Next Article in Journal
Age-Dependent Lethality in Ducks Caused by Highly Pathogenic H5N6 Avian Influenza Virus
Previous Article in Journal
Avian Influenza A Virus Infects Swine Airway Epithelial Cells without Prior Adaptation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/v12060590
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Non-Mouse-Adapted H1N1pdm09 Virus as a Model for Influenza Research

by
Irina Kiseleva
1,*,†,
Andrey Rekstin
1,†,
Mohammad Al Farroukh
1,
Ekaterina Bazhenova
1,
Anastasia Katelnikova
2,
Ludmila Puchkova
1 and
Larisa Rudenko
1
1
Department of Virology, Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Institute of Experimental Medicine”, 197376 St Petersburg, Russia
2
Department of Toxicology and Microbiology, Institute of Preclinical Research Ltd., 188663 St Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2020, 12(6), 590; https://doi.org/10.3390/v12060590
Submission received: 30 April 2020 / Revised: 21 May 2020 / Accepted: 27 May 2020 / Published: 29 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Viruses)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The number of lung-adapted influenza viruses is limited. Most of them are not antigenically related to current circulating viruses. Viruses similar to recent strains are required for screening modern antiviral compounds and studying new vaccine candidates against novel influenza viruses. The process by which an influenza virus adapts to a new host is rather difficult. The aim of this study was to select a non-adapted current virus whose major biological properties correspond to those of classical lab-adapted viruses. Mice were inoculated intranasally with non-lung-adapted influenza viruses of subtype H1N1pdm09. They were monitored closely for body weight loss, mortality outcomes and gross pathology for 14 days following inoculation, as well as viral replication in lung tissue. Lung-adapted PR8 virus was used as a control. The tested viruses multiplied equally well in the lower respiratory tract of mice without prior adaptation but dramatically differed in lethality; the differences in their toxicity and pathogenicity in mice were established. A/South Africa/3626/2013 (H1N1)pdm09 virus was found to be an appropriate candidate to replace PR8 as a model virus for influenza research. No prior adaptation to the animal model is needed to reach the pathogenicity level of the classical mouse-adapted PR8 virus.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Influenza A mouse and ferret models are widely used in influenza virus research in, for instance, preclinical studies of vaccine candidates to evaluate their safety, immunogenicity and efficacy in preventing influenza infection; to investigate the pathogenesis of influenza infection; or to screen antiviral compounds [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. However, the susceptibility of the animal model to the influenza virus depends not only on the animal species but also on the particular virus strain to be tested in this model. The animal model needs to be exposed to the appropriate virus to adequately assess the safety, toxicity, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of any potential novel drug or vaccine.
Historically, the pathogenesis of influenza infection has been studied in mice using lab lung-adapted strains [2]. The limited number of classical mouse-adapted viruses includes A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1), B/Lee/40, A/Victoria/35/72 (H3N2), and A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2). All of them are antigenically distinct from currently circulating viruses. However, a number of tests (for instance, the screening of antiviral agents) require the use of currently circulating strains.
The process by which an influenza virus adapts to a new host is rather difficult. Fortunately, certain influenza viruses of the avian origin [11,12], some H1N1 strains of the 2009 pandemic [13,14], and reconstructed 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic virus [15] may cause disease in mice without prior adaptation. For preclinical assessments of antiviral compounds or vaccine candidates, the currently circulating non-adapted virus could be a good choice.
It is important to understand that such a commonly used lab animal species like mice and ferrets may be fully sensitive to infection with non-adapted influenza viruses.
Primary viral pneumonia is recognized as the most severe pulmonary manifestation of influenza infection in mice inoculated with a mouse-adapted virus. Viral pneumonia develops on days 6–8 after intranasal infection. Conversely, non-mouse-adapted influenza viruses were shown to kill mice by exerting a so-called toxic effect when massive doses were administered [16]. Acute pulmonary edema develops on days 2–4 after the intranasal inoculation of mice. Both primary influenza pneumonia and toxicity have a high mortality rate, which can reach 100%. This study compared the in vivo properties of two non-mouse-adapted influenza viruses of the H1N1pdm09 subtype, namely, A/South Africa/3626/2013 and A/California/07/2009. The viruses were tested for their ability to cause sudden pulmonary edema and viral pneumonia. Two previous viruses that are antigenically non-related to currently circulating viruses, i.e., the mouse-adapted PR8 strain and non-mouse-adapted A/Singapore/1/57 (H2N2) strain, were used as controls.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Viruses

The following influenza A viruses were used: A/South Africa/3626/2013 (H1N1)pdm09 (SA), obtained from The Francis Crick Institute (London, UK); and the A/California/07/2009 (H1N1)pdm09 (CA), obtained from the CDC (Atlanta, GA, USA), CDC ID No. 2009712112; A/Singapore/1/57 (H2N2) (SGP) and four mouse-adapted strains—A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1) (PR8), B/Lee/40 (LEE), A/Victoria/35/72 (H3N2) (VIC), and A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2) (ACH)—were obtained from the Virus Collection of the Institute of Experimental Medicine (IEM, St. Petersburg, Russia) (Table 1).
All the work with the influenza viruses was performed in a Class II biosafety cabinet (BSC) in a biosafety level-2 (BSL-2) laboratory.
The viruses were propagated in the chorioallantoic cavity of 10–11 day old clean chicken eggs supplied by «Sinyavino» poultry farm (Kirovsk Area, Leningrad region, Russia). The eggs were incubated for 48 h at 32 °C and the harvested viruses were stored in aliquots at −70 °C.

2.2. Determining ts/ca Phenotype

The capacity of influenza viruses to grow at optimal (32 °C), low (26 °C, cold-adapted virus, ca phenotype), and elevated (40 °C, temperature-sensitive virus, ts phenotype) temperatures was determined by titration in 10–11 day old eggs. The log10 50% embryo infectious dose (EID50/mL) calculation was based on Reed and Muench’s method [17]. The viruses were considered as possessing a non-ts phenotype if log10 EID50/mL at 32 °C–log10 EID50/mL at 40 °C ≤ 4.0 log10 EID50/mL. The viruses were considered as having a non-ca phenotype if log10 EID50/mL at 32 °C–log10 EID50/mL at 26 °C ≥ 3.0 log10 EID50/mL.

2.3. Mice

Female BALB/c mice of 6–8 weeks of age were supplied by the laboratory breeding nursery “Rappolovo” (St. Petersburg Region, Russia). The animals were allowed free access to food and water.

2.4. Ferrets

Male ferrets (Mustela putorius furo), aged 5–6 months and weighing 1.1–1.9 kg at the beginning of the experiment, were supplied by the Scientific Production Organization House of Pharmacy JSC (St. Petersburg, Russia). They were prescreened by a routine hemagglutination inhibition test to ensure that they were negative for the A/South Africa/3626/2013 (H1N1)pdm09 virus being tested. Prior to infection, the ferrets were randomly divided into two groups and housed individually in isolation units with free access to food and water. The unpublished results of the testing ferrets nested in a past preclinical trial [18] are included in this paper. The ferrets were monitored for clinical signs and morbidity. The body temperature of the animals was recorded by temperature loggers (Data Storage Tag, DST micro-T ultra-small temperature loggers; Star-Oddi, Reykjavik, Iceland), which were placed in the peritoneal cavity.

2.5. Ethics Statement

The mice, ferrets and chicken embryos were handled in accordance with European Union legislation [19] and the Russian Manual for laboratory animals [20]. The mice use protocol (No. 1/20) was approved on 27 February 2020 by the Institutional Local Ethical Committee (IEM, St. Petersburg, Russia). The ferret study was conducted using protocol No. BEC 2.12/18 approved on 28 February 2018 by the Local Bioethical Committee of the Institute of Preclinical Research Ltd. (St. Petersburg, Russia). At the end of the study, the animals were humanely euthanized. The fertilized eggs used for virus propagation were discarded in an appropriate manner, according to the Russian Sanitary epidemiological rules SP 1.3.2322-08 (approved 28 Jan 2008).
The 50% lethal dose (LD50), 50% mouse infectious dose (MID50), and 50% pneumonia dose (PnD50) in mice were evaluated to standardize the infectious dose of the influenza viruses that possess different properties. The lethal dose was determined as the dose of the virus that kills 50% of the animals, MID50 was determined by isolating the virus from animal lungs, and PnD50 was determined by assessing the severity of gross pathological lesions in lungs on day 14 after infection.
The 50% dose was calculated by the routine Reed and Muench method [17] and expressed as log10 EID50/mL. Under inhalation anesthesia by ether, the animals were infected intranasally with serial 10-fold dilutions of the tested virus in 50 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing the appropriate viral dilution, divided equally between the nostrils.

2.6. Viral Replication in Lung Tissue

To determine the virus infectivity in the lower respiratory tract, the mice were lightly anesthetized with ether and inoculated intranasally with 50 μL of PBS containing 102 MID50 of the influenza virus, divided equally between the nostrils. The viral load was measured in lung samples collected on day 3 post infection. Tissue homogenates were prepared using a small bead mill TissueLyser LT (QIAGEN, Germany) in 1.0 mL of PBS containing antibiotic-antimycotic (Invitrogen, UK); the clarified supernatants were titrated in eggs at the temperature of 32 °C.
Ferrets (five animals per group) were given 6.0 log10 EID50/mL of SA or PBS. The preparations were divided between the two nostrils and given to the animals under short-term anesthesia induced by the intramuscular injection of Zoletil 100 at a dose of 12.5 mg/kg of body weight. The samples of the lung tissue of ferrets were taken on day 4 after infection. Nasal washes were collected until 4 days after infection. All the samples were analyzed for the presence of virus by culturing in embryonated chicken eggs, as described above.

2.7. Gross Pathology

A complete macroscopic post-mortem (gross pathology) examination was performed at the time of death or at the end of the observation period of 14 days. All the lung lobes were inspected. Macroscopic changes in the lungs were assessed in accordance with the color and the severity of the lesions.

2.8. Acute Toxicity in Mice (Development of Acute Pulmonary Edema)

A massive dose of virus (≥8.0 log10 EID50) was administered intranasally in mice under inhalation anesthesia by ether. The lethality from acute pulmonary edema was monitored daily for the first 4 days post-infection.

2.9. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis of H1N1pdm09 viruses was performed using the nextstrain.org website [21].

2.10. Statistics

Statistical analysis of the results was carried out using the GraphPad Prizm 7 and Statistica 10 software. The non-parametric Mann–Whitney test and Kruskal–Wallis test were applied for data comparison. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Determining ts and ca Phenotype In Ovo

The capacity to replicate outside of the optimal temperature of incubation is one of the important phenotypic characteristics of wild-type (WT) viruses. Four WT viruses (two antigenic variants of H1N1pdm09, reference virus of the Asian pandemic of 1957, and PR8) were studied for their capacity to grow at temperatures of 32 °C (optimal temperature), 26 °C and 40 °C.
Ts and ca characteristics of the H1N1pdm09 viruses were similar to those of previous pandemic and epidemic strains, SGP and PR8, respectively. Regardless of their antigenic characteristics, the reference virus of the Asian pandemic (SGP), two novel H1N1pdm09 viruses (CA and SA), and PR8 displayed the same pronounced non-ts/non-ca phenotype as the corresponding typical WT influenza virus (Table 2). The viruses were able to grow at an elevated temperature of 40 °C and were not able to grow at 26 °C.

3.2. Viral Replication in Lung Tissue

The replication capacity of different influenza viruses in the lungs of mice was evaluated. The influenza virus replication in the lower respiratory tract was detected, despite differences in antigenic specificity and their level of adaptation to mice. On day 3 post administration of 102 MID50, the lung virus titers of PR8 and SA reached 8.8 ± 0.5 log10 EID50/mL/g tissue and 8.9 ± 0.3 log10 EID50/mL/g tissue, respectively. The lowest lung virus titer was detected for CA (4.2 ± 0.4 log10 EID50/mL/g tissue) (Table 2). Although CA replicated in the lower respiratory tract of mice, it did not cause severe lung lesions that are typical of infection with the mouse-adapted PR8 strain.
The low dose of PR8 (1.0 log10 EID50/mL) infected 50% of the tested mice. Similarly, the low dose of SA (1.8 log10 EID50/mL) caused detectable virus replication in the lung tissue of 50% of the infected mice (Table 2). In contrast, to infect 50% of the mice with SGP and CA, higher doses were needed; 1.0 MID50 was found to be 5.5 log10 EID50/mL and 6.0 log10 EID50/mL, respectively.

3.3. Acute Toxicity in Mice

Massive doses of SGP, PR8 or SA were administered intranasally to mice causing 70%–80% mortality during the first days post infection (Table 2, Figure 1b).
The pathological examination of the lungs of dead mice showed that acute pulmonary edema affected all lobes of the lung. At the time of toxic death, the lungs were hemorrhagic (Figure 2a).

3.4. Pathogenicity in Mice

Mice were intranasally inoculated with a 10-fold serial dilution of each virus in PBS under general anesthesia with ether. The weight changes and survival rates were monitored daily for two weeks. The results are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 3. The viruses differed in the main characteristics of pathogenicity being tested in the mice. As shown in the section “acute toxicity in mice”, the toxic action of the intranasally inoculated mouse-adapted PR8 influenza virus killed mice within the first 3–4 days. As can be seen from Figure 3, the second peak of late deaths occurred at 6–10 days post infection and was due to pulmonary consolidation and primary viral pneumonia. Interestingly, non-mouse-adapted SA was also shown to be pathogenic to mice.
As reported in Figure 3, we found one peak of toxic death at 2–4 days post infection in mice that were administered a high dose of SA and the second one at 6–10 days. For SA, 50% LD was found to be 4.2 log10 EID50/mL. Lung-adapted PR8 displayed comparable pathogenicity: LD50 was found to be 4.0 log10 EID50/mL. Another non-mouse-adapted strain, SGP, caused acute pulmonary edema when administered intranasally at the high dose. It killed 90% of mice in 4 days. However, unlike SA, it has no natural ability to adapt to mice.
The ability of the non-adapted SGP to cause severe lung lesions disappeared with the virus dilution. The results indicated that one log10 reduction in the infectious dose resulted in the loss of the ability to cause toxic pulmonary edema. When diluted 10 times, the SGP did not display pathogenicity for mice; all the animals survived (Figure 1d). In contrast, when inoculated into mice at the low dose, SA maintained its pathogenicity. When administered as a dose of 1–10 LD50 (5.0 log10 EID50/mL), SA caused a lethal infection in mice compared with that of the PR8.
The maximum weight loss analysis revealed that the difference in body weight loss between the tested viruses was determined primarily by differences in their ability to cause lethal infection in mice. Weight loss (Figure 1e) and the level of lethality (Figure 1f) of mice infected with 1–10 LD50 of PR8 were compared with those of SA. Both the mouse-adapted PR8 and non-adapted SA strains caused severe weight loss compared with a mock group when a dose of 1–10 LD50 (5.0 log10 EID50/mL) was administered intranasally to the BALB/c mice. CA, which is not lethal to mice, did not cause significant weight loss.

3.5. A/South Africa/3626/2013 Virus Infection in Ferrets

The non-lung-adapted SA influenza virus in a dose of 6.0 log10 EID50/mL caused sneezing, nasal discharge on the external nares, and mouth breathing on day 3 post administration (Figure 4b) and severe lung lesions on day 4 (Figure 4a).
The virus efficiently multiplied in the lower respiratory tract of the ferrets. This was estimated through the titration of lung tissue samples taken on day 4 post infection (Figure 5). A virus titer of 7.3 ± 0.4 log10 EID50/mL/g lung tissue was achieved. On day 2 post infection, the virus titer reached a maximum titer of 8.0 ± 0.4 log10 EID50/mL.
Red circle—virus titer in the nasal washes of the infected ferrets; blue triangle—virus titer in the lung tissue of the infected ferrets; black circle—virus titer in the nasal washes of the ferrets inoculated with PBS; black triangle—virus titer in the lung tissue of ferrets inoculated with PBS; gray—the limit of virus detection (1.2 log10 EID50/mL).
The body temperature of the ferrets was recorded on days 0–4 every 10 min (Figure 6a). A significant rise in body temperature (1.5–2 °C, average 40 °C) was seen in the animals after the inoculation with SA influenza virus compared with the control group, which was administered PBS (Figure 6b). These data confirm the development of the disease in the inoculated animals.

3.6. Phylogenetic Characterization of H1N1pdm09 Viruses

The analysis of the H1N1pdm09 viruses that circulated between 2009 and 2014 revealed that the HA and NA of the A/California/07/2009 reference virus were genetically distinguished from those of A/South Africa/3626/2013 (Figure 7). For instance, the following mutations were identified in the HA2 of A/South Africa/3626/2013 compared with A/California/07/2009: S83P/I321V, S203T E47K, D97N, S185T/S124N, K283E/E172K, K163Q/A256T [22].

4. Discussion

The number of mouse-adapted lab influenza viruses is limited. The first mouse-adapted strains were initially developed in the 1930s–1960s. The most famous of them, PR8, was isolated in 1934. By 1938, the PR8 strain had already been passaged in mice 158 times [23]. In 1940, the number of mouse lung-to-lung passages had already reached 333 [24]. In addition, it has had over 100 passages in ferrets [25] and 200 passages in embryonated chicken eggs [26]. According to another source, the adaptation process of PR8 involved 77 passages in mice; 717 passages in cell culture; 30 passages in chicken embryos; five passages in ferrets; and an additional 50 passages in chicken embryos [27]. The result of such a long passage history was the complete attenuation of the virus for humans and a high level of adaptation to mice. PR8 has been used for pathogenicity studies for decades; however, this virus and the currently circulating H1N1pdm09 strains are antigenically and genetically dramatically distinct H1N1 viruses. Other classical mouse-adapted viruses are also antigenically out-of-date.
In recent years, numerous antigenically relevant human-origin or avian-origin influenza viruses have been adapted to other hosts. Some of them were adapted by sequential lung-to-lung passages through the new host [28,29,30,31,32], and others were obtained by introducing host-range mutations [32,33,34]. The adaptation of the influenza virus in a new host is rather difficult and may take time. However, it was recently shown that certain influenza viruses of human or avian origin might cause disease in mice without prior adaptation [11,12,13,14,15].
Therefore, in our study, an attempt was made to select a non-adapted current virus whose major biological properties corresponded to those of the lab-adapted virus. We compared the main biological properties of the classical mouse-adapted PR8 virus, reference virus of the Asian pandemic of 1957 SGP, and two current human influenza viruses of subtype H1N1pdm09. The objective of our study was to evaluate the possibility of using the current influenza virus for influenza studies without adaptation to a new host.
It has been previously shown that the influenza viruses that caused past pandemics or large outbreaks were typically able to grow at a temperature above the normal physiological range [35,36]. The ts and ca characteristics of the viruses tested in this study were similar to those of typical pandemic and epidemic WT viruses. All of them displayed a pronounced non-ts/non-ca phenotype: they were able to grow at an elevated temperature of 40 °C and not able to grow at 26 °C.
The standardization of the infectious dose is important for the study design and the subsequent interpretation of the results. The literature describes three options for standardizing the dose of the influenza virus to be used to infect experimental animals. (i) The first measure is the mouse infectious dose (MID50) [12,37]. Depending on the objectives, the animals were infected with 101–102 MID50. However, a preliminary determination of the MID50 is often an expensive procedure, especially when it comes to animals such as monkeys or ferrets. As an option, the infectious dose to be inoculated into animals can be established by (ii) the measure of the infectious virus titer in eggs (fifty-percent embryo infectious dose, EID50) or in tissue culture (fifty-percent tissue culture infectious dose, TCID50; plaque-forming units, PFU); the animals are infected with a dose in the range of 5.0–7.0 log10 EID50 [38,39,40,41,42,43] or 3.0–8.0 log10 TCID50/PFU [7,44,45,46,47,48,49]. (iii). If the virus to be tested is lung-adapted and may cause animal death, the fifty-percent lethal dose (LD50) can be used [2,37,46].
In this work, the mice experiments were conducted by determining the EID50, MID50, LD50 and the rarely defined PnD50. For the ferret study, to reduce pain and the number of experimental animals, we followed the principles of the 3Rs (replacement, reduction and refinement) and reduced the number of experimental groups to two: group 1 was inoculated intranasally with one dose of the WT virus—6.0 log10 EID50; group 2 was inoculated with the placebo (PBS).
In mammalian models (mice), the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza viruses that have evolved since the pandemic onset were not able to induce interstitial pneumonia [28]. In our experiments, the first 2009 pandemic virus, A/California/07/2009, efficiently replicated in the lower respiratory tract of mice but did not cause the severe lung lesions that are typical of infection with a mouse-adapted PR8 strain. In contrast, during their circulation in humans, some H1N1pdm09 viruses have acquired the pronounced ability to cause fatal pneumonia in mice.
The phylogenetic analysis of the HA genes of A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses circulating between 2009 and 2014 revealed a number of genetic groups, in which the reference strain A/California/07/2009 represents group 1 (clade 1). Between the pandemic 2009 A/California/07/2009 and A/South Africa/3626/2013 viruses (clade 6B), multiple substitutions have emerged in HA [22], resulting in viruses that possess new biological properties, such as a high toxicity and pathogenicity in lab animals. SA, isolated in 2013, was shown to be very toxic and pathogenic to mice. The 50% lethal dose of non-mouse-adapted SA was found to be 4.2 log10 EID50/mL. For comparison, the 50% lethal dose of mouse-adapted PR8 was found to be very close to that of SA (4.0 log10 EID50/mL).
Influenza viruses were shown to kill mice by exerting a so called toxic effect. The acute toxicity of mouse-adapted influenza viruses was discovered in the 1940s [16,50]. It has been reported that a massive dose of the virus, when inoculated by intranasal or intravenous routes, may cause severe lesions and damage in the lungs of mice. This toxic effect was not produced unless at least 8.0–8.5 log10 EID50 of the virus was inoculated [51]. The toxic property of influenza viruses was studied extensively in the 1940s–1960s. However, the nature and detailed mechanisms of this phenomenon remain unclear.
In the latter study, after intravenous injection, the PR8 virus killed rabbits [52]. Apparently, the mouse-adapted virus may be considered non-rabbit-adapted. In another study, the death of mice from sudden pulmonary edema occurred after they were infected with a very high dose of the non-mouse-adapted influenza virus [53].
In our experiments, the toxic effects of the intranasally inoculated lung-adapted PR8 influenza virus killed mice within the first 3–4 days. After these toxic deaths, the second peak of late deaths was detected at 6–10 days and was due to primary viral pneumonia. These results correspond to early publications [51]. Conversely, only one peak of early deaths (D2–D4) was seen after the inoculation of mice with non-mouse-adapted viruses. Ninety percent and 80% of the mouse deaths were recorded in the first 4 days post-intranasal inoculation with the non-mouse-adapted SGP and SA, respectively.
Two tested H1N1pdm09 viruses differed in their ability to cause acute pulmonary edema. CA did not cause pronounced toxic effects in BALB/c mice (10% lethality by day 4 post-intranasal administration). In contrast, the lethal effect of the intranasal inoculation of the massive dose of SA or SGP in mice was rather strengthened, with 20% and 10% survival by day 4 post infection, respectively. The lungs of the dead mice were examined for gross pathological lesions. This examination revealed pronounced acute pulmonary edema.
We found that the non-mouse-adapted SA virus displayed pathogenicity that was comparable to that of the mouse-adapted PR8 virus. This notion was supported by the observation that the main characteristics of SA (toxicity and lethality for mice, the level of virus replication in lungs, non-ts/non-ca phenotype) were close to those of PR8. Mice and ferrets are the most employed animals in virology. Therefore, it is important that SA is shown to be a good model for influenza research in both these animal models.
Intoxication is a typical clinical symptom of influenza. The significant association between severe manifestations of influenza infection and the toxicity of the influenza virus is worth further investigation. To facilitate the development of antivirals against acute pulmonary edema of influenza virus origin, screening platforms based on non-adapted, highly toxic influenza viruses should be established.
It is of importance to identify which mutations determine virulence, pathogenicity and the host range of mammals. The mechanisms responsible for a virus’ adaptation to a new host or its enhanced virulence are not fully understood. The contribution of genes coding HA, PB2, NP, or NA proteins to enhanced pathogenicity and mouse adaptation was established in a number of studies [32,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64], which suggest that mouse-adapted changes in HA and PB2 are key factors in increased pathogenicity and the adaptation in a new host. The mechanism of the natural adaptation of SA to mice is not clear yet.
The HAs of the early 2009 H1N1 pandemic viruses are not able to maintain a trimeric complex when expressed in a recombinant system. In contrast, the hemagglutinins of recent strains are more stable; the improvement of their stability is attributed to an E47K substitution in the HA2 subunit of the stalk that emerged naturally in the currently circulating viruses [65,66]. The strains isolated after 2010 possess new HA substitutions near the HA receptor-binding site (N125D and D127E or D127E and K209E) and efficiently grow in embryonated chicken eggs and mammalian cell lines [67]. Hemagglutinin thermostability is an important property of the influenza virus. Highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses displayed a higher thermostability compared with viruses with low pathogenicity [68]. The resistance of HA to high temperatures contributes to environmental resistance in viruses [69] and affects pathogenicity in sensitive mammalian hosts [70]. Pathogenicity for animals of the SA may be associated with more pronounced thermostability of its HA.

5. Conclusions

We believe that the reported data set allows us to make the overall conclusion that currently circulating non-mouse-adapted influenza viruses may be used to evaluate potential antiviral and antitoxic drugs and vaccine candidates. The advantage of non-adapted viruses is that there is no need for additional lab work for their adaptation to model animals. Non-mouse-adapted A/South Africa/3626/2013 (H1N1)pdm09 virus is a good option to use as a model for influenza research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.K. and A.R.; methodology, I.K., A.R., and L.P.; validation, A.K. and L.P.; formal analysis, I.K. and A.R.; investigation, I.K., A.R., M.A.F., E.B., and A.K.; resources, A.R.; data curation, I.K.; writing—original draft preparation, I.K., M.A.F., and E.B.; writing—review and editing, I.K., L.P., and L.R.; supervision, I.K. and L.R.; project administration, L.R. and A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Russian Ministry of Science and Education Program, ID 0557-2019-0003.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Ekaterina Stepanova for her help in the construction of phylogenetic trees. We are thankful to all the staff members of the Smorodintsev Department of Virology of the Institute of Experimental Medicine, St. Petersburg, Russia, who helped us in our work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Barnard, D.L. Animal models for the study of influenza pathogenesis and therapy. Antivir. Res. 2009, 82, A110–A122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bouvier, N.M.; Lowen, A.C. Animal Models for Influenza Virus Pathogenesis and Transmission. Viruses 2010, 2, 1530–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Enkirch, T.; von Messling, V. Ferret models of viral pathogenesis. Virology 2015, 479–480, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Matsuoka, Y.; Lamirande, E.W.; Subbarao, K. The mouse model for influenza. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2009, 15, 15G3.1–15G.3.30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Thangavel, R.R.; Bouvier, N.M. Animal models for influenza virus pathogenesis, transmission, and immunology. J. Immunol. Methods 2014, 410, 60–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. van der Laan, J.W.; Herberts, C.; Lambkin-Williams, R.; Boyers, A.; Mann, A.J.; Oxford, J. Animal models in influenza vaccine testing. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2008, 7, 783–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, L.; Bao, L.; Deng, W.; Zhu, H.; Chen, T.; Lv, Q.; Li, F.; Yuan, J.; Xiang, Z.; Gao, K.; et al. The mouse and ferret models for studying the novel avian-origin human influenza A (H7N9) virus. Virol. J. 2013, 10, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Margine, I.; Krammer, F. Animal models for influenza viruses: Implications for universal vaccine development. Pathogens 2014, 3, 845–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Matsuoka, Y.; Lamirande, E.W.; Subbarao, K. The ferret model for influenza. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2009, 15, 15G.2.1–15.G.2.29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Neumann, G.; Kawaoka, Y. Optimization of animal models to better predict influenza vaccine efficacy (VA). Vaccine 2020, 38, 2749–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Belser, J.A.; Szretter, K.J.; Katz, J.M.; Tumpey, T.M. Use of animal models to understand the pandemic potential of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses. Adv. Virus Res. 2009, 73, 55–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lu, X.; Tumpey, T.M.; Morken, T.; Zaki, S.R.; Cox, N.J.; Katz, J.M. A mouse model for the evaluation of pathogenesis and immunity to influenza A (H5N1) viruses isolated from humans. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 5903–5911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Belser, J.A.; Wadford, D.A.; Pappas, C.; Gustin, K.M.; Maines, T.R.; Pearce, M.B.; Zeng, H.; Swayne, D.E.; Pantin-Jackwood, M.; Katz, J.M.; et al. Pathogenesis of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) and triple-reassortant swine influenza A (H1) viruses in mice. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 4194–4203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Itoh, Y.; Shinya, K.; Kiso, M.; Watanabe, T.; Sakoda, Y.; Hatta, M.; Muramoto, Y.; Tamura, D.; Sakai-Tagawa, Y.; Noda, T.; et al. In vitro and in vivo characterization of new swine-origin H1N1 influenza viruses. Nature 2009, 460, 1021–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tumpey, T.M.; Basler, C.F.; Aguilar, P.V.; Zeng, H.; Solorzano, A.; Swayne, D.E.; Cox, N.J.; Katz, J.M.; Taubenberger, J.K.; Palese, P.; et al. Characterization of the reconstructed 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic virus. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2005, 310, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Henle, W.; Henle, G. Studies on the toxicity of influenza viruses. J. Bacteriol. 1946, 51, 632. [Google Scholar]
  17. Reed, L.J.; Muench, H. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1938, 27, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Isakova-Sivak, I.; Matyushenko, V.; Kotomina, T.; Kiseleva, I.; Krutikova, E.; Donina, S.; Rekstin, A.; Larionova, N.; Mezhenskaya, D.; Sivak, K.; et al. Sequential Immunization with Universal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine Candidates Protects Ferrets against a High-Dose Heterologous Virus Challenge. Vaccines 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. European_Council. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of September 22, 2010, on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32010L0063 (accessed on 14 May 2020).
  20. Karkishenko, N.N.; Grachev, C.V. Manual for Laboratory Animals and Alternative Models in Biomedical Research. Available online: http://www.scbmt.ru/mag/rukovodstvo.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2020).
  21. Hadfield, J.; Megill, C.; Bell, S.M.; Huddleston, J.; Potter, B.; Callender, C.; Sagulenko, P.; Bedford, T.; Neher, R.A. Nextstrain: Real-time tracking of pathogen evolution. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 4121–4123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wedde, M.; Biere, B.; Wolff, T.; Schweiger, B. Evolution of the hemagglutinin expressed by human influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) viruses circulating between 2008–2009 and 2013–2014 in Germany. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 305, 762–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Woolpert, O.C.; Gallagher, F.W.; Rubinstein, L.; Hudson, N.P. Propagation of the virus of human influenza in the guinea pig fetus. J. Exp. Med. 1938, 68, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Taylor, R.M. Experimental infection with influenza a virus in mice: The increase in intrapulmonary virus after inoculation and the influence of various factors thereon. J. Exp. Med. 1941, 73, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. WHO. Biosafety Risk Assessment and Guidelines for the Production and Quality Control of Human Influenza Pandemic Vaccines. Available online: http://www.who.int/biologicals/publications/trs/areas/vaccines/influenza/Annex%205%20human%20pandemic%20influenza.pdf (accessed on 18 May 2020).
  26. Magill, T.P.; Francis, T. The action of immune serum on human influenza virus in vitro. J. Exp. Med. 1937, 65, 861–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Hannoun, C. The evolving history of influenza viruses and influenza vaccines. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2013, 12, 1085–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Prokopyeva, E.A.; Sobolev, I.A.; Prokopyev, M.V.; Shestopalov, A.M. Adaptation of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus in experimental mouse models. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 39, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ilyushina, N.A.; Khalenkov, A.M.; Seiler, J.P.; Forrest, H.L.; Bovin, N.V.; Marjuki, H.; Barman, S.; Webster, R.G.; Webby, R.J. Adaptation of pandemic H1N1 influenza viruses in mice. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 8607–8616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Brown, E.G. Increased virulence of a mouse-adapted variant of influenza A/FM/1/47 virus is controlled by mutations in genome segments 4, 5, 7, and 8. J. Virol. 1990, 64, 4523–4533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Narasaraju, T.; Sim, M.K.; Ng, H.H.; Phoon, M.C.; Shanker, N.; Lal, S.K.; Chow, V.T. Adaptation of human influenza H3N2 virus in a mouse pneumonitis model: Insights into viral virulence, tissue tropism and host pathogenesis. Microbes Infect. 2009, 11, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Choi, E.J.; Lee, Y.J.; Lee, J.M.; Kim, Y.J.; Choi, J.H.; Ahn, B.; Kim, K.; Han, M.G. The effect of mutations derived from mouse-adapted H3N2 seasonal influenza a virus to pathogenicity and host adaptation. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Herfst, S.; Schrauwen, E.J.; Linster, M.; Chutinimitkul, S.; de Wit, E.; Munster, V.J.; Sorrell, E.M.; Bestebroer, T.M.; Burke, D.F.; Smith, D.J.; et al. Airborne transmission of influenza A/H5N1 virus between ferrets. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2012, 336, 1534–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Linster, M.; van Boheemen, S.; de Graaf, M.; Schrauwen, E.J.A.; Lexmond, P.; Manz, B.; Bestebroer, T.M.; Baumann, J.; van Riel, D.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F.; et al. Identification, characterization, and natural selection of mutations driving airborne transmission of A/H5N1 virus. Cell 2014, 157, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Rudenko, L.G.; Kiseleva, I.V.; Larionova, N.V.; Grigorieva, E.P.; Naikhin, A.N.; Alexandrova, G.I. Analysis of some factors influencing immunogenicity of live cold–adapted reassortant influenza vaccines. In Proceedings of the Options for the Control of Influenza V, Okinawa, Japan, 6–9 October 2003; pp. 542–546. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kiseleva, I.; Larionova, N.; Kuznetsov, V.; Rudenko, L. Phenotypic characteristics of novel swine-origin influenza A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) virus. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2010, 4, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Lu, X.; Edwards, L.E.; Desheva, J.A.; Nguyen, D.C.; Rekstin, A.; Stephenson, I.; Szretter, K.; Cox, N.J.; Rudenko, L.G.; Klimov, A.; et al. Cross-protective immunity in mice induced by live-attenuated or inactivated vaccines against highly pathogenic influenza A (H5N1) viruses. Vaccine 2006, 24, 6588–6593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Klimov, A.I.; Kiseleva, I.V.; Alexandrova, G.I.; Cox, N.J. Genes coding for polymerase proteins are essential for attenuation of the cold–adapted A/Leningrad/134/17/57 (H2N2) influenza virus. In Proceedings of the Options for the Control of Influenza IV, Crete, Greece, 23–28 September 2000; pp. 955–959. [Google Scholar]
  39. Larionova, N.; Kiseleva, I.; Isakova-Sivak, I.; Rekstin, A.; Dubrovina, I.; Bazhenova, E.; Ross, T.M.; Swayne, D.; Gubareva, L.; Tsvetnitsky, V.; et al. Live attenuated influenza vaccines against highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza: Development and preclinical characterization. J. Vaccines Vaccin. 2013, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. de Jonge, J.; Isakova-Sivak, I.; van Dijken, H.; Spijkers, S.; Mouthaan, J.; de Jong, R.; Smolonogina, T.; Roholl, P.; Rudenko, L. H7N9 Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine Is Highly Immunogenic, Prevents Virus Replication, and Protects Against Severe Bronchopneumonia in Ferrets. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther. 2016, 24, 991–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Huang, S.S.H.; Banner, D.; Paquette, S.G.; Leon, A.J.; Kelvin, A.A.; Kelvin, D.J. Pathogenic influenza B virus in the ferret model establishes lower respiratory tract infection. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 2127–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Middleton, D.; Rockman, S.; Pearse, M.; Barr, I.; Lowther, S.; Klippel, J.; Ryan, D.; Brown, L. Evaluation of vaccines for H5N1 influenza virus in ferrets reveals the potential for protective single-shot immunization. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 7770–7778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Paquette, S.G.; Banner, D.; Huang, S.S.; Almansa, R.; Leon, A.; Xu, L.; Bartoszko, J.; Kelvin, D.J.; Kelvin, A.A. Influenza Transmission in the Mother-Infant Dyad Leads to Severe Disease, Mammary Gland Infection, and Pathogenesis by Regulating Host Responses. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1005173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Broadbent, A.J.; Santos, C.P.; Anafu, A.; Wimmer, E.; Mueller, S.; Subbarao, K. Evaluation of the attenuation, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a live virus vaccine generated by codon-pair bias de-optimization of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus, in ferrets. Vaccine 2016, 34, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Carolan, L.A.; Rockman, S.; Borg, K.; Guarnaccia, T.; Reading, P.; Mosse, J.; Kelso, A.; Barr, I.; Laurie, K.L. Characterization of the Localized Immune Response in the Respiratory Tract of Ferrets following Infection with Influenza A and B Viruses. J. Virol. 2015, 90, 2838–2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Chen, J.R.; Yu, Y.H.; Tseng, Y.C.; Chiang, W.L.; Chiang, M.F.; Ko, Y.A.; Chiu, Y.K.; Ma, H.H.; Wu, C.Y.; Jan, J.T.; et al. Vaccination of monoglycosylated hemagglutinin induces cross-strain protection against influenza virus infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 2476–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Pascua, P.N.; Marathe, B.M.; Burnham, A.J.; Vogel, P.; Webby, R.J.; Webster, R.G.; Govorkova, E.A. Competitive Fitness of Influenza B Viruses Possessing E119A and H274Y Neuraminidase Inhibitor Resistance-Associated Substitutions in Ferrets. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Russier, M.; Yang, G.; Marinova-Petkova, A.; Vogel, P.; Kaplan, B.S.; Webby, R.J.; Russell, C.J. H1N1 influenza viruses varying widely in hemagglutinin stability transmit efficiently from swine to swine and to ferrets. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kim, E.H.; Park, S.J.; Kwon, H.I.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, Y.I.; Song, M.S.; Choi, E.J.; Pascua, P.N.; Choi, Y.K. Mouse adaptation of influenza B virus increases replication in the upper respiratory tract and results in droplet transmissibility in ferrets. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Henle, W.; Henle, G. The toxicity of influenza viruses. Science (New York, N.Y.) 1945, 102, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mims, C.A. An analysis of the toxicity for mice of influenza virus. II. Intravenous toxicity. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1960, 41, 593–598. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kato, N.; Hara, H. The toxic effect on rabbits of influenza virus given intravenously. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1961, 42, 145–152. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kiseleva, I.V. The effect of remantadine on the development of toxicosis caused by different influenza virus strains. Vopr. Virusol. 1981, 26, 541–543. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gabriel, G.; Czudai-Matwich, V.; Klenk, H.D. Adaptive mutations in the H5N1 polymerase complex. Virus Res. 2013, 178, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gabriel, G.; Fodor, E. Molecular determinants of pathogenicity in the polymerase complex. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2014, 385, 35–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hu, M.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, K.; Singh, K.; Ma, Q.; Zhou, J.; Chu, H.; Zheng, B.J. PB2 substitutions V598T/I increase the virulence of H7N9 influenza A virus in mammals. Virology 2017, 501, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Manz, B.; Schwemmle, M.; Brunotte, L. Adaptation of avian influenza a virus polymerase in mammals to overcome the host species barrier. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 7200–7209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Mok, C.K.; Lee, H.H.; Lestra, M.; Nicholls, J.M.; Chan, M.C.; Sia, S.F.; Zhu, H.; Poon, L.L.; Guan, Y.; Peiris, J.S. Amino acid substitutions in polymerase basic protein 2 gene contribute to the pathogenicity of the novel A/H7N9 influenza virus in mammalian hosts. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 3568–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Ping, J.; Dankar, S.K.; Forbes, N.E.; Keleta, L.; Zhou, Y.; Tyler, S.; Brown, E.G. PB2 and hemagglutinin mutations are major determinants of host range and virulence in mouse-adapted influenza A virus. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 10606–10618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Rodriguez-Frandsen, A.; Alfonso, R.; Nieto, A. Influenza virus polymerase: Functions on host range, inhibition of cellular response to infection and pathogenicity. Virus Res. 2015, 209, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Song, H.; Qi, J.; Khedri, Z.; Diaz, S.; Yu, H.; Chen, X.; Varki, A.; Shi, Y.; Gao, G.F. An Open Receptor-Binding Cavity of Hemagglutinin-Esterase-Fusion Glycoprotein from Newly-Identified Influenza D Virus: Basis for Its Broad Cell Tropism. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Tan, L.; Su, S.; Smith, D.K.; He, S.; Zheng, Y.; Shao, Z.; Ma, J.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, G. A combination of HA and PA mutations enhances virulence in a mouse-adapted H6N6 influenza A virus. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 14116–14125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Watanabe, T.; Tisoncik-Go, J.; Tchitchek, N.; Watanabe, S.; Benecke, A.G.; Katze, M.G.; Kawaoka, Y. 1918 Influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) and the viral RNA polymerase complex enhance viral pathogenicity, but only HA induces aberrant host responses in mice. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 5239–5254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Yamayoshi, S.; Yamada, S.; Fukuyama, S.; Murakami, S.; Zhao, D.; Uraki, R.; Watanabe, T.; Tomita, Y.; Macken, C.; Neumann, G.; et al. Virulence-affecting amino acid changes in the PA protein of H7N9 influenza A viruses. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 3127–3134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Cotter, C.R.; Jin, H.; Chen, Z. A single amino acid in the stalk region of the H1N1pdm influenza virus HA protein affects viral fusion, stability and infectivity. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1003831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yang, H.; Chang, J.C.; Guo, Z.; Carney, P.J.; Shore, D.A.; Donis, R.O.; Cox, N.J.; Villanueva, J.M.; Klimov, A.I.; Stevens, J. Structural stability of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus hemagglutinins. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 4828–4838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Wang, W.; Lu, J.; Cotter, C.R.; Wen, K.; Jin, H.; Chen, Z. Identification of critical residues in the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase of influenza virus H1N1pdm for vaccine virus replication in embryonated chicken eggs. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 4642–4649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. He, L.; Liu, D.; Hu, J.; Sun, W.; Gao, R.; Shi, L.; He, D.; Li, B.; Wang, X.; Gu, M.; et al. A comprehensive comparison of the fifth-wave highly pathogenic and low-pathogenic H7N9 avian influenza viruses reveals potential threat posed by both types of viruses in mammals. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 1459–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Terregino, C.; Beato, M.S.; Bertoli, E.; Mancin, M.; Capua, I. Unexpected heat resistance of Italian low-pathogenicity and high-pathogenicity avian influenza A viruses of H7 subtype to prolonged exposure at 37 degrees C. Avian Pathol. 2009, 38, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. An, S.H.; Lee, C.Y.; Hong, S.M.; Song, C.S.; Kim, J.H.; Kwon, H.J. Novel Mutations Evading Avian Immunity around the Receptor Binding Site of the Clade 2.3.2.1c Hemagglutinin Gene Reduce Viral Thermostability and Mammalian Pathogenicity. Viruses 2019, 11, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Viruses 12 00590 g001 550
Figure 1. Weight loss and lethality of the influenza viruses for BALB/c mice. Weight loss, %, p < 0.05 (a,c,e), and survival, % (b,d,f), were monitored daily for 14 days. Mice were inoculated intranasally with 8.5 log10 EID50 (a,b), 7.5 log10 EID50 (c,d) or 5.0 log10 EID50 (1–10 LD50) (e,f).
Figure 1. Weight loss and lethality of the influenza viruses for BALB/c mice. Weight loss, %, p < 0.05 (a,c,e), and survival, % (b,d,f), were monitored daily for 14 days. Mice were inoculated intranasally with 8.5 log10 EID50 (a,b), 7.5 log10 EID50 (c,d) or 5.0 log10 EID50 (1–10 LD50) (e,f).
Viruses 12 00590 g001
Viruses 12 00590 g002 550
Figure 2. Gross examination of the lungs of mice infected with A/South Africa/3626/2013 (H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus: (a) hemorrhagic pulmonary edema (8.2 log10 EID50/mouse, D4); (b) primary viral pneumonia (1 PnD50/mouse = 5.0 log10 EID50/mouse, D14); (c) normal lungs of a control mouse inoculated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (D14).
Figure 2. Gross examination of the lungs of mice infected with A/South Africa/3626/2013 (H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus: (a) hemorrhagic pulmonary edema (8.2 log10 EID50/mouse, D4); (b) primary viral pneumonia (1 PnD50/mouse = 5.0 log10 EID50/mouse, D14); (c) normal lungs of a control mouse inoculated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (D14).
Viruses 12 00590 g002
Viruses 12 00590 g003 550
Figure 3. Lethality of the influenza viruses for the BALB/c mice. The mice were inoculated with a massive dose of influenza virus (8.0–9.0 log10 EID50/mL).
Figure 3. Lethality of the influenza viruses for the BALB/c mice. The mice were inoculated with a massive dose of influenza virus (8.0–9.0 log10 EID50/mL).
Viruses 12 00590 g003
Viruses 12 00590 g004 550
Figure 4. Nasal symptoms and gross examination of the lungs of the ferrets infected with A/South Africa/3626/2013 (H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus. (a,b) The ferrets were inoculated with 6.0 log10 EID50. (a) Severe lung lesions were registered on day 4 post infection. (b) On D3 post infection, the animals displayed sneezing, nasal discharge on the external nares (red arrow) and mouth breathing. (c) In contrast, the lungs of the ferrets inoculated with PBS were normal.
Figure 4. Nasal symptoms and gross examination of the lungs of the ferrets infected with A/South Africa/3626/2013 (H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus. (a,b) The ferrets were inoculated with 6.0 log10 EID50. (a) Severe lung lesions were registered on day 4 post infection. (b) On D3 post infection, the animals displayed sneezing, nasal discharge on the external nares (red arrow) and mouth breathing. (c) In contrast, the lungs of the ferrets inoculated with PBS were normal.
Viruses 12 00590 g004
Viruses 12 00590 g005 550
Figure 5. Virus replication in the lungs and upper respiratory tract of the ferrets as measured by titration in embryonated chicken eggs (mean ± SD).
Figure 5. Virus replication in the lungs and upper respiratory tract of the ferrets as measured by titration in embryonated chicken eggs (mean ± SD).
Viruses 12 00590 g005
Viruses 12 00590 g006 550
Figure 6. Body temperature of the ferrets after infection with the SA influenza virus: (a) variation in the body temperature until 4 days post infection (raw data). The temporary decreases in temperature were the result of sedation during the collection of nasal washes. The body temperature was recorded by temperature loggers every 10 min; (b) the difference between the infected group and the control group, represented by the mean ± SD, p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Body temperature of the ferrets after infection with the SA influenza virus: (a) variation in the body temperature until 4 days post infection (raw data). The temporary decreases in temperature were the result of sedation during the collection of nasal washes. The body temperature was recorded by temperature loggers every 10 min; (b) the difference between the infected group and the control group, represented by the mean ± SD, p < 0.05.
Viruses 12 00590 g006
Viruses 12 00590 g007 550
Figure 7. Phylogenetic trees of hemagglutinin (upper panel) and neuraminidase (lower panel) of the H1N1pdm09 influenza viruses. The website https://nextstrain.org/ [21] was used to construct the figure. Black cross: A/California/07/2009; black circle: A/South Africa/3626/2013.
Figure 7. Phylogenetic trees of hemagglutinin (upper panel) and neuraminidase (lower panel) of the H1N1pdm09 influenza viruses. The website https://nextstrain.org/ [21] was used to construct the figure. Black cross: A/California/07/2009; black circle: A/South Africa/3626/2013.
Viruses 12 00590 g007
Table
Table 1. Viruses used in this study.
Table 1. Viruses used in this study.
Strain DesignationType/SubtypeLab Adaptation to MicePathogenicity in MiceAcute Toxicity in Mice
PR8H1N1yesyesyes
LEEByesyesyes
VICH3N2yesyesyes
ACHH3N2yesyesyes
SGPH2N2nonoyes
CAH1N1pdm09nonono
SAH1N1pdm09noyesyes
Table
Table 2. The main characteristics of the influenza viruses tested in vivo and in ovo.
Table 2. The main characteristics of the influenza viruses tested in vivo and in ovo.
TestingStrain Designation
PR8SGPCASA
In Vivo Study
Acute toxicity 1, %8/10 (80%)8/10 (80%)1/10 (10%)7/10 (70%)
LD50 24.0>8.5>8.04.2
PnD50 32.3>8.5>8.02.8
MID50 41.0 5.57.01.8
Max weight loss 5, %22.225.23.120.3
Mean virus lung titer 5 ± SD8.8 ± 0.56.8 ± 0.44.2 ± 0.48.9 ± 0.3
In Ovo Study
Mean virus titer 6 ± SD at 32 °C9.0 ± 0.38.5 ± 0.28.0 ± 0.29.2 ± 0.5
Mean virus titer 6 ± SD at 40 °C7.2 ± 0.36.5 ± 0.56.8 ± 0.38.7 ± 0.4
Mean virus titer 6 ± SD at 26 °C2.2 ± 0.31.8 ± 0.12.0 ± 0.24.0 ± 0.3
Phenotypenon-ts/non-canon-ts/non-canon-ts/non-canon-ts/non-ca
1 Mortality from acute hemorrhagic pulmonary edema to day 4 post-intranasal inoculation of undiluted virus-containing allantoic fluid containing ≥ 8.0 log10 50% embryo infectious dose (EID50/mL) of the virus. 2 Expressed as the log10 EID50/mL required to give 1 50% lethal dose (LD50). 3 Expressed as the log10 EID50/mL required to give 150% pneumonia dose (PnD50). 4 Expressed as the log10 EID50/mL required to give 1 50% mouse infectious dose (MID50). 5 Mice were inoculated with 100 MID50; expressed as log10 EID50/mL/gram of lung tissue. 6 Expressed as log10 EID50/mL.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kiseleva, I.; Rekstin, A.; Al Farroukh, M.; Bazhenova, E.; Katelnikova, A.; Puchkova, L.; Rudenko, L. Non-Mouse-Adapted H1N1pdm09 Virus as a Model for Influenza Research. Viruses 2020, 12, 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12060590

AMA Style

Kiseleva I, Rekstin A, Al Farroukh M, Bazhenova E, Katelnikova A, Puchkova L, Rudenko L. Non-Mouse-Adapted H1N1pdm09 Virus as a Model for Influenza Research. Viruses. 2020; 12(6):590. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12060590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kiseleva, Irina, Andrey Rekstin, Mohammad Al Farroukh, Ekaterina Bazhenova, Anastasia Katelnikova, Ludmila Puchkova, and Larisa Rudenko. 2020. "Non-Mouse-Adapted H1N1pdm09 Virus as a Model for Influenza Research" Viruses 12, no. 6: 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12060590

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop