Novel Ternary Biopolymer Films Incorporating Amygdalin: FTIR, TG, and In Vitro Evaluation on Model Bacteria
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals
2.2. Methods
- Synthesis of amygdalin-doped films
- FTIR analysis
- TG/DTG analysis
- Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions
- Antibacterial effect of amygdalin-doped films. TTC viability assay
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Synthesis of Amygdalin-Loaded Films
3.2. FTIR Analysis
- Constituents of the film’s biopolymer matrix
- Amygdalin-doped films
3.3. TG/DTG Analysis
- Constituents of the film’s biopolymer matrix
- Amygdalin-doped films
3.4. In Vitro Evaluation
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| FTIR | Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy |
| TG | Thermogravimetric analysis |
| DTG | Derivative thermogravimetric analysis |
| PHB | poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) |
| KC | κ–carrageenan |
| HPMC | hydroxypropyl methylcellulose |
| GEL | Gelatine |
| GLY | Glycerol |
| AMY | Amygdalin |
| TTC | 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride |
| TSA | Tryptic Soy Agar |
| TSB | Tryptic Soy Broth |
References
- Kogje, M.; Satdive, A.; Mestry, S.; Mhaske, S.T. Biopolymers: A comprehensive review of sustainability, environmental impact, and lifecycle analysis. Iran. Polym. J. 2025, 34, 1481–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakare, N.R.; Hazarika, S. Eco-friendly biopolymers and their biomedical applications: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 327, 147225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, N.R.; Saiyad, M.M. Greening packaging: A step towards biopolymers in multilayer films. Interactions 2024, 245, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edo, G.I.; Ndudi, W.; Yousif, E.; Gaaz, T.S.; Jikah, A.N.; Isoje, E.F.; Igbuku, U.A.; Akpoghelie, P.O.; Oberhiri, S.O.; Ufuoma, E.G.; et al. A general review on biopolymers composites. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2025, 303, 1451–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.; Ramakrishnan, R.; Goksen, G.; Singh, S.; Łopusiewicz, Ł. Recent progress on UV-light barrier food packaging films—A systematic review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 91, 103550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bharadwaj, V.N.; Tzabazis, A.Z.; Klukinov, M.; Manering, N.A.; Yeomans, D.C. Intranasal Administration for Pain: Oxytocin and Other Polypeptides. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Yang, J.; Loh, X.J. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Opening doors for a sustainable future. NPG Asia Mater. 2016, 8, e265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco-Quito, E.-M.; Ruiz-Caro, R.; Veiga, M.-D. Carrageenan: Drug Delivery Systems and Other Biomedical Applications. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jabeen, F.; Zil-e-Aimen; Ahmad, R.; Mir, S.; Awwad, N.S.; Ibrahium, H.A. Carrageenan: Structure, properties and applications with special emphasis on food science. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 22035–22062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Foox, M.; Zilberman, M. Drug delivery from gelatin-based systems. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2015, 12, 1547–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bugarčić, M.; Jovanović, A.; Petrović, J.; Mišić, M.; Sokić, M.; Milivojević, M. Decadal Trends in Biopolymer Production and Utilization: A Comprehensive Review. Metall. Mater. Data 2024, 2, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deshmukh, K.; Ahamed, M.B.; Deshmukh, R.R.; Pasha, S.K.K.; Bhagat, P.R.; Chidambaram, K. Biopolymer Composites with High Dielectric Performance: Interface Engineering. In Biopolymer Composites in Electronics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 27–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Peña, I.Y.; Barreras-Urbina, C.G.; Madera-Santana, T.J.; de la Mora-López, D.S.; Millán-Seaman, J.; Montaño-Grijalva, E.A.; Tapia-Hernández, J.A.; Rodríguez-Félix, F.; Leyva-Verduzco, A.A. Classification and Synthesis of Nano-Biopolymers. In Green Chemistry Methods for Producing Biopolymeric Nanomaterials; Abd-Elsalam, K.A., Ed.; Smart Nanomaterials Technology; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2025; pp. 31–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, P.; Rawat, B.; Sahu, K.K.; Akram, W. Unveiling the transformative horizon of biopolymers in drug delivery. Polym. Bull. 2025, 82, 8727–8762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baranwal, J.; Barse, B.; Fais, A.; Delogu, G.L.; Kumar, A. Biopolymer: A Sustainable Material for Food and Medical Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senevirathna, S. Biopolymers: Structure, properties, extraction methods and applications. Sri Lankan J. Appl. Sci. 2022, 1, 18–30. [Google Scholar]
- Fazal, T.; Murtaza, B.N.; Shah, M.; Iqbal, S.; Rehman, M.-U.; Jaber, F.; Dera, A.A.; Awwad, N.S.; Ibrahium, H.A. Recent developments in natural biopolymer based drug delivery systems. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 23087–23121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borandeh, S.; Van Bochove, B.; Teotia, A.; Seppälä, J. Polymeric drug delivery systems by additive manufacturing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021, 173, 349–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popescu, R.; Dinu-Pîrvu, C.-E.; Ghica, M.V.; Anuța, V.; Popa, L. Physico-Chemical Characterization and Initial Evaluation of Carboxymethyl Chitosan–Hyaluronan Hydrocolloid Systems with Insulin Intended for Intranasal Administration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, M.N.; Khan, S.A.; Sadozai, S.K.; Khalil, I.A.; Anter, A.; El Fouly, M.; Osman, A.H.; Kazi, M. Nanoparticles Loaded Thermoresponsive In Situ Gel for Ocular Antibiotic Delivery against Bacterial Keratitis. Polymers 2022, 14, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chittasupho, C.; Angklomklew, J.; Thongnopkoon, T.; Senavongse, W.; Jantrawut, P.; Ruksiriwanich, W. Biopolymer Hydrogel Scaffolds Containing Doxorubicin as A Localized Drug Delivery System for Inhibiting Lung Cancer Cell Proliferation. Polymers 2021, 13, 3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodgers, K.; Jadhav, S.S. The application of mesenchymal stem cells to treat thermal and radiation burns. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 123, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, H.; Shi, Z.; Ji, L.; Yang, J.; Yu, H.; Tan, J. Types, properties, and applications of polysaccharide-based wound dressings: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 319, 145237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Savencu, I.; Iurian, S.; Porfire, A.; Bogdan, C.; Tomuță, I. Review of advances in polymeric wound dressing films. React. Funct. Polym. 2021, 168, 105059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokra, I.; Somaly, S.; Meta, H.; Sarun, H.; Molikoy, C. Mechanisms of potential bacteria in controlling crop diseases: A systematic review. J. Agric. Technol. 2026, 2, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, P.; Ganguly, S.; Marvi, P.K.; Hassan, S.; Sherazee, M.; Mahana, M.; Tang, X.; Srinivasan, S.; Rajabzadeh, A.R. Silicene-Based Quantum Dots Nanocomposite Coated Functional UV Protected Textiles With Antibacterial and Antioxidant Properties: A Versatile Solution for Healthcare and Everyday Protection. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2025, 14, 2404911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan, N.; Shao, K.; Huang, S.; Chen, C. Chitosan, alginate, hyaluronic acid and other novel multifunctional hydrogel dressings for wound healing: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 240, 124321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okolišan, D.; Vlase, G.; Budiul, M.M.; Matica, M.A.; Vlase, T. Amygdalin-Doped Biopolymer Composites as Potential Wound Dressing Films: In Vitro Study on E. coli and S. aureus. Gels 2025, 11, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Lin, J.; Zhao, S.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, G. Recent advances in cellulose-based antimicrobial films: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 356, 123398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nemeş, N.S.; Ardean, C.; Davidescu, C.M.; Negrea, A.; Ciopec, M.; Duţeanu, N.; Negrea, P.; Paul, C.; Duda-Seiman, D.; Muntean, D. Antimicrobial Activity of Cellulose Based Materials. Polymers 2022, 14, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barakat, H.; Aljutaily, T.; Almujaydil, M.S.; Algheshairy, R.M.; Alhomaid, R.M.; Almutairi, A.S.; Alshimali, S.I.; Abdellatif, A.A.H. Amygdalin: A Review on Its Characteristics, Antioxidant Potential, Gastrointestinal Microbiota Intervention, Anticancer Therapeutic and Mechanisms, Toxicity, and Encapsulation. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alwan, A.M.; Rokaya, D.; Kathayat, G.; Afshari, J.T. Onco-immunity and therapeutic application of amygdalin: A review. J. Oral Biol. Craniofacial Res. 2023, 13, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Z.; Xu, X. Advanced research on anti-tumor effects of amygdalin. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2014, 10, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, Q.; Yu, S.; Wang, S.; Qin, Y.; Xia, Q.; Wang, S.; Chen, G.; Shen, C.; Song, S. Impact of intestinal microbiota on metabolic toxicity and potential detoxification of amygdalin. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1030516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jaszczak-Wilke, E.; Polkowska, Ż.; Koprowski, M.; Owsianik, K.; Mitchell, A.E.; Bałczewski, P. Amygdalin: Toxicity, Anticancer Activity and Analytical Procedures for Its Determination in Plant Seeds. Molecules 2021, 26, 2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdel-Gawad, D.R.I.; Ibrahim, M.A.; El-Banna, H.A.; Hassan, W.H.; El-Ela, F.I.A. Evaluating the therapeutic potential of amygdalin: Cytotoxic and antimicrobial properties. Tissue Cell 2024, 89, 102443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hakimi, F.; Sharifyrad, M.; Safari, H.; Khanmohammadi, A.; Gohari, S.; Ramazani, A. Amygdalin/chitosan-polyvinyl alcohol/cerium-tannic acid hydrogel as biodegradable long-time implant for cancer recurrence care applications: An in vitro study. Heliyon 2023, 9, e21835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saravanan, K.; Bharathi, M.; Alyam, N.M.; Ali, S.; Hussein-Al-Ali, S.H.; Arulselvan, P. Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Chitosan-Nickel oxide Based Amygdalin Hybrid Nanomaterials for Antibacterial and Anticancer Properties. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2024, 58, 1225–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moussa, S.H.; Tayel, A.A.; Al-Hassan, A.A.; Farouk, A. Tetrazolium/Formazan Test as an Efficient Method to Determine Fungal Chitosan Antimicrobial Activity. J. Mycol. 2013, 2013, 753692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galiano, F.; Mancuso, R.; Guzzo, M.G.; Lucente, F.; Gukelberger, E.; Losso, M.A.; Figoli, A.; Hoinkis, J.; Gabriele, B. New Polymeric Films with Antibacterial Activity Obtained by UV-induced Copolymerization of Acryloyloxyalkyltriethylammonium Salts with 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasavada, N. Online Web Statistical Calculators: One-Way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) with Post-Hoc Tukey HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) Test Calculator. Available online: https://astatsa.com/OneWay_Anova_with_TukeyHSD/ (accessed on 19 February 2026).
- Zhou, Y.; Chen, F.-Q.; Chen, S.; Xiao, Q.; Weng, H.-F.; Yang, Q.-M.; Xiao, A.-F. Preparation and Characterization of κ-Carrageenan Modified with Maleic Anhydride and Its Application in Films. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Picoli, P.M.C.; Soares, T.A.; Gonçalves, A.M.; Trovatti, E. Carrageenan-amino acid interaction as a tool for understanding atherosclerotic process initiation. Electron. J. Gen. Med. 2024, 21, em590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres, M.D.; Chenlo, F.; Moreira, R. Structural features and water sorption isotherms of carrageenans: A prediction model for hybrid carrageenans. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 180, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Meutter, J.; Goormaghtigh, E. Evaluation of protein secondary structure from FTIR spectra improved after partial deuteration. Eur. Biophys. J. 2021, 50, 613–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adochitei, A.; Drochioiu, G. Rapid characterization of peptide secondary structure by FT-IR spectroscopy. Rev. Roum. Chim. 2011, 56, 783–791. [Google Scholar]
- Wardhana, Y.W.; Aanisah, N.; Sopyan, I.; Hendriani, R.; Chaerunisaa, A.Y. Gelling Power Alteration on Kappa-Carrageenan Dispersion through Esterification Method with Different Fatty Acid Saturation. Gels 2022, 8, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porfírio, L.d.O.; Costa, A.A.; Conceição, R.R.; Matos, T.d.O.; Almeida, E.D.P.; Sarmento, V.H.V.; Araújo, A.A.S.; Nunes, R.d.S.; Lira, A.A.M. Compatibility study of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose films containing zidovudine and lamivudine using thermal analysis and infrared spectroscopy. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2015, 120, 817–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J.; Luo, K.; Chen, X.; Khutoryanskiy, V.V. Miscibility studies of the blends of chitosan with some cellulose ethers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 63, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cernușcă, B.-D.; Bradu, I.-A.; Pahomi, A.; Okolisan, D.; Budiul, M.M.; Vlase, G.; Vlase, T. Study of thermally induced interactions between active substances from the sartans class and various excipients. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2024, 150, 6761–6775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Basheer, T.; Shehap, A.; Mahmoud, K.; El-kader, M.A. Preparation and Thermal Properties of Gelatin/TGS Composite Films. Middle East J. Appl. Sci. 2015, 5, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Jiang, S.; Chen, Y.; Qiu, D.; Weng, Y. Synthesis and Characterization of a Novel Composite Edible Film Based on Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose Grafted with Gelatin. Gels 2023, 9, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ducatti, D.R.B.; Santos, B.P.D.; De Souza, C.F.; Junior, L.A.; Duarte, M.E.R.; Noseda, M.D. Synthesis of unsaturated polysaccharide via selective desulfation of oxidized κ-Carrageenan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 367, 123978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rupert, R.; Rodrigues, K.F.; Thien, V.Y.; Yong, W.T.L. Carrageenan From Kappaphycus alvarezii (Rhodophyta, Solieriaceae): Metabolism, Structure, Production, and Application. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 859635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, A.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Yuan, G. Study on the preparation, characterization, and antibacterial properties of keggin POMs functionalized carrageenan composite films. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 29935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramachandran, I.; Baskaralingam, V.; Elumalai, P. Extraction and characterization of antibacterial marine polysaccharide K-Carrageenan from Kappaphycus alvarezii against multidrug-resistant wound associated bacteria. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 37446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.F.; Yao, Z.; Wu, H.G.; Zhang, S.X.; Zhu, N.N.; Gai, X. Antibacterial Activities of Kappa-Carrageenan Oligosaccharides. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2011, 108, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Heijenoort, J. Peptidoglycan Hydrolases of Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2011, 75, 636–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaefler, S.; Malamy, A.; Green, I. Phospho-β-glucosidases and β-Glucoside Permeases in Streptococcus, Bacillus, and Staphylococcus. J. Bacteriol. 1969, 99, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Bakri, S.; Nima, Z.; Jabri, R.; Ajeel, E.A. Antibacterial activity of apricot kernel extract containing amygdalin. Iraqi J. Sci. 2010, 51, 571–576. [Google Scholar]
- Walker, J.W.; Krieble, V.K. The hydrolysis of amygdalin by acids. Part I. J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 1909, 95, 1369–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abtahi, H.; Ghazavi, A.; Karimi, M.; Mollaghase, S.; Mosayebi, G. Antimicrobial Activities of Water and Methanol Extracts of Bitter Apricot Seeds. J. Med. Sci. 2008, 8, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hildebrand, D.C.; Schroth, M.N. β-Glucosidase Activity in Phytopathogenic Bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. 1964, 12, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedman, M.; Henika, P.R.; Mandrell, R.E. Antibacterial Activities of Phenolic Benzaldehydes and Benzoic Acids against Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella enterica. J. Food Prot. 2003, 66, 1811–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Z.; Du, H.; Wan, H.; Yang, J.; Wan, H. Amygdalin prevents multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-induced lung epithelial cell injury by regulating inflammation and oxidative stress. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0310253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| κAm0 | κAm1 | κAm2 | κAm3 | κAm4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amygdalin (mg) | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 |
| Physical appearance | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Sample | Process No. | Mass Loss (%) | DTG Temperature (°C) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tonset | Tmax | Tendset | |||
| KC | 1 | −9.46 | 36.65 | 64.39 | 96.79 |
| 2 | −6.93 | 167.45 | 193.25 | 216.96 | |
| 3 | −6.10 | 228.45 | 249.51 | 260.08 | |
| 4 | −15.54 | 270.30 | 289.55 | 339.22 | |
| GEL | 1 | −0.13 | 40.14 | 61.20 | 98.79 |
| 2 | −0.69 | 255.66 | 256.95 | 258.35 | |
| 3 | −54.59 | 259.41 | 359.08 | 439.67 | |
| HPMC | 1 | −89.10 | 274.37 | 335.55 | 431.35 |
| AMY | 1 | −1.47 | 42.09 | 55.72 | 129.23 |
| 2 | −73.71 | 264.35 | 347.35 | 390.21 | |
| κAm0 | 1 | −5.06 | 40.33 | 68.64 | 85.54 |
| 2 | −53.10 | 101.19 | 147.52 | 224.26 | |
| 3 | −8.64 | 237.50 | 268.77 | 294.54 | |
| 4 | −4.07 | 301.04 | 343.04 | 371.82 | |
| κAm1 | 1 | −5.05 | 39.83 | 70.43 | 92.04 |
| 2 | −46.82 | 99.01 | 147.38 | 227.40 | |
| 3 | −11.91 | 241.39 | 279.14 | 307.93 | |
| 4 | −7.10 | 303.25 | 379.06 | 423.49 | |
| κAm2 | 1 | −5.25 | 41.27 | 77.99 | 106.30 |
| 2 | −42.93 | 104.04 | 146.06 | 229.33 | |
| 3 | −14.93 | 248.54 | 278.62 | 307.43 | |
| 4 | −6.02 | 311.32 | 365.57 | 391.02 | |
| κAm3 | 1 | −4.99 | 39.29 | 75.51 | 101.82 |
| 2 | −38.65 | 106.86 | 148.80 | 231.70 | |
| 3 | −15.34 | 250.40 | 279.69 | 301.98 | |
| 4 | −8.37 | 311.58 | 376.84 | 417.62 | |
| κAm4 | 1 | −5.17 | 40.92 | 78.97 | 107.80 |
| 2 | −43.10 | 111.58 | 148.37 | 236.30 | |
| 3 | −15.75 | 256.55 | 284.63 | 315.11 | |
| 4 | −7.04 | 319.53 | 379.61 | 428.09 | |
| (a) ANOVA | |||
| Source of Variation | df | F | p-Value |
| Between Groups | 4 | 2691.644 | 4.12 × 10−15 |
| Within Groups | 10 | ||
| Total | 14 | ||
| (b) Tukey HSD Test [41] | |||
| Treatments Pair | Tukey HSD Q Statistic | Tukey HSD p-Value | Tukey HSD Inference |
| κAm0 vs. κAm1 | 44.7077 | 0.0010053 | ** p < 0.01 |
| κAm0 vs. κAm2 | 67.8498 | 0.0010053 | ** p < 0.01 |
| κAm0 vs. κAm3 | 67.0887 | 0.0010053 | ** p < 0.01 |
| κAm0 vs. κAm4 | 68.6380 | 0.0010053 | ** p < 0.01 |
| κAm1 vs. κAm2 | 112.5574 | 0.0010053 | ** p < 0.01 |
| κAm1 vs. κAm3 | 111.7964 | 0.0010053 | ** p < 0.01 |
| κAm1 vs. κAm4 | 113.3457 | 0.0010053 | ** p < 0.01 |
| κAm2 vs. κAm3 | 0.7611 | 0.8999947 | insignificant |
| κAm2 vs. κAm4 | 0.7883 | 0.8999947 | insignificant |
| κAm3 vs. κAm4 | 1.5493 | 0.7862805 | insignificant |
| ANOVA | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Source of Variation | df | F | p-Value |
| Between Groups | 4 | 1.303671 | 0.332849 |
| Within Groups | 10 | ||
| Total | 14 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Okolišan, D.; Potinteu, A.-I.; Vlase, G.; Budiul, M.M.; Matica, M.A.; Pahomi, A.; Mogoş, A.; Vlase, T. Novel Ternary Biopolymer Films Incorporating Amygdalin: FTIR, TG, and In Vitro Evaluation on Model Bacteria. Materials 2026, 19, 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19050897
Okolišan D, Potinteu A-I, Vlase G, Budiul MM, Matica MA, Pahomi A, Mogoş A, Vlase T. Novel Ternary Biopolymer Films Incorporating Amygdalin: FTIR, TG, and In Vitro Evaluation on Model Bacteria. Materials. 2026; 19(5):897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19050897
Chicago/Turabian StyleOkolišan, Dorinel, Amalia-Ionela Potinteu, Gabriela Vlase, Mihaela Maria Budiul, Mariana Adina Matica, Alexandru Pahomi, Alin Mogoş, and Titus Vlase. 2026. "Novel Ternary Biopolymer Films Incorporating Amygdalin: FTIR, TG, and In Vitro Evaluation on Model Bacteria" Materials 19, no. 5: 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19050897
APA StyleOkolišan, D., Potinteu, A.-I., Vlase, G., Budiul, M. M., Matica, M. A., Pahomi, A., Mogoş, A., & Vlase, T. (2026). Novel Ternary Biopolymer Films Incorporating Amygdalin: FTIR, TG, and In Vitro Evaluation on Model Bacteria. Materials, 19(5), 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19050897






