Next Article in Journal
Spatial Pattern of Populus euphratica Forest Change as Affected by Water Conveyance in the Lower Tarim River
Next Article in Special Issue
Resiliency of an Interior Ponderosa Pine Forest to Bark Beetle Infestations Following Fuel-Reduction and Forest-Restoration Treatments
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Composition and Elevation of Spruce Forests Affect Susceptibility to Bark Beetle Attacks: Implications for Forest Management
Comment published on 22 April 2014, see Forests 2014, 5(4), 822-826.
Open AccessReview

Management for Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreak Suppression: Does Relevant Science Support Current Policy?

1
Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59804, USA
2
School of Law, University of California, Berkeley, CA 97420-7200, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2014, 5(1), 103-133; https://doi.org/10.3390/f5010103
Received: 4 December 2013 / Revised: 27 December 2013 / Accepted: 6 January 2014 / Published: 15 January 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interactions between Bark Beetles and Forests)
While the use of timber harvests is generally accepted as an effective approach to controlling bark beetles during outbreaks, in reality there has been a dearth of monitoring to assess outcomes, and failures are often not reported. Additionally, few studies have focused on how these treatments affect forest structure and function over the long term, or our forests’ ability to adapt to climate change. Despite this, there is a widespread belief in the policy arena that timber harvesting is an effective and necessary tool to address beetle infestations. That belief has led to numerous proposals for, and enactment of, significant changes in federal environmental laws to encourage more timber harvests for beetle control. In this review, we use mountain pine beetle as an exemplar to critically evaluate the state of science behind the use of timber harvest treatments for bark beetle suppression during outbreaks. It is our hope that this review will stimulate research to fill important gaps and to help guide the development of policy and management firmly based in science, and thus, more likely to aid in forest conservation, reduce financial waste, and bolster public trust in public agency decision-making and practice. View Full-Text
Keywords: bark beetle; clearcut; climate change; climate change adaptation; daylighting; Dendroctonus ponderosae; forest pest management; monitoring; sanitation; thinning bark beetle; clearcut; climate change; climate change adaptation; daylighting; Dendroctonus ponderosae; forest pest management; monitoring; sanitation; thinning
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Six, D.L.; Biber, E.; Long, E. Management for Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreak Suppression: Does Relevant Science Support Current Policy? Forests 2014, 5, 103-133. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5010103

AMA Style

Six DL, Biber E, Long E. Management for Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreak Suppression: Does Relevant Science Support Current Policy? Forests. 2014; 5(1):103-133. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5010103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Six, Diana L.; Biber, Eric; Long, Elisabeth. 2014. "Management for Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreak Suppression: Does Relevant Science Support Current Policy?" Forests 5, no. 1: 103-133. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5010103

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop