Next Article in Journal
The Persistence of Container Nursery Treatments on the Field Performance and Root System Morphology of Longleaf Pine Seedlings
Next Article in Special Issue
The Composition and Height of Saplings Capturing Silvicultural Gaps at Two Long-Term Experiments in Managed Northern Hardwood Forests
Previous Article in Journal
Machinability Study of Australia’s Dominate Plantation Timber Resources
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analyzing Spatial Distribution Patterns of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Regeneration in Dependence of Canopy Openings
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/f10090806
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Forest Gap Size Alters the Functional Diversity of Soil Nematode Communities in Alpine Forest Ecosystems

by
Ya Shen
1,
Wanqin Yang
2,
Jian Zhang
1,
Zhenfeng Xu
1,
Li Zhang
1,
Yang Liu
1,
Han Li
1,
Chengming You
1 and
Bo Tan
1,*
1
Institute of Ecology & Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Forestry Ecological Engineering in Upper Reaches of Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Alpine Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 611130, China
2
School of Life Science, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2019, 10(9), 806; https://doi.org/10.3390/f10090806
Received: 10 July 2019 / Revised: 30 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 September 2019 / Published: 16 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Gap Factors in Forest Tree Regeneration and Plant Communities)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Changes in the microenvironment driven by forest gaps have profound effects on soil nutrient cycling and litter decomposition processes in alpine forest ecosystems. However, it is unclear whether a similar forest gap effect occurs in the soil decomposer community. A field experiment was conducted in an alpine forest to investigate the composition and structure of the soil nematode community among four treatments, including under a closed canopy and in small (<10 m in diameter), medium (10–15 m in diameter), and large (15–20 m in diameter) gaps. A total of 92,787 individuals and 27 species (genera level) of soil nematode were extracted by elutriation and sugar centrifugation, respectively. Filenchus was the most abundant dominant taxa and represented 24.27–37.51% of the soil nematodes in the four treatments. Compared to the closed canopy, the forest gaps did not affect the composition, abundance, or species diversity of the soil nematode community but significantly affected the functional diversity of the soil nematode community. The maturity indices (MI, ∑MI, and MI2‒5) of the soil nematode community in the closed canopy were significantly lower than those in the forest gaps. Moreover, the proportion of plant parasitic index and maturity index (PPI/MI) values of the closed canopy and small gaps were significantly higher than those of the medium and large gaps. Our results suggest that the forest gap size substantially alters the functional diversity of soil nematodes in the debris food web, and changes in soil nematode community structure due to gap formation may have profound effects on soil biogeochemical processes in alpine forests.

1. Introduction

A forest gap, which is caused by the death of one or more canopy trees, is the dominant form of disturbance in various forest ecosystems [1]. After gap formation, more irradiance and rainfall reach under the canopy, and the temperature and moisture conditions are generally improved compared to those under a closed canopy [2,3]. These changes driven by gap formation have profound effects on tree regeneration, plant nutrient uptake, and litter input under the canopy [4,5]. Moreover, the formation of forest gaps may alter the compositional and structural diversity of the soil decomposer food web on the forest floor through positive or negative effects to the microclimate and aboveground plant community [6,7].
Numerous studies have suggested that the composition and structure of the nematode community are sensitive ecological indicators that can be used to determine the integrated effects of disturbances on small-scale spatial variations in the decomposer community in forest ecosystems [8,9,10]. The main reasons are that (1) soil nematodes are the Earth’s most abundant metazoan and respond rapidly to environmental changes (e.g., warming, drought, and land-use change) and (2) their feeding specificity and high number of species play an indispensable role in the soil decomposer food web, such as by regulating the microbial community structure [11,12]. Furthermore, multitudinous studies have reported that nematode communities are greatly affected by the spatial and temporal patterns of soil moisture and temperature. For example, drought stress or warming was found to decrease the abundance of soil nematodes [13,14], whereas the trophic groups responded differently to soil moisture, with bacterivores decreasing and plant-parasitic nematodes increasing with an increase in moisture [15]. In alpine ecosystems, the microclimatic conditions (e.g., soil temperature and soil moisture) were found to be higher under an open canopy than under a closed canopy [16], and these changes accelerated litter decomposition, lignin loss, and nutrient cycling [17,18]. However, it is still unclear whether a similar gap effect occurs in the soil decomposer community (e.g., nematode) in alpine forests.
For this study, we conducted a field experiment to investigate the composition and structure of soil nematodes under a closed canopy and under different forest gaps in an alpine forest of southwestern China. We hypothesized that (1) the abundance and species diversity of soil nematodes were greater in the forest gaps than under a closed canopy due to increased soil temperature and moisture condition and that (2) the structure of the soil food web differed under a closed canopy and in the forest gaps due to variations in the functional diversity of soil nematodes. The aim of our study was to explore the feasibility of using soil nematode communities as indicator species for environmental changes and to gain a deeper understanding of the characteristics of soil biodiversity in alpine forests.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

This study was conducted at the Long-Term Research Station of Alpine Forest Ecosystems (31°14′ N, 102°53′ E, 3582 m a.s.l.), which is located on the eastern Tibetan Plateau, China. The study site is a primary fir (Abies fargesii var. faxoniana) forest with a tree age of approximately 140 years, and the forest canopy is dominated by fir (70–80%) and spruce (Picea asperata). The mean annual air temperature and the mean annual rainfall at the site are 2‒4 °C and 850 mm, respectively. The understory shrubs are dominated by Salix paraplesia, Sorbus rufopilosa, Rhododendron lapponicum, and Rosa sweginzowii, and the coverage ratio of shrubs is approximately 0.4. The herbs consist of Cacalia auriculata, Cystopteris montana, Carex spp., Cyperus spp., and other species, and the coverage ratio of herbs is approximately 0.6 [19]. The coverage ratio of herbs is approximately 0.85 in the forest gaps [20]. The soil is classified as a Cambic Umbrisol according to the International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS) Working Group, and the basic chemical soil properties (0‒15 cm) can be found in Tan et al. [21].

2.2. Experimental Design and Soil Sampling

In this study, we defined the forest gaps according to the conception of an expanded forest gap, and the edges of the expanded gaps were defined by the trunk bases of the border trees [22,23]. Previous investigations have found that the shapes of the forest gaps in the study site were approximately elliptical [19]. Therefore, the distance between the two most distant trunks in the gap and the distance between the two trunks perpendicular to each other were used as the long and short axes of the ellipse, respectively, and the area of the gap was calculated by the ellipse area formula [22,24]. The gap age was calculated from the degree of decomposition of the gap maker [25]. Moreover, our previous studies suggested that treefalls account for 70% of the gap formation types and that the largest expanded forest gap at the experimental site was approximately 280 m2 [19]. Thus, the treefall gap sizes selected in this experiment are 255‒290 m2 (large gap with a diameter 15‒20 m), 153‒176 m2 (medium gap with a diameter 10‒15 m), and 38‒46 m2 (small gap with a diameter <10 m).
The experimental plots were set up in a primary fir forest formed by natural vegetation succession. The average tree height and diameter at breast height (DBH) were 28 m and 30 cm, respectively [19]. Three plots showing homogeneous topography were established. Within each plot, treefall gaps were selected for soil sampling, including large, medium, and small gaps and a closed canopy area. The properties of the selected gaps are shown in Table 1. Soil samples (approximately 500 g each) were collected from the center of the forest gaps because the microclimates between the southern and northern edges of the gap often show significant differences [2]. In each plot, three intact soil cores (20 × 25 cm) were collected from the gaps and closed canopy at a depth of 15 cm for soil nematode extraction in August 2016. A total of 36 soil samples (4 treatments × 3 plots × 3 samples) were collected in the study. After screening out the rocks and coarse debris from the soil samples, the soil samples were stored in a cooler box with ice packs and transported to the laboratory within 24 h. The samples were stored in a laboratory refrigerator at 4 °C and the analysis was completed within one week.

2.3. Soil Nematode Extraction

The soil nematode community structure was determined by extracting the nematodes from each soil sample (100 g) using the elutriation and sugar centrifugation method [26]. The extracted nematodes were killed and fixed in hot formalin. After counting the total number of nematodes, 100 specimens per sample were randomly selected and identified to the genus level using an inverted compound microscope (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY, USA) according to the reference of Yin [27]. The nematodes were assigned to the bacterivores (Ba), fungivores (Fu), omnivore-predators (OP) and plant parasites (PP) trophic groups according to their feeding habits [28,29].

2.4. Data Calculations and Statistical Analyses

The abundance (the number of individuals per 100 g of dry soil) and generic richness (mean number of genera per sample) were used to measure the response of the soil nematode community to changes in the microclimate from a large gap to a closed canopy. The dominant species, frequent species, and rare species were defined as those with abundances greater than 10% (+++), between 10% and 1% (++), and less than 1% (+) of the total individual density, respectively [29]. Life strategy was assessed by the colonizer-persister (c-p) scale from 1 to 5, which was used to provide information on the functioning and condition of the nematode food web in the gaps and closed canopy [11].
The differences in soil nematode diversity between the gaps and the closed canopy were described by using the species diversity indices, such as the Shannon–Wiener index (H’), Pielou index (J’), dominance index (λ), and Margalef index (SR). Moreover, the life history diversity indices based on different life history characteristics were also calculated to determine the differences in the soil nematode community between the gaps and closed canopy, including the free-living nematodes with c-p1 through c-p5 (MI), free-living nematodes with c-p2 through c-p5 (MI2‒5), the plant parasite index (PPI), the sum maturity index (∑MI), and the proportion of PPI and MI (PPI/MI). The structure index (SI), enrichment index (EI), and channel index (CI) are functional diversity indices that were used to assess the soil quality in the gaps and closed canopy. Life history diversity indices and functional diversity indices were collectively referred to as functional group indices, which were used to characterize the functional structure of soil nematodes in the different treatments (Supplementary Materials). All indices were calculated using the following equations:
H ′ = − ∑ i = 1 S P i ( In P i ) ,
J ′ = H ′ In ( S )   ,
  SR = S − 1 InN   ,
λ = ∑ P i 2   ,
where N is the number of individuals identified, S is the number of taxa identified, and P i is the proportion of individuals in the ith taxon (a given taxon is regarded as the ith taxon) [30,31,32];
MI ( ∑ MI , MI 2 – 5 , and   PPI ) = ∑ i = 1 n c p i · p i ,
where n is the number of taxa in the sample, c p i is the c-p value of soil nematodes to the ith taxon, and P i is the proportion of individuals in the ith taxon [31,33,34,35];
SI = 100 × ( s / ( s + b ) ) ,
  EI = 100 × ( e / ( e + b ) ) ,  
  CI = 100 × ( 0.8 F u 2 / ( 0.8 F u 2 + 3.2 B a 1 ) )   .
The b component is calculated as ∑ k b n b , where the k b values are the weightings assigned to the guilds that indicate the basal characteristics of the food web (0.8Ba2, 0.8Fu2) and the n b values are the abundances of nematodes in those guilds. The e and s components are calculated similarly, and the k b values are calculating using the guilds indicating enrichment (3.2Ba1, 0.8Fu2) and structure (1.8Fu3, 1.8Ba3, 3.2Fu4, 3.2Ba4, and 3.2OP) [36].
One-way ANOVA was conducted to test for significant differences in the nematode community among the four gap treatments, and if significant differences were identified by ANOVA, multiple comparisons were performed using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post-hoc test. Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance was performed before conducting the ANOVAs, and the data were logarithmic transformed if required. ANOVAs were performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and figures were prepared using Origin 9.1 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using Canoco 5.0 (Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA) to assess the effects of the gap treatment on the composition of the soil nematode community. The PCA was run separately for each treatment to reduce the number of variables and the figure complexity. The PCA analyses were performed with the abundance data (ind.·100 g−1 dry soil) at the family level.

3. Results

3.1. Soil Nematode Composition

In the four treatments, a total of 92,787 individuals and 27 species (genera level) of soil nematodes were trapped. Compared to the closed canopy, the three gap treatments did not significantly (F = 2.40, p = 0.09) affect the abundance of soil nematodes. The abundance of soil nematodes varied from 774.3 to 1288.5 ind.·100 g−1 with the rank of the medium gap > closed canopy > large gap > small gap (Table 2).
According to species proportions (Table 2), Filenchus was the most abundant dominant taxa and represented 24.27–37.51% of the soil nematodes in the four treatments. Pararotylenchus was the dominant genera that existed in only the forest gaps, whereas Coslenchus was a rare genus that occurred in only the closed canopy. The PCA showed that the composition of the soil nematode community was similar in the four treatments (Figure 1), but the spatial variations in nematode community composition were relatively large in the closed canopy and medium gap. Tylenchidae and Hoplolaimidae were the main taxonomic families associated with the separation of PC1 and PC2, respectively.

3.2. Soil Nematode Functional (Trophic, c-p) Groups

According to the proportions in the soil nematode trophic structure (Figure 2), fungivores and bacterivores were the two main trophic taxa and represented 31.10–47.83% and 32.31–35.91% of the soil nematodes in all treatments, respectively. Moreover, the trophic structure of the nematode community varied among the four treatments. The fungivores were the most numerous trophic taxa in the closed canopy and small gaps, whereas the bacterivores were the most numerous trophic taxa in the medium and large gaps. The nematode community trophic structure was unaffected (all p > 0.5) by the gap treatment.
The cp1, cp2, cp3, and cp4 groups of soil nematodes accounted for 6.26%, 51.05%, 29.96%, and 12.73% of the total number of soil nematodes, respectively. The result of one-way ANOVA indicated that only the values of cp4 exhibited significant differences (p < 0.05) between the closed canopy and the forest gaps. The proportions of soil nematodes in the cp1 and cp2 groups in the closed canopy were higher than those in the forest gaps. In contrast, the proportions of soil nematodes in the cp3 and cp4 groups in the closed canopy and small gaps were lower than those in the medium and large gaps (Figure 3).

3.3. Soil Nematode Community Indices

The species diversity indices (H’, J’, λ, and SR) of soil nematodes were not significantly different among the four treatments. The highest H’, J’, and SR values were in the medium gaps, whereas the lowest λ values were also in the medium gaps. The maturity indices of MI, ∑MI, and MI2‒5 were significantly lower in the closed canopy than in the gaps. Moreover, the PPI/MI values of the closed canopy and small gaps were significantly higher than those of the medium and large gaps (Table 3). The enrichment index (EI) and channel index (CI) exhibited no significant differences among the four treatments, but the structure index (SI) in the closed canopy was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that in the three gaps (Table 3 and Figure 4).

4. Discussion

In high-elevation ecosystems, the formation of forest gaps alters the soil temperature and moisture conditions compared with those under a closed canopy [16], which has positive, negative, or neutral effects on litter decomposition and soil nutrient mineralization [17,37,38]. Previous studies have shown that the individual density and genera of the soil nematodes in a forest gap are significantly higher than those under a closed canopy, although the soil physical and chemical properties show slight differences between the gaps and the closed canopy [39,40]. Contrary to our first hypothesis and previous results, forest gap formation did not affect the abundance of the soil nematode community in this study. Moreover, the composition of the soil nematode community was similar in the closed canopy and the forest gaps, and the species diversity indices (H’, J’, λ, and SR) of the soil nematodes were not significantly different among the four treatments. One possible explanation for this finding is that the vegetation types on the forest floor were the same among treatments, and the ratio of herb coverage was similar in the closed canopy (0.6) and the forest gaps (0.85) during the growing season at the study sites [19,20], as plant species diversity affects nematode diversity. Another possible explanation is that the ecological niches of the soil nematodes in the four treatments were completely differentiated through long-term adaptation (Table 1, gap age), so there were no significant differences in soil nematode diversity among the different treatments [41]. Coslenchus (plant parasites) existed in only the closed canopy, which was consistent with our previous findings in the same alpine and subalpine forests [42], indicating that the roots of the primary fir (Abies fargesii var. faxoniana) forest may be highly suitable for Coslenchus. In addition, Walker proposed that the loss of certain species can be compensated for by the transformation of the abundance of other species to maintain the stability of the entire soil ecosystem [43]. Interestingly, the medium gap had the lowest number of genera but the highest abundance among the four treatments, which is consistent with Walker’s hypothesis. Therefore, a medium gap (153‒176 m2) may be a critical gap size for the change in the soil decomposer community in an alpine forest.
The changes in forest gap size have been suggested to affect the activities of the soil decomposer community and nutrient cycle under the canopy [4,6,44]. In our study, soil nematodes under the closed canopy and in the small gaps (38–46 m2) were dominated by fungivores, whereas those in the medium (153–176 m2) and large (255–290 m2) gaps were dominated by bacterivores. This finding is similar to the results in the alpine forests of southeastern Tibet [40]. However, the CI of the soil nematode community in the four treatments was greater than 50, illustrating that the soil organic matter in the four treatments is mainly decomposed by fungal channels in the debris food web. This result is different from the finding that the decomposition channel of soil organic matter in the debris food web changes from fungi to bacteria from a closed canopy to a large gap. The disparate results can be mainly explained as follows: (1) the recalcitrant substrates (e.g., lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose) and C/N ratios in the soil organic layer of the studied forest are relatively high [45,46,47], and the decomposition of recalcitrant substrates is highly dependent on fungal involvement [48,49,50] and (2) the soil temperature and moisture often increase with the increase in forest gap sizes in the growing season (Table 1). The high temperature and moisture conditions are suitable for the growth of the bacterial community [2,51], leading to the bacteria being the main trophic group in the medium and large gaps.
Nematode life history diversity indices (MI, ∑MI, MI2‒5, PPI, and PPI/MI) can sensitively respond to the changes in the soil environment and the situation of the soil food web structure [52]. The values of MI and PPI between 1 and 4 are used to indicate the succession status of the soil nematode community and the stability of the soil environment. Generally, a small value suggests a weak soil environment, and the soil nematode community can be considered to be in the early succession stage [34,41]. Additionally, cp1‒2 nematodes have a competitive strategy (r-strategy) with a short life cycle, reproduce well, and can tolerate external disturbance. In contrast, cp 3‒5 nematodes have a competitive strategy (k-strategy) with a long life cycle, reproduce weakly, and are sensitive to external disturbance [11]. The abundances of cp4 groups in the medium and large gaps were significantly higher than those in the closed canopy and small gaps, indicating that the competitive strategy changed with gap size in the present study. Consistent with our second hypothesis, forest gaps significantly affected the functional diversity of the soil nematode communities in our experimental sites. The maturity indices (MI, ∑MI, and MI2‒5) were significantly lower in the closed canopy than in the forest gaps, indicating that the soil microenvironment and soil nematode community structure in the closed canopy differed from those in the forest gaps. Moreover, the MI values gradually increased from the closed canopy to the large gaps, which suggested that a continuous change in the functional diversity of the soil nematode community may occur between the closed canopy and forest gaps.
Bongers et al. considered that disturbance would increase the PPI/MI value of a soil nematode community, whereas the PPI/MI value of an undisturbed natural environment would be lower than that of a disturbed environment [33]. Plants optimally use nutrient resources when the PPI/MI values are close to 0.9, whereas the PPI/MI values near 1.2 indicate slight nutrient disturbances [12]. As shown in this study, the PPI/MI values of the closed canopy and small gaps were significantly higher than those of the medium and large gaps (Table 3), which indicated that the environment of the medium and large gaps was relatively stable or less disturbed. The reason for this finding may be that the characteristics of the medium and large gaps are similar, such as the gap size, cause of the gap, gap year, gap makers, and soil moisture (Table 1). Furthermore, according to the calculated EI and SI, the nematode fauna can be divided into four quadrants, A, B, C, and D, where the values of EI and SI vary from 0 to 100. When EI is greater than 50 but SI is less than 50 (A quadrant), the soil nutrient status is good but the degree of disturbance is high, and the food web is subject to a certain degree of disturbance. When both EI and SI are greater than 50 (B quadrant), the soil nutrient condition is improved, the degree of disturbance is small, and the food web is stable and mature. When EI is less than 50 but SI is greater than 50 (C quadrant), the soil nutrient condition is poor but the degree of disturbance is small, and the food web is in a structured state. When both EI and SI are less than 50 (D quadrant), the soil nutrient condition is poor and the degree of disturbance is highest, which causes stress to the environment and degrades the food web [36]. Nematode faunal analysis suggested that the closed canopy belonged to quadrant A, the small and medium gaps belonged to quadrant B, and the large gaps belonged to quadrant C (Figure 4). The results indicated that the degree of disturbance (SI < 50) in the closed canopy was high, whereas it was low in the gaps. Moreover, soil nutrient enrichment (EI) was close to 50 in all four treatments. Thus, the food web structure was more stable and mature in the gaps than under the closed canopy.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this experiment investigated the effects of forest gap formation on the composition and functional structure of the soil nematode community in an alpine forest. Our results suggested that the changes in gap size caused slight changes in the composition, abundance, and diversity of the soil nematode community. However, forest gaps showed significant effects on the functional diversity of the soil nematode community. The maturity indices (MI, ∑MI, and MI2‒5) significantly increased from the closed canopy to the large gap, whereas the PPI/MI values of the closed canopy and small gaps were significantly higher than those of the medium and large gaps. Our results highlight the conclusion that forest gap sizes have non-negligible effects on the soil nematode community in the debris food web in alpine forests. Changes in the functional structure of the soil nematode community due to gap formation may have profound effects for soil biogeochemical processes in alpine forests.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/10/9/806/s1, Supplementary files S1: Detailed description of the soil nematode community indices.

Author Contributions

W.Y., J.Z., and B.T. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.S. and B.T. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. Y.L., C.Y., and H.L. participated in field investigations. B.T., W.Y., Z.X., and L.Z. contributed resources.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870602, 31700542, 31570601, and 31500509), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0503906), and the Special Fund for Key Programs of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (2018SZDZX0030).

Acknowledgments

Bo Tan and Chengming You acknowledge the China Scholarship Council for supporting a visiting scholar program grant (201806915014) and Ph.D. program grant (201806910030), respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yamamoto, S.I. Forest gap dynamics and tree regeneration. J. For. Res. 2000, 5, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ritter, E.; Dalsgaard, L.; Einhorn, K.S. Light, temperature and soil moisture regimes following gap formation in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest in Denmark. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 206, 15–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Scharenbroch, B.C.; Bockheim, J.G. Impacts of forest gaps on soil properties and processes in old growth northern hardwood-hemlock forests. Plant Soil 2007, 294, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sariyildiz, T. Effects of Gap-Size Classes on Long-Term Litter Decomposition Rates of Beech, Oak and Chestnut Species at High Elevations in Northeast Turkey. Ecosystems 2008, 11, 841–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schnitzer, S.A.; Dalling, J.W.; Carson, W.P. The impact of lianas on tree regeneration in tropical forest canopy gaps: Evidence for an alternative pathway of gap-phase regeneration. J. Ecol. 2000, 88, 655–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Muscolo, A.; Sidari, M.; Mercurio, R. Influence of gap size on organic matter decomposition, microbial biomass and nutrient cycle in Calabrian pine (Pinus laricio, Poiret) stands. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 242, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wardle, D.A.; Bardgett, R.D.; Klironomos, J.N.; Setala, H.; van der Putten, W.H.; Wall, D.H. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 2004, 304, 1629–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Butenko, K.O.; Gongalsky, K.B.; Korobushkin, D.I.; Ekschmitt, K.; Zaitsev, A.S. Forest fires alter the trophic structure of soil nematode communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 109, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kitagami, Y.; Kanzaki, N.; Matsuda, Y. Distribution and community structure of soil nematodes in coastal Japanese pine forests were shaped by harsh environmental conditions. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 119, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Salamun, P.; Hanzelova, V.; Miklisova, D.; Sestinova, O.; Findorakova, L.; Kovacik, P. The effects of vegetation cover on soil nematode communities in various biotopes disturbed by industrial emissions. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 592, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bongers, T.; Bongers, M. Functional diversity of nematodes. Appl. Soil Ecol. 1998, 10, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gutierrez, C.; Fernandez, C.; Escuer, M.; Campos-Herrera, R.; Beltran Rodriguez, M.E.; Carbonell, G.; Rodriguez Martin, J.A. Effect of soil properties, heavy metals and emerging contaminants in the soil nematodes diversity. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 213, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mueller, K.E.; Blumenthal, D.M.; Carrillo, Y.; Cesarz, S.; Ciobanu, M.; Hines, J.; Pabst, S.; Pendall, E.; de Tomasel, C.M.; Wall, D.H.; et al. Elevated CO2 and warming shift the functional composition of soil nematode communities in a semiarid grassland. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 103, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Olatunji, O.A.; Gong, S.; Tariq, A.; Pan, K.; Sun, X.; Chen, W.; Zhang, L.; Dakhil, M.A.; Huang, D.; Tan, X. The effect of phosphorus addition, soil moisture, and plant type on soil nematode abundance and community composition. J. Soil. Sediment. 2019, 19, 1139–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vandegehuchte, M.L.; Sylvain, Z.A.; Reichmann, L.G.; de Tomasel, C.M.; Nielsen, U.N.; Wall, D.H.; Sala, O.E. Responses of a desert nematode community to changes in water availability. Ecosphere 2015, 6, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prescott, C.E.; Blevins, L.L.; Staley, C.L. Effects of clear-cutting on decomposition rates of litter and forest floor in forests of British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res. 2000, 30, 1751–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. He, W.; Wu, F.; Yang, W.; Zhang, D.; Xu, Z.; Tan, B.; Zhao, Y.; Justine, M.F. Gap locations influence the release of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in two shrub foliar litter in an alpine fir forest. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  18. Ni, X.; Berg, B.; Yang, W.; Li, H.; Liao, S.; Tan, B.; Yue, K.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wu, F. Formation of forest gaps accelerates C, N and P release from foliar litter during 4 years of decomposition in an alpine forest. Biogeochemistry 2018, 139, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  19. Wu, Q.; Wu, F.; Yang, W.; Tan, B.; Yang, Y.; Ni, X.; He, J. Characteristics of Gaps and Disturbance Regimes of the Alpine Fir Forest in Western Sichuan. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2013, 19, 922–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, Q.; Wu, F.; Tan, B.; Yang, W.; He, W.; Ni, X. Effects of gap sizes on foliar litter decomposition in alpine forests. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 3537–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tan, B.; Wu, F.; Yang, W.; Yu, S.; Liu, L.; Wang, A.; Yang, Y. Seasonal dynamics of soil fauna in the subalpine and alpine forests of west Sichuan at different altitudes. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2013, 33, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schliemann, S.A.; Bockheim, J.G. Methods for studying treefall gaps: A review. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 261, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brokaw, N.V.L. The definition of treefall gap and its effect on measures of forest dynamics. Biotropica 1982, 14, 158–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Runkle, J.R. Gap regeneration in some old-growth forests of the Eastern United States. Ecology 1981, 62, 1041–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, Q.H.; Hytteborn, H. Gap structure, disturbance and regeneration in a primeval Picea abies forest. J. Veg. Sci. 1991, 2, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liang, W.; Li, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Neher, D.A. Nematode faunal analysis in an aquic brown soil fertilised with slow-release urea, Northeast China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2005, 29, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yin, W.Y. Pictorial Keys to Soil Animals of China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yeates, G.W.; Bongers, T.; de Goede, R.G.; Freckman, D.W.; Georgieva, S.S. Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera-an outline for soil ecologists. J. Nematol. 1993, 25, 315–331. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, X.K.; Liang, W.J.; Li, Q. Forest Soil Nematodes in Changbai Mountain: Morphology and Distribution; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pielou, E.C. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collection. J. Theoret. Biol. 1966, 13, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yeates, G.W.; Bongers, T. Nematode diversity in agroecosystems. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 1999, 74, 113–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yeates, G.W. Variation in soil nematode diversity under pasture with soil and year. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1984, 16, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bongers, T.; van der Meulen, H.; Korthals, G. Inverse relationship between the nematode maturity index and plant parasite index under enriched nutrient conditions. Appl. Soil Ecol. 1997, 6, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bongers, T. The maturity index: An ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia 1990, 83, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Neher, D.A. Role of nematodes in soil health and their use as indicators. J. Nematol. 2001, 33, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Ferris, H.; Bongers, T.; de Goede, R.G.M. A framework for soil food web diagnostics: Extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2001, 18, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yang, W.; Wu, F.; Xu, Z.; Tan, B.; Zhang, L.; He, X.; Guo, L. Canopy gaps accelerate soil organic carbon retention by soil microbial biomass in the organic horizon in a subalpine fir forest. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 125, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Prescott, C.E.; Hope, G.D.; Blevins, L.L. Effect of gap size on litter decomposition and soil nitrate concentrations in a high-elevation spruce–fir forest. Can. J. For. Res. 2003, 33, 2210–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xue, H.; Luo, D. Characteristics of soil nematode community in clear cutting slash of Fir forests in southeast Tibet. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2013, 49, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xue, H.Y.; Luo, D.Q. Characteristics of soil nematode community in Abies georgei var. smithii forest gaps in southeast Tibet, China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 24, 2494–2502. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, R.; Liu, X.; Zhong, H.; Wu, Q.; Wu, P. Distribution pattern of soil nematode communities along the vertical climate zones on the eastern slope of Gongga Mountain. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2016, 22, 959–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, Y.; Yang, W.; Wu, F.; Yang, F.; Lan, L.; Liu, Y.; Guo, C.; Tan, B. Diversity of soil nematode communities in the subalpine and alpine forests of western Sichuan, China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2017, 28, 3360–3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Walker, B.H. Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy. Conserv. Biol. 1992, 6, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lin, N.; Bartsch, N.; Heinrichs, S.; Vor, T. Long-term effects of canopy opening and liming on leaf litter production, and on leaf litter and fine-root decomposition in a European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 338, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. He, W.; Wu, F.; Yang, W.; Tan, B.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, Q.; He, M. Lignin Degradation in Foliar Litter of Two Shrub Species from the Gap Center to the Closed Canopy in an Alpine Fir Forest. Ecosystems 2015, 19, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, H.; Wu, F.; Yang, W.; Xu, L.; Ni, X.; He, J.; Tan, B.; Hu, Y. Effects of Forest Gaps on Litter Lignin and Cellulose Dynamics Vary Seasonally in an Alpine Forest. Forests 2016, 7, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Feng, R.; Yang, W.; Zhang, J. Review on biochemical property in forest soil organic layer and its responses to climate change. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2006, 12, 734–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Baldrian, P. Forest microbiome: Diversity, complexity and dynamics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 109–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jones, D.; Farmer, V.C. The ecology and physiology of soil fungi involved in the degradation of lignin and related aromatic compounds. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1967, 18, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lin, D.; Pang, M.; Fanin, N.; Wang, H.; Qian, S.; Zhao, L.; Yang, Y.; Mi, X.; Ma, K. Fungi participate in driving home-field advantage of litter decomposition in a subtropical forest. Plant Soil 2019, 434, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bakonyi, G.; Nagy, P. Temperature- and moisture-induced changes in the structure of the nematode fauna of a semiarid grassland-patterns and mechanisms. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2000, 6, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yeates, G.W. Nematodes as soil indicators: Functional and biodiversity aspects. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2003, 37, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Forests 10 00806 g001 550
Figure 1. Variations in community structure of the soil nematodes in four treatments. CC, closed canopy; SG, small gaps; MG, medium gaps; LG, large gaps.
Figure 1. Variations in community structure of the soil nematodes in four treatments. CC, closed canopy; SG, small gaps; MG, medium gaps; LG, large gaps.
Forests 10 00806 g001
Forests 10 00806 g002 550
Figure 2. Ratio of the functional groups of the soil nematode community in the closed canopy and three types of forest gaps (small, medium, and large gaps). Ba, bacterivores; Fu, fungivores; OP, omnivore-predators; PP, plant parasites. CC, closed canopy; SG, small gaps; MG, medium gaps; LG, large gaps.
Figure 2. Ratio of the functional groups of the soil nematode community in the closed canopy and three types of forest gaps (small, medium, and large gaps). Ba, bacterivores; Fu, fungivores; OP, omnivore-predators; PP, plant parasites. CC, closed canopy; SG, small gaps; MG, medium gaps; LG, large gaps.
Forests 10 00806 g002
Forests 10 00806 g003 550
Figure 3. The colonizer-persister (c-p) values of the four habitats (mean ± SE, n = 9). Lowercase letters indicate differences within treatments at the p < 0.05 level. CC, closed canopy; SG, small gaps; MG, medium gaps; LG, large gaps. CP1, CP2, CP3, and CP4 are the colonizer-persister scales from 1 to 4.
Figure 3. The colonizer-persister (c-p) values of the four habitats (mean ± SE, n = 9). Lowercase letters indicate differences within treatments at the p < 0.05 level. CC, closed canopy; SG, small gaps; MG, medium gaps; LG, large gaps. CP1, CP2, CP3, and CP4 are the colonizer-persister scales from 1 to 4.
Forests 10 00806 g003
Forests 10 00806 g004 550
Figure 4. Enrichment index (EI) and structure index (SI) values for the four treatments. CC, closed canopy; SG, small gaps; MG, medium gaps; LG, large gaps. Food web diagnostic quadrants are indicated above each bar, and the means are from Ferris et al. [36].
Figure 4. Enrichment index (EI) and structure index (SI) values for the four treatments. CC, closed canopy; SG, small gaps; MG, medium gaps; LG, large gaps. Food web diagnostic quadrants are indicated above each bar, and the means are from Ferris et al. [36].
Forests 10 00806 g004
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the four treatments (mean ± SE, n = 3).
Table 1. Characteristics of the four treatments (mean ± SE, n = 3).
Type of GapGap Size (m2)Cause of GapGap Age (Year)Gap MakersSoil Temperature (°C)Soil Moisture (%)
Large gap281.7 ± 4.4Breakage at trunk31.4 ± 2.7Fir (78%) + spruce (22%)9.23 ± 0.22 a40.72 ± 2.33 ab
Medium gap165.0 ± 5.8Breakage at trunk30.1 ± 2.8Fir (71%) + spruce (29%)7.81 ± 0.15 b37.54 ± 2.69 ab
Small gap43.3 ± 3.3Standing death26.7 ± 1.9Fir7.48 ± 0.14 c36.67 ± 1.94 b
Closed canopy----7.42 ± 0.16 c43.71 ± 1.72 a
Lowercase letters indicate differences within treatments at the p < 0.05 level.
Table
Table 2. Composition and abundance (ind.·100 g−1 dry soil) of soil nematodes in the closed canopy and three types of forest gaps.
Table 2. Composition and abundance (ind.·100 g−1 dry soil) of soil nematodes in the closed canopy and three types of forest gaps.
TG/GeneraFGClosed CanopySmall GapsMedium GapsLarge GapsTotal
Ind.DominanceInd.DominanceInd.DominanceInd.DominanceInd.Dominance
Ba 386.5 250.2 423.7 370.1 1430.4
RhabditisBa192.1++45.4++61.4++40.6++239.5++
BunonemaBa17.1+6.7+5.0+0.9+19.7+
EucephalobusBa235.3++21.2++26.6++17.8++100.9++
HeterocephalobusBa26.5+0.9+1.3+2.0+10.6+
AcrobeloidesBa262.4++17.6++35.1++29.9++145.0++
PlectusBa236.4++27.8++75.1++82.4++221.6++
WilsonemaBa231.9++22.9++26.4++23.5++104.7++
MicrolaimusBa21.7+0.9+10.7+5.2+18.5+
TeratocephalusBa343.9++55.8++70.4++66.3++236.4++
MetateratocephalusBa310.2+5.2+0-0.7+16.1+
RhabdolaimusBa33.8+0-4.2+1.9+9.9+
PrismatolaimusBa330.5++17.2++53.7++25.9++127.4++
AlaimusBa411.3++16.1++38.6++63.2++129.2++
ParamphidelusBa413.4++12.4++15.2++9.8+50.9++
Fu 537.3 354.2 416.7 320.5 1628.8
FilenchusFu2421.3+++278.7+++312.8+++261.6+++1274.4+++
AphelenchoidesFu289.3++48.1++23.8++10.4++171.6++
DiphtherophoraFu317.1++14.6++36.5++27.0++95.2++
TylencholaimusFu49.5+12.9++43.6++21.5++87.5++
OP 46.5 40.7 113.7 68.8 269.7
EpidorylaimusOP45.9+9.9++47.0++20.3++83.0++
DorydorellaOP440.6++30.8++66.7++48.6++186.6++
PP 153.1 129.1 334.5 271.2 887.8
CoslenchusPP22.1+0-0-0-2.1+
BasiriaPP224.7++4.1+26.2++6.7+61.6++
ParatylenchusPP210.9+8.7++10.1+14.4++44.1++
NagelusPP315.4++6.9+33.8++4.5+60.6++
PararotylenchusPP390.1++102.0+++259.8+++237.5+++689.3+++
PratylenchusPP33.4+3.4+1.1+0.7+8.6+
MacroposthoniaPP36.5+3.9+3.6+7.5+21.5+
Total individuals 1123.3 774.3 1288.5 1030.6 4216.7
Total genera 27 25 25 26 27
TG, trophic group; FG, functional guild; trophic group with c-p value (Ba, bacterivores; Fu, fungivores; OP, omnivore-predators; PP, plant parasites). +++, dominant genera; ++, common genera; +, rare genera; -, none observed.
Table
Table 3. Soil nematode community indices of the four treatments.
Table 3. Soil nematode community indices of the four treatments.
IndicesClosed CanopySmall GapsMedium GapsLarge Gaps
H’2.09 ± 0.24a2.09 ± 0.26a2.31 ± 0.24a2.17 ± 0.19a
J’0.78 ± 0.08a0.76 ± 0.07a0.82 ± 0.06a0.80 ± 0.05a
λ0.19 ± 0.07a0.21 ± 0.08a0.16 ± 0.05a0.17 ± 0.04a
SR2.01 ± 0.32a2.22 ± 0.38a2.23 ± 0.41a2.08 ± 0.47a
MI2.19 ± 0.13c2.38 ± 0.18b2.53 ± 0.14a2.52 ± 0.14ab
∑MI2.29 ± 0.19b2.47 ± 0.20a2.59 ± 0.17a2.60 ± 0.16a
MI2-52.32 ± 0.10b2.52 ± 0.21a2.65 ± 0.17a2.61 ± 0.12a
PPI2.68 ± 0.29a2.88 ± 0.12a2.73 ± 0.33a2.80 ± 0.28a
PPI/MI1.22 ± 0.10a1.22 ± 0.10a1.08 ± 0.11b1.11 ± 0.10b
EI54.92 ± 8.50a57.53 ± 8.13a53.74 ± 7.60a49.31 ± 10.45a
SI44.07 ± 8.84b59.21 ± 13.48a67.01 ± 8.47a64.99 ± 6.88a
CI59.42 ± 24.57a57.59 ± 17.12a58.90 ± 18.25a69.02 ± 24.18a
Values are mean ± SE (n = 9). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among the four habitats (p < 0.05). H’, Shannon–Weaver index; J’, Pielou index; λ, Simpson index; SR, Margalef index; MI, maturity index; ∑MI, sum MI; MI2‒5, MI without c-p1; PPI, plant parasitic index; PPI/MI, proportion of PPI and MI; EI, enrichment index; SI, structure index; CI, channel index.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shen, Y.; Yang, W.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; You, C.; Tan, B. Forest Gap Size Alters the Functional Diversity of Soil Nematode Communities in Alpine Forest Ecosystems. Forests 2019, 10, 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10090806

AMA Style

Shen Y, Yang W, Zhang J, Xu Z, Zhang L, Liu Y, Li H, You C, Tan B. Forest Gap Size Alters the Functional Diversity of Soil Nematode Communities in Alpine Forest Ecosystems. Forests. 2019; 10(9):806. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10090806

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shen, Ya, Wanqin Yang, Jian Zhang, Zhenfeng Xu, Li Zhang, Yang Liu, Han Li, Chengming You, and Bo Tan. 2019. "Forest Gap Size Alters the Functional Diversity of Soil Nematode Communities in Alpine Forest Ecosystems" Forests 10, no. 9: 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10090806

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop