Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Different Container Types and Substrate Ratios on the Growth Characteristics of Zelkova schneideriana Hand.-Mazz. Seedlings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Tensile Strength Behavior of Finger-Jointed Beech and Oak Wood as Affected by Joint Geometry and Tooth Proportions

1
Department of Wood Science and Technology, Faculty of Technical Engineering, University of Bihac, 77000 Bihac, Bosnia and Herzegovina
2
Department of Wood and Furniture Industry Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord 64164478, Iran
3
Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Science, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord 64164478, Iran
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2026, 17(4), 474; https://doi.org/10.3390/f17040474 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 15 February 2026 / Revised: 7 April 2026 / Accepted: 11 April 2026 / Published: 12 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Wood Science and Forest Products)

Abstract

Wood finger joints are widely used in both structural timber and high-quality furniture due to their ability to create long, continuous members from shorter pieces. The mechanical performance of these joints depends not only on the wood species but also on the geometry of the interlocking teeth and the quality of the adhesive bond. This study explores how the geometry of finger joints affects the tensile behavior and fracture characteristics of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and oak (Quercus robur L.). Specimens with varying tooth dimensions were tested using a 50 kN universal testing machine from Shimadzu. Key metrics such as ultimate tensile load, effective cross-sectional area, cohesive stress, energy required to cause failure, and fracture energy (Gc) at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm displacements were systematically measured. The results revealed that beech specimens achieved ultimate tensile loads up to 21,320 N and cohesive stress of 204 MPa, while oak reached 21,631 N with a cohesive stress of 239 MPa. Fracture energy (Gc) values ranged from 0.036 N/mm for beech to 0.051 N/mm for oak, depending on joint geometry. Results show that both the type of wood and the tooth design, including width and length, play a decisive role in joint performance. In general, longer teeth and larger bonded areas improved tensile capacity and increased resistance to fracture. These findings offer deeper insights into the fracture mechanics of hardwood finger joints and provide practical guidance for optimizing glued connections in furniture and structural timber. The collected data can also support accurate modeling, quality assurance, and numerical simulations in future studies.
Keywords: finger-jointed timber; tensile strength; tooth dimensions; wood species finger-jointed timber; tensile strength; tooth dimensions; wood species

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hasanagić, R.; Fathi, L.; Gharahi, N.; Bahmani, M. Tensile Strength Behavior of Finger-Jointed Beech and Oak Wood as Affected by Joint Geometry and Tooth Proportions. Forests 2026, 17, 474. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17040474

AMA Style

Hasanagić R, Fathi L, Gharahi N, Bahmani M. Tensile Strength Behavior of Finger-Jointed Beech and Oak Wood as Affected by Joint Geometry and Tooth Proportions. Forests. 2026; 17(4):474. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17040474

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hasanagić, Redžo, Leila Fathi, Nasrin Gharahi, and Mohsen Bahmani. 2026. "Tensile Strength Behavior of Finger-Jointed Beech and Oak Wood as Affected by Joint Geometry and Tooth Proportions" Forests 17, no. 4: 474. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17040474

APA Style

Hasanagić, R., Fathi, L., Gharahi, N., & Bahmani, M. (2026). Tensile Strength Behavior of Finger-Jointed Beech and Oak Wood as Affected by Joint Geometry and Tooth Proportions. Forests, 17(4), 474. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17040474

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop