Mining Remnants Hindering Forest Management Detected Using Digital Elevation Model from the National Airborne Laser Scanning Database (Kłobuck Forest District and Its Environs, Southern Poland)
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area


2.2. DEM as an Inventory Tool
- Id—terrain deformation index,
- a—surface area occupied by a mound-shaped spoil tip,
- A—surface area of the forest compartment.
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| DEM | Digital Elevation Model |
| ALS | Airborne Laser Scanning |
| LIDAR | Light Detection and Ranging |
| HOGC | Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography |
| SGCC | State Geodesy and Cartography Collection |
References
- Pietrzyk-Sokulska, E. Tereny po odkrywkowej eksploatacji zwięzłych kopalin skalnych na Wyżynie Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej—możliwości adaptacji. Probl. Ekol. Kraj. 2009, 24, 37–48. [Google Scholar]
- Madziarz, M.; Sztuk, H. Prace badawczo-inwentaryzacyjne stanowisk dawnego górnictwa kruszców jako element zabezpieczenia, ochrony i wykorzystania dziedzictwa górniczego Dolnego Śląska. Min. Sci. 2012, 135, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madziarz, M. Historical ore mining sites in Lower Silesia (Poland) as geo-tourism attraction. Acta Geoturistica 2013, 4, 15–26. [Google Scholar]
- Małka, A. Śladami bursztynowego górnictwa w województwie pomorskim. Acta Univ. Lodz. Folia Geogr. Socio-Oeconomica 2015, 22, 65–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wrona, P.; Różański, Z.; Pach, G.; Niewiadomski, A.P.; Veiga, J.P. Historical Outline of Iron Mining and Production in the Area of Present-Day Poland. Minerals 2021, 11, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dulias, R. The Impact of Mining on the Landscape. A Study of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin in Poland; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Kurowska, E.E.; Czerniak, A.; Bańkowski, J. The Rationale for Restoration of Abandoned Quarries in Forests of the Ślęża Massif (Poland) in the Context of Sustainable Tourism and Forest Environment Protection. Forests 2023, 14, 1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zajączkowski, M.; Czerniak, A.; Adamski, P. Wydobywanie Kopalin ze złóż Położonych na Gruntach w Zarządzie PGL LP—Zasady i tryb Ubiegania się o Koncesję Przez Jednostki PGL LP; Państwowe Gospodarstwo Leśne Lasy Państwowe: Warszawa, Poland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Doyle, F.J. Digital Terrain Models: An Overview. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1978, 44, 1481–1487. [Google Scholar]
- Hutchinson, M.F.; Gallant, J.C. Digital elevation models and representation of terrain shape. In Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications; Wilson, J.P., Gallant, J.C., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000; pp. 29–50. [Google Scholar]
- Sasaki, H.; Mukoyama, S.; Nagata, N.; Namikawa, K. Digital Terrain Analysis Using Airborne Laser Scanner (LIDAR) Data for Natural Hazard Assessment. Int. Arch. Photogramm. 2008, 37, 1225–1228. [Google Scholar]
- Guth, P.L.; Van Niekerk, A.; Grohmann, C.H.; Muller, J.-P.; Hawker, L.; Florinsky, I.V.; Gesch, D.; Reuter, H.I.; Herrera-Cruz, V.; Riazanoff, S.; et al. Digital Elevation Models: Terminology and definitions. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, C.; Remmel, T.K. Airborne LiDAR Applications in Forest Landscapes. In Mapping Forest Landscape Patterns; Remmel, T.K., Perera, A.H., Eds.; Springer Science + Business Media LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 147–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alganci, U.; Besol, B.; Sertel, E. Accuracy Assessment of Different Digital Surface Models. ISPRS Int. J. Geo. Inf. 2018, 7, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, M.; Di Tommaso, S. Mapping forests with Lidar provides flexible, accurate data with many uses. Calif. Agric. 2015, 69, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmgren, J. Prediction of tree height, basal area and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning. Scand. J. For. Res. 2004, 19, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chirrek, M.; Wencel, A.; Strzeliñski, P.; Stereñczak, K.; Zasada, M.; Zawiła-Niedźwiecki, T. Airborne Laser Scanning as a Source of Data for GIS in Forest Districs. Rocz. Geomatyki 2007, 5, 19–28. [Google Scholar]
- Maier, B.; Tiede, D.; Dorren, L. Characterising Mountain Forest Structure Using Landscape metrics on LiDAR−Based Canopy Surface Models. In Object−Based Image Analysis; Blaschke, T., Lang, S., Hay, G.J., Eds.; Series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 625–643. [Google Scholar]
- Hollaus, M.; Mandlburger, G.; Pfeifer, N.; Mücke, W. Land Cover Dependent Derivation of Digital Surface Models from Airborne Laser Scanning Data. IAPRS 2010, 38, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Järnstedt, J.; Pekkarinen, A.; Tuominen, S.; Ginzler, C.; Holopainen, M.; Viitala, R. Forest variable estimation using a high-resolution digital surface model. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2012, 74, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balenović, I.; Alberti, G.; Marjanović, H. Airborne Laser Scanning—The Status and Perspectives for the Application in the South-East European Forestry. South East Eur. For. 2013, 4, 59–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ross, C.W.; Loudermilk, E.L.; O’Brien, J.J.; Flanagan, S.A.; McDaniel, J.; Aubrey, D.P.; Lowe, T.; Hiers, J.K.; Skowronski, N.S. Lidar-derived estimates of forest structure in response to fire frequency. Fire Ecol. 2024, 20, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anders, N.S.; Seijmonsbergen, A.C.; Bouten, W. Geomorphological change detection using object-based feature extraction from multi-temporal LiDAR data. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2013, 10, 1587–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawłuszek, K.; Marczak, S.; Borkowski, A.; Tarolli, P. Multi-Aspect Analysis of Object-Oriented Landslide Detection Based on an Extended Set of LiDAR-Derived Terrain Features. ISPRS Int. J. Geo. Inf. 2019, 8, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eagleston, H.; Marion, J.L. Application of airborne LiDAR and GIS in modeling trail erosion along the Appalachian Trail in New Hampshire, USA. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 198, 103765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pryde, J.K.; Osorio, J.; Wolfe, M.L.; Heatwole, C.; Benham, B.; Cardenas, A. Comparison of watershed boundaries derived from SRTM and ASTER digital elevation datasets and from a digitized topographic map. In Proceedings of the ASABE Annual International Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 17–20 June 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Moges, D.M.; Virro, H.; Kmoch, A.; Cibin, R.; Rohith, A.N.; Martínez-Salvador, A.; Conesa-García, C.; Uuemaa, E. How does the choice of DEMs affect catchment hydrological modeling? Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 892, 164627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annis, A.; Nardi, F.; Petroselli, A.; Apollonio, C.; Arcangeletti, E.; Tauro, F.; Belli, C.; Bianconi, R.; Grimaldi, S. UAV-DEMs for Small-Scale Flood Hazard Mapping. Water 2020, 12, 1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parizi, E.; Khojeh, S.; Hosseini, S.M.; Moghadam, Y.J. Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle DEM in flood modeling and comparison with global DEMs: Case study of Atrak River Basin, Iran. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 317, 115492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, V.; Karan, S.K.; Singh, C.; Samadder, S.R. Assessment of the capability of SWAT model to predict surface runoff in open cast coal mining areas. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 40073–40083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kowalski, A.; Maciejak, K.; Wojewoda, J.; Kozłowski, A.; Raczyński, P. Antropogeniczne zmiany rzeźby na terenach górniczych Starego Zagłębia Miedziowego (synklinorium północnosudeckie) w świetle analiz geomorfometrycznych NMT LiDAR i danych archiwalnych. Biul. Państwowego Inst. Geol. 2017, 469, 177–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bindzarova Gergelova, M.; Labant, S.; Mizak, J.; Sustek, P.; Leicher, L. Inventory of Locations of Old Mining Works Using LiDAR Data: A Case Study in Slovakia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szostak, M.; Pajak, M. LiDAR Point Clouds Usage for Mapping the Vegetation Cover of the “Fryderyk” Mine Repository. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, R.A.; Dietterick, B.C.; Mastin, T.; Strohman, R. Forest Roads Mapped Using LiDAR in Steep Forested Terrain. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 1120–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterenczak, K.; Moskalik, T. Use of LIDAR-based digital terrain model and single tree segmentation data for optimal forest skid trail network. Iforest Biogeosciences For. 2014, 8, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waga, K.; Tompalski, P.; Coops, N.C.; White, J.C.; Wulder, M.A.; Malinen, J.; Tokola, T. Forest Road Status Assessment Using Airborne Laser Scanning. For. Sci. 2020, 66, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bednarek, J.; Haisig, J.; Lewandowski, J.; Wilanowski, S. Objaśnienia do Szczegółowej Mapy Geologicznej Polski, Arkusz Kłobuck; Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny: Warszawa, Poland, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Fajer, M.; Waga, J.M. Hałdy górnictwa rud żelaza w regionie częstochowskim. In Kształtowanie Środowiska Geograficznego i Ochrona Przyrody na Obszarach Uprzemysłowionych i Zurbanizowanych; Choiński, A., Dulias, D., Havrlant, J., Herczek, A., Jankowski, A.T., Łopuch, P.S., Strzelec, M., Świeca, A., Wach, J., Wika, S., Eds.; Uniwersytet Śląski: Katowice, Poland, 2012; Volume 44, pp. 22–34. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: https://www.bdl.lasy.gov.pl/portal/mapy (accessed on 17 November 2025).
- Available online: https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl (accessed on 17 November 2025).
- Adamski, A. Górnictwo Rud Żelaza w Regionie Częstochowskim; SiiTG: Częstochowa, Poland, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Praska, S. Zwałowiska porudne i ich otoczenie w procesie zmian krajobrazowych. In Kształtowanie Środowiska Geograficznego i Ochrona Przyrody na Obszarach Uprzemysłowionych i Zurbanizowanych; Uniwersytet Śląski: Katowice, Poland, 2001; Volume 31, pp. 40–47. [Google Scholar]
- Pacholewski, A. Hydrogeologia złóż i problemy wodne zlikwidowanego górnictwa rud żelaza w rejonie częstochowskim. In Wody Podziemne Rejonu Częstochowsko-Zawierciańskiego Ich Występowanie, Zagrożenia, Degradacja i Ochrona; Pacholewski, A., Ed.; Informator PSH; PIG-PIB: Warszawa, Poland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Gajowiec, B. (Ed.) Mapa Hydrogeologiczna Polski (PPPWWH) w Skali 1:50 000 ark. Kłobuck (808); PIG-PIB & MŚ: Warszawa, Poland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Wagner, J.; Zembal, M.; Rolka, M.; Kaczorowski, Z. (Eds.) Mapa Hydrogeologiczna Polski (PPPWWH) w Skali 1:50,000 ark. Częstochowa (845); PIG-PIB & MŚ: Warszawa, Poland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Kaczorowski, Z.; Cudak, J.; Razowska-Jaworek, L. (Eds.) Mapa Hydrogeologiczna Polski (PPPWWH) w skali 1:50,000 ark. Boronów (844); PIG-PIB & MŚ: Warszawa, Poland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Paulo, A. Economical and Natural Conditions Applicable to the Development Oo Post-Mining Areas. Pol. Geol. Inst. Spec. Pap. 2005, 17, 49–69. [Google Scholar]
- Macdonald, S.E.; Landhäusser, S.M.; Skousen, J.; Franklin, J.; Frouz, J.; Hall, S.; Jacobs, D.F.; Quideau, S. Forest restoration following surface mining disturbance: Challenges and solutions. New For. 2015, 46, 703–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hlásny, T.; Mátyás, C.; Seidl, R.; Kulla, L.; Merganičová, K.; Trombik, J.; Dobor, L.; Barcza, Z.; Konôpka, B. Climate change increases the drought risk in Central European forests: What are the options for adaptation? For. J. 2014, 60, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skrzecz, I.; Perlińska, A. Current problems and tasks of forest protection in Poland. Folia For. Pol. Ser. A For. 2018, 60, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czerniak, A.; Grajewski, S.; Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, A.; Kurowska, E.E.; Okoński, B.; Górna, M.; Borkowski, R. Engineering Methods of Forest Environment Protection against Meteorological Drought in Poland. Forests 2020, 11, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pietrzykowski, M.; Woś, B. The Impact of Climate Change on Forest Tree Species Dieback and Changes in Their Distribution. In Climate Change and the Microbiome: Sustenance of the Ecosphere, Soil Biology; Choudhary, D.K., Arti, M., Ajit, V., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reutebuch, S.E.; McGaughey, R.J.; Andersen, H.-E.; Carson, W.W. Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 29, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krogstad, F.; Schiess, P. The Allure and Pitfalls of Using LiDAR Topography in Harvest and Road Planning. In Proceedings of the 12th International Mountain Logging Conference, Vancouver, BC, USA, 13–16 June 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X. Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: Some critical issues. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 2008, 32, 31–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chase, A.F.; Chase, D.Z.; Fisher, C.T.; Leisz, S.J.; Weishampel, J.F. Geospatial revolution and remote sensing LiDAR in Mesoamerican archaeology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 12837–13132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kakoulaki, G.; Martinez, A.; Florio, P. Non-Commercial Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Data in Europe, Publications Office of the European Union. 2021. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/212427 (accessed on 17 November 2025).
- Stoker, J.; Harding, D.; Parrish, J. The need for a national LIDAR data set. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2008, 74, 1066–1068. [Google Scholar]
- Kocel, J.; Kwiecień, R. Methodological foundations of determining the indicator of the degree of management difficulty in the State Forests forest ranges. Sylwan 2012, 156, 118–127. [Google Scholar]
- Collerton, H.; Hock, B.; Hawke, R.; Payn, T. Digital terrain modelling for site productivity assessment and stand management in plantation forestry. N. Z. J. For. 2008, 53, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
- Yiğit, A.Y.; Şenol, H.İ. Surface Change and Stability Analysis in Open-Pit Mines Using UAV Photogrammetric Data and Geospatial Analysis. Drones 2025, 9, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilar, F.J.; Mills, J.P. Accuracy assessment of lidar-derived digital elevation models. Photogramm. Rec. 2008, 23, 148–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bater, C.W.; Coops, N.C. Evaluating error associated with lidar-derived DEM interpolation. Comput. Geosci. 2009, 35, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drăguţ, L.; Blaschke, T. Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis. Geomorphology 2006, 81, 330–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Cheng, X.; Chen, W.; Chen, G.; Liu, S. Identification of Forested Landslides Using LiDar Data, Object-based Image Analysis, and Machine Learning Algorithms. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 9705–9726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.; Lan, Y.; Yang, A.; Zhang, Y.; Wen, S.; Deng, J. Deep learning versus Object-based Image Analysis (OBIA) in weed mapping of UAV imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2020, 41, 3446–3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simionato, J.; Bertani, G.; Sayuri Osako, L. Identification of artisanal mining sites in the Amazon Rainforest using Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) and Data Mining techniques. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2021, 24, 100633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Xu, J.; Lv, Y.; Zhou, C.; Zhu, Y.; Cheng, W. Deep learning-based automated terrain classification using high-resolution DEM data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2023, 118, 103249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witt, E.C. Use of lidar point cloud data to support estimation of residual trace metals stored in mine chat piles in the Old Lead Belt of southeastern, Missouri. AIMS Environ. Sci. 2016, 3, 509–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moudrý, V.; Gdulová, K.; Fogl, M.; Klápště, P.; Urban, R.; Komárek, J.; Moudrá, L.; Štroner, M.; Barták, V.; Solský, M. Comparison of leaf-off and leaf-on combined UAV imagery and airborne LiDAR for assessment of a post-mining site terrain and vegetation structure: Prospects for monitoring hazards and restoration success. Appl. Geogr. 2019, 104, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Velázquez, S.; Rodríguez-Santalla, I.; Ropero-Szymañska, N.; Gomez-Ortiz, D.; Martín-Crespo, T.; de Ignacio-San José, C. Geomorphological Mapping and Erosion of Abandoned Tailings in the Hiendelaencina Mining District (Spain) from Aerial Imagery and LiDAR Data. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.; Tomás, R.; Tang, X.; López Vinielles, J.; Herrera, G.; Li, T.; Liu, Z. Updating Active Deformation Inventory Maps in Mining Areas by Integrating InSAR and LiDAR Datasets. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, S.; Yuan, L.; Xu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhou, D. Ground subsidence monitoring in based on UAV-LiDAR technology: A case study of a mine in the Ordos, China. Geomech. Geophys. Geo Energ. Geo Resour. 2024, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.J.; Turner, R.; Yun, B.Y.; Lee, J.O. Change detection analysis using airborne LiDAR: Open-cut mine environment. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress for Mine Surveying, Brisbane, AU, Australia, 12–16 September 2016. [Google Scholar]





| Location (Forest District) | Location (Forest Unit) | Forest Compartment | Number of Mounds | Elongated Forms (Embankments); Larger Spoil Tips | Perimeter [m] | Surface Area [m2] | Length/Width (x,y Dimensions) [m] | Height [m] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kłobuck Forest District | Pierzchno | 595 | 13 | 25.4–90 | 46.9–501 | 7.77–27.9 | 0.3–1.8 | |
| 593, 594, 596, 583, 566, 635 | 6 single occurrences – shafts depth: 2.9–17 m | 24.3–37.8 | 43.7–106 | 8.4–13.4 | 0.4–1.1 | |||
| Wręczyca | 624, 625, 639, 640, 641, 645, comptm. owned by other entities | 233 | 27.1–159 | 52.6–1541 | 9.47–59.2 | 0.7–3.9 | ||
| 1 large dump; the terrain owned by other entities | 827.7 | 39,793.0 | 255.3 | 23.3 | ||||
| Zwierzyniec | comptm. owned by other entities | 82 | 46.1–97.4 | 143–718 | 15.9–32.9 | 0.7–1.9 | ||
| Herby Forest District | Aleksandria | 227, 228 | 128 | 26–135 | 48.1–951 | 9.1–51.2 | 0.3–2.7 | |
| 4 embankments | 155–240 | 1081–1587 | 60.8–109 | 1.0–2.7 | ||||
| Hutki | comptm. owned by other entities | 6 | 62.7–86.9 | 164–508 | 18–28.8 | 1.1–1.7 | ||
| Kuleje | comptm. owned by other entities | 173 | 42–105 | 126–775 | 14.5–34.6 | 0.5–2 | ||
| 1 embankment | 411 | 3742 | 183 | 1.8 | ||||
| 2 middle-size dumps | 207–319 | 2970–5771 | 60.9–115 | 7–11 | ||||
| Złoty Potok Forest District | Kręciwilk | 537, comptm. owned by other entities | 10 | 40–102.3 | 110.6–622 | 13.8–34.3 | 0.4–1.4 | |
| 1 large dump | 612 | 24,779 | 210 | 23.5 | ||||
| 2 remnants of a larger dump | 81.7–316 | 304–3929 | 35.6–117 | 2.9–4.2 | ||||
| Siedlec | 600, comptm. owned by other entities | 46 | 31.4–113 | 64.4–887 | 12.3–37.5 | 0.6–2.4 | ||
| Poraj | comptm. owned by other entities | 112 | 33.8–156 | 81–1656 | 11.5–52.5 | 0.3–1.7 | ||
| 3 embankments | 133–212 | 757–1459 | 49.5–86 | 0.6–0.9 |
| No. | Location | Perimeter Measured at the Base of the Landform in the Field | Perimeter Measured at the Base of the Landform from the DEM | Difference [m] {Absolute Error} | Relative Error | Length Measured in the Field | Length Measured from the DEM | Difference {Absolute Error} | Relative Error | Width Measured in the Field | Width Measured from the DEM | Difference {Absolute Error} | Relative Error | Mean Height Measured in the Field | Mean Height Measured from the DEM | Difference {Absolute Error} | Relative Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [m] | [m] | [m] | [%] | [m] | [m] | [m] | [%] | [m] | [m] | [m] | [%] | [m] | [m] | [m] | [%] | ||
| 1 | Wręczyca Forest Unit, compartment 640 | 105.86 | 97.4 | 8.46 (+) | 7.99 (+) | 33.75 | 32.3 | 1.45 (+) | 4.3 (+) | 30.18 | 29.9 | 0.28 (+) | 0.938 (+) | 2.17 | 1.95 | 0.22 (+) | 9.93 (+) |
| 2 | 96.46 | 89.96 | 6.50 (+) | 6.74 (+) | 31.80 | 30.75 | 1.05 (+) | 3.30 (+) | 26.3 | 25.1 | 1.2 (+) | 4.56 (+) | 1.72 | 1.5 | 0.22 (+) | 12.54 (+) | |
| 3 | 91.6 | 92.8 | 1.20 (−) | 1.31 (−) | 28.10 | 31.80 | 3.7 (−) | 13.17 (−) | 24.15 | 26.8 | 2.65 (−) | 10.97 (−) | 1.69 | 1.65 | 0.04 (+) | 2.37 (+) | |
| 4 | 104.76 | 102 | 2.76 (+) | 2.63 (+) | 33.30 | 33.0 | 0.3 (+) | 0.90 (+) | 29.8 | 31.8 | 2 (−) | 6.71 (−) | 1.71 | 2.1 | 0.39 (−) | 22.80 (−) | |
| 5 | 100.86 | 101 | 0.14 (−) | 0.14 (−) | 31.55 | 34.2 | 2.65 (−) | 8.4 (−) | 25.25 | 27.6 | 2.35 (−) | 9.32 (−) | 2.43 | 2.55 | 0.12 (−) | 4.94 (−) | |
| 6 | 86.5 | 88.8 | 2.30 (−) | 2.66 (−) | 25.25 | 29.8 | 4.55 (−) | 18.02 (−) | 19 | 24.3 | 5.3 (−) | 27.9 (−) | 1.25 | 1.5 | 0.25 (−) | 20.0 (−) | |
| 7 | 82.4 | 83.6 | 1.20 (−) | 1.46 (−) | 22.50 | 26.0 | 3.5 (−) | 15.56 (−) | 22.4 | 24.2 | 1.8 (−) | 8.04 (−) | 1.11 | 1.1 | 0.005 (+) | 0.45 (+) | |
| 8 | Zwierzyniec Forest Unit, Compartment 519 c | 40.5 | 39.3 | 1.20 (+) | 2.96 (+) | 12 | 12 | 0.0 | 0 | 10 | 9.32 | 0.68 (+) | 6.8 (+) | 1.7 | 1.8 | 0.1 (−) | 5.882 (−) |
| r */SD **/RMSE *** | 0.9833/3.97/4.05 | 0.9460/2.52/2.67 | 0.9498/2.31/2.49 | 0.8798/0.22/0.20 | |||||||||||||
| Location (Forest District) | Location (Forest Unit) | Forest Compartment | Surface Area of Compartment (m2) | Total Surface Area Occupied by Mounds and Other Spoil Heaps, Obtained Through Digitization from DEM in GIS Software [m2] | Deformation Index [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kłobuck Forest District | Pierzchno | 595 | 220,196 | 3078 | 1.4 |
| Wręczyca | 640 | 289,096.1 | 62,779.9 | 21.7 | |
| 641 | 135,947.5 | 20,132.9 | 14.8 | ||
| 639 | 288,634.5 | 3849 | 1.3 | ||
| 645 625 626 | 316,720.2 192,893.2 111,672.8 | 959.7 15,670 127 | 0.3 8.1 0.1 | ||
| Herby Forest District | Aleksandria | 227 228 | 182,100.4 322,404.5 | 17,264 23,160 | 9.5 7.2 |
| Złoty Potok Forest District | Kręciwilk | 537 | 52,646.3 | 29,143 | 55.4 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Kurowska, E.E.; Grzyb, K.; Czerniak, A. Mining Remnants Hindering Forest Management Detected Using Digital Elevation Model from the National Airborne Laser Scanning Database (Kłobuck Forest District and Its Environs, Southern Poland). Forests 2026, 17, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17010037
Kurowska EE, Grzyb K, Czerniak A. Mining Remnants Hindering Forest Management Detected Using Digital Elevation Model from the National Airborne Laser Scanning Database (Kłobuck Forest District and Its Environs, Southern Poland). Forests. 2026; 17(1):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17010037
Chicago/Turabian StyleKurowska, Ewa E., Krzysztof Grzyb, and Andrzej Czerniak. 2026. "Mining Remnants Hindering Forest Management Detected Using Digital Elevation Model from the National Airborne Laser Scanning Database (Kłobuck Forest District and Its Environs, Southern Poland)" Forests 17, no. 1: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17010037
APA StyleKurowska, E. E., Grzyb, K., & Czerniak, A. (2026). Mining Remnants Hindering Forest Management Detected Using Digital Elevation Model from the National Airborne Laser Scanning Database (Kłobuck Forest District and Its Environs, Southern Poland). Forests, 17(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17010037

