AI-Enhanced Design and Application of High School Geography Field Studies in China: A Case Study of the Yellow (Bohai) Sea Migratory Bird Habitat Curriculum
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Area and Design Concept
2.1. Study Tour Project Area
2.2. Design Concept
2.3. Design Principles
3. Geography Research Course Design Assisted by AI
3.1. Course Objectives
3.2. Course Content
4. Evaluation System
4.1. Process Evaluation
4.2. Summative Evaluation
4.3. AI Evaluation Summary and Feedback
4.4. Test and Effect Evaluation
4.4.1. Process Test
4.4.2. Summative Test
4.4.3. Test Results Before and After the Course
4.4.4. Student Feedback on AI-Enabled Teaching Methods
5. Limitations of and Optimization Strategies for AI-Driven High School Geography Research Design
5.1. Limitations of AI in High School Geography Research
- Insufficient technical adaptability
- 2.
- Differences in students’ abilities and learning habits
- 3.
- Transformation and adaptation of teachers’ roles
5.2. Optimization Strategy
- Improve data quality and technology platforms
- 2.
- Strengthen students’ technical training
- 3.
- Improve teachers’ AI application capabilities
- 4.
- Enrich AI functions and teaching scenarios
5.3. Application Prospects After Optimization
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pedro, F.; Subosa, M.; Rivas, A.; Valverde, P. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development. 2019. Available online: http://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/20.500.12799/6533 (accessed on 21 November 2024).
- Sun, Q. The Functional Mechanism, Practical Challenges and Path Selection of Artificial Intelligence Empowering the Innovation of Ideological and Political Education Mode for College Students. High. Educ. Res. 2024, 10, 81–84+89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodruff, A.; Shelby, R.; Kelley, P.G.; Rousso-Schindler, S.; Smith-Loud, J.; Wilcox, L. How knowledge workers think generative ai will (not) transform their industries. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA, 11–16 May 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Bit, D.; Biswas, S.; Nag, M. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Educational System. Indo Am. J. Pharm. Res. 2024, 11, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.; Fang, X. Analysis of the Hotspots and Trends of Foreign Artificial Intelligence Education Research. Contin. Educ. Res. 2023, 10, 56–62. [Google Scholar]
- Mishra, A. Scalable AI and Design Patterns: Design, Develop, and Deploy Scalable AI Solutions; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Paek, S.; Kim, N. Analysis of worldwide research trends on the impact of artificial intelligence in education. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Chen, P.; Lin, Z. Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 75264–75278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bin Salem, I. Integrating artificial intelligence in personalized learning: A future-oriented approach to enhance student engagement and achievement. Int. J. Post Axial Futur. Teach. Learn. 2024, 2, 111–119. [Google Scholar]
- Rakuasa, H. Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Geography Learning: Challenges and Opportunities. Sinergi Int. J. Educ. 2023, 1, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerski, J.J. The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education. J. Geogr. 2004, 102, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldstein, D.; Alibrandi, M. Integrating GIS in the middle school curriculum: Impacts on diverse students’ standardized test scores. J. Geogr. 2013, 112, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodzin, A.M.; Anastasio, D. Using web-based gis for earth and environmental systems education. J. Geosci. Educ. 2006, 54, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, G.-J.; Yang, L.-H.; Wang, S.-Y. A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses. Comput. Educ. 2013, 69, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henning, J.E. Beyond Action and Cognition: The Role of Awareness and Emotion in Experiential Learning. J. Philos. Educ. 2023, 79, 77. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Education. Opinions on Promoting Study Tours for Primary and Secondary School Students. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. 2 December 2016. Available online: https://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3325/201612/t20161219_292354.html (accessed on 21 November 2024).
- Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. Compulsory Education Geography Curriculum Standards (2022 Edition); Beijing Normal University Press: Beijing, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z.; Klahr, D. All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Dev. 1999, 70, 1239–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerski, J.J. The role of GIS in Digital Earth education. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2008, 1, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bednarz, S.W.; van der Schee, J. Europe and the United States: The implementation of geographical information systems in secondary education in two contexts. Technol. Pedagog. Educ. 2006, 15, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albert, W.S.; Golledge, R.G. The use of spatial cognitive abilities in geographical information systems: The map overlay operation. Trans. GIS 1999, 3, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doering, A.; George, V. An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the K-12 classroom. J. Geogr. 2008, 106, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Favier, T.T.; van der Schee, J.A. Exploring the characteristics of an optimal design for inquiry-based geography education with Geographic Information Systems. Comput. Educ. 2012, 58, 874–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilmartin, P.P.; Patton, J.C. Comparing the sexes on spatial abilities: Map-use skills. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 1984, 74, 310–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marsh, M.; Golledge, R.; Battersby, S.E. Geospatial concept understanding and recognition in G6–College students: A preliminary argument for minimal GIS. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2007, 97, 280–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kali, Y.; Orion, N.; Eylon, B.S. The effect of knowledge integration activities on students’ perception of the earth’s crust as a cyclic system. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2003, 40, 656–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hattie, J. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement; Routledge: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, B.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, G.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, J.; Ji, X.; Jiang, S. Recent evolution of the intertidal sand ridge lines of the Dongsha shoal in the modern radial sand ridges, east China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Higuchi, H. Bird migration and the conservation of the global environment. J. Ornithol. 2012, 153, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutten, R.; Boekema, F. Regional social capital: Embeddedness, innovation networks and regional economic development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2007, 74, 1834–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, A.S.; Monroe, M.C. Place-based education: A model for integrating human and natural geography in the classroom. J. Geogr. 2017, 116, 117–125. [Google Scholar]
- Falk, J.H.; Dierking, L.D. The Museum Experience Revisited; Left Coast Press: Walnut Creek, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Stevenson, R.B.; Brody, M. Place-Conscious Education: Reimagining Learning Through the Local; Harvard Education Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Chassignol, M.; Khoroshavin, A.; Klimova, A.; Bilyatdinova, A. Artificial Intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2018, 136, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woolf, B.P. AI grand challenges for education. AI Mag. 2013, 34, 66–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colucci-Gray, L.; Camino, E.; Barbiero, G.; Gray, D. From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education. Sci. Educ. 2006, 90, 227–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, Y.; Chen, J.; Shirkey, G.; John, R.; Wu, S.R.; Park, H.; Shao, C. Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: An updated review. Ecol. Process. 2016, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pienaar, E.F.; Lew, D.K.; Wallmo, K. Are environmental attitudes influenced by survey context? An investigation of the context dependency of the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale. Soc. Sci. Res. 2013, 42, 1542–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, F.; Jian, Y. The Role of integrating AI and VR in fostering environmental awareness and enhancing activism among college students. Sci. Total. Environ. 2023, 908, 168200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Crompton, H.; Burke, D. Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. Educ. Technol. J. 2023, 3, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mousavi, S.A.; Schmidt, M.; Squires, V.; Wilson, K. Assessing the effectiveness of student advice recommender agent (SARA): The case of automated personalized feedback. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 2021, 31, 603–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Pastore, F.; Goknil, A.; Briand, L.C. Automatic generation of acceptance test cases from use case specifications: An nlp-based approach. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 2020, 48, 585–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, W. Evaluating generative artificial intelligence in answering course –related open questions: A pilot study. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), Macau, Macao, 29 July–1 August 2024; pp. 64–69. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, R.; Merzdorf, H.E.; Anwar, S.; Hipwell, M.C.; Srinivasa, A. Automatic assessment of text-based responses in post-secondary education: A systematic review. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 2024, 6, 100206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Damasevicius, R. From Trivial Answers to Critical Questions: Transforming Education with AI-Driven Inquiry Scenarios. In Teaching and Assessment in the Era of Education 5.0; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; pp. 173–193. [Google Scholar]
- Himeur, Y.; Rimal, B.; Tiwary, A.; Amira, A. Using artificial intelligence and data fusion for environmental monitoring: A review and future perspectives. Inf. Fusion 2022, 86–87, 44–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almasri, F. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning of science: A systematic review of empirical research. Res. Sci. Educ. 2024, 54, 977–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, S.; Jie, W. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence application in personalized learning environments: Thematic analysis of undergraduates’ perceptions in China. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romero, C.; Ventura, S. Data mining in education. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2013, 3, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khreisat, M.N.; Khilani, D.; Rusho, M.A.; Karkkulainen, E.A.; Tabuena, A.C.; Uberas, A.D. Ethical Implications of AI Integration. Educ. Decis. Mak. Syst. Rev. 2024, 30, 8521–8527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizvi, S. Revolutionizing Student Engagement: Artificial Intelligence’s Impact on Specialized Learning Motivation. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci. 2023, 10, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milberg, T. The Future of Learning: How AI Is Revolutionizing Education 4.0. World Economic Forum; World Economic Forum: Cologny, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, J. Understanding Cultural Geography: Places and Traces; Routledge: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Malik, G.; Tayal, D.K.; Vij, S. An analysis of the role of artificial intelligence in education and teaching. In Recent Findings in Intelligent Computing Techniques: Proceedings of the 5th ICACNI 2017; Springer: Singapore, 2019; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
Category | AI Technology Capabilities | Specific Applications |
---|---|---|
Dynamic data support | Process and analyze complex geographic data in real time to provide students with dynamic learning resources. | 1. Analyze wetland ecological changes and migratory patterns of migratory birds. |
2. Generate ecological change models based on historical data to help students predict future trends. | ||
Personalized learning paths | Provide personalized learning topic recommendations and adjust task difficulty and content based on student feedback. | 1. Students can choose learning topics based on their interests (e.g., migratory bird ecology or wetland protection). |
2. Adjust task content in real time to meet the learning needs of different students. | ||
Immersive study experience | Generate virtual study scenarios and support student data analysis and conclusion generation in real time. | 1. Generate a 3D wetland model in the pre-trip stage to help students familiarize themselves with the characteristics of the area. |
2. Provide real-time data analysis support during the in-service stage to accelerate students’ understanding and application of collected data. | ||
Diversified evaluation mechanism | Quantitatively evaluate student performance and generate learning reports to improve learning strategies. | 1. Quantitatively evaluate students’ knowledge, practical ability, and innovative thinking. |
2. AI-generated reports help students and teachers improve their learning processes and strategies. |
Modules | Activity Topics | Place | Activity Content | How to Get Involved with AI | Design Intent |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thinking before going | Regional cognition and background analysis | Classroom | 1. Use AI-generated dynamic maps and wetland models to learn about migratory bird routes and wetland change history. | 1. ERNIE Bot generates dynamic maps and wetland models, providing intuitive learning resources. | Guide students to understand the dynamic changes in wetland ecology and its global conservation significance, laying the foundation for subsequent field investigations. |
2. Use educational chatbots to answer questions related to ecological protection and sort out the relationship between wetlands and migratory bird ecosystems. | 2. ERNIE Bot’s chatbot supports students in answering questions and supplementing knowledge in real time. | ||||
Remote sensing images and environmental monitoring | Classroom | 1. Students use AI-assisted remote sensing images to compare changes in wetland area over different eras. | 1. ERNIE Bot processes remote sensing images over multiple time periods and generates wetland change trend maps in real time. | Cultivate students’ ability to analyze geographic information and help them understand the driving factors of wetland ecological changes. | |
2. Use AI to analyze the specific impact of human activities on wetland ecology. | 2. ERNIE Bot automatically identifies key impact points of human activities (such as industrial development and tourism) on the ecosystem. | ||||
Study on the Go | From the edge to the center: the return of the Chinese elk and the harmony between people and the land | Chinese Elk Park | 1. Students use AI to collect data such as temperature, humidity, and air pressure to analyze the differences in natural conditions in elk habitats. | 1. ERNIE Bot analyzes the data collected by students in real time and presents the correlation between natural conditions and ecological behaviors. | Help students intuitively understand the importance of the natural environment to the survival of species, and explore the dynamic changes in the relationship between humans and land through actual data. |
2. Using AI-generated ecological data, students study the impact of human activities on the habitat of elk. | 2. ERNIE Bot generates a dynamic model of human activities and habitat suitability to assist students in drawing conclusions. | ||||
Green Ocean: Construction of Forest Ecosystem and Human–Land Relationship | Huanghai National Forest Park | 1. Using AI-supported environmental measurement tools, students measure ecological data such as soil moisture in different zones and distribution of vegetation communities. | 1. ERNIE Bot analyzes students’ soil moisture and vegetation distribution data in real time, and automatically generates a visual report on the relationship between environmental factors and ecosystems. | Guide students to understand the impact of human activities on forest ecology through data and behavioral records, and explore how to achieve sustainable use of forest resources. | |
2. Record the impact of tourist behavior and forest management measures on ecological balance, and use AI to generate a report on the ecological impact of behavior. | 2. ERNIE Bot identifies visitor behavior data and provides automatic analysis and management optimization suggestions for ecological disturbance. | ||||
Migratory bird paradise: practice of ecological balance and sustainable development | Tiaozini Wetland | 1. Students use telescopes to record the behavioral characteristics of migratory birds, and AI helps to count population data and analyze its changing trends. | 1. ERNIE Bot processes the migratory bird observation data uploaded by students and generates a dynamic analysis report on population size and behavioral characteristics. | Through observation and data analysis, students can understand the dynamic relationship between human activities and the natural environment and propose ecological protection strategies for sustainable development. | |
2. Use AI to simulate the impact of different development or protection measures on wetland ecosystems and propose a balance between protection and development. | 2. ERNIE Bot’s ecological simulation tool generates an ecological impact prediction model based on the scenarios input by students, supporting students in optimizing strategy design. | ||||
Post-trip learning | Ecological protection plan display | Classroom | 1. Student teams present wetland protection plans, including data analysis results and innovative suggestions. | 1. ERNIE Bot generates group data analysis reports to quantitatively evaluate the scientific nature of student solutions. | Guide students through the complete path from data to decision-making, and cultivate innovation capabilities and awareness of sustainable development. |
2. AI evaluates the scientificity and innovation of the solution, generates feedback reports, and provides optimization directions. | 2. ERNIE Bot provides improvement suggestions based on ecological theory to support students in further optimizing their solutions. | ||||
Community Outreach and Environmental Action | Community | 1. Students make environmental protection posters or videos, and AI helps to proofread the scientificity and logic of the content. | 1. ERNIE Bot reviews the scientific validity of students’ promotional content and provides optimization suggestions. | Transform students’ learning outcomes into practical actions and enhance their sense of social responsibility and leadership. | |
2. Use AI interactive platforms to promote wetland protection concepts, record community feedback and generate data reports. | 2. ERNIE Bot analyzes community feedback data and automatically generates campaign impact assessment reports to support improvements in subsequent environmental protection actions. |
Evaluation Dimensions | Evaluation Project | Evaluation Criteria | AI Analysis Support |
---|---|---|---|
Knowledge Mastery | Wetland ecosystem and migratory bird habitat | Whether students can accurately understand the dynamic changes in wetland ecosystems and the ecological significance of migratory bird migration. | ERNIE Bot evaluates students’ depth of understanding of ecosystem and migratory bird data based on their answers and data analysis results. |
Forest ecosystem and the impact of human activities | Can students analyze the environmental factors of forest ecology and the ecological impacts of human activities? | ERNIE Bot quantifies students’ ability to process soil moisture and vegetation distribution data and generates charts for display. | |
Practical Operation | Data collection and processing capabilities | Whether students can correctly use instruments (such as telescopes and soil moisture meters) to complete data collection and use AI to process data. | ERNIE Bot detects the accuracy and completeness of data collection and generates real-time feedback. |
Simulation of ecological models and predictive capabilities | Can students use AI to generate ecological simulation models and make predictive conclusions? | ERNIE Bot evaluates the scientificity of students’ models and the rationality of their predictions, and quantifies the accuracy of the simulation parameters used. | |
Teamwork | Task division and collaboration | Whether students have clear division of roles in group work and whether they can effectively communicate and collaborate with team members to complete tasks. | ERNIE Bot analyzes the efficiency and contribution ratio of team collaboration by recording task submission time and discussion records. |
Depth of thinking | Data analysis and reflection | Can students draw scientific conclusions based on data and make suggestions for improvement based on reflection? | ERNIE Bot automatically analyzes students’ data reports, marks logical loopholes and provides directions for improvement. |
Evaluation Dimensions | Evaluation Project | Evaluation Criteria | AI Analysis Support |
---|---|---|---|
Knowledge Application | Analysis and application of wetland and migratory bird data | Can students accurately explain the results of data analysis in their presentations and explain the phenomena using theories? | ERNIE Bot analyzes the accuracy and logic of the data used in the presentation and assesses the depth of students’ integration of theory and practice. |
A balanced approach to ecological protection and development | Can students design feasible plans that take into account both ecological protection and economic development, and clearly express their scientific basis? | ERNIE Bot quantifies the innovations in the solution and generates targeted improvement suggestions. | |
Practical results | Data analysis and visualization | Can students complete analysis based on the collected data and create dynamic maps or charts? | ERNIE Bot detects the scientificity and completeness of charts and provides visual improvement directions. |
Model design and prediction capabilities | Can students use AI to generate ecological prediction models and verify their rationality? | ERNIE Bot analyzes model parameters and evaluates the accuracy and scientificity of predictions. | |
Teamwork | Group task division and results integration | Whether the team can efficiently complete the division of tasks and integrate the presentation to form systematic results. | ERNIE Bot counts team members’ task participation and contribution ratios to evaluate the efficiency of team collaboration. |
Innovative thinking | Ecological protection innovation | Whether students can propose innovative strategies in their plans and provide theoretical and data support. | ERNIE Bot identifies the innovative points in the solution and provides optimization directions. |
Functional Category | Specific Content | The Role of AI Support |
---|---|---|
Generate personalized learning reports | 1. Summarize students’ knowledge, practical ability and innovative program design, generate personalized learning reports, and mark problems and strengths. | ERNIE Bot points out errors in the processing of migratory bird data in the data analysis report and provides directions for improvement. |
ERNIE Bot quantifies the innovativeness of solution designs and provides more scientific optimization suggestions. | ||
Real-time dynamic feedback | 1. In the process of evaluation, students can view the task completion progress and analysis results in real time. | Through ERNIE Bot’s interactive feedback system, students can intuitively understand their performance and shortcomings in each aspect. |
2. In summative evaluation, generate suggestions in real time based on the presentation content to support student learning improvement. | ERNIE Bot provides dynamic progress and improvement suggestions for task completion to enhance the targeted nature of learning. | |
Improved learning paths | 1. Based on students’ comprehensive performance, recommend personalized learning improvement plans to help students make up for their shortcomings. | ERNIE Bot recommends more detailed data analysis guidance content to students with weaker performance. |
2. Provide more challenging tasks for high-performing students. | ERNIE Bot provides high-performing students with more complex ecological protection problem tasks and cultivates advanced analytical and problem-solving skills. |
Test Category | Specific Test Content | Test Format | Scoring Subject and Method |
---|---|---|---|
Knowledge mastery test | Knowledge on wetland ecosystem and migratory bird habitat | Weekly online quiz (5 multiple-choice questions, 3 short-answer questions, 2 analytical questions) | ERNIE Bot is evaluated based on answering questions and data analysis results, for teachers to refer to |
Knowledge on forest ecosystems and the impact of human activities | Group discussion and report every two weeks | Teachers grade students based on discussion performance (participation, accuracy, and depth of ideas) and presentation content | |
Practical skills test | Data collection and processing capabilities practice | After the field investigation, data will be collated and analyzed and a report will be submitted | ERNIE Bot is scored based on data accuracy, completeness, and analysis rationality |
Simulation ecological model and predictive capability practice | Use tools to build models and predict ecological change trends | Teachers and ERNIE Bot jointly evaluate the scientific nature of the model, the rationality of the prediction, and the ability to apply knowledge tools | |
Teamwork ability test | Task division and collaboration observation | During each group activity, the teacher observes and ERNIE Bot records | Teachers make observations and ERNIE Bot analyzes team collaboration efficiency and other scores based on records. |
Teamwork project assessment | Monthly teamwork project presentation and evaluation (with the participation of other groups and teachers) | Other groups, teachers, and ERNIE Bot will rate based on project goals, division of labor, collaboration, results, etc. | |
Depth of thinking test | Data analysis and reflection report | Write a report after completing data collection and analysis | ERNIE Bot analysis report logic, depth and reflection effectiveness rating |
Problem-solving and Creative thinking challenges | Set questions from time to time and discuss solutions in groups | Teachers and ERNIE Bot evaluate the innovation, feasibility, flexibility, and depth of thinking of the solution |
Test Category | Specific Test Content | Test Format | Scoring Subject and Method |
---|---|---|---|
Comprehensive test on knowledge application | Research results report and defense | After the course, the group will present and defend their research | Teachers grade the reports based on accuracy, logic, depth, and the degree of “coordination between humans and land”. ERNIE Bot helps analyze the data. |
Study manual and knowledge summary assessment | Check the study manual and personal knowledge summary | Teachers grade the construction and deepening of the knowledge system based on the comprehensive accuracy, depth of knowledge understanding, and degree of integration with practice in the manual. ERNIE Bot assists in data analysis. | |
Comprehensive evaluation of practical results | Field investigation results display and evaluation | Present field investigation materials and analyze and propose solutions | Teachers grade the data based on the quality of the data, scientific analysis, and feasibility of the solution, and ERNIE Bot helps analyze the data |
Evaluation of innovative practice works | Submit innovative practice works (posters, videos, plans, etc.) | Teachers evaluate from multiple dimensions such as innovation, scientificity, practicality, and artistry, and ERNIE Bot helps analyze the rationality of data application, etc. | |
Overall team performance evaluation | Quality assessment of team project results | Comprehensive evaluation of team projects (publicity activities, protection program implementation, etc.) | Teachers conduct field visits, community feedback surveys, and project report scoring, and ERNIE Bot assists in data analysis |
Team member growth and development analysis | Compare the performance of team members before and after the course, and analyze the role of collaboration in individual growth | Teachers conduct comprehensive evaluation based on observation and students’ self-evaluation and peer evaluation, and ERNIE Bot assists in data analysis |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, B.; Zeng, W.; Liu, W.; Peng, Y.; Yao, N. AI-Enhanced Design and Application of High School Geography Field Studies in China: A Case Study of the Yellow (Bohai) Sea Migratory Bird Habitat Curriculum. Algorithms 2025, 18, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18010047
Liu B, Zeng W, Liu W, Peng Y, Yao N. AI-Enhanced Design and Application of High School Geography Field Studies in China: A Case Study of the Yellow (Bohai) Sea Migratory Bird Habitat Curriculum. Algorithms. 2025; 18(1):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18010047
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Binglin, Weijia Zeng, Weijiang Liu, Yi Peng, and Nini Yao. 2025. "AI-Enhanced Design and Application of High School Geography Field Studies in China: A Case Study of the Yellow (Bohai) Sea Migratory Bird Habitat Curriculum" Algorithms 18, no. 1: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18010047
APA StyleLiu, B., Zeng, W., Liu, W., Peng, Y., & Yao, N. (2025). AI-Enhanced Design and Application of High School Geography Field Studies in China: A Case Study of the Yellow (Bohai) Sea Migratory Bird Habitat Curriculum. Algorithms, 18(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18010047