Next Article in Journal
Association Between FOXP3 and OX40 Expression in Adult T-Cell Leukemia Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Three Years After COVID-19 Vaccination, Anti-Spike SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Concentration Decreases and Is Accompanied by Increasing Anti-Nucleocapsid Seropositivity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neutralizing Antibodies Against the Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses (PERVs)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Simultaneous ASFV and Haptoglobin Detection by Duplex qPCR Enables Pre-Viremia Diagnosis of African Swine Fever

by
Yun Bao
1,†,
Shimin Gao
1,†,
Shuang Li
2,
Yijie Liu
2,
Fei Gao
2,
Liwei Li
2,
Wu Tong
2,
Changlong Liu
2,
Yanjun Zhou
2 and
Yifeng Jiang
2,3,*
1
College of Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
2
Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 200241, China
3
Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2025, 17(11), 1444; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17111444
Submission received: 21 October 2025 / Revised: 28 October 2025 / Accepted: 29 October 2025 / Published: 30 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Porcine Viruses 2025)

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF), caused by African swine fever virus (ASFV), has inflicted severe economic losses on China’s pig industry. Existing ASFV nucleic acid detection methods struggle to identify infected pigs in the pre-viremic stage, especially for recently emerged recombinant ASFV strains that exhibit delayed clinical symptoms and prolonged virus shedding, posing great challenges to ASF prevention and control. To fit the problem, this study established a TaqMan duplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay targeting the ASFV p72 gene and porcine Hp gene for early diagnosis of ASFV infection. The qPCR reaction system (20 μL) and conditions were optimized and showed high sensitivity, with detection limits of 1.42 × 101 copies/μL for Hp and 2.23 × 101 copies/μL for ASFV, as well as excellent specificity and reproducibility. Serum cDNA samples from pigs infected with virulent or recombinant ASFV strains were tested, and the result showed that Hp was detectable as early as 1 day post-infection (DPI), however ASFV remained undetectable until 3DPI. Then cDNA samples from cohabitation infection were tested and 80% samples were Hp-positive, although ASFV test was negative.In conclusion, this duplex qPCR assay for simultaneous detection of Hp and ASFV enables pre-viremia diagnosis of ASF, providing a valuable tool for early screening of ASFV-infected pigs.

1. Introduction

African swine fever (ASF) has caused devastating economic losses to China’s pig industry, since it emerged in 2018 [1,2,3]. ASFV infections cause nearly 100% mortality among pigs, and there is no vaccine or drug that can effectively prevent and control ASF [4]. Currently, pig farms can rely on biosecurity measures to prevent and control ASF, especially through the early diagnosis of infected pigs to avoid large-scale infections. Pigs infected with the Georgia strain develop clinical symptoms, such as high fever, quickly, and pig farms can eliminate the infected pig through the “test-and-cull” method [4]. However, the recombinant strains which emerged recently cause delayed clinical symptoms, leading to a long period of virus shedding in infected pigs, before they were detected [5,6,7]. Most of the ASFV nucleic acid detection methods are difficult to identify in pigs in the early stage of infection that have not yet developed viremia. As a result, once the recombinant strain infection occurs, the pig farms need to conduct “test-and-cull” operations continuously, which not only increase costs but also make it difficult to fully control ASFV infection [8,9]. Therefore, a method that can detect infected pigs in the earlier stages of ASFV infection is urgently needed [10].
Haptoglobin (Hp) is an acidic glycoprotein found in the α2-globulin fraction of serum [11]. It is primarily synthesized and metabolized in the liver, and is widely distributed in the serum and other body fluids of mammals [12]. Furthermore, as an important acute-phase protein in pigs, Hp functions as a marker for inflammatory diseases and is involved in processes such as antibacterial activity and immune regulation [13]. As a nonspecific inflammatory biomarker with significant physiological activity, Hp exhibits a rapid concentration increase following pathological damage in animals within 24 to 48 h, and returns to normal quickly once tissue recovery is achieved [14]. Its serum concentration correlates with disease severity and prognosis, as evidenced by a 23.9-fold increases in porcine circovirus type 2 infections [15].

2. Materials and Methods

This study established a TaqMan dual-fluorescence quantitative PCR (qPCR) method targeting ASFV p72 gene and Hp gene for the rapid diagnosis of pigs infected by ASFV in the early stages. The standard plasmids for Hp (NM_214000.2) and ASFV p72 gene (OM966719.1) used in this study were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd. [16]. After measuring the concentration of the standard plasmids, the initial copy numbers were calculated as 1.42 × 1010 copies/μL for Hp and 2.23 × 1010 copies/μL for ASFV. Subsequently, the standard plasmids were diluted in a 10-fold to gradient eight dilution from 1.42 × 101 to 1.42 × 108 for Hp and 2.23 × 101 to 2.23 × 108 for ASFV, respectively, and reactions were performed using a LightCycler®96 Real-Time PCR System, manufactured by Roche (Basel, Switzerland). Primers and probes were designed based on the conserved sequences of Hp and ASFV p72 gene. For Hp detection, the primers and probe were designed as follows: Forward primer, 5′-GAAGTATGTCATGCTGCCGGTG-3′; Reverse primer, 5′-GAAGGTGTGCTCGTTCAGGATG-3′; Probe, 5′6-FAM-CAGTACTACGAAGGCAGCACCGTG-3′BHQ1; and the amplified fragment size was 122 bp. For ASFV detection, the primers and probe were designed as follows: Forward primer, 5′-GCTATTCCCTCAGTATCCATTCC-3′; Reverse primer, 5′-AAACGTGACTGGCGTACAA-3′; Probe, 5′-HEX-TCGGCGAGCGCTTTATCACCATAA-3′BHQ1; and the amplified fragment size was 113 bp. Subsequently, we optimized the qPCR reaction system: the concentrations of both primers and probes were diluted to 10 μmol/L. We selected 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 μL of primers, along with 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 μL of probes, and used three temperatures (56 °C, 58 °C, and 60 °C) as annealing temperatures for combinatorial testing.

3. Results

Based on factors such as cycle threshold (Ct value), fluorescence intensity, and reaction cost, the optimal reaction system and conditions were determined as follows: The 20-μL duplex qPCR system consisted of 10 μL QPS-101 THUNDERBIRD Probe qPCR Mix, 0.5 μL of each Hp primer, 0.6 μL of the Hp probe, 0.5 μL of each ASFV primer, 0.7 μL of the ASFV probe, 2 μL of test template, and nuclease-free water to make up a total volume of 20 μL. The fluorescent quantitative PCR conditions were set as follows: an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 s and annealing at 60 °C for 30 s. Standard curves were constructed by plotting the logarithm (base 10) of the initial copy number of the standard plasmids on the horizontal axis and the Ct value on the vertical axis. The detection limits for Hp and ASFV were 1.42 × 101 copies/μL and 2.23 × 101 copies/μL, respectively, with good linearity (Figure 1A,B). The optimized method was used to detect nucleic acids of common swine virus diseases, including Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), Porcine Circovirus Type 2 (PCV2), and Classical Swine Fever Virus (CSFV), as well as various acute-phase proteins such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and Transthyretin (TTR). The results demonstrated that this method exhibits high specificity and excellent reproducibility.
The cDNA samples (extracted from the serum of infected pigs) of the ASFV virulence (GZ2018, ON263123.1 and Pig/HLJ/18, MK333180.1) and recombinant strains (JS/LG/21, OQ504956) used for detection of Hp and ASFV were kindly provided by Professors Guihong Zhang and Dongming Zhao (Table 1). The results showed that for the virulence strain, Hp could be detected one day post-infection (DPI) (Figure 1C); however, ASFV could not be detected until 2DPI (Figure 1D), with only one sample from 2 DPI being positive (Table 1). For the recombinant strain, Hp was also detectable at 1 DPI (Figure 1E), whereas ASFV remained undetectable from 1 to 3 DPI (Figure 1F). Subsequently, this method was applied to detect cDNA samples collected from pigs either artificially or naturally infected with the recombinant ASFV strain, 6-9 days post-infection during the cohabitation challenge trial. The results showed that 80% of the samples in the cohabitation-infected group exhibited a significant increase in Hp, whereas none of the samples were detected as ASFV positive (Table 1). The test results are consistent with the background of the samples.

4. Discussion

African swine fever virus belongs to the genus Asfivirus within the family Asfarviridae. Clinically, it primarily causes symptoms in pigs such as high fever, loss of appetite, lethargy, weakness, hemorrhagic signs, and respiratory distress, with a mortality rate of up to 100% in susceptible pig populations [17,18]. Due to its severe impact, China has classified it as a Category I animal disease. In early 2021, a naturally recombinant strain of ASFV was isolated in China, and the emergence of recombinant strains has further complicated the prevention and control of ASF [19]. Pig farms use biosecurity measures to prevent and control African Swine Fever (ASF). They control the spread of the virus by detecting and culling pigs infected with the African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV). Most of the existing ASFV antigen detection methods are nucleic acid tests, which have high sensitivity. The sensitivity of the detection method we established is comparable to that of other methods. However, the difficulty in clinical prevention and control of ASF lies in how to identify infected pigs before viremia occurs, thereby controlling the spread of the virus through the “test-and-cull” method. In the early stages of disease infection, the concentration of Hp can increase dramatically even before viremia, this makes HP a characteristic marker of early infection [20]. Our research results showed that Hp can be detected in cDNA samples as early as 1DPI, 24 to 48 h earlier than the ASFV nucleic acid detection method, more over Hp method can detect more potentially infected pigs than the ASFV nucleic acid detection method, this indicates that Hp can serve as an indicator for ASFV infection.
Although Hp has the potential to indicate African swine fever virus (ASFV) infection, it should be noted that as an acute-phase protein, infections caused by other viruses (such as porcine circovirus type 2 and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus) or bacteria can also lead to an increase in Hp concentration [12,21,22,23]. Therefore, in clinical practice, the determination of ASFV infection using the Hp index must be combined with the actual situation and the results of ASFV nucleic acid detection. For example, when the health status of the pig herd is stable, if the surrounding ASF epidemic is severe, this method can be used as an early warning for ASFV infection; in emergency situations where ASFV infection occurs in the pig herd, this method can also be used to screen and cull potentially infected pigs, so as to reduce possible economic losses.
In summary, this study has established a dual-fluorescence quantitative PCR method for Hp and ASFV, which has good sensitivity and specificity. The method could be used for early screening of ASFV-infected pigs under specific conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.J. and S.G.; methodology, Y.J., F.G., L.L. and W.T.; software, Y.J. and S.L.; validation, Y.B. and Y.L.; formal analysis, Y.B., S.L. and C.L.; investigation, Y.J.; resources, Y.Z. and Y.J.; data curation, S.G., S.L. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.B.; writing—review and editing, Y.J.; visualization, W.T. and Y.B.; supervision, Y.J. and S.G.; project administration, C.L.; funding acquisition, Y.J. and Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (23ZR1476800) and Major Tasks of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ZDRW202409-2).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All the cDNA samples used in the article were donated by others groups, this study does not involve animal experiment content and therefore we do not provide an ethical certification.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We extend our thanks to Guihong Zhang and Dongming Zhao for providing all the sera cDNA samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shi, K.; Qian, X.; Shi, Y.; Wei, H.; Pan, Y.; Long, F.; Zhou, Q.; Mo, S.; Hu, L.; Li, Z. A triplex crystal digital PCR for the detection of genotypes I and II African swine fever virus. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1351596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, N.; Zhao, D.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, M.; Gao, Y.; Li, F.; Wang, J.; Bu, Z.; Rao, Z.; et al. Architecture of African swine fever virus and implications for viral assembly. Science 2019, 366, 640–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhao, D.; Liu, R.; Zhang, X.; Li, F.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; et al. Replication and virulence in pigs of the first African swine fever virus isolated in China. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2019, 8, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, M.; Zheng, H. Insights and progress on epidemic characteristics, pathogenesis, and preventive measures of African swine fever virus: A review. Virulence 2025, 16, 2457949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sun, E.; Huang, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Shen, D.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Huo, H.; Wang, W.; Huangfu, H.; et al. Genotype I African swine fever viruses emerged in domestic pigs in China and caused chronic infection. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2021, 10, 2183–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sun, E.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; He, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, W.; Huang, L.; Xi, F.; Huangfu, H.; et al. Emergence and prevalence of naturally occurring lower virulent African swine fever viruses in domestic pigs in China in 2020. Sci. China Life Sci. 2021, 64, 752–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, D.; Sun, E.; Huang, L.; Ding, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Shen, D.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, T.; et al. Highly lethal genotype I and II recombinant African swine fever viruses detected in pigs. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ding, L.L.; Ren, T.; Huang, L.Y.; Weldu, T.; Zhu, Y.M.; Li, F.; Sun, E.C.; Bu, Z.G.; Zhao, D.M. Developing a duplex ARMS-qPCR method to differentiate genotype I and II African swine fever viruses based on their B646L genes. J. Integr. Agric. 2023, 22, 1603–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, W.; Zhang, Z.J.; Tesfagaber, W.; Zhang, J.W.; Li, F.; Sun, E.C.; Tang, L.J.; Bu, Z.G.; Zhu, Y.M.; Zhao, D.M. Establishment of an indirect immunofluorescence assay for the detection of African swine fever virus antibodies. J. Integr. Agric. 2024, 23, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Auer, A.; Cattoli, G.; Padungtod, P.; Lamien, C.E.; Oh, Y.; Jayme, S.; Rozstalnyy, A. Challenges in the Application of African Swine Fever Vaccines in Asia. Animals 2024, 14, 2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zeller, L.; Tyrrell, P.N.; Wang, S.; Fischer, N.; Haas, J.P.; Hügle, B. α2-fraction and haptoglobin as biomarkers for disease activity in oligo- and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr. Rheumatol. Online J. 2022, 20, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kohansal-Nodehi, M.; Swiatek-de Lange, M.; Tabarés, G.; Busskamp, H. Haptoglobin polymorphism affects its N-glycosylation pattern in serum. J. Mass. Spectrom. Adv. Clin. Lab. 2022, 25, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pérez-Pérez, L.; Carvajal, A.; Puente, H.; Peres Rubio, C.; Cerón, J.J.; Rubio, P.; Argüello, H. New insights into swine dysentery: Faecal shedding, macro and microscopic lesions and biomarkers in early and acute stages of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae infection. Porc. Health Manag. 2024, 10, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Grantz, J.M.; Thirumalaikumar, V.P.; Jannasch, A.H.; Andolino, C.; Taechachokevivat, N.; Avila-Granados, L.M.; Neves, R.C. The platelet and plasma proteome and targeted lipidome in postpartum dairy cows with elevated systemic inflammation. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 31240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Parra, M.D.; Fuentes, P.; Tecles, F.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; Martínez, J.S.; Muñoz, A.; Cerón, J.J. Porcine acute phase protein concentrations in different diseases in field conditions. J. Vet. Med. B Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health 2006, 53, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Miao, C.; Yang, S.; Shao, J.; Zhou, G.; Ma, Y.; Wen, S.; Hou, Z.; Peng, D.; Guo, H.; Liu, W.; et al. Identification of p72 epitopes of African swine fever virus and preliminary application. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1126794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Duan, X.; Ru, Y.; Yang, W.; Ren, J.; Hao, R.; Qin, X.; Li, D.; Zheng, H. Research progress on the proteins involved in African swine fever virus infection and replication. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 947180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, Y.; Yuan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Luan, J.; Wang, H. Progress in African Swine Fever Vector Vaccine Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Borca, M.V.; Ramirez-Medina, E.; Silva, E.; Rai, A.; Espinoza, N.; Velazquez-Salinas, L.; Gladue, D.P. ASF Vaccine Candidate ASFV-G-∆I177L Does Not Exhibit Residual Virulence in Long-Term Clinical Studies. Pathogens 2023, 12, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Franco-Martínez, L.; Beer, M.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; García-Manzanilla, E.; Blome, S.; Carrau, T. Impact of ASFV Detergent Inactivation on Biomarkers in Serum and Saliva Samples. Pathogens 2022, 11, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Silva, C.A.; Callegari, M.A.; Dias, C.P.; de Souza, K.L.; Romano, G.S.; Hernig, L.F.; Lippke, R.T.; Jansen, R.; Leite, F.L.; Filipe, F.; et al. Well-Being and Performance of Nursery Pigs Subjected to Different Commercial Vaccines Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis. Vaccines 2024, 12, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sorensen, N.S.; Tegtmeier, C.; Andresen, L.O.; Piñeiro, M.; Toussaint, M.J.; Campbell, F.M.; Lampreave, F.; Heegaard, P.M. The porcine acute phase protein response to acute clinical and subclinical experimental infection with Streptococcus suis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2006, 113, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tor, M.; Fraile, L.; Vilaro, F.; Pena, R.N. Multiplex Assay to Determine Acute Phase Proteins in Modified Live PRRSV Vaccinated Pigs. J. Proteome Res. 2024, 23, 3515–3523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Establishment and evaluation of a dual TaqMan qPCR assay for African Swine Fever Virus and Haptoglobin. (A): Duplex fluorescent quantitative PCR amplification curve. Dashed lines represent real-time fluorescence amplification curves of ASFV standard samples from 2.23 × 101–2.23 × 108 copies; solid lines represent real-time fluorescence amplification curves of Hp standard samples from 1.42 × 101–1.42 × 108 copies; (B): Standard curve of the duplex fluorescent quantitative PCR method. The dual qPCR assay was conducted using the established method to test samples collected at 1–3 DPI from pigs infected with either the virulent or recombinant ASFV strain; (C): Hp detection results in virulent-strain-infected group (days 1–3); (D): ASFV detection results in virulent-strain-infected group (days 1–3); (E): Hp detection results in recombinant-strain-infected group (days 1–3); (F): ASFV detection results in recombinant-strain-infected group (days 1–3). Negative controls consisted of the serum cDNA from healthy pigs, positive controls were the cDNA of wild-type ASFV and recombinant strain, and blank controls were dd H2O. Time point with single “ns” above the black line means there was no significant difference among the groups. ** means p < 0.01, *** means p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Establishment and evaluation of a dual TaqMan qPCR assay for African Swine Fever Virus and Haptoglobin. (A): Duplex fluorescent quantitative PCR amplification curve. Dashed lines represent real-time fluorescence amplification curves of ASFV standard samples from 2.23 × 101–2.23 × 108 copies; solid lines represent real-time fluorescence amplification curves of Hp standard samples from 1.42 × 101–1.42 × 108 copies; (B): Standard curve of the duplex fluorescent quantitative PCR method. The dual qPCR assay was conducted using the established method to test samples collected at 1–3 DPI from pigs infected with either the virulent or recombinant ASFV strain; (C): Hp detection results in virulent-strain-infected group (days 1–3); (D): ASFV detection results in virulent-strain-infected group (days 1–3); (E): Hp detection results in recombinant-strain-infected group (days 1–3); (F): ASFV detection results in recombinant-strain-infected group (days 1–3). Negative controls consisted of the serum cDNA from healthy pigs, positive controls were the cDNA of wild-type ASFV and recombinant strain, and blank controls were dd H2O. Time point with single “ns” above the black line means there was no significant difference among the groups. ** means p < 0.01, *** means p < 0.001.
Viruses 17 01444 g001
Table 1. Results of double fluorescence quantitative PCR detection.
Table 1. Results of double fluorescence quantitative PCR detection.
Virulence StrainRecombinant StrainArtificial InfectionCohabitation Natural Infection
1DPI2DPI3DPI1DPI2DPI3DPI
Hp6/614/146/66/66/66/64/416/20
ASFV0/61/143/60/60/60/64/40/20
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bao, Y.; Gao, S.; Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Gao, F.; Li, L.; Tong, W.; Liu, C.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, Y. Simultaneous ASFV and Haptoglobin Detection by Duplex qPCR Enables Pre-Viremia Diagnosis of African Swine Fever. Viruses 2025, 17, 1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17111444

AMA Style

Bao Y, Gao S, Li S, Liu Y, Gao F, Li L, Tong W, Liu C, Zhou Y, Jiang Y. Simultaneous ASFV and Haptoglobin Detection by Duplex qPCR Enables Pre-Viremia Diagnosis of African Swine Fever. Viruses. 2025; 17(11):1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17111444

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bao, Yun, Shimin Gao, Shuang Li, Yijie Liu, Fei Gao, Liwei Li, Wu Tong, Changlong Liu, Yanjun Zhou, and Yifeng Jiang. 2025. "Simultaneous ASFV and Haptoglobin Detection by Duplex qPCR Enables Pre-Viremia Diagnosis of African Swine Fever" Viruses 17, no. 11: 1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17111444

APA Style

Bao, Y., Gao, S., Li, S., Liu, Y., Gao, F., Li, L., Tong, W., Liu, C., Zhou, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2025). Simultaneous ASFV and Haptoglobin Detection by Duplex qPCR Enables Pre-Viremia Diagnosis of African Swine Fever. Viruses, 17(11), 1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17111444

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop