Next Article in Journal
Editorial Overview: Endogenous Retroviruses in Development and Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Invasive Alien Plants in Africa and the Potential Emergence of Mosquito-Borne Arboviral Diseases—A Review and Research Outlook
Previous Article in Journal
Field Verification of an African Swine Fever Virus Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay during an Outbreak in Timor-Leste
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low Aedes aegypti Vector Competence for Zika Virus from Viremic Rhesus Macaques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

First Record of Mosquito-Borne Kyzylagach Virus in Central Europe

1
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Květná 8, CZ-60365 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, CZ-62100 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2020, 12(12), 1445; https://doi.org/10.3390/v12121445
Submission received: 24 September 2020 / Revised: 10 December 2020 / Accepted: 11 December 2020 / Published: 16 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Arboviruses)

Abstract

:
RNA of Kyzylagach virus (KYZV), a Sindbis-like mosquito-borne alphavirus from Western equine encephalitis virus complex, was detected in four pools (out of 221 pools examined), encompassing 10,784 female Culex modestus mosquitoes collected at a fishpond in south Moravia, Czech Republic, with a minimum infection rate of 0.04%. This alphavirus was never detected in Central Europe before.

1. Introduction

Mosquito-borne alphaviruses (genus Alphavirus; family Togaviridae) have often been reported to cause disease outbreaks worldwide [1]. In the past few decades, single or large epidemic events were caused by Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) in Europe, Asia, the Americas, and Pacific islands; Sindbis virus (SINV) in Northern Europe; Ross River (RRV) and Barmah Forest viruses (BFV) in Australia; Mayaro virus (MAYV) in South America; or O’nyong’nyong virus (ONNV) in Africa [2]. Pathogenic alphaviruses generally cause fever, headache, rash, fatigue, muscle pain, arthralgia, and/or arthritis, less frequent symptoms include nausea, dizziness, enlarged lymph nodes, diarrhea, and photophobia. Some patients, mostly in the case of SINV fever, experienced prolonged joint symptoms (mainly arthritis) over months or even years after infection. Infections are often self-limited or subclinical, which might contribute to their underdiagnosis and, thus, limited availability of routine clinical testing [3,4]. As a consequence, the eco-epidemiology of mosquito-borne alphaviruses and actual burden of diseases in human population is still not completely understood [1,2,3].
The mosquito Culex modestus Ficalbi, 1889 (Diptera: Culicidae) is a Eurasian mosquito species that is distributed from England to southern Siberia and common in southern and central countries of Europe. Typical larval habitats of Cx. modestus constitute ponds and swamps with rich vegetation, marshes, flooded wetlands, ditches, and rice fields [5]. In the Czech Republic, the species has been frequently reported from South Moravia and South Bohemia, where both larval and adult stages have been observed from early June to late September, typically in reed beds surrounding fish ponds [6,7], and often syntopically with Anopheles hyrcanus Pallas, 1771, An. maculipennis Meigen, 1818, Cx. pipiens Linnaeus, 1758, and Uranotaenia unguiculata Edwards, 1913 [7].
Several surveillance studies have been aimed at the detection of pathogenic flaviviruses and bunyaviruses in a particular mosquito vector [8,9]. However, despite the fact that several members of this group, namely SINV or Western and Eastern equine encephalitis viruses, circulate within a mosquito–bird cycle [3], similarly to West Nile virus (WNV) and Usutu virus (USUV), both of which are established in Cx. modestus mosquitoes in Central Europe [8,10], only few studies have focused directly on alphaviruses. Therefore, we aimed at the molecular screening of Cx. modestus mosquito females for pathogenic alphaviruses, which might (in addition to WNV and USUV) contribute to public health burden of mosquito-borne viral diseases in Central Europe.

2. Materials and Methods

Mosquito Trapping, Their Identification, and Processing

In this study, Cx. modestus mosquitoes were collected in reedbeds along shore of the fishpond “Mlýnský” (48°47′ N, 16°49′ E; 86 ha, 162 m a.s.l.) near Lednice in South Moravia, Czechland. They were captured using CDC miniature light‒CO2 (dry ice)-baited traps during two seasons, 2010 (July 15 to October 14) and 2014 (July 30 to August 28). The trapped insects were then transported to the laboratory in cooled flasks and stored at −65 °C until examination. Mosquito species and sex were determined on a cooled plate under a stereomicroscope [5]. Monospecific pools of 50 females of Cx. modestus were prepared. They were homogenized in 1.5–2.0 mL of cooled phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, supplemented with 0.4% bovine serum albumin fraction V (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA), penicillin (500 i.u./mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL), and gentamicin (100 μg/mL). The homogenates were centrifuged at 1500× g for 20 min (at 0 °C), and supernatants were used for RNA extraction and viral isolation attempts. The RNA was extracted from 150 μL of mosquito homogenates by using the QIAamp viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All suspensions were tested by broad-range reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for alphaviruses using generic primers assigned as “VIR966” [11]. Alphavirus-positive pools were then tested with primers targeting three different fragments, specifically positions 8122 to 8885, 9415 to 10,044, and 9978 to 10,642 of Sindbis virus polyprotein gene, encompassing E2 and E1 regions [12]. A continuous RT-PCR system employing the QIAGEN OneStep RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was applied on RNA extracts. Specific PCR products were further processed by the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and characterized by sequence analysis (Sanger method) on an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Obtained sequences were compared by a basic alignment search tool (BLAST) and further aligned with a partial nucleotide sequences of particular protein coding region and/or complete genome sequences of other Sindbis virus strains deposited in GenBank database. The evolutionary history was inferred by the maximum-likelihood method (ML) using Mega 7.0 [13]. The best-fit model of molecular evolution was determined for the analysis dataset using the Akaike Criterion (AIC) in Modeltest ver. 2.1.4 [14]. For ML analysis, we conducted heuristic searches under a GTR + G (general time-reversible model). Initial tree(s) were obtained automatically by applying neighbor-join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the maximum-composite-likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. A discrete gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (G = 0.9441). The tree with the highest log likelihood −10,918.66) is shown. The robustness of inferred trees was assessed by bootstrapping (1000 replicates).
Pools positive for Alphavirus RNA in PCR were tested on suckling mice by intracerebral inoculation (0.02 mL). The experiments with laboratory mice were conducted in accordance with the Czech Animal Protection Act no. 246/1992, and the protocols were approved by the Institutional and Central Care and Use Committees at the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic in Prague. The facility is accredited by the Czech National Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (70084/2016-MZE-17214).

3. Results and Discussion

Females of Cx. modestus mosquitoes collected in 2010 (4487 individuals in 90 pools) were all negative, while four pools collected in 2014 (6297 individuals in 131 pools) were positive for Kyzylagach virus (KYZV). The minimum infection rate is therefore 0.06%. However, no RNA-positive pool killed suckling mice. According to phylogenetic analysis of a 1992-bp-long fragment of the polyprotein gene (encompassing E2 and E1 regions) (Figure 1), we can conclude that our strains share sequence similarity (98.2% nucleotide identity) with the strain KYZV LEIV-65A (GenBank accession no. KF981618), strain Stavropol (MG679375) as well as Chinese strain XJ-160 (AF103728). Moreover, all obtained sequences were identical. The Czech representative sequence was deposited in the GenBank database under accession no. MT951214.
A prototype strain of KYZV was first isolated from Cx. modestus mosquitoes collected in the Kyzyl-Agach game preserve (39°03′ N, 48°50′ E) on the shores of the Caspian Sea in southeastern Azerbaijan in a breeding colony of ardeid birds on 16 August 1969 [15]. The virus has been named as Sindbis-like virus (subtype or variant of Sindbis virus, SINV: [16,17]). A virtually identical strain (XJ-160) of KYZV was isolated from Anopheles sp. mosquitoes captured in a rice field at the Yili River in Xinjiang, China in 1990 [18], with only 0.01% difference in nucleotides and amino acids between strains LEIV-65A and XJ-160 [19]. KYZV was later assigned to Sindbis virus genotype 4 using genome sequencing data [19,20,21]. Based on phylogenetic analysis, an additional five SINV genotypes were identified: Sindbis virus genotype 1 (SINV-1) is distributed in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East; Sindbis virus genotype 2 (SINV-2) and Sindbis virus genotype 6 (SINV-6) in Australia; Sindbis virus genotype 3 (SINV-3) in Southeast Asia; and Sindbis virus genotype 5 (SINV-5) (also referred to as Whataroa virus) in New Zealand. Human infections including documented epidemics are attributed in most cases to the SINV-1 genotype [20,22].
According to literature [15,23] both SINV and KYZV kill newborn mice when inoculated intracerebrally, but newborn mice are not susceptible to intraperitoneal inoculation of KYZV, whereas they are killed after the same route of inoculation with SINV. There is also only a one-way antigenic cross-reaction between these viruses: KYZV antibodies do not neutralize SINV, while SINV antibodies neutralize both viruses in a plaque-reduction neutralization test [16]. The same one-way reaction was observed in a complement fixation test [23].
The current distribution of KYZV includes four geographically distant areas—Czech Republic, southern Russia, Azerbaijan, and China (Figure 2). Calisher et al. [16] wrote “Viruses of the WEE complex (including Sindbis virus) with lesser antigenic differences may develop in discrete ecologic conditions,” which may be also valid for KYZV. In accordance with a previous study [15], the vector of KYZV is most likely Cx. modestus occurring predominantly in wetland habitats with reed beds and abundant water birds across Europe and Asia. The Kyzyl-Agach game preserve, the place where the KYZV prototype strain was originally isolated, is the most important migration stopover site for migrating waterfowl in the former Soviet Union (geographically and politically belonging to Azerbaijan). During wintertime, coots, ducks, geese, swans, and flamingo are found in the ice-free freshwater coves and shallows of the sea. During the summer, large colonies of glossy ibises, squacco herons, egrets, and purple herons occur. Similarly, a local (Czech) study site is characterized by the typical reed bed ecosystem (Phragmites communis alliance) situated at the littoral zone of the fishponds. More than 30 species of birds have been recorded breeding in the reed bed in southern Moravia, and an additional 54 wild wetland and terrestrial bird species visit this ecosystem during seasonal movements [24]. This might contribute to transport of mosquito-borne KYZV over long geographical distances.
From an epidemiological point of view, Cx. modestus is a very efficient vector of West Nile virus (WNV) [8,25,26] and is implicated in the circulation of two other local arboviruses, Ťahyňa and Lednice viruses [27,28]. The females of Cx. modestus feed preferably on birds (e.g., Anseriformes), but sometimes feed on mammals (e.g., horses and rabbits) and may therefore act as bridge vectors for certain arboviruses [29,30,31]. They are also reported to commonly bite humans outdoors, close to their larval habitat [5]. Cx. modestus might be a frequent human-biting species in certain areas of the United Kingdom [32].
From a medical point of view, KYZV antibodies were previously found in a Chinese human population. A seroprevalence study carried out with the strain XJ-160 involving 521 subjects from 10 different provinces in China showed that 19% of the subjects had positive antibody titers against the XJ-160 strain [18]. Partial cross-reaction with very closely related SINV-1 cannot be excluded. In fact, SINV-4 has never been reported associated to human disease.
In conclusion, future surveillance efforts in Central Europe for mosquito-borne viruses of medical importance should take into account variant Sindbis viruses, in addition to SINV, WNV, USUV, Ťahyňa, and Batai arboviruses. Studies on alphaviruses have been neglected or they have received less attention in Central Europe.

Author Contributions

I.R., P.S., L.B., and H.B. collected mosquitoes in the field. O.Š. identified mosquitoes. S.Š., P.S., P.D., I.R., and Z.H. performed laboratory analyses and interpreted results. J.M. did sequencing and performed bioinformatic analysis. S.Š., I.R., and Z.H. coordinated the study and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was financially supported by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (reg. no. NV19-09-00036). All rights reserved.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jakub Vojtíšek and Romana Kejíková for excellent technical assistance. P.S. was supported by the Veterinary Research Institute (RVO: RO 0518). This research was supported by the Institute of Vertebrate Biology of the Czech Academy of Sciences (RVO: 68081766 to LG).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Lwande, O.W.; Obanda, V.; Bucht, G.; Mosomtai, G.; Otieno, V.; Ahlm, C.; Evander, M. Global emergence of Alphaviruses that cause arthritis in humans. Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 2015, 5, 29853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Azar, S.R.; Campos, R.K.; Bergren, N.A.; Camargos, V.N.; Rossi, S.L. Epidemic Alphaviruses: Ecology, Emergence and Outbreaks. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hubálek, Z.; Rudolf, I. Microbial Zoonoses and Sapronoses; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. Adouchief, S.; Smura, T.; Sane, J.; Vapalahti, O.; Kurkela, S. Sindbis virus as a human pathogen—Epidemiology, clinical picture and pathogenesis. Rev. Med. Virol. 2016, 26, 221–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Becker, N.; Petric, D.; Zgomba, M.; Boase, C.; Madon, M.; Dahl, C.; Kaiser, A. Mosquitoes and Their Control, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  6. Votýpka, J.; Šeblová, V.; Rádrová, J. Spread of the West Nile virus vector Culex modestus and the potential malaria vector Anopheles hyrcanus in Central Europe. J. Vector Ecol. 2008, 33, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Šebesta, O.; Gelbič, I.; Peško, J. Seasonal dynamics of mosquito occurrence in the Lower Dyje River Basin at the Czech-Slovak-Austrian border. Ital. J. Zool. 2013, 80, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Rudolf, I.; Bakonyi, T.; Šebesta, O.; Peško, J.; Venclíková, K.; Mendel, J.; Betášová, L.; Blažejová, H.; Straková, P.; Nowotny, N.; et al. West Nile virus lineage 2 isolated from Culex modestus mosquitoes in the Czech Republic, 2013: Expansion of the European WNV endemic area to the North? Eurosurveillance 2014, 19, 20867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Hubálek, Z.; Šebesta, O.; Peško, J.; Betášová, L.; Blažejová, H.; Venclíková, K.; Rudolf, I. Isolation of Ťahyňa virus (California encephalitis group) from Anopheles hyrcanus (Diptera, Culicidae), a mosquito species new to, and expanding in, Central Europe. J. Med. Entomol. 2014, 51, 1264–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rudolf, I.; Bakonyi, T.; Šebesta, O.; Mendel, J.; Peško, J.; Betášová, L.; Blažejová, H.; Venclíková, K.; Straková, P.; Nowotny, N.; et al. Co-circulation of Usutu virus and West Nile virus in a reed bed ecosystem. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Eshoo, M.W.; Whitehouse, C.A.; Zoll, S.T.; Massire, C.; Pennella, T.D.; Blyn, L.B.; Sampath, R.; Hall, T.A.; Ecker, J.A.; Desai, A.; et al. Direct broad-range detection of alphaviruses in mosquito extracts. Virology 2007, 368, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Jöst, H.; Bialonski, A.; Storch, V.; Günther, S.; Becker, N.; Schmidt-Chanasit, J. Isolation and phylogenetic analysis of Sindbis viruses from mosquitoes in Germany. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 1900–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Posada, D. jModeltest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 1253–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lvov, D.K.; Gromashevsky, V.L.; Skvortsova, T.M.; Berezina, L.K.; Zakaryan, V.A. Kyzylagach virus (family Togaviridae, genus Alphavirus), a new arbovirus isolated from Culex modestus mosquitoes trapped in the Azerbaijan SSR. Vopr. Virusol. 1979, 5, 519–523. [Google Scholar]
  16. Calisher, C.H.; Karabatsos, N.; Lazuick, J.S.; Monath, T.P.; Wolff, K.L. Reevaluation of the western equine encephalitis antigenic complex of alphaviruses (family Togaviridae) as determined by neutralization tests. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1988, 38, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. King, A.M.Q.; Adams, M.J.; Carstens, E.B.; Lefkowitz, E.J. Genus Alphavirus. In Virus Taxonomy-Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses (Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses); Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 1105–1108. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liang, G.D.; Li, L.; Zhou, G.L.; Fu, S.H.; Li, Q.P.; Li, F.S.; He, H.H.; Jin, Q.; He, Y.; Chen, B.Q.; et al. Isolation and complete nucleotide sequence of a Chinese Sindbis-like virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2000, 81, 1347–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alkhovsky, S.V.; Lvov, D.K.; Shchelkanov, M.Y.; Shchetinin, A.M.; Deryabin, P.G.; Gitelman, A.K.; Botikov, A.G.; Samokhvalov, E.I. Complete genome characterization of the Kyzylagach virus (KYZV) (Togaviridae, Alphavirus, Sindbis serogroup) isolated from mosquitoes Culex modestus Ficalbi, 1889 (Culicinae) collected in a colony of herons (Ardeidae Leach, 1820) in Azerbaijan. Vopr. Virusol. 2014, 59, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lundstrom, J.O.; Pfeffer, M. Phylogeographic structure and evolutionary history of Sindbis virus. Vector. Borne Zoonot. Dis. 2010, 10, 889–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lvov, D.K.; Shchelkanov, M.; Alkhovsky, S.V.; Deryabin, P.G. Zoonotic Viruses of Northern Eurasia: Taxonomy and Ecology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ling, J.; Smura, T.; Lundström, J.O.; Pettersson, J.H.O.; Sironen, T.; Vapalahti, O.; Lundkvist, Å.; Hesson, J.C. Introduction and Dispersal of Sindbis Virus from Central Africa to Europe. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e00620-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Karabatsos, N. International Catalogue of Arboviruses, Including Certain Other Viruses of Vertebrates, 3rd ed.; American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene: San Antonio, TX, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hubálek, Z.; Juřicová, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Pellantová, J.; Hudec, K. Arboviruses associated with birds in southern Moravia, Czechoslovakia. Acta Sci. Nat. Brno 1989, 23, 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  25. Balenghien, T.; Vazeille, M.; Grandadam, M.; Schaffner, F.; Zeller, H.; Reiter, P.; Sabatier, P.; Fouque, F.; Bicout, D.J. Vector competence of some French Culex and Aedes mosquitoes for West Nile Virus. Vector-Borne Zoonot Dis. 2008, 8, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cotar, A.I.; Falcuta, E.; Prioteasa, L.F.; Dinu, S.; Ceieanu, C.S.; Paz, S. Transmission dynamics of the West Nile virus in mosquito vector populations under the influence of weather factors in the Danube delta, Romania. EcoHealth 2016, 13, 796–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Danielová, V. To the problem of the vector of Lednice virus. Folia Parasitol. 1984, 31, 379–382. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hubálek, Z.; Halouzka, J. Arthropod-borne viruses of vertebrates in Europe. Acta Sci. Nat. Brno 1996, 30, 1–95. [Google Scholar]
  29. Brugman, V.A.; Hernandez-Triana, L.M.; England, M.E.; Medlock, J.M.; Mertens, P.P.C.; Logan, J.G.; Wilson, A.J.; Fooks, A.R.; Johnson, N.; Carpenter, S. Blood-feeding patterns of native mosquitoes and insights into their potential role as pathogen vectors in the Thames estuary region of the United Kingdom. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rádrová, J.; Šeblová, V.; Votýpka, J. Feeding behaviour and spatial distribution of Culex mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in wetland areas of the Czech Republic. J. Med. Entomol. 2013, 50, 1097–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Balenghien, T.; Fouque, F.; Sabatier, P.; Bicout, D.J. Horse-, bird-, and human-seeking behaviour and seasonal abundance of mosquitoes in a West Nile virus focus of southern France. J. Med. Entomol. 2006, 43, 936–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brugman, V.A.; England, M.E.; Stoner, J.; Tugwell, L.; Harrup, L.E.; Wilson, A.J.; Medlock, J.M.; Logan, J.G.; Fooks, A.R.; Mertens, P.P.C.; et al. How often do mosquitoes bite humans in southern England? A standardised summer trial at four sites reveals spatial, temporal and site-related variation in biting rates. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Phylogram demonstrating relationship of Kyzylagach virus (KYZV) detected in mosquitoes in the Czech Republic, based on a 1992-bp-long partial nucleotide sequence of the virus polyprotein gene from Czech sequences obtained in this work and other Sindbis virus strains circulating worldwide. Each record consists of particular accession number, source (human/mosquito/bird), place, and year of detection/isolation. Czech samples are highlighted by red triangles. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using the maximum-likelihood (ML) algorithm using the general time-reversible model (MEGA 7.0). The robustness of trees was tested by bootstrap resampling of 1000 replicates, and its values are listed near the nodes (only values ≥85 are shown). The horizontal bar shows genetic distance. (Legend: BABV—Babanki virus; KYZV—Kyzylagach virus; OCKV—Ockelbo virus; SINV—Sindbis virus; WHATV—Whataroa virus; WEEV—Western equine encephalitis virus).
Figure 1. Phylogram demonstrating relationship of Kyzylagach virus (KYZV) detected in mosquitoes in the Czech Republic, based on a 1992-bp-long partial nucleotide sequence of the virus polyprotein gene from Czech sequences obtained in this work and other Sindbis virus strains circulating worldwide. Each record consists of particular accession number, source (human/mosquito/bird), place, and year of detection/isolation. Czech samples are highlighted by red triangles. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using the maximum-likelihood (ML) algorithm using the general time-reversible model (MEGA 7.0). The robustness of trees was tested by bootstrap resampling of 1000 replicates, and its values are listed near the nodes (only values ≥85 are shown). The horizontal bar shows genetic distance. (Legend: BABV—Babanki virus; KYZV—Kyzylagach virus; OCKV—Ockelbo virus; SINV—Sindbis virus; WHATV—Whataroa virus; WEEV—Western equine encephalitis virus).
Viruses 12 01445 g001
Figure 2. Current geographical distribution of Kyzylagach virus: 1—South Moravia (Czech Republic); 2—Stavropol region (southern Russia); 3—Kyzylagach preserve (Azerbaijan); 4—Yili river, Xinjiang (China).
Figure 2. Current geographical distribution of Kyzylagach virus: 1—South Moravia (Czech Republic); 2—Stavropol region (southern Russia); 3—Kyzylagach preserve (Azerbaijan); 4—Yili river, Xinjiang (China).
Viruses 12 01445 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Šikutová, S.; Dočkal, P.; Straková, P.; Mendel, J.; Šebesta, O.; Betášová, L.; Blažejová, H.; Hubálek, Z.; Rudolf, I. First Record of Mosquito-Borne Kyzylagach Virus in Central Europe. Viruses 2020, 12, 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12121445

AMA Style

Šikutová S, Dočkal P, Straková P, Mendel J, Šebesta O, Betášová L, Blažejová H, Hubálek Z, Rudolf I. First Record of Mosquito-Borne Kyzylagach Virus in Central Europe. Viruses. 2020; 12(12):1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12121445

Chicago/Turabian Style

Šikutová, Silvie, Patrik Dočkal, Petra Straková, Jan Mendel, Oldřich Šebesta, Lenka Betášová, Hana Blažejová, Zdeněk Hubálek, and Ivo Rudolf. 2020. "First Record of Mosquito-Borne Kyzylagach Virus in Central Europe" Viruses 12, no. 12: 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12121445

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop