Next Article in Journal
Plant Diversity Along the Urban–Rural Gradient and Its Relationship with Urbanization Degree in Shanghai, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Stakeholders’ Social Network in the Participatory Process of Formulation of Natura 2000 Management Programme in Slovenia
Previous Article in Journal
Weather, Risk, and Resource Orders on Large Wildland Fires in the Western US
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conservation–Protection of Forests for Wildlife in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley
Open AccessArticle

Deforestation and Connectivity among Protected Areas of Tanzania

1
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, NO-1431 Ås, Norway
2
National Carbon Monitoring Center and Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3000 Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2020, 11(2), 170; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11020170
Received: 30 December 2019 / Revised: 20 January 2020 / Accepted: 27 January 2020 / Published: 4 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protected Areas in Forest Conservation: Challenges and Opportunities)
Protected Areas (PAs) in Tanzania had been established originally for the goal of habitat, landscape and biodiversity conservation. However, human activities such as agricultural expansion and wood harvesting pose challenges to the conservation objectives. We monitored a decade of deforestation within 708 PAs and their unprotected buffer areas, analyzed deforestation by PA management regimes, and assessed connectivity among PAs. Data came from a Landsat based wall-to-wall forest to non-forest change map for the period 2002–2013, developed for the definition of Tanzania’s National Forest Reference Emissions Level (FREL). Deforestation data were extracted in a series of concentric bands that allow pairwise comparison and correlation analysis between the inside of PAs and the external buffer areas. Half of the PAs exhibit either no deforestation or significantly less deforestation than the unprotected buffer areas. A small proportion (10%; n = 71) are responsible for more than 90% of the total deforestation; but these few PAs represent more than 75% of the total area under protection. While about half of the PAs are connected to one or more other PAs, the remaining half, most of which are Forest Reserves, are isolated. Furthermore, deforestation inside isolated PAs is significantly correlated with deforestation in the unprotected buffer areas, suggesting pressure from land use outside PAs. Management regimes varied in reducing deforestation inside PA territories, but differences in protection status within a management regime are also large. Deforestation as percentages of land area and forested areas of PAs was largest for Forest Reserves and Game Controlled areas, while most National Parks, Nature Reserves and Forest Plantations generally retained large proportions of their forest cover. Areas of immediate management concern include the few PAs with a disproportionately large contribution to the total deforestation, and the sizeable number of PAs being isolated. Future protection should account for landscapes outside protected areas, engage local communities and establish new PAs or corridors such as village-managed forest areas. View Full-Text
Keywords: deforestation; isolation; protected areas; buffer areas; Tanzania deforestation; isolation; protected areas; buffer areas; Tanzania
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gizachew, B.; Rizzi, J.; Shirima, D.D.; Zahabu, E. Deforestation and Connectivity among Protected Areas of Tanzania. Forests 2020, 11, 170.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop