1. Introduction
Aluminum–silicon (Al-Si) alloys are extensively utilized in aerospace, automotive manufacturing, power electronics, and marine engineering due to their favorable castability, low density, high specific strength, and good high-temperature oxidation resistance [
1,
2,
3]. However, their broader application is constrained by insufficient corrosion resistance in harsh service environments, particularly under conditions of high humidity, in acidic media, or in marine atmospheres [
4,
5]. Surface degradation phenomena, including pitting corrosion, intergranular corrosion, and stress corrosion cracking, often lead to a marked reduction in service life. The corrosion behavior of Al-Si alloys is governed primarily by three interrelated factors: the alloy microstructure, the surrounding electrochemical environment, and the thermal processing history [
6,
7,
8,
9]. During corrosion, the silicon phase generally acts as a cathode, while the α-Al matrix undergoes anodic dissolution, forming micro-galvanic cells that accelerate localized attack. Heat treatment can enhance corrosion resistance by modifying the morphology and distribution of precipitates, thereby reducing the number and electrochemical activity of such micro-cells [
10]. Consequently, several strategies have been proposed to improve the corrosion performance of Al-Si alloys, including the optimization of alloying elements, control of heat treatment parameters, and application of surface protection technologies [
11,
12,
13]. In recent years, significant improvements have been achieved through the introduction of trace corrosion-resistant alloying elements combined with well-designed solution and aging treatments [
14]. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms through which specific alloying elements and heat treatment schedules affect corrosion resistance remain incompletely understood. Further in-depth research is therefore essential to optimize alloy composition and processing routes, enabling the reliable use of high-performance Al-Si alloys in highly corrosive environments [
15].
The addition of alloying elements significantly influences the corrosion resistance of Al-Si alloys [
16,
17,
18]. Magnesium is a common strengthening addition that forms Mg
2Si precipitates, improving mechanical properties. However, Mg
2Si exhibits a relatively low electrode potential and is prone to localized corrosion and pitting in Cl
−-containing media. Hence, Mg content must be optimized to balance strength with corrosion resistance. Zirconium promotes the formation of stable Al
3Zr dispersoids, which refine grains, suppress grain boundary segregation, and effectively reduce corrosion susceptibility [
19]. Moreover, Zr can influence the precipitation behavior of Cu and Mg
2Si, weakening micro-galvanic coupling and improving pitting resistance. Copper contributes notably to solid-solution strengthening in Al-Si alloys [
20], but both solute Cu and Cu-rich precipitates (e.g., Al
2Cu) tend to act as active cathodic sites, increasing local corrosion sensitivity. Therefore, while maintaining mechanical properties, Cu content should be carefully controlled. Scandium mainly leads to the formation of nanoscale Al
3(Sc,Zr) precipitates, which refine the grain structure, stabilize the microstructure, reduce micro-galvanic activity, and enhance overall corrosion resistance. Thus, through rational alloy design and optimization of elemental ratios, it is possible to simultaneously improve both strength and corrosion resistance. However, complex interactions among different alloying elements are likely, and further investigation is needed to clarify the specific role of precipitate formation and distribution on corrosion behavior [
21].
Optimization of the heat treatment process also represents a key approach to improving the corrosion resistance of Al-Si alloys. Appropriate solution treatment promotes the dissolution of alloying elements, enhances matrix homogeneity, and reduces the amount of corrosion-sensitive phases [
12]. However, excessively high solution temperatures can cause grain boundary coarsening, increasing the risk of intergranular corrosion. Aging treatments influence corrosion resistance mainly by controlling the morphology and distribution of precipitates [
22]. Therefore, by integrating advanced heat treatment strategies, synergistic optimization of mechanical properties and corrosion performance can be achieved.
2. Materials and Methods
Al-Si-Mg-Zr-Cu-Sc alloys were prepared from Al-4Si, Al-50Mg, Al-10Zr, Al-50Cu, and Al-2Sc master alloys. The preparation procedure was as follows: First, Al-4Si master alloy was melted in a resistance furnace at 780 ± 10 °C. Other master alloys were then added to the molten aluminum, and the melt was stirred with graphite rods to remove slag and degas. After holding for 30 min, the melt was cast into an ingot with a diameter of 85 mm. The ingot was homogenized at 420 °C for 6 h in a resistance furnace, followed by hot extrusion into a rod of 9.5 mm diameter. The chemical composition of the prepared alloy is listed in
Table 1.
In this study, 180 °C, 200 °C and 220 °C were selected as the aging temperatures with 0, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h as the aging durations, and the selection of this temperature range was determined based on the heat treatment characteristics of Al-Si-Mg series alloys, the diffusion law of alloying elements and the results of preliminary pre-experiments. This temperature range is not only the optimal aging window for the classic T6 heat treatment of Al-Si-Mg series alloys, which can balance the nucleation and growth processes of the Mg
2Si strengthening precipitates, but also falls within the diffusion kinetic window (170~230 °C) of Sc and Zr atoms in the Al matrix, which can effectively promote the uniform nucleation and dispersed distribution of Al
3(Sc,Zr) nano-precipitates. The results of preliminary experiments further verified that when the aging temperature is lower than 180 °C, the thermal motion capacity of atoms inside the alloy is insufficient and the slow diffusion of solute atoms will lead to inadequate precipitation of precipitates, while a temperature higher than 220 °C is prone to induce the coarsening of nucleated precipitates, and also cause the segregation of some solute atoms at grain boundaries and aggravate the micro-galvanic corrosion tendency of the alloy. Therefore, 180 °C, 200 °C and 220 °C were finally determined as the aging temperature variables in this study. The aging treatment parameters of this study are summarized in
Table 2.
Specimens for microstructure analysis and corrosion testing were prepared by sectioning 10 mm long rod samples via wire electrical discharge machining (EDM, DK7740, Changde Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Changde, China). The samples were then cold-mounted, sequentially ground using 600, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 3000 grit sandpaper, ultrasonically cleaned (JP-020, Shenzhen Jieqing Cleaning Equipment Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China), rinsed with anhydrous ethanol, and finally air-dried. Microstructure and elemental distribution were examined using a high-resolution field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Apreo 2S, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy detector (EDS, EDAX). Phase composition before and after corrosion was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, XRD-7000, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) performed at a scanning speed of 5°/min over a 2θ range of 10–90°.
Electrochemical investigations, consisting of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and potentiodynamic polarization measurements, were performed using a CHI660E electrochemical workstation with a conventional three-electrode configuration. The electrolyte was a 3.5 wt% NaCl solution (pH 6.8–7.2) maintained at 25 °C. The working electrode was a mounted alloy sample with an exposed surface area of 1 cm2, the counter electrode was a platinum sheet (10 mm × 10 mm × 0.2 mm), and the reference electrode was a saturated calomel electrode (SCE). The electrolyte volume-to-sample area ratio exceeded 100 mL/cm2. Prior to each test, the sample was immersed in the solution for 30 min to attain a stable open-circuit potential (OCP). Following OCP stabilization, potentiodynamic polarization was conducted by scanning the potential from −160 mV to +160 mV (vs. OCP) at a rate of 1.0 mV/s to record the polarization curve.
The corrosion potential and corrosion current density were determined using the Tafel extrapolation method. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were conducted at the open-circuit potential (OCP) by applying a sinusoidal potential signal with a frequency range from 100 kHz to 0.05 Hz and an amplitude of 5 mV RMS. The impedance spectra were acquired with 12 points collected per frequency decade. To ensure the reliability of the electrochemical data, at least two samples of each alloy were tested; results were required to be consistent between replicates, otherwise additional specimens were measured.
Immersion corrosion tests were conducted in a 3.5 wt% NaCl solution at 25 °C. Specimens with dimensions of 10 mm × 10 mm × 5 mm were prepared and immersed for periods of 5 and 10 days. Following immersion, corrosion products were removed by treating the samples for 3 min at 25 °C in a solution consisting of 70 vol.% HNO
3 (500 mL/L) and deionized water (500 mL/L). The mass loss before and after immersion was measured using an analytical balance with an accuracy of 0.01 mg, and the corrosion rate was calculated according to Equation (1) following the ASTM G1-03 standard [
23].
where
Cr is the corrosion rate (mm/a),
K is a constant (6.78 × 10
4),
W is the mass loss (g), A is the exposed sample area (cm
2),
T is the immersion time (h), and
ρ is the density of the alloy (g cm
−3). Immersion tests were performed in triplicate for each alloy condition. The reported corrosion rate for each condition represents the average of the three measurements, with the associated error ranges (e.g., standard deviation) derived from the same replicate set. Following 10 days of immersion, the surface microstructure of the alloy samples under different heat treatment states was examined.
The extruded rods were sectioned into 10 mm diameter specimens using wire electrical discharge machining. The specimens were cold-mounted, and then sequentially ground with 400, 1200, 2000, and 3000 grit abrasive papers. Subsequently, they were ultrasonically cleaned, rinsed with anhydrous ethanol, and air-dried to prepare them for testing. Scanning Vibrating Electrode Technique (
SVET) measurements were performed using a Princeton VersaScan micro-electrochemical system (AMETEK, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA). The test parameters were as follows: a vibrating frequency of 80 Hz, an amplitude of 30 µm, a probe-to-surface distance of approximately 100 µm, a scanning area of 400 µm × 400 µm, and a step size of 50 µm [
24,
25,
26].
The measured relative voltage was converted to current density using Equation (2),
i =
k·Δ
V/Δ
r, where
i is the current density,
k is the conductivity of the electrolyte, and Δ
V is the potential gradient measured over a known vibration distance Δ
r. Prior to testing, the system was calibrated to convert the local potential differences into quantitative current density values. A schematic overview of the complete experimental procedure is provided in
Figure 1.
4. Discussion
This study systematically investigated the influence of heat treatment on the microstructure and corrosion resistance of an Al-Si-Mg-Zr-Cu-Sc alloy. The experimental results demonstrated that the sample subjected to solution treatment at 500 °C for 4 h followed by aging at 200 °C for 48 h exhibited the most optimal comprehensive performance. A detailed analysis of the results under this specific condition is presented below.
Figure 13 shows the stage-specific corrosion mechanism schematic of the as-extruded and optimally heat-treated (solution treated at 500 °C for 4 h followed by aging at 200 °C for 48 h) Al-Si-Mg-Zr-Cu-Sc alloy in a 3.5 wt% NaCl solution, which clearly illustrates the core process by which heat treatment modulates the alloy’s microstructure to achieve a fundamental transition in corrosion mode from severe localized corrosion to mild uniform corrosion. The corrosion behaviors and corresponding microstructural regulation mechanisms at each stage are elaborated as follows:
- (1)
Pre-corrosion Stage: Electrochemical intrinsic properties dictated by the microstructure
In the as-extruded alloy, coarse and inhomogeneously distributed eutectic Si phases and large-sized second-phase particles generate intense electrochemical heterogeneity with the α-Al matrix, and such inhomogeneity is further exacerbated by solute segregation at grain boundaries. Owing to their higher electrode potential, the second-phase particles act as cathodes while the surrounding α-Al matrix serves as anodes, leading to the spontaneous formation of numerous micro-galvanic cells prior to corrosion. These cells provide the thermodynamic prerequisites for the initiation of localized corrosion (
Figure 13, As-extruded, Stage 1). In contrast, for the alloy subjected to optimal heat treatment, nanoscale Mg
2Si and Al
3(Sc,Zr) phases precipitate uniformly within the α-Al matrix, which effectively eliminates solute segregation and second-phase coarsening, thus significantly enhancing the electrochemical uniformity of the alloy. As a result, the number and coupling strength of micro-galvanic cells are drastically reduced. Meanwhile, the homogeneous microstructure facilitates the spontaneous formation of a dense Al
2O
3 passive film on the alloy surface, which acts as a robust physical barrier against the infiltration of corrosive media (
Figure 13, Heat-treated state, Stage 1).
- (2)
Corrosion Initiation Stage: Infiltration of corrosive media and initiation of electrochemical reactions
Chloride ions (Cl
−) in the NaCl solution, as active corrosive anions, are the core inducer for the initiation of localized corrosion. The as-extruded alloy surface is unprotected by a stable passive film, allowing Cl
− to rapidly infiltrate the alloy matrix and react with the α-Al in the anodic regions of micro-galvanic cells. This triggers the anodic dissolution of aluminum with electron loss (Al − 3e
− = Al
3+), and the released electrons migrate rapidly to the cathodic second-phase particles through the matrix. Sustained electrochemical reactions cause irreversible damage to the passive film in local areas, which subsequently serve as nucleation sites for pitting corrosion (
Figure 13, As-extruded, Stage 2). For the heat-treated alloy, the dense Al
2O
3 passive film on its surface can effectively block the rapid infiltration of Cl
−, resulting in only slight anodic dissolution at a small number of micro-defects. Furthermore, the excellent electrochemical uniformity of the heat-treated alloy leads to a significant reduction in electron migration rate, which largely inhibits the micro-galvanic cell reactions. Simultaneously, the dissolved Al
3+ can react with O
2 and H
2O in the electrolyte to realize the self-repair of the passive film (4Al
3+ + 3O
2 + 6H
2O = 2Al
2O
3·3H
2O), thereby preventing the further propagation of corrosion (
Figure 13, Heat-treated state, Stage 2).
- (3)
Corrosion Propagation Stage: Divergent evolution of corrosion modes
After the nucleation of pitting corrosion in the as-extruded alloy, the strong micro-galvanic cells formed by coarse blocky second-phase particles continuously drive the anodic dissolution of α-Al in the anodic regions, leading to the rapid expansion and deepening of pitting pits. Meanwhile, solutes segregated at grain boundaries form intergranular corrosion channels, and the synergetic effect of localized corrosion (pitting corrosion coupled with intergranular corrosion) results in a sharp increase in the corrosion rate (
Figure 13, As-extruded, Stage 3). In the heat-treated alloy, the uniform distribution of nanoscale Mg
2Si and Al
3(Sc,Zr) phases can effectively inhibit the expansion of pitting pits, and the stable passive film persistently blocks the infiltration of corrosive media. Even if slight corrosion occurs at a small number of micro-defects, it evolves into overall uniform corrosion due to the high electrochemical uniformity of the alloy, without any obvious characteristics of localized corrosion. Ultimately, a significant reduction in the corrosion rate is achieved (
Figure 13, Heat-treated state, Stage 3).
In summary, the improvement of the alloy’s corrosion performance by heat treatment is essentially attributed to the modulation of microstructural homogeneity, which weakens the micro-galvanic coupling effect from the source and simultaneously promotes the formation and self-repair of a stable protective passive film. This realizes a fundamental transition in the corrosion mechanism of the Al-Si-Mg-Zr-Cu-Sc alloy from micro-galvanic cell-driven rapid localized corrosion to passive film-modulated mild uniform corrosion.
Under the optimal heat treatment regime (500 °C for 4 h + 200 °C for 48 h), the corrosion resistance of the alloy is significantly enhanced, which is comprehensively verified by multiple test results. Electrochemical measurements (
Figure 3 and
Figure 4 and
Table 3) show that the corrosion current density (
icorr) of the optimal sample is as low as 79.30 μA/cm
2, which is far lower than that of the sample aged at 180 °C for 48 h (127.8 μA/cm
2). Meanwhile, the non-monotonic evolution of corrosion resistance at 180 °C—peaking at 24 h of aging and deteriorating significantly at 48 h, as evidenced by the change in capacitive semicircle diameter in Nyquist plots (
Figure 3a), low-frequency |Z| value in Bode plots (
Figure 3b) and
Rp/
icorr parameters in
Table 3—can also be systematically clarified from the perspective of atomic diffusion kinetics and precipitation evolution, combined with microstructural characterization results.
For the aging treatment at 180 °C, the thermal driving force leads to a pronounced difference in the diffusion kinetics of distinct alloying elements in the Al matrix: Mg atoms maintain a relatively fast diffusion rate, while the migration of Sc and Zr atoms is extremely sluggish at this temperature, which directly drives the staged evolution of precipitate microstructure and corresponding corrosion resistance along with the extension of aging time. In the early stage of aging (within 24 h), Mg and Si atoms preferentially diffuse and nucleate into fine, uniformly dispersed nano-sized Mg
2Si precipitates. This process consumes the supersaturated solute atoms in the α-Al matrix, mitigates the electrochemical inhomogeneity of the matrix, and thus weakens the micro-galvanic coupling effect. Correspondingly, the charge transfer resistance of the alloy increases continuously, reaching the maximum
Rp of 505.0 Ω·cm
2 and the minimum
icorr of 79.84 μA/cm
2 at 24 h (
Table 3), which corresponds to the optimal corrosion resistance at this aging temperature. As the aging time prolongs to 48 h, the insufficient thermal driving force still fails to support the effective nucleation and uniform dispersion of Al
3(Sc,Zr) precipitates—the core phase for stabilizing grain boundaries and inhibiting precipitate coarsening, as verified by the TEM characterization in
Figure 6. Meanwhile, the pre-formed fine Mg
2Si phases undergo inhomogeneous coarsening and grain boundary segregation. The coarsened second phases aggravate the micro-galvanic coupling effect with the Al matrix, and the grain boundary-segregated precipitates act as preferential corrosion channels. These two factors jointly result in a significant decrease in charge transfer resistance and the deterioration of corrosion resistance at 48 h, which is well consistent with the reduced capacitive semicircle diameter in
Figure 3a and the elevated
icorr in
Table 3.
In contrast, 200 °C exactly falls within the optimal diffusion kinetic window of Mg, Sc and Zr atoms in the Al matrix. This temperature can not only provide sufficient driving force for the uniform nucleation and dispersed distribution of nano-scale Mg
2Si and Al
3(Sc,Zr) precipitates during 48 h of aging (as shown in the TEM results of
Figure 6), but also avoid the obvious coarsening of the precipitates [
28]. The synergistic effect of the two types of uniformly dispersed nano-precipitates minimizes the micro-galvanic coupling effect inside the alloy, and facilitates the formation of a stable and compact passive film on the alloy surface. This mechanism is further verified by the highest low-frequency |Z| value in Bode plots (
Figure 3b), the uniform and mild corrosion morphology after immersion (
Figure 9), and the low and evenly distributed local current density in SVET tests (
Figure 12), thus achieving the optimal comprehensive corrosion resistance of the alloy. EIS measurements (as depicted in
Figure 3) revealed that the heat-treated alloy exhibited higher low-frequency impedance modulus and phase angle, indicative of the formation of a stable passive film on the surface. EDS analysis confirmed an increased oxygen content on the surface of the heat-treated alloy, which was attributed to the formation of an Al
2O
3-based passive film. The uniform distribution of precipitates not only mitigated the micro-galvanic effect but also reduced defects within the passive film, thereby hindering the rapid penetration of Cl
− ions to the underlying matrix. This aligns with the research by Evertsson et al. [
29,
30], which concluded that a homogeneous microstructure facilitates the formation of a continuous and stable oxide film on aluminum alloys.
SVET (Scanning Vibrating Electrode Technique) was employed to observe the corrosion mechanism with higher precision. The results showed that the as-extruded alloy exhibited persistent high current density hotspots (with a peak value reaching 106 µA/cm2) during immersion, indicating continuous localized corrosion. In stark contrast, the current density of the heat-treated alloy was confined within the range of ±20 µA/cm2. Transient localized activity was observed only at 12 h of immersion, which was rapidly suppressed by the passive film. The corrosion mode thus transitioned from severe localized corrosion in the as-extruded state to relatively mild and uniform corrosion in the heat-treated state. This transformation stems from the elimination of grain boundary precipitate segregation—i.e., the corrosion-sensitive zones—through the heat treatment process.
Despite these insightful findings, this study has certain limitations. The primary focus was on the corrosion resistance of the alloy, without further investigation into its mechanical properties (such as hardness and tensile strength). Future research should aim to explore strategies that can improve the corrosion resistance of the Al-Si-Mg-Zr-Cu-Sc alloy without compromising its mechanical performance, ultimately leading to the development of an alloy with exceptional comprehensive properties.