Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Analysis of the Cork Oak (Quercus suber) Transcriptome Involved in the Regulation of Bud Sprouting
Next Article in Special Issue
Use, Utilization, Productivity and Fuel Consumption of Purpose-Built and Excavator-Based Harvesters and Processors in Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Fire-Driven Decline of Endemic Allosyncarpia Monsoon Rainforests in Northern Australia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aboveground Biomass Equations for Small Trees of Brutian Pine in Turkey to Facilitate Harvesting and Management
Article

Suitability of Soil Erosion Models for the Evaluation of Bladed Skid Trail BMPs in the Southern Appalachians

Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 310 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2017, 8(12), 482; https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120482
Received: 29 September 2017 / Revised: 30 November 2017 / Accepted: 30 November 2017 / Published: 6 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Operations, Engineering and Management)
This project measured soil erosion rates from bladed skid trails in the mountains of Virginia following a timber harvest, and compared measured erosion to four erosion model predictions produced by Universal Soil Loss Equation—Forest (USLE-Forest), Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, v.2 (RUSLE2), Water Erosion Prediction Project—Road (WEPP-Road) using default files, and WEPP-Road using modified files in order to assess the utility of the models for these conditions. Skid trails were segregated into six blocks where each block had similar trail slopes and soils. Each block contained four skid trail closure treatments: (1) bare soil (Control); (2) residual limbs and tops (Slash); (3) grass seed (Seed); and (4) fertilizer, seed, and straw mulch (Mulch). All treatments had waterbars, the minimum trail closure best management practice (BMP), to provide upslope and downslope borders of experimental units. Site cover characteristics on each experimental unit were collected quarterly as input parameters for erosion models. The suitability of soil erosion models were evaluated based upon statistical summaries, linear relationships with measured erosion rates, Nash-Sutcliffe Model Efficiency, and a nonparametric analysis. Treatments were measured to have erosion rates of 15.2 tonnes ha−1 year−1 (Control), 5.9 tonnes ha−1 year−1 (Seed), 1.1 tonnes ha−1 year−1 (Mulch), and 0.8 tonnes ha−1 year−1 (Slash). It was determined that WEPP-Road: Modified (p-value = 0.643) and USLE-Forest (p-value = 0.307) were the most suitable models given their accuracy; however USLE-Forest may be better for making management decisions given its practicality. View Full-Text
Keywords: bladed skid trails; forest operations; forest harvesting; soil erosion modeling; best management practices bladed skid trails; forest operations; forest harvesting; soil erosion modeling; best management practices
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Vinson, J.A.; Barrett, S.M.; Aust, W.M.; Bolding, M.C. Suitability of Soil Erosion Models for the Evaluation of Bladed Skid Trail BMPs in the Southern Appalachians. Forests 2017, 8, 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120482

AMA Style

Vinson JA, Barrett SM, Aust WM, Bolding MC. Suitability of Soil Erosion Models for the Evaluation of Bladed Skid Trail BMPs in the Southern Appalachians. Forests. 2017; 8(12):482. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120482

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vinson, J. A., Scott M. Barrett, W. M. Aust, and M. C. Bolding 2017. "Suitability of Soil Erosion Models for the Evaluation of Bladed Skid Trail BMPs in the Southern Appalachians" Forests 8, no. 12: 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120482

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop