Next Article in Journal
Can Wearable Inertial Measurement Units Be Used to Measure Sleep Biomechanics? Establishing Initial Feasibility and Validity
Next Article in Special Issue
Self-Assembly, Self-Folding, and Origami: Comparative Design Principles
Previous Article in Journal
Overview on Adjunct Ingredients Used in Hydroxyapatite-Based Oral Care Products
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecularly Designed Ion-Imprinted Nanoparticles for Real-Time Sensing of Cu(II) Ions Using Quartz Crystal Microbalance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Diversity of Biogenic Nanoparticles Obtained by the Fungi-Mediated Synthesis: A Review

by
Ekaterina A. Loshchinina
,
Elena P. Vetchinkina
* and
Maria A. Kupryashina
Laboratory of Microbiology, Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Plants and Microorganisms, Saratov Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IBPPM RAS), 13 Prospekt Entuziastov, 410049 Saratov, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomimetics 2023, 8(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010001
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 15 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 20 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomimetic Nanotechnology Vol. 3)

Abstract

:
Fungi are very promising biological objects for the green synthesis of nanoparticles. Biogenic synthesis of nanoparticles using different mycological cultures and substances obtained from them is a promising, easy and environmentally friendly method. By varying the synthesis conditions, the same culture can be used to produce nanoparticles with different sizes, shapes, stability in colloids and, therefore, different biological activity. Fungi are capable of producing a wide range of biologically active compounds and have a powerful enzymatic system that allows them to form nanoparticles of various chemical elements. This review attempts to summarize and provide a comparative analysis of the currently accumulated data, including, among others, our research group’s works, on the variety of the characteristics of the nanoparticles produced by various fungal species, their mycelium, fruiting bodies, extracts and purified fungal metabolites.

1. Introduction

The most important task of modern nanotechnology is the development of reliable and efficient techniques allowing one to produce monodisperse nanoparticles with needed parameters. Nanoparticle production methods can be divided into physical, chemical and biological (or bio-assisted) [1,2], as well as combined methods putting together biological materials and physical influences, such as microwave radiation [3,4]. The chemical and physical methods traditionally used to produce nanoparticles allow large quantities of particles to be synthesized in a short time, but they are often expensive and difficult to perform; the issue of their environmental safety is a big problem as well. Therefore, in recent years, there has been an increasing interest in green nanotechnology and the biological synthesis of nanoparticles [5,6,7,8]. The introduction of green synthesis techniques can reduce the negative impact of nanotechnology on the environment by using less toxic reagents and reducing the risks of secondary pollution. Furthermore, nanoparticles produced via biosynthesis may have higher stability and biocompatibility and lower toxicity owing to their coating with biogenic surfactants or capping agents [9,10,11].
The ability to form nanoparticles has been found in all groups of organisms. Numerous studies have shown that plants [12,13,14,15], animals [10,16,17], bacteria [16,18], fungi [11,19,20,21], actinomycetes [22,23], algae [14,16,24,25], lichens [26] and viruses [10] can be successfully used to produce nanoparticles. Along with living cultures, their biomass, cell fractions, extracts, metabolites and spent media can also be used in green nanosynthesis [6,11,12,14,27,28], as well as various plant and animal food products [29,30,31,32] and organic industrial wastes [33,34,35]. Fungal cultures of different taxonomic groups are very promising biological objects for the green synthesis of nanoparticles [11,20,36]. The advantage of fungi in comparison to other organisms is their ability to produce a wide range of active protein molecules, convert ions of heavy metals and other trace elements into less toxic forms under the action of their enzymes and accumulate them in large quantities both within their mycelium and extracellularly. Therefore, fungi-mediated nanosynthesis has been increasingly studied in the past two decades. In fungal cultures, the ability to form a wide range of nanoparticles of different chemical compositions was found, including metals, metalloids, metal oxides and sulfides and other compounds, as well as composite nanoparticles [19,36,37].
All biological methods of nanosynthesis can be divided into two main types. In the first one, living cultures are used directly to serve as “nanofactories“, forming nanoparticles in vivo and accumulating them in their cells, on their cell surface or in the medium. Fungal biomass separated from the culture liquid can also be used. The disadvantage of this method is the need to separate the obtained nanoparticles from the bio-object’s cells; moreover, the process of biosynthesis by growing cultures may take a long time. The level of the precursor may also be a limiting factor, because high concentrations of metals and other compounds used to biosynthesize nanoparticles inhibit the growth processes. Another option for green nanoparticle synthesis is the use of various substances derived from bio-objects, such as culture liquids, intracellular extracts, protein fractions or individual fungal metabolites. The use of such techniques greatly facilitates the process of nanosynthesis, as there is no need to destroy the producing organism’s cells and separate nanoparticles from them.
The physico-chemical properties of nanoparticles are closely related not only to their chemical composition and crystal structure but also to their size and morphology, including particle physical shape, surface topography and the presence of pores and cavities [38,39]. It is also important that the synthesized nanoparticles are homogeneous in size and shape and resistant to aggregation in suspensions. The properties of biogenic nanoparticles have been found to depend on the species and strain of the microorganism, the extracts and metabolites used, the precursor compound and its concentration, media composition, stirring rate, incubation time, temperature, pH and other conditions, the varying of which can control nanoparticle formation [40,41,42]. The characteristics of the resulting nanoparticles determine their future applications. In this regard, an important challenge in nanobiotechnology is to develop methods allowing one to produce nanoparticles with better control over their size, shape and other properties. However, not enough attention has been paid to the study of the influence of the synthesis conditions on the properties of biogenic nanoparticles. In particular, there are still few comparative studies on the mycosynthesis of nanoparticles with different characteristics using the same fungal species but under different conditions.
In this review, we tried to summarize the currently available data on the variety of characteristics of the nanoparticles produced by various fungal species, their mycelium, fruit bodies, extracts and purified fungal metabolites. We paid special attention to the nanoparticles of the elements that currently remain understudied and insufficiently covered in reviews.

2. Fungi-Mediated Synthesis of Nanoparticles

2.1. Mycosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles

Owing to their unique features, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have many applications in various fields of medicine and engineering. The area of their applications includes electronic components, biomedical devices, textile engineering, cosmetics, agricultural engineering and many others [43,44]. AgNPs have been found to have a wide range of biological activities, including antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antitumor, hepatoprotective and hypotensive properties, which is why they are actively used for therapeutic purposes [45,46].
To date, the biological synthesis of AgNPs in fungi has been the most extensively studied of all elements. The ability to produce nanosilver has been detected in more than 120 species of fungi from different taxa, including Ascomycota (Alternaria [47], Aspergillus [48,49], Beauveria [50], Bionectria [51], Botryodiplodia [52], Chrysosporium [53], Cladosporium [54], Colletotrichum [55], Epicoccum [56], Fusarium [57,58], Geotricum [59], Guignardia [60], Helvella [61], Hormoconis [62], Humicola [63], Macrophomina [64], Neurospora [65], Paecilomyces [66], Penicillium [67,68,69,70,71,72], Pestalotia [73], Phoma [74,75], Picoa [76], Saccharomyces [77], Sclerotinia [78], Scopulariopsis [79], Talaromyces [80], Tirmania [81], Trichoderma [42,48,82,83,84], Verticillium [85], Yarrowia [86]), Mucoromycota (Rhizopus [87]) and Basidiomycota (Agaricus [41,88,89,90,91], Auricularia [92], Bjerkandera [93], Boletus [94], Calocybe [95], Coriolus [94], Cryptococcus [96], Flammulina [97,98], Fomes [99], Fomitopsis [100], Ganoderma [41,82,101,102], Grifola [41], Hypsizygus [103], Inonotus [104], Lactarius [105], Laxitextum [106], Lentinus [41,107], Microporus [108], Phaenerochaete [109], Phellinus [88], Piriformospora [110], Pleurotus [41,111,112,113,114], Pycnoporus [115], Rhodotorula [116], Schizophylluum [117], Trametes [118], Tricholoma [119], Volvariella [120]). Basidiomycetes are of particular interest as promising bio-objects for nanoparticle fabrication. Most of the basidiomycetes studied for mycosynthesis belong to edible and medicinal mushrooms, many of which are grown in artificial culture. These fungi produce a wide range of biologically active molecules, which not only can act as capping and stabilizing agents but also have anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities themselves, allowing the production of nanoparticles with complex biomedical properties.
The number of research papers on nanosilver mycosynthesis includes many dozens and is constantly growing. In recent years, there have been several reviews detailing the production of biogenic nanoparticles of this element using fungal cultures [45,121,122]. Therefore, below we will focus on some of the most recent publications in the past five years (Table 1).
As can be seen from the table, AgNPs are commonly spherical in shape; irregular, oval, cubic, triangular, polygonal and other shapes are less common. Extracts from fruit bodies and mycelium are the most frequently used biological material for AgNP mycosynthesis, while culture liquids, biomass, living cultures and fungal metabolites of different purity (including enzymes, polysaccharides and phenolic compounds) are less commonly used.
A number of researchers have screened fungal cultures to find the most promising ones for AgNP biofabrication. For example, Qu et al. studied 10 Trichoderma species and found that AgNPs obtained using different species differed in the degree of antimicrobial activity [42]. Other researchers found that among nine different fungi isolated from metal-rich sites, a strain of Penicillium janthinellum exhibited maximum metal tolerance capacity and AgNP-synthesizing ability [69].
The shape, size, homogeneity and stability of nanoparticles are influenced by the process conditions, the optimization of which can improve the quality of the obtained particles. For example, Mohanta et al. used various ratios of a Ganoderma sessiliforme mushroom extract to AgNO3 for AgNP synthesis [101]. At a 0.5:10 ratio, nanoparticles formed very slowly; at a 1.5:10 ratio, the reaction was very rapid but nanoparticles formed large aggregates. The 1:10 ratio was optimal and allowed the authors to obtain nanoparticles with an average size of 45 nm with antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. In another study, the utilization of a Ganoderma lucidum fruit body extract was scrutinized under different operational conditions including the AgNO3:extract ratio, reaction time and temperature to establish an effective myconanosynthesis method with a high yield rate and nanoparticle stabilization [125]. Vetchinkina et al. studied the effect of the Lentinus edodes culture age and stage of ontogenesis on the biogenic AgNP synthesis using culture liquids of different ages [41] and extracts obtained from the different morphological structures of L. edodes [128]. Parametric optimization, including the concentration of AgNO3, fungal biomass, ratio of cell filtrate to AgNO3, pH, reaction time and presence of light, was performed for the rapid synthesis of silver nanoparticles by Penicillium polonicum [72]. For Trichoderma harzianum and Ganoderma sessile, different methods of mycelial extraction for silver mycosynthesis were compared [82]. The extract containing intracellular components of fungal strains was obtained from a mechanically disrupted mycelium, while for the extract containing extracellular components of fungal strains, the biomass was extracted without disruption. The second method produced smaller particles.
A number of researchers have studied the effect of various additional external physical influences on the fungi-mediated nanoparticle formation and developed combined methods of myconanosynthesis to improve AgNP characteristics. For example, UV radiation enhanced the characteristics of AgNPs obtained with an Agaricus bisporus pilei extract [89]. Microwave irritation enhanced the properties of AgNPs synthesized with the use of a Pleurotus sajor-caju fruit body extract [113]. AgNPs were synthesized from Pleurotus florida fruit body extracts using different electro-magnetic radiations, microwaves, visible light and UV rays [111]. Microwave irradiation led to the synthesis of monodisperse AgNPs of 10 nm size within 150 s of exposure, whereas visible light and UV radiation led to the synthesis of polydisperse AgNPs with inconsistent dimensions.
Numerous studies have shown that mycosynthesized AgNPs have antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, antioxidant, larvicidal and other properties, and the same nanoparticles can exhibit a wide range of biological activities. For example, silver nanospheres obtained by using Flammulina velutipes had bactericidal, fungicidal, anti-Alzheimer, anticancer, antioxidant and anti-diabetic activities, as well as good biocompatibility against human red blood cells [97]. Silver nanospheres produced using Aspergillus niger and Trichoderma longibrachiatum xylanases exhibited antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, anticoagulant, thrombolytic and dye-degrading activities [48]. All these properties offer great prospects for biomedical applications of mycogenic AgNPs.

2.2. Mycosynthesis of Gold Nanoparticles

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have attracted attention owing to their unique optical, electronic, thermal, chemical and biological properties. They have been used in chemical and biological sensing, bio-imaging, nonlinear optics, catalysis, targeted drug delivery, gene delivery and as antimicrobial and antioxidant agents, as well as in cancer, Alzheimer’s, cardiovascular and infectious disease therapy [129,130,131]. In the past two decades, the biological synthesis of gold nanoparticles by fungi has been studied almost as extensively as that of silver. The ability to form AuNPs has been found in dozens of micro- and macromycete species. The table shows the AuNP mycosynthesis data published in the past five years (Table 2).
As with silver, the ability to biosynthesize gold nanoparticles has been studied mainly in two groups of fungi—ascomycetes and basidiomycetes. Mycogenic AuNPs most often have a spherical shape, but triangular, hexagonal, cubic, irregular and other shapes were also found.
Needle- and flower-like nanostructures with a spindle shape were obtained using Fusarium solani biomass extract [140]. Spherical and hexagonal particles 22–30 nm in size were mycosynthesized with the use of Fusarium oxysporum cultural liquid [139].
Spherical, pentagonal and hexagonal nanoparticles (5–30 nm) were obtained with Trichoderma hamatum mycelial extract [149]. The authors optimized the conditions for the synthesis of AuNPs with the smallest size using T. hamatum. Nanoparticles biosynthesized using T. harzianum mycelial biomass had a nanometric size distribution below 30 nanometers and a spherical shape [150].
AuNPs of variable shapes with considerable antibacterial, antioxidant and antimitotic activities were obtained with an Alternaria spp. extract [135]. Gold nanospheres (10–100 nm) with antibacterial and antifungal properties were obtained using Phoma sp. mycelial biomass [148]. Cubic AuNPs with strong antimicrobial, cytotoxic and antioxidant activity were synthesized using a Morchella esculenta fruit body extract [147].
Molnár et al. studied AuNP mycosynthesis by 29 thermophilic fungi and compared the results of three different approaches for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles using the extracellular fraction, the autolysate or the intracellular fraction of the fungi [152]. They observed the formation of nanoparticles with different sizes (ranging between 6 nm and 40 nm) and size distributions depending on the fungal strain and experimental conditions.
Vetchinkina et al. studied AuNP mycosynthesis by A. bisporus and Agaricus arvensis cultures [41,153]. The use of live cultures, culture liquids and mycelial extracts resulted in the formation of nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes. Nanospheres were formed with living cultures and culture liquids, while irregularly spherical particles in the case of A. bisporus and various shapes with A. arvensis were formed using intracellular mycelial extracts.
An extract from the A. bisporus fruit body was prepared and utilized as a reducing and stabilizing agent toward a green synthesis of AuNPs [134]. The different parameters such as the precursor concentration, precursor:extract ratio, pH, temperature, reaction mode and reaction time were optimized for the mycosynthesis of AuNPs. The synthesized gold nanospheres (10–50 nm) significantly inhibited the growth of clinically important pathogenic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and pathogenic fungi. AuNPs with a dye-degrading activity obtained by Dheyab et al. using an A. bisporus fruit body extract were oval, spherical, drum-like, hexagonal and triangular (average size of 53 nm) [133]. An A. bisporus mushroom extract was also used to synthesize gold nanospheres through a hydrothermal process (at a pressure of 15 psi and a temperature of 121°C for 15 min) [132]. The optimal conditions for the maximum nanoparticle concentration and stability were selected.
Face-centered cubic nanocrystals with dye-reducing properties were synthesized using phenolic compounds isolated from Ganoderma applanatum [141]. Anticancer AuNPs biofabricated using a G. lucidum fruit body extract exhibited shapes such as spherical, oval and irregular, and their size ranged between 1 and 100 nm [142].
AuNPs synthesized using G. lucidum living cultures, as well as cultural liquid, were spherical, while the use of G. lucidum mycelial extract resulted in spherical, hexagonal, tetragonal and triangular particle formation [41]. The same results were obtained for Grifola frondosa and Pleurotus ostreatus cultures as well [41].
Chaturvedi et al. combined AuNP synthesis with the use of a P. sajor-caju fruit body extract followed by microwave irritation to further enhance the effects of fabricated gold nanospheres [113].
Vetchinkina et al. studied AuNP mycosynthesis by the L. edodes culture [41]. Living cultures formed nanospheres of 5–50 nm; smaller nanospheres were formed by the incubation of culture liquid with HAuCl4, and spherical, hexagonal, tetragonal and triangular particles of various sizes were formed with mycelial extract. Nanoparticles different in shape and size were synthesized using enzymes isolated and purified from the L. edodes mycelium. Spherical nanoparticles (2–20 nm) were obtained using intracellular Mn-peroxidase, and particles forming with the use of intracellular laccases and tyrosinases were bigger and irregularly spherical, triangular and tetrahedral in shape. When AuNPs were made with extracts from different morphogenetic stages of L. edodes and G. lucidum, their size, shape and degree of aggregation differed between the morphological structures involved [128]. The cytotoxicity of the AuNPs was negligible in a broad concentration range.
Other researchers used an L. edodes fruit body extract to produce AuNPs of various shapes [145].
Basu et al. obtained variously shaped gold nanoparticles using a Tricholoma crassum mycelial extract [151]. They showed that particle size could be altered by changing synthesis parameters such as temperature and substrate and precursor concentrations. A mixture of triangular, spherical and irregular shapes with an average size of 74.32 nm was fabricated using a Flammulina velutipes fruit body extract [138]. A chaga (Inonotus obliquus) medicinal mushroom extract induced the formation of mostly spherical AuNPs with a size below 20 nm [143]. These AuNPs are promising dual-modal (chemo-photothermal) therapeutic candidates for anticancer applications. The production of AuNPs by a Coprinus comatus fruit body extract and the effect of UV irradiation at different times on nanoparticle size were investigated [137]. Gold nanospheres were also obtained using fruit body extracts of Cantharellus sp. (average particle size of 60.6 nm) [136] and Laetiporus versisporus (average particle size of 10 nm) [144].

2.3. Mycosynthesis of Platinum Nanoparticles

Platinum nanoparticles (PtNPs) are of great interest in various fields of engineering and biomedicine owing to their unique physico-chemical (catalytic, magnetic and optical) and biological (antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer) properties [154,155,156]. The mycosynthesis of PtNPs is much less studied, as compared to that of silver and gold. To date, the ability to form nanoparticles of this noble metal has been detected in several Ascomycota species (Table 3).
PtNP biosynthesis has been best studied in F. oxysporum. Riddin et al. showed that the mycelial biomass of F. oxysporum is capable of producing nanoparticles of various shapes (hexagons, pentagons, circles, squares, rectangles) and sizes (10–100 nm) and determined the optimal conditions (pH, temperature and concentration of the precursor compound H2PtCl6) for maximum nanoparticle yield [158]. Nanoparticles were formed both extracellularly and intracellularly as well as on the hyphae surface, but only the extracellular production of nanoparticles proved to be statistically significant. In further studies [161], a hydrogenase with Pt(IV)-reductase activity was isolated from this strain of F. oxysporum. It was shown that the bioreduction of platinum salt by hydrogenase takes place by a passive process and not an active one as previously understood. PtNPs formed by cell-free mycelial extract and purified hydrogenase differed in size and shape. The particles formed with the extract were irregular in shape, with an average nanoparticle size of 30–40 nm. Circular, triangular, pentagonal and hexagonal nanoparticles, often appearing as nanoplates, with a mean size range of 40–60 nm, were formed using the enzyme. It was found that the oxidation state of the platinum salt also plays an important role in nanoparticle formation [160]. When PtCl2 was used as a precursor, large (100–180 nm) nanoparticles of predominantly rectangular and triangular shape forming aggregates were biosynthesized with F. oxysporum hydrogenase. Bioreduction of H2PtCl6 produced spherical monodisperse nanoparticles varying in size with the mean nanoparticle size between 100 and 140 nm.
Syed and Ahmad were able to produce spherical PtNPs with a diameter of 15–30 nm using F. oxysporum mycelial biomass [161]. The particles were formed extracellularly and were capped by natural proteins secreted by the fungus and therefore did not require the addition of stabilizing agents. Gupta and Chundawat obtained face-centered cubic nanoparticles with an average size of 25 nm with antimicrobial and photocatalytic activity using F. oxysporum filtrate [162].
The use of Penicillium chrysogenum culture filtrate made it possible to obtain highly dispersed non-aggregating platinum nanospheres (5–40 nm) [164]. Another ascomycete in which the ability to synthesize platinum nanoparticles has been found is Neurospora crassa [163]. Incubation of mycelial biomass with H2PtCl6 produced extracellular PtNPs (4–35 nm in diameter) and spherical nanoaggregates (20–110 nm in diameter). Using a mycelial extract from the same fungi, round single-crystal nanoagglomerates with diameters of 17 to 76 nm were obtained, containing individual single crystals of approximately 2–3 nm in diameter. Nanoplatinum was also obtained using the culture filtrate of the phytopathogenic fungus Alternaria alternata [157]. The particles were found to be irregular in shape presenting an overall quasi-spherical, rectangular, tetrahedral and hexagonal as well as polygonal morphology. Their size varied in the range of 50–315 nm with an average size of 135 nm.
Borse et al. investigated the production of platinum nanospheres using cell-free extract of Saccharomyces boulardii yeast biomass and the effect of parameters such as the concentration of H2PtCl6, temperature, pH, reaction time and cell concentration [165]. A cell mass concentration of 500 mg/ mLin, the presence of 0.5 mM chloroplatinic acid at 35 °C, pH 7 and 200 rpm for 36 h showed maximum PtNP synthesis. Under these conditions, platinum nanospheres (80–150 nm) with anticancer activity were formed. It was also shown that nanoparticles were formed intracellularly when whole yeast cells were incubated with H2PtCl6.

2.4. Mycosynthesis of Palladium Nanoparticles

The ability to biofabricate nanoparticles of another platinum-group noble metal, palladium, has been also discovered in fungi. Palladium nanoparticles (PdNPs) have brilliant catalytic, electronic, physical, mechanical and optical properties and have impressive potential for the development of novel photothermal, photoacoustic, antimicrobial and antitumor agents, gene/drug carriers, prodrug activators and biosensors [166]. Biosynthesized PdNPs have been found to possess more enhanced anticancer activities, as compared to other synthetic anticancer drugs [167]. However, the possibility of using the unique properties of palladium in various areas of biomedicine is still understudied and needs further research. To date, the mycosynthesis of this element in fungal cultures has remained extremely understudied, as compared to plants [167], and has been reported only in a few publications (Table 4).
Incubation of an Agaricus bisporus mushroom extract with palladium acetate resulted in the formation of PdNPs with anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and antioxidant activities [168]. Porous anisotropic palladium nanoparticles were synthesized using an extract from the powder of the medicinal chaga mushroom (I. obliquus) [169]. The morphology of these nanoparticles could be controlled by changing the chaga extract concentration—with its increase, their rough surface morphology and porosity also increased. The properties of the obtained nanostructures showed their potential for biological-chemo-thermo tri-modal anticancer therapy.
PdNP synthesis using the baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae biomass has also been reported. Saitoh and colleagues described the formation of crystalline PdNPs with diameters of 10–20 nm, deposited on the surfaces of the S. cerevisiae cells [171]. Other researchers have obtained hexagonal PdNPs using a dry yeast extract [170]. The synthesized PdNPs were found to be active toward the photocatalytic degradation of the azo dye.

2.5. Mycosynthesis of Copper Nanoparticles

Copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) have attracted attention owing to their optical, catalytic, mechanical, electrical and biomedical properties [172]. Biosynthesized CuNPs have antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral and anticancer properties and can be used in targeted drug delivery, cosmetic applications, catalysis, microelectronics, gas sensors, high-temperature superconductors, solar cells, as bactericide agents, wound dressings, biopesticides, in bioremediation, biodegradation and energy storage [172,173,174].
The mycosynthesis of CuNPs also remains poorly studied. An analysis of the literature showed that CuNPs produced by fungi are predominantly spherical in shape (Table 5).
Irregular spherical CuNPs of 5–25 size with antimicrobial activity against phytopathogens were obtained from a mycelial extract of Trichoderma atroviride [183]. Salvadori et al. found that Trichoderma koningiopsis can produce CuNPs [184]. Live, dead (autoclaved) and dried biomass of T. koningiopsis was used in the experiment. The dead biomass showed a higher capacity to adsorb copper metal ions than live and dried biomass and was used for further nanoparticle production. The resulting nanoparticles were predominantly spheric (average size of 87.5 nm) and were formed extracellularly. Similar results were shown for Hypocrea lixii, but the nanoparticles were smaller (average size of 24.5 nm) [180].
Cuevas et al. compared the CuNP mycosynthesis by a Stereum hirsutum extract using three different salts (CuSO4, Cu(NO3)2 and CuCl2) [182]. Nanoparticle biosynthesis in the presence of all copper salts demonstrated higher formation with 5 mM CuCl2 under alkaline conditions. The nanoparticles were mainly spherical (5 to 20 nm).
Copper nanospheres with their diameters ranging from 2 to 60 nm were formed on the surface of the Aspergillus flavus mycelium [176]. Noor et al. studied CuNP synthesis with A. niger [177]. The ability to mycosynthesize CuNPs was found in only one of the eight A. niger strains studied. The CuNPs were spherical and uniformly distributed without substantial agglomeration. Their size ranged from 5 to 100 nm. These nanoparticles showed anticancer, antimicrobial and antidiabetic activity. Nanoparticles 23–82 nm in size with a round to polygonal shape were obtained using an Aspergillus versicolor mycelial extract [178]. An antifungal study showed their potential antifungal activity against rotting plant pathogens.
Spherical CuNPs with excellent antibacterial, free-radical-scavenging and cytotoxic effects were obtained using an aqueous extract of A. bisporus fruit bodies [175]. CuNPs (40–65 nm in diameter) obtained with Shizophyllum commune biomass [181] exhibited antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity against human pathogens. F. oxysporum was found to leach copper from electronic waste composed of integrated circuits from obsolete and discarded electronic goods, forming nanoparticles [179], which opens the prospect of using myconanosynthesis in the bioremediation of electronic waste in order to recycle valuable metals.

2.6. Mycosynthesis of Iron Nanoparticles

Iron is one of the most abundant elements in the Earth’s crust that has been used by humankind for thousands of years, but only recently, with the development of nanotechnology, has it become a focus of interest in this new field of application. Iron nanoparticles (FeNPs) and iron-based nanomaterials are very important for the abatement of environmental pollution (degradation of organic dyes and other pollutants, heavy metal removal, wastewater treatment) and for use in biomedicine as antimicrobial agents [185,186]. So far, the production of FeNPs has been studied mainly in Ascomycota micromycetes (Table 6).
The table shows that mycogenic FeNPs are predominantly spherical in shape. For example, iron nanospheres approximately 100 nm in diameter with antimicrobial activity were obtained from a P. florida fruit body extract [192].
An Aspergillus oryzae extract was used to make 10–24.6 nm nanospheres [189]. Incubation of a Penicillium oxalicum mycelial extract with FeSO4 produced spherical nanoparticles with an average diameter of 140 nm, which effectively decolorized methylene blue dye [191]. FeNPs were also obtained using a cell-free filtrate extract of the Rhizopus stolonifer mycelium [194] and Trichoderma sp. [195].
Small cubic-shaped FeNPs with antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were obtained by incubating an A. alternata mycelial extract with Fe(NO3)3 [187]. Other researchers obtained FeNPs using an A. alternata extract and FeSO4 as a precursor and found that the size and shape of the synthesized nanoparticles depended on the medium in which the fungal culture was grown [188]. The culture grown in a potato dextrose broth biosynthesized semi-oval polydisperse particles with size in the range of 20–40 nm, while fungi grown on the Czapek media produced particles with spheroid morphology of 10 to 80 nm. Six months after their production, 5 µm microparticles were formed from the mycosynthesized nanoparticles, possibly owing to the magnetic attraction of these materials.
Mazumdar and Haloi found that when a Pleurotus sp. mycelium was incubated with FeSO4, nanoparticles were synthesized both extra- and intracellularly [193]. A distinct layer of ferric nanoparticles was formed around the cells. The amount of nanoparticles inside the cells was significantly lower than outside. Nanoparticles synthesized with F. oxysporum biomass [190] had a size of 20–40 nm and possessed antimicrobial activity, but it was less pronounced than that of silver nanoparticles studied in the same work.

2.7. Mycosynthesis of Selenium Nanoparticles

In addition to metals, fungi have also been found to biosynthesize nanoparticles of metalloids, most notably selenium. Selenium is an essential element for humans, animals and microorganisms, but many of its compounds are highly toxic. Selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) are of great interest owing to their lower toxicity than inorganic and organic forms of selenium and their biocompatibility, bioavailability and biomedical properties. Nano-selenium exhibits excellent antimicrobial, anticancer, antidiabetic, antiparasitic and antioxidant activities [196]. SeNPs can be used in targeted drug delivery, bioremediation, nanobiosensors, as a food supplement and in many other areas [197,198].
The ability of fungi to convert selenium from selenites, selenates and other compounds into elementary form to reduce their toxic effects has long been known to mycologists. For example, in as early as 1995, a number of fungal cultures were shown to reduce selenite to elementary selenium [199]. Aspergillus funiculosus and Fusarium sp. incubated with sodium selenite produced needle-like crystals of elementary selenium on the surfaces of hyphae and conidia. A. funiculosus also deposited electron-dense granules in vacuoles of selenite-treated fungi. However, SeNP mycosynthesis has received considerable attention only in recent years. So far, the biological synthesis of SeNPs has been detected in a fairly large number of fungal species and is best studied in microscopic ascomycetes (Table 7). As can be seen from the table, mycogenic SeNPs are mostly spherical in shape, and their diameter can vary widely. In some cultures, such as A. alternata, Fusarium equiseti and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, the formation of selenium nanorods was also observed.
The ability to mycosynthesize SeNPs has been best studied in several species of Penicillium, Aspergillus and Trichoderma. For example, monodispersed selenium nanospheres with an average size of 24.65 nm exhibiting antibacterial activity were obtained using P. chrysogenum culture liquid and Na2SeO3 as a precursor [212]. Other researchers obtained molluscicidal and larvicidal SeNPs (44–78 nm) using a P. chrysogenum culture liquid [213]. El-Sayyad et al. developed a method to produce nanoparticles involving the incubation of a P. chrysogenum filtrate with Na2SeO4 following the application of gamma irradiation [214]. These nanospheres had an average diameter of 33.84 nm and exhibited antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities.
Amin et al. used another method to produce SeNPs involving the use of gamma radiation [215]. The spore suspension of Penicillium citrinum was exposed to different doses of gamma radiation, and SeNPs were then produced by an irradiated P. citrinum. Irradiation by gamma rays enhanced the mycosynthesis of SeNPs, and the size of the nanoparticles was dependent on the radiation dose.
Spherical SeNPs obtained with Penicillium corylophilum culture liquid had antimicrobial, cytotoxic and larvicidal activity against the mosquito vector of malaria [216]. Nanospheres with a diameter of 3–22 nm exhibiting antimicrobial, anticancer and catalytic activity were obtained using Penicillium crustosum culture liquid [217]. It was found that the presence of light is one of the influential parameters to promote these activities of SeNPs. Small selenium nanospheres with a wide range of biomedical activities, including antimicrobial activity against fungi, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and antioxidant and anticancer activity, were obtained using Penicillium expansum culture liquid [218].
Hussein et al. isolated several species of microscopic fungi with the ability to mycosynthesize SeNPs [203]. Aspergillus quadrilineatus, Aspergillus ochraceusand and Aspergillus terreus produced nanospheres of different sizes depending on the species, and Fusarium equiseti synthesized spherical and rod-shaped particles. The nanoparticles obtained had antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant properties. Selenium nanospheres (average size of 47 nm) were also obtained using A. terreus culture liquid [204]. Selenium nanospheres mycosynthesized with Aspergillus flavus and Candida albicans culture liquid exhibited high antifungal activity showing inhibition of fungal growth in the presence of lower concentrations of nanoparticles than antifungal drugs [202].
Mycogenic selenium nanospheres synthesized from a T. atroviride extract had antifungal activity and also possessed the unique property of aggregating and binding to the zoospores of the phytopatogenic oomycete fungi Phytophthora infestans [221]. Spherical and pseudospherical SeNPs were synthesized by Trichoderma sp. on a medium with SeO2 [223]. The authors determined the optimal pH values, precursor concentration and application time for nanoparticle synthesis. Elementary selenium nanospheres (40–100 nm) with larvicidal activity were obtained using a Trichoderma sp. extract [224]. Hu et al. obtained irregularly spherical SeNPs using T. harzianum [222]. Many organic acids, sugars and their derivatives, such as heptonic acid, ferulate, fumaric acid and threonic acid, as well as glucose and mannitol, capped the selenium nanoparticles and played the role of stabilizing agents. Mycogenic nanoparticles inhibited the growth of pathogenic fungi better than traditionally produced SeNPs.
The fungi T. harzianum, Aureobasidium pullulans, Mortierella humilis and Phoma glomerata were able to grow on selenium-containing media resulting in the extensive precipitation of elementary selenium nanoparticles on fungal surfaces [205]. The average size of the A. pullulans-synthesized nanospheres was 60 nm, and that of M. humilis-synthesized nanoparticles was about 48 nm. Nanospheres with the size of 20–120 nm were formed when A. pullulans culture liquid was incubated with selenite [206]. Spherical nanoparticles (100–200 nm) formed on fungal surfaces and in the medium during the growth of P. glomerata with selenite [219].
Sarkar et al. reported on the synthesis of SeNPs with a spherical [200] or rod-like shape [201] using an A. alternata culture filtrate. When F. oxysporum biomass was incubated with selenious acid as a precursor, spherical selenium and selenium sulfide nanoparticles with their size between 34.32 and 231.98 nm were formed [207]. When the fungus Mariannaea sp. was grown in the presence of SeO2, intracellular and extracellular selenium nanospheres deposited on the cell wall and in the cytoplasmic region were formed [210]. The average size of the nanospheres was 45.19 nm for intracellular SeNPs and 212.65 nm for extracellular SeNPs.
Lian et al. studied SeNP production using cell-free extracts of a novel yeast, Magnusiomyces ingens, and showed that the pH, concentration of the selenium-containing compound SeO2 and protein content in the yeast extract could distinctly influence the formation and stabilization of SeNPs [209]. The SeNPs were almost quasispherical and spherical with a small number of irregular SeNPs. The diameter was mainly between 70 and 90 nm. Using the biomass of the yeast Nematospora coryli, selenium nanospheres with anti-Candida and anti-oxidant activities were obtained [211]. The aquatic yeast R. mucilaginosa synthesized SeNPs extracellularly and intracellularly [220]. Utilization of low selenite precursor concentrations (1–4 mM) resulted in the formation of spherical nanoparticles, and they formed rod-shaped structures at a higher precursor concentration (5 mM).
Compared to the cultures described above, the possibility of SeNP mycosynthesis using basidial macromycetes has been much less studied.
Vetchinkina et al. compared SeNP mycosynthesis by a number of edible and medicinal basidiomycetes using their mycelial extracts and culture liquids [41]. A. arvensis, A. bisporus, G. lucidum and G. frondosa produced selenium nanospheres whose size varied depending on the culture and method of their biosynthesis. In the case of L. edodes and P. ostreatus, nanospheres were fabricated using culture liquids while mycelial extracts produced irregularly spherical particles.
Living cultures of G. lucidum, G. frondosa, L. edodes and P. ostreatus also formed selenium nanospheres when grown on a medium with Na2SeO3 [208]. In G. lucidum, the diameter of the nanospheres was 20–50 nm; the other species synthesized larger particles (50–320 nm). Se0 nanoparticles were also formed when L. edodes was grown with the organic selenium compound but not with Na2SeO4 [225].

2.8. Mycosynthesis of Tellurium Nanoparticles

Tellurium is another metalloid that has recently attracted attention owing to its biogenic nanoparticles (TeNPs). Their photoconductive, thermoconductive, piezoelectric, non-linear optical, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticancer, immunomodulating and cytotoxic properties, as well as their potential of being used in drug delivery, bioremediation and biorecovery, are of interest [226]. In fungi, TeNP formation is still very poorly studied (Table 8).
Biogenic TeNPs are typically rod-like or spherical. In Phoma glomerata, Aureobasidium pullulans, Mortierella humilis and T. harzianum cultures, the ability to form TeNPs intra- and extracellularly was found [205,219]. In Phanerochaete chrysosporium, the formation of needle-like particles (20–465 nm) of Te0 in the fungal hyphae was shown when incubated with TeO32- [229]. Tellurium nanospheres were obtained using culture liquids of Aspergillus welwitschiae [227] and P. chrysogenum [228].

3. Mechanisms of Fungi-Mediated Nanoparticle Biosynthesis

The process of nanoparticle formation by fungi can take place intra- and extracellularly under the action of enzymes and other biologically active molecules (Figure 1).
In recent years, more and more attention is paid to the study of the reduction mechanisms of various compounds by fungi, but not enough is known about particular compounds of the fungal secretome involved in the formation of nanoparticles. It has been found that laccase [146,230,231,232], Mn-peroxidase [146], tyrosinase [146] and ligninase [231] are involved in AuNP biosynthesis by fungi. Nitrate reductase [233], laccase [234,235] and xylanase [48] are involved in the AgNP mycosynthesis, while PtNP synthesis is catalyzed by hydrogenase [159,160]. The same culture can produce several enzymes catalyzing nanoparticle fabrication; for example, for P. chrysosporium, laccase and ligninase have been shown to be responsible for the extracellular and intracellular AuNP formation, respectively [231]. In addition to enzymatic myconanosynthesis, fungal peptides [236], polysaccharides [68,88,236] and phenolic compounds were found to participate in the reduction of various compounds and nanoparticle formation [86,141,237]. Thus, many researchers confirm that biological molecules such as polysaccharides, enzymes, proteins or peptides can be used for the synthesis and assembly of materials with nanoscale dimensions. Similar methods of the rational usage of biological processes could provide a new way for the development of nanotechnology.

4. Advantages of Fungi-Mediated Nanoparticle Synthesis and Prospects for Application of Mycogenic Nanoparticles

Among the variety of organisms capable of forming nanoparticles, fungi attract special attention. Owing to the unique properties of fungi, green fungal nanoparticle synthesis has several important advantages over the use of bacteria, plants and other organisms [40,238,239,240]. These advantages include:
  • Active production of reducing and capping compounds;
  • High activity of enzymes involved in the bioreduction of various compounds resulting in nanoparticle formation;
  • Resistance to high concentrations of metals and metalloids;
  • Ability to biofabricate large quantities of nanoparticles mostly extracellularly;
  • High speed of nanoparticle formation;
  • Simplicity of cultivation, nanoparticle downstream processing and scaling up;
  • Safety for human health (when using edible and medicinal mushrooms);
  • Ability to produce nanoparticles with complex medical properties (when using medicinal mushrooms).
Mycogenic nanoparticles have a wide range of biological activities that allow their use in many fields of medicine, agriculture and industry. Bactericidal, antibiofilm, fungicidal, antiviral, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticoagulant and thrombolytic properties of the mycogenic nanoparticles of gold, silver, platinum, palladium, copper, selenium and other elements allow their use in the therapy of various diseases, including cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes and cardiovascular and infectious diseases, as well as in wound healing [240,241,242]. It has been found that fungi-derived nanoparticles can effectively inhibit the growth of various pathogenic microorganisms [202], including drug-resistant pathogens [64,123]. The use of nanoparticles in combination with other antimicrobial agents increases their therapeutic effect and allows reducing the risk of the resistance development in pathogens, as well as restoring the activity of antibiotics that have lost their efficiency [243]. Of great interest is the use of medicinal fungi to produce nanoparticles with complex medical activity, which is achieved by combining the properties of the nanoparticles themselves and of the fungal metabolites acting as capping agents [169]. Activity of the nanoparticles against insect larvae and pupae spreading human diseases [53,216,244,245,246], as well as against pathogen vector mollusks [213,247], is also of interest in terms of the use of mycogenic AuNPs, AgNPs and SeNPs as an eco-friendly and cost-effective tool for disease biological control. Mycosynthesized nanoparticles have great potential for use as carriers in targeted drug delivery, for bioimaging and biolabeling, as sensors for optical and electronic devices and in the cosmetics, textile and food processing industries [240,248,249].
In agriculture, fungi-derived nanoparticles find application as nanopesticides and nanofertilizers, allowing one to reduce the use of more toxic agrochemicals [250,251,252,253]. Fungicidal, bactericidal, larvicidal and nematicidal activity found in many mycogenic nanoparticles [178,183,221,254,255,256,257] holds great promise for their use in the control of pests and phytopathogens, including pesticide-resistant ones. Another important area of application for mycogenic nanoparticles is mycoremediation [258]. The ability of fungi to utilize metal and metalloid compounds converting them into less toxic forms and accumulating them in the mycelium as nanoparticles is well known [259]. Due to this, fungi can be successfully used for metal and metalloid removal from soil and water and for their further recycling [184,260]. Immobilization of fungal biomass with nanoparticles allows one to obtain hybrid biosorbents for toxic element disposal [261]. The ability of mycogenic nanoparticles to degrade industrial and agricultural pollutants is of great interest. Various azo, diazo and metal-complex dyes are widely used in many industries; they get into water and soil in large quantities and pose a serious threat to the environment and human health, so recently the ability of fungi to produce nanoparticles with dye-degrading properties has been actively studied [262]. The dye-degrading activity found in mycogenic AuNPs [133,141], AgNPs [48], FeNPs [191] and PdNPs [170] makes them promising tools for eliminating industrial and municipal wastewater contamination by toxic dyes. Furthermore, fungi-derived nanoparticles have shown to be effective for pesticide removal [263] and for the treatment of wastewaters polluted with microbial contaminants [79].

5. Conclusions

The characteristics of mycogenic nanoparticles, including their shape, size, surface topography, homogeneity, resistance to aggregation and formation rate, can vary greatly for the same element. They depend on the physico-chemical parameters of the bioreduction process (chemical composition and concentration of the precursor, composition of the cultivation medium, pH, temperature, reaction time, presence of agitation and lighting, as well as additional influences such as microwave radiation and gamma radiation) and biological parameters (fungal species and strain, culture age, extract type and metabolites used).
The ability to form nanoparticles has been found in many fungal species, predominantly belonging to the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Studies on the screening of various fungal cultures to identify the best nanoparticle producers show that different species and strains of the same species can vary greatly in nanosynthetic activity under the same conditions. The way in which fungal cultures are used to produce nanoparticles is also very important—whether in the form of living cultures grown on media with precursors, as filtered mycelial biomass, cell-free culture liquid, purified metabolites, extracts from a submerged mycelium, fruit bodies or other morphological formations. A summary of nanoparticle mycosynthesis is shown in Figure 2.
All these methods have their advantages and disadvantages. Living cultures growing on media with metal ions and metalloids can actively produce nanoparticles and accumulate them in the medium and inside their cells in very large quantities, but these particles require separation from the hyphae for their further use. Therefore, filtrates of culture liquids, extracts from undestroyed or destroyed mycelium and commercially purchased fruit bodies may be easier to use. Studies of nanoparticle mycosynthesis using enzymes and other compounds isolated from fungi can broaden the knowledge on the mechanisms of nanoparticle formation by fungi and are therefore of great importance for the development of fundamental science.
The fungi-mediated synthesis of elementary silver, gold and, to a lesser extent, selenium nanoparticles has now been studied in some detail and continues to be actively researched. Yet, other elements remain little explored or almost not at all in terms of myconanosynthesis. An important remaining task is the need to deepen and broaden our knowledge of fungi capable to biosynthesize nanoparticles of various chemical elements, search for new producers and optimize nanosynthesis processes for the efficient and controlled fabrication of particles with the desired properties. Green fungi-mediated nanoparticle synthesis is an eco-friendly and effective method that still needs further research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A.L., E.P.V. and M.A.K.; investigation, E.A.L., E.P.V. and M.A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, E.A.L.; writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Research Project (IBPPM RAS) no.121031100266-3.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dhand, C.; Dwivedi, N.; Loh, X.J.; Jie Ying, A.N.; Verma, N.K.; Beuerman, R.W.; Lakshminarayanan, R.; Ramakrishna, S. Methods and strategies for the synthesis of diverse nanoparticles and their applications: A comprehensive overview. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 105003–105037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Krichevsky, G.E. Ecological «Green» biosynthesis of metal nanoparticles, reality and potential of their use in various fields of medicine. NBICS-Sci. Technol. 2018, 2, 85–106. [Google Scholar]
  3. Joseph, S.; Mathew, B. Microwave-assisted green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and the study on catalytic activity in the degradation of dyes. J. Mol. Liq. 2015, 204, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shakibaie, M.; Torabi-Shamsabad, R.; Forootanfar, H.; Amiri-Moghadam, P.; Amirheidari, B.; Adeli-Sardou, M.; Ameri, A. Rapid microwave-assisted biosynthesis of platinum nanoparticles and evaluation of their antioxidant properties and cytotoxic effects against MCF-7 and A549 cell lines. 3 Biotech 2021, 11, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kharissova, O.V.; Dias, H.V.R.; Kharisov, B.I.; Pérez, B.O.; Pérez, V.M.J. The greener synthesis of nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ovais, M.; Khalil, A.; Ayaz, M.; Ahmad, I.; Nethi, S.; Mukherjee, S. Biosynthesis of Metal Nanoparticles via Microbial Enzymes: A Mechanistic Approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ali, M.A.; Ahmed, T.; Wu, W.; Hossain, A.; Hafeez, R.; Islam Masum, M.M.; Wang, Y.; An, Q.; Sun, G.; Li, B. Advancements in Plant and Microbe-Based Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Antimicrobial Activity against Plant Pathogens. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Saravanan, A.; Kumar, P.S.; Karishma, S.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Jeevanantham, S.; Yaashikaa, P.R.; George, C.S. A review on biosynthesis of metal nanoparticles and its environmental applications. Chemosphere 2021, 264, 128580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schröfel, A.; Kratošová, G.; Šafařík, I.; Šafaříková, M.; Raška, I.; Shor, L.M. Applications of biosynthesized metallic nanoparticles—A review. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 4023–4042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Das, R.K.; Pachapur, V.L.; Lonappan, L.; Naghdi, M.; Pulicharla, R.; Maiti, S.; Cledon, M.; Dalila, L.M.A.; Sarma, S.J.; Brar, S.K. Biological synthesis of metallic nanoparticles: Plants, animals and microbial aspects. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2017, 2, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Castro-Longoria, E. Fungal Biosynthesis of Nanoparticles, a Cleaner Alternative. In Fungal Applications in Sustainable Environmental Biotechnology; Purchase, D., Ed.; Fungal Biology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 323–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Majeed, A.; Ullah, W.; Anwar, A.W.; Shuaib, A.; Ilyas, U.; Khalid, P.; Mustafa, G.; Junaid, M.; Faheem, B.; Ali, S. Cost-effective biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using different organs of plants and their antimicrobial applications: A review. Mater. Technol. 2018, 33, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vijayaraghavan, K.; Ashokkumar, T. Plant-mediated biosynthesis of metallic nanoparticles: A review of literature, factors affecting synthesis, characterization techniques and applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 4866–4883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bao, Z.; Lan, C.Q. Advances in biosynthesis of noble metal nanoparticles mediated by photosynthetic organisms—A review. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 184, 110519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sorbiun, M.; Shayegan Mehr, E.; Ramazani, A.; Mashhadi Malekzadeh, A. Biosynthesis of metallic nanoparticles using plant extracts and evaluation of their antibacterial properties. Nanochemistry Res. 2018, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singh, C.R.; Kathiresan, K.; Anandhan, S. A review on marine based nanoparticles and their potential applications. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 14, 1525–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jaganathan, A.; Murugan, K.; Panneerselvam, C.; Madhiyazhagan, P.; Dinesh, D.; Vadivalagan, C.; Aziz, A.T.; Chandramohan, B.; Suresh, U.; Rajaganesh, R.; et al. Earthworm-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles: A potent tool against hepatocellular carcinoma, Plasmodium falciparum parasites and malaria mosquitoes. Parasitol. Int. 2016, 65, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Koul, B.; Poonia, A.K.; Yadav, D.; Jin, J.-O. Microbe-Mediated Biosynthesis of Nanoparticles: Applications and Future Prospects. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Owaid, M.N.; Ibraheem, I.J. Mycosynthesis of nanoparticles using edible and medicinal mushrooms. Eur. J. Nanomed. 2017, 9, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adebayo, E.A.; Azeez, M.A.; Alao, M.B.; Oke, A.M.; Aina, D.A. Fungi as veritable tool in current advances in nanobiotechnology. Heliyon 2021, 7, e08480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Q.; Liu, F.; Li, M.; Chen, C.; Gadd, G.M. Nanoparticle and nanomineral production by fungi. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2022, 41, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Manimaran, M.; Kannabiran, K. Actinomycetes-mediated biogenic synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: Progress and challenges. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 64, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kumari, S.; Tehri, N.; Gahlaut, A.; Hooda, V. Actinomycetes mediated synthesis, characterization, and applications of metallic nanoparticles. Inorg. Nano-Met. Chem. 2020, 51, 1386–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chaudhary, R.; Nawaz, K.; Khan, A.K.; Hano, C.; Abbasi, B.H.; Anjum, S. An Overview of the Algae-Mediated Biosynthesis of Nanoparticles and Their Biomedical Applications. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, S.-N.; Wang, R.; Ho, S.-H. Algae-mediated biosystems for metallic nanoparticle production: From synthetic mechanisms to aquatic environmental applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 420, 126625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hamida, R.S.; Ali, M.A.; Abdelmeguid, N.E.; Al-Zaban, M.I.; Baz, L.; Bin-Meferij, M.M. Lichens—A Potential Source for Nanoparticles Fabrication: A Review on Nanoparticles Biosynthesis and Their Prospective Applications. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, G. Wang Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using chloroplasts. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Durán, M.; Silveira, C.P.; Durán, N. Catalytic role of traditional enzymes for biosynthesis of biogenic metallic nanoparticles: A mini-review. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2015, 9, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khanna, P.K.; Nair, C.K.K. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Cod Liver Oil (Fish Oil): Green Approach to Nanotechnology. Int. J. Green Nanotechnol. Phys. Chem. 2009, 1, P3–P9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, K.-J.; Park, S.-H.; Govarthanan, M.; Hwang, P.-H.; Seo, Y.-S.; Cho, M.; Lee, W.-H.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kamala-Kannan, S.; Oh, B.-T. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using cow milk and their antifungal activity against phytopathogens. Mater. Lett. 2013, 105, 128–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, L.; Weng, X.; Chen, Z.; Megharaj, M.; Naidu, R. Green synthesis of iron nanoparticles by various tea extracts: Comparative study of the reactivity. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 130, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. González Fá, A.J.; Juan, A.; Di Nezio, M.S. Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles Prepared with Honey: The Role of Carbohydrates. Anal. Lett. 2017, 50, 877–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Krishnaswamy, K.; Valib, H.; Orsata, V. Value-adding to grape waste: Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles. J. Food Eng. 2014, 142, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ibrahim, H.M.M. Green synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using banana peel extract and their antimicrobial activity against representative microorganisms. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2015, 8, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bagherzade, G.; Tavakoli, M.M.; Namaei, M.H. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous extract of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) wastages and its antibacterial activity against six bacteria. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2017, 7, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Boroumand Moghaddam, A.; Namvar, F.; Moniri, M.; Tahir, P.M.; Azizi, S.; Mohamad, R. Nanoparticles Biosynthesized by Fungi and Yeast: A Review of Their Preparation, Properties, and Medical Applications. Molecules 2015, 20, 16540–16565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bhanja, S.K.; Samanta, S.K.; Mondal, B.; Jana, S.; Ray, J.; Pandey, A.; Tripathy, T. Green synthesis of Ag@Au bimetallic composite nanoparticles using a polysaccharide extracted from Ramaria botrytis mushroom and performance in catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol and antioxidant, antibacterial activity. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2020, 14, 100341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Albanese, A.; Tang, P.S.; Chan, W.C.W. The Effect of Nanoparticle Size, Shape, and Surface Chemistry on Biological Systems. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Guisbiers, G.; Mejía-Rosales, S.; Deepak, F.L. Nanomaterial Properties: Size and Shape Dependencies. J. Nanomater. 2012, 2012, 180976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khandel, P.; Shahi, S.K. Mycogenic nanoparticles and their bio-prospective applications: Current status and future challenges. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2018, 8, 369–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Vetchinkina, E.; Loshchinina, E.; Kupryashina, M.; Burov, A.; Nikitina, V. Shape and Size Diversity of Gold, Silver, Selenium, and Silica Nanoparticles Prepared by Green Synthesis Using Fungi and Bacteria. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 17207–17218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Qu, M.; Yao, W.; Cui, X.; Xia, R.; Qin, L.; Liu, X. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) employing Trichoderma strains to control empty-gut disease of oak silkworm (Antheraea pernyi). Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 28, 102619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rafique, M.; Sadaf, I.; Rafique, M.S.; Tahir, M.B. A review on green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their applications. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2017, 45, 1272–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Razak, N.H.A.; Zawawi, N.A.; Chundawat, T.S. Brief Review on Bioresources Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles. J. Adv. Res. Mater. Sci. 2021, 76, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  45. Khan, A.U.; Malik, N.; Khan, M.; Cho, M.H.; Khan, M.M. Fungi-assisted silver nanoparticle synthesis and their applications. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2018, 41, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ratan, Z.A.; Haidere, M.F.; Nurunnabi, M.; Shahriar, S.M.; Ahammad, A.J.S.; Shim, Y.Y.; Reaney, M.J.T.; Cho, J.Y. Green Chemistry Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Potential Anticancer Effects. Cancers 2020, 12, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Win, T.T.; Khan, S.; Fu, P. Fungus-(Alternaria sp.) Mediated Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis, Characterization, and Screening of Antifungal Activity against Some Phytopathogens. J. Nanotechnol. 2020, 2020, 8828878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Elegbede, J.A.; Lateef, A.; Azeez, M.A.; Asafa, T.B.; Yekeen, T.A.; Oladipo, I.C.; Adebayo, E.A.; Beukes, L.S.; Gueguim-Kana, E.B. Fungal xylanases-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles for catalytic and biomedical applications. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 12, 857–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nanda, A.; Nayak, B.K.; Krishnamoorthy, M. Antimicrobial properties of biogenic silver nanoparticles synthesized from phylloplane fungus, Aspergillus tamarii. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tyagi, S.; Tyagi, P.K.; Gola, D.; Chauhan, N.; Bharti, R.K. Extracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticles using entomopathogenic fungus: Characterization and antibacterial potential. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Rodrigues, A.G.; Ping, L.Y.; Marcato, P.D.; Alves, O.L.; Silva, M.C.P.; Ruiz, R.C.; Melo, I.S.; Tasic, L.; De Souza, A.O. Biogenic antimicrobial silver nanoparticles produced by fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Janakiraman, V.; Govindarajan, K.; CR, M. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Endophytic Fungi, and its Cytotoxic Activity. BioNanoScience 2019, 9, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Soni, N.; Prakash, S. Possible Mosquito Control by Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized by Soil Fungus (Aspergillus niger 2587). Adv. Nanoparticles 2013, 02, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Manjunath Hulikere, M.; Joshi, C.G. Characterization, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized using marine endophytic fungus- Cladosporium cladosporioides. Process Biochem. 2019, 82, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Azmath, P.; Baker, S.; Rakshith, D.; Satish, S. Mycosynthesis of silver nanoparticles bearing antibacterial activity. Saudi Pharm. J. 2016, 24, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Qian, Y.; Yu, H.; He, D.; Yang, H.; Wang, W.; Wan, X.; Wang, L. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by the endophytic fungus Epicoccum nigrum and their activity against pathogenic fungi. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 36, 1613–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ingle, A.; Rai, M.; Gade, A.; Bawaskar, M. Fusarium solani: A novel biological agent for the extracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 2009, 11, 2079–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ishida, K.; Cipriano, T.F.; Rocha, G.M.; Weissmüller, G.; Gomes, F.; Miranda, K.; Rozental, S. Silver nanoparticle production by the fungus Fusarium oxysporum: Nanoparticle characterisation and analysis of antifungal activity against pathogenic yeasts. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2013, 109, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jebali, A.; Ramezani, F.; Kazemi, B. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by Geotricum sp. J. Clust. Sci. 2011, 22, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Balakumaran, M.D.; Ramachandran, R.; Kalaichelvan, P.T. Exploitation of endophytic fungus, Guignardia mangiferae for extracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their in vitro biological activities. Microbiol. Res. 2015, 178, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Talie, M.D.; Hamid Wani, A.; Ahmad, N.; Yaqub Bhat, M.; Mohd War, J. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using Helvella leucopus Pers. and their antimycotic activity against fungi causing fungal rot of apple. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2020, 13, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Varshney, R.; Mishra, A.N.; Bhadauria, S.; Gaur, M.S. A novel microbial route to synthesize silver nanoparticles using fungus Hormoconis resinae. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2009, 4, 349–355. [Google Scholar]
  63. Syed, A.; Saraswati, S.; Kundu, G.C.; Ahmad, A. Biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles using the fungus Humicola sp. and evaluation of their cytoxicity using normal and cancer cell lines. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2013, 114, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chowdhury, S.; Basu, A.; Kundu, S. Green synthesis of protein capped silver nanoparticles from phytopathogenic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid with antimicrobial properties against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Quester, K.; Avalos-Borja, M.; Castro-Longoria, E. Controllable Biosynthesis of Small Silver Nanoparticles Using Fungal Extract. J. Biomater. Nanobiotechnology 2016, 07, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Devi, L.; Joshi, S. Ultrastructures of silver nanoparticles biosynthesized using endophytic fungi. J. Microsc. Ultrastruct. 2015, 3, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Danagoudar, A.; Pratap, G.K.; Shantaram, M.; Ghosh, K.; Kanade, S.R.; Joshi, C.G. Characterization, cytotoxic and antioxidant potential of silver nanoparticles biosynthesised using endophytic fungus (Penicillium citrinum CGJ-C1). Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 25, 101385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wanarska, E.; Maliszewska, I. The possible mechanism of the formation of silver nanoparticles by Penicillium cyclopium. Bioorganic Chem. 2019, 93, 102803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pareek, V.; Bhargava, A.; Panwar, J. Biomimetic approach for multifarious synthesis of nanoparticles using metal tolerant fungi: A mechanistic perspective. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2020, 262, 114771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Feroze, N.; Arshad, B.; Younas, M.; Afridi, M.I.; Saqib, S.; Ayaz, A. Fungal mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and evaluation of antibacterial activity. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2020, 83, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Seetharaman, P.K.; Chandrasekaran, R.; Periakaruppan, R.; Gnanasekar, S.; Sivaperumal, S.; Abd-Elsalam, K.A.; Valis, M.; Kuca, K. Functional Attributes of Myco-Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles from Endophytic Fungi: A New Implication in Biomedical Applications. Biology 2021, 10, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Neethu, S.; Midhun, S.J.; Sunil, M.A.; Soumya, S.; Radhakrishnan, E.K.; Jyothis, M. Efficient visible light induced synthesis of silver nanoparticles by Penicillium polonicum ARA 10 isolated from Chetomorpha antennina and its antibacterial efficacy against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2018, 180, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Raheman, F.; Deshmukh, S.; Ingle, A.; Gade, A.; Rai, M. Silver Nanoparticles: Novel Antimicrobial Agent Synthesized from an Endophytic Fungus Pestalotia sp. Isolated from Leaves of Syzygium cumini (L). Nano Biomed. Eng. 2011, 3, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gade, A.K.; Bonde, P.; Ingle, A.P.; Marcato, P.D.; Durán, N.; Rai, M.K. Exploitation of Aspergillus niger for Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2008, 2, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rai, M.; Ingle, A.P.; Gade, A.; Duran, N. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles by Phoma gardeniae and in vitro evaluation of their efficacy against human disease-causing bacteria and fungi. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2015, 9, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Owaid, M.N.; Rabeea, M.A.; Abdul Aziz, A.; Jameel, M.S.; Dheyab, M.A. Mycogenic fabrication of silver nanoparticles using Picoa, Pezizales, characterization and their antifungal activity. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2022, 17, 100612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Korbekandi, H.; Mohseni, S.; Mardani Jouneghani, R.; Pourhossein, M.; Iravani, S. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 44, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Saxena, J.; Sharma, P.K.; Sharma, M.M.; Singh, A. Process optimization for green synthesis of silver nanoparticles by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum MTCC 8785 and evaluation of its antibacterial properties. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Moustafa, M.T. Removal of pathogenic bacteria from wastewater using silver nanoparticles synthesized by two fungal species. Water Sci. 2017, 31, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Hu, X.; Saravanakumar, K.; Jin, T.; Wang, M.-H. Mycosynthesis, characterization, anticancer and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles from endophytic fungus Talaromyces purpureogenus. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 3427–3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Owaid, M. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Truffles and Mushrooms and Their Applications as Nanodrugs. Curr. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2021, 22, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Murillo-Rábago, E.I.; Vilchis-Nestor, A.R.; Juarez-Moreno, K.; Garcia-Marin, L.E.; Quester, K.; Castro-Longoria, E. Optimized Synthesis of Small and Stable Silver Nanoparticles Using Intracellular and Extracellular Components of Fungi: An Alternative for Bacterial Inhibition. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Raja, M.; Sharma, R.K.; Jambhulkar, P.; Sharma, K.R.; Sharma, P. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from Trichoderma harzianum Th3 and its efficacy against root rot complex pathogen in groundnut. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 43, 3140–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Saravanakumar, K.; Wang, M.-H. Trichoderma based synthesis of anti-pathogenic silver nanoparticles and their characterization, antioxidant and cytotoxicity properties. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 114, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Mukherjee, P.; Ahmad, A.; Mandal, D.; Senapati, S.; Sainkar, S.R.; Khan, M.I.; Parishcha, R.; Ajaykumar, P.V.; Alam, M.; Kumar, R.; et al. Fungus-Mediated Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Immobilization in the Mycelial Matrix: A Novel Biological Approach to Nanoparticle Synthesis. Nano Lett. 2001, 1, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Apte, M.; Sambre, D.; Gaikawad, S.; Joshi, S.; Bankar, A.; Kumar, A.R.; Zinjarde, S. Psychrotrophic yeast Yarrowia lipolytica NCYC 789 mediates the synthesis of antimicrobial silver nanoparticles via cell-associated melanin. AMB Express 2013, 3, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Ottoni, C.A.; Simões, M.F.; Fernandes, S.; dos Santos, J.G.; da Silva, E.S.; de Souza, R.F.B.; Maiorano, A.E. Screening of filamentous fungi for antimicrobial silver nanoparticles synthesis. AMB Express 2017, 7, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Klaus, A.; Petrovic, P.; Vunduk, J.; Pavlovic, V.; Van Griensven, L.J.L.D. The Antimicrobial Activities of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized from Medicinal Mushrooms. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2020, 22, 869–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Owaid, M.N.; Naeem, G.A.; Muslim, R.F.; Oleiwi, R.S. Synthesis, characterization and antitumor efficacy of silver nanoparticle from Agaricus bisporus pileus, Basidiomycota. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 2020, 17, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jameel, M.S.; Aziz, A.A.; Dheyab, M.A.; Khaniabadi, P.M.; Kareem, A.A.; Alrosan, M.; Ali, A.T.; Rabeea, M.A.; Mehrdel, B. Mycosynthesis of ultrasonically-assisted uniform cubic silver nanoparticles by isolated phenols from Agaricus bisporus and its antibacterial activity. Surf. Interfaces 2022, 29, 101774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Krishnamoorthi, R.; Mahalingam, P.U.; Malaikozhundan, B. Edible mushroom extract engineered Ag NPs as safe antimicrobial and antioxidant agents with no significant cytotoxicity on human dermal fibroblast cells. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 139, 109362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Abikoye, E.T.; Oloke, J.K.; Elemo, G.; Okorie, P.C.; Aier, S.; Oluwawole, O.F.; Barooah, M. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles in improved strain of Auricularia polytricha—An edible mushroom from Nigeria and its antimicrobial activities. Covenant J. Phys. Life Sci. (Spec. Ed.) 2019, 7, 47–55. [Google Scholar]
  93. Osorio-Echavarría, J.; Osorio-Echavarría, J.; Ossa-Orozco, C.P.; Gómez-Vanegas, N.A. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using white-rot fungus Anamorphous Bjerkandera sp. R1: Influence of silver nitrate concentration and fungus growth time. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kaplan, Ö.; Gökşen Tosun, N.; Özgür, A.; Erden Tayhan, S.; Bilgin, S.; Türkekul, İ.; Gökce, İ. Microwave-assisted green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using crude extracts of Boletus edulis and Coriolus versicolor: Characterization, anticancer, antimicrobial and wound healing activities. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 64, 102641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mirunalini, S.; Arulmozhi, V.; Deepalakshmi, K.; Krishnaveni, M. Intracellular Biosynthesis and Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Using Edible Mushrooms. Not. Sci. Biol. 2012, 4, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Fernández, J.G.; Fernández-Baldo, M.A.; Berni, E.; Camí, G.; Durán, N.; Raba, J.; Sanz, M.I. Production of silver nanoparticles using yeasts and evaluation of their antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi. Process Biochem. 2016, 51, 1306–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Faisal, S.; Khan, M.A.; Jan, H.; Shah, S.A.; Abdullah; Shah, S.; Rizwan, M.; Wajidullah; Akbar, M.T. Redaina Edible mushroom (Flammulina velutipes) as biosource for silver nanoparticles: From synthesis to diverse biomedical and environmental applications. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 065101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, L.; Wei, Y.; Wang, H.; Wu, F.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, X.; Wu, H.; Wang, L.; Su, H. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using mushroom Flammulina velutipes extract and their antibacterial activity against aquatic pathogens. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2020, 13, 1908–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rehman, S.; Farooq, R.; Jermy, R.; Mousa Asiri, S.; Ravinayagam, V.; Al Jindan, R.; Alsalem, Z.; Shah, M.A.; Reshi, Z.; Sabit, H.; et al. A Wild Fomes fomentarius for Biomediation of One Pot Synthesis of Titanium Oxide and Silver Nanoparticles for Antibacterial and Anticancer Application. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Rehman, S.; Jermy, R.; Mousa Asiri, S.; Shah, M.A.; Farooq, R.; Ravinayagam, V.; Azam Ansari, M.; Alsalem, Z.; Al Jindan, R.; Reshi, Z.; et al. Using Fomitopsis pinicola for bioinspired synthesis of titanium dioxide and silver nanoparticles, targeting biomedical applications. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 32137–32147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mohanta, Y.; Nayak, D.; Biswas, K.; Singdevsachan, S.; Abd_Allah, E.; Hashem, A.; Alqarawi, A.; Yadav, D.; Mohanta, T. Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Wild Mushroom Show Potential Antimicrobial Activities against Food Borne Pathogens. Molecules 2018, 23, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Dandapat, S.; Kumar, M.; Ranjan, R.; Sinha, M.P. Ganoderma applanatum extract mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 58, e19173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Shivashankar, M.; Premkumari, B.; Chandan, N. Biosynthesis, partial characterization and antimicrobial activities of silver nanoparticles from Pleurotus species. Int. J. Integr. Sci. Innov. Technol. 2013, 2, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  104. Jaloot, A.S.; Owaid, M.N.; Naeem, G.A.; Muslim, R.F. Mycosynthesizing and characterizing silver nanoparticles from the mushroom Inonotus hispidus (Hymenochaetaceae), and their antibacterial and antifungal activities. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2020, 14, 100313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Vamanu, E.; Ene, M.; Biță, B.; Ionescu, C.; Crăciun, L.; Sârbu, I. In Vitro Human Microbiota Response to Exposure to Silver Nanoparticles Biosynthesized with Mushroom Extract. Nutrients 2018, 10, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Javier, K.R.A.; Camacho, D.H. Dataset on the optimization by response surface methodology for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Laxitextum bicolor mushroom. Data Brief 2022, 45, 108631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Debnath, G.; Das, P.; Saha, A.K. Characterization, Antimicrobial and α-Amylase Inhibitory Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized by using Mushroom Extract of Lentinus tuber-regium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2020, 90, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Balashanmugam, P.; Santhosh, S.; Giyaullah, H.; Balakumaran, M.D. Mycosynthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles from Microporus xanthopus: A macro mushroom. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2007, 2, 6262–6270. [Google Scholar]
  109. Saravanan, M.; Arokiyaraj, S.; Lakshmi, T.; Pugazhendhi, A. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Phenerochaete chrysosporium (MTCC-787) and their antibacterial activity against human pathogenic bacteria. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 117, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Aziz, N.; Faraz, M.; Sherwani, M.A.; Fatma, T.; Prasad, R. Illuminating the Anticancerous Efficacy of a New Fungal Chassis for Silver Nanoparticle Synthesis. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Kaur, G.; Kalia, A.; Sodhi, H.S. Size controlled, time-efficient biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from Pleurotus florida using ultra-violet, visible range, and microwave radiations. Inorg. Nano-Met. Chem. 2020, 50, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Acay, H.; Baran, M. Determination of Antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of king oyster mushroom mediated AgNPs synthesized with environmentally friendly methods. Med. Sci. 2020, 9, 760–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chaturvedi, V.K.; Yadav, N.; Rai, N.K.; Ellah, N.H.A.; Bohara, R.A.; Rehan, I.F.; Marraiki, N.; Batiha, G.E.-S.; Hetta, H.F.; Singh, M.P. Pleurotus sajor-caju-Mediated Synthesis of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles Active against Colon Cancer Cell Lines: A New Era of Herbonanoceutics. Molecules 2020, 25, 3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Martínez-Flores, H.E.; Contreras-Chávez, R.; Garnica-Romo, M.G. Effect of Extraction Processes on Bioactive Compounds from Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus djamor: Their Applications in the Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2021, 31, 1406–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chan, Y.S.; Don, M.M. Biosynthesis and structural characterization of Ag nanoparticles from white rot fungi. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Cunha, F.A.; Cunha, M.D.C.; da Frota, S.M.; Mallmann, E.J.J.; Freire, T.M.; Costa, L.S.; Paula, A.J.; Menezes, E.A.; Fechine, P.B.A. Biogenic synthesis of multifunctional silver nanoparticles from Rhodotorula glutinis and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa: Antifungal, catalytic and cytotoxicity activities. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Arun, G.; Eyini, M.; Gunasekaran, P. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using the mushroom fungus Schizophyllum commune and its biomedical applications. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2014, 19, 1083–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kobashigawa, J.M.; Robles, C.A.; Martínez Ricci, M.L.; Carmarán, C.C. Influence of strong bases on the synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using the ligninolytic fungi Trametes trogii. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1331–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Anthony, K.J.P.; Murugan, M.; Jeyaraj, M.; Rathinam, N.K.; Sangiliyandi, G. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using pine mushroom extract: A potential antimicrobial agent against E. coli and B. subtilis. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 2325–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Philip, D. Biosynthesis of Au, Ag and Au–Ag nanoparticles using edible mushroom extract. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2009, 73, 374–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhao, X.; Zhou, L.; Riaz Rajoka, M.S.; Yan, L.; Jiang, C.; Shao, D.; Zhu, J.; Shi, J.; Huang, Q.; Yang, H.; et al. Fungal silver nanoparticles: Synthesis, application and challenges. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 817–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Guilger-Casagrande, M.; Lima, R. de Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Mediated by Fungi: A Review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Al-Ansari, M.M.; Dhasarathan, P.; Ranjitsingh, A.J.A.; Al-Humaid, L.A. Ganoderma lucidum inspired silver nanoparticles and its biomedical applications with special reference to drug resistant Escherichia coli isolates from CAUTI. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 2993–3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Aygün, A.; Özdemir, S.; Gülcan, M.; Cellat, K.; Şen, F. Synthesis and characterization of Reishi mushroom-mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles for the biochemical applications. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 178, 112970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Dat, T.D.; Viet, N.D.; Dat, N.M.; My, P.L.T.; Thinh, D.B.; Thy, L.T.M.; Huong, L.M.; Khang, P.T.; Hai, N.D.; Nam, H.M.; et al. Characterization and bioactivities of silver nanoparticles green synthesized from Vietnamese Ganoderma lucidum. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 27, 101453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Iruoma, C.A.; Reginald, E.E.; Motunrayo, O.; Ezinwa, I.U. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Pleurotus ostreatus. J. Appl. Life Sci. Int. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Bhardwaj, A.K.; Naraian, R. Green synthesis and characterization of silver NPs using oyster mushroom extract for antibacterial efficacy. J. Chem. Environ. Sci. Its Appl. 2020, 7, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Vetchinkina, E.; Loshchinina, E.; Kupryashina, M.; Burov, A.; Pylaev, T.; Nikitina, V. Green synthesis of nanoparticles with extracellular and intracellular extracts of basidiomycetes. PeerJ 2018, 6, e5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ahmed, S.; Annu; Ikram, S.; Yudha, S.S. Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles: A green approach. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2016, 161, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Elahi, N.; Kamali, M.; Baghersad, M.H. Recent biomedical applications of gold nanoparticles: A review. Talanta 2018, 184, 537–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kalimuthu, K.; Cha, B.S.; Kim, S.; Park, K.S. Eco-friendly synthesis and biomedical applications of gold nanoparticles: A review. Microchem. J. 2020, 152, 104296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Eskandari-Nojedehi, M.; Jafarizadeh-Malmiri, H.; Rahbar-Shahrouzi, J. Hydrothermal green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) extract: Physico-chemical characteristics and antifungal activity studies. Green Process. Synth. 2018, 7, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Dheyab, M.A.; Owaid, M.N.; Rabeea, M.A.; Aziz, A.A.; Jameel, M.S. Mycosynthesis of gold nanoparticles by the Portabello mushroom extract, Agaricaceae, and their efficacy for decolorization of Azo dye. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2020, 14, 100312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Krishnamoorthi, R.; Bharathakumar, S.; Malaikozhundan, B.; Mahalingam, P.U. Mycofabrication of gold nanoparticles: Optimization, characterization, stabilization and evaluation of its antimicrobial potential on selected human pathogens. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 35, 102107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Hemashekhar, B.; Chandrappa, C.P.; Govindappa, M.; Chandrashekar, N. Endophytic fungus Alternaria spp isolated from Rauvolfia tetraphylla root arbitrate synthesis of gold nanoparticles and evaluation of their antibacterial, antioxidant and antimitotic activities. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 10, 035010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Jha, P.; Saraf, A.; Sohal, J.K. Antimicrobial Activity of Biologically Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles from Wild Mushroom Cantharellus Species. J. Sci. Res. 2021, 65, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Naeem, G.A.; Jaloot, A.S.; Owaid, M.N.; Muslim, R.F. Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles from Coprinus comatus, Agaricaceae, and the Effect of Ultraviolet Irradiation on Their Characteristics. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 2021, 18, 9396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Rabeea, M.A.; Owaid, M.N.; Aziz, A.A.; Jameel, M.S.; Dheyab, M.A. Mycosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using the extract of Flammulina velutipes, Physalacriaceae, and their efficacy for decolorization of methylene blue. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Naimi-Shamel, N.; Pourali, P.; Dolatabadi, S. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Fusarium oxysporum and antibacterial activity of its tetracycline conjugant. J. Mycol. Médicale 2019, 29, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Clarance, P.; Luvankar, B.; Sales, J.; Khusro, A.; Agastian, P.; Tack, J.-C.; Al Khulaifi, M.M.; AL-Shwaiman, H.A.; Elgorban, A.M.; Syed, A.; et al. Green synthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles using endophytic fungi Fusarium solani and its in-vitro anticancer and biomedical applications. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 706–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Abdul-Hadi, S.Y.; Owaid, M.N.; Rabeea, M.A.; Abdul Aziz, A.; Jameel, M.S. Rapid mycosynthesis and characterization of phenols-capped crystal gold nanoparticles from Ganoderma applanatum, Ganodermataceae. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 27, 101683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Elumalai, D.; Suman, T.Y.; Hemavathi, M.; Swetha, C.; Kavitha, R.; Arulvasu, C.; Kaleena, P.K. Biofabrication of gold nanoparticles using Ganoderma lucidum and their cytotoxicity against human colon cancer cell line (HT-29). Bull. Mater. Sci. 2021, 44, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Shukurov, I.; Mohamed, M.S.; Mizuki, T.; Palaninathan, V.; Ukai, T.; Hanajiri, T.; Maekawa, T. Biological Synthesis of Bioactive Gold Nanoparticles from Inonotus obliquus for Dual Chemo-Photothermal Effects against Human Brain Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Farzana Fathima, M.R.; Usha Raja Nanthini, A.; Al-Khattaf, F.S.; Hatamleh, A.A.; Kabir, S.B. Mycosynthesis of Noble Metal Nanoparticle Using Laetiporus versisporus Mushroom and Analysis of Antioxidant Activity. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 8086803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Owaid, M.N.; Rabeea, M.A.; Abdul Aziz, A.; Jameel, M.S.; Dheyab, M.A. Mushroom-assisted synthesis of triangle gold nanoparticles using the aqueous extract of fresh Lentinula edodes (shiitake), Omphalotaceae. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2019, 12, 100270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Vetchinkina, E.P.; Loshchinina, E.A.; Vodolazov, I.R.; Kursky, V.F.; Dykman, L.A.; Nikitina, V.E. Biosynthesis of nanoparticles of metals and metalloids by basidiomycetes. Preparation of gold nanoparticles by using purified fungal phenol oxidases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 1047–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Acay, H. Utilization of Morchella esculenta -mediated green synthesis golden nanoparticles in biomedicine applications. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 51, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Soltani Nejad, M.; Samandari Najafabadi, N.; Aghighi, S.; Pakina, E.; Zargar, M. Evaluation of Phoma sp. Biomass as an Endophytic Fungus for Synthesis of Extracellular Gold Nanoparticles with Antibacterial and Antifungal Properties. Molecules 2022, 27, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Abdel-Kareem, M.M.; Zohri, A.A. Extracellular mycosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using Trichoderma hamatum: Optimization, characterization and antimicrobial activity. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 67, 465–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. do Nascimento, J.M.; Cruz, N.D.; de Oliveira, G.R.; Sá, W.S.; de Oliveira, J.D.; Ribeiro, P.R.S.; Leite, S.G.F. Evaluation of the kinetics of gold biosorption processes and consequent biogenic synthesis of AuNPs mediated by the fungus Trichoderma harzianum. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Basu, A.; Ray, S.; Chowdhury, S.; Sarkar, A.; Mandal, D.P.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Kundu, S. Evaluating the antimicrobial, apoptotic, and cancer cell gene delivery properties of protein-capped gold nanoparticles synthesized from the edible mycorrhizal fungus Tricholoma crassum. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Molnár, Z.; Bódai, V.; Szakacs, G.; Erdélyi, B.; Fogarassy, Z.; Sáfrán, G.; Varga, T.; Kónya, Z.; Tóth-Szeles, E.; Szűcs, R.; et al. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles by thermophilic filamentous fungi. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Loshchinina, E.A.; Vetchinkina, E.P.; Kupryashina, M.A.; Kursky, V.F.; Nikitina, V.E. Nanoparticles synthesis by Agaricus soil basidiomycetes. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2018, 126, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Jeyaraj, M.; Gurunathan, S.; Qasim, M.; Kang, M.-H.; Kim, J.-H. A Comprehensive Review on the Synthesis, Characterization, and Biomedical Application of Platinum Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Fahmy, S.A.; Preis, E.; Bakowsky, U.; Azzazy, H.M.E.-S. Platinum Nanoparticles: Green Synthesis and Biomedical Applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 4981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Muñiz-Diaz, R.; Gutiérrez de la Rosa, S.Y.; Gutiérrez Coronado, Ó.; Patakfalvi, R. Biogenic synthesis of platinum nanoparticles. Chem. Pap. 2022, 76, 2573–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Sarkar, J.; Acharya, K. Alternaria alternata culture filtrate mediated bioreduction of chloroplatinate to platinum nanoparticles. Inorg. Nano-Met. Chem. 2017, 47, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Riddin, T.L.; Gericke, M.; Whiteley, C.G. Analysis of the inter- and extracellular formation of platinum nanoparticles by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici using response surface methodology. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 3482–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Govender, Y.; Riddin, T.; Gericke, M.; Whiteley, C.G. Bioreduction of platinum salts into nanoparticles: A mechanistic perspective. Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 31, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Govender, Y.; Riddin, T.L.; Gericke, M.; Whiteley, C.G. On the enzymatic formation of platinum nanoparticles. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2010, 12, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Syed, A.; Ahmad, A. Extracellular biosynthesis of platinum nanoparticles using the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2012, 97, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Gupta, K.; Chundawat, T.S. Bio-inspired synthesis of platinum nanoparticles from fungus Fusarium oxysporum: Its characteristics, potential antimicrobial, antioxidant and photocatalytic activities. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 1050d6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Castro-Longoria, E. Production of Platinum Nanoparticles and Nanoaggregates Using Neurospora crassa. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 22, 1000–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Subramaniyan, S.A.; Sheet, S.; Vinothkannan, M.; Yoo, D.J.; Lee, Y.S.; Belal, S.A.; Shim, K.S. One-Pot Facile Synthesis of Pt Nanoparticles Using Cultural Filtrate of Microgravity Simulated Grown P. chrysogenum and Their Activity on Bacteria and Cancer Cells. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 18, 3110–3125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Borse, V.; Kaler, A.; Banerjee, U.C. Microbial Synthesis of Platinum Nanoparticles and Evaluation of Their Anticancer Activity. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Electr. Electron. 2015, 11, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Phan, T.T.V.; Huynh, T.-C.; Manivasagan, P.; Mondal, S.; Oh, J. An Up-To-Date Review on Biomedical Applications of Palladium Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2019, 10, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Fahmy, S.; Preis, E.; Bakowsky, U.; Azzazy, H.M. Palladium Nanoparticles Fabricated by Green Chemistry: Promising Chemotherapeutic, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Agents. Materials 2020, 13, 3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Mohana, S.; Sumathi, S. Multi-Functional Biological Effects of Palladium Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Agaricus bisporus. J. Clust. Sci. 2020, 31, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Gil, Y.-G.; Kang, S.; Chae, A.; Kim, Y.-K.; Min, D.-H.; Jang, H. Synthesis of porous Pd nanoparticles by therapeutic chaga extract for highly efficient tri-modal cancer treatment. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 19810–19817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Sriramulu, M.; Sumathi, S. Biosynthesis of palladium nanoparticles using Saccharomyces cerevisiae extract and its photocatalytic degradation behaviour. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 025018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Saitoh, N.; Fujimori, R.; Yoshimura, T.; Tanaka, H.; Kondoh, A.; Nomura, T.; Konishi, Y. Microbial recovery of palladium by baker’s yeast through bioreductive deposition and biosorption. Hydrometallurgy 2020, 196, 105413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Rafique, M.; Shaikh, A.J.; Rasheed, R.; Tahir, M.B.; Bakhat, H.F.; Rafique, M.S.; Rabbani, F. A Review on Synthesis, Characterization and Applications of Copper Nanoparticles Using Green Method. NANO: Brief Rep. Rev. 2017, 12, 1750043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Al-Hakkani, M.F. Biogenic copper nanoparticles and their applications: A review. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Chaerun, S.K.; Prabowo, B.A.; Winarko, R. Bionanotechnology: The formation of copper nanoparticles assisted by biological agents and their applications as antimicrobial and antiviral agents. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2022, 18, 100703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Sriramulu, M.; Shanmugam, S.; Ponnusamy, V.K. Agaricus bisporus mediated biosynthesis of copper nanoparticles and its biological effects: An in-vitro study. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2020, 35, 100254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Saitawadekar, A.; Kakde, U.B. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using Aspergillus flavus. J. Crit. Rev. 2020, 7, 9. [Google Scholar]
  177. Noor, S.; Shah, Z.; Javed, A.; Ali, A.; Hussain, S.B.; Zafar, S.; Ali, H.; Muhammad, S.A. A fungal based synthesis method for copper nanoparticles with the determination of anticancer, antidiabetic and antibacterial activities. J. Microbiol. Methods 2020, 174, 105966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Ammar, H.A.; Rabie, G.H.; Mohamed, E. Novel fabrication of gelatin-encapsulated copper nanoparticles using Aspergillus versicolor and their application in controlling of rotting plant pathogens. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 42, 1947–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Majumder, D.R. Bioremediation: Copper Nanoparticles from Electronic-waste. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2012, 4, 10. [Google Scholar]
  180. Salvadori, M.R.; Lepre, L.F.; Ando, R.A.; Oller do Nascimento, C.A.; Corrêa, B. Biosynthesis and Uptake of Copper Nanoparticles by Dead Biomass of Hypocrea lixii Isolated from the Metal Mine in the Brazilian Amazon Region. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Fatima, F.; Wahid, I. Eco-friendly synthesis of silver and copper nanoparticles by Shizophyllum commune fungus and its biomedical applications. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 7915–7926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Cuevas, R.; Durán, N.; Diez, M.C.; Tortella, G.R.; Rubilar, O. Extracellular Biosynthesis of Copper and Copper Oxide Nanoparticles by Stereum hirsutum, a Native White-Rot Fungus from Chilean Forests. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Natesan, K.; Ponmurugan, P.; Gnanamangai, B.M.; Manigandan, V.; Joy, S.P.J.; Jayakumar, C.; Amsaveni, G. Biosynthesis of silica and copper nanoparticles from Trichoderma, Streptomyces and Pseudomonas spp. evaluated against collar canker and red root-rot disease of tea plants. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2021, 54, 56–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Salvadori, M.R.; Ando, R.A.; Oller Do Nascimento, C.A.; Corrêa, B. Bioremediation from wastewater and extracellular synthesis of copper nanoparticles by the fungus Trichoderma koningiopsis. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2014, 49, 1286–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Saif, S.; Tahir, A.; Chen, Y. Green Synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles and Their Environmental Applications and Implications. Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Pasinszki, T.; Krebsz, M. Synthesis and Application of Zero-Valent Iron Nanoparticles in Water Treatment, Environmental Remediation, Catalysis, and Their Biological Effects. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Mohamed, Y.M.; Azzam, A.M.; Amin, B.H.; Safwat, N.A. Mycosynthesis of iron nanoparticles by Alternaria alternata and its antibacterial activity. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 14, 1234–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Alamilla-Martínez, D.G.; Rojas-Avelizapa, N.G.; Domínguez-López, I.; Pool, H.; Gómez-Ramírez, M.; de Querétaro, A. Biosynthesis of iron nanoparticles (FeNPs) by Alternaria alternata MVSS-AH-5. Mex. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 4, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Tarafdar, J.C.; Raliya, R. Rapid, Low-Cost, and Ecofriendly Approach for Iron Nanoparticle Synthesis Using Aspergillus oryzae TFR9. J. Nanoparticles 2013, 2013, 141274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Abdeen, S.; Isaac, R.R.; Geo, S.; Sornalekshmi, S.; Rose, A.; Praseetha, P.K. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of Biosynthesized Iron and Silver Nanoparticles Using the Fungi Fusarium oxysporum and Actinomycetes sp. on Human Pathogens. Nano Biomed. Eng. 2013, 5, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Mathur, P.; Saini, S.; Paul, E.; Sharma, C.; Mehtani, P. Endophytic fungi mediated synthesis of iron nanoparticles: Characterization and application in methylene blue decolorization. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Manikandan, G.; Ramasubbu, R. Biosynthesis of Iron Nanoparticles from Pleurotus florida and its Antimicrobial Activity against Selected Human Pathogens. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 83, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Mazumdar, H.; Haloi, N. A study on Biosynthesis of Iron Nanoparticles by Pleurotus sp. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Res. 2011, 12, 39–49. [Google Scholar]
  194. Adeleye, T.; Kareem, S.; Kekere-Ekun, A. Optimization studies on biosynthesis of iron nanoparticles using Rhizopus stolonifer. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 805, 012037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Kareem, S.; Adeleye, T.; Ojo, R. Effects of pH, temperature and agitation on the biosynthesis of iron nanoparticles produced by Trichoderma species. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 805, 012036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Bisht, N.; Phalswal, P.; Khanna, P.K. Selenium nanoparticles: A review on synthesis and biomedical applications. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 1415–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Shoeibi, S.; Mozdziak, P.; Golkar-Narenji, A. Biogenesis of Selenium Nanoparticles Using Green Chemistry. Top. Curr. Chem. (Z) 2017, 375, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Kumar, A.; Prasad, K.S. Role of nano-selenium in health and environment. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 325, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Gharieb, M.M.; Wilkinson, S.C.; Gadd, G.M. Reduction of selenium oxyanions by unicellular, polymorphic and filamentous fungi: Cellular location of reduced selenium and implications for tolerance. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1995, 14, 300–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Sarkar, J.; Dey, P.; Saha, S.; Acharya, K. Mycosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles. Micro Nano Lett. 2011, 6, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Sarkar, J.; Saha, S.; Dey, P.; Acharya, K. Production of Selenium Nanorods by Phytopathogen, Alternaria alternata. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2012, 10, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Bafghi, M.H.; Darroudi, M.; Zargar, M.; Zarrinfar, H.; Nazari, R. Biosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles by Aspergillus flavus and Candida albicans for antifungal applications. Micro Nano Lett. 2021, 16, 656–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Hussein, H.G.; El-Sayed, E.-S.R.; Younis, N.A.; Hamdy, A.E.H.A.; Easa, S.M. Harnessing endophytic fungi for biosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles and exploring their bioactivities. AMB Express 2022, 12, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Zare, B.; Babaie, S.; Setayesh, N.; Shahverdi, A.R. Isolation and characterization of a fungus for extracellular synthesis of small selenium nanoparticles. Nanomed. J. 2013, 1, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  205. Liang, X.; Perez, M.A.M.-J.; Nwoko, K.C.; Egbers, P.; Feldmann, J.; Csetenyi, L.; Gadd, G.M. Fungal formation of selenium and tellurium nanoparticles. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 7241–7259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  206. Liang, X.; Zhang, S.; Gadd, G.M.; McGrath, J.; Rooney, D.W.; Zhao, Q. Fungal-derived selenium nanoparticles and their potential applications in electroless silver coatings for preventing pin-tract infections. Regen. Biomater. 2022, 9, rbac013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Asghari-Paskiabi, F.; Imani, M.; Razzaghi-Abyaneh, M.; Rafii-Tabar, H. Fusarium oxysporum, a bio-Factory for Nano Selenium Compounds: Synthesis and Characterization. Sci. Iran. 2018, 25, 1857–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Vetchinkina, E.P.; Loshchinina, E.A.; Kurskyi, V.F.; Nikitina, V.E. Biological synthesis of selenium and germanium nanoparticles by xylotrophic basidiomycetes. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2016, 52, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Lian, S.; Diko, C.S.; Yan, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Q.; Qu, Y. Characterization of biogenic selenium nanoparticles derived from cell-free extracts of a novel yeast Magnusiomyces ingens. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Zhang, H.; Zhou, H.; Bai, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Ma, Q.; Qu, Y. Biosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles mediated by fungus Mariannaea sp. HJ and their characterization. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 571, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Rasouli, M. Biosynthesis of Selenium Nanoparticles using yeast Nematospora coryli and examination of their anti-candida and anti-oxidant activities. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2019, 13, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Vahidi, H.; Kobarfard, F.; Kosar, Z.; Mahjoub, M.A.; Saravanan, M.; Barabadi, H. Mycosynthesis and characterization of selenium nanoparticles using standard Penicillium chrysogenum PTCC 5031 and their antibacterial activity: A novel approach in microbial nanotechnology. Nanomed. J. 2020, 7, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Morad, M.Y.; El-Sayed, H.; Elhenawy, A.A.; Korany, S.M.; Aloufi, A.S.; Ibrahim, A.M. Myco-Synthesized Molluscicidal and Larvicidal Selenium Nanoparticles: A New Strategy to Control Biomphalaria alexandrina Snails and Larvae of Schistosoma mansoni with an In Silico Study on Induced Oxidative Stress. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. El-Sayyad, G.S.; El-Bastawisy, H.S.; Gobara, M.; El-Batal, A.I. Gentamicin-Assisted Mycogenic Selenium Nanoparticles Synthesized Under Gamma Irradiation for Robust Reluctance of Resistant Urinary Tract Infection-Causing Pathogens. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 195, 323–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Amin, B.H.; Ahmed, H.Y.; El Gazzar, E.M.; Badawy, M.M.M. Enhancement the Mycosynthesis of Selenium Nanoparticles by Using Gamma Radiation. Dose-Response 2021, 19, 155932582110593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Salem, S.S.; Fouda, M.M.G.; Fouda, A.; Awad, M.A.; Al-Olayan, E.M.; Allam, A.A.; Shaheen, T.I. Antibacterial, Cytotoxicity and Larvicidal Activity of Green Synthesized Selenium Nanoparticles Using Penicillium corylophilum. J. Clust. Sci. 2021, 32, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Fouda, A.; Hassan, S.E.-D.; Eid, A.M.; Abdel-Rahman, M.A.; Hamza, M.F. Light enhanced the antimicrobial, anticancer, and catalytic activities of selenium nanoparticles fabricated by endophytic fungal strain, Penicillium crustosum EP-1. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Hashem, A.H.; Khalil, A.M.A.; Reyad, A.M.; Salem, S.S. Biomedical Applications of Mycosynthesized Selenium Nanoparticles Using Penicillium expansum ATTC 36200. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 3998–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Liang, X.; Perez, M.A.M.; Zhang, S.; Song, W.; Armstrong, J.G.; Bullock, L.A.; Feldmann, J.; Parnell, J.; Csetenyi, L.; Gadd, G.M. Fungal transformation of selenium and tellurium located in a volcanogenic sulfide deposit. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 2346–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Ashengroph, M.; Tozandehjani, S. Optimized resting cell method for green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles from a new Rhodotorula mucilaginosa strain. Process Biochem. 2022, 116, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Joshi, S.; De Britto, S.; Jogaiah, S.; Ito, S. Mycogenic Selenium Nanoparticles as Potential New Generation Broad Spectrum Antifungal Molecules. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  222. Hu, D.; Yu, S.; Yu, D.; Liu, N.; Tang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Wang, C.; Wu, A. Biogenic Trichoderma harzianum-derived selenium nanoparticles with control functionalities originating from diverse recognition metabolites against phytopathogens and mycotoxins. Food Control 2019, 106, 106748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Diko, C.S.; Zhang, H.; Lian, S.; Fan, S.; Li, Z.; Qu, Y. Optimal synthesis conditions and characterization of selenium nanoparticles in Trichoderma sp. WL-Go culture broth. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 246, 122583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Arunthirumeni, M.; Veerammal, V.; Shivakumar, M.S. Biocontrol Efficacy of Mycosynthesized Selenium Nanoparticle Using Trichoderma sp. on Insect Pest Spodoptera litura. J. Clust. Sci. 2022, 33, 1645–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Vetchinkina, E.; Loshchinina, E.; Kursky, V.; Nikitina, V. Reduction of organic and inorganic selenium compounds by the edible medicinal basidiomycete Lentinula edodes and the accumulation of elemental selenium nanoparticles in its mycelium. J. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 829–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Zambonino, M.C.; Quizhpe, E.M.; Jaramillo, F.E.; Rahman, A.; Santiago Vispo, N.; Jeffryes, C.; Dahoumane, S.A. Green Synthesis of Selenium and Tellurium Nanoparticles: Current Trends, Biological Properties and Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Abo Elsoud, M.M.; Al-Hagar, O.E.A.; Abdelkhalek, E.S.; Sidkey, N.M. Synthesis and investigations on tellurium myconanoparticles. Biotechnol. Rep. 2018, 18, e00247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Barabadi, H.; Kobarfard, F.; Vahidi, H. Biosynthesis and Characterization of Biogenic Tellurium Nanoparticles by Using Penicillium chrysogenum PTCC 5031: A Novel Approach in Gold Biotechnology. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2018, 17, 87–97. [Google Scholar]
  229. Espinosa-Ortiz, E.J.; Rene, E.R.; Guyot, F.; van Hullebusch, E.D.; Lens, P.N.L. Biomineralization of tellurium and selenium-tellurium nanoparticles by the white-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 124, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Faramarzi, M.A.; Forootanfar, H. Biosynthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles produced by laccase from Paraconiothyrium variabile. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 87, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Sanghi, R.; Verma, P.; Puri, S. Enzymatic Formation of Gold Nanoparticles Using Phanerochaete Chrysosporium. Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 1, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. El-Batal, A.I.; ElKenawy, N.M.; Yassin, A.S.; Amin, M.A. Laccase production by Pleurotus ostreatus and its application in synthesis of gold nanoparticles. Biotechnol. Rep. 2015, 5, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  233. Gholami-Shabani, M.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Norouzian, D.; Amini, A.; Gholami-Shabani, Z.; Imani, A.; Chiani, M.; Riazi, G.; Shams-Ghahfarokhi, M.; Razzaghi-Abyaneh, M. Antimicrobial Activity and Physical Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles Green Synthesized Using Nitrate Reductase from Fusarium oxysporum. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 172, 4084–4098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Durán, N.; Cuevas, R.; Cordi, L.; Rubilar, O.; Diez, M.C. Biogenic silver nanoparticles associated with silver chloride nanoparticles (Ag@AgCl) produced by laccase from Trametes versicolor. SpringerPlus 2014, 3, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  235. Alharbi, R.M.; Alshammari, S.O.; Abd El Aty, A.A. Statically improved fungal laccase-mediated biogenesis of silver nanoparticles with antimicrobial applications. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 001–014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Chen, X.; Yan, J.-K.; Wu, J.-Y. Characterization and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles prepared with a fungal exopolysaccharide in water. Food Hydrocolloids 2016, 53, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Nair, V.; Sambre, D.; Joshi, S.; Bankar, A.; Ravi Kumar, A.; Zinjarde, S. Yeast-Derived Melanin Mediated Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles. J. Bionanosci. 2013, 7, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Dhillon, G.S.; Brar, S.K.; Kaur, S.; Verma, M. Green approach for nanoparticle biosynthesis by fungi: Current trends and applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2012, 32, 49–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Siddiqi, K.S.; Husen, A. Fabrication of Metal Nanoparticles from Fungi and Metal Salts: Scope and Application. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Fungal Nanobionics: Principles and Applications; Prasad, R.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, M.; Wang, S. (Eds.) Springer: Gateway East, Singapore, 2018; 316p, p. 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Nanobiotechnology in Neurodegenerative Diseases; Rai, M.; Yadav, A. (Eds.) Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; 398p, p. 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Simões, M.F.; Ottoni, C.A.; Antunes, A. Mycogenic metal nanoparticles for the treatment of mycobacterioses. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Yadav, R.N.; Chitara, M.K.; Zaidi, N.W.; Khan, A.I.; Singh, U.S.; Singh, H.B. Novel facets and challenges in the management of phytopathogens using myconanoparticles. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 3296–3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Sundaravadivelan, C.; Padmanabhan, M.N. Effect of mycosynthesized silver nanoparticles from filtrate of Trichoderma harzianum against larvae and pupa of dengue vector Aedes aegypti L. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 4624–4633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Soni, N.; Prakash, S. Microbial synthesis of spherical nanosilver and nanogold for mosquito control. Ann. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 1099–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Salunkhe, R.B.; Patil, S.V.; Patil, C.D.; Salunke, B.K. Larvicidal potential of silver nanoparticles synthesized using fungus Cochliobolus lunatus against Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) and Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera; Culicidae). Parasitol. Res. 2011, 109, 823–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Zayed, K.M.; Guo, Y.-H.; Lv, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X.-N. Molluscicidal and antioxidant activities of silver nanoparticles on the multi-species of snail intermediate hosts of schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Gade, A.; Ingle, A.; Whiteley, C.; Rai, M. Mycogenic metal nanoparticles: Progress and applications. Biotechnol. Lett. 2010, 32, 593–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Sudheer, S.; Bai, R.G.; Muthoosamy, K.; Tuvikene, R.; Gupta, V.K.; Manickam, S. Biosustainable production of nanoparticles via mycogenesis for biotechnological applications: A critical review. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 111963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Yadav, A.; Kon, K.; Kratosova, G.; Duran, N.; Ingle, A.P.; Rai, M. Fungi as an efficient mycosystem for the synthesis of metal nanoparticles: Progress and key aspects of research. Biotechnol. Lett. 2015, 37, 2099–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Singh, R.P.; Handa, R.; Manchanda, G. Nanoparticles in sustainable agriculture: An emerging opportunity. J. Control. Release 2021, 329, 1234–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Alghuthaymi, M.A.; Abd-Elsalam, K.A.; AboDalam, H.M.; Ahmed, F.K.; Ravichandran, M.; Kalia, A.; Rai, M. Trichoderma: An eco-friendly source of nanomaterials for sustainable agroecosystems. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Sonawane, H.; Shelke, D.; Chambhare, M.; Dixit, N.; Math, S.; Sen, S.; Borah, S.N.; Islam, N.F.; Joshi, S.J.; Yousaf, B.; et al. Fungi-derived agriculturally important nanoparticles and their application in crop stress management—Prospects and environmental risks. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Akther, T.; Hemalatha, S. Mycosilver Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization and its efficacy against plant pathogenic fungi. BioNanoScience 2019, 9, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Barbosa, A.C.; Silva, L.P.; Ferraz, C.M.; Tobias, F.L.; de Araújo, J.V.; Loureiro, B.; Braga, G.M.; Veloso, F.B.; de Freitas Soares, F.E.; Fronza, M.; et al. Nematicidal activity of silver nanoparticles from the fungus Duddingtonia flagrans. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 2341–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  256. Shukla, G.; Gaurav, S.S.; Rani, V.; Singh, A.; Rani, P.; Verma, P.; Kumar, B. Evaluation of larvicidal effect of mycogenic silver nanoparticles against white grubs (Holotrichia sp). J. Adv. Sci. Res. 2020, 11, 296–304. [Google Scholar]
  257. Joshi, S.M.; De Britto, S.; Jogaiah, S. Myco-engineered selenium nanoparticles elicit resistance against tomato late blight disease by regulating differential expression of cellular, biochemical and defense responsive genes. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 325, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. He, K.; Chen, G.; Zeng, G.; Huang, Z.; Guo, Z.; Huang, T.; Peng, M.; Shi, J.; Hu, L. Applications of white rot fungi in bioremediation with nanoparticles and biosynthesis of metallic nanoparticles. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 4853–4862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Shakya, M.; Rene, E.R.; Nancharaiah, Y.V.; Lens, P.N.L. Fungal-Based Nanotechnology for Heavy Metal Removal. In Nanotechnology, Food Security and Water Treatment; Gothandam, K.M., Ranjan, S., Dasgupta, N., Ramalingam, C., Lichtfouse, E., Eds.; Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 229–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Sabuda, M.C.; Rosenfeld, C.E.; DeJournett, T.D.; Schroeder, K.; Wuolo-Journey, K.; Santelli, C.M. Fungal bioremediation of selenium-contaminated industrial and municipal wastewaters. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Espinosa-Ortiz, E.J.; Shakya, M.; Jain, R.; Rene, E.R.; van Hullebusch, E.D.; Lens, P.N.L. Sorption of zinc onto elemental selenium nanoparticles immobilized in Phanerochaete chrysosporium pellets. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 21619–21630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Kalia, A.; Singh, S. Myco-decontamination of azo dyes: Nano-augmentation technologies. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Deka, A.C.; Sinha, S.K. Mycogenic silver nanoparticle biosynthesis and its pesticide degradation potentials. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Emerg. Eng. Res. 2015, 3, 108–113. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of fungi-mediated nanoparticle biosynthesis.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of fungi-mediated nanoparticle biosynthesis.
Biomimetics 08 00001 g001
Figure 2. Mycosynthesis of various nanoparticles.
Figure 2. Mycosynthesis of various nanoparticles.
Biomimetics 08 00001 g002
Table 1. Mycosynthesis of silver nanoparticles.
Table 1. Mycosynthesis of silver nanoparticles.
SpeciesSourcePrecursorNanoparticlesReferences
Agaricus arvensisLiving cultureAgNO3Spherical (10–20 nm)[41]
Cultural liquidAgNO3Irregular spherical (10–100 nm)
Mycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (1–10 nm)
Agaricus bisporusLiving cultureAgNO3Spherical (10–20 nm)[41]
Cultural liquidAgNO3Irregular spherical (10–100 nm)
Mycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (1–10 nm)
Agaricus bisporusCrude polysaccharide extractAgNO3Irregularly quasi-spherical (20–40 nm)[88]
Agaricus bisporusFruit body extractAgNO3Face-centered cubic (average size of 43.9 nm)[89]
Agaricus bisporusFruit body extractAgNO3Cubic (average size of 50.44 nm)[90]
Agaricus bisporusFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 16 nm)[91]
Agaricus brasiliensisCrude polysaccharide extractAgNO3Irregularly quasi-spherical (20–40 nm)[88]
Alternaria sp.Mycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (3–10 nm)[47]
Aspergillus nigerCrude xylanaseAgNO3Spherical, cylindrical, oval (15.21–77.49 nm)[48]
Auricularia polytrichaMycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (5–50 nm)[92]
Beauveria bassianaMycelial extractAgNO3Triangular, circular, hexagonal (10–50 nm)[50]
Botryodiplodia theobromaeMycelial extractAgNO366.75–111.23 nm[52]
Mycelial biomassAgNO362.77–103 nm
Flammulina velutipesFungal extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 21.4 nm)[97]
Flammulina velutipesFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 22 nm)[98]
Fomes fomentariusFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (10–20 nm)[99]
Fomitopsis pinicolaFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (10–30 nm)[100]
Ganoderma applanatumFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 58.77 nm)[102]
Ganoderma lucidumLiving cultureAgNO3Spherical (10–20 nm)[41]
Cultural liquidAgNO3Irregular spherical (10–100 nm)
Mycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (1–10 nm)
Fruit body extractAgNO3Near-cubic (20–200 nm)
Ganoderma lucidumFungal extractAgNO3Spherical (23–58 nm)[123]
Ganoderma lucidumFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (15–22 nm)[124]
Ganoderma lucidumFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 11.38 nm)[125]
Ganoderma sessileMycelial extractAgNO3Quasi-spherical (average size of 5.4 or 8.9 nm depending on the extraction method)[82]
Ganoderma sessiliformeFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 45 nm)[101]
Grifola frondosaLiving cultureAgNO3Spherical (10–20 nm)[41]
Cultural liquidAgNO3Irregular spherical (10–100 nm)
Mycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (1–10 nm)
Helvella leucopusFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (80–100 nm), aggregated[61]
Lactarius piperatusFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 49 nm)[105]
Lentinus edodesLiving cultureAgNO3Spherical (10–20 nm)[41]
Cultural liquidAgNO3Irregular spherical (10–100 nm), spherical conglomerates 50–250)
Mycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (1–10 nm)
Lentinus tuber-regiumFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (5–35 nm)[107]
Penicillium citrinumMycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (2–5 nm)[67]
Penicillium cyclopiumMycelial biomassAgNO3Mostly irregular (12–25 nm)[68]
Penicillium janthinellumMycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (1–30 nm)[69]
Penicillium oxalicumMycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (60–80 nm)[70]
Penicillium oxalicumMycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 52.26 nm)[71]
Penicillium polonicumMycelial extractAgNO3Mostly spherical (10–15 nm), hexagonal, polyhedral (above 30 nm)[72]
Phaenerochaete chrysosporiumMycelial extractAgNO3Spherical, oval (34–90 nm)[109]
Phellinus linteusCrude polysaccharide extractAgNO3Irregularly quasi-spherical (20–40 nm)[88]
Picoa sp.Fruit body extractAgNO3Irregular (average size of 19.5 nm)[76]
Pleurotus djamorFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 55.76 nm)[114]
Pleurotus eryngiiFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 18.45 nm)[112]
Pleurotus floridaFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 10 nm)[111]
Pleurotus ostreatusLiving cultureAgNO3Spherical (10–20 nm)[41]
Cultural liquidAgNO3Irregular spherical (10–100 nm)
Mycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (1–10 nm)
Pleurotus ostreatusFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical, hexagonal (18–82 nm)[126]
Pleurotus ostreatusFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 28.44 nm)[114]
Pleurotus sajor cajuFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (11–44 nm)[127]
Pleurotus sajor cajuFruit body extractAgNO3Spherical (average size of 15–20 nm)[113]
Tirmania sp.Fruit body extractAgNO3Irregular, spherical (average size of 72 nm)[81]
Trametes trogiiMycelial extractAgNO3Mostly spherical (5–65 nm)[118]
Trichoderma atrovirideMycelial extractAgNO315–25 nm[84]
Trichoderma atrovirideCultural liquidAgNO3Spherical (20–30 nm)[42]
Mycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (15–35 nm)
Trichoderma harzianumMycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (10–25 nm)[83]
Trichoderma harzianumMycelial extractAgNO3Quasi-spherical (average size of 9.6 or 19.1 nm depending on the extraction method)[82]
Trichoderma longibrachiatumCrude xylanaseAgNO3Spherical, cylindrical, oval (15.21–77.49 nm)[48]
Trichoderma longibrachiatumCultural liquidAgNO3Spherical (5–15 nm)[42]
Mycelial extractAgNO3Spherical (10–25 nm)
Table 2. Mycosynthesis of gold nanoparticles.
Table 2. Mycosynthesis of gold nanoparticles.
SpeciesSourcePrecursorNanoparticlesReferences
Agaricus arvensisLiving cultureHAuCl4Spherical (5–50 nm)[41]
Cultural liquidHAuCl4Spherical (2–10 nm)
Mycelial extractHAuCl4Irregular spherical (25–20 nm)
Agaricus bisporusFruit body extractHAuCl4Spherical (average size of 25 nm)[132]
Agaricus bisporusLiving cultureHAuCl4Spherical (5–50 nm)[41]
Cultural liquidHAuCl4Spherical (2–10 nm)
Mycelial extractHAuCl4Spherical (10–50 nm), hexagonal, tetragonal, triangular (30–100 nm)
Agaricus bisporusFruit body extractHAuCl4Oval, spherical, drum-like, hexagonal, triangular (average size of 53 nm)[133]
Agaricus bisporusFruit body extractHAuCl4Spherical (10–50 nm)[134]
Alternaria spp.Fungal extractHAuCl4Triangular, circular (average size of 28 nm)[135]
Cantharellus sp.Fungal extractHAuCl4Spherical (average size of 60.6 nm)[136]
Coprinus comatusFruit body extractHAuCl4Face-centered cubic (average size of 17.39 nm)[137]
Flammulina velutipesFruit body extractHAuCl4Triangular, spherical, irregular (average size of 74.32 nm)[138]
Fusarium oxysporumCultural liquidHAuCl4Spherical, hexagonal (22–30 nm)[139]
Fusarium solaniBiomass extractHAuCl4Needle and flower-like structures with spindle shape (40–45 nm)[140]
Ganoderma applanatumIsolated phenolic compoundsHAuCl4Face-centered cubic (average size of 18.70 nm)[141]
Ganoderma lucidumLiving cultureHAuCl4Spherical (5–50 nm)[41]
Cultural liquidHAuCl4Spherical (5–60 nm)
Mycelial extractHAuCl4Spherical (10–50 nm), hexagonal, tetragonal, triangular (30–100 nm)
Ganoderma lucidumFruit body extractHAuCl4Spherical, oval, irregular (1–100 nm)[142]
Grifola frondosaLiving cultureHAuCl4Spherical (5–50 nm)[41]
Cultural liquidHAuCl4Spherical (2–10 nm)
Mycelial extractHAuCl4Spherical (10–50 nm), hexagonal, tetragonal, triangular (30–100 nm)
Inonotus obliquusFruit body extractHAuCl4Mostly spherical (below 20 nm)[143]
Laetiporus versisporusFruit body extractHAuCl4Spherical (average size of 10 nm)[144]
Lentinus edodesFruit body extractHAuCl4Triangular, hexagonal, spherical, irregular (average size of 72 nm)[145]
Lentinus edodesLiving cultureHAuCl4Spherical (5–50 nm)[41,146]
Cultural liquidHAuCl4Spherical (2–20 nm)
Mycelial extractHAuCl4Spherical (10–50 nm), hexagonal, tetragonal, triangular (30–200 nm)
Intracellular Mn-peroxidaseHAuCl4Spherical (2–20 nm)
Intracellular laccases and tyrosinasesHAuCl4Irregular spherical, triangular, tetrahedral (5–120 nm)
Morchella esculentaFruit body extractHAuCl4Face-centered cubic (average size of 16.51 nm)[147]
Penicillium janthinellumMycelial extractHAuCl4Spherical (1–40 nm)[69]
Phoma sp.Mycelial biomassHAuCl4Spherical (10–100 nm)[148]
Pleurotus ostreatusLiving cultureHAuCl4Spherical (5–50 nm)[41]
Cultural liquidHAuCl4Spherical (2–20 nm)
Mycelial extractHAuCl4Spherical (10–50 nm), hexagonal, tetragonal, triangular (30–200 nm)
Pleurotus sajor-cajuFruit body extractHAuCl4Spherical (average size of 16–18 nm)[113]
Trichoderma hamatumMycelial extractHAuCl4Spherical, pentagonal, hexagonal (5–30 nm)[149]
Trichoderma harzianumMycelial biomassHAuCl4Spherical (below 30 nm)[150]
Tricholoma crassumMycelial extractHAuCl4Circular, rhomboid (5 nm or less), hexagonal, cubic, triangular (4.36–22.94 nm)[151]
Table 3. Mycosynthesis of platinum nanoparticles.
Table 3. Mycosynthesis of platinum nanoparticles.
SpeciesSourcePrecursorNanoparticlesReferences
Alternaria alternataCultural liquidH2PtCl6Irregular (50–315)[157]
Fusarium oxysporumMycelial biomassH2PtCl6Hexagonal, pentagonal, circular, square, rectangular (10–100 nm)[158]
Fusarium oxysporumPurified mycelial enzymePtCl2Rectangular, triangular (100–180 nm)[159]
Purified mycelial enzymeH2PtCl6Spherical (100–140 nm)
Fusarium oxysporumMycelial extractH2PtCl6Irregular (30–40 nm)[160]
Purified mycelial enzymeH2PtCl6Circular, triangular, pentagonal, hexagonal, often as nanoplates (40–60 nm)
Fusarium oxysporumMycelial biomassH2PtCl6Spherical (15–30 nm)[161]
Fusarium oxysporumCultural liquidH2PtCl6Face-centered cubic (average size of 25 nm)[162]
Neurospora crassaMycelial biomassH2PtCl6Quazi-spherical single PtNPs (4–35 nm) and spherical nanoaggregates (20–110 nm)[163]
Mycelial extractH2PtCl6Spherical nanoaggregates (17–76 nm), containing individual single crystals 2–3 nm in diameter
Penicillium chrysogenumCultural liquidH2PtCl6Spherical (5–40 nm)[164]
Saccharomyces boulardiiCell free extractH2PtCl6Spherical (80–150 nm)[165]
Table 4. Mycosynthesis of palladium nanoparticles.
Table 4. Mycosynthesis of palladium nanoparticles.
SpeciesSourcePrecursorNanoparticlesReferences
Agaricus bisporusMushroom extract[Pd(OAc)2]nTriangular and spherical (13–18 nm)[168]
Inonotus obliquusFruit body powder extractPdCl42−Porous spherical[169]
Saccharomyces cerevisiaeBiomass extract[Pd(OAc)2]nHexagonal (average size of 32 nm), agglomerated[170]
Saccharomyces cerevisiaeBiomassNa2PdCl4Spherical (10–20 nm)[171]
Table 5. Mycosynthesis of copper nanoparticles.
Table 5. Mycosynthesis of copper nanoparticles.
SpeciesSourcePrecursorNanoparticlesReferences
Agaricus bisporusFruit body extractCu(NO3)2Spherical (10–60 nm)[175]
Aspergillus flavusMycelial biomassCuSO4Spherical (2–60 nm)[176]
Aspergillus nigerMycelial extractCuSO4Spherical (5–100 nm)[177]
Aspergillus versicolorMycelial extractCuSO4Spherical, polygonal (23–82 nm)[178]
Fusarium oxysporumMycelial biomassCopper-containing wasteSpherical (93–115 nm)[179]
Hypocrea lixiiMycelial biomassCuCl2Spherical (average size of 24.5 nm)[180]
Shizophyllum communeMycelial biomassCuCl2Spherical (40–65 nm)[181]
Stereum hirsutumMycelial extractCuCl2Spherical (5–20 nm)[182]
Trichoderma atrovirideMycelial extractCuSO4Irregular spherical (5–25 nm)[183]
Trichoderma koningiopsisMycelial biomassCuCl2Spherical (average size of 87.5 nm)[184]
Table 6. Mycosynthesis of iron nanoparticles.
Table 6. Mycosynthesis of iron nanoparticles.
SpeciesSourcePrecursorNanoparticlesReferences
Alternaria alternataMycelial extractFe(NO3)3Cubic (average size of 9 nm)[187]
Alternaria alternataMycelial extractFeSO4Semi-oval (20–40 nm)/spherical (10–80 nm)[188]
Aspergillus oryzaeMycelial extractFeCl3Spherical (10–24.6 nm)[189]
Fusarium oxysporumMycelial biomassK3Fe(CN)6Spherical (20–40 nm)[190]
K4Fe(CN)6
Penicillium oxalicumMycelial extractFeSO4Spherical (average size of 140 nm)[191]
Pleurotus floridaFruit body extractFeCl3Spherical (100 nm)[192]
Pleurotus sp.Mycelial biomassFeSO4[193]
Rhizopus stoloniferMycelial extractFeCl3[194]
Trichoderma sp.Mycelial extractFeCl3[195]
Table 7. Mycosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles.
Table 7. Mycosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles.
SpeciesSourcePrecursorNanoparticlesReferences
Agaricus arvensisCultural liquidNa2SeO3Spherical (150–550 nm)[41,153]
Mycelial extractNa2SeO3Spherical (100–250 nm)
Agaricus bisporusCultural liquidNa2SeO3Spherical (100–250 nm)[41,153]
Mycelial extractNa2SeO3Spherical (40–140 nm)
Alternaria alternataCultural liquidNa2SeO4Spherical (30–150 nm)[200]
Alternaria alternataCultural liquidNa2SeO4Nanorods (200–800 nm in length, 50–70 nm in width)[201]
Aspergillus flavusCultural liquidNa2SeO4Spherical (average size of 51.5 nm)[202]
Aspergillus ochraceusLiving cultureNa2SeO3Spherical (average size of 45.22 nm)[203]
Aspergillus quadrilineatusLiving cultureNa2SeO3Spherical (average size of 55.37 nm)[203]]
Aspergillus terreusCultural liquidSe4+ ions solutionSpherical (average size of 47 nm)[204]
Aspergillus terreusLiving cultureNa2SeO3Spherical (average size of 30.98 nm)[203]
Aureobasidium pullulansLiving cultureNa2SeO3Spherical (average size of 60 nm)[205]
Aureobasidium pullulansCultural liquidNa2SeO3Spherical (20–120 nm)[206]
Candida albicansCultural liquidNa2SeO4Spherical (average size of 64 nm)[202]
Fusarium equisetiLiving cultureNa2SeO3Spherical and rod-shaped (average size of 30.11 nm)[203]
Fusarium oxysporumBiomassH2SeO3Spherical (34.32–231.98 nm)[207]
Ganoderma lucidumLiving cultureNa2SeO3Spherical (20–50 nm)[208]
Ganoderma lucidumCultural liquidNa2SeO3Spherical (20–50 nm)[41]
Mycelial extractNa2SeO3Spherical (100–300 nm)
Grifola frondosaLiving cultureNa2SeO3Spherical (50–320 nm)[208]
Grifola frondosaCultural liquidNa2SeO3Spherical (20–50 nm)[41]
Mycelial extractNa2SeO3Spherical (100–300 nm)
Lentinus edodesLiving cultureNa2SeO3Spherical (50–320 nm)[208]
Lentinus edodesCultural liquidNa2SeO3Spherical (50–150 nm)[41]
Mycelial extractNa2SeO3Irregular spherical (50–150 nm)
Magnusiomyces ingensBiomass extractSeO2Spherical, quasi-spherical (70–90 nm)[209]
Mariannaea sp.Living cultureSeO2Spherical (average size of 45.19/212.65 nm depending on the nanoparticle location)[210]
Mortierella humilisLiving cultureNa2SeO3Spherical (average size of 48 nm)[205]
Nematospora coryliBiomassNa2SeO3Spherical (50–250 nm)[211]
Penicillium chrysogenumCultural liquidNa2SeO3Spherical (average size of 24.65 nm)[212]
Penicillium chrysogenumCultural liquidNa2SeO3Spherical (44–78 nm)[213]
Penicillium chrysogenumCultural liquidNa2SeO4Spherical (average size of 33.84 nm)[214]
Penicillium citrinumBiomassHNaO3SeSpherical (various sizes depending on the conditions)[215]
Penicillium corylophilumCultural liquidNa2SeO3Spherical (29.1–48.9 nm)[216]
Penicillium crustosumCultural liquidNa2SeO3Spherical (3–22 nm)[217]
Penicillium expansumCultural liquidSeO2Spherical (4–12.7 nm)[218]
Phoma glomerataLiving cultureNa2SeO3Spherical (100–200 nm)[219]
Pleurotus ostreatusLiving cultureNa2SeO3Spherical (50–320 nm)[208]
Pleurotus ostreatusCultural liquidNa2SeO3Spherical (50–150 nm)[41]
Mycelial extractNa2SeO3Irregular spherical (50–150 nm)
Rhodotorula mucilaginosaBiomassNa2SeO3Spherical, rod-shaped (83–478 nm depending on the precursor concentration)[220]
Trichoderma atrovirideMycelial extractNa2SeO3Spherical (60.48–123.16 nm)[221]
Trichoderma harzianumMycelial extractNa2SeO3Irregular (average size of 60 nm)[222]
Trichoderma sp.Living cultureSeO2Spherical, pseudo-spherical (20–220 nm)[223]
Trichoderma sp.Mycelial extractSpherical (40–100 nm)[224]
Table 8. Mycosynthesis of tellurium nanoparticles.
Table 8. Mycosynthesis of tellurium nanoparticles.
SpeciesSourcePrecursorNanoparticlesReferences
Aspergillus welwitschiaeCultural liquidK2TeO3Oval to spherical (60.80 nm)[227]
Aureobasidium pullulansLiving cultureNa2TeO3Granular[205]
Mortierella humilisLiving cultureNa2TeO3Granular[205]
Penicillium chrysogenumCultural liquidK2TeO3Spherical (average size of 50.16 nm)[228]
Phanerochaete chrysosporiumLiving cultureK2TeO3Needles (20–465 nm)[229]
Phoma glomerataLiving cultureNa2TeO3Pillars, needles[205]
Phoma glomerataLiving cultureNa2TeO3Rods (10–80 nm)[219]
Trichoderma harzianumLiving cultureNa2TeO3Pillars, needles, agglomerated rods[205]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Loshchinina, E.A.; Vetchinkina, E.P.; Kupryashina, M.A. Diversity of Biogenic Nanoparticles Obtained by the Fungi-Mediated Synthesis: A Review. Biomimetics 2023, 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010001

AMA Style

Loshchinina EA, Vetchinkina EP, Kupryashina MA. Diversity of Biogenic Nanoparticles Obtained by the Fungi-Mediated Synthesis: A Review. Biomimetics. 2023; 8(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Loshchinina, Ekaterina A., Elena P. Vetchinkina, and Maria A. Kupryashina. 2023. "Diversity of Biogenic Nanoparticles Obtained by the Fungi-Mediated Synthesis: A Review" Biomimetics 8, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop