Next Article in Journal
A Credit Rating Model in a Fuzzy Inference System Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Money Neutrality, Monetary Aggregates and Machine Learning
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Quantum-Behaved Neurodynamic Approach for Nonconvex Optimization with Constraints

Algorithms 2019, 12(7), 138; https://doi.org/10.3390/a12070138
by Zheng Ji, Xu Cai and Xuyang Lou *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Algorithms 2019, 12(7), 138; https://doi.org/10.3390/a12070138
Submission received: 29 May 2019 / Revised: 27 June 2019 / Accepted: 3 July 2019 / Published: 5 July 2019

Round  1

Reviewer 1 Report

The method presented is of interest to the global optimization and particle swarm optimization communities. The paper is reasonably written and presented. Nevertheless, I think that the following two major points need to be addressed before the paper can be accepted: (1) a statistical analysis of the results must be provided though multiple runs to prove the robustness of the method; (2) comparison to other global optimization methods including PSO versions should be presented and discussed for a variety of test problems to show the potentiality of the current method as opposed to others.

Author Response

The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the reviewer for the constructive comments provided in the review and time spent. Based on the points raised, we have carefully revised the manuscript, which we believe has significantly improved our previous submission. We welcome any additional suggestions and feedback from the reviewer.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

Enclosed are my comments/suggestion about the manuscript.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

First, the authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the reviewer for the constructive comments provided in the review and time spent. Without the careful comments, this manuscript would not be improved. We welcome any additional suggestions and feedback from the reviewer.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round  2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed my comments and extended the results accordingly. I am satisfied with the revisions made.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have addressed all my comments.

I recommend the acceptance of the manuscript.                                                    

Back to TopTop