Abbreviations
ABA, abscisic acid; AN, instant net photosynthesis; E, instant leaf transpiration; ECLs, established cell lines; EDM, Embryo Development Medium; EMs, embryonal masses; gS, stomatal conductance; GT, greenhouse’s temperature; I, irrigation condition; LE, length of somatic embryo; MT, maturation temperatures; NAE, abnormal somatic embryos; NI, without irrigation; NNE, number of normal mature somatic embryos; SE, somatic embryogenesis; ses, somatic embryos; UI, under irrigation; WE, width of somatic embryo; Ψleaf, water potential.
Figure 1.
Somatic embryos showing distinct morphologies: (a) normal somatic embryo (NNE) for Pinus radiata D.Don; (b) normal somatic embryo (NNE) for Pinus halepensis Mill.; (c) abnormal somatic embryo (NAE) for P. radiata; (d) abnormal somatic embryo (NAE) for P. halepensis, bar = 2 mm.
Figure 1.
Somatic embryos showing distinct morphologies: (a) normal somatic embryo (NNE) for Pinus radiata D.Don; (b) normal somatic embryo (NNE) for Pinus halepensis Mill.; (c) abnormal somatic embryo (NAE) for P. radiata; (d) abnormal somatic embryo (NAE) for P. halepensis, bar = 2 mm.
Figure 2.
Pinus radiata D.Don plantlets obtained from embryonal masses maturated at high temperatures during the hardening stage in the greenhouse, bar = 8 cm.
Figure 2.
Pinus radiata D.Don plantlets obtained from embryonal masses maturated at high temperatures during the hardening stage in the greenhouse, bar = 8 cm.
Figure 3.
Somatic embryos obtained per 0.08 g of embryonal masses submitted in different maturation temperatures (23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, after 12 weeks, 90, 30, 5 min, respectively). (a) Number of normal and abnormal somatic embryos; (b) the length and width of Pinus radiata D.Don normal embryos. Different letters or numbers show significant differences by the Tukey–Kramer test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3.
Somatic embryos obtained per 0.08 g of embryonal masses submitted in different maturation temperatures (23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, after 12 weeks, 90, 30, 5 min, respectively). (a) Number of normal and abnormal somatic embryos; (b) the length and width of Pinus radiata D.Don normal embryos. Different letters or numbers show significant differences by the Tukey–Kramer test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4.
Germination and acclimatization of somatic plantlets from P. radiata obtained from different embryogenic cell lines and maturation temperatures. (a) Plantlets after two months in germination medium, bar = 1 cm; (b) plantlets after three months cultivated in the germination medium, bar = 2 cm; (c) plantlets derived from normal cotyledonary somatic embryos growing in the greenhouse, bar = 2 cm.
Figure 4.
Germination and acclimatization of somatic plantlets from P. radiata obtained from different embryogenic cell lines and maturation temperatures. (a) Plantlets after two months in germination medium, bar = 1 cm; (b) plantlets after three months cultivated in the germination medium, bar = 2 cm; (c) plantlets derived from normal cotyledonary somatic embryos growing in the greenhouse, bar = 2 cm.
Figure 5.
Somatic embryos obtained per 0.08 g of embryonal masses submitted in different maturation temperatures (23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, after 12 weeks, 90, 30, 5 min, respectively). (a) Number of normal and abnormal somatic embryos; (b) the length and width of normal embryos from Pinus halepensis Mill. Different letters or numbers show significant differences according to the Tukey–Kramer test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 5.
Somatic embryos obtained per 0.08 g of embryonal masses submitted in different maturation temperatures (23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, after 12 weeks, 90, 30, 5 min, respectively). (a) Number of normal and abnormal somatic embryos; (b) the length and width of normal embryos from Pinus halepensis Mill. Different letters or numbers show significant differences according to the Tukey–Kramer test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 6.
Germination and acclimatization of somatic plantlets from Pinus halepensis Mill. obtained from different embryogenic cell lines and maturation temperatures. (a) Somatic plantlets after two months in germination medium, bar = 1 cm; (b) plantlets cultivated after three months in the germination medium, bar = 2 cm; (c) plantlets derived from normal cotyledonary somatic embryos growing in the greenhouse, bar = 5 cm.
Figure 6.
Germination and acclimatization of somatic plantlets from Pinus halepensis Mill. obtained from different embryogenic cell lines and maturation temperatures. (a) Somatic plantlets after two months in germination medium, bar = 1 cm; (b) plantlets cultivated after three months in the germination medium, bar = 2 cm; (c) plantlets derived from normal cotyledonary somatic embryos growing in the greenhouse, bar = 5 cm.
Figure 7.
Pinus radiata D.Don somatic plants: (a) showing needle epinasty and apical curvature at greenhouse temperature of 40 °C under irrigation or nonirrigated (left and right, respectively), bar = 6 cm; (b) plants not irrigated submitted to 40 and 23 °C in greenhouse (left and right, respectively), bar = 3 cm; (c) plants not irrigated submitted to 23 and 40 °C in greenhouse (left and right, respectively), after rewatering, bar = 6 cm.
Figure 7.
Pinus radiata D.Don somatic plants: (a) showing needle epinasty and apical curvature at greenhouse temperature of 40 °C under irrigation or nonirrigated (left and right, respectively), bar = 6 cm; (b) plants not irrigated submitted to 40 and 23 °C in greenhouse (left and right, respectively), bar = 3 cm; (c) plants not irrigated submitted to 23 and 40 °C in greenhouse (left and right, respectively), after rewatering, bar = 6 cm.
Figure 8.
Water potentials and gas exchange parameters in plants with greenhouse temperature (23 or 40 °C) under (UI) irrigation or no irrigation (NI) conditions (I) obtained from EMs of Pinus radiata D.Don submitted to different maturation temperatures (MT). (a) Leaf water potentials (Ψleaf) initial and final (applying of these treatments), (b) instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), (c) stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2 s−1), and (d) instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2 s−1). Different letters show significant differences by the Tukey–Kramer test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 8.
Water potentials and gas exchange parameters in plants with greenhouse temperature (23 or 40 °C) under (UI) irrigation or no irrigation (NI) conditions (I) obtained from EMs of Pinus radiata D.Don submitted to different maturation temperatures (MT). (a) Leaf water potentials (Ψleaf) initial and final (applying of these treatments), (b) instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), (c) stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2 s−1), and (d) instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2 s−1). Different letters show significant differences by the Tukey–Kramer test (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 1.
Analysis of deviance for the effect of different maturation temperatures in the number of normal (NNE) and abnormal somatic embryos (NAE) per 0.08 g of embryonal masses; the length (LE-mm) and width of normal embryos (WE-mm) of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Table 1.
Analysis of deviance for the effect of different maturation temperatures in the number of normal (NNE) and abnormal somatic embryos (NAE) per 0.08 g of embryonal masses; the length (LE-mm) and width of normal embryos (WE-mm) of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Source | df | NNE | NAE | LE | WE |
---|
x2 Test | p-Value | x2 Test | p-Value | x2Test | p-Value | x2 Test | p-Value |
---|
T | 3 | 34.69 | ≤0.05 * | 27.56 | ≤0.05 * | 0.04 | >0.05 ns | 0.09 | >0.05 ns |
Table 2.
Analysis of deviance for the effect of different maturation temperatures in the number of normal (NNE) and aberrant somatic embryos (NAE) per 0.08 g of embryonal masses; the length (LE-mm) and width of normal embryos (WE-mm) of Pinus halepensis Mill.
Table 2.
Analysis of deviance for the effect of different maturation temperatures in the number of normal (NNE) and aberrant somatic embryos (NAE) per 0.08 g of embryonal masses; the length (LE-mm) and width of normal embryos (WE-mm) of Pinus halepensis Mill.
Source | df | NNE | NAE | LE | WE |
---|
x2 Test | p-Value | x2 Test | p-Value | x2 Test | p-Value | x2 Test | p-Value |
---|
T | 3 | 21.15 | ≤0.05 * | 0.98 | >0.05 ns | 2.44 | ≤0.05 * | 0.17 | >0.05 ns |
Table 3.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the effect of different maturation temperatures (MT) and greenhouse temperatures (GT) on the initial and final water potential (Ψleaf initial and Ψleaf final, respectively) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don under irrigation and/or no irrigation conditions (I).
Table 3.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the effect of different maturation temperatures (MT) and greenhouse temperatures (GT) on the initial and final water potential (Ψleaf initial and Ψleaf final, respectively) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don under irrigation and/or no irrigation conditions (I).
ANOVA |
---|
Effect | df | Ψleaf initial |
MT | 3 | ≤0.05 * |
Effect | df | Ψleaf initial |
MT | 3 | ≤0.05 * |
GT | 1 | ≤0.05 * |
I | 1 | >0.05 ns |
MT × GT | 3 | >0.05 ns |
MT × I | 3 | >0.05 ns |
GT × I | 1 | >0.05 ns |
MT × GT × I | 3 | >0.05 ns |
Table 4.
ANOVA for the effect of different maturation temperatures (MT) in the instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1), and instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Table 4.
ANOVA for the effect of different maturation temperatures (MT) in the instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1), and instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
ANOVA Gas Exchange Initial |
---|
Effect | df | AN | gs | E |
---|
MT | 3 | >0.01 ns | >0.01 ns | >0.01 ns |
Table 5.
ANOVA for the effect of different maturation temperatures (MT), greenhouse temperature (GT), and irrigation or no irrigation conditions (I) in the instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1), and instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Table 5.
ANOVA for the effect of different maturation temperatures (MT), greenhouse temperature (GT), and irrigation or no irrigation conditions (I) in the instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1), and instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
ANOVA Gas Exchange Final |
---|
Effect | df | AN | gs | E |
---|
MT | 3 | ≤0.01 ** | ≤0.001 *** | ≤0.001 *** |
GT | 1 | >0.01 ns | ≤0.001 *** | ≤0.001 *** |
I | 1 | >0.01 ns | ≤0.01 ** | ≤0.01 ** |
MT × GT | 3 | ≤0.05 * | ≤0.001 *** | ≤0.001 *** |
MT × I | 3 | >0.01 ns | ≤0.01 ** | >0.01 ns |
GT × I | 1 | ≤0.01 ** | ≤0.001 *** | ≤0.001 *** |
MT × GT × I | 3 | ≤0.01 ** | ≤0.01 ** | >0.01 ns |
Table 6.
Effect of different maturation temperatures (MT-°C), greenhouse temperature (GT-°C), and irrigation (1) or no irrigation (2) conditions (I) on the instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Table 6.
Effect of different maturation temperatures (MT-°C), greenhouse temperature (GT-°C), and irrigation (1) or no irrigation (2) conditions (I) on the instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Effect (MT-GT-I) | AN | gs |
---|
40-40-1 | 14.89 a | 0.38 b,c |
60-40-2 | 14.79 a | 0.49 a |
50-40-1 | 14.04 a | 0.48 a,b |
40-23-2 | 13.97 a | 0.19 c,d |
23-23-2 | 13.82 a | 0.19 c,d |
60-23-1 | 13.46 a | 0.18 c,d |
60-23-2 | 12.52 a | 0.19 c,d |
60-40-1 | 11.40 a | 0.45 a,b |
40-23-1 | 11.35 a | 0.17 c,d |
23-23-1 | 11.24 a | 0.18 c,d |
50-23-2 | 10.24 a | 0.13 d |
50-23-1 | 8.78 a | 0.12 d |
23-40-1 | 8.54 a | 0.23 c,d |
40-40-2 | 8.39 a | 0.21 c,d |
23-40-2 | 7.44 b | 0.12 d |
50-40-2 | 6.90 b | 0.21 c,d |
Table 7.
Effect of different greenhouse temperatures (GT, °C) and irrigation (UI) or no irrigation (NI) conditions (I) in the instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2 s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Table 7.
Effect of different greenhouse temperatures (GT, °C) and irrigation (UI) or no irrigation (NI) conditions (I) in the instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2 s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Effect (GT (°C)-I) | E |
---|
40-UI | 7.19 a |
40-NI | 5.61 b |
23-NI | 4.26 b,c |
23-UI | 3.96 c |