1. Introduction
Bioactive glasses are widely investigated for tissue engineering, where high specific surface area and specific porosity enable both tissue ingrowth and local drug delivery.
Bioglass biomaterials are a family of bioactive glasses composed of silicon dioxide, sodium oxide, calcium oxide, and phosphorus pentoxide. These materials exhibit a high specific surface area, a surface pore structure of approximately 5–20 nm, a high pore volume, and good cytocompatibility. Due to these unique properties, clinical applications of bioglass have focused on osteogenesis, as in the case of other biomaterials such as hydroxyapatite or calcium phosphate [
1,
2]. Due to its ability to form chemical bonds with the surrounding native tissue, this biomaterial not only promotes excellent repair of bone defects but also prevents the stimulation of the formation of an immune fibrous capsule around the implant. Despite these beneficial properties, histological evaluation of long-term implants made of 45S5 Bioglass revealed that it exhibits behaviors of partial degradation, fragmentation, and invasion of the connective tissue of the implant and the implantation area [
1].
One of the most studied bioactive glasses for biomedical applications is the commercial 45S5 bioglass. Although it was invented more than half a century ago, it remains a common topic in research aimed at improving the bonding properties of implants to bone tissue. Bioactive glasses are a class of inorganic bioactive ceramics that react with physiological fluids to form strong bonds with bone tissue by forming hydroxyapatite-like layers in bone, as well as through biological interactions between collagen and the material’s surface [
3,
4,
5]. The literature describes how reactions on the surface of bioglass lead to the release of critical concentrations of soluble ions (such as Si, P, Ca, and Na) and thus induce intracellular and extracellular responses favorable to the rapid formation of new bone tissue [
3]. Bioglass has emerged as an up-and-coming field of research. An important direction in the study of this biomaterial has been its loading with therapeutic agents to improve tissue regeneration around the damaged area. The loading of bioglass with a drug depends on its crystallinity, as well as the implant’s porosity and morphology, and the release of the active substance is dictated by the degradation rate, which can vary from a few hours to a few weeks. By manipulating this variability, control over the release rate of agents loaded into the material can be achieved. It is known that bioglass degrades through hydrolysis of the silica matrix, leading to the formation of orthosilicic acid and silanols. These processes contribute crucially to the development of new bones by initially increasing the pH at the surface, thereby promoting hydrolytic degradation and nucleation of carbonated hydroxyapatite within the silica gel layer [
1].
Bioglass is an amorphous solid material without a precise long-range order, being characterized by the same building blocks (cationic polyhedra) of other similar materials. However, bioglasses present a random arrangement of these elements and wider distributions of bond angles. From a compositional point of view, three main classes of bioglasses can be identified, based on SiO
2, P
2O
5, and P
2O
3, with the first being the most studied and most frequently used for biomedical applications [
3,
4,
5,
6].
By adding modifying oxides such as alkali or alkaline earth metals to the continuous three-dimensional network interconnected by SiO
2 groups, the discontinuity of the silicate network is obtained by replacing the Si-BO-Si bonds with Si-NBO bonds, where BO and NBO represent the oxygen atom that forms bonds and the oxygen atom that does not form any bonds. Among the most commonly used modifying oxides are CaO, Na
2O, and K
2O. Obtaining this discontinuity allows stabilization of “inverted” glasses containing small amounts of silica, which are characterized by network fragments, possibly interconnected, as in the case of bioactive glasses [
7,
8].
Dopant ions introduced into the bioactive glass structure enhance the material’s bioactivity or stimulate the desired response in bone tissue. Compared to other types of glass, those with biological activity must have a maximum content of 60% SiO
2 if obtained by the melting process or a maximum of 85% SiO
2 in the case of synthesis by the sol–gel method. Otherwise, the bioglasses obtained lose their bioactivity. Similarly, the bioglass must have a high CaO/P
2O
5 ratio [
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14].
The specific properties of bioactive glasses can be improved and controlled when synthesized at the nanoscale. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in nanoscopic silicate bioglasses in the specialized literature, this being due to their superior bioactivity, improved osteoconductivity, and antibacterial properties compared to conventional bioactive bioglasses (of micron size) [
1].
Since the original formulation by Hench in the late 1960s, many bioactive glass systems have been established for use in several biomedical applications, including the treatment of osteomyelitis, repair of orthopedic bone defects, bioactive coatings, periodontal reconstruction, or small bone implants [
7,
15,
16,
17]. Bioactive glass can be used as a bone graft because it can bond to specific connective tissues by forming collagen on the surface. Bioglass, due to its interconnected porosity, offers advantages for hard tissue implants, as its porous structure supports tissue growth and improves implant stability through biological fixation. The fact that bioglass is a highly effective material for this type of application is confirmed by numerous clinical studies. Among these is the use of bioactive glass particles in the treatment of human periodontal bone defects. In this study, significantly less gingival recession was observed in the bioactive glass-treated areas than in the control areas. Also, greater filling of the defect was observed in regions with bioactive glass, which showed a significant improvement in clinical parameters [
1]. Other studies that involved filling periodontal bone defects with bioglass particles demonstrated a substantial increase in the density and radiographic volume of the treated defects, thus demonstrating the potential of this material for treating bone defects.
It is known that bioglass is a material commonly used in studies in bone tissue engineering. One of the main obstacles in the use of bioglass in tissue engineering is the need to imitate the extracellular matrix. Scaffolds made of biocomposite nanofibers and nano-hydroxyapatite were naturally very porous, facilitating cell proliferation, vascularization, nutrient transport, and the removal of metabolic waste. Studies comparing bioinert glass-ceramic scaffolds with highly bioactive glass scaffolds have demonstrated that the latter promote increased proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast cells. Furthermore, some studies indicate that bioglasses induce human fetal osteoblasts to attach, migrate, proliferate, and mineralize into bone, representing a significant step towards filling bone defects [
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23].
Also, over the last 20 years, bioactive glass-based systems have offered an alternative for loading and releasing multifunctional therapeutics, with optimized kinetics that can improve drug availability at the target site. Although drug carriers are generally inert, bioglasses are unique among biomaterials in having the potential for pharmacological activity through ionic dissolution products released into the physiological environment, thereby promoting the regeneration of hard and soft tissues [
1].
The advantages of using bioactive glass for targeted drug delivery include eliminating many of the drawbacks of systemic treatment. These include frequent administration, peak–plateau effect, interaction with non-target sites, or high drug concentration required to reach the desired site [
23].
The antibacterial activity of bioactive glass is due to its properties, such as the ability to increase ambient pH, high osmotic pressure, and mechanical damage to cell walls caused by sharp debris. Through these mechanisms, the use of bioglass can lead to the death of microorganisms. Numerous studies in the specialized literature highlight that the antibacterial effect of bioglass is attributed to its alkaline nature. Most tests demonstrate a considerable reduction in bacterial viability used species such as
Streptococcus sanguis, Streptococcus mutans, or Actinomyces viscous [
7,
8,
9,
10,
11].
Since the discovery of bioactive glass more than 50 years ago, many variations in the material composition have been studied and developed to improve the properties of this biomaterial. So far, ions have been studied for doping bioglass to enhance bioactivity, angiogenesis, osteogenic stimulation, and antibacterial effects [
8,
20,
21,
22,
23].
It is self-evident that understanding and deepening the mechanisms by which dopant ions influence the physical and biological properties of bioactive glasses has become crucial for future research directions and for developing more promising, better-performing biomaterials. Zinc is an essential microelement found in all biological tissues and serves as a cofactor for many enzymes, and also has a necessary role in the growth, development, and differentiation of bone cells. Although the information on the influence of zinc ions on the ability to induce the deposition of a calcium phosphate layer on the surface of bioglass remains contradictory, it is recognized that at concentrations below 10 mol%, Zn exerts a beneficial effect on bioactivity. Also, the larger surface area of the Zn-substituted glass may provide better nucleation sites when immersed in SBF solution, making the calcium phosphate phase more crystalline. Moreover, various studies have shown the osteogenic potential of sol–gel bioglass doped with 5 mol% ZnO, which exhibits enhanced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and osteoblast cell proliferation [
7,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19].
Zinc shows strong antibacterial activity against
B. subtilis and
P. aeruginosa strains. Zinc ions can be readily incorporated into the bioglass structure and released progressively during dissolution, ensuring controlled, sustained delivery of the antibacterial agent. Zinc also shows promising activity in the treatment of chronic inflammation and processes characterized by an inflammatory component, such as wound healing [
24].
Magnesium is the fourth most abundant cation in the human body, being present at a content of 0.44, 1.23 and 0.73% by weight in natural enamel, dentin and bone. Approximately 65% of the total magnesium in the body is found in bones and teeth and plays a role in bone metabolism, promoting new bone formation through direct interaction with integrins on osteoblast cells, which are responsible for cell adhesion and stability [
25,
26,
27,
28]. Once introduced into the bioglass network, magnesium ions act as network formers or modifiers. By doping bioactive glass with magnesium, its bioactivity is remarkably improved within just a few days of immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF), due to the increased dissolution rate of the bioactive glass resulting from the disruption of its silica network [
7].
Ketoprofen is part of the category of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), representing one of the most used NSAIDs due to the rapidity and effectiveness of its activity. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antipyretic properties, thus reducing fever and pain and preventing inflammation. These types of drugs the advantages of being simple, inexpensive to administer. For example, studies have shown that in the case of surgical intervention such as total hip arthroplasty, treatment with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug for 14 days postoperatively reduces the occurrence of chronic pain and disability, with a very low risk of adverse effects. NSAIDs also prevent the formation of new bone with ectopic tissue in the soft tissues around the hip joint.
Ketoprofen is a drug indicated for the symptomatic treatment of inflammatory and degenerative rheumatic diseases, as well as for the relief of pain in certain painful syndromes. Some of the main conditions for which ketoprofen is recommended are rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, seronegative spondyloarthropathies, acute joint or peri-articular diseases, cervical spondylosis, low back pain, post-traumatic joint, muscle or connective tissue pain, and inflammation after orthopedic surgical procedures [
29,
30,
31].
Bioglasses are materials with superior biocompatible properties and can be used in applications that aim to regenerate bone by repairing damaged tissues and stimulating the growth of new bone tissue [
24]. These biomaterials have made it possible to move from an intensively studied material in the research field to a significant candidate considered for most clinical applications aimed at the skeletal system, such as the treatment of fractures and defects or bone reconstruction surgery, due to their ability to support bone regeneration and improve its healing process. Also, mesoporous bioactive glasses possess a higher specific surface area and pore volume than conventional bioactive glass. Also, the loading efficiency of drugs and growth factors in MBG is significantly higher, and the drug release kinetics from this material is lower than that of dense bioglass [
32,
33,
34,
35,
36]. The aim of this project is due to the importance of bioglasses as biomaterials in the field of research and the significant potential for clinical applications. Bioglasses can bring important benefits in the treatment of bone defects, especially in pathological cases such as bone defects or fractures.
The novelty of this study is the combination of sol–gel and emulsion synthesis methods for Zn2+/Mg2+ doped bioglass as suitable support material for ketoprofen loading with potential use in tissue engineering applications, integrating structural and biological functions and analysis but also preliminary release drug aspects.
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Characterization of the Dried and Thermally Treated Powders
The resulting dried powders were characterized from a compositional point of view by complex thermal analysis—
Figure 2, and X-ray diffraction—
Figure 3. It can be observed that the thermal analysis differential (ATD) curves highlight an important, exothermic effect at approximately 300 °C accompanied by mass loss that can be associated with the combustion of the residual organic component and endothermic cascade effects, between 120 and 200 °C, of lower intensity, which can be attributed to the decomposition of the two crystal hydrates highlighted by X-ray diffraction–CaHPO
4(H
2O)
2 (PDF 072-0713) and CaZn(PO
4)(H
2O)
2 (PDF 035-0495).
After 600 °C, mass loss is no longer important, which caused the samples to be calcined at 600 °C/3 h, the calcination curve being given in
Figure 4, so as to favor the appearance of small open pores.
After calcination heat treatment at 600 °C/3 h, the diffractograms presented in
Figure 5 show a low degree of crystallinity, through the presence of diffraction halos in which low intensity characteristic Ca
3(PO
4)
2 (PDF 009-0169) diffraction interferences are found, and the FTIR spectra in
Figure 6 show vibration bands characteristic of Si-O-Si at 445 cm
−1 and 808 cm
−1 and 1060 cm
−1 and 602 cm
−1 for Ca-O and P-O bonds, for all masses, respectively Zn-O- for M1 and M3, and O-Mg-O- for M2 and M3 [
42].
In terms of specific surface area and structural characteristics–open porosity, the powders were characterized by BET analysis (N
2 absorption isotherms), the results being centralized in
Figure 7. It can be observed that the isotherms are of type IV, characteristic of porous materials, the specific surface area decreasing in the series M0 > M3 > M1 > M2, directly proportional to the porosity—
Figure 7; M0, M1 and M2 powders are characterized mainly by pores with a size above 50 nm (M0 > M1 > M2, which explains the larger volume of adsorbed N
2). It is also observed that a more important porosity with a size below 20 nm, characteristic of mesopores, is shown by the M3 > M0 > M1 > M2 samples (
Figure 7e detail).
Morpho-structural characteristics, the calcined powders were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy—
Figure 8, noting that the obtained vitreous materials show dimensional inhomogeneity, having a multimodal distribution. Also, it can be observed that there is a tendency for particles to agglomerate in the case of all four powder compositions. Moreover, it can be noted that there is porosity both at their surface and in the depth of the material, with intergranular spaces present. The SEM micrographs are consistent with the results obtained using the N
2 physical adsorption/desorption analysis, noting that the M0, M1 and M3 samples show high porosity, while in the case of the M2 powder composition the porosity is lower.
Regarding morphology, it can be noted that the samples show particles with different morphologies depending on the composition used. Thus, in the samples in which the dopant oxide ZnO is present, namely M1 and M3, the presence of quasi-spherical particles is observed, while sample M2, which contained MgO as the dopant oxide, is characterized mainly by polyhedral shaped granules. It can also be noted that in the case of all samples, particles with polyhedral or non-uniform morphology are also distinguished.
3.2. Biological Characterization of Synthesized Vitreous Powders
From a biological point of view, the masses were characterized in vitro by incubation with MG-63 osteoblast-type cells to determine their bioactivity and cytotoxicity.
The results obtained for the MTT test after 14 days of incubation were different. Samples M0, M1, and M3 show biocompatibility behavior, with cell viability being around 80% [
39], while M2 showed a reduction in cell metabolism up to cell viability values of 50% [
39].
Results of the LDH test (
Figure 9), which characterizes the effect of cell death by necrosis, associated with the destruction of the cell membrane, showed that after 7 days of incubation, samples M0 and M2 did not show an increase in the amount of LDH in the extracellular environment following exposure of osteoblast cells to them. Practically, in the case of samples M0 and M2, the calculated relative values were lower compared to the negative control (NC), which can be associated with a reduction in the number of cells in the respective sample, compared to the negative control. It is also observed that the cells exposed to samples M1 and M3 suffered cell membrane damage, measured by the release of LDH into the extracellular medium, to a small extent (compared to the negative control). The results obtained after 14 days of incubation are like those obtained after 7 days.
The results of the cytotoxicity tests suggest the following conclusions. The biocompatibility of samples M0 and M2 is observed. Sample M2 shows biocompatible behavior at 7 and 14 days, manifested by the fact that LDH was not released into the extracellular environment (relative to the negative control); cellular metabolism is maintained within the limits of biocompatibility at 7 days of cultivation, but after 14 days a slight decrease is recorded up to 50%.
Sample M1 induces a cytotoxic effect on osteoblast-type cells, manifested by the release of LDH, but the active maintenance of metabolism at 7 days of cultivation, respectively by the significant reduction of cellular metabolism associated with the release of LDH into the extracellular environment after 14 days of cultivation. The mechanism of cell death is associated with a necrotic phenomenon. Samples M1 and M3 show a slight cytotoxic effect associated with the release of LDH enzyme from osteoblast cells into the extracellular environment after 7 and 14 days of cultivation, a phenomenon associated with maintaining cellular metabolism within biocompatibility limits [
39]. The cell differentiation test with Alizarin Red (
Figure 9c), which involves measuring Ca deposits formed following osteoid mineralization, showed that after 7 days of incubation, a significant increase in mineralization is revealed in osteoblast cells exposed to samples M0 and M3, compared to the negative control. The results after 14 days of incubation reveal a significant increase in mineralization in osteoblast cells exposed to samples M1, M2, M3.
In conclusion, samples M0 and M1 demonstrate biocompatibility towards osteoblast cells, inducing a slight acceleration of the mineralization phenomenon in the osteoid of the cells compared to the negative control after 7 days of incubation, an effect that is, however, lost after 14 days. Cell morphology investigations support these statements. Sample M2 demonstrates biocompatibility towards osteoblast cells, inducing a slight acceleration of the mineralization phenomenon in the osteoid of the cells after 14 days, compared to the negative control. Cell morphology investigations support these statements. Sample M3 demonstrates a slight cytotoxic phenomenon manifested by the release of LDH into the culture medium. The sample induces a slight acceleration of the mineralization phenomenon in the osteoid of the cells after 14 days, compared to the negative control. The reduction in cellular metabolism is associated with the phenomenon of cellular differentiation. Cell morphology investigations support these statements.
SEM images for MG63 osteoblast cells cultured for 3 days under standard conditions on the negative control and M0–M3 sample are given in
Figure 10.
The negative control is represented by osteoblast-type cells adhered to the glass. Their elongated and flat morphology is observed under super-confluent conditions.
The SEM image of MG63 osteoblast cells cultured for 3 days under standard conditions on the M0 sample showed good adhesion of the osteoblast cells at confluence. They have polygonal morphology but are not completely spread out to the substrate, probably due to the rough appearance of the M0 ceramic surface. The cells show adhesion points in the form of dendritic-like extensions, suggesting that is initiating a differentiation process.
For sample M1, good adhesion of osteoblast-type cells, at confluence, is observed. Although the cells have a polygonal morphology, their tendency to elongate and orient in a certain direction can be observed. Multiple cytoplasmic extensions (filopodia) with an adhesion role are observed.
For the M2 sample, good adhesion of osteoblast-type cells is observed. The cell density is lower in this sample compared to CN, M0 or M1. The cells have a stellate morphology, with multiple cytoplasmic extensions that play a role in adhesion. The cells follow the irregular surface of the material, so they do not present a flat, spread-out appearance.
For sample M3, a reduced density of osteoblast-type cells is observed, compared to the rest of the samples. Some of the cells have an elongated morphology, are exposed to the substrate and present multiple cytoplasmic extensions, but there are multiple rounded cells.
3.3. Characterization of Synthesized Vitreous Powders for a Potential Drug Release Support
A specific graphical pattern represents the incipient kinetics study of drug release in a controlled-release system. The releases were determined at 233 nm (Ketoprofen British Pharmacopoeia Monograph). Primary graphs were obtained by UV spectrometry to follow the kinetics of ketoprofen release from experimentally prepared vitreous materials and, ultimately, to establish, in perspective, a possible mechanism of its release. After processing the experimental data (
Figure 11) and the quantitative evaluation of ketoprofen released from the samples, it can be observed that in the first 4 h, there is a rapid increase in the amount of drug released from all materials, followed by a slow release over the next 160 h. Compared to the non-lyophilized samples, the amount of drug released from the lyophilized samples is higher, likely due to the presence of propylene glycol in the initial, non-lyophilized samples. For lyophilized samples, although drug diffusion is observed, erosion-controlled is also present. For non-lyophilized samples the release is more gradual and does not present that instantaneous burst in the first 5 min as for lyophilized samples. Also, for non-lyophilized samples the release is dominated by simple diffusion, following the Higuchi model that can be further analyzed. The actual data shows some variability, and RM1 is the sample that most closely follows a standard mathematical model of release, presenting the more stable release.
However, the release graph is specific to controlled release for both air-dried and lyophilized samples, demonstrating the achievement of the proposed release system, with promising data for mathematical models of release.