Next Article in Journal
Intravenous Infection of Small Ruminants Suggests a Goat-Restricted Host Tropism and Weak Humoral Immune Response for an Atypical Bluetongue Virus Isolate
Next Article in Special Issue
Cardiac Arrhythmias in Post-COVID Syndrome: Prevalence, Pathology, Diagnosis, and Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Equine Arteritis Virus in Monocytic Cells Suppresses Differentiation and Function of Dendritic Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Report of German Nationwide Inpatient Data on the Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Including Annual Direct Healthcare Costs
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Subjective and Objective Cognitive Impairments in Non-Hospitalized Persons 9 Months after SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Viruses 2023, 15(1), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15010256
by Inge Kirchberger 1,2,*, Daniela Peilstöcker 1, Tobias D. Warm 3, Jakob Linseisen 1,2, Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr 3, Christine Meisinger 1 and Yvonne Goßlau 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Viruses 2023, 15(1), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15010256
Submission received: 7 December 2022 / Revised: 11 January 2023 / Accepted: 13 January 2023 / Published: 16 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Post-COVID Syndrome)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please find the attachment file for comments details. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for the opportunity to review the manuscript “Post-COVID-19 subjective and objective cognitive impairments in persons after outpatient treatment” (viruses-2116024).

 

The authors investigate the frequency, severity and associated factors of objective and self-reported cognitive difficulties post COVID-19, using data from a prospective observational study.

The objectives and the rationale of the study are clearly stated.

However, the authors should work out more clearly why patients with mild courses sought outpatient care (preferably in the introduction).

 

The interpretation of results and study conclusions are supported by the data.

The Authors also clearly emphasized the strengths of their study and clearly stated the limitations.

Many assessment parameters are used. For the reader would therefore be advantageous: if the central results were summarized in a figure (in results section).

In the conclusion, implications that can be derived from the study should be presented in more detail.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

NO

Back to TopTop