Next Article in Journal
Tunable Emission Wavelength Stacked InAs/GaAs Quantum Dots by Chemical Beam Epitaxy for Optical Coherence Tomography
Next Article in Special Issue
Acoustic Emission of Deformation Twinning in Magnesium
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental and Finite Element Investigations of Damage Resistance in Biomimetic Composite Sandwich T-Joints
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Ultrasound Transmission through Fluid-Solid and Air-Solid Phononic Plates
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Correction published on 20 September 2016, see Materials 2016, 9(9), 784.

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Materials 2016, 9(7), 508;

Calibration Methods of Acoustic Emission Sensors

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Academic Editor: Alkiviadis Paipetis
Received: 30 May 2016 / Revised: 16 June 2016 / Accepted: 20 June 2016 / Published: 24 June 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Acoustic Waves in Advanced Materials)


This study examined outstanding issues of sensitivity calibration methods for ultrasonic and acoustic emission transducers and provides workable solutions based on physically measureable quantities, laser-based displacement measurement in particular. This leads to mutually consistent determination of transmitting and receiving sensitivities of sensors and transducers. Methods of circumventing problems of extraneous vibrations on free transmitters are used, giving the foundation for face-to-face calibration methods. Working on many ultrasonic and acoustic emission transducers, their receiving and transmitting sensitivities are found to be always different, while their ratios exhibit unexpected similarity. This behavior is attributed to monopolar pulse generation and bipolar received signals due to electrical charge transfer during elastic wave motion and reflection on the back face. This is verified through a quantitative piezoelectric sensing experiment. Displacement vs. velocity calibration terminology is clarified, redefining the “V/µbar” reference for contact sensor calibration. With demonstrated differences in the transmitting and receiving sensitivities of transducers, the requirement of the Hill-Adams equation invalidates the basic premise of the currently formulated reciprocity calibration methods for acoustic emission transducers. In addition, the measured reciprocity parameter for the case of through-transmission significantly deviates from the approximate theoretical prediction. It is demonstrated that three methods provide reliable sensor calibration results that are complimentary among them. View Full-Text
Keywords: acoustic emission; sensors; transducers; calibration; face-to-face; laser interferometry; Hill-Adams equation; tri-transducer method acoustic emission; sensors; transducers; calibration; face-to-face; laser interferometry; Hill-Adams equation; tri-transducer method

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ono, K. Calibration Methods of Acoustic Emission Sensors. Materials 2016, 9, 508.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Materials EISSN 1996-1944 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top