Next Article in Journal
Mapping Net Stocked Plantation Area for Small-Scale Forests in New Zealand Using Integrated RapidEye and LiDAR Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
Value Retention, Service Life, Use Intensity and Long-Term Productivity of Wood Chippers as Obtained from Contractor Records
Previous Article in Journal
Vicariance and Oceanic Barriers Drive Contemporary Genetic Structure of Widespread Mangrove Species Sonneratia alba J. Sm in the Indo-West Pacific
Previous Article in Special Issue
Suitability of Soil Erosion Models for the Evaluation of Bladed Skid Trail BMPs in the Southern Appalachians
Article

Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy

1
CNR Ivalsa, Via Madonna del Piano 10, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy
2
CRA-ING Via della Pascolare 16, I-00015 Monterotondo Scalo (Roma), Italy
3
AFORA, University of the Sunshine Coast, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore, QLD 4558, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2017, 8(12), 485; https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120485
Received: 4 November 2017 / Revised: 1 December 2017 / Accepted: 4 December 2017 / Published: 6 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Operations, Engineering and Management)
Annual use, utilization, productivity and fuel consumption of three purpose-built and three excavator-based harvesters and processors were monitored for one work year. All machines were owned and operated by private contractors and were representative of the Italian machine fleet. Despite challenging mountain terrain, annual use ranged from 675 to 1525 h per year, and production from 3200 to 27,400 m3 per year. Productivity was lower for excavator-based units, and for machines working under a yarder, due to limited yarder capacity. Purpose-built machines offered higher utilization, productivity and fuel efficiency compared with excavator-based machines. Fuel consumption per m3 was 2.4 times greater for excavator-based units, compared with purpose-built machines. Excavator-based units offered financial and technical advantages, but their long-term market success will likely depend on future improvements in fuel efficiency, in the face of increasing fuel prices. View Full-Text
Keywords: efficiency; contractors; benchmark; logging efficiency; contractors; benchmark; logging
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Magagnotti, N.; Pari, L.; Spinelli, R. Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy. Forests 2017, 8, 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120485

AMA Style

Magagnotti N, Pari L, Spinelli R. Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy. Forests. 2017; 8(12):485. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120485

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magagnotti, Natascia, Luigi Pari, and Raffaele Spinelli. 2017. "Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy" Forests 8, no. 12: 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120485

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop