Results Based Payments for REDD+ under the Green Climate Fund: Lessons Learned on Social, Environmental and Governance Safeguards
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (a)
- That actions complement or are consistent with the objectives of national forest programmes and relevant international conventions and agreements;
- (b)
- Transparent and effective national forest governance structures, taking into account national legislation and sovereignty;
- (c)
- Respect for the knowledge and rights of indigenous peoples and members of local communities, by taking into account relevant international obligations, national circumstances and laws, and noting that the United Nations General Assembly has adopted the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples;
- (d)
- The full and effective participation of relevant stakeholders, in particular indigenous peoples and local communities, in the actions referred to in paragraphs 70 and 72 of this decision;
- (e)
- That actions are consistent with the conservation of natural forests and biological diversity, ensuring that the actions referred to in paragraph 70 of this decision are not used for the conversion of natural forests, but are instead used to incentivize the protection and conservation of natural forests and their ecosystem services, and to enhance other social and environmental benefits;
- (f)
- Actions to address the risks of reversals;
- (g)
- Actions to reduce the displacement of emissions.
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. RBPs Pilot Programme: Relevant Eligibility Criteria and Assessment Provisions Regarding Safeguards
3.2. Emerging Lessons from Approved Funding Proposals
- Evidence of a system that provides information on how safeguards referred to in Appendix I of 1/CP.16 have been addressed and respected;
- Evidence of having submitted an SOI to the UNFCCC with information on how all safeguards were addressed and respected during the results period.
4. Discussion
- by applying the binary pass/fail approach rather than a more qualitative one, the pilot programme is currently only able to assess FPs in terms of their capacity to adhere to the Cancun Safeguards, but not on their actual application, and hence, hinders the assessment on the extent to which all the Cancun Safeguards have been addressed and respected throughout results-based REDD+ implementation;
- the pass/fail approach has resulted in the assessment of compliance or non-compliance with each safeguard in a binary manner at one point in time. Such an approach fails to capture the progressive nature through which countries are expected to implement and report on having addressed and respected each safeguard, consistent with the stepwise approach to REDD+ implementation, and therefore, does not capture countries’ reflections on challenges and areas for improvement;
- in line with the findings above, the pilot programme lacks a verification process or approach (including third party) to assess the extent to which the Cancun Safeguards have been addressed and respected.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). In Proceedings of the Conference of the Parties on its Nineteen Session, Warsaw, Poland, 11–22 November 2013; Decisions 9/CP.19; 10/CP.19; 11/CP.19; 12/CP.19; 13/CP.19; 14CP.19 and 15/CP.19. UNFCCC: Bonn, Germany, 2013. Available online: https://unfccc.int/documents/8105 (accessed on 27 November 2020).
- UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). In Proceedings of the Conference of the Parties on its Twenty First Session, Paris, France, 30 November–11 December 2015; Decisions 16/CP.21, 17/CP.21, 18/CP.21. UNFCCC: Bonn, Germany, 2015. Available online: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/10.pdf (accessed on 27 November 2020).
- UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). In Proceedings of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventeen Session, Durban, South Africa, 28 November–9 December 2011; Decision 12/CP.17. UNFCCC: Bonn, Germany, 2011. Available online: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdf (accessed on 27 November 2020).
- UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). In Proceedings of the Conference of the Parties on its Sixteen Session, Cancun, Mexico, 29 November–10 December 2010; Decision 1/CP.16 Annex I. UNFCCC: Bonn, Germany, 2010. Available online: https://unfccc.int/documents/6525 (accessed on 27 November 2020).
- GCF (Green Climate Fund). In Proceedings of the Board Meeting on its Eighteenth Meeting, Cairo, Egypt, 30 September–2 October 2017; Board Decisions B.18/07 and B.18/23, Annexes XI and XII. GCF: Songdo, Korea, 2017. Available online: https://www.greenclimate.fund/boardroom/meeting/b18 (accessed on 27 November 2020).
- To date of writing this article, the Carbon Fund has signed 10 ERPAs, yet only Ghana has received an upfront advanced payment for US $1.3 million in August 2020. RBPs transfers under other signed ERPAs are only expected to begin after the first quarter of 2021. In Proceedings of the Carbon Fund, Twenty Second Meeting CF22, 17 November 2020; Virtual Meeting. Available online: https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/system/files/documents/CF22%202b.%20Portfolio%20management%20update_0.pdf (accessed on 27 November 2020).
- Annandale, D.; Annandale, D.; Christen, D.R.; Espinosa, M.G.; Horberry, J.; Mutunga, J.M.; Mwandri, P.; Puri, J.; Pham, G.; Reumann, A. Independent Evaluation of the Green Climate Fund’s Environmental and Social Safeguards and the Environmental and Social Management System; Special Study: Project Preparation Facility, June 2020; Independent Evaluation Unit, Green Climate Fund: Songdo, Korea, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Facility Management Team Note. CF-2013-3, World Bank Safeguard Policies and the UNFCCC REDD+ Safeguards; Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) Carbon Fund: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; Available online: https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/system/files/documents/FMT%20Note%20CF-2013-3_FCPF%20WB%20Safeguard%20Policies%20and%20UNFCCC%20REDD%2B%20Safeguards_FINAL_0.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2020).
- INDUFOR, World Bank, Second Evaluation of the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. 2016. Available online: https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/system/files/documents/Second+FCPF+Evaluation+Final+Report+Nov+2016+%28ID+94139%29.pdf (accessed on 16 October 2020).
- GCF (Green Climate Fund). In Proceedings of the Board Meeting on its Nineteenth meeting, Songdo, Incheon, Korea, 26 February–1 March 2018; Board Decision B.19/06. GCF: Songdo, Korea, 2018. Available online: https://www.greenclimate.fund/boardroom/meeting/b19 (accessed on 16 October 2020).
- GCF (Green Climate Fund). In Proceedings of the Board Meeting on Its Eleventh Meeting, Livingstone, Zambia, 2–5 November 2015; Board Decisions B.11/24 and B.11/10, Annex I, paragraph 3. GCF: Songdo, Korea, 2015. Available online: https://www.greenclimate.fund/boardroom/meeting/b11 (accessed on 16 October 2020).
- Moss, N.; Nussbaum, R. A Review of Three REDD+ Safeguard Initiatives; Forest Carbon Partnership Facility: Washington DC, USA; UN-REDD Programme: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; p. 3. Available online: https://www.uncclearn.org/wp-content/uploads/library/wb94.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2020).
- Rey, D.; Shah, W.P.; Swan, S. Country Approaches to REDD+ Safeguards, A Global Review of Initial Experiences and Emerging Lessons; UN-REDD Programme: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; Available online: https://www.unredd.net/documents/redd-papers-and-publications-90/16673-technical-resource-series-2-country-approaches-to-redd-safeguards-a-global-review-of-initial-experiences-and-emerging-lessons-1.html?path=redd-papers-and-publications-90 (accessed on 12 October 2020).
- Rey, D.; Roberts, J.; Korwin, S.; Rivera, L.; Ribet, U. A Guide to Understanding and Implementing the UNFCCC REDD+ Safeguards; ClientEarth: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Rey, D.; Korwin, S.; Ribet, U.; Rivera, L. Best Practices and Considerations for the Development of REDD+ Country Approaches to Safeguards and Design of Safeguard Information Systems; CLP and SNV: London, UK, 2016; p. 12. Available online: http://www.climatelawandpolicy.com/files/Best_Practices_and_Considerations_for_the_Development_of_REDD_Country_Approaches_to_Safeguards_and_Design_of_Safeguard_Information_Systems.pdf (accessed on 19 October 2020).
- Voigt, C.; Ferreira, F. The Warsaw Framework for REDD: Implications for National Implementation and Access to Results-Based Finance (30 July 2015). Carbon and Climate Law Review, Special issue on Implementing REDD+ in Context: Developing National and Sub-national Legal Frameworks, August/September 2015, University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2015-28. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2637767 (accessed on 19 October 2020).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rey Christen, D.; García Espinosa, M.; Reumann, A.; Puri, J. Results Based Payments for REDD+ under the Green Climate Fund: Lessons Learned on Social, Environmental and Governance Safeguards. Forests 2020, 11, 1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121350
Rey Christen D, García Espinosa M, Reumann A, Puri J. Results Based Payments for REDD+ under the Green Climate Fund: Lessons Learned on Social, Environmental and Governance Safeguards. Forests. 2020; 11(12):1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121350
Chicago/Turabian StyleRey Christen, Daniela, María García Espinosa, Andreas Reumann, and Jyotsna Puri. 2020. "Results Based Payments for REDD+ under the Green Climate Fund: Lessons Learned on Social, Environmental and Governance Safeguards" Forests 11, no. 12: 1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121350
APA StyleRey Christen, D., García Espinosa, M., Reumann, A., & Puri, J. (2020). Results Based Payments for REDD+ under the Green Climate Fund: Lessons Learned on Social, Environmental and Governance Safeguards. Forests, 11(12), 1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121350