Next Article in Journal
Predicting the Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Logs at the Standing Tree Stage: A Site-Specific Approach to Streamline Log Trading
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Paulownia as a Sustainable Alternative to Balsa in Plywood Manufacturing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Burn Severity Does Not Significantly Alter Pollen Abundance Across a Burn Matrix Four Years Post Wildfire in Sub-Boreal Forests of British Columbia, Canada
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphological and Morphometric Characterization of Lycopodiaceae Spores from the Białowieża Primeval Forest Ecosystem (NE Poland)

1
Institute of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Białystok University of Technology, ul. Wiejska 45E, 15-351 Białystok, Poland
2
Forest Protection Department, Forest Research Institute, ul. Braci Leśnej 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2025, 16(9), 1437; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16091437
Submission received: 12 August 2025 / Revised: 5 September 2025 / Accepted: 8 September 2025 / Published: 9 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pollen Monitoring of Forest Communities)

Abstract

Spores offer the most accessible diagnostic characters for the early-divergent Lycopodiaceae. We quantified eight morphometric traits—equivalent diameter, polar length, equatorial width, projected area, perimeter, and aspect ratio—in a balanced sample of 50 spores from each of six Central European taxa (Diphasiastrum alpinum, D. tristachyum, D. complanatum, Lycopodium annotinum, L. clavatum, and Huperzia selago) collected in the Białowieża Primeval Forest. Integrated light-microscope and scanning-electron-microscope imaging revealed three discrete wall-ornamentation syndromes (reticulate, verrucate, and granulose) that parallel the quantitative gradients. Principal component analysis showed that a single, collinear size axis accounts for 79% of variance, situating H. selago at the large-diameter extreme (mean: 37 μ m ) and the three Diphasiastrum species at the small-diameter pole (mean: 32– 33 μ m ). One-way ANOVA ( p < 10 31 ) and PERMANOVA ( R 2 = 0.52 ) confirmed decisive interspecific separation that mirrors published molecular phylogenies, underscoring a strong phylogenetic signal in spore form. While trait baselines are taxonomically stable, moderate microhabitat-driven shifts indicate limited ecophenotypic plasticity. The resulting high-resolution benchmark refines palynological identification, enables rapid spore-based bioindication of demographic stress, and strengthens conservation monitoring in relic temperate forest ecosystems.

1. Introduction

The family Lycopodiaceae represents one of the most ancient extant lineages of vascular plants [1,2] and exhibits marked ecological versatility across an exceptionally wide biogeographical range [3,4]. Spores, the sole propagules of these homosporous taxa, perform both reproductive and adaptive functions; their fine-scale morphology therefore offers valuable evidence for research in palynology, systematics, and evolutionary ecology [5].
Members of Lycopodiaceae occur on every continent except Antarctica and attain their greatest species richness in humid montane and alpine environments within the intertropical zone [2,6]. Growth forms encompass terrestrial and epiphytic strategies, underscoring a considerable adaptive capacity. In Poland the family is represented by three genera—Diphasiastrum, Huperzia, and Lycopodium—all subject to statutory protection owing to their declining populations and high conservation value [7], with recent national monitoring corroborating conservation concerns [8]. Their taxonomic relationships are outlined in Figure 1.
Spores are produced in eusporangia borne adaxially on specialized sporophylls; in certain taxa the sporangia are partly embedded within the strobilus axis, a feature diagnostic at the genera level [9,10,11]. Successive cell divisions generate an outer wall layer and an inner sporogenous tissue, resulting in typically plano-convex to reniform spores that display conspicuous inter- and intraspecific variations in size, outline, and surface sculpture [12].
Spore micromorphology observed with light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is a decisive taxonomic character across land plants, fungi, and myxomycetes. Example studies span East–Central European ferns [13] and Himalayan Selaginella [14]; in fungi, it resolves cryptic Cystolepiota complexes [15] and clarifies mistletoe-linked mycobiota [16]. Parallel LM/SEM analyses also reveal hidden slime mold diversity in temperate swamps [17,18]. Together, these cases demonstrate the diagnostic value of spore traits for biodiversity assessment and conservation surveys.
Earlier quantitative work on these attributes was largely confined to scattered linear measurements or qualitative SEM descriptions. The pioneering survey by Wilce (1972) recognized five generic ornamentation types but offered no statistical analysis of intraspecific variation [19]. More recently, Ramos Giacosa et al. ([20]) showed that elliptic Fourier descriptors capture ecologically relevant differences among Andean taxa—for example, within Lycopodiaceae from northwest Argentina (Austrolycopodium erectum, Diphasiastrum thyoides, Phlegmariurus mandiocanus, P. phylicifolius [20]). Consequently, fully replicated morphometric datasets from Central European populations in near-natural forest conditions are still lacking, leaving unresolved the balance between species identity and local habitat as drivers of spore variation.
The Białowieża Primeval Forest, one of the last substantially intact lowland forests in Europe, provides a unique setting in which to examine this question under near-pristine ecological conditions. Its heterogeneous mosaic of old-growth stands, diverse microhabitats, and minimal anthropogenic disturbance offers an unparalleled opportunity to assess how habitat factors may influence morphogenetic patterns in protected clubmoss species.
The present investigation analyses spores of six Lycopodiaceae taxa—Huperzia selago, Lycopodium clavatum, L. annotinum, Diphasiastrum complanatum, D. tristachyum, and D. alpinum—because these all constitute members of the family currently recorded in the Białowieża Primeval Forest [21,22]. A synthesized phytosociological overview (Table 1) demonstrates that each of the six species functions as a characteristic or indicator element of habitat types recognized under the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) and the Natura 2000 network, thereby highlighting their bioindicative value for conservation planning.
Against this background, the present study undertakes a comprehensive quantitative analysis of spores from six Lycopodiaceae taxa collected within the Białowieża Forest and its buffer zone. Specifically, we tested three a priori predictions: morphometric disparity among taxa outweighs intraspecific variability; spore size decreases along the xeric–mesic habitat gradient; and a principal component ordination segregates taxa primarily by overall spore size. These hypotheses were interrogated via a tiered analytical workflow that encompassed rigorous sampling-quality checks, univariate and bivariate morphometric assessments, high-resolution micromorphological imaging, interspecific comparative statistics, multivariate ordinations with classification routines, and focused evaluations of within-species disparity. The investigation establishes a detailed morphometric profile for each taxon, evaluates the relative magnitude of variation within and between species, and explores the extent to which observed patterns correspond with habitat attributes documented in the field.
By delivering the first high-resolution benchmark for spore morphology in Diphasiastrum, Huperzia, and Lycopodium under natural temperate forest conditions, the research provides a reference framework for further studies in palynology, biodiversity monitoring, and conservation management of relic forest ecosystems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Field work was conducted in the strictly protected core and buffer zones of the Białowieża Primeval Forest (52°43′ N, 23°52′ E), a trans-boundary UNESCO World Heritage Site on the Polish–Belarusian frontier (Figure 2).
This near-primeval landscape comprises a heterogeneous mosaic of coniferous, mixed, and broad-leaved old-growth stands that have experienced only minimal direct anthropogenic disturbance since the late nineteenth century. The terrain is mostly flat, with podzolic and rusty soils developed on glaciofluvial sands predominating. Numerous kettle holes and paleochannels, however, create pronounced local micro-edaphic and moisture gradients.
The climate is temperate-continental. The mean annual precipitation recorded at the Białowieża meteorological station for the period 1951–2020 was 641 mm, a value that generally exceeds potential evapotranspiration, and the long-term mean annual temperature was 7.4 °C.
Within this forest, lycopod sporophytes occupy three principal habitat types: dry oligotrophic heath–pine woodland, moist montane-like spruce forest. and open acidic grassland patches belonging, respectively, to the Dicrano–Pinion, Vaccinio–Piceion, and Nardo–Callunetea syntaxa [22]. Representative field views, together with the six investigated Lycopodiaceae taxa in situ, are shown in Figure 3.

2.2. Study Taxa, Sampling Protocol, and Voucher Deposition

Dry, mature spores of six Lycopodiaceae taxa—Huperzia selago (H.s.), Lycopodium clavatum (L.c.), L. annotinum (L.a.), Diphasiastrum complanatum (D.c.), D. tristachyum (D.t.), and D. alpinum (D.a.)—were collected from sporophytes. Fifty visually undamaged spores per species were randomly selected, yielding a balanced dataset of 300 observations. All primary morphometric measurements (50 spores × 6 species) are provided in Supplementary Data [23].
Voucher specimens are deposited in the Herbarium of the Institute of Forest Sciences, Białystok University of Technology (Index Herbariorum code BLS). The BLS compactus cabinets and representative voucher sheets used for spore isolation are illustrated in Table 2 and Figure 4.

2.3. Spore Preparation and Storage

Immediately after herbarium retrieval, all spores were desiccated at 15% relative humidity and 4 °C and were stored for no longer than six months prior to analysis. Comparable experiments show that fern spores maintain at least 80% germinability for three months under such cool, dry conditions [24], and earlier work has confirmed prolonged viability in homosporous pteridophytes [25]. Any collection exceeding the six-month limit was discarded.
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), air-dried spores were sprinkled onto 12.7 mm aluminum stubs furnished with double-sided carbon-adhesive discs, gently cleaned with compressed air, and sputter-coated with gold in a Leica EM ACE200 low-vacuum coater equipped with a quartz crystal microbalance; up to 18 stubs were processed simultaneously to ensure a uniform conductive film across the entire batch.
For light-microscope observation, spores were acetolyzed, suspended in a drop of glycerol–gelatine mounting medium on standard glass slides, and sealed beneath a coverslip with clear nail varnish to prevent desiccation. The complete SEM sample preparation workflow is depicted in Figure 5.

2.4. Microscopy

Transmitted-light microscopy was performed in bright-field and differential interference contrast (DIC) modes using an OPTA-TECH LAB 40 research microscope (OPTA-TECH Sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland) equipped with plan achromatic objectives 4 × / 0.10 , 10 × / 0.25 , 20 × / 0.40 , 40 × / 0.65 , and 100 × / 1.25 (oil immersion), giving a total magnification range of 40– 1000 × . The infinity-corrected optical path was illuminated by a 10 W LED source under Köhler illumination using a swing-out condenser (NA 1.2/0.22). Digital micrographs were acquired with an integrated 12 Mpx CMOS camera (OPTA-TECH Sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland).

ScanningElectron Microscopy (SEM)

High-resolution surface micrographs were recorded on a Phenom G2 Pro desktop SEM equipped with a CeB6 thermionic emitter. The column operated in high-vacuum mode (2 × 10−3 Pa) with the factory-defined imaging beam current setting. Images were acquired using the instrument’s integrated backscattered electron (BSE) detector. A pixel dwell time of 10 µs generated 2048 × 2048-pixel frames (pixel size = 2.9 nm) at an electron optical magnification of 2600×, yielding an effective spatial resolution of approximately 25 nm without charging artefacts or beam-induced damage. All SEM micrographs are BSE contrast images.
The principal microscopy instruments used in this study are shown in Figure 6. The eight quantitative descriptors extracted from every spore—area, perimeter, axial and equatorial dimensions, four Feret diameters, and the area-equivalent diameter—are defined in Table 3.

2.5. Morphometric Measurement and Image Analysis

Digital micrographs were calibrated at each session with a NIST-traceable stage micrometer (1 mm scale divided into 100 × 10 µm intervals; certified length uncertainty <1 µm over the full scale) [26]. The calibrated images were imported into MultiScan v. 18.03, where automated contour detection delineated individual spores; all contours were verified visually. Only grains lying in strict polar view with a clearly visible proximal trilete scar were retained. The primary descriptors, defined in Table 3, were extracted for every specimen.
For each spore the dimensionless shape factor, where S is the projected area and L is the perimeter, was derived from the measured data and exported alongside the eight raw variables for downstream analyses.
W = 2 π S L ,
Instrumental plus operator error, assessed from ten replicate measurements of a reference particle set, contributed less than 3% to total variance, well below the 5% threshold recommended for morphometric studies [27]. Outliers were identified by the inner-fence rule ( Q 1 1.5 IQR , Q 3 + 1.5 IQR ) and subjected to manual inspection; fewer than 2% of observations required review and none were excluded after confirming morphological plausibility.

2.6. Data Management and Quality Control

All datasets were processed in R v4.4.0. Raw .xlsx files were imported with readxl, harmonized with janitor, and reshaped using the tidyverse. Column headers were converted to snake case and a two-letter abbreviation map enforced taxonomic consistency.
A heat map generated with naniar::gg_miss_var identified only isolated single-cell gaps; therefore no missing-data imputation was undertaken. Where technical replicates (area_rep1, area_rep2) existed, repeatability was quantified with intra-class correlation coefficients calculated by irr::icc (two-way, single-measure, agreement design). Bland–Altman plots confirmed the absence of systematic bias. If replicate columns were not present the pipeline issued a console notification and skipped this step automatically.
After inspection, all quantitative variables—including the derived shape factor—were z-standardized to mean 0 and unit variance to ensure comparability across scales.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Species-wise arithmetic means, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained with rstatix::get_summary_stats.
Pairwise linear associations among the eight primary descriptors and the shape factor were quantified with Pearson and, for completeness, Spearman coefficients; two-tailed p-values were adjusted by the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure ( α = 0.05 ). Multicollinearity was diagnosed via variance inflation factors,
VIF j = 1 1 R j 2 ,
with R j 2 obtained from regression of the j-th variable on the remaining predictors; values > 10 were interpreted as indicating severe redundancy.
Morphometric differentiation among species was first assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on each descriptor; post hoc contrasts employed Tukey’s honestly significant difference test. Normality and homoscedasticity were evaluated, respectively, with the Shapiro–Wilk statistic and Levene’s test; variables breaching either assumption were natural log-transformed. Balanced sampling of 50 spores per species ensured adequate statistical power at p < 0.05 .
All variables were then z-standardised and subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) with FactoMineR::PCA. The first two components (PC1, PC2) captured the majority of total variance and were retained for ordination. Leave-one-out cross-validation of a k-nearest-neighbor classifier (class::knn) yielded an overall assignment accuracy. The optimal odd value of k was
k = min N , min ( n i ) 1 = 17 ,
where N = 300 and min ( n i ) = 50 .
Euclidean distances in the first three PC dimensions were used to compute, for each taxon, the mean pairwise distance and its dispersion index. The same distance matrix was hierarchically clustered with Ward.D2 linkage (hclust), producing a dendrogram. Multivariate group separation was formally tested with permutational multivariate analysis of variance (vegan::adonis2, 999 unrestricted permutations).
Bivariate length–width allometry was investigated by ordinary least-squares regression:
width i = β 0 + β 1 length i + k = 2 6 γ k S k , i + k = 2 6 δ k length i × S k , i + ε i ,
where the dummy variables S k , i contrast each species with L. clavatum.
In addition to the cross-species ANCOVA in Equation (4), per–taxon bivariate allometry (length vs. width) was fitted using a standardized major axis (SMA) model smatr; where an SMA estimate was not available, an ordinary least-squares (OLS) fit was used. For SMA fits, we report r 2 (squared Pearson correlation) as the measure of fit; for OLS we report R 2 . The SMA intercept was obtained as w ¯ β ^ SMA l ¯ , with w ¯ and l ¯ denoting species-wise means of width and length.
Type II sums of squares assessed the significance of species and interaction terms; diagnostic plots confirmed linearity, homoscedasticity, and normally distributed residuals.

2.8. Software Environment, Data Archiving, and Reproducibility

All analyses were scripted in R v4.4.0. Core packages comprised tidyverse (data wrangling and visualization), readxl (file import), janitor (data cleaning), naniar (missing-data diagnostics), irr (repeatability statistics), rstatix (univariate testing), ggpubr (publication-ready graphics), FactoMineR and factoextra (multivariate ordination), vegan (PERMANOVA), and class (nearest-neighbor classification). Figures were generated with ggplot2 and exported at 300 dpi to layout template.

3. Results

3.1. Sampling Design and Data Quality

Fifty morphometric observations were obtained for each of the six Lycopodiaceae taxa occurring in the Białowieża Forest: Diphasiastrum alpinum, D. complanatum, D. tristachyum, Huperzia selago, Lycopodium annotinum, and L. clavatum. Screening of the raw matrix confirmed that missing values never exceeded a low-single-digit percentage for any trait; list-wise deletion was therefore adopted without appreciable loss of statistical power. Replicate measurements were absent, obviating intra-class correlation and Bland–Altman diagnostics. Equal sample sizes ( n = 50 ) across taxa precluded the need for prior probability weighting and secured balanced designs for all subsequent parametric and non-parametric procedures.

3.2. Univariate and Bivariate Morphometric Variation

Descriptive statistics for the six morphological traits are summarized in Appendix A, Table A1. The mean projected area ranged from 711 µm2 in D. alpinum to 915 µm2 in H. selago, whereas equivalent diameter spanned 31.5–37.0 µm; standard deviations for all traits remained below 2.5 µm, attesting to narrow intraspecific dispersion. For inferential contrasts, Table A1 reports descriptive summaries only; post hoc pairwise comparisons (Tukey HSD) and the corresponding homogeneous-group letters for each trait are presented in Figure 7.
Pairwise associations proved exceptionally strong. All twenty-eight Pearson coefficients remained above r 0.80 after false-discovery-rate adjustment (Figure 8 and Figure 9); Spearman estimates mirrored both direction and magnitude. Variance inflation factors corroborated this redundancy (Table 4); although perimeter_um, feret_h_um and feret_v_um fell below the conventional cut-off of 10, the remaining descriptors exceeded it substantially, with equiv_diam_um peaking at 1852.3.
Allometry was explored with a length–width regression (Figure 10). Width increased significantly with length ( F 1 , 288 = 267.27 , p < 0.001 ), while taxon identity exerted a significant main effect on intercepts ( F 5 , 288 = 8.88 , p < 0.001 ); the non-significant interaction ( F 5 , 288 = 1.11 , p = 0.356 ) indicates a common slope among taxa. Spores of D. tristachyum occupy the lower intercept (narrow spores), whereas those of H. selago plot highest (broad spores). Collectively, these results confirm that the morphometric space is dominated by a single “general size” axis and that shape anisotropy arises chiefly from proportional variation in spore length and width. Per-taxon SMA fits corroborate a wide spread in fit strengths (panel annotations on Figure 10), with r 2 ranging from 0.07 (D. alpinum) to 0.40 (L. annotinum); intermediate values occur in D. complanatum (0.27), L. clavatum (0.18), D. tristachyum (0.13), and H. selago (0.08). For D. alpinum and H. selago, the 95% confidence intervals for the SMA slope include zero ([ 1.042 , 1.747 ] and [ 0.708 , 1.381 ], respectively), so the fitted lines should be interpreted as descriptive trend summaries rather than predictive models in these panels. Complete diagnostics (sample size, slope, intercept, 95% CI, and R 2 / r 2 ) are provided in Table 5.

3.3. Palynological Micromorphology (LM and SEM)

Qualitative examination under light microscopy (Figure 11) and scanning electron microscopy (Figure 12) complements the quantitative patterns described above. All spores are trilete mesopores, yet they diverge conspicuously in aperture morphology, exine sculpture, and surface microstructure, as detailed in Table 6.
Spores of L. clavatum and L. annotinum possess granulato-reticulate exines with conspicuous adhesion arms; the dorsal elevation in L. clavatum is particularly diagnostic. In the three Diphasiastrum taxa the reticulum is narrower and more corrugated: D. complanatum shows a reticulata plicata pattern while D. tristachyum exhibits broader meshes in a reticulata ampla pattern, whereas D. alpinum presents an irregular network whose architecture appears habitat dependent. The markedly larger spores of H. selago combine an even reticulum with a uniformly distributed microvillar cover.
These micromorphological distinctions mirror the morphometric gradients identified above: taxa characterized by finely corrugated reticulate exines (Diphasiastrum) occupy the smaller end of the size spectrum, whereas those with smoother or more open ornamentation (H. selago, Lycopodium) trend towards larger diameters.

3.4. Interspecific Morphological Contrasts

Eight morphometric traits differed highly significantly among the six Lycopodiaceae taxa (Table 7). F statistics ranged from 41.9 for width to 162.0 for perimeter, and every p-value lay well below 10 31 .
Post hoc Tukey tests confirmed that no single homogeneous subset encompassed all species (Figure 7). In particular, spores of Huperzia selago possess the largest projected areas and perimeters, whereas the three Diphasiastrum species are consistently smaller and display narrower inter-quartile ranges. Within this latter group, D. tristachyum and D. complanatum retain significantly larger diameters than Lycopodium annotinum and L. clavatum, corroborating the diameter contrasts reported in the descriptive summary (Table A1). The right-skewed distributions of area and perimeter in H. selago suggest occasional production of exceptionally large spores, whereas the length-restricted plots for D. alpinum and D. tristachyum indicate tighter developmental canalization. For clarity, Table A1 presents descriptive summaries only; the corresponding post hoc groupings for each trait are given in Figure 7.

3.5. Multivariate Ordination and Species Classification

Principal component analysis condensed the eight correlated descriptors into three orthogonal axes that together account for 94.2% of the variance (Table 8). PC1, dominated by uniformly positive loadings, constitutes a general size gradient; PC2 contrasts length-related dimensions with width-related metrics, thereby expressing shape anisotropy; whereas PC3 captures outline complexity.
The PCA biplot (Figure 13) shows six group-wise 95% confidence ellipses that overlap to varying degrees, indicating incomplete separation among taxa. Ordination is dominated by PC1 (82% of total variance), whereas PC2 accounts for 7%; as a result, between-group shifts of the centroids are modest relative to within-group dispersion, which explains the observed overlap. We therefore treat the PCA as descriptive evidence of broad morphometric similarity rather than discrete clustering.
Permutation multivariate analysis of variance confirms the visual segregation: species identity explains 52% of the morphometric variation (Table 9), and every pairwise contrast remains significant after Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment.
Ward agglomeration of Euclidean distances reproduces the PCA topology (Figure 14); the longest branch separates the three Diphasiastrum taxa from the clade comprising Huperzia and Lycopodium, echoing published molecular phylogenies.
A k-nearest-neighbor classifier ( k = 17 ) trained on the first three principal components achieved 59.7% overall accuracy (Table 10). Class-specific performance exceeds 80% for D. complanatum and H. selago but falls below 60% for L. annotinum, D. tristachyum, and D. alpinum, reflecting the partial overlap of their morphospaces.

3.6. Within-Species Morphological Disparity

Morphospace occupation, measured as the mean pairwise Euclidean distance among specimens in the three-dimensional PCA space, varies more than three-fold among the six taxa (Table 11).
Diphasiastrum alpinum shows the greatest intraspecific dispersion (mean pairwise distance in PC1–PC3 = 2.89), followed by Lycopodium annotinum (2.81) and D. tristachyum (2.61). Huperzia selago is intermediate (1.98), whereas narrower envelopes are evident in L. clavatum (1.79) and especially D. complanatum (1.55). These differences are visualized in Figure 15. Convex hull surface areas computed in the same space mirror this ordering (D. alpinum: 65.689; L. annotinum: 60.911; D. tristachyum: 55.314; H. selago: 35.868; L. clavatum: 28.112; D. complanatum: 21.994).

4. Discussion

4.1. Morphometric Disparity Among Central European Lycopodiaceae

Light and scanning electron microscopy confirmed the canonical Lycopodiaceae spore architecture: a trilete aperture set in a triangular polar outline and an exine sculptured in reticulata-, verrucata-, or rugulata-like relief, corroborating the early observations of Wilson [28]. Quantitative analyses based on eight size and shape descriptors measured for fifty spores per taxon revealed that interspecific variance greatly exceeded intraspecific noise. The largest contrast—a 5.5 µm difference in equivalent diameter between hygrophilous Huperzia selago and terricolous Lycopodium clavatum—was more than twice the greatest intraspecific standard deviation. Perimeter emerged as the most discriminative single trait, yet mean diameter remained taxonomically stable: our 32 µm estimate for L. clavatum matches the 31 µm reported by Okubo [29], while the 31–44 µm span for H. selago encompasses the ranges documented by Fernández-Prieto et al. [30] and Yin [31]. The post hoc compact letter display and the correlation matrix together demonstrate that the eight routinely measurable descriptors form a concise yet powerful diagnostic suite for Central European representatives of the family. These patterns are consonant with recent LM/SEM-based studies in pteridophytes that achieved high discriminatory power from micromorphology alone [13,14].

4.2. Ecological and Evolutionary Drivers of Spore Morphology

Spore-size hierarchies mirrored a broad xeric–mesic gradient. The smallest spores characterized heathland species of Diphasiastrum that occupy well-drained clearings, whereas the largest were produced by the hygrophilous, often epiphytic H. selago; intermediate values typified Lycopodium. Moisture regime alone, however, cannot account for the full spectrum of variation. Sunshine, precipitation, and temperature jointly modulate spore production and dimensions [32], indicating that micro-environmental filtering is superimposed upon phylogenetic constraint. Habitat-linked contrasts between H. selago and Lycopodium in boreal pine forests further support this reading [33], while the functioning of below-ground mycorrhizal networks conditions realized niches at landscape scales [34]. Misclassification patterns obtained from the k-nearest-neighbor benchmark reinforced these ecological interpretations, with frequent confusion between D. alpinum and D. tristachyum reflecting their shared montane–subalpine niches and erroneous allocation of nutrient-poor-site specialist L. annotinum to either L. clavatum or H. selago suggesting convergent reductions in distal ornamentation under oligotrophic conditions. Moreover, cytotype mosaicism in H. selago indicates that some micro-characters vary independently of ploidy, cautioning against over-interpreting size shifts as purely cytogenetic [35].

4.3. Taxonomic, Systematic, and Palaeopalynological Implications

True positive rates approached unity for both D. complanatum and H. selago, underscoring the diagnostic clarity afforded by their plano-convex outline and pronounced trilete scar relief. Building on these metrics, we propose two operational palynotypes for dispersed-spore studies: the Diphasiastrum-type, recognized by a distinctly plano-convex amb with strongly protruding trilete rays; and the Huperzia-type, with a more nearly equant amb and moderately elevated rays, further separable by the quantitative microsculpture metrics reported here. In stratigraphic applications, these types are most informative in late Pleistocene–Holocene records (ca. 100–0 ka), where lycopodiaceous spores become abundant and ecologically responsive; outside the Quaternary, morphological convergence among lycopsid isospores limits their primary biostratigraphic utility to supporting assemblage-level inference. Integrating LM and SEM is known to increase palynomorph separability and interpretability [36], and complementary machine learning pipelines now permit objective placement of dispersed morphotypes within phylogenetic frameworks, shown for pollen by [37].

4.4. Life History Traits and Conservation Relevance

Spores of all six Natura 2000-listed taxa remain dormant in the soil for five to seven years, after which germination gives rise to subterranean gametophytes that persist for an additional twelve to fifteen years while maintaining obligatory associations with Glomeromycota fungi [38,39]. This protracted, entirely below-ground, phase renders populations highly sensitive to soil compaction, eutrophication, and disruptions to mycorrhizal networks. The non-overlapping spore-morphometric envelopes offer a rapid, non-destructive proxy for monitoring such pressures: contraction or displacement of a population’s size–shape polygon can flag recruitment failure well before mature sporophytes decline. Because mean diameter is taxonomically stable across broad environmental gradients, deviations from established baselines are unlikely to reflect analytical artefacts. Integrating morphometric surveillance with habitat-quality indices therefore refines conservation assessments and supports evidence-based management in relic temperate forests. Given that mycorrhizal mycelium constitutes a globally significant carbon pool, safeguarding edaphic integrity around Lycopodiaceae populations yields biodiversity and climate co-benefits [34].

4.5. Methodological Robustness, Limitations, and Future Directions

The balanced design of fifty spores per species provided ample power for all inferential statistics, and missing values were scarce, trait-specific, and random, permitting light imputation without bias. The absence of technical replicates is the principal limitation; forthcoming campaigns will therefore include duplicate measurements and cross-platform calibration to quantify intra-observer error. Strong inter-descriptor correlations inflated variance inflation factors. Dimensionality reduction—either by selecting a single proxy, such as projected area, or by principal component analysis—will mitigate multicollinearity and clarify ecological interpretation. The current k-nearest-neighbor classifier employs an isotropic Euclidean metric and equal feature weighting. Replacing this with covariance-aware distance metrics or probabilistic classifiers should enhance discrimination among ecologically convergent taxa. Hierarchical sampling across multiple stands per species will allow variance partitioning to site, maternal sporophyte, and laboratory preparation, thereby tightening confidence intervals around ecological effect sizes. Planned analytical extensions include mixed-effects modeling, explicit size–shape dissociation, allometric scaling, elliptic Fourier coefficients, and texture descriptors extracted directly from microscopy images. In parallel, image-based classifiers trained on LM/SEM imagery—particularly convolutional neural networks—are proving highly effective in palynology and could be adapted to lycopodiaceous spores [37,40].

5. Conclusions

Six routinely measured descriptors (projected area, perimeter, polar length, equatorial width, aspect ratio, and equivalent diameter) delimit discrete, statistically robust spore envelopes for all six Central European Lycopodiaceae. A single, largely collinear size axis captures most quantitative variation, placing Huperzia selago at the large-diameter extreme, the three Diphasiastrum species at the small-diameter pole, and both Lycopodium taxa in an intermediate position. Interspecific contrasts outweigh within-species noise, and the morphometric dendrogram accords with published molecular frameworks, indicating a strong phylogenetic signal. Qualitative micromorphology (aperture architecture and exine sculpture) corroborates these metrics, with fine, narrow reticula typifying small-spored Diphasiastrum and smoother or more open relief prevailing in Huperzia and Lycopodium. Together, these lines of evidence provide quantitative baselines against which shifts in size–shape envelopes can be interpreted as early-warning signals of demographic stress and habitat degradation.
Because spore size and shape integrate moisture regime, nutrient status, and dispersal strategy while remaining constrained by lineage, the approach has immediate value for conservation. Routine LM/SEM screening of spore metrics can prioritize stands for strict protection or restoration where envelopes contract or shift; guide the choice of donor and recipient sites for translocations by matching micro-edaphic envelopes; and evaluate management effectiveness (for example, retention of coarse woody debris, careful gap creation, nutrient-load mitigation) through pre- and post-treatment comparisons. Uneven within-species disparity indicates contrasting management needs: broad morphospaces in D. alpinum and L. annotinum are consistent with ecological generalism and benefit from landscape heterogeneity and connectivity, whereas the narrow envelopes of D. complanatum and L. clavatum argue for safeguarding moisture-stable, oligotrophic microsites under low-disturbance regimes. The life-history context—multi-year spore dormancy and a prolonged, subterranean, mycorrhiza-dependent gametophyte—explains why spore-based diagnostics can anticipate visible declines in sporophyte populations.
Future work should embed hierarchical sampling across stands and maternal sporophytes, include technical replication and cross-platform calibration, and adopt mixed-effects modeling to partition variance among biological and analytical sources. Explicit size–shape dissociation, allometric scaling, elliptic Fourier descriptors, and texture features extracted directly from images will refine characterization. Replacing isotropic metrics with covariance-aware distances and trialing probabilistic and image-based classifiers trained on LM/SEM data should improve discrimination among ecologically convergent taxa. Linking these baselines to soil condition and mycorrhizal indicators will strengthen early-warning capacity, and extending the reference library beyond Central Europe will enable comparative and paleopalynological applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.W.; data curation, K.W., M.P., and T.P.; formal analysis, K.W. and T.P.; funding acquisition, T.O. and K.W.; investigation, K.W. and M.P.; methodology, K.W. and M.P.; project administration, K.W.; resources, K.W., T.P., and M.P.; software, T.P.; supervision, T.O., T.P., and M.P.; validation, all authors; visualization, K.W., T.P., and M.P.; writing—original draft, K.W. and T.P.; writing—review and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the Białystok University of Technology (WZ/WB-INL/2/2024) and Forest Research Institute.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
H.s.Huperzia selago
L.c.Lycopodium clavatum
L.a.Lycopodium annotinum
D.c.Diphasiastrum complanatum
D.t.Diphasiastrum tristachyum
D.a.Diphasiastrum alpinum

Appendix A. Supplementary Spore Morphometrics for Lycopodiaceae

Table A1. Summary of averaged measurements by species of the family Lycopodiaceae (descriptive statistics).
Table A1. Summary of averaged measurements by species of the family Lycopodiaceae (descriptive statistics).
SpeciesStatisticProjected Area ( μ m2)Perimeter ( μ m)Polar Length ( μ m)Equatorial Width ( μ m)Aspect RatioEquivalent Diameter ( μ m)
Diphasiastrum alpinumAverage710.89119.4034.2629.730.7931.75
Maximum899.62135.5940.1935.400.9235.91
Minimum542.3190.3129.1324.180.7228.05
SD93.109.162.182.930.042.14
Diphasiastrum complanatumAverage799.59114.9934.0631.770.8732.86
Maximum995.34132.1339.5335.990.9137.33
Minimum611.92101.0631.0926.240.8428.46
SD61.914.951.531.510.011.33
Diphasiastrum tristachyumAverage814.77129.4036.3131.640.7833.76
Maximum1041.46143.1739.4836.250.8337.80
Minimum669.71115.3732.9724.380.7229.06
SD87.817.891.892.660.022.00
Huperzia selagoAverage914.82146.6439.5534.860.7337.03
Maximum1075.47162.7143.7638.320.7739.88
Minimum710.86131.9936.1530.560.6633.35
SD77.516.391.641.660.021.34
Lycopodium annotinumAverage895.43125.6438.2733.900.8435.92
Maximum1127.74143.2943.0038.610.8939.82
Minimum596.88105.0533.4927.240.7630.15
SD115.968.652.282.640.032.27
Lycopodium clavatumAverage721.74110.1033.4229.840.8631.50
Maximum870.69120.6636.3433.290.9034.32
Minimum603.87100.2929.9726.640.8328.21
SD56.584.231.481.730.021.38

References

  1. Kenrick, P.; Crane, P.R. The Origin and Early Diversification of Land Plants: A Cladistic Study; Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group I. A community-derived classification for extant lycophytes and ferns. J. Syst. Evol. 2016, 54, 563–603. [CrossRef]
  3. ∅llgaard, B. New combinations in Neotropical Lycopodiaceae. Phytotaxa 2012, 57, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tutin, T.G.; Burges, N.A.; Chater, A.O.; Edmondson, J.R.; Heywood, V.H.; Moore, D.M.; Valentine, D.H.; Walters, S.M.; Webb, D.A. (Eds.) Flora Europaea, Volume 1: Psilotaceae to Platanaceae, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tryon, A.F.; Lugardon, B. Spores of the Pteridophyta: Surface, Wall Structure, and Diversity Based on Electron Microscope Studies; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mazumdar, J. A New Combination in Spinulum (Lycopodiaceae) from India. Int. J. Adv. Res. Innov. Ideas Educ. 2017, 3, 4387. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ochrona Gatunkowa roślin. Dziennik Ustaw Dz.U.2014.1409 Akt Obowiązujący. Wersja od: 16 paźDziernika 2014 r. ROZPORZĄDZENIE MINISTRA ŚRODOWISKA z dnia 9 paźDziernika 2014 r. w Sprawie Ochrony Gatunkowej rośLin. Available online: https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/dzu-dziennik-ustaw/ochrona-gatunkowa-roslin-18132148 (accessed on 7 July 2025).
  8. Bielecki, M.; Kołodziej, M.; Romańczyk, W. Sprawozdanie z Monitoringu widłaków Lycopodium spp. w Polsce w roku 2023. Monitoring Gatunków roślin z Uwzględnieniem Specjalnych Obszarów Ochrony Siedlisk Natura 2000—2023–2025; Technical Report; Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska: Warszawa, Poland, 2024. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  9. Kramer, K.U.; Green, P.S. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. I. Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 31–33. [Google Scholar]
  10. Szweykowska, A.; Szweykowski, J. Botanika. Systematyka. Tom 2; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2007; p. 636. [Google Scholar]
  11. Szweykowska, A.; Szweykowski, J. Botanika. Morfologia. Tom 1; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2005; p. 344. [Google Scholar]
  12. Podbielkowski, Z.; Rejment-Grochowska, I.; Skirgiełło, A. Rośliny Zarodnikowe; Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe: Warsaw, Poland, 1961. [Google Scholar]
  13. Szkudlarz, P.; Celka, Z.; Szczęśniak, E.; Shevera, M.V.; Drapikowska, M. Micromorphology of fern spores as a tool in taxonomy of East-Central European species from the family Aspleniaceae (Polypodiopsida). Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2024, 93, 87281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aran, K.; Giri, P.; Roy, H.; Uniyal, P.L. Taxonomic significance of megaspores in some species of Selaginella from Arunachal Pradesh in India. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2024, 87, 1413–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Qu, H.; Damm, U.; Hou, Y.J.; Ge, Z.W. Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Cystolepiota (Agaricaceae, Agaricales): New Species, New Combinations and Notes on the C. seminuda Complex. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pawłowicz, T.; Oszako, T.; Borowik, P.; Malewski, T.; Faedda, R. The Mycobiota Diversity Associated with Mistletoe (Viscum album L.) in Poland. Forests 2024, 15, 2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. García-Cunchillos, I.; Estébanez, B.; Lado, C. Spore ultrastructural features and significance of their diverse ornamental elements in the evolutionary history of the order Trichiales (Myxomycetes, Amoebozoa). Mycologia 2021, 113, 999–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pawłowicz, T.; Żebrowski, I.; Micewicz, G.M.; Puchlik, M.; Wilamowski, K.; Sztabkowski, K.; Oszako, T. First Assessment of the Biodiversity of True Slime Molds in Swamp Forest Stands of the Knyszyn Forest (Northeast Poland) Using the Moist Chambers Detection Method. Forests 2025, 16, 1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wilce, J.H. Lycopod spores I. General spore patterns and the generic segregates of Lycopodium. Am. Fern J. 1972, 62, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ramos Giacosa, J.P.; Morbelli, M.A.; Giudice, G.; Gorrer, D.A. Spore morphology and wall ultrastructure of Lycopodiaceae from northwest Argentina. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2016, 225, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zając, A.; Zając, M. (Eds.) Atlas Rozmieszczenia Roślin Naczyniowych w Polsce; Pracownia Chorologii Komputerowej Instytutu Botaniki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego: Kraków, Poland, 2001; p. 714. [Google Scholar]
  22. Matuszkiewicz, W. Przewodnik do Oznaczania Zbiorowisk Roślinnych Polski; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilamowski, K.; Puchlik, M.; Pawłowicz, T.; Oszako, T. Morphometric Measurements of 300 Spores from Six Lycopodiaceae Taxa Collected from Bialowieża Primeval Forest Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, Dataset. 2025. Available online: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/4pnx6vmytg/1 (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  24. Ballesteros, D.; Narayan, S.; Varghese, B.; Sershen. Photo-oxidation modulates green fern spore longevity during dry storage. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2018, 133, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dyer, A.F. The culture of fern gametophytes for experimental investigation. In The Experimental Biology of Ferns; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1979; pp. 253–305. [Google Scholar]
  26. Microscope Central. NIST Traceable Stage Micrometer 1 mm/100 Divisions. 2025. Available online: https://microscopecentral.com/products/nist-traceable-stage-micrometer-1mm-100-divisions (accessed on 7 June 2025).
  27. Yezerinac, S.M.; Lougheed, S.C.; Handford, P. Measurement Error and Morphometric Studies: Statistical Power and Observer Experience. Syst. Biol. 1992, 41, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wilson, L.R. The spores of the genus Lycopodium in the United States and Canada. Rhodora 1934, 36, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  29. Okubo, T.; Kokufuta, E.; Nakamuro, M. Drying dissipative structures of aqueous dispersions of lycopodium particles (31 µm in average diameter). Colloids Surfaces Biointerfaces 2010, 79, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fernández Prieto, J.A.; Aguiar, C.; Dias, E.; Fernández Casado, M.d.l.A.; Homet, J. The genus Huperzia (Lycopodiaceae) in the Azores and Madeira. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2008, 158, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yin, X.; Meicenheimer, R.D. The ontogeny, phyllotactic diversity, and discontinuous transitions of Diphasiastrum digitatum (Lycopodiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2017, 104, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Field, K.J.; Pressel, S. Unity in diversity: Structural and functional insights into the ancient partnerships between plants and fungi. New Phytol. 2018, 220, 996–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rimgailė-Voicik, R.; Voicikas, A.; Fediajevaitė, J.; Juzėnas, S.; Patamsytė, J. Origin and Persistence of Lycopodium clavatum and Lycopodium annotinum (Lycopodiaceae) in Scots Pine Forests. Plants 2024, 13, 2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hawkins, H.J.; Cargill, R.I.M.; Van Nuland, M.E.; Hagen, S.C.; Field, K.J.; Sheldrake, M.; Soudzilovskaia, N.A.; Kiers, E.T. Mycorrhizal mycelium as a global carbon pool. Curr. Biol. 2023, 33, R560–R573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vejvodová, K.; Krejčí, J.; Koutecký, P.; Lučanová, M.; Hornych, O.; Ekrt, L. High mountains of central Europe as a refuge of surprising cytotype diversity of Huperzia selago (Lycopodiaceae). Alp. Bot. 2024, 134, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vieira, M.; Jolley, D.W.; Zetter, R. Enhancing dinoflagellate cyst classification through combined LM and SEM analysis: A reassessment of Spiniferites magnificus and Fibradinium annetorpense. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2025, 336, 105300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Adaïmé, M.É.; Kong, S.; Punyasena, S.W. Deep learning approaches to the phylogenetic placement of extinct pollen morphotypes. PNAS Nexus 2024, 3, pgad419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Witkowska-Żuk, L. Rośliny leśne; Flora Polski, Multico Oficyna Wydawnicza: Warszawa, Poland, 2013; p. 760. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pacyna, A. Zarodniki i przedrośla widłaków. WiadomośCi Bot. 1972, 16, 57–63. [Google Scholar]
  40. Olsson, O.; Karlsson, M.; Persson, A.S.; Smith, H.G.; Varadarajan, V.; Yourstone, J.; Stjernman, M.; Freckleton, R. Efficient, automated and robust pollen analysis using deep learning. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2021, 12, 850–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the taxonomic tree of the family Lycopodiaceae, including the three main genera (Diphasiastrum, Huperzia, Lycopodium) and representative species.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the taxonomic tree of the family Lycopodiaceae, including the three main genera (Diphasiastrum, Huperzia, Lycopodium) and representative species.
Forests 16 01437 g001
Figure 2. Geographical setting of the study area. (A) Position of the Białowieża Primeval Forest within Europe; (B) Extent of the Białowieża Primeval Forest (area shaded in red) within Poland; central coordinates: 52°43′ N, 23°52′ E. Numbered labels indicate voivodeship capitals (see list below). Map prepared by the authors; base map data © OpenStreetMap contributors (2025). Voivodeship capitals by number: 1—Białystok; 2—Bydgoszcz; 3—Gdańsk; 4—Gorzów Wielkopolski; 5—Katowice; 6—Kielce; 7—Kraków; 8—Lublin; 9—Łódź; 10—Olsztyn; 11—Opole; 12—Poznań; 13—Rzeszów; 14—Szczecin; 15—Toruń; 16—Warszawa; 17—Wrocław; 18—Zielona Góra.
Figure 2. Geographical setting of the study area. (A) Position of the Białowieża Primeval Forest within Europe; (B) Extent of the Białowieża Primeval Forest (area shaded in red) within Poland; central coordinates: 52°43′ N, 23°52′ E. Numbered labels indicate voivodeship capitals (see list below). Map prepared by the authors; base map data © OpenStreetMap contributors (2025). Voivodeship capitals by number: 1—Białystok; 2—Bydgoszcz; 3—Gdańsk; 4—Gorzów Wielkopolski; 5—Katowice; 6—Kielce; 7—Kraków; 8—Lublin; 9—Łódź; 10—Olsztyn; 11—Opole; 12—Poznań; 13—Rzeszów; 14—Szczecin; 15—Toruń; 16—Warszawa; 17—Wrocław; 18—Zielona Góra.
Forests 16 01437 g002
Figure 3. Representative habitats and field morphology of the six investigated Lycopodiaceae taxa in the Białowieża Primeval Forest. (A) Lycopodium clavatum; (B) Lycopodium annotinum; (C) Diphasiastrum complanatum; (D) Diphasiastrum tristachyum; (E) Diphasiastrum alpinum; (F) Huperzia selago.
Figure 3. Representative habitats and field morphology of the six investigated Lycopodiaceae taxa in the Białowieża Primeval Forest. (A) Lycopodium clavatum; (B) Lycopodium annotinum; (C) Diphasiastrum complanatum; (D) Diphasiastrum tristachyum; (E) Diphasiastrum alpinum; (F) Huperzia selago.
Forests 16 01437 g003
Figure 4. Herbarium resources housing the study vouchers. (A) Compactus cabinets holding the BLS collection at the Institute of Forest Sciences, Białystok University of Technology; (B) voucher sheets selected for spore isolation, each bearing full accession data and taxonomic determination.
Figure 4. Herbarium resources housing the study vouchers. (A) Compactus cabinets holding the BLS collection at the Institute of Forest Sciences, Białystok University of Technology; (B) voucher sheets selected for spore isolation, each bearing full accession data and taxonomic determination.
Forests 16 01437 g004
Figure 5. Sample preparation workflow for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). (A) Leica EM ACE200 low-vacuum sputter coater; (B) sample holder with mounted SEM stub prior to microscope insertion; (C) 12.7 mm aluminum stub bearing a carbon-adhesive disc; (D) batch of 10 stubs ready for simultaneous sputtering; (E) stubs positioned on the quartz crystal microbalance shelf for real-time film-thickness monitoring.
Figure 5. Sample preparation workflow for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). (A) Leica EM ACE200 low-vacuum sputter coater; (B) sample holder with mounted SEM stub prior to microscope insertion; (C) 12.7 mm aluminum stub bearing a carbon-adhesive disc; (D) batch of 10 stubs ready for simultaneous sputtering; (E) stubs positioned on the quartz crystal microbalance shelf for real-time film-thickness monitoring.
Forests 16 01437 g005
Figure 6. Principal microscopy instrumentation used for spore imaging. (A) Phenom G2 Pro desktop SEM providing 25 nm spatial resolution at 2600 × magnification; (B) OptaTech LAB 40 transmitted-light microscope with an integrated 12 Mpx CMOS camera, supporting bright-field and DIC imaging up to 1000 × .
Figure 6. Principal microscopy instrumentation used for spore imaging. (A) Phenom G2 Pro desktop SEM providing 25 nm spatial resolution at 2600 × magnification; (B) OptaTech LAB 40 transmitted-light microscope with an integrated 12 Mpx CMOS camera, supporting bright-field and DIC imaging up to 1000 × .
Forests 16 01437 g006
Figure 7. Multi-panel box plot of eight morphometric traits across six Lycopodiaceae taxa (labels: L.c., L.a., D.c., D.t., D.a., H.s.). Alphabetical letters above boxes indicate Tukey homogeneous groups ( α = 0.05 ). Projected area, for instance, separates D.t. (group A) from L.c. and L.a. (group C), confirming significant interspecific divergence.
Figure 7. Multi-panel box plot of eight morphometric traits across six Lycopodiaceae taxa (labels: L.c., L.a., D.c., D.t., D.a., H.s.). Alphabetical letters above boxes indicate Tukey homogeneous groups ( α = 0.05 ). Projected area, for instance, separates D.t. (group A) from L.c. and L.a. (group C), confirming significant interspecific divergence.
Forests 16 01437 g007
Figure 8. Violin boxplot depicting the distribution of equivalent spore diameters across six Lycopodiaceae taxa. White diamonds represent arithmetic means, while box limits denote inter-quartile ranges. The plot reveals pronounced interspecific size divergence, with H.s. possessing the largest mean diameter ( 37.0 μ m ) and L.c. the smallest ( 31.5 μ m ).
Figure 8. Violin boxplot depicting the distribution of equivalent spore diameters across six Lycopodiaceae taxa. White diamonds represent arithmetic means, while box limits denote inter-quartile ranges. The plot reveals pronounced interspecific size divergence, with H.s. possessing the largest mean diameter ( 37.0 μ m ) and L.c. the smallest ( 31.5 μ m ).
Forests 16 01437 g008
Figure 9. Correlation matrix of eight morphometric variables. Pearson coefficients are displayed, with non-significant cell pairs (false discovery rate > 0.05 ) left blank. Strong collinearity is evident between length-related measures (length_um, feret_v_um), whereas area_um2 maintains moderate independence (VIF 3 ), justifying its retention in multivariate models.
Figure 9. Correlation matrix of eight morphometric variables. Pearson coefficients are displayed, with non-significant cell pairs (false discovery rate > 0.05 ) left blank. Strong collinearity is evident between length-related measures (length_um, feret_v_um), whereas area_um2 maintains moderate independence (VIF 3 ), justifying its retention in multivariate models.
Forests 16 01437 g009
Figure 10. Faceted allometry plots of axial spore length against width for six Lycopodiaceae taxa (labels: L.c., L.a., D.c., D.t., D.a., H.s.). Points represent individual spores; regression lines depict the preferred model (SMA, or OLS if SMA could not be estimated). Panel annotations report the sample size (n) and goodness of fit ( r 2 for SMA; R 2 for OLS). Given the scatter observed in some taxa, lines are presented as trend summaries; see Table 5 for slopes, intercepts, and 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 10. Faceted allometry plots of axial spore length against width for six Lycopodiaceae taxa (labels: L.c., L.a., D.c., D.t., D.a., H.s.). Points represent individual spores; regression lines depict the preferred model (SMA, or OLS if SMA could not be estimated). Panel annotations report the sample size (n) and goodness of fit ( r 2 for SMA; R 2 for OLS). Given the scatter observed in some taxa, lines are presented as trend summaries; see Table 5 for slopes, intercepts, and 95% confidence intervals.
Forests 16 01437 g010
Figure 11. Spores imaged under transmitted-light microscopy in differential interference contrast (DIC) mode (all panels at 1000 × ). (A) Lycopodium clavatum; (B) Lycopodium annotinum; (C) Diphasiastrum complanatum; (D) Diphasiastrum tristachyum; (E) Diphasiastrum alpinum; (F) Huperzia selago.
Figure 11. Spores imaged under transmitted-light microscopy in differential interference contrast (DIC) mode (all panels at 1000 × ). (A) Lycopodium clavatum; (B) Lycopodium annotinum; (C) Diphasiastrum complanatum; (D) Diphasiastrum tristachyum; (E) Diphasiastrum alpinum; (F) Huperzia selago.
Forests 16 01437 g011
Figure 12. Backscatteredelectron (BSE) SEM micrographs of Lycopodiaceae spores (imaging mode: BSE, high vacuum; all panels at 2600 × ). (A) Lycopodium clavatum; (B) Lycopodium annotinum; (C) Diphasiastrum complanatum; (D) D. tristachyum; (E) D. alpinum; (F) Huperzia selago. Characteristic exine ornamentation and aperture architecture are shown.
Figure 12. Backscatteredelectron (BSE) SEM micrographs of Lycopodiaceae spores (imaging mode: BSE, high vacuum; all panels at 2600 × ). (A) Lycopodium clavatum; (B) Lycopodium annotinum; (C) Diphasiastrum complanatum; (D) D. tristachyum; (E) D. alpinum; (F) Huperzia selago. Characteristic exine ornamentation and aperture architecture are shown.
Forests 16 01437 g012
Figure 13. PCA biplot of the first two principal components (Dim1 = 82%, Dim2 = 7%) with 95% confidence ellipses for each species. Vectors indicate variable loadings; symbols denote species. The ellipses overlap to varying degrees.
Figure 13. PCA biplot of the first two principal components (Dim1 = 82%, Dim2 = 7%) with 95% confidence ellipses for each species. Vectors indicate variable loadings; symbols denote species. The ellipses overlap to varying degrees.
Forests 16 01437 g013
Figure 14. Ward-linkage dendrogram based on Euclidean distances among z-scored centroid vectors of the six Lycopodiaceae species. Branch lengths confirm the greatest divergence of H.s. and D.t., whereas L.c. and L.a. remain morphometrically closest.
Figure 14. Ward-linkage dendrogram based on Euclidean distances among z-scored centroid vectors of the six Lycopodiaceae species. Branch lengths confirm the greatest divergence of H.s. and D.t., whereas L.c. and L.a. remain morphometrically closest.
Forests 16 01437 g014
Figure 15. Bar plot of the mean pairwise Euclidean distance among spores in PCA space (PC1–PC3) for each taxon (n = 50 spores per taxon; 1225 unique pairs). Higher values indicate greater intraspecific morphological dispersion; D.a. shows the widest spread and D.c. the most compact. Convex hull surface areas computed in the same space corroborate this ordering (D.a. largest; D.c. smallest).
Figure 15. Bar plot of the mean pairwise Euclidean distance among spores in PCA space (PC1–PC3) for each taxon (n = 50 spores per taxon; 1225 unique pairs). Higher values indicate greater intraspecific morphological dispersion; D.a. shows the widest spread and D.c. the most compact. Convex hull surface areas computed in the same space corroborate this ordering (D.a. largest; D.c. smallest).
Forests 16 01437 g015
Table 1. Phytosociological affinity of the six Lycopodiaceae species occurring in the Białowieża Forest; after [22].
Table 1. Phytosociological affinity of the six Lycopodiaceae species occurring in the Białowieża Forest; after [22].
SpeciesChCl.ChO.ChAll.ChAss.
Huperzia selagoJuncetea trifidi--Oreochloo distichae–Juncetum trifidi
Lycopodium clavatumNardo–Callunetea---
Lycopodium annotinum-Vaccinio–Piceetalia-Vaccinio uliginosi–Betuletum pubescentis
Diphasiastrum complanatum--Dicrano–Pinion-
Diphasiastrum tristachyum-Calluno–Ulicetalia--
Diphasiastrum alpinum--NardionCarici rigidae–Nardetum
Abbreviations: ChCl.—characteristic of class; ChO.—order; ChAll.—alliance; ChAss.—association.
Table 2. Sample sizes per species and their abbreviations used in all analyses.
Table 2. Sample sizes per species and their abbreviations used in all analyses.
SpeciesAbbreviationSpores Analysed (n)
Huperzia selagoH.s.50
Lycopodium clavatumL.c.50
L. annotinumL.a.50
Diphasiastrum complanatumD.c.50
D. tristachyumD.t.50
D. alpinumD.a.50
Table 3. Morphometric variables recorded for each spore.
Table 3. Morphometric variables recorded for each spore.
VariableDefinition
area_um2Two-dimensional projected area
perimeter_umOutline perimeter
length_umMaximum Feret length (polar axis)
width_umMinimum Feret length (equatorial axis)
feret_h_umHorizontal Feret diameter
feret_v_umVertical Feret diameter
sieve_diam_umDiameter of best-fitting sieve circle
equiv_diam_umDiameter of an area-equivalent circle
Table 4. Variance inflation factors (VIFs) for the eight morphometric variables.
Table 4. Variance inflation factors (VIFs) for the eight morphometric variables.
VariableVIF
area_um21852.3
equiv_diam_um1741.6
length_um264.9
width_um213.4
aspect_ratio156.2
perimeter_um4.7
feret_h_um3.9
feret_v_um3.4
Table 5. Regression diagnostics for the length–width allometry (preferred per-taxon model). R 2 is reported for OLS, r 2 for SMA.
Table 5. Regression diagnostics for the length–width allometry (preferred per-taxon model). R 2 is reported for OLS, r 2 for SMA.
TaxonnSlopeIntercept95% CI (Slope) R 2 / r 2 Method
D.a.501.346−16.375[ 1.042 , 1.747 ]0.07SMA
D.c.500.984−1.741[ 0.678 , 1.370 ]0.27SMA
D.t.501.406−19.415[ 1.099 , 1.789 ]0.13SMA
H.s.501.013−5.198[ 0.708 , 1.381 ]0.08SMA
L.a.501.158−10.410[ 0.912 , 1.452 ]0.40SMA
L.c.501.170−9.263[ 0.945 , 1.473 ]0.18SMA
Table 6. Comparative micromorphological traits of spores from six Lycopodiaceae taxa collected in the Białowieża Forest. Ranges are minima–maxima, with the mean in parentheses.
Table 6. Comparative micromorphological traits of spores from six Lycopodiaceae taxa collected in the Białowieża Forest. Ranges are minima–maxima, with the mean in parentheses.
TaxonSpore TypeDiameterExine SculptureAperture FeaturesOrnamentation/CommentLM FigureSEM Figure
Lycopodium clavatumMesospore, trilete27–36 (32) µmGranulata–reticulate; distal-side reticulateTrilobed, occasionally unfused; adhesion arms conspicuousIrregular granules; dorsal elevation diagnosticFigure 11AFigure 12A
Lycopodium annotinumMesospore, trilete; tetrad dispersal27–43 (36) µmReticulata with variable pentagonal meshesAdhesion arms well defined; contact lines sharpMicro-corrugations and fine granulationsFigure 11BFigure 12B
Diphasiastrum complanatumMesospore, trilete26–40 (33) µmreticulata plicata; corrugated pentagonal meshesConical scars clearly delimitedMicrofolds and microgranules around laesuraFigure 11CFigure 12C
Diphasiastrum tristachyumMesospore, trilete24–39 (34) µmReticulata ampla with broad meshesAperture rounded, margins smoothMicrogranules and folds distally concentratedFigure 11DFigure 12D
Diphasiastrum alpinumMesospore, trilete24–40 (32) µmReticulata irregularisCross-shaped aperture, fine folds plus granulesMesh architecture habitat dependentFigure 11EFigure 12E
Huperzia selagoMesospore, trilete31–44 (37) µmEven, reticulate meshworkAdhesion shoulders gently curvedMicropores and microvilli uniformly distributedFigure 11FFigure 12F
Table 7. One-way ANOVA testing the effect of species on eight morphometric descriptors. All contrasts are highly significant after false-discovery-rate adjustment.
Table 7. One-way ANOVA testing the effect of species on eight morphometric descriptors. All contrasts are highly significant after false-discovery-rate adjustment.
Variabledf1df2Fp
Area ( μ m 2 )5294137.4< 10 58
Perimeter ( μ m )5294162.0< 10 63
Length ( μ m )529476.3< 10 46
Width ( μ m )529441.9< 10 31
Feret h ( μ m )529488.4< 10 50
Feret v ( μ m )5294115.7< 10 56
Aspect ratio529452.8< 10 36
Equivalent diameter ( μ m )5294149.2< 10 60
Table 8. Percentage of total variance explained by the first three principal components.
Table 8. Percentage of total variance explained by the first three principal components.
ComponentVariance (%)Cumulative (%)
PC182.082.0
PC27.089.0
PC35.294.2
Table 9. Summary of the PERMANOVA testing the effect of species on spore morphometry (Euclidean distances; 999 permutations).
Table 9. Summary of the PERMANOVA testing the effect of species on spore morphometry (Euclidean distances; 999 permutations).
SourcedfSSMSF R 2
Species51241.55248.3110.170.52
Residual2941146.423.900.48
Total2992387.97 1.00
Table 10. Confusion matrix for leave-one-out k-NN classification based on the first three principal components ( k = 17 ). Diagonal cells (bold) are correct predictions; off-diagonal cells are misclassifications. Overall accuracy computed from this matrix is 67.0%.
Table 10. Confusion matrix for leave-one-out k-NN classification based on the first three principal components ( k = 17 ). Diagonal cells (bold) are correct predictions; off-diagonal cells are misclassifications. Overall accuracy computed from this matrix is 67.0%.
Predicted
ActualDaDcDtHsLaLc
Da26411063
Dc2410124
Dt8029094
Hs0004325
La3281297
Lc4132733
Note. Da, D. alpinum; Dc, D. complanatum; Dt, D. tristachyum; Hs, H. selago; La, L. annotinum; Lc, L. clavatum.
Table 11. Within-species morphological disparity calculated as the mean pairwise Euclidean distance among spores in PCA space (PC1–PC3).
Table 11. Within-species morphological disparity calculated as the mean pairwise Euclidean distance among spores in PCA space (PC1–PC3).
SpeciesDisparity
Diphasiastrum alpinum2.89
Diphasiastrum complanatum1.55
Diphasiastrum tristachyum2.34
Huperzia selago2.08
Lycopodium annotinum2.81
Lycopodium clavatum1.79
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wilamowski, K.; Puchlik, M.; Pawłowicz, T.; Oszako, T. Morphological and Morphometric Characterization of Lycopodiaceae Spores from the Białowieża Primeval Forest Ecosystem (NE Poland). Forests 2025, 16, 1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16091437

AMA Style

Wilamowski K, Puchlik M, Pawłowicz T, Oszako T. Morphological and Morphometric Characterization of Lycopodiaceae Spores from the Białowieża Primeval Forest Ecosystem (NE Poland). Forests. 2025; 16(9):1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16091437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wilamowski, Konrad, Monika Puchlik, Tomasz Pawłowicz, and Tomasz Oszako. 2025. "Morphological and Morphometric Characterization of Lycopodiaceae Spores from the Białowieża Primeval Forest Ecosystem (NE Poland)" Forests 16, no. 9: 1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16091437

APA Style

Wilamowski, K., Puchlik, M., Pawłowicz, T., & Oszako, T. (2025). Morphological and Morphometric Characterization of Lycopodiaceae Spores from the Białowieża Primeval Forest Ecosystem (NE Poland). Forests, 16(9), 1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16091437

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop