Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Retention and Waterproof Properties of Bacterial Cellulose-Reinforced Thermoplastic Starch Biocomposites Modified with Sodium Hexametaphosphate
Previous Article in Journal
Optical Properties and Plasmonic Performance of Titanium Nitride
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 8
Issue 6
10.3390/ma8063155
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Homogeneous Catalyst for the Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine Borane Starting with Ruthenium(III) Acetylacetonate

by
Ebru Ünel Barın
,
Mehdi Masjedi
and
Saim Özkar
*
Department of Chemistry, Middle East Technical University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2015, 8(6), 3155-3167; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8063155
Submission received: 21 April 2015 / Revised: 11 May 2015 / Accepted: 15 May 2015 / Published: 2 June 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The catalytic activity of ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate was investigated for the first time in the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane. During catalytic reaction, a new ruthenium(II) species is formed in situ from the reduction of ruthenium(III) and characterized using UV-Visible, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), 1H NMR, and mass spectroscopy. The most likely structure suggested for the ruthenium(II) species is mer-[Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H]. Mercury poisoning experiment indicates that the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane is homogeneous catalysis. The kinetics of the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane starting with Ru(acac)3 were studied depending on the catalyst concentration, substrate concentration and temperature. The hydrogen generation was found to be first-order with respect to catalyst concentration and zero-order regarding the substrate concentration. Evaluation of the kinetic data provides the activation parameters for the dehydrogenation reaction: the activation energy Ea = 85 ± 2 kJ·mol−1, the enthalpy of activation ∆H# = 82 ± 2 kJ·mol−1 and the entropy of activation; ∆S# = −85 ± 5 J·mol−1·K−1. The ruthenium(II) catalyst formed from the reduction of ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate provides 1700 turnovers over 100 hours in hydrogen generation from the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane before deactivation at 60 °C.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Catalytic dehydrocoupling of amine-borane adducts has become increasingly important from the perspective of current interest in hydrogen storage [1,2,3], as the efficient storage of hydrogen is still the key issue in hydrogen economy on the way towards a sustainable energy future [4,5]. Of particular importance is the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane (Me2HN·BH3, DMAB), which can release hydrogen in the presence of suitable catalyst under mild conditions (Equation (1)) [6,7,8,9,10].
2   M e 2 H N · B H 3   → c a t a l y s t   ( M e 2 N · B H 2 ) 2 + 2 H 2
A number of catalysts have recently been employed in dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane: various Ru, Rh, Pd, and Ir complexes [11], Ru(H)(PMe3)(PNP) and trans-Ru(H)2(PMe3)(PNPH) [12], [Rh(1,5-cod)(µ-Cl)]2 [13,14,15], [Cp2Ti] [16,17], [RuH2(η2-H2)2(PCy3)2] and [RuH2(η2:η2-H2B-N(Me2)2(PCy3)2] [18], RhCl3, colloidal Rh/[Oct4N]Cl and Rh/Al2O3 [19], laurate-stabilized Rh(0) [20], hexanoate-stabilized Rh(0) [21], aminopropyltriethoxysilane-stabilized Ru(0) [22], Re complexes [23], Rh4-6 clusters [24], RhCl(PHCy2)3 [25], Ru/ZIF-8 [26], [Ru(p-Cym)(bipy)Cl]Cl [27], Pd(0)/MOF [28], Pd(0)/amylamine [29]. Recent studies have shown that ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate acts as homogeneous catalyst at room temperature in the hydrolysis of sodium borohydride [30,31,32]. This observation prompted us to test the catalytic activity of ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate in the dehydrogenation of DMAB. It was found that the dehydrogenation of DMAB in toluene solution takes place at an appreciable rate in the presence of ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate at temperature above 50 °C and a new ruthenium(II) species is formed during catalytic reaction. The ruthenium(II) species could be characterized by UV-Visible, FTIR, 1H NMR, and Mass Spectroscopy. Herein we report the results of catalytic tests using ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate in the dehydrogenation of DMAB in toluene solution as well as the kinetic study of the catalytic reaction depending on the catalyst concentration, substrate concentration and temperature. Our report also includes efforts to identify the catalytically active species in this reaction.

2. Results and Discussion

Ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate was found to be a homogeneous catalyst in dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane at temperatures above 50 °C. The kinetics of the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane in the presence of Ru(acac)3 were studied by monitoring hydrogen generation depending on catalyst concentration, substrate concentration and temperature. Figure 1a shows the volume of hydrogen versus time plots during the dehydrogenation of DMAB solution (500 mM) catalyzed by Ru(acac)3 in different ruthenium concentrations at 60.0 ± 0.1 °C.
The inspection of the plots displayed in Figure 1a reveals the following points: (i) The increasing catalytic activity observed after a certain period of time (induction time) in each case is indicative of the formation of an active species from the reaction of ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate and dimethylamine borane during the induction time. (ii) The active species has higher catalytic activity in comparison to the initial activity observed when the ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate precatalyst was added. (iii) The induction time for the formation of active catalyst decreases with the increasing concentration of ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate. (iv) Conversely, the catalytic activity during the induction time increases with the increasing concentration of ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate. (v) After the induction period, an almost linear hydrogen evolution continues until all the dimethylamine borane is consumed. The rate of hydrogen generation was determined from the slope of the linear portion of plots after the induction time. The hydrogen generation rate increases with the concentration of ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate. The plot of hydrogen generation rate versus catalyst concentration, both in logarithmic scale, gives a straight line with a slope of 1.0 as shown in Figure 1b. Thus, hydrogen evolution rate exhibits a first-order dependence on the ruthenium concentration. In other words, the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane is first-order with respect to the catalyst concentration.
Materials 08 03155 g001 1024
Figure 1. (a) Plots of hydrogen volume versus time for the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane (500 mM) catalyzed by Ru(acac)3 as pre-catalyst with different ruthenium concentrations at 60 °C. (b) The plot of hydrogen generation rate versus the concentration of ruthenium, both in logarithmic scale.
Figure 1. (a) Plots of hydrogen volume versus time for the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane (500 mM) catalyzed by Ru(acac)3 as pre-catalyst with different ruthenium concentrations at 60 °C. (b) The plot of hydrogen generation rate versus the concentration of ruthenium, both in logarithmic scale.
Materials 08 03155 g001
The effect of substrate concentration on the hydrogen evolution rate was determined by varying the concentration of NH(CH3)2BH3 at a constant ruthenium concentration of 5.0 mM and temperature of 60.0 ± 0.1 °C (Figure 2a). Figure 2b shows the plots of hydrogen generation rate versus NH(CH3)2BH3 concentration, both in logarithmic scale, which gives a horizontal straight line. This indicates that dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane is zero-order with respect to the substrate concentration, at least in the range of 0.2–1.0 M NH(CH3)2BH3, in the presence of Ru(acac)3.
Dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane was carried out at various temperatures in the range of 50–70 °C starting with a solution containing 500 mM DMAB and 5.0 mM ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate (Figure 3). The examination of the plots given in Figure 3 reveals the following points: (i) The induction time for the formation of active catalyst decreases with increasing temperature. (ii) The catalytic activity during the induction period and afterwards increases with increasing temperature as the fraction of ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate converted to active catalyst increases concurrently. (iii) After the induction time, the values of the rate constant k were determined from the linear part of the plots considering the rate dependence on temperature (Table 1) in order to attain the activation parameters for the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane by using either an Arrhenius (Figure 4a) or Eyring plot (Figure 4b). The Arrhenius activation energy was found to be Ea = 85 ± 2 kJ·mol−1 for the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane starting with Ru(acac)3. The Eyring plot provides the activation enthalpy and the activation entropy values: ∆H# = 82 ± 2 kJ·mol−1 and ∆S# = −85 ± 5 J·mol−1·K−1. The large negative value of activation entropy indicates that the mechanism for the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane starting with Ru(acac)3 has an associative nature in the transition state [33,34].
Materials 08 03155 g002 1024
Figure 2. (a) Plots of hydrogen volume versus time for the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane catalyzed by 5.0 mM Ru(acac)3 as pre-catalyst with different substrate concentrations at 60.0 ± 0.1 °C. (b) The plot of hydrogen generation rate versus the concentration of dimethylamine borane, both in logarithmic scales.
Figure 2. (a) Plots of hydrogen volume versus time for the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane catalyzed by 5.0 mM Ru(acac)3 as pre-catalyst with different substrate concentrations at 60.0 ± 0.1 °C. (b) The plot of hydrogen generation rate versus the concentration of dimethylamine borane, both in logarithmic scales.
Materials 08 03155 g002
Materials 08 03155 g003 1024
Figure 3. Plots of hydrogen volume versus time for dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane starting with a solution containing 500 mM NH(CH3)2BH3 and 5.0 mM Ru(acac)3 at various temperatures.
Figure 3. Plots of hydrogen volume versus time for dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane starting with a solution containing 500 mM NH(CH3)2BH3 and 5.0 mM Ru(acac)3 at various temperatures.
Materials 08 03155 g003
Table
Table 1. Values of the rate constant k in (mol H2)·(mol Ru)−1·s−1 for dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane (500 mM) catalyzed by ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate (5.0 mM) at different temperatures.
Table 1. Values of the rate constant k in (mol H2)·(mol Ru)−1·s−1 for dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane (500 mM) catalyzed by ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate (5.0 mM) at different temperatures.
T (°C)k ((mol H2)·(mol Ru)−1·s−1)
501.30 ± 0.07 ×10−1
551.72 ± 0.09 ×10−1
602.97 ± 0.15 ×10−1
654.67 ± 0.23 ×10−1
707.95 ± 0.40 ×10−1
Materials 08 03155 g004 1024
Figure 4. (a) Arrhenius plot, (b) Eyring plot for the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane starting with a solution containing 500 mM NH(CH3)2BH3 and 5.0 mM Ru(acac)3 at different temperatures.
Figure 4. (a) Arrhenius plot, (b) Eyring plot for the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane starting with a solution containing 500 mM NH(CH3)2BH3 and 5.0 mM Ru(acac)3 at different temperatures.
Materials 08 03155 g004
The system comprising Ru(acac)3 and NH(CH3)2BH3 appears to be stable and long-lived catalyst in dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane. The lifetime of the catalyst was measured by determining the total turnover number (TTON) in hydrogen generation from dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane at 60.0 ± 0.1 °C. Figure 5 shows the variation in the turnover number with time during the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane starting with ruthenium (III) acetylacetonate in toluene at 60.0 ± 0.1 °C. The catalyst formed from the reduction of ruthenium (III) acetylacetonate provides 1700 turnovers over 100 h in the hydrogen generation from the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane in toluene at 60.0 ± 0.1 °C. The highest value of turnover frequency (TOF) was found to be 17.8 (mol H2)·(mol Ru)−1·(min)−1 for the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane in toluene at 60.0 ± 0.1 °C.
Materials 08 03155 g005 1024
Figure 5. Plot of turnover number versus time for the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane (3000 mM) catalyzed by Ru(acac)3 (5.0 mM) pre-catalyst along with [Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H] in toluene at 60.0 ± 0.1 °C.
Figure 5. Plot of turnover number versus time for the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane (3000 mM) catalyzed by Ru(acac)3 (5.0 mM) pre-catalyst along with [Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H] in toluene at 60.0 ± 0.1 °C.
Materials 08 03155 g005
A mercury poisoning experiment was performed in order to show whether the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane starting with Ru(acac)3 is homogeneous or heterogeneous [35]. The hydrogen generation rate in the system comprising Ru(acac)3 precatalyst and in situ active catalyst was not affected by the addition of 50 equivalent of mercury to the reaction solution after 50% conversion of NH(CH3)2BH3. This observation indicates unequivocally that the catalytic reaction is homogeneous.
During the induction, the reaction solution gradually changes its color from red to reddish brown, reflecting the reduction of Ru3+. This color change implies that monitoring the UV-vis electronic absorption spectra of the solution may provide a convenient way to follow the conversion. For a better appreciation of the change in the ruthenium complex, the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane starting with ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate was followed by UV-Visible electronic absorption spectroscopy for 3 h even though the reaction is complete in 1 h (Figure 6).
Materials 08 03155 g006 1024
Figure 6. UV-Visible electronic absorption spectra taken from the solution during the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane starting with Ru(acac)3.
Figure 6. UV-Visible electronic absorption spectra taken from the solution during the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane starting with Ru(acac)3.
Materials 08 03155 g006
UV-Visible electronic absorption spectrum of sole Ru(acac)3 at the beginning of the catalytic reaction shows three prominent absorption bands at 270, 350 and 510 nm. After a certain period of time (induction time), a noticeable increase in the hydrogen generation rate is observed, indicating the formation of a new ruthenium species which has higher catalytic activity in comparison to that of Ru(acac)3. As observed in the UV-Visible electronic absorption spectra in Figure 6, a new absorption band at 282 nm grows while the absorption bands of ruthenium(III) disappear. This new absorption feature can be attributed to a ruthenium(II) species, considering its similarity to those reported for octahedral complexes of ruthenium(II), [Ru(en)2IP]2+ (IP: imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline), [Ru(en)Phen]2+ (Phen: 1,10-phenanthroline) [36], and cis-[Ru(acac)2(P(OMe)3)2] [37].
In order to isolate the active catalyst, after the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane the volatiles were evaporated in vacuum and the residue was dissolved in a mixture of hexane-dichloromethane. Upon cooling the solution to −20 °C, the cyclic dehydrogenation product [(CH3)2NBH2]2 of dimethylmine-borane was precipitated out from the solution. After decantation of solution, solvent was removed in vacuum leaving the ruthenium catalyst in the solid residue. Mass spectrum of isolated ruthenium(II) species after the reaction shows a [M-H]+ fragment at m/z = 463 as the base peak (Figure 7a). In addition, two other peaks at m/z = 419 and m/z = 364 are observed for the [M–NMe2]+ and [M-(acac)]+ fragments, respectively. The high-resolution mass spectrum in Figure 7b shows the isotope distribution for the molecular peak which matches well with the simulated isotope pattern for the molecular formula C17H41N6O2Ru.
The 1H NMR spectrum (Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials), taken from chloroform-d solution, gives a singlet at −5.60 ppm for the hydridic hydrogen directly coordinated to ruthenium. Two other singlets at 1.18 and 0.89 ppm are attributed to the methyl groups of acetylacetonate. A singlet peak is observed at 3.42 ppm for N-Me groups. The FTIR spectrum of the isolated ruthenium(II) species shows absorption bands characteristic of C-H, N-N and C-N stretchings at 2926–2972, 1515 and 1020–1200 cm−1, respectively. Accordingly, in the presence of dimethylamine borane as a reducing agent, Ru(acac)3 is reduced to a ruthenium(II) species, which is most likely in the form of mer-[Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H]. The mer-form of the complex is also anticipated to be favorable over the fac-form because of less competition between the O- and N-donor ligand [38,39].
Materials 08 03155 g007 1024
Figure 7. (a) Mass spectrum of the ruthenium(II) species, [Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H], isolated after catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane starting with Ru(acac)3. (b) High resolution mass spectrum of [Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H] and the isotope distribution simulated for C17H41N6O2Ru.
Figure 7. (a) Mass spectrum of the ruthenium(II) species, [Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H], isolated after catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane starting with Ru(acac)3. (b) High resolution mass spectrum of [Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H] and the isotope distribution simulated for C17H41N6O2Ru.
Materials 08 03155 g007
Concerning the formation of [Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H] complex during the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane starting with ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate, it is likely that dimethylamine borane acts not only as a substrate for releasing hydrogen gas but also as a supplier of tetramethylhydrazine. In addition to the generation of tetramethylhydrazine from the B-N bond dissociation of NH(CH3)2BH3, the formation of instable BH3 is also expected which would then be converted to the relatively stable gaseous diborane (B2H6). The latter gaseous dimer was trapped in the form of trimethylborate in methanol after passing through a bubbler filled with a high-boiling hydrocarbon and identified using an 11B NMR spectrum. The observation of a single peak at δ = 16.4 ppm in the 11B NMR spectra due to B(OMe)3 unambiguously shows the evolution of diborane (B2H6) during the reduction of ruthenium(III) to ruthenium(II) [40]. There exist precedents in the literature for the formation of tetramethylhydrazine from dimethylamine [41,42]. In particular, the formation of N2Me4 from dimethylamidotitanium has significant relevance to the present study [43].
It is noteworthy that the isolated ruthenium(II) species, mer-[Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H], shows a catalytic activity in dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane, almost comparable to the initial activity when started with Ru(acac)3, but without an induction period as the experiment started with a preformed catalyst. However, we have to admit that measuring the activity has noticeable uncertainty because of the insufficient amount of isolated complex and impurities in it.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials

Ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate, borane dimethylamine complex (97%), toluene (99.7%) and hexane (99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dichloromethane (99%) was purchased from Merck® (Darmstadt, Germany). All glassware and Teflon coated magnetic stir bars were cleaned with acetone, followed by copious rinsing with distilled water before drying at 150 °C for a few hours.

3.2. Equipment

All reactions were performed under argon or nitrogen atmospheres and carried out in a Parr-5101 low pressure stirred reactor with a circulating water-bath for constant temperature control. The Parr-5101 low-pressure stirred reactor was connected with a digital transmitter to a computer using a RS-232 module. The progress of an individual dehydorgenation reaction was followed by monitoring the increase in the pressure of hydrogen gas with the program Calgrafix. The temperature was also controlled via a thermocouple placed inside the reactor. 1H NMR spectrum was measured on a Bruker Avance (III) 400 MHz spectrometer, chemical shifts are given in ppm (δ) relative to Me4Si as internal standard. UV-visible electronic absorption spectra were recorded on a Schimadzu-2450 double beam spectrometer. The infrared spectrum was recorded from a Vertex 70 ATR/FTIR spectrometer. Positive ion mass spectrometry data was acquired on a Micro TOF-LC/ESI/Ms system.

3.3. Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine Borane Starting with Ruthenium(III) Acetylacetonate

In order to test the catalytic activity of ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate in the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane, 500 mM dimethylamine borane was dissolved in 10 mL toluene in a reactor thermostated to 60 °C under inert atmosphere. Afterwards, 5 mM Ru(acac)3 was added into the reaction solution. After the addition of Ru(acac)3, the reactor was closed immediately and stirring at 1000 rpm was turned on. Hydrogen started to evolve from the reaction and increase pressure inside the reactor. Pressure inside the reactor was recorded every 5 seconds. All reactions were performed in 10 mL of toluene in which dimethylamine borane (within the range of 200–1000 mM) and Ru(acac)3 (within the range of 2.5–5.0 mM) are dissolved. Kinetics of dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane catalyzed by Ru(acac)3 as pre-catalyst was studied depending on substrate concentration, catalyst concentration and temperature. In a set of experiments, NH(CH3)2BH3 concentration was held constant at 500 mM and Ru(acac)3 concentration was varied in the range of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 mM at 60.0 ± 0.1 °C. In the second set of experiments, Ru(acac)3 concentration was held constant at 5 mM, while NH(CH3)2BH3 concentration was varied in the range of 200, 400, 500, 600, 800 and 1000 mM at 60.0 ± 0.1 °C. The third set of experiments were performed by keeping NH(CH3)2BH3 and Ru(acac)3 concentrations constant at 500 and 5 mM, respectively, and varying the temperature in the range of 50, 55, 60, 65 and 70 °C in order to obtain the activation energy (Ea), enthalpy of activation (∆H#) and entropy of activation (∆S#). In all sets of experiments, the hydrogen evolved from the dehydrogenation reaction was followed by monitoring the increase in the pressure of hydrogen gas with the program Calgrafix. The pressure versus time data was processed using Microsoft Office Excel 2003 and Origin 7.0 and then converted into the values in the proper unit, volume of hydrogen (mL).

3.4. Catalytic Lifetime of Ruthenium(III) Acetylacetonate

The catalytic lifetime of Ru(acac)3 in dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane was determined by calculating the total turnover number (TTO). The life time experiment was started with 10 mL toluene solution containing 5 mM Ru(acac)3 and 3000 mM NH(CH3)2BH3. Hydrogen gas started to evolve from the reaction. When 75 percent of hydrogen generation was achieved, more NH(CH3)2BH3 was added to the reaction solution. By this way, the addition of NH(CH3)2BH3 was repeated until no more hydrogen gas was evolved. The TTO, that is, the number of moles of hydrogen evolved per number of moles of ruthenium, was calculated.

3.5. Poisoning Experiment

In order to understand whether dehydrogenation of dimethylamine borane catalyzed by Ru(acac)3 is homogenous or heterogeneous, mercury poisoning experiment was carried out [44]. After the 50% conversion of reaction was attained, 50 equivalent of mercury per ruthenium was added to the reaction solution including 5 mM Ru(acac)3 and 500 mM NH(CH3)2BH3.

3.6. Isolation and Characterization of Rutneium(II) Species, [Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H]

19.92 mg Ru(acac)3 (5 mM) was added into the reaction flask containing 294.6 mg NH(CH3)2BH3 (500 mM) dissolved in 10 mL toluene and thermostated at 60.0 ± 0.1 °C. Although the complete conversion took 1 hour, the reaction was carried on for 3 h under inert atmosphere and followed by UV-Vis spectroscopy. After 3 h stirring, the solvent was evaporated in vacuum and the residue was dissolved in the mixture of hexane-dichloromethane. Then, the mixture was put in a fridge in order to precipitate out NH(CH3)2BH3 and the cyclic product formed during dehydrogenation of NH(CH3)2BH3. At the next step, the solution was filtered and evaporated in vacuum giving about 8 mg [Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H] complex (35% yield). [Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H]: 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): δ-5.60 (br s, 1H, Ru-H), 0.89 (br s, 3H, CH3), 1.18 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.42 (br s, 36H, N-CH3). FTIR (neat, n, cm−1): 2972 m, 2926 m, 1515 m, 1350–1470 s, 1020–1200 m. UV: λmax (Toluene, nm) 282. Mass: m/z 463 ([M-H]+, 100%), 419 (32), 364 (15). A 13C NMR spectrum couldn’t be taken because there was an insufficient amount of sample.

4. Conclusions

In summary, our study on the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane starting with ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate produced the following conclusions and insights, some of which were previously unavailable: (i) Ru(acac)3 is a pre-catalyst in dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane, being converted to an active species. (ii) A new ruthenium(II) species is formed during the catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane starting with Ru(acac)3 after the induction time and isolated in the form of mer-[Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H]. (iii) Increasing the concentration of Ru(acac)3 and applying a higher temperature leads to a decrease in the induction time and an increase in the formation rate of active catalyst. (iv) The new ruthenium(II) complex, mer-[Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H], isolated from the catalytic reaction solution, provides faster dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane than that obtained initially by starting with Ru(acac)3. (v) Dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane starting with ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate is first-order with respect to the catalyst concentration and zero-order with respect to substrate concentration. (vi) The catalyst formed from Ru(acac)3 provides 1700 turnovers over 100 h in hydrogen generation from the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane before its deactivation. (vii) A UV-Visible electronic absorption spectrum of the reaction solution after induction period remains unaltered during the whole catalytic reaction and is the same as that of the isolated mer-[Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H] complex. This observation supports the hypothesis that mer-[Ru(N2Me4)3(acac)H] isolated from the reaction solution is the active catalyst rather than its conversion product. (viii) The activation parameters of catalytic dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane starting with ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate, determined from the evaluation of the kinetic data, are activation energy Ea = 85 ± 2 kJ·mol−1, enthalpy of activation ∆H# = 82 ± 2 kJ·mol−1 and entropy of activation ∆S# = −85 ± 5 J·mol−1·K−1.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/8/6/3155/s1.

Acknowledgments

Partial support of this work by the Turkish Academy of Sciences is gratefully acknowledged. Mehdi Masjedi thanks the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for awarding a Ph.D. fellowship. We thank Bunyamin Cosut from Gebze Institute of Technology for performing mass analysis.

Author Contributions

Mehdi Masjedi and Saim Özkar conceived and designed the experiments; Ebru Ünel Barın performed the experiments; Ebru Ünel Barın and Mehdi Masjedi analyzed the data; Saim Özkar contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Saim Özkar wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bluhm, M.E.; Bradley, M.G.; Butterick, R.; Kusari, U.; Sneddon, L.G. Amineborane-Based Chemical Hydrogen Storage:  Enhanced Ammonia Borane Dehydrogenation in Ionic Liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7748–7749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Blaquiere, N.; Diallo-Garcia, S.; Gorelsky, S.I.; Black, D.A.; Fagnou, K. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Dehydrogenation of Ammonia Boranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14034–14035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Käß, M.; Friedrich, A.; Dress, M.; Schneider, S. Ruthenium Complexes with Cooperative PNP Ligands: Bifunctional Catalysts for the Dehydrogenation of Ammonia-Borane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 905–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. US Department of Energy (DOE). Basic Research Needs for the Hydrogen Economy. Available online: http://science.energy.gov/~/media/bes/pdf/reports/files/nhe_rpt.pdf (accessed on 27 May 2015).
  5. Inter Academy Council. Lighting the Way: Towards a Sustainable Energy Futures; Inter Academy Council: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  6. Van den Berg, A.W.C.; Areán, C.O. Materials for Hydrogen Storage: Current Research Trends and Perspectives. Chem. Commun. 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. T-Raissi, A. Technoeconomic Analysis of Area II Hydrogen Production-PART II: Hydrogen from Ammonia and Ammonia-Borane Complex for Fuel Cell Applications. Available online: http://www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/32405b15.pdf (accessed on 27 May 2015).
  8. Annual Energy Outlook 2005. With Projections To 2025. Available online: http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo05/pdf/0383(2005).pdf (accessed on 27 May 2015).
  9. Turner, J.; Sverdrup, G.; Mann, K.; Maness, P.G.; Kroposki, B.; Ghirardi, M.; Evans, R.J.; Blake, D. Renewable Hydrogen Production. Int. J. Energy Res. 2007, 32, 379–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jaska, C.A.; Temple, K.; Lough, A.J.; Manners, I. Rhodium-Catalyzed Formation of Boron–Nitrogen Bonds: A Mild Route to Cyclic Aminoboranes and Borazines. Chem. Commun. 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jaska, C.A.; Temple, K.; Lough, A.J.; Manners, I. Transition Metal-Catalyzed Formation of Boron-Nitrogen Bonds: Catalytic Dehydrocoupling of Amine-Borane Adducts to Form Aminoboranes and Borazines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9424–9434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Friederich, A.; Drees, M.; Schneider, S. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Dimethylamineborane Dehydrogenation: Stepwise Metal-Centered Dehydrocyclization. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 10339–10342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jaska, C.A.; Manners, I. Heterogeneous or Homogeneous Catalysis? Mechanistic Studies of the Rhodium-Catalyzed Dehydrocoupling of Amine-Borane and Phosphine-Borane Adducts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9776–9785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, Y.; Fulton, J.L.; Linehan, J.C.; Autrey, T. In-situ Spectroscopic Studies of Rhodium Catalyzed Production of Hydrogen from Dimethylamine Borane: Homogeneous or Heterogeneous Catalysis? Prepr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Fuel Chem. 2004, 49, 972–973. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, Y.; Fulton, J.L.; Linehan, J.C.; Autrey, T. In Situ XAFS and NMR Study of Rhodium-Catalyzed Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine Borane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3254–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Clark, T.J.; Russell, C.A.; Manners, I. Homogeneous, Titanocene-Catalyzed Dehydrocoupling of Amine–Borane Adducts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9582–9583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sloan, M.E.; Staubitz, A.; Clark, T.J.; Russell, C.A.; Lloyd-Jones, G.C.; Manners, I. Homogeneous Catalytic Dehydrocoupling/Dehydrogenation of Amine-Borane Adducts by Early Transition Metal, Group 4 Metallocene Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3831–3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Alcaraz, G.; Vendier, L.; Clot, E.; Sabo-Etienne, S. Ruthenium Bis(σ-B H) Aminoborane Complexes from Dehydrogenation of Amine–Boranes: Trapping of H2BNH2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 918–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jaska, C.A.; Manners, I. Ambient Temperature, Tandem Catalytic Dehydrocoupling-Hydrogenation Reactions Using Rh Colloids and Me2NH·BH3 as a Stoichiometric H2 Source. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2698–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Durap, F.; Zahmakıran, M.; Özkar, S. Water Soluble Laurate-Stabilized Rhodium(0) Nanoclusters Catalyst with Unprecedented Catalytic Lifetime in the Hydrolytic Dehydrogenation of Ammonia-Borane. Appl. Cat. A Gen. 2009, 369, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zahmakıran, M.; Özkar, S. Dimethylammonium Hexanoate Stabilized Rhodium(0) Nanoclusters Identified as True Heterogeneous Catalysts with the Highest Observed Activity in the Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine-Borane. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 8955–8964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zahmakıran, M.; Tristany, M.; Philippot, K.; Fajerweg, K.; Özkar, S.; Chaudret, B. Aminopropyltriethoxysilane Stabilized Ruthenium(0) Nanoclusters as an Isolable and Reusable Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine–Borane. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2938–2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jiang, Y.; Berke, H. Dehydrocoupling of Dimethylamine-Borane Catalysed by Rhenium Complexes and its Application in Olefin Transfer-Hydrogenations. Chem. Commun. 2007, 34, 3571–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fulton, J.L.; Linehan, J.C.; Autrey, T.; Balasubramanian, M.; Chen, Y.; Szymczak, N.K. When is a Nanoparticle a Cluster? An Operando EXAFS Study of Amine Borane Dehydrocoupling by Rh4-6 Clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11936–11949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sloan, M.E.; Clark, T.J.; Manners, I. Homogeneous Catalytic Dehydrogenation/Dehydrocoupling of Amine-Borane Adducts by the Rh(I) Wilkinson’s Complex Analogue RhCl(PHCy2)3 (Cy = cyclohexyl). Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 2429–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yurderi, M.; Bulut, A.; Zahmakiran, M.; Gulcan, M.; Özkar, S. Ruthenium(0) Nanoparticles Stabilized by Metal-Organic Framework (ZIF-8): Highly Efficient Catalyst for the Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine-Borane and Transfer Hydrogenation of Unsaturated Hydrocarbons using Dimethylamine-Borane as Hydrogen Source. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 160–161, 534–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Munoz-Olasagasti, M.; Telleria, A.; Perez-Miqueo, J.; Garralda, M.A.; Freixa, Z. A Readily Accessible Ruthenium Catalyst for the Solvolytic Dehydrogenation of Amine–Borane Adducts. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 11404–11409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gulcan, M.; Zahmakiran, M.; Özkar, S. Palladium(0) Nanoparticles Supported on Metal Organic Framework as Highly Active and Reusable Nanocatalyst in Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine-Borane. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 147, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sen, F.; Karatas, Y.; Gulcan, M.; Zahmakiran, M. Amylamine Stabilized Platinum(0) Nanoparticles: Active and Reusable Nanocatalyst in the Room Temperature Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine-Borane. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 1526–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Keceli, E.; Özkar, S. Ruthenium(III) Acetylacetonate: A Homogeneous Catalyst in the Hydrolysis of Sodium Borohydride. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2008, 286, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Masjedi, M.; Demiralp, T.; Özkar, S. Testing Catalytic Activity of Ruthenium(III) Acetylacetonate in the Presence of Trialkylphosphite or Trialkylphosphine in Hydrogen Generation from the Hydrolysis of Sodium Borohydride. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2009, 310, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Masjedi, M.; Yildirim, L.T.; Özkar, S. Novel Homogeneous Catalyst Comprising Ruthenium and Trimethylphosphite for the Hydrolysis of Sodium Borohydride. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2012, 355, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Connors, K.A. Chemical Kinetics: The Study of Reaction Rates in Solution; VCH Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  34. Twigg, M.V. Mechanism of Inorganic and Organometallic Reactions; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hornstein, B.J.; Aiken, J.D.; Finke, R.G. Nanoclusters in Catalysis:  A Comparison of CS2 Catalyst Poisoning of Polyoxoanion- and Tetrabutylammonium-Stabilized 40 ± 6 Å Rh(0) Nanoclusters to 5 Rh/Al2O3, Including an Analysis of the Literature Related to the CS2 to Metal Stoichiometry Issue. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 1625–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nagababu, P.; Latha, J.N.L.; Satyanarayana, S. DNA-Binding Studies of Mixed-Ligand (Ethylenediamine)Ruthenium(II) Complexes. Chem. Biodivers. 2006, 3, 1219–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Masjedi, M.; Yildirim, L.T.; Özkar, S. Crystal Structure of Trans and Cis-Bis(Acetylacetonato)Bis(Trimethylphosphite)Ruthenium(II) Complexes and Testing their Catalytic Activity in Hydrogen Generation from the Hydrolysis of Sodium Borohydride. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2010, 363, 1713–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barth, M.; Kaestele, X.; Kluefers, P. Polyol Metal Complexes. 46. Nitrosyl Ruthenium Diolato Complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 7, 1353–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Diamantis, A.A.; Moritz, P.S.; Snow, M.R.; Tiekink, E.R.T. Substituted Ruthenium Triammine Complexes: the Crystal Structure of Triammineaqua(Pentane-2,4-Dionato)Ruthenium(III) Dithionate Dihydrate, [Ru(NH3)3(acac)(OH2)][S2O6]·2H2O. Aust. J. Chem. 1988, 41, 1251–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. King, B.T.; Michl, J. The Explosive “Inert” Anion CB11(CF3)12−. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10255–10256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hancock, K.G.; Dickinson, D.A. Photochemistry of Dimethylamine in Hydrocarbon Solvents. Striking Differences between Solution- and Gas-Phase Photochemical Reactivity. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 969–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Prakash, H. Ureas as Amine Substrates for Hydrazine and Alkylhydrazine Synthesis-Base-Assisted Chlorination of Urea by Dimethylchloramine as a Route for Hydrazine and Tetramethylhydrazine Synthesis. Indian J. Chem. A Inorg. Phys. Theo. Anal. 1986, 25A, 764–767. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bouman, M.; Zaera, F. Reductive Eliminations from Amido Metal Complexes: Implications for Metal Film Deposition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2011, 158, D524–D526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Widegren, J.A.; Finke, R.G. A Review of the Problem of Distinguishing True Homogeneous Catalysis from Soluble or Other Metal-Particle Heterogeneous Catalysis under Reducing Conditions. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2003, 198, 317–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barın, E.Ü.; Masjedi, M.; Özkar, S. A New Homogeneous Catalyst for the Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine Borane Starting with Ruthenium(III) Acetylacetonate. Materials 2015, 8, 3155-3167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8063155

AMA Style

Barın EÜ, Masjedi M, Özkar S. A New Homogeneous Catalyst for the Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine Borane Starting with Ruthenium(III) Acetylacetonate. Materials. 2015; 8(6):3155-3167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8063155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barın, Ebru Ünel, Mehdi Masjedi, and Saim Özkar. 2015. "A New Homogeneous Catalyst for the Dehydrogenation of Dimethylamine Borane Starting with Ruthenium(III) Acetylacetonate" Materials 8, no. 6: 3155-3167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8063155

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop