of new mobilities (such as e-bikes and e-scooters), whose health impacts can be easily predicted [7] Goli proposed a two-stage methodology based on the energy savings gained by optimal network reconductoring was developed for the sizing and allocation of electric vehicle (EV) charging load at the residential locations in urban distribution systems. [8]. Diaz-Parra proposed a mathematical approach for resolving the electric School Bus Routing Problem (SBRP), which aims at minimizing the cost and optimizing the time and cost of transporting students [9]. Holyoak et al. scrutinized what it would take to turn a city into a world-class sustainable city through specific measures that would accelerate the use of active transportation, with a high number of households and industries equipped with solar and photovoltaic smart fast-charging station systems at strategic locations for electric-assisted non-motorized transportation and for low-power transportation [10].
The content of the article is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the materials and methods for conducting the research. Section 3 presents the results obtained from the research. Section 4 provides a discussion of the findings, and Section 5 provides the conclusions of the research.

2. Materials and Methods

The PRISMA method and the Kofod-Petersen method were used to extract useful information from the systematic review. The PRISMA 2020 statement includes reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesize studies. The structure and presentation of the items were modified to facilitate implementation with a 27-item checklist [11]. A systematic review has three main phases: planning, conducting, and reporting. Each of these phases is divided into several steps. The first phase involves planning the review and can be broken down into the following steps: identification of the need for a review, commissioning a review, specifying the research question(s), developing a review protocol, and evaluating the review protocol. This second phase is the actual review of the literature and consists of the following steps: identification of research, selection of primary studies, study quality assessment, data extraction and monitoring, and data synthesis. The last phase deals with how to disseminate the newly acquired knowledge and consists of three steps: specifying the dissemination strategy, formatting the main report, and evaluating the report [12]. In addition, the authors asked the research questions, determined the search process, identified the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the publications, selected individual studies, performed the data extraction and synthesis, and determined the risk of bias, as outlined in the following subsections [13].

2.1. Research Questions

The aim of this systematic review is to determine the possible solutions for the development of long-range super-lightweight small electric vehicles for the intergenerational urban E-mobility in Smart Cities concept. The steps to determine the current status of the solution are as follows:
  • Analyze the requirements and solutions of the needs for the development of a micro-mobility concept in Smart Cities;
  • Analyze the requirements and solutions of the needs for the development of the concept of electric vehicle charging while driving;
  • Analyze the requirements and solutions of the needs for the development of the electric scooter charger concept;
  • Analyze the requirements and solutions of the needs for the development of the management and sharing of the electric scooter concept;
  • Analyze the requirements and solutions of the needs for the development of the concept of E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Homes).
A number of questions were identified for this systematic review:
  • RQ1: What technological solutions and innovations can be used to develop the concept of micro-mobility in Smart Cities?
  • RQ2: What technological solutions and innovations can be used for the development of the concept of electric vehicle charging while driving?
  • RQ3: What technological solutions and innovations can be used to develop the electric scooter charger concept?
  • RQ4: What technological solutions and innovations can be used to develop the management and sharing of the electric scooter concept?
  • RQ5: What technological solutions and innovations can be used to develop the E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Homes) concept?

2.2. Search Process

The Web of Science scientific database [13] was used for the search. The search process started on 16 March 2022 and ended on 4 July 2022. The search results were stored in the Web of Science database, and the selected publications were uploaded and imported into the Endnote online reference manager. The main search keywords were “Smart Cities”, “micro-mobility”, “electric vehicle charging while driving”, “charger for electric scooter”, “management and sharing of electric scooters”, and “E-mobility within Smart City (Smart Home)”.

2.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

In order to refine the search and select relevant literature, inclusion and exclusion criteria were used in the search (Table 1).

2.4. Study Selection

The criteria for article selection included a review of the document title, abstract, and skimming of the article. In addition, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were also used in accordance with the PRISMA flowchart (Figure 1).
Specifically, 3693 publications were found for the keywords “Smart Cities mobility”. After specifying “electric mobility”, 712 publications were found. After entering the keywords “micro-mobility”, 63 publications were chosen, from which 38 publications (Table 2) were selected for the study of the “Smart Cities micro-mobility” topic.

2.5. Data Extraction and Synthesis

General information for the evaluation of the articles should include information on a needs analysis and innovative solutions in the areas of:
  • Smart Cities and micro-mobility.
  • Smart Cities and electric vehicle charging while driving.
  • Charger for an electric scooter.
  • Management and sharing of electric scooters.
  • E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Homes).
For each of the identified topics, the necessity to address the needs and individual requirements of the above-described area is described in the context of the current state of the solution in the development of super-lightweight small electric vehicles with a long range for intergenerational urban E-mobility concepts within Smart Cities. Furthermore, a table was created in the text—an overview of the tasks addressed within each topic in the development of super-lightweight small electric vehicles with a long range for intergenerational urban E-mobility concepts within Smart Cities.
The data obtained from the selected literature were tabulated in Excel according to the following structure:
  • Title
  • Authors
  • Corporate Authors
  • Editors
  • Book Editors
  • Source Title
  • Publication Date
  • Publication Year
  • Volume Issue Part Number
  • Supplement
  • Special Issue
  • Beginning Page
  • Ending Page
  • Article Number
  • DOI
  • Conference Title
  • Conference Date
  • Total Citations
  • Average per Year

2.6. Risk of Bias

The risk of the distortion of the objective information obtained from the retrieved publications may be influenced by the specified years of the selected literature in the interval between 2008 and 2022. Another possible factor influencing the distortion is the subjective view of the authors of the article on the area addressed and the chosen selection process. Last but not least, the effect of the bias of selecting literature only from the Web of Knowledge scientific database should also be mentioned.

3. Results

This section presents the results from the data collected from RQ1 to RQ5 listed in Section 2. RQ1 and RQ2 provide a general perspective on the issues analyzed. The focus on the analyzed area of technological solutions and innovations for the development of the charger for electric scooters and management and sharing of electric scooter concepts is established by RQ3 and RQ4. The context of E-mobility solutions within Smart Homes in Smart Cities is asked by question RQ5.
In the following text, the technical terms PHEV, PLEV, BEV, EV, and HEV are used: “PHEV—Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle”, “PLEV—Personal Light Electric Vehicle”, “BEV—Battery Electric Vehicle”, “EV—Electric Vehicle “, “HEV—Hybrid Electric Vehicle”. Electric Vehicles (EVs) move using an electric motor instead of using an Internal Combustion Engine (ICE). Electric vehicles require a charging port and outlet to charge their batteries fully (BEVs). In other vehicles, such as conventional hybrids (HEVs), the engine requires both fuel and electricity to run. This is the same for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) [14].

3.1. Smart Cities and Micro-Mobility

Interest in publishing on the topic of Smart Cities and micro-mobility according to the number of publications began in 2011. The highest number of publications, 12, was reached in 2019 (Figure 2).
The total number of 63 publications covering the research area that focus on the described topic includes, among others, the following disciplines: Computer Science, Engineering, Transportation, Telecommunications, Environmental Sciences Ecology, Science Technology Other Topics, and others (Table 3).
In terms of affiliations, the topic is, among others, addressed by: Delft University of Technology, Universidad de Malaga, Czech Technical University Prague, Enzo Ferrari Engn Dept, Univ Nacl Patagonia Austral, Universidad Publica de Navarra (Table 4).
Countries/regions that support research on the topic include Spain, the USA, Germany, Italy, England, Mexico, The Netherlands, and others (Table 5).
An overview of the solved tasks within the topic “Smart Cities and micro-mobility” is as follows:
  • Sharing electric scooters in SCs [1];
  • Resolving problems in city administration, such as traffic regulations, public safety, parking regulations, and liability issues of running MM in SCs [2,3,5];
  • Adequate distribution of electrical energy for MM in SCs [4];
  • Metrics for evaluating Mobility and Energy Productivity (MEP) in SCs [6];
  • Assessment of the health impact of operating electric scooters in SCs [7];
  • Optimization of electric car charging in residential SHs in SCs [8];
  • Sharing MM resources in SCs [15,16];
  • Analyses of the use of PLEVs in public transport using quantitative and qualitative indicators in SCs [17,18];
  • Sustainability of PLEVs in SCs [19];
  • The use of mobile phones during PLEV [20] operations for tracing and localization in SCs [21];
  • Electric carsharing and micro-mobility [22];
  • Environment Friendly booster bike [23];
  • Optimization of the PLEV driving solution in SCs [24];
  • Legislation and legitimization of the conflict within the framework of the operation of MM in SCs [25];
  • The Infrastructure for Sustainable Mobility [26];
  • Assignment of a Synthetic Population for Activity-Based Modeling Employing Publicly Available Data [27]
  • Visualization and analysis of MM in SCs [28];
  • The use of the IoT [29] in the operation of MM [30] using the LoRaWAN platform in SCs [31];
  • The use of PLEVs to resolve noise in SCs [32];
  • Machine Learning-Based Radio Access Technology Selection in the Internet of Moving Things [33];
  • On-board unit to connect personal mobility vehicles to the IoT [34];
  • Evaluation of alternative battery charging schemes for one-way electric vehicle smart mobility sharing systems based on real urban trip data [35];
  • Consumers’ innovativeness and conspicuous consumption orientation as predictors of environmentalism [36];
  • The use of MM operation to improve the environment in SCs [37];
  • Data collection from sensors deployed in the urban environment in SCs [38];
  • Resolving the problem of traffic loads using MM in SCs [39];
  • OSU SMOOTH in a Smart City [40];
  • The use of MM to support the independent life of disabled persons or seniors in SCs or SHs [41,42].
  • Two-Layer Model Predictive Battery Thermal and Energy Management Optimization for Connected and Automated Electric Vehicles [43];

3.2. Smart Cities and Electric Vehicle Charging while Driving

The first article on Smart Cities and electric vehicle charging while driving was published in 2011. The number of publications peaked in 2020 (Figure 3).
Out of the total number of 108 publications covering the research area that focuses on the described topic are included the areas: Engineering, Computer Science, Energy Fuels, Transportation, Telecommunications, Science Technology Other Topics, Environmental Sciences Ecology, Automation Control Systems (Table 6).
In terms of affiliations, the topic is, among others, addressed by the United States Department of Energy, Polytechnic University of Turin, University of Zagreb, American University of Sharjah, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Concordia University Canada (Table 7).
Countries/regions that support research on the topic include the People’s Republic China, the USA, India, Italy, Canada, England, Japan, and South Korea (Table 8).
Figure 4 shows the keywords of selected publications for the topic of Smart Cities and electric vehicle charging while driving.
The automotive industry is currently shifting from traditional fossil fuels to electrification. There is a growing need in the EV industry to provide new infrastructures, services, tools, and solutions to support the use of EVs [44]. It is expected that future EVs will increasingly be able to use a connected driving environment for efficient, comfortable, and safe driving. Due to the relatively slow dynamics associated with the state of charge and temperature response in large battery-electrified vehicles, a long prediction/planning horizon is required to achieve better energy efficiency benefits [45]. The deployment of a Battery Management System (BMS) unit is a key element for monitoring the battery status of an electric car. In turn, the development and assessment of electric vehicle models form the basis for BMS design, as it provides a fast and inexpensive solution for testing optimal battery control logic in the Loop software environment [46]. In modern Smart Cities, mobility is based on EVs and it is considered a key factor in reducing carbon emissions and pollution. However, despite worldwide interest and investment, user adoption is still low, mainly due to a lack of support for charging services [47].
Figure 4. Individual keywords for the Smart Cities and electric vehicle charging while driving topic (created in SW Tool VOSviewer) [48].
Figure 4. Individual keywords for the Smart Cities and electric vehicle charging while driving topic (created in SW Tool VOSviewer) [48].
Wevj 13 00176 g004
Lithium ion batteries play a key role in powering electric cars. The battery’s Remaining Useful Life (RUL) is fundamentally important to ensure the safety and reliability of vehicles. Due to the complex aging mechanism, RUL prediction for Battery Management Systems (BMSs) is challenging [49]. An accurate prediction of the Remaining Available Energy (E-RAE) of lithium ion batteries is still a challenging problem for electric vehicles, which is of fundamental importance for predicting the remaining range of EVs [50]. Solid and Liquid Electrolyte Lithium ion Batteries (SLELBs) have good commercial applicability in electric vehicles because they combine the safety of solid electrolyte lithium ion batteries with the high ionic conductivity of Liquid Electrolyte Lithium ion Batteries (LELBs) [20]. Feng et al. presented a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle supervisory control strategy based on energy demand prediction and route preview with an adaptive fuel Consumption Minimization Strategy (ECMS) in real-time operation using neural networks [51]. For the implementation of the electrochemical–thermal model in the BMS of electric cars, Gao et al. introduced a control-oriented electrochemical model of lithium ion batteries and its real-time implementation in the EV BMS by simplifying partial differential equations using the Laplace transform and Pade approximation [52].
Gong et al. focused on the study of the performance of Lithium ion (Li ion) batteries depending on the ambient temperature with respect to the available range of electric cars (electrochemical impedance spectroscopy test, dynamic driving plan test, and others) for the prediction of the available range and also for the development of vehicle control for electric cars and PHEVs [53]. Gozukucuk et al. used the Monte Carlo method to probabilistically predict the optimal energy to reach a given route obtained from Google Maps incorporating location and road topology [54]. Guo et al. developed an energy consumption control strategy for an extended-range electric vehicle based on a predictive control model [55]. In order to accurately predict the SOC value of an electric vehicle, He et al. developed a battery state space model suitable for pure EVs [56]. Hoekstra et al. proposed a real-time active cell balancing strategy derived from model-based predictive control [57]. Hu et al. proposed an optimization control strategy for a parallel hybrid electric vehicle with multiple excitation sources to improve torsional stability using the established simplified two-mass nonlinear dynamic model of the HEV powertrain [58]. To improve the energy efficiency and adaptability of pure EV driving conditions in a complex traffic environment, simulation conditions that can dynamically update traffic information based on measured data have been proposed [59]. Huber et al. resolved the problem of the shortest path with a constraint that makes it possible to treat uncertainty—especially the risks resulting from imperfect predictions of energy consumption using an energy reserve from a certain part of the battery capacity provided as such an energy reserve [60]. Jin et al. proposed the parameter estimation of an electrochemistry-based lithium ion battery model using a two-step procedure and parameter sensitivity analysis [61]. Lee et al. presented an adaptive optimal control strategy for SOC balancing based on Pontryagin’s minimum principle that can be applied to real vehicles and does not require the prediction of driving patterns using an adaptive SOC balancing concept [62]. Li et al. provided an electrochemical model of a lithium ion battery with variable solid-state diffusion and the identification of parameters over a wide temperature range [63]. To increase the accuracy of E-RDE, Liu et al. introduced a Battery Energy (EB) prediction method based on predictive control theory, in which the combined prediction of the future change of the battery state, the change of the battery model parameters, and the voltage response is implemented on the E-RDE prediction horizon, and the E-RDE is then accumulated and optimized in real-time [64]. Falai et al. focused on assessing the performance and electric range of a two-wheel pure electric scooter in a real driving cycle, where the drive system of the device includes a set of LIBs with an Electric Energy Storage System (EESS) [46].
An overview of the solved tasks within the topic “Smart Cities and Electric Vehicles driving and charging” is given as follows:
  • Thermal and energy management of Electric Vehicle (EV) batteries to ensure consumption savings through real-time prediction and optimization [45];
  • Planning EV mobility routes also on medium and long routes [47];
  • Indication of battery degradation using information obtained from discharge voltage on energy from voltage signals to reveal degradation characteristics [49];
  • Determination of the energy state of the battery for the realization of the prediction of the future EV load [50];
  • Supervisory management of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles based on the prediction of energy demand and route overview with the aim of minimizing energy consumption in real operation [51];
  • Realization of the electrochemical–thermal model in the Battery Management System (BMS) in EVs [52];
  • Verification of the performance of lithium ion batteries in EVs depending on the temperature [53];
  • Resolution of the equation of EV dynamics for the generalization of energy consumption management issues using a large-capacity battery [54];
  • Energy consumption management strategy based on Model Predictive Control (MPC) [55];
  • Accurate predictions of the SOC EV value using the created battery model [56];
  • Maximization of the EV range in RT by means of active balancing of cells using MPC [57];
  • Elimination of HEV torsional vibrations to optimize energy consumption management [58];
  • Optimal energy-efficient control of EVs based on the dynamic flow of traffic information [59];
  • Solution of the optimization of the shortest EV path by ensuring the energy reserve [60];
  • LIB model parameter estimation [61];
  • Adaptive optimal control strategy for SOC balancing with application to real vehicles [62];
  • Description of the LIB electrochemical model with variable diffusion in the solid phase and identification of parameters in a wide range of temperatures [63];
  • Increasing the accuracy of E-RDE in RT [64];
  • Optimal range of a two-wheeled electric scooter in a real driving cycle using an LIB—EESS [65].
  • Optimal estimation of SOC battery status for HEVs [65];
  • Range extension, system energy consumption forecast, range estimation, and control of the car’s battery charge status [66];
  • Efficient optimization of fast charging protocols to maximize battery cycle life [67];
  • Forecasts and optimization of the range of electric cars [68];
  • Use of a high-energy density battery and a high-power density supercapacitor to predict power demand within seconds [69];
  • Accurate estimation of the state of charge of the battery in order to reduce estimation errors [70];
  • Parameterization of a typical model of the Equivalent Electric Circuit (EEC) LIPB [71];
  • Predictive control of circulating current with improvement of capacitor voltage behavior in real-time for modular multilevel converters [72];
  • AER (All-Electric Range) adaptive energy management strategy based on the equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS) and the forthcoming energy consumption prediction [73];
  • Determination of the importance of HVLIB internal losses for EV range estimation algorithms [74];
  • Forecasts of the need to charge an electric car driven by a specific user to make a predefined journey using Information Technology (IT) with Virtual Sensors (VSs) [44];
  • Safe and efficient EV operation using accurate knowledge of battery behavior under various influencing factors with the creation of a battery simulation model [75];
  • Estimation of SOC during HEV operation in RT [76];
  • Optimization of the energy consumption management of electric vehicles with an extended range in RT [77];
  • Use of ANN for PHEV energy prediction within the AER adaptive control strategy [78];

3.3. Chargers for Electric Scooters

According to the number of publications, the interest in the charger topic for electric scooters is increasing (Figure 5). The largest number of publications so far was in 2021.
The total number of 28 publications covering the research area that focus on the described topic include the areas: Engineering, Energy Fuels, Computer Science, Science Technology, Telecommunications, Transportation, and others (Table 9).
In terms of affiliations, the topic is, among others, addressed by the Osaka Institute of Technology, Imperial College London, Polytechnic University of Turin, Universiti Malaya, Fuzhou University, King Saud University, and others (Table 10).
Countries/regions that support research on the topic include Italy, Japan, England, Malaysia, Taiwan, Australia, the Czech Republic, India, and others (Table 11).
Ando et al. dealt with a super-fast ES pulse charging system, based on an Electric Double-Layer Capacitor (EDLC) [79]. Devendra et al. focused on the design and production of ES charging devices [80]. Hicham et al. implemented Space Vector Modulations for a Direct Torque Control (SVM-DTC) unit of a BLDC three-wheel ES with two BLDC motors that drove the rear wheels [81]. Hsu et al. presented an ES with grid-to-vehicle/Vehicle-to-Home (V2H)/Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) and energy harvesting functions using Photovoltaic panels (PV) [82]. Joseph et al. tried to optimize Series–Series-Wireless Power Transmission (SS-WPT) based on a current converter to achieve higher coupling separation, higher power transfer efficiency, and higher misalignment tolerance than conventional WPT designs with a transmission efficiency of 94% at a 200 mm link distance [83]. Kaneko et al. focused on an electric scooter powered by a powerful electronic motor and its associated new EDLC [84,85,86]. Kwan et al. presented a wireless charging solution for 600 W electric scooters operating at a frequency of 6.78 MHz with a battery charging efficiency of 84% [87] and 65.5% [88]. In order to realize emission-free solutions and clean transportation alternatives, Lin presented a novel frequency-controlled pulsed-DC converter for EVs’ or Light Electric Vehicles’ (LEVs) battery chargers [89]. Martinez-Navarro et al. designed, built, and commissioned a sustainable e-scooter charging dock using photovoltaic panels and a battery system in Valencia, Spain [90]. Masoud et al. developed a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model for the real-world ESCA charger allocation problem. The proposed model allocates e-scooters to chargers with an emphasis on minimizing the average distance traveled by chargers to pick up e-scooters [91,92]. Monteiro et al. presented a mobile battery network for electronic devices via power banks in the city and proposed an optimization model to find the optimal location and layout of the network considering customer demand, logistics components, battery degradation, and terminal charging mode [93]. The aim of Tai et al. was to develop a battery charger with remote monitoring and an intelligent active equalizer with NCR18650PF batteries, which have a nominal voltage of 3.6 V and a nominal capacity of 2900 mAh [94].
An overview of the solved tasks within the topic “Chargers for Electric Scooter” is given as follows:
  • Fast charging of ESs [79];
  • HW and SW solution of the charging station for ESs [80];
  • DC motor torque control for ES drive [81];
  • ES with the function of energy transfer from the grid to the vehicle/from the Vehicle to the House (V2H)/from the Vehicle to the Grid (V2G) and energy collection using PV [82];
  • Use of a charger with EC [84,85,86];
  • Use of a wireless charger for Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) within ES operation [83,87,88,95,96,97,98];
  • Use of a DC–DC converter with frequency control for LEV applications [89];
  • Realization of a charging dock with PV for ESs [90];
  • Resolving the problem of allocating chargers for ESs [91];
  • Optimal assignment of E-scooter to chargers [92];
  • Optimization of the mobile network for energy storage [93,99,100];
  • Battery charger design for ESs [94,101,102,103,104,105];
  • Solution to the design and implementation of a fast charger with high efficiency for lead acid batteries [106].

3.4. Management and Sharing of Electric Scooters

Interest in publishing on the management and sharing of electric scooters topic started in 2012. The largest number of publications produced so far was in 2021 (Figure 6).
The total number of 21 publications covering the research area that focus on the described topic include the areas: Transportation, Business Economics, Computer Science, Environmental Sciences Ecology, Telecommunications, and others (Table 12).
In terms of affiliations, the topic is, among others, addressed by the University of California System, Asia University Taiwan, Barcelona Supercomputer Center BSC CNS, Beijing Institute of Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, China Medical University Hospital Taiwan, and others (Table 13).
Countries/regions that support research on the topic include the USA, Taiwan, Germany, Italy, the People’s Republic of China, Poland, Sweden, and Australia (Table 14).
Current mobility trends suggest that the popularity of private cars will decline in the near future. One of the reasons for this development is the proliferation of mobility services such as car or bicycle sharing or Mobility-packages-as-a-Service (MaaS) [107]. Electric micro-mobility is becoming increasingly popular as an urban transport option. It could help reduce transport externalities and provide last-mile solutions and complementary ways to access public transport [108]. Micro-mobility can alleviate many of the problems facing large cities today and offer a path to more sustainable urban transport [109]. Micro-mobility is shaping first- and last-mile journeys in urban areas. Recently, shared dockless electric scooters (e-scooters) have emerged in major cities as an everyday alternative to driving for short-distance commuters due to their affordability, ease of app accessibility, and zero emissions [110]. On-demand mobility services such as bike-sharing, scooter-sharing, and transportation network companies (TNCs, also known as ride-sourcing and ride-hailing) are changing the way people travel by providing dynamic on-demand mobility that can complement public transport and passenger car use [111]. Electric scooter (e-scooter) sharing services have redefined the concept of urban transport and urban development around the world. However, these services have raised concerns about information privacy due to allegations that they are used by companies and even government agencies to collect information [112]. Through the IoT and cloud computing technologies, the marketing and availability of electric motorcycles can be increased [113]. It is also necessary to ensure the management of traffic and traffic lights in connection with the operation of EC [114].
Scorrano et al. found that the purchase price, fuel consumption, annual road tax, insurance costs, range, motor power, country of manufacture, and replaceable battery were consistently statistically significant across different specifications in the application of ES operation [115]. Other important parameters for the wider use of ESs are providing an increase in the lifetime of products, ensuring the exchangeability of batteries, alternative logistics of data collection, as well as ensuring a suitable charging concept that takes into account the protection of the environment [116]. Another important factor in ES operation is the provision of information on the interactions of ES operations with existing transport systems, such as modeling the interaction of e-scooters and bus transit services [117].
An overview of the solved tasks within the topic “Management and sharing electric scooter” is given as follows:
  • Car or bicycle sharing or mobility-packages-as-a-service [107];
  • Last-mile solutions and complementary ways of accessing public transport from the point of view of the private operator based on cost effectiveness, guaranteeing access to these services in a sustainable and safe way, and from the user’s point of view by increasing the availability of the network through more mobility options [108];
  • Sustainability of urban transport [109];
  • Solving urban governance issues such as traffic regulations, public safety, parking regulations, and liability issues, analyses of the causes of injuries associated with shared e-scooters [110];
  • ES operation flexibility and affordability [111];
  • Privacy of information obtained in the sharing economy of e-scooters within the framework of development with the use of IT [112];
  • Improving the appearance design and service of ESs to attract the attention of consumers [113];
  • Management of operation, traffic, and traffic lights [114];
  • Analyses of the impact of the purchase price, fuel consumption, annual road tax, and insurance premium costs, range, motor power, country of manufacture, and replaceable battery for extending ES operation [115];
  • Analyses of the impact on the environment in connection with the lifetime of products, replaceable batteries, alternative collection logistics, and charging concepts compared to alternative means of transport [116];
  • Resolving the problem of modelling the interaction of e-scooters and bus transit services [117].
  • Use of hybrid energy systems of fuel cells and batteries with increased efficiency [118];
  • Increasing the efficiency of the Fuel Cell (FC) in partial load conditions, improvement and protection of the environment [119,120];
  • Elimination of accidents and injuries [121,122];
  • Analyses of safety risks (alcohol, non-use of head, hand, foot protection, etc.) in ES operation [122];
  • Monitoring of e-scooter routes during the delivery of goods (elimination of delays in the delivery of goods) [123];
  • Measuring the quality of shared mobility [124]; Visualization, analysis, and comparison of the impacts of Smart City policies based on innovative mobility concepts in urban areas [125];

3.5. E-Mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Homes)

Interest in publishing on the topic of E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Homes) began in 2015. The largest number of publications so far was in 2018 (Figure 7).
The total number of 24 publications covering the research area that focus on the described topic include the areas: Computer Science, Engineering, Energy Fuels, Telecommunications, Automation Control Systems, and others (Table 15).
In terms of affiliations, the topic is, among others, addressed by the Eindhoven University of Technology, Ku Leuven, Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics ICTP, AGH University of Science Technology, Alma Digit Res Labs, Beijing Jiaotong University, and others (Table 16).
Countries/regions that support research in the given topic include, among others: People’s Republic of China, the USA, India, Italy, The Netherlands, Belgium, and others (Table 17).
Ideas about what the cities of the future will look like are currently met by the Smart Cities concept, which is an effective platform that ensures the optimization of resources and services through monitoring and communication technologies [126,127]. By 2030, the number of urban areas is expected to triple, housing 60% of the world’s population [128]. The Internet of Things (IoT) is expected to provide the basic infrastructure for Smart Cities and make ICT a technology to address major challenges related to climate change, energy efficiency, mobility, and future services [129]. Urban mobility is a multidimensional characteristic of cities, which is seen as layers of interconnected infrastructures, places, people, and information. Therefore, the study of networks such as electrical and transportation systems should go beyond the individual network and connect with other networks in the SC [130]. There are six possible tools to make urban mobility more environmentally friendly: stricter rules for urban transport policy solutions, taking advantage of shared vehicles, improving the urban fabric, proposing alternatives to car use, new financial resources to change driver behavior, and a business model for those cities that want to have a green image [131]. To resolve poor air quality and greenhouse gas emissions in cities, it is proposed that the use of electric cars, electric bicycles, and electric scooters be established [132]. For that reason, it is necessary to focus on new methods of electricity production and storage (photovoltaics, fuel cells, battery storage systems) [133] using the current structure of SH solutions within building automation [134]. With the transition to the Internet of Things (IoT), there is a significant increase in stationary and mobile IoT sensing and computing devices that continuously generate a huge amount of contextual information [135]. Based on the obtained data, it is possible to more easily provide information modeling the behavior of residents on the scale of Smart Cities [136]. The emerging paradigm of the Internet of Things is based on intelligent objects that will be able to communicate with the surrounding environment using ubiquitous connectivity [137]. An overview of the solved tasks within the topic “E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Home)” is given as follows:
  • Secure data collection using the IoT within SCs [128,138];
  • Sending data over long distances using a wireless network and archiving data [137];
  • Localization of people and objects in cities [139];
  • Prediction of the consumption of electricity in connection with e-transport in SCs [130];
  • Monitoring and modelling the behavior of residents for realistic suggestions for predicting electricity consumption [136];
  • Financing of electricity infrastructures within the framework of electricity regulation and E-mobility [132];
  • Support, development, and use of environmentally friendly vehicles [131];
  • Development of domestic battery systems within SHs [134];
  • Use of SH automation and innovations (Smart Meters) within SCs [129];
  • Innovative approaches to solving ways of producing photovoltaic energy for smart charging stations for e-bikes and e-scooters, together with energy stored in a local battery [126,127];
  • Photovoltaic energy supply for smart charging stations for e-scooters together with energy stored in a local battery [133];
  • Identification of electricity consumption model devices in households in connection with SG [140];
  • Smart Metering in Smart Homes [141,142].

4. Discussion

The main objective of the article was to investigate the current state of research, analysis, and design of a solution for the maximally efficient and comprehensive concept of urban E-mobility to bring a qualitatively new level both in terms of the design and in terms of the parameters of the ESs themselves and, at the same time, in terms of their operation, charging, and management within SCs.
The aim of the systematic review was to determine the possible solutions for the development of long-range super-lightweight small electric vehicles for intergenerational urban E-mobility in the SC concept. The steps to determine the current status of the solution were to analyze the requirements and solutions needed for the development of the: “MM concept in SC, the concept of EV charging while driving, the ES charger concept, the management and sharing of the ES concept, of the concept of E-mobility within SC (SH)”.
A number of questions were identified for this systematic review: “RQ1 What technological solutions and innovations can be used to develop the concept of micro-mobility in Smart Cities?”, “RQ2 What technological solutions and innovations can be used for the development of the concept of electric vehicle charging while driving?”, “RQ3 What technological solutions and innovations can be used to develop the electric scooter charger concept?”, “RQ4 What technological solutions and innovations can be used to develop the management and sharing of the electric scooter concepts?”, “RQ5 What technological solutions and innovations can be used to develop the E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Home) concept?”.
The PRISMA studies and the Kofod-Petersen method were used to extract useful information from the presented systematic review.
To answer RQ1 related to the solution of the “Smart Cities and micro-mobility” concept requires addressing the following needs, which are listed in Table 18. The most mentioned tasks for solving are “traffic regulations, public safety, PLEVs parking”, “MM and PLEV shared micro-mobility”, “PLEVs analysis for urban public transport”, “IoT, LoRaWAN, SC”, “connection of MM with traffic load in SC and configuration and provision of SC infrastructure”, and “support for seniors and disabled people for an active life with the help of MM”.
To answer RQ2 related to the solution of the “SC and EV driving and charging” concept requires addressing the following needs, which are listed in Table 19. The most mentioned tasks are “Battery charging with MPC of EV in RT”, “Battery SOC Estimation Optimization Model”, “Prediction, EV range optimization”, and “Battery behavior model”.
To answer RQ3 related to the solution of the “Chargers for Electric Scooter” concept requires addressing the following needs, which are listed in Table 20. The most mentioned tasks are “Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) using Wireless Charger”, “EDLC charger solution (Electric Double Layer Capacitor)”, “Optimization of MESN solutions for ES”, “Design and solution of BC for ES”, and “FC with high efficiency for LAB”.
To answer RQ4 related to the solution of the “Management and sharing of electric scooters” concept requires addressing the following needs, which are listed in Table 21. The most mentioned tasks are “The connection between EC operation and environmental protection”, “Elimination of accidents and injuries”, and “EC traffic problems, traffic regulations”.
To answer RQ5 related to the solution to the development of the concept of “E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Homes)” requires addressing the following needs, which are listed in Table 22 The most mentioned tasks are “Secure data collection using IoT within SC”, “Optimization of resources and services through monitoring and IT in SC”, and “Implementation of Smart Metering in Smart Homes”.
Some limitations of the EV use in SCs (SHs) [140] arise from the dependence of electricity generation on weather conditions and the utility of EVs [139] depending on the range of vehicle use with respect to the following [138]:
  • The variation in vehicle energy consumption by season (winter/summer);
  • The actual charging profile of the EV;
  • The parking periods required to achieve the target range for the user.
The analyses showed that the most important factors in the operation of the electric shared mobility market are prices, the condition of the fleet, the replacement of vehicles, rental area, legal requirements, the location of parking spaces, and operational safety [139].

5. Conclusions

The main contribution of the article was a systematic overview and discussion related to the research on the current status of the development of long-range super-lightweight small electric vehicles for intergenerational urban E-mobility within the Smart Cities concept for a pilot study of a new way of resolving the traffic management of the urban district of Poruba within the statutory city of Ostrava in the Czech Republic. Another of the goals was to help researchers and other workers dealing with the described area to identify the most feasible solution for the use of electric scooters as part of micro-mobility solutions in Smart Cities.
After applying the above-described inclusion and exclusion criteria to articles generated from the scientific research database Web of Science on the subject of the “Smart Cities and micro-mobility”, “Smart Cities and Electric Vehicles charging while driving”, “chargers for electric scooters”, “Management and sharing of electric scooters”, and “E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Homes)”, 134 articles in the period from 2008 to 2022 were selected. The selected articles made it possible to achieve the set goals and answer the research questions of this systematic review. Most of the mentioned studies were conducted in the USA (44), followed by contributions by the People’s Republic of China (36), Italy (31), India and England (15), Germany (12), Canada (11), Japan (10), The Netherlands (7), South Korea (6), Mexico (4) and the Czech Republic (4).
A summary of the findings of this research review is provided for each research question:
RQ1:
As part of the search for an answer to RQ1, the largest number of articles dealt with the issue of shared PLEV micro-mobility (6). Other articles dealt with the provision of the IoT in connection with the operation of MM in Smart Cities (5), resolving traffic regulations and public safety together with ensuring the provision of parking (4), and providing data collection within MM (2) in connection with solving traffic loads (2). Supporting the active life of seniors and disabled people with the help of MM (2) is also an important topic to address.
RQ2:
In response to RQ2, the articles dealt with topics describing the solution of the battery behavior model (5) and the optimization of the estimation of the battery SOC (3). The topics of Model-Predictive-Control-based battery charging control (MPC) of Electric Vehicles (EVs) in Real-Time (RT) (2) and EV range optimization solutions (2) were also important topics.
RQ3:
In the search for answers to RQ3, most of the articles dealt with the issue of wireless charger solutions for Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) (7) and solutions for the design of an EDLC (3). Other articles dealt with the optimization of the MESN solution for ESs (3) and the design of the battery charger for electric scooters (6).
RQ4:
In order to find the answer to RQ4, articles were examined that dealt with the connection between the operation of electric scooters and environmental protection (2), as well as the elimination of accidents and injuries during the operation of ESs (2), ES operation, IT development, data security, the provision of visualization within ES operation (service and maintenance), the IoT, and cloud computing
RQ5:
In the search for answers to RQ5, articles were found describing the optimization of resources and services through monitoring and communication technologies in SCs (2), the implementation of Smart Metering in Smart Homes (2), the use of wireless networks and long-distance data transmission in SCs, the localization of persons and objects in SCs, and the prediction of electricity consumption in connection with e-transportation in SCs using monitoring and modelling of the behavior of residents for realistic suggestions for predicting electricity consumption in SCs.
Future research should focus on the development of charging stations and the investigation of models of the behavior of conventional and wireless batteries in connection with the operation of PLEVs in SCs, their sharing, visualization, and monitoring using long-term measured data, and their analysis using SW tools within the IoT to ensure the long-range certainty.
In spite of all the answers obtained, there are also limitations in the present study. The defined inclusion and exclusion criteria limited the scope of this study. Consequently, this systematic review does not provide the details of the described technological systems that do not include environmental parameters. Additionally, publications were retrieved from only one database (Web of Science) [136], and the search was limited to publications between 2008 and 2022.

Author Contributions

J.V. proposed the system concept; J.V. wrote the manuscript; J.V. and P.B. edited the manuscript; J.V. designed and implemented the classification methods; J.V. and P.B. critically evaluated the scientific validity of the proposed system, acquired the vital data, and performed the final edits. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Student Grant System of VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Grant Number SP2022/88.

Acknowledgments

This research work was supported under the Student Grant System of VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Grant Number SP2022/88.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AEMSAdaptive Energy Management Strategy
AERAll-Electric Range
ANNArtificial Neural Network
BCBattery Charger
BEVBattery Electric Vehicle
BLDCBrushless DC electric motor
BMSBattery Management System
CEVCompact Electric Vehicle
CSCharging Station
DC–DCDirect Current–Direct Current
DFNDoyle–Fuller–Newman
DSESDockless Shared Electric Scooters
ECElectric Capacitor
ECEEnergy Conversion Efficiency
ECMElectronically Commutated Motor
ECMSEquivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy
EDLCElectric Double-Layer Capacitor
EECElectronic Engine Control
EESSElectrical Energy Storage System
EISElectrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
ERAEaccurate Remaining Available Energy
ERCEbattery Remaining Chemical Energy state
ERDERemaining Discharge Energy
ERPElectric Range Prediction
ESElectric Scooter
ESCAE-Scooter Chargers’ Allocation
EVElectric Vehicle
EVCSElectric Vehicle Charging Station
FCFast Chargers
FPAFlower Pollination Algorithm
FRGMFractional Grey Model
HESSHybrid Energy Storage System
HEVHybrid Electric Vehicles
HVLIBHigh-Voltage Lithium Ion Battery
ICTInformation and Communication Technologies
IoTInternet of Things
ITInformation Technology
KDEKernel Density Estimation
KFKalman Filter
LABLead Acid Batteries
LELBLiquid Electrolyte Lithium ion Batteries
LEVLight Electric Vehicle
LIBLithium Ion Battery
LIPBLithium Ion Phosphate Battery
LoRaWANLong-Range Wide Area Network
MaaSMobility-as-a-Service
MEPMobilita a Energetická Produktivita
MESNMobile Energy Storage Network
MILPMixed-Integer Linear Programming
MLMachine Learning
MMMicro-Mobility
MMCModular Multilevel Converters
MMQUALMicro-Mobility QUALity
MPCModel Predictive Control
NMPCNonlinear Model Predictive Control
NNNeural Network
OCPPOpen Charge Point Protocol
OML-SOCEOptimal Machine-Learning-based SOC Estimation
OMSOpen Metering Specification
P2PPeer-to-Peer
PLEVPersonal Light Electric Vehicle
PHEVPlug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle
PVPhotovoltaic Panel
RTReal-Time
RULRemaining Useful Life
SBRPSchool Bus Routing Problem
SCSmart Cities
SECMSimplified Equivalent Circuit Model
SGSmart Grids
SHSmart Home
SLELBSolid–Liquid Electrolyte Lithium ion Battery
SMSmart Metering
SOCState Of Charge
SOEState Of Energy
SOHState Of Health
SRUKFSquare-Root Unscented Kalman Filter
SSASalp Swarm Algorithm
SSAEStacked Sparse Auto Encoder
SS-WPT Series–Series Wireless Power Transmission
SVM-DTCSpace Vector Modulation for Direct Torque Control
TEMTransactive Energy Management
THDTotal Harmonic Distortion
TNCTransportation Network Companies
UPFUnscented Particle Filter
V2GVehicle to Grid
V2HVehicle to Home

References

  1. Ciociola, A.; Cocca, M.; Giordano, D.; Vassio, L.; Mellia, M. E-Scooter Sharing: Leveraging Open Data for System Design. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 24th International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT), Electr Network, Valencia, Spain, 14–16 September 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 206–213. [Google Scholar]
  2. Stehlin, J.; Payne, W. Disposable infrastructures: ‘Micro-mobility’ platforms and the political economy of transport disruption in Austin, Texas. Urban Stud. 2022, 18; in press. [CrossRef]
  3. Cerrone, C.; Cerulli, R.; Sciomachen, A. Grocery distribution plans in urban networks with street crossing penalties. Networks 2021, 78, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brdulak, A.; Chaberek, G.; Jagodzinski, J. Determination of Electricity Demand by Personal Light Electric Vehicles (PLEVs): An Example of e-Motor Scooters in the Context of Large City Management in Poland. Energies 2020, 13, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Field, C.; Jon, I. E-Scooters: A Ne w Smart Mobility Option? The Case of Brisbane, Australia. Plan. Theory Pract. 2021, 22, 368–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Garikapati, V.; Young, S.; Hou, Y. Measuring Fundamental Improvements in Sustainable Urban Mobility: The Mobility- Energy Productivity Metric. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Transportation and Development 2019: Innovation and Sustainability in Smart Mobility and Smart Cities—Selected Papers from the International Conference on Transportation and Development 2019, Alexandria, VA, USA, 9–12 June 2019; pp. 111–121. [Google Scholar]
  7. Giles-Corti, B.; Zapata-Diomedi, B.; Jafari, A.; Both, A.; Gunn, L. Could smart research ensure healthy people in disrupted cities? J. Transp. Health 2020, 19, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Goli, P.; Jasthi, K.; Gampa, S.R.; Das, D.; Shireen, W.; Siano, P.; Guerrero, J.M. Electric Vehicle Charging Load Allocation at Residential Locations Utilizing the Energy Savings Gained by Optimal Network Reconductoring. Smart Cities 2022, 5, 177–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Diaz-Parra, O.; Ruiz-Vanoye, J.A.; Fuentes-Penna, A.; Zezzatti, A.O.; Cruz-Hernandez, E.; Estrada-Garcia, S.; Alvarado-Perez, A. Editorial for Volume 11 Number 2: Electric School Bus Routing Problem for Smart Cities. Int. J. Comb. Optim. Probl. Inform. 2020, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  10. Holyoak, N.; Spandonide, B.; Zito, R.; Stazic, B. Active deserts: Alice Springs as a world-class non-motorised transportation town. In Proceedings of the ATRF 2016—Australasian Transport Research Forum 2016, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 16–18 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  11. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2021, 134, 178–189. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kofod-Petersen, A. How to Do a Structured Literature Review in Computer Science; Technical Report; Department of Computer and Information Science at Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU): Trondheim, Norway, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mena, A.R.; Ceballos, H.G.; Alvarado-Uribe, J. Measuring Indoor Occupancy through Environmental Sensors: A Systematic Review on Sensor Deployment. Sensors 2022, 22, 3770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Al-Thani, H.; Koç, M.; Isaifan, R.J.; Bicer, Y. A Review of the Integrated Renewable Energy Systems for Sustainable Urban Mobility. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Javadinasr, M.; Asgharpour, S.; Rahimi, E.; Choobchian, P.; Mohammadian, A.K.; Auld, J. Eliciting attitudinal factors affecting the continuance use of E-scooters: An empirical study in Chicago. Transp. Res. Part F-Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2022, 87, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, S.N.; Shin, K.G.; Assoc Comp, M. Dynamic Flow Distribution Prediction for Urban Dockless E-Scooter Sharing Reconfiguration. In Proceedings of the 29th Web Conference (WWW), Taipei, Taiwan, 20–24 April 2020; Assoc Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 133–143. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hipogrosso, S.; Nesmachnow, S. Analysis of sustainable public transportation and mobility recommendations for montevideo and parque rodó neighborhood. Smart Cities 2020, 3, 479–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hipogrosso, S.; Nesmachnow, S. Sustainable Mobility in the Public Transportation of Montevideo, Uruguay. In Communications in Computer and Information Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 1152 CCIS, pp. 93–108. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang, L.; Wu, Z.; Pan, S.; Li, Z.; Xiong, Z.; Fu, Y. Design of Mini Folding Electric Scooter Based on Relative Attitude Angle Control. Xitong Fangzhen Xuebao/J. Syst. Simul. 2018, 30, 2295–2305. [Google Scholar]
  20. Khan, J.A.; Bangalore, K.U.; Kurkcu, A.; Ozbay, K. TREAD: Privacy Preserving Incentivized Connected Vehicle Mobility Data Storage on InterPlanetary-File-System-Enabled Blockchain. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board; The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Washington, DC, USA, 2022; Volume 2676, pp. 680–691. [Google Scholar]
  21. Leone, C.; Longo, M.; Foiadelli, F. Public and Micro-Mobility Transportation Modes Comparison. In Proceedings of the 2021 16th International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER 2021), Monte-Carlo, Monaco, 5–7 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liao, F.C.; Correia, G. Electric carsharing and micro-mobility: A literature review on their usage pattern, demand, and potential impacts. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2022, 16, 269–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lopes, S.J.; Gattelu, A.; Ghosalkar, A.; Gonsalves, S. Environment Friendly booster bike. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Smart City and Emerging Technology (ICSCET 2018), Mumbai, India, 5 January 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. López-Escolano, C.; Campos, Á.P. Emerging mobilities after the great recession: From shared bike to electric scooter: From case of the city of Zaragoza (Spain). Belgeo 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. Losapio, G.; Minutoli, F.; Mascardi, V.; Ferrando, A. Smart balancing of E-scooter sharing systems via deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the WOA 2021: 22nd Workshop “From Objects to Agents”, Bologna, Italy, 1–3 September 2021; Volume 2963, pp. 83–97. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mazzoncini, R.; Somaschini, C.; Longo, M. The Infrastructure for Sustainable Mobility. In Green Planning for Cities and Communities, Novel Incisive Approaches to Sustainability, © Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 255–277. [Google Scholar]
  27. Agriesti, S.; Roncoli, C.; Nahmias-Biran, B.H. Assignment of a Synthetic Population for Activity-Based Modeling Employing Publicly Available Data. Isprs Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oliveira, T.A.; Gabrich, Y.B.; Ramalhinho, H.; Oliver, M.; Cohen, M.W.; Ochi, L.S.; Gueye, S.; Protti, F.; Pinto, A.A.; Ferreira, D.V.M.; et al. Mobility, Citizens, Innovation and Technology in Digital and Smart Cities. Future Internet 2020, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Orozco-Fontalvo, M.; Llerena, L.; Cantillo, V. Dockless electric scooters: A review of a growing micro-mobility mode. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2022, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Quqa, S.; Giordano, P.F.; Limongelli, M.P. Shared micro-mobility-driven modal identification of urban bridges. Autom. Constr. 2022, 134, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Roelofsen, E.; Schaepman, R.; Roelofsen, L. Electric Heroes, go smart go electric. In Proceedings of the 41st International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering 2012 (INTER-NOISE 2012), New York, NY, USA, 19–22 August 2012; Volume 12, pp. 9968–9975. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sanchez-Iborra, R.; Bernal-Escobedo, L.; Santa, J. Eco-Efficient Mobility in Smart City Scenarios. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sanchez-Iborra, R.; Bernal-Escobedo, L.; Santa, J. Machine Learning-Based Radio Access Technology Selection in the Internet of Moving Things. China Commun. 2021, 18, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Santa, J.; Bernal-Escobedo, L.; Sanchez-Iborra, R. On-board unit to connect personal mobility vehicles to the IoT. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020, 175, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schnieder, M.; West, A. Evaluation of alternative battery charging schemes for one-way electric vehicle smart mobility sharing systems based on real urban trip data. In Proceedings of the 5th International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry: Innovation to Shape the Future (RTSI 2019), Florence, Italy, 9–12 September 2019; pp. 296–301. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sestino, A.; Amatulli, C.; Guido, G. Consumers’ innovativeness and conspicuous consumption orientation as predictors of environmentalism: An investigation in the context of smart mobility. Technol. Anal. Strateg Manag. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stankov, I.; Stefanova-Stoyanova, V. Urban Intelligent Transport Management Systems. In Proceedings of the 29th National Conference with International Participation (TELECOM 2021), Sofia, Bulgaria, 28–29 October 2021; pp. 113–116. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tan, S.; Tamminga, K. A Vision for Urban Micro-mobility: From Current Streetscape to City of the Future. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Case Studies on Transport Policy: Skiathos Island, Greece, 2021; Volume 1278, pp. 158–167. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tsigdinos, S.; Karolemeas, C.; Bakogiannis, E.; Nikitas, A. Introducing autonomous buses into street functional classification systems: An exploratory spatial approach. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2021, 9, 813–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vernier, M.; Redmill, K.; Ozguner, U.; Kurt, A.; Guvenc, B.A. OSU SMOOTH in a Smart City. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Science of Smart City Operations and Platforms Engineering (SCOPE) in Partnership with Global City Teams Challenge (GCTC) (SCOPE-GCTC), Vienna, Austria, 11 April 2016. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zaffagnini, T.; Lelli, G.; Fabbri, I.; Negri, M. Innovative Street Furniture Supp.orting Electric Micro-mobility for Active Aging. In Studies in Computational Intelligence; Springer: Singapore, 2022; Volume 1011, pp. 313–327. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zou, Z.P.; Younes, H.; Erdogan, S.; Wu, J.H. Exploratory Analysis of Real-Time E-Scooter Trip Data in Washington, DC. Transp. Res. Rec. 2020, 2674, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Amini, M.R.; Sun, J.; Kolmanovsky, I. Two-Layer Model Predictive Battery Thermal and Energy Management Optimization for Connected and Automated Electric Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 57th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Miami Beach, FL, USA, 17–19 December 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 6976–6981. [Google Scholar]
  44. Annamalai, S.; Mangaiyarkarasi, S.P.; Rani, M.S.; Ashokkumar, V.; Gupta, D.; Rodrigues, J. Design of peer-to-peer energy trading in transactive energy management for charge estimation of lithium-ion battery on hybrid electric vehicles. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2022, 207, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Asus, Z.; Aglzim, E.H.; Chrenko, D.; Daud, Z.H.C.; Le Moyne, L. Dynamic Modeling and Driving Cycle Prediction for a Racing Series Hybrid Car. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2014, 2, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Attia, P.M.; Grover, A.; Jin, N.; Severson, K.A.; Markov, T.M.; Liao, Y.H.; Chen, M.H.; Cheong, B.; Perkins, N.; Yang, Z.; et al. Closed-loop optimization of fast-charging protocols for batteries with machine learning. Nature 2020, 578, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Baek, D.; Chen, Y.K.; Bocca, A.; Bottaccioli, L.; Di Cataldo, S.; Gatteschi, V.; Pagliari, D.J.; Patti, E.; Urgese, G.; Chang, N.; et al. Battery-Aware Operation Range Estimation for Terrestrial and Aerial Electric Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 5471–5482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Baumann, M.; Buchholz, M.; Dietmayer, K. Model Predictive Control of a Hybrid Energy Storage System Using Load Prediction. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA), Ohrid, Macedonia, 3–6 July 2017; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 636–641. [Google Scholar]
  49. Bedogni, L.; Bononi, L.; D’Elia, A.; Di Felice, M.; Di Nicola, M.; Cinotti, T.S. Driving without Anxiety: A Route Planner Service with Range Prediction for the Electric Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), Vienna, Austria, 3–7 November 2014; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 199–206. [Google Scholar]
  50. Chakraborty, D.; Ghivari, M.; Datar, M.; Gogate, A. A Hybrid System and Method for Estimating State of Charge of a Battery. Sae Int. J. Commer. Veh. 2021, 14, 375–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, L.; Chen, J.; Wang, H.M.; Wang, Y.J.; An, J.J.; Yang, R.; Pan, H.H. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Battery Using a Novel Indicator and Framework with Fractional Grey Model and Unscented Particle Filter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 5850–5859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, Y.J.; Yang, X.L.; Luo, D.; Wen, R. Remaining available energy prediction for lithium-ion batteries considering electrothermal effect and energy conversion efficiency. J. Energy Storage 2021, 40, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dong, T.K.; Montaru, M.; Kirchev, A.; Perrin, M.; Lambert, F.; Bultel, Y. Modeling of Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries by an Equivalent Electrical Circuit: Part II—Model Parameterization as Function of Power and State of Energy (SOE). In Proceedings of the Symposium on Batteries and Energy Technology Joint General Session/219th Meeting of the Electrochemical-Society (ECS), Montreal, QC, Canada, 1–6 May 2011; Electrochemical Soc Inc.: Pennington, AL, USA, 2011; Volume 35, pp. 229–237. [Google Scholar]
  54. Dreke, V.D.R.; Lazar, M. Long-Horizon Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Modular Multilevel Converters. Energies 2022, 15, 22. [Google Scholar]
  55. Enthaler, A.; Gauterin, F. Significance of internal battery resistance on the remaining range estimation of electric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2–6 December 2013; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 94–99. [Google Scholar]
  56. Fanti, M.P.; Mangini, A.M.; Roccotelli, M. An Innovative Service for Electric Vehicle Energy Demand Prediction. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), Prague, Czech Republic, 29 June–2 July 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 880–885. [Google Scholar]
  57. Feng, F.; Yang, R.; Meng, J.H.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Z.G.; Chai, Y.; Mou, L.S. Electrochemical impedance characteristics at various conditions for commercial solid-liquid electrolyte lithium-ion batteries: Part. 2. Modeling and prediction. Energy 2022, 243, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Feng, T.H.; Yang, L.; Gu, Q.; Hu, Y.Q.; Yan, T.; Yan, B. A Supervisory Control Strategy for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on Energy Demand Prediction and Route Preview. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2015, 64, 1691–1700. [Google Scholar]
  59. Gao, Y.Z.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, X.; Guo, B.J. Implementation and evaluation of a practical electrochemical-thermal model of lithium-ion batteries for EV battery management system. Energy 2021, 221, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gong, X.Z.; Mi, C.C. Temperature-Dependent Performance of Lithium Ion Batteries in Electric Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Charlotte, NC, USA, 15–19 March 2015; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 1065–1072. [Google Scholar]
  61. Gozukucuk, M.A.; Akdogan, T.; Hussain, W.; Tasooji, T.K.; Sahin, M.; Celik, M.; Ugurdag, H.F. Design and Simulation of an Optimal Energy Management Strategy for Plug-In Electric Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Control Engineering and Information Technology (CEIT), Istanbul, Turkey, 25–27 October 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  62. Guo, C.; Cao, D.B.; Qiao, Y.R.; Yang, Z.Y.; Chang, Z.Z.; Zhao, D.; Hou, Z.R. Energy Management Strategy of Extended-Range Electric Bus Based on Model Predictive Control. Sae Int. J. Commer. Veh. 2021, 14, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. He, C.; Liu, C.C.; Wu, Y.; Wu, T. Estimation for SOC of Electric Vehical Lithium Battery Based on Artificial Immune Particle Filter. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Smart City and Systems Engineering (ICSCSE), Xiamen, China, 28–30 December 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 675–678. [Google Scholar]
  64. Hoekstra, F.S.J.; Ribelles, L.A.W.; Bergveld, H.J.; Donkers, M.C.F. Real-Time Range Maximisation of Electric Vehicles through Active Cell Balancing using Model-Predictive Control. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC), Denver, CO, USA, 1–3 July 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 2219–2224. [Google Scholar]
  65. Hu, D.H.; Hu, L.L.; Yan, Y.Z. Optimization methodology for control strategy of parallel hybrid electric vehicle based on chaos prediction. Aip Adv. 2018, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hu, J.J.; Xiao, F.; Mei, B.; Lin, Z.Q.; Fu, C.Y. Optimal Energy Efficient Control of Pure Electric Vehicle Power System Based on Dynamic Traffic Information Flow. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2022, 8, 510–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hu, Y.R.; Yurkovich, S.; Guezennec, Y.; Bornatico, R. Model-based calibration for battery characterization in HEV applications. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference 2008, Seattle, WA, USA, 11–13 June 2008; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2008; p. 318. [Google Scholar]
  68. Huber, G.; Bogenberger, K.; van Lint, H. Optimization of Charging Strategies for Battery Electric Vehicles Under Uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 23, 760–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jin, N.; Danilov, D.L.; van den Hof, P.M.J.; Donkers, M.C.F. Parameter estimation of an electrochemistry-based lithium-ion battery model using a two-step procedure and a parameter sensitivity analysis. Int. J. Energy Res. 2018, 42, 2417–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lee, W.; Jeoung, H.; Park, D.; Kim, N. An Adaptive Energy Management Strategy for Extended-Range Electric Vehicles Based on Pontryagin’s Minimum Principle. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), Chicago, IL, USA, 27–30 August 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  71. Li, C.L.; Cui, N.X.; Wang, C.Y.; Zhang, C.H. Simplified electrochemical lithium-ion battery model with variable solid-phase diffusion and parameter identification over wide temperature range. J. Power Sources 2021, 497, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, J.; Wu, X.D.; Xu, M.; Liu, Y.G. A real-time optimization energy management of range extended electric vehicles for battery lifetime and energy consumption. J. Power Sources 2021, 498, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lin, X.Y.; Zhou, K.C.; Li, H.L. AER adaptive control strategy via energy prediction for PHEV. Iet Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 13, 1822–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, G.M.; Ouyang, M.G.; Lu, L.G.; Li, J.Q.; Hua, J.F. A highly accurate predictive-adaptive method for lithium-ion battery remaining discharge energy prediction in electric vehicle applications. Applied Energy 2015, 149, 297–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Falai, A.; Giuliacci, T.A.; Misul, D.; Paolieri, G.; Anselma, P.G. Modeling and On-Road Testing of an Electric Two-Wheeler towards Range Prediction and BMS Integration. Energies 2022, 15, 2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ando, T.; Omori, H.; Kaneko, K.; Kimura, N.; Morizane, T.; Nakaoka, M. A New Super-Rapid Pulse Power Charging Electric Scooter System with Balancer-Less EDLC Stack. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (EDPE), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 4–6 October 2017; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 59–64. [Google Scholar]
  77. Devendra, D.; Malkurthi, S.; Navnit, A.; Hussain, A.M. Compact Electric Vehicle Charging Station using Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP) for E-Scooters. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Future Electric Transportation (SeFeT), Gokaraju Rangaraju Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Electr Network, Hyderabad, India, 21–23 January 2021; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  78. Hicham, C.; Nasri, A.; Kayisli, K. A Novel Method of Electric Scooter Torque Estimation Using the Space Vector Modulation Control. Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev.-Ijred 2021, 10, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hsu, Y.C.; Kao, S.C.; Ho, C.Y.; Jhou, P.H.; Lu, M.Z.; Liaw, C.M. On an Electric Scooter with G2V/V2H/V2G and Energy Harvesting Functions. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2018, 33, 6910–6925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Joseph, P.K.; Elangovan, D.; Sanjeevikumar, P. System Architecture, Design, and Optimization of a Flexible Wireless Charger for Renewable Energy-Powered Electric Bicycles. IEEE Syst. J. 2021, 15, 2696–2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kaneko, K.; Omori, H.; Kimura, N.; Morizane, T.; Mekhilef, S.; Nakaoka, M. Design of Super-Rapid Charging Capacitor Scooter with EDLC Power Supply and Pulse Power Charger. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Annual Southern Power Electronics Conference (SPEC), Auckland, New Zealand, 5–8 December 2016; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  82. Kaneko, K.; Omori, H.; Kimura, N.; Morizane, T.; Nakaoka, M. A Novel Type of EDLC Electric Motor-Driven Scooter with Pulse Power Super-Rapid Charger. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (Edpe), Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia, 21–23 September 2015; pp. 476–481. [Google Scholar]
  83. Kaneko, K.; Omori, H.; Morizane, T.; Kimura, N.; Nakaoka, M.; Mekhilef, S. A Study of Balancer-Less EDLC Stack in A New Power Electric Motor-Driven Capacitor Scooter System. In Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Energy, Power and Transportation Electrification (ACEPT), Singapore, 24–26 October 2017; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  84. Kindl, V.; Pechanek, R.; Zavrel, M.; Kavalir, T.; Turjanica, P. Inductive coupling system for electric scooter wireless charging: Electromagnetic design and thermal analysis. Electr. Eng. 2020, 102, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kwan, C.H.; Arteaga, J.M.; Aldhaher, S.; Yates, D.C.; Mitcheson, P.D. A 600 W 6.78 MHz Wireless Charger for an Electric Scooter. In Proceedings of the IEEE PELS Workshop on Emerging Technologies—Wireless Power Transfer (WoW)/IEEE Wireless Power Week (WPW)/IEEE MTT-S Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC), Seoul, Korea, 15–19 November 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 278–282. [Google Scholar]
  86. Kwan, C.H.; Arteaga, J.M.; Pucci, N.; Yates, D.C.; Mitcheson, P.D. A 110 W E-scooter Wireless Charger Operating at 6.78 MHz with Ferrite Shielding. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Power Week (WPW)/IEEE MTT-S Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC)/IEEE PELS Workshop on Emerging Technologies—Wireless Power (WoW), Electr Network, San Diego, CA, USA, 1–4 June 2021; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  87. Kwan, C.H.; Arteaga, J.M.; Yates, D.C.; Mitcheson, P.D. Design and Construction of a 100W Wireless Charger for an E-Scooter at 6.78 MHz. In Proceedings of the IEEE MTT-S Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC)/IEEE PELS Workshop on Emerging Technologies—Wireless Power (WoW)/Wireless Power Week Conference, London, UK, 17–21 June 2019; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 186–190. [Google Scholar]
  88. Lin, B.R. Analysis and Implementation of a Frequency Control DC-DC Converter for Light Electric Vehicle Applications. Electronics 2021, 10, 1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Martinez-Navarro, A.; Cloquell-Ballester, V.A.; Segui-Chilet, S. Photovoltaic Electric Scooter Charger Dock for the Development of Sustainable Mobility in Urban Environments. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 169486–169495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Masoud, M.; Elhenawy, M.; Almannaa, M.H.; Liu, S.Q.; Glaser, S.; Rakotonirainy, A. Heuristic Approaches to Solve E-Scooter Assignment Problem. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 175093–175105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Masoud, M.; Elhenawy, M.; Almannaa, M.H.; Liu, S.Q.; Glaser, S.; Rakotonirainy, A. Optimal Assignment of e-scooter to chargers. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (IEEE-ITSC), Auckland, New Zealand, 27–30 October 2019; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 4204–4209. [Google Scholar]
  92. Monteiro, L.E.C.; Repolho, H.M.V.; Calili, R.F.; Louzada, D.R.; Teixeira, R.S.D.; Vieira, R.S. Optimization of a Mobile Energy Storage Network. Energies 2022, 15, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Pellegrino, G.; Armando, E.; Guglielmi, P. An Integral Battery Charger with Power Factor Correction for Electric Scooter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2010, 25, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mundra, T.S.; Kumar, A. An innovative battery charger for safe charging of NiMH/NiCd batteries. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2007, 53, 1044–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pellegrino, G.; Armando, E.; Guolielmi, P. Integrated Battery Charger for Electric Scooter. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE 2009), Barcelona, Spain, 8–10 September 2009; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 2176–2182. [Google Scholar]
  96. Pellitteri, F.; Campagna, N.; Castiglia, V.; Damiano, A.; Miceli, R. Design, implementation and experimental results of an inductive power transfer system for electric bicycle wireless charging. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2020, 14, 2908–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pernia, A.M.; Prieto, M.J.; Martin-Ramos, J.A.; Villegas, P.J.; Navarro, A.; Sedano, J. Wireless LLC converter for electric bicycle. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), Electr Network, Gijon, Spain, 18 November–16 December 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  98. Sirotic, I.; Unde, V.; Ban, Z. Algorithm for Fast Determination of LiFePO4 Battery Nominal Current. In Proceedings of the 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia, 26–30 May 2014; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 121–124. [Google Scholar]
  99. Solero, L. Nonconventional on-board charger for electric vehicle propulsion batteries. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2001, 50, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tai, Y.K.; Lin, Y.H.; Hwu, K.I. Smart Active Battery Charger for Prototypal Electric Scooter. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control (IS3C), Natl Chin Yi Univ Technol, Taichung, Taiwan, 13–16 November 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 268–271. [Google Scholar]
  101. Veneri, O.; Capasso, C.; Iannuzzi, D. Experimental evaluation of DC charging architecture for fully-electrified low-power two-wheeler. Appl. Energy 2016, 162, 1428–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Vorel, P.; Cervinka, D.; Prochazka, P.; Toman, M.; Martis, J. High Efficiency Fast-Chargers for Lead-Acid Batteries. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Advanced Batteries, Accumulators and Fuel Cells (ABAF), Brno, Czech Republic, 28–31 August 2016; Electrochemical Soc Inc.: Pennington, AL, USA, 2016; Volume 74, pp. 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  103. Wijesekera, A.; Binduhewa, P. Impact of Electric Motorcycles on Distribution Network and Design of a Charger for Electric Motorcycles. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE-Region-10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC), Malambe, Sri Lanka, 6–8 December 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  104. Brezovec, P.; Hampl, N. Electric Vehicles Ready for Breakthrough in MaaS? Consumer Adoption of E-Car Sharing and E-Scooter Sharing as a Part of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS). Energies 2021, 14, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Carrese, S.; Giacchetti, T.; Nigro, M.; Algeri, G.; Ceccarelli, G. Analysis and Management of E-scooter Sharing Service in Italy. In Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (Mt-Its), Heraklion, Greece, 16–17 June 2021. [Google Scholar]
  106. Chao, C.H.; Shieh, J.J. A new control strategy for hybrid fuel cell-battery power systems with improved efficiencyInt. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 13141–13146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chen, C.F.; Eccarius, T.; Su, P.C. The role of environmental concern in forming intentions for switching to electric scooters. Transp. Res. Part A-Policy Pract. 2021, 154, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Eccarius, T.; Lu, C.C. Adoption intentions for micro-mobility—Insights from electric scooter sharing in Taiwan. Transp. Res. Part D-Transp. Environ. 2020, 84, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Feng, Y.H.; Zhong, D.; Sun, P.; Zheng, W.J.; Cao, Q.L.; Luo, X.; Lu, Z. Micro-mobility in Smart Cities: A Closer Look at Shared Dockless E-Scooters via Big Social Data. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Electr Network, Montreal, QC, Canada, 14–23 June 2021; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  110. Flores, P.J.; Jansson, J. The role of consumer innovativeness and green perceptions on green innovation use: The case of shared e-bikes and e-scooters. J. Consum. Behav. 2021, 20, 1466–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gehrke, S.R.; Russo, B.J.; Sadeghinasr, B.; Riffle, K.R.; Smaglik, E.J.; Reardon, T.G. Spatial interactions of shared e-scooter trip generation and vulnerable road user crash frequency. J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 2021, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Habault, G.; Taniguchi, Y.; Yamanaka, N. Delivery Management System based on Vehicles Monitoring and a Machine-learning Mechanism. In Proceedings of the 88th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), Chicago, IL, USA, 27–30 August 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  113. Hamerska, M.; Ziolko, M.; Stawiarski, P. A Sustainable Transport System-The MMQUAL Model of Shared Micro-mobility Service Quality Assessment. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Lazarus, J.R.; Caicedo, J.D.; Bayen, A.M.; Shaheen, S.A. To Pool or Not to Pool? Understanding opportunities, challenges, and equity considerations to expanding the market for pooling. Transp. Res. Part A-Policy Pract. 2021, 148, 199–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Li, L.; Lee, K.Y.; Chang, Y.H.; Yang, S.B.; Park, P. IT-enabled sustainable development in electric scooter sharing platforms: Focusing on the privacy concerns for traceable information. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2021, 27, 736–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mitchell, G.; Tsao, H.; Randell, T.; Marks, J.; Mackay, P. Impact of electric scooters to a tertiary emergency department: 8-week review after implementation of a scooter share scheme. Emerg. Med. Australas. 2019, 31, 930–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Montero, L.; Linares, M.P.; Serch, O.; Casanovas-Garcia, J. A Visualization Tool Based on Traffic Simulation for the Analysis and Evaluation of Smart City Policies, Innovative Vehicles and Mobility Concepts. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 3–6 December 2017; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 3196–3207. [Google Scholar]
  118. Pham, T.T.; Kuo, T.C.; Tseng, M.L.; Tan, R.R.; Tan, K.; Ika, D.S.; Lin, C.J. Industry 4.0 to Accelerate the Circular Economy: A Case Study of Electric Scooter Sharing. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Rathje, P.; Poirot, V.; Landsiedel, O. STARC: Low-power Decentralized Coordination Primitive for Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), Electr Network, Budapest, Hungary, 20–24 April 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  120. Scorrano, M.; Danielis, R. The characteristics of the demand for electric scooters in Italy: An exploratory study. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2021, 39, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Severengiz, S.; Finke, S.; Schelte, N.; Wendt, N. Life Cycle Assessment on the Mobility Service E-Scooter Sharing. In Proceedings of the IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit (E-TEMS), Fachhochschule Dortmund Univ Appl Sci & Arts, Inst Digital Transformat App, Dortmund, Germany, 5–7 March 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  122. Zuniga-Garcia, N.; Tec, M.; Scott, J.G.; Machemehl, R.B. Evaluation of e-scooters as transit last-mile solution. Transp. Res. Part C-Emerg. Technol. 2022, 139, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Anagnostopoulos, C. Intelligent Contextual Information Collection in Internet of Things. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 2016, 23, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Carvalho, D.F.; Depari, A.; Ferrari, P.; Flammini, A.; Rinaldi, S.; Sisinni, E. On the feasibility of mobile sensing and tracking applications based on LPWAN. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), Seoul, Korea, 12–14 March 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 297–302. [Google Scholar]
  125. Chen, Q.X.; Ding, D.D.; Wang, X.; Liu, A.X.; Zhao, J.F. An efficient urban localization method based on speed humps. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 2019, 24, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Cordova, J.; Sriram, L.M.K.; Kocatepe, A.; Zhou, Y.X.; Ozguven, E.E.; Arghandeh, R. Combined Electricity and Traffic Short-Term Load Forecasting Using Bundled Causality Engine. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 20, 3448–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Dong, B.; Liu, Y.P.; Fontenot, H.; Ouf, M.; Osman, M.; Chong, A.D.; Qin, S.X.; Salim, F.; Xue, H.; Yan, D.; et al. Occupant behavior modeling methods for resilient building design, operation and policy at urban scale: A review. Appl. Energy 2021, 293, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hall, S.; Jonas, A.E.G.; Shepherd, S.; Wadud, Z. The smart grid as commons: Exploring alternatives to infrastructure financialisation. Urban Stud. 2019, 56, 1386–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. MacLachlan, A.; Biggs, E.; Roberts, G.; Boruff, B. Sustainable City Planning: A Data-Driven Approach for Mitigating Urban Heat. Front. Built Environ. 2021, 6, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Malasek, J. A set of tools for making urban transport more sustainable. In Proceedings of the 6th Transport Research Arena (TRA), Warsaw, Poland, 18–21 April 2016; Elsevier Science Bv: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 14, pp. 876–885. [Google Scholar]
  131. Oldewurtel, F.; Ulbig, A.; Morari, M.; Andersson, G. Building Control and Storage Management with Dynamic Tariffs for Shaping Demand Response. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE PES International Conference and Exhibition on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT Europe), Univ Manchester, Manchester, UK, 5–7 December 2011; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  132. Palomar, E.; Liu, Z.M.; Bowen, J.P.; Zhang, Y.; Maharjan, S. Component-Based Modelling for Sustainable and Scalable Smart Meter Networks. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), Sydney, NSW, Australia, 19 December 2014; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  133. Ramirez-Moreno, M.A.; Keshtkar, S.; Padilla-Reyes, D.A.; Ramos-Lopez, E.; Garcia-Martinez, M.; Hernandez-Luna, M.C.; Mogro, A.E.; Mahlknecht, J.; Huertas, J.I.; Peimbert-Garcia, R.E.; et al. Sensors for Sustainable Smart Cities: A Review. Applied Sci. Basel 2021, 11, 8198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Raut, P.B.; Raut, S.K. Shrinking Spaces and Emerging Role of Information Technology in India. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Urban and Regional Development and Spatial Planning in the Information Society (REAL CORP), Vienna Univ Technol, Campus Gusshaus, Vienna, Austria, 4–6 April 2018; Corp—Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning: Vienna, Austria, 2018; pp. 651–657. [Google Scholar]
  135. Thomas, D.; Vallee, F.; Klonari, V.; Ioakimidis, C.S. Implementation of an E-bike Sharing System: The Effect on Low Voltage Network using PV and Smart Charging Stations. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), Palermo, Italy, 22–25 November 2015; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 572–577. [Google Scholar]
  136. Gazafroudi, A.S.; Shafie-khah, M.; Heydarian-Forushani, E.; Hajizadeh, A.; Heidari, A.; Corchado, J.M.; Catalao, J.P.S. Two-stage stochastic model for the price-based domestic energy management problem. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2019, 112, 404–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Jaouhari, S.E.L.; Palacios-Garcia, E.J.; Anvari-Moghaddam, A.; Bouabdallah, A. Integrated Management of Energy, Wellbeing and Health in the Next Generation of Smart Homes. Sensors 2019, 19, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Rua, D.; Issicaba, D.; Soares, F.J.; Almeida, P.M.R.; Rei, R.J.; Lopes, J.A.P. Advanced Metering Infrastructure Functionalities for Electric Mobility. In Proceedings of the IEEE-PES Conference on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe), Gothenburg, Sweden, 11–13 October 2010; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  139. Web of Science. Web of Science Core Collection 2022. Available online: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/basic-search (accessed on 20 April 2022).
  140. Cieslik, W.; Szwajca, F.; Zawartowski, J.; Pietrzak, K.; Rosolski, S.; Szkarlat, K.; Rutkowski, M. Capabilities of Nearly Zero Energy Building (nZEB) Electricity Generation to Charge Electric Vehicle (EV) Operating in Real Driving Conditions (RDC). Energies 2021, 14, 7591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Turoń, K.; Kubik, A.; Chen, F. Electric Shared Mobility Services during the Pandemic: Modeling Aspects of Transportation. Energies 2021, 14, 2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Cieslik, W.; Szwajca, F.; Golimowski, W.; Berger, A. Experimental Analysis of Residential Photovoltaic (PV) and Electric Vehicle (EV) Systems in Terms of Annual Energy Utilization. Energies 2021, 14, 1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart for the selection of relevant publications and articles, processed for the selection of studies based on PRISMA.
Figure 1. Flowchart for the selection of relevant publications and articles, processed for the selection of studies based on PRISMA.
Wevj 13 00176 g001
Figure 2. The number of publications in individual years on the Smart Cities and micro-mobility topics.
Figure 2. The number of publications in individual years on the Smart Cities and micro-mobility topics.
Wevj 13 00176 g002
Figure 3. Number of publications in individual years for Smart Cities and electric vehicle charging while driving.
Figure 3. Number of publications in individual years for Smart Cities and electric vehicle charging while driving.
Wevj 13 00176 g003
Figure 5. The number of publications in individual years on the topic of chargers for electric scooters.
Figure 5. The number of publications in individual years on the topic of chargers for electric scooters.
Wevj 13 00176 g005
Figure 6. Number of publications in individual years on the topic of the management and sharing of electric scooters.
Figure 6. Number of publications in individual years on the topic of the management and sharing of electric scooters.
Wevj 13 00176 g006
Figure 7. Number of publications in individual years on the subject of E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Homes).
Figure 7. Number of publications in individual years on the subject of E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Homes).
Wevj 13 00176 g007
Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Inclusion CriteriaExclusion Criteria
IC1The publication contains the keywords “Mobility”, “Smart Cities”, and “Micro-mobility” in the title, abstract, and topic.No match with the described criteria, duplicate publication.
IC2Articles that contain the keywords and match the keywords “charger for electric scooter”.No match with the described criteria, duplicate publication.
IC3Articles that contain the keywords and match the keywords “management and sharing electric scooter” and “E-mobility within Smart City (Smart Home)”.No match with the described criteria, duplicate publication.
IC4The publication contains the keywords “electric vehicle charging while driving” and “Smart Cities”.No match with the described criteria, duplicate publication.
IC5The publication contains the keywords “electric mobility”, “Smart Home”, and “Smart Cities” in the title, abstract, and topic.No match with the described criteria, duplicate publication.
Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Query No.Query StringsResultsSelected
1Key (Smart Cities all fields) AND (mobility all fields) AND (micro-mobility all fields)6338
2Key (Smart Cities all fields) AND (Electric Vehicles driving charging all fields) AND (micro-mobility all fields)10833
3Key (Charger all fields) AND (electric Scooter all fields)2928
4Key (electric Scooter all fields) AND (Management and sharing all fields)2119
5Key (Smart Cities all fields) AND (Electric mobility all fields) AND (Smart Home all fields)2416
Total245134
Table 3. The research areas that focus on the topic “Smart Cities and micro-mobility”.
Table 3. The research areas that focus on the topic “Smart Cities and micro-mobility”.
Research AreasRecord Count% of 63
Computer Science2539.7
Engineering1727.0
Transportation1422.2
Telecommunications1219.1
Environmental Sciences Ecology1015.9
Science Technology Other Topics1015.9
Table 4. In terms of affiliations which are dealing with the topic “Smart Cities and micro-mobility”.
Table 4. In terms of affiliations which are dealing with the topic “Smart Cities and micro-mobility”.
AffiliationsRecord Count% of 63
Delft University of Technology34.7
Universidad de Malaga34.7
Czech Technical University Prague23.2
Enzo Ferrari Engn Dept23.2
Univ Nacl Patagonia Austral23.2
Universidad Publicad de Navarra23.2
Table 5. Countries/regions that support research on the topic “Smart Cities and micro-mobility”.
Table 5. Countries/regions that support research on the topic “Smart Cities and micro-mobility”.
Countries/RegionsRecord Count% of 63
Spain1219.0
USA1117.5
Germany1015.9
Italy1015.9
England46.4
Mexico46.4
The Netherlands46.4
Brazil34.7
Table 6. The research areas that focus on the topic “Smart Cities and Electric Vehicles driving and charging”.
Table 6. The research areas that focus on the topic “Smart Cities and Electric Vehicles driving and charging”.
Research AreasRecord Count% of 108
Engineering6358.3
Computer Science3330.6
Energy Fuels2523.1
Transportation2220.4
Telecommunications1816.7
Science Technology Other Topics87.4
Environmental Sciences Ecology76.5
Automation Control Systems65.6
Table 7. Affiliations that support research on the topic “Smart Cities and Electric Vehicles driving and charging”.
Table 7. Affiliations that support research on the topic “Smart Cities and Electric Vehicles driving and charging”.
AffiliationsRecord Count% of 108
United States Department Oof Energy (DOE)54.6
Polytechnic University of Turin43.7
University of Zagreb43.7
American University of Sharjah32.8
Chinese Academy of Sciences32.8
Concordia University Canada32.8
Table 8. Countries/regions that support research on the topic “Smart Cities and Electric Vehicles driving and charging”.
Table 8. Countries/regions that support research on the topic “Smart Cities and Electric Vehicles driving and charging”.
Countries/RegionsRecord Count% of 108
People’s Republic of China2725.0
USA2220.4
India1110.2
Italy98.3
Canada87.4
England87.4
Japan65.6
South Korea65.6
Table 9. The research areas that focus on the topic “Chargers for Electric Scooter”.
Table 9. The research areas that focus on the topic “Chargers for Electric Scooter”.
Research AreasRecord Count% of 28
Engineering2382.1
Energy Fuels1035.7
Computer Science621.4
Science Technology Other Topics414.3
Telecommunications414.3
Transportation414.3
Table 10. Affiliations that support research on the topic “Chargers for Electric Scooter”.
Table 10. Affiliations that support research on the topic “Chargers for Electric Scooter”.
AffiliationsRecord Count% of 28
Osaka Institute of Technology414.3
Imperial College London310.7
Polytechnic University of Turin310.7
Universiti Malaya310.7
Fuzhou University27.1
King Saud University27.1
Table 11. Countries/regions that support research on the topic “Chargers for Electric Scooter”.
Table 11. Countries/regions that support research on the topic “Chargers for Electric Scooter”.
Countries/RegionsRecord Count% of 28
Italy621.4
Japan414.3
England310.7
Malaysia310.7
Taiwan310.7
Australia27.1
Czech Republic27.1
India27.1
Table 12. The research areas that focus on the topic “Management and sharing electric scooter”.
Table 12. The research areas that focus on the topic “Management and sharing electric scooter”.
Research AreasRecord Count% of 21
Transportation942.9
Business Economics419.1
Computer Science419.1
Environmental Sciences Ecology314.3
Telecommunications314.3
Energy Fuels29.5
Table 13. Affiliations that support research on the topic “Management and sharing electric scooter”.
Table 13. Affiliations that support research on the topic “Management and sharing electric scooter”.
AffiliationsRecord Count% of 21
University of California System29.5
Asia University Taiwan14.8
Barcelona Supercomputer Center BSC CNS14.8
Beijing Institute of Technology14.8
Chalmers University of Technology14.8
China Medical University Hospital Taiwan14.8
Table 14. Countries/regions that support research on the topic “Management and sharing electric scooter”.
Table 14. Countries/regions that support research on the topic “Management and sharing electric scooter”.
Countries/RegionsRecord Count% of 21
USA523.8
Taiwan419.1
Germany29.5
Italy29.5
People’s Republic of China29.5
Poland29.5
Sweden29.5
Australia14.8
Table 15. The research areas that focus on the topic “E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Home)”.
Table 15. The research areas that focus on the topic “E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Home)”.
Research AreasRecord Count% of 24
Computer Science1145.8
Engineering937.5
Energy Fuels729.2
Telecommunications312.5
Automation Control Systems28.3
Chemistry28.3
Table 16. Affiliations that support research on the topic “E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Home)”.
Table 16. Affiliations that support research on the topic “E-mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Home)”.
AffiliationsRecord Count% of 24
Eindhoven University of Technology28.3
Ku Leuven28.3
Abdus Salam International Centre For Theoretical Physics ICTP14.2
AGH University of Science Technology14.2
Alma Digit Res Labs14.2
Beijing Jiaotong University14.2
Table 17. Countries/regions that support research on the topic “E mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Home)”.
Table 17. Countries/regions that support research on the topic “E mobility within Smart Cities (Smart Home)”.
Countries/RegionsRecord Count% of 24
People’s Republic of China729.2
USA625.0
India416.7
Italy416.7
The Netherlands312.5
Belgium28.3
England28.3
Germany28.3
Table 18. Overview—topics addressed within the “SC and MM” concept.
Table 18. Overview—topics addressed within the “SC and MM” concept.
Topic of the ArticleReference NumberObservations
PLEVs demand in cities, Micro-Mobility (MM)[4]SC, PLEV, Poland
Sharing PLEVs[1]SC, PLEV, USA
Tracking EVs[9]SC, EV
Traffic regulations, public safety, PLEVs parking[2,3]SC, PLEV
Regulation of the use of PLEVs [5]SC, PLEV, Australia
Mobility and Energy Productivity (MEP) assessment methodology[6]SC, PLEV, MEP
Health impacts and injuries[7]SC, PLEV, health
EV charging methodology—optimization[8]SC, SH, EV, charging optimization
MM and PLEV shared micro-mobility[15,23,26,31,36,43]SC, PLEV MM sharing
Use of ANN to predict PLEV sharing[16]SC, Predikce, sdílení, PLEV, USA
PLEVs analysis for urban public transport[17,18]SC, PLEV sustainability, Uruguay
Charging station—Photovoltaics (PV)—households (Smart Homes), PLEVs[19]SC, SH, PV, PLEV, SH
Smart mobile, PLEV driving intention[20]SC, Mobile, PLEV
Localization of PLEVs, data processing[21]SC, PLEV, data processing, USA
A sustainable alternative for moving around the city—PLEVs[22]SC, sustainability, PLEVs, Italy
PLEVs, Brushless DC motor (BLDC)[24]PLEV, BLDC motor
PLEVs’ conflicts, legitimization[25]SC, PLEV, conflicts
Infrastructure for sustainable mobility[27]SC, PLEV, infrastructure
SW tool, simulation, and analysis of micro-mobility[28]SC, MM, Talin, Estonia
IoT, LoRaWAN, Smart Cities[29,33,34,35,42],SC, MM, IoT
A comprehensive PLEV sharing solution—Dockless Shared Electric Scooters (DSESs)[30]SC, MM, DSES
Resolving noise in cities using PLEVs[32]SC, PLEV, noise
Ensuring data collection within micro-mobility[36,38]SC, MM, data collection
Internet of Moving Things (IoMT), PLEVs[34]SC, MM, IoMT
Micro-mobility for environmental improvement[37]SC, MM, environment
Connection of MM with traffic load in SCs and configuration and provision of SC infrastructure[39,40]SC, MM, traffic load, infrastructure
Disabled people + seniors’ support for an active life with the help of MM[41,42]SC, MM, seniors, disabled people
Table 19. Overview—resolved topics within the “SC and EV driving and charging” concept.
Table 19. Overview—resolved topics within the “SC and EV driving and charging” concept.
Topic of the ArticleReference NumberObservations
Battery charging MPC of Electric Vehicles (EVs) in RT[45,69]Battery, EV, MPC, HESS
Battery State Of Charge (SOC) estimation optimization model[65,66,70]SOC, HEV, OML-SOCE,
Fast charging optimization to maximize battery cycle life[67]ML, fast charging
Prediction, EV range optimization[47,68]EV, range
Indication of battery degradation during battery charging[49]RUL, FRGM
E-RCE battery energy state determination, EV remaining range prediction[50]SOE, SRUKF, ECE, E-RCE, E-RAE, range
Parameterization of EEC, LIPB—a combination of the EIS method and analysis of charge/discharge curves with the prediction of the behavior of Li ion batteries[71]EEC, LIPB, EIS, SOE/SOC, battery parameterization
Modular Multilevel Converters (MMCs)—quick charge[73]MMC, quick charge, NMPC
Determining the importance of HVLIB internal losses to EV range estimation algorithms[74]EV, range, HVLIB, SOC, SOH
Demand prediction—EV range solution—virtual sensors[44]EV, VS, prediction, IT
Accurate knowledge of battery behavior, creation of battery simulation model[75]SLELB, EIS, EV, SECM, SOC
Battery behavior model[51,52,53,54,55]EV, MPC, battery model
SOC prediction in EVs using a battery model[56]SOC, EV, battery model
Maximizing EV range in RT using active cell balancing with MPC[57]EV, RT, MPC
Torsional vibration removal of HEVs to optimize energy management[58]HEV energy optimization
Optimal energy-efficient EV control based on the dynamic flow of traffic information[59]EV, control optimization
Estimation of SoC during HEV operation in RT[76]HEV, SOC, RT
Optimizing EV shortest distance estimation[60]EV, shortest distance range
Lithium ion battery model parameter estimation[61]LIB model estimation
Adaptive SOC balancing control with application to real vehicles[62]SOC, EV
Description of the electrochemical model of the lithium ion battery[63]Estimation of the LIB model
Optimization of EV energy management with extended range in RT[77]EV, RT
ANN for PHEV energy prediction under AER adaptive control strategy[78]ANN, PHEV, AER
Ensuring the accuracy of E-RDE[64]E-RDE
Optimization of battery management within BMS for ERP[46]ES, BMS, EESS, LIB, ERP
Table 20. Overview—resolved topics within the “Chargers for ES” concept.
Table 20. Overview—resolved topics within the “Chargers for ES” concept.
Topic of the ArticleReference NumberObservations
Super-fast-charging ES, Electric Double-Layer Capacitor (EDLC)[79]EDLC, ES,
HW and SW solutions of EVCS using the OCPP standard[80]EVCS, OCPP
Reduction of THD in BLDC[81]THD, BLDC, ES
ES with V2H and V2G energy transfer function using PV[82]ES, V2H, V2G, PV
Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) using wireless charger[83,87,88,95,96,97,98]WPT, ES
EDLC charger solution [84,85,86]ES, EDLC
DC–DC converter with frequency control for LEV[89]LEV, DC-DC converter
Photovoltaic charging dock for electric scooters[90]PV, ES
Solving ES charging dock allocation problem (ESCA)[91]ES, ESCA, MILP, charging docks
Optimizing ES assignment solutions to chargers[92]ES, allocation, charging docks
Optimization of MESN solutions for ES[93,99,100]ES, MESN
Design and solution of BC for ES[94,101,102,103,104,105]ES, BC
FC with high efficiency for LAB[106]ES, FC, LAB
Table 21. Overview—topics resolved in the “Management and sharing ES” concept.
Table 21. Overview—topics resolved in the “Management and sharing ES” concept.
Topic of the ArticleReference NumberObservations
Car or bicycle sharing or mobility-packages-as-a-service[107]ES, sharing, MaaS
Last-mile operation solutions from the point of view of the private operator and from the point of view of the user[108]ES, mobility, sharing
Use of hybrid energy systems of fuel cells and batteries with increased efficiency[118]ES, electric batteries
The connection between EC operation and environmental protection[119,120]ES, sharing, environment
Sustainability of urban transport in connection with the operation of ESs[109]ES, sustainability of transport
EC traffic problems, traffic regulations, public safety, parking regulations, liability issues, accident, and injury analysis[110]ES, rules of the road
Elimination of accidents and injuries[121,122]ES, elimination of injuries
Monitoring of e-scooter routes during goods delivery[123]ES, route monitoring
ES shared mobility quality measurement, MMQUAL[124]ES, shared mobility quality
Ensuring ES operation flexibility and affordability[111]ES, TNC, flexibility, price
EC operation, IT development, data protection[112]ES, IT, data secure
Ensuring safety risk analysis of ES operation[122]ES, safety, analysis
Ensuring visualization, analysis, and comparison of the impacts of SC policies based on innovative mobility concepts in urban areas[125]ES, visualization, traffic impact analysis
Ensuring service and maintenance of batteries and charging stations for ESs[113]ES, service and maintenance, IoT, cloud computing
Ensuring the control of operation, traffic, and traffic lights[114]ES, traffic control
Provision of analysis of possibilities for expansion of ES operation[115]ES, expansion of operation, impact analysis
Ensuring the analysis of the impact of ES operations on the improvement of the environment[116]ES, operation, environment
Providing a solution to the problem of modeling the interaction of e-scooters and bus transit services.[117]ES, interaction with the operation of electric buses
Table 22. Overview—topics addressed within the “E-mobility within SC (SH)” concept.
Table 22. Overview—topics addressed within the “E-mobility within SC (SH)” concept.
Topic of the ArticleReference NumberObservations
Secure data collection using IoT within SCs[128,138]IoT, SC, data
Wireless networks, long-distance data transmission in SCs[137]SC, Wireless networks, data
Localization of persons and objects in SCs[139]Localization, SC
Electricity consumption prediction in connection with e-transport in SCs[130]SC, consumption of electricity, prediction, e-transport
Monitoring and modeling the behavior of residents for realistic proposals for predicting electricity consumption; energy in SCs[136]SC, behavior monitoring, prediction of electricity consumption; energy
Financing of electric power infrastructures within the framework of the regulation of electric power and E-mobility in SCs[132]Financing of electric power, E-mobility
Ensuring the support, development, and use of environmentally friendly vehicles in SCs[131]SC, support
SH automation, dynamic tariffs for demand response shaping[134]SH, dynamic tariffs
Smart Meters within SCs[129]SC, smart meters
Optimization of resources and services through monitoring and IT in SCs[126,127]SC, IT, monitoring
PV energy supply for smart charging stations for e-scooters + a local battery[133]ES, SH, PV, BEV
Identification of electricity consumption models facilities in SHs in connection with SG[140]SH, SG
Implementation of Smart Metering in Smart Homes[141,142]SM, SH
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vanus, J.; Bilik, P. Research on Micro-Mobility with a Focus on Electric Scooters within Smart Cities. World Electr. Veh. J. 2022, 13, 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj13100176

AMA Style

Vanus J, Bilik P. Research on Micro-Mobility with a Focus on Electric Scooters within Smart Cities. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2022; 13(10):176. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj13100176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vanus, Jan, and Petr Bilik. 2022. "Research on Micro-Mobility with a Focus on Electric Scooters within Smart Cities" World Electric Vehicle Journal 13, no. 10: 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj13100176

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop