Next Article in Journal
Enteric Coating Enhances the Biopharmaceutical Performance of a Silica–Lipid Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate
Previous Article in Journal
Tweaking Polybia-MP1: How a Lysine-Histidine Swap Redefines Its Surface Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nanoformulation-Based Transdermal Drug Delivery: A Paradigm Shift in Antiparasitic Therapy for Zoonotic Diseases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Engineered Phage-Guided Nanotherapeutic Systems for Precision Antibacterial Therapy: Hacking Bacterial Resistance Mechanisms

by
Bandar Aldhubiab
* and
Rashed M. Almuqbil
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2025, 17(10), 1288; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17101288
Submission received: 9 August 2025 / Revised: 26 September 2025 / Accepted: 30 September 2025 / Published: 2 October 2025

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) poses a critical global public health challenge necessitating immediate action. Without prompt interventions, infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria could surpass the annual mortality rates of all cancers combined by 2050. Phages are one of the most abundant biological entities on earth that specifically infect and replicate in bacterial cells and can act as potential alternatives to antibiotics. Nanotechnology provides a favorable solution to overcome various challenges linked with phage therapy. Developments in nanotechnology, including nano-encapsulation, offer solutions to various clinical as well as pharmacological challenges by improving delivery efficacy, ensuring controlled release, and protecting phages from environmental degradation and immune clearance. The synergistic actions of phage-guided targeting and the strong bactericidal potential of engineered nanocapsules (NCs) could effectively eradicate multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria while diminishing off-target activities. Potential applications of engineered phage-guided nanotherapeutic systems have already been explored in terms of phage/nanocarrier cocktails, enhanced antibacterial activity, effective treatment of nosocomial infections, wound healing, and disruption of bacterial biofilms. The present review focuses on comprehensively discussing the advances in phage-guided NCs along with their mechanisms in enhancing precision antibacterial therapy. In this regard, numerous in vitro and in vivo study findings have been summarized in this review. Moreover, various approaches to overcome and optimize the pharmacokinetic profiles of phage-guided NCs have been discussed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) in bacteria is a global threat to public health that requires urgent attention [1,2]. In 2019 alone, ABR was directly responsible for 1.27 million deaths globally and was linked with around 5 million deaths [3]. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, predominantly those with biofilm-forming capacities, pose a significant danger as they have the ability to cause recurrent and chronic infections [4]. Bacterial biofilms are complex communities of microorganisms encased in extracellular polymeric substances. These biofilms show heightened resistance to antibiotics and various other antimicrobial therapies [5]. Biofilms can also mediate horizontal gene transfer, which can result in the spread of ABR genes [6]. In addition, biofilms facilitate microbial populations to colonize both animal and human hosts, as well as allow their attachment to inert surfaces. It has been observed that these characteristics are contributing to the growing occurrence of infections associated with the usage of biomaterials in both veterinary and human medicine [7]. The lack of novel antibiotics threatens our ability to control resistant strains, and projections indicate ABR-related deaths may surpass cancer mortality by 2050 [8]. Therefore, there is a critical need for the development of alternative approaches to manage biofilm-forming MDR infections and prevent the advancement of ABR [9].
Bacteriophages, commonly known as phages, are among the most prevalent biological entities on Earth [10]. These viruses specifically target and replicate within bacterial cells. They have the privilege to act as potential alternatives to antibiotics. Phages were independently discovered by Frederick Twort and Felix d’Hérelle in 1915 and 1917, respectively [11]. The increasing MDR cases have revived the research on phage therapy in the 21st century. A number of studies have already demonstrated the significance of phage therapy in the treatment of various types of infections, including pneumonia [12], osteomyelitis, urinary tract infection [13], and sepsis [14]. Phage production methods are cost-effective, swift, and straightforward due to the self-replicating nature of phages; however, this advantage is contingent upon the specific bacterial host species [15]. Despite the promising potential of phage therapy, it has not received widespread regulatory approval for human use. Antibiotics often provide a broad-spectrum activity, thus resulting in indiscriminate killing or suppression of various beneficial microbiota [16]. On the other hand, phages precisely target and attack designated bacterial hosts (Table 1).
Nanotechnology provides a more favorable solution to overcome various challenges linked with phage preparations. Developments in nanotechnology, including nano-encapsulation, offer solutions to various clinical as well as pharmacological challenges by improving delivery efficacy, ensuring controlled release, and protecting phages from environmental degradation and immune clearance [33]. Encapsulation of phages within nanovesicles can protect phages and provide a controlled release [34]. Nanofibers produced via electrospinning are an alternative and promising method to improve the outcomes of phage therapy [33]. Integration of nanotechnology with phage therapy offers several benefits, including overcoming the limitations of phage-only formulations, ensuring better therapeutic efficiency, and optimizing the pharmacokinetic profile of phages. Phages are also used as cocktails with antibiotics that offer several advantages [35]. Phages can disturb bacterial biofilms and enhance antibiotic penetration as well as efficiency [36], whereas antibiotics can diminish bacterial defenses and make them more prone to phage attacks [37]. Moreover, researchers have developed novel antimicrobial agents via the alteration of phages and endolysins to overcome the phage therapy-associated challenges. These newly developed agents can selectively target bacteria and eliminate biofilms, which is a novel approach to tackle ABR infections and biofilms (Figure 1) [38].
This review comprehensively examines advancements in phage-guided nanocarriers (NCs) and their mechanisms for improving precision antibacterial therapy. It summarizes findings from numerous in vitro and in vivo studies. Additionally, strategies to enhance and optimize the pharmacokinetic profiles of phage-guided nanotherapeutic systems are explored.

2. Engineering Phage-Guided Nanocarriers to Enable Precise Pathogen Targeting

In recent years, nanotechnology has gained traction as a novel approach in healthcare, offering potential alternatives to antibiotics and traditional phage therapy. NCs are colloidal drug carrier systems having sizes less than 500 nm. NCs are revolutionizing drug delivery systems by encapsulating and delivering therapeutic drugs by using nanosized vehicles to improve bioavailability, drug efficacy, as well as controlled, targeted, and specific drug release [39]. Most commonly used and potential NCs include lipid-based NCs, micro- and nanoemulsions, exosomes, dendrimers, niosomes, and liposomes [40,41,42,43]. Furthermore, the development of new antimicrobial agents is mediated by various engineered nanomaterial designs including nanoscale metal–organic frameworks, polymeric NCs, nanospheres, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, and carbon nanotubes [44,45,46,47]. A range of delivery and encapsulation techniques has already been implemented to enhance the intracellular delivery and stability of phages (Figure 2).
The population dynamics of phage-bacteria are crucial for the success of phage-based therapies in the eradication of infections caused by bacteria [33]. Higher densities of phages are required to inhibit the growth of bacteria that are susceptible to phage therapy; however, continuous phage amplification is also important to limit the multiplication as well as spread of bacteria. However, phage amplification relies on the bacterial concentration; thus, a minimum level of bacterial concentration is required at the target site [48]. On the other hand, if phage is administered at earlier phases of infection or if a lower level of bacterial density is present, bacteria might take some time for their growth before achieving the thresholds to mediate effective amplification of phages [25]. In these cases, phages might decline in initial titer or face earlier decay. In addition, there are various other factors that can cause clearance of phages including enzymes, immune factors of the host, and various other stress factors or tissue fluids, which can further reduce viable titer, leading to reduced effectiveness of phage therapies [20,49]. In such scenarios, the encapsulation process can be an efficient and potentially useful approach that can serve in various applications. The advantages of encapsulation include prolonged release of viable phages over an extended period, playing a role as an active delivery system, and shielding or protecting phages from the outer environment [50,51,52]. Therefore, the encapsulation process helps in maintaining titers of phages to therapeutically efficient concentrations over an extended period in a way that once the threshold level of bacteria is achieved, titers of phages can further amplify, resulting in effective and faster action [25,51,53]. Furthermore, substantial advances have been achieved in addressing various challenges linked with phage therapy by using modern nanoscale-based encapsulation approaches [33].

2.1. Encapsulation

Modern lipid-based nanovesicle is a type of NC that offers versatile and promising drug delivery approaches involving vesicles composed of synthetic or natural lipids. It has been reported that these NCs self-enclose and self-assemble to generate spheres composed of lipid bilayers containing inner aqueous cores that have the potential to encapsulate and protect sensitive drugs [54]. Liposomes are a type of lipid-based nanovesicle that have excellent biocompatibility with phages without disturbing their numbers and efficacy both during as well as after encapsulation [55,56]. The use of liposomes was found to be beneficial in phage delivery in order to target biofilm-associated pathogens, intracellular pathogens, gut pathogens, and so on. These non-immunogenic and non-toxic NCs also provide protection to phages against various outer stress factors, including elimination from the reticuloendothelial system, highly acidic pH of the gastric system during gastrointestinal transit, and functions of neutralizing antibodies, henceforth improving the circulation time in vivo [55,57,58,59,60]. The preparation method of liposomes is easy, and the encapsulation process can effectively control a range of physical factors, including encapsulation dose, encapsulating efficiency, and vesicle size. Liposomes have the capacity to mimic biological membranes with regard to fluidity, behavior, and structure. Therefore, they can go through multiple dynamic and conformational transitions that are crucial for numerous biological actions. In this regard, for instance, liposomes can cross several host tissue barrier layers, including deep-seated tissues, intestinal mucosa, and epidermal layers, as well as bacterial mature biofilms, facilitating deeper delivery of the entrapped drugs to such areas [33,61].
Liposome complexation is a technique that can be used to modify the structure of a liposome to ameliorate its pharmacokinetic profile, stability, and physicochemical properties. Liposomes that have been complexed are commonly referred to as liposome complexes. Polymers can be used as a complex-forming agent. It has been observed that each polymer type is likely to cause different types of complex shapes as well as interactions with liposomes [62].
Other particle production techniques for phage encapsulation involve spray drying, electrospray, and freeze drying. Lyophilization or freeze drying method is widely used to preserve proteinaceous compounds, which can also be used to prepare dried particles with phages [63]. The manufacturing method of lyophilized phage particles is simple, which includes freezing a solution containing phages at −20 °C and then removing water through sublimation and desorption under vacuum conditions [64].
Various studies have already encapsulated phages in various polymers and liposomes. For example, in a study, Singla et al. [58] used a conventional approach to prepare cationic liposome-encapsulated phages in order to ensure efficient intracellular delivery into macrophages infected by Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae). The researchers killed any extracellular bacteria by using gentamicin in the culture media, since their focus was on intracellular bacteria only [58]. Moreover, it was observed that liposome-encapsulated phages were protected against neutralizing antibodies in comparison with the free phages [58]. In a different study, Chadha et al. encapsulated a phage cocktail in liposomes [56]. The developed liposome-loaded phage cocktail showed improved therapeutic efficacy against K. pneumoniae infection in burn wounds in BALB/c mice [58]. The average size of the liposome-loaded phages was 229 nm, which exhibited 79.2% ± 5.6 encapsulation efficiency. Following 3 days of administration, liposome-encapsulated phage cocktail exhibited 1–2 log order decrease in bacterial counts in comparison with the free phages in liver, blood, and skin [58]. In another study, Rios et al. [65] used liposomes as a vehicle for phage delivery. The encapsulation of phages in liposomes provided 100% protection to the phage against neutralizing antibodies. In contrast, the unentrapped phages were neutralized by the neutralizing antibodies within 3 h of their interactions. The researchers found that free phages could not penetrate macrophages, whereas liposome-encapsulated phages successfully delivered their payload into macrophages, achieving a 94.6% reduction in intracellular K. pneumoniae. Furthermore, these liposome-encapsulated phages demonstrated synergistic effects with amikacin, effectively eradicating mature K. pneumoniae biofilms.
Despite considerable research, no significant progress has been reported in terms of clinical translation of liposome-assisted drug delivery platforms owing to several challenges. These challenges include cost, multiple chemical synthesis steps and formulation processes, difficulty in large-scale good manufacturing production, and presence of increased number of complex physicochemical variables [66,67].
Niosome-encapsulated endolysins have also exhibited several beneficial effects. In a study, Marchianò et al. [68] successfully encapsulated antistaphylococcal lytic protein (CHAPSH3b) in non-ionic niosomes via combining cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, cholesterol, and Span 60 at concentrations that warranted the desired vesicle size. The researchers observed a synergistic effect between cetyltrimethylammonium bromide and phage protein against planktonic bacteria even after 2 weeks of storage. On the other hand, phage-based hydrogels show good biocompatibility as well as antibacterial action. Phage-based hydrogels exert excellent antibacterial actions on targeted bacteria owing to their specific targeted bactericidal activity; however, only a few studies have explored the antibacterial actions of phage hydrogels so far [69]. In a study, Abed et al. [70] fabricated phage-based hydrogels by utilizing hyaluronic acid, carboxymethyl cellulose, and sodium alginate to treat wounds infected by Enterococcus faecalis. The developed phage-containing hydrogels efficiently treated the infected wounds and mediated wound healing through controlled phage release [70].
Emulsification is an important encapsulation technique, where uniform emulsions can be prepared by mixing drugs, enzymes, cells, and microbes with a well-suited polymer, and this mixture can be further dispersed into another phase of vegetable oils [71]. In addition, the prepared emulsions can be further stabilized by adding stabilizing agents and emulsifiers. Therefore, nanoemulsions provide a new approach to encapsulate various sensitive molecules, including phages, enzymes, and proteins, in a nanoporous matrix. It has been observed that the entrapment of bio-molecules within nanoemulsions results in an alteration in the surrounding water activity, which provides increased stability during storage [72]. Moreover, preparation of such emulsion formulations can provide protection to the phages against inactivation caused by outer proteolytic enzymes and the immune system, while preserving their structures and functions [33]. However, hydrophile–lipophile balance (HLB) must be carefully considered while choosing an emulsifier. It has been observed that emulsifiers with high HLB values (8–18) are best suited for oil-in-water nanoemulsions, whereas emulsifiers with low HLB values (3–6) are best-suited for water-in-oil nanoemulsions [73]. Nanoemulsions provide a highly uniform droplet size, which improves reproducibility and controlled drug release [74]. However, several challenges might be encountered while working with nanoemulsions. For example, the use of a large amount of surfactant and co-surfactant sometimes makes this delivery system bulky and toxic. It has also been reported that nanoemulsions prepared by phase inversion techniques show susceptibility to flocculation and Ostwald ripening [75].

2.2. Nanofibers

Nanofibers are typically produced via electrospinning, a process that uses a strong electric field to transform polymer solutions into continuous nanoscale fibers [76]. In electrospinning, a polymer solution is extruded through a syringe needle, forming a droplet. A high-voltage power supply connects the needle and collector, generating an electric field between them. This field induces surface charges on the droplet, causing it to elongate into a conical shape. Subsequently, a jet of polymer solution emerges from the cone, stretching toward the oppositely charged collector. During this trajectory, the solvent evaporates, and the polymer solidifies, forming continuous nanofibers on the collector surface [77]. Phage-incorporated nanofibers have been developed to combat pathogenic bacteria [76]. For example, Nogueira et al. [78] immobilized vB_Pae_Kakheti25 phage capsids onto polycaprolactone (PCL) nanofibers, creating a laundry-resistant, antimicrobial, and non-toxic dressing for biomedical applications. Surface analysis confirmed that the phage capsids were oriented on the PCL nanofibers to optimize tail-mediated bacterial interactions. Antimicrobial assays demonstrated a highly effective 6-log bacterial reduction (99.9999%) upon immediate contact and after 2 h, even following 25 washing cycles.

2.3. Stimuli-Responsive Nanocarriers

In terms of drug delivery, there is a growing interest in the smart release platforms because of their capacity to release active compounds or drugs at the targeted area in response to external stimuli (Figure 3). Stimuli-responsive nanoplatforms have the capacity to respond to various physical stimuli (for example, magnetic fields, ultrasound, light) and changes in the infection microenvironment (for example, enzymes, pH, hydrogen peroxide) [79,80]. Indeed, these stimuli-responsive antibacterial nanomaterials can be cleverly designed to maximize the antibacterial effects and minimize toxic side effects [81]. Eudragits are synthetic polymers produced by polymerization of acrylic acid as well as methacrylic acid or their esters, such as dimethylaminoethyl ester or butyl ester [82]. Eudragit polymers are polymethacrylates that act as pH-responsive polymers by reacting to alterations in pH [33,83]. There are different grades of Eudragit, for instance, Eudragit S100 dissolves at pH 7, while Eudragit L100 dissolves at a pH of 6. Therefore, the usage of such polymers in the encapsulation matrix enables drug release solely at the desired site and at the correct time, upon reaching the desired pH. On the other hand, Eudragit S and Eudragit L are two highly stable forms that can generate coatings or films resistant against low gastric pH, thus mediating drugs to effortlessly circumvent the stomach and reach the intestine [84]. In addition to this, these films are soluble in intestinal fluid at pH 6 and 7, where they secrete the active compound [33,85]. In a similar manner, phages can be encapsulated and protected against gastric pH, which will allow phage release only at the desired area upon reaching the desired pH. This approach can be beneficial for the success of oral phage therapy against a range of enteric infections [33]. Various studies have already developed formulations based on Eudragit microparticles and microspheres to enhance the stability of phages.
In a study, Vinner et al. [87] encapsulated myovirus CDKM9, a Clostridium difficile-specific phage, in Eudragit S100 (with and without alginate) by utilizing microfluidic glass capillary devices for colon delivery using pH-triggered release. The researchers trapped phage-containing highly monodispersed core–shell microparticles within the particle core, which were prepared by in situ polymer curing by utilizing 4-aminobenzoic acid dissolved in the oil phase. As compared to free phages, the encapsulated phages within the microparticles showed resistance against simulated gastric fluid at pH 2, mimicking the human stomach environment, for 3 h, and then showed a pH-triggered burst release at pH 7 [87]. In a different study, Vinner et al. [88] developed microencapsulated Escherichia coli (E. coli)-phages in a pH-responsive solid oral dosage formulation. They produced Eudragit S100 and alginate containing uniform pH-responsive composite microparticles. The microencapsulation technique provided protection to phages when exposed to a simulated gastric acidic environment for a prolonged period. In addition, the encapsulated phages pre-exposed to simulated gastric acid were then added to actively growing bacterial cells by utilizing in vitro cell cultures, and the phages showed effective killing of E. coli. The researchers also observed through confocal microscopy that the morphology of encapsulated phage-receiving epithelial cells was significantly better compared to controls without phage therapy. Moreover, the encapsulated phages were found to be stable when stored over a four-week period in a refrigerator [88].
Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) is a thermosensitive polymer that undergoes phase transition in response to temperature variations [89]. In a study, Hathaway et al. [90] developed poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-allylamine) (PNIPAM-co-ALA) nanospheres for temperature-triggered release of phage K. These nanospheres, leveraging the thermosensitive properties of the polymer, were designed to collapse at elevated temperatures associated with bacterial skin infections. The phage-loaded PNIPAM-co-ALA nanospheres effectively lysed Staphylococcus aureus ST228 at 37 °C, while bacterial growth remained unaffected at 25 °C, demonstrating precise thermally induced phage release. In another study, Hathaway et al. [91] utilized PNIPAM to control methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by enabling the temperature-dependent release of a synergistic enzybiotic cocktail containing staphylococcal bacteriocin lysostaphin and truncated phage endolysin CHAPK. Bacterial lysis was observed at 37 °C, whereas bacterial growth persisted at the uninfected skin temperature of 32 °C [91].
Despite promising progress in stimuli-responsive NCs, their widespread clinical translation still faces critical challenges. Major challenges for clinical translations include reproducibility in manufacturing, cost, and scalability. Laboratory-scale formulation and synthesis techniques are good enough for proof-of-concept studies; however, they often encounter substantial challenges during scale-up to industrial production. At industrial scales, it is very difficult to ensure batch-to-batch consistency in terms of release kinetics, drug loading efficiency, surface characteristics, and size distribution [92].

3. Mechanisms by Which Phage-Guided Nanocarriers Accurately Combat Bacterial Pathogens

In order to exert antimicrobial activities, an agent needs to gain access to the molecular targets that are associated with the metabolism of microbial cells, including protein synthesis and cell wall synthesis [93]. The integration of phages with engineered NCs is a crucial step for the phage-guided NCs that act against pathogenic bacteria. Engineered NCs loaded with various therapeutic agents can be precisely transported to the infected microenvironment. Chemically or naturally engineered NCs can exert powerful antimicrobial actions by using a range of mechanisms that involve reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can interrupt DNA synthesis, disturb enzymatic activity, and damage internal cell organelles [93]. In terms of the mechanism of phage-guided NCs, firstly, phages need to be conjugated with the engineered NCs, which would enhance selective detection and target specificity [94,95,96]. Receptor binding proteins (RBPs) in phages are specialized proteins located at the tail of phages. RBPs are exclusively associated with the host-phage interaction, since they are accountable for the identification of bacterial hosts [52]. On the other hand, cell wall binding domains (CBDs) of phage endolysins have the capacity to target the enzymes to their substrates in the bacterial peptidoglycans along with extraordinary specificity [97]. Following attachment, the phage-guided engineered NCs can fight against the infections by penetrating bacterial cell membranes, generating ROS, DNA damage, and protein damage, which eventually results in bacterial cell death (Figure 4) [51].
A range of studies have already demonstrated the efficacy of various phage-guided engineered NCs. In a study, Peng et al. [98] conjugated engineered phages with gold nanorods for selective attachment with various Gram-negative organisms, such as the human pathogens including Vibrio cholerae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), and E. coli, and the plant pathogen Xanthomonas campestris. The researchers reported that the engineered phages selectively delivered gold nanorods to the targeted bacteria, and the nanorods terminated both phages and bacteria simultaneously [98]. In another study, Yan et al. [99] used lysin CBD derived from a novel virulent MRSA phage Z for gold nanosheet functionalization. The researchers confirmed that the phage lysin-CBD-modified gold nanosheets potentially delivered directly to MRSA and effectively eradicated them under near-infrared irradiation in vitro, while exhibiting satisfactory in vivo biocompatibility [99]. Collectively, the findings suggest the synergistic actions of phage-guided targeting and strong bactericidal potential of engineered NCs, which could effectively eradicate MDR bacteria while diminishing off-target activities [96].

4. Potential Applications of Engineered Phage-Guided Nanotherapeutic Systems for Precision Antibacterial Therapy

4.1. Management of Nosocomial Infections

ABR is an increasing and life-threatening public health concern, particularly in surgical patients [57,58]. In addition, ABR further creates complications in nosocomial infections by elevating costs, morbidity, and mortality. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) listed a range of bacteria that are responsible for causing severe infections in humans and are responsible for the highest risk of developing multidrug resistance. Unfortunately, most of these bacteria are commonly found in hospitals/hospital facilities, spreading through human contact and surfaces. The 6 highly drug-resistant bacteria are known as ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii), P. aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species), causing hospital-acquired infections or nosocomial infections worldwide and progressively showing multidrug resistance [100]. Over two-thirds of nosocomial infections are likely to be turned into high-density biofilm, skin, or chronic infections, which are often troublesome to treat because of their adaptive nature and virulence [101]. Various innovative approaches have been adopted in order to tackle such infections, including denaturalizing the lipopolysaccharides present in the aforementioned bacteria. Among them, a potential approach is the use of NCs and endolysins or lysins encoded by phages [102,103].
Silver NCs are extensively utilized in biomedical fields because of their wide range of applications. Researchers have demonstrated the powerful antimicrobial activity of green-synthesized silver NCs against antibiotic-resistant, Gram-positive, and Gram-negative bacteria [104,105,106]. In a study, Ramírez Saenz et al. [107] conjugated BK510 commercial endolysins with metallic NCs to abolish the significant challenges caused by the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Silver NCs were prepared by green synthesis, and their average size was 16.06 ± 4.23 nm. The silver NCs and endolysins were utilized to prepare conjugates that were assessed against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The study findings suggested that usage of the conjugates showed a higher inhibitory effect than silver NCs in over 65% of the Gram-negative bacteria [107]. In a different study, Hopf et al. [10] developed an NC-based antibacterial system that structurally mimicked the protein-turret distribution on the head structure of certain phages. The researchers explored the antibacterial potential of various combinations of different materials. They synthesized phage-mimicking antibacterial NCs composed of silver-coated gold nanospheres distributed randomly on a silica core. These phage-mimicking NCs were evaluated for their biocompatibility with human skin keratinocytes and bactericidal capacity against 4 clinically relevant nosocomial pathogens, including Corynebacterium striatum, Enterococcus faecalis, P. aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). The researchers observed that the bacterial growth of these 4 bacteria was delayed (by up to 5 h) and suppressed (21% to 90%). In addition, the Gram-positive bacteria were found to be more sensitive to the phage-mimicking NCs. These NCs also did not exert any noticeable cytotoxic activities against human skin keratinocytes [10].

4.2. Improved Wound Healing

In humans, S. aureus is a common inhabitant of the skin and nasal passages [108]. Skin typically acts as a barrier against progressive infection. Nonetheless, a breach in the skin surface because of a burn, cut, or scratch can provide an entry point for opportunistic bacteria. It has been reported that S. aureus is one of the most common pathogens responsible for skin and soft tissue infections [109,110]. This pathogen delays wound healing and also causes systemic infections, including sepsis, endocarditis, and osteomyelitis [111]. There is an urgent need for an alternative approach because of the global emergence and increased occurrence of MRSA. The mortality rate and treatment cost of hospital-acquired MRSA are double those of the methicillin-susceptible counterparts [112]. In a study, Hathaway et al. [90] formulated Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), a thermally responsive polymer, nanospheres copolymerized with allylamine. The researchers demonstrated that by using this polymer, it is possible to engineer the nanospheres in a way that they will collapse at an increased temperature linked with a skin infection caused by bacteria. The developed phage incorporated Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) nanospheres copolymerized with allylamine successfully lysed S. aureus at 37 °C, while the growth of bacteria remained unchanged at 25 °C, therefore providing a thermally triggered phage release.
In another study, Sarhan and Azzazy [113] developed green wound dressings that exhibited potent antibacterial effects and enhanced wound-healing. Polyvinyl alcohol, honey, and chitosan nanofibers were electrospun and loaded with bee venom, propolis and/or phage against the MDR P. aeruginosa and evaluated their cytotoxicity, wound healing, as well as antibacterial capacity. The researchers observed that among different nanofiber formulations, polyvinyl alcohol, honey, chitosan-bee venom/phage showed the highest antibacterial activity against all tested Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and caused nearly complete eradication of P. aeruginosa. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity experiment demonstrated improved biocompatibility, and the in vivo experiment showed improved wound-healing [113].
Burned areas are particularly prone to bacterial colonization, where approximately 10% of all burn areas eventually become infected [114]. Such infections can elevate morbidity and mortality of patients, and increase treatment costs because of long-term hospitalization [115]. Thus, phages and NCs have emerged as a potential therapy against the burn-related microbial infections [116]. In a study, Esteban et al. [117] evaluated the antibacterial potential of phage K against S. aureus over time, when stabilized and delivered via an oil-in-water nano-emulsion. The researchers observed that the phage-loaded nano-emulsion formulations showed enhanced antibacterial action as compared to freely suspended phage. Furthermore, the phage-loaded nano-emulsions resulted in complete and rapid bacterial death of 3 different strains of S. aureus [117].

4.3. Enhanced Antibacterial Activity

Mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (MBGNs) are promising multifunctional materials that can be chemically modified to introduce antibacterial properties [118]. Advantages of MBGNs include tunable pore structure, large surface area, and small particle size [119]. In a study, Meng et al. [120] engineered MBGNs by utilizing phages to improve the antibacterial property. The researchers used Salmonella Typhimurium-specific phage PFPV25.1, which has the capacity to infect Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain LT2, which was utilized as a model phage to engineer MBGNs. They modified MBGNs with amine groups to improve the affinity between phages and the surfaces of MBGNs. It was observed that Salmonella Typhimurium-specific phage PFPV25.1 was effectively bound onto MBGNs surfaces without compromising their bioactivity. As compared to non-functionalized MBGNs, an increased level of phages was found to be bound to amine-functionalized MBGNs. In addition, because of this increased phage binding, amine-functionalized MBGNs showed higher antibacterial properties as compared to phage-bound MBGNs [120].
In a different study, Abdelsattar et al. [121] combined 3 phages (ZCPA5, ZCSS1, and ZCSE6) with 3 green synthesized NCs, including silver-chitosan-NCs, pH-sensitive chitosan-NCs, and propolis-chitosan-NPs to treat P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus sciuri, and Salmonella Typhimurium. Among the NCs, silver-chitosan-NCs showed higher bactericidal properties in combination with phages. In addition, a substantial killing capacity was exhibited by silver-chitosan-NCs (16.5–30.1 μg/mL) in combination with phages [121].

4.4. Disruption of Pathogenic Bacterial Biofilms

Phages in the form of cocktails were found to be effective in reducing biofilm growth on various surfaces [122]. Nonetheless, researchers recently identified that biofilms can regrow after 24 h of phage therapy, which further diminishes the effectiveness of phage therapy [123]. Similar findings were observed in the case of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii biofilms [124]. Metal NCs, including gold and silver NCs, have demonstrated efficacy against a range of MDR bacterial strains, such as Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus, A. baumannii, Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli [125,126,127]. Moreover, these metal NCs were combined with various antibiotics, including gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, ceftazidime, and cefotaxime, to kill K. pneumoniae and E. coli [128]. In a study, Szymczak and Golec [129] evaluated the efficacy of engineered T7 phages armed with silver NCs to eradicate the biofilms of Escherichia coli. The researchers confirmed that such biomaterials can exert a prolonged antimicrobial effect even after prolonged exposure. In comparison with the silver NCs or phages alone, the developed biomaterial markedly improved biofilm eradication, especially following 48 h of treatment. Overall, the findings indicate the efficacy of the synergistic phage-NC approach to fight against biofilm-related infections [129].
In a different study, Wang et al. [130] developed a novel bioactive nanoconjugate of drug-loaded liposomes and phages for targeted MDR biofilm eradication in the case of orthopedic infections. The researchers used the phage Sb-1, which has the capacity to degrade the extracellular polymeric substance matrix of bacterial biofilms, for conjugation with antibiotic-loaded liposomes. Following exposure to the biofilms, the phage Sb-1 degraded the extracellular polymeric substance structure, thus increasing the bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics and allowing the antibiotics to penetrate deeply into the biofilm. In addition, low dose of antibiotics was found to be effective in removing MDR bacterial biofilm both in vitro and in vivo. The developed liposome-phage nanoconjugates also efficiently reduced the bacterial load in the infected region and markedly mediated osteomyelitis recovery in the rat prosthetic joint infection model [130]. In another study, Szymczak et al. [45] demonstrated that T7 phages armed with silver NCs were highly effective in controlling bacterial biofilms, in comparison with NCs or phages alone. They identified the novel silver NC-binding peptide and then prepared T7 phages that effectively displayed the peptide on the outer surface of the viral head. The developed silver NC-binding phages efficiently eradicated bacterial biofilms, even at lower concentrations. In addition, these silver NC-binding phages were not toxic to eukaryotic cells [45].

4.5. Enhanced Eradication of Bacteria by Using Phage/Nanocarrier Cocktails

Phages are commonly studied as cocktails with antibiotics [35]. These cocktails can improve the eradication of bacteria while decreasing the possibility of resistance development. Phages disturb biofilms of bacteria, enhancing antibiotic penetration as well as efficacy [36], whereas antibiotics weaken bacterial defenses, making them more vulnerable to phage attacks [37]. In a study, Wdowiak et al. [131] studied the synergy between phages and green tea extract-capped silver NCs in combating pathogenic bacteria, including Salmonella enterica and MRSA. These NCs showed negligible antiphage actions, which ensured compatibility in phage-NC formulations. In addition, these combinations markedly decreased bacterial counts in a short time; for example, MRSA survival was approximately 30% following incubation with just 0.001 mg/mL of green tea extract-capped silver NCs, while phages and green tea extract-capped silver NCs alone resulted in approximately 70% and 80% survival, respectively. The researchers concluded that green tea extract-capped silver NCs are safe and effective in phage/NC antibacterial formulations with dual amoebicidal and antimicrobial functions for environmental and therapeutic uses [131] (Table 2).

5. Challenges and Future Directions

Phage-based therapy can serve as a viable alternative antibacterial strategy in treating infections caused by bacteria that are resistant to commonly used antibiotics [132,133]. In addition, phage-based therapy can also be personalized to each patient as a personalized therapy [134]. Such personalization requires isolation as well as analysis of the clinical pathogenic strains responsible for causing the disease in a given patient, and then comparing them with well-characterized phage bank, which is likely to provide better clinical outcomes [135,136,137].
Although phage therapy offers numerous benefits in terms of selective and enhanced killing of bacteria, phages also suffer from several limitations, including immunological actions, development of bacterial resistance against phage, and secondary infection, as well as co-infection [138]. Thus, there is a growing interest in adding natural products or antibiotics with phages to improve phage effectiveness and decrease the occurrence of phage resistance [139]. The use of phage therapy involving engineered or natural phages often raises various ethical challenges across societal, regulatory, and scientific domains. The major concerns for the development of phage-based therapy include a lack of a predefined regulatory pathway and concerns over intellectual property protection [140]. These concerns further create uncertainty regarding profitability in therapy development and complications in investment recovery. On the other hand, ethical challenges arise from the unpredictable and complex risks of phage therapy, which makes rigorous patient consent procedures crucial owing to the different understanding levels of patients and healthcare providers. Phage therapy also involves concerns regarding the development of ABR because of the horizontal gene transfer capacities of phages, especially during the lysogenic cycle. Therefore, more studies, particularly clinical trials, are required to enhance phage therapy efficacy and ensure reasonable global access to this promising therapy [141].
A key challenge to phage stability is the occurrence of spontaneous mutations in phage stocks during prolonged storage or accumulation during phage production and preparation, which may reduce viral fitness [142]. Although challenging, predicting phage evolution during preparation could aid in developing manufacturing techniques that minimize mutation rates in phage genomes [143]. Due to the high specificity of phage activity, screening large phage collections is necessary to identify phages targeting specific bacterial strains [144]. To enable broader adoption of phage therapy, a rapid, simple, and high-throughput phage screening method should be developed and implemented in phage banks and clinical settings. Furthermore, promoting education about phage therapy is crucial to counter misinformation and enhance its acceptance. Additionally, transparent reporting of the potential, limitations, and challenges associated with its therapeutic application is essential [145].
The interactions between phages and immune cells are yet to be fully understood. Phages are known to interact indirectly or directly with the host’s adaptive and innate immune systems. Nonetheless, the exact mechanism and main immunomodulatory properties are still largely elusive. Extreme production of neutralizing antibodies could be a major challenge in phage therapy, as these antibodies can cause phage clearance prior to the elimination of pathogens [30]. Therefore, a balance is required between immune activation, host immunological status, the dose, and administration routes [26,146]. The usage of bioinformatics tools is crucial in forecasting, phage efficacy, phage, as well as pathogen binding sites. Bioinformatics tools are also important to correctly define phages with precise detection as well as killing capacity against ABR pathogens. Furthermore, bioinformatics and whole-genome sequencing play an important role in various studies regarding phage therapy to tackle any limitations in phage therapy against ABR pathogens [145].
The incorporation of phages with nanotherapeutic systems offers numerous advantages to selectively eradicate pathogenic bacteria; however, still there are significant limitations and challenges in their clinical applications. More studies are required focusing on safety concerns to make sure that phages conjugated with engineered NCs do not generate systemic side effects, and optimization of their efficacy against a wide range of bacteria. Furthermore, more studies are also required to evaluate the controlled-release property, potential risks, metabolic responses, targeting efficiency, and stability of phage-guided NCs. In terms of clinical uses, standardization of manufacturing methods and scalability for large-scale production need to be carefully considered. The effects of the combinations of phage-guided NCs with various other therapies, including photodynamic therapy and immunotherapy, can also be explored to achieve a multidimensional therapeutic outcome. In addition, interdisciplinary collaborations between materials science, immunology, microbiology, and artificial intelligence are important to mediate the commercialization of phage-guided NCs and fast-track the translation from bench to bedside [96]. Phages are genetically modifiable supra-macromolecules. Phage hybridization with inorganic compounds is likely to offer new properties to phages and might be a potential approach for the development of bioinorganic carriers [147].
Although efficacy in experimental findings and animal models indicates potential for safety of human phage-based therapy, there are still major challenges that need to be addressed before standardization of phage therapy for human use, such as potential human immune response induced by phage-based therapy, the pharmacokinetics of phage, and the development of phage-resistant bacteria [148]. On the other hand, NCs have a tendency to form aggregates because of high surface energy. Drying, synthesis, and forces like capillary and Van der Waals forces affect this aggregation [149,150]. Uncontrolled aggregation of NCs is likely to exert negative effects and needs to be avoided. In order to avoid aggregation-related problems, NCs ought to possess excess negative surface charges predominantly in the fasting state and exhibit steric hindrance via surface decoration with anionic surfactants, citrate, and large polymeric chains (including polyvinylpyrrolidone and polyethylene glycol) [151].

6. Conclusions

The emergence of MDR bacteria is causing a major public health threat that requires urgent multidisciplinary approaches to develop novel control measures. ABR-associated deaths, because of infections not responding to antibiotics, are becoming an alarming crisis globally, where phage-guided NCs might serve as a game-changing therapy. The integration of phages with NCs can be useful to effectively treat a wide range of infections caused by MDR bacteria. Indeed, phage encapsulation provides enhanced bioavailability, targeted delivery, greater stability, evasion of rapid clearance from the body, and avoidance of loss of activity. Therefore, it is crucial to develop new types of NCs for the delivery of phages by combining the benefits of natural and synthetic polymers. In addition, ameliorated manufacturing methods are required to ensure the scale-up and reproducibility of phage-based NCs to meet industrial manufacturing requirements. More studies, particularly clinical studies, are also required so that phage-guided NCs can see faster progress and wider clinical success. Major challenges also need to be addressed before standardization of phage therapy for human use, including the potential for human immune response induced by phage-based therapy, the complex pharmacokinetics of phages, and the development of phage-resistant bacteria, which can eventually limit the efficacy of phage-based therapy over time. Moreover, innovative strategies, including artificial intelligence-enhanced structural prediction, and bioengineering strategies, including CRISPR-Cas, are also required to improve phage therapies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.A. and R.M.A.; literature review, B.A. and R.M.A.; formal analysis, B.A. and R.M.A.; data curation, B.A. and R.M.A.; writing—review and editing, B.A. and R.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded through the Ambitious Researcher Track- Review Articles by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia [Grant Number KFU253497].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are contained within this article.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, for their financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Schulze, A.; Mitterer, F.; Pombo, J.P.; Schild, S. Biofilms by bacterial human pathogens: Clinical relevance—development, composition and regulation—therapeutical strategies. Microb. Cell 2021, 8, 28–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shinu, P.; Mouslem, A.K.A.; Nair, A.B.; Venugopala, K.N.; Attimarad, M.; Singh, V.A.; Nagaraja, S.; Alotaibi, G.; Deb, P.K. Progress report: Antimicrobial drug discovery in the resistance era. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Naghavi, M.; Vollset, S.E.; Ikuta, K.S.; Swetschinski, L.R.; Gray, A.P.; Wool, E.E.; Robles Aguilar, G.; Mestrovic, T.; Smith, G.; Han, C.; et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: A systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet 2024, 404, 1199–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pontes, J.T.C.d.; Toledo Borges, A.B.; Roque-Borda, C.A.; Pavan, F.R. Antimicrobial Peptides as an Alternative for the Eradication of Bacterial Biofilms of Multi-Drug Resistant Bacteria. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Abeleda, H.E.P.; Javier, A.P.; Murillo, A.Q.M.; Baculi, R.Q. Alpha-amylase conjugated biogenic silver nanoparticles as innovative strategy against biofilm-forming multidrug resistant bacteria. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 101784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Masters, E.A.; Ricciardi, B.F.; Bentley, K.L.d.M.; Moriarty, T.F.; Schwarz, E.M.; Muthukrishnan, G. Skeletal infections: Microbial pathogenesis, immunity and clinical management. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 385–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Silver, L.L. Challenges of Antibacterial Discovery. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 71–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Szymczak, M.; Grygorcewicz, B.; Karczewska-Golec, J.; Decewicz, P.; Pankowski, J.A.; Országh-Szturo, H.; Bącal, P.; Dołęgowska, B.; Golec, P. Characterization of a Unique Bordetella bronchiseptica vB_BbrP_BB8 Bacteriophage and Its Application as an Antibacterial Agent. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hopf, J.; Waters, M.; Kalwajtys, V.; Carothers, K.E.; Roeder, R.K.; Shrout, J.D.; Lee, S.W.; Nallathamby, P.D. Phage-mimicking antibacterial core–shell nanoparticles. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 4812–4826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aswani, V.H.; Shukla, S.K. An Early History of Phage Therapy in the United States: Is it Time to Reconsider? Clin. Med. Res. 2021, 19, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Weaver, A.A.; Hasan, N.A.; Klaassen, M.; Karathia, H.; Colwell, R.R.; Shrout, J.D. Prosthetic joint infections present diverse and unique microbial communities using combined whole-genome shotgun sequencing and culturing methods. J. Med. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 1507–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bonine, N.G.; Berger, A.; Altincatal, A.; Wang, R.; Bhagnani, T.; Gillard, P.; Lodise, T. Impact of Delayed Appropriate Antibiotic Therapy on Patient Outcomes by Antibiotic Resistance Status From Serious Gram-negative Bacterial Infections. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 357, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ramalingam, B.; Parandhaman, T.; Das, S.K. Antibacterial Effects of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles on Surface Ultrastructure and Nanomechanical Properties of Gram-Negative Bacteria viz. Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 4963–4976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sachdeva, P.; Nath, G.; Jain, U. Phage based biosensors: Enhancing early detection of emerging pathogens in diagnostics. Talanta Open 2024, 10, 100345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Baquero, F.; Levin, B.R. Proximate and ultimate causes of the bactericidal action of antibiotics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Divya Ganeshan, S.; Hosseinidoust, Z. Phage Therapy with a Focus on the Human Microbiota. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Patangia, D.V.; Anthony Ryan, C.; Dempsey, E.; Paul Ross, R.; Stanton, C. Impact of antibiotics on the human microbiome and consequences for host health. Microbiologyopen 2022, 11, e1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Javaudin, F.; Bémer, P.; Batard, E.; Montassier, E. Impact of Phage Therapy on Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Intestinal Carriage in a Murine Model. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Principi, N.; Silvestri, E.; Esposito, S. Advantages and Limitations of Bacteriophages for the Treatment of Bacterial Infections. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 457104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdelkader, K.; Gerstmans, H.; Saafan, A.; Dishisha, T.; Briers, Y. The Preclinical and Clinical Progress of Bacteriophages and Their Lytic Enzymes: The Parts are Easier than the Whole. Viruses 2019, 11, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tian, F.; Li, J.; Nazir, A.; Tong, Y. Bacteriophage—A Promising Alternative Measure for Bacterial Biofilm Control. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bullen, N.P.; Johnson, C.N.; Andersen, S.E.; Arya, G.; Marotta, S.R.; Lee, Y.-J.; Weigele, P.R.; Whitney, J.C.; Duerkop, B.A. An enterococcal phage protein inhibits type IV restriction enzymes involved in antiphage defense. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, Q.; Zhang, F.; Bai, J.; Che, Q.; Xiang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Sjöling, Å.; Martín–Rodríguez, A.J.; Zhu, B.; et al. Bacteriophage-resistant carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae shows reduced antibiotic resistance and virulence. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2024, 64, 107221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Malik, D.J.; Sokolov, I.J.; Vinner, G.K.; Mancuso, F.; Cinquerrui, S.; Vladisavljevic, G.T.; Clokie, M.R.J.; Garton, N.J.; Stapley, A.G.F.; Kirpichnikova, A. Formulation, stabilisation and encapsulation of bacteriophage for phage therapy. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2017, 249, 100–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Van Belleghem, J.D.; Dąbrowska, K.; Vaneechoutte, M.; Barr, J.J.; Bollyky, P.L. Interactions between Bacteriophage, Bacteria, and the Mammalian Immune System. Viruses 2018, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cui, L.; Kiga, K.; Kondabagil, K.; Węgrzyn, A. Current and future directions in bacteriophage research for developing therapeutic innovations. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 24404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fernandes, P.; Martens, E. Antibiotics in late clinical development. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017, 133, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pelfrene, E.; Willebrand, E.; Cavaleiro Sanches, A.; Sebris, Z.; Cavaleri, M. Bacteriophage therapy: A regulatory perspective. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 2071–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kortright, K.E.; Chan, B.K.; Koff, J.L.; Turner, P.E. Phage Therapy: A Renewed Approach to Combat Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 25, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Osman, A.H.; Kotey, F.C.N.; Odoom, A.; Darkwah, S.; Yeboah, R.K.; Dayie, N.; Donkor, E.S. The Potential of Bacteriophage-Antibiotic Combination Therapy in Treating Infections with Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Huang, W.; Khan Mirzaei, M.; Deng, L. Comparative evaluation of long-term preservation methods for morphologically distinct bacteriophages. Microbiol. Spectr. 2025, 13, e0144224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kaur, S.; Kumari, A.; Kumari Negi, A.; Galav, V.; Thakur, S.; Agrawal, M.; Sharma, V. Nanotechnology Based Approaches in Phage Therapy: Overcoming the Pharmacological Barriers. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 699054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. González-Menéndez, E.; Fernández, L.; Gutiérrez, D.; Pando, D.; Martínez, B.; Rodríguez, A.; García, P. Strategies to Encapsulate the Staphylococcus aureus Bacteriophage phiIPLA-RODI. Viruses 2018, 10, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, M.K.; Chen, Q.; Echterhof, A.; Pennetzdorfer, N.; McBride, R.C.; Banaei, N.; Burgener, E.B.; Milla, C.E.; Bollyky, P.L. A blueprint for broadly effective bacteriophage-antibiotic cocktails against bacterial infections. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 9987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kebriaei, R.; Lehman, S.M.; Shah, R.M.; Stamper, K.C.; Coyne, A.J.K.; Holger, D.; Ghali, A.E.; Rybak, M.J. Optimization of Phage-Antibiotic Combinations against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e04918–e04922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Akturk, E.; Melo, L.D.R.; Oliveira, H.; Crabbé, A.; Coenye, T.; Azeredo, J. Combining phages and antibiotic to enhance antibiofilm efficacy against an in vitro dual species wound biofilm. Biofilm 2023, 6, 100147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Eghbalpoor, F.; Gorji, M.; Alavigeh, M.Z.; Moghadam, M.T. Genetically engineered phages and engineered phage-derived enzymes to destroy biofilms of antibiotics resistance bacteria. Heliyon 2024, 10, e35666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jacob, S.; Kather, F.S.; Morsy, M.A.; Boddu, S.H.S.; Attimarad, M.; Shah, J.; Shinu, P.; Nair, A.B. Advances in Nanocarrier Systems for Overcoming Formulation Challenges of Curcumin: Current Insights. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Din, F.U.; Aman, W.; Ullah, I.; Qureshi, O.S.; Mustapha, O.; Shafique, S.; Zeb, A. Effective use of nanocarriers as drug delivery systems for the treatment of selected tumors. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 7291–7309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aldhubiab, B.; Almuqbil, R.M.; Nair, A.B. Harnessing the Power of Nanocarriers to Exploit the Tumor Microenvironment for Enhanced Cancer Therapy. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gorain, B.; Choudhury, H.; Nair, A.B.; Al-Dhubiab, B.E. 6—Dendrimers: An effective drug delivery and therapeutic approach. In Design and Applications of Theranostic Nanomedicines; Ray, S., Nayak, A.K., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2023; pp. 125–142. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jacob, S.; Nair, A.; Boddu, S.; Abuhijjleh, R.; Selvaraju, K.; Babu, T.; Gorain, B.; Shah, J.; Morsy, M. The emerging role of lipid nanosystems and nanomicelles in liver diseases. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2023, 27, 8651–8680. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhu, J.; Xie, R.; Gao, R.; Zhao, Y.; Yodsanit, N.; Zhu, M.; Burger, J.C.; Ye, M.; Tong, Y.; Gong, S. Multimodal nanoimmunotherapy engages neutrophils to eliminate Staphylococcus aureus infections. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2024, 19, 1032–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Szymczak, M.; Pankowski, J.A.; Kwiatek, A.; Grygorcewicz, B.; Karczewska-Golec, J.; Sadowska, K.; Golec, P. An effective antibiofilm strategy based on bacteriophages armed with silver nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 9088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gandhi, S.; Shastri, D.H.; Shah, J.; Nair, A.B.; Jacob, S. Nasal Delivery to the Brain: Harnessing Nanoparticles for Effective Drug Transport. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shinu, P.; Nair, A.B.; Kumari, B.; Jacob, S.; Kumar, M.; Tiwari, A.; Tiwari, V.; Venugopala, K.N.; Attimarad, M.; Nagaraja, S. Recent Advances and Appropriate use of Niosomes for the Treatment of Skin Cancer. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2022, 56, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Łusiak-Szelachowska, M.; Międzybrodzki, R.; Drulis-Kawa, Z.; Cater, K.; Knežević, P.; Winogradow, C.; Amaro, K.; Jończyk-Matysiak, E.; Weber-Dąbrowska, B.; Rękas, J.; et al. Bacteriophages and antibiotic interactions in clinical practice: What we have learned so far. J. Biomed. Sci. 2022, 29, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Dąbrowska, K. Phage therapy: What factors shape phage pharmacokinetics and bioavailability? Systematic and critical review. Med. Res. Rev. 2019, 39, 2000–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Choińska-Pulit, A.; Mituła, P.; Śliwka, P.; Łaba, W.; Skaradzińska, A. Bacteriophage encapsulation: Trends and potential applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 45, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Loh, B.; Gondil, V.S.; Manohar, P.; Khan, F.M.; Yang, H.; Leptihn, S. Encapsulation and Delivery of Therapeutic Phages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e01979-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Abdelsattar, A.S.; Abdelrahman, F.; Dawoud, A.; Connerton, I.F.; El-Shibiny, A. Encapsulation of E. coli phage ZCEC5 in chitosan–alginate beads as a delivery system in phage therapy. AMB Express 2019, 9, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Suh, G.A.; Lodise, T.P.; Tamma, P.D.; Knisely, J.M.; Alexander, J.; Aslam, S.; Barton, K.D.; Bizzell, E.; Totten, K.M.C.; Campbell, J.L.; et al. Considerations for the Use of Phage Therapy in Clinical Practice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022, 66, e02071–e02121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bozzuto, G.; Molinari, A. Liposomes as nanomedical devices. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 975–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Singla, S.; Harjai, K.; Katare, O.P.; Chhibber, S. Bacteriophage-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carrier: Improved Pharmacokinetics Mediates Effective Resolution of Klebsiella pneumoniae–Induced Lobar Pneumonia. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 212, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chadha, P.; Katare, O.P.; Chhibber, S. Liposome loaded phage cocktail: Enhanced therapeutic potential in resolving Klebsiella pneumoniae mediated burn wound infections. Burns 2017, 43, 1532–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Colom, J.; Cano-Sarabia, M.; Otero, J.; Cortés, P.; Maspoch, D.; Llagostera, M. Liposome-Encapsulated Bacteriophages for Enhanced Oral Phage Therapy against Salmonella spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 4841–4849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Singla, S.; Harjai, K.; Katare, O.P.; Chhibber, S. Encapsulation of Bacteriophage in Liposome Accentuates Its Entry in to Macrophage and Shields It from Neutralizing Antibodies. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chhibber, S.; Kaur, J.; Kaur, S. Liposome Entrapment of Bacteriophages Improves Wound Healing in a Diabetic Mouse MRSA Infection. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Leung, S.S.Y.; Morales, S.; Britton, W.; Kutter, E.; Chan, H.-K. Microfluidic-assisted bacteriophage encapsulation into liposomes. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 545, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hua, S. Lipid-based nano-delivery systems for skin delivery of drugs and bioactives. Front. Pharmacol. 2015, 6, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sriwidodo; Umar, A.K.; Wathoni, N.; Zothantluanga, J.H.; Das, S.; Luckanagul, J.A. Liposome-polymer complex for drug delivery system and vaccine stabilization. Heliyon 2022, 8, e08934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, Y.; Peng, X.; Zhang, H.; Watts, A.B.; Ghosh, D. Manufacturing and ambient stability of shelf freeze dried bacteriophage powder formulations. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 542, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yang, Y.; Du, H.; Zou, G.; Song, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Li, H.; Tan, C.; Chen, H.; Fischetti, V.A.; Li, J. Encapsulation and delivery of phage as a novel method for gut flora manipulation in situ: A review. J. Control. Release 2023, 353, 634–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rios, A.C.; Vila, M.M.D.C.; Lima, R.; Del Fiol, F.S.; Tubino, M.; Teixeira, J.A.; Balcão, V.M. Structural and functional stabilization of bacteriophage particles within the aqueous core of a W/O/W multiple emulsion: A potential biotherapeutic system for the inhalational treatment of bacterial pneumonia. Process Biochem. 2018, 64, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sercombe, L.; Veerati, T.; Moheimani, F.; Wu, S.Y.; Sood, A.K.; Hua, S. Advances and Challenges of Liposome Assisted Drug Delivery. Front. Pharmacol. 2015, 6, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tinkle, S.; McNeil, S.E.; Mühlebach, S.; Bawa, R.; Borchard, G.; Barenholz, Y.; Tamarkin, L.; Desai, N. Nanomedicines: Addressing the scientific and regulatory gap. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 1313, 35–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Marchianò, V.; Duarte, A.C.; Agún, S.; Luque, S.; Marcet, I.; Fernández, L.; Matos, M.; Blanco, M.D.C.; García, P.; Gutiérrez, G. Phage Lytic Protein CHAPSH3b Encapsulated in Niosomes and Gelatine Films. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bai, H.; Borjihan, Q.; Li, Z.; Qin, P.; Cheng, J.; Xiao, D.; Dong, A. Phage-Based antibacterial hydrogels for bacterial targeting and Ablation: Progress and perspective. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2024, 198, 114258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Abed, S.; Beig, M.; Barzi, S.M.; Shafiei, M.; Hashemi Shahraki, A.; Sadeghi, S.; Sohrabi, A. Development of phage-containing hydrogel for treating Enterococcus faecalis-infected wounds. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0312469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jacob, S.; Kather, F.S.; Boddu, S.H.S.; Shah, J.; Nair, A.B. Innovations in Nanoemulsion Technology: Enhancing Drug Delivery for Oral, Parenteral, and Ophthalmic Applications. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Franklyne, J.S.; Iyer, S.; Ebenazer, A.; Mukherjee, A.; Chandrasekaran, N. Essential oil nanoemulsions: Antibacterial activity in contaminated fruit juices. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 2802–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Preeti; Sambhakar, S.; Malik, R.; Bhatia, S.; Al Harrasi, A.; Rani, C.; Saharan, R.; Kumar, S.; Geeta; Sehrawat, R. Nanoemulsion: An Emerging Novel Technology for Improving the Bioavailability of Drugs. Scientifica 2023, 2023, 6640103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Vladisavljević, G.T.; Al Nuumani, R.; Nabavi, S.A. Microfluidic Production of Multiple Emulsions. Micromachines 2017, 8, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ziani, K.; Chang, Y.; McLandsborough, L.; McClements, D.J. Influence of Surfactant Charge on Antimicrobial Efficacy of Surfactant-Stabilized Thyme Oil Nanoemulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 6247–6255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Stojanov, S.; Berlec, A. Electrospun Nanofibers as Carriers of Microorganisms, Stem Cells, Proteins, and Nucleic Acids in Therapeutic and Other Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Abdulhussain, R.; Adebisi, A.; Conway, B.R.; Asare-Addo, K. Electrospun nanofibers: Exploring process parameters, polymer selection, and recent applications in pharmaceuticals and drug delivery. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 90, 105156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nogueira, F.; Karumidze, N.; Kusradze, I.; Goderdzishvili, M.; Teixeira, P.; Gouveia, I.C. Immobilization of bacteriophage in wound-dressing nanostructure. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2017, 13, 2475–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Huang, Y.; Zou, L.; Wang, J.; Jin, Q.; Ji, J. Stimuli-responsive nanoplatforms for antibacterial applications. WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotechnology 2022, 14, e1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jacob, S.; Rao, R.; Gorain, B.; Boddu, S.H.S.; Nair, A.B. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Anticancer Phytochemical Delivery: Advances, Challenges, and Future Prospects. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, J.; Tang, W.; Zhang, X.; Song, Z.; Tong, T. An Overview of Stimuli-Responsive Intelligent Antibacterial Nanomaterials. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Thakral, S.; Thakral, N.K.; Majumdar, D.K. Eudragit®: A technology evaluation. Expert. Opin. Drug Deliv. 2013, 10, 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Dos Santos, J.; da Silva, G.S.; Velho, M.C.; Beck, R.C.R. Eudragit®: A Versatile Family of Polymers for Hot Melt Extrusion and 3D Printing Processes in Pharmaceutics. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kumria, R.; Nair, A.B.; Al-Dhubiab, B.E. Loratidine buccal films for allergic rhinitis: Development and evaluation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2014, 40, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Nikam, A.; Sahoo, P.R.; Musale, S.; Pagar, R.R.; Paiva-Santos, A.C.; Giram, P.S. A Systematic Overview of Eudragit® Based Copolymer for Smart Healthcare. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Fleige, E.; Quadir, M.A.; Haag, R. Stimuli-responsive polymeric nanocarriers for the controlled transport of active compounds: Concepts and applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 866–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Vinner, G.K.; Vladisavljević, G.T.; Clokie, M.R.J.; Malik, D.J. Microencapsulation of Clostridium difficile specific bacteriophages using microfluidic glass capillary devices for colon delivery using pH triggered release. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Vinner, G.K.; Richards, K.; Leppanen, M.; Sagona, A.P.; Malik, D.J. Microencapsulation of Enteric Bacteriophages in a pH-Responsive Solid Oral Dosage Formulation Using a Scalable Membrane Emulsification Process. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jacob, S.; Nair, A.B.; Shah, J.; Sreeharsha, N.; Gupta, S.; Shinu, P. Emerging role of hydrogels in drug delivery systems, tissue engineering and wound management. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hathaway, H.; Alves, D.R.; Bean, J.; Esteban, P.P.; Ouadi, K.; Mark Sutton, J.; Jenkins, A.T.A. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-allylamine) (PNIPAM-co-ALA) nanospheres for the thermally triggered release of Bacteriophage K. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2015, 96, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hathaway, H.; Ajuebor, J.; Stephens, L.; Coffey, A.; Potter, U.; Sutton, J.M.; Jenkins, A.T.A. Thermally triggered release of the bacteriophage endolysin CHAPK and the bacteriocin lysostaphin for the control of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J. Control. Release 2017, 245, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zheng, J.; Yang, Z.; Shi, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, F. Targeted polymeric drug delivery systems with stimuli-responsive release capabilities: Status and future perspectives. Nanomedicine 2025, 2025, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Fatima, F.; Siddiqui, S.; Khan, W.A. Nanoparticles as Novel Emerging Therapeutic Antibacterial Agents in the Antibiotics Resistant Era. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 2552–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Jin, L.; Cao, F.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Qian, Z.; Zhang, J.; Mao, Z. Microenvironment-Activated Nanozyme-Armed Bacteriophages Efficiently Combat Bacterial Infection. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2301349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Peng, H.; Chen, I.A. Rapid Colorimetric Detection of Bacterial Species through the Capture of Gold Nanoparticles by Chimeric Phages. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 1244–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ahmed, T.; Xu, X.; Noman, M.; Wang, Q.; Li, B. Phage-guided nanocarriers: A precision strategy against bacterial pathogens. Trends Biotechnol. 2025, 43, 494–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Eugster, M.R.; Haug, M.C.; Huwiler, S.G.; Loessner, M.J. The cell wall binding domain of Listeria bacteriophage endolysin PlyP35 recognizes terminal GlcNAc residues in cell wall teichoic acid. Mol. Microbiol. 2011, 81, 1419–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Peng, H.; Borg, R.E.; Dow, L.P.; Pruitt, B.L.; Chen, I.A. Controlled phage therapy by photothermal ablation of specific bacterial species using gold nanorods targeted by chimeric phages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 1951–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yan, J.; Lyu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Ng, K.R.; Yang, R.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, W. Precise Photothermal Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Infection via Phage Lysin-Cell Binding Domain-Modified Gold Nanosheets. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 6514–6525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Santajit, S.; Indrawattana, N. Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 2475067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pletzer, D.; Mansour, S.C.; Wuerth, K.; Rahanjam, N.; Hancock, R.E. New Mouse Model for Chronic Infections by Gram-Negative Bacteria Enabling the Study of Anti-Infective Efficacy and Host-Microbe Interactions. mBio 2017, 8, e00140-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ciepluch, K.; Maciejewska, B.; Gałczyńska, K.; Kuc-Ciepluch, D.; Bryszewska, M.; Appelhans, D.; Drulis-Kawa, Z.; Arabski, M. The influence of cationic dendrimers on antibacterial activity of phage endolysin against P. aeruginosa cells. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 91, 103121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Shemyakin, I.G.; Firstova, V.V.; Fursova, N.K.; Abaev, I.V.; Filippovich, S.Y.; Ignatov, S.G.; Dyatlov, I.A. Next-Generation Antibiotics, Bacteriophage Endolysins, and Nanomaterials for Combating Pathogens. Biochemistry 2020, 85, 1374–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wasilewska, A.; Klekotka, U.; Zambrzycka, M.; Zambrowski, G.; Święcicka, I.; Kalska-Szostko, B. Physico-chemical properties and antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles fabricated by green synthesis. Food Chem. 2023, 400, 133960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Akter, S.; Lee, S.-Y.; Siddiqi, M.Z.; Balusamy, S.R.; Ashrafudoulla, M.; Rupa, E.J.; Huq, M.A. Ecofriendly Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by Terrabacter humi sp. nov. and Their Antibacterial Application against Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Martínez Espinosa, J.C.; Carrera Cerritos, R.; Ramírez Morales, M.A.; Sánchez Guerrero, K.P.; Silva Contreras, R.A.; Macías, J.H. Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles Obtained by a Green Route and Their Evaluation in the Bacterium of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Crystals 2020, 10, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ramírez Saenz, D.; Martínez Espinosa, J.C.; Mancillas, A.G.V.; Lechuga Arana, A.A.; Silva Contreras, R.A.; Gutiérrez Chávez, A.J. Silver Nanoparticles Conjugated with BK510Lys Endolysin for Gram-Negative Bacteria Inhibition. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 6493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Piewngam, P.; Otto, M. Staphylococcus aureus colonisation and strategies for decolonisation. Lancet Microbe 2024, 5, e606–e618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Linz, M.S.; Mattappallil, A.; Finkel, D.; Parker, D. Clinical Impact of Staphylococcus aureus Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Almuqbil, R.M.; Aldhubiab, B. Bioadhesive Nanoparticles in Topical Drug Delivery: Advances, Applications, and Potential for Skin Disorder Treatments. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lacey, K.A.; Geoghegan, J.A.; McLoughlin, R.M. The Role of Staphylococcus aureus Virulence Factors in Skin Infection and Their Potential as Vaccine Antigens. Pathogens 2016, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Abebe, A.A.; Birhanu, A.G. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Drug Resistance Development and Novel Strategies to Combat. Infect. Drug Resist. 2023, 16, 7641–7662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sarhan, W.A.; Azzazy, H.M.E. Apitherapeutics and phage-loaded Nanofibers As Wound Dressings With Enhanced Wound Healing and Antibacterial Activity. Nanomedicine 2017, 12, 2055–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Jeschke, M.G.; van Baar, M.E.; Choudhry, M.A.; Chung, K.K.; Gibran, N.S.; Logsetty, S. Burn injury. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2020, 6, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Moradi, S.; Najafpour, Z.; Cheraghian, B.; Keliddar, I.; Mombeyni, R. The Extra Length of Stay, Costs, and Mortality Associated With Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Case-Control Study. Health Sci. Rep. 2024, 7, e70168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Faruk, O.; Jewel, Z.A.; Bairagi, S.; Rasheduzzaman, M.; Bagchi, H.; Tuha, A.S.M.; Hossain, I.; Bala, A.; Ali, S. Phage treatment of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in humans, animals, and plants: The current status and future prospects. Infect. Med. 2025, 4, 100168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Esteban, P.P.; Alves, D.R.; Enright, M.C.; Bean, J.E.; Gaudion, A.; Jenkins, A.T.A.; Young, A.E.R.; Arnot, T.C. Enhancement of the antimicrobial properties of bacteriophage-K via stabilization using oil-in-water nano-emulsions. Biotechnol. Prog. 2014, 30, 932–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zheng, K.; Sui, B.; Ilyas, K.; Boccaccini, A.R. Porous bioactive glass micro- and nanospheres with controlled morphology: Developments, properties and emerging biomedical applications. Mater. Horiz. 2021, 8, 300–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhu, H.; Zheng, K.; Boccaccini, A.R. Multi-functional silica-based mesoporous materials for simultaneous delivery of biologically active ions and therapeutic biomolecules. Acta Biomater. 2021, 129, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Meng, X.; Xu, Z.; Wang, C.; Patitz, J.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Burkovski, A.; Zheng, K. Surface engineering of mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles with bacteriophages for enhanced antibacterial activity. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2024, 234, 113714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Abdelsattar, A.S.; Yakoup, A.Y.; Khaled, Y.; Safwat, A.; El-Shibiny, A. The synergistic effect of using bacteriophages and chitosan nanoparticles against pathogenic bacteria as a novel therapeutic approach. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 228, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Liu, S.; Lu, H.; Zhang, S.; Shi, Y.; Chen, Q. Phages against Pathogenic Bacterial Biofilms and Biofilm-Based Infections: A Review. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Roach, D.R.; Leung, C.Y.; Henry, M.; Morello, E.; Singh, D.; Di Santo, J.P.; Weitz, J.S.; Debarbieux, L. Synergy between the Host Immune System and Bacteriophage Is Essential for Successful Phage Therapy against an Acute Respiratory Pathogen. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 22, 38–47.e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Blasco, L.; Bleriot, I.; González de Aledo, M.; Fernández-García, L.; Pacios, O.; Oliveira, H.; López, M.; Ortiz-Cartagena, C.; Fernández-Cuenca, F.; Pascual, Á.; et al. Development of an Anti-Acinetobacter baumannii Biofilm Phage Cocktail: Genomic Adaptation to the Host. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022, 66, e0192321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Slavin, Y.N.; Ivanova, K.; Hoyo, J.; Perelshtein, I.; Owen, G.; Haegert, A.; Lin, Y.-Y.; LeBihan, S.; Gedanken, A.; Häfeli, U.O.; et al. Novel Lignin-Capped Silver Nanoparticles against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 22098–22109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Pareek, V.; Devineau, S.; Sivasankaran, S.K.; Bhargava, A.; Panwar, J.; Srikumar, S.; Fanning, S. Silver Nanoparticles Induce a Triclosan-Like Antibacterial Action Mechanism in Multi-Drug Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 638640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gouyau, J.; Duval, R.E.; Boudier, A.; Lamouroux, E. Investigation of Nanoparticle Metallic Core Antibacterial Activity: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Najjuka, C.F.; Kateete, D.P.; Kajumbula, H.M.; Joloba, M.L.; Essack, S.Y. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from outpatients in urban and rural districts of Uganda. BMC Res. Notes 2016, 9, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Szymczak, M.; Golec, P. Long-Term Effectiveness of Engineered T7 Phages Armed with Silver Nanoparticles Against Escherichia coli Biofilm. Int. J. Nanomed. 2024, 19, 10097–10105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Wang, L.; Tkhilaishvili, T.; Jiang, Z.; Pirlar, R.F.; Ning, Y.; Millán Laleona, A.; Wang, J.; Tang, J.; Wang, Q.; Trampuz, A.; et al. Phage-liposome nanoconjugates for orthopedic biofilm eradication. J. Control. Release 2024, 376, 949–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wdowiak, M.; Raza, S.; Grotek, M.; Zbonikowski, R.; Nowakowska, J.; Doligalska, M.; Cai, N.; Luo, Z.; Paczesny, J. Phage/nanoparticle cocktails for a biocompatible and environmentally friendly antibacterial therapy. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025, 109, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ling, H.; Lou, X.; Luo, Q.; He, Z.; Sun, M.; Sun, J. Recent advances in bacteriophage-based therapeutics: Insight into the post-antibiotic era. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2022, 12, 4348–4364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hitchcock, N.M.; Devequi Gomes Nunes, D.; Shiach, J.; Valeria Saraiva Hodel, K.; Dantas Viana Barbosa, J.; Alencar Pereira Rodrigues, L.; Coler, B.S.; Botelho Pereira Soares, M.; Badaró, R. Current Clinical Landscape and Global Potential of Bacteriophage Therapy. Viruses 2023, 15, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Zalewska-Piątek, B. Phage Therapy-Challenges, Opportunities and Future Prospects. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Terwilliger, A.L.; Gu Liu, C.; Green, S.I.; Clark, J.R.; Salazar, K.C.; Hernandez Santos, H.; Heckmann, E.R.; Trautner, B.W.; Ramig, R.F.; Maresso, A.W. Tailored Antibacterials and Innovative Laboratories for Phage (Φ) Research: Personalized Infectious Disease Medicine for the Most Vulnerable At-Risk Patients. Phage 2020, 1, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Reuter, M.; Kruger, D.H. Approaches to optimize therapeutic bacteriophage and bacteriophage-derived products to combat bacterial infections. Virus Genes 2020, 56, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Jones, J.D.; Varghese, D.; Pabary, R.; Langley, R.J. The potential of bacteriophage therapy in the treatment of paediatric respiratory infections. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2022, 44, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Melo, L.D.R.; Oliveira, H.; Pires, D.P.; Dabrowska, K.; Azeredo, J. Phage therapy efficacy: A review of the last 10 years of preclinical studies. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 46, 78–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Segall, A.M.; Roach, D.R.; Strathdee, S.A. Stronger together? Perspectives on phage-antibiotic synergy in clinical applications of phage therapy. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019, 51, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kingwell, K. Bacteriophage therapies re-enter clinical trials. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 515–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kakkar, A.; Kandwal, G.; Nayak, T.; Jaiswal, L.K.; Srivastava, A.; Gupta, A. Engineered bacteriophages: A panacea against pathogenic and drug resistant bacteria. Heliyon 2024, 10, e34333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Botka, T.; Pantůček, R.; Mašlaňová, I.; Benešík, M.; Petráš, P.; Růžičková, V.; Havlíčková, P.; Varga, M.; Žemličková, H.; Koláčková, I.; et al. Lytic and genomic properties of spontaneous host-range Kayvirus mutants prove their suitability for upgrading phage therapeutics against staphylococci. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. García, R.; Latz, S.; Romero, J.; Higuera, G.; García, K.; Bastías, R. Bacteriophage Production Models: An Overview. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Pires, D.P.; Costa, A.R.; Pinto, G.; Meneses, L.; Azeredo, J. Current challenges and future opportunities of phage therapy. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 44, 684–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Anyaegbunam, N.J.; Anekpo, C.C.; Anyaegbunam, Z.K.G.; Doowuese, Y.; Chinaka, C.B.; Odo, O.J.; Sharndama, H.C.; Okeke, O.P.; Mba, I.E. The resurgence of phage-based therapy in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance: From research progress to challenges and prospects. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 264, 127155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Gogokhia, L.; Buhrke, K.; Bell, R.; Hoffman, B.; Brown, D.G.; Hanke-Gogokhia, C.; Ajami, N.J.; Wong, M.C.; Ghazaryan, A.; Valentine, J.F.; et al. Expansion of Bacteriophages Is Linked to Aggravated Intestinal Inflammation and Colitis. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 25, 285–299.e288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Karimi, M.; Mirshekari, H.; Moosavi Basri, S.M.; Bahrami, S.; Moghoofei, M.; Hamblin, M.R. Bacteriophages and phage-inspired nanocarriers for targeted delivery of therapeutic cargos. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 106, 45–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Caflisch, K.M.; Suh, G.A.; Patel, R. Biological challenges of phage therapy and proposed solutions: A literature review. Expert. Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2019, 17, 1011–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Shrestha, S.; Wang, B.; Dutta, P. Nanoparticle processing: Understanding and controlling aggregation. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2020, 279, 102162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kumar, R.N.; Srilatha, P.; Muhammad, T.; Nagaraja, K.V.; Karthik, K.; Kumar, R.; Gowda, R.J.P. Numerical Study on Nanoparticles Aggregation with Brownian Motion in Fluid Flow Induced by Squeezing Porous Slider. BioNanoScience 2024, 14, 2446–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lim, S.H.; Wong, T.W.; Tay, W.X. Overcoming colloidal nanoparticle aggregation in biological milieu for cancer therapeutic delivery: Perspectives of materials and particle design. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2024, 325, 103094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Potential antibiofilm strategies based on engineered phages. Reproduced from Reference [38]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier B.V. Biofilms are aggregates of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which are often difficult to penetrate and eliminate because of their lack of response or low penetrability to antibiotics, natural phages, and endolysins. It has been reported that targeted manipulation or engineering of endolysins and phages can result in enhancing their capacities to penetrate as well as eradicate biofilms and abolish antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Figure 1. Potential antibiofilm strategies based on engineered phages. Reproduced from Reference [38]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier B.V. Biofilms are aggregates of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which are often difficult to penetrate and eliminate because of their lack of response or low penetrability to antibiotics, natural phages, and endolysins. It has been reported that targeted manipulation or engineering of endolysins and phages can result in enhancing their capacities to penetrate as well as eradicate biofilms and abolish antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Pharmaceutics 17 01288 g001
Figure 2. Multiple potential phage delivery strategies. These strategies protect phages from physicochemical stresses and/or immunological reactions.
Figure 2. Multiple potential phage delivery strategies. These strategies protect phages from physicochemical stresses and/or immunological reactions.
Pharmaceutics 17 01288 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of a stimuli-responsive nanocarrier for the delivery of active compounds. Reproduced with permission from Reference [86]. Copyright 2012, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of a stimuli-responsive nanocarrier for the delivery of active compounds. Reproduced with permission from Reference [86]. Copyright 2012, Elsevier B.V.
Pharmaceutics 17 01288 g003
Figure 4. Antimicrobial mechanism of phage-guided nanocarriers. The engineered nanocarriers conjugated to phages disrupt the cell membranes of bacteria. Then, the nanocarriers produce toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) and induce various intracellular effects, including DNA and protein damage, which eventually result in cell death.
Figure 4. Antimicrobial mechanism of phage-guided nanocarriers. The engineered nanocarriers conjugated to phages disrupt the cell membranes of bacteria. Then, the nanocarriers produce toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) and induce various intracellular effects, including DNA and protein damage, which eventually result in cell death.
Pharmaceutics 17 01288 g004
Table 1. Comparison of antibiotics and phage-based therapies.
Table 1. Comparison of antibiotics and phage-based therapies.
FeaturesAntibiotic TherapyPhage TherapyReferences
Antimicrobial spectrumBroad-spectrum, thus affects more than the targeted organismSelectively infect and eliminate bacteria with a high degree of specificity.[17]
Disruption of beneficial microbiotaDisrupts the balance of the host’s beneficial microbiome, resulting in dysbiosis and potential secondary infectionsMinimal impact on the beneficial microbiome[18,19]
DosingContinuous dosing is required to maintain therapeutic levels in the bodySelf-amplification in target bacteria after initial administration and enhanced concentration at the target site, therefore, reduces the frequency of administration[20,21]
Anti-biofilm activityIneffective/less effectiveEffectively penetrates and destroys biofilms[22]
Resistance DevelopmentMore recurrently used to treat infections; therefore, there is an increased occurrence of a wide range of bacteria developing resistancePhages co-evolve with bacteria, therefore limited chances of developing resistance[23,24]
Side effectsNumerous side effects are observedSide effects related to phage therapy have rarely been reported[25]
Impact on the immune systemDirectly affects the immune system via various immunomodulatory antibioticsRepeated administration of phages may result in the development of anti-phage antibodies that can neutralize therapeutic phages[26,27]
Regulatory pathwayStandardizedComplex[28,29]
Discovery processSlowRapid[30,31]
Storage stabilityTypically show higher and more consistent long-term storage stabilityExhibit variable stability depending on the storage method and phage type[32]
Table 2. A summary of a range of preclinical trials involving phage-guided nanotherapeutic systems.
Table 2. A summary of a range of preclinical trials involving phage-guided nanotherapeutic systems.
Phage-Guided Nanotherapeutic Systems Target PathogensStudy OutcomesReferences
BK510 commercial phage endolysins conjugated with silver nanocapsules (NCs)Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter speciesUse of the conjugates showed a higher inhibitory effect as compared to silver NCs in over 65% of the Gram-negative bacteria.[107]
Phage-mimicking antibacterial NCs composed of silver-coated gold nanospheresCorynebacterium striatum, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureusThe bacterial growth of these 4 bacteria was delayed (by up to 5 h) and suppressed (21% to 90%).[10]
Phage K incorporated poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) nanospheres copolymerized with allylamineMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusThe developed phage incorporated Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) nanospheres copolymerized with allylamine successfully lysed Staphylococcus aureus at 37 °C, while the growth of bacteria remained unchanged at 25 °C, therefore providing a thermally triggered phage release.[90]
Polyvinyl alcohol, honey, and chitosan nanofibers were electrospun and loaded with bee venom, propolis and/or phageStaphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosaAmong various nanofiber formulations, the combination of polyvinyl alcohol, honey, and chitosan-bee venom/phage exhibited the highest antibacterial efficacy against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, achieving near-complete elimination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.[113]
Phage K-loaded nano-emulsionStaphylococcus aureus strains H560, H325, and Btn766Phage-loaded nano-emulsion formulations demonstrated superior antibacterial activity compared to freely suspended phages. Additionally, these nano-emulsions achieved rapid and complete eradication of three distinct Staphylococcus aureus strains.[117]
Engineered Mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (MBGNs) by utilizing phage PFPV25.1Salmonella
Typhimurium strain LT2
MBGNs were modified with amine groups to improve the affinity between phages and the surfaces of MBGNs. As compared to non-functionalized MBGNs, an increased level of phages was found to be bound onto amine-functionalized MBGNs. In addition, because of this increased phage binding, amine-functionalized MBGNs showed higher antibacterial properties as compared to phage-bound MBGNs.[120]
Combination of 3 phages (ZCPA5, ZCSS1, and ZCSE6) with 3 green synthesized NCs including silver-chitosan-NCs, pH-sensitive chitosan-NCs, and propolis-chitosan-NCsPseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus sciuri, and Salmonella TyphimuriumAmong the NCs, silver-chitosan-NCs showed higher bactericidal properties in combination with phages. In addition, a substantial killing capacity was exhibited by silver-chitosan-NCs (16.5–30.1 μg/mL) in combination with phages.[121]
Engineered T7 phages armed with silver NCsEscherichia coliIn comparison with the silver NCs or phages alone, the developed biomaterial markedly improved biofilm eradication, especially following 48 h of treatment.[129]
Novel bioactive nanoconjugate of antibiotic-loaded liposomes and phage Sb-1Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusUpon exposure to biofilms, the Sb-1 phage disrupted the extracellular polymeric substance structure, enhancing bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics and facilitating deeper antibiotic penetration into the biofilm. Additionally, the liposome-phage nanoconjugates effectively reduced bacterial load in the infected area and significantly promoted recovery from osteomyelitis in a rat model of prosthetic joint infection.[130]
T7 phages armed with silver NCsEscherichia coliThe developed silver NC-binding phages efficiently eradicated bacterial biofilms, even at lower concentrations. In addition, these silver NC-binding phages were not toxic to eukaryotic cells.[45]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aldhubiab, B.; Almuqbil, R.M. Engineered Phage-Guided Nanotherapeutic Systems for Precision Antibacterial Therapy: Hacking Bacterial Resistance Mechanisms. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17101288

AMA Style

Aldhubiab B, Almuqbil RM. Engineered Phage-Guided Nanotherapeutic Systems for Precision Antibacterial Therapy: Hacking Bacterial Resistance Mechanisms. Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(10):1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17101288

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aldhubiab, Bandar, and Rashed M. Almuqbil. 2025. "Engineered Phage-Guided Nanotherapeutic Systems for Precision Antibacterial Therapy: Hacking Bacterial Resistance Mechanisms" Pharmaceutics 17, no. 10: 1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17101288

APA Style

Aldhubiab, B., & Almuqbil, R. M. (2025). Engineered Phage-Guided Nanotherapeutic Systems for Precision Antibacterial Therapy: Hacking Bacterial Resistance Mechanisms. Pharmaceutics, 17(10), 1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17101288

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop