Next Article in Journal
The Role of Phylogenetics in Discerning HIV-1 Mixing among Vulnerable Populations and Geographic Regions in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Detection of Q129H Immune Escape Mutation in Apparently Healthy Hepatitis B Virus Carriers in Southwestern Nigeria
Previous Article in Journal
Relevance of Human Papillomaviruses in Head and Neck Cancer—What Remains in 2021 from a Clinician’s Point of View?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Review of Lambda Interferons in Hepatitis B Virus Infection: Outcomes and Therapeutic Strategies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/v13061169
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Novel Antivirals in Clinical Development for Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

by
Lung-Yi Mak
1,2,
Wai-Kay Seto
1,2 and
Man-Fung Yuen
1,2,*
1
Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road 102, Hong Kong, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2021, 13(6), 1169; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061169
Submission received: 1 May 2021 / Revised: 6 June 2021 / Accepted: 15 June 2021 / Published: 18 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Management of Hepatitis B and towards Achieving a HBV Cure)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Globally, chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection is one of the leading causes of liver failure, decompensated cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Existing antiviral therapy can suppress viral replication but not fully eradicate the virus nor the risk of liver-related complications. Novel treatments targeting alternative steps of the viral cycle or to intensify/restore the host’s immunity are being developed. We discuss novel drugs that have already entered clinical phases of development. Agents that interfere with specific steps of HBV replication include RNA interference, core protein allosteric modulation, and inhibition of viral entry or viral protein excretion (NAPs and STOPS). Agents that target the host’s immunity include toll-like receptor agonists, therapeutic vaccines, immune checkpoint modulators, soluble T-cell receptors, and monoclonal antibodies. Most have demonstrated favorable results in suppression of viral proteins and genomic materials (i.e., HBV DNA and/or pre-genomic RNA), and/or evidence on host-immunity restoration including cytokine responses and T-cell activation. Given the abundant clinical experience and real-world safety data with the currently existing therapy, any novel agent for CHB should be accompanied by convincing safety data. Combination therapy of nucleos(t)ide analogue, a novel virus-directing agent, and/or an immunomodulatory agent will be the likely approach to optimize the chance of a functional cure in CHB.

1. Introduction

Chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB) affects 292 million people globally [1], and is a major risk factor of liver-related diseases including liver failure, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); and mortality. Many patients with CHB require antiviral therapy to suppress viral replication in order to reduce the risk of liver-related complications. Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) and pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) are the currently available treatment options in CHB. These agents, especially NAs, are highly effective in achieving normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA suppression [2,3], and risk reduction in HCC and mortality [4,5,6]. Due to the high rate of virological relapse post-NA cessation in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB [7,8], most NA-treated patients require lifelong therapy, which creates issues of cost, adherence, and risks of therapy-related adverse events [9]. Moreover, the risk of liver-related complications is not entirely eliminated despite long-term therapy. In view of these concerns, the goals of therapy have been redefined and new treatment approaches are being developed, which will be reviewed in the following sections.

2. Functional Cure: The Preferred Treatment Endpoint

Even with wide availability of NAs that are potent and safe, there is a pressing need for additional treatment due to the fact that the existing therapy cannot eliminate the residual risks of liver-related complications and the indefinite duration of long-term antivirals. The goal of developing novel therapies is to promote a cure in patients with CHB, which refers to elimination of the virus from the host, following which antiviral therapy can be stopped; i.e., finite therapy, with minimal risks of virological relapse and ongoing liver damage, which eventually will reduce the risk of cirrhosis and HCC. Table 1 shows the preferred therapeutic endpoints in CHB. Partial cure refers to sustained virological suppression after stopping NA, which is a better treatment endpoint compared to virological suppression with long-term NA, as patients can remain drug-free if it is achieved. Functional cure is a superior treatment endpoint to partial cure, which refers to sustained seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) with or without seroconversion of antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs). NA has been shown to reduce intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) from 7.28 to 0.57 copies/cell upon 1 year of treatment, and even below detection limit upon ≥6 years of NA treatment, although expression of HBsAg was not completely suppressed [10]. It is believed that with time and appropriate therapeutic strategy, elimination of the cccDNA pool, i.e., complete cure, will become feasible. Due to the existence of integrated HBV DNA, a sterilizing cure is clearly impossible at present and is not expected to be achievable within a short period of time. Therefore, functional cure is deemed an achievable goal for the time being, among the few therapeutic endpoints, and should this be the primary endpoint; while partial cure is regarded as an intermediate goal for phase 3 trials in CHB [11].
Achieving a functional cure is associated with better clinical outcomes. Firstly, antiviral treatment can be safely stopped (except in patients with cirrhosis with detectable DNA) with a low risk of HBsAg seroreversion or virological rebound [12,13]. Secondly, patients who achieve a functional cure, especially if onset of HBsAg seroclearance is below age of 50 years old, are at a significantly lower risk of HCC [14,15,16]. Thirdly, liver fibrosis will regress and the risks of liver decompensation, of need for liver transplantation, and of death are significantly lowered in patients who have achieved functional cure [17,18,19]. In view of the clear evidence of benefits brought by functional cures, and the fact that achieving HBsAg seroclearance is a rare event with the current therapy (around 1–2% per year), novel therapies are aimed at improving the chance of achieving a functional cure, or at least achieving a partial cure in patients expected to be on NA for an indefinite duration.

3. Novel Therapeutic Approaches

Novel therapeutic approaches aim to achieve sustained viral suppression and restoration of anti-HBV immunity through a finite duration of therapy [20,21]. They can be divided into two types: inhibition of alternative steps of viral replication (i.e., virus-directing agents) and direct enhancement of host immunity (immunomodulatory agents). The two approaches are closely intercalated, as HBV itself plays a major role in the immunopathogenesis of CHB. In neonatal infection, the HBV antigens behave as neo-self-antigens and elicit tolerance as opposed to activation of HBV-specific T cells, which will lead to clonal deletion or clonal downregulation of high-affinity T-cell clones that are specific to all structural and non-structural HBV antigens (HBs, HBe/HBc, Pol, and X) [22]. Without effective antiviral functions, the virus persists in the body, and chronic exposure to the viral proteins results in impaired activation of toll-like receptor pathways [23] and lymphocyte dysfunction [24] through mechanisms including clonal anergy, clonal ignorance, T-regulatory activity, and immune checkpoints [25]. In contrast to patients with self-limiting acute HBV infection, CHB patients do not have strong, multiple, and sustained cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses [26,27]. Enhanced and sustained expressions of different types of inhibitory markers on CD8+T cells have been reported, which include programmed cell-death protein-1 (PD-1), T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain-containing 3 (TIM-3), cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), and CD244 [28,29]. In CHB, B lymphocytes, albeit with static numbers in the peripheral blood, are functionally deficient and exhibit atypical phenotypes (CD21- CD27-) with enhanced PD-1 expression, resulting in impaired production of neutralizing antibodies [30]. HBsAg also enhances regulatory T-cell [Treg (CD4+CD25+FoxP3+)] and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) activity [31,32]. These mechanisms (i.e., chronic viral antigen exposure and the resultant numerical and/or functional depletion of cells in both innate and adaptive immune systems) have been proposed to contribute to the HBV chronicity, i.e., persistence of HBV beyond 6 months without development of polyclonal HBV-specific lymphocytes [2]. It is generally accepted that HBsAg seroclearance is the result of regaining immunologic control of HBV from the immune exhaustion exerted by the huge numbers of viral proteins. Therefore, with the help of virus-directing agents to reduce the viral proteins, the host immunity can be restored and, thus, in turn the virus can be controlled. On the other hand, immunomodulatory agents directly suppress viral replication via enhancement of cellular effector functions (Figure 1). In the following sections, only agents that are already in the clinical phases of development will be discussed. As mentioned above, a functional cure is the desirable endpoint and should be achieved in ≥30% of patients for drugs tested in phase 3 trials [11]. For early-phase development, i.e., phase 1 and 2 trials, no recommendations or guidance have been proposed but are usually substituted by achieving a pre-defined HBsAg level or magnitude of HBsAg decline. This is likely to be related to the fact that HBsAg seroclearance is preceded by a low HBsAg level [33,34], and only agents that demonstrate potent effect in suppression of HBsAg in early-phase trials will show potential to achieve the desirable endpoint for phase 3 trials. Therefore, HBsAg decline is the most frequently assessed parameter for assessing the efficacy of anti-HBV drugs in the trials discussed below. In addition to exploring whether novel agents are able to achieve a higher rate of functional cure, it would be highly appreciable if novel agents could also have a more long-term effect on cccDNA reduction.

3.1. Virus-Directing Agents

The replication of HBV involves many different steps, including viral entry, transcription, translation, encapsidation, DNA synthesis, and virion export. These are the target sites for anti-HBV drugs to act on — competing for the sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP), interference of RNA transcription, inhibition of functional capsid formation/encapsidation, DNA synthesis, and viral protein export. Table 2 summarizes the virus-directing agents for CHB that are currently in clinical phases of development.

3.1.1. Inhibition of Viral Entry

Sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) is a hepatic bile acid cotransporter and is the receptor for HBV entry, which uses its surface lipopeptide pre-S1 for docking to the hepatocyte via NTCP [35]. Myrcludex B, now named Bulevertide, is a lipomyristolated peptide containing 47 amino acids of the pre-S1 domain of the HBV large surface protein that competes with natural HBsAg for NTCP binding and thereby inhibits viral entry. This drug has been approved for medical use in the European Union in July 2020 for patients with chronic hepatitis B/D coinfection. HBV DNA was significantly reduced compared to PEG-IFN monotherapy after 24 weeks of combination therapy with Myrcludex B with PEG-IFN in patients with hepatitis B/D coinfection. Although HBsAg reduction was not significantly different between the two treatment arms initially, continuation of combination therapy until 48 weeks was associated with a higher proportion of patients achieving HBsAg reduction >1 log IU/mL and/or HBsAg negativity compared to PEG-IFN monotherapy [36]. Myrcludex B needs to be administered subcutaneously, and is in general well-tolerated. Higher doses of Myrcludex B (IC50 47 nM) would affect bile acid transportation and there was once a concern that it would lead to increased risks of adverse reactions related to bile acid accumulation. Fortunately, effective viral entry inhibition can be achieved at much lower doses (IC50 80 pM, i.e., 500 folds lower than the dose that would affect the bile acid metabolism) [37], thus theoretically related adverse events, e.g., pruritus or diarrhea, were not observed at the therapeutic doses used for CHB patients in the clinical trials [38]. CRV431 is a cyclophilin inhibitor that inhibits HBV entry without interfering with the NTCP transporter [39]. When given orally in transgenic mice, CRV431 led to a significant reduction in liver HBV DNA levels and serum HBsAg level without toxicities [40]. The exact anti-HBV mechanisms remain unknown but are believed to be the neutralizing effect on the peptidyl–prolyl isomerase activity resulting in interference with protein unfolding. CRV431 is currently undergoing phase 1 study.

3.1.2. Interference of RNA

RNA interference (RNAi) is a naturally occurring and biologically conserved mechanism for specific post-transcriptional gene silencing [41,42]. RNAi can directly target HBV transcripts and induce degradation, thereby leading to gene silencing. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are structurally duplex (ds) RNA strands with guide and passenger RNA strands of 23 nucleotide and 21 nucleotides, respectively. After association with the Argonaute (AGO)-RNA-induced silencing complex, the passenger strand is removed and the guide strand leads the AGO to the target complementary mRNA and induces mRNA cleavage [43]. As siRNAs cannot enter cells by themselves, early siRNAs developed were conjugated with N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), which preferentially binds to asialoglycoprotein, a receptor enriched in hepatocytes, in order to enhance hepatic uptake of the target molecule as well as to decrease off-target engagement. Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are another class of gene silencers, which are structurally single DNA strands of 8 to 10 nucleotides modified to resist nucleases, which induces cleavage of the target HBV RNAs inside the nucleus and cytoplasm via RNase H1. ASOs by themselves can be taken up by all cells including hepatocytes, while the GaiNAc-conjugation improves exposure by about 10-folds [44]. Locked nucleic acid (LNA) is a type of chemical modification of the ribose sugar, which is another strategy to enhance delivery of the oligonucleotide to target binding [45,46]. GaINAc-conjugated LNA-single-stranded oligonucleotide resulted in a rapid and long-lasting reduction of HBsAg in the AAV–HBV mouse model [47]. The host RNA polymerase II uses cccDNA as a template, which contains four open reading frames (ORF) for transcribing viral RNAs that encode precore/core, polymerase, surface, and X protein using a common 3’ end. This characteristic is advantageous for RNAi therapy, because all the four viral transcripts from cccDNA and integrated DNA can be degraded using a single-target RNAi. Many RNAi therapies for CHB are currently evaluated in phase 2 clinical trials.
Most siRNAs are given at monthly doses and achieve potent and robust on-treatment HBsAg responses. JNJ-3989 [48], VIR-2218 [49], RG-6346 [50], and AB-729 [51] each led to >1 log HBsAg reduction in 85–92% subjects, and the target of nadir HBsAg < 100 IU/mL was achieved in >50% subjects. Moreover, durable post-treatment HBsAg suppression was also demonstrated after finite doses of JNJ-3989 and RG-6346. In the open-label extension cohort of the phase 1b study that involved eight CHB patients who received 4–9 weekly doses of ARC-520 (a first-in-class siRNA that was later stopped development due to death in non-human primates), HBsAg loss was seen in some patients after using multiple doses [52].
ISIS505358/GSK3228836 (GSK836) is a type of non-GaiNAc-conjugated ASO. GSK836 given subcutaneously on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, and 22 led to significant reductions in HBsAg, with bigger magnitudes of decline in NA-treated patients (2.51 logs) compared to NA-naïve patients (1.56 logs). Moreover, 4 out of 16 patients had transient HBsAg loss during dosing, and prolonged HBsAg loss was observed in one NA-naïve patient and one NA-treated patient after dosing of GSK836 (from day 23 to day 126 and from day 36 to day 113, respectively) [53]. ALT elevations were observed after profound suppression in HBV antigen load without dose – response relationships with RNAi dosing, which may suggest immune restoration, but more studies are required to prove this hypothesis.

3.1.3. Inhibition of Functional Capsid Assembly or Encapsidation

The core protein is essential for capsid formation, encapsidation, and reverse transcription of pre-genomic RNA, virion formation, and cccDNA amplification. Core protein allosteric modulators (CpAMs) target the step of capsid formation by either forming aberrant unstable capsids (class 1) or empty capsids (class 2). Apart from reduction in the formation of mature virions, these dysfunctional capsids would also impair the nuclear recycling of rcDNA-containing nucleocapsids for cccDNA pool replenishment and epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in cccDNA transcription [54].
RO7049389 (also known as RG7907), a class 1 CpAM, was given to treatment-naïve CHB patients at daily or twice-daily oral dosing for 4 weeks, which led to median serum DNA reduction of 2.66–3.2 logs and rebound back to the baseline level after the dosing period. No significant changes were observed in the HBsAg levels [55].
GLS4, a class 1 CpAM, was coupled with ritonavir and compared with ETV monotherapy in the phase 2 trial. No patients in the ETV group achieved ≥1.5 log HBsAg decline at week 24 compared to 12.5% patients in the GLS4/ritonavir group. In addition, GLS4/ritonavir was more effective than ETV in suppression of HBV RNA (3.53 vs. 0.73 logs, respectively) and HBcrAg (1.32 vs. 0.65 logs, respectively) in previously treatment-naïve patients at week 24 [56].
Most CpAMs in development can be administered orally and are used in combination with NAs (Table 2). JNJ-6379, a class 2 CpAM, was used in combination with NA in the phase 2 trial. While JNJ-6379 + NA was effective in suppression of HBV DNA and RNA, the degree of HBsAg reduction was relatively modest (0.4 logs in HBeAg-positive treatment-naïve patients) at week 24 [57]. Six out of 31 patients had self-limiting grade 2–4 ALT elevation without derangement of coagulation profile or bilirubin, which required no treatment dose change or interruption. ABI-H0731 (Vebicorvir), a class 2 CpAM, when combined with NAs, demonstrated quicker and bigger reductions in HBV DNA and HBV RNA when compared with NA alone. In the open label extension study, 26 HBeAg-positive and 43 HBeAg-negative viral-suppressed CHB patients received Vebicorvir + NA for 76 weeks (up to 148 weeks). Twenty-three and 18 subjects, respectively, met the stopping criteria, which was defined as HBV total nucleic acids <20 IU/mL and HBeAg negative or HBeAg ≤ 5 IU/mL for ≥6 months prior to week 76. Upon cessation of therapy, 100% of them had virological relapse and none achieved HBsAg seroclearance [58]. Although Vebicorvir was well-tolerated [59], the data precludes the potential development of Vebicorvir as a finite duration of therapy. Therefore, it will not enter phase 3 clinical trial based on the developing company’s decision in February 2021 to redirect the resources to more potent next-generation CpAMs.
ALG-000184 (prodrug of ALG-001075) is another class 2 CpAM that has demonstrated 10- to 80- folds stronger antiviral activity at HBV DNA suppression compared to other CpAMs currently in clinical development in cell line models [60]. ALG-001075 demonstrated broad antiviral activity against HBV genotypes A to J, and antiviral activity was retained against most known NA resistance mutations and CpAM resistance mutations F23Y, I105F, I105T, T109M, Y118F, and T128I with only 0.5- to 3.0- fold shifts, except T33N that led to 28-fold loss of activity [60]. ALG-000184 is administered orally and is currently undergoing phase 1 clinical trial.

3.1.4. Inhibition of Viral Protein Export

Nucleic acid polymers (NAPs) prevent release of HBsAg subviral particles from infected hepatocytes. The mechanism of action was investigated in a cell-based assay using human HepG2.2.15 cells. Following endosomal release, NAPs destabilize subviral particle assembly and secretion (but not Dane particles) through interaction with some uncharacterized host protein. Intracellular HBsAg accumulation is prevented by proteosomal and lysosomal degradation, which is enhanced by NAPs. Dane particles and other viral markers such as HBeAg secretion are not affected because their assembly and secretion pathways are via the multivesicular body pathway but not the endoplasmic-reticulum-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) pathway for subviral particles [61,62].
REP 2139 or REP 2165 are NAPs and were investigated in combination with PEG-IFN and NA. In the phase 2 study, combination therapy with REP 2139/REP 2165 + TDF + PEG-IFN for 24 weeks was effective in causing HBsAg < 0.05 IU/mL (60% patients), with 35% patients achieving HBsAg seroclearance [63].
S-antigen Transport-inhibiting Oligonucleotide Polymers (STOPS) share structural similarities with NAPs with stronger in vitro potency. In the preclinical studies using cell line models, ALG-010133 (STOPS) was 30- to 180-folds more potent than REP 2139 (NAP) in inhibition of HBsAg release [64]. The intracellular HBsAg was reduced upon STOPS treatment, indicating that STOPS do not simply trap HBsAg inside the cells, and the cell viability was not compromised. In addition, STOPS demonstrated pan-genotypic activity (A-D) as well as 100-fold better potency in inhibition of HBsAg production from the integrated HBV genome in cell line models [64]. ALG-010133 is currently undergoing phase 1 clinical trial. For both NAPs and STOPS, the reduction in viral antigen secretion will reduce antigen presentation on hepatocytes and theoretically should restore the function of exhausted T cells and B cells [65]. However, it is believed that exhausted T cells acquired epigenetically distinct profiles from effector T cells [66], and this may not be entirely restorable by simply reducing antigen presentation. Therefore, additional therapy following NAPs/STOPS may be needed to prime HBV-specific T cells to maximize the effect on immune restoration.

3.1.5. Farnesoid X Receptor Agonist

EYP001 is an orally bioavailable second-generation non-bile acid farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist. The FXR nuclear receptor is highly expressed in the liver and intestine. There are two FXR response elements located in the HBV Enhancer II and core promoter region, which stimulate HBV pregenomic RNA synthesis and viral replication [67]. Modulation of FXR receptor activity by ligands alters HBV replication. In vivo and in vitro studies showed that treatment with FXR agonist inhibited the FXR proviral effect on cccDNA and the HBx-dependent inhibition of pregenomic RNA and precure RNA transcription and DNA secretion [68]. In the phase 1 study, EYP001 was shown to engage FXR as evidenced by fibroblast growth factor 19, the total bile acid precursor C4, and total bile acid changes, and led to HBsAg reduction of 0.1 log after 4 weeks of 400 mg daily dosing [69]. EYP001 is currently undergoing phase 2 clinical trial.

3.2. Enhancement of Host Immunity

As mentioned above, chronic viral antigen exposure weakens HBV-specific immunity and leads to virus-specific T-cell anergy, leading to immune exhaustion in the host. Novel therapies aiming to restore or enhance the host immunity are being actively developed (Table 2).
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) that upon activation would stimulate various leukocytes in both the innate and adaptive system. GS-9620 (Vesatolimod) is a TLR7 agonist. In the phase 2 double-blind placebo-controlled trial, GS-9620 induced ≥2-fold expression of the interferon-stimulated gene (ISG15) especially in female subjects. However, no significant serum interferon (IFN) alpha expression or HBsAg decline was demonstrated [70]. GS-9688 (Selgantolimod) is a TLR8 agonist and achieved modest decline in HBsAg when given in combination with NA in the phase 2 study. GS-9688 induced dose-dependent cytokine responses (IL-12p40, IL-1RA, IFNγ) and shifts in peripheral immune cell subsets [71].
HBV-specific T-cell function can be restored by autoantibodies that block the inhibitory molecules. Nivolumab is a monoclonal antibody against PD-1 that is approved for treatment of various malignancies. When given at a reduced dose in combination with GS-4774 (a therapeutic vaccine; see below), nivolumab led to a modest reduction in HBsAg level (0.16 to 0.3 log reduction) at 12 weeks, and one patient achieved HBsAg seroclearance that was preceded by ALT flare and an increase in peripheral HBsAg-specific T cells [72].
IMC-I109V is a novel immunotherapy. It is a soluble bi-specific T-cell-engaging fusion protein comprised of a soluble affinity-enhanced T-cell receptor fused to a humanized anti-CD3 single chain variable fragment. As a type of immune-mobilizing monoclonal T-cell receptor against virus (ImmTAV), IMC-I109V TCR recognizes HBsAg presented by specific human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02:01 on the surface of infected hepatocytes. Upon engagement of TCR with HBsAg, the effector domain will bind to CD3 on any surrounding T cell of a different family, which is redirected to the complex, thereby engaging the global T-cell population and compensating for the defective HBV-specific CD8 cells in CHB. In vitro study has confirmed that ImmTAV-Env (ImmTAV molecules that are specific for HLA-A*02:01-restricted HBV epitopes derived from the viral envelope proteins) can redirect T cells from healthy and HBV-infected donors toward HCC cells containing integrated DNA. The induced cytokine release was suppressible by corticosteroid, and the redirected T-cells induced cytolysis of HBV-infected cells and antigen-positive HCC cells, leading to reduction of HBeAg and loss of cells expressing viral RNA [73]. IMC-I109V is currently in phase 1/2 clinical trial, involving mainly non-cirrhotic and virally suppressed HBeAg-negative CHB patients. The reported frequencies of HLA-A*02:01 are highly variable among different ethnicities. For instance, its prevalence is 11–20% in Asians and 23–60% in Caucasians [74]. Subsequently, a HLA non-restrictive approach (HLA-E) has been developed and this would allow drug target engagement in all patients [75]. It is worth noting that adverse reactions related to infusion of IMC-I109V such as hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis, and cytokine release syndrome have been reported in treatment with tebentafusp, another novel bispecific TCR-anti-CD3 directed against gp100 for patients with advanced melanoma, which might require immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., corticosteroids) for treatment [76]. Given the excellent safety profile of current antiviral treatment with NAs, it is crucial to establish the safety of T-cell therapy in CHB patients, which means achieving a safe and effective level of cytolysis as induced by the redirected T cells, which is therapeutically adequate to achieve HBsAg seroclearance but not to the level of excessive hepatocyte death, causing hepatic decompensation [77].
Therapeutic vaccines for CHB make use of different vaccination doses and frequencies to stimulate an anti-HBV immune response. Different viral components have been used, including DNA or peptide vaccines, vector or cell-based vaccines, and combinations of core, X, and polymerase antigens in addition to HBsAg. GS-4774, a yeast-based vaccine that consists of highly immunogenic recombinant HBcAg, HBsAg, and HBx epitopes, led to HBsAg decline ≥0.5 logs at week 24 in 3 out of 50 CHB patients who received it every 4 weeks, and no patient experienced a functional cure [78]. ABX-203 (HeberNasvac), a yeast-based vaccine that comprises HBsAg and HBcAg virus-like particles, was studied in phase 1–3 clinical trials. It led to HBsAg seroclearance in two out of six CHB patients who had prior PEG-IFN treatment and were given ABX-203 intranasally every 2 weeks for up to 5 years [79]. TG-1050, an adenovirus 5-based vaccine that expresses HBV polymerase and domains of core and HBsAg, was shown to induce specific IFNγ-producing T cells and led to minor reductions of HBsAg and significant reductions in HBcrAg in NA-treated CHB patients [80].
GC1102 is a recombinant monoclonal hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) with enhanced affinity to HBsAg. HBsAg seroclearance was achieved in 22.2% CHB patients whose baseline HBsAg were ≤1000 IU/mL after 7 weeks of treatment with GC1102 [81]. VIR-3434 is another recombinant HBIg that is currently being evaluated in a phase 1 clinical trial. Initial data showed that six out of eight patients achieved a mean reduction of 1.3 logs of HBsAg by day 8 [82]. It is worth noting that both trials of recombinant monoclonal antibodies recruit CHB patients with baseline HBsAg ≤ 1000 IU/mL. Similar to NAPs and STOPS, it is expected that reduction in liver and circulating viral antigen load using neutralizing antibodies will restore adaptive immunity [65]. Historically, HBIG derived from HBsAg-vaccinated subjects could lead to emergence and/or selection of immune escape HBV mutants, particularly in the ‘a’ determinant loop, that enables viral persistence despite antibody titers. Cases of fulminant hepatic failure resulting from immune escape mutants have been reported in liver allograft recipients [83,84,85,86]. This again highlights the importance of safety during drug development. The potential risk of recombinant HBIG-induced escape mutations and subsequent hepatic failure can be minimized by selecting patients with low viral load, e.g., low HBsAg titers as in the GC1102 trial, the use of next generation monoclonal antibodies that display improved broadly neutralizing potential against different HBV strains and escape mutants [87], and the concomitant use of another antiviral agent, e.g., NAs to reduce the immune selection pressure.
SB9200 (Inarigrivir) is a dual agonist of retinoic acid inducible gene-1 and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain that consists of host PRRs that activate the innate immune pathway. SB9200-induced HBsAg decline ≥ 0.5 logs from baseline in 22% patients [88]. However, the developing company prematurely terminated the phase 2b trial after the occurrence of unexpected serious adverse events, including one patient death in the Phase 2b CATALYST trial of SB9200 in January 2020.

4. Combination Strategies

With the efficacy and safety data of the individual novel agents mentioned above, the approach of combining two or more novel agents to reduce viral antigen load, inhibit viral replication, and stimulate immunity is being actively explored.
The triple combination of RNAi (monthly injections for three doses of JNJ-3989) + CpAM (daily oral doses of JNJ-6379 for 85 days) + NA (daily oral doses beyond the end of CpAM dosing) led to mean 1.7 logs reduction in HBsAg on day 113 in 12 CHB patients. In addition, other viral products including HBV DNA, HBV RNA, and HBcrAg were profoundly suppressed. This combination therapy was in general well-tolerated with no serious or severe adverse events reported. Mild ALT flares were observed in five patients and were attributed to therapeutic flares [89].
A few more combination therapies are currently being evaluated in a phase 2 study that evaluates the safety and efficacy of multiple combination therapies (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04225715). One of them is a similar example as the above with triple combination with RNAi (RG6346) + CpAM (RO7049389) + NA. Other examples include: triple combination of RNAi (RG6346) + TLR7 agonist (RO7020531) + NA, triple combination with RNAi (RG6346) + PEG-IFN + NUC, and triple combination with CpAM (RO7049389) + TLR agonist (RO7020531) + NA. The approach of sequential use of therapeutic vaccines after antigen knockdown by RNAi has been explored in mice models that showed encouraging results in suppression of viral burden and stimulation in the number of functional HBV-specific T cells and production of HBV-neutralizing antibodies [90]. Clinical studies using this approach are awaited.
Some agents will require combination with NAs, especially CpAMs, NAPs, and most immune modulatory agents, in contrast to RNAi. This is likely to be related to whether the antiviral effect of the individual agent leads to silencing of cccDNA transcriptional activity, which is the case for RNAi via post-transcriptional knockdown of HBV transcripts. Theoretically, sequential combinational therapy will result in rapid decline in HBsAg (by virus-directing agents) which is beneficial for subsequent immune stimulation therapy [91]. In transgenic mice models, GaINac-conjugated siRNA followed by therapeutic vaccine showed significantly stronger immune stimulatory effect in terms of development of polyfunctional, HBV-specific CD8+ T cells compared to mice given control RNAs with NA, and therapeutic vaccine [90]. Although many RNAi-based combination therapies are still tested in clinical trials in combination with NAs, it remains to be unveiled whether the viral suppressive effects of NA can be substituted by other virus-directing agents.

5. Conclusions

The currently preferred treatment endpoint for CHB is functional cure. Novel agents work on different steps of viral replication or the host’s immune system, in order to reduce viral burden, inhibit viral replication, and restore host immunity. The therapeutic effects of both virus-directed and host-immunity-directed agents are intercalated and are equally crucial for achieving a functional cure. Most agents currently in clinical phases of development demonstrated favorable results in suppression of viral proteins and genomic materials, with initially promising results of enhancing the functional cure of CHB. With an increasing number of novel agents entering clinical phases of development, it is expected that each agent should demonstrate favorable safety data, and long-term follow-up data in the subjects that participated in these trials will be an important consideration. Most trials aimed to achieve broad eligibility by recruiting CHB patients with variable duration of infection and viral activity. However, it is likely that specific subgroups of patients will benefit most from selected agents so that a finite duration of therapy (partial cure or functional cure if HBsAg seroclearance can be achieved) instead of lifelong NA treatment can become feasible. For all trials mentioned, no cirrhotic patients were included and this will need to be addressed when more safety data are available. Combination therapy with two or more novel agents theoretically leads to synergistic therapeutic effects. NA and/or PEG-IFN are still the backbone of these combination regimens. The best cocktail of therapies is being sought, and different regimens are likely to be needed for different patient populations with various viral factors (e.g., HBsAg levels, previous treatment exposure), and host factors (e.g., HLA allele, gender).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-K.S. and M.-F.Y.; methodology, N/A; software, N/A.; validation, L.-Y.M. and W.-K.S.; formal analysis, N/A.; investigation, N/A.; resources, N/A.; data curation, N/A.; writing—original draft preparation, L.-Y.M.; writing—review and editing, L.-Y.M., W.-K.S. and M.-F.Y.; visualization, M.-F.Y.; supervision, M.-F.Y.; project administration, W.-K.S. and M.-F.Y.; funding acquisition, N/A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

M.-F.Y. received research funding from Assembly Biosciences, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myer Squibb, Fujirebio Incorporation, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Springbank Pharmaceuticals, Sysmex Corporation, Roche, and is an advisory board member and/or received research funding from AbbVie, Aligos Therapeutics, Arbutus Biopharma, Bristol Myer Squibb, Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Finch Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Clear B Therapeutics, Springbank Pharmaceuticals, Roche. W.K.S. received speaker’s fees from AstraZeneca and Mylan, is an advisory board member of CSL Behring, is an advisory board member and received speaker’s fees from AbbVie, and is an advisory board member, received speaker’s fees and researching funding from Gilead Sciences. L.-Y.M. has nothing to declare.

References

  1. Razavi-Shearer, D.; Gamkrelidze, I.; Nguyen, M.H.; Chen, D.-S.; Van Damme, P.; Abbas, Z.; Abdulla, M.; Abou Rached, A.; Adda, D.; Aho, I.; et al. Global prevalence, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in 2016: A modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 3, 383–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 370–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Terrault, N.A.; Lok, A.S.F.; McMahon, B.J.; Chang, K.M.; Hwang, J.P.; Jonas, M.M.; Brown, R.S., Jr.; Bzowej, N.H.; Wong, J.B. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology 2018, 67, 1560–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, S.M.; Sheen, I.S.; Chien, R.N.; Chu, C.M.; Liaw, Y.F. Long-term beneficial effect of interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology 1999, 29, 971–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Seto, W.K.; Lau, E.H.; Wu, J.T.; Hung, I.F.; Leung, W.K.; Cheung, K.S.; Fung, J.; Lai, C.L.; Yuen, M.F. Effects of nucleoside analogue prescription for hepatitis B on the incidence of liver cancer in Hong Kong: A territory-wide ecological study. Aliment. Pharmacol Ther. 2017, 45, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Thiele, M.; Gluud, L.L.; Dahl, E.K.; Krag, A. Antiviral therapy for prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality in chronic hepatitis B: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2013, 3, e003265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Seto, W.K.; Hui, A.J.; Wong, V.W.; Wong, G.L.; Liu, K.S.; Lai, C.L.; Yuen, M.F.; Chan, H.L. Treatment cessation of entecavir in Asian patients with hepatitis B e antigen negative chronic hepatitis B: A multicentre prospective study. Gut 2015, 64, 667–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lai, C.L.; Wong, D.K.; Wong, G.T.; Seto, W.K.; Fung, J.; Yuen, M.F. Rebound of HBV DNA after cessation of nucleos/tide analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients with undetectable covalently closed. JHEP Rep. 2020, 2, 100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mak, L.Y.; Seto, W.K.; Lai, C.L.; Yuen, M.F. DNA polymerase inhibitors for treating hepatitis B: A safety evaluation. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2016, 15, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lai, C.L.; Wong, D.; Ip, P.; Kopaniszen, M.; Seto, W.K.; Fung, J.; Huang, F.Y.; Lee, B.; Cullaro, G.; Chong, C.K.; et al. Reduction of covalently closed circular DNA with long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment in chronic hepatitis B. J. Hepatol. 2017, 66, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cornberg, M.; Lok, A.S.; Terrault, N.A.; Zoulim, F.; Berg, T.; Brunetto, M.R.; Buchholz, S.; Buti, M.; Chan, H.L.Y.; Chang, K.-M.; et al. Guidance for design and endpoints of clinical trials in chronic hepatitis B—Report from the 2019 EASL-AASLD HBV Treatment Endpoints Conference. Hepatology 2019, 72, 539–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Yip, T.C.; Wong, G.L.; Wong, V.W.; Tse, Y.K.; Lui, G.C.; Lam, K.L.; Chan, H.L. Durability of hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in untreated and nucleos(t)ide analogue-treated patients. J. Hepatol. 2017, 68, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Seto, W.K.; Cheung, K.S.; Wong, D.K.; Huang, F.Y.; Fung, J.; Liu, K.S.; Lai, C.L.; Yuen, M.F. Hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance during nucleoside analogue therapy: Surface antigen kinetics, outcomes, and durability. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 51, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yuen, M.F.; Wong, D.K.; Fung, J.; Ip, P.; But, D.; Hung, I.; Lau, K.; Yuen, J.C.; Lai, C.L. HBsAg Seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B in Asian patients: Replicative level and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 1192–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yip, T.C.; Chan, H.L.; Wong, V.W.; Tse, Y.K.; Lam, K.L.; Wong, G.L. Impact of age and gender on risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 902–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, G.A.; Lee, H.C.; Kim, M.J.; Ha, Y.; Park, E.J.; An, J.; Lee, D.; Shim, J.H.; Kim, K.M.; Lim, Y.S. Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma after HBsAg seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B patients: A need for surveillance. J. Hepatol. 2015, 62, 1092–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Anderson, R.T.; Choi, H.S.J.; Lenz, O.; Peters, M.G.; Janssen, H.L.A.; Mishra, P.; Donaldson, E.; Westman, G.; Buchholz, S.; Miller, V.; et al. Association Between Seroclearance of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 19, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kim, G.A.; Lim, Y.S.; An, J.; Lee, D.; Shim, J.H.; Kim, K.M.; Lee, H.C.; Chung, Y.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Suh, D.J. HBsAg seroclearance after nucleoside analogue therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B: Clinical outcomes and durability. Gut 2014, 63, 1325–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mak, L.Y.; Seto, W.K.; Hui, R.W.; Fung, J.; Wong, D.K.; Lai, C.L.; Yuen, M.F. Fibrosis evolution in chronic hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients across a 10-year interval. J. Viral Hepat. 2019, 26, 818–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Berg, T.; Lampertico, P. The times they are a-changing—A refined proposal for finite HBV nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy. J. Hepatol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tout, I.; Loureiro, D.; Mansouri, A.; Soumelis, V.; Boyer, N.; Asselah, T. Hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance: Immune mechanisms, clinical impact, importance for drug development. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 409–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Milich, D.R.; Jones, J.E.; Hughes, J.L.; Price, J.; Raney, A.K.; McLachlan, A. Is a function of the secreted hepatitis B e antigen to induce immunologic tolerance in utero? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 6599–6603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Jiang, M.; Broering, R.; Trippler, M.; Poggenpohl, L.; Fiedler, M.; Gerken, G.; Lu, M.; Schlaak, J.F. Toll-like receptor-mediated immune responses are attenuated in the presence of high levels of hepatitis B virus surface antigen. J. Viral Hepat. 2014, 21, 860–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rehermann, B. Pathogenesis of chronic viral hepatitis: Differential roles of T cells and NK cells. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 859–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Chen, M.; Sallberg, M.; Hughes, J.; Jones, J.; Guidotti, L.G.; Chisari, F.V.; Billaud, J.N.; Milich, D.R. Immune tolerance split between hepatitis B virus precore and core proteins. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 3016–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Maini, M.K.; Boni, C.; Ogg, G.S.; King, A.S.; Reignat, S.; Lee, C.K.; Larrubia, J.R.; Webster, G.J.; McMichael, A.J.; Ferrari, C.; et al. Direct ex vivo analysis of hepatitis B virus-specific CD8(+) T cells associated with the control of infection. Gastroenterology 1999, 117, 1386–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Penna, A.; Artini, M.; Cavalli, A.; Levrero, M.; Bertoletti, A.; Pilli, M.; Chisari, F.V.; Rehermann, B.; Del Prete, G.; Fiaccadori, F.; et al. Long-lasting memory T cell responses following self-limited acute hepatitis B. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 98, 1185–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Fisicaro, P.; Valdatta, C.; Massari, M.; Loggi, E.; Biasini, E.; Sacchelli, L.; Cavallo, M.C.; Silini, E.M.; Andreone, P.; Missale, G.; et al. Antiviral intrahepatic T-cell responses can be restored by blocking programmed death-1 pathway in chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 2010, 138, 682–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wongjitrat, C.; Sukwit, S.; Chuenchitra, T.; Seangjaruk, P.; Rojanasang, P.; Romputtan, P.; Srisurapanon, S. CTLA-4 and its ligands on the surface of T- and B-lymphocyte subsets in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J. Med. Assoc. Thail. Chotmaihet Thangphaet 2013, 96, S54–S59. [Google Scholar]
  30. Burton, A.R.; Pallett, L.J.; McCoy, L.E.; Suveizdyte, K.; Amin, O.E.; Swadling, L.; Alberts, E.; Davidson, B.R.; Kennedy, P.T.; Gill, U.S.; et al. Circulating and intrahepatic antiviral B cells are defective in hepatitis B. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 4588–4603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Fang, Z.; Li, J.; Yu, X.; Zhang, D.; Ren, G.; Shi, B.; Wang, C.; Kosinska, A.D.; Wang, S.; Zhou, X.; et al. Polarization of Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells by Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Is Mediated via ERK/IL-6/STAT3 Signaling Feedback and Restrains the Activation of T Cells in Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 4873–4883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Kondo, Y.; Ninomiya, M.; Kakazu, E.; Kimura, O.; Shimosegawa, T. Hepatitis B surface antigen could contribute to the immunopathogenesis of hepatitis B virus infection. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2013, 2013, 935295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yeo, Y.H.; Ho, H.J.; Yang, H.I.; Tseng, T.C.; Hosaka, T.; Trinh, H.N.; Kwak, M.S.; Park, Y.M.; Fung, J.Y.Y.; Buti, M.; et al. Factors Associated With Rates of HBsAg Seroclearance in Adults With Chronic HBV Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yeo, Y.H.; Tseng, T.C.; Hosaka, T.; Cunningham, C.; Fung, J.Y.Y.; Ho, H.J.; Kwak, M.S.; Trinh, H.N.; Ungtrakul, T.; Yu, M.L.; et al. Incidence, Factors, and Patient-Level Data for Spontaneous HBsAg Seroclearance: A Cohort Study of 11,264 Patients. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2020, 11, e00196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yuen, M.F.; Lai, C.L. Hepatitis B in 2014: HBV research moves forward–receptors and reactivation. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 12, 70–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wedemeyer, H.; Schöneweis, K.; Bogomolov, P.O.; Chulanov, V.; Stepanova, T.; Viacheslav, M.; Allweiss, L.; Dandri, M.; Ciesek, S.; Dittmer, U.; et al. 48 weeks of high dose (10 mg) bulevirtide as monotherapy or with peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic HBV/HDV co-infection. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, S52–S53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Urban, S.; Bartenschlager, R.; Kubitz, R.; Zoulim, F. Strategies to inhibit entry of HBV and HDV into hepatocytes. Gastroenterology 2014, 147, 48–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bogomolov, P.; Alexandrov, A.; Voronkova, N.; Macievich, M.; Kokina, K.; Petrachenkova, M.; Lehr, T.; Lempp, F.A.; Wedemeyer, H.; Haag, M.; et al. Treatment of chronic hepatitis D with the entry inhibitor myrcludex B: First results of a phase Ib/IIa study. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shimura, S.; Watashi, K.; Fukano, K.; Peel, M.; Sluder, A.; Kawai, F.; Iwamoto, M.; Tsukuda, S.; Takeuchi, J.S.; Miyake, T.; et al. Cyclosporin derivatives inhibit hepatitis B virus entry without interfering with NTCP transporter activity. J. Hepatol. 2017, 66, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gallay, P.; Ure, D.; Bobardt, M.; Chatterji, U.; Ou, J.; Trepanier, D.; Foster, R. The cyclophilin inhibitor CRV431 inhibits liver HBV DNA and HBsAg in transgenic mice. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Agrawal, N.; Dasaradhi, P.V.; Mohmmed, A.; Malhotra, P.; Bhatnagar, R.K.; Mukherjee, S.K. RNA interference: Biology, mechanism, and applications. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. MMBR 2003, 67, 657–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Mello, C.C.; Conte, D., Jr. Revealing the world of RNA interference. Nature 2004, 431, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Watts, J.K.; Corey, D.R. Silencing disease genes in the laboratory and the clinic. J. Pathol. 2012, 226, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Prakash, T.P.; Graham, M.J.; Yu, J.; Carty, R.; Low, A.; Chappell, A.; Schmidt, K.; Zhao, C.; Aghajan, M.; Murray, H.F.; et al. Targeted delivery of antisense oligonucleotides to hepatocytes using triantennary N-acetyl galactosamine improves potency 10-fold in mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 8796–8807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Veedu, R.N.; Wengel, J. Locked nucleic acid as a novel class of therapeutic agents. RNA Biol. 2009, 6, 321–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Kauppinen, S.; Vester, B.; Wengel, J. Locked nucleic acid: High-affinity targeting of complementary RNA for RNomics. RNA Towards Med. 2006, 173, 405–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Javanbakht, H.; Mueller, H.; Walther, J.; Zhou, X.; Lopez, A.; Pattupara, T.; Blaising, J.; Pedersen, L.; Albaek, N.; Jackerott, M.; et al. Liver-Targeted Anti-HBV Single-Stranded Oligonucleotides with Locked Nucleic Acid Potently Reduce HBV Gene Expression In Vivo. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2018, 11, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Gane, E.; Locarnini, S.; Lim, T.; Strasser, S.; Sievert, W.; Cheng, W.; Thompson, A.; Given, B.; Schluep, T.; Hamilton, J.; et al. Short-term treatment with RNA interference therapy, JNJ-3989, results in sustained hepatitis B surface antigen suppression in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment. In Proceedings of the Digital International Liver Congress, 27–29 August 2020; p. S20. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gane, E.; Lim, Y.; Tangkijvanich, P.; O’Beirne, J.; Lim, T.; Bakardjiev, A.; Ding, X.; Connolly, L.; Huang, S.; Kim, J.; et al. Preliminary safety and antiviral activity of VIR-2218, an X-targeting HBV RNAi therapeutic, in chronic hepatitis B patients. In Proceedings of the Digital International Liver Congress, 27–29 August 2020; pp. S50–S51. [Google Scholar]
  50. Yuen, M.; Lim, T.; Kin, W.; Tongkijvonich, P.; Yoon, J.; Sievert, W.; Sukeepoisornjoroen, W.; Thompson, A.; CSchwabe, C.; Brown, B.; et al. HBV RNAi inhibitor RG6346 in Phase 1b-2a trial was safe, well-tolerated, and resulted in substantial and durable reductions in serum HBsAg levels. In Proceedings of the Digital Liver Meeting, 11–16 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  51. Yuen, M.; Berliba, E.; Kim, Y.; Holmes, J.; Lim, Y.; Strasser, S.; Schwabe, C.; Jucov, A.; Lee, A.; Thi, E.; et al. Safety and pharmacodynamics of the GalNAc-siRNA AB-729 in subjects with chronic hepatitis B infection. In Proceedings of the Digital Liver Meeting, 11–16 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yuen, M.F.; Wong, D.K.; Schluep, T.; Lai, C.L.; Ferrari, C.; Locarnini, S.; Lo, R.C.; Gish, R.G.; Hamilton, J.; Wooddell, C.I.; et al. Long-term serological, virological and histological responses to RNA inhibition by ARC-520 in Chinese chronic hepatitis B patients on entecavir treatment. Gut 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yuen, R.; Heo, J.; Jang, J.; Yoon, J.-H.; Kweon, Y.; Park, S.-J.; Bennett, F.; Kwoh, J. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) inhibition with isis 505358 in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients on stable nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve CHB patients: Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, S49–S50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mak, L.Y.; Wong, D.K.; Seto, W.K.; Lai, C.L.; Yuen, M.F. Hepatitis B core protein as a therapeutic target. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2017, 21, 1153–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Yuen, M.F.; Schwabe, C.; Tanwandee, T.; Jin, Y.; Gao, L.; Zhou, X.; Das, S.; Wang, Y.; Lemenuel-Diot, A.; Cosson, A.; et al. RO7049389, a core protein allosteric modulator, demonstrates robust decline in HBV DNA and HBV RNA in chronic HBV infected patients. In Proceedings of the International Liver Congress, EASL2019, Vienna, Austria, 10–14 April 2019; p. e491. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.; Tan, Y.; Xin, Y.; Gao, H.; Zheng, S.; Yi, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wu, C.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Efficacy and safety of GLS4/ritonavir combined with entecavir in HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B: Interim results from phase 2b, multi-center study. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73 (Suppl. 1), S878–S879. [Google Scholar]
  57. Janssen, H.; Hou, J.; Asselah, T.; Chan, H.; Zoulim, F.; Tanaka, Y.; Janczewska, E.; Nahass, R.; Bourgeois, S.; Buti, M.; et al. Efficacy and Safety Results of the Phase 2 JNJ-56136379 JADE Study in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: Interim Week 24 Data. In Proceedings of the Digital ILC, 27–29 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
  58. Gane, E.; Sulkowski, M.; Ma, X.; Nguyen, T.; Hann, H.; Hassanein, T.; Elkhashab, M.; Nahass, R.; Chan, S.; Bennett, M.; et al. Viral response and safety following discontinuation of treatment with the core inhibitor vebicorvir and a nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor in patients with HBeAg positive or negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2021. In Press. [Google Scholar]
  59. Yuen, M.F.; Agarwal, K.; Gane, E.J.; Schwabe, C.; Ahn, S.H.; Kim, D.J.; Lim, Y.S.; Cheng, W.; Sievert, W.; Visvanathan, K.; et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral effects of ABI-H0731, a hepatitis B virus core inhibitor: A randomised, placebo-controlled phase 1 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jekle, A.; Zhang, Q.; Serebryany, V.; Welch, M.; Liu, J.; Vendeville, S.; Debing, Y.; Kum, D.B.; Ren, S.; Liu, C.; et al. Best-in-class preclinical characteristics of ALG-000184, a prodrug of the capsid assembly modulator ALG-001075 for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. In Proceedings of the Digital Liver Meeting 2020, Boston, MA, USA, 13–16 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  61. Boulon, R.; Blanchet, M.; Lemasson, M.; Vaillant, A.; Labonte, P. Characterization of the antiviral effects of REP 2139 on the HBV lifecycle in vitro. Antivir. Res. 2020, 183, 104853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Vaillant, A. REP 2139: Antiviral Mechanisms and Applications in Achieving Functional Control of HBV and HDV Infection. ACS Infect. Dis. 2019, 5, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bazinet, M.; Pantea, V.; Placinta, G.; Moscalu, I.; Cebotarescu, V.; Cojuhari, L.; Jimbei, P.; Iarovoi, L.; Smesnoi, V.; Musteata, T.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of 48 Weeks REP 2139 or REP 2165, Tenofovir Disoproxil, and Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a in Patients With Chronic HBV Infection Naive to Nucleos(t)ide Therapy. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 2180–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nie, Y.; Tan, H.; Kao, C.; Ren, S.; Pandey, R.; Chanda, S.; Lin, T.-I.; Blatt, L.M.; Beigelman, L.N.; Symons, J.A.; et al. ALG-010133, a Representative S-Antigen Transport-inhibiting Oligonucleotide Polymer (STOPSTM) Effectively Inhibits Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Secretion in Multiple Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Cell Models. In Proceedings of the Digital Liver Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, 13–16 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  65. Maini, M.K.; Burton, A.R. Restoring, releasing or replacing adaptive immunity in chronic hepatitis B. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 662–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pauken, K.E.; Sammons, M.A.; Odorizzi, P.M.; Manne, S.; Godec, J.; Khan, O.; Drake, A.M.; Chen, Z.; Sen, D.R.; Kurachi, M.; et al. Epigenetic stability of exhausted T cells limits durability of reinvigoration by PD-1 blockade. Science 2016, 354, 1160–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ramiere, C.; Scholtes, C.; Diaz, O.; Icard, V.; Perrin-Cocon, L.; Trabaud, M.A.; Lotteau, V.; Andre, P. Transactivation of the hepatitis B virus core promoter by the nuclear receptor FXRalpha. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 10832–10840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Mouzannar, K.; Fusil, F.; Lacombe, B.; Ollivier, A.; Menard, C.; Lotteau, V.; Cosset, F.L.; Ramiere, C.; Andre, P. Farnesoid X receptor-alpha is a proviral host factor for hepatitis B virus that is inhibited by ligands in vitro and in vivo. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 2472–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Erken, R.; Stelma, F.; Roy, E.; Diane, S.; Andre, P.; Vonderscher, J.; Eric, M.; Tim, S.; Philippe, P.; Christian, L.; et al. First clinical evaluation in chronic hepatitis B patients of the synthetic farnesoid X receptor agonist EYP001. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, S488–S489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Janssen, H.L.A.; Brunetto, M.R.; Kim, Y.J.; Ferrari, C.; Massetto, B.; Nguyen, A.H.; Joshi, A.; Woo, J.; Lau, A.H.; Gaggar, A.; et al. Safety, efficacy and pharmacodynamics of vesatolimod (GS-9620) in virally suppressed patients with chronic hepatitis B. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gane, E.J.; Kim, H.J.; Visvanathan, K.; Kim, Y.J.; Nguyen, A.H.; Wallin, J.J.; Chen, D.Y.; McDonald, C.; Arora, P.; Tan, S.K.; et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the oral TLR8 agonist selgantolimod in chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Gane, E.; Verdon, D.J.; Brooks, A.E.; Gaggar, A.; Nguyen, A.H.; Subramanian, G.M.; Schwabe, C.; Dunbar, P.R. Anti-PD-1 blockade with nivolumab with and without therapeutic vaccination for virally suppressed chronic hepatitis B: A pilot study. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 900–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fergusson, J.R.; Wallace, Z.; Connolly, M.M.; Woon, A.P.; Suckling, R.J.; Hine, D.W.; Barber, C.; Bunjobpol, W.; Choi, B.S.; Crespillo, S.; et al. Immune-Mobilizing Monoclonal T Cell Receptors Mediate Specific and Rapid Elimination of Hepatitis B-Infected Cells. Hepatology 2020, 72, 1528–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Allele frequency net database (AFND) 2020 update: Gold-standard data classification, open access genotype data and new query tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D783–D788.
  75. Leonard, S.; Paterson, R.; Godinho, L.; Howe, D.; Monteiro, M.; Hague, R.M.; Atkin, K.; Sarkar, A.; Suckling, R.; Bunjobpol, W.; et al. NOVEL HLA-E SPECIFIC IMMTAV® MOLECULES FOR THE TREATMENT OF HEPATITIS B. In Proceedings of the Digital Liver Meeting, 11–16 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  76. Damato, B.E.; Dukes, J.; Goodall, H.; Carvajal, R.D. Tebentafusp: T Cell Redirection for the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Cancers 2019, 11, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Bertoletti, A. ImmTAV, a New Immunotherapy Targeting the Source of HBV Infection. Hepatology 2020, 72, 1514–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Lok, A.S.; Pan, C.Q.; Han, S.H.; Trinh, H.N.; Fessel, W.J.; Rodell, T.; Massetto, B.; Lin, L.; Gaggar, A.; Subramanian, G.M.; et al. Randomized phase II study of GS-4774 as a therapeutic vaccine in virally suppressed patients with chronic hepatitis B. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Aguilar, J.C.; León, Y.; Lobaina, Y.; Freyre, F.; Fernández, G.; Sanchez, A.L.; Jerez, E.; Anillo, L.E.; Aguiar, J.A.; Cinza, Z.; et al. Five-year Follow-up of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Immunized by Nasal Route with the Therapeutic Vaccine HeberNasvac. Euroasian J. Hepato Gastroenterol. 2018, 8, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zoulim, F.; Fournier, C.; Habersetzer, F.; Sprinzl, M.; Pol, S.; Coffin, C.S.; Leroy, V.; Ma, M.; Wedemeyer, H.; Lohse, A.W.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the therapeutic vaccine TG1050 in chronic hepatitis B patients: A phase 1b placebo-controlled trial. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2020, 16, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Lee, H.W.; Park, J.Y.; Hong, T.; Park, M.S.; Ahn, S.H. A prospective, openlabel, dose-escalation, single-center, phase 1 study for GC1102, a recombinant human immunoglobulin for chronic hepatitis B patients. In Hepatology; WILEY: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; Volume 68, pp. 268A–269A. [Google Scholar]
  82. Vir Biotechnology. Initial Data from Ongoing Phase 1 Trial of VIR-3434 for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection Demonstrates Significant and Rapid Reduction in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen; Vir Biotechnology Inc., 2021. Available online: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/01/26/2164220/0/en/Initial-Data-from-Ongoing-Phase-1-Trial-of-VIR-3434-for-Chronic-Hepatitis-B-Virus-Infection-Demonstrates-Significant-and-Rapid-Reduction-in-Hepatitis-B-Surface-Antigen.html (accessed on 17 June 2021).
  83. Protzer-Knolle, U.; Naumann, U.; Bartenschlager, R.; Berg, T.; Hopf, U.; Meyer zum Buschenfelde, K.H.; Neuhaus, P.; Gerken, G. Hepatitis B virus with antigenically altered hepatitis B surface antigen is selected by high-dose hepatitis B immune globulin after liver transplantation. Hepatology 1998, 27, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Cooreman, M.P.; Leroux-Roels, G.; Paulij, W.P. Vaccine- and hepatitis B immune globulin-induced escape mutations of hepatitis B virus surface antigen. J. Biomed. Sci. 2001, 8, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. de Man, R.A.; Bartholomeusz, A.I.; Niesters, H.G.; Zondervan, P.E.; Locarnini, S.A. The sequential occurrence of viral mutations in a liver transplant recipient re-infected with hepatitis B: Hepatitis B immune globulin escape, famciclovir non-response, followed by lamivudine resistance resulting in graft loss. J. Hepatol. 1998, 29, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mina, T.; Amini Bavil Olyaee, S.; Tacke, F.; Maes, P.; Van Ranst, M.; Pourkarim, M.R. Genomic Diversity of Hepatitis B Virus Infection Associated With Fulminant Hepatitis B Development. Hepat. Mon. 2015, 15, e29477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Kucinskaite-Kodze, I.; Pleckaityte, M.; Bremer, C.M.; Seiz, P.L.; Zilnyte, M.; Bulavaite, A.; Mickiene, G.; Zvirblis, G.; Sasnauskas, K.; Glebe, D.; et al. New broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies against hepatitis B virus surface antigen. Virus Res. 2016, 211, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yuen, R.; Chen, C.; Liu, C.; Jeng, R.; Elkhashab, M.; Coffin, C.; Kim, W.; Greenbloom, S.; Ramji, A.; Lim, Y.; et al. Ascending dose cohort study of inarigivir—A novel RIG I agonist in chronic HBV patients: Final results of the ACHIEVE trial. Proc. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, e47–e48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yuen, R.; Locarnini, S.; Given, B.; Schluep, T.; Hamilton, J.; Biermer, M.; Kalmeijer, R.; Beumont-Mauviel, M.; Lenz, O.; Cloherty, G.; et al. First clinical experience with RNA interference [RNAI]-based triple combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB): JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-3989), JNJ-56136379 (JNJ-6379) and a nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA). In Proceedings of the Liver Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, 8–12 November 2019; p. 1489A. [Google Scholar]
  90. Michler, T.; Kosinska, A.D.; Festag, J.; Bunse, T.; Su, J.; Ringelhan, M.; Imhof, H.; Grimm, D.; Steiger, K.; Mogler, C.; et al. Knockdown of Virus Antigen Expression Increases Therapeutic Vaccine Efficacy in High-Titer Hepatitis B Virus Carrier Mice. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 1762–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dusheiko, G. Will we need novel combinations to cure HBV infection? Liver Int. 2020, 40, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Viruses 13 01169 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram illustrating the therapeutic approaches currently in clinical development in chronic hepatitis B infection. Left panel: virus-directed agents target different steps of the viral replicatory cycle, including viral entry, RNA interference, capsid formation and pgRNA encapsidation, DNA synthesis, and viral protein secretion. Although NAs are already in clinical use, they will remain the backbone of combination therapy in the context of novel antiviral treatment. Right panel: immune modulatory agents restore the host immunity at both innate and adaptive systems, which are interlinked by inflammatory cytokines and specific cell types. *RIG-I agonists once entered a phase 2 clinical trial but this was terminated due to a safety issue. The two approaches are intercalated as represented by the curved green arrows and the dotted line.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram illustrating the therapeutic approaches currently in clinical development in chronic hepatitis B infection. Left panel: virus-directed agents target different steps of the viral replicatory cycle, including viral entry, RNA interference, capsid formation and pgRNA encapsidation, DNA synthesis, and viral protein secretion. Although NAs are already in clinical use, they will remain the backbone of combination therapy in the context of novel antiviral treatment. Right panel: immune modulatory agents restore the host immunity at both innate and adaptive systems, which are interlinked by inflammatory cytokines and specific cell types. *RIG-I agonists once entered a phase 2 clinical trial but this was terminated due to a safety issue. The two approaches are intercalated as represented by the curved green arrows and the dotted line.
Viruses 13 01169 g001
Table
Table 1. Definitions of therapeutic endpoints for HBV therapy.
Table 1. Definitions of therapeutic endpoints for HBV therapy.
Therapeutic OutcomeBloodLiver
HBV DNAHBsAgAnti-HBs *Anti-HBccccDNAIntegrated DNA
Partial cure−+−−/+++
Functional cure−−−/+−/+++
Complete cure−−−/+−/+−+
Sterilizing cure−−−/+−/+−−
* Anti-HBs and anti-HBc are not required for defining therapeutic endpoints. Anti-HBs: antibody to HBV surface antigen; cccDNA: covalently closed circular DNA; HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV: hepatitis B virus.
Table
Table 2. Novel antiviral agents in clinical phases of development.
Table 2. Novel antiviral agents in clinical phases of development.
Main MechanismRemarksDrug NamesDeliveryPhaseClinical Trial Identifier
Inhibition of viral entryNTCP bindingMyrcludex B/BulevertideSC3NCT03852719
Cyclophilin inhibitorCRV-431Oral1NCT03596697
RNA interferencesiRNADicerna GAIXc-HBVS (RG 6346)SC1/2NCT03772249
JNJ 3989 (ARO-HBV 1 & ARO-HBV 2)2NCT04129554
AB-7292NCT04820686
VIR-2218 (ALN-HBV)2NCT03672188
ASOGSK-836 (ISIS-358)-non GaINAcSC2NCT04449029
GSK-404-GaiNAc2NCT03020745
RO7062931-GaiNAc1NCT03038113
Inhibition of capsid formationCpAMClass 1GLS-4 (Morphothiadin)/ritonavirOral2NCT04147208
Class 2ABI-HB0731 (Vebicorvir)2NCT03780543
Class 2ABI-H21582NCT04398134
Class 2JNJ-63792NCT03361956
Class 2EDP-5141NCT04470388
NCT04008004
Not disclosedQL-0071NCT03770624
NCT03244085
Class 2ZM-H1505R1NCT04220801
Class 2ABI-H37331NCT04271592
Class 2ALG-000184 (prodrug of ALG-001075)1NCT04536337
Class 1RO7049389 (RG7907)1NCT02952924
Inhibition of HBsAg releaseNucleic acid polymerREP 2139 or REP 2165IV2NCT02565719
STOPSALG-010133SC1NCT04485663
Interaction with host nuclear receptorFXR agonistEYP001Oral2NCT04465916
Enhancement of innate/adaptive immunityTLR agonistRO7020531 (also known as RG-7854, TLR7)Oral1NCT02956850
Vesatolimod (TLR7, GS-9620)2NCT02166047
Selgantolimod (TLR8, GS-9688)2NCT03491553
T cellASC22 (Anti-PDL1)SC2NCT04465890
Cemiplimab (Anti-PD1)IV1/2NCT04046107
Nivolumab (Anti-PD1)IV1ACTRN12615001133527 *
APG-1387 (apoptosis inducer)IV2NCT04568265
IMC-I109V (soluble T-cell receptor, ImmTAV molecule)IV1/2NCT03973333
Therapeutic vaccineHeberNasvac (ABX-203)Intranasal3NCT02249988
GS-4774SC2NCT01943799
HepTcellIM2NCT04684914
AIC649IV1Not applicable
HB-110EP1NCT01641536
VTP-300IM1/2NCT04778904
JNJ 64300535EP1NCT03463369
BRII-179 (VBI-2601)IM1/2NCT04749368
TG-1050SC1NCT02428400
INO-1800EP1NCT02431312
Monoclonal antibodyGC1102IV2NCT03801798
VIR-3434SC/IV1NCT04423393
ASO: antisense oligonucleotide; CpAM: core protein allosteric modulator; EP: electroporation; FXR: farnesoid X receptor; HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen; IM: intramuscularly; IV: intravenously; NTCP: sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide; SC: subcutaneously; siRNA: small interfering RNA; STOPS: S-antigen transport-inhibiting oligonucleotide polymers; TLR: toll-like receptor. * Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (with or without GS-4774). Agents in bold text represent those with clinical data available.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mak, L.-Y.; Seto, W.-K.; Yuen, M.-F. Novel Antivirals in Clinical Development for Chronic Hepatitis B Infection. Viruses 2021, 13, 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061169

AMA Style

Mak L-Y, Seto W-K, Yuen M-F. Novel Antivirals in Clinical Development for Chronic Hepatitis B Infection. Viruses. 2021; 13(6):1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061169

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mak, Lung-Yi, Wai-Kay Seto, and Man-Fung Yuen. 2021. "Novel Antivirals in Clinical Development for Chronic Hepatitis B Infection" Viruses 13, no. 6: 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061169

APA Style

Mak, L.-Y., Seto, W.-K., & Yuen, M.-F. (2021). Novel Antivirals in Clinical Development for Chronic Hepatitis B Infection. Viruses, 13(6), 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061169

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop