Reduction Behavior and Melting Characteristics of Blast Furnace Iron Ore Mixed with Carbon-Rich Iron Particles
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Material Preparation and Experimental Ore Proportion
2.2. Reduction Experiment
2.2.1. Experimental Apparatus for Thermogravimetric Analysis
process/theoretical weight of removeable O2 in Fe2O3 and FeO of iron ore) ×
100%,
2.2.2. Iron Ore Stacking Method for Reduction Experiment
2.3. Primary Slag Viscosity Analysis
2.3.1. Sample Preparation for Viscosity Analysis
2.3.2. Procedure of Viscosity Measurements
3. Results
3.1. High-Temperature Reduction and Melting Behavior
3.2. Reduction Degree of Mixed Composite Iron Ore with Different Carbon Contents
3.3. Melting Behavior of Mixed Iron Ore with Different Carbon Contents
3.4. Iron–Slag Melting Temperature of Mixed Ore Reduction Test
4. Conclusions
- When the carbon content of the high-metallic material was 0.6 wt.%, it exhibited the lowest reduction rate (47%) and the widest iron–slag dripping temperature range (238 °C). When the carbon content exceeded 1.6 wt.%, both the reduction degree and the iron–slag dripping temperature range were superior to those of conventional blast furnace iron ore blends.
- Increasing the carbon content of the high-metallic material from 1.6 wt.% to 3.6 wt.% increased the reduction rate from 65% to 86%, representing a 21% improvement. At a carbon content of 3.6 wt.%, the iron–slag dripping temperature range decreased to 122 °C, achieving an optimal temperature range.
- Theoretical prediction indicated that replacing 15 wt.% of sinter with HBI containing 1.6 wt.% carbon could yield comparable reduction rates and slag melting characteristics to those of traditional blast furnace materials. Therefore, 1.6 wt.% is identified as the optimal carbon content in HBI for adjusting blast furnace slag.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mathieson, J.G.; Herbertson Am, J. A feed-flexible blast furnace strategy to place the steel industry on an accelerated path toward Net-Cero CO2 emissions. J. Sustain. Metall. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dishwar, R.K.; Sinha, O.P. Effect of basicity on the activation energy during reduction of highly fluxed iron ore pellets. Fuel 2021, 296, 120640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Long, H.; Zhou, T. Effects of SiO2, CaO and basicity on reduction behaviors and swelling properties of fluxed pellet at different stages. Powder Technol. 2022, 396, 477–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.; Liang, J.L.; Chen, Y.M.; Shiau, J.S.; Lin, B.J.; Kuo, P.C. Development of simple blast furnace models for addressing carbon reduction strategies. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 302, 118138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, D.; Jiang, Y.; Pan, J.; Yang, C. Study of mineralogy and metallurgical properties of lump ores. Metals 2022, 12, 1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Yang, S.; Tang, W.; Xue, X. Investigations of MgO on sintering performance and metallurgical property of high-chromium vanadium-titanium magnetite. Minerals 2019, 9, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, Y.; Pan, J.; Zhu, D.; Guo, Z.; Tian, H.; Shi, Y.; Lu, S. Effect of alumina occurrence on sintering performance of iron ores and its action mechanism. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 12, 1157–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.-F.; He, Z.-J.; Zhan, W.-L.; Kong, W.-G.; Han, P.; Zhang, J.-H.; Pang, Q.-H. Relationship and mechanism analysis of soft-melt dropping properties and primary-slag formation behaviors of the mixed burden in increasing lump ore ratio. Metals 2020, 10, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Diao, J.; Xie, B.; Qi, C.; Du, P. Melting–dropping property of blast furnace charge on the basis of its slag formation behavior. Metals 2022, 12, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.-M.; Zhang, J.-L.; Wang, Y.-Z.; Ma, X.-Y.; Wang, G.-L.; Li, Z.; Jiang, H.-Q.; Liu, Z.-J. Magnesium-containing pellet regulating blast furnace ferrous burden interaction: Softening–melting behavior and mechanism. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2024, 31, 1623–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Li, T.; Sun, C.; Yang, S.; Wang, Q. The effects of mgo and Al2O3 content in sinter on the softening–melting properties of mixed ferrous burden. Materials 2023, 16, 5490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Allwood, J.M.; Cullen, J.M.; Milford, R.L. Options for achieving a 50% cut in industrial carbon emissions by 2050. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 1888–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xing, Y.; Luo, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Kou, M.; Wu, S.; Zou, Z.; Zhou, H. Modelling in-furnace phenomena in a hydrogen-rich low-carbon reduction smelting furnace: Influence of blast parameters of hydrogen-rich gas. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2025, 273, 126494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Wang, N.; Duan, W.; Li, H.; Chen, M. Material and exergy-driven comparative assessment of hydrogen-rich fuels injection in blast furnaces: Feasibility envelope and carbon reduction. Energy 2025, 337, 138659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holappa, L. A general vision for reduction of energy consumption and CO2 emissions from the steel industry. Metals 2020, 10, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, L.; Jiang, X.; An, H.; Zheng, H.; Gao, Q.; Shen, F. Effects of pellet ratio on the burden movement and distribution characteristics in the bf throat. Powder Technol. 2024, 432, 119130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Pan, J.; Guo, Z.; Zhu, D. Optimization of four-component furnace burdens with hydrogen-reduced metallized pellets based on blast furnace performance. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, 100, 596–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, L.; Liu, M.; Yuan, X.; Wang, Q.; Ma, Q.; Wang, P.; Hong, J.; Liu, H. Environmental and economic impact assessment of three sintering flue gas treatment technologies in the iron and steel industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 311, 127703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esposito, V.; Maffei, A.; Bruno, D.; Varvaglione, B.; Ficocelli, S.; Capoccia, C.; Spartera, M.; Giua, R.; Blonda, M.; Assennato, G. Pop emissions from a large sinter plant in taranto (italy) over a five-year period following enforcement of new legislation. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 491–492, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Esposito, V.; Bruno, D.; Maffei, A.; Giua, R.; Capoccia, C.; Nicosia, A.; Ficocelli, S. Long-term emission sampling validation for pcdd/fs control of compliance to permitted emission limit values at a large sinter plant. Chemosphere 2019, 233, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.; Ooi, T.; Li, X. Sintering emissions and their mitigation technologies. In Iron Ore; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 18, pp. 551–579. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, Y.; Rufford, T.E.; Chen, J.; Hao, L.; Li, M.; Qiu, Y.; Garg, S.; Rudolph, V.; Wang, G. Opportunities to reduce energy consumption and co2 emissions from ironmaking blast furnace using co2 electrolysis to co for carbon recycling. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 389, 135997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, G.; Qureshi, A.S. A novel method for estimating carbon emission based on industrial metabolism: Blast furnace iron-making with micro mechanism model. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 10125–10133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, X.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Huang, J.; Cai, H.; Kou, M.; Wu, S. Numerical simulation of the influence of operating parameters on the inner characteristics in a hydrogen-enriched shaft furnace. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 55, 1131–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Lu, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, Q.; Ma, Y. Study on optimization of reduction temperature of hydrogen-based shaft furnace—Numerical simulation and multi-criteria evaluation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 16132–16142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.; Tian, X.; Kou, M.; Wu, S.; Shen, Y.; Li, Y.; Shen, Y. Numerical simulation of the effect of burden profile on gas flow in a corex shaft furnace. Powder Technol. 2020, 376, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Åhman, M.; Algers, J.; Nilsson, L.J. Decarbonizing the asian steel industries through green hot briquetted iron trade. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2025, 219, 108275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huitu, K.; Helle, H.; Helle, M.; Kekkonen, M.; Saxén, H. Optimization of steelmaking using fastmet direct reduced iron in the blast furnace. ISIJ Int. 2013, 53, 2038–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Liu, K.; Chen, F.; Wang, S.; Zheng, F.; Yang, L.; Liu, Y. Effect of basicity on the reduction swelling behavior and mechanism of limestone fluxed iron ore pellets. Powder Technol. 2021, 393, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yilmaz, C.; Turek, T. Modeling and simulation of the use of direct reduced iron in a blast furnace to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 164, 1519–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Lu, M.; Cai, Q.; Xu, C.; Li, Z.; Liu, Z. Mixed burden softening-melting property optimization based on high-silica fluxed pellets. Powder Technol. 2022, 412, 117979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.-J.; She, X.-F.; Han, Y.-H.; Wang, J.-S.; Zeng, F.-B.; Xue, Q.-G. Softening and melting behavior of ferrous burden under simulated oxygen blast furnace condition. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2015, 22, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mizoguchi, H.; Suzuki, H.; Hayashi, S. Influence of mixing coal composite iron ore hot briquettes on blast furnace simulated reaction behavior in a packed mixed bed. ISIJ Int. 2011, 51, 1247–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelrahim, A.; Iljana, M.; Omran, M.; Vuolio, T.; Bartusch, H.; Fabritius, T. Influence of H2–H2O content on the reduction of acid iron ore pellets in a CO–CO2–N2 reducing atmosphere. ISIJ Int. 2020, 60, 2206–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, L.; Huang, Z.; Jiang, T.; Zhong, R.; Liang, Z. Iron ore pellet disintegration mechanism in simulated shaft furnace conditions. Powder Technol. 2017, 317, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, L.; Hao, H.; Shen, X.; Shu, Y.; Xiao, H.; Zhong, Q.; Zhang, X. Thermal decrepitation of pilbara (pb) lump ore: Characteristic, mechanism, and inhibitory strategy. Powder Technol. 2023, 430, 119016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]












| Sample | Chemical Composition, wt.% | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe | C | FeO | Fe2O3 | CaO | SiO2 | C/S | Al2O3 | MgO | |
| HBI-1 | 79.97 | 0.64 | 13.67 | 0.71 | 1.14 | 2.57 | 0.44 | 0.99 | 0.15 |
| Sample | Chemical Composition, wt.% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | MgO | FeO | Fe2O3 | |
| Sinter | 9.59 | 5.08 | 1.76 | 1.33 | 5.43 | 76.30 |
| Pellet | 2.13 | 2.93 | 0.67 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 93.61 |
| Lump | 0.09 | 2.49 | 1.11 | 0.01 | 0.53 | 89.48 |
| Group | Sinter | Pellet | Lump Ore | Iron Particles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPL | 70 | 10 | 20 | - |
| C0.6 | 55 | 10 | 20 | 15 (0.6 wt.% C) |
| C1.6 | 55 | 10 | 20 | 15 (1.6 wt.% C) |
| C2.9 | 55 | 10 | 20 | 15 (2.9 wt.% C) |
| C3.6 | 55 | 10 | 20 | 15 (3.5 wt.% C) |
| Sample | Chemical Composition, wt.% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | MgO | FeO | |
| SPL | 10.9 | 6.3 | 11.5 | 2.4 | 68.9 |
| C0.6 | 12.9 | 10.7 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 67.7 |
| C1.6 | 16.8 | 13.9 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 62.3 |
| C2.9 | 22.5 | 18.6 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 53.3 |
| C3.6 | 26.6 | 22.2 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 45.5 |
| No. | Chemical Composition, at.% | Phase | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe | C | Ca | Si | Mg | O | ||
| H1 | 84.3 | 15.7 | - | - | - | - | Fe |
| H2 | 0.6 | - | 27.3 | 14.1 | - | 58 | C2S |
| H3 | 53.2 | - | 1.2 | - | 3.7 | 41.9 | FeO |
| C1 | 76.3 | 23.7 | - | - | - | - | Fe |
| C2 | 0.7 | - | 29.3 | 14.5 | - | 55.5 | C2S |
| C3 | 52.8 | - | - | - | - | 47.2 | FeO |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Shen, J.-M.; Lin, C.-M.; Hong, Y.-R.; Luo, S.-F.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Shiau, J.-S.; Wu, W. Reduction Behavior and Melting Characteristics of Blast Furnace Iron Ore Mixed with Carbon-Rich Iron Particles. Materials 2026, 19, 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19020248
Shen J-M, Lin C-M, Hong Y-R, Luo S-F, Chen Y-Y, Shiau J-S, Wu W. Reduction Behavior and Melting Characteristics of Blast Furnace Iron Ore Mixed with Carbon-Rich Iron Particles. Materials. 2026; 19(2):248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19020248
Chicago/Turabian StyleShen, Jyun-Ming, Chi-Ming Lin, You-Ren Hong, Shao-Feng Luo, Yu-Yang Chen, Jia-Shyan Shiau, and Weite Wu. 2026. "Reduction Behavior and Melting Characteristics of Blast Furnace Iron Ore Mixed with Carbon-Rich Iron Particles" Materials 19, no. 2: 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19020248
APA StyleShen, J.-M., Lin, C.-M., Hong, Y.-R., Luo, S.-F., Chen, Y.-Y., Shiau, J.-S., & Wu, W. (2026). Reduction Behavior and Melting Characteristics of Blast Furnace Iron Ore Mixed with Carbon-Rich Iron Particles. Materials, 19(2), 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19020248

