A Commented Review of Eco-Product Value Realization and Ecological Industry and Its Enlightenment for Agroforestry Ecosystem Services in the Karst Ecological Restoration

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

All my suggestions were inserted in the text.

In the title, I suggest adding the word COMMENTED. "A Commented Review..."

Pay attention to the conclusion section. Please use direct phrases and remove phrases that are methodology or results.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer:

Thank you for your comments concerning our manuscript entitled “A review of eco-product value realization and ecological industry and its enlightenment for agroforestry ecosystem services in the karst ecological restoration” (ID: forests-2137472). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and re-edited manuscript in track changes mode. And provide point-to-point answers below. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper.

Special thanks to your good comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an important review paper for eco-industries and eco-product values in the Karst ecosystem. There are some shortages that need to be correct.

1.please shorten and condense the Introduction section.

2. It is inappropriate for the subtitle of section 4.1.2

3.Please shorten and condense Section 4.

4. Please reorganize the subtitles in section 5 as problems or objectives.

6. Please shorten the Conclusion section.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer:

Thank you for your comments concerning our manuscript entitled “A review of eco-product value realization and ecological industry and its enlightenment for agroforestry ecosystem services in the karst ecological restoration” (ID: forests-2137472). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and re-edited manuscript in track changes mode. And provide point-to-point answers below. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper.

Special thanks to your good comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The subject of this paper is suitable.  Unfortunately, the standard of English is very poor making it very difficult to read.  Consequently, the text needs major revision to make it understandable.

In addition (although I may have misunderstood because of the poor use of English), the paper is possibly attempting to cover too much.  Specifically, I would distinguish between research into the management and land use practices needed to improve environmental conditions in the karst versus the different ways in which such practices could be funded.  Both are important, but the latter should (at least from the title) be the main focus of the paper. 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer:

    Thank you for your comments concerning our manuscript entitled “A review of eco-product value realization and ecological industry and its enlightenment for agroforestry ecosystem services in the karst ecological restoration” (ID: forests-2137472). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our research. We have studied the comments carefully and re-edited the manuscript in track changes mode. And provide point-to-point answers below. Revised portions are marked in red in the paper.

    Special thanks for your good comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

I thank the authors for their revisions - the paper is much better now.

I think line 227 is missing the word 'all' : "Almost all of....."

Line 245 needs to define "PPP".

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

 

Thank you for your comments on our article "Value Realization of Ecological Products and Ecological Industries in Karst Ecological Restoration and Their Implications for Agroforestry Ecosystem Services" (ID: forest-2137472). These opinions are very valuable, helpful to the revision and improvement of our paper, and have important guiding significance for our research. We studied the comments carefully and re-edited the manuscript in tracking change mode. And provide the peer-to-peer answers below. The revised part is marked in red on the paper.

 

Thank you very much for your kind comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx