Next Article in Journal
Top-Leader Growth in Nordmann Fir (Abies nordmanniana)
Next Article in Special Issue
Shiro-like Structure Formation of Chinese Tricholoma matsutake Strain YN1 in Pinus armandii and Pinus elliottii Seedlings
Previous Article in Journal
Thin Cell Layer Tissue Culture Technology with Emphasis on Tree Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diversity and Potential Interactions of Soil Viruses and Host Bacteria under Different Land Use Patterns
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Ficus carica L. Water Extract on Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc. Growth

1
Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
2
College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Resource Utilization, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
3
Engineering Research Center of Forest Bio-Preparation, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
4
Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ecological Utilization of Forestry-Based Active Substances, Harbin 150040, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Forests 2023, 14(6), 1213; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061213
Submission received: 12 May 2023 / Revised: 6 June 2023 / Accepted: 8 June 2023 / Published: 12 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal–Plant Interactions: Latest Advances and Prospects)

Abstract

:
Our research group successfully designed the F. carica and Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc mixed forest, and confirmed that their interspecific relationship was stable and F. carica has a promoting effect on neighboring T. cuspidata growth. However, the promoting mechanism has not been elucidated. In this study, F. carica was used as the donor plant and T. cuspidata was used as the recipient plant. T. cuspidata seedlings were irrigated with F. carica root extracts of different concentrations (10.0, 20.0, 40.0 g·L−1), and the plant height, base diameter, photosynthetic parameters, photosynthetic pigments, MDA contents, and antioxidant enzyme activities were measured. Soil physical and chemical properties, enzyme activities, and microbial diversity were measured. The results showed that the abundance of growth-promoting bacteria increased and the number of pathogenic bacteria decreased in the rhizosphere of T. cuspidata soil. It was speculated that the chemicals secreted by F. carica roots interacted with soil microorganisms of T. cuspidata soil after enrichment, changed soil microbial diversity, and indirectly promoted the growth of T. cuspidata. UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS was used to analyze F. carica root water extract and F. carica root exudates, respectively, and it was found that the main components were similar. Therefore, the promoting effect of F. carica on T. cuspidata is mainly caused by the accumulation of potential chemicals in F. carica root exudates in the soil through interaction with soil microorganisms. Furthermore, the allelopathic-promoting mechanism of F. carica on T. cuspidata was discussed from various aspects, to provide a theoretical basis for the protection, breeding, and sustainable management of T. cuspidata resources.

1. Introduction

Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc. is a small conifer or shrub belonging to the genus Taxus, family Taxaceae. In China, it is naturally distributed in the Northeast region and cultivated in Shandong, Jiangsu, and Xinjiang. Taxol, a new anticancer drug material that can effectively inhibit the growth of cancer cells, can be isolated from the roots, stems, and branches of T. cuspidata [1]. At present, most of the raw materials of taxol preparations are obtained from T. cuspidata, having a great demand in medicinal companies. In addition to its breeding characteristics, habitat conditions, climate change, and land use, it is now in the endangered state; it is listed as one of the plant species that is recognized as a national class I key protection of endangered plant species [2]. Mixed forest is a stable and efficient artificial complex ecosystem that can promote plant development, and is thus a practical means of addressing the issue of T. cuspidata’s threatened status. Therefore, it is necessary to find a suitable tree species to mix with T. cuspidata to improve the survival rate and promote the growth of this plant.
Ficus carica Linn., belonging to the genus Ficus, family Moraceae, is one of the best medicinal and edible homologous tree species in the history of cultivation [3]. Primarily, these are small trees or deciduous shrubs; dioecious; with blooms enclosed in capsule-shaped receptacles; a fruit-like appearance; and no flowers. F. carica grows rapidly, having no strict requirements for its growth and soil conditions [4]. They are widely cultivated in China, and mainly distributed in Shandong, Xinjiang, Jiangsu, and Yunnan.
From April to September 2020, based on the characteristics of T. cuspidata with a non-fast-growing, sciophilous, medium–deep root system and F. carica with a fast-growing, heliophilous, shallow root system, our research team successfully designed a mixed forest of F. carica and T. cuspidata in Xiazhuang Experimental Field, Rongcheng City, Shandong Province, China (37°23′ N; 122°52′ E). The results showed that the interspecific relationship between T. cuspidata and F. carica species was stable [5]. F. carica can not only reduce the damage of strong light to T. cuspidata in its early growth period, saving the cost of planting T. cuspidata in the conventional shade shed, but also promote the growth of T. cuspidata. Compared with the pure forest of T. cuspidata, the plant height growth of T. cuspidata in the mixed forest increased by 22.33%, and the base diameter increased by 19.85%. However, the mechanism of F. carica promoting the growth of T. cuspidata has not been clarified.
The concept of allelopathy (chemical interaction between species) was first proposed by Hans Molisch, and its connotation has been continuously enriched by subsequent scholars [6]. The broad sense of allelopathy includes one plant causing both the promotion and inhibition of the growth of other neighboring plants [7,8]. In the process of growth and development, plants release specific metabolites to the environment, change the surrounding microecological environment, and affect the growth and development of other plants around, and this leads to mutual exclusion or promotion among plants [9,10]. Rational use of positive allelopathy can achieve the dual purpose of improving forest productivity and maintaining ecosystem stability [11]. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to reveal the interspecific allelopathy mechanism of mixed forest ecosystems to fully understand the interspecific relationships of specific combination trees and then to build mixed forests with coordinated interspecific relationships.
The chemicals released into the environment by plants can affect the chlorophyll contents of receptor plant cells by changing the formation of photosynthetic pigments, the light reaction and dark reaction in plants, the process of chlorophyll synthesis, and the photosynthetic rate of plants, thus affecting the photosynthesis of plants [12]. The activity levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) can reflect the antioxidant capacity of the body and are the most important factors of the active oxygen scavenging system in plants. They interact and work together to effectively prevent the harm that reactive-oxygen-species-induced membrane lipid peroxidation causes to cells [13]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) content indirectly reflects the degree of tissue peroxidation damage and is an important parameter to indirectly judge the stress resistance of plants and the degree of cell membrane damage [14]. Soil physical and chemical properties, soil enzyme activities, and soil microorganisms are all stable indicators to evaluate soil quality. They are not only important indicators of soil fertility but can also reflect the maintenance of plant growth conditions, plant stress resistance, and the intensity of soil metabolism to a certain extent, and play an important role in the energy flow and material cycle of terrestrial ecosystems [15,16,17].
In this study, we used water extract of F. carica to irrigate seedlings of T. cuspidata in a pot experiment and measured the growth and physiological indicators (plant height, basal diameter, gas exchange parameters, chlorophyll contents, antioxidant enzymes, and MDA) and soil properties (soil physical and chemical property, soil enzyme activity, and soil microbial diversity) of T. cuspidata. Furthermore, the potential functional chemicals were screened out. The aim is to explore the specific mechanism of F. carica promoting the growth of T. cuspidata and the potential growth-promoting chemicals through allelopathy between plants, which is helpful to solve the problem of the slow growth of T. cuspidata seedlings. This study provides new insights into the effective and sustainable management of an artificial F. carica and T. cuspidata mixed forest in an agroforestry ecological system.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Reagents

The donor plant F. carica and the recipient plant T. cuspidata were collected in Chengshan Town, Rongcheng City, Shandong Province.
The ultrapure water used in the experiment was prepared by a Standard Unique-LC R20 ultrapure water machine (Xiamen Research Water Purification Technology Co., Ltd., Fujian, China). Mass spectrum grade methanol, acetonitrile and formic acid were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Pure aquatic products for UPLC-MS/MS analysis from Wahaha Group Co., LTD. (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China). Other chemicals and solvents were analytical grade and purchased from Tianjin Comer Chemical Reagent Company (Tianjin, China).

2.2. Effects of Extracts from Different Parts of F. carica on the Growth of T. cuspidata

2.2.1. Sample Collection and Processing

The pot experiment was conducted in the Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology of the Ministry of Education (45°43′8″ N, 126°38′3″ E) at Northeast Forestry University for 180 days from 15 March to 15 September 2022. The temperature of the greenhouse was kept at 15~30 °C, the transmittance was about 75% of the natural illumination, the air humidity was controlled at 50%–70%, the daily light time was 12~14 h, and the appropriate weather was regularly selected for ventilation. The soil used in the experiment was taken from the topsoil (0–20 cm) of the Xiazhuang experimental field in Chengshan Town, Rongcheng City, Shandong Province. The upper mouth diameter of the cultivation pots was 20 cm, the lower mouth diameter was 18 cm, the depth of the pot was 25 cm, and the soil in each pot was 6 kg. The healthy fresh roots, stems, and leaves of F. carica without infection of diseases and pests were collected. After cleaning the surrounding soil, it was rinsed with water and placed on dry, clean filter paper to drain. After the moisture on the surface was completely dry, it was placed in the oven with the temperature set at 60 °C. After drying to a constant weight, it was smashed with a shredder and passed through a 2 mm sieve.
The root exudate solution was obtained by hydroponics [18]. A potted F. carica seedling with good growth was selected from the greenhouse of Northeast Forestry University. The roots were soaked in deionized water for 5 min, during which time the roots were gently shaken every 1 min to ensure that the soil and impurities were washed. The F. carica plant was then cultured at 25 ± 1 °C for 7 days in a cylindrical glass bottle (14 mm diameter and 86 mm height) containing 100 mL of highly purified water and the photocycle was 12 h. Deionized water was added every 24 h to keep the solution in the container at the same level. Only seedling roots were immersed in the solution during incubation. The high pure water culture medium in a glass bottle was the solution containing root exudates. After vacuum freeze-drying, the sample was ground with a grinder (30 Hz, 1.5 min) to powder form. An amount of 100 mg powder was weighed and dissolved in 1.2 mL 70% methanol solution. To improve the extraction rate, the samples were vortexed every 30 min for 30 s and 6 times in total. The samples were placed in a 4 °C refrigerator overnight. Finally, the samples were centrifuged (12,000 r·min−1, 10 min), the supernatant was absorbed, and the samples were filtered by a microporous filter membrane (pore size 0.22 μm), and stored in the sample bottle for LC-MS/MS analysis.

2.2.2. Preparation of Water Extracts from Different Parts of F. carica

After accurately weighing 20 g of F. carica roots, stems, and leaves powder, ultrasonic extraction for 30 min, and centrifugation for 10 min at 12,000 r·min−1, the supernatant was taken to obtain the extract solution with a concentration of 40.0 g·L−1, which was diluted into 20.0 g·L−1 and 10.0 g·L−1 solutions, respectively. The above three concentrations of extracting solution were stored in the refrigerator at 4 °C for subsequent pot watering experiments.

2.2.3. Pot Experiment of T. cuspidata Irrigated with Water Extracts from Different Parts of F. carica

There were three treatments: F. carica root extract, F. carica stem extract, and F. carica leaf extract. Distilled water was used as the control, and each treatment had 3 replicates. T. cuspidata was irrigated thoroughly with F. carica extract from different parts for the first time, and then irrigated once every 7 days with 100 mL of the extract in each pot, and 100 mL of distilled water was added to the control. After 30 days of irrigation, the plant height and base diameter of T. cuspidata were measured using a tape measure and vernier caliper, respectively, and the average value of 3 measurements was taken as the growth index.

2.3. Effects of F. carica Root Water Extract on the Growth of T. cuspidata

2.3.1. Preparation of F. carica Root Water Extract

The F. carica root powder 5.0 g was accurately weighed and placed in a triangle bottle with 100 mL distilled water and extracted at room temperature for 24 h, during which it was shaken every 15 min, and then ultrasonic for 30 min. The residue was filtered with four layers of gauze and collected into a centrifuge tube. The supernatant was centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 r·min−1. A total of 40.0 g·L−1 fresh water extract was prepared and diluted to a concentration of 20.0 g·L−1 and 10.0 g·L−1, and then used in a refrigerator at 4 °C.

2.3.2. Irrigation of T. cuspidata with Water Extract of F. carica Root

There were three treatments: F. carica root extract of 10.0 g·L−1, 20.0 g·L−1, 40.0 g·L−1, and distilled water as control. Three replicates were set for each treatment concentration, and the average values of 3 measurements were taken as the results of each growth index. T. cuspidata was irrigated with different concentrations of F. carica root extract thoroughly for the first time, and then irrigated once every 7 days for each pot, and the control was irrigated with distilled water. Each treatment was irrigated for 180 days. Growth, physiological indices, and soil property were measured on 15 April (30 days’ irrigation), 1 July (105 days’ irrigation), and 15 September (180 days’ irrigation), 2022.

2.3.3. Determination of Plant Height and Base Diameter of T. cuspidata

The plant height was measured with a tape measure (units: cm; precision: 0.1 cm), and the basal diameter was measured with a vernier caliper (units: mm; precision: 0.02 mm) (Pulisen Measuring Tools Co., Ltd., Harbin, China).

2.3.4. Determination of Gas Exchange Parameters

The LI-6400 portable photosynthesis system (LiCor, Lincoln, NE, USA) was used to measure the gas exchange parameters of leaves at 9:00 a.m. on a sunny day [19]. The mature leaves of the apex with good growth and brightness were selected, with 3 replicates for each treatment. The concentration of CO2 was 452 μmol·mol−1, and the saturation light intensity was 1000 μmol·m−2·s−1 in the greenhouse. Net photosynthetic rate (Pn, μmol·m−2·s−1), stomatal conductance (Gs, mmol·m−2·s−1), transpiration rate (Tr, mmol·m−2·s−1), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, μmol·mol−1) were measured.

2.3.5. Determination of Chlorophyll Contents

The chlorophyll contents of plants were determined by UV spectrophotometry (UV-2600, Shimadzu Instruments Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). The mixed solution of acetone–absolute ethanol =1:1 was taken as the blank control, and the absorbance measured at the wavelengths of 645 nm and 663 nm, respectively [20,21]. The concentration of Ca, Cb, and CT (i.e., chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll, mg·L−1) was calculated by the following formula.
  • C: Chlorophyll concentration (mg·L−1);
  • V: Total extract volume (mL);
  • M: Fresh leaf weight (g).

2.3.6. Determination of Protective Enzyme Activity and MDA Contents

Antioxidant enzyme activity and MDA content were determined according to Abdelkader et al. [22].

2.4. Effects of F. carica Root Extract on Soil Properties of T. cuspidata

2.4.1. Collection of Soil Samples

After 30 days (15 April), 105 days (1 July), and 180 days (15 September) of pot experiment irrigation, S-type sampling was carried out for each treatment group, and each treatment was repeated 3 times. The collected soil sample was placed into the numbered sterile sealed bag and the sample brought back to the laboratory as soon as possible. The soil samples obtained were uniformly mixed and then passed through a 2 mm soil sieve, which was equally divided into 3 parts. The first part was dried naturally and used for soil nutrient contents determination, the second part was stored at 4 °C for soil enzymatic activity determination, and the third part was stored at −80 °C for soil microbial diversity determination.

2.4.2. Measurement of Soil Physicochemical Property

The physical and chemical properties of soil were determined by Huang et al. [23] and Raya-Moreno et al. [24]. Soil pH was measured with a pH meter (Sartorius PT-21, Beijing Ouxinsheng Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Soil electrical conductivity (EC) was measured with an electrical conductivity meter (DDS-11A, Shanghai INESA Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Soil organic carbon (SOC) was determined by the external heating method of potassium dichromate oxidation. Soil available nitrogen (AN) was determined by alkaline hydrolysis diffusion method. Available phosphorus (AP) in soil was determined by the molybdenum antimony colorimetric method. Available potassium (AK) in soil was determined by the flame photometric method.

2.4.3. Determination of Soil Enzyme Activity

The activities of urease, catalase, and sucrase in soil were determined according to Zhang et al. [25]. Cellulase activity was determined according to the method of Shen et al. [26].

2.4.4. Determination of Soil Microbial Diversity

Illumina Hiseq sequencing method was used to analyze the diversity of soil bacteria and fungi by DNA extraction, PCR amplification, fluorescence quantification, Miseq library construction, and Miseq sequencing.

2.5. Identification of Potential Chemicals in Water Extract of T. cuspidata

The potential chemicals in the water extract of T. cuspidata were identified by UPLC-MS/MS (Dionex UIiMate 300, Themo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The chromatographic column used was the Hyperil Gold column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm). In the positive ion mode, gradient elution was used to achieve the separation of compounds; the mobile phase under this elution was 0.1% formic acid-H2O (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B). The mobile phase under the negative ion mode was 5 mM ammonium acetate-H2O (pH = 9, ammonia water conditioning, solvent A) and methanol (solvent B). The elution conditions under positive and negative ions were the same: 5% B (0–0.45 min), 5–100% B (0.45–30.05 min), 100% B (30.05–34.27 min), 100–5% B (34.27–34.70 min), and 3.8 min were used to balance the initial conditions, with an analysis time of 38.5 min.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Xcalibur and Compound Discoverer 3.1 software were used to analyze the MS data. All data were analyzed by SPSS22.0 statistical software, and one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s Multiple-range Tests (p < 0.05) were used to further deal with data differences. Origin2021 was used for mapping. The microbial species composition, diversity, and richness were analyzed using the Majorbio cloud platform online platform at www.majorbio.com (accessed on 29 November 2022).

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Extracts from Different Parts of F. carica on the Growth of T. cuspidata

The changes in plant height and base diameter of T. cuspidata irrigated by different parts (root, stem, and leaf) of F. carica were measured. As shown in Figure 1a, T. cuspidata’s plant height increased slowly after being irrigated with different concentrations of F. carica stem and leaf extract, and there was no significant difference between them and the control (p > 0.05). Only 10.0 g·L−1 and 20.0 g·L−1 concentrations of extracts showed a promoting effect on the plant height of T. cuspidata. The plant height of T. cuspidata irrigated with different concentrations of F. carica root extract was higher than that of the control, and there were significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.05). The plant height of T. cuspidata reached the highest value 24.40 cm by irrigating with the concentration of 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract, and significantly increased by 15.80% compared with the control (p < 0.05).
According to Figure 1b, the basal diameter of T. cuspidata irrigated with different concentrations of F. carica root extract was higher than that of the control, but there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). The F. carica stem extract with a concentration of 40.0 g·L−1 showed an inhibitory effect on the basal diameter of T. cuspidata. The basal diameter of T. cuspidata irrigated with F. carica leaf extract was higher than that of the control only at the concentration of 10.0 g·L−1 but was lower than that of the control under other concentrations irrigated.
It can be concluded that the extracts from different parts of a plant have different effects on the same receptor plants. In this test, F. carica root extract had a better-promoting effect on the growth of T. cuspidata than other parts (stem and leaf), so the F. carica root extract with a stronger promoting effect was selected for subsequent irrigation in the experiment.

3.2. Effect of F. carica Water Extract on the Growth of T. cuspidata

3.2.1. Effect of F. carica Water Extract on the Plant Height and Base Diameter of T. cuspidata

The plant morphology index can directly reflect the influence of water extract of some donor plants on the recipient plants, and plant height and base diameter are the most intuitive expression of its growth [27]. The effects of different concentrations of F. carica root water extract on plant height and base diameter of T. cuspidata were measured. The plant height and base diameter of T. cuspidata irrigated with the same concentration of F. carica root extract increased gradually with the increase in irrigating time. As shown in Figure 1c, the plant height of T. cuspidata irrigated with 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract increased rapidly. After 30 and 105 days of irrigation, the plant height of T. cuspidata was increased by 15.82% and 20.46% compared with the control. At 180 days of irrigating, the maximum value of 53.03 cm was achieved, which increased by 18.29% compared with the control. When irrigated with 40.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract for 30 days, the plant height of T. cuspidata irrigated was 1.05 times that of the control, and was not significantly increased at 105 days of irrigation compared with the control (p > 0.05); it only increased by 5.94%. After 180 days of irrigation, it increased by 6.34% compared with the control and the difference was significant (p < 0.05).
According to Figure 1d, the basal diameter of T. cuspidata irrigated with 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract increased rapidly by 1.43% compared with the control at 30 days of irrigating. After 105 days of irrigation, it increased by 7.17% compared with the control and the difference was significant (p < 0.05). At 180 days, the maximum value of 6.53 mm was reached, which was significantly increased by 5.66% compared with the control. On the other hand, the basal diameter of T. cuspidata irrigated with 40.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract increased slowly, and there was almost no change in basal diameter after 30 days of irrigating, and the promoting effect was not significant (p > 0.05). The basal diameter of T. cuspidata irrigation with 105 days increased by 3.49% compared with the control and the difference was significant (p < 0.05). After 180 days of irrigating, the basal diameter was 1.06 times that of the control, significantly increased by 1.94% (p < 0.05).

3.2.2. Effects of F. carica Water Extract on Gas Exchange Parameters of T. cuspidata

Photosynthesis is an important biological process of plant life, and plays an important role in the improvement of the earth’s ecosystem. The metabolic energy of higher plants comes from photosynthesis, through which the energy of sunlight is captured and converted into biological energy [28,29]. Figure 2 shows the results of Pn, Tr, Gs, and Ci of T. cuspidata irrigated by F. carica root extract with different concentrations. Under the irrigation of F. carica root extract, the contents of Pn, Tr, Gs, and Ci in T. cuspidata continued to increase with the increase in irrigating time, and there were significant differences compared to the control (p < 0.05). Under lower concentrations (10.0 g·L−1 and 20.0 g·L−1) of F. carica root extract, the contents of Pn, Tr, Gs, and Ci were significantly higher than those in the control (p < 0.05). However, under high concentrations (40.0 g·L−1) of F. carica root extract, the contents of Pn, Tr, Gs, and Ci were lower than those in the control.
The highest Pn value was 4.72 µmol·m2·s−1 after 105 days of irrigation with 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract, which was an increase of 9.94% compared with the control. The content of Pn of F. carica root extract irrigated with a high concentration of 40.0 g·L−1 was lower than that of the control group, showing an inhibitory effect. At 30 days of irrigation, the difference was not significant (p > 0.05), and at 105 and 180 days of irrigation, the difference was significantly decreased by 17.24% and 19.03% compared with the control (Figure 2a). The highest Tr value was 1.46 µmol·m2·s−1 after 105 days of 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract irrigation, which was an increase of 23.03% compared with the control. Although the Tr in the F. carica root extract irrigation with a high concentration of 40.0 g·L−1 was still higher than that in the control, the promotion effect was weak, and it only increased by 6.96%, 8.71%, and 4.83% compared with the control at 30 days, 105 days, and 180 days, respectively (Figure 2b). The lowest content of Gs was 50.63 µmol·m2·s−1 when the concentration of F. carica root extract was 40.0 g·L−1 for 30 days, which was 6.00% lower than that of the control (p > 0.05). The highest value was 107.57 µmol·m2·s−1, at the concentration of 10 g·L−1 F. carica root extract for 105 days, which was a significant increase of 8.87% compared with the control (p < 0.05) (Figure 2c). The highest Ci content was 421.00 µmol·mol −1 when the concentration of 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract was irrigated for 180 days, which was an increase of 5.34% compared with the control. The content of Pn in the F. carica root extract irrigation group with a high concentration of 40.0 g·L−1 was lower than that in the control, and showed a significant difference (p < 0.05). The contents of Ci in the F. carica root extract irrigation were reduced by 7.26%, 10.10%, and 8.51% compared with the control at 30 days, 105 days, and 180 days, respectively (Figure 2d).

3.2.3. Effect of F. carica Water Extract on Chlorophyll Contents of T. cuspidata

Chlorophyll is the basis of plant photosynthesis, which can directly affect the intensity of photosynthesis, photosynthetic efficiency, and the accumulation of photosynthetic products in plants, and play a key role in plant day lighting and light protection [30]. The changes in chlorophyll contents (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll) of T. cuspidata were measured by irrigating different concentrations of F. carica root extracts. Under the same irrigation concentration, chlorophyll a contents in T. cuspidata leaves showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase in irrigation time, and all groups reached the maximum value at 105 days of irrigation. F. carica root extracts with 10.0 g·L−1 and 20.0 g·L−1 irrigation were 1.28 and 1.26 times that of the control, respectively. Compared with the control, F. carica root extract at the concentration of 40.0 g·L−1 was reduced by 16.07% (Figure 3a). The chlorophyll b content in the leaves of T. cuspidata irrigated with 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract was significantly different from that of the control (p < 0.05), and increased by 19.87%, 32.62%, and 25.02% at 30, 105, and 180 days, respectively. At 105 days of irrigation, the maximum value was 6.36, 1.33 times that of the control (Figure 3b). Total chlorophyll contents also showed a trend of first increase and then decrease with the increase in irrigation time, and all groups reached their maximum value at 105 days of irrigation. When 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract was irrigated for 105 days, the maximum value was 20.48 mg·g−1, which was 1.03 times that of the control and the difference was significant (p < 0.05). The F. carica root water extract at 40.0 g·L−1 was reduced by 16.03% compared with the control (Figure 3c).

3.2.4. Effects of F. carica Water Extract on Enzymatic Activity and Malondialdehyde Contents of T. cuspidata

When plants are in a stressed environment, SOD, POD, and CAT in the antioxidant protection enzyme system of plants can work together to eliminate O2, H2O2, and other oxygen free radicals produced during the growth of plants [31]. The enhancement of their activity can effectively prevent the accumulation of reactive oxygen species and reduce the damage to plant cell membranes, to ensure that MDA is maintained at a low level [32]. It plays an important role in maintaining the normal growth of plants. The activity of three main protective enzymes (SOD, POD, CAT) and the contents of MDA in T. cuspidata irrigated with F. carica root water extract at different concentrations was measured. The activity of SOD, POD, and CAT in T. cuspidata increased when the concentration of F. carica root extract was 10.0–20.0 g·L−1, and the increase in activity was most obvious when the concentration was 10.0 g·L−1. The variation range of SOD was 307.64–652.38 U·g−1·min−1 FW. After 105 days of irrigation, SOD activity was significantly increased by 27.24% (p < 0.05) to the maximum. When the concentration was 40.0 g·L−1, the activity of SOD decreased by 14.80%, 15.65%, and 17.00% at 30, 105, and 180 days, respectively, compared with the control (p > 0.05) (Figure 4a). POD ranged from 396.45–740.35 U·g−1·min−1 FW, and reached the maximum value at 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract for 105 days, which was a significant increase of 38.89% compared with the control (p < 0.05). However, the promoting effect started to decrease when the concentration was 40.0 g·L−1, and the POD activity was only 1.03 times that of the control at 180 days of irrigation. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) (Figure 4b). CAT ranged from 447.13 to 707.18 U·g−1·min−1 FW. When the concentration was 10.0 g·L−1, the promoting effect was most obvious. Compared with the control, CAT activity was increased by 29.05% and the difference was significant (p < 0.05) at 105 days, reaching the maximum. However, when the concentration was 40.0 g·L−1, the promoting effect began to decrease, although it was still higher than the control, and the CAT activity was only 1.05 times that of the control after 180 days of irrigation (Figure 4c).
MDA contents ranged from 0.85 to 3.42 μmol·g−1 FW. The influence of different concentrations of F. carica root extract on the MDA content of T. cuspidata was inhibited. The MDA contents in the low concentration (10.0 g·L−1) and medium concentration (20.0 g·L−1) F. carica root extract irrigation were always significantly lower than that in the control (p > 0.05), and reached the lowest value at 105 days of irrigation. They were 42.49% and 19.31% lower than the control, respectively. The content of MDA in 40.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract irrigation was significantly higher than that in the control (p < 0.05), and reached the maximum value at 30 days of irrigation, which was 38.14% higher than that in the control. The inhibitory effect was strongest at 10.0 g/L and reached 0.85 μmol·g-1FW at 105 days, while the MDA content in the control group was 1.74 times that of this group. In addition, the concentration of F. carica root extract was lower than that of other groups at different irrigation periods, and the inhibition effect of T. cuspidata roots was the least, and the damage to the antioxidant system of the roots of T. cuspidata was also the least (Figure 4d).

3.3. Effects of F. carica Water Extract on Soil Properties of T. cuspidata

3.3.1. Changes in Soil Physicochemical Properties

Many studies have shown that the contents of soil pH, soil organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, available phosphorus, total potassium, and available potassium vary with different concentrations of donor plant water extracts, which changes soil physical and chemical properties and soil quality, thus indirectly affecting the growth and development of recipient plants [33]. We tested the effects of different concentrations of F. carica root extracts on soil physicochemical properties (pH, EC, SOC, AN, AP, AK) of T. cuspidata.
With the increase in the concentration of F. carica root extract, the soil pH of T. cuspidata showed a trend of first rising to a certain value and then decreasing, but the overall value remained above the control group. After 180 days of irrigating, the soil pH values of T. cuspidata with 10.0 g·L−1, 20.0 g·L−1, and 40.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract were significantly different from that of the control (p < 0.05), and were 1.92%, 1.01%, and 0.69% higher than that of the control, respectively (Figure 5a). On the whole, different concentrations of F. carica root extracts could improve the pH of T. cuspidata soil, which was in the range of 6.07–6.41, belonging to acidic soil (pH 5.0–6.5). The results indicated that the F. carica root extract might contain antibacterial substances, which could improve the microecological environment and physical and chemical properties of T. cuspidata soil and promote the growth and development of plants. It may also be that F. carica root extract has a strong ability to absorb inorganic nitrogen, which increases the soil pH of T. cuspidata, changes soil physical and chemical properties, and maintains soil fertility [34]. The lowest EC was found in F. carica root extract with a concentration of 20.0 g·L−1 for 30 days, which could significantly reduce the soil EC of T. cuspidata (p < 0.05) and was 5.80% lower than that of the control. After 180 days of irrigation, all three irrigation concentrations (10.0 g·L−1, 20.0 g·L−1, and 40.0 g·L−1) could significantly reduce the soil EC of T. cuspidata (p < 0.05), and the lower the concentration was, the lower the soil EC was. They were 4.04%, 5.60%, and 3.84% lower than the control, respectively. On the whole, different concentrations of F. carica root extracts could reduce the soil EC of T. cuspidata, and the EC ranged from 13.41 to 22.73 ms·m−1. The soil EC of T. cuspidata was significantly decreased after different concentrations of F. carica root extract were irrigated, which showed a law of first increasing and then decreasing with the change in irrigation time, and reached the peak value at 105 days, which may be because the high temperature in July resulted in increased water evaporation, increased salt contents, and increased soil EC. Cold autumn weather in September resulted in less water evaporation, less salt, and lower soil EC [35]. With the increase in treatment time, the SOC contents showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing, and reached the highest value at 105 days. However, the SOC content of T. cuspidata irrigated with high concentration (40.0 g·L−1) F. carica root extract had no significant difference compared with that of the control, and only increased by 1.16%. The SOC contents of T. cuspidata irrigated with low concentration (10.0 g·L−1) and medium concentration (20.0 g·L−1) F. carica root extract were significantly higher than that of the control by 29.49% and 10.08% (p < 0.05), respectively. The F. carica root extract may accelerate the growth of T. cuspidata underground parts, increasing the number of root secretions, increasing the soil’s carbon source, stimulating the soil microbial activity of T. cuspidata, accelerating the decomposition of soil organic matter, and producing more SOC [36].
According to Figure 5b, under the same irrigation time, with the increase in F. carica root water extract concentration, soil AN, AP, and AK contents all increased to a certain value and then decreased. A low concentration (10.0 g·L−1) and medium concentration (20.0 g·L−1) of F. carica root extract increased soil AN contents of T. cuspidata, and there were significant differences (p < 0.05). The soil AN content of T. cuspidata irrigated with 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract had the most significant difference compared with the control (p < 0.05), and increased by 16.30%, 17.87%, and 13.59% at 30 days, 105 days, and 180 days, respectively. Different concentrations of F. carica root extract increased the soil AP contents of T. cuspidata. There were significant differences in soil AP contents (p < 0.05), and the range of soil AP contents was 17.31–40.59 mg·kg−1. The elevation effect was most obvious when the concentration was 10.0 g·L−1, and the soil AP content of T. cuspidata was significantly increased by 69.13% (p < 0.05) at 105 days of irrigation, reaching the maximum 40.59 mg·kg−1 compared with the control. A low concentration (10.0 g·L−1) and medium concentration (20.0 g·L−1) of F. carica root extract increased soil AK contents of T. cuspidata, and there were significant differences in soil AK contents (p < 0.05); the range of soil AK contents was 76.24–153.13 mg·kg−1. After 180 days of irrigation, the soil AK contents of T. cuspidata irrigated with the three concentrations of F. carica root extract reached their maximum values, which were 39.18%, 29.42%, and 2.15% higher than that of the control, respectively.

3.3.2. Changes in Soil Enzymatic Activities

Plant development and soil enzyme activity are closely related, and soil enzyme activity is a key measure of soil biological efficiency. It is often used to evaluate soil fertility, ripening degree, and fertility level, and is an indicator of biological activity indirectly reflecting soil quality [37]. We tested the activities of urease, catalase, cellulase, and sucrase in the soil of T. cuspidata irrigated with different concentrations of F. carica root extract. Under the same concentration of F. carica root water extract irrigation, the four soil enzyme activities showed an increase first and then a decrease with the change in irrigation time. The activities of urease, catalase, cellulase, and sucrase in the soil of T. cuspidata were 0.33–0.86 mg·g−1, 0.23–0.84 mg·g−1, 0.12–0.54 mg·g−1, and 22.79–68.63 mg·g−1, respectively.
A low concentration (10.0 g·L−1) and medium concentration (20.0 g·L−1) of F. carica root extract increased the activity of soil urease, and there were significant differences (p < 0.05). After 30 days of irrigation, it increased by 31.96% and 41.39%, respectively, compared with the control. The maximum value was reached at 105 days of irrigation, with increases of 36.95% and 42.99% compared with the control. After 180 days of irrigation, the difference was significant compared with the control (p < 0.05), and was 1.42 times and 1.48 times, respectively (Figure 6a). The maximum soil catalase value of 0.84 mg·g−1 appeared at 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root water extract for 105 days, which was a significant increase of 70.59% compared with the control. The maximum values of 20.0 g·L−1 and 40.0 g·L−1 also appeared at 105 days of irrigation, with increases of 67.65% and 29.41% compared with the control, respectively (Figure 6b). At a low concentration (10.0 g·L−1) and medium concentration (20.0 g·L−1) of F. carica root extract, the soil cellulase activity of T. cuspidata was significantly increased (p < 0.05), and was 44.10% and 27.25% higher than that of the control at 30 days of irrigation, respectively. When 10.0 g·L−1 was irrigated for 105 days, the maximum value was 57.13% higher than that of the control (Figure 6c). After 105 days of irrigating with 20.0 g·L−1 F. carica root water extract, soil sucrase activity reached the maximum of 68.63 mg·g−1, which was an increase of 44.33% compared with the control. The soil sucrase activity of T. cuspidata irrigated with a high concentration (40.0 g·L−1) of F. carica root extract had no significant difference compared with the control (p > 0.05), and was only increased by 3.95%, 2.81%, and 4.76% at 30, 105, and 180 days, respectively, compared with the control (p < 0.05) (Figure 6d).

3.3.3. Effect of Water Extract on Soil Microbial Community

Based on changes in soil microbial diversity, high-throughput sequencing technologies can further reflect changes in bacterial and fungal species diversity and community structure. In the following test, soil samples A1, A2, and A3 were the control (not irrigated with F. carica root extract for 30 days, 105 days, and 180 days, respectively). B1, B2, and B3 were irrigated with 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract for 30 days, 105 days, and 180 days, respectively. C1, C2, and C3 were irrigated with 20.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract for 30 days, 105 days, and 180 days, respectively. D1, D2, and D3 were irrigated with 40.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract for 30 days, 105 days, and 180 days, respectively.

Effects of Different Treatments on α Diversity of Soil Microorganisms

Through changes in the index, Shannon and Simpson’s indices represent community variation. The larger Shannon index reflects the higher community species diversity, while the smaller Simpson index reflects the higher species diversity. As can be seen from Table 1A,B, the richness and diversity of soil bacterial and fungal communities of T. cuspidata in different irrigation stages showed certain differences. The Shannon index of soil bacteria A2 samples was the highest, followed by C2, indicating that the diversity of the soil bacteria community of T. cuspidata was higher after 105 days of irrigation (1 July). The Simpson index of soil bacteria reached its maximum value 30 days after the set concentration of irrigation, indicating that the soil bacterial community diversity of T. cuspidata was low 30 days after irrigation (15 April). The Shannon index of soil fungi was the highest after irrigation for 180 days at the set concentration except for 10.0 g·L−1. The Simpson index of soil fungi was the lowest after 180 days of irrigating, indicating that the soil fungal community diversity of T. cuspidata was higher after 180 days of irrigating (15 September).
Ace and Chao1 indices reflect the richness of the community through the change in the index, and the higher the Ace and Chao1 index, the higher the species richness of the community. The Ace index of soil bacteria was highest at 105 days after irrigation except for 10.0 g·L−1. This indicated that the richness of the soil bacterial community of T. cuspidata was higher after 105 days of irrigation (1 July). The Chao1 index of soil bacteria peaked at 105 days under 20.0 g·L−1 and 40.0 g·L−1 irrigation. At 0.0 g·L−1 and 10.0 g·L−1 of irrigation, the maximum appeared at 30 days and 180 days, respectively. Except for the control, the Ace index and Chao1 index of soil fungi of T. cuspidata were the highest at 180 days, indicating that the richness of the soil fungi community of T. cuspidata was high at 180 days (15 September). The coverage index reflects the reliability of the sequencing results. The coverage index of soil bacteria is greater than 96%, and the coverage index of soil fungi is greater than 99%, with high coverage, indicating that most bacteria and fungi populations were detected, which can represent the real status of microorganisms in the samples. In summary, F. carica root extract had different effects on the diversity and richness of soil bacteria and fungi with different irrigation times. The diversity and richness of the soil bacteria community in T. cuspidata soil were higher at 105 days of irrigation (1 July). The effect on the soil fungal community mainly occurred at 180 days of irrigation (15 September).

Effects of Different Treatments on β Diversity of Soil Microorganisms

To investigate the differences in the soil bacterial community structure of T. cuspidata between different treatments, nonmetric multidimensional scaling analysis (NMDS) was conducted based on the Bray–Curtis distance. The degree of difference between different regions can be indicated by the distance between points by controlling other variables to examine the response of various treatments to microbial communities. The soil bacterial communities of T. cuspidata irrigated with different concentrations were divided into four different levels by nonmetric multidimensional scaling analysis at the OTU level.
The stress function value = 0.063 < 0.1, which means that the graph has certain explanatory significance and the sample ranking is good. Among them, soil bacterial communities in four strata overlapped partially, and all sample sites were close to relatively clustered, indicating that the species composition of all samples was similar (Figure 7a). In contrast, different sites of soil fungi were more dispersed, and there was a certain distance between samples irrigated at a different time within the same horizon, indicating that there were differences in the composition of the fungi community in the soil samples irrigated at different times. At the same time, ANOSIM was used to analyze the similarity of the soil fungal communities of T. cuspidata under different timings of irrigation (Figure 7b). The results showed that there were significant differences in the soil fungal community composition of T. cuspidata under different OTU levels considering the phylogenetic evolutionary distance and fungal species abundance (R = 0.6327, p = 0.001). These results indicate that F. carica root extract could change the soil bacterial community structure of T. cuspidata.

Effects of Different Treatments on Soil Microbial Community Composition and Abundance

As shown in Figure 7c, based on phylum classification level analysis, a total of 33 phyla of bacteria were detected in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with different concentrations of F. carica root extract after 30 days. Compared with A1, both B1 and D1 contained the deficient GAL15 bacteria, while C1 had the deficient Fibrobacterota and Actinobacteria, and there was an increase in the abundance ratio of Actinobacteria A total of 36 bacterial phyla were detected in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with F. carica root extract at different concentrations after 105 days. Compared with A2, both B2 and D2 contained the deficient WPS-2 bacteria, while C2 had the deficient Fibrobacterota and the abundance of Acidobacteria increased. A total of 36 bacterial phyla were detected in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with F. carica root extract at different concentrations during 180 days of irrigation. Compared with A3, B3, C3, and D3 all contained missing Sumerlaeota, Dadabacteria, and Fibrobacterota, while C3 contained missing TX1A-33. The abundance of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria increased.
Based on phylum classification level analysis, a total of 16 phyla of fungi were detected in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with different concentrations of F. carica root extract after 30 days. It can be seen from Figure 7d that, compared with A1, both B1 and C1 contained missing Monoblepharomycota, and B1 contained missing Calcarisporiellomycota and Aphelidiomycota. The proportion of Basidiomycota fungi abundance increased. A total of 15 fungal phyla were detected in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with F. carica root extract at different concentrations after 105 days. Compared with A2, both B2 and D2 contained missing Monoblepharomycota and Calcarisporiellomycota, and the abundance of Mortierellomycota fungi increased. A total of 14 fungal phyla were detected in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with F. carica root extract at different concentrations during 180 days of irrigation. Compared with A3, the relative abundance of Basidiomycota after irrigation with F. carica root extract increased by 1.08%, 0.78%, and 3.96% in B3, C3, and D3, respectively.
Based on the taxonomic analysis, a total of 576 bacteria genera were detected in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with F. carica root extract at different concentrations after 30 days. As shown in Figure 7e, Arthrobacter was increased by 1.10%, 2.32%, and 1.34% in B1, C1, and D1, respectively, compared with A1. A total of 557 bacteria genera were detected in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with F. carica root extract at different concentrations for 105 days. Vicinamibacterales had the highest proportion in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with different concentrations of F. carica root extract. In A2, B2, C2, and D2, these increased by 3.10%, 6.20%, 6.94%, and 6.31%, respectively. A total of 608 bacteria genera were detected in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with F. carica root extract at different concentrations for 180 days. Compared with A3, the relative abundance of Arthrobacter after irrigation with F. carica root extract increased by 0.49%, 4.97%, and 1.12% in B3, C3, and D3, respectively.
A total of 447 fungi genera were detected in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with F. carica root extract at different concentrations after 30 days. As shown in Figure 7f, Mortierella accounted for the highest proportion in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with different concentrations of F. carica root extracts. Compared with A1, the abundance proportion of Mortierella fungi in B1, C1, and D1 increased. A total of 430 fungi genera were detected in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with F. carica root extract at different concentrations after 105 days. Compared with A2, the relative abundance of Mortierella increased in B2, C2, and D2, while the relative abundance of Penicillium decreased. A total of 480 genera of fungi were detected in T. cuspidata soil irrigated with F. carica root extract at different concentrations for 180 days. Compared with A2, the relative abundance of Penicillium in B2, C2, and D2 decreased by 4.23%, 3.61%, and 2.17%, respectively.
Our results show that the soil bacterial diversity and richness of T. cuspidata were the highest at 105 days of F. carica root extract irrigation, and the soil fungal diversity and richness of T. cuspidata were highest at 180 days of F. carica root extract irrigation. After irrigating with F. carica root extract, the bacterial community structure of T. cuspidata was changed, and the abundance of beneficial microorganisms such as Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Acidobacteria were enriched at the phylum level. The abundance of Arthrobacter beneficial microorganisms was enhanced at the genus level. The fungal community structure of T. cuspidata irrigated with F. carica root extract was also different, and the abundance of beneficial microorganisms of Basidiomycota and Mortierellomycota were enriched at the phylum level. At the genus level, the relative abundance of Mortierella was increased, while that of Penicillium was decreased. These dominant microbial groups can produce various extracellular hydrolase, degrade various insoluble organic substances in soil to obtain various nutrients required for cell metabolism, and play an important role in the mineralization of organic matter, to participate in the natural cycles, purify the environment, and enhance soil fertility [38]. At the same time, they resist rhizosphere harmful microorganisms in various ways, inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria, to reduce the impact of diseases on plant growth and development, and indirectly promote plant colonization, growth, and development [39].
The species Venn chart is mainly used to calculate the number of operational taxonomic units (OTU) unique to and shared by each sample. On the other hand, it can also intuitively reflect the similarity and overlapping between different samples. Based on OTU levels, it was found that species numbers in soil bacteria of T. cuspidata were different after 30 days, 105 days, and 180 days after F. carica root extract was irrigated with different concentrations. A1 contained 1720 bacterial OTUs, B1 contained 1482 bacterial OTUs, C1 contained 1583 bacterial OTUs, and D1 contained 1423 bacterial OTUs (Figure 7g). There are 788 OTUs for A1, B1, C1, and D1. A2 contained 1820 bacterial OTUs, B2 contained 1721 bacterial OTUs, C2 contained 1739 bacterial OTUs, and D2 contained 1744 bacterial OTUs. There are 1139 OTUs for A2, B2, C2, and D2 (Figure 7h). A total of 2012 bacterial OTUs were found in A3, 2005 bacterial OTUs were found in B3, 1870 bacterial OTUs were found in C3, and 1869 bacterial OTUs were found in D3 (Figure 7i). In addition, there are 1188 OTUs for A3, B3, C3, and D3. The overall performance was a trend of continuous increase from March to September under the same concentration of irrigation, and the number of OTUs was in the order of 180 days > 105 days > 30 days.
There were differences in the number of species of soil fungi in T. cuspidata after 30 days, 105 days, and 180 days of irrigation of different concentrations of F. carica root extract. Among them, A1 contained 784 fungal OTUs, B1 contained 855 bacterial OTUs, C1 contained 605 bacterial OTUs, and D1 contained 783 bacterial OTUs. In addition, there are 220 OTUs for A1, B1, C1, and D1 (Figure 7j). A2 had 901 fungal OTUs, B2 had 866 fungal OTUs, C2 had 778 fungal OTUs, and D2 had 886 fungal OTUs (Figure 7k). In addition, there are 330 OTUs for A2, B2, C2, and D2. A total of 1041 fungal OTUs were found in A3, 991 in B3, 989 in C3, and 1157 in D3 (Figure 7l). In addition, there are 393 OTUs for A3, B3, C3, and D3.
By comparing the Venn diagram, it was found that there are differences in the number of bacterial and fungal communities in T. cuspidata soil watered by different treatments of F. carica root extracts, and they all show a trend of continuous increase from March to September under the same concentration of irrigation. At the same time, the number of endemic communities under 0.0 g·L−1, 10.0 g·L−1, and 20.0 g·L−1 irrigation decreased first and then increased from March to September. The number of endemic communities increased continuously when 40.0 g·L−1 was irrigated. In terms of the number of unique bacterial communities, 10.0 g·L−1 was higher than that of the control at 105 days and 180 days. A concentration of 20.0 g·L−1 was higher than the control at 30 days; 40.0 g·L−1 was higher than the control at 180 days. In terms of the number of endemic fungal communities, 10.0 g·L−1 was higher than that of the control at 30 days and 105 days. A concentration of 40.0 g·L−1 was higher than the control at 105 days and 180 days.

3.4. Determination of Potential Growth-Promoting Chemicals in Extracts

UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS was used for the analysis of F. carica root water extract and F. carica root exudates under Section 2.5. The results showed that the chemicals in the water extract of F. carica root had good signals under both positive and negative modes, and were separated well. Combined with the screening results of positive and negative ions, the presence of at least two excimer ions was used as the criterion to confirm the existence of the screening compounds and lock the target compounds. Based on the literature reports, the secondary mass spectrometry fragment ions of the target compounds were analyzed and compared with the search results of ChemSpider, mzVault, Mass List Search, and other databases (database matching score > 95), to reasonably predict the specific chemical structure of the target compounds. The comparison of chemicals between F. carica root water extract and F. carica root exudates is detailed in Table 2. The compound type, retention time, main ion peak, target compound, and related information are listed in Table S1 (F. carica root water extract) and Table S2 (F. carica root exudates). A total of 103 chemicals were detected in the F. carica root water extract and F. carica root exudates with relative accuracy < 10 ppm, including 12 coumarins, 18 terpenoids, 28 alkaloids, 16 flavonoids, 20 organic acids, 5 steroids, and 5 quinones. There were 62 chemicals shared by F. carica root water extract and F. carica root exudates, 29 chemicals unique to F. carica root water extract, and 13 chemicals unique to F. carica root exudates.

4. Discussion

At the same irrigation time, the plant height and base diameter of T. cuspidata irrigated with different concentrations of F. carica root extract increased first and then decreased with the increase in F. carica root extract concentration (Figure 1). All of them showed the trend of “promoting low and suppressing high”. Only from the view of plant height and base diameter of T. cuspidata, was F. carica root extract with 10.0 g·L−1 concentration superior to other concentrations. This is consistent with the results of other studies on the concentration effect of “low promotion and high inhibition” in plant interaction [5,40]. The reason for the weakening of the promoting effect of high-concentration irrigation may be that the plant interaction becomes stronger when the concentration of F. carica root extract increases, while the physiological morphology of the young roots of T. cuspidata has not been fully formed, and the protective enzyme system and defense system in the plant are also poor, so they are more sensitive to plant metabolites and other external stimuli, and are more prone to disease and adversity [27,41,42].
Figure 2 shows the photosynthetic results of T. cuspidata irrigated with F. carica root extract of different concentrations. Compared with the control, a low concentration (10.0 g·L−1) and medium concentration (20.0 g·L−1) of F. carica root extract significantly promoted the contents of Pn, Tr, Gs, and Ci. These results indicate that a lower concentration of F. carica root extract irrigation can promote the stomatal opening of T. cuspidata leaves, enhance transpiration activity, provide sufficient photosynthetic raw materials in cells, improve the efficiency of light energy capture, and thus increase dry matter accumulation [43]. The decrease in the contents of Pn, Tr, Gs, and Ci in T. cuspidata leaves irrigated with a high concentration of 40.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract may be due to the inhibition of the activity of ATPase in plant cell mitochondria, which reduced the respiration rate of plants and reduced the photosynthetic performance [44]. It may also be that the high-concentration irrigation reduced the self-regulation ability of T. cuspidata and damaged the CO2 transfer pathway from the stomatal cavity to the chloroplast carboxylation site, resulting in the reduction in the CO2 transport rate, and affected the photosynthetic electron transport chain in T. cuspidata leaves [45].
With the increase in F. carica root extract concentration at the same irrigation time, the contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll in the leaves of T. cuspidata showed a trend of first rising and then falling (Figure 3). The contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll in the leaves of T. cuspidata increased under lower concentrations of F. carica root extracts (10.0 g·L−1 and 20.0 g·L−1), which may be due to the strong regulation ability of T. cuspidata and its strong chlorophyll biosynthesis function [46]. The suppression of chlorophyll synthetase activity may be the cause of the decrease in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll levels in the leaves of T. cuspidata watered with a high concentration of F. carica root extract (40.0 g·L−1), which leads to the change in the pigment protein structure on the thylakoid membrane or the destruction of the chloroplast structure, which leads to chlorophyll degradation [47].
As can be seen in Figure 4, after the F. carica root extract was irrigated at a lower concentration, the contents of protective enzymes in T. cuspidata leaves increased, while the content of MDA significantly decreased. It was consistent with the changing trend of protective enzymes in T. cuspidata leaves. It may be that in the early stage of T. cuspidata leaves, oxidizing substances accumulated continuously, and protective enzyme activities were activated and reduced MDA contents [48]. However, under a high concentration of F. carica root extract, the activity of the protective enzyme in the leaves of T. cuspidata was inhibited and the content of MDA was increased, indicating that high-concentration irrigation significantly inhibited T. cuspidata growth, causing a free radical reaction and lipid peroxidation, and damaging the physiological integrity of plant cells. The reason may be that with the increase in the concentration of F. carica root extract, the secondary metabolites in the extract also increased, and the stress effect on T. cuspidata was enhanced. In the adverse environment, the accumulation of reactive oxygen species in T. cuspidata caused serious membrane lipid peroxidation in the leaves of T. cuspidata, which affected the cell structure, increased the relative permeability of the plasma membrane and the accumulation of oxidizing substances in the plant body, eventually leading to membrane peroxidation [49].
As can be seen from Figure 5, soil pH, SOC, AN, AP, and AK contents were all increased under the irrigation of F. carica root extract at a low concentration (10.0 g·L−1) and medium concentration (20.0 g·L−1), and showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase in concentration. These results indicate that the extract of F. carica root might contain antibacterial substances, which could improve the microecological environment and physical and chemical properties of T. cuspidata soil in Northeast China. The content of root exudates further increased the soil carbon source, stimulated the soil microbial activity of T. cuspidata, enhanced the decomposition of soil organic matter, increased the content of soil organic matter, and promoted the fixation, conversion, and availability of soil nitrogen [50,51,52]. The activity of soil phosphorus was also enhanced, promoting its conversion into AP. At the same time, under the action of microorganisms, the potassium mineralization and decomposition in the soil of T. cuspidata were accelerated, and finally, the content of potassium in the soil was increased [53,54]. The soil EC increased first and then decreased with the irrigation time, and reached the peak value in summer (105 days). This may be due to the high temperature in July, which leads to increased evaporation of water, increased salt content, and higher soil EC. In September, when the temperature drops, the water evaporates less, the salt content decreases, and the soil EC decreases [55].
It can be seen in Figure 6 that the low concentration (10.0 g·L−1) and medium concentration (20.0 g·L−1) F. carica root extract had the most significant promoting effect on the soil enzyme activity of T. cuspidata. The reason may be that the nitrogen fixation of F. carica root extract at a lower concentration increased the contents of soil organic matter, and the organic matter contained in F. carica root extract promoted the growth and propagation of soil microorganisms [56]. The soil enzyme activity was also improved. It is also possible that a lower concentration of F. carica root extract can accelerate the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide, which is harmful to plants, to alleviate the damage of T. cuspidata to some extent [57]. However, the high concentration of 40.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract inhibited the soil enzyme activities of T. cuspidata most significantly, which may be due to the excessive chemicals contained in the high concentration of F. carica root extract, which formed a certain inhibition effect on plant growth and led to the decreased in soil enzyme activities [58].
In terms of the mechanism of allelopathy, this study started from the interaction between T. cuspidata, soil, and microorganisms mediated by secretions and simulated the potential allelopathy effect of T. cuspidata root exudates on T. cuspidata with F. carica root water extract. Different irrigation times had different effects on the diversity and richness of soil bacteria and fungi. The diversity and richness of the soil bacterial community were higher at 105 days of irrigation, while the influence of the soil fungal community mainly occurred at 180 days of irrigation (Table 1). The bacterial and fungal community structure of T. cuspidata was changed by irrigation with F. carica root water extract (Figure 7). At the phylum and genus levels, the bacterial community was enriched in plant growth, promoting rhizobacteria, including Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Arthrobacter. The bacterial colonies have a positive effect on plants, and can inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria, participate in nutrient cycling in plants and secrete plant growth regulators, and promote the absorption and utilization of mineral nutrients in plants [59]. Basidiomycota, Mortierellomycota, and Mortierella were dominant in the soil. They have antagonistic effects on a variety of pathogenic fungi and can effectively degrade refractory organic matter such as lignin and keratins in soil. At the same time, the relative abundance of the pathogen Penicillium in soil decreased after irrigation with F. carica root water extract. The action mechanism of beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms is relatively complex. On the one hand, it may be that these growth-promoting bacteria change the physical and chemical properties of soil and the form of ineffective mineral elements in soil, making them more easily absorbed and utilized by T. cuspidata, thus directly promoting the growth of T. cuspidata [60]. On the other hand, plants can communicate with soil through root exudates, which provide energy for soil microorganisms, change the soil microbial community structure, and improve the population of beneficial microorganisms while restricting the growth of pathogenic bacteria. It also indirectly promotes the growth of T. cuspidata [61].
By UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS analysis, the compounds identified in F. carica root water extract and F. carica root exudates were of the same species and a similar composition, and most of these chemicals were secondary metabolites of F. carica [62]. This mainly includes coumarins, terpenoids, alkaloids, flavonoids, organic acids steroids, and quinones (Table 2). Therefore, it is speculated that the enrichment of potential chemicals secreted by F. carica root interacts with soil microorganisms of T. cuspidata, and increases the relative abundance of growth-promoting bacteria such as Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Arthrobacter, Basidiomycota, Mortierellomycota, and Mortierella. In addition, beneficial microorganisms competed with pathogenic bacteria in nutrition and site competition, which reduced the growth of the pathogenic bacteria Penicillium, and then promoted the growth and development of T. cuspidata. The allelopathic-promoting effect of F. carica on T. cuspidata was mainly caused by the accumulation of potential chemicals in F. carica root exudates in the soil through the interaction with soil microorganisms. Therefore, this is the result of the comprehensive action of chemicals and rhizosphere soil microorganisms.

5. Conclusions

This study systematically investigated the effects of F. carica root water extract on the growth, physiology, and biochemistry, and the rhizosphere microbial community diversity of T. cuspidata. It was found that F. carica rhizosphere soil water extract and root exudates had to promote the growth of T. cuspidata, and had a great impact on the rhizosphere microbial community structure of T. cuspidata. The diversity of microbial communities was changed, the number of growth-promoting bacteria increased, and the number of pathogenic bacteria decreased. A total of 103 chemicals were identified from F. carica root water extract and F. carica root exudates by UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS, among which 62 chemicals were common to the two. Therefore, it can be preliminarily inferred that F. carica roots release a large number of chemicals into the soil during the mixed planting process of F. carica and T. cuspidata, which may directly promote the growth of T. cuspidata by affecting the soil microbial community structure and changing the soil environment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f14061213/s1, Table S1. Chemicals in F. carica root water extract; Table S2. Chemicals in F. carica root exudates.

Author Contributions

Q.L.: data curation, writing—original draft preparation, and investigation. J.H.: visualization and investigation. X.Y.: resources and investigation. Z.G.: writing—review and editing. W.S.: formal analysis. B.Q.: resources. J.C.: software and validation. C.L.: conceptualization and supervision. C.Z.: supervision and project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2572022DP06), the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH2022C004), the Heilongjiang Touyan Innovation Team Program (Tree Genetics and Breeding Innovation Team), and the Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project (the 111 Project), China (B20088).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hazrati, R.; Zare, N.; Asghari, R.; Sheikhzadeh, P.; Johari-Ahar, M. Biologically synthesized CuO nanoparticles induce physiological, metabolic, and molecular changes in the hazel cell cultures. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 6017–6031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. White, H.B.; Batcheller, G.R.; Boggess, E.K.; Brown, C.L.; Butfiloski, J.W.; Decker, T.A.; Erb, J.D.; Fall, M.W.; Hamilton, D.A.; Hiller, T.L.; et al. Best Management Practices for Trapping Furbearers in the United States. Wildl. Monogr. 2021, 207, 3–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Morovati, M.R.; Ghanbari-Movahed, M.; Barton, E.M.; Farzaei, M.H.; Bishayee, A. A systematic review on potential anticancer activities of Ficus carica L. with focus on cellular and molecular mechanisms. Phytomedicine 2022, 105, 154333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, H.; Geekiyanage, N.; Wen, B.; Cao, K.-F.; Goodale, U.M. Regeneration responses to water and temperature stress drive recruitment success in hemiepiphytic fig species. Tree Physiol. 2021, 41, 358–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Li, Q.; Qiao, B.; Shi, S.; Zhao, C. Enhancement of Interplanting of Ficus carica L. with Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc. on Growth of Two Plants. Agriculture 2021, 11, 1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Molisch, H. Der Einfluss Einer Pflanze auf die Andere Allelopathie; Gustav Fischer Verlag: Jena, Germany, 1937. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hierro, J.L.; Callaway, R.M. The Ecological Importance of Allelopathy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2021, 52, 25–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, J.W.; Li, F.L.; Yao, S.K.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Feng, X.; Chen, R.Z.; Xu, Y.Q. Iva xanthiifolia leaf extract reduced the diversity of indigenous plant rhizosphere bacteria. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, L.L.; Zhao, H.H.; Kong, C.H. (-)-Loliolide, the most ubiquitous lactone, is involved in barnyardgrass-induced rice allelopathy. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 1540–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bolouri, P.; Salami, R.; Kouhi, S.; Kordi, M.; Lajayer, B.A.; Hadian, J.; Astatkie, T. Applications of Essential Oils and Plant Extracts in Different Industries. Molecules 2022, 27, 8999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, C.Y.; Li, L.L.; Meiners, S.J.; Kong, C.H. Root placement patterns in allelopathic plant–plant interactions. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pouresmaeil, M.; Nojadeh, M.S.; Movafeghi, A.; Maggi, F. Exploring the bio-control efficacy of Artemisia fragrans essential oil on the perennial weed Convolvulus arvensis: Inhibitory effects on the photosynthetic machinery and induction of oxidative stress. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 155, 112785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, J.; Bao, G.; Yang, Y.; Xi, J.; Zhang, X.; Pan, X.; Zhao, H.; Li, G.; Fan, C. Impact of repeated freeze-thaw cycles environment on the allelopathic effect to Secale cereale L. seedlings. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, D.; Wang, Y.; Song, X.; Jiang, M.; Zhao, X.; Cao, X. The inhibitory effects of simulated light sources on the activity of algae cannot be ignored in photocatalytic inhibition. Chemosphere 2022, 309, 136611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Randé, H.; Michalet, R.; Nemer, D.; Sappin-Didier, V.; Delerue, F. Contrasting soil-and canopy-nurse effects in metalliferous systems may be explained by dominant plant functional strategies. J. Appl. Ecol. 2022, 60, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guan, B.; Xie, B.; Yang, S.; Hou, A.; Chen, M.; Han, G. Effects of five years’ nitrogen deposition on soil properties and plant growth in a salinized reed wetland of the Yellow River Delta. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 136, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ablimit, R.; Li, W.; Zhang, J.; Gao, H.; Zhao, Y.; Cheng, M.; Meng, X.; An, L.; Chen, Y. Altering microbial community for improving soil properties and agricultural sustainability during a 10-year maize-green manure intercropping in Northwest China. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 321, 115859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Williams, A.; Langridge, H.; Straathof, A.L.; Fox, G.; Muhammadali, H.; Hollywood, K.A.; Xu, Y.; Goodacre, R.; de Vries, F.T. Comparing root exudate collection techniques: An improved hybrid method. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 161, 108391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.L. Using an IR camera to improve leaf area and temperature measurements: A new method for increasing the accuracy of photosynthesis-related parameters. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2022, 322, 109005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abbasvand, E.; Hassannejad, S. Reduce the Adverse Effects of Dodder on Sweet Basil by Seed Priming with Salicylic Acid (SA) and Sown in Residues of Syrian Bean-Caper. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 42, 2763–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zulfa, A.W.; Norizah, K.; Hamdan, O.; Zulkifly, S.; Faridah-Hanum, I.; Rhyma, P.P. Discriminating trees species from the relationship between spectral reflectance and chlorophyll contents of mangrove forest in Malaysia. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 111, 106024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abdelkader, M.; Geioushy, R.A.; Fouad, O.A.; Khaled, A.G.A.; Liudmila, P.V. Investigation the activities of photosynthetic pigments, antioxidant enzymes and inducing genotoxicity of cucumber seedling exposed to copper oxides nanoparticles stress. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 305, 111364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, T.; Yang, N.; Lu, C.; Qin, X.; Siddique, K.H.M. Soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, available nutrients, and yield under different straw returning methods. Soil Tillage Res. 2021, 214, 105171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Raya-Moreno, I.; Canizares, R.; Domene, X.; Carabassa, V.; Alcaniz, J.M. Comparing current chemical methods to assess biochar organic carbon in a Mediterranean agricultural soil amended with two different biochars. Sci. Total. Environ. 2017, 598, 604–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, Z.; Ai, N.; Liu, G.; Liu, C.; Qiang, F. Soil quality evaluation of various microtopography types at different restoration modes in the loess area of Northern Shaanxi. Catena 2021, 207, 105633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shen, L.; Wang, C.; Chen, J. Photometric determination of the activity of cellulase and xylanase via measurement of formation of gold nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shi, S.; Gao, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, J.; Guan, J.; Zhao, C.; Fu, Y. Allelopathy of Taxus chinensis var. mairei on Camptotheca acuminata seedling growth and identification of the active principles. J. Plant Interact. 2021, 17, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xin, J.; Zhao, C.; Li, Y.; Ma, S.; Tian, R. Transcriptional, secondary metabolic, and antioxidative investigations elucidate the rapid response mechanism of Pontederia cordata to cadmium. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 232, 113236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Schlüter, U.; Bräutigam, A.; Gowik, U.; Melzer, M.; Christin, P.-A.; Kurz, S.; Mettler-Altmann, T.; Weber, A.P.M. Photosynthesis in C3–C4 intermediate Moricandia species. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 191–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Xu, M.; Liu, R.; Chen, J.M.; Shang, R.; Liu, Y.; Qi, L.; Croft, H.; Ju, W.; Zhang, Y.; He, Y.; et al. Retrieving global leaf chlorophyll content from MERIS data using a neural network method. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2022, 192, 66–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lyu, M.; Liu, J.; Xu, X.; Liu, C.; Qin, H.; Zhang, X.; Tian, G.; Jiang, H.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, Z.; et al. Magnesium alleviates aluminum-induced growth inhibition by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activity and carbon-nitrogen metabolism in apple seedlings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 249, 114421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Y.; Zhang, S.; Bao, Q.; Chu, Y.; Sun, H.; Huang, Y. Jasmonic acid alleviates cadmium toxicity through regulating the antioxidant response and enhancing the chelation of cadmium in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ. Pollut. 2022, 304, 119178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shi, S.; Cheng, J.; Ahmad, N.; Zhao, W.; Tian, M.; Yuan, Z.; Li, C.; Zhao, C. Effects of potential allelochemicals in a water extract of Abutilon theophrasti Medik. on germination and growth of Glycine max L., Triticum aestivum L., and Zea mays L. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 103, 2155–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hyun, J.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, A.; Plante, A.F.; Yoo, G. Ecosystem services-based soil quality index tailored to the metropolitan environment for soil assessment and management. Sci. Total. Environ. 2022, 820, 153301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zheng, L.; Jiang, C.; Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Zheng, L. Combining hydrochemistry and hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes to reveal the influence of human activities on surface water quality in Chaohu Lake Basin. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 312, 114933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yasmeen, T.; Arif, M.S.; Shahzad, S.M.; Riaz, M.; Tufail, M.A.; Mubarik, M.S.; Ahmad, A.; Ali, S.; Albasher, G.; Shakoor, A. Abandoned agriculture soil can be recultivated by promoting biological phosphorus fertility when amended with nano-rock phosphate and suitable bacterial inoculant. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 234, 113385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Díaz-López, M.; Siles, J.A.; Ros, C.; Bastida, F.; Nicolás, E. The effects of ozone treatments on the agro-physiological parameters of tomato plants and the soil microbial community. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 812, 151429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, S.; Wang, J.; Pu, S.; Blagodatskaya, E.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Razavi, B.S. Impact of manure on soil biochemical properties: A global synthesis. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 745, 141003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, H.; Yang, H.; Calderón-Urrea, A.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Y.; Ma, J.; Shi, G. Microbial Fertilization Improves Soil Health When Compared to Chemical Fumigation in Sweet Lily. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, F.; Zhao, W.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y. Allelopathic inhibitory effect on the growth of microcystis aeruginosa by improvedultrasonic-cellulase extract of Vallisneria. Chemosphere 2022, 298, 134245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jiao, Y.; Li, Y.; Yuan, L.; Huang, J. Allelopathy of uncomposted and composted invasive aster (Ageratina adenophora) on ryegrass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 402, 123727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, J.; Xu, G.; Yin, L.; Xu, X.; Armitage, D.W.; Dong, T. Invasive plants exert disproportionately negative allelopathic effects on the growth and physiology of the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 747, 141534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Baresch, A.; Crifo, C.; Boyce, C.K. Competition for epidermal space in the evolution of leaves with high physiological rates. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 628–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Huang, S.-R.; Ai, Y.; Du, J.-B.; Yu, L.; Wang, X.-C.; Yang, W.-Y.; Sun, X. Photosynthetic compensation of maize in heterogeneous light is impaired by restricted photosynthate export. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 192, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kromdijk, J.; Głowacka, K.; Long, S.P. Photosynthetic efficiency and mesophyll conductance are unaffected in Arabidopsis thaliana aquaporin knock-out lines. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 318–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ma, C.; Yuan, S.; Xie, B.; Li, Q.; Wang, Q.; Shao, M. IAA Plays an Important Role in Alkaline Stress Tolerance by Modulating Root Development and ROS Detoxifying Systems in Rice Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Guo, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, M.; Fu, R.; Sun, Y. Physiological and iTRAQ-based proteomic analyses for yellowing of postharvest broccoli heads under elevated O2 controlled atmosphere. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 294, 110769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Altınkaynak, Y.; Kural, B.; Akcan, B.A.; Bodur, A.; Özer, S.; Yuluğ, E.; Munğan, S.; Kaya, C.; Örem, A. Protective effects of L-theanine against doxorubicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 108, 1524–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Xi, J.; Tian, L.-L.; Xi, J.; Girimpuhwe, D.; Huang, C.; Ma, R.; Yao, X.; Shi, D.; Bai, Z.; Wu, Q.-X.; et al. Alterperylenol as a Novel Thioredoxin Reductase Inhibitor Induces Liver Cancer Cell Apoptosis and Ferroptosis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 15763–15775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Honeker, L.K.; Hildebrand, G.A.; Fudyma, J.D.; Daber, L.E.; Hoyt, D.; Flowers, S.E.; Gil-Loaiza, J.; Kübert, A.; Bamberger, I.; Anderton, C.R.; et al. Elucidating Drought-Tolerance Mechanisms in Plant Roots through 1H NMR Metabolomics in Parallel with MALDI-MS, and NanoSIMS Imaging Techniques. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 2021–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huérfano, X.; Estavillo, J.M.; Torralbo, F.; Vega-Mas, I.; González-Murua, C.; Fuertes-Mendizábal, T. Dimethylpyrazole-based nitrification inhibitors have a dual role in N2O emissions mitigation in forage systems under Atlantic climate conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 807, 150670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, W.; Shi, Y.F.; Zhu, D.D.; Wang, W.Q.; Liu, H.W.; Li, J.Y.; Shi, N.N.; Ma, L.; Fu, S.L. Fine root biomass and morphology in a temperate forest are influenced more by the nitrogen treatment approach than the rate. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 130, 108031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, C.; Zhou, X.; Wang, X.; Ge, J.; Cai, B. Elaeagnus angustifolia can improve salt-alkali soil and the health level of soil: Emphasizing the driving role of core microbial communities. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 305, 114401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ivashchenko, K.; Sushko, S.; Selezneva, A.; Ananyeva, N.; Zhuravleva, A.; Kudeyarov, V.; Makarov, M.; Blagodatsky, S. Soil microbial activity along an altitudinal gradient: Vegetation as a main driver beyond topographic and edaphic factors. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 168, 104197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhao, S.; Schmidt, S.; Gao, H.; Li, T.; Chen, X.; Hou, Y.; Chadwick, D.; Tian, J.; Dou, Z.; Zhang, W.; et al. A precision compost strategy aligning composts and application methods with target crops and growth environments can increase global food production. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 741–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yansheng, C.; Fengliang, Z.; Zhongyi, Z.; Tongbin, Z.; Huayun, X. Biotic and abiotic nitrogen immobilization in soil incorporated with crop residue. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 202, 104664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Huang, X.; Wang, L.; Mei, Y.; Jia, Z.; Li, T.; Yu, G.; Ran, W. Towards a mechanistic understanding of microbial and nonmicrobial mediated topsoil organic carbon sequestration efficiency in a rice-wheat cropping system. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 170, 104259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xu, W.; Tan, L.; Guo, X.; Wang, J. Isolation of anti-algal substances from Cylindrotheca closterium and their inhibition activity on bloom-forming Prorocentrum donghaiense. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Magalhães, A.P.; Jorge, P.; Pereira, M.O. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus communication in biofilm infections: Insights through network and database construction. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 45, 712–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Benidire, L.; Madline, A.; Pereira, S.I.A.; Castro, P.M.L.; Boularbah, A. Synergistic effect of organo-mineral amendments and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the establishment of vegetation cover and amelioration of mine tailings. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 127803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vaidya, B.P.; Hagmann, D.F.; Haramuniz, J.; Krumins, J.A.; Goodey, N.M. Artificial root exudates restore microbial functioning in a metal contaminated, barren, inactive soil. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 312, 120007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Salehi, B.; Prakash-Mishra, A.; Nigam, M.; Karazhan, N.; Shukla, I.; Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz, A.; Sawicka, B.; Głowacka, A.; Abu-Darwish, M.S.; Tarawneh, A.H.; et al. Ficus plants: State of the art from a phytochemical, pharmacological, and toxicological perspective. Phytotherapy Res. 2021, 35, 1187–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Plant height (a) and base diameter (b) of T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract from different parts (root, stem, and leaf) of F. carica. Plant height (c) and base diameter (d) of T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract of F. carica root. Values are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3. Different uppercase letters in the different concentrations indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among different irrigated times; different lowercase letters in the different irrigation times indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among different concentrations irrigated.
Figure 1. Plant height (a) and base diameter (b) of T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract from different parts (root, stem, and leaf) of F. carica. Plant height (c) and base diameter (d) of T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract of F. carica root. Values are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3. Different uppercase letters in the different concentrations indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among different irrigated times; different lowercase letters in the different irrigation times indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among different concentrations irrigated.
Forests 14 01213 g001
Figure 2. The contents of Pn (a), Tr (b), Gs (c), and Ci (d) of T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract of F. carica root. Values are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3.
Figure 2. The contents of Pn (a), Tr (b), Gs (c), and Ci (d) of T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract of F. carica root. Values are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3.
Forests 14 01213 g002
Figure 3. The contents of chlorophyll a (a), chlorophyll b (b), and total chlorophyll (c) of T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract of F. carica root. Values are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3.
Figure 3. The contents of chlorophyll a (a), chlorophyll b (b), and total chlorophyll (c) of T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract of F. carica root. Values are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3.
Forests 14 01213 g003
Figure 4. SOD (a), POD (b), CAT (c) activity and MDA (d) contents of T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract of F. carica root. Values are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different treatments time; Different lowercase letters in the same column indi-cated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different concentration treatments.
Figure 4. SOD (a), POD (b), CAT (c) activity and MDA (d) contents of T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract of F. carica root. Values are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different treatments time; Different lowercase letters in the same column indi-cated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different concentration treatments.
Forests 14 01213 g004
Figure 5. The contents of EC, SOC, and the pH (a), AN, AP, and AK contents (b) in T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract of F. carica root. Values are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different treatments time; Different lowercase letters in the same column indi-cated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different concentration treatments.
Figure 5. The contents of EC, SOC, and the pH (a), AN, AP, and AK contents (b) in T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract of F. carica root. Values are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different treatments time; Different lowercase letters in the same column indi-cated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different concentration treatments.
Forests 14 01213 g005
Figure 6. The activity of urease (a), catalase (b), cellulase (c), and sucrase (d) in the soil of T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract of F. carica root. Values are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different treatments time; Different lowercase letters in the same column indicated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different concentration treatments.
Figure 6. The activity of urease (a), catalase (b), cellulase (c), and sucrase (d) in the soil of T. cuspidata irrigated with water extract of F. carica root. Values are reported as mean ± SD, n = 3. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different treatments time; Different lowercase letters in the same column indicated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different concentration treatments.
Forests 14 01213 g006
Figure 7. β diversity NMDS analysis of bacteria (a) and fungi (b), community composition analysis of bacteria (c) and fungi (d) at phylum level and bacteria (e) and fungi (f) at genus level, species Venn diagram analysis of bacteria (g) and fungi (h) at 30 days, bacteria (i) and fungi (j) at 105 days, and bacteria (k) and fungi (l) at 180 days of T. cuspidata from F. carica water extract. A1, A2, and A3 were the control (irrigated distilled water for 30, 105 and 180 days, respectively). B1, B2, and B3 were irrigated with 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract for 30, 105 and 180 days, respectively. C1, C2, and C3 were irrigated with 20.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract for 30 days, 105 days, and 180 days, respectively. D1, D2, and D3 were irrigated with 40.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract for 30, 105 and 180 days, respectively.
Figure 7. β diversity NMDS analysis of bacteria (a) and fungi (b), community composition analysis of bacteria (c) and fungi (d) at phylum level and bacteria (e) and fungi (f) at genus level, species Venn diagram analysis of bacteria (g) and fungi (h) at 30 days, bacteria (i) and fungi (j) at 105 days, and bacteria (k) and fungi (l) at 180 days of T. cuspidata from F. carica water extract. A1, A2, and A3 were the control (irrigated distilled water for 30, 105 and 180 days, respectively). B1, B2, and B3 were irrigated with 10.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract for 30, 105 and 180 days, respectively. C1, C2, and C3 were irrigated with 20.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract for 30 days, 105 days, and 180 days, respectively. D1, D2, and D3 were irrigated with 40.0 g·L−1 F. carica root extract for 30, 105 and 180 days, respectively.
Forests 14 01213 g007
Table 1. α diversity index of soil bacteria (A) and fungi (B) in T. cuspidata (OTU level).
Table 1. α diversity index of soil bacteria (A) and fungi (B) in T. cuspidata (OTU level).
SampleShannonSimpsonAceChao1Coverage
A: bacteria
A16.34 ± 0.28 Aa0.0057 ± 0.0002 Ab3251.70 ± 137.24 Aa3237.81 ± 146.74 Aa0.9666 ± 0.0013 Aa
A26.54 ± 0.29 Aa0.0037 ± 0.0001 Cb3293.86 ± 148.76 Aa3230.11 ± 151.46 Aa0.9672 ± 0.008 Aa
A36.5 ± 0.32 Aa0.0041 ± 0.0001 Bc3185.11 ± 139.84 Aa3164.75 ± 144.11 Aa0.9681 ± 0.0012 Aa
B16.25 ± 0.40 Aa0.0055 ± 0.0002 Ab2953.54 ± 136.49 ABb3026.41 ± 153.06 Ab0.9696 ± 0.0009 Aa
B26.37 ± 0.39 Ab0.0046 ± 0.0001 Ba2851.46 ± 142.81 Bb2802.97 ± 142.12 Ab0.9723 ± 0.0016 Aa
B36.43 ± 0.45 Aa0.0043 ± 0.0001 Cbc3076.59 ± 140.93 Ab3027.90 ± 154.12 Aab0.9692 ± 0.0014 Aa
C16.03 ± 0.29 Bb0.0091 ± 0.0003 Aa2610.63 ± 118.32 Bc2526.66 ± 105.80 Bd0.9750 ± 0.0005 Aa
C26.47 ± 0.37 Aa0.0039 ± 0.0001 Cb3060.00 ± 147.33 Ab2933.94 ± 128.02 Ab0.9700 ± 0.0021 Aa
C36.27 ± 0.32 Ab0.0055 ± 0.0002 Ba2864.25 ± 133.27 Abc2880.64 ± 126.42 Ab0.9711 ± 0.0017 Aa
D16.21 ± 0.28 Aa0.0051 ± 0.0002 Ac2779.35 ± 130.21 Bbc2822.53 ± 114.68 Ac0.9717 ± 0.0010 Aa
D26.35 ± 0.26 Ab0.0048 ± 0.0001 ABa2997.85 ± 142.09 Ab2949.22 ± 125.48 Ab0.9701 ± 0.0005 Aa
D36.34 ± 0.35 Aa0.0045 ± 0.0001 Bb2660.82 ± 135.94 Bc2642.08 ± 137.26 Bc0.9749 ± 0.0014 Aa
B: fungi
A14.84 ± 0.19 Aa0.0264 ± 0.0011 Aa951.53 ± 38.06 Bb953.92 ± 48.16 Bb0.9976 ± 0.0009 Aa
A24.67 ± 0.19 Ab0.0221 ± 0.0013 ABa1253.98 ± 52.16 Aa1240.38 ± 59.62 Aa0.9946 ± 0.0008 Aa
A34.94 ± 0.20 Aa0.0174 ± 0.0007 Ba1205.03 ± 48.20 Aa1207.17 ± 58.29 Aab0.9957 ± 0.0005 Aa
B14.79 ± 0.17 Bab0.0242 ± 0.0006 Aa1028.49 ± 45.14 Ba1026.60 ± 51.06 Ba0.9970 ± 0.008 Aa
B25.02 ± 0.18 Aa0.0169 ± 0.0012 Ab1015.63 ± 43.63 Bb1034.56 ± 41.04 Bb0.9975 ± 0.0002 Aa
B34.99 ± 0.21 Aa0.0174 ± 0.0015 Aa1133.12 ± 39.99 Ab1123.13 ± 43.69 Ab0.9963 ± 0.0007 Aa
C14.89 ± 0.19 Aa0.0191 ± 0.0018 Ab987.60 ± 37.63 Bab996.17 ± 39.89 Cb0.9968 ± 0.0009 Aa
C24.94 ± 0.18 Aa0.0195 ± 0.0013 Aab1050.64 ± 48.52 Bb1078.28 ± 42.35 Bb0.9970 ± 0.0006 Aa
C35.06 ± 0.20 Aa0.0172 ± 0.0005 Ba1285.57 ± 58.57 Aa1311.17 ± 57.27 Aa0.9954 ± 0.0009 Aa
D14.70 ± 0.19 ABb0.0233 ± 0.0012 Aab663.10 ± 40.89 Cc668.57 ± 36.74 Cc0.9990 ± 0.0001 Aa
D24.60 ± 0.17 Bb0.0254 ± 0.0007 Aa996.87 ± 39.91 Bb987.83 ± 49.51 Bc0.9962 ± 0.0003 Aa
D34.98 ± 0.18 Aa0.0163 ± 0.0008 Ba1154.25 ± 54.63 Ab1167.26 ± 56.69 Ab0.9961 ± 0.0007 Aa
Note: Different uppercase letters in the same row indicated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different treatments time; Different lowercase letters in the same column indicated significant differences at p < 0.05 among different concentration treatments.
Table 2. Comparison of chemicals between F. carica root water extract and F. carica root exudates.
Table 2. Comparison of chemicals between F. carica root water extract and F. carica root exudates.
Type of CompoundRT (min)FormulaProposed CompoundF. carica Root Water ExtractF. carica Root Exudates
Coumarins3.94C9H6O4Esculetin++
4.88C11H6O4Xanthotoxol++
4.89C11H6O4Bergaptol++
5.57C9H6O3Umbelliferone++
6.77C14H12O3Angenomalin++
6.83C14H12O3Trioxsalen+
8.17C14H14O4Nodakenetin++
8.26C14H14O4Columbianetin++
9.63C11H6O3Psoralen++
11.21C12H8O4Bergapten++
25.70C21H24O5Rutamarin++
35.59C11H10O37- Ethoxycoumarin++
Terpenoids0.73C13H16N4O6Furaltadone++
0.75C3H6N6O51,3-Dinitro-5-nitroso-1,3,5-triazinane+-
3.66C20H24O10Ginkgolide B+
4.22C11H15N3O8Polyoxin C+
5.61C31H32N4O9Cotarnine phthalate+
7.23C25H22N2O5Zanamivir Amine Triacetate Methyl Ester++
10.57C28H229,10-Bis(4-methylphenyl)anthracene++
11.20C9H3N3O31,3,5-Triisocyanatobenzene+
15.30C26H26O9Gilvocarcin M++
19.36C20H22O2Longistylin+
24.10C14H26O4Tetradecaneioic acid+
26.91C38H49N3O5Bemotrizinol++
27.27C24H38O4Dioctyl phthalate++
27.76C25H35NO4Norbuprenorphine++
29.56C30H46O3Wilforlide A+
31.46C15H22O4Zinniol++
31.94C12H16O4-Cyclohexylphenol+
34.61C17H26O5Decyl Gallate++
Alkaloids0.69C11H6O64-Azido-3,5-dinitrobenzonitrile+
0.82C14H21NO32,6-ditert-butyl-4-nitrophenol+
0.90C21H16O6Justicidin B++
0.93C4H2N6O5Azoxyfuroxan++
1.22C13H20N2O65-Butyluridine+
4.28C22H26O12Catalposide+
4.98C32H18N8Phthalocyanine+
5.55C20H24O104-[4-(3-Phenyl-2-quinoxalinyl)phthalonitrile++
5.93C30H22N4O4Adozelesin+
6.07C15H18O4Helenalin++
7.15C19H20N6O6Azido-Thalidomide+
7.30C18H26N2O9Nicametate citrate+
7.38C37H28O10Pyranoamentoflavone++
8.11C18H22N2O10Nitrophenyl 2-acetamido-3,6-di-O-acety-2-deoxyl-beta-D-glucopyranoside++
13.89C19H38N2O3N-Pentadecyl-L-asparagine+
13.94C16H35NO2Lauryldimethylammonium Acetate++
14.03C14H31NOLauryldimethylamine oxide++
16.29C18H39NO2Safingol++
17.32C15H18N6O2Pimefylline+
17.51C21H37NN,N-Dimethylandrostan-1-amine++
19.60C7H17NN,N-dimethylpentan-3-amine++
20.39C22H47NO2Ammonium Behenate++
20.65C22H47NDocosylamine+
23.36C18H35NO9-Octadecenamide+
25.33C18H37NOAmide C18++
25.58C20H41NON,N-Dimethylstearamide++
35.14C19H30O5Dodecyl gallate++
Flavones0.70C30H22O10Isochamaejasmin+
0.85C30H26O13Proanthocyanidins++
0.92C15H12O7Taxifolin++
2.49C15H14O6(-)-Epicatechin++
3.16C30H26O12Procyanidin B2++
3.31C21H23N3O7Amicycline++
3.91C30H26O11Gambiriin C++
4.45C30H26O12Procyanidin B3++
4.47C26H28O15Neocarlinoside+
4.92C24H22O13Malonylgenistin++
7.25C28H34O15Hesperidin++
8.86C15H11O6Cyanidin cation++
23.99C27H30O16Rutin+
35.14C19H30O5Dodecyl gallate+
35.56C27H32O14Naringin++
35.60C28H34O15Neohesperidin++
Organic acids0.71C12H21N3O6Boc-Ala-Gly-Gly+
0.94C11H20N2O3Pro-leu+
0.95C10H13NO2Phenprobamate++
1.22C5H11NO2Valine+
4.51C11H18N2O2Cyclo(leucylprolyl)++
5.21C10H19N7O5neosaxitoxin conjugate acid+
5.34C24H39N7O8L-Threonyl-L-histidyl-L-threonyl-L-valyl-L-proline++
6.43C9H14N2O7Asp-Glu+
9.36C6H12N2O4Glycyl-D-threonine++
11.10C10H5O3Oxo-4-phenyl-3-butynoate++
11.32C24H20O10Gyrophoric acid+
13.35C10H16N2O8Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid++
19.67C24H40O25β-cholanoic acid++
21.11C14H26N2O6BOC-L-DAB(BOC)+
27.78C19H38N2O62,3-dihydroxybutanedioic acid++
30.62C15H22O3gemfibrozil++
32.15C44H58N2O34-[28-Oxo-28-{[2-(2-pyridinyl)ethyl]amino}lupa-2,20(29)-dien-3-yl]benzoic acid++
32.22C39H58N4O53-hexanoyl-NBD Cholesterol++
32.34C26H52O326-Hydroxyhexacosanoic acid+
33.68C6H8O7Citric Acid+
Steroids0.74C11H15N5O3Lobucavir+
4.63C22H14Pentaphene+
5.77C14H7NO51-Hydroxy-3-nitro-9,10-anthraquinone+
15.37C24H30O6Meprednisone Acetate++
27.63C19H26O6Arctiopicri+
Quinones5.20C32H28O9Shikometabolin B+
6.66C27H30O13Lignan P+
32.18C17H26O4Embelin++
35.53C19H30O4Decylubiquinone++
35.63C11H8O3Plumbagin++
Note: ”+” means the chemical is present and “−” means the chemical is not present.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Q.; Huang, J.; Yang, X.; Gul, Z.; Sun, W.; Qiao, B.; Cheng, J.; Li, C.; Zhao, C. Effects of Ficus carica L. Water Extract on Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc. Growth. Forests 2023, 14, 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061213

AMA Style

Li Q, Huang J, Yang X, Gul Z, Sun W, Qiao B, Cheng J, Li C, Zhao C. Effects of Ficus carica L. Water Extract on Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc. Growth. Forests. 2023; 14(6):1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061213

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Qianqian, Jin Huang, Xue Yang, Zarmina Gul, Wenxue Sun, Bin Qiao, Jiabo Cheng, Chunying Li, and Chunjian Zhao. 2023. "Effects of Ficus carica L. Water Extract on Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc. Growth" Forests 14, no. 6: 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061213

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop