Next Article in Journal
Co-Creating Conceptual and Working Frameworks for Implementing Forest and Landscape Restoration Based on Core Principles
Previous Article in Journal
Inducing Plant Defense Reactions in Tobacco Plants with Phenolic-Rich Extracts from Red Maple Leaves: A Characterization of Main Active Ingredients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Processed Baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) Food Products in Malawi: From Poor Men’s to Premium-Priced Specialty Food?
Open AccessArticle

Sage Species Case Study on a Spontaneous Mediterranean Plant to Control Phytopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria

CREA-Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Via Cavalleggeri 25, 84098 Salerno, Italy
CREA-Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Roma, Italy
School of Biology and Environment, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, P-5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
Centre for Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
Industrial Biotechnology Program, University of Tiradentes (UNIT), Av. Murilo Dantas 300, Aracaju 49032-490, Brazil
Tiradentes Institute, 150 Mt Vernon St., Dorchester, MA 02125, USA
Laboratory of Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine (LNMED), Institute of Technology and Research (ITP), Av. Murilo Dantas 300, Aracaju 49010-390, Brazil
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Pólo das Ciências da Saúde, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
CEB-Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
Department of Pharmacy, University of Napoli Federico II, Via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Napoli, Italy
Department of Pharmacy, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Salerno, Italy
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2020, 11(6), 704;
Received: 30 May 2020 / Revised: 13 June 2020 / Accepted: 19 June 2020 / Published: 24 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest, Foods and Nutrition)


Sage species belong to the family of Labiatae/Lamiaceae and are diffused worldwide. More than 900 species of sage have been identified, and many of them are used for different purposes, i.e., culinary uses, traditional medicines and natural remedies and cosmetic applications. Another use of sage is the application of non-distilled sage extracts and essential oils to control phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi, for a sustainable, environmentally friendly agriculture. Biocidal propriety of non-distilled extracts and essential oils of sage are w documented. Antimicrobial effects of these sage extracts/essential oils depend on both sage species and bacteria and fungi species to control. In general, it is possible to choose some specific extracts/essential oils to control specific phytopathogenic bacteria or fungi. In this context, the use of nanotechnology techniques applied to essential oil from salvia could represent a future direction for improving the performance of eco-compatible and sustainable plant defence and represents a great challenge for the future.
Keywords: essential oils; extracts; Salvia Africana; S. rutilans; S. munzii; S. mellifera; S. greggii; S. officinalis “Icterina”; S. officinalis essential oils; extracts; Salvia Africana; S. rutilans; S. munzii; S. mellifera; S. greggii; S. officinalis “Icterina”; S. officinalis

1. Introduction

Medicinal plants are recently getting growing attention worldwide as important sources of bioactive compounds, and hence for their potential beneficial properties [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that about 80% of the world′s population use herbal medicine for the treatment of many diseases, referring to traditional drugs only as a second choice, due to diffidence for chemical origin pharmaceuticals [24]. A lot of plants and herbs have been cultivated for their aromatic and medicinal proprieties. In particular, the interest for aromatic plants has increased not only in medicine but also in agriculture, since their essential oils are among the eco-compatible compounds potentially useful to control dangerous biotic agents of the crops, which makes them extremely interesting in view of eco-sustainable and environmentally friendly agriculture practices [25,26,27,28].

Main Features of Some Sage Species (Salvia africana, Salvia rutilans, Salvia munzii, Salvia mellifera, Salvia greggii, Salvia officinalis “Icterina”, Salvia officinalis)

Salvia genus belongs to the family of Labiatae/Lamiaceae [29,30] and is widespread in various regions around the world, being particularly present in Mediterranean regions of Europe, South Africa, Central and South America, and South-East Asia [31,32]. It includes more than 900 species, which are used for different purposes, i.e., culinary uses, traditional medicines and remedies, and cosmetic applications. Plants of the genus Salvia have been reported to have a wide range of biological activities and are used for the prevention and treatment of various diseases, due to the presence of a peculiar profile of secondary metabolites/bioactive components isolated in several parts of the plants (i.e., flowers, leaves, stem), in particular, essential oils, with a large spectrum of terpenoids (i.e., α- and β-thujone, camphor, 1,8-cineole, α-humulene, β-caryophyllene and viridiflorol) as well as di- and tri-terpenes (i.e., carnosic acid, ursolic acid, carnosol and tanshinones), polyphenols, comprising an array of phenolic acids (i.e., caffeic acid and its derivatives, rosmarinic acid, salvianolic acids, sage coumarin, lithospermic acids, sagernic acid, and yunnaneic acids) and flavonoids (i.e., luteolin, apigenin, hispidulin, kaempferol and quercetin) [33].
The most common species, namely the Salvia officinalis L., represents an important medicinal and aromatic plant, with antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties. Poulios et al. [34] well summarized the current advances on the extraction and identification of bioactive components of sage; further, the same authors gave a current state-of-the-art on the antioxidant activity of sage (Salvia spp.) and its bioactive components [35].
The study of Craft et al. [36] revealed the presence of five major chemotypes of sage (Salvia officinalis L.) leaf essential oils, with several subtypes: most sage oils belonged to the “typical” chemotype composition containing, in percentages (w/w), α-thujone > camphor > 1,8-cineole; however, the essential oil composition can vary widely and may have a profound effect on flavour and fragrance profiles, as well as on biological activities.
An update overview of pharmacological properties of Salvia officinalis and its components was exploited in the recent review of Ghorbani and Esmaeilizadeh [37].
S. officinalis ‘Icterina’ is a cultivar of S. officinalis characterised by yellow-green variegated leaves, as reported by Pop et al. [38]. Salvia Africana L., commonly known as Bruinsalie or beach sage, is distributed from Namaqualand to the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa [39]. Etsassala et al. [40] reported how the methanolic extract of S. africana-lutea L. is a rich source of terpenoids, especially abietane diterpenes, with strong antioxidant and anti-diabetic activities, that can be helpful to modulate the redox status of the body and could be, therefore, an excellent candidate for the prevention of diabetes.
The phytochemical composition and bioactive effects of Salvia Africana and Salvia officinalis ‘Icterina’, was recently reported by Afonso et al. [41]; particularly, rosmarinic acid was the dominant phenolic compound in all the extracts, yet that of S. africana origin was characterised by the presence of yunnaneic acid isomers, which overall accounted for about 40% of total phenolics, whereas S. officinalis ‘Icterina’ extract presented glycosidic forms of apigenin, luteolin and scuttelarein [41].
Salvia mellifera Greene, known as Black sage, is a traditional medicine of the Chumash Indians. De Martino et al. [42] reported that Salvia mellifera essential oils contain fifty-four monoterpenoids and several diterpenoids, such as carnosol (41%), carnosic acid (22%), salvicanol (15%) and rosmanol (9%). Adams et al. [43] reported how several chronic pain patients have reported long-term improvements in their pain after treatment with sun tea, made from the stems and leaves of the Salvia mellifera.
S. greggii A. Gray was studied for its terpenic compounds content [44,45], and the anti-germinative properties of its essential oils [42]. Pereira et al. [46] suggested that decoctions of S. greggii (S. elegans, S. officinalis) could be an effective natural antidiabetic and anti-obesity agent and help to control the glucose levels through the modulation of the α-glucosidase activity.
Salvia rutilans Carrière (synonym S. elegans Vahl) is native to Mexico, known as “pineapple-scented sage”. The plant is used in traditional Mexican medicine for the treatment of Central Nervous System discomforts [47], and this species has been reported as a possible source of anxiolytic and antidepressant compounds [48]. The essential oil of this plant has been studied by Makino et al. [49], and its antigerminative activity was reported [50].
Salvia munzii Epling is present in xeric coastal sage scrub in Northern Baja California. It’s essential oil was previously studied [50] and it was also studied for its antigerminative effects [50].

2. Sage Plants to Control Fungal and Bacterial Diseases

Sage-based phytochemicals have showed a great potential to face phytopathogens causing diseases and very important economic losses in agricultural systems worldwide. Several studies indicated the suitability of these natural substances to implement conventional crop management protocols and match the pressing sustainability challenge about safe foods and organic productions, launched by the political institutions and the large-scale distribution. In addition, the consumers’ preference toward no-pesticides of chemical origin-treated crops needs to be considered. In order to reduce or eliminate the use of chemical fungicides for plant protection, research is moving toward the study and implementation of new eco-friendly non-synthetic tools able to effectively replace them in sustainable producing contests. All the plants are a source of secondary metabolites belonging to several chemical groups, that, once extracted, may be exploitable for their antifungal properties [51] alone or in integration with antagonistic microorganisms in controlling plant pathogens [52].
Aromatic plants have been extensively investigated as potential sources of natural compounds with antimicrobial activity, which can be effectively used to replace conventional environment unfriendly pesticides. This topic also includes all the bioactive sage species. Due to the natural origin, many of the sage-derived antifungal compounds could be included into the “generally recognised as safe (GRAS)” classification [53] for plant protection and food preservation. The antimicrobial compounds from sage tissues are currently extracted in raw blends, in which the activity is based on all the phytochemicals [54], such as solvent-extracts and essential oils that are among the main promising tools to totally replace or integrate chemicals for disease management.

2.1. Solvent Sage Extracts

The bioactive antimicrobial molecules are extracted from dried plant sage material to obtain their raw blends or purified compounds through water or other solvents, expression under pressure, supercritical CO2, and solvent-free microwave methods [55,56].
Recently, Nutrizio et al. [57] explored an innovative process based on high-voltage electrical discharge for the eco-friendly recovery of bioactive compounds from Dalmatian sage. Sage extracts are characterised by antioxidant activity, high phenolic content and steroids, alkaloids and saponins to a lesser extent [58,59]. For example, caffeic acid and rosmarinic acid, reported as the most abundant phenolic compounds in sage extracts [60,61,62], have been associated to the control ability of Fusarium root rot in asparagus [63] and against Fusarium wilt in cyclamen [64]. The antifungal activity of S. fruticosa Mill. ethyl acetate extract against B. cinerea and P. digitatum has been supported by three major constituents, carnosic acid, carnosol and hispidulin [65].
As a hypothetical mechanism of action, sage extracts have been reported to affect cellular processes associated with changes in the membrane functionality involved in feeding and growth of the pathogen. A cytological study performed on Candida albicans yeast revealed the leakage of intracellular contents caused by membrane lipid bilayer alteration after treatment with the ethanol extract of Salvia miltiorrhiza [66].
A literature survey indicated a wide range of pathogens that are susceptible to the sage extract exposure (Table 1).
S. officinalis ethanolic extracts have proven to be able to control Plasmopara viticola on grapevine [77] and Pseudoperonospora cubensis on organic cucumber [79]. Salvia aegyptiaca L. ethanolic extracts have resulted as effective both in vitro and in vivo against Phytophthora infestans, the causal agent of late blight disease of tomato [67]. Dellavalle et al. [80] assessed the minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) and migration inhibitory factor (MIF) values of Salvia officinalis L. and Salvia sclarea L. respectively, foliar and seed acid extracts against Alternaria spp. quite comparable to values obtained with the conventional fungicide captants (2.5 µg mL−1). In vitro inhibitory effects were also found on Fusarium proliferatum and F. verticilloides by Salvia africana-lutea extracts [68] and on Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium frequentans, Botrytis cinerea, Geotrichum candidum, Fusarium oxysporum and Alternaria alternara by treatments with ethanolic extracts of Salvia tigrina Hedge & Hub.-Mor. [84]. All these fungi are able to produce many metabolites [85,86,87,88,89]. Water, ethanol and methanol extracts of S. officinalis, S. cryptantha Montbret and Aucher and S. tomentosa Mill. have been found effective against F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici [69] and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Alternaria solani, Ascochyta rabiei, Botrytis cinerea, Rhizoctonia solani, Penicillum italicum, Aspergillus niger and Monilia laxa [70]. The mycelium development of Rhizoctonia solani, Alternaria solani, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis lycopersici and Verticillium dahliae were repressed by methanol and n-hexane extracts of Salvia virgate Jacq. [83], while ethanol, hexane and aqueous extracts of S. sclarea have shown in vitro antifungal activity against pathogenic fungi Epicoccum nigrum and Colletotrichum coccodes [90]. Salvia fructicosa Mill. (sage Greek) has sourced very active extracts against the mycelial growth and sclerotial formation and germination of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum [73] and against the early blight fungus, Alternaria solani [71].
The formulation of sage extracts aimed at improving their safe use and antimicrobial efficacy is a very active research field. Ghaedi et al. [91] have made available preparations based on the incorporation in Zn(OH)2 nanoparticles and Hp-2-minh of extracts of Salvia officinalis. Chitosan-based edible coating was combined with the acetonic extract of Salvia fruticosa. Carrying the flavonoids hispidulin, salvigenin and cirsimaritin and the diterpenes carnosic acid, carnosol and the 12-methoxycarnosic acid as major constituents, showed encouraging efficacy against the grey mould of table grapes [72]. Salević et al. [92] recently characterised electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) films containing a solid dispersion of Salvia officinalis extract for their antimicrobial potential.

2.2. Sage Essential Oils

The genus Salvia, as all the aromatic plant species from Lamiaceae, is a noble source of essential oils (EOs), obtained by the steam or hydro-distillation of different vegetative parts of the plant, including leaves, flowers, seeds and stems [93,94]. The super critical fluid-mediated extraction of bioactive EOs has also been achieved: it utilizes carbon dioxide at fluid state as the solvent in the same extractor model by merely lowering the extraction temperatures. EOs contain a wide variety of hydrophobic secondary metabolites, such as mainly terpenes, that can enhance the antimicrobial activity through synergic action [95,96] and are reported to be responsible for antiseptic properties of the phytochemical [97]. For example, Džamić et al. [98] found linalyl acetate, linalool, α-terpineol, α-pinene, 1,8-cineole, limonene, β-caryophyllene and β-terpineol as the main components of S. sclarea EO that affect the moderate to high antimicrobial activity against a plethora of phytopathogens. Three major constituents, α-thujone, β-thujone and myrcene, have been identified, instead, in the wide-spectrum fungistatic S. pomifera subsp. calycina EO [99,100]. The major compounds in the antimicrobial EOs of Salvia mirzayanii Rech. F. and Esfand were α-terpinyl acetate, eudesm-7(11)-en-4-ol, bicyclogermacrene, δ-cadinene, 1,8-cineole, germacrene D-4-ol, cis-dihyroagarofuran, linalyl acetate, α-cadinol, linalool and α-terpineol [101]. While, 1,8-cineole, α-pinene, camphene, borneol, camphor and β-pinene have been indicated among the most abundant constituents of Salvia brachyodon Vandas antifungal EOs [102]. The presence of cis-thujone and camphor has been associated to the fungicidal activity of S. officinalis EO against filamentous fungi, belonging to Penicillium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium and Fusarium genera [103].
EOs antimicrobial activity exploitable in the control of phytopatogenic diseases is due to these single constituents and their synergistic interactions [104]. Lipophilic volatile molecules of EOs penetrate the cell wall and damage cell membranes by altering permeability and seal and affect morphology, growth, reproductive functions and viability of microorganisms [105]. An injured plasma membrane may result in a leakage of cellular components, including nucleic acids and proteins, and cellular collapse until death, representing the mode of action underlying the biostatic and biocidal EOs effects [106]. EOs also may induce decreased Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydride (NADH) oxidase activities and cause extreme changes in ultra-structures by penetrating and dissolving the mitochondrial membranes [107]. The exposure of Escherichia coli and Staphyloccocus aureus to Salvia sclarea EO caused cell plasmalemma disintegration with a massive leakage of cellular material and reduction of the intracellular ATP, as well as nuclear DNA content [108]. Among all components of the sage volatile blends, the monoterpene alcohol linalool has been shown to have the strongest antifungal activity, while 1,8-cineole was only moderate, and linalyl acetate was lower [109,110,111]. The antifungal in vitro activity of linalool has been attributed to leakage of intracellular material that dramatically affects radial mycelial growth and conidial production and germination of treated pathogens with severity according to dose [112]. Ultrastructural studies carried out on Botrytis cinerea exposed to 1,8-cineole revealed detrimental effects on cell organelles [113]. The volatile bicyclic sesquiterpene β-caryophyllene showed inhibitory effects against bacteria via suppression of DNA replication [114]. Sage EOs are assayed both in vitro and in vivo on a wide range of plant pathogens, giving encouraging indications about their fungicidal activity measured as MIC and MIF and disease control efficacy, also in comparison with synthetic molecules (Table 2).
Volatility of active molecules from sage EOs benefits fumigating applications against soil-borne [120] and storage pathogens [146]. S. officinalis EO proved to be a potential alternative method to conventional fungicides for the control of Sclerotinia rot in lettuce [78].
Aromatic waters obtained from distillation after oil separation were also found to be active against two fungal pathogens, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotinia minor [147]. However, this product shaped up to be an extract.
Also, about EOs, formulation techniques have been developed especially in order to enhance the efficacy in practical application. Due to the higher hydrophobicity of compounds, innovative preparations have been developed to improve EOs aqueous dispersions, for example by absorbing them in a swelling matrix of semisynthetic copolymers [135,148], nanocapsule suspensions [149], microencapsulation within alginate [150] or solid lipid nanoparticles [151]. Kodadová et al. [152] have formulated S. officinalis EO monoterpenes into a chitosan-based hydrogel, while nanoemulsions containing Salvia multicaulis Vahl EO, have recently been pinpointed to enhance the safe control of food-borne bacteria [153].

3. Sage Essential Oils: Experimental Part of the Case Study

The case study concerns the evaluation of the bactericidal and fungicide effect of EOs extracted from seven species of sage, most of which are not well known. In detail, the sage species investigated were: Salvia africana L., S. rutilans Carrière, S. munzii Epling, S. mellifera Greene, S. greggii A. Gray, S. officinalis “Icterina” L. and S. officinalis L., the bacteria tested were: Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris and Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, both phytopathogens, while the fungi tested were: Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, Sclerotinia minor, Fusarium oxysporum, F. sambucinum, F. semitectum, F. solani and Rhizoctonia solani, all phytopathogenics.
Plant cultivation took place between 2005 and 2006 at “Improsta” farm, in the Campania Region, Southern Italy.
At the balsamic stage, the leaves were taken, and the essential oils were obtained by hydrodistillation. The oils extracted were stored at 4 °C until the tests for evaluation of their antibacterial and antifungal activity were run.
The EOs extracted were also analysed for their main constituents by GC and GC/MS [42].
To evaluate the ability of EOs to inhibit the growth of bacterial and fungal plant pathogens, in vitro plate tests were performed. For each essential oil, plugs (5 mm diameter) were removed from the edge of the growing mycelia or bacterial suspensions (108 CFU mL−1) and were incubated overnight at 25 °C in sterile double distilled water (SDDW) containing 1% essential oil emulsion; for controls, plugs or bacterial suspensions were incubated in SDDW only. After incubation, plugs were transferred in the centre of potato dextrose agar (PDA) Petri plates (60 mm diameter) and incubated at 25 °C, while bacterial suspensions were incubated on nutrient agar (NA) Petri plates (60 mm diameter) at 28 °C. For each essential oil, treatments and incubation were performed in triplicate.
The diameter of the mycelia was measured daily until fungi reached the edge of the control plates, and data were expressed as % growth reduction (or, sometimes, growth increment) with respect to control; for bacteria, presence or absence of growth was evaluated after 48 h.
The EOs of the different species of sage showed different bactericidal and fungicide effects and a different composition for their main constituents. Both bacteria and phytopathogenic fungi showed different susceptibility depending on the bacterial or fungal species and depending on the essential oil used.
The bactericidal effect was generally more pronounced against Pectobaterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, with four out of seven essential oils, expect for Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, on which only two EOs were found to be active (Table 3).
The fungicide effect of EOs was very different, depending on the fungal species. The EOs of some species of sage have been able to completely inhibit the growth of certain fungal species, such as S. greggi and S. officinalis, that completely inhibited the development of three phytopathogenic fungi: S. munzii, that completely inhibited two fungal species, and S. rutilans, that completely inhibited one of the eight species of fungi tested (see Table 4). Some EOs were found to be less active, such as S. africana, S. mellifera and S. officinalis “Icterina”, as shown in Table 4. Some fungi were found, in general, to be very resistant to the tested EOs, such as Fusarium sambucinum, while other fungi were found to be more sensitive, such as the two “soil-borne” Sclerotinia minor and Rhizoctonia solani (see Table 4).
However, the EOs have also been able to increase the development of some fungal colonies, such as in the case of S. africana for S. minor and R. solani. It is possible to speculate that some constituents of the oils are used as a nutrient source. The different EOs were also analysed for their composition. The results are shown in Table 5. This Case Study was presented here to show how different Mediterranean species of sage may have interesting potential to provide EOs with antifungal and antibacterial properties. The research was carried out to screen new environmentally compatible suppressive means of eight fungal and two bacterial phytopathogens, which cause economically important diseases on several agrarian species worldwide. In this view, the assayed samples have displayed differential phytochemical profiles that suggest species-specific effects, likely to which the inhibitive activity could be associated. In agreement with the previous studies listed in the Table 2, the most active EOs contain thujone (cis*trans), 1,8-cineole, camphor, α-pinene and lower traces of gerianol. These compounds supported the activities of sage-sourced EOs against a plethora of fungi [118,120]. Moreover, among their major components, δ-cadinene was also found in these samples, noticed in Salvia reflexa essential oil producing in vitro mycelia growth inhibition of Curvularia lunata and Helmenusathosporium maydis. On the other hand, the S. africana essential oil profile markedly differentiated from each other with the presence of p-cymene, ɤ-terpinene and epizonareme among the most abundant components, which to our knowledge have not been reported as antimicrobial effector constituents of sage EOs to determine detrimental effects against plant pathogens. This circumstance may explain the reduced bioactivity shown by the sample from S. Africana with respect to the other.
The methodology used in this study to assess the antifungal potential of EOs by submerging fungal plugs into an EOs emulsion has been developed previously [141] and could also be applied to MIC determination if repeated at different effective concentrations. The relevance of sage material to derive suitable antifungal EOs may have a friendly impact on developing sustainable protocols for practical application in plant disease management, where the availability of alternative tools to synthetic fungicides are urgent. Furthermore, the possibility to submit the residual biomasses of the sage plants to the distillation process also opens the way to a circular economy scheme.
Some molecules have been found in many essential oils, such as canphor and δ-cadinene, while other molecules have been found in interesting quantities only in a single species, such as p-menthadiene, isobornyl acetate, γ-terpinene, epizonareme and (Z)-β-ocimene, as shown in Table 5.
Some of these molecules are already known to have bactericidal activity, such as camphor [154]; however, biocidal effects of an essential oil can be due to a synergistic action of the many active molecules which the oil contains.

4. Conclusions and Future Remarks

The use of essential oils of Salvia spp. to control plant disease, can be a valid eco-friendly strategy to control plant diseases, but it is very important to improve their performance by applying nanotechnologies.
Nanotechnologies represent a great challenge for the future. An emerging direction is to apply the nanotechnologies [155,156] to plant defence.
The adoption of this technology in food and agrochemical industries is emerging, addressing new nanoformulations of biopesticides [157,158]. Formulations of nanobiopesticide and nanoherbicides as a “smart delivery system” are currently studied and produced from the perspective of an eco-friendly approach, by reducing herbicide inputs and providing more effective control on where and when an active ingredient is released.
In this regard, Jampílek, and Kráľová [156] showed state-of-the-art and future opportunities for nanobiopesticides in agriculture, with particular regards to pesticide-effective organic or inorganic (poly)materials of natural origin, EOs loaded in various matrices and green-synthesised metal or metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs).
In particular, novel strategies related to both the encapsulation of vegetable oils, related methods of preparation, applications as antimicrobials and insecticide/pesticide/pest repellents, have been studied and developed [157]. Recently, de Matos et al. [158] gave an updated overview on analytical methods and challenges of essential oils in nanostructured systems. This represents a new frontier in the area of interest.

Author Contributions

M.Z., A.D. and A.S. conceived and designed the work. M.Z., C.P., A.D., M.L., E.B.S. and A.S. wrote the manuscript. M.Z., C.P., M.C., A.M.S. and P.S. validated and elaborated data information and figures. M.Z., C.P., M.C., A.D., M.L., A.M.S., P.S., E.B.S., A.S. and V.D.F. made a substantial contribution to the revision of the work and approved it for publication. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


The authors acknowledge the support of the research project: Nutraceutica come supporto nutrizionale nel paziente oncologico, CUP: B83D18000140007. E.B.S. acknowledges the sponsorship of the projects M-ERA-NET-0004/2015-PAIRED and UIDB/04469/2020 (strategic fund), receiving support from the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation, Ministry of Science and Education (FCT/MEC) through national funds, and co-financed by FEDER, under the Partnership Agreement PT2020. The authors also acknowledge Agricultural Department of Campania Region (Italy) for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Santini, A.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals: Beyond the diet before the drugs. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2014, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Durazzo, A. Extractable and non-extractable polyphenols: An overview. In Non-Extractable Polyphenols and Carotenoids: Importance in Human Nutrition and Health; Saura-Calixto, F., Perez-Jimenez, Eds.; RSC Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2018; Volume 5, pp. 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  3. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Kiefer, J.; Mahesar, S.A. State-of-the-art infrared applications in drugs, dietary supplements, and nutraceuticals. Hindawi J. Spectrosc. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M. The State of science and innovation of bioactive research and applications, health and diseases. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Santini, A.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals-shedding light on the grey area between pharmaceuticals and food. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 11, 545–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Santini, A.; Novellino, E.; Armini, V.; Ritieni, A. State of the art of ready-to-use therapeutic food: A tool for nutraceuticals addition to foodstuff. Food Chem. 2013, 140, 843–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Souto, E.B.; Cicala, C.; Caiazzo, E.; Izzo, A.A.; Novellino, E.; Santini, A. Polyphenols: A concise overview on the chemistry, occurrence, and human health. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 2221–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lucarini, M.; Durazzo, A.; Kiefer, J.; Santini, A.; Lombardi-Boccia, G.; Souto, E.B.; Romani, A.; Lampe, A.; Ferrari Nicoli, S.; Gabrielli, P. Grape Seeds: Chromatographic profile of fatty acids and phenolic compounds and qualitative analysis by FTIR-ATR spectroscopy. Foods 2020, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Salehi, B.; Venditti, A.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; Kręgiel, D.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Santini, A.; Souto, E.B.; Novellino, E. The therapeutic potential of apigenin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Novellino, E.; Souto, E.B.; Daliu, P.; Santini, A. Abelmoschus esculentus (L.): Bioactive components’ beneficial properties—Focused on antidiabetic role—For sustainable health applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abenavoli, L.; Izzo, A.A.; Milić, N.; Cicala, C.; Santini, A.; Capasso, R. Milk thistle (Silybum marianum): A concise overview on its chemistry, pharmacological, and nutraceutical uses in liver diseases. Phytother. Res. 2018, 32, 2202–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Santini, A.; Tenore, G.C.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals: A paradigm of proactive medicine. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 96, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Daliu, P.; Santini, A.; Novellino, E. A decade of nutraceutical patents: Where are we now in 2018? Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2018, 28, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Santini, A.; Cammarata, S.M.; Capone, G.; Ianaro, A.; Tenore, G.C.; Pani, L.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals: Opening the debate for a regulatory framework. Br. J. Clin Pharmacol. 2018, 84, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bircher, J.; Hahn, E.G. Understanding the nature of health: New perspectives for medicine and public health. Improved Wellbeing at Lower Costs: New Perspectives for Medicine and Public Health: Improved Wellbeing at Lower Cost. F1000Research 2016, 5, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yeung, A.W.K.; Souto, E.B.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Novellino, E.; Tewari, D.; Wang, D.; Atanasov, A.G.; Santini, A. Big impact of nanoparticles: Analysis of the most cited nanopharmaceuticals and nanonutraceuticals research. Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 2020, 2, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Daliu, P.; Santini, A.; Novellino, E. From pharmaceuticals to nutraceuticals: Bridging disease prevention and management. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Durazzo, A.; D’Addezio, L.; Camilli, E.; Piccinelli, R.; Turrini, A.; Marletta, L.; Marconi, S.; Lucarini, M.; Lisciani, S.; Gabrielli, P. From plant compounds to botanicals and back: A current snapshot. Molecules 2018, 23, 1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Durazzo, A.; Camilli, E.; D’Addezio, L.; Piccinelli, R.; Mantur-Vierendeel, A.; Marletta, L.; Finglas, P.; Turrini, A.; Sette, S. Development of dietary supplement label database in Italy: Focus of FoodEx2 coding. Nutrients 2020, 12, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M. A current shot and re-thinking of antioxidant research strategy. Braz. J. Anal. Chem. 2018, 5, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M. Extractable and non-extractable antioxidants. Molecules 2019, 24, 1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Santini, A.; Cicero, N. Development of food chemistry, natural products, and nutrition research: Targeting new frontiers. Foods 2020, 9, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Santini, A. Nutraceuticals in Human Health. Foods 2020, 9, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. World Health Organization (WHO). 2013. Available online: (accessed on 18 May 2020).
  25. Cimmino, A.; Andolfi, A.; Troise, C.; Zonno, M.C.; Santini, A.; Tuzi, A.; Vurro, M.; Ash, G.; Evidente, A. Phomentrioloxin: A Novel Phytotoxic Pentasubstituted Geranylcyclohexentriol Produced by Phomopsis sp., a Potential Mycoherbicide for Carthamus lanathus Biocontrol. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 1130–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cimmino, A.; Andolfi, A.; Zonno, M.C.; Avolio, F.; Santini, A.; Tuzi, A.; Berestetskyi, A.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A. Chenopodolin: A Phytotoxic Unrearranged ent-Pimaradiene Diterpene Produced by Phoma chenopodicola, a Fungal Pathogen for Chenopodium album Biocontrol. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mikušová, P.; Šrobárová, A.; Sulyok, M.; Santini, A. Fusarium fungi and associated metabolites presence on grapes from Slovakia. Mycotoxin Res. 2013, 29, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Salvo, A.; La Torre, G.L.; Mangano, V.; Casale, K.E.; Bartolomeo, G.; Santini, A.; Granata, T.; Dugo, G. Toxic inorganic pollutants in foods from agricultural producing areas of Southern Italy: 2 level and risk assessment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 148, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Carovic-Stanko, K.; Petek, M.; Martina, G.; Pintar, J.; Bedeković, D.; Custić, M.H.; Satovic, Z. Medicinal plants of the family lamiaceae as functional foods—A review. Czech J. Food Sci. 2016, 34, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Salehi, B.; Armstrong, L.; Rescigno, A.; Yeskaliyeva, B.; Seitimova, G.; Beyatli, A.; Sharmeen, J.; Mahomoodally, M.F.; Sharopov, F.; Durazzo, A.; et al. Lamium plants—A comprehensive review on health benefits and biological activities. Molecules 2019, 24, 1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dweck, A.C. The folklore and cosmetic use of various Salvia species. In SAGE-The Genus Salvia; Kintzios, S.E., Ed.; Harwood Academic Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  32. Walker, J.B.; Sytsma, K.J. Staminal evolution in the genus Salvia (Lamiaceae): Molecular phylogenetic evidence for multiple origins of the staminal lever. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100, 375–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, Y.B.; Ni, Z.Y.; Shi, Q.W.; Dong, M.; Kiyota, H.; Gu, Y.C.; Cong, B. Constituents from Salvia species and their biological activities. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5967–6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Poulios, E.; Giaginis, C.; Vasios, G.K. Current advances on the extraction and identification of bioactive components of sage (Salvia spp.). Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2019, 20, 845–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Poulios, E.; Giaginis, C.; Vasios, G.K. Current state of the art on the antioxidant activity of sage (salvia spp.) and its bioactive components. Planta Med. 2020, 86, 224–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Craft, J.D.; Satyal, P.; Setzer, W.N. The Chemotaxonomy of common sage (Salvia officinalis) based on the volatile constituents. Medicines 2017, 4, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ghorbani, A.; Esmaeilizadeh, M. Pharmacological properties of Salvia officinalis and its components. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2017, 7, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pop, A.; Tofană, M.; Socaci, S.A.; Pop, C.; Rotar, A.M.; Salan¸tă, L. Determination of antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial activity of selected Salvia species. Bull. UASVM Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Manning, J.; Goldblatt, P. Plants of the Greater Cape Floristic Region 1: The Core Cape Flora; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  40. Etsassala, N.G.E.R.; Badmus, J.A.; Waryo, T.T.; Marnewick, J.L.; Cupido, C.N.; Hussein, A.A.; Iwuoha, E.I. Alpha-glucosidase and alpha-amylase inhibitory activities of novel abietane diterpenes from Salvia africana-lutea. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Afonso, A.F.; Pereira, O.R.; Fernandes, A.; Calhelha, R.C.; Silva, A.M.S.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Cardoso, S.M. Phytochemical composition and bioactive effects of Salvia africana, Salvia officinalis ‘Icterina’ and Salvia mexicana aqueous extracts. Molecules 2019, 24, 4327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. De Martino, L.; Roscigno, G.; Mancini, E.; De Falco, E.; De Feo, V. Chemical composition and antigerminative activity of the essential oils from five Salvia species. Molecules 2010, 15, 735–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Adams, J.D.; Guhr, S.; Villaseñor, E. Salvia mellifera-how does it alleviate chronic pain? Medicines 2019, 6, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kawahara, N.; Inoue, M.; Kawai, K.I.; Sekita, S.; Satake, M.; Goda, Y. Diterpenoid from Salvia greggii. Phytochemistry 2003, 63, 859–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kawahara, N.; Tamura, T.; Inoue, M.; Hosoe, T.; Kawai, K.I.; Sekita, S.; Satake, M.; Goda, Y. Diterpenoid glucosides from Salvia greggii. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 2577–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pereira, O.R.; Catarino, M.D.; Afonso, A.F.; Silva, A.M.S.; Cardoso, S.M. Salvia elegans, Salvia greggii and Salvia officinalis decoctions: Antioxidant activities and inhibition of carbohydrate and lipid metabolic enzymes. Molecules 2018, 23, 3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mora, S.; Millán, R.; Lungenstrass, H.; Díaz-Véliz, G.; Morán, J.A.; Herrera-Ruiz, M.; Tortoriello, J. The hydroalcoholic extract of Salvia elegans induces anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 106, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Herrera-Ruiz, M.; Garcia-Beltran, Y.; Mora, S.; Diaz-Veliz, G.; Viana Glauce, S.B.; Tortoriello, J.; Ramirez, G. Antidepressant and anxiolytic effects of hydroalcoholic extract from Salvia elegans. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 107, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Makino, T.; Ohno, T.; Iwbuchi, H. Aroma components of pineapple sage (Salvia elegans Vahl). Foods Food Ingred. J. Jpn. 1996, 169, 121–124. [Google Scholar]
  50. Neisess, K.R.; Scora, R.W.; Kumamoto, J. Volatile leaf oils of California salvias. J. Nat. Prod. 1987, 50, 515–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gurjar, M.; Ali, S.; Akhtar, M.; Singh, K. Efficacy of plant extracts in plant disease management. Agric. Sci. 2012, 3, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pane, C.; Villecco, D.; Zaccardelli, M. Combined use of Brassica carinata seed meal, thyme oil and a Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain for controlling three soil-borne fungal plant diseases. J. Plant. Pathol. 2017, 99, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  53. Marchev, A.; Haas, C.; Schulz, S.; Georgiev, V.; Steingroewer, J.; Bley, T.; Pavlov, A. Sage in vitro cultures: A promising tool for the production of bioactive terpenes and phenolic substances. Biotechnol. Lett. 2014, 36, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zeng, S.L.; Duan, L.; Chen, B.Z.; Li, P.; Liu, E.H. Chemicalome and metabolome profiling of polymethoxylated flavonoids in Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium based on an integrated strategy combining background subtraction and modified mass defect filter in a Microsoft Excel Platform. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1508, 106–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kavoura, D.; Kyriakopoulou, K.; Papaefstathiou, G.; Spanidi, E.; Gardikis, K.; Louli, V.; Aligiannis, N.; Krokida, M.; Magoulas, K. Supercritical CO2 extraction of Salvia fruticose. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 146, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Šulniūtė, V.; Ragažinskienė, O.; Venskutonis, P.R. Comprehensive evaluation of antioxidant potential of 10 salvia species using high pressure methods for the isolation of lipophilic and hydrophilic plant fractions. Plant. Foods Hum. Nutr. 2016, 71, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nutrizio, M.; Kljusurić, J.G.; Sabolović, M.B.; Kovačević, D.B.; Šupljika, F.; Putnik, P.; Čakić, M.S.; Dubrović, I.; Vrsaljko, D.; Maltar-Strmečki, N.; et al. Valorization of sage extracts (Salvia officinalis L.) obtained by high voltage electrical discharges: Process control and antioxidant properties. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 60, 102284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Abdelkaderm, M.; Ahcen, B.; Rachid, D.; Hakim, H. Phytochemical study and biological activity of sage (Salvia officinalis L.). Int. J. Sch. Sci. Res. Innov. 2014, 8, 1253–1287. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sotiropoulou, N.S.; Megremi, S.F.; Tarantilis, P. Evaluation of antioxidant activity, toxicity, and phenolic profile of aqueous extracts of chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) and sage (Salvia officinalis L.) prepared at different temperatures. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lu, Y.; Foo, L.Y. Antioxidant activities of polyphenols from sage (Salvia officinalis). Food Chem. 2001, 75, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Salari, S.; Bakhshi, T.; Sharififar, F.; Naseri, A.; Ghasemi Nejad Almani, P. Evaluation of antifungal activity of standardized extract of Salvia rhytidea Benth. (Lamiaceae) against various Candida isolates. J. Mycol. Méd. 2016, 26, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Katanić Stanković, J.S.; Srećković, N.; Mišić, D.; Gašić, U.; Imbimbo, P.; Monti, D.M.; Mihailović, V. Bioactivity, biocompatibility and phytochemical assessment of lilac sage, Salvia verticillata L. (Lamiaceae)—A plant rich in rosmarinic acid. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 143, 111932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ahmad, H.; Matsubara, Y. Antifungal effect of Lamiaceae herb water extracts against Fusarium root rot in Asparagus. J. Plant. Dis. Prot. 2020, 127, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ahmad, H.; Matsubara, Y. Suppression of Fusarium wilt in cyclamen by using sage water extract and identification of antifungal metabolites. Australas. Plant. Pathol. 2020, 49, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Exarchou, V.; Kanetis, L.; Charalambous, Z.; Apers, S.L.; Pieters, V.; Gekas, V.; Goulas, V. HPLC-SPE-NMR characterization of major metabolites in Salvia fruticosa Mill. extract with antifungal potential: Relevance of carnosic acid, carnosol, and hispidulin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lee, S.O.; Choi, G.J.; Jang, K.S.; Lim, H.K.; Cho, K.Y.; Kim, J.C. Antifungal activity of five plant essential oils as fumigant against postharvest and soilborne plant pathogenic fungi. Plant. Pathol. 2007, 23, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Baka, Z.A.M. Antifungal activity of extracts from five Egyptian wild medicinal plants against late blight disease of tomato. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant. Prot. 2014, 47, 1988–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nkomo, M.M.; Katerere, D.D.R.; Vismer, H.H.; Cruz, T.T.; Balayssac, S.S.; Malet-Martino, M.M.; Makunga, N.N.P. Fusarium inhibition by wild populations of the medicinal plant Salvia africana-lutea L. linked to metabolomic profiling. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 14, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yilar, M.; Kadioglu, I. Antifungal activities of some Salvia apecies extracts on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici (Forl) mycelium growth in-vitro. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2016, 26, 115–118. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yilar, M.; Izzet, K.; Telci, I. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of Salvia officinalis (L.), S. cryptantha (Montbret et aucher ex Benth.), S. tomentosa (Mill.) plant essential oils and extracts. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2018, 27, 1695–1706. [Google Scholar]
  71. Goussous, S.J.; Abu el-Samen, F.M.; Tahhan, R.A. Antifungal activity of several medicinal plants extracts against the early blight pathogen (Alternaria solani). Arch. Phytopathol. Plant. Prot. 2010, 43, 1745–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kanetis, L.; Exarchou, V.; Charalambous, Z.; Goulas, V. Edible coating composed of chitosan and Salvia fruticosa Mill. extract for the control of grey mould of table grapes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Goussous, S.J.; Mas’ad, I.S.; Abu El-Samen, F.M.; Tahhan, R.A. In vitro inhibitory effects of rosemary and sage extracts on mycelial growth and sclerotial formation and germination of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2013, 46, 890–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Özcan, M.M.; AL Juhaimi, F.Y. Antioxidant and antifungal activity of some aromatic plant extracts. J. Med. Plant. Res. 2011, 5, 1361–1366. [Google Scholar]
  75. Nikolova, M.; Yordanov, P.; Slavov, S.; Berkov, S. Antifungal activity of plant extracts against phytopathogenic fungi. J. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2017, 6, 155–161. [Google Scholar]
  76. Pahlaviani, M.R.M.K.; Darsanaki, R.K.; Bidarigh, S. Antimicrobial activities of some plants extracts against phytopathogenic fungi and clinical isolates in Iran. J. Med. Bacteriol. 2018, 7, 5–16. [Google Scholar]
  77. Dagostin, S.; Formolo, T.; Giovannini, O.; Pertot, I. Salvia officinalis extract can protect grapevine against Plasmopara viticola. Plant. Dis. 2010, 94, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Pansera, M.R.; Pauletti, M.; Fedrigo, C.P.; Camatii Sartori, V.; Da Silva Ribeiro, R.T. Utilization of essential oil and vegetable extracts of Salvia officinalis L. in the control of rot Sclerotinia in lettuce. Braz. J. Appl. Technol. Agric. Sci. 2013, 6, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
  79. Scherf, A.; Schuster, C.; Marx, P.; Gärber, U.; Konstantinidou-Doltsinis, S.; Schmitt, A. Control of downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora cubensis) of greenhouse grown cucumbers with alternative biological agents. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2010, 75, 541–554. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  80. Dellavalle, P.D.; Cabrera, A.; Alem, D.; Larrañaga, P.; Ferreira, F.; Rizza, M.D. Antifungal activity of medicinal plant extracts against phytopathogenic fungus Alternaria spp. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 71, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chudasama, K.S.; Thaker, V.S. Biological control of phytopathogenic bacteria Pantoea agglomerans and Erwinia chrysanthemy using 100 essential oils. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant. Protect. 2014, 47, 2221–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Khosravi, D.N.; Ostad, S.N. Cytotoxic activity of the essential oil of Salvia verticillata L. Res. J. Pharmacogn. 2014, 1, 7–33. [Google Scholar]
  83. Bayar, Y.; Yilar, M. The antifungal and phytotoxic effect of different plant extracts of Salvia virgata Jacq. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2019, 28, 3492–3497. [Google Scholar]
  84. Dulger, B.; Hacioglu, N. Antifungal activity of endemic Salvia tigrina in Turkey. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2008, 7, 1051–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Šrobárová, A.; Eged, S.; Teixeira Da Silva, J.; Ritieni, A.; Santini, A. The use of Bacillus subtilis for screening Fusaric Acid production by Fusarium spp. Czech J. Food Sci. 2009, 27, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nesic, K.; Ivanovic, S.; Nesic, V. Fusarial toxins: Secondary metabolites of Fusarium fungi. Rev. Environ. Cont. Toxicol. 2014, 228, 101–120. [Google Scholar]
  87. Mikušová, P.; Sulyok, M.; Samtini, A.; Šrobárová, A. Aspergillus spp. and their secondary metabolite production in grape berries from Slovakia. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2014, 53, 109–114. [Google Scholar]
  88. Samtini, A.; Mikušová, P.; Sulyok, M.; Krska, R.; Labuda, R.; Šrobárová, A. Penicillium strains isolated from Slovak grape berries taxonomy assessment by secondary metabolite profile. Mycotoxin Res. 2014, 30, 213–220. [Google Scholar]
  89. Sakhri, A.; Chaouche, N.K.; Catania, M.R.; Ritieni, A.; Santini, A. Chemical Composition of Aspergillus creber Extract and Evaluation of its Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yuce, E.; Yildirim, N.; Yildirim, N.C.; Paksoy, M.Y.; Bagci, E. Essential oil composition, antioxidant and antifungal activities of Salvia sclarea L. from Munzur Valley in Tunceli, Turkey. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2014, 60, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  91. Ghaedi, M.; Naghiha, R.; Jannesar, R.; Dehghanian, N.; Mirtamizdoust, B.; Pezeshkpour, V. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of flower extracts of Urtica dioica, Chamaemelum nobile and Salvia officinalis: Effects of Zn[OH]2 nanoparticles and Hp-2-minh on their property. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 32, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Salević, A.; Prieto, C.; Cabedo, L.; Nedović, V.; Lagaron, J.M. Physicochemical, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) films containing a solid dispersion of sage (Salvia officinalis L.) extract. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 270. [Google Scholar]
  93. Soković, M.; Grubišić, D.; Ristić, M. Chemical composition and antifungal activities of essential oils from leaves, calyx and corolla of Salvia brachyodon Vandas. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2005, 17, 227–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Karpiński, T.M. Essential oils of Lamiaceae family plants as antifungal. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Abu-Darwish, M.S.; Cabral, C.; Ferreira, I.V.; Gonçalves, M.J.; Cavaleiro, C.; Cruz, M.T.; Al-Bdour, T.H.; Salgueiro, L. Essential oil of common sage (Salvia officinalis L.) from Jordan: Assessment of safety in mammalian cells and its antifungal and anti-inflammatory potential. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Redondo-Blanco, S.; Fernández, J.; López-Ibáñez, S.; Miguélez, E.M.; Villar, C.J.; Lombó, F. Plant phytochemicals in food preservation: Antifungal bioactivity: A review. J. Food Prot. 2020, 83, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Stappen, I.; Tabanca, N.; Ali, A.; Wanner, J.; Lal, B.; Jaitak, V.; Wedge, D.E.; Kaul, V.K.; Schmidt, E.; Jirovetz, L. Antifungal and repellent activities of the essential oils from three aromatic herbs from western Himalaya. Open Chem. 2018, 16, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Džamić, A.; Soković, M.; Ristić, M.; Grujić-Jovanović, S.; Vukojević, J.; Marin, P.D. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of Salvia sclarea (Lamiaceae) essential oil. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2008, 60, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Pitarokili, D.; Tzakou, O.; Couladis, M.; Verykokidou, E. Composition and antifungal activity of the essential oil of Salvia pomifera subsp. calycina growing wild in Greece. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1999, 11, 655–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Glamočlija, J.; Soković, M.; Vukojević, J.; Milenković, I.; Van Griensven, L.J.L.D. Chemical composition and antifungal activities of essential oils of Satureja thymbra L. and Salvia pomifera ssp. calycina (Sm.) Hayek. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2006, 18, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ghasemi, E.; Sharafzadeh, S.; Amiri, B.; Alizadeh, A.; Bazrafshan, F. Variation in essential oil constituents and antimicrobial activity of the flowering aerial parts of Salvia mirzayanii Rech. & Esfand. Ecotypes as a folkloric herbal remedy in Southwestern Iran. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2020, 23, 51–64. [Google Scholar]
  102. Sokovic, M.; Griensven, L.J.L.D.V. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and their components against the three major pathogens of the cultivated button mushroom, Agaricus bisporus. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2006, 116, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Pinto, E.; Salgueiro, L.R.; Cavaleiro, C.; Palmeira, A.; Gonçalves, M.J. In vitro susceptibility of some species of yeasts and filamentous fungi to essential oils of Salvia officinalis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2007, 26, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Grande-Tovar, C.D.; Chaves-Lopez, C.; Serio, A.; Rossi, C.; Paparella, A. Chitosan coatings enriched with essential oils: Effects on fungi involved in fruit decay and mechanisms of action. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Souza, D.P.; Pimentel, R.B.Q.; Santos, A.S.; Albuquerque, P.M.; Fernandes, A.V.; Junior, S.D.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Ramos, M.V.; Rathinasabapathi, B.; Gonçalvesa, J.F.C. Fungicidal properties and insights on the mechanisms of the action of volatile oils from Amazonian Aniba trees. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 143, 111914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lengai, G.M.W.; Muthomi, J.W.; Mbega, E.R. Phytochemical activity and role of botanical pesticides in pest management for sustainable agricultural crop production. Sci. Afr. 2020, 7, e00239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chen, C.J.; Li, Q.Q.; Zeng, Z.Y.; Duan, S.S.; Wang, W.; Xu, F.R.; Cheng, Y.X.; Dong, X. Efficacy and mechanism of Mentha haplocalyx and Schizonepeta tenuifolia essential oils on the inhibition of Panax notoginseng pathogens. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 145, 112073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Cui, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; Zhao, C.; Lin, L. Antimicrobial activity and mechanisms of Salvia sclarea essential oil. Bot. Stud. 2015, 56, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Fraternale, D.; Giamperi, L.; Bucchini, A.; Ricci, D.; Epifano, F.; Genovese, S.; Curini, M. Composition and antifungal activity of essential oil of Salvia sclarea from Italy. Chem. Nat. Comp. 2005, 41, 604–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Soković, M.D.; Brkić, D.D.; Džamić, A.M.; Ristić, M.S.; Marin, P.D. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of Salvia desoleana Atzei & Picci essential oil and its major components. Flavour Fragr. J. 2009, 24, 83–87. [Google Scholar]
  111. Morcia, C.; Malnati, M.; Terzi, V. In vitro antifungal activity of terpinen-4-ol, eugenol, carvone, 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol) and thymol against mycotoxigenic plant pathogens. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2012, 29, 415–422. [Google Scholar]
  112. Silva, K.V.S.; Lima, M.I.O.; Cardoso, G.N.; Santos, A.S.; Silva, G.S.; Pereira, F.O. Inibitory effects of linalool on fungal pathogenicity of clinical isolates of Microsporum canis and Microsporum gypseum. Mycoses 2017, 60, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yu, D.; Wang, J.; Shao, X.; Xu, F.; Wang, H. Antifungal modes of action of tea tree oil and its two characteristic components against Botrytis cinerea. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Woo, H.J.; Yang, J.Y.; Lee, M.H.; Kim, H.W.; Kwon, H.J.; Park, M.; Kim, S.K.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, S.H.; d Kim, J.B. Inhibitory effects of β-caryophyllene on Helicobacter pylori infection in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Digrak, M.; Alma, M.H.; Ilcim, A.; Sen, S. Antibacterial and antifungal effects of various commercial plant extracts. Pharm. Biol. 1999, 37, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Peana, A.; Moretti, M.D.; Julidano, C. Chemical composition and antimicrobial action of the essential oils of Salvia desoleana and S. sclarea. Planta Med. 1999, 5, 752–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Ferdes, M.; Al Juhaimi, F.; Özcan, M.M.; Ghafoor, K. Inhibitory effect of some plant essential oils on growth of Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, Mucor pusillus and Fusarium oxysporum. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 113, 457–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Starovic, M.; Ristic, D.; Pavlovic, S.; Ristic, M.; Stevanovic, M.; Aljuhaimi, F.; Svetlana, N.; Ozcan, M.M. Antifungal activities of different essential oils against anise seeds mycopopulations. J. Food Saf. Food Qual. 2016, 67, 61–92. [Google Scholar]
  119. Daferera, D.J.; Ziogas, B.N.; Polissiou, M.G. The effectiveness of plant essential oils on the growth of Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium sp. and Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. Michiganensis. Crop. Prot. 2003, 22, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Pitarokili, D.; Tzakou, O.; Loukis, A.; Harvala, C. Volatile metabolites from Salvia fruticosa as antifungal agents in soilborne pathogens. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 3294–3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Kotan, R.; Kordali, S.; Cakir, A.; Kesdek, M.; Kaya, Y.; Kilic, H. Antimicrobial and insecticidal activities of essential oil isolated from Turkish Salvia hydrangea DC. ex Benth. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2008, 36, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Cosic, J.; Vrandecic, K.; Postic, J.; Jurkovic, D.; Ravlic, M. In vitro antifungal activity of essential oils on growth of phytopathogenic fungi. Polyjoprivreda 2010, 16, 25–28. [Google Scholar]
  123. Lu, M.; Han, Z.; Xu, Y.; Yao, L. Effects of essential oils from Chinese indigenous aromatic plants on mycelial growth and morphogenesis of three phytopathogens. Flavour Fragr. J. 2013, 28, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Elshafie, H.S.; Sakr, S.; Mang, S.M.; Belviso, S.; De Feo, V.; Camele, I. Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of three essential oils extracted from mediterranean aromatic plants. J. Med. Food 2016, 19, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Carta, C.; Moretti, M.D.L.; Peana, A.T. Activity of the oil of Salvia officinalis L. against Botrytis cinerea. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1996, 8, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Arici, S.E.; Sanli, A. Effect of some essential oils against Rhizoctonia solani and Streptomycetes scabies on potato plants in field conditions. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2014, 4, 2027–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Khedher, M.R.B.; Khedher, S.B.; Chaieb, I.; Tounsi, S.; Hammami, M. Chemical composition and biological activities of Salvia officinalis essential oil from Tunisia. EXCLI J. 2017, 16, 160–173. [Google Scholar]
  128. Palfi, M.; Konjevoda, P.; Vrandečić, K.; Ćosić, J. Antifungal activity of essential oils on mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum and Bortytis cinerea. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2019, 31, 544–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Tanovic, B.; Potocnik, I.; Delibasic, G.; Ristic, M.; Kostic, M.; Markovic, M. In vitro effect of essential oils from aromatic and medicinal plants on mushroom pathogens: Verticillium fungicola var. fungicola, Mycogone perniciosa, and Cladobotryum sp. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2006, 61, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Pawar, V.C.; Thaker, V.S. Evaluation of the anti-Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicer and anti-Alternaria porri effects of some essential oils. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 23, 1099–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Tomescu, A.; Sumalan, R.M.; Pop, G.; Alexa, E.; Poiana, M.A.; Copolovici, D.M.; Mihay, C.S.S.; Negrea, M.; Galuscan, A. Chemical composition and protective antifugal activity of Mentha Piperita L. and Salvia Officinalis L. essential oils against Fusarium Graminearum spp. Rev. Chem. 2015, 66, 1027–1030. [Google Scholar]
  132. Arsalan, M.; Dervis, S. Antifungal activity of essential oils against three vegetative compatibility groups of Verticillium dahlia. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 26, 1813–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Todorovic, B.; Potocnik, I.; Rekanovic, E.; Stepanovic, M.; Kostic, M.; Ristic, M.; Marcic, S.M. Toxicity of twenty-two plant essential oils against pathogenic bacteria of vegetables and mushrooms. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2016, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Salteh, S.A.; Arzani, K.; Omidbeige, R.; Safaie, N. Essential oils inhibit mycelial growth of Rhizopus stolonifer. Eur. J. Hort. Sci. 2010, 75, 278–282. [Google Scholar]
  135. Moretti, M.D.L.; Peana, A.T.; Franceschini, A.; Carta, C. In vivo activity of Salvia officinalis oil against Botrytis cinerea. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1998, 10, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Bi, Y.; Jiang, H.; Hausbeck, M.K.; Hao, J.J. Inhibitory effects of essential oils for controlling Phytophthora capsici. Plant. Dis. 2012, 96, 797–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Hoseini, S.; Amini, J.; Rafei, J.N.; Khorshidi, J. Inhibitory effect of some plant essential oils against strawberry anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum nymphaeae under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2019, 155, 1287–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Noscirvani, N.; Fasihi, H. Control of Aspergilus niger in vitro and in vivo by three Iranian essential oils. Int. Food Res. J. 2018, 25, 1745–1752. [Google Scholar]
  139. Lopez-Reyes, J.G.; Spadaro, D.; Gullino, M.L.; Garibaldi, A. Efficacy of plant essential oils on postharvest control of rot caused by fungi on four cultivars of apples in vivo. Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 25, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lopez-Reyes, J.G.; Spadaro, D.; Prelle, A.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M.L. Efficacy of plant essential oils on postharvest control of rots caused by fungi on different stone fruits in vivo. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Pane, C.; Villecco, D.; Roscigno, G.; De Falco, E.; Zaccardelli, M. Screening of plant-derived antifungal substances useful for the control of seedborne pathogens. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant. Prot. 2013, 46, 1533–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Yilar, M.; Bayar, Y. Antifungal of essential oils of Salvia officinalis and Salvia Tomentosa plants on six different isolates of Aschochyta rabie (PASS) Labr. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2019, 28, 2170–2175. [Google Scholar]
  143. Goswami, S.; Kanval, J.; Prakash, O.; Kumar, R.; Rawat, D.S.; Srivastava, R.M.; Pant, A.K. Chemical composition, antioxidant, antifungal and antifeedant activity of the Salvia reflexa Hornem essential oil. Asian J. Appl. Sci. 2019, 12, 185–191. [Google Scholar]
  144. Pitarokili, D.; Couladis, M.; Panayotarou, N.K.; Tzakou, O. Composition and antifungal activity on soil-borne pathogens of the essential oil of Salvia sclarea from Greece. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6688–6691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Jularat, U.; Apinya, P.; Peerayot, K.K.; Pitipong, T. Antifungal properties of essential oils from Thai medial plants against rice phytopathogenic fungi. Asian J. Food Ag-Ind. 2009, 2, S24–S30. [Google Scholar]
  146. Bahman, H.; Alireza, E.; Seyed Mehdi, M. Fumigant toxicity of essential oil from ‘Salvia leriifolia’ (Benth) against two stored product insect pests. Aust. J. Crop. Sci. 2013, 7, 855–860. [Google Scholar]
  147. Zaccardelli, M.; Roscigno, G.; Pane, C.; De Falco, E. Antifungal activity of residues from aromatic waters distilled from thyme and sage. In Multidisciplinary Approaches for Studying and Combating Microbial Pathogens; Mendez-Vilas, A., Ed.; Universal-Publishers: Irvine, CA, USA, 2015; pp. 31–33. [Google Scholar]
  148. Feng, W.; Zheng, X. Essential oils to control Alternaria alternata in vitro and in vivo. Food Control 2006, 18, 1126–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Flores, F.C.; De Lima, J.A.; Ribeiro, R.F.; Alves, S.H.; Rolim, C.M.B.; Beck, R.C.R.; Bona da Silva, C. Antifungal activity of nanocapsule suspensions containing tea tree oil on the growth of Trichophyton rubrum. Mycopathologia 2013, 175, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Soliman, E.A.; El-Moghazy, A.Y.; Mohy El-Din, M.S.; Massoud, M.A. Microencapsulation of essential oils within alginate: Formulation and in vitro evaluation of antifungal activity. J. Encapsulation Adsorption Sci. 2013, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Nasseri, M.; Golmohammadzadeh, S.; Arouiee, H.; Jaafari, M.R.; Neamati, H. Antifungal activity of Zataria multiflora essential oil-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles in-vitro condition. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2016, 19, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar]
  152. Kodadová, A.; Vitková, Z.; Herdová, P.; Ťažký, A.; Oremusová, J.; Grančai, D.; Mikuš, P. Formulation of sage essential oil (Salvia officinalis, L.) monoterpenes into chitosan hydrogels and permeation study with GC-MS analysis. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2015, 41, 1080–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Gharenaghadeh, S.; Karimi, N.; Forghani, S.; Nourazarian, M.; Gharehnaghadeh, S.; Jabbari, V.; Sowtikhiabani, M.; Kafil, H.S. Application of Salvia multicaulis essential oil-containing nanoemulsion against food-borne pathogens. Food Biosci. 2017, 19, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zaccardelli, M.; Mancini, E.; Campanile, F.; De Feo, E.; De Falco, E. Identification of bio-active coumpounds in essential oils of medicinal plants toxic for phytopathogenic fungi and bacteria. J. Plant. Pathol. 2007, 89, 3. [Google Scholar]
  155. Souto, E.B.; Silva, G.F.; Dias-Ferreira, J.; Zielinska, A.; Ventura, F.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Novellino, E.; Santini, A. Nanopharmaceutics: Part II—Production scales and clinically compliant production methods. Nanomater 2020, 10, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Jampílek, J.; Kráľová, K. Nanobiopesticides in agriculture: State of the art and future opportunities. In Nano-Biopesticides Today and Future Perspectives; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Chapter 17; pp. 397–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Sagiri, S.S.; Anis, A.; Pal, K. Review on encapsulation of vegetable oils: Strategies, preparation methods, and applications. Polym. Plast. Technol. 2016, 55, 291–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. De Matos, S.P.; Lucca, L.G.; Koester, L.S. Essential oils in nanostructured systems: Challenges in preparation and analytical methods. Talanta 2019, 195, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Sage extracts exhibiting antimicrobial activity against phytopathogens, their extraction methods, susceptible microorganisms and bioassay to test the control efficacy.
Table 1. Sage extracts exhibiting antimicrobial activity against phytopathogens, their extraction methods, susceptible microorganisms and bioassay to test the control efficacy.
Sage Species
(Salvia spp.)
Extraction MethodsTarget PhytopatogensEfficacy on BioassayReference
S. aegyptiacaEthanol and water extractionPhyphtora infestansIn vitro and in vivo on tomato[67]
S. africana-luteaDichloromethane: Methanol extractionFusarium verticillioides and F. proliferatumIn vitro determination of MICand MFC[68]
S. cryptantha,
S. officinalis,
S. tomentosa
Water, ethanol and methanol extractionFusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicisIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[69]
S. cryptantha
S. officinalis,
S. tomentosa
Methanol and ethanol extractionBotrytis cinerea, Monilia laxa, Aspergillus niger, and Penicillum sp.In vivo on apple[70]
S. fruticosaCrude water extractionAlternaria solaniIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[71]
S. fruticosaExtraction in semi-automated Soxlet systemB. cinereaIn vivo on grape[72]
S. fruticosaEthanol extractionSclerotinia sclerotoriumIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[73]
S. officinalisExtracted in 90% methanol +
9% water + 1% acetic acid
Alternaria alternata, A. niger, and
A. parasiticus
In vitro mycelial growth inhibition[74]
S. officinalisMetanolic extractionA. alternata, B. cinerea, Phytophtora cambivora, and F. oxysporumIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[75]
S. officinalisEthanol and methanol extractionA. alternata, A. solani, Fusarium solani, F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici, P. infestans, Rhizoctonia solani, B. cinerea, Colletotrichum coccoides, Verticillum albo-atrumIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[76]
S. officinalisEthanol extractionPlasmopora viticolaIn vivo on grape[77]
S. officinalisWater extractionF. oxysporum f.sp. asparagiIn vitro on conidia germination[63]
S. officinalisHydroethanol, ethanol and water infusionS. sclerotiorumIn vitro and in vivo on lettuce[78]
S. officinalisWater extractionF. oxysporum f.sp. cyclaminisIn vitro density of conidia[64]
S. officinalisEthanol extractionPseudoperonospora cubensisIn vivo on cucumber[79]
S. officinalis, S. sclareaAqueous, saline Buffer and acid extractionAlternaria spp.In vitro determination of MIC and MFC[80]
S. officinalis, S. sclarea Pantoea agglomerans, Erwinia chrysanthemyIn vitro growth inhibition [81]
S. verticillataMethanol extractionF. oxysporum, A. alternata, Aureobasidium pillulans, Trichoderma harzianum, Penicillum canescensIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[82]
S. virgataMethanol and n-hexane extractionR. solani, A. solani, F. oxysporum f.sp. radicis, lycopersici, Verticillum dalhiaeIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition [83]
S. tigrinaEthanol extractionB. cinerea, F. oxysporum, A. alternataIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[84]
MIC: Minimal inhibitory concentration; MFC: Minimum fungicidal concentration.
Table 2. Sage essential oils with antimicrobial activity on phytopathogens, main active components, susceptible microorganisms and bioassay to test the control efficacy.
Table 2. Sage essential oils with antimicrobial activity on phytopathogens, main active components, susceptible microorganisms and bioassay to test the control efficacy.
Sage Species
(Salvia spp.)
Major ComponentsTarget PhytopatogensEfficacy on BioassayReference
S. aucheeri var. aucheri Alternaria alternata, Penicillium italicum, Fusarium equisetiIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[115]
S. cryptantha,
S. officinalis,
S. tomentosa
Eucalyptol, Camphor, α-pinetene, β-thujone, borneol, camphor, 3-thujoneneBotrytis cinerea, Monilia laxa, Aspergillus niger, Penicillum sp.In vivo on apple[70]
S. cryptantha,
S. officinalis,
S. tomentosa
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersiciIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[69]
S. desoleana1,8-cineoleA. niger, A. ochraceus, A. versicolor, A. flavus, A. terreus, A. alternata, Penicillium ochrocholon, P. funiculosum, Cladosporium cladosporoides, Trichoderma viride, Fusarium tricinctum, Phomopsis helianthiIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[116]
S. fruticosa A. niger, A. oryza, Mucor pusillus, F. oxysporumIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[117]
S. fruticosa1,8-Cineole, CamphorBipolaris/Drechslera sorociniana, Fusarium subglutinans, F. vertricilioides, F. oxysporum, F. tricinctum, F. sporotrichioides, F. equiseti, F. incarnatum, F. proliferatum,
Macrophomina phaseolina
In vitro determination of MIC and MFC[118]
S. fruticosaEucalyptol, CamphorB. cinerea, Fusarium solani var. coeruleum, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensisIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[119]
S. fruticosaHispidulin, salvigenin, cirsimaritin, carnosic acid, carnosol, and 12-methoxycarnosic
Aspergillus tubingensis, B. cinerea, P. digitatumIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[65]
S. fruticosa1,8-cineole, α-thujone, β-thujone, camphor, (E) caryophylleneF. oxysporum f.sp. dianthi, F. proliferatum,
Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium sclerotiorum, F. solani f. sp. cucurbitae
In vitro mycelial growth inhibition[120]
S. hydrangea A. alternata, A. solani, Aspergillus sp., Botrytis sp., Colletotrichum sp., Drechslera sp., Fusarium acuminatum, F. chlamydosporum, F. culmorum, F. equiseti, F. graminearum, F. incarnatum, F. nivale, F. oxysporum, F. proliferatum, F. sambucinum, F. scirpi, F. semitectum, F. solani, F. tabacinum, F. verticillioides, Nigrospora sp., Penicillium jensenii, Phoma sp., Pythium ultimum, Phytophthora capsici, Rhizoctonia solani, S. sclerotiorum, Sclerotinia sp., Trichothecium sp., Verticillium albo-atrum, V. dahliae, V.tenerumIn vitro microbial growth inhibition[121]
S. lavenduulfolia, S. sclarea B. cinerea, C. gloeosporioides, F. oxysporum, P. ultimum, R. solaniIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[66]
S. officinalis F. graminearum, F. verticilloides, F. subglutinans, F. oxysporum, F. avenaceum, Diaporthe phaseolarum var. caulivora, Phomopsis viticola, Helminthosporium sativum, Colletotrichum coccodes, Thanatephorus cucumerisIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[122]
S. officinalis A. alternata, Colletotrichum destructivum, Phytophthora parasiticaIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[123]
S. officinalisMonoterpeneColletotrichum acutatum, B. cinerea, Clavibacter michiganensis, Xanthomonas campestris, Pseudomonas savastanoi, P. syringae pv. phaseolicolaIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[124]
S. officinalisα-p-thujone, 1,8-cineole and camphorB. cinereaIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[125]
S. officinalis R.solani, Streptomycetes scabiesIn vivo on potato[126]
S. officinalisCamphor, α-thujone, 1,8-cineole, viridiflorol, β-thujone, β-caryophyllene, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
radical-scavenging, linoleic acid peroxidation, ferric reducing assays
B. cinerea, R. solani, F. oxysporum, A. alternataIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[127]
S. officinalis F. oxysporum, B. cinereaIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[128]
S. officinalis Verticillium fungicola var. fungicola, Cladobotryum sp.In vitro determination of MIC and MFC[129]
S. officinalis F. oxysporum f. sp. cicer, Alternaria porriIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[130]
S. officinalisCamphor, camphene, eucalyptolFusarium graminearumIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[131]
S. officinalis1,8-cineole, β-thujone, L-camphorVerticillum dalhieIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[132]
S. officinalis Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Pseudomonas tolaasiiIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[133]
S. officinalisThujone, camphorRhizopus stoloniferIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[134]
S. officinalisCamphor, α-thujoneV. fungicola, Trichoderma harzianumIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[102]
S. officinalis A. alternataIn vitro and in vivo on tomato[125]
S. officinalis S. sclerotiorumIn vitro and in vivo on lettuce[78]
S. officinalis C. cinereaIn vivo on tomato[135]
S. officinalisCis-thujone, camphorP. italicum, Aspergillus sp., Cladosporium cladosporioides, Fusaarium moniliformeIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[103]
S. officinalis Phytophthora capsiciIn vitro and in vivo on zucchini[136]
S. officinalis Colletotrichum nymphaeaeIn vitro and in vivo on strawberry[137]
S. officinalis Aspergillus nigerIn vitro and in vivo on tomato paste[138]
S. officinalis B. cinerea, P. expansumIn vivo on apples[139]
S. officinalis Monilinia laxa, B. cinerea,In vivo on apricot, peach and almond[140]
S. officinalis F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, R. solani, S. minorIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[52]
S. officinalis Alternaria dauci, A. radicina, C. lindemuthianum, Ascochyta rabieiIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[141]
S. officinalis,
S. tomentosa
A. rabieiIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[142]
S. pomifera sp. calycinaα-thujone, β-thujoneMycogone perniciosaIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[100]
S. pomifera subsp. calycinaα-thujone, β thujone, myrceneF. oxysporumf. sp. dianthus, F. solani f.sp. cucurbitae, F. proliferatum, S. slerotiorum, R. solani, V. dahliae, P. exspansumIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[99]
S. pomifera subsp. calycinaα-thujone, β-thujone, myrceneF. oxysporum f.sp. dianthy, F. solani f.sp. cucurbitae, F. proliferatum, S. sclerotium, R. solani, V. dalhie, P. expansumIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[100]
S. reflexaPhenols, diterpenes, fatty acids, Palmitic acid, phytol (E)caryophyllene,
caryophyllene oxide,
phytol isomer, β-asarone, α-copaene, δ-cadinene
Curvularia lunata, Helmenusathosporium maydisIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[143]
S. sclareaLinalyl acetate, linalool, α-terpineol, α-pinene,
1.8-cineole, limonene, β-caryophyllene, β-terpineol
A. alternata, C. cladosporioides, C. fulvum, F. tricinctum, F. sporotrichoides, Phoma macdonaldii, Phomopsis helianthi, Trichoderma virideIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[98]
S. sclareaLinalyl acetate, linalool, geranyl acetate, R-terpineol,F. oxysporumf. sp. dianthi, S.sclerotiorum, Sclerotium cepivorumIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[144]
S. sclareaLinalool, linalyl acetate, geranyl acetate, β-ocimene, caryophylleneoxideF. oxysporum, B. cinerea, R. solani, A. solaniIn vitro determination of MIC and MFC[109]
S. sclareaCaryophyllene oxide, sclareol, spathulenol, 1H-naphtho, pyran, β-caryophylleneEpicoccum nigrum, Colletotrichum coccodesIn vitro mycelial growth inhibition[90]
S. officinalis,
S. sclarea
Pantoea agglomerans, Erwinia chrysanthemyIn vitro inhibition measurement[145]
MIC: Minimal inhibitory concentration; MFC: Minimum fungicidal concentration.
Table 3. Antibacterial activity of essential oils of Salvia spp. used in this study.
Table 3. Antibacterial activity of essential oils of Salvia spp. used in this study.
Salvia spp.Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestrisPectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum
S. africana0-
S. rutilans--
S. munzii00
S. mellifera+/−-
S. greggii+/−0
S. officinalis “Icterina”00
S. officinalis--
Legend: 0 = no inhibition; - = total inhibition; +/- = partial inhibition.
Table 4. Antifungal activity of essential oils of Salvia spp. used in this study. The numbers indicate % reduction (values with −) or increase (values with +) of the diameter of the colonies treated with essential oils with respect to not treated (control).
Table 4. Antifungal activity of essential oils of Salvia spp. used in this study. The numbers indicate % reduction (values with −) or increase (values with +) of the diameter of the colonies treated with essential oils with respect to not treated (control).
Salvia spp.Alternaria alternataBotrytis cinereaSclerotinia minorFusarium oxysporumFusarium sambucinumFusarium semitectumFusarium solaniRhizoctonia solani
S. africana0−31.2+50.0+3−5.4−12.5−20.0+20.0
S. rutilans−55.5−50.0−100.0−5.6+8.1−21.9−4.0+20.0
S. munzii0 0+33.3−22.7−9.9−100.0−40.0−100.0
S. mellifera−11.1−50.0−33.3−14.1+8.1−35.5−40.0−24.0
S. greggii−100.0−50.0−100.0−18.5+3.6−25.0−32.0−100.0
S. officinalis “Icterina”−33.3−50.0−50.0−7.3−1−21.9+8.0+8.0
S. officinalis−100.0−100.0−100.0000−50.00−50.0
Table 5. Main constituents of essential oils (% on total oil, w/w) extracted from Salvia spp. species used in this study.
Table 5. Main constituents of essential oils (% on total oil, w/w) extracted from Salvia spp. species used in this study.
MoleculesS. melliferaS. africanaS. rutilansS. munziiS. greggiiS. officinalis “Icterina”S. officinalis
Thujone (cis*trans) 38.733.343.434.637.9
1,8-Cineole38.8 4.64.2
Camphor12.2 4.727.24.27.513.9
δ-Cadinene 3.811.58.914.0
α-Pinene9.2 4.4
Limonene2.2 1.4
Isobornyl acetate 5.0
Camphene 4.64.1
p-Cymene 17.7 1.2
γ-Terpinene 12.9
Epizonareme 11.3
Geranyl acetate 6.9 8.7
(Z)-β-Ocimene 5.7
Back to TopTop