Next Article in Journal
Current Perspectives on JC Polyomavirus Transmission and Associated Diseases: Implications for Prevention in Risk Populations
Previous Article in Journal
Whole-Genome Sequencing for High-Consequence Emerging RNA Viruses: Strategy Selection for Bundibugyo Virus Disease Under 2026 Outbreak Constraints
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Synthetic Biology Strategies for the Development of Live Attenuated Influenza Viruses: Recent Advances and Applications

School of Basic Medical Sciences, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2026, 18(7), 715; https://doi.org/10.3390/v18070715
Submission received: 19 May 2026 / Revised: 10 June 2026 / Accepted: 16 June 2026 / Published: 29 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Viral Immunology, Vaccines, and Antivirals)

Abstract

Influenza viruses, due to their simple genomic structure and potent immunostimulatory capacity, have been extensively explored for applications in cancer immunotherapy and viral vector vaccine development. However, wild-type influenza viruses possess inherent risks of lethal pathogenicity and transmissibility, which limit their direct application. Special cold-adapted influenza strains have been widely used in live attenuated vaccines, which rely on specific amino acid mutations. With the advancement in synthetic biology and reverse genetics technologies, a variety of next-generation attenuated influenza virus have been developed, including genome-recoded viruses, miRNA-targeted viruses, viruses containing premature termination codons, and proteolysis-targeting recombinantviruses. This study systematically summarized the synthetic biology-based strategies for generating a next-generation method for the attenuated influenza virus, critically discussed the advantages and limitations of each strategy, and further analyzed their applications and challenges in cancer therapy and viral vector vaccine development. By synthesizing current research progress, this review aimed to provide a theoretical basis for constructing safer, more stable, and more controllable influenza virus engineering platforms, and to offer new insights for the design of attenuated influenza virus suitable for tumor therapy and novel vaccine delivery.

1. Introduction

Influenza viruses belong to the family Orthomyxoviridae. They are enveloped, segmented, negative-sense single-stranded RNA viruses with a genome composed of eight independent segments, which encode 17 essential and non-structural proteins for influenza viruses A and B. They contain seven segments for influenza viruses C and D. Because the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes are prone to antigenic drift and antigenic shift, influenza viruses can cause seasonal epidemics every year and may even trigger global pandemics, posing a persistent threat to public health. In response to this challenge, the development of safe and effective vaccines has become central to influenza prevention and control. In the 1960s, scientists successfully screened cold-adapted attenuated influenza virus with cold-adapted and temperature-sensitive phenotypes by serially passaging influenza viruses in embryonated chicken eggs or primary chicken kidney cells (PCKCs) under gradually decreasing temperatures. Representative strains include A/Ann Arbor/6/60, B/Ann Arbor/1/66, A/Leningrad/134/17/57, and B/USSR/60/69 [1,2,3]. These attenuated strains replicate efficiently only in the nasal cavity, whereas their replication in the lower respiratory tract is restricted. Following intranasal inoculation, they can mimic the natural infection process of influenza viruses and induce humoral immunity, mucosal immunity, and cytotoxic T-cell responses against viral antigens, thereby providing effective protection against influenza. Herein, A/Leningrad/134/17/57 also possesses three major phenotypes: attenuation (att), temperature sensitivity (ts) and cold adaptation (ca). Together with Ann Arbor/6/60, they represent two classic cold-adapted master donor viruses (MDVs) developed via parallel and independent selection. The two strains share identical phenotypes but differ slightly in their genetic backgrounds.
Notably, the attenuated phenotype of cold-adapted strains can be stably inherited. By co-infecting embryonated chicken eggs with a cold-adapted attenuated strain and a circulating influenza strain, or by using reverse genetics, reassortant viruses can be generated that retain the attenuated phenotype while acquiring the immunogenicity of the circulating strain, thereby providing effective protection against antigenically variant viruses. In 2003, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) first approved the intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), named FluMist®, Ultravac®, Fluenz® and Nasovac-S®, a trivalent LAIV developed using this technology, which was later expanded into a quadrivalent vaccine covering additional subtypes [4,5]. At present, such live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIVs) remain important tools for the prevention and control of seasonal influenza and influenza pandemics.
Furthermore, the backbone of attenuated influenza virus could be used in more research fields. In a transgenic mouse model that spontaneously develops non-small-cell lung cancer, low-pathogenicity influenza A virus efficiently and rapidly eliminated more than 70% of the initial tumor burden [6]. A recent study using influenza A virus to infect murine melanoma demonstrated that the virus could induce immunogenic cell death in tumor cells and activate antitumor immune responses, thereby significantly inhibiting tumor growth [7]. Recombinant influenza viruses generated by reverse genetics have also been successfully used to deliver antigen genes from different pathogens and to induce corresponding protective immunity [8,9]. In addition, Kawaoka et al. [10] found that introducing specific amino acid mutations into genes encoding the viral polymerase complex enhanced the stability of foreign genes within the viral genome, supporting the application of influenza viruses in gene therapy and next-generation vaccine development. Collectively, these studies highlight the potential of attenuated influenza virus as multifunctional vectors. Among the existing influenza attenuation strategies, cold-adapted attenuated strains are the most widely used. However, this strategy has significant limitations: the attenuated phenotype relies solely on specific amino acid substitutions in a limited number of genes, such as polymerase basic protein 1 (PB1), polymerase basic protein 2 (PB2), nucleoprotein (NP), polymerase acidic protein (PA), or matrix protein (M) [11,12], which poses substantial safety concerns for their application as oncolytic viruses. Moreover, clinical guidelines have clearly prohibited the use of LAIVs delivered via nasal spray in cancer patients and immunocompromised individuals. This indicates that cold-adapted attenuated strains cannot meet the safety requirements for use as oncolytic viruses.
Given the intrinsic limitations of conventional attenuation strategies and the increasing demand for viral stability in emerging applications, researchers have developed multiple strategies for attenuating influenza viruses to overcome these challenges. This review focuses on synthetic strategies for generating attenuated strains using influenza A virus as a vector. We compare the attenuation mechanisms, advantages, and limitations of different approaches and summarize recent progress in the applications of attenuated influenza strains. By doing so, this review aims to provide insights into the design of attenuated influenza virus vectors for vaccine development, cancer therapy, and related fields.

2. Novel Development Strategies for Live Attenuated Influenza Viruses

Based on key stages of the influenza virus life cycle, including replication, transcription, translation, and host–virus interactions, multiple strategies have been developed for generating live attenuated influenza viruses. These include non-structural protein 1 (NS1) or polymerase acidic X protein (PA-X) mutant viruses, genome-recoded viruses, miRNA-targeted viruses, viruses carrying premature termination codons, small-molecule-dependent viruses, and proteolysis-targeting recombinant viruses (Figure 1). The following sections describe each attenuation strategy in detail.

2.1. NS1 or PA-X Mutant Viruses

During influenza virus infection, the virus encodes multiple proteins that suppress host gene expression to attenuate antiviral responses, while simultaneously enabling viral mRNAs to preferentially utilize the host translation machinery, thereby coordinately promoting viral replication and immune evasion. For example, NS1 binds to tripartite motif protein 25 (TRIM25), thereby inhibiting the ubiquitination of RIG-I and blocking IRF3/NF-κB signaling. This interferes with the transcription and expression of interferon (IFN) and interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), ultimately impairing the host’s antiviral capacity [13,14]. PA-X, which possesses endonuclease activity, targets and degrades host mRNAs transcribed by RNA polymerase II, suppressing host protein synthesis and thereby facilitating viral replication [15,16]. Based on these mechanisms, researchers have proposed strategies that involve modifying the coding regions of NS1 or PA-X to attenuate the virus’s ability to antagonize interferon responses or suppress host gene expression, thus generating live attenuated influenza viruses.
Previous studies have shown that various influenza viruses with NS1 deletions or truncations exhibit significantly attenuated replication capacity and pathogenicity in normal cells or mice [17,18,19]. Recently, Hancková et al. [20] used a reverse genetics system to construct a recombinant influenza virus expressing an NS1 protein lacking both the effector domain and the C-terminal domain. In Vero and IC-21 cells, the titer of this virus was substantially lower than that of the wild-type A/WSN/33 strain. Gao et al. [21] demonstrated that an H9N2 virus with PA-X deletion exhibited diminished suppression of host protein synthesis, leading to reduced replication capacity and pathogenicity in mice. It is known that PA-X and NS1 do not function independently to suppress host gene expression [16]; instead, they act synergistically. PA-X cleaves host mRNAs via its endonuclease activity, which dissociates poly(A) binding protein cytoplasmic 1 (PABPC1) from mRNAs and exposes its nuclear localization signal. Meanwhile, NS1 sequesters poly(A) binding protein nuclear 1 (PABPN1), thereby eliminating the competitive inhibition of PABPN1 on the binding sites of nuclear polyadenylated RNAs. Through the synergistic regulation of PABPC1 nuclear translocation and PABPN1 sequestration, PA-X and NS1 shut down host gene expression and prioritize viral gene expression. This serves as a core strategy for the efficient replication of influenza viruses. These combined effects promote the nuclear accumulation of PABPC1, which may contribute to the nuclear retention of viral mRNAs or their preferential engagement with viral transcripts, thereby facilitating viral gene expression.
Avanthay et al. [22] constructed recombinant influenza viruses with NS1 deletion, PA-X deletion, or combined NS1/PA-X deletion based on the pH1N1/09 strain. Their study showed that the NS1/PA-X double-mutant recombinant virus exhibited a 100-fold reduction in viral titer in MDCK cells compared with the wild-type virus and was the only recombinant virus that was significantly attenuated in T3 porcine bronchial epithelial cells. It has been confirmed that introducing PA-X mutations into NS1-truncated viruses can potentiate their attenuation and improve the safety of embryonated chicken egg inoculation. Combined modification of NS1 and PA-X greatly weakens the ability of the virus to antagonize host immune responses, leading to a remarkable reduction in viral replication capacity and pathogenicity [23]. Given that influenza virus strains differ substantially in the basal activity of PA-X and NS1 as well as their functional interaction patterns, mutations will disrupt the original functional homeostasis of the virus. Host environments and the regulatory effects of other viral genes further drive phenotypic divergence of the mutants. Accordingly, PA-X and NS1 mutations exhibit distinct phenotypes across different viral strains [24,25]. For this reason, a universal modification strategy is not applicable to these two proteins, and mutation combinations need to be customized according to the characteristics of individual strains. Furthermore, excessive attenuation may compromise viral immunogenicity, and the low replication efficiency in embryonated chicken eggs or MDCK cells poses a constraint on large-scale production. Future efforts should focus on optimizing this strategy for specific strains to achieve an appropriate balance between attenuation and immunogenicity.

2.2. Genome-Recoding Viruses

Owing to the degeneracy of the genetic code, the same amino acid can be encoded by multiple synonymous codons. However, organisms exhibit codon usage bias, a phenomenon in which certain codons are used at frequencies far exceeding those statistically expected. A similar bias exists for codon pair usage [26,27,28,29,30]. Accordingly, researchers have proposed codon or codon pair deoptimization strategies, in which hundreds to thousands of synonymous nucleotide mutations are introduced in a targeted manner into the influenza virus genome without altering the amino acid sequences of the encoded viral proteins. By increasing the number of infrequently used codons or underrepresented codon pairs, these viruses exhibit markedly reduced translation efficiency and protein expression levels in host cells, thereby suppressing viral replication.
Multiple studies have confirmed that recombinant influenza viruses carrying recoded PB1, nucleoprotein (NP), HA, or NA genes display attenuated replication in mice [31,32,33,34,35]. For example, Fan et al. [32] avoided the packaging signals and alternatively spliced regions located at the gene termini and introduced 351 synonymous codon mutations across the eight gene segments of A/Brisbane/59/2007, generating the recombinant virus BR59-8-mut. Compared with the wild-type virus, BR59-8-mut exhibited a 100-fold reduction in replication capacity in A549 cells. Dong et al. [36] replaced approximately 62% of the NA gene of an influenza A virus with synonymous codons to construct a recombinant virus. This recombinant virus showed a dramatically reduced viral titer in mouse lungs while eliciting robust humoral, cellular, and mucosal immune responses. Beyond modulating codon usage frequency, another recoding strategy focuses on altering dinucleotide abundance. The CpG/UpA dinucleotide enrichment strategy increases the abundance of CpG and UpA dinucleotides in the influenza virus genome, thereby activating the zinc-finger antiviral protein (ZAP)-mediated innate immune pathway to suppress viral replication [37,38,39]. Sharp et al. [39] introduced 126 CpG sites into the PB2 gene to construct a recombinant virus enriched in CpG dinucleotides. Their study demonstrated that the attenuation of this virus was dependent on ZAP recognition: viral titers in normal A549 cells were reduced by approximately 100-fold, whereas replication capacity was restored in ZAP-deficient cells. Animal experiments showed that this virus was highly attenuated in mice, and a single low-dose inoculation induced potent humoral and cellular immune responses.
In summary, the genome-recoding strategy introduces a large number of synonymous nucleotide mutations into the viral genome, thereby preserving the native antigen while greatly reducing the likelihood of virulence reversion through mutation. Although this strategy offers significant advantages in terms of in vivo attenuation and immunogenicity, some recoded viruses are severely restricted in replication within current vaccine production platforms (e.g., embryonated chicken eggs, MDCK cells), making large-scale production difficult. In the future, efforts should focus on developing compatible production platforms (such as ZAP-knockout cell lines). However, for current mechanistic studies, ZAP-knockout cell lines do not need to fully meet vaccine manufacturing qualifications. If such cell lines are to be used for formal vaccine evaluation in the future, we will conduct complete qualification and validation in accordance with relevant guidelines to meet equivalent regulatory requirements.

2.3. miRNA-Targeted Viruses

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of non-coding RNAs approximately 18–22 nucleotides in length that broadly participate in regulating critical physiological processes such as cell differentiation, proliferation, immune responses, and stress responses [40]. During influenza virus infection, host miRNAs can interfere with viral replication either by directly targeting viral genes or by modulating host immune-signaling pathways, representing an important mechanism of the host antiviral response [41,42]. The underlying modes of action can be divided into two main categories [40,43]: one involves complete base-pairing with target mRNA, leading to mRNA degradation; the other involves incomplete base-pairing with the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of target mRNAs, primarily repressing translation. Notably, miRNA expression exhibits species-specificity, meaning that certain miRNAs are expressed only in particular species. Taking advantage of this property, researchers have proposed inserting miRNA target sequences into key genes of influenza viruses to allow host miRNAs to modulate viral protein expression, thereby achieving regulated control of viral replication.
MicroRNA-93 (miR-93) is broadly expressed in humans and mice but is absent in embryonated chicken eggs. One study [44] inserted miR-93 target sequences into the NP gene of A/Puerto Rico/8/34 and successfully generated a genetically stable attenuated influenza virus. The 50% lethal dose (LD50) of this recombinant virus in mice was 4.1 × 105 PFU, which was 100-fold higher than that of the wild-type virus, demonstrating a markedly attenuated phenotype. Gao et al. [45] inserted several tandemly repeated miRNA-192 target sequences downstream of the stop codon of the NP gene and found that recombinant viruses harboring six or nine copies exhibited attenuated properties, with LD50 values ten times higher than those of the wild-type virus. Notably, another study [46] reported a recombinant influenza virus engineered to express an exogenous miRNA that targets and represses the host genes, Cdc2-like kinase 1 (CLK1) or SON DNA-binding protein (SON), thereby restricting viral replication. The results showed that infection with this recombinant virus significantly reduced both mRNA and protein expression levels of CLK1 or SON in A549 cells. Moreover, when mice were infected with a lethal dose of this virus, no severe body weight loss or mortality was observed.
These studies indicate that miRNA-based attenuation strategies effectively reduce influenza virus pathogenicity by inhibiting viral or host genes, providing a reliable approach for the generation of attenuated influenza virus strains. However, the expression of miRNAs is environment-dependent, and alterations in miRNA expression profiles in diseased populations may lead to the restoration of virulence in miRNA-targeted viruses. Additionally, miRNAs carry off-target risks that may cause unpredictable cytotoxicity. To overcome these limitations, future optimization can be pursued in three aspects: (1) screening highly specific miRNAs and designing fully complementary miRNA target sequences to reduce off-target effects; (2) employing multi-target miRNA combinations or combining them with other attenuation strategies to synergistically enhance attenuation and prevent mutation risks; and (3) developing miRNA-knockout cell lines to enable efficient large-scale production of recombinant viruses. Currently, these gene-edited cell lines are used only for basic mechanistic studies, not for vaccine production or potency testing, and therefore do not require vaccine validation.

2.4. Premature Termination Codon Viruses

Premature termination codon (PTC)-containing viruses are generated by introducing stop codons (e.g., UAG, UGA) into essential viral genes, causing premature termination of viral mRNA translation in host cells. This leads to the loss of functional proteins and the inability to complete the viral replication cycle, thereby drastically reducing viral pathogenicity [47,48,49]. To address the challenge of efficient production of PTC-containing viruses, researchers [50] established a transgenic cell line stably expressing the Methanosarcina barkeri pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase (MbPylRS) and tRNA CUA, based on the orthogonal translation system of M. barkeri. Through the coordinated action of MbPylRS, tRNA CUA, and an unnatural amino acid (UAA), this cell line is able to read through the introduced stop codons in viral mRNAs and incorporate the UAA, thereby producing full-length functional viral proteins and enabling efficient in vitro production of PTC viruses. Si et al. [48] employed genetic code expansion technology to introduce a large number of amber stop codons (UAG) into the PA, PB2, PB1, and NP genes of the influenza A virus strain A/WSN/33, successfully constructing the replication-defective influenza virus PTC-4A. Mice inoculated with PTC-4A at a dose of 109 PFU—LD50 of a wild-type virus being 8 × 103 PFU—showed no significant body weight loss or mortality, and viral titers were virtually undetectable in the lungs. Notably, co-infection with this recombinant virus and wild-type virus produces progeny viruses containing amber stop codons, thereby substantially reducing the risk of genetic reassortment.
Recently, a study [51] reported that anticodon-engineered tRNA (ACE-tRNA) technology enables efficient in vitro production of PTC viruses. This approach modifies the tRNA anticodon to allow endogenous aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to recognize the introduced stop codons, eliminating the requirement for an exogenous synthetase. Compared with genetic code expansion technology, ACE-tRNA technology markedly improves the readthrough efficiency of engineered stop codons. At the same time, it exhibits extremely low readthrough efficiency at natural stop codons, thereby minimizing adverse effects on the virus and the host cell. However, PTC sites are genetically unstable and are particularly prone to reversion mutations in RNA viruses with high mutation rates. Future efforts should integrate bioinformatics approaches to predict PTC sites with high readthrough efficiency and conservation, and to establish engineered cell lines stably expressing ACE-tRNAs. This would lay the foundation for a platform capable of large-scale production of genetically stable PTC viruses, enabling a rapid response to potential viral transmission.

2.5. Small-Molecule-Dependent Viruses

Inteins are polypeptide sequences with self-splicing activity. During post-translational processing, an intein precisely excises itself from the precursor protein and ligates the flanking exteins through a peptide bond, thereby converting an inactive precursor into a functionally mature protein [52,53]. Exploiting this property, Buskirk et al. [54] inserted the human estrogen receptor ligand-binding domain (ER-LBD) into the Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecA intein, constructing the first 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-HT)-dependent intein-based molecular switch capable of conditionally controlling protein function in cells. Subsequently, Peck et al. [55] further optimized the screening system and obtained a second-generation 4-HT-dependent intein, which markedly improved the splicing efficiency for proteins such as GFP, mCherry, and glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 (Gli1), with splicing activity strictly dependent on the presence of 4-HT. Accordingly, researchers have proposed inserting the gene encoding the 4-HT-dependent intein into key genes essential for influenza virus replication and using 4-HT to regulate viral protein function, thereby generating conditionally replicating live attenuated influenza viruses.
PA, a core subunit of the influenza virus polymerase complex, is essential for viral genome replication and transcription. Chen et al. [56] inserted the above-mentioned 4-HT-dependent intein gene into the coding region of the viral PA gene and successfully constructed a 4-HT-dependent attenuated influenza virus, designated strain S218. At the cellular level, replication of the S218 virus was controlled by 4-HT: in the presence of 4-HT, the viral titer reached 104·3 TCID50/mL at 72 h post-infection, with replication capacity reduced by approximately 100-fold compared with the wild-type virus; in the absence of 4-HT, no cytopathic effect was observed in virus-infected cells. In vivo experiments in mice demonstrated that this virus was highly attenuated and did not cause pulmonary pathological damage, with its replication in vivo strictly dependent on exogenously supplied 4-HT. More recently, the same group [57] applied the S218 virus to treat melanoma in mice and found that it significantly suppressed tumor growth and lung metastasis, with no marked body weight loss or toxicity observed during the treatment period, further confirming the safety of this virus.
Collectively, the above studies indicate that the attenuation strategy based on small-molecule-dependent intein switches combines several advantages, including operational simplicity, a high safety profile, scalability for manufacturing, and cross-platform versatility. Nevertheless, this technology still faces potential challenges: endogenous estrogen-like substances may activate the intein, leading to off-target viral replication, and the intein itself, as a foreign sequence, carries the risk of eliciting host immune responses. Future optimization efforts will focus on engineering the ER-LBD to reduce its sensitivity to endogenous estrogen-like substances and introducing degron elements to accelerate the clearance of excised free intein fragments, thereby enhancing the safety and controllability of this platform.

2.6. Proteolysis-Targeting Recombinant Viruses

Since the Sakamoto group [58] developed the Protac-1 molecule and successfully induced the degradation of methionine aminopeptidase-2 (MetAP-2), proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) technology has progressively evolved into a novel protein regulation strategy. This technology employs bifunctional molecules that simultaneously bind a target protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase, promoting target protein ubiquitination and subsequent recognition and degradation by the host ubiquitin–proteasome system, thereby modulating protein expression [59,60]. Inspired by this technology, researchers have proposed inserting proteasome-targeting peptides into the influenza virus genome to promote the ubiquitination of viral proteins, thereby enabling targeted degradation of viral proteins via the host ubiquitin–proteasome system to regulate viral replication.
Si et al. [61] inserted a proteasome-targeting domain (PTD) consisting of a proteasome-targeting peptide (ALAPYIP) and a tobacco etch virus cleavage site (TEVcs)-containing linker (ENLYFQG) upstream of the stop codon of the M1 gene, constructing the attenuated influenza virus M1-PTD. When this virus infects conventional cells, the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) protein recognizes the proteasome-targeting peptide within the PTD and mediates the ubiquitination of the M1 protein via an E3 ubiquitin ligase, leading to its degradation by the host proteasome and consequent suppression of viral replication. In cells expressing tobacco etch virus protease (TEVp), however, TEVp cleaves the TEVcs, releasing the proteasome-targeting peptide from the M1 protein and thereby restoring viral replication capacity. Compared with the wild-type virus, the M1-PTD virus exhibited a 100-fold reduction in replication capacity in conventional cells and could be stably propagated for more than 20 passages. To overcome the limitation that PTD insertion sites were restricted to the C-terminus of genes, the same group [62] performed a genome-wide screen and identified six novel candidate sites (PA-D294, NS1-L163, PA-N350, M1-M135, M1-H222, and the M1 C-terminus), successfully constructing recombinant attenuated viruses capable of engaging either Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) or beta-transducin repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP) E3 ubiquitin ligases. Three days after intranasal inoculation, the viral titer of this virus in mouse lung tissue was 103 PFU, approximately 200-fold lower than that of the wild-type virus.
Compared with cold-adapted attenuated strains, PROTAC-based viruses exhibit superior attenuation. However, their clinical application still faces several challenges. For instance, the expression levels of E3 ubiquitin ligases such as VHL and β-TrCP vary among individuals; in particular, individuals with deficient E3 ubiquitin ligase expression or those receiving protease inhibitor therapy may be at risk of attenuation failure. Furthermore, as a foreign peptide, the PTD may act as a neoantigen and carry the risk of inducing an autoimmune response. To address these limitations, future studies may consider introducing multi-PTD cooperative designs and exploring alternative degradation pathways, such as the autophagy–lysosome system, so as to overcome variability in E3 ubiquitin ligase expression and reduce the likelihood of virulence reversion. In addition, bioinformatics-based screening of PTD sequences with low immunogenicity could further enhance the safety and applicability of this platform.

3. Application of Live Attenuated Influenza Virus

Table 1 systematically summarizes the research progress on the development of influenza attenuated strains based on different attenuation strategies. With the successful implementation of multiple influenza attenuation strategies, the virulence of attenuated influenza strains has become stable and controllable, substantially improving their safety when used as live attenuated influenza vaccines. This progress signifies that the influenza virus is transitioning from a natural pathogen into a controllable biological tool. Consequently, the application of live attenuated influenza viruses is no longer confined to the development of conventional influenza vaccines but is progressively expanding into multiple directions, including vaccine platforms and oncolytic viruses.

3.1. Application as a Viral Vector Platform in Vaccine Development

Currently, more than ten viral vectors—including adenovirus, vesicular stomatitis virus, vaccinia virus, and measles virus—are commonly used in vaccine development. Among these, attenuated influenza virus strains used as viral vectors [65,66] offer distinctive biological advantages: (1) mucosal route immunization effectively activates humoral, mucosal, and cellular immunity, which is particularly important for preventing infection by pathogens that invade via mucosal surfaces; (2) the flexibility to exchange foreign antigen genes enables rapid responses to antigenic variants or emerging pathogens; and (3) the stably inherited attenuated phenotype ensures the safety of vaccination.
In recent years, numerous studies have reported influenza-vectored vaccines targeting COVID-19. The design concept involves inserting antigenic genes, such as conserved T-cell epitopes of SARS-CoV-2 or the spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD), into the genome of an influenza vector, thereby enabling virus-mediated delivery of foreign genes to activate immune responses against SARS-CoV-2. Chen et al. [67,68] constructed an influenza-vectored vaccine expressing the RBD based on an NS1-deleted A/California/04/2009 backbone. This vaccine effectively activated humoral immunity, mucosal immunity, tissue-resident memory (TRM) T cells in the upper respiratory tract, and trained immunity, significantly ameliorating SARS-CoV-2-variant-induced lung injury in hamsters. Moreover, clinical studies have further demonstrated that this vaccine possesses excellent safety, tolerability, and user experience, and has shown favorable immunoprotective efficacy against the Omicron variant [69,70,71]. Using an matrix protein 2 (M2)-deficient single-replication (M2SR) influenza virus as a vector, Hill-Batorski et al. developed a bivalent vaccine, SARS-CoV-2 M2SR, carrying the RBD. Intranasal inoculation of hamsters with this vaccine caused no adverse reactions while effectively activating immune responses against both influenza and COVID-19. Furthermore, attenuated influenza vectors have been successfully applied in the development of vaccines against a variety of bacteria (e.g., Helicobacter pylori, Brucella spp., Mycobacterium tuberculosis) and viruses (e.g., tick-borne encephalitis virus, respiratory syncytial virus, human immunodeficiency virus), inducing protective immunity against the respective pathogens [72,73,74,75,76,77].
Nevertheless, attenuated influenza viruses used as vaccine vectors still face considerable limitations. Traditional attenuated influenza strains are often over-attenuated, and defective interfering particles (DIPs) are frequently generated during their production [78]. These DIPs carry short defective viral genomes (DVGs) that have lost the ability to encode complete functional proteins. They preferentially compete for key factors such as RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, nucleoproteins, and envelope proteins through short DVGs, and exploit retained packaging signals to outcompete full-length vRNAs for packaging opportunities. This results in a large number of progeny viruses being non-infectious DIPs, thereby reducing the delivery efficiency and immunogenicity of foreign viral antigens. Pre-existing anti-influenza antibodies, which are widespread in the human population, can neutralize influenza viruses, further impairing the potency of vectored vaccines [79]. Additionally, the packaging capacity of the influenza virus genome is limited, and the insertion of relatively large foreign gene fragments can significantly affect viral replication and genetic stability. In response to these challenges, various optimization strategies have been developed. Novel influenza attenuation strategies that incorporate conditional replication control mechanisms enable precise regulation of the degree of attenuation, thereby effectively balancing the safety and immunogenicity of vectored vaccines. Replacing the HA and NA subtypes on the surface of the viral vector can reduce the neutralizing effect of pre-existing antibodies in the population. The use of 2A self-cleaving peptides or internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements to achieve polycistronic expression of multiple genes, or the modular partitioning of antigens into different gene segments, can overcome the genetic payload limitations of influenza vectors [80,81]. These optimization strategies provide an important foundation for the application of attenuated influenza vectors in next-generation vaccine development.

3.2. Application as Oncolytic Viruses in Tumor Therapy

Influenza virus possesses the ability to selectively infect and lyse tumor cells, and its tropism for tumors is closely related to its unique replication advantage in malignant cells. Unlike normal cells, influenza virus preferentially infects tumor cells because tumor cells overexpress sialic acid receptors, including Neu5Gc, to facilitate viral entry, while their antiviral pathways (especially the IFN-signaling pathway) are defective. Furthermore, the tumor microenvironment is favorable for viral replication. Viral infection and replication induce potent oncolytic effects and immunogenic cell death, thereby activating antitumor immunity [6,82]. At present, research on oncolytic influenza viruses remains at the preclinical stage, and their clinical translation faces considerable safety challenges. To address these challenges, scientists have been actively exploring the use of live attenuated influenza viruses as oncolytic agents, aiming to reduce viral pathogenicity while enhancing oncolytic potency.
Kuznetsova et al. [83] introduced the double mutations S342P and R343I into the HA gene of an NS1-truncated influenza virus, replacing the trypsin cleavage site of HA with an elastase cleavage site to further enhance tumor tropism. Compared with the wild-type virus, this recombinant virus, administered intravenously at a dose of 108 TCID50/mL, significantly inhibited the growth of melanoma and pancreatic cancer, while no virus was detected in the brain, lungs, or liver. This modification eliminated the natural restriction that viral activation is dependent on the respiratory tract. However, due to the widespread distribution of elastase in tissues, the virus is capable of causing systemic infection and viremia, thereby introducing risks of enhanced virulence and cytokine storms. Furthermore, elastase is highly conserved across species, which weakens the interspecies barrier and increases the risk of zoonotic transmission. Du et al. [84,85] constructed a hyper-interferon-sensitive influenza virus (HIS) by introducing eight interferon-sensitive mutations into the PB2, matrix protein 1 (M1), and NS1 genes. As a genetically engineered strain, HIS features precise genetic modifications, high sensitivity to interferon, restricted replication, potent immune activation, and excellent safety, resulting in attenuated replication, robust immune responses, and no pathogenicity in immunocompetent hosts. Subsequent studies showed that intranasal administration of HIS at a dose of 104 TCID50/mL did not cause distal organ damage or mortality in mice. Compared with the wild-type virus, intratumoral injection of HIS significantly suppressed the growth of a mouse lung cancer model resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Chen et al. [57] demonstrated that intratumoral injection or intranasal inoculation of a 4-HT-dependent attenuated influenza virus inhibited the growth of melanoma and lung metastatic foci in mice, and the oncolytic effect could be further enhanced by co-administration of 4-HT. Notably, this group constructed a folic acid (FA)-modified nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) capable of targeted delivery of 4-HT to tumor cells, thereby specifically activating the virus within the tumor and enhancing antitumor efficacy without damaging normal tissues. Ji et al. [86] introduced premature termination codons (PTCs) into the PB1, PA, NP, and HA genes of the influenza A virus strain A/WSN/33/H1N1 (WSN), generating a PTC virus. The results showed that intranasal inoculation of this virus at a dose of 105 PFU significantly suppressed lung melanoma metastasis in mice without causing body weight loss or lung injury. However, the intrinsic immunostimulatory capacity of influenza virus is relatively weak and insufficient to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. To address this, they inserted an anti-PD-L1 nanobody gene into the PB2 gene, which further enhanced the inhibitory effect on lung metastatic foci in mice and significantly improved the objective response rate in tumor-bearing animals. Similarly, numerous studies have utilized influenza virus as a vector to deliver immunostimulatory genes into the tumor microenvironment, compensating for the limited immune-activating capacity of the virus itself and thereby achieving more potent oncolytic effects [87,88].
In summary, as a novel oncolytic virus, influenza virus—through genetic modification or drug combination—can enhance its tumor tropism and immune-activating capacity, exhibiting excellent oncolytic efficacy and safety in various tumor types, including hepatocellular carcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and melanoma. Nevertheless, this field still faces core challenges, including insufficient immune stimulation, neutralization by pre-existing antibodies, and difficulties associated with intravenous route administration. To overcome the current therapeutic bottlenecks, it is necessary to engineer novel vectors regulated by tumor-specific promoters to improve safety, explore cell-based carriers or inhalation-based delivery to overcome delivery obstacles, and deeply integrate oncolytic influenza viruses with other therapeutic modalities (such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, radiotherapy, and CAR-T cell therapy) to achieve synergistic antitumor efficacy.

4. Conclusions

This paper systematically reviews the strategies for constructing attenuated influenza viruses and their application progress in two major directions: vaccine vectors and oncolytic viruses. To overcome the inherent limitations of conventional cold-adapted attenuated strains in terms of genetic stability and safety, researchers have developed a variety of novel influenza attenuation strategies by reducing viral pathogenicity through three approaches: impairing viral immune evasion, suppressing viral transcription or translation, and modulating viral protein function at the post-translational level. Although these attenuation strategies differ in their technical routes, they share a common contradiction: the more thoroughly the influenza virus is attenuated, the weaker its replication in vivo and the lower its yield in production systems, thereby limiting its efficacy as a vaccine or oncolytic agent. In other words, it is difficult to simultaneously balance viral safety, efficacy, and productivity. For instance, conventional cold-adapted strains, which rely on only a small number of amino acid mutations to achieve an attenuated phenotype, are unable to strike an adequate balance among safety, efficacy, and productivity. Genome-recoded viruses, which incorporate hundreds or thousands of synonymous mutations to reduce translational efficiency, greatly enhance safety but at the cost of reduced production titers and diminished viral efficacy.
Nevertheless, these novel influenza attenuation strategies provide a basis for resolving the trade-off among these three factors. For example, small-molecule-dependent intein-based and proteasome-targeting attenuation strategies couple viral replication capacity to external signals such as 4-HT or TEVp. Supplying the signal during production maintains viral yield, while withdrawing the signal after inoculation renders the virus incompetent, thereby decoupling safety from productivity. miRNA-targeted attenuation strategies link the condition for viral attenuation to host species specificity: high expression of specific miRNAs in normal cells restricts viral replication, whereas the absence of such miRNAs in tumor cells permits efficient viral replication, thereby achieving a separation of safety and efficacy. Thus, the key to balancing these three factors lies not in finding a static optimal compromise, but in designing them so that they no longer constrain one another, allowing each to reach its optimum. The studies by Chen et al. [56,57] further validate this concept: this group constructed a 4-HT-dependent attenuated influenza virus that achieves large-scale in vitro production upon the addition of 4-HT in embryonated chicken eggs or MDCK cells. For in vivo application, they developed a folate receptor (FR)-modified NLC capable of specifically delivering 4-HT to tumor cells, thereby precisely activating the virus within the tumor. This strategy prevents safety, efficacy, and manufacturability from constraining one another—it not only enables efficient in vitro production of the virus but also demonstrates remarkable oncolytic efficacy and safety in melanoma and lung metastasis models. Therefore, future design of attenuated influenza viruses should shift from single attenuation strategies toward multi-layered safety control, combining PTC, codon deoptimization, miRNA targeting, PROTAC-mediated degradation, and other strategies to construct viruses with multiple replication restrictions, thereby reducing the risk of virulence reversion and aberrant replication. Concurrently, engineered complementary cell lines and active targeting strategies should be developed to address the issues of insufficient yield and low efficacy of highly attenuated viruses.
Furthermore, attenuated influenza viruses still face several limitations in their applications. Pre-existing immunity may neutralize the viral vector, impairing in vivo delivery efficiency; certain strategies that rely on exogenous signals may increase production costs and process complexity; oncolytic virus monotherapy exhibits limited efficacy, and intratumoral injection restricts its clinical applicability; intravenous or inhalation delivery faces challenges such as neutralizing antibodies and insufficient targeting. To address these issues, future research should develop viral vectors with rare serotypes or substituted surface proteins to evade pre-existing immunity, and optimize low-cost inducers and production systems. In addition, emphasis should be placed on developing conditional replication elements triggered by tumor hypoxia or aberrant signaling pathways, so as to confine efficient viral replication to lesion sites, while exploring combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other modalities to overcome the limitations of monotherapy. Only through simultaneous breakthroughs in both design concepts and application technologies can attenuated influenza viruses truly be realized as a controllable biological platform.
On the other hand, in practice, the research and development of oncolytic viruses inevitably faces multiple technical and regulatory challenges. Despite these hurdles, constructing oncolytic viral vectors based on influenza virus is technically achievable. Given its promising prospects for tumor treatment, relevant regulatory bodies support exploratory research in this area, and candidate products developed from this strategy qualify for application as Class 1 New Drugs. In terms of the quality control and supervision of genetically modified virus seeds, the Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) has explicitly stipulated strict requirements on the maximum passage number of oncolytic viruses. Specifically, whole-genome sequencing is mandatory for viruses at each passage generation during serial cultivation, so as to guarantee consistent genetic stability and sustained therapeutic potency throughout passaging. Considering that the vector is derived from live influenza virus, there exists a theoretical risk of genetic reassortment between the engineered virus and wild-type influenza strains. Nevertheless, our experimental results confirm that this safety risk is negligible. Since key virulence genes of the oncolytic influenza virus have been genetically modified, the likelihood of spontaneous genetic reassortment has been substantially minimized.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.O.; writing—original draft preparation, K.Y.; writing—reviewing and editing, X.O., Y.X. and G.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Project (grant number 82560547), and the General Project of the Yunnan Province Science and Technology Department (202301AT070478, 202401AT070369).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rudraraju, R.; Mordant, F.; Subbarao, K. How Live Attenuated Vaccines Can Inform the Development of Broadly Cross-Protective Influenza Vaccines. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 219, S81–S87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Maassab, H.F.; Bryant, M.L. The development of live attenuated cold-adapted influenza virus vaccine for humans. Rev. Med. Virol. 1999, 9, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jin, H.; Subbarao, K. Live attenuated influenza vaccine. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 386, 181–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, G.L.; Subbarao, K. Live attenuated vaccines for pandemic influenza. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 333, 109–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yeolekar, L.R.; Guilfoyle, K.; Ganguly, M.; Tyagi, P.; Stittelaar, K.J.; van Amerongen, G.; Dhere, R.M.; BerlandaScorza, F.; Mahmood, K. Immunogenicity and efficacy comparison of MDCK cell-based and egg-based live attenuated influenza vaccines of H5 and H7 subtypes in ferrets. Vaccine 2020, 38, 6280–6290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Masemann, D.; Köther, K.; Kuhlencord, M.; Varga, G.; Roth, J.; Lichty, B.D.; Rapp, U.R.; Wixler, V.; Ludwig, S. Oncolytic influenza virus infection restores immunocompetence of lung tumor-associated alveolar macrophages. Oncoimmunology 2018, 7, e1423171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zheng, P.; Yang, Z.; Duan, B.; He, J.; Li, W.; Li, D.; et al. Tumor Vaccine Exploiting Membranes with Influenza Virus-Induced Immunogenic Cell Death to Decorate Polylactic Coglycolic Acid Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2025, 19, 3115–3134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Xu, Y.; Sun, F.; Bai, Z.; Bian, C.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, P. Cold-adapted influenza-vectored RSV vaccine protects BALB/c mice and cotton rats from RSV challenge. J. Med. Virol. 2024, 96, e29308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cardoso, K.F.; de Souza, L.R.A.; da Silva Santos, B.S.Á.; de Carvalho, K.R.A.; da Silva Messias, S.G.; de Faria Gonçalves, A.P.; Kano, F.S.; Alves, P.A.; da Silva Campos, M.A.; Xavier, M.P.; et al. Intranasal influenza-vectored vaccine expressing pneumococcal surface protein A protects against Influenza and Streptococcus pneumoniae infections. npj Vaccines 2024, 9, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Furusawa, Y.; Yamada, S.; da Silva Lopes, T.J.; Dutta, J.; Khan, Z.; Kriti, D.; van Bakel, H.; Kawaoka, Y. Influenza Virus Polymerase Mutation Stabilizes a Foreign Gene Inserted into the Virus Genome by Enhancing the Transcription/Replication Efficiency of the Modified Segment. mBio 2019, 10, e01794-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Cox, N.J.; Kitame, F.; Kendal, A.P.; Maassab, H.F.; Naeve, C. Identification of sequence changes in the cold-adapted, live attenuated influenza vaccine strain, A/Ann Arbor/6/60 (H2N2). Virology 1988, 167, 554–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Snyder, M.H.; Betts, R.F.; DeBorde, D.; Tierney, E.L.; Clements, M.L.; Herrington, D.; Sears, S.D.; Dolin, R.; Maassab, H.F.; Murphy, B.R. Four viral genes independently contribute to attenuation of live influenza A/Ann Arbor/6/60 (H2N2) cold-adapted reassortant virus vaccines. J. Virol. 1988, 62, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Qian, W.; Wei, X.; Guo, K.; Li, Y.; Lin, X.; Zou, Z.; Zhou, H.; Jin, M. The C-Terminal Effector Domain of Non-Structural Protein 1 of Influenza A Virus Blocks IFN-β Production by Targeting TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 3. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jureka, A.S.; Kleinpeter, A.B.; Tipper, J.L.; Harrod, K.S.; Petit, C.M. The influenza NS1 protein modulates RIG-I activation via a strain-specific direct interaction with the second CARD of RIG-I. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 1153–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jagger, B.W.; Wise, H.M.; Kash, J.C.; Walters, K.-A.; Wills, N.M.; Xiao, Y.-L.; Dunfee, R.L.; Schwartzman, L.M.; Ozinsky, A.; Bell, G.L.; et al. An overlapping protein-coding region in influenza A virus segment 3 modulates the host response. Science 2012, 337, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bougon, J.; Kadijk, E.; Gallot-Lavallee, L.; Curtis, B.A.; Landers, M.; Archibald, J.M.; Khaperskyy, D.A. Influenza A virus NS1 effector domain is required for PA-X-mediated host shutoff in infected cells. J. Virol. 2024, 98, e0190123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ferko, B.; Stasakova, J.; Sereinig, S.; Romanova, J.; Katinger, D.; Niebler, B.; Katinger, H.; Egorov, A. Hyperattenuated recombinant influenza A virus nonstructural-protein-encoding vectors induce human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef-specific systemic and mucosal immune responses in mice. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 8899–8908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  18. Hwang, J.; Yoon, S.-W.; Ga, E.; Moon, S.; Choi, J.; Bae, E.; Kang, J.-A.; Kim, H.K.; Jeong, D.G.; Song, D.; et al. Development of Live Vaccine Candidates for Canine Influenza H3N2 Using Naturally Truncated NS1 Gene. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2024, 2024, 4335836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vandoorn, E.; Parys, A.; Chepkwony, S.; Chiers, K.; Van Reeth, K. Efficacy of the NS1-truncated live attenuated influenza virus vaccine for swine against infection with viruses of major North American and European H3N2 lineages. Vaccine 2022, 40, 2723–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hancková, M.; Miháliková, L.; Pastoreková, S.; Betáková, T. Hypoxia alters the immune response in mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with influenza a virus with truncated NS1 protein. Cytokine 2023, 164, 156138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Gao, H.; Xu, G.; Sun, Y.; Qi, L.; Wang, J.; Kong, W.; Sun, H.; Pu, J.; Chang, K.-C.; Liu, J. PA-X is a virulence factor in avian H9N2 influenza virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2015, 96, 2587–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Avanthay, R.; Garcia-Nicolas, O.; Zimmer, G.; Summerfield, A. NS1 and PA-X of H1N1/09 influenza virus act in a concerted manner to manipulate the innate immune response of porcine respiratory epithelial cells. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1222805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ghorbani, A.; Ngunjiri, J.M.; Edward C. Abundo, M.; Pantin-Jackwood, M.; Kenney, S.P.; Lee, C.-W. Development of in ovo-compatible NS1-truncated live attenuated influenza vaccines by modulation of hemagglutinin cleavage and polymerase acidic X frameshifting sites. Vaccine 2023, 41, 1848–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, X.; Kong, M.; Ma, C.; Zhang, M.; Hu, Z.; Gu, M.; Wang, X.; Gao, R.; Hu, S.; Chen, Y.; et al. The PA-X host shutoff site 100 V exerts a contrary effect on viral fitness of the highly pathogenic H7N9 influenza A virus in mice and chickens. Virulence 2025, 16, 2445238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hu, J.; Mo, Y.; Wang, X.; Gu, M.; Hu, Z.; Zhong, L.; Wu, Q.; Hao, X.; Hu, S.; Liu, W.; et al. PA-X decreases the pathogenicity of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus in avian species by inhibiting virus replication and host response. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 4126–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, F.-P.; Li, H. Codon-pair usage and genome evolution. Gene 2009, 433, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hu, X.; Gao, M.; Ren, X.; An, L.; Wang, C.; Ma, X.-X. Effects of synonymous codons with optimization/deoptimization in nucleoprotein (NP) gene of influenza A virus on interaction between NP and tripartite motif protein 25 (TRIM25). Virology 2025, 610, 110626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gun, L.; Haixian, P.; Yumiao, R.; Han, T.; Jingqi, L.; Liguang, Z. Codon usage characteristics of PB2 gene in influenza A H7N9 virus from different host species. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 65, 430–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nambou, K.; Anakpa, M.; Tong, Y.S. Human genes with codon usage bias similar to that of the nonstructural protein 1 gene of influenza A viruses are conjointly involved in the infectious pathogenesis of influenza A viruses. Genetica 2022, 150, 97–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, Y.; Ma, T.; He, Y.; Li, Q.; Mai, K.; Mo, M.; Cao, C.; Li, J.; Feng, P.; Peng, J.; et al. Genome-Wide Codon Reprogramming Enables a Multifactorially Attenuated Influenza Vaccine with Broad Cross-Protection. Adv. Sci. 2026, 13, e16448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Broadbent, A.J.; Santos, C.P.; Anafu, A.; Wimmer, E.; Mueller, S.; Subbarao, K. Evaluation of the attenuation, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a live virus vaccine generated by codon-pair bias de-optimization of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus, in ferrets. Vaccine 2016, 34, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fan, R.L.Y.; Valkenburg, S.A.; Wong, C.K.S.; Li, O.T.W.; Nicholls, J.M.; Rabadan, R.; Peiris, J.S.M.; Poon, L.L.M. Generation of Live Attenuated Influenza Virus by Using Codon Usage Bias. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 10762–10773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kaplan, B.S.; Souza, C.K.; Gauger, P.C.; Stauft, C.B.; Robert Coleman, J.; Mueller, S.; Vincent, A.L. Vaccination of pigs with a codon-pair bias de-optimized live attenuated influenza vaccine protects from homologous challenge. Vaccine 2018, 36, 1101–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mueller, S.; Coleman, J.R.; Papamichail, D.; Ward, C.B.; Nimnual, A.; Futcher, B.; Skiena, S.; Wimmer, E. Live attenuated influenza virus vaccines by computer-aided rational design. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 723–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yang, C.; Skiena, S.; Futcher, B.; Mueller, S.; Wimmer, E. Deliberate reduction of hemagglutinin and neuraminidase expression of influenza virus leads to an ultraprotective live vaccine in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 9481–9486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dong, J.; Dong, Z.; Feng, P.; Gao, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Han, L.; Li, Z.; Wang, Q.; Niu, X.; et al. Influenza Virus Carrying a Codon-Reprogrammed Neuraminidase Gene as a Strategy for Live Attenuated Vaccine. Vaccines 2023, 11, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gu, H.; Fan, R.L.Y.; Wang, D.; Poon, L.L.M. Dinucleotide evolutionary dynamics in influenza A virus. Virus Evol. 2019, 5, vez038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Le Nouën, C.; Collins, P.L.; Buchholz, U.J. Attenuation of Human Respiratory Viruses by Synonymous Genome Recoding. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sharp, C.P.; Thompson, B.H.; Nash, T.J.; Diebold, O.; Pinto, R.M.; Thorley, L.; Lin, Y.-T.; Sives, S.; Wise, H.; Clohisey Hendry, S.; et al. CpG dinucleotide enrichment in the influenza A virus genome as a live attenuated vaccine development strategy. PLoS Pathog. 2023, 19, e1011357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Filipowicz, W.; Bhattacharyya, S.N.; Sonenberg, N. Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: Are the answers in sight? Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bayat, M.; Nahid-Samiei, R.; Sadri Nahand, J.; Naghili, B. Interferon and immunity: The role of microRNA in viral evasion strategies. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1567459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xing, Y.; Chen, L.; Hu, B.; Li, Y.; Mai, H.; Li, G.; Han, S.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Tian, Y.; et al. Therapeutic role of miR-19a/b protection from influenza virus infection in patients with coronary heart disease. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2024, 35, 102149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fay, E.J.; Langlois, R.A. MicroRNA-Attenuated Virus Vaccines. Non-Coding RNA 2018, 4, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Perez, J.T.; Pham, A.M.; Lorini, M.H.; Chua, M.A.; Steel, J.; tenOever, B.R. MicroRNA-mediated species-specific attenuation of influenza A virus. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 572–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gao, F.; Yang, T.; Liu, X.; Xiong, F.; Luo, J.; Yi, Y.; Fan, J.; Chen, Z.; Tan, W.-S. MiRNA Targeted NP Genome of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines Provide Cross-Protection against a Lethal Influenza Virus Infection. Vaccines 2020, 8, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wen, K.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Yang, H.; Zheng, Z.; Yan, Y.; Realivazquez Pena, A.; Zeng, M. A new self-attenuated therapeutic influenza vaccine that uses host cell-restricted attenuation by artificial microRNAs. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 612, 121325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hao, R.; Ma, K.; Ru, Y.; Li, D.; Song, G.; Lu, B.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wu, C.; et al. Amber codon is genetically unstable in generation of premature termination codon (PTC)-harbouring Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) via genetic code expansion. RNA Biol. 2021, 18, 2330–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Si, L.; Xu, H.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Z.; Tian, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Niu, Z.; Zhang, C.; et al. Generation of influenza A viruses as live but replication-incompetent virus vaccines. Science 2016, 354, 1170–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhang, R.-R.; Ye, Q.; Li, X.-F.; Deng, Y.-Q.; Xu, Y.-P.; Huang, X.-Y.; Xia, Q.; Qin, C.-F. Construction and characterization of UAA-controlled recombinant Zika virus by genetic code expansion. Sci. China Life Sci. 2021, 64, 171–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wang, L.; Brock, A.; Herberich, B.; Schultz, P.G. Expanding the genetic code of Escherichia coli. Science 2001, 292, 498–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, T.-Y.; Meng, F.-D.; Sang, G.-J.; Zhang, H.-L.; Tian, Z.-J.; Zheng, H.; Cai, X.-H.; Tang, Y.-D. A novel viral vaccine platform based on engineered transfer RNA. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2023, 12, 2157339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Humberg, C.; Yilmaz, Z.; Fitzian, K.; Dörner, W.; Kümmel, D.; Mootz, H.D. A cysteine-less and ultra-fast split intein rationally engineered from being aggregation-prone to highly efficient in protein trans-splicing. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sekar, G.; Stevens, A.J.; Mostafavi, A.Z.; Sashi, P.; Muir, T.W.; Cowburn, D. A Conserved Histidine Residue Drives Extein Dependence in an Enhanced Atypically Split Intein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 19196–19203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Buskirk, A.R.; Ong, Y.-C.; Gartner, Z.J.; Liu, D.R. Directed evolution of ligand dependence: Small-molecule-activated protein splicing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 10505–10510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Peck, S.H.; Chen, I.; Liu, D.R. Directed evolution of a small-molecule-triggered intein with improved splicing properties in mammalian cells. Chem. Biol. 2011, 18, 619–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, J.; Wang, W.; Wei, C.; Zhong, H.; Dong, M. Generation of a Live Attenuated Influenza A Vaccine Using Chemical-Triggered Intein. ACS Synth. Biol. 2023, 12, 1686–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chen, J.; Guo, X.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, P.; Dong, M.; Du, J. Selective Activation of Conditionally Replicating Influenza A Virus in Pulmonary Tumors for Enhanced Oncolytic Efficacy and Systemic Safety. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2026, 15, e02017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sakamoto, K.M.; Kim, K.B.; Kumagai, A.; Mercurio, F.; Crews, C.M.; Deshaies, R.J. Protacs: Chimeric molecules that target proteins to the Skp1-Cullin-F box complex for ubiquitination and degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 8554–8559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Békés, M.; Langley, D.R.; Crews, C.M. PROTAC targeted protein degraders: The past is prologue. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2022, 21, 181–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Li, X.; Pu, W.; Zheng, Q.; Ai, M.; Chen, S.; Peng, Y. Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) in cancer therapy. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Si, L.; Shen, Q.; Li, J.; Chen, L.; Shen, J.; Xiao, X.; Bai, H.; Feng, T.; Ye, A.Y.; Li, L.; et al. Generation of a live attenuated influenza A vaccine by proteolysis targeting. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 1370–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhang, C.; Hou, J.; Li, Z.; Shen, Q.; Bai, H.; Chen, L.; Shen, J.; Wang, P.; Su, Y.; Li, J.; et al. Author Correction: PROTAR Vaccine 2.0 generates influenza vaccines by degrading multiple viral proteins. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2025, 21, 1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Prokopenko, P.; Matyushenko, V.; Rak, A.; Stepanova, E.; Chistyakova, A.; Goshina, A.; Kudryavtsev, I.; Rudenko, L.; Isakova-Sivak, I. Truncation of NS1 Protein Enhances T Cell-Mediated Cross-Protection of a Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine Virus Expressing Wild-Type Nucleoprotein. Vaccines 2023, 11, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nicolodi, C.; Groiss, F.; Kiselev, O.; Wolschek, M.; Seipelt, J.; Muster, T. Safety and immunogenicity of a replication-deficient H5N1 influenza virus vaccine lacking NS1. Vaccine 2019, 37, 3722–3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Liu, Y.; Deng, S.; Ren, S.; Tam, R.C.-Y.; Liu, S.; Zhang, A.J.; To, K.K.-W.; Yuen, K.-Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, P. Intranasal influenza virus-vectored vaccine offers protection against clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 infection in small animal models. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 3133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Ly, H. Advances in Development and Application of Influenza Vaccines. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 711997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chen, J.; Wang, P.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, H.; Chen, C.; Wang, X.; Han, J.; Chen, Y.; et al. A live attenuated virus-based intranasal COVID-19 vaccine provides rapid, prolonged, and broad protection against SARS-CoV-2. Sci. Bull. 2022, 67, 1372–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; He, J.; Chen, J.; Qi, R.; Yuan, L.; Shao, T.; Zhao, H.; Chen, C.; Chen, Y.; et al. Intranasal influenza-vectored COVID-19 vaccine restrains the SARS-CoV-2 inflammatory response in hamsters. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhu, F.; Zhuang, C.; Chu, K.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, H.; Huang, S.; Su, Y.; Lin, H.; Yang, C.; Jiang, H.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a live-attenuated influenza virus vector-based intranasal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and 2 trials. Lancet Respir. Med. 2022, 10, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zhu, F.; Huang, S.; Liu, X.; Chen, Q.; Zhuang, C.; Zhao, H.; Han, J.; Jaen, A.M.; Do, T.H.; Peter, J.G.; et al. Safety and efficacy of the intranasal spray SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dNS1-RBD: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2023, 11, 1075–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ma, Y.; Li, J.; Cao, Y.; Li, W.; Shi, R.; Jia, B.; Wang, H.; Yan, L.; Suo, L.; Yang, W.; et al. Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2023, 19, 2235963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Jindra, C.; Hainisch, E.K.; Rümmele, A.; Wolschek, M.; Muster, T.; Brandt, S. Influenza virus vector iNS1 expressing bovine papillomavirus 1 (BPV1) antigens efficiently induces tumour regression in equine sarcoid patients. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0260155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bugybayeva, D.; Kydyrbayev, Z.; Zinina, N.; Assanzhanova, N.; Yespembetov, B.; Kozhamkulov, Y.; Zakarya, K.; Ryskeldinova, S.; Tabynov, K. A new candidate vaccine for human brucellosis based on influenza viral vectors: A preliminary investigation for the development of an immunization schedule in a guinea pig model. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2021, 10, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sergeeva, M.; Romanovskaya-Romanko, E.; Zabolotnyh, N.; Pulkina, A.; Vasilyev, K.; Shurigina, A.P.; Buzitskaya, J.; Zabrodskaya, Y.; Fadeev, A.; Vasin, A.; et al. Mucosal Influenza Vector Vaccine Carrying TB10.4 and HspX Antigens Provides Protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Mice and Guinea Pigs. Vaccines 2021, 9, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, J.; Shu, T.; Deng, W.; Zheng, Y.; Liao, M.; Ye, X.; Han, L.; He, P.; Zheng, X.; Li, T.; et al. Mucosal Priming with a Recombinant Influenza A Virus-Vectored Vaccine Elicits T-Cell and Antibody Responses to HIV-1 in Mice. J. Virol. 2021, 95, e00059-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Beicht, J.; Kubinski, M.; Zdora, I.; Puff, C.; Biermann, J.; Gerlach, T.; Baumgärtner, W.; Sutter, G.; Osterhaus, A.D.M.E.; Prajeeth, C.K.; et al. Induction of humoral and cell-mediated immunity to the NS1 protein of TBEV with recombinant Influenza virus and MVA affords partial protection against lethal TBEV infection in mice. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1177324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Pulkina, A.; Vasilyev, K.; Muzhikyan, A.; Sergeeva, M.; Romanovskaya-Romanko, E.; Shurygina, A.-P.; Shuklina, M.; Vasin, A.; Stukova, M.; Egorov, A. IgGκ Signal Peptide Enhances the Efficacy of an Influenza Vector Vaccine against Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wu, M.; Wang, P.; Wang, L.; Li, C.; Sheng, R.; Dong, H.; Fu, X.; Zhou, E.; Zhang, C.; Lu, T.; et al. Live attenuated influenza vaccine with low proportions of defective interfering particles elicits robust immunogenicity and cross-protection. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 9647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Jung, J.; Mundle, S.T.; Ustyugova, I.V.; Horton, A.P.; Boutz, D.R.; Pougatcheva, S.; Prabakaran, P.; McDaniel, J.R.; King, G.R.; Park, D.; et al. Influenza vaccination in the elderly boosts antibodies against conserved viral proteins and egg-produced glycans. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e148763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ziegler, E.; Borman, A.M.; Kirchweger, R.; Skern, T.; Kean, K.M. Foot-and-mouth disease virus Lb proteinase can stimulate rhinovirus and enterovirus IRES-driven translation and cleave several proteins of cellular and viral origin. J. Virol. 1995, 69, 3465–3474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Hunt, S.L.; Skern, T.; Liebig, H.D.; Kuechler, E.; Jackson, R.J. Rhinovirus 2A proteinase mediated stimulation of rhinovirus RNA translation is additive to the stimulation effected by cellular RNA binding proteins. Virus Res. 1999, 62, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wang, Q.; Pan, W.; Wang, S.; Pan, C.; Ning, H.; Huang, S.; Chiu, S.-H.; Chen, J.-L. Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP2 Suppresses Host Innate Immunity against Influenza A Virus by Regulating EGFR-Mediated Signaling. J. Virol. 2021, 95, e02001-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kuznetsova, I.; Arnold, T.; Aschacher, T.; Schwager, C.; Hegedus, B.; Garay, T.; Stukova, M.; Pisareva, M.; Pleschka, S.; Bergmann, M.; et al. Targeting an Oncolytic Influenza A Virus to Tumor Tissue by Elastase. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2017, 7, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Du, Y.; Xin, L.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, T.-H.; Wu, N.C.; Dai, L.; Gong, D.; Brar, G.; Shu, S.; Luo, J.; et al. Genome-wide identification of interferon-sensitive mutations enables influenza vaccine design. Science 2018, 359, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Du, Y.; Salehi-Rad, R.; Zhang, T.-H.; Crosson, W.P.; Abascal, J.; Chen, D.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, H.; Tseng, Y.-W.; Ma, X.; et al. Hyper-Interferon Sensitive Influenza Induces Adaptive Immune Responses and Overcomes Resistance to Anti-PD-1 in Murine Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2024, 12, 1765–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ji, D.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, J.; Zhang, B.; Ma, W.; Cheng, B.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Mu, Y.; Xu, H.; et al. An engineered influenza virus to deliver antigens for lung cancer vaccination. Nat. Biotechnol. 2024, 42, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kandasamy, M.; Gileadi, U.; Rijal, P.; Tan, T.K.; Lee, L.N.; Chen, J.; Prota, G.; Klenerman, P.; Townsend, A.; Cerundolo, V. Recombinant single-cycle influenza virus with exchangeable pseudotypes allows repeated immunization to augment anti-tumour immunity with immune checkpoint inhibitors. eLife 2023, 12, e76414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Xiao, M.; Xie, L.; Cao, G.; Lei, S.; Wang, P.; Wei, Z.; Luo, Y.; Fang, J.; Yang, X.; Huang, Q.; et al. CD4+ T-cell epitope-based heterologous prime-boost vaccination potentiates anti-tumor immunity and PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. J. Immunother. Cancer 2022, 10, e004022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Influenza virus life cycle and strategies for developing attenuated influenza viruses. The main steps of viral entry into host cells include attachment via hemagglutinin (HA) to sialic acid receptors, endocytosis into acidic endosomes triggering HA conformational change and release of viral ribonucleoproteins (vRNPs), nuclear entry of vRNPs and transcription/replication by the viral RNA polymerase complex, translation of viral mRNA by host ribosomes, post-translational regulation or modification of viral proteins to achieve functionality, and assembly and budding of progeny virions. The strategies for generating attenuated influenza viruses can be categorized into three levels: (1) attenuation achieved by non-structural protein 1 (NS1)/polymerase acidic X (PA-X) protein mutation or deletion, abrogating viral suppression of the host immune system; (2) inhibition at the transcriptional or translational level, mediated by genome-recoding to restrict mRNA translation efficiency, miRNA targeting to induce viral mRNA degradation, or the introduction of premature termination codons to limit protein synthesis; and (3) post-translational regulation of viral protein activity and stability, accomplished either by protein activation via small-molecule-dependent inteins or by targeted protein degradation using proteolysis-targeting chimera technology.
Figure 1. Influenza virus life cycle and strategies for developing attenuated influenza viruses. The main steps of viral entry into host cells include attachment via hemagglutinin (HA) to sialic acid receptors, endocytosis into acidic endosomes triggering HA conformational change and release of viral ribonucleoproteins (vRNPs), nuclear entry of vRNPs and transcription/replication by the viral RNA polymerase complex, translation of viral mRNA by host ribosomes, post-translational regulation or modification of viral proteins to achieve functionality, and assembly and budding of progeny virions. The strategies for generating attenuated influenza viruses can be categorized into three levels: (1) attenuation achieved by non-structural protein 1 (NS1)/polymerase acidic X (PA-X) protein mutation or deletion, abrogating viral suppression of the host immune system; (2) inhibition at the transcriptional or translational level, mediated by genome-recoding to restrict mRNA translation efficiency, miRNA targeting to induce viral mRNA degradation, or the introduction of premature termination codons to limit protein synthesis; and (3) post-translational regulation of viral protein activity and stability, accomplished either by protein activation via small-molecule-dependent inteins or by targeted protein degradation using proteolysis-targeting chimera technology.
Viruses 18 00715 g001
Table 1. Summary of attenuated influenza virus strains based on different attenuation strategies.
Table 1. Summary of attenuated influenza virus strains based on different attenuation strategies.
Attenuation StrategyParental StrainGene Modification MethodsInfection ModelAttenuated EffectReference
NS1 or PA-X mutantHA and NA derived from the A/Anhui/1/2013 (H7N9), six internal genes derived from A/Leningrad/17NS1 truncation (NS1-126)Mouse Mutated strain is completely nonpathogenicProkopenko et al., 2023 [63]
 HA, NA and M derived from the A/Vietnam/1203/04 (H5N1), five internal genes derived from IVR-116NS1-ORF deletionHuman No serious adverse events were observedNicolodi et al., 2019 [64]
 A/Hamburg/4/2009pdm09(H1N1)NS1 truncation (NS1-126), PA-X nullCell (MDCK)Parental strainViral titer of mutated strain is 100 times lower than parental strainAvanthay et al., 2023 [22]
    Mutated strain  
 NS1-truncated A/turkey/Oregon/71-delNS1 (H7N3) variantPB2-D309N, PA-X nullEggParental strainELD50/EID50 is 1Ghorbani et al., 2023 [23]
    Mutated strainELD50/EID50 is 0.49 
Genome recodingA/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1)Codon synonymous mutation modification in eight segmentsCell (A549)Parental strainViral titer of mutated strain is 100 times lower than parental strainFan et al., 2015 [32]
    Mutated strain  
 A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)Codon synonymous mutation modification in PR8-NA geneEggParental strainViral titer of mutated strain is 100 times lower than parental strainDong et al., 2023 [36]
    Mutated strain  
 A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)Synonymous addition of 126 CpGs into PB2 geneCell (A549)Parental strainViral titer of mutated strain is 100 times lower than parental strainSharp et al., 2023 [39]
    Mutated strain  
Small-Molecule-DependentA/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)4-HT-dependent inteinMouse or cellParental strainViral titer of mutated strain is 100 times lower than parental strainChen et al., 2023 [56]
    Mutated strain  
Premature termination codon virusesA/WSN/1933 (H1N1)Addition of stop codon into PA, PB2, PB1, NP geneMouseParental strainLD50 is 8 × 103 PFUSi et al., 2016 [48]
    Mutated strain109 PFU inoculation does not induce any clinical sign 
MicroRNA-targetingA/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)Insertion of the microRNA-93 target sequence into NP geneMouse LD50 of mutated strain is 100 times more than parental strainPerez et al., 2009 [44]
 A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1)Insertion of the microRNA-192 target sequence into NP geneMouseParental strain103 PFU induces 100% mortalityGao et al., 2020 [45]
    Mutated strainLD50 is 104 PFU 
 A/Puerto Rico/8-KV20/1934 (H1N1)Insertion of the artificial microRNAs into NA geneMouseParental strain MLD50 is 500 PFU Wen et al., 2022 [46]
    Mutated strain3 × 105 PFU is nonpathogenic 
Protein degradation-targeting chimeric virusesA/WSN/1933 (H1N1)Incorporation of PTD into the M1 geneCell (MDCK-TEVp) Compared with parental strain, the mutant virus exhibits a replication capacity in MDCK-TEVp cells that is reduced by more than 100-fold and is non-replicative in conventional cellsSi et al., 2022 [61]
 A/WSN/1933 (H1N1) MouseParental strainLD50 is 103 TCID50Zhang et al., 2025 [62]
    Mutated strain105 PFU is nonpathogenic 
Abbreviations: EID50, 50% of the chicken embryo infection dose; ELD50, 50% of the chicken embryo lethal dose; TCID50, 50% Tissue Culture Infectious Dose; PFU, plaque formation unit; LD50, 50% lethal dose; MLD50, 50% mouse lethal dose; IVR-116, a high-growth reassortant vaccine backbone strain recommended by the WHO. It possesses the HA and NA genes from A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1), the PB1 gene from A/Texas/1/77 (H3N2), and the remaining genes (PB2, PA, NP, M, NS) from A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (PR8).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, K.; Yang, G.; Xia, Y.; Ou, X. Synthetic Biology Strategies for the Development of Live Attenuated Influenza Viruses: Recent Advances and Applications. Viruses 2026, 18, 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18070715

AMA Style

Yang K, Yang G, Xia Y, Ou X. Synthetic Biology Strategies for the Development of Live Attenuated Influenza Viruses: Recent Advances and Applications. Viruses. 2026; 18(7):715. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18070715

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Kai, Guangtao Yang, Yunxin Xia, and Xia Ou. 2026. "Synthetic Biology Strategies for the Development of Live Attenuated Influenza Viruses: Recent Advances and Applications" Viruses 18, no. 7: 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18070715

APA Style

Yang, K., Yang, G., Xia, Y., & Ou, X. (2026). Synthetic Biology Strategies for the Development of Live Attenuated Influenza Viruses: Recent Advances and Applications. Viruses, 18(7), 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18070715

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop