Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Review of Haute Autorité de Santé and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Health Technology Assessments of Ikervis® to Treat Severe Keratitis in Adult Patients with Dry Eye Disease Which Has Not Improved despite Treatment with Tear Substitutes
Previous Article in Journal
Towards a More Comprehensive Approach for a Total Economic Assessment of Vaccines?
 
 
Journal of Market Access & Health Policy (JMAHP) is published by MDPI from Volume 12 Issue 1 (2024). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Taylor & Francis.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

2. How Is the Economic Assessment of Vaccines Performed Today?

by
Baudouin Standaert
1,* and
Rino Rappuoli
2
1
Health Economics, GSK, Avenue Fleming 20, 1300 Wavre, Belgium
2
Research & Development GSK, Siena, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2017, 5(1), 1335163; https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1335163
Submission received: 2 May 2017 / Revised: 2 May 2017 / Accepted: 22 May 2017 / Published: 31 August 2017

Abstract

This paper describes how the economic assessment of vaccines is performed today. It discusses why it may be incomplete and explores potential approaches to adjust the analysis to be more comprehensive. Besides helping protect against serious disease, vaccines also help avoid mild disease episodes that may not receive medical attention but which have important societal consequences. They also benefit unvaccinated individuals by reducing disease transmission. Wider societal benefits may extend beyond a decrease in disease incidence, as lower transmission rates reduce the risk of epidemics, which in turn reduces the pressure on healthcare providers, and may improve the quality of care for patients with unrelated diseases. Vaccines also lower the use of antibiotics leading to less pressure on anti-microbial resistance. Conventional ICUA focuses on individual health benefits, like increased survival. Therefore, this approach may not adequately capture the wider vaccination benefits. We discuss differences between treatment and vaccine prevention in the economic assessment, and how ICUA has been adapted to cope with the inconsistencies. Although such adaptations may fulfil the demand of one specific stakeholder, they may not meet the needs of other stakeholders who operate at the societal level, such as ministries other than healthcare, employers, caregivers, and insurers.
Keywords: budget; economic evaluation; cost effectiveness analysis; societal perspective; vaccines; value assessment budget; economic evaluation; cost effectiveness analysis; societal perspective; vaccines; value assessment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Standaert, B.; Rappuoli, R. 2. How Is the Economic Assessment of Vaccines Performed Today? J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2017, 5, 1335163. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1335163

AMA Style

Standaert B, Rappuoli R. 2. How Is the Economic Assessment of Vaccines Performed Today? Journal of Market Access & Health Policy. 2017; 5(1):1335163. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1335163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Standaert, Baudouin, and Rino Rappuoli. 2017. "2. How Is the Economic Assessment of Vaccines Performed Today?" Journal of Market Access & Health Policy 5, no. 1: 1335163. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1335163

APA Style

Standaert, B., & Rappuoli, R. (2017). 2. How Is the Economic Assessment of Vaccines Performed Today? Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, 5(1), 1335163. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1335163

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop