Next Article in Journal
Porcine HMGCR Inhibits Porcine Circovirus Type 2 Infection by Directly Interacting with the Viral Proteins
Previous Article in Journal
Presence of Antibodies against Sindbis Virus in the Israeli Population: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/v11060543
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of American-Lineage Influenza H5N2 Reassortant Vaccine Viruses for Pandemic Preparedness

by
Po-Ling Chen
1,2,†,
Alan Yung-Chih Hu
1,†,
Chun-Yang Lin
1,
Tsai-Chuan Weng
1,
Chia-Chun Lai
1,3,
Yu-Fen Tseng
1,
Ming-Chu Cheng
4,5,
Min-Yuan Chia
1,6,
Wen-Chin Lin
7,
Chia-Tsui Yeh
7,
Ih-Jen Su
1 and
Min-Shi Lee
1,*
1
National Institution of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes (NHRI), Zhunan, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan
2
Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
3
College of Life Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
4
Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan
5
Animal Health Research Institutes, Danshui, New Taipei City 25158, Taiwan
6
Department of Veterinary Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
7
Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defence Medical Centre, Taipei 23742, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equal contribution
Viruses 2019, 11(6), 543; https://doi.org/10.3390/v11060543
Submission received: 23 April 2019 / Revised: 4 June 2019 / Accepted: 5 June 2019 / Published: 11 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Viral Immunology, Vaccines, and Antivirals)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Novel low-pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) H5N2 viruses hit poultry farms in Taiwan in 2003, and evolved into highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses in 2010. These viruses are reassortant viruses containing HA and NA genes from American-lineage H5N2 and six internal genes from local H6N1 viruses. According to a serological survey, the Taiwan H5N2 viruses can cause asymptomatic infections in poultry workers. Therefore, a development of influenza H5N2 vaccines is desirable for pandemic preparation. In this study, we employed reverse genetics to generate a vaccine virus having HA and NA genes from A/Chicken/CY/A2628/2012 (E7, LPAI) and six internal genes from a Vero cell-adapted high-growth H5N1 vaccine virus (Vero-15). The reassortant H5N2 vaccine virus, E7-V15, presented high-growth efficiency in Vero cells (512 HAU, 107.6 TCID50/mL), and passed all tests for qualification of candidate vaccine viruses. In ferret immunization, two doses of inactivated whole virus antigens (3 μg of HA protein) adjuvanted with alum could induce robust antibody response (HI titre 113.14). In conclusion, we have established reverse genetics to generate a qualified reassortant H5N2 vaccine virus for further development.

1. Introduction

Avian influenza (AI) viruses may not readily infect humans and cause diseases; however, mutations or reassortment give AI viruses a chance to escape the host barrier. AI H5, H6, H7, H9, and H10 subtypes are considered to have pandemic potential because of the occurrence of human infections and low level of population immunity [1]. In particular, AI H5N1 and H7N9 viruses have caused hundreds of human cases with high mortality in recent years [2]. Vaccination is a cost-effective method to mitigate impacts of an influenza pandemic and the World Health Organization (WHO) reference labs have generated many candidate vaccine viruses (CVVs) against those AI with high pandemic potentials. However, some local strains with limited circulation may not be included as a high priority but should not be ignored.
In late 2003, low-pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) H5N2 viruses emerged in poultry farms in Taiwan. The H5N2 viruses carry a unique gene constellation containing HA and NA genes from American-lineage H5N2 viruses and six internal genes from local H6N1 viruses. The H5N2 viruses hit poultry farms again in 2008 and evolved into highly pathogenic AI (HPAI) strains in 2010 [3,4]. A serologic surveillance conducted by Centres for Disease Control, Taiwan (Taiwan CDC) in 2012 showed that the seroconversion rate in poultry workers was 4.3%, which is significantly higher than that in general populations [5].
HA and NA genes of the novel H5N2 reassortant viruses belong to the American lineage which is antigenically different from the current H5N1 vaccines of the Eurasian lineage (Table S1) [6]. Therefore, it is desirable to develop American lineage-derived influenza H5 vaccine viruses for pandemic preparedness.
The embryonated egg-based vaccine production platform is a mature technology and has been widely used since 1945. However, the supply of the eggs may be influenced by the HPAI outbreaks. Moreover, an egg-induced antigenic drift during vaccine production may lead to poor vaccine effectiveness [7]. Therefore, alternative technology such as cell-based platforms is becoming attractive [8], including MDCK and Vero cells. Many influenza viruses grow well in MDCK cells and reach high titres with short adaptation times. Several MDCK cell-derived seasonal influenza vaccines have been licensed in Europe, South Korea, and the United States [9,10,11,12]. However, MDCK cells can only be used to produce influenza vaccines. Due to the unpredictability of influenza pandemics, multi-functional platforms are desirable for influenza pandemic preparedness [13]. Vero cells are widely used for the production of human vaccines (e.g., poliovirus, Japanese encephalitis, rabies) and could be developed as a multi-functional platform for the production of human vaccines [14]. Therefore, this study chose the Vero cell-based platform to develop H5N2 influenza vaccines for pandemic preparedness.
The current master donor virus used in the WHO reference labs, A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (PR8), was developed for the egg-based platform but not for Vero cell culture system. Therefore, a new master donor virus was required for the Vero cell-based platform. In 2010, a Vero cell-adapted high-growth H5N1 vaccine virus, Vero-15, was generated in our laboratory [15]. Vero-15 is the Vero-adapted NIBRG-14 (A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1) × PR8) virus with internal genes derived from the PR8 strain. In this study, the Vero-15 virus was further used to establish reverse genetics platforms and generate H5N2 reassortant vaccine viruses for the Vero cell culture system.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cells, Viruses, and Medium

Vero cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA) and grown in M199 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Moregate, Bulimba, Queensland, Australia). The cells were further adapted to serum-free medium, VP-SFM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For virus bulk preparation, the cells were grown in VP-SFM with Cytodex 1 microcarriers (4 g/L) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). When cell number reached 2 × 106 cells/mL, viruses infected with 0.0001 MOI (multiplicity of infection). Avian influenza viruses, A/Chicken/CY/A2628/2012 (H5N2)—(E7, LPAI) and A/Chicken/YL/0502/2012 (H5N2)—(R3, HPAI), were provided by Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI). Vero-15 virus was the Vero cell-adapted NIBRG-14 (A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1) × PR8) virus from the National Health Research Institute (NHRI) [15].

2.2. Clone

H5N2 virus RNAs were extracted by MagNA Pure Compact Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and transcribed to cDNA with Uni12 (AGCAAAAGCAGG) primers using HiScript I Reverse Transcriptase kit (AM0670-1000, BIONOVAS, Toronto, ON, Canada). HA genes of H5N2 viruses (E7-HA: KY989967; R3-HA: KJ720208) were amplified by Bm-HA-F and Bm-NS-R, and NA genes (E7-NA: KY989968; R3-NA: KR137712) were amplified by Bm-NA-F and Bm-NA-R (Table S2) [16]. The HA and NA genes were cloned into pHW2000 vectors [17]. Plasmids which contained HA and NA genes of E7 and R3 viruses were named as pHW-E7-HA, pHW-E7-NA, pHW-R3-HA, and pHW-R3-NA, respectively. By direct mutagenesis, the cleavage site of HA genes was modified from REKR (E7) and RRKR (R3) to GETR by primer 08-forward and 08-reverse to reduce the virus pathogenicity (Table S2) [18], and the plasmid with modified HA gene was named pHW-E7-HAm and pHW-R3-HAm. Six internal genes of Vero-15 virus were cloned to pHW2000, which were pHW-V15-PB1, pHW-V15-PB2, pHW-V15-PA, pHW-V15-NP, pHW-V15-NS, and pHW-V15-M.

2.3. Generatation of H5N2 Vaccine Viruses Using Reverse Genetics

Eight plasmids which contained NA and modified HA genes from an H5N2 virus and six internal genes from the Vero-15 virus were transfected into Vero cells to generate H5N2 vaccine viruses by electroporation (Bio-RAD Gene Pulser Xcell system, Hercules, CA, USA). A quantity of 5 × 106 Vero cells were suspended in 300 μL of OPTI-MEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and then mixed with eight plasmids (3 μg of each plasmid). The cell mixture was transferred into a 4-mm electroporation cuvette and then electroporated by two 220V square waves (20 ms duration time of each pulse and 0.1 s span between pulses). After electroporation, the cell mixture was transferred into a T25 flask which contained 5 mL pre-warmed M199 + 10% FBS and then incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for overnight. The next day, the medium was replaced by M199 with 2 μg/mL TPCK-trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Transfected cells were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 1μg/mL TPCK-trypsin was added to the medium every day. Generated viruses were harvested when the cells showed 90% CPE or on day 7 after the transfection. The viruses may need further passages or plaque purification in Vero cells. Virus titre was determined by haemagglutination assay (HA assay) and 50% Tissue Culture Infective Dose (TCID50) following the WHO standard procedures [19].

2.4. Sequencing

Viral RNA was extracted by MagNA Pure Compact Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), and then the extracted viral RNAs were amplified by the one-step RT-PCR (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Primers for sequencing are listed in Table S2.

2.5. Antigenicity Analysis

Antigenicity was analysed by using hemagglutinin inhibition assay (HI assay). Tested antigens were diluted to 4 HAU and incubated with ferret antisera, anti-R3 and anti-A/CK/CH/1209/2003 (anti-CH/2003). These two antisera were generated in the previous study to evaluate the antigenicity of H5N2 viruses isolated from 2003 to 2012 [6]. Turkey and chicken red blood cells (RBCs) were used for HI assay following WHO standard procedures [19].

2.6. Trypsin Dependency Test

A concentration of 1 × 106 Vero cells/well was cultured in 6-well plates at 37 °C, 5% CO2 overnight. Before virus infection, the cells were washed with 1X PBS. Tested viruses were diluted with M199 or M199 containing 2 μg/mL TPCK-trypsin and then added to wells with a cell layer. The cells and viruses were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for an hour, and then washed with 1X PBS to remove unattached viruses. In a trypsin-contained group, the cells were covered with M199 containing 0.3% agarose and 2 μg/mL TPCK-trypsin, and in counterpart group, the cells were covered with M199 containing 0.3% agarose (VWR-Amersco, Radnor, PA, USA) without TPCK-trypsin. The cells were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for three days. The plaques were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde and stained with 0.5% crystal violet [20].

2.7. Intravenous Pathogenicity Index (IVPI)

Six-week-old SPF chickens were provided by AHRI. Before injection, viruses were tested for sterilization and 10-fold diluted. Ten chickens were injected intravenously with 100 μL of diluted viruses. The chickens were examined daily for 10 days and scored [21].

2.8. Pathogenicity Tests and Immunization in Ferrets

Four- to six-month-old ferrets were obtained through a laboratory-breeding program at Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defence Medical Centre. Prior to the animal study, microchips capable of measuring temperature were implanted beneath the skin between the shoulder blades. Ferrets were numbered and housed separately in animal biosafety level 3 (ABSL3) laboratories with individual temperature control at 22–24 °C and 55–60% relative humidity throughout the experiment. All study procedures and animal care were conducted in accordance with the guidelines and under the supervision of Institutional Committee on Animal Care and Use, Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defence Medical Centre.
For the pathogenicity test, each ferret was intranasally infected with 0.5 mL of viruses, and each group had four ferrets (two males and two females). After the infection, the weight and temperature of the ferrets were monitored every day. Two ferrets (one male and one female) were sacrificed at DPI (day post-infection) 3, and the nasal turbinate, upper respiratory tract, lower respiratory tract, lung, and Hilar lymph node were collected for virus titration. Based on a pilot test, the H5N2 viruses were not pathogenic at DPI 7. Therefore, the other two ferrets were sacrificed at DPI 14 using the same procedure.
For immunization study, four ferrets (two males and two females) were intramuscularly injected with two doses of inactivated whole virus vaccine adjuvanted with Al(OH)3 (Brenntag, Essen, Germany). Each dose contained 3 μg of HA protein and 300 μg of Al(OH)3. The ferrets were boosted 14 days after the first immunization. The sera were collected 23 days after the first immunization.

2.9. Preparation of Standard Antigen and Antiserum

For standard antigen preparation, Vero cells were grown in VP-SFM with 4 g/L microcarrier using the 14-L bioreactor (CelliBen® BLU Single-Use Bioreactor, International Labmate Ltd, St Albans, Hertfordshire, UK) and infected with viruses (0.0001 MOI). The supernatant of virus culture was harvested on day 4. The harvest was inactivated with 0.01% formaldehyde and purified with flow-through chromatography [22]. The purified viruses were treated with PNGase (P0704S, NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA), and the HA content was analysed by SDS-PAGE and densitometry [23].
Before goat immunization, the HA protein was cleaved from viruses with bromelain (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and purified by using sucrose gradient [24]. A goat received 20 μg of HA protein with complete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at the first immunization. After that, the goat was boosted with 10 μg of HA protein with incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) every two weeks. Until the HI titre against the given antigen, HA protein, reached 320, the serum was collected. To remove plasma protein, the serum was treated with 5% caprylic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to the pH value of 5.5, and then centrifuged at 2400× g for 5 min. The supernatant was moved to a new tube and shaken at 300 rpm at 31 °C for 90 min. The supernatant was centrifuged at 3500× g for 45 min to remove more precipitant. The purified serum was stored at −20 °C [25].

2.10. Radial Immunodiffusion (SRID) Assay

Agarose gel (1%) was prepared with agarose powder (SeaKem® ME Agarose, Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) and 1× PBS with 0.05% NaN3. The gel was mixed with the purified goat anti-E7HA serum. The ratio of serum to agarose was 1:75. The gel was placed in a circular mould and wells were generated by gel puncher. The purified viruses were treated with 1/10 V of 10% Zwittergent® 3-14 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution for 30 min and then diluted with 1× PBS with 0.05% NaN3. The diluted antigens were added to the wells and left overnight. After that, the gel was washed and then dried at 37 °C. Finally, the gel was stained with Coomassie blue to show the precipitin rings [26].

2.11. Ethics Statement

The animal experiments have followed the guidelines of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) based on the Institutional Animal Care Committee Guidebook published by the US Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare under the supervision of IACUC, Animal Health Research Institutes (A02019, 2 April 2013), and IACUC, Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defence Medical Centre (AN-102-24, 12 April 2013).

3. Results

3.1. Generation of Influenza Reassortant H5N2 Vaccine Viruses

H5N2 reassortant viruses E7-V15 and R3-V15 were generated with the NA and modified HA genes from E7 and R3 viruses and internal genes from Vero-15 virus. The viruses were passaged in Vero cells. The HA titre of E7-V15 V3 virus was 4 HAU and that of R3-V15 V3 virus was undetectable. In addition, the E7-V15 V3 also had a higher live virus titre than the R3-V15 V3 (Table 1). Therefore, E7-V15 virus was chosen for further adaptation to improve the virus yield. After 16 passages and three times of plaque purification in Vero cells, a vaccine seed virus was selected (E7-V15 C11) and its virus stock was generated (128 HAU and 3.16 × 107 TCID50/mL). Growth efficiency of the vaccine virus was evaluated in Vero cells, which peaked to 5.62 × 107 TCID/mL and 512 HAU at DPI 2 (Figure S1).

3.2. Qualification of Candidate Vaccine Viruses

According to the suggestions of WHO and CDC [27,28], there are several tests for the qualification of candidate vaccine viruses (Table 2), including live virus titre, HA titre, sequence analysis, antigenic analysis, sterility test, trypsin dependency, chicken pathogenicity, ferret pathogenicity, and genetic stability of HA cleavage site. The candidate vaccine virus, E7-V15 C11, had mutations on HA (N155D, T231K, G323R, and I381V), NA (N4K) and PA (E349G) proteins compared with E7 (HA and NA) and Vero-15 (PA). The antigenicity was analysed with two ferret antisera (anti-R3 and anti-CH/2003). The HI titres of E7 and E7-V15 C11 viruses were 226 and 80 with anti-R3 sera, respectively, and 320 and 160 with anti-CH/2003 sera, respectively (Table S3). There seemed to be a slight reduction with anti-R3 sera. Therefore, we also did the HI assay with sera from immunised ferret (Section 3.7), infected chicken (IVPI test, Section 3.4) and goat (standard reagent obtained in this study, Section 3.6). The HI titre of chicken sera against E7 and E7-V15 C11 was 113, and that of goat serum was 320. The HI titres of immunised ferret against E7-V15 C11 and E7 only had a two-fold difference (226 and 113, respectively). Overall, the HI titres of sera against E7 and E7-V15 C11 were less than four-fold different (Table S3). Based on this result, the candidate vaccine virus has similar antigenicity to its parental virus.

3.3. Genetic Stability and Trypsin Dependency of H5N2 Vaccine Viruses

To evaluate the genetic stability on HA cleavage site, E7-V15 C11 virus was passaged in Vero cells ten times and sequenced. The HA cleavage site was the same after passages (RETR↓GLF). In trypsin dependency test, E7-V15 C11 virus formed plaques when trypsin was supplied in the culture medium, but it lost the ability without trypsin (Figure S2).

3.4. Intravenous Pathogenicity Index (IVPI) of H5N2 Vaccine Viruses

Nine chickens were intravenously injected with the vaccine candidate virus, E7-V15 C11, and monitored for ten days. The chickens did not show any syndromes and were alive (IVPI = 0). The sera were collected for the HI test on the 10th day after infection. The HI titres of eight chicken sera were 16 or higher (Table S4). The seropositive rate was 89% (eight out of nine). This result shows that E7-V15 C11 virus can infect chickens, but does not cause diseases.

3.5. Pathogenicity in Ferrets

Ferret model was used to assess the pathogenicity of influenza viruses in mammals. The candidate vaccine virus, E7-V15 C11, was intranasally inoculated to four ferrets (3.16 × 107 TCID50/mL, 0.5 mL/ferret). The physical condition of the ferrets was monitored for 14 days. The body temperature of all infected ferrets was lower than 39.5 °C. The body weight change was lower than 5% (Figure S3), and the ferrets did not show any symptoms. Live virus titre of organs collected from the infected ferrets was measured with Vero cells, and there was no detectable virus titre in these samples (Table S5). The sera from the infected ferrets were collected at DPI 14, and the homologous HI titre was higher than 20, which indicated that the candidate vaccine virus could infect ferrets with low pathogenicity.
Based on the WHO and US CDC guidelines [27,28], reassortant candidate vaccine viruses derived from H5 and H7 LPAI viruses should be assessed by monitoring the sequence of the HA cleavage site, testing the genetic stability, and conducting pathogenicity tests in ferrets and egg embryos (or chickens). The results of quality tests are listed in Table 2, which indicates that the candidate vaccine virus is lowly pathogenic and maintains a similar antigenicity with the parental virus.

3.6. Preparation of Standard Antigen and Antiserum

We generated standard reagents for the quantitation of HA content using E7-V15 C11 viruses. An inactivated whole virus antigen was prepared by using the serum-free microcarrier culture platform to grow viruses, and a flow-through chromatography system for purification [22]. The HA content of the whole virus antigen (H5N2 E7 Ag), as a standard antigen, was calculated as 64.8 μg/mL (36.4% of total protein) using SDS-PAGE and densitometry (Figure S4 and Table S6). For standard antiserum preparation, the purified virus was treated with bromelain, and the HA protein (E7 bHA) was purified using sucrose gradient. A goat was immunized with E7 bHA to generate anti-E7 bHA serum. The HI titre of the serum was 320 against H5N2 wild-type viruses, E7 and R3. Single radial immunodiffusion (SRID) assay was conducted with goat anti-E7 bHA serum and the H5N2 E7 Ag. The R-value of the SRID assay was 0.9973 (Figure 1).

3.7. Ferret Immunization

Four ferrets (two males and two females) were injected intramuscularly with two doses of the H5N2 E7 Ag (3 μg of each dose) adjuvanted with alum hydroxide. Interestingly, the male ferrets had a much lower serum HI titre against two wild-type H5N2 viruses compared with female ones (Table 3). Since the male and female ferrets had very different serum HI antibody responses, it is not desirable to merge them for calculating GMT. Overall, the female ferrets had similar serum HI antibody titres against two wild-type virus antigens (GMT 160 and 113) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Although avian influenza viruses are considered as a risk of a future pandemic, local circulating viruses sometimes are ignored, such as the novel American-lineage H5N2 reassortant viruses. However, considering the uncertainty of disease outbreak, the potential of influenza viruses causing human infection should receive more attention. In previous studies, the H5N2 viruses were found to cause asymptomatic infection in poultry workers [5] and have different antigenicity with Eurasia-lineage H5 viruses (Table S1) [6]. Therefore, we generated a candidate vaccine virus and related standard reagents for pandemic preparedness.
In this study, we focused on an establishment of Vero cell-based reverse genetics and production platform. Because small countries usually do not have enough space and financial support to build many factories for each kind of vaccines, a multi-functional platform is reasonable [13]. Vero cells, which are widely used for human vaccines, are suitable for this platform [14]. By using internal genes from a Vero cell-adapted high-growth H5N1 viruses, Vero-15, two Vero-derived Taiwan H5N2 reassortant viruses were generated (Table 1).
The first step of influenza vaccine production is to generate a high-growth vaccine virus. In this study, we generated two reassortant viruses, but only one (E7-V15) had detectable HA titres. Based on the receptor preference assay with turkey and horse RBCs, the E7 virus can bind 2,3- and 2,6-sialic acid receptor, but the R3 virus could only bind 2,3-sialic acid receptor (data not shown). Therefore, the low growth efficiency of the other reassortant virus (R3-V15) may be due to the receptor preference. Overall, it is desirable to generate multiple reassortant viruses bearing different receptor binding preferences.
Because the HA and live virus titres of E7-V15 were too low for commercial production (4 HAU and 1.78 × 106 TCID50/mL, respectively), we adapted E7-V15 in Vero cells to generate high-growth vaccine viruses. After 16 passages and three times of plaque purification in Vero cells, the HA and live virus titre of E7-V15 C11 increased to 128 HAU and 3.16 × 107 TCID50/mL, respectively, and adapted mutations appeared on HA, NA and PA proteins. There were four adapted mutations on HA protein, N155D, T231K, G323R and I381V, and a mutation on NA protein, NA-N4K. The HA-N155D is located near a reported glycosylation site HA-154N [29]. Glycosylation at HA protein is related to antigenicity [29,30,31]. In our study, the amino acid sequences (154–158) of parental virus E7 and Vero-adapted E7-V15 C11 were NNVYR and NDVYR, respectively, so there was no glycosylation at HA-154 and HA-155 before and after adaptation. The NA mutation, NA-N4K, was located in the cytoplasmic tail of NA protein (M NPNQK). The cytoplasmic tail of NA protein is important for lipid raft targeting, virus assembly and morphology [32,33,34,35,36], not for antigenicity. Besides, our study shows that the antigenicity of E7 and E7-V15 C11 were similar based on serum HI assay (Table S3). Therefore, Vero-adapted mutations on HA and NA proteins in this study seemed not to change the antigenicity of E7-V15 C11 compared with E7.
SRID is the standard assay for quantification of HA contents [37]. However, the preparation of standard reagents (antigen and antiserum) for SRID is time-consuming and labour-intensive, which could delay the supply of pandemic influenza vaccines. Currently, only four essential regulatory laboratories (ERLs) are invited to generate these standard reagents, and it will be desirable to include more laboratories to accelerate the preparation of standard reagents for pandemic preparedness [38]. In this study, we successfully generated the standard reagents for SRID to quantify our vaccine antigen for the ferret study.
Ferret is the standard animal model for evaluating human influenza vaccines [28]. We assessed the pathogenicity and immunogenicity of the H5N2 vaccine in ferrets, and found that the H5N2 candidate vaccine virus was lowly pathogenic and could elicit a robust antibody response in female ferrets but not male ferrets (Table 3). We found three previous ferret vaccination studies which evaluated H5 viruses (Eurasian-lineage) and commercial adjuvants, and provided serum antibody response and gender information (two female studies and one male study) [39,40,41]. In the female ferret studies, ferrets were immunised with 3.8 μg of split antigens and oil-in-water adjuvant (GSK), and robust immune responses were observed (serum HI antibody ~100–300), which is similar to the finding in our study (Table 3). In the male study, ferrets were immunised with 7.5 μg of split antigens and oil-in-water adjuvants (AS03), strong immune responses were observed (serum HI antibody about 400). It is hard to make a conclusion about gender difference in immune response to influenza vaccination as different antigen types and adjuvants used in different studies.
Influenza risk assessment tool (IRAT) helps the decision of vaccine development [42,43]. For lowly pathogenic influenza viruses, generation of high-growth candidate vaccine viruses may be enough. When the risk increases, it may be necessary to initiate vaccine production and clinical trials. In this study, a high-growth candidate vaccine virus has been generated using reverse genetics for a Vero cell-based production platform. Once the risk of the H5N2 viruses increases, the candidate vaccine virus can be used for production and start of clinical trials.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/11/6/543/s1, Figure S1: Growth curve of E7-V15 C11 virus, Figure S2: Trypsin dependency test of the H5N2 reassortant virus, E7-V15 C11, Figure S3: The change of body weight and temperature in pathogenicity assay in ferrets, Figure S4: The HA content of purified virus, E7-V15 C11, was analysed by using SDS-PAGE, Table S1: The cross-reactive HI antibody titres using Eurasian-lineage H5N1 mouse anti-sera, Table S2: The sequence of the primers used in this study, Table S3: The antigenicity of reassortant viruses analysed using HI assay, Table S4: The HI titre of E7-V15 C11 virus-infected chickens, Table S5: Virus titres (log (TCID50)) of organs from infected ferrets were tested with Vero cells, Table S6: The HA content and HA:NP ratio of the E7-V15 C11 purified whole virus antigens.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-S.L.; Formal analysis, P.-L.C. and A.Y.-C.H.; Funding acquisition, I.-J.S. and M.-S.L.; Investigation, P.-L.C., C.-Y.L., T.-C.W., C.-C.L., Y.-F.T., M.-Y.C. and W.-C.L.; Resources, A.Y.-C.H., M.-C.C., C.-T.Y., I.-J.S. and M.-S.L.; Supervision, A.Y.-C.H., M.-C.C., M.-Y.C., C.-T.Y. and M.-S.L.; Writing–original draft, P.-L.C.; Writing–review & editing, M.-S.L.

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, MOHW102-TD-B-111-V003 and the Ministry of Science and Technology, MOST102-2321-B-400-022, Taiwan.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful for help from the Animal Health Research Institute, Institute of Preventive Medicine, Taiwan Centres for Disease Control, National Cheng Kung University and National Institute of Infectious Diseases.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schrauwen, E.J.; Fouchier, R.A. Host adaptation and transmission of influenza A viruses in mammals. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2014, 3, e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Neumann, G.; Kawaoka, Y. Transmission of influenza A viruses. Virology 2015, 479–480, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cheng, M.C.; Soda, K.; Lee, M.S.; Lee, S.H.; Sakoda, Y.; Kida, H.; Wang, C.H. Isolation and characterization of potentially pathogenic H5N2 influenza virus from a chicken in Taiwan in 2008. Avian Dis. 2010, 54, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lee, C.C.; Zhu, H.; Huang, P.Y.; Peng, L.; Chang, Y.C.; Yip, C.H.; Li, Y.T.; Cheung, C.L.; Compans, R.; Yang, C.; et al. Emergence and evolution of avian H5N2 influenza viruses in chickens in Taiwan. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 5677–5686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, H.S.; Yang, J.R.; Liu, M.T.; Yang, C.H.; Cheng, M.C.; Chang, F.Y. Influenza A(H5N2) virus antibodies in humans after contact with infected poultry, Taiwan, 2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 857–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lin, C.Y.; Chia, M.Y.; Chen, P.L.; Yeh, C.T.; Cheng, M.C.; Su, I.J.; Lee, M.S. Assessment of pathogenicity and antigenicity of American lineage influenza H5N2 viruses in Taiwan. Virology 2017, 508, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Harding, A.T.; Heaton, N.S. Efforts to Improve the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine. Vaccines 2018, 6, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hegde, N.R. Cell culture-based influenza vaccines: A necessary and indispensable investment for the future. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2015, 11, 1223–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Manini, I.; Trombetta, C.M.; Lazzeri, G.; Pozzi, T.; Rossi, S.; Montomoli, E. Egg-Independent Influenza Vaccines and Vaccine Candidates. Vaccines 2017, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Perez Rubio, A.; Eiros, J.M. Cell culture-derived flu vaccine: Present and future. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2018, 14, 1874–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Choi, W.S.; Noh, J.Y.; Song, J.Y.; Cheong, H.J.; Wie, S.H.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.W.; Jeong, H.W.; Jung, S.I.; et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a cell culture-derived inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (NBP607-QIV): A randomized, double-blind, multi-center, phase III clinical trial in adults and elderly subjects. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2017, 13, 1653–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Oh, C.E.; Choi, U.Y.; Eun, B.W.; Lee, T.J.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, N.H.; Jo, D.S.; Shin, S.H.; Kim, K.H.; et al. A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Clinical Trial of a Cell Culture-derived Inactivated Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (NBP607) in Healthy Children 6 Months Through 18 Years of Age. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2018, 37, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lee, M.S.; Hu, A.Y. A cell-based backup to speed up pandemic influenza vaccine production. Trends Microbiol. 2012, 20, 103–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Barrett, P.N.; Terpening, S.J.; Snow, D.; Cobb, R.R.; Kistner, O. Vero cell technology for rapid development of inactivated whole virus vaccines for emerging viral diseases. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2017, 16, 883–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tseng, Y.F.; Hu, A.Y.; Huang, M.L.; Yeh, W.Z.; Weng, T.C.; Chen, Y.S.; Chong, P.; Lee, M.S. Adaptation of high-growth influenza H5N1 vaccine virus in Vero cells: implications for pandemic preparedness. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hoffmann, E.; Stech, J.; Guan, Y.; Webster, R.G.; Perez, D.R. Universal primer set for the full-length amplification of all influenza A viruses. Arch. Virol. 2001, 146, 2275–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hoffmann, E.; Neumann, G.; Kawaoka, Y.; Hobom, G.; Webster, R.G. A DNA transfection system for generation of influenza A virus from eight plasmids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 6108–6113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gohrbandt, S.; Veits, J.; Hundt, J.; Bogs, J.; Breithaupt, A.; Teifke, J.P.; Weber, S.; Mettenleiter, T.C.; Stech, J. Amino acids adjacent to the haemagglutinin cleavage site are relevant for virulence of avian influenza viruses of subtype H5. J. Gen. Virol. 2011, 92, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. WHO Manual on Animal Influenza Diagnosis and Surveillance. Available online: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/influenza/en/whocdscsrncs20025rev.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2002).
  20. Li, S.; Liu, C.; Klimov, A.; Subbarao, K.; Perdue, M.L.; Mo, D.; Ji, Y.; Woods, L.; Hietala, S.; Bryant, M. Recombinant influenza A virus vaccines for the pathogenic human A/Hong Kong/97 (H5N1) viruses. J. Infect. Dis. 1999, 179, 1132–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shankar, B.P.; Gowda, R.N.S.; Prabhu, B.H.M.; Pattnaik, B.; Nagarajan, S.; Patil, S.S.; Pradhan, H.K. Assessment of Pathogenic Potential of Two Indian H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus Isolates by Intravenous Pathogenicity Index Test. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2009, 8, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Tseng, Y.F.; Weng, T.C.; Lai, C.C.; Chen, P.L.; Lee, M.S.; Hu, A.Y. A fast and efficient purification platform for cell-based influenza viruses by flow-through chromatography. Vaccine 2018, 36, 3146–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Harvey, R.; Hamill, M.; Robertson, J.S.; Minor, P.D.; Vodeiko, G.M.; Weir, J.P.; Takahashi, H.; Harada, Y.; Itamura, S.; Bamford, P.; et al. Application of deglycosylation to SDS PAGE analysis improves calibration of influenza antigen standards. Biologicals 2012, 40, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jing, X.; Soto, J.; Gao, Y.; Phy, K.; Ye, Z. Assessment of viral replication in eggs and HA protein yield of pre-pandemic H5N1 candidate vaccine viruses. Vaccine 2013, 31, 4091–4097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Page, M.; Thorpe, R. Purification of IgG Using Caprylic Acid. In The Protein Protocols Handbook, 3rd ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 1753–1754. [Google Scholar]
  26. Minor, P.D. Assaying the Potency of Influenza Vaccines. Vaccines 2015, 3, 90–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Making a Candidate Vaccine Virus (CVV) for a HPAI (Bird Flu) Virus. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/avianflu/candidate-vaccine-virus.htm#quality2017 (accessed on 19 May 2017).
  28. WHO Biosafety Risk Assessment and Guidelines for the Production and Quality Control of Human Influenza Pandemic Vaccines. Available online: https://www.who.int/biologicals/vaccines/INFLUENZA_BIOSAFETY_GL_draft_1_1st_PC_22_Nov_2017_TZ.pdf (accessed on 22 November 2017).
  29. Wang, W.; Lu, B.; Zhou, H.; Suguitan, A.L., Jr.; Cheng, X.; Subbarao, K.; Kemble, G.; Jin, H. Glycosylation at 158N of the hemagglutinin protein and receptor binding specificity synergistically affect the antigenicity and immunogenicity of a live attenuated H5N1 A/Vietnam/1203/2004 vaccine virus in ferrets. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 6570–6577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abe, Y.; Takashita, E.; Sugawara, K.; Matsuzaki, Y.; Muraki, Y.; Hongo, S. Effect of the addition of oligosaccharides on the biological activities and antigenicity of influenza A/H3N2 virus hemagglutinin. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 9605–9611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sun, X.; Jayaraman, A.; Maniprasad, P.; Raman, R.; Houser, K.V.; Pappas, C.; Zeng, H.; Sasisekharan, R.; Katz, J.M.; Tumpey, T.M. N-linked glycosylation of the hemagglutinin protein influences virulence and antigenicity of the 1918 pandemic and seasonal H1N1 influenza A viruses. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 8756–8766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Barman, S.; Adhikary, L.; Chakrabarti, A.K.; Bernas, C.; Kawaoka, Y.; Nayak, D.P. Role of Transmembrane Domain and Cytoplasmic Tail Amino Acid Sequences of Influenza A Virus Neuraminidase in Raft Association and Virus Budding. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 5258–5269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ohkura, T.; Momose, F.; Ichikawa, R.; Takeuchi, K.; Morikawa, Y. Influenza A virus hemagglutinin and neuraminidase mutually accelerate their apical targeting through clustering of lipid rafts. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 10039–10055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, J.; Leser, G.P.; Pekosz, A.; Lamb, R.A. The cytoplasmic tails of the influenza virus spike glycoproteins are required for normal genome packaging. Virology 2000, 269, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, J.; Pekosz, A.; Lamb, R.A. Influenza virus assembly and lipid raft microdomains: a role for the cytoplasmic tails of the spike glycoproteins. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 4634–4644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nayak, D.P.; Balogun, R.A.; Yamada, H.; Zhou, Z.H.; Barman, S. Influenza virus morphogenesis and budding. Virus Res. 2009, 143, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Engelhardt, O.G.; Edge, C.; Dunleavy, U.; Guilfoyle, K.; Harvey, R.; Major, D.; Newman, R.; Penn, R.; Skeldon, S.; Storey, C.; et al. Comparison of single radial immunodiffusion, SDS-PAGE and HPLC potency assays for inactivated influenza vaccines shows differences in ability to predict immunogenicity of haemagglutinin antigen. Vaccine 2018, 36, 4339–4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Generic Protocol for the Calibration of Seasonal/Pandemic Influenza Antigen Working Reagents by WHO Essential Regulatory Laboratories. Available online: http://www.who.int/biologicals/vaccines/INFLUENZA_Calibration_protocol_DB_CA_DB23_April.pdf (accessed on 23 April 2012).
  39. Baras, B.; Stittelaar, K.J.; Simon, J.H.; Thoolen, R.J.; Mossman, S.P.; Pistoor, F.H.; van Amerongen, G.; Wettendorff, M.A.; Hanon, E.; Osterhaus, A.D. Cross-protection against lethal H5N1 challenge in ferrets with an adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Baras, B.; Stittelaar, K.J.; Kuiken, T.; Jacob, V.; Bernhard, R.; Giannini, S.; de Waal, L.; van Amerongen, G.; Simon, J.H.; Osterhaus, A.D.; et al. Longevity of the protective immune response induced after vaccination with one or two doses of AS03A-adjuvanted split H5N1 vaccine in ferrets. Vaccine 2011, 29, 2092–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sun, X.; Belser, J.A.; Pulit-Penaloza, J.A.; Creager, H.M.; Guo, Z.; Jefferson, S.N.; Liu, F.; York, I.A.; Stevens, J.; Maines, T.R.; et al. Stockpiled pre-pandemic H5N1 influenza virus vaccines with AS03 adjuvant provide cross-protection from H5N2 clade 2.3.4.4 virus challenge in ferrets. Virology 2017, 508, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cox, N.J.; Trock, S.C.; Burke, S.A. Pandemic preparedness and the Influenza Risk Assessment Tool (IRAT). Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2014, 385, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Burke, S.A.; Trock, S.C. Use of Influenza Risk Assessment Tool for Prepandemic Preparedness. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Viruses 11 00543 g001 550
Figure 1. Single radial immunodiffusion (SRID) assay of goat anti-E7 bHA serum against the H5N2 E7 Ag.
Figure 1. Single radial immunodiffusion (SRID) assay of goat anti-E7 bHA serum against the H5N2 E7 Ag.
Viruses 11 00543 g001
Table
Table 1. The profile of generated H5N2 reassortant viruses.
Table 1. The profile of generated H5N2 reassortant viruses.
Strain IDE7-V15 V3R3-V15 V3
Source of HA and NA genesA/CK/CY/A2628/2012 (E7, LPAI)A/CK/YL/0502/2012 (R3, HPAI)
Modified cleavage siteGGA GAA ACA AGA (GETR)GGA GAA ACA AGA (GETR)
Source of internal genesVero-15Vero-15
HA titre4 HAU<2 HAU
Virus titre1.78 × 106 TCID50/mL3.98 × 105 TCID50/mL
Table
Table 2. The summary of vaccine quality tests of E7-V15 C11 virus.
Table 2. The summary of vaccine quality tests of E7-V15 C11 virus.
Test ItemsResult
Live virus titre3.16 × 107 TCID50/mL (5.44 × 107 PFU/mL)
HA titre128 HAU
Sequence analysis 1HA (N155D, T231K, G323R, I381V)
NA (N4K)
PA (E349G)
Antigenic analysisSimilar to parental strain (E7)
Sterility testNo bacteria contamination
Trypsin-dependencyTrypsin dependent
Chicken pathogenicityIVPI = 0
Ferret pathogenicityLow pathogenicity (weight loss <5%)
Genetic stability of HA cleavage siteWithout mutations on the cleavage site after 10 passages
1 The HA and NA genes were compared with HA and NA of E7. The internal genes were compared with those of Vero-15.
Table
Table 3. The HI titre of ferret sera after two intramuscular injections of H5N2 inactivated virus vaccine.
Table 3. The HI titre of ferret sera after two intramuscular injections of H5N2 inactivated virus vaccine.
Vaccine StrainE7-V15 C11+ Al(OH)3
Ferret no.259 (M)269 (M)265 (F)266 (F)GMT (M/F)
YL/120502 (2012)- R3<1010320807/160
CY/A2628 (2012)- E7<1010160807/113

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, P.-L.; Hu, A.Y.-C.; Lin, C.-Y.; Weng, T.-C.; Lai, C.-C.; Tseng, Y.-F.; Cheng, M.-C.; Chia, M.-Y.; Lin, W.-C.; Yeh, C.-T.; et al. Development of American-Lineage Influenza H5N2 Reassortant Vaccine Viruses for Pandemic Preparedness. Viruses 2019, 11, 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11060543

AMA Style

Chen P-L, Hu AY-C, Lin C-Y, Weng T-C, Lai C-C, Tseng Y-F, Cheng M-C, Chia M-Y, Lin W-C, Yeh C-T, et al. Development of American-Lineage Influenza H5N2 Reassortant Vaccine Viruses for Pandemic Preparedness. Viruses. 2019; 11(6):543. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11060543

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Po-Ling, Alan Yung-Chih Hu, Chun-Yang Lin, Tsai-Chuan Weng, Chia-Chun Lai, Yu-Fen Tseng, Ming-Chu Cheng, Min-Yuan Chia, Wen-Chin Lin, Chia-Tsui Yeh, and et al. 2019. "Development of American-Lineage Influenza H5N2 Reassortant Vaccine Viruses for Pandemic Preparedness" Viruses 11, no. 6: 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11060543

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop