Next Article in Journal
Pollen Morphology and Variability of Abies alba Mill. Genotypes from South-Western Poland
Next Article in Special Issue
Establishment of a Genetically Diverse, Disease-Resistant Acacia koa A. Gray Seed Orchard in Kokee, Kauai: Early Growth, Form, and Survival
Previous Article in Journal
Collembolan Assemblages Response to Wild Boars (Sus scrofa L.) Rooting in Pine Forest Soil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interaction of Biochar Type and Rhizobia Inoculation Increases the Growth and Biological Nitrogen Fixation of Robinia pseudoacacia Seedlings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nursery Cultural Techniques Facilitate Restoration of Acacia koa Competing with Invasive Grass in a Dry Tropical Forest

by
Douglass F. Jacobs
1,*,
Anthony S. Davis
1,2,
R. Kasten Dumroese
3 and
Owen T. Burney
4
1
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
2
College of Life Sciences and Agriculture, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
3
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, ID 83843, USA
4
John T Harrington Forestry Research Center, New Mexico State University, Mora, NM 87732, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2020, 11(11), 1124; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111124
Submission received: 11 September 2020 / Revised: 9 October 2020 / Accepted: 19 October 2020 / Published: 22 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Scientific Basis of the Target Plant Concept)

Abstract

:
Anthropogenic activity has caused persistent and prominent losses of forest cover in dry tropical forests. Natural regeneration of forest trees in grazed areas often fails due to lack of seed sources and consumption by ungulates. To address this, the effective restoration of such sites often requires fencing and outplanting nursery-grown seedlings. In the degraded, dry forests of tropical Hawaii, USA, an additional challenge to restoration of native forest trees is the introduced kikuyu grass (Cenchrus clandestinus). This invasive, rapidly growing rhizomatous plant forms deep, dense mats. We studied the use of nursery cultural techniques to facilitate the establishment of koa (Acacia koa) seedlings outplanted amidst well-established kikuyu grass on a volcanic cinder cone on the dry, western side of Hawaii Island. Seedlings were grown four months in three container sizes (49, 164, 656 cm3) and with four rates (0, 4.8, 7.2, and 9.6 kg m−3) of 15–9–12 (NPK) controlled-release fertilizer incorporated into media prior to sowing. After 16 months in the field, seedling survival was > 80% for all treatments with two exceptions: the non-fertilized 49 cm3 (78%) and 164 cm3 (24%) containers. After 10 years, only these two treatments had significantly lower survival (35% and 10%, respectively) than the other treatments. One year following planting, none of the non-fertilized seedlings had transitioned to phyllodes from juvenile true leaves, regardless of container size. For the fertilized 656 cm3 container treatment, 78%–85% of seedlings had phyllodes, with mean values increasing by fertilizer rate. Phyllodes are known to confer greater drought resistance than true leaves in koa, which may help to explain the improved survival of fertilized trees on this relatively dry site. Overall, nursery fertilization was more influential on seedling height and diameter response than container size after outplanting. However, the largest container (656 cm3) with the addition of fertilizer, produced significantly larger trees than all other treatments during the early regeneration phase; early growth differences tended to fade at 10 years due to inter-tree canopy competition. Although koa is able to fix atmospheric nitrogen through rhizobium associations, our data confirm the importance of nursery fertilization in promoting regeneration establishment. Nursery cultural techniques may play an important role in forest restoration of dry tropical sites invaded by exotic vegetation.

1. Introduction

Human-driven land use change, such as conversion of forest into pasture for cattle production, has caused prominent losses of forest cover worldwide [1,2]. However, a decline in the profitability of ranching in some regions, combined with governmental cost-share programs and tax incentives for conservation, have increased interest in restoring abandoned grazing lands to native forests [3,4]. Natural regeneration of forest trees in such areas is difficult to achieve due to lack of naturally available seed, difficult germination conditions due to vegetative competition, and consumption of germinated seeds and young seedlings by ungulates. Therefore, fencing and artificial reforestation through the outplanting of nursery-grown seedlings is often required. The successful restoration of grazed sites by tree planting is inhibited by myriad factors, including costs, seasonal drought, competition from invasive species, such as non-native grasses [5,6,7,8], and increased fire susceptibility caused by inflammable introduced grasses [9,10].
To successfully restore forest sites degraded by grazing, the conceptual framework provided by the Target Plant Concept (TPC) may be used to (1) identify important limiting factors on the outplanting site, and (2) develop plant materials (i.e., stocktypes) and site preparation methods to increase the likelihood of outplanting success [11,12,13]. Mechanical and chemical site preparation can alleviate harsh soil conditions and reduce vegetative competition to improve seedling establishment success and accelerate regeneration trajectories [7,14,15], but targeting optimal stocktypes to overcome specific site limiting factors may achieve a similar result, even without site preparation [7,16,17]. For example, taller seedlings are more competitive on sites with high vegetative competition that limit light [18,19,20,21,22], and seedlings with large root systems [16,23,24], and balanced shoot-to-root ratio to reduce transpirational demand [25,26] may perform better on drought-prone sites. Nursery fertilization regimes may also be adjusted to optimize nutrient levels in seedlings, often through inducing luxury nutrient consumption [27,28,29,30]. Thus, through the manipulation of cultural conditions (e.g., container volume or configuration; fertilization or irrigation regimes), forest nurseries can produce a wide variety of stocktypes tailored to perform well on a given outplanting site [13,31,32,33,34]. Nursery studies have routinely measured plant morphological and physiological quality following the nursery cultivation period, but relatively fewer such trials have tracked subsequent seedling performance under field conditions [13,35,36].
Within the United States, Hawaii’s native tropical forests have experienced severe habitat fragmentation and degradation due to excessive harvesting, conversion to pasturelands, and competition from introduced species [37,38]. More than half of the Hawaiian land area is either heavily (16%) or somewhat disturbed (36%) by non-native vegetation [39] and often passive natural regeneration is impeded [40]. Thus, forest restoration in Hawaii is usually accomplished via reconstruction projects [41], whereby ungulates are removed and native species outplanted [40]. In particular, the habitat of Hawaii’s endemic, montane koa (Acacia koa A. Gray) forest has been severely depleted [42], causing many species, particularly forest birds, to become threatened, endangered, or extinct [43,44]. Beyond its ecological importance, old-growth koa has high economic value for specialty value-added wood products [45,46] and emerging markets for younger, small diameter koa have development potential [47]. As a leguminous species, koa and its symbiotic bacterial partner fix atmospheric nitrogen and grow rapidly under optimal conditions [48,49]. Planted koa may thus provide a means to quickly restore dominant native forest cover, enhance species richness [50], and recreate habitat of native forest birds [51]. This has generated unique interest and incentive for planting koa to restore habitat and meet multiple restoration objectives, including ecosystem and socioeconomic goals [52]. Large-scale native forest restoration of high-elevation pastures in Hawaii began in the 1970s and 1980s and typically involved planting koa to serve as nurse crops for underplantings of other native species [40,42].
The mesic, montane zones frequently targeted for koa restoration are mainly dominated by introduced kikuyu grass (Cenchrus clandestinus (Hochst. ex Chiov.) Morrone) [40,53]. Kikuyu grass exhibits invasive behavior and produces dense, thick mats of rhizomes that inhibit successful natural tree regeneration [54], as well as survival and growth of outplanted koa [7,55]. Although site preparation techniques have been developed to help control kikuyu grass for koa restoration plantings [7,56], this is still an emerging science [40], and few studies have examined the potential for nursery cultural treatments to promote koa seedling establishment in the absence of effective site preparation. Further, while some recent studies on koa reforestation and restoration have followed the basic premise of the TPC by tracking nursery treatments in the field [7,57], most trials have either reported results of nursery treatments in the absence of outplanting [58,59,60] or evaluated site preparation treatments without a nursery component [49,61,62]. Additionally, most koa reforestation studies, and those conducted under tropical conditions more broadly, have been limited in time frame to the first year or two after planting, with relatively few longer-term assessments. Long-term reforestation trials could be particularly insightful for koa because its leaves exhibit heteroblasty, involving transition from bipinnately compound, horizontally oriented true leaves to vertically oriented phyllodes [63]. These different leaf types have varying ecophysiological attributes related to light capture and drought resistance [64,65,66,67,68,69]. Thus, cultural treatments that affect this rate of transition may have important implications on koa growth and development beyond the establishment phase [49,62].
In a 10-year field trial, we evaluated the influence of nursery fertilization and container size on koa field performance after outplanting onto a site on the dry western slopes of Hawaii Island. The site was occupied exclusively by dense African kikuyu grass prior to planting and no site preparation was conducted. Specifically, we hypothesized that (i) koa produced in relatively large nursery containers would exhibit greater survival and height/diameter, as well as faster transition from juvenile true leaves to phyllodes, (ii) seedlings fertilized at higher treatment rates in the nursery would perform better within a given container type, and (iii) at least some of the treatment differences that occurred during the early establishment phase would be maintained through the end of the experiment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Nursery Treatments

Koa seedlings were grown in an uncovered, outdoor compound at the Hawaii Division of Forestry and Wildlife Kamuela (Waimea) State Tree Nursery, 4 km south of Kamuela on Hawaii Island, USA (20.007017 N, 155.833607 W). Seeds from a local source (Pu’u Wa’awa’a) were collected in July 2005 from more than 20 trees. In early November 2005, we transplanted germinating (7 days following the usual hot water soak) koa seeds, and seedlings were grown for approximately 4 months (November 2005 to March 2006) under a combination of different nutrition and container size treatments.
Three container types provided a range of sizes:
  • Hawaii dibble tube: 49 cm3 volume, 2.5 cm diameter × 12 cm depth, and tray density of 449 containers m−2 (Pacific Allied Products, Ltd., Kapolei, HI USA).
  • Ray Leach “cone-tainer” SC-10: 164 cm3 volume, 3.8 cm diameter × 21 cm depth, and tray density of 528 containers m−2 (Stuewe and Sons, Inc., Tangent, OR USA).
  • Deepot 40 (D-40): 656 cm3 volume, 6.4 cm diameter × 25 cm depth, and tray density of 174 containers m−2 (Stuewe and Sons, Inc., Tangent, OR USA).
Containers were filled with 2 parts Sphagnum peat moss (Pro-Mix, Premier Horticulture, Dorval, QC, Canada) mixed to 1 part perlite (v:v) medium and amended with four levels of controlled release fertilizer: 0, 4.8 (nursery standard), 7.2, and 9.6 kg m−3 of Osmocote Plus (15N:9P2O5:12K2O; 5 to 6 month longevity at 21 °C; Scotts Co., Marysville, OH, USA). These rates reflect the decompressed volume of the medium. All seedlings were grown under operational irrigation conditions characterized by overhead irrigation applied every other day using rotating nozzles on risers on 6.6 m × 5.3 m spacing.

2.2. Outplanting Site and Experimental Design

Seedlings were hand-planted with tree spades on the Pu’u Wa’a Wa’a cinder cone within the Pu’u Wa’a Wa’a Forest Reserve on Hawaii Island, USA. The site is on the leeward, dry western slopes of the island at an elevation of 1200 m (19.773524 N, 155.833607 W). The cone was deforested during the previous century and grazed by cattle, sheep, and goats [70]. Since 2003, some parcels have been fenced and planted to restore native trees. The study was conducted on approximately 0.4 ha within a 36-ha fenced area free from grazing and in need of reforestation. The soil is classified as a medial, amorphic, isothermic Pachic Haplustands of the Waawaa series consisting of a medial silt loam A-horizon above a medial silty clay loam B-horizon. These productive soils are deep (> 2 m), slightly acidic to neutral in pH, well-drained with moderate soil water storage, and have an estimated CEC at a pH of 7 of 83.3 meg 100 g−1 at 0–30 cm depth [71].
This region is arid and within the lower range of annual precipitation requirements for koa [72]. Mean annual rainfall for the Waawaa soil series is about 560 mm and mean annual air temperature is about 20 °C [71]. From 2004 through 2014, August was the warmest month (21.3 °C) and February was the coolest (17.9 °C). According to a nearby Remote Automated Weather Station (RAWS) station at the base of the cone, average annual precipitation during 2005 through 2013 was 326 ± 57 mm, but this included extreme drought years during 2010 to 2012. Additionally, the top of the cone, where the study was located, receives more precipitation than much of the surrounding area. The mean annual precipitation recorded from 1978 to 2007 was 688 mm [73].
The site was occupied exclusively by dense African kikuyu grass prior to planting. No site preparation (e.g., mechanical or chemical; fertilization) or post-planting silvicultural management was conducted on the study site. Seedlings from the nursery treatments were outplanted in late-March 2006 on a 2 × 2 m spacing. The study was established in the nursery as a randomized complete block design (three container sizes × four fertilizer rates) replicated across three blocks. Each container size × fertilizer rate combination represented an individual nursery stocktype. When lifting from nursery containers, we selected seedlings from the centermost portions of container trays to avoid edge effects. In the field, we maintained the same randomized complete block design using 10 trees per treatment replication for a total of 360 seedlings. Each individual seedling represented a sampling unit and the experimental unit used in data analysis was the mean response for each treatment replication.

2.3. Measurements and Data Analysis

Immediately after outplanting (April 2006), initial measurements were taken for height and ground line diameter (GLD). Additionally, measurements were taken for survival, height, and GLD in August 2007 and May 2016. Diameter at breast height (DBH, 1.37 m above groundline) was assessed in May 2016. The presence of phyllodes was assessed in April 2007 (one year after outplanting).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for data analysis using SAS Software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Tests for normality, constant variance, and linearity were performed with data transformations being applied when statistical assumptions were not met. One-way ANOVA was used because seedlings fertilized at different treatment rates (kg m−3) within a container treatment received different total fertilizer amounts. Additionally, absolute values for morphological response variables were used in the analyses. Relative growth measures may lead to faulty conclusions for a long-term study according to the variable interest law, which states that the growth of a plant during a unit of time is a percentage of the initial size of the plant at the beginning of that time. As the plant grows, however, this percentage will change in response, creating a varied percentage over time [74]. Thus, absolute values were used to capture seedling performance based on nursery cultural practices and to eliminate issues with variable growth patterns during the experiment. When significant (p < 0.05) treatment effects were detected, means separations were performed at α = 0.05 using Fisher’s LSD test. Results of transformed variables are described as back-transformations, in which the mid-point of the 95% confidence interval is used to estimate the mean.

3. Results

3.1. Survival

Seedling survival 16 months after outplanting (August 2007) was > 80% for most stocktypes, and only the 49 cm3 control (78%) and 164 cm3 control (24%) stocktypes were statistically different (p < 0.001) from some other treatments and each other (Figure 1). Ten years after outplanting (May 2016), tree survival had declined across all stocktypes, with the greatest reduction observed for the 49 cm3 control stocktype (78% at 16 months to 35% at 10 years). Ten-year survival ranged from 61% to 90% without significant differences among stocktypes, with the exception of the 49 cm3 control (35%) and 164 cm3 control (18%) stocktypes, which were statistically different (p < 0.001) from most other treatments but not themselves (Figure 1).

3.2. Phyllode Development

At the April 2007 measurement period (one year following planting), significant differences (p < 0.0001) occurred among nursery treatments in the percentage of seedlings that had transitioned from juvenile true leaves to mature phyllodes (Figure 1 and Figure 2). None of the non-fertilized seedlings exhibited phyllodes, regardless of container size (Figure 1). Seedlings within the fertilized 49 cm3 container treatment combination exhibited a trend of declining phyllodes production (10%–44%) with increasing fertilizer rate. No clear trends were observed for the fertilized 164 cm3 container treatments although the highest fertilizer rate produced the greatest proportion of seedlings exhibiting phyllodes (59%). Among the fertilized 656 cm3 container treatments, 78%–85% of seedlings had phyllodes, with no difference among fertilizer rates.

3.3. Tree Growth

When outplanted (April 2006), nursery treatments of fertilizer and container size yielded a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) response for mean height and GLD. Seedlings grown with fertilizer and in the two largest containers (164 cm3 and 656 cm3) had greater height and GLD than seedlings grown without fertilizer and in the smallest container size (Figure 3). Among fertilized seedlings, the 7.2 and 9.6 kg m−3 rates resulted in significantly greater heights and GLDs compared to the low 4.8 kg m−3 rate, but only for the two larger container sizes. The tallest seedlings with the largest GLD at the time of planting were associated with the stocktype from the largest container (656 cm3), receiving the most fertilizer (9.6 kg m−3) (Figure 3). Mean height and GLD for this stocktype were significantly greater than all other stocktypes, with the exception of height when compared to the 656 cm3 7.2 kg m−3 stocktype. Overall, nursery fertilization was more influential on seedling height and GLD response than container size (Figure 3).
Sixteen months later (August 2007), container size and fertilization continued to significantly (p < 0.0001) affect mean height and GLD responses (Figure 3). The positive effects of fertilization during the nursery phase were still apparent, compared to non-fertilized seedlings. No significant differences were found, however, among fertilized seedlings within all container types for both height and GLD responses (Figure 3). These results were similar to those at the time of planting: stocktypes from the larger container (656 cm3) with the addition of fertilizer continued to be significantly greater than all other stocktypes (Figure 3).
Ten years after planting (May 2016), many of the observed differences in height and GLD responses to treatments had diminished. Height responses showed few significant differences among treatments (Figure 3). The main exceptions included the 164 cm3 control, which had significantly smaller height than all other treatments, as well as the 164 cm3 7.2 kg m−3 and 656 cm3 control stocktypes that had significantly smaller total heights compared to some of the other stocktypes (Figure 3). GLD responses also showed few significant differences among treatments (Figure 3). Similar to height, the smallest mean GLD was observed in the 164 cm3 control stocktype, which was 40% of the next smallest GLD (Figure 3) and significantly smaller than all other treatments. The 656 cm3 container with fertilization at the highest two rates (7.2 and 9.6 kg m−3) produced stocktypes with the largest GLDs, but they were significantly different from only a few of the other stocktypes (Figure 3). Diameter at breast height (DBH) followed a similar pattern as that observed with GLD: only the 164 cm3 control stocktype had significantly lower mean DBH compared to all other stocktypes (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

As expected, initial (post-nursery cultivation) height and stem diameter of koa seedlings generally increased with container size (Figure 3), similar to past studies with koa [7,59] and other tree species [28,75]. Within each container treatment, the initial size of outplanted seedlings also tended to increase with increasing fertilizer rate (Figure 3), but the most pronounced differences occurred between the control and all fertilizer rates, as also previously shown for koa [58,59]. Using these same nursery fertilizer rates with koa, Dumroese et al. [59] reported that seedling size and N concentration differed between fertilized seedlings and the non-fertilized control, but not among fertilizer rates. They suggested that plants were already experiencing luxury consumption even at the lowest fertilizer rate. In our study, however, the higher fertilizer treatment rates did produce an increase in initial seedling size for the largest two containers (164 and 656 cm3), suggesting that the relatively larger seedlings in this container type had a greater capacity to allocate higher nutrient availability to growth [59,76].
The ability of outplanted tree seedlings to overcome plant competition effects on degraded tropical sites dominated by invasive species is one of the greatest challenges to successful native species restoration projects [77,78,79]. While site preparation treatments to alleviate the effects of invasive introduced vegetation have been identified, remaining ecological concerns with some of these treatments (e.g., pesticide use; [15,80]) suggest that producing seedling stocktypes that resist such competition may represent an effective alternative and/or produce an additive effect to site preparation [7,16,17,81]. Our study results effectively demonstrate the potential for nursery treatments to aid in koa establishment on kikuyu grass-infested restoration sites even without mechanical or chemical site preparation. After 16 months in the field, seedling survival was > 80% for all treatments except for seedlings grown without fertilization in containers of ≤ 164 cm3 volume. (Figure 1). After 10 years, this pattern persisted (Figure 1). Other field experiments with koa have reported much lower survival rates during establishment, especially without site preparation [56,57].
Culturing seedlings with sufficient nutrient and carbohydrate reserves for the outplanting site is an important prerequisite for survival and growth [82]. For koa and other Acacia spp. in particular, outplanted seedlings having these characteristics can readily form a symbiotic relationship with Bradyrhizobium spp., N-fixing bacteria that increase N availability [83,84]. During nursery production, a lack of nutrition and Bradyrhizobium spp. inoculation leads to low nutrient availability and poor growth [58,59]. Although the paradigm was that fertilization may reduce nodulation and N-fixing capacity of legume symbionts, the aforementioned work with koa suggested that nursery fertilization, nodulation, and N-fixing capacity need not be mutually exclusive. Recent nursery fertilization studies have shown that growth and N status of other leguminous N-fixing tree species can be enhanced through a synergistic effect provided by robust fertilization in concert with inoculation of symbiotic N-fixing bacteria [85,86].
One year after planting, none of the non-fertilized seedlings had transitioned to mature phyllodes from juvenile true leaves, regardless of container size (Figure 1). Koa’s bipinnately compound true leaves may be functionally relevant to help ensure early growth at a low carbon cost following regeneration in forest canopy gaps [63,67,69]. Our field site was, however, open pastureland and therefore not light-limited during at least the first year of establishment. Phyllodes, conversely, appear to be important for drought resistance and as an adaptation to high-light environments because of increased stomatal responsiveness to reduced vapor pressure deficit and ability to respond to desiccation and rehydration [64,65,66,67,68,69]. Thus, seedlings planted into our open, relatively dry site conditions should have benefited in drought resistance with rapid transition from true leaves to phyllodes, and this may help to explain the improved survival of fertilized trees.
While ensuring high seedling survival is paramount in forest restoration generally [87], and for koa specifically [42], increasing the growth rates of outplanted trees will help to more rapidly meet the diverse goals (i.e., habitat creation, carbon sequestration, timber) of native species restoration [7,40,88,89]. Overall, nursery fertilization was more influential on seedling height and groundline diameter response 16 months after planting (August 2007) than container size (Figure 3). However, the largest container (656 cm3) with addition of fertilizer produced significantly larger trees than all other treatments during this establishment stage (Figure 3). Koa restoration in Hawaii has traditionally relied upon relatively small stocktypes [56,90], similar to those produced in our smallest (49 cm3) container treatment. Dumroese et al. [59] have since shown that koa nursery seedling size generally increased with increasing container volume, and Pinto et al. [7] found that stocktypes produced with larger (207 cm3) containers outperformed smaller (111 cm3) ones in the field, with or without site preparation to control kikuyu grass. These results with koa verify the general finding of improved survival and growth for larger stocktypes in reforestation [28] and forest restoration [17,75,91,92,93]. This response is mainly attributable to greater seedling size and nutrient/carbohydrate reserves facilitating root growth and physiological coupling to the outplanting site to resist extreme periodic drought [17,33,82,94,95]. In our study, fertilized seedlings in the largest (656 cm3) container treatment were not only larger at planting, but also 78%–85% of these seedlings had transitioned to phyllodes within one year, which was significantly greater than any other treatment except the 164 cm3 9.6 kg m−3 container–fertilizer combination (Figure 1). Thus, in our case, the greater initial size along with faster transition to phyllodes for high fertilized (7.2, 9.6 kg m−3) koa seedlings in the largest (656 cm3) container treatment likely facilitated establishment on this site, thereby maintaining significantly greater size after 16 months in the field.
With the exception of the maintenance of some significant differences between non-fertilized and fertilized seedlings within a container treatment, early size differences tended to fade at 10 years (Figure 3 and Figure 4). This effect was likely due to inter-tree competition that occurred beginning midway (~year 5) through the experiment. Seedlings were planted on a 2 × 2 m spacing (equivalent of 2500 trees ha−1), no thinning was conducted, and trees were generally > 7 m in height and > 10 cm DBH at 10 years (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Fast growing tropical plantations may already exhibit crown recession at 3–4 years of age with live crown ratios < 40% and/or height:diameter > 100 [96]. In some fast-growing tropical systems, optimal thinning schedules may require three entries prior to age 10 [97]. Past thinning studies in koa have demonstrated that stands may begin to show significant growth reductions after 11 years due to overstocking and loss of crown vigor [98,99,100], indicating that the first pre-commercial thinning in dense koa stands should occur by 10 years of age, and preferably 2–3 years earlier [100]. Thus, thinning before the end of our trial may have helped to minimize crown recession and maintain some of the initial size differences in this fast-growing species. Late thinning is, however, fairly typical of management in this region [100] and in restoration of many other fast-growing, native tropical tree species [96,97,101].

5. Conclusions

We generally confirmed our initial hypothesis that koa stocktypes produced in relatively large nursery containers would demonstrate greater height and diameter after 16 months in the field. Additionally, seedlings grown in the largest containers exhibited faster transition from juvenile true leaves to mature phyllodes. Survival differences were not detected among container treatments, however. We also partially confirmed our second hypothesis that survival, rate of transition to phyllodes, as well as height and diameter after 16 months in the field would be significantly greater for fertilized vs. non-fertilized trees within a container type. However, no significant survival or height and diameter differences were found among fertilized seedlings within each container type at 16 months after outplanting. Thus, nursery fertilization was overall more influential on seedling establishment success than container size. Our third hypothesis, that at least some of the treatment differences that occurred during the establishment phase would be maintained to the end of the experiment after 10 years, was only partially confirmed, as survival continued to be significantly different for fertilized vs. non-fertilized seedlings. This implies that, in the long-term, on this site container size may be relatively inconsequential, as long as seedlings were adequately fertilized in the nursery. However, the fading of other treatment size differences detected during the establishment period was attributed to inter-tree competition that occurred beginning midway through the experiment, a tangible longer-term benefit of the aforementioned high rate of seedling survival. Future studies examining effects of nursery culture on long-term plantation responses in fast growing tropical forestry systems should incorporate timely thinning operations with sufficient post-thinning sample sizes that allow potential for continued expression of early treatment responses. Based on results of this study and Dumroese et al. [58,59], relatively low applications of N during nursery production are sufficient to maximize koa growth and development in various container sizes. Additionally, although koa is able to fix atmospheric N through rhizobium associations, our data confirm the importance of nursery fertilization to ensure that seedlings have sufficient resources for field establishment, and recent research suggests this is not mutually exclusive of inoculating N-fixing symbionts during the nursery phase. This experiment demonstrates that nursery cultural techniques may play an important role in forest restoration of dry tropical sites invaded by exotic vegetation, particularly in the absence of effective site preparation to reduce vegetative cover.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: D.F.J., A.S.D., R.K.D.; Data curation: D.F.J., O.T.B.; Formal analysis: O.T.B.; Funding acquisition: D.F.J., R.K.D.; Investigation: D.F.J., A.S.D., R.K.D., O.T.B.; Methodology: D.F.J., A.S.D., R.K.D., O.T.B.; Project administration: D.F.J.; Resources: D.F.J., A.S.D., R.K.D., O.T.B.; Software: D.F.J., A.S.D., R.K.D., O.T.B.; Supervision: D.F.J.; Validation: D.F.J., A.S.D., R.K.D., O.T.B.; Visualization: D.F.J., A.S.D., R.K.D., O.T.B.; Writing—original draft: D.F.J.; Writing—review and editing: D.F.J., A.S.D., R.K.D., O.T.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, McIntire Stennis project IND011535, USDA Forest Service (USFS) Cooperative Agreement 02-CA-11244225-224, USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station, USFS National Center for Reforestation, Nurseries, and Genetic Resources, Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center, Fred M. van Eck Forest Foundation, and JTH Forestry Center with NMSU.

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Michael Donoho, Elliott Parsons, and Waimea State Tree Nursery (Division of Forestry and Wildlife, Department of Land and Natural Resources, State of Hawaii) for valuable assistance with this project. The comments of three reviewers improved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rudel, T.K.; Defries, R.; Asner, G.P.; Laurance, W.F. Changing drivers of deforestation and new opportunities for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 23, 1396–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Houghton, R.A. Carbon emissions and the drivers of deforestation and forest de- gradation in the tropics. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2012, 4, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Benayas, J.M.R.; Martins, A.; Nicolau, J.M.; Schulz, J.J. Abandonment of agricultural land: An overview of drivers and consequences. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2007, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Cramer, V.A.; Hobbs, R.J.; Standish, R.J. What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Aide, T.M.; Ruiz-Jaen, M.C.; Grau, H.R. What is the state of tropical montane cloud forest restoration? Tropical montane cloud forests. Sci. Conserv. Manag. 2010, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Thaxton, J.M.; Cordell, S.; Cabin, R.J.; Sandquist, D.R. Non-native grass removal and shade increase soil moisture and seedling performance during Hawaiian dry forest restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2012, 20, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pinto, J.R.; Davis, A.S.; Leary, J.J.K.; Aghai, M.M. Stocktype and grass suppression accelerate the restoration trajectory of Acacia koa in Hawaiian montane ecosystems. New For. 2015, 46, 855–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yelenik, S.G. Linking dominant Hawaiian tree species to understory development in recovering pastures via impacts on soils and litter. Restor. Ecol. 2017, 25, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vitousek, P.M.; D’antonio, C.M.; Loope, L.L.; Rejmanek, M.; Westbrooks, R. Introduced species: A significant component of human-caused global change. N. Z. J. Ecol. 1997, 21, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  10. Brooks, M.L.; D’antonio, C.M.; Richardson, D.M.; Grace, J.B.; Keeley, J.E.; DiTomaso, J.M.; Hobbs, R.J.; Pellant, M.; Pyke, D. Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. Bioscience 2004, 54, 677–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rose, R.; Carlson, W.C.; Morgan, P. The Target Seedling Concept. In Proceedings of the Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations, Roseburg, OR, USA, 13–17 August 1990; General Technical Report RM-200. Rose, R., Carlson, W.C., Landis, T.D., Eds.; USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  12. Landis, T.D.; Dumroese, R.K. Applying the Target Plant Concept to Nursery Stock Quality. In Plant Quality: A Key to Success in Forest Establishment, Proceedings of the COFORD Conference, Tullow, Ireland, 20–21 September 2005; MacLennan, L., Fennessy, J., Eds.; National Council for Forest Research and Development: Dublin, Ireland, 2006; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dumroese, R.K.; Landis, T.D.; Pinto, J.R.; Haase, D.L.; Wilkinson, K.M.; Davis, A.S. Meeting forest restoration challenges: Using the Target Plant Concept. Reforesta 2016, 1, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Rose, R.; Ketchum, J.S.; Hanson, D.E. Three-year survival and growth of Douglas-fir seedlings under various vegetation-free regimes. For. Sci. 1999, 45, 117–126. [Google Scholar]
  15. Löf, M.; Dey, D.C.; Navarro, R.M.; Jacobs, D.F. Mechanical site preparation for forest restoration. New For. 2012, 43, 825–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chirino, E.; Vilagrosa, A.; Hernández, E.I.; Matos, A.; Vallejo, V.R. Effects of a deep container on morpho-functional characteristics and root colonization in Quercus suber L. seedlings for reforestation in Mediterranean climate. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Villar-Salvador, P.; Puértolas, J.; Cuesta, B.; Peñuelas, J.L.; Uscola, M.; Heredia-Guerrero, N.; Rey Benayas, J.M. Increase in size and nitrogen concentration enhances seedling survival in Mediterranean plantations. Insights from an ecophysiological conceptual model of plant survival. New For. 2012, 43, 755–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Overton, W.S.; Ching, K.K. Analysis of differences in height growth among populations in a nursery selection study of Douglas-fir. For. Sci. 1978, 24, 497–509. [Google Scholar]
  19. Newton, M.; Cole, E.C.; White, D.E. Tall planting stock for enhanced growth and domination of brush in the Douglas-fir region. New For. 1993, 7, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jobidon, R.; Charette, L.; Bernier, P.Y. Initial size and competing vegetation effects on water stress and growth of Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP seedlings planted in three different environments. For. Ecol. Manag. 1998, 103, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. South, D.B.; Mitchell, R.J. Determining the “optimum” slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, USA. Can. J. For. Res. 1999, 29, 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thiffault, N.; Jobidon, R.; Munson, A.D. Performance and physiology of large containerized and bare-root spruce seedlings in relation to scarification and competition in Quebec (Canada). Ann. For. Sci. 2003, 60, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Rose, R.; Haase, D.L.; Kroiher, F.; Sabin, T. Root volume and growth of ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir seedlings: A summary of eight growing seasons. West. J. Appl. For. 1997, 12, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Jacobs, D.F.; Salifu, K.F.; Seifert, J.R. Relative contribution of initial root and shoot morphology in predicting field performance of hardwood seedlings. New For. 2005, 30, 295–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cregg, B.M. Carbon allocation, gas exchange, and needle morphology of Pinus ponderosa genotypes known to differ in growth and survival under imposed drought. Tree Physiol. 1994, 14, 883–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Jacobs, D.F.; Salifu, K.F.; Davis, A.S. Drought susceptibility and recovery of transplanted Quercus rubra seedlings in relation to root system morphology. Ann. For. Sci. 2009, 66, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Timmer, V.R.; Miller, B.D. Effects of contrasting fertilization and moisture regimes on biomass, nutrients, and water relations of container grown red pine seedlings. New For. 1991, 5, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Haase, D.L.; Rose, R.; Trobaugh, J. Field performance of three stock sizes of Douglas-fir container seedlings grown with slow-release fertilizer in the nursery growing medium. New For. 2006, 31, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salifu, K.F.; Jacobs, D.F. Characterizing fertility targets and multi-element interactions in nursery culture of Quercus rubra seedlings. Ann. For. Sci. 2006, 63, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Uscola, M.; Salifu, K.F.; Oliet, J.A.; Jacobs, D.F. An exponential fertilization dose response model to promote restoration of the Mediterranean oak Quercus ilex. New For. 2015, 46, 795–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Endean, F.; Carlson, L.W. The effect of rooting volume on the early growth of lodgepole pine seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 1975, 5, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lamhamedi, M.S.; Bernier, P.Y.; Hébert, C. Effect of shoot size on the gas exchange and growth of containerized Picea mariana seedlings under different watering regimes. New For. 1996, 13, 207–221. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pinto, J.R.; Dumroese, R.K.; Davis, A.S.; Landis, T.D. Conducting seedling stocktype trials: A new approach to an old question. J. For. 2011, 109, 293–299. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sloan, J.L.; Burney, O.T.; Pinto, J.R. Drought-conditioning of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) seedlings during nursery production modifies seedling anatomy and physiology. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 557894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Davis, A.S.; Jacobs, D.F. Quantifying root system quality of nursery seedlings and relationship to outplanting performance. New For. 2005, 30, 295–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wilson, B.C.; Jacobs, D.F. Quality assessment of temperate zone deciduous hardwood seedlings. New For. 2006, 31, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Balis-Larsen, M.; Motivansm, K. Saving species on the brink of extinction. Endanger. Species Bull. 2003, 28, 12–13. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wagner, W.L.; Herbst, D.R.; Sohmer, S.H. Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawaii; Bishop Museum: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1990; Volume 1, p. 988. [Google Scholar]
  39. Selmants, P.C.; Giardina, C.P.; Jacobi, J.D.; Zhu, Z. Chapter 2: Baseline Land Cover. In Baseline and Projected Future Carbon Storage and Carbon Fluxes in Ecosystems of Hawai‘I; Geological Survey Professional Paper 1834; U.S. Department of the Interior: Washington, DC, USA; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2017; pp. 9–20. [Google Scholar]
  40. Friday, J.B.; Cordell, S.; Giardina, C.P.; Inman-Narahari, F.; Koch, N.; Leary, J.J.K.; Litton, C.M.; Trauernicht, C. Future directions for forest restoration in Hawaii. New For. 2015, 46, 733–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stanturf, J.A.; Palik, B.J.; Dumroese, R.K. Contemporary forest restoration: A review emphasizing function. For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 331, 292–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Scowcroft, P.G.; Jeffrey, J. Potential significance of frost, topographic relief, and Acacia koa stands to restoration of mesic Hawaiian forests on abandoned rangeland. For. Ecol. Manag. 1999, 114, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Scott, J.M.; Mountainspring, S.; Ramsey, F.L.; Kepler, C.B. Forest bird communities of the Hawaiian Islands: Their dynamics, ecology, and conservation. Stud. Avian Biol. 1986, 9, 1–431. [Google Scholar]
  44. Maxfield, B. Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge. Endanger. Species Bull. 2003, 28, 9–11. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yanagida, J.F.; Friday, J.B.; Illukpitiya, P.; Mamiit, R.J.; Edwards, Q. Economic value of Hawai‘i’s forest industry in 2001. Econ. Issues 2004, 7, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  46. Elevitch, C.R.; Wilkinson, K.M.; Friday, J.B. Acacia koa (koa) and Acacia koaia (koai’a). In Traditional Trees of Pacific Islands: Their Culture, Environment, and Use; Elevitch, C.R., Ed.; Permanent Agriculture Resources: Holualoa, HI, USA, 2006; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lowell, E.C.; Wilson, K.; Friday, J.B.; Wiedenbeck, J.; Chan, C. Market appeal of Hawaiian koa wood product characteristics: A consumer preference study. In Proceedings of the 59th International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology, Curitiba, Brazil, 6–10 March 2016. [Google Scholar]
  48. Cole, T.G.; Yost, R.S.; Kablan, R.; Olsen, T. Growth potential of twelve Acacia species on acid soils in Hawaii. For. Ecol. Manag. 1996, 80, 175–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rose, K.M.E.; Friday, J.B.; Oliet, J.A.; Jacobs, D.F. Canopy openness affects microclimate and performance of underplanted trees in restoration of high-elevation tropical pasturelands. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2020, 292, 108105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Parrotta, J.A. The role of plantation forests in rehabilitating degraded tropical ecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1992, 41, 115–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Horiuchi, B.; Jeffrey, J. Native Plant Propagation and Habitat Restoration at Hakalau Forest NWR, Hawai’i. In National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations—1999, 2000, and 2001, Proceedings RMRS-P-24, Kailua-Kona, USA, 22-25 August 2000; Dumroese, R.K., Riley, L.E., Landis, T.D., Eds.; USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2002; p. 233. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pejchar, L.; Press, D.M. Achieving conservation objectives through production forestry: The case of Acacia koa on Hawaii Island. Environ. Sci. Policy 2006, 9, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Motooka, P.; Castro, L.; Nelson, D.; Nagai, G.; Ching, L. Weeds of Hawai‘i’s Pastures and Natural Areas; University of Hawai’i, Manoa: Manoa, HI, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  54. Shlisky, A. The Hawaiian Island environment. Rangel Arch 2000, 22, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Jeffery, J.; Horicuhi, B. Tree planting at Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge—The right tool for the right stock type. Nativ. Plants J. 2003, 4, 30–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Scowcroft, P.G.; Adee, K.T. Site Preparation Affects Survival, Growth of Koa on Degraded Montane Forest Land; Research Paper PSW-205; USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1991.
  57. Davis, A.S.; Pinto, J.R.; Jacobs, D.F. Early field performance of Acacia koa seedlings grown under subirrigation and overhead irrigation. Nativ. Plants J. 2011, 12, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dumroese, R.K.; Jacobs, D.F.; Davis, A.S. Inoculating Acacia koa with Bradyrhizobium and applying fertilizer in the nursery: Effects on nodule formation and seedling growth. Hort Sci. 2009, 44, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Dumroese, R.K.; Davis, A.S.; Jacobs, D.F. Nursery response of Acacia koa seedlings to container size, irrigation method, and fertilization rate. J. Plant Nutr. 2011, 34, 877–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Idol, T.W.; Diarra, G. Mycorrhizal colonization is compatible with exponential fertilization to improve tree seedling quality. J. Plant Nutr. 2016, 40, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Earnshaw, K.M.; Baribault, T.W.; Jacobs, D.F. Alternative field fertilization techniques to promote restoration of leguminous Acacia koa on contrasting tropical sites. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 376, 126–134. [Google Scholar]
  62. Rose, K.M.E.; Friday, J.B.; Jacobs, D.F. Establishment and heteroblasty of Acacia koa in canopy gaps. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 453, 117592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rose, K.M.E.; Mickelbart, M.V.; Jacobs, D.F. Plasticity of phenotype and heteroblasty in contrasting populations of Acacia koa. Ann. Bot. 2019, 124, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Walters, G.A.; Bartholomew, D.P. Acacia koa leaves and phyllodes: Gas exchange, morphological, anatomical, and biochemical characteristics. Bot. Gaz. 1984, 145, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Walters, G.A.; Bartholomew, D.P. Adaptation of Acacia koa leaves and phyllodes to changes in photosynthetic photon flux density. For. Sci. 1990, 36, 1050–1060. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hansen, D.H. Water relations of compound leaves and phyllodes in Acacia koa var. latifolia. Plant Cell Environ. 1986, 9, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hansen, D.H. Establishment and persistence characteristics in juvenile leaves and phyllodes of Acacia koa (Leguminosae) in Hawaii. Int. J. Plant Sci. 1996, 157, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Craven, D.; Gulamhussein, S.; Berlyn, G.P. Physiological and anatomical responses of Acacia koa (Gray) seedlings to varying light and drought conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 69, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pasquet-Kok, J.; Creese, C.; Sack, L. Turning over a new ‘leaf’: Multiple functional significances of leaves versus phyllodes in Hawaiian Acacia koa. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 2084–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Giffin, J.G. Puu Waawaa Biological Assessment. Division of Forestry and Wildlife, State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources. 2003. Available online: http://dlnr.hawaii.gov/dofaw/files/2014/02/PWW_biol_assessment.pdf (accessed on 7 August 2020).
  71. Soil Survey Staff. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Official Soil Series Descriptions. 2020. Available online: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/soils/survey/ (accessed on 13 July 2020).
  72. Baker, P.J.; Scowcroft, P.G.; Ewel, J.J. Koa (Acacia koa) Ecology and Silviculture; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: Albany, CA, USA, 2009; 129p.
  73. Giambelluca, T.W.; Chen, Q.; Frazier, A.G.; Price, J.P.; Chen, Y.-L.; Chu, P.-S.; Eischeid, J.K.; Delparte, D.M. Online Rainfall Atlas of Hawai’i. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2013, 94, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. South, D.B. Relative growth rates: A critique. South Afr. For. J. 1995, 173, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pinto, J.R.; Marshall, J.D.; Dumroese, R.K.; Davis, A.S.; Cobos, D.R. Photosynthetic response, carbon isotopic composition, survival, and growth of three stock types under water stress enhanced by vegetative competition. Can. J. For. Res. 2012, 42, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cuesta, B.; Villar-Salvador, P.; Puértolas, J.; Jacobs, D.F.; Benayas, J.M.R. Why do large, nitrogen rich seedlings better resist stressful transplanting conditions? A physiological analysis in two functionally contrasting Mediterranean forest species. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 260, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Holl, K.D.; Loik, M.E.; Lin, E.H.V.; Samuels, I.A. Tropical montane forest restoration in Costa Rica: Overcoming barriers to dispersal and establishment. Restor. Ecol. 2000, 8, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cabin, R.J.; Weller, S.G.; Lorence, D.H.; Cordell, S.; Hadway, L.J. Effects of microsite, water, weeding, and direct seeding on the regeneration of native and alien species within a Hawaiian dry forest preserve. Biol. Conserv. 2002, 104, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Denslow, J.S.; Uowolo, A.L.; Hughes, R.F. Limitations to seedling establishment in a mesic Hawaiian forest. Oecologia 2006, 148, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Thiffault, N.; Roy, V. Living without herbicides in Québec (Canada): Historical context, current strategy, research and challenges in forest vegetation management. Eur. J. For. Res. 2011, 130, 117–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. South, D.B.; Rose, R.W.; McNabb, K.L. Nursery and site preparation interaction research in the United States. New For. 2001, 22, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Villar-Salvador, P.; Uscola, M.; Jacobs, D.F. The role of stored carbohydrates and nitrogen in the growth and stress tolerance of planted forest trees. New For. 2015, 46, 813–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Scowcroft, P.G.; Haraguchi, J.E.; Hue, N.V. Reforestation and topography affect montane soil properties, nitrogen pools, and nitrogen transformations in Hawaii. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2004, 68, 959–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Idol, T.W.; Baker, P.J.; Meason, D.F. Indicators of forest ecosystem productivity and nutrient status across precipitation and temperature gradients in Hawaii. J. Trop. Ecol. 2007, 23, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, P.; Dumroese, R.K.; Pinto, J.R. Organic or inorganic nitrogen and rhizobia inoculation provide synergistic growth response of a leguminous forb and tree. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Sun, Q.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Dumroese, R.K. Interaction of biochar type and rhizobia inoculation increases the growth and biological nitrogen fixation of Robinia pseudoacacia seedlings. Forests 2020, 11, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Oliet, J.A.; Jacobs, D.F. Restoring forests: Advances in techniques and theory. New For. 2012, 43, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jacobs, D.F.; Oliet, J.A.; Aronson, J.; Bolte, A.; Bullock, J.M.; Donoso, P.J.; Landhäusser, S.M.; Madsen, P.; Peng, S.; Rey-Benayas, J.M.; et al. Restoring forests: What constitutes success in the twenty-first century? New For. 2015, 46, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Löf, M.; Madsen, P.; Metslaid, M.; Witzell, J.; Jacobs, D.F. Restoring forests: Regeneration and ecosystem function for the future. New For. 2019, 50, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Whitesell, C.D. Acacia koa A. Gray. In Silvics of North America. Volume 2: Hardwoods; Burns, R.M., Honkala, B.H., Eds.; Agricultural Handbook 654; USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1990; pp. 17–28. [Google Scholar]
  91. Oliet, J.A.; Artero, F.; Cuadros, S.; Puértolas, J.; Luna, L.; Grau, J.M. Deep planting with shelters improves performance of different stocktype sizes under arid Mediterranean conditions. New For. 2012, 43, 925–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Aghai, M.M.; Pinto, J.R.; Davis, A.S. Container volume and growing density influence western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.) seedling development during nursery culture and establishment. New For. 2014, 45, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mariotti, B.; Maltoni, A.; Chiarabaglio, P.M.; Giorcelli, A.; Jacobs, D.F.; Tognetti, R.; Tani, A. Can the use of large, alternative nursery containers aid in field establishment of Juglans regia and Quercus robur seedlings? New For. 2015, 46, 773–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Burdett, A.N. Physiological processes in plantation establishment and the development of specifications for forest planting stock. Can. J. For. Res. 1990, 20, 415–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Grossnickle, S.C. Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New For. 2005, 30, 273–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Galloway, G.; Ugalde, L.; Vasquez, W. Importance of density reductions in tropical plantations: Experiences in Central America. For. Trees Livelihoods 2001, 11, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Piotto, D.; Montagnini, F.; Ugalde, L.; Kanninen, M. Growth and effects of thinning of mixed and pure plantations with native trees in humid tropical Costa Rica. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 177, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Scowcroft, P.G.; Stein, J.D. Stimulating Growth of Stagnated Acacia koa by Thinning and Fertilizing; Research Note PSW-380; USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1986; p. 8.
  99. Pearson, H.L.; Vitousek, P.M. Stand dynamics, nitrogen accumulation, and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in regenerating stands of Acacia koa. Ecol. Appl. 2001, 11, 1381–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Idol, T.W.; Morales, R.M.; Friday, J.B.; Scowcroft, P.G. Precommercial release thinning of potential Acacia koa crop trees increases stem and crown growth in dense, 8-year-old stands in Hawaii. For. Ecol. Manag. 2017, 392, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Haggar, J.P.; Briscoe, C.B.; Butterfield, R.P. Native species: A resource for the diversification of forestry production in the lowland humid tropics. For. Ecol. Manag. 1998, 106, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mean (± SE) percent survival of Acacia koa by stocktype treatment 16 months and 10 years post planting, and percentage of seedlings with phyllodes by stocktype treatment 1 year following outplanting. One-way ANOVA was performed independently for each response variable at each measurement period. Treatment mean values for survival at 16 months or phyllodes at 1-year post planting followed by different lowercase letters denote significant differences at α = 0.05 using Fisher’s LSD. Mean values for survival 10 years post planting followed by different uppercase letters denote significant differences at α = 0.05 using Fisher’s LSD.
Figure 1. Mean (± SE) percent survival of Acacia koa by stocktype treatment 16 months and 10 years post planting, and percentage of seedlings with phyllodes by stocktype treatment 1 year following outplanting. One-way ANOVA was performed independently for each response variable at each measurement period. Treatment mean values for survival at 16 months or phyllodes at 1-year post planting followed by different lowercase letters denote significant differences at α = 0.05 using Fisher’s LSD. Mean values for survival 10 years post planting followed by different uppercase letters denote significant differences at α = 0.05 using Fisher’s LSD.
Forests 11 01124 g001
Figure 2. Examples of Acacia koa seedlings from different nursery treatments one year following planting exhibiting juvenile true leaves (a) and following transition to mature phyllodes (b).
Figure 2. Examples of Acacia koa seedlings from different nursery treatments one year following planting exhibiting juvenile true leaves (a) and following transition to mature phyllodes (b).
Forests 11 01124 g002
Figure 3. Mean (± SE) height and groundline diameter response of Acacia koa by stocktype treatment. One-way ANOVA was performed independently for each response variable at each measurement period. Treatment mean values followed by different letters denote significant differences at α = 0.05 using Fisher’s LSD. Values at each fertilizer rate are staggered to improve clarity among container volumes.
Figure 3. Mean (± SE) height and groundline diameter response of Acacia koa by stocktype treatment. One-way ANOVA was performed independently for each response variable at each measurement period. Treatment mean values followed by different letters denote significant differences at α = 0.05 using Fisher’s LSD. Values at each fertilizer rate are staggered to improve clarity among container volumes.
Forests 11 01124 g003
Figure 4. Diameter at breast height (DBH, 1.37 m height) of Acacia koa by stocktype treatment 10 years following outplanting. Vertical boxes represent the range of means across the three blocks for each stocktype. Within each box, the solid horizontal line is the median value and the dotted line is the mean. Treatment mean values followed by different letters denote significant differences at α = 0.05 using Fisher’s LSD.
Figure 4. Diameter at breast height (DBH, 1.37 m height) of Acacia koa by stocktype treatment 10 years following outplanting. Vertical boxes represent the range of means across the three blocks for each stocktype. Within each box, the solid horizontal line is the median value and the dotted line is the mean. Treatment mean values followed by different letters denote significant differences at α = 0.05 using Fisher’s LSD.
Forests 11 01124 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jacobs, D.F.; Davis, A.S.; Dumroese, R.K.; Burney, O.T. Nursery Cultural Techniques Facilitate Restoration of Acacia koa Competing with Invasive Grass in a Dry Tropical Forest. Forests 2020, 11, 1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111124

AMA Style

Jacobs DF, Davis AS, Dumroese RK, Burney OT. Nursery Cultural Techniques Facilitate Restoration of Acacia koa Competing with Invasive Grass in a Dry Tropical Forest. Forests. 2020; 11(11):1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111124

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jacobs, Douglass F., Anthony S. Davis, R. Kasten Dumroese, and Owen T. Burney. 2020. "Nursery Cultural Techniques Facilitate Restoration of Acacia koa Competing with Invasive Grass in a Dry Tropical Forest" Forests 11, no. 11: 1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111124

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop