1. Introduction
Metal-based drugs, generally including inorganic nanomaterials, have been studied as a next-generation nanomedicine [
1,
2]. Some of these drugs include iron oxide (Fe
3O
4 or γ-Fe
2O
3), titanium dioxide (TiO
2), cerium dioxide (CeO
2), copper oxide (Cu
2O or CuO), silica (SiO
2), gold, silver, platinum, and zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (NPs) [
1,
2,
3,
4]. These NPs demonstrate their unique pharmaceutical characteristics and novel pharmacological functions [
5,
6,
7]. Metal-based nanotherapeutics with controllable features such as particle size and porosity, are valuable for biomedical applications of drug delivery and therapeutic activity.
Zinc oxide NPs have been highlighted as promising metal-based nanodrugs due to the fact of their biocompatibility, selectivity, and high potency [
2,
6,
7]. They have a wide band gap energy (3.3 eV) and a high excitation binding energy (60 meV) at room temperature with thermal and mechanical stability [
8,
9]. Zinc oxide NPs have been extensively used in applications related to optical, chemical sensing, semiconducting, and piezoelectric research [
10,
11]. They also have photocatalytic functions that allow them to be used in purification and disinfection processes [
12,
13,
14]. Although ZnO is categorized as “generally recognized as safe (GRAS)” by the US Food and Drug Administration [
15], ZnO NPs still have toxicity issues [
16].
Despite the toxicity, ZnO NPs have been conventionally used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and medical devices of adhesives, mastics, and sealants [
17,
18,
19] (
Table 1). In the pharmaceutical industry, ZnO NPs are used in soaps, toothpaste, ointments, dental inlays, and powders [
20]. Zinc oxide NPs are also used in hair and skin powders, creams, ultraviolet (UV) radiation-blocking sunscreen lotions, and burn ointments [
20,
21]. Surgical and industrial adhesives containing ZnO NPs (e.g., Neoprene adhesive [
22]) are used for medical devices.
Zinc oxide NPs have also been investigated as drug delivery carriers, therapeutics, and diagnostics for human biomedical applications due to the fact of their biocompatibility [
23,
24,
25,
26,
27] (
Figure 1). Zamani et al. [
25] reported mesoporous ZnO–graphene oxide (GO) combined with TiO
2 NPs (TiO
2@ZnO–GO NPs) for the targeted drug delivery to the colon. The TiO
2@ZnO–GO NPs showed a pH-dependent drug release, in which the rate of release was higher at a neutral pH than at an acidic pH. Doxorubicin, daunorubicin, and plasmid DNA were conjugated to ZnO NPs to improve targeted delivery of cancer therapeutics [
28,
29,
30]. Zinc oxide NPs have also been developed as therapeutics for the treatment of bacterial infections, diabetes, wounds, and inflammation [
24,
31]. In terms of diagnostic applications, ZnO nanostructures have been studied as biosensors, including nanowires for glucose detection [
32], and core–shell nanorods for detecting UV radiation and hydrogen [
33].
The unique morphology and structure of ZnO NPs and their networks are generated depending on synthesis techniques [
34,
35]. The following one-dimensional ZnO structures have been reported: nanocombs [
36,
37], nanorods [
38,
39], nanobelts [
40,
41], nanoneedles [
42,
43], and nanowires [
44,
45]. Nanoplates/nanosheets [
46,
47] and nanopellets [
48] are two-dimensional structures, while nanoflowers [
49] and snowflakes [
50] are three-dimensional structures described in the literature. Moreover, ZnO NPs and aggregates can be built into three-dimensional network structures with hierarchical porosity [
13,
51].
In this review, we summarized the synthesis techniques, physicochemical properties (including the tools used to evaluate these properties), and unique structures of ZnO NPs. We categorized the synthesis techniques of ZnO NPs into the following categories: conventional (e.g., physical, chemical, and biological methods) and microfluidic reactor-based methods. In the discussion regarding the physicochemical properties of ZnO NPs, we describe representative evaluation tools of X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and Brunauer–Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis. We also explore the three-dimensional ZnO NP structures and their fabrication methods including conventional synthesis techniques, biotemplating, and self-assembly. We focused particularly on the multilevel porous three-dimensional structures that are used for biomedical applications. We further discussed the current biomedical applications of ZnO NPs.
3. Physicochemical Characterization and Tools
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recommends that engineered nanomaterials undergo a physicochemical property evaluation as a pre-requisite for toxicological assessment [
108,
109]. The OECD recommends investigating the following physicochemical properties: agglomeration/aggregation, catalytic potential, composition, concentration, crystalline phase, dustiness, fat solubility/oleophilicity, grain size, hydrodynamic size/particle size/size distribution, length, purity, shape, specific surface area, surface chemistry, water solubility/hydrophilicity, and zeta potential [
108].
Table 3 summarizes the physicochemical characteristics of ZnO NPs and the analysis tools. The physicochemical results for engineered nanomaterials are needed to predict toxicological risks in vitro and in vivo [
109]. The physicochemical properties of ZnO NPs and their representative evaluation tools are also described below.
3.1. Appearance, Crystallinity, Particle Size, Morphology, and Porosity
Zinc oxide NPs (81.38 g/mol, m.p. 1975 °C) are a white, colorless, and odorless solid. Zinc oxide crystal structures mainly take after hexagonal wurtzite and cubic zinc blended forms [
9,
110]. The hexagonal wurtzite form in which each tetrahedral Zn atom is surrounded by four oxygen atoms or vice versa is common and generally stable [
35,
110]. Zinc oxide NPs are less than 200 nm in diameter and are used in cosmetics, foot care products, whitening agents, and ointments [
68,
110]. As previously mentioned, ZnO NPs have one-, two-, or three-dimensional structures. They also generate aggregates and can self-assemble into three-dimensional networks with multilevel porosity [
13,
68,
111].
3.2. Characterization Tools
Characterization tools are necessary to identify the properties of engineered nanomaterials. Some tools used to determine the crystallinity, morphology, particle size/size distribution, and surface characteristics (specific surface area and porosity) of ZnO NPs include XRD, SEM, TEM, and BET analysis.
3.2.1. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)
X-ray diffraction is a well-established technique for analyzing the size, shape, and crystal structures of inorganic, carbon-based, or complex crystalline materials [
108,
109]. It offers high spatial resolution at the atomic scale, but it is limited to crystalline materials and has a lower intensity compared to electron diffraction. For ZnO NPs, a pure hexagonal wurtzite structure was identified using diffraction peaks (2θ degree) and attributed to the following Miller–Bravais indices: (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), (200), (112), and (201) (JCPDS No.89-0510 or JCPDS No.36-1541) [
112,
113,
114]. Bindu and Thomas [
112] analyzed the lattice strain in ZnO NPs with crystalline sizes of 27.49 nm, 35.35 nm, 36.28 nm, 36.09 nm, and 34.55 nm as calculated by Scherrer method, the uniform deformation model, uniform stress deformation model, and uniform deformation energy density model of the Williamson–Hall method, and a size-strain plot. The crystal size of those ZnO NPs was measured at 30 nm using TEM. Khalafi et al. [
113] synthesized pure ZnO NPs using a
Chlorella aqueous extract and reported a hexagonal wurtzite structure (19.44 nm; calculated from Debye–Scherrer equation) as determined by the XRD pattern. Abdullayeva et al. [
115] investigated the crystallinity of nanoflower-, nanosheet-, and nanorod-like three-dimensional ZnO nanostructures. According to the XRD patterns, all ZnO nanostructures were the hexagonal wurtzite type from the (100), (002), and (101) of Miller–Bravais indices.
3.2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Scanning electron microscopy is a high-resolution method for estimating size, size distribution, shape, aggregation, dispersion (cryo-SEM), and crystallinity (electron backscattering detection) [
108,
109]. It may be used to analyze inorganic, organic, carbon-based, biological, and complex materials and to determine whether they are spherical or equiaxial particles, tubes, flakes, rods, fibers, or of any other shape. Scanning electron microscopy is limited to the analysis of conductive or coated materials under non-physiological conditions. The cryogenic method is required for biomaterials. Various ZnO NP shapes have been reported from SEM analyses, including spheres and rods [
13,
32,
116,
117]. Sphere-type ZnO NPs less than 50 nm in diameter have also been reported [
116]. Other spherical ZnO NPs produced an aggregate network on a Si wafer using a layer-by-layer structure [
13,
111]. Zinc oxide NPs that were used in electrochemical biosensors for detecting glucose, were shaped as nanocombs, nanorods, nanofibers, nanowires, and nano-nails [
117].
3.2.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
Transmission electron microscopy measures size and size distribution and confirms the nanomaterial shapes with higher resolution compared to SEM [
108,
109]. Aggregation, dispersion (environmental TEM), and crystal structure can also be determined by TEM. The TEM technique is limited to very thin samples under non-physiological conditions. It can be used to visualize inorganic, organic, carbon-based, biological, and complex materials as spherical and equiaxial particles, tubes, flakes, rods, or fibers. The size, size distribution, crystalline structures, and aggregates of ZnO NPs have been analyzed using TEM [
46,
118,
119]. The TEM technique is extensively used to determine the size, size distribution, and morphology of ZnO NPs based on the stabilizer (glycerol)-to-zinc source ratios during the synthesis [
46,
109]. Li et al. [
118] reported the layer-by-layer growth of ZnO nanopillar crystals using in situ, high-resolution TEM. Ludi and Niederberger [
119] also used TEM to demonstrate the nucleation and growth of ZnO NPs, including the hexagonal pyramid and oleic acid-stabilized, cone-shaped ZnO nanocrystals in liquid media.
3.2.4. Brunauer–Emmett-Teller (BET) Analysis
Brunauer–Emmett-Teller analysis provides the specific surface area and porosity of spherical and equiaxial particles of inorganic, carbon-based, and complex materials [
120]. This technique is limited to the analysis of volatile compound-free materials. Furthermore, BET cannot distinguish between particles and nonparticulate porous materials. Mesoporous ZnO thin films were found to have a specific surface area of 14–140 m
2/g depending on the synthesis techniques [
121]. Zafar et al. [
122] reported spherical ZnO NPs with a specific surface area of 49.36 m
2/g that could be used for the removal of adsorptive azo dyes, such as methyl orange and amaranth. Lu et al. [
123] described three-dimensional macroporous network structures of ZnO that were synthesized as dried gels. These structures had specific surface areas of 131 m
2/g, 50 m
2/g, 20 m
2/g, and 18 m
2/g, before and after heat treatment at 320 °C, 360 °C, and 400 °C, respectively.