Next Article in Journal
Forest, Foods, and Nutrition
Next Article in Special Issue
Transformation of American Chestnut (Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh) Using RITA® Temporary Immersion Bioreactors and We Vitro Containers
Previous Article in Journal
Estimates of Tree Canopy Closure and Basal Area as Proxies for Tree Crown Volume at a Stand Scale
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vegetative Propagation of Phytophthora cinnamomi-Tolerant Holm Oak Genotypes by Axillary Budding and Somatic Embryogenesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pinus spp. Somatic Embryo Conversion under High Temperature: Effect on the Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Plantlets

by
Antonia Maiara Marques do Nascimento
1,
Priscila Alves Barroso
2,
Naysa Flavia Ferreira do Nascimento
3,
Tomás Goicoa
4,5,
María Dolores Ugarte
4,5,
Itziar Aurora Montalbán
1,* and
Paloma Moncaleán
1,*
1
Departamento de Ciencias Forestales, Neiker-BRTA, 01080 Arkaute, Spain
2
Departamento de Agronomía, Campus Professora Cinobelina Elvas, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Bom Jesus, Piauí 64900-000, Brazil
3
Departamento de Fitotecnia e Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba 58397-000, Brazil
4
Departamento de Estadística, Informática y Matemáticas, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
5
INMAT2, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2020, 11(11), 1181; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111181
Submission received: 20 October 2020 / Revised: 4 November 2020 / Accepted: 5 November 2020 / Published: 8 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Tissue Culture in Plant Reproduction)

Abstract

:
Climatic variations in the current environmental scenario require plants with tolerance to sudden changes in temperature and a decrease in water availability. Accordingly, this tolerance will enable successful plantations and the maintenance of natural and planted forests. Consequently, in the last two decades, drought tolerance and high temperatures in conifers have been an important target for morphological, physiological, and epigenetic studies. Based on this, our research team has optimized different stages of somatic embryogenesis (SE) in Pinus spp. improving the success of the process. Through this method, we can obtain a large amount of clonal material and then analyze the somatic plants under different conditions ex vitro. The analysis of the morphological and physiological parameters in somatic embryos (ses) and plants with different tolerances to abiotic stress can provide us with valuable information about the mechanisms used by plants to survive under adverse environmental conditions. Thus, the objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of high temperatures (23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, after 12 weeks, 90, 30, 5 min, respectively) on the morphology of somatic embryos obtained from Pinus radiata D.Don (Radiata pine) and Pinus halepensis Mill. (Aleppo pine). In addition, we carried out a physiological evaluation of the somatic plants of P. radiata submitted to heat and water stress in a greenhouse. We observed that the number of somatic embryos was not affected by maturation temperatures in both species. Likewise, P. radiata plants obtained from these somatic embryos survived drought and heat stress in the greenhouse. In addition, plants originating from embryonal masses (EMs) subjected to high maturation temperature (40 and 60 °C) had a significant increase in gs and E. Therefore, it is possible to modulate the characteristics of somatic plants produced by the manipulation of environmental conditions during the process of SE.

1. Introduction

In the current climate change scenario, research is needed to enable plants to have greater water use efficiency in different environmental conditions [1] and to develop drought tolerance [2] and thermotolerance [3]. This thermotolerance can be achieved by changing the conditions in the different stages of somatic embryogenesis (SE) without it being necessary to enforce any change in the DNA, but only by allowing the formation of epigenetic memory [4,5].
Pinus halepensis is an important forest tree for reforestation in Mediterranean regions, because it has adapted to drought conditions with high temperatures [6,7]. On the other hand, Pinus radiata D. Don is a forest tree of economic importance due to the capacity it has for intensive use of its wood [8]. Preliminary studies with P. radiata species have reported that the high heat and drought tolerance in environments with climate variation is dependent on the ecotype [2,9]. The same observation has been made with Basque Country/Spain ecotypes, which are more sensitive to water stress compared to ecotypes from other parts of the world [2,9].
SE is a biotechnological tool which consists in the dedifferentiation of somatic cells and their subsequent cell re-differentiation in somatic embryos (ses), through genetic reprogramming [10]. Based on the morphogenetic response, SE is widely used to obtain large amounts of cloned material from elite material in response to an external stress stimulus [11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
In recent years, several studies have reported the influence of high temperature in the induction of SE in Pinus spp. [18,19,20,21]. In this regard, the effect of different temperatures applied in the initiation [4,19,20,21] and maturation [4,20,22,23] stages of SE process has been reported at 18, 23, or 28 °C. Recently, our research group has reported that somatic plants of P. radiata coming from EMs initiated at different temperatures have a different behavior in the greenhouse under water stress conditions [24].
Taking into account the abovementioned studies, in this work, we used higher maturation temperatures than those described in previous studies with P. radiata and P. halepensis. Thus, the objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of high temperatures (23 (control temperature), 40, 50, and 60 °C, after 12 weeks, 90, 30, 5 min, respectively) applied during the maturation stage of the SE in terms of both quantity and morphology of the ses obtained of P. radiata and P. halepensis. Moreover, we carried out a physiological evaluation of the obtained P. radiata plantlets subjected to heat and water stress in the greenhouse in order to test the possible improvement related to heat and water stress tolerance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experiment I

EMs obtained from immature female cones of P. radiata, were collected from four mother trees in a seed orchard established by Neiker-BRTA in Deba (Spain) and P. halepensis cones were collected from five mother trees in Berantevilla (Spain). The immature seeds were extracted and surface sterilized following Montalbán et al. [25]. Seed coats were removed and intact megagametophytes excised out aseptically were initiated and proliferated following the protocol described by Montalbán et al. for P. radiata [25] and for P. halepensis [26].
For P. radiata SE, the basal medium was Embryo Development Medium (EDM) (Duchefa Biochemie, Amsterdam, Netherlands) [27]. The maturation of EMs was performed following the protocol described by Montalbán et al. [28]. The EMs were briefly suspended in liquid basal medium devoiding plant growth regulators and then filtered on a filter paper in a Büchner funnel. Each filter paper, with 0.08 g of EMs, was placed in the corresponding maturation media. The basal medium was supplemented with 60 g L−1 of sucrose, 9 g L−1 of Gelrite® (Duchefa Biochemie, Amsterdam, Netherlands), 60 µM of abscisic acid (ABA), and the amino acid mixture of EDM medium used for initiation and proliferation (550 mg L−1 of L-glutamine, 525 mg L−1 of asparagine, 175 mg L−1 of arginine, 19.75 mg L−1 of citrulline, 19 mg L−1 of ornithine, 13.75 mg L−1 of lysine, 10 mg L−1 of alanine, and 8.75 mg L−1 of proline) [27].
For P. halepensis SE, the basal medium used was DCR medium (Duchefa Biochemie, Amsterdam, Netherlands) [29] supplemented with 75 µM of ABA, 60 g L−1 of sucrose, 9 g L−1 of Gelrite® and the amino acid mixture of the EDM medium. The maturation of the 0.08 g of EMs/ plate was carried out as described above.
The cultures were kept at different maturation temperatures (MT) (23 (control temperature), 40, 50, and 60 °C) during different incubation periods (12 weeks, 90, 30, 5 min, respectively). Based on previous studies, we observed that extreme temperatures cannot be applied over extended periods as the ECLs are killed. Once the different treatments had finished, all cultures were kept in darkness at 23 °C.
Germination and acclimatization of cotyledonary ses were performed according to Montalbán and Moncaleán [30].
Therefore, four different temperatures were tested in six established cell lines (ECLs) (R2, R9, R16, R49, R130, and R138 for P. radiata and H2, H23, H48, H60, H153, and H204 for P. halepensis), in a factorial design with eight repetitions (plates) per treatment and ECL. After 16 weeks from the beginning of the experiments, the number of normal mature somatic embryos (NNE) (for P. radiata and P. halepensis, Figure 1a,b, respectively) and abnormal somatic embryos (NAE) for P. radiata and P. halepensis, Figure 1c,d, respectively) per 0.08 g of EMs were counted. NAE displayed abnormal morphology, manifested by precocious germination, and in some cases by a lack of cotyledons [28]. Additionally, the length (LE) and width (WE) of 960 NNE was measured. After two months in germination medium, the percentage of the germination for the NNE was calculated.

2.2. Experiment II

Six-month-old radiata pine plants (Figure 2) were analyzed in October 2019. Twenty plants were used per MT; one fourth of each MT were randomly selected and submitted to the following four treatments: greenhouse temperature (GT) at 23 °C and under an irrigation rate of three times per week (UI); GT at 23 °C and without irrigation (NI); GT at 40 °C and UI; GT at 40 °C and NI. Irrigation conditions were maintained for two weeks, and GT at 40 °C two hours/day for five days.
Summarizing, in this analysis 16 treatments were considered for each species (four MT × two GT × two irrigation condition) in a factorial with five repetitions (plants), totaling 80 plants analyzed.
After two weeks from the beginning of the greenhouse experiments, plantlets from the greenhouse with a temperature at 23 °C with or without irrigation or with a greenhouse temperature at 40 °C with or without irrigation, started to present external symptoms of drought stress such as needle epinasty or apical curvature [9]. Subsequently, the leaf water status and gas exchange parameters were measured. The water potential (Ψleaf, MPa) of one needle per plant, was measured at predawn using a Scholander chamber (Skye SKPM 1400) and the pressure-equilibration technique [31].
The response of instant net photosynthesis (AN, µmol CO2 m−2s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1), and instant leaf transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2s−1) were quantified at midday with a LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System (Li-Cor Biosciences) equipped with the 6400-05 Clear Conifer Chamber (Li-Cor Biosciences).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

For experiment I, ECLs were considered as a block in the model to decrease variability. Deviance analysis was performed with the Χ2 test (p < 0.05) to assess the effect of temperature on the parameters studied. According to the data distribution, Poisson (NNE and NAE) or Gamma (LE and WE) distribution for P. radiata, and Poisson (NNE and NAE) and normal (LE and WE) were used for P. halepensis. The data were analyzed using R software®, version 3.6.1. [32] using the general linear model (glm) function.
To assess the effect of maturation temperature on the percentage of germinated NNE and the percentage of surviving plants, a logistic regression and the corresponding analysis of deviance was conducted. The cell line was included in the model to cope with variability. When required, a quasibinomial family was considered to deal with overdispersion.
For experiment II, an analysis of variance was conducted to assess the effects of MT, greenhouse temperature (GT), and irrigation condition (I) on water potential, instant net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and instant leaf transpiration. Full models with the complete interaction MT × GT × I were fitted.
After the analysis of variance was conducted, differences in means between treatment combinations were assessed using the Tukey post-hoc test (α = 0.05) adjusted for multiple comparisons.

3. Results

3.1. Experiment I

3.1.1. P. radiata

The application of high temperatures caused statistically significant differences for the NNE and NAE (Table 1). However, the application of high temperature was not statistically significant for the LE and WE (Table 1).
There was a tendency to increase the NNE (Figure 3a) and the NAE (Figure 3a) from MT 23 °C to MT 50 °C, and the NNE decreased significantly at 60 °C.
Although nonsignificant differences were found between MT for LE and WE (Table 1), a similar trend was observed for NNE and NAE. The highest LE and WE were recorded in ses from MT 40 (3.03 mm for LE and 1.49 for WE) and 23 °C; the 50 °C treatment showed intermediate values and treatment at 60 °C presented the lowest (2.92 mm for LE and 1.42 mm for WE). We also observed that the longest embryos were also the widest (Figure 3b).
The application of high temperature was not statistically significant for the germination of ses and the survival percentage of somatic plants in the greenhouse (44%, 51%, 46%, and 51% for 23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, respectively). However, plantlets were obtained from all the tested maturation treatments (63%, 55%, 60%, and 63% from temperatures 23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, respectively) (Figure 4a,b) and a total of 614 plantlets were acclimated in a greenhouse (Figure 4c).

3.1.2. P. halepensis

Maturation temperature affected significantly the NNE and LE. On the contrary, MT was not statistically significant for the NAE and WE (Table 2).
Unlike in radiata pine, the increase in the MT from 23 to 40 °C did not promote an increase in NNE, but a decrease in their production was observed (Figure 5a). On the other hand, no significant differences were found between the control MT (23 °C) and temperatures of 50 or 60 °C (Figure 5a).
Although no significant differences were detected between MT for the NAE (Table 2) (Figure 5a), the MT 50 °C promoted a significant increase in LE when compared to 60 °C, whereas MT 23 and 40 °C led to intermediate values (Figure 5b). A similar tendency was observed in WE, but in this case no significant differences were found between MT (Figure 5b).
In total, 262 viable plantlets were obtained in this experiment (Figure 6c). The application of high temperature was not statistically significant for the germination percentage of ses and the survival of somatic plants in the greenhouse (22%, 30%, 24%, and 34% for 23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, respectively). Furthermore, in all ECLs and MTs, a high acclimatization rate was obtained (91.82%, 92.61%, 98.08%, and 88.91% from temperatures of 23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, respectively).

3.2. Experiment II

Water Potential and Gas Exchange Parameters

Plants coming from all treatments applied during the maturation stage survived after the drought and thermic stress in the greenhouse (Figure 7). Significant differences were observed for the effect of MT on the initial and final evaluation of water potential in plants subjected to different stress conditions (Table 3); but in the first evaluation no significant differences were observed for gas exchange parameters (Table 3).
Statistically significant differences were also found for GT for the final assessment of water potential (Table 3). At the end of the experiment, water potential in plants at GT of 23 °C was significantly lower (−0.3 MPa) than Ψleaf final in plants at GT of 40 °C (−0.26 MPa) by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). This implies that plants originating from EMs subjected to different MTs had a tolerance to heat stress in the greenhouse, as plants exposed to GT of 40 °C were more hydrated compared to plants exposed to GT of 23 °C. The irrigation regime did not show significant differences for this parameter.
A decrease in water potential was observed in plants from ECLs matured in MTs of 23 °C (Figure 8a). Similarly, the same pattern of decline was observed when assessing water potential after water and heat stress conditions, which in turn was less than the initial water potential (Figure 8a). For this characteristic, the data fit the model with a determination coefficient above 98% (R2 = 0.98).
In the first evaluation, there were no significant statistical differences for AN, gs, and E (Table 4). By contrast, in the second evaluation, the AN presented significant statistical differences for the effects MT, MT × GT, GT × I, and in the triple interaction MT × GT × I (Table 5). Stomatal conductance was statistically significant for all the factors and instant transpiration was statistically significant for all the factors assessed, except MT × I and the triple interaction (Table 5).
As we can see in Table 6, the relative effect of heat and water stress did not induce statistically significant differences in instantaneous liquid photosynthesis between any treatments, except those plants originating from ECLs submitted to maturation temperatures of 23 and 50 °C (Figure 8b).
However, plants have greater variability with statistically significant differences in stomatal conductance (Table 6). In addition, the plants that maintained higher stomatal conductance compared to those under stress conditions or otherwise, were plants originating from ECLs exposed to high maturation temperatures (0.49 mmol H2O m−2s−1 by 60 °C) (Figure 8c) (Table 6).
At the end of the experiment, under high temperature conditions in a greenhouse, we observed a significantly increase in the instant transpiration in plants originating from ECLs subjected to MT at 60 °C, followed by 50 and 40 °C. We also observed that this increase was greater under conditions of heat stress than in nonstressed plants (Figure 8d). This parameter also showed statistically significant differences in plants growing in the greenhouse at 40 °C under irrigation, with an increase in transpiration in this cultivation condition (Table 7).

4. Discussion

The formation of somatic embryos is affected by several factors, such the genetic background and the cultivation conditions [33,34]. In this study, the same ECLs (five for each species), were subjected to different maturation treatments, in order to try to minimize the genetic impact on the results obtained. In our experiments we observed that, in both species, embryos were formed with normal and abnormal morphologies. Merino et al. [35] in Scots pine attributed the formation of ses with normal and abnormal morphology to the difference of transcripts in embryogenic cells. However, the increase in temperature did not significantly promote the formation of abnormal embryos.
In this work we observed that the NNE was not affected by high temperatures applied at the beginning of maturation stage in P. radiata, except in P. halepensis in which we observed a reduction in NNE in at 50 °C. Kvaalen and Johnsen [22] and García-Mendiguren et al. [18], when working with Picea abies and P. radiata, respectively, also reported an increase in the number of embryos obtained when high temperatures were applied in the initiation stage. In contrast, Arrillaga et al. [20], in proliferation and maturation stages Pinus pinaster SE showed that control temperature (23 °C) provoked the best results in terms of the number of embryos developed.
Castander-Olarieta et al. [21] in P. radiata showed that somatic embryos originating from EMs initiated at 50 °C for 30 min had a higher LE. This is in agreement with our results for Aleppo pine where the longest embryos were found at this temperature.
The germination mechanism of cotyledonary somatic embryos is complex and an alternative in this case are studies with post-maturation treatments [36], because in P. halepensis (22%, 30%, 24%, and 34% for 23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, respectively) we observed a low percentage rate of germination compared to P. radiata (44%, 51%, 46%, and 51% for 23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, respectively).
Stresses applied to EMs in late SE stages, besides inducing different responses between species of conifers, can also guarantee an improvement in the germination of cotyledonary somatic embryos [37]. The germination rate changes according to species and treatments. This result was also described in other conifer species [20,38,39]. In this work, we observed that the high MTs did not affect either the germination of ses or the acclimatization of plants in both species of Pinus.
The conditions of cultivation during the maturation stage in the SE are crucial for the regeneration of the somatic embryos in quality plantlets with an ex vitro survival capacity [40]. We obtained the highest acclimatization (≤88.91%) independently of the line or temperature for P. halepensis in relation to P. radiata (ranging from 55.84% to 63.47% for temperature). The maturation of EMs in ses and their subsequent conversion to plants, in both species, prove the tolerance of these EMs to high temperatures.
The pressures exerted by high temperatures and drought affect numerous defense mechanisms in plants [41], such as changes in photosynthetic machinery [42]. This can happen at an embryogenic level with the formation of an epigenetic memory [4] even at the plant level. In this work, we observed that the different MTs applied to EMs promoted ses without significant physical anomalies. However, P. radiata plants originated from these treatments responded physiologically in different ways (Figure 8) when they were subjected to drought and heat stress in the greenhouse.
Taiz and Zeiger [43] reported that water stress significantly affects stomatal conductance more than photosynthesis, corroborating our results (Table 6). In addition, we also observed that E was affected by heat and water stress (Figure 8d and Table 7).
It is possible that plants originating from ECLs subjected to high temperatures in the maturation stage have developed epigenetic mechanisms that allowed a better response to stress [44], since the plants maintained or adapted their water and gas exchange potential to adverse temperature conditions and water stress to which they were subjected (Figure 8).
In this work, plants from all MT submitted to GT of 23 °C showed a similar behavior for gs and E. However, when subjected to heat stress (40 °C), plants originating from EMs subjected to high MTs (40 and 60 °C) had a significant increase in gs and E, reinforcing once again the possibility of “priming” in ECLs subjected to high temperatures. In natural conditions, similar behavior is observed in the apical meristem of plants, which is the center of the morphogenesis of the aerial part and is in constant cell division. The environmental restrictions, for example, heat and drought, perceived by these meristematic regions, trigger changes in the epigenetic state of the plants, developing a memory which, when under stress conditions again, enables the plants to have better tolerance [45].
In conclusion, it is possible to modulate the tolerance to stress by applying high temperatures during the final stages of the embryogenic process. Future experiments will be carried out to analyze methylation, physiological and biochemical aspects in one-year old plants to assess whether the plant characteristics endure over time.

5. Conclusions

P. radiata and P. halepensis EMs produced ses at high maturation temperatures. High maturation temperatures compared to the control temperature (23 °C) did not affect the morphological characteristics of the embryos obtained, except for the LE in both species, and WE in P. halepensis. The plants obtained from these somatic embryos survived drought and heat stresses in the greenhouse. Moreover, plants originated from EMs submitted to a maturation temperature of 40 and 60 °C, presented better adaptation to drought and heat stress based on the water potential and gas exchange parameters analyzed in this experiment. Studies will be carried out to characterize possible epigenetic marks in the obtained plants caused by heat stress applied during the embryogenic process and drought and heat stress applied in plants in greenhouses.

Author Contributions

P.M. and I.A.M. conceived and planned the experiments. A.M.M.d.N. performed the experiments. P.A.B., N.F.F.d.N., T.G. and M.D.U. carried out the statistical analyses. A.M.M.d.N. wrote the manuscript and all authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by MINECO (Spanish Government) project (AGL2016-76143-C4-3R), CYTED (P117RT0522), and MINECO (BES-2017-081249, “Ayudas para contratos predoctorales para la formación de doctores”). MULTIFOREVER (Project MULTIFOREVER) is supported under the umbrella of ERA-NET cofund Forest Value by ANR (FR), FNR (DE), MINCyT (AR), MINECO-AEI (ES), MMM (FI), and VINNOVA (SE). Forest value has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programmed under agreement No 773324.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ABA, abscisic acid; AN, instant net photosynthesis; E, instant leaf transpiration; ECLs, established cell lines; EDM, Embryo Development Medium; EMs, embryonal masses; gS, stomatal conductance; GT, greenhouse’s temperature; I, irrigation condition; LE, length of somatic embryo; MT, maturation temperatures; NAE, abnormal somatic embryos; NI, without irrigation; NNE, number of normal mature somatic embryos; SE, somatic embryogenesis; ses, somatic embryos; UI, under irrigation; WE, width of somatic embryo; Ψleaf, water potential.

References

  1. Pareek, A.; Dhankher, O.P.; Foyer, C.H. Mitigating the impact of climate change on plant productivity and ecosystem sustainability. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. De Diego, N.; Saiz-Fernández, I.; Rodríguez, J.L.; Pérez-Alfocea, P.; Sampedro, M.C.; Barrio, R.J.; Lacuesta, M.; Moncaleán, P. Metabolites and hormones are involved in the intraspecific variability of drought hardening in radiata pine. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 188, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Priya, M.; Sharma, L.; Kaur, R.; Bindumadhava, H.; Nair, R.M.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Nayyar, H. Gaba (γ-aminobutyric acid), as a thermo-protectant, to improve the reproductive function of heat-stressed mungbean plants. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Yakovlev, I.A.; Carneros, E.; Lee, Y.; Olsen, J.E.; Fossdal, C.G. Transcriptional profiling of epigenetic regulators in somatic embryos during temperature induced formation of an epigenetic memory in norway spruce. Planta 2016, 243, 1237–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Taïbi, K.; del Campo, A.D.; Vilagrosa, A.; Bellés, J.M.; López-Gresa, M.P.; Pla, D.; Calvete, J.J.; López-Nicolás, J.M.; Mulet, J.M. Drought tolerance in Pinus halepensis seed sources as identified by distinctive physiological and molecular markers. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gazol, A.; Ribas, M.; Gutiérrez, E.; Camarero, J.J. Aleppo pine forests from across Spain show drought-induced growth decline and partial recovery. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2017, 232, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Manrique-Alba, À.; Beguería, S.; Molina, A.J.; González-Sanchis, M.; Tomàs-Burguera, M.; del Campo, A.D.; Colangelo, M.; Camarero, J.J. Long-term thinning effects on tree growth, drought response and water use efficiency at two aleppo pine plantations in Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 138536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fuentes-Sepúlveda, R.; García-Herrera, C.; Vasco, D.A.; Salinas-Lira, C.; Ananías, R.A. Heat characterization of pinus radiata wood vacuum-impregnated with octadecane. Energies 2020, 13, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. De Diego, N.; Pérez-Alfocea, F.; Cantero, E.; Lacuesta, M.; Moncaleán, P. Physiological response to drought in radiata pine: Phytohormone implication at leaf level. Tree Physiol. 2012, 32, 435–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Fehér, A. Somatic embryogenesis—Stress-induced remodeling of plant cell fate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gene Regul. Mech. 2015, 1849, 385–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Castander-Olarieta, A.; Pereira, C.; Montalbán, I.A.; Canhoto, J.; Moncaleán, P. Stress modulation in Pinus spp. Somatic embryogenesis as model for climate change mitigation: Stress is not always a problem. In Agricultural, Forestry and Bioindustry Biotechnology and Biodiscovery; Chong, P.A., Newman, D.J., Steinmacher, D.A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 117–130. [Google Scholar]
  12. Raza, G.; Singh, M.B.; Bhalla, P.L. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from commercial soybean cultivars. Plants 2020, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Almeida, R.F.; Meira, F.S.; Gomes, H.T.; Balzon, T.A.; Bartos, P.M.C.; Meira, R.d.O.; da Cunha, R.N.V.; Lopes, R.; Mehta, A.; Scherwinski-Pereira, J.E. Capacity for somatic embryogenesis of adult oil palm genitors (Elaeis guineensis, var. Pisifera) from immature leaf tissues. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 131, 229–239. [Google Scholar]
  14. Arnholdt-Schmitt, B.; Ragonezi, C.; Cardoso, H. Do mitochondria play a central role in stress-induced somatic embryogenesis? In Vitro Embryogenesis in Higher Plants; Germana, M.A., Lambardi, M., Eds.; Springer New York: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 87–100. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pires, R.; Cardoso, H.; Ribeiro, A.; Peixe, A.; Cordeiro, A. Somatic embryogenesis from mature embryos of Olea europaea l. Cv. ‘Galega vulgar’ and long-term management of calli morphogenic capacity. Plants 2020, 9, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, F.; Peng, C.; Wang, H.; Shen, H.; Yang, L. Selection of culture conditions for callus induction and proliferation by somatic embryogenesis of Pinus koraiensis. J. For. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maruyama, T.E.; Ueno, S.; Hirayama, S.; Kaneeda, T.; Moriguchi, Y. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from sugi (japanese cedar, Cryptomeria japonica d. Don, Cupressaceae) seed families by marker assisted selection for the male sterility allele ms1. Plants 2020, 9, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. García-Mendiguren, O.; Montalbán, I.A.; Goicoa, T.; Ugarte, M.D.; Moncaleán, P. Environmental conditions at the initial stages of Pinus radiata somatic embryogenesis affect the production of somatic embryos. Trees 2016, 30, 949–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pereira, C.; Montalbán, I.A.; Goicoa, T.; Ugarte, M.D.; Correia, S.; Canhoto, J.M.; Moncaleán, P. Short communication: The effect of changing temperature and agar concentration at proliferation stage in the final success of aleppo pine somatic embryogenesis. For. Syst. 2018, 26, eSC05. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Arrillaga, I.; Morcillo, M.; Zanón, I.; Lario, F.; Segura, J.; Sales, E. New approaches to optimize somatic embryogenesis in maritime pine. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Castander-Olarieta, A.; Montalbán, I.A.; De Medeiros Oliveira, E.; Dell’Aversana, E.; D’Amelia, L.; Carillo, P.; Steiner, N.; Fraga, H.P.D.F.; Guerra, M.P.; Goicoa, T.; et al. Effect of heat stress on tissue ultrastructure and metabolite profiles during initiation of radiata pine somatic embryogenesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kvaalen, H.; Johnsen, Ø. Timing of bud set in Picea abies is regulated by a memory of temperature during zygotic and somatic embryogenesis. New Phytol. 2008, 177, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moncaleán, P.; García-Mendiguren, O.; Novák, O.; Strnad, M.; Goicoa, T.; Ugarte, M.D.; Montalbán, I.A. Temperature and water availability during maturation affect the cytokinins and auxins profile of radiata pine somatic embryos. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Castander-Olarieta, A.; Moncaleán, P.; Pereira, C.; Pěnčík, A.; Petřík, I.; Pavlović, I.; Novák, O.; Strnad, M.; Goicoa, T.; Ugarte, M.D.; et al. Cytokinins are involved in drought tolerance of Pinus radiata plants originating from embryonal masses induced at high temperatures. Tree Physiol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Montalbán, I.A.; De Diego, N.; Moncaleán, P. Enhancing initiation and proliferation in radiata pine (Pinus radiata d. Don) somatic embryogenesis through seed family screening, zygotic embryo staging and media adjustments. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2012, 34, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Montalbán, I.A.; Setién-Olarra, A.; Hargreaves, C.L.; Moncaleán, P. Somatic embryogenesis in Pinus halepensis mill.: An important ecological species from the mediterranean forest. Trees 2013, 27, 1339–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Walter, C.; Find, J.I.; Grace, L.J. Somatic embryogenesis and genetic transformation in Pinus radiata. In Protocol for Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants; Jain, S.M., Gupta, P.K., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 11–24. [Google Scholar]
  28. Montalbán, I.A.; De Diego, N.; Moncaleán, P. Bottlenecks in Pinus radiata somatic embryogenesis: Improving maturation and germination. Trees 2010, 24, 1061–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gupta, P.K.; Durzan, D.J. Shoot multiplication from mature trees of douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana). Plant Cell Rep. 1985, 4, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Montalbán, I.A.; Moncaleán, P. Rooting of Pinus radiata somatic embryos: Factors involved in the success of the process. J. For. Res. 2019, 30, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Scholander, P.F.; Bradstreet, E.D.; Hemmingsen, E.A.; Hammel, H.T. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 1965, 148, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  33. Breton, D.; Harvengt, L.; Trontin, J.-F.; Bouvet, A.; Favre, J.-M. High subculture frequency, maltose-based and hormone-free medium sustained early development of somatic embryos in maritime pine. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2005, 41, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lelu-Walter, M.-A.; Bernier-Cardou, M.; Klimaszewska, K. Simplified and improved somatic embryogenesis for clonal propagation of Pinus pinaster (ait.). Plant Cell Rep. 2006, 25, 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Merino, I.; Abrahamsson, M.; Larsson, E.; von Arnold, S. Identification of molecular processes that differ among scots pine somatic embryogenic cell lines leading to the development of normal or abnormal cotyledonary embryos. Tree Genet. Genomes 2018, 14, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Maruyama, T.E.; Hosoi, Y. Post-maturation treatment improves and synchronizes somatic embryo germination of three species of japanese pines. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2012, 110, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stasolla, C.; Yeung, E.C. Recent advances in conifer somatic embryogenesis: Improving somatic embryo quality. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2003, 74, 15–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Niskanen, A.-M.; Lu, J.; Seitz, S.; Keinonen, K.; Von Weissenberg, K.; Pappinen, A. Effect of parent genotype on somatic embryogenesis in scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Tree Physiol. 2004, 24, 1259–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Carneros, E.; Celestino, C.; Klimaszewska, K.; Park, Y.S.; Toribio, M.; Bonga, J.M. Plant regeneration in stone pine (Pinus pinea l.) by somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2009, 98, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, F.; Xia, X.-R.; Ke, X.; Ye, J.; Zhu, L.-H. Somatic embryogenesis in slash pine (Pinus elliottii engelm): Improving initiation of embryogenic tissues and maturation of somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2020, 143, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gratkowska-Zmuda, D.M.; Kubala, S.; Sarnowska, E.; Cwiek, P.; Oksinska, P.; Steciuk, J.; Rolicka, A.T.; Zaborowska, M.; Bucior, E.; Maassen, A.; et al. The swi/snf atp-dependent chromatin remodeling complex in arabidopsis responds to environmental changes in temperature-dependent manner. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Johnová, P.; Skalák, J.; Saiz-Fernández, I.; Brzobohatý, B. Plant responses to ambient temperature fluctuations and water-limiting conditions: A proteome-wide perspective. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Proteins Proteom. 2016, 1864, 916–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E. Stress physiology (chapter 25). In Plant Physiology; Sinauer Associates Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2010; pp. 591–623. [Google Scholar]
  44. Correia, B.; Valledor, L.; Meijón, M.; Rodriguez, J.L.; Dias, M.C.; Santos, C.; Cañal, M.J.; Rodriguez, R.; Pinto, G. Is the interplay between epigenetic markers related to the acclimation of cork oak plants to high temperatures? PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Sow, M.D.; Allona, I.; Ambroise, C.; Conde, D.; Fichot, R.; Gribkova, S.; Jorge, V.; Le-Provost, G.; Pâques, L.; Plomion, C.; et al. Chapter twelve—Epigenetics in forest trees: State of the art and potential implications for breeding and management in a context of climate change. In Advances in Botanical Research; Mirouze, M., Bucher, E., Gallusci, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; Volume 88, pp. 387–453. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Somatic embryos showing distinct morphologies: (a) normal somatic embryo (NNE) for Pinus radiata D.Don; (b) normal somatic embryo (NNE) for Pinus halepensis Mill.; (c) abnormal somatic embryo (NAE) for P. radiata; (d) abnormal somatic embryo (NAE) for P. halepensis, bar = 2 mm.
Figure 1. Somatic embryos showing distinct morphologies: (a) normal somatic embryo (NNE) for Pinus radiata D.Don; (b) normal somatic embryo (NNE) for Pinus halepensis Mill.; (c) abnormal somatic embryo (NAE) for P. radiata; (d) abnormal somatic embryo (NAE) for P. halepensis, bar = 2 mm.
Forests 11 01181 g001
Figure 2. Pinus radiata D.Don plantlets obtained from embryonal masses maturated at high temperatures during the hardening stage in the greenhouse, bar = 8 cm.
Figure 2. Pinus radiata D.Don plantlets obtained from embryonal masses maturated at high temperatures during the hardening stage in the greenhouse, bar = 8 cm.
Forests 11 01181 g002
Figure 3. Somatic embryos obtained per 0.08 g of embryonal masses submitted in different maturation temperatures (23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, after 12 weeks, 90, 30, 5 min, respectively). (a) Number of normal and abnormal somatic embryos; (b) the length and width of Pinus radiata D.Don normal embryos. Different letters or numbers show significant differences by the Tukey–Kramer test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3. Somatic embryos obtained per 0.08 g of embryonal masses submitted in different maturation temperatures (23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, after 12 weeks, 90, 30, 5 min, respectively). (a) Number of normal and abnormal somatic embryos; (b) the length and width of Pinus radiata D.Don normal embryos. Different letters or numbers show significant differences by the Tukey–Kramer test (p ≤ 0.05).
Forests 11 01181 g003
Figure 4. Germination and acclimatization of somatic plantlets from P. radiata obtained from different embryogenic cell lines and maturation temperatures. (a) Plantlets after two months in germination medium, bar = 1 cm; (b) plantlets after three months cultivated in the germination medium, bar = 2 cm; (c) plantlets derived from normal cotyledonary somatic embryos growing in the greenhouse, bar = 2 cm.
Figure 4. Germination and acclimatization of somatic plantlets from P. radiata obtained from different embryogenic cell lines and maturation temperatures. (a) Plantlets after two months in germination medium, bar = 1 cm; (b) plantlets after three months cultivated in the germination medium, bar = 2 cm; (c) plantlets derived from normal cotyledonary somatic embryos growing in the greenhouse, bar = 2 cm.
Forests 11 01181 g004
Figure 5. Somatic embryos obtained per 0.08 g of embryonal masses submitted in different maturation temperatures (23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, after 12 weeks, 90, 30, 5 min, respectively). (a) Number of normal and abnormal somatic embryos; (b) the length and width of normal embryos from Pinus halepensis Mill. Different letters or numbers show significant differences according to the Tukey–Kramer test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 5. Somatic embryos obtained per 0.08 g of embryonal masses submitted in different maturation temperatures (23, 40, 50, and 60 °C, after 12 weeks, 90, 30, 5 min, respectively). (a) Number of normal and abnormal somatic embryos; (b) the length and width of normal embryos from Pinus halepensis Mill. Different letters or numbers show significant differences according to the Tukey–Kramer test (p ≤ 0.05).
Forests 11 01181 g005
Figure 6. Germination and acclimatization of somatic plantlets from Pinus halepensis Mill. obtained from different embryogenic cell lines and maturation temperatures. (a) Somatic plantlets after two months in germination medium, bar = 1 cm; (b) plantlets cultivated after three months in the germination medium, bar = 2 cm; (c) plantlets derived from normal cotyledonary somatic embryos growing in the greenhouse, bar = 5 cm.
Figure 6. Germination and acclimatization of somatic plantlets from Pinus halepensis Mill. obtained from different embryogenic cell lines and maturation temperatures. (a) Somatic plantlets after two months in germination medium, bar = 1 cm; (b) plantlets cultivated after three months in the germination medium, bar = 2 cm; (c) plantlets derived from normal cotyledonary somatic embryos growing in the greenhouse, bar = 5 cm.
Forests 11 01181 g006
Figure 7. Pinus radiata D.Don somatic plants: (a) showing needle epinasty and apical curvature at greenhouse temperature of 40 °C under irrigation or nonirrigated (left and right, respectively), bar = 6 cm; (b) plants not irrigated submitted to 40 and 23 °C in greenhouse (left and right, respectively), bar = 3 cm; (c) plants not irrigated submitted to 23 and 40 °C in greenhouse (left and right, respectively), after rewatering, bar = 6 cm.
Figure 7. Pinus radiata D.Don somatic plants: (a) showing needle epinasty and apical curvature at greenhouse temperature of 40 °C under irrigation or nonirrigated (left and right, respectively), bar = 6 cm; (b) plants not irrigated submitted to 40 and 23 °C in greenhouse (left and right, respectively), bar = 3 cm; (c) plants not irrigated submitted to 23 and 40 °C in greenhouse (left and right, respectively), after rewatering, bar = 6 cm.
Forests 11 01181 g007
Figure 8. Water potentials and gas exchange parameters in plants with greenhouse temperature (23 or 40 °C) under (UI) irrigation or no irrigation (NI) conditions (I) obtained from EMs of Pinus radiata D.Don submitted to different maturation temperatures (MT). (a) Leaf water potentials (Ψleaf) initial and final (applying of these treatments), (b) instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), (c) stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2 s−1), and (d) instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2 s−1). Different letters show significant differences by the Tukey–Kramer test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 8. Water potentials and gas exchange parameters in plants with greenhouse temperature (23 or 40 °C) under (UI) irrigation or no irrigation (NI) conditions (I) obtained from EMs of Pinus radiata D.Don submitted to different maturation temperatures (MT). (a) Leaf water potentials (Ψleaf) initial and final (applying of these treatments), (b) instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), (c) stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2 s−1), and (d) instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2 s−1). Different letters show significant differences by the Tukey–Kramer test (p ≤ 0.05).
Forests 11 01181 g008
Table 1. Analysis of deviance for the effect of different maturation temperatures in the number of normal (NNE) and abnormal somatic embryos (NAE) per 0.08 g of embryonal masses; the length (LE-mm) and width of normal embryos (WE-mm) of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Table 1. Analysis of deviance for the effect of different maturation temperatures in the number of normal (NNE) and abnormal somatic embryos (NAE) per 0.08 g of embryonal masses; the length (LE-mm) and width of normal embryos (WE-mm) of Pinus radiata D.Don.
SourcedfNNENAELEWE
x2 Testp-Valuex2 Testp-Valuex2Testp-Valuex2 Testp-Value
T334.69≤0.05 *27.56≤0.05 *0.04>0.05 ns0.09>0.05 ns
* Significant differences at p ≤ 0.05; ns nonsignificant; df—degrees of freedom.
Table 2. Analysis of deviance for the effect of different maturation temperatures in the number of normal (NNE) and aberrant somatic embryos (NAE) per 0.08 g of embryonal masses; the length (LE-mm) and width of normal embryos (WE-mm) of Pinus halepensis Mill.
Table 2. Analysis of deviance for the effect of different maturation temperatures in the number of normal (NNE) and aberrant somatic embryos (NAE) per 0.08 g of embryonal masses; the length (LE-mm) and width of normal embryos (WE-mm) of Pinus halepensis Mill.
SourcedfNNENAELEWE
x2 Testp-Valuex2 Testp-Valuex2 Testp-Valuex2 Testp-Value
T321.15≤0.05 *0.98>0.05 ns2.44≤0.05 *0.17>0.05 ns
* Significant differences at p ≤ 0.05; ns nonsignificant; df—degrees of freedom.
Table 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the effect of different maturation temperatures (MT) and greenhouse temperatures (GT) on the initial and final water potential (Ψleaf initial and Ψleaf final, respectively) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don under irrigation and/or no irrigation conditions (I).
Table 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the effect of different maturation temperatures (MT) and greenhouse temperatures (GT) on the initial and final water potential (Ψleaf initial and Ψleaf final, respectively) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don under irrigation and/or no irrigation conditions (I).
ANOVA
EffectdfΨleaf initial
MT3≤0.05 *
EffectdfΨleaf initial
MT3≤0.05 *
GT1≤0.05 *
I1>0.05 ns
MT × GT3>0.05 ns
MT × I3>0.05 ns
GT × I1>0.05 ns
MT × GT × I3>0.05 ns
* Significant differences at p ≤ 0.05; ns nonsignificant at p ≤ 0.05; df—degrees of freedom.
Table 4. ANOVA for the effect of different maturation temperatures (MT) in the instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1), and instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Table 4. ANOVA for the effect of different maturation temperatures (MT) in the instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1), and instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
ANOVA Gas Exchange Initial
EffectdfANgsE
MT3>0.01 ns>0.01 ns>0.01 ns
ns nonsignificant at p ≤ 0.05; df—degrees of freedom.
Table 5. ANOVA for the effect of different maturation temperatures (MT), greenhouse temperature (GT), and irrigation or no irrigation conditions (I) in the instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1), and instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Table 5. ANOVA for the effect of different maturation temperatures (MT), greenhouse temperature (GT), and irrigation or no irrigation conditions (I) in the instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1), and instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
ANOVA Gas Exchange Final
EffectdfANgsE
MT3≤0.01 **≤0.001 ***≤0.001 ***
GT1>0.01 ns≤0.001 ***≤0.001 ***
I1>0.01 ns≤0.01 **≤0.01 **
MT × GT3≤0.05 *≤0.001 ***≤0.001 ***
MT × I3>0.01 ns≤0.01 **>0.01 ns
GT × I1≤0.01 **≤0.001 ***≤0.001 ***
MT × GT × I3≤0.01 **≤0.01 **>0.01 ns
*; **; *** Significant differences at p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01, or p ≤ 0.001, respectively; ns nonsignificant at p ≤ 0.01; df—degrees of freedom.
Table 6. Effect of different maturation temperatures (MT-°C), greenhouse temperature (GT-°C), and irrigation (1) or no irrigation (2) conditions (I) on the instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Table 6. Effect of different maturation temperatures (MT-°C), greenhouse temperature (GT-°C), and irrigation (1) or no irrigation (2) conditions (I) on the instantaneous net photosynthesis (AN, μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mmol H2O m−2s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Effect (MT-GT-I)ANgs
40-40-114.89 a0.38 b,c
60-40-214.79 a0.49 a
50-40-114.04 a0.48 a,b
40-23-213.97 a0.19 c,d
23-23-213.82 a0.19 c,d
60-23-113.46 a0.18 c,d
60-23-212.52 a0.19 c,d
60-40-111.40 a0.45 a,b
40-23-111.35 a0.17 c,d
23-23-111.24 a0.18 c,d
50-23-210.24 a0.13 d
50-23-18.78 a0.12 d
23-40-18.54 a0.23 c,d
40-40-28.39 a0.21 c,d
23-40-27.44 b0.12 d
50-40-26.90 b0.21 c,d
Different letters within a column show significant differences in the means observed by Tukey–Kramer’s post hoc test (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 7. Effect of different greenhouse temperatures (GT, °C) and irrigation (UI) or no irrigation (NI) conditions (I) in the instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2 s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Table 7. Effect of different greenhouse temperatures (GT, °C) and irrigation (UI) or no irrigation (NI) conditions (I) in the instant transpiration (E, mmol H2O m−2 s−1) in plants of Pinus radiata D.Don.
Effect (GT (°C)-I)E
40-UI7.19 a
40-NI5.61 b
23-NI4.26 b,c
23-UI3.96 c
Different letters show significant differences in the means observed by Tukey–Kramer’s post hoc test (p ≤ 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nascimento, A.M.M.d.; Barroso, P.A.; Nascimento, N.F.F.d.; Goicoa, T.; Ugarte, M.D.; Montalbán, I.A.; Moncaleán, P. Pinus spp. Somatic Embryo Conversion under High Temperature: Effect on the Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Plantlets. Forests 2020, 11, 1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111181

AMA Style

Nascimento AMMd, Barroso PA, Nascimento NFFd, Goicoa T, Ugarte MD, Montalbán IA, Moncaleán P. Pinus spp. Somatic Embryo Conversion under High Temperature: Effect on the Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Plantlets. Forests. 2020; 11(11):1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111181

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nascimento, Antonia Maiara Marques do, Priscila Alves Barroso, Naysa Flavia Ferreira do Nascimento, Tomás Goicoa, María Dolores Ugarte, Itziar Aurora Montalbán, and Paloma Moncaleán. 2020. "Pinus spp. Somatic Embryo Conversion under High Temperature: Effect on the Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Plantlets" Forests 11, no. 11: 1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111181

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop