Next Article in Journal
Study on the Properties of Waterborne Epoxy Resin/Polyurethane Composite Modified Emulsified Asphalt
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology: Highlights from the 2025 Editor’s Choice Collection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bio-Based Smart Packaging Materials for Next-Generation Food Systems

Institute of Polymer Materials, School of Materials Science & Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(11), 2393; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19112393
Submission received: 21 April 2026 / Revised: 28 May 2026 / Accepted: 1 June 2026 / Published: 4 June 2026

Abstract

Traditional petroleum-based packaging suffers from pollution and functional limits, making it unsuitable for next-generation food systems. In contrast, bio-based smart packaging—combining renewable substrates with responsive components—transforms packaging from a passive shell into an active quality monitor and supply chain information node through three interconnected pillars: renewability, real-time responsiveness to freshness markers, and digital traceability. Market figures confirm this shift, with the smart food packaging sector projected to reach USD 48.97 billion by 2028 (CAGR 4.49% from 2023). This review covers recent progress in natural polymers (cellulose, chitosan, alginate, gelatin) and bio-based polyesters (PLA, PHA). Their multiscale structures enable tunable mechanical and barrier properties while serving as hosts for intelligent functions. Two functional directions stand out: active preservation (antimicrobial, antioxidant, gas-regulating, stimulus-controlled release) and intelligent sensing (colorimetric indicators, bio-based sensors, nano-amplified signals for real-time freshness monitoring). Beyond material functions, digital tools such as IoT and blockchain turn packaging into interactive data nodes, linking material intelligence with full traceability to enhance food safety and supply chain efficiency. Key challenges remain with long-term operational stability, production costs, scalable manufacturing, and life cycle assessments. Nevertheless, bio-based smart packaging is expected to evolve through biomimetic design, process innovation, and system-level integration toward adaptability, multifunctionality, and intelligence, ultimately supporting safer, more transparent, efficient, and sustainable food systems.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Packaging has evolved from a traditional food protection carrier to a core functional node within the new generation of food systems, with its performance directly impacting the overall efficiency of the system [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The global food system faces interconnected structural challenges that compromise its sustainability and safety. Significant food loss and waste persist, alongside ongoing safety risks such as microbial contamination and the improper use of additives, which complicate effective prevention and control measures [7,8,9,10,11]. Furthermore, the widespread use of conventional fossil-based packaging contributes substantially to carbon emissions, intensifying environmental pressures. These issues are compounded by pervasive information asymmetry across supply chain stages, leading to a systemic lack of transparency that impedes traceability and undermines accountability [12,13].
The traditional fossil-based packaging is limited not only by resource depletion and environmental pollution but also by functional constraints—their passive nature, only providing basic physical barriers and limited spoilage protection, fails to meet the dynamic monitoring and regulatory requirements of modern food system [14,15,16,17,18]. Even conventional bio-based packaging often also lacks integrated intelligent responsiveness, precluding real-time quality traceability and early risk warning. Accordingly, next-generation smart packaging systems, which feature sustainability, intelligence, resilience, and digital integration, have emerged as a critical research frontier, emphasizing resource circularity, proactive risk prevention, anti-interference capability, and seamless information interoperability [19,20,21,22].
Bio-based smart packaging integrates proactive data generation with inherent sustainability, combining renewable, non-toxic, and biodegradable bio-substrates with the sensing, signaling, and data functions of smart components, thus serving as key proactive functional elements in future food systems. Smart packaging enables non-contact monitoring of food and environmental quality to reduce spoilage losses, while active packaging focuses on substance release or scavenging to extend shelf life—distinct concepts often integrated in practice [7,23,24,25,26,27]. By detecting spoilage gases, temperature, and humidity, these systems generate visual or quantifiable data to optimize supply chains, enhance quality control, and support consumer decision-making. Specifically, they incorporate active components (e.g., antimicrobials, antioxidants) for active preservation and use pH-, gas-, or temperature-responsive mechanisms for in situ freshness indication. When further integrated with digital tools, such as IoT and blockchain, the packaging acts as a data node within the supply chain, offering an integrated solution to curb waste, enhance safety, and improve traceability [28,29]. The market potential for these systems is substantial, with the smart food packaging sector projected to reach a value of USD 48.97 billion by 2028, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.49% from 2023 to 2028 [7]. A diverse range of bio-based materials supports this growth, including wood-derived polymers (e.g., cellulose, lignin), protein-based polymers (e.g., gelatin, whey protein, soy protein), and microorganism-derived polymers (e.g., polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), polylactic acid (PLA)), which are intensively explored as sustainable alternatives to conventional packaging [30,31].
As a sustainable alternative to fossil-based materials in food systems, bio-based smart packaging has garnered increasing research and application attention. Previous studies have confirmed the effectiveness of various bio-based and intelligent strategies in enhancing food safety and reducing environmental impact, while also highlighting the promising role of nanomaterials in this field [32,33,34,35,36,37]. Nevertheless, critical scientific and technical questions remain unresolved. These span from elucidating the structure–property relationships of foundational materials (e.g., cellulose, chitosan, PLA) and achieving the synergistic, stable performance of active functions, to the precise integration and real-world adaptation of smart sensing technologies—all of which demand further clarification to overcome current technical bottlenecks. Against this backdrop, this review focuses on bio-based smart packaging materials for next-generation food systems. This paper first reviews the composition and classification of key materials, analyzes the structure–property relationships within their multiscale material platforms, and evaluates the characteristics, advantages, and limitations of these functional materials. Building upon this foundation, it systematically elucidates the core functional mechanisms enabling active preservation and intelligent response in these materials. Subsequently, it explores pathways for integrating smart sensing technologies with digital systems, examines the enabling role of nanotechnology, and reviews application potential across diverse scenarios, such as fresh produce and convenience foods. Finally, it dissects current technical, economic, and regulatory challenges while projecting future trends toward biomimetic, adaptive, and system-integrated developments. This comprehensive analysis aims to provide systematic guidance for academic innovation and industrial applications in this field. Figure 1 depicts the positioning of bio-based smart packaging in next-generation food systems, illustrating an evolutionary pathway that begins with addressing traditional packaging limitations, advances through integrated innovation in materials and functionality, and ultimately achieves a transformation into a key enabling node within the food system.

2. Bio-Based Material Platforms for Smart Packaging

2.1. Natural Polymers and Biopolymers

Natural and biopolymers, derived from renewable sources, form a fundamental material platform for smart packaging due to their inherent biocompatibility and versatile structural adaptability. Table 1 summarizes selected biopolymers that enable functionality through smart packaging.

2.1.1. Cellulose and Its Derivatives

Cellulose and its derivatives represent a research hotspot in the field of food packaging, with studies focusing on optimizing functional derivatives and other modification techniques for waterproofing and oil resistance, thereby enhancing mechanical, barrier, and antimicrobial properties. As a linear polymer composed of D-glucose units, native cellulose possesses a dense hydrogen-bond network that provides high mechanical strength, thermal stability, and favorable barrier properties [38,39]. It should be kept in mind, however, that chemically modified cellulose derivatives—for instance, those produced via etherification, esterification, or graft copolymerization—can adopt branched or even hyperbranched architectures. Films derived from cellulose (typically from native or modified forms) exhibit excellent toughness, tensile strength, transparency, and optical performance. However, strong hydrophilicity limits their use in high-temperature or high-humidity environments [40,41,42,43,44,45]. To overcome this, covalent functionalization, through modifications like acetylation or salinization, is commonly employed to enhance water resistance and barrier properties, reduce leaching of components in humid conditions, and enhance compatibility with smart components [46,47].
Plasticizers such as glycerol form amorphous domains with cellulose through intermolecular hydrogen bonding, improving flexibility while retaining high light transmittance, high water vapor permeability, and low oxygen transmission rates—ideal for packaging high-respiration fresh produce [48,49,50,51]. Reinforcing fillers (e.g., lignin) boost mechanical strength and UV stability, while active additives (e.g., antioxidants, antimicrobials) extend shelf life and improve biosafety. Molecular design also enables hydrophobic and oil-resistant modifications of cellulose, balancing performance with biodegradability. Alternatively, multi-component composites can create multifunctional high-barrier materials with enhanced barrier properties. Inspired by nacreous architectures, a bio-based dual-layer composite film incorporating a natural indicator, polysaccharide, with a functional inner layer synergistically combines antioxidant and pH-responsive color-changing properties, enabling real-time visual freshness monitoring across various meats and showing strong potential for universal application [52,53].
Nano-cellulose derivatives, including cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs), offer high specific surface areas after micro/nano-processing, combining high tensile strength, excellent gas barrier properties, low permeability coefficients, and low thermal expansion coefficients, which make them suitable as reinforcing materials for sensing platforms in intelligent packaging [54,55,56,57]. Derivatives such as carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) undergo etherification modification to optimize water solubility and film-forming properties, yielding highly flexible, low gas permeability transparent films [58,59,60]. Blending with biopolymers further enhances smart functionalities [40,61]. Cellulose acetate (CA), enhanced through esterification for solvent resistance and hydrolysis stability, finds widespread use in rigid packaging [62,63]. Bacterial cellulose (BC), characterized by high purity, an ultrafine three-dimensional network structure, and high specific surface area, exhibits a highly developed pore and tunnel network conducive to diffusion of embedded active or smart materials, demonstrating excellent adaptability in specific packaging applications [64,65]. Ethyl cellulose (EC) and methyl cellulose (MC) also serve as key components in smart active packaging [66,67,68,69].

2.1.2. Chitosan and Chitin Derivatives

Chitosan (CS), a deacetylated derivative of chitin, possesses abundant amino and hydroxyl groups that grant it inherent antibacterial activity, cationic polyelectrolyte behavior, and chemical versatility [70,71,72,73]. The antimicrobial effect mainly comes from protonation of the amino groups, which disrupts microbial cell membranes and suppresses common foodborne pathogens. Pure CS-based packaging suffers from high hydrophilicity, poor mechanical strength, and limited functionality. To overcome these drawbacks, chemical modification (e.g., quaternization, carboxymethylation) or composite strategies are widely adopted. Such approaches improve water solubility, film-forming capacity, and antioxidant/antimicrobial efficacy, while also enabling advanced functions like pH-responsive sensing and ion detection [74,75,76].
As a mainstream derivative of chitosan, carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS) possesses excellent biocompatibility and film-forming capabilities, making it an ideal substrate for food packaging films [77,78,79,80]. Blending with polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) or compositing with sodium alginate (SA) to form multilayer structures via layer-by-layer self-assembly improves flexibility, chemical resistance, barrier properties, and mechanical stability [81]. Such composites also facilitate the efficient loading and controlled release of antimicrobial and antioxidant agents, thereby inhibiting microbial growth and extending product shelf life. SA, as a natural anionic polysaccharide, interacts with CMCS through hydrogen bonding and electrostatic forces, further enhancing film performance [74]. For instance, multifunctional smart packaging films, fabricated by complexing and blending SA-proanthocyanidin (SA-PC) with CMCS-curcumin (CMCS-Cur), integrate pH-responsive colorimetric sensing, UV blocking, antibacterial, and antioxidant functionalities, along with favorable biodegradability, enabling simultaneous real-time freshness monitoring of shrimp and extended preservation of grapes [74]. Chitosan nanofibers (CSNFs) or nanoparticles (CSNPs) can also be incorporated as functional fillers into other polymer matrices to impart sustained antibacterial and antioxidant activity, delaying lipid oxidation and microbial contamination [82,83].
For functional expansion, CS-based active and smart films can be designed to respond to biomarkers such as ammonia and pH via embedded natural indicators (e.g., Anthocyanins (ACNs), Cur), enabling real-time visual monitoring of food freshness. Incorporating active compounds—such as phenolics for enhanced mechanical and barrier properties, or essential oils and plant extracts for strengthened antimicrobial and antioxidant functions—further tailors the film’s performance [84]. Essential oils disrupt microbial membranes and inhibit efflux pumps; encapsulation in biopolymer matrices allows controlled release and extends shelf life. Polyphenol-rich plant extracts scavenge free radicals and chelate metal ions, reinforcing the antimicrobial effect. Antimicrobial peptides can be immobilized onto CS films via electrostatic adsorption, enabling targeted antibacterial activity while retaining biocompatibility. However, the inherent hydrophilicity of chitosan leads to swelling in acidic or humid conditions, undermining mechanical strength and moisture barrier properties. Surface nanoengineering offers a potential route to improve hydrophobicity by increasing the water contact angle [85]. Current challenges for CS-based smart packaging include limited sensitivity to early spoilage indicators and a narrow application scope, requiring further research for commercial adoption.

2.1.3. Starch and Alginate

Starch and sodium alginate (SA) are abundant, low-cost, biodegradable, and non-toxic, as well as easy to process and form, making them suitable for direct food contact applications, and have garnered significant attention in the food packaging sector [86,87,88,89,90,91]. Starch possesses excellent gelatinization to form films, where amylose enhances packaging strength and crystallinity, while amylopectin improves flexibility [92,93,94,95,96]. Starches from different sources can be used alone or blended with other natural polymers to create biodegradable coatings or packaging films that extend food shelf life [97]. For instance, corn starch/gelatin–sorbitol composite coatings improve post-harvest quality in grapes, while mango kernel starch packaging extends tomato shelf life. However, starch-based packaging exhibits strong hydrophilicity, often resulting in poor barrier and mechanical properties, high brittleness, and insufficient moisture resistance. Modification with plasticizers is frequently required to reduce deformation stress [98,99]. Alternatively, functional natural extracts (such as beetroot extract) are incorporated as bio-based sensors, not only reducing light transmittance and water vapor permeability but also enhancing flexibility and hydrophobicity via intermolecular interactions; concurrently, it confers pH responsiveness for freshness monitoring [99,100].
SA can form gels through ionic crosslinking, making it suitable for microencapsulating active compounds and constructing smart devices that indicate and track food freshness. Pure SA films exhibit low mechanical strength, susceptibility to cracking, humidity sensitivity, poor barrier properties, and limited protection against flavor compounds, which can be improved through nanocomposites, chemical crosslinking, blending with other polysaccharides (e.g., CS, pectin, starch), and incorporating lipids or proteins [101,102,103,104,105,106,107].

2.1.4. Protein-Based Materials

Plant-based (e.g., soy protein) and animal-based (e.g., gelatin) proteins form three-dimensional network structures through amino acid residues, exhibiting excellent film-forming properties, UV barrier performance, flexibility, transparency, and gas barrier properties [108,109,110]. Their high biocompatibility makes them suitable for direct-to-eat integrated packaging applications [111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118]. Their mechanical properties fall between hydrophilic polysaccharides and hydrophobic polyesters, balancing mechanical strength, barrier efficiency, and bioactivity [119]. For instance, gelatin composites inhibit foodborne pathogens [120,121,122], while soy protein films form cohesive networks through thermal or chemical denaturation, exhibiting superior oxygen barrier properties to polysaccharide and lipid films under dry conditions [123], and whey protein isolate coatings significantly delay lipid oxidation and hydrogen peroxide generation [124]. When combined with CS, they further enhance network structure, increase mechanical strength, and reduce water vapor transmission [125]. However, protein materials are susceptible to microbial degradation and exhibit poor acid/alkali resistance and moisture tolerance. Their preservation and antimicrobial functions require further enhancement through crosslinking, nanocomposites, or the addition of natural antimicrobial agents or phenolic extracts [126]. This ensures stability and maintains the freshness of perishable products for advanced packaging needs [119]. Figure 2 presents a simplified classification of natural polymers and biopolymers used in smart food packaging, along with a summary of their prevalent challenges.
Table 1. Representative biopolymers for functional smart packaging.
Table 1. Representative biopolymers for functional smart packaging.
MaterialsActive IngredientsApplicationsProductsRefs.
MCJambolao’s anthocyaninsExtend shelf life; indicate freshness.Meat or seafood[127]
MC-CSNFSaffron anthocyaninsMonitor pH levels and volatile gas; real-time freshness monitoring.Meat or seafood[128]
CMC/starchPurple sweet potato’s anthocyaninsReal-time monitoring of freshness; pH or NH3 level indicator.Fish[129]
BCGarlic extract; bromophenol blueDelay spoilage; pH indicator; monitor freshness.Meat (e.g., beef)[130]
BCPelargonidinVisual monitoring of freshness.Tilapia filets[131]
CACurThermochromism; temperature sensor to monitor food quality.Entire supply chain[132]
Guar gum, SA, and carboxylated cellulose nanofibersBlack rice extract, curcumin, and their compoundsBionic shellfish sensor; visual freshness monitoring.Chicken, pork, and shrimp[52]
Oxidized chitin nanocrystals/CSBlack rice bran anthocyaninsMonitoring the spoilage process; pH indicator.Fish and shrimp[133]
CMCS/SAPC and CurMonitor freshness of shrimp; extend shelf life of grapes.Shrimp and grapes[74]
CS/PVAAlizarin, 9-Phenanthreneboronic acid, and beeswaxAnti-counterfeiting; food freshness preservation and visual monitoring of spoilage; extend shelf life.Fish[85]
CS/pectinNystatin and epigallocatechin gallateSlow microbial growth and quality deterioration.Strawberries[134]
Starch/gelatinCarrot anthocyaninpH colorimetric indicators reveal meat spoilage.Meat[135]
Joha rice starchBeetroot extractMonitor food freshness.Chicken, fish, and Indian cottage cheese[99]
Pectin/SA/xanthan gumRaspberry pomace extractMonitor freshness of high-protein foods.Pork rind and lard[136]
SA-CSRed prickly pear’s betalainMonitor freshness.Salmon[137]
SA-Guar gumGlucose–glycerol carbon dotsMonitor freshness through humidity changes (fluorescence intensity).Bread[138]
Fish gelatin/PVAVinasse anthocyaninsFreshness monitoring; packaging refrigerated foodsShrimps[139]
Gelatin/K-carrageenanAnthocyanins and TiO2 nanoparticlespH indication; antimicrobial and antioxidant; monitor freshness.Fish[140]
Soy protein isolateCNC/Cur/polyvinylpyrrolidone nano-capsulesMonitor freshness.Shrimp[141]
CollagenLaponite @Cur-CAMonitor freshness; extend shelf life.Shrimp[142]

2.2. Bio-Based Polyesters and Emerging Platforms

Bio-based polyesters address the performance shortcomings of natural polymers for smart packaging through controlled molecular structures, which are achievable via microbial fermentation or chemical synthesis and have exceptional stability, positioning them as crucial enabling materials.

2.2.1. Polylactic Acid and Polyhydroxyalkanoates

Polylactic acid (PLA) and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) represent the principal bio-based polyesters in food packaging [143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151]. PLA, synthesized from renewable resources such as corn starch or sugarcane via fermentation and ring-opening polymerization, exhibits high transparency, mechanical strength, compostability, biocompatibility, and full biodegradability within months under industrial composting conditions, which make it an ideal sustainable alternative to traditional plastics [152,153]. Its tensile strength approaches that of polyethylene (PE) (suitable for rigid packaging), and its oxidation resistance rivals most conventional plastics without the risk of harmful substance migration [154,155]. However, its applications are constrained by inherent brittleness, low thermal resistance, high permeability, and relatively high production costs, with its low melting point further restricts its application in high-temperature food packaging [156,157]. Consequently, modification strategies for PLA include additive incorporation, polymer blending, nanocomposite formation, surface coating, and crystallinity control [153,158]. For instance, incorporating modified starch enhances tensile strength and overall barrier performance, surpassing both pure PLA and conventional petroleum-based materials. Nanocomposites and surface treatments further improve structural integrity, oxygen barrier properties, moisture resistance, and antimicrobial functionality [159,160]. Annealing processes can optimize crystallinity, thereby improving heat resistance and barrier performance, making PLA suitable for hot-food packaging [161]. Currently, recycling approaches are evolving from traditional degradation toward high-value conversion pathways like catalytic, photocatalytic, and bio-enzymatic pathways to enable sustainability in packaging [162,163].
PHAs, encompassing polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), polyhydroxy-valerate (PHV), and others, are polyesters produced by microbial fermentation of sugars, lipids, or oils [153]. They demonstrate excellent biocompatibility, moisture resistance, gas barrier properties, tunable mechanical, thermal stability, and thermoplasticity. Their performance can be further optimized through adjusting monomer compositions. Unlike PLA, which requires industrial composting for degradation, PHAs degrade fully in diverse natural environments—such as soil, oceans, and wastewater—making them particularly suitable for marine-biodegradable eco-friendly packaging [153,164,165]. They also generally have higher melting points than PLA, making them more suitable for hot-food packaging and high-heat barrier applications [166]. High production costs remain a challenge, yet mixed microbial culture (MMC) fermentation offers a potential path to cost reduction [167].
Both PLA and PHAs function as core materials in smart packaging systems. By regulating crystallinity through blending or copolymerization, their mechanical and barrier properties can be tailored to integrate intelligent functions such as temperature responsiveness and gas sensing. Their complementary characteristics enable the design of multilayer packing films, where enhances barrier performance and mitigates PLA’s moisture sensitivity, broadening food packaging applications [168]. In the near term, PLA remains a cost-effective and readily available alternative, while PHAs, with their superior biodegradability and multifunctionality, are positioned for long-term sustainable use—especially under demanding degradation conditions or higher operating temperatures [153].

2.2.2. Emerging Bio-Based Polyesters

Emerging bio-based polyesters include poly (ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PEF), synthesized from biomass-derived furan-dicarboxylic acid and ethylene glycol [169,170,171]. Structurally similar to conventional petroleum-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET), PEF uses renewable feedstocks, making it a promising bio-based alternative [172,173]. Compared to conventional bio-based polyesters, PEF exhibits significantly superior barrier properties, with O2 and CO2 permeability values 2–11 and 10–19 times lower than PET, respectively, and water permeability reduced by approximately half [174]. This advantage comes from the higher rigidity of the furan ring relative to terephthalate units, which restricts segmental motion and reduces molecular diffusion in the amorphous phase.
Although sharing comparable transparency, barrier performance, and mechanical strength with PET, PEF’s application is hindered by a slower crystallization rate and inherent brittleness in films and bottle packaging [175]. Low-load polymer nanocomposite modification leverages the high specific surface area of nanoparticles to simultaneously enhance PEF’s mechanical and crystallization properties while imparting innovative functions, such as UV shielding, blue light blocking, and antimicrobial properties [176,177,178]. Miah et al. [169] demonstrated that incorporating just 1.0wt% carboxylated cellulose nanofibers into the PEF matrix via hydrogen bonding can simultaneously enhance mechanical and barrier properties, enabling effective preservation under high temperature and high humidity. Furthermore, the chemical reactivity of the furan ring provides a platform for developing advanced, responsive smart packaging materials for food quality monitoring. Table 2 demonstrates performance enhancements in bio-based polyester smart packaging, achieved through specific material and functional modifications.

2.2.3. Structure–Property Relationships Relevant to Smart Packaging Applications

The bio-based smart packaging performance is governed by a multiscale structural hierarchy that determines responsiveness, stability, and environmental adaptability. At the molecular level, functional groups (e.g., hydroxyls in PLA and PHAs) provide anchoring sites for smart components, directly influencing functional efficiency. Crystallinity serves as a key regulator of mechanical and barrier properties; however, while high crystallinity improves stiffness and barrier performance, it often compromises flexibility, necessitating precise modulation through blending, copolymerization, or annealing. The amorphous regions of PLA host more functional molecules, whereas the crystalline domains of PHA enhance response stability. Furthermore, interfacial interactions in composite systems critically govern structure–property synergies. For example, the addition of Cu promotes ordered crystalline arrangements, enhancing barrier performance and demonstrating the ability of functional additives to modulate polymer aggregation [184]. The multiscale structure–property relationships underlying bio-based smart packaging materials are depicted in Figure 3.
To further optimize performance, multiscale structural design is applied across different length scales. Macroscopically, biomimetic multilayer composite structures—inspired by the “brick-and-mortar” architecture of seashells—enhance barrier and mechanical properties by creating tortuous diffusion pathways through the oriented dispersion of rigid mica flakes in a PLA matrix [52]. A hydrophobic outer layer simultaneously shields a hydrophilic smart inner sensing zone, thereby overcoming the poor water resistance of conventional polysaccharide films. Similarly, the reed-leaf-inspired superhydrophobic surface increase water contact angles, achieving outstanding water repellency and anti-fouling properties [28]. At the micro–nano scale, integrating functional nanofillers (e.g., Co-based MOFs for ammonia detection, surface-modified Laponite (LAP) nanosheets for Cur delivery) via robust interfacial bonding ensures stable immobilization of active molecules, enabling high sensitivity, stability, and multifunctional performance [142]. The photophysical properties of functional molecules, like umbelliferone (UMB) and Cur, including pH-responsive and fluorescent mechanisms, are determined by their chemical structures, making their stable nano-integration essential for reliable smart-packaging performance.

3. Active Functions in Bio-Based Smart Packaging

3.1. Antimicrobial and Antifungal Functions

The antimicrobial and antifungal functionalities of bio-based smart packaging are essential for ensuring food safety and extending shelf life, achieved through either the intrinsic activity of endogenous antibacterial biopolymers or the integration of exogenous functional components [185,186,187,188,189,190]. This offers dual advantages of environmental sustainability and highly effective antimicrobial activity. Endogenous antibacterial biopolymers exhibit natural antimicrobial activity through their chemical structure, eliminating the need for additional antimicrobial agents, while offering high biocompatibility and avoiding secondary pollution. Typical examples, such as CS (protonated amino groups under acidic conditions disrupting the cell membrane integrity of common foodborne pathogens), BC (ultrafine 3D network acting as a physical barrier against microbial invasion while creating a microenvironment that inhibits microbial growth), and quaternized cellulose (inducing cell death through electrostatic interactions of cationic groups), provide biocompatible, non-leaching antimicrobial properties [191,192].
The synergistic integration of natural antimicrobial agents with functional nanomaterials within bio-based matrices enables significantly enhanced antibacterial efficiency, persistence, and stability. Natural antimicrobial agents, such as plant essential oils (rich in phenolic and terpenoid compounds) and natural extracts like curcumin, exert broad-spectrum antibacterial activity through multi-target mechanisms—including disruption of microbial cell membranes, interference with enzymatic function, and damage to genetic material [193,194]. However, each type of these natural antimicrobial agents has its own limitations, as essential oils exhibit high volatility and poor chemical stability, resulting in limited efficacy when used directly; conversely, curcumin and other extracts suffer from low water solubility and susceptibility to photothermal degradation, making it difficult to maintain long-lasting antibacterial activity. Their incorporation into biopolymer substrates (e.g., CS, starch, PLA) enables the design of long-lasting and sustained-release antimicrobial systems. For example, gelatin–CMC–guar gum films containing green onion extract effectively suppress microbial growth [195]. Nevertheless, practical application faces challenges such as the high volatility of essential oils and limited compatibility with polymer matrices. Functional nanomaterials—including CQDs, LAP nanosheets, MOFs, and metal nanoparticles—enhance interactions with microorganisms through high specific surface area and interfacial effects [187,196]. Simultaneously, they serve as carriers to improve the dispersion, stability, and efficacy of other active ingredients. For instance, surface-modified LAP nanosheets in collagen matrices enable stable loading of active compounds, while the migration behavior and biosafety of nanomaterials through standardized assessments remain critical for practical use [142]. Selected examples of the response behavior of bio-based smart packaging materials in food quality monitoring are presented in Table 3.

3.2. Antioxidant and Freshness-Preserving Functions

While excellent barrier properties in bio-based packaging reduce the impact of molecular oxygen, it is the antioxidant activity, powered by the free radical-scavenging mechanisms of natural compounds like phenolics and curcumin, that plays the crucial role in delaying oxidative degradation and ensuring food preservation [187,197]. Specifically, phenolic substances neutralize free radicals by providing hydrogen atoms, while Cur captures reactive oxygen species via its conjugated double bonds [192]. For instance, incorporating tannic acid into gelatin matrices can increase DPPH radical-scavenging rates to 56% [198]. Furthermore, natural antioxidants can be effectively incorporated into packaging matrices via advanced dispersion strategies. As an example, the uniform distribution of Cur within a BC film using a Pickering emulsion system not only delivers high antibacterial efficacy (approaching 100%) but also confers radical-scavenging capacities of 27% (DPPH) and 74% (ABTS) [199]. Although synthetic nanoparticles (e.g., Se, TiO2, SiO2) exhibit alternative antioxidant mechanisms and enhanced thermal stability and mechanical properties, natural antioxidants are generally preferred for their superior biocompatibility and broader consumer acceptance [187,192,200,201].
Antioxidants are sensitive to pH, temperature, light, and time. Synergistic effects between bio-based matrices (e.g., starch, sodium alginate, PLA) and active agents can significantly enhance antioxidant and preservation efficiency. Matrices not only provide stable loading platforms for antioxidants but also prevent degradation and loss during processing or storage, through interactions like hydrogen bonds and ionic bonds. Simultaneously, the barrier properties of these matrices reduce exposure of food to oxidative triggers such as oxygen and moisture. For example, incorporating CNC into gelatin/tannic acid films allows the highly reactive hydroxyl groups on CNC surfaces to form hydrogen bonds with tannic acid. This weakens the crosslinking between tannic acid and gelatin, promoting antioxidant release, while simultaneously enhancing oxygen barrier properties by forming a dense network structure, collectively boosting preservation efficacy [198].

3.3. Barrier Properties

The barrier performance of bio-based smart packaging is fundamental to preserving food quality, achieved by controlling the permeation of oxygen, water vapor, light, CO2, volatiles, microorganisms, and lipids. This effectively mitigates oxidation, moisture uptake, photodegradation, spoilage, and flavor loss, addressing the diverse storage requirements of perishable foods.
For oxygen-sensitive products (e.g., fresh and lipid-rich foods), oxygen barriers retard lipid oxidation and microbial growth, while CO2 barriers help maintain internal atmosphere equilibrium to delay ripening [187]. The gas barrier properties of bio-based materials rely on molecular chain density and crystallinity, which can be enhanced through blending, nanocomposites (e.g., ordered cellulose nanocrystal layers), or multilayer designs [202,203]. For instance, CNFs form entangled networks that prolong gas diffusion paths, while starch or chitosan-based matrices—when combined with nanofillers (e.g., LAP nanosheets) or crosslinking strategies—create dense interfacial networks that block volatile transfer and flavor degradation [142,187,204,205]. Bio-inspired multilayer films further optimize performance: a hydrophobic outer layer limits oxygen ingress, while an active inner layer absorbs residual oxygen [206]. Ethylene-scavenging functionalities can also be incorporated to delay fruit and vegetable ripening and decay. For example, alkaline treated halloysite nanotubes (a-Hal) can efficiently adsorb ethylene due to their well-defined mesoporous structure [207].
Moisture barrier properties maintain humidity equilibrium within packaging by regulating vapor transmission, preventing food from softening due to moisture absorption or shriveling from dehydration. For foods requiring low humidity environments, such as grains and nuts, hydrophobic materials like acetylated cellulose reduce vapor ingress. For foods needing moderate humidity, such as fruits, vegetables, and fresh meat, hygroscopic systems are constructed using hydrophilic groups in polysaccharide substrates or porous nanomaterials. Multilayer architectures combine hydrophobic exterior layers with hydrophilic inner phases for dynamic humidity control [208]. In addition, hydrophobic antimicrobials such as essential oils, when incorporated into bio-based matrices, impose a tortuous pathway for water molecules, thereby further improving moisture barrier efficiency without compromising biodegradability.
Light exposure accelerates photooxidation of lipids, proteins, and pigments, leading to nutrient degradation, off-flavors, and discoloration [209]. The photo-oxidation process can be blocked through natural UV absorbers (e.g., bamboo leaf extracts and Cur) or nanocomposite designs (e.g., BC nanocrystals forming tortuous channels that scatter light) [210,211]. Nanoparticles like ZnO are particularly effective, as they possess a wide bandgap that enables strong UV absorption, lowering the availability of high-energy photons that initiate photooxidation. Similar UV-blocking effects can be achieved with other nanofillers, including titanium dioxide or cerium oxide. Beyond light management, bamboo extract also provides radical-scavenging activity, while metal complexes contribute photothermal antibacterial effects. Composites of high-density bio-based matrices with nanofillers further enhance light-blocking efficiency. Bio-based materials inhibit microbial invasion through physical obstruction (e.g., BC networks) and functional coatings (e.g., PHA-based layers), simultaneously providing lipid barriers to prevent oil migration and rancidity in fatty foods [212,213].

3.4. Controlled Release and Stimuli-Responsive Systems

Controlled-release and stimuli-responsive systems represent a research frontier in bio-based smart packaging, achieving sustained and intelligent functionality by encapsulating active substances within microcapsules or nano-carriers for targeted release under specific environmental stimuli [214,215,216,217]. Microencapsulation and nano-carrier delivery technologies serve as the foundation for the controlled release of active ingredients in bio-based packaging, effectively preventing their deactivation or concentration imbalance caused by direct food contact [218,219,220]. Bio-based carrier materials (e.g., SA, CS, starch) can form microcapsules via ion crosslinking or emulsion polymerization. For instance, embedding Artemisia annua essential oil (AAEO) within a gelatin-Arabic gum (GAG) protective shell creates shell–core microcapsules with sustained-release properties to reduce volatility, enabling prolonged antimicrobial effects [221]. Nano-carriers like nano-cellulose, zein nanoparticles, and LAP nanosheets leverage high specific surface area, excellent biocompatibility, and modifiability to achieve uniform dispersion and sustained release of active ingredients, enhancing functional persistence [142,222].
pH-, temperature-, and humidity-responsive release mechanisms leverage the sensitivity of bio-based materials to environmental parameter changes, enabling intelligent release of active ingredients that aligns with food quality degradation processes [223,224,225]. pH-responsive systems employ polyelectrolytes such as CS or HPMC, which undergo reversible structural changes in response to pH shifts induced by spoilage metabolites (e.g., organic acids or basic nitrogen compounds), triggering the controlled release of antimicrobials, indicator substances, or color changes. For instance, HPMC/SA-Cur composite films release curcumin under acidic conditions generated by spoiling pork and shrimp, providing simultaneous preservation and visual freshness signaling [184]. Temperature-sensitive systems leverage the phase-change behavior of bio-based polyester like PHA and PLA to modulate diffusion pathways of active compounds in response to temperature variations, making them suitable for cold-chain applications. Humidity response achieves switching between moisture absorption and moisture barrier functions, or humidity-triggered release of active ingredients, through the reversible transformation of hydrophilic/hydrophobic structures in bio-based materials. Under high-humidity environments, water infiltration induces matrix swelling, increasing porosity and accelerating the release of active compounds such as borneol to prevent premature or excessive emission [226]. Additionally, the combination of a hydrophobic outer layer and a hydrophilic inner layer enables unidirectional moisture transfer from the interior to the exterior based on environmental humidity gradients, reducing condensation buildup and improving preservation of moisture-sensitive produce such as cucumbers [227].
In Figure 4 are summarized the functional mechanisms of bio-based smart packaging, namely baseline barrier with physical blocking and volatile control, active preservation via antioxidant and antimicrobial effects, controlled release, and smart responses including pH- and temperature-responsiveness.
Table 3. Examples of responsive behavior in bio-based smart packaging materials for food quality monitoring.
Table 3. Examples of responsive behavior in bio-based smart packaging materials for food quality monitoring.
Basic Bio-Based MaterialsSmart ComponentsFood ModelBehavior/TriggerRefs.
Konjac glucomannan/CMCACNsFishRed to yellow–green (pH: 2–12)[228]
CNC/nanofiber celluloseACNsShrimpLight purple–light green (ammonia and pH (1–13))[229]
Soy protein isolate/CNCCurShrimpYellow–orange (ammonia and pH (3–11))[141]
CS/polyvinyl alcoholShikonin and nano-ZnOShrimpDark red–dark bluish (ammonia and temperature)[230]
Cellulose acetateCurAluminum can (water)Yellow–red (temperature)[132]
HPMC/Zn2+-SACurPork and shrimpYellow–red (nitrogen and pH (2–12))[184]
StarchBeetroot extractChicken and fishRed–pale yellow (pH: 2–12)[99]
Laponite/caffeic acidCurShrimpYellow–reddish brown (ammonia and pH (3–11))[142]
PLA/nanofiber celluloseACNsCherry tomatoPurple–greenish yellow (pH: 2–14)[231]

4. Intelligent Sensing, System Integration, and Sustainability Assessment

4.1. Intelligent Sensing and Responsiveness

Intelligent sensing and response constitute the core of bio-based smart packaging, enabling real-time food quality monitoring through three pivotal technologies. Freshness colorimetric indicators (e.g., pH-responsive natural pigments, gas-responsive dyes) enable rapid visual feedback on spoilage, providing qualitative information [232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239]. Bio-based electrochemical and conductive sensors utilize conductive composite materials based on biopolymers like CS and sericin to build flexible printable sensing platforms for quantitative detection of key quality parameters [240,241]. Functional nanomaterial-enabled sensing technologies enhance detection selectivity through the designable channels of MOFs and COFs, while boosting detection sensitivity via nano-enzyme-catalyzed signal amplification [242,243,244,245,246]. Aligned with green sustainability principles, these technologies collectively advance smart packaging from qualitative indication toward precise, sensitive quantitative monitoring.

4.2. Integration of Smart Packaging into Next-Generation Food Systems

Smart packaging is evolving from a passive barrier into an active, decision-making core for next-generation food systems. Functioning first as a data interface, it integrates bio-based sensors with Near Field Communication (NFC)/Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology to build real-time monitoring systems capable of interacting with smart devices [247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255], progressing to IoT- and blockchain-enabled traceability [256,257,258,259,260,261,262], and culminating in autonomous system intelligence for dynamic quality control and risk alerts, thereby supporting a more efficient, transparent, and resilient food system [263,264,265,266].

4.3. Safety Standards and Lifecycle Considerations

The innovation and scaling of bio-based smart packaging must advance within a framework of safety and sustainability, achieving a unified balance of functionality, safety, and environmental value. The primary consideration is food contact safety [267,268,269,270]. A rigorous evaluation of migration behavior and toxicological risks of smart components (e.g., nanoparticles and pigments) is required, along with establishing corresponding testing protocols. Systematic research must be conducted on their migration behavior, degradation products, and potential toxicological risks in various food simulants to ensure long-term consumption safety. Secondly, biodegradability and end-of-life scenarios must be clearly defined. Not all bio-based materials degrade rapidly in natural environments. The compostability conditions (industrial or household composting) must be specified. Materials should degrade completely under specific conditions (e.g., industrial composting), with degradation rates aligned to shelf life to prevent secondary pollution from microplastics or ecotoxicity. Finally, life cycle assessments (LCAs) must quantify environmental performance [271,272]. By conducting multidimensional comparisons with traditional plastic packaging, the advantages and limitations of bio-based smart packaging in energy consumption, pollutant emissions, and resource utilization can be clarified. This provides data support for material optimization and process improvements, driving continuous enhancement of environmental sustainability.

5. Application Scenarios for Bio-Based Smart Packaging Materials

5.1. Fresh Food and Produce

Fresh produce (such as fruits, vegetables, meat, and seafood) is highly perishable with a short shelf life, demanding exceptional packaging performance in freshness preservation and quality monitoring [273,274,275,276]. This makes it a core application scenario for smart packaging. Bio-based smart packaging integrates long-lasting freshness preservation with freshness sensing capabilities, enabling targeted solutions to address these. For post-harvest produce, respiration and transpiration can disrupt gas equilibria (e.g., O2, CO2), while ripening-related gases like ethylene accelerate overripening and decay [277,278,279]. Packaging must therefore regulate gas and water vapor transmission while incorporating adsorbents—such as functionalized MOFs—to selectively trap spoilage-related gases and delay deterioration [280,281]. Furthermore, these integrated materials can serve as smart carriers for controlled release of antimicrobial agents and provide visual freshness feedback. For meat and seafood, where spoilage raises pH and releases amines, packaging can incorporate pH-responsive films—for example, those containing ACNs—which offer visual freshness feedback through distinct color changes as pH shifts from acidic to alkaline [282,283].

5.2. Convenience Food

The market for convenience foods—such as instant noodles, self-heating meals, and snacks—is large, demanding packaging that ensures safety and quality while improving user convenience and experience. Bio-based smart packaging materials show unique value in this sector. Edible packages (EPs), including films or coatings made from biopolymers such as proteins, polysaccharides, or lipids, can serve directly as seasoning packet liners, realizing the concept of “packaging as food” while reducing plastic use [284,285,286]. Water-soluble bio-based films can be used in heating packs for self-heating meals, dissolving upon contact with water to release heating agents while combining safety with convenience. For microwave-ready products, packaging must be heat resistant and capable of integrating heat-sensitive labels to verify thorough heating. Furthermore, by integrating sensors and QR codes via printed electronics, these materials can provide traceability and nutritional guidance, boosting transparency and engagement.

5.3. Functional Food

To meet the stringent requirements of functional foods for stable protection of active ingredients, maintenance of efficacy, and effective delivery, bio-based smart packaging offers systematic solutions. High barrier bio-based packaging (such as polyester) effectively blocks oxygen and light, preventing oxidation and degradation of light-sensitive nutrients [84,287]. For live microbial products, integrated oxygen scavenging and desiccants create anaerobic, low-humidity microenvironments to sustain activity. For nutrient fortification and delivery, edible films loaded with nutrients (e.g., probiotics, fiber) enable direct nutritional supplementation [288,289]. Combined with stimuli-responsive release systems (e.g., tear-activated), protective agents or flavor compounds can be precisely released during consumption, enabling on-demand delivery. Additionally, this packaging further employs smart controlled-release and selective barrier mechanisms to continuously protect active ingredients during storage and transport, preventing oxidation and moisture-induced degradation.

5.4. Paper-Based Food Packaging

Owing to its recyclability, biodegradability, and absence of microplastic risks, paper-based packaging is a key sustainable alternative for next-generation food systems [290,291,292,293]. Its intelligent properties are primarily achieved through surface functionalization via coating or impregnation, as well as structural integration technologies [294,295]. For instance, coating paper surfaces with bio-based barriers like chitosan or starch derivatives significantly enhances water and oil resistance. Further embedding smart indicators (e.g., Cur, ACNs) or functional nanomaterials (e.g., ZnO, MOFs) into these coatings endows packaging with freshness monitoring or antimicrobial capabilities. As exemplified by ZIF-67/shellac composite coatings, such integration can maintain high barrier performance while enabling rapid gas sensing (e.g., ammonia), significantly expanding the functional scope and application value of paper-based smart packaging [296,297]. Figure 5 illustrates the functional design of bio-based smart packaging across four key application areas, showcasing the targeted alignment between material capabilities and specific usage requirements.

6. Challenges and Future Perspectives

6.1. Major Challenges

Bio-based smart packaging presents a promising strategy to address current challenges in food safety, promote sustainable development, and reduce food waste. Current research focuses on developing smart packaging materials capable of responding to multiple indicators, such as humidity, pH, and temperature, enabling real-time visual monitoring of food quality. However, scaling this technology for widespread application still faces multiple challenges.
  • The long-term stability and reliability of smart responses require improvement. Natural indicators (such as ACNs) are prone to degradation by light, heat, and oxygen exposure, compromising the reversibility and precision of color changes in complex food systems and during extended storage, while sensor signals drift over time. Similar stability issues also affect other natural active agents—essential oils are volatile and prone to oxidation, while antimicrobial peptides can be degraded by proteolytic enzymes—highlighting a common challenge for incorporating diverse natural compounds into smart packaging. Additionally, the controlled release and matrix compatibility of functional nanomaterials (e.g., nanoparticles, MOFs) also require further optimization.
  • Achieving synergistic optimization among performance, cost, and sustainability proves challenging, with these factors mutually constraining commercialization. High-performance bio-based materials (e.g., PHA, nano-cellulose) and smart components (e.g., MOFs) often carry high costs, while their production may conflict with green objectives due to energy and chemical inputs.
  • Bottlenecks exist in translating laboratory prototypes to industrial-scale applications. Most smart packaging preparation processes (e.g., precision coating, electrospinning) are complex and inefficient, lacking mature mass production technologies and supporting processes. Concurrently, the absence of unified performance standards and safety assessment protocols severely hinders commercialization.
  • Finally, regulatory compliance poses a major obstacle. Approval processes for novel bio-based packaging are time-consuming and costly, particularly due to limited toxicological data and health risk assessments. Furthermore, the incorporation of smart functional components raises concerns about direct food contact safety. While most studies indicate low cytotoxicity, concerns over genotoxicity and nanoparticle migration persist, affecting consumer and regulatory acceptance.
Addressing these interrelated challenges is essential to fully realize the potential of bio-based smart packaging in next-generation food systems.

6.2. Future Outlook

The future development of bio-based smart packaging will focus on material functional upgrades, evolving toward biomimetic, adaptive, and system-integrated directions to drive packaging from single-function to intelligent, multi-functional integration. Near-term development focuses on optimizing materials and processes: enhancing active component stability through advanced encapsulation and curing; tuning the barrier, mechanical, and thermal properties of substrates via customized chemical or enzymatic modification; and utilizing low-cost, renewable feedstocks like agricultural waste to develop green processing routes. Furthermore, integrating with established technologies can reduce costs and increase consumer acceptance, balancing performance with economic and environmental goals. Concurrently, functional stability must be strengthened, and safety standards must be established to ensure public trust. This includes employing encapsulation or covalent fixation to prevent indicator migration and enhance durability, alongside developing material-specific toxicity protocols and regulatory frameworks to define safety limits and build public trust. Additionally, rigorous evaluation with large, diverse sample sets is needed to minimize false positives and optimize the packaging’s effectiveness in reducing food waste.
The medium-to-long-term evolution of bio-based smart packaging will progress toward higher-level intelligence by developing self-healing, adaptive biomimetic materials, enabling scalable, low-cost production through process integration, and transforming packages into IoT nodes. These intelligent systems fuse real-time food data with supply chain AI, thereby enabling a critical shift from passive monitoring to predictive regulation and autonomous control.

7. Conclusions

Bio-based smart packaging combines renewable feedstocks with responsive functionalities, shifting packaging from passive containment to active quality monitoring and supply chain information nodes. The market reflects this shift: the smart food packaging sector is projected to reach USD 48.97 billion by 2028 (CAGR 4.49%). At the material level, natural polymers, biopolymers, and bio-based polyesters provide the structure–property foundation. Among these, cellulose and its derivatives have drawn the strongest research interest over the past five years, confirming their leading role as renewable, versatile materials. Beyond passive barriers, these materials enable active intervention through core functions—active preservation (antimicrobial, antioxidant, controlled release) and intelligent sensing (pH-responsive indicators, IoT integration). For instance, chitosan with essential oils offers proactive preservation, while pH-sensitive anthocyanins visually indicate spoilage. Smart release systems triggered by pH, temperature, or gases shift from continuous to on-demand action. On the informational front, packaging acts as an in situ sensing terminal. Sensing technologies have evolved from colorimetric indicators to electrochemical sensors enhanced by nanomaterials (e.g., MOFs, nanozymes). Integration with IoT and blockchain bridges physical and digital supply chains, enabling full traceability.
Challenges remain with long-term stability, cost–sustainability trade-offs, scalability, and regulation. Future work should prioritize biomimetic design, system integration, and AI-driven analytics toward resilient, self-adaptive food systems. Ultimately, this evolution supports safer, more transparent, efficient, and sustainable food systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z. and S.W.; methodology, Z.Z. and H.Q.; formal analysis, H.Q. and C.S.; investigation, Z.Z., H.Q. and C.S.; resources, Z.Z., H.Q. and C.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.W.; visualization, Z.Z. and H.Q.; supervision, S.W. funding acquisition, S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Practice Innovation Training Program Projects of Jiangsu University (X2025102990307, X2025102990305).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

Doubao’s text-to-image function was used only for non-data decorative elements and icons in Figure 1 (concept of intelligent packaging, active freshness preservation), Figure 3 (hierarchical progressive background), Figure 4 (physical barrier, controlled release), and Figure 5 (functional food); it was not used for data, results, scientific text, analyses, or conclusions. The authors have reviewed all output and take full responsibility. Doubao (Doubao Large Model), ByteDance Ltd., Beijing, China, https://www.doubao.com.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

CNFCellulose nanofiberCNCCellulose nanocrystal
MC Methyl celluloseHPMCHydroxypropyl methylcellulose
CACellulose acetateBCBacterial cellulose
ECEthyl celluloseCMCCarboxymethyl cellulose
CSChitosanCMCSCarboxymethyl chitosan
PVAPolyvinyl alcoholPEFPoly (ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate)
ACNAnthocyaninPETPolyethylene terephthalate
SASodium alginateMOFMetal–organic framework
CurCurcuminCOFCovalent organic framework
PHAPolyhydroxyalkanoatePLAPolylactic acid
PHBPolyhydroxybutyratePHVPolyhydroxy-valerate
LAPLaponiteEPEdible package

References

  1. Siebler, A.; Keller, J.; Strenger, M.; Prescher, T.; Albrecht, S.; Schmid, M. Function Meets Environment-Approach for the Environmental Assessment of Food Packaging, Taking into Account Packaging Functionality. Sustainability 2026, 18, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhu, Y.L.; Cui, H.Y.; Li, C.Z.; Lin, L. A novel polyethylene oxide/Dendrobium officinale nanofiber: Preparation, characterization and application in pork packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 21, 100329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhai, X.D.; Li, Z.H.; Shi, J.Y.; Huang, X.W.; Sun, Z.B.; Zhang, D.; Zou, X.B.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, J.J.; Holmes, M.; et al. A colorimetric hydrogen sulfide sensor based on gellan gum-silver nanoparticles bionanocomposite for monitoring of meat spoilage in intelligent packaging. Food Chem. 2019, 290, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, L.; Gu, Y.L.; Cui, H.Y. Moringa oil/chitosan nanoparticles embedded gelatin nanofibers for food packaging against Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus on cheese. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 19, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, W.J.; Luo, J.Y.; Zhao, L.H.; Zhao, M.; Ouyang, Z.; Yang, M.H. Influences of different storage environments and packaging materials on the quality of the traditional Chinese health food Herba Menthae Haplocalycis. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 15, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lin, L.; Liao, X.; Surendhiran, D.; Cui, H.Y. Preparation of ε-polylysine/chitosan nanofibers for food packaging against Salmonella on chicken. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 17, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Upadhyay, A.; Agbesi, P.; Arafat, K.M.Y.; Urdaneta, F.; Dey, M.; Basak, M.; Hong, S.; Umeileka, C.; Argyropoulos, D. Bio-based smart packaging: Fundamentals and functions in sustainable food systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 145, 104369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chrisendo, D.; Piipponen, J.; Heino, M.; Kummu, M. Socioeconomic factors of global food loss. Agric. Food Secur. 2023, 12, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gil-Martín, E.; Forbes-Hernández, T.; Romero, A.; Cianciosi, D.; Giampieri, F.; Battino, M. Influence of the extraction method on the recovery of bioactive phenolic compounds from food industry by-products. Food Chem. 2022, 378, 131918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shouket, S.; Khurshid, S.; Khan, J.; Batool, R.; Sarwar, A.; Aziz, T.; Alhomrani, M.; Alamri, A.S.; Sameeh, M.Y.; Filimban, F.Z. Enhancement of shelf-life of food items via immobilized enzyme nanoparticles on varied supports. A sustainable approach towards food safety and sustainability. Food Res. Int. 2023, 169, 112940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shi, C.; Chen, Y.Y.; Li, C.Z.; Al-Asmari, F.; Cui, H.Y.; Lin, L. Potential Application of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum in Food Bio-preservation—A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on the Antibacterial and Anti-Virulence Effects on Foodborne Pathogens. Food Rev. Int. 2024, 40, 2993–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, X.; Wang, Z.; Gao, Z.; Lang, H.; Shao, X.; Liu, Z. Applications, challenges, and prospects of AI-driven intelligent packaging technologies in the food supply chain under Industry 4.0. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 165, 105367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mohammadi Khoshoue, F.; Karki, T.; Leminen, V. Recycled Plastics Utilization in Packaging Converting Processes: A Semi-Systematic Review. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2026, 2026, 1728680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Periyasamy, T.; Asrafali, S.P.; Lee, J. Recent Advances in Functional Biopolymer Films with Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties for Enhanced Food Packaging. Polymers 2025, 17, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cheng, Y.; Wang, J.; Fang, C.; Du, Y.; Su, J.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y. Recent Progresses in Pyrolysis of Plastic Packaging Wastes and Biomass Materials for Conversion of High-Value Carbons: A Review. Polymers 2024, 16, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Torkelis, A.; Dvarioniene, J.; Denafas, G. The Factors Influencing the Recycling of Plastic and Composite Packaging Waste. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhai, X.D.; Wang, X.Y.; Zhang, J.J.; Yang, Z.K.; Sun, Y.; Li, Z.H.; Huang, X.W.; Holmes, M.; Gong, Y.Y.; Povey, M.; et al. Extruded low density polyethylene-curcumin film: A hydrophobic ammonia sensor for intelligent food packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, L.; Mahdi, A.A.; Li, C.Z.; Al-Ansi, W.; Al-Maqtari, Q.A.; Hashim, S.B.H.; Cui, H.Y. Enhancing the properties of Litsea cubeba essential oil/peach gum/polyethylene oxide nanofibers packaging by ultrasonication. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 34, 100951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rehman, A.; Jafari, S.M.; Aadil, R.M.; Assadpour, E.; Randhawa, M.A.; Mahmood, S. Development of active food packaging via incorporation of biopolymeric nanocarriers containing essential oils. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 101, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, Z.K.; Zhai, X.D.; Zou, X.B.; Shi, J.Y.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H.; Gong, Y.Y.; Holmes, M.; Povey, M.; Xiao, J.B. Bilayer pH-sensitive colorimetric films with light-blocking ability and electrochemical writing property: Application in monitoring crucian spoilage in smart packaging. Food Chem. 2021, 336, 127634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, X.W.; Zhang, K.; Li, Z.H.; Zhang, J.J.; Zhai, X.D.; Zhang, N.; Du, L.Z.; Qin, Z. Exploring the Integration of Anthocyanins with Functional Materials in Smart Food Packaging: From Stabilization to Application. Foods 2025, 14, 2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Murugesan, A.; Li, H.H. Toward Sustainable Food Packaging: Innovations in Biodegradable Materials, Smart Technologies, and AI Integration. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2026, 25, e70397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, Z.Q.; Zhai, X.D.; Yin, L.T.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B.; Li, Z.H.; Huang, X.W.; Ma, X.D.; Povey, M. A smart bilayer film containing zein/gelatin/carvacrol and polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan/anthocyanin for Lateolabrax japonicus preservation and freshness monitoring. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2023, 17, 6470–6483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yan, X.X.; Li, Z.W.; Cheng, W.H.; Chen, R.; Liu, J.; Song, J.L.; Xiao, H.N.; Du, H.S.; Guo, J.Q. Cellulose nanocrystals for functional food packaging: Enhancing performance and enabling intelligence. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 163, 105163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ahmad, K.; Din, Z.U.; Ullah, H.; Ouyang, Q.; Rani, S.; Jan, I.; Alam, M.; Rahman, Z.; Kamal, T.; Ali, S.; et al. Preparation and Characterization of Bio-based Nanocomposites Packaging Films Reinforced with Cellulose Nanofibers from Unripe Banana Peels. Starch-Starke 2022, 74, 2100283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hashim, S.B.H.; Tahir, H.E.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.J.; Zhai, X.D.; Mahdi, A.A.; Awad, F.N.; Hassan, M.M.; Zou, X.B.; Shi, J.Y. Intelligent colorimetric pH sensoring packaging films based on sugarcane wax/agar integrated with butterfly pea flower extract for optical tracking of shrimp freshness. Food Chem. 2022, 373, 131514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ding, F.Y.; Long, S.M.; Huang, X.W.; Shi, J.Y.; Povey, M.; Zou, X.B. Emerging Pickering emulsion films for bio-based food packaging applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2024, 42, 101242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, L.; Luo, X.; Liu, Y.; Teng, M.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X. Biomimetic reed-leaf nanostructures enabling dual-channel-responsive biopolymer platforms for IoT-embedded intelligent active packaging. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 522, 167493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rahman, M.; Sobhan, A.; Sadak, O. Emerging trends in intelligent packaging for tackling food waste in the modern food supply chain. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2026, 167, 105436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Du, H.; Sun, X.; Chong, X.; Yang, M.; Zhu, Z.; Wen, Y. A review on smart active packaging systems for food preservation: Applications and future trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 141, 104200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shao, P.; Liu, L.; Yu, J.; Lin, Y.; Gao, H.; Chen, H.; Sun, P. An overview of intelligent freshness indicator packaging for food quality and safety monitoring. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boukoufi, C.; Boudier, A.; Maincent, P.; Vigneron, J.; Clarot, I. Food-inspired innovations to improve the stability of active pharmaceutical ingredients. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 623, 121881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, Y.Q.; Li, W.L.; Feng, Y.R.; Shi, J.Y. Carbon Dots as Multifunctional Nanofillers in Sustainable Food Packaging: A Comprehensive Review. Foods 2025, 14, 3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhai, X.D.; Li, Z.H.; Zhang, J.J.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.Y.; Huang, X.W.; Zhang, D.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Z.K.; Holmes, M.; et al. Natural Biomaterial-Based Edible and pH-Sensitive Films Combined with Electrochemical Writing for Intelligent Food Packaging. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 12836–12846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, X.T.; Shi, J.Y.; Shi, Y.Q.; Zou, X.B.; Arslan, M.; Zhang, W.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H.; Xu, Y.W. Use of a smartphone for visual detection of melamine in milk based on Au@Carbon quantum dots nanocomposites. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Atta, O.M.; Manan, S.; Shahzad, A.; Ul-Islam, M.; Ullah, M.W.; Yang, G. Biobased materials for active food packaging: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 125, 107419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Iqbal, M.W.; Riaz, T.; Yasmin, I.; Leghari, A.A.; Amin, S.; Bilal, M.; Qi, X.H. Chitosan-Based Materials as Edible Coating of Cheese: A Review. Starch-Starke 2021, 73, 202100088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mu, R.J.; Hong, X.; Ni, Y.S.; Li, Y.Z.; Pang, J.; Wang, Q.; Xiao, J.B.; Zheng, Y.F. Recent trends and applications of cellulose nanocrystals in food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 93, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, S.S.; Deng, C.; Zhang, H.L.; Yue, X.J.; Qiu, F.X.; Zhang, T. Antibacterial cellulose-based membrane with heat dissipation and liquid transportation for food packaging applications. Food Bioprod. Process. 2025, 149, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Y.; Ahmed, S.; Sameen, D.E.; Wang, Y.; Lu, R.; Dai, J.; Li, S.; Qin, W. A review of cellulose and its derivatives in biopolymer-based for food packaging application. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 532–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, X.L.; Dai, J.M.; Aziz, T.; Al-Asmari, F.; Shami, A.; Al-Joufi, F.A.; Cui, H.Y.; Lin, L. Advances in green preparation and functionalized applications of cellulose aerogels derived from agricultural waste for food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 165, 105352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nath, P.C.; Sharma, R.; Mahapatra, U.; Mohanta, Y.K.; Rustagi, S.; Sharma, M.; Mahajan, S.; Nayak, P.K.; Sridhar, K. Sustainable production of cellulosic biopolymers for enhanced smart food packaging: An up-to-date review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 273, 133090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Romao, S.; Bettencourt, A.; Ribeiro, I.A.C. Novel Features of Cellulose-Based Films as Sustainable Alternatives for Food Packaging. Polymers 2022, 14, 4968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yekta, R.; Abedi-Firoozjah, R.; Azimi Salim, S.; Khezerlou, A.; Abdolmaleki, K. Application of cellulose and cellulose derivatives in smart/intelligent bio-based food packaging. Cellulose 2023, 30, 9925–9953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhou, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Wang, G.; Lu, W. Sustainable biomass materials: Active and intelligent packaging based on cellulose. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025, 233, 121409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aziz, T.; Li, W.; Zhu, J.; Chen, B. Developing multifunctional cellulose derivatives for environmental and biomedical applications: Insights into modification processes and advanced material properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 278, 134695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rozas, B.; Bruna, J.E.; Guarda, A.; Galotto, M.J.; Reyes, C.; Valenzuela, X.; Rodriguez-Mercado, F.; Torres, A. Bio-Based Coatings on Cellulosic Materials Resistant to Humidity and Fats. Polymers 2025, 17, 2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Benitez, J.J.; Florido-Moreno, P.; Porras-Vázquez, J.M.; Tedeschi, G.; Athanassiou, A.; Heredia-Guerrero, J.A.; Guzman-Puyol, S. Transparent, plasticized cellulose-glycerol bioplastics for food packaging applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 273, 132956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Krithivasan, R.; Miller, G.Z.; Belliveau, M.; Gearhart, J.; Krishnamoorthi, V.; Lee, S.; Kannan, K. Analysis of ortho-phthalates and other plasticizers in select organic and conventional foods in the United States. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2023, 33, 778–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mena-Prado, I.; Fernandez-Garcia, M.; del Campo, A.; Bonilla, A.M. Natural Macromolecules Used as Bioplasticizer in Polymer Materials for Food Contact Applications. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2025, 38, 511–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mena-Prado, I.; Navas-Ortiz, E.; Fernandez-Garcia, M.; Blazquez-Blazquez, E.; Limbo, S.; Rollini, M.; Martins, D.M.; Bonilla, A.M.; del Campo, A. Enhancing functional properties of compostable materials with biobased plasticizers for potential food packaging applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 280, 135538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, Z.; Wang, Q.; Lin, L.; Liu, Q.; Ma, W.; Cheng, Q.; Yang, J.; Tang, F.; Xu, M.; Yang, X.; et al. Engineering a shellfish-inspired bio-based double-layered smart packaging material with enhanced water resistance and barrier performance for universally applicable meat freshness monitoring. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 501, 157808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jiao, H.X.; Shi, Y.F.; Sun, J.Z.; Lu, X.C.; Zhang, H.X.; Li, Y.; Fu, Y.Y.; Guo, J.Q.; Wang, Q.Q.; Liu, H.; et al. Sawdust-derived cellulose nanofibrils with high biosafety for potential bioprinting. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 209, 118025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, Y.; Liang, W.; Huang, M.G.; Huang, W.Y.; Feng, J. Green preparation of holocellulose nanocrystals from burdock and their inhibitory effects against α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 170–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lu, Q.M.; Yu, X.J.; Yagoub, A.A.; Wahia, H.; Zhou, C.S. Application and challenge of nanocellulose in the food industry. Food Biosci. 2021, 43, 101285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, L.; Boni, B.O.O.; Ullah, M.W.; Qi, F.Y.; Li, X.H.; Shi, Z.J.; Yang, G. Cellulose: A promising and versatile Pickering emulsifier for healthy foods. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 7081–7111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lu, A.P.; Yu, X.J.; Ji, Q.H.; Chen, L.; Yagoub, A.E.G.; Olugbenga, F.; Zhou, C.S. Preparation and characterization of lignin-containing cellulose nanocrystals from peanut shells using a deep eutectic solvent containing lignin-derived phenol. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 195, 116415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, C.; Zheng, Y.M.; Ai, C.; Cao, H.; Xiao, J.B.; El-Seedi, H.; Chen, L.; Teng, H. Effect of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) on some physico-chemical and mechanical properties of unrinsed surimi gels. Lwt-Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 180, 114653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, Z.P.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, X.J.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Gomez, P.L.; Alzamora, S.M.; Zou, X.B.; Guo, Z.M. Enhanced composite Co-MOF-derived sodium carboxymethyl cellulose visual films for real-time and in situ monitoring fresh-cut apple freshness. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 157, 110475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Luo, S.W.; Yu, L.J.; Song, J.F.; Wu, C.E.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C.C. Hybridization of glucosyl stevioside and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose to improve the solubility of lutein. Food Chem. 2022, 394, 133490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rahman, M.S.; Hasan, M.S.; Nitai, A.S.; Nam, S.; Karmakar, A.K.; Ahsan, M.S.; Shiddiky, M.J.A.; Ahmed, M.B. Recent Developments of Carboxymethyl Cellulose. Polymers 2021, 13, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, Y.F.; Dai, Y.T.; Zhu, Y.; Xue, S.L.; Qiu, F.X.; Zhang, T. Transparent cellulose acetate/polyvinylidene difluoride films with heat dissipation for agricultural mulch application. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025, 224, 120302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, W.; Liang, J.; Wu, Y.Q.; Li, W.L.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H.; Zhang, X.N.; Zou, X.B.; Shi, J.Y. Fish freshness monitoring based on bilayer cellulose acetate/polyvinylidene fluoride membranes containing ZIF-8 loaded curcumin. Food Chem. 2024, 463, 141054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mohammadalinejhad, S.; Almasi, H.; Moradi, M. Immobilization of Echium amoenum anthocyanins into bacterial cellulose film: A novel colorimetric pH indicator for freshness/spoilage monitoring of shrimp. Food Control 2020, 113, 107169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cazón, P.; Vázquez, M. Bacterial cellulose as a biodegradable food packaging material: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 113, 106530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, X.Y.; Zhai, X.D.; Zou, X.B.; Li, Z.H.; Shi, J.Y.; Yang, Z.K.; Sun, Y.; Arslan, M.; Chen, Z.Y.; Xiao, J.B. Novel hydrophobic colorimetric films based on ethylcellulose/castor oil/anthocyanins for pork freshness monitoring. Lwt-Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 164, 113631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rashid, A.; Qayum, A.; Bacha, S.A.S.; Liang, Q.F.; Liu, Y.X.; Kang, L.X.; Chi, Z.Z.; Chi, R.H.; Han, X.; Ekumah, J.N.; et al. Novel pullulan-sodium alginate film incorporated with anthocyanin-loaded casein-carboxy methyl cellulose nanocomplex for real-time fish and shrimp freshness monitoring. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 156, 110356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, K.; Li, Z.H.; Huang, X.W.; Qin, Y.N.; Zhang, J.J.; Hashim, S.B.H.; Xu, H.Y.; Zhang, R.Y.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B. Pore-structure-tunable carboxymethyl cellulose/polyvinyl alcohol aerogel functionalized with butterfly pea anthocyanin for real-time visual monitoring of pork freshness. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2025, 148, 108491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Khan, S.; Ke, Z.; Shishir, M.R.I.; Karim, N.; Ji, Y.; Xiaobo, Z.; Li, F.J. Synergistic effect of berry wax and miswak extract in a carboxymethylcellulose-based coating for banana preservation. Food Res. Int. 2026, 225, 118120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dăescu, D.I.; Dreavă, D.M.; Todea, A.; Peter, F.; Păușescu, I. Intelligent Biopolymer-Based Films: Promising New Solutions for Food Packaging Applications. Polymers 2024, 16, 2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cui, H.Y.; Bai, M.; Rashed, M.M.A.; Lin, L. The antibacterial activity of clove oil/chitosan nanoparticles embedded gelatin nanofibers against Escherichia coli O157:H7 biofilms on cucumber. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 266, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, C.; Long, Y.H.; Wang, Q.P.; Li, J.H.; An, H.M.; Wu, X.M.; Li, M. The effect of preharvest 28.6% chitosan composite film sprays for controlling the soft rot on kiwifruit and its defence responses. Hortic. Sci. 2019, 46, 180–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhang, Z.; Lu, Y.J.; Zhao, Y.M.; Cui, L.J.; Xu, C.; Wu, S.P. Current Developments in Chitosan-Based Hydrogels for Water and Wastewater Treatment: A Comprehensive Review. Chemistryselect 2025, 10, e202404061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tie, S.; Ding, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Cao, L.; Li, X.; Zhao, L.; Gu, S. Preparation and characterization of pH-sensitive intelligent films based on carboxymethyl chitosan and sodium alginate for preservation monitoring. Food Control 2026, 179, 111599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, C.; Long, Y.H.; Li, J.H.; Li, M.; Xing, D.K.; An, H.M.; Wu, X.M.; Wu, Y.Y. A Chitosan Composite Film Sprayed before Pathogen Infection Effectively Controls Postharvest Soft Rot in Kiwifruit. Agronomy 2020, 10, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Godana, E.A.; Yang, Q.Y.; Wang, K.L.; Zhang, H.Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Zhao, L.N.; Abdelhai, M.H.; Legrand, N.N.G. Bio-control activity of Pichia anomala supplemented with chitosan against Penicillium expansum in postharvest grapes and its possible inhibition mechanism. Lwt-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 124, 109188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ding, F.Y.; Hu, B.; Lan, S.; Wang, H.X. Flexographic and screen printing of carboxymethyl chitosan based edible inks for food packaging applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ding, F.Y.; Fu, L.; Huang, X.W.; Shi, J.Y.; Povey, M.; Zou, X.B. Self-healing carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel with anthocyanin for monitoring the spoilage of flesh foods. Food Hydrocoll. 2025, 165, 111270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cheng, K.; Xu, F.F.; Du, J.; Li, C.F.; Wang, Z.K.; Zhang, L.W.; Wang, X.Q.; Liu, J. Enhancing the preservation of blueberry with a tough and biodegradable soy protein isolate-carboxymethyl chitosan film integrated with TiO2 nanotube arrays. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2025, 48, 101467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ashraf, J.; Zhang, J.Y.; Tufail, T.; Awais, M.; Liu, S.Y.; Qi, Y.J.; Ahmed, Z.; Yue, L.M.; Sumei, Z.; Xu, B. Deep eutectic solvent: A promising way to enhance the physicomechanical and antimicrobial properties of pullulan/carboxymethyl chitosan films impregnated with zein-nisin nanofillers for sustainable food packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2026, 171, 111866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Huie, J.; Suqiu, Z.; Haiyan, J.; Zhijian, L.; Lijuan, C.; Nihao, L.; Xinhua, L. Microporous chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol based active packaging materials with integrated gas-transmission, radiation-cooling, anti-microbial, and ultraviolet shielding features. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 473, 145432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lin, L.; Mao, X.; Sun, Y.; Rajivgandhi, G.; Cui, H. Antibacterial properties of nanofibers containing chrysanthemum essential oil and their application as beef packaging. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 292, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cui, H.; Surendhiran, D.; Li, C.; Lin, L. Biodegradable zein active film containing chitosan nanoparticle encapsulated with pomegranate peel extract for food packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 24, 100511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Flórez, M.; Guerra-Rodríguez, E.; Cazón, P.; Vázquez, M. Chitosan for food packaging: Recent advances in active and intelligent films. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124, 107328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jiang, H.; Zou, L.; Li, Z.; Guo, P.; Ju, H.; Mo, H.; Liu, X. Molecularly orchestrated room-temperature phosphorescent biocomposite for intelligent food packaging: Integrating anti-counterfeiting and real-time visual freshness supervision. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2025, 52, 101660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Abelti, A.L.; Teka, T.A.; Fikreyesus Forsido, S.; Tamiru, M.; Bultosa, G.; Alkhtib, A.; Burton, E. Bio-based smart materials for fish product packaging: A review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2022, 25, 857–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhai, X.D.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B.; Wang, S.; Jiang, C.P.; Zhang, J.J.; Huang, X.W.; Zhang, W.; Holmes, M. Novel colorimetric films based on starch/polyvinyl alcohol incorporated with roselle anthocyanins for fish freshness monitoring. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 69, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hamadou, A.H.; Zhang, J.Y.; Li, H.T.; Chen, C.; Xu, B. Modulating the glycemic response of starch-based foods using organic nanomaterials: Strategies and opportunities. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 11942–11966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, J.N.; Zhang, J.J.; Guan, Y.F.; Huang, X.W.; Arslan, M.; Shi, J.Y.; Li, Z.H.; Gong, Y.Y.; Holmes, M.; Zou, X.B. High- sensitivity bilayer nanofiber film based on polyvinyl alcohol/sodium alginate/polyvinylidene fluoride for pork spoilage visual monitoring and preservation. Food Chem. 2022, 394, 133439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yang, Z.K.; Li, M.R.; Li, Y.X.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H.; Zhai, X.D.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B.; Xiao, J.B.; Sun, Y.; et al. Sodium alginate/guar gum based nanocomposite film incorporating β-Cyclodextrin/persimmon pectin-stabilized baobab seed oil Pickering emulsion for mushroom preservation. Food Chem. 2024, 437, 137891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rashid, A.; Qayum, A.; Bacha, S.A.S.; Liang, Q.F.; Liu, Y.X.; Kang, L.X.; Chi, Z.Z.; Chi, R.H.; Han, X.; Ekumah, J.N.; et al. Preparation and functional characterization of pullulan-sodium alginate composite film enhanced with ultrasound-assisted clove essential oil Nanoemulsions for effective preservation of cherries and mushrooms. Food Chem. 2024, 457, 140048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Şomoghi, R.; Mihai, S.; Oancea, F. An Overview of Bio-Based Polymers with Potential for Food Packaging Applications. Polymers 2025, 17, 2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Onyeaka, H.; Obileke, K.; Makaka, G.; Nwokolo, N. Current Research and Applications of Starch-Based Biodegradable Films for Food Packaging. Polymers 2022, 14, 1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wei, B.X.; Cai, C.X.; Xu, B.G.; Jin, Z.Y.; Tian, Y.Q. Disruption and molecule degradation of waxy maize starch granules during high pressure homogenization process. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Cai, C.X.; Wei, B.X.; Tian, Y.Q.; Ma, R.R.; Chen, L.; Qiu, L.Z.; Jin, Z.Y. Structural changes of chemically modified rice starch by one-step reactive extrusion. Food Chem. 2019, 288, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Obadi, M.; Xu, B. Review on the physicochemical properties, modifications, and applications of starches and its common modified forms used in noodle products. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 112, 106286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Li, Q.Q.; Liu, S.Y.; Obadi, M.; Jiang, Y.Y.; Zhao, F.F.; Jiang, S.; Xu, B. The impact of starch degradation induced by pre-gelatinization treatment on the quality of noodles. Food Chem. 2020, 302, 125267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sarak, S.; Pisitaro, W.; Rammak, T.; Kaewtatip, K. Characterization of starch film incorporating Hom Nil rice extract for food packaging purposes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 254, 127820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lekurwale, S.; Mahajan, S.; Banerjee, S.K.; Banerjee, S. Systematic evaluations and integration of Assam indigenous Joha rice starch in intelligent packaging films for monitoring food freshness using beetroot extract. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 277, 134332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, J.N.; Zhang, J.J.; Zhang, X.A.; Huang, X.W.; Shi, J.Y.; Sobhy, R.; Khalifa, I.; Zou, X.B. Ammonia-Responsive Colorimetric Film of Phytochemical Formulation (Alizarin) Grafted onto ZIF-8 Carrier with Poly(vinyl alcohol) and Sodium Alginate for Beef Freshness Monitoring. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 11706–11715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vrabič-Brodnjak, U.; Ružič, T. Bio-Based Alginate Films Incorporating Bacterial Nanocellulose and Grape Seed Extract for Enhanced Food Packaging. Polymers 2025, 17, 2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Xu, H.N.; Pan, J.Y.; Ma, C.F.; Mintah, B.K.; Dabbour, M.; Huang, L.R.; Dai, C.H.; Ma, H.L.; He, R.H. Stereo-hindrance effect and oxidation cross-linking induced by ultrasound-assisted sodium alginate-glycation inhibit lysinoalanine formation in silkworm pupa protein. Food Chem. 2025, 463, 141284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Khan, A.A.; Cui, F.J.; Ullah, M.W.; Qayum, A.; Khalifa, I.; Bacha, S.A.S.; Ying, Z.Z.; Khan, I.; Zeb, U.; Alarfaj, A.A.; et al. Fabrication and characterization of bioactive curdlan and sodium alginate films for enhancing the shelf life of Volvariella volvacea. Food Biosci. 2024, 62, 105137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhang, J.N.; Zhang, J.J.; Huang, X.W.; Zhai, X.D.; Li, Z.H.; Shi, J.Y.; Sobhy, R.; Khalifa, I.; Zou, X.B. Lemon-derived carbon quantum dots incorporated guar gum/sodium alginate films with enhanced the preservability for blanched asparagus active packaging. Food Res. Int. 2025, 202, 115736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Li, Y.; Wang, Z.Y.; Xia, W.R.; Chai, Z.; Feng, J.; Teng, C.; Ma, K.Y.; Hu, X.D.; Xu, L.J. Sodium alginate coated ferritin as ACE inhibitory peptide carrier: Prolonged release property and enhanced transepithelial transport. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2025, 34, 1867–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sun, Q.L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhou, C.S.; Phyllis, O.; Yu, X.J. Sequence-dependent assembly of whey protein-sodium alginate-steviol glycoside ternary complexes: Mechanistic insights and functional modulation. Food Chem. 2026, 501, 147609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Man, Y.X.; Zhou, C.S.; Adhikari, B.; Wang, Y.C.A.; Xu, T.T.; Wang, B. High voltage electrohydrodynamic atomization of bovine lactoferrin and its encapsulation behaviors in sodium alginate. J. Food Eng. 2022, 317, 110842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Huang, L.R.; Ding, X.N.; Li, Y.L.; Ma, H.L. The aggregation, structures and emulsifying properties of soybean protein isolate induced by ultrasound and acid. Food Chem. 2019, 279, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Huang, L.R.; Ding, X.N.; Dai, C.H.; Ma, H.L. Changes in the structure and dissociation of soybean protein isolate induced by ultrasound-assisted acid pretreatment. Food Chem. 2017, 232, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, Y.L.; Shao, F.; Wan, X.; Zhang, H.H.; Cai, M.H.; Hu, K.; Duan, Y.Q. Effects of rapeseed protein addition on soybean protein-based textured protein produced by low-moisture extrusion: Changes in physicochemical attributes, structural properties and barrel flow behaviors. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 149, 109631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Adilah, Z.A.M.; Jamilah, B.; Hanani, Z.A.N. Storage stability of mayonnaise packaged in soy protein isolate films incorporated with mango kernel extract. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2023, 40, 101216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cheng, H.; McClements, D.J.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, H.; Wang, W.; Jin, Z.; Chen, L. Development, characterization, and biological activity of composite films: Eugenol-zein nanoparticles in pea starch/soy protein isolate films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 293, 139342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Karabulut, G. Advancing sustainable packaging through self-assembly induced amyloid fibrillization of soy and pea protein nanofilms. Food Chem. 2025, 463, 141302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Lu, Y.; Luo, Q.; Chu, Y.; Tao, N.; Deng, S.; Wang, L.; Li, L. Application of Gelatin in Food Packaging: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rather, J.A.; Akhter, N.; Ashraf, Q.S.; Mir, S.A.; Makroo, H.A.; Majid, D.; Barba, F.J.; Khaneghah, A.M.; Dar, B.N. A comprehensive review on gelatin: Understanding impact of the sources, extraction methods, and modifications on potential packaging applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 34, 100945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Said, N.S.; Sarbon, N.M. Physical and Mechanical Characteristics of Gelatin-Based Films as a Potential Food Packaging Material: A Review. Membranes 2022, 12, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhou, C.Q.; Abdel-Samie, M.A.; Li, C.Z.; Cui, H.Y.; Lin, L. Active packaging based on swim bladder gelatin/galangal root oil nanofibers: Preparation, properties and antibacterial application. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Liu, C.; Liu, H.; Zheng, Y.; Luo, J.; Lu, C.; He, Y.; Pang, X.; Layek, R. Schiff base crosslinked graphene/oxidized nanofibrillated cellulose/chitosan foam: An efficient strategy for selective removal of anionic dyes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 252, 126448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kumar, A.; Kumar, A.; Wei, S.; Chopra, S.; Rudra, S.G.; Rabbani, A. Biodegradable and smart packaging films for food quality and safety: A review. Appl. Food Res. 2025, 5, 101491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Chaudhary, V.; Kajla, P.; Kumari, P.; Bangar, S.P.; Rusu, A.; Trif, M.; Lorenzo, J.M. Milk protein-based active edible packaging for food applications: An eco-friendly approach. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 942524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Choi, H.-J.; Choi, S.-W.; Lee, N.; Chang, H.-J. Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan/Gelatin/Poly(vinyl alcohol) Ternary Blend Film Incorporated with Duchesnea indica Extract in Strawberry Applications. Foods 2022, 11, 3963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Li, H.; Yang, M.; Liu, G.; Gao, Z. Composite Sustained-Release Antibacterial Films Formed by Hydrogen-Bonding Cross-Linking of Sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin@curcumin Inclusion Complexes with Gelatin for Grape Preservation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025, 73, 14592–14607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Khaliq, A.; Mishra, A.; Shaukat, M.; Rabbani, A. Plant-based dairy substitutes: Current scenario and future prospects. Innov. Agric. 2023, 6, e32880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Song, H.-g.; Choi, I.; Lee, J.-S.; Chang, Y.; Yoon, C.S.; Han, J. Whey protein isolate coating material for high oxygen barrier properties: A scale-up study from laboratory to industrial scale and its application to food packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 31, 100765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Tavares, L.; Souza, H.K.S.; Gonçalves, M.P.; Rocha, C.M.R. Physicochemical and microstructural properties of composite edible film obtained by complex coacervation between chitosan and whey protein isolate. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 113, 106471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Purewal, S.S.; Kaur, A.; Bangar, S.P.; Singh, P.; Singh, H. Protein-Based Films and Coatings: An Innovative Approach. Coatings 2023, 14, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. da Silva Filipini, G.; Romani, V.P.; Guimarães Martins, V. Biodegradable and active-intelligent films based on methylcellulose and jambolão (Syzygium cumini) skins extract for food packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 109, 106139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Alizadeh-Sani, M.; Tavassoli, M.; McClements, D.J.; Hamishehkar, H. Multifunctional halochromic packaging materials: Saffron petal anthocyanin loaded-chitosan nanofiber/methyl cellulose matrices. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 111, 106237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Jiang, G.; Hou, X.; Zeng, X.; Zhang, C.; Wu, H.; Shen, G.; Li, S.; Luo, Q.; Li, M.; Liu, X.; et al. Preparation and characterization of indicator films from carboxymethyl-cellulose/starch and purple sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) lam) anthocyanins for monitoring fish freshness. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 143, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Dirpan, A.; Djalal, M.; Kamaruddin, I. Application of an Intelligent Sensor and Active Packaging System Based on the Bacterial Cellulose of Acetobacter xylinum to Meat Products. Sensors 2022, 22, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Liu, H.; Shi, C.; Sun, X.; Zhang, J.; Ji, Z. Intelligent colorimetric indicator film based on bacterial cellulose and pelargonidin dye to indicate the freshness of tilapia fillets. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 29, 100712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Pereira, A.; Marques, M.A.; Alves, J.; Morais, M.; Figueira, J.; Pinto, J.V.; Moreira, F.T.C. Irreversible colorimetric bio-based curcumin bilayer membranes for smart food packaging temperature control applications. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 8981–8989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Wu, C.; Sun, J.; Zheng, P.; Kang, X.; Chen, M.; Li, Y.; Ge, Y.; Hu, Y.; Pang, J. Preparation of an intelligent film based on chitosan/oxidized chitin nanocrystals incorporating black rice bran anthocyanins for seafood spoilage monitoring. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 222, 115006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Fu, X.; Chang, X.; Xu, S.; Xu, H.; Ge, S.; Xie, Y.; Wang, R.; Xu, Y.; Luo, Z.; Shan, Y.; et al. Development of a chitosan/pectin-based multi-active food packaging with both UV and microbial defense functions for effectively preserving of strawberry. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 254, 127968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Chayavanich, K.; Thiraphibundet, P.; Imyim, A. Biocompatible film sensors containing red radish extract for meat spoilage observation. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 226, 117601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Yang, J.; Fan, Y.; Cui, J.; Yang, L.; Su, H.; Yang, P.; Pan, J. Colorimetric films based on pectin/sodium alginate/xanthan gum incorporated with raspberry pomace extract for monitoring protein-rich food freshness. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 185, 959–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Halloub, A.; Raji, M.; Essabir, H.; Nekhlaoui, S.; Bensalah, M.-O.; Bouhfid, R.; Qaiss, A.e.k. Stable smart packaging betalain-based from red prickly pear covalently linked into cellulose/alginate blend films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 234, 123764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Rahman, S.; Chowdhury, D. Guar gum-sodium alginate nanocomposite film as a smart fluorescence-based humidity sensor: A smart packaging material. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 216, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kamer, D.D.A.; Kaynarca, G.B.; Yücel, E.; GÜMÜŞ, T. Development of gelatin/PVA based colorimetric films with a wide pH sensing range winery solid by-product (Vinasse) for monitor shrimp freshness. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 220, 627–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Alizadeh Sani, M.; Tavassoli, M.; Salim, S.A.; Azizi-lalabadi, M.; McClements, D.J. Development of green halochromic smart and active packaging materials: TiO2 nanoparticle- and anthocyanin-loaded gelatin/κ-carrageenan films. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124, 107324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Xiao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Kang, S.; Cui, M.; Xu, H. Development of pH-responsive antioxidant soy protein isolate films incorporated with cellulose nanocrystals and curcumin nanocapsules to monitor shrimp freshness. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 120, 106893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Shi, J.; Sheng, L.; Chen, M.; Wu, X.; Li, X.; Tan, Y.Q. pH-responsive collagen nanocomposite films reinforced by curcumin-loaded Laponite nanoplatelets for dynamic visualization of shrimp freshness. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 157, 110447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Hussain, M.; Khan, S.M.; Shafiq, M.; Abbas, N. A review on PLA-based biodegradable materials for biomedical applications. Giant 2024, 18, 100261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Karabagias, V.K.; Giannakas, A.E.; Andritsos, N.D.; Moschovas, D.; Karydis-Messinis, A.; Leontiou, A.; Avgeropoulos, A.; Zafeiropoulos, N.E.; Proestos, C.; Salmas, C.E. Νovel Polylactic Acid/Tetraethyl Citrate Self-Healable Active Packaging Films Applied to Pork Fillets’ Shelf-Life Extension. Polymers 2024, 16, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kirac, F.T.; Dagdelen, A.F.; Saricaoglu, F.T. Recent advances in polylactic acid biopolymer films used in food packaging systems. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2022, 61, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  146. Lyn, F.H.; Ismail-Fitry, M.R.; Noranizan, M.A.; Tan, T.B.; Hanani, Z.A.N. Recent advances in extruded polylactic acid-based composites for food packaging: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 266, 131340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Swetha, T.A.; Bora, A.; Mohanrasu, K.; Balaji, P.; Raja, R.; Ponnuchamy, K.; Muthusamy, G.; Arun, A. A comprehensive review on polylactic acid (PLA)-Synthesis, processing and application in food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 234, 123715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Genovesi, A.; Aversa, C.; Barletta, M. Polyhydroxyalkanoates-based Cast Film as Bio-based Packaging for Fresh Fruit and Vegetables: Manufacturing and Characterization. J. Polym. Environ. 2023, 31, 4522–4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kusuma, H.S.; Sabita, A.; Putri, N.A.; Azliza, N.; Illiyanasafa, N.; Darmokoesoemo, H.; Amenaghawon, A.N.; Kurniawan, T.A. Waste to wealth: Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production from food waste for a sustainable packaging paradigm. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 2024, 9, 100225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Pandey, V.K.; Shafi, Z.; Tripathi, A.; Singh, G.; Singh, R.; Rustagi, S. Production of biodegradable food packaging from mango peel via enzymatic hydrolysis and polyhydroxyalkanoates synthesis: A review on microbial intervention. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2024, 7, 100292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Jannatiha, N.; Gutiérrez, T.J. Recycling and revalorization of PLA and PHA-based food packaging waste: A review. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2025, 44, e01364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Chellali, J.E.; Alverson, A.K.; Robinson, J.R. Zinc Aryl/Alkyl β-diketiminates: Balancing Accessibility and Stability for High-Activity Ring-Opening Polymerization ofrac-Lactide. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 5585–5594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Mafe, A.N.; Edo, G.I.; Ali, A.B.M.; Akpoghelie, P.O.; Yousif, E.; Isoje, E.F.; Igbuku, U.A.; Opiti, R.A.; Ajiduku, L.A.; Owheruo, J.O.; et al. Next-Generation Biopolymers for Sustainable Food Packaging: Innovations in Material Science, Circular Economy, and Smart Technologies. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2025, 18, 9052–9108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wu, Y.; Feng, J.; Hu, G.; Zhang, E.; Yu, H.-H. Colorimetric Sensors for Chemical and Biological Sensing Applications. Sensors 2023, 23, 2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Holler, M.; Alberdi-Cedeño, J.; Auñon-Lopez, A.; Pointner, T.; Martínez-Yusta, A.; König, J.; Pignitter, M. Polylactic acid as a promising sustainable plastic packaging for edible oils. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2023, 36, 101051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. O’Loughlin, J.; Doherty, D.; Herward, B.; McGleenan, C.; Mahmud, M.; Bhagabati, P.; Boland, A.N.; Freeland, B.; Rochfort, K.D.; Kelleher, S.M.; et al. The Potential of Bio-Based Polylactic Acid (PLA) as an Alternative in Reusable Food Containers: A Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. da Silva Pens, C.J.; Klug, T.V.; Stoll, L.; Izidoro, F.; Flores, S.H.; de Oliveira Rios, A. Poly (lactic acid) and its improved properties by some modifications for food packaging applications: A review. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2024, 41, 101230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Abdollahi Moghaddam, M.R.; Hesarinejad, M.A.; Javidi, F. Characterization and optimization of polylactic acid and polybutylene succinate blend/starch/wheat straw biocomposite by optimal custom mixture design. Polym. Test. 2023, 121, 108000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Marano, S.; Laudadio, E.; Minnelli, C.; Stipa, P. Tailoring the Barrier Properties of PLA: A State-of-the-Art Review for Food Packaging Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Tripathy, J.; Mishra, A.; Pandey, M.; Thakur, R.R.; Chand, S.; Rout, P.R.; Shahid, M.K. Advances in Nanoparticles and Nanocomposites for Water and Wastewater Treatment: A Review. Water 2024, 16, 1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Benkraled, L.; Zennaki, A.; Zair, L.; Arabeche, K.; Berrayah, A.; Barrera, A.; Bouberka, Z.; Maschke, U. Effect of Plasticization/Annealing on Thermal, Dynamic Mechanical, and Rheological Properties of Poly(Lactic Acid). Polymers 2024, 16, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Shi, X.; Cui, L.; Xu, C.; Wu, S. Next-Generation Bioplastics for Food Packaging: Sustainable Materials and Applications. Materials 2025, 18, 2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Trivedi, A.K.; Gupta, M.K.; Singh, H. PLA based biocomposites for sustainable products: A review. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2023, 6, 382–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Stublić, K.; Ranilović, J.; Ocelić Bulatović, V.; Kučić Grgić, D. Advancing Sustainability: Utilizing Bacterial Polyhydroxyalkanoate for Food Packaging. Processes 2024, 12, 1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Acharjee, S.A.; Bharali, P.; Gogoi, B.; Sorhie, V.; Walling, B.; Alemtoshi. PHA-Based Bioplastic: A Potential Alternative to Address Microplastic Pollution. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022, 234, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Gao, H.; Fang, X.; Chen, H.; Qin, Y.; Xu, F.; Jin, T.Z. Physiochemical properties and food application of antimicrobial PLA film. Food Control 2017, 73, 1522–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Sabapathy, P.C.; Devaraj, S.; Meixner, K.; Anburajan, P.; Kathirvel, P.; Ravikumar, Y.; Zabed, H.M.; Qi, X. Recent developments in Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) production—A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 306, 123132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Patiño Vidal, C.; Muñoz-Shugulí, C.; Guivier, M.; Puglia, D.; Luzi, F.; Rojas, A.; Velásquez, E.; Galotto, M.J.; López-de-Dicastillo, C. PLA- and PHA-Biopolyester-Based Electrospun Materials: Development, Legislation, and Food Packaging Applications. Molecules 2024, 29, 5452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Miah, M.R.; Ding, J.; Zhao, H.; Wang, H.; Chu, Q.; Fang, B.; Fan, L.; Wang, J.; Zhu, J. Enhancing the mechanical and barrier properties of biobased polyester incorporated with carboxylated cellulose nanofibers. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 38, 108538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Papageorgiou, G.Z.; Nikolaidis, G.N.; Ioannidis, R.O.; Rinis, K.; Papageorgiou, D.G.; Klonos, P.A.; Achilias, D.S.; Kapnisti, M.; Terzopoulou, Z.; Bikiaris, D.N. A Step Forward in Thermoplastic Polyesters: Understanding the Crystallization and Melting of Biobased Poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PEF). ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 7050–7064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Xu, C.; Shi, X.K.; Cui, L.J.; Gao, S.J.; Wu, S.P. From biomass to biopolymer: Strategic development of PEF for sustainable material solutions. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining-Biofpr 2025, 19, 2542–2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Sousa, A.F.; Patrício, R.; Terzopoulou, Z.; Bikiaris, D.N.; Stern, T.; Wenger, J.; Loos, K.; Lotti, N.; Siracusa, V.; Szymczyk, A.; et al. Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 8795–8820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Forestier, E.; Combeaud, C.; Guigo, N.; Sbirrazzuoli, N.; Billon, N. Understanding of strain-induced crystallization developments scenarios for polyesters: Comparison of poly(ethylene furanoate), PEF, and poly(ethylene terephthalate), PET. Polymer 2020, 203, 122755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Banella, M.B.; Bonucci, J.; Vannini, M.; Marchese, P.; Lorenzetti, C.; Celli, A. Insights into the Synthesis of Poly(ethylene 2,5-Furandicarboxylate) from 2,5-Furandicarboxylic Acid: Steps toward Environmental and Food Safety Excellence in Packaging Applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 8955–8962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Li, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, M.; Zhou, G. High performance biobased poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) nanocomposites for food and cosmetics packaging materials: PMDA chain extended and TiO2 NPs functionalized. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 105228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Loos, K.; Zhang, R.; Pereira, I.; Agostinho, B.; Hu, H.; Maniar, D.; Sbirrazzuoli, N.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Guigo, N.; Sousa, A.F. A Perspective on PEF Synthesis, Properties, and End-Life. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Huang, G.; Huang, Y.; Xu, W.; Yao, Q.; Liu, X.; Ding, C.; Chen, X. Cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals for ultraviolet and blue light blocking. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019, 30, 1021–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Xu, W.; Zhong, L.; Xu, F.; Song, W.; Wang, J.; Zhu, J.; Chou, S. Ultraflexible Transparent Bio-Based Polymer Conductive Films Based on Ag Nanowires. Small 2019, 15, 1805094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Han, Y.; Ding, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, Q.; Yang, H.; Sun, T.; Li, H. Fabrication and characterization of polylactic acid coaxial antibacterial nanofibers embedded with cinnamaldehyde/tea polyphenol with food packaging potential. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 184, 739–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Cvek, M.; Paul, U.C.; Zia, J.; Mancini, G.; Sedlarik, V.; Athanassiou, A. Biodegradable Films of PLA/PPC and Curcumin as Packaging Materials and Smart Indicators of Food Spoilage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 14654–14667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Olejnik, O.; Masek, A. Bio-Based Packaging Materials Containing Substances Derived from Coffee and Tea Plants. Materials 2020, 13, 5719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Ferri, M.; Papchenko, K.; Degli Esposti, M.; Tondi, G.; De Angelis, M.G.; Morselli, D.; Fabbri, P. Fully Biobased Polyhydroxyalkanoate/Tannin Films as Multifunctional Materials for Smart Food Packaging Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 28594–28605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Ma, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, Y. Development of PLA-PHB-based biodegradable active packaging and its application to salmon. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2018, 31, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Liu, C.; Li, N.; Niu, L.; Li, X.; Feng, J.; Liu, Z. Eco-friendly Smart Packaging Film with High Thermal Stabilities, Antibacterial Activities, and Food Freshness Monitoring. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2024, 18, 1549–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Qiao, X.; Xie, Y.; Ding, K.; Sun, Y.; Xu, S.; Tang, Q.; Zhang, S.; Guo, J.; Li, H.; Wang, R.; et al. Adaptive response platforms in smart packaging: Endogenous triggering and exogenous activation enable dynamic release of active substances to preserve postharvest fruits and vegetables. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 523, 168723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Ali, S.; Chen, X.; Ajmal Shah, M.; Ali, M.; Zareef, M.; Arslan, M.; Ahmad, S.; Jiao, T.; Li, H.; Chen, Q. The avenue of fruit wastes to worth for synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles and their antimicrobial application against foodborne pathogens: A review. Food Chem. 2021, 359, 129912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Ding, F.; Fu, L. Recent advances in gelatin-cellulose composite films for food packaging applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 321, 146135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Zhang, J.J.; Qin, Z.; Zhang, R.J.; Zhang, J.N.; Huang, X.W.; Zhang, L.D.; Shen, T.T.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B. Advances in Controlled-Release Packaging for Food Applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2025, 24, e70311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Cui, H.Y.; Wu, J.; Li, C.Z.; Lin, L. Improving anti-listeria activity of cheese packaging via nanofiber containing nisin-loaded nanoparticles. Lwt-Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 81, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. El-Mesery, H.S.; Sarpong, F.; Atress, A.S.H. Statistical interpretation of shelf-life indicators of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) in correlation to storage packaging materials and temperature. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2022, 16, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Vasanthan, N.; Kwon, D.; Furman, S. Regioselective synthesis of quaternized cellulose nanocrystals and its antibacterial properties in clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Tetrahedron Lett. 2025, 155, 155420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Zhan, D.; Yu, Q.; Li, M.; Sun, S.; Ding, M.; Mo, Z.; Ma, R.; Jiang, F.; Song, Z.; Wang, Z.; et al. Sustainable biomacromolecules revolutionizing intelligent food packaging: State-of-the-art review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 319, 145381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Asgher, M.; Qamar, S.A.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M.N. Bio-based active food packaging materials: Sustainable alternative to conventional petrochemical-based packaging materials. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Wu, Y.Q.; Zhang, J.J.; Hu, X.T.; Huang, X.W.; Zhang, X.A.; Zou, X.B.; Shi, J.Y. Preparation of edible antibacterial films based on corn starch/carbon nanodots for bioactive food packaging. Food Chem. 2024, 444, 138467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Nguyen, Q.-D.; Tran, T.T.V.; Nguyen, N.-N.; Nguyen, T.-P.; Lien, T.-N. Preparation of gelatin/carboxymethyl cellulose/guar gum edible films enriched with methanolic extracts from shallot wastes and its application in the microbiological control of raw beef. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2023, 37, 101091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Sahota, S.; Soman, V.; Thakur, D.; Poddar, M.K. Biobased plastics and their nanocomposites: Emerging trends in active and intelligent food packaging applications. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 62, 1618–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Zhang, D.; Ivane, N.M.A.; Haruna, S.A.; Zekrumah, M.; Elysé, F.K.R.; Tahir, H.E.; Wang, G.; Wang, C.; Zou, X. Recent trends in the micro-encapsulation of plant-derived compounds and their specific application in meat as antioxidants and antimicrobials. Meat Sci. 2022, 191, 108842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Leite, L.S.F.; Pham, C.; Bilatto, S.; Azeredo, H.M.C.; Cranston, E.D.; Moreira, F.K.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Bras, J. Effect of Tannic Acid and Cellulose Nanocrystals on Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Gelatin Films. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 8539–8549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Miao, W.; Gu, R.; Shi, X.; Zhang, J.; Yu, L.; Xiao, H.; Li, C. Indicative bacterial cellulose films incorporated with curcumin-embedded Pickering emulsions: Preparation, antibacterial performance, and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 495, 153284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Gao, X.; Ye, C.; Ma, H.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.-H.; Zhao, X.; Ho, C.-T. Research Advances in Preparation, Stability, Application, and Possible Risks of Nanoselenium: Focus on Food and Food-Related Fields. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 8731–8745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Ahmadi, A.; Ahmadi, P.; Sani, M.A.; Ehsani, A.; Ghanbarzadeh, B. Functional biocompatible nanocomposite films consisting of selenium and zinc oxide nanoparticles embedded in gelatin/cellulose nanofiber matrices. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 175, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Leite, L.S.F.; Bilatto, S.; Paschoalin, R.T.; Soares, A.C.; Moreira, F.K.V.; Oliveira, O.N.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Bras, J. Eco-friendly gelatin films with rosin-grafted cellulose nanocrystals for antimicrobial packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 2974–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Yang, Z.; Zhai, X.; Zhang, C.; Shi, J.; Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Zou, X.; Gong, Y.; Holmes, M.; Povey, M.; et al. Agar/TiO2/radish anthocyanin/neem essential oil bionanocomposite bilayer films with improved bioactive capability and electrochemical writing property for banana preservation. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 123, 107187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Wang, L.; Chen, C.; Wang, J.; Gardner, D.J.; Tajvidi, M. Cellulose nanofibrils versus cellulose nanocrystals: Comparison of performance in flexible multilayer films for packaging applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 23, 100464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Shan, P.; Wang, K.; Sun, F.; Li, Y.; Sun, L.; Li, H.; Peng, L. Humidity-adjustable functional gelatin hydrogel/ethyl cellulose bilayer films for active food packaging application. Food Chem. 2024, 439, 138202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Cai, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhong, H.; Li, C.; Shi, C.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. Ethyl cellulose/gelatin-carboxymethyl chitosan bilayer films doped with Euryale ferox seed shell polyphenol for cooked meat preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 256, 128286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Ucpinar Durmaz, B.; Ugur Nigiz, F.; Aytac, A. Active packaging films based on poly(butylene succinate) films reinforced with alkaline halloysite nanotubes: Production, properties, and fruit packaging applications. Appl. Clay Sci. 2024, 259, 107517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Pasquier, E.; Mattos, B.D.; Koivula, H.; Khakalo, A.; Belgacem, M.N.; Rojas, O.J.; Bras, J. Multilayers of Renewable Nanostructured Materials with High Oxygen and Water Vapor Barriers for Food Packaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 30236–30245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Dai, J.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. A pH indicator film based on dragon fruit peel pectin/cassava starch and cyanidin/alizarin for monitoring the freshness of pork. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2023, 40, 101215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Sun, F.; Shan, P.; Liu, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhuang, Y.; Ning, D.; Li, H. Gelatin-based multifunctional composite films integrated with dialdehyde carboxymethyl cellulose and coffee leaf extract for active food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 263, 130302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. He, B.; Wang, W.; Song, Y.; Ou, Y.; Zhu, J. Structural and physical properties of carboxymethyl cellulose/gelatin films functionalized with antioxidant of bamboo leaves. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 1649–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Shi, B.; Xie, S.; Huang, D.; Wang, Y. Fully bio-based grease resistant composite coating: Chitosan-Genipin-microfibrillated cellulose for sustainable paper food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 311, 143660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Mujtaba, M.; Lipponen, J.; Ojanen, M.; Puttonen, S.; Vaittinen, H. Trends and challenges in the development of bio-based barrier coating materials for paper/cardboard food packaging; a review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 851, 158328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Dai, J.M.; Hu, W.; Yang, H.Y.; Li, C.Z.; Cui, H.Y.; Li, X.Z.; Lin, L. Controlled release and antibacterial properties of PEO/casein nanofibers loaded with Thymol/β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes in beef preservation. Food Chem. 2022, 382, 132369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Wei, B.X.; Yin, L.Q.; Shi, K.; Zou, J.; Fan, Z.M.; Zhu, S.Y.; Xu, B.G. Design of Starch Coatings to Control the In Vitro Release of Insulin From Chitosan Hydrogels. Starch-Starke 2025, 77, e202400099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Peng, L.J.; Zhu, A.F.; Ahmad, W.; Adade, S.; Chen, Q.M.; Wei, W.Y.; Chen, X.M.; Wei, J.; Jiao, T.H.; Chen, Q.S. A three-channel biosensor based on stimuli-responsive catalytic activity of the Fe3O4@Cu for on-site detection of tetrodotoxin in fish. Food Chem. 2024, 460, 140566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Lin, L.; Wu, J.J.; Li, C.Z.; Chen, X.C.; Cui, H.Y. Fabrication of a dual-response intelligent antibacterial nanofiber and its application in beef preservation. Lwt-Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 154, 112606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Zhang, J.Y.; Hamadou, A.H.; Chen, C.; Xu, B. Encapsulation of phenolic compounds within food-grade carriers and delivery systems by pH-driven method: A systematic review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 4153–4174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Yu, Y.B.; Wu, M.Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, Z.W.; Chen, T.T.; Yan, J.K. Constructing biocompatible carboxylic curdlan-coated zein nanoparticles for curcumin encapsulation. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 108, 106028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Wen, C.T.; Zhang, J.X.; Zhang, H.H.; Duan, Y.Q. New Perspective on Natural Plant Protein-Based Nanocarriers for Bioactive Ingredients Delivery. Foods 2022, 11, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Li, C.; Liu, J.; Li, W.; Liu, Z.; Yang, X.; Liang, B.; Huang, Z.; Qiu, X.; Li, X.; Huang, K.; et al. Biobased Intelligent Food-Packaging Materials with Sustained-Release Antibacterial and Real-Time Monitoring Ability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 37966–37975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Drago, E.; Franco, P.; Campardelli, R.; De Marco, I.; Perego, P. Zein electrospun fibers purification and vanillin impregnation in a one-step supercritical process to produce safe active packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 122, 107082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Zhang, J.J.; Zhang, J.N.; Zhang, R.J.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H.; Zhai, X.D.; Shen, T.T.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B. Preparation of photodynamic-controlled release packaging for pork preservation and its visualization. Food Chem. 2025, 473, 143005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Chen, T.W.; Huang, C.Q.; Ye, C.Z.; Li, L.; Liu, Z.Y.; Huang, W.Q.; Lin, L.; Li, C.Z.; Ye, Y. Controlled release and antibacterial properties of nanofiber membrane loaded with tea saponin. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 191, 115935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Li, C.Z.; Bai, M.; Chen, X.C.; Hu, W.; Cui, H.Y.; Lin, L. Controlled release and antibacterial activity of nanofibers loaded with basil essential oil-encapsulated cationic liposomes against Listeria monocytogenes. Food Biosci. 2022, 46, 101578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Guan, Y.; Li, J.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, K.; Wu, H.; Peng, F.; Gao, H.; Liu, S. Biodegradable xylan/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane based composite films for fruit preservation. Food Chem. 2025, 491, 145209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Xu, J.; Wang, F.; Wang, S.; Xiao, M.; Jiang, F. Thin and biodegradable konjac glucomannan–ethyl cellulose/zein bilayer films with directional moisture regulation for cucumber preservation. Food Hydrocoll. 2026, 174, 112358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. You, P.; Wang, L.; Zhou, N.; Yang, Y.; Pang, J. A pH-intelligent response fish packaging film: Konjac glucomannan/carboxymethyl cellulose/blackcurrant anthocyanin antibacterial composite film. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 204, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Shayan, M.; Gwon, J.; Koo, M.S.; Lee, D.; Adhikari, A.; Wu, Q. pH-responsive cellulose nanomaterial films containing anthocyanins for intelligent and active food packaging. Cellulose 2022, 29, 9731–9751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Khan, J.; Alam, S.; Begeno, T.A.; Du, Z. Anti-bacterial films developed by incorporating shikonin extracted from radix lithospermi and nano-ZnO into chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol for visual monitoring of shrimp freshness. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 260, 129542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Zabidi, N.A.; Nazri, F.; Tawakkal, I.S.M.A.; Basri, M.S.M.; Basha, R.K.; Othman, S.H. Characterization of active and pH-sensitive poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) films containing essential oils and anthocyanin for food packaging application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 212, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Viscusi, G.; Gorrasi, G. Blueberry extract loaded into rice milk/alginate-based hydrogels as pH-sensitive systems to monitor the freshness of minced chicken. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 282, 137210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Priyadarshi, R.; Ezati, P.; Rhim, J.-W. Recent Advances in Intelligent Food Packaging Applications Using Natural Food Colorants. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 1, 124–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Forghani, S.; Zeynali, F.; Almasi, H.; Hamishehkar, H. Accurate Monitoring of Shrimp Freshness via Cornflower Anthocyanins-Loaded Bio-based Nanofiber Mats and Casted Films. J. Polym. Environ. 2023, 31, 4258–4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Li, L.Q.; Xie, S.M.; Zhu, F.Y.; Ning, J.M.; Chen, Q.S.; Zhang, Z.Z. Colorimetric sensor array-based artificial olfactory system for sensing Chinese green tea’s quality: A method of fabrication. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017, 20, 1762–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Ouyang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Q.S.; Guo, Z.M.; Zhao, J.W.; Li, H.H.; Hu, W.W. Rapid and specific sensing of tetracycline in food using a novel upconversion aptasensor. Food Control 2017, 81, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Zhang, J.J.; Zou, X.B.; Zhai, X.D.; Huang, X.W.; Jiang, C.P.; Holmes, M. Preparation of an intelligent pH film based on biodegradable polymers and roselle anthocyanins for monitoring pork freshness. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Yu, S.S.; Huang, X.Y.; Wang, L.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, X.R.; Wang, Y. Characterization of selected Chinese soybean paste based on flavor profiles using HS-SPME-GC/MS, E-nose and E-tongue combined with chemometrics. Food Chem. 2022, 375, 131840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Liu, R.; Ali, S.; Haruna, S.A.; Ouyang, Q.; Li, H.H.; Chen, Q.S. Development of a fluorescence sensing platform for specific and sensitive detection of pathogenic bacteria in food samples. Food Control 2022, 131, 108419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Tripathi, S.; Bisht, S.; Kumar, P.; Mia, M.R.; Gaikwad, K.K. Printable and flexible electronics for smart packaging applications: Status, challenges, and opportunities. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2025, 36, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Kang, W.C.; Lin, H.; Jiang, H.; Adade, S.; Xue, Z.L.; Chen, Q.S. Advanced applications of chemo-responsive dyes based odor imaging technology for fast sensing food quality and safety: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 5145–5172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Ramezani, G.; Assadpour, E.; Zhang, W.; Jafari, S.M. Carbon nanomaterial-based sensors for smart packaging of food products. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025, 232, 121315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Mohammadi, Z.; Jafari, S.M. Detection of food spoilage and adulteration by novel nanomaterial-based sensors. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 286, 102297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Jin, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Shi, H.; Fan, C.; Liu, Y.; Ji, Q.; Sheng, W.; Ma, L.; et al. Real-time food freshness monitoring with AI assisted colorimetric and fluorescent dual-mode paper-based sensors: Harnessing size-dependent effects of mesoporous Cu2O. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 526, 170581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Wu, X.X.; Yuan, Z.C.; Gao, S.J.; Zhang, X.A.; El-Mesery, H.S.; Lu, W.J.; Dai, X.L.; Xu, R.J. Nanostructure-Engineered Optical and Electrochemical Biosensing Toward Food Safety Assurance. Foods 2025, 14, 3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Hassan, M.M.; Zareef, M.; Jiao, T.H.; Liu, S.S.; Xu, Y.; Viswadevarayalu, A.; Li, H.H.; Chen, Q.S. Signal optimized rough silver nanoparticle for rapid SERS sensing of pesticide residues in tea. Food Chem. 2021, 338, 127796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Douaki, A.; Ahmed, M.; Longo, E.; Windisch, G.; Riaz, R.; Inam, S.; Tran, T.N.; Papadopoulou, E.L.; Athanassiou, A.; Boselli, E.; et al. Battery-Free, Stretchable, and Autonomous Smart Packaging. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e2417539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Naik, A.; Lee, H.S.; Herrington, J.; Barandun, G.; Flock, G.; Guder, F.; Gonzalez-Macia, L. Smart Packaging with Disposable NFC-enabled Wireless Gas Sensors for Monitoring Food Spoilage. ACS Sens. 2024, 9, 6789–6799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Narayana, G.P.; Singh, D.K.; Chudasama, M.H.; Deotale, S.; Reddy, N.B.P.; Perumal, T. Intelligent packaging of functional foods: A comprehensive review of its advances, recyclability, and regulatory frameworks. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2025, 32, 102449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Zhu, J.L.; Zou, M.; Wang, S.J.; Guo, Y.T.; Dai, C.H.; Zhou, M.; Ma, H.L.; Guan, X.Y.; Zhang, L.H. Synergistic fungicidal mechanism of radio frequency heating combined with natamycin against Aspergillus niger spores in shiitake mushrooms revealed at cellular and molecular levels. Food Biosci. 2025, 74, 107899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Wang, B.; Deng, J.H.; Jiang, H. Markov Transition Field Combined with Convolutional Neural Network Improved the Predictive Performance of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Models for Determination of Aflatoxin B1 in Maize. Foods 2022, 11, 2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Dong, C.W.; Zhu, H.K.; Wang, J.J.; Yuan, H.B.; Zhao, J.W.; Chen, Q.S. Prediction of black tea fermentation quality indices using NIRS and nonlinear tools. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Feng, Y.; Tang, B.C.; Zhou, D.T.; Zhang, L.H.; Huang, Z.; Cheng, T.; Wang, S.J.; Guan, X.Y.; Lu, X.M. Improving radio-frequency heating uniformity to ensure food safety. J. Food Eng. 2026, 405, 112783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Wu, B.G.; Qiu, C.C.; Guo, Y.T.; Zhang, C.H.; Li, D.; Gao, K.; Ma, Y.J.; Ma, H.L. Comparative Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties, Microstructure, and Antioxidant Activity of Jujube Polysaccharides Subjected to Hot Air, Infrared, Radio Frequency, and Freeze Drying. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Zhang, L.H.; Zhu, J.L.; Wang, S.J.; Chen, L.; Song, Z.H.; Zhang, L.; Ma, H.L. Effect of radio frequency energy combined with natamycin on Aspergillus niger survival and quality of dried shiitake mushroom with different moisture content. Food Control 2025, 170, 111053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Du, L.; Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Qin, Z.; Zhang, N.; Zhai, X.; Shi, J.; Zhang, J.; Shen, T.; Zhang, R.; et al. Application of Smart Packaging in Fruit and Vegetable Preservation: A Review. Foods 2025, 14, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Ge, C.; Zhang, G.J.; Wang, Y.J.; Shao, D.D.; Song, X.J.; Wang, Z.W. Research Status and Development Trends of Artificial Intelligence in Smart Agriculture. Agriculture 2025, 15, 2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Qureshi, W.A.; Gao, J.M.; Elsherbiny, O.; Mosha, A.H.; Tunio, M.H.; Qureshi, J.A. Boosting Aeroponic System Development with Plasma and High-Efficiency Tools: AI and IoT-A Review. Agriculture 2025, 15, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Wang, C.Q.; Gu, C.D.; Zhao, X.; Yu, S.S.; Zhang, X.R.; Xu, F.Y.; Ding, L.J.; Huang, X.Y.; Qian, J. Self-designed portable dual-mode fluorescence device with custom python-based analysis software for rapid detection via dual-color FRET aptasensor with IoT capabilities. Food Chem. 2024, 457, 140190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Mohamed, T.M.K.; Gao, J.M.; Tunio, M. Development and experiment of the intelligent control system for rhizosphere temperature of aeroponic lettuce via the Internet of Things. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2022, 15, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Ding, C.B.; Wang, L.M.; Chen, X.Y.; Yang, H.T.; Huang, L.X.; Song, X.M. A blockchain-based wide-area agricultural machinery resource scheduling system. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2023, 39, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Zhang, Y.Q.; Chen, L.Y.; Battino, M.; Farag, M.A.; Xiao, J.B.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Gao, H.Y.; Jiang, W.B. Blockchain: An emerging novel technology to upgrade the current fresh fruit supply chain. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 124, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Zhu, X.Y.; Chikangaise, P.; Shi, W.D.; Chen, W.H.; Yuan, S.Q. Review of intelligent sprinkler irrigation technologies for remote autonomous system. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2018, 11, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Liu, W.; Zhou, J.H.; Zhang, T.F.; Zhang, P.C.; Yao, M.J.; Li, J.H.; Sun, Z.T.; Ma, G.X.; Chen, X.X.; Hu, J.P. Key Technologies in Intelligent Seeding Machinery for Cereals: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Agriculture 2025, 15, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Shi, Y.Q.; Yang, S.S.; Li, W.T.; Wu, Y.Q.; Luo, W.R. Deep Learning-Driven Intelligent Fluorescent Probes: Advancements in Molecular Design for Accurate Food Safety Detection. Foods 2025, 14, 3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Li, H.H.; Geng, W.H.; Hassan, M.M.; Zuo, M.; Wei, W.Y.; Wu, X.Y.; Ouyang, Q.; Chen, Q.S. Rapid detection of chloramphenicol in food using SERS flexible sensor coupled artificial intelligent tools. Food Control 2021, 128, 108186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. He, X.; Tang, L.; Li, C.; Hao, J.; Huang, R. Eco-friendly Poly(butylene adipate-co-butylene terephthalate)/Poly(lactic acid) packaging films with grape seed extract for extending the shelf life of strawberries and broccoli. Lwt 2025, 227, 117990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Li, H.; Li, C.Z.; Ye, Y.; Cui, H.Y.; Lin, L. Inhibition mechanism of cyclo (L-Phe-L-Pro) on early stage Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and its application on food contact surface. Food Biosci. 2022, 49, 101968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Li, H.; Li, J.; Hua, Z.C.; Aziz, T.; Khojah, E.; Cui, H.Y.; Lin, L. Transcriptomic combined with molecular dynamics simulation analysis of the inhibitory mechanism of clove essential oil against Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and its application on surface of food contact materials. Food Bioprod. Process. 2025, 150, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Yang, L.S.; Wan, S.B.; Guo, J.R.; Chen, Q.M.; Dong, L.; Zhang, D.; Qin, Z.; Gao, H.Y. Effect of Amomum tsaoko essential oil on the inhibition and removal of Cronobacter sakazakii biofilm on food contact materials. Food Biosci. 2025, 71, 107258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Jayakumar, A.; Radoor, S.; Kim, J.T.; Rhim, J.W.; Nandi, D.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Siengchin, S. Recent innovations in bionanocomposites-based food packaging films—A comprehensive review. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 33, 100877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Bilal, M.; Arslan, M.; Khan, S.; Shi, J.Y.; Li, Z.H.; Guo, Y.M.; Sun, X.; Zou, X.B. Sustainable food packaging: Life cycle assessment, recycling innovations, and Pestalotiopsis microspora in biodegradable solutions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 166, 105400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Zhang, H.; Noykaew, P.; Kong, H.; Huang, S.; Tian, H.; Xie, Y.; Yu, Z. Functionalized metal-organic frameworks in smart packaging: Synthesis and application in perishable foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 166, 105395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Zhang, J.J.; Zhang, J.N.; Zhang, L.D.; Qin, Z.; Wang, T.X. Review of Recent Advances in Intelligent and Antibacterial Packaging for Meat Quality and Safety. Foods 2025, 14, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Zhang, J.J.; Huang, X.W.; Zhang, J.N.; Liu, L.; Shi, J.Y.; Muhammad, A.; Zhai, X.D.; Zou, X.B.; Xiao, J.B.; Li, Z.H.; et al. Development of nanofiber indicator with high sensitivity for pork preservation and freshness monitoring. Food Chem. 2022, 381, 132224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Kutsanedzie, F.Y.H.; Guo, Z.M.; Chen, Q.S. Advances in Nondestructive Methods for Meat Quality and Safety Monitoring. Food Rev. Int. 2019, 35, 536–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Jiang, W.; Zhou, X.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, X.; Zhu, J.; Cheng, W. Multifunctional Metal–Organic Frameworks for Enhancing Food Safety and Quality: A Comprehensive Review. Foods 2025, 14, 4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Zhang, H.Y.; Mahunu, G.K.; Castoria, R.; Apaliya, M.T.; Yang, Q.Y. Augmentation of biocontrol agents with physical methods against postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 69, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Zhang, H.Y.; Mahunu, G.K.; Castoria, R.; Yang, Q.Y.; Apaliya, M.T. Recent developments in the enhancement of some postharvest biocontrol agents with unconventional chemicals compounds. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Khan, M.J.; Hafeez, F.; Islam, M.R.; Zhu, C.; Xianyu, Y. Advanced Antibacterial Packaging for Food Preservation Through Multifunctional Metal–Organic Framework Nanocomposite. Small 2025, 21, e2501111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Yang, W.; Liu, S.; Ren, H.; Huang, Y.; Zheng, S.; Li, S.; Ling, Z.; Fan, W.; Tian, Y.; Pan, L.; et al. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)-based materials in food packaging: A review. J. Mater. Sci. 2024, 59, 20157–20175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Prasetya, N.B.A.; Masfufah, F.I.S.; Ngadiwiyana, N.; Yassaroh, Y.; Wulandari, R. pH-sensitive chitosan/graphene oxide films enriched with red cabbage anthocyanins for visual spoilage detection in chicken meat. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 329, 147866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Song, Z.; Ni, W.; Zheng, Y.; Ma, Y.; Cao, Y.; Han, L.; Yu, Q. A polysaccharide smart packaging materials: Anthocyanin microcapsules synergized with nanosilver co-filled gellan gum/sodium alginate film for monitoring chilled mutton freshness. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 368, 124221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Ribeiro, I.S.; Maciel, G.M.; Bortolini, D.G.; Fernandes, I.d.A.A.; Maroldi, W.V.; Pedro, A.C.; Rubio, F.T.V.; Haminiuk, C.W.I. Sustainable innovations in edible films and coatings: An overview. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 143, 104272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Pedro, A.C.; Paniz, O.G.; Fernandes, I.d.A.A.; Bortolini, D.G.; Rubio, F.T.V.; Haminiuk, C.W.I.; Maciel, G.M.; Magalhães, W.L.E. The Importance of Antioxidant Biomaterials in Human Health and Technological Innovation: A Review. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Echegaray, N.; Goksen, G.; Kumar, M.; Sharma, R.; Hassoun, A.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Dar, B.N. A critical review on protein-based smart packaging systems: Understanding the development, characteristics, innovations, and potential applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 64, 8633–8648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Martínez, W.E.C.; Acosta, Y.K.R.; Reyes Acosta, A.V.; de León Gómez, R.E.D.; Patel, A.R.; Verma, D.K.; Aguilar, C.N. Advances in Polylactic acid-based composites as a promising biomaterial for food packaging and biomedical Applications: Reinforcement strategies, functional enhancements, and future research directions. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2025, 45, e01560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Peng, Y.; Sun, Q.C.; Park, Y. The Bioactive Effects of Chicoric Acid As a Functional Food Ingredient. J. Med. Food 2019, 22, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Mintah, B.K.; He, R.H.; Agyekum, A.A.; Dabbour, M.; Golly, M.K.; Ma, H.L. Edible insect protein for food applications: Extraction, composition, and functional properties. J. Food Process Eng. 2020, 43, e13362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Jafarzadeh, S.; Yildiz, Z.; Yildiz, P.; Strachowski, P.; Forough, M.; Esmaeili, Y.; Naebe, M.; Abdollahi, M. Advanced technologies in biodegradable packaging using intelligent sensing to fight food waste. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 261, 129647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Chen, J.; Mu, X.; Tu, C.; Hu, G. Evaluation index system for the implementation of extended producer responsibility system: Chinese beverage paper-based composite packaging manufacturers. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2023, 36, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Mengozzi, A.; Quinteiro, P.; Bot, F.; Dias, M.F.; Reis, F.; Chiavaro, E. Packaging for cured meat: An environmental assessment of plastic multi-material and paper-based solutions. Food Bioprod. Process. 2026, 156, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Shi, J.; Li, T.; Wu, C.; Zhou, D.; Fan, G.; Li, X. Paper-based material with hydrophobic and antimicrobial properties: Advanced packaging materials for food applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2024, 23, e13373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Adibi, A.; Trinh, B.M.; Mekonnen, T.H. Recent progress in sustainable barrier paper coating for food packaging applications. Prog. Org. Coat. 2023, 181, 107566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Perumal, T.; Krebs de Souza, C.; Nihues, T.C.; Jain, P.; Gaikwad, K.K.; Roy, S. A review on biopolymer-based oil and water-resistant functional paper coating for food packaging. Food Biosci. 2025, 63, 105656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Poddar, D.; Goel, G.; Pattanayek, S.K. Paper-Based Biopolymer Seafood Packaging with Integrated Colorimetric Ammonia Detection for Intelligent Barrier Technologies. Langmuir 2025, 41, 21276–21288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Poddar, D.; Pandey, K.; Kim, S.-J.; Yoo, H.M. Development of electrosprayed assisted shellac-MOF particle coated paper for food packaging and its environmental impacts. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2024, 42, e01192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The passive protection provided by traditional fossil-based packaging is contrasted with the core functional nodes of bio-based intelligent packaging, driving the evolution direction towards the next-generation food system: bio-based substrates, active preservation, intelligent components, and intelligent sensing. (The decorative elements and icons in Figure 1 depicting intelligent packaging and active freshness preservation concepts were generated using AI tool (Doubao, Doubao-Seed 2.0)).
Figure 1. The passive protection provided by traditional fossil-based packaging is contrasted with the core functional nodes of bio-based intelligent packaging, driving the evolution direction towards the next-generation food system: bio-based substrates, active preservation, intelligent components, and intelligent sensing. (The decorative elements and icons in Figure 1 depicting intelligent packaging and active freshness preservation concepts were generated using AI tool (Doubao, Doubao-Seed 2.0)).
Materials 19 02393 g001
Figure 2. Classification and common challenges of natural polymers and biopolymers (cellulose from cotton/wood, chitosan from shrimp/crab, starch from corn/yam, animal protein from milk/fish/eggs, plant protein from soy/grains, sodium alginate from seaweed) in smart food packaging: mechanical/barrier trade-off, hygroscopicity, reduced degradability, plastic incompatibility, storage decay, and high cost. All biopolymers shown are derived from natural sources.
Figure 2. Classification and common challenges of natural polymers and biopolymers (cellulose from cotton/wood, chitosan from shrimp/crab, starch from corn/yam, animal protein from milk/fish/eggs, plant protein from soy/grains, sodium alginate from seaweed) in smart food packaging: mechanical/barrier trade-off, hygroscopicity, reduced degradability, plastic incompatibility, storage decay, and high cost. All biopolymers shown are derived from natural sources.
Materials 19 02393 g002
Figure 3. Schematic of the multiscale structure–property relationship in bio-based smart packaging, from molecular chain functional groups and aggregate states (crystalline/amorphous), through macroscopic biomimetic design and micro–nano functional composites, to system-level integration of intelligent functions. (The decorative elements and icons in Figure 3 depicting hierarchical progressive background were generated using AI tool (Doubao)).
Figure 3. Schematic of the multiscale structure–property relationship in bio-based smart packaging, from molecular chain functional groups and aggregate states (crystalline/amorphous), through macroscopic biomimetic design and micro–nano functional composites, to system-level integration of intelligent functions. (The decorative elements and icons in Figure 3 depicting hierarchical progressive background were generated using AI tool (Doubao)).
Materials 19 02393 g003
Figure 4. Functional mechanisms of bio-based smart packaging: baseline barrier (physical blocking, volatile control), active preservation (antioxidant, antimicrobial), controlled release, and smart responses (pH-responsive, temperature-responsive). (The decorative elements and icons in Figure 4 depicting physical barrier and controlled release were generated using AI tool (Doubao)).
Figure 4. Functional mechanisms of bio-based smart packaging: baseline barrier (physical blocking, volatile control), active preservation (antioxidant, antimicrobial), controlled release, and smart responses (pH-responsive, temperature-responsive). (The decorative elements and icons in Figure 4 depicting physical barrier and controlled release were generated using AI tool (Doubao)).
Materials 19 02393 g004
Figure 5. Application scenarios of bio-based smart packaging across major food categories: fresh produce (temperature/humidity sensing, antibacterial, shelf life extension); convenience foods (oxygen barrier, oil/water resistance, microwave compatibility); functional foods (nutrition monitoring, active ingredient release, consumer interaction); and paper-based packaging (biodegradability, printability, mechanical optimization). (The decorative elements and icons in Figure 5 depicting functional food were generated using AI tool (Doubao)).
Figure 5. Application scenarios of bio-based smart packaging across major food categories: fresh produce (temperature/humidity sensing, antibacterial, shelf life extension); convenience foods (oxygen barrier, oil/water resistance, microwave compatibility); functional foods (nutrition monitoring, active ingredient release, consumer interaction); and paper-based packaging (biodegradability, printability, mechanical optimization). (The decorative elements and icons in Figure 5 depicting functional food were generated using AI tool (Doubao)).
Materials 19 02393 g005
Table 2. Improvements and performance of bio-based polyesters smart packaging.
Table 2. Improvements and performance of bio-based polyesters smart packaging.
StrategyModificationAdvantagesRefs.
Nanocomposite materialsCoaxial electrospinning encapsulates cinnamaldehyde (CMA) and tea polyphenols (TPs) within PLA nanofibers.Significantly enhances mechanical and barrier properties; sequential release of TP and CMA achieves optimal synergistic antimicrobial efficacy.[179]
Polymer blending; functional additivesCur acts as a responsive indicator and antioxidant within a PLA/polypropylene carbonate (PPC) matrix.Monitors the freshness of shrimp and other foods; PPC enhances water and oxygen barrier, while Cur provides antioxidant activity.[180]
Functional additivesCaffeic acid and green tea extract are incorporated into PLA as antioxidants.Enhanced thermal oxidation stability; provides intuitive, intelligent indicators of degradation during oxidation.[181]
Functional additivesFormic acid enables the uniform dispersion of hydrophilic tannic acid within poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate) (PHBV) matrix.Tannic acid delivers antioxidant, UV shielding, and high barrier performance; intelligently signals spoilage; extended shelf life.[182]
Plasticizers; functional additivesPLA-PHB matrix is enhanced with glycerol monolaurate (GML) for plasticization and cinnamaldehyde for antimicrobial activity.Excellent mechanical properties and strong antimicrobial activity; preserves freshness.[183]
Layer-by-layer assemblyIntroducing carboxylated cellulose nanofibers as nano-reinforcing phases into PEF.Mechanical and barrier properties significantly outperform pure PEF film; extended shelf life.[169]
Nanocomposite materialsUtilizing PEF as a matrix, nano-TiO2 as a functional additive, and PMDA as a chain extender.Enhances overall performance; UV/blue light shielding and antibacterial; inhibits Ti migration.[175]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.; Qian, H.; Shen, C.; Wu, S. Bio-Based Smart Packaging Materials for Next-Generation Food Systems. Materials 2026, 19, 2393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19112393

AMA Style

Zhang Z, Qian H, Shen C, Wu S. Bio-Based Smart Packaging Materials for Next-Generation Food Systems. Materials. 2026; 19(11):2393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19112393

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Ziao, Haowen Qian, Chun Shen, and Shuping Wu. 2026. "Bio-Based Smart Packaging Materials for Next-Generation Food Systems" Materials 19, no. 11: 2393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19112393

APA Style

Zhang, Z., Qian, H., Shen, C., & Wu, S. (2026). Bio-Based Smart Packaging Materials for Next-Generation Food Systems. Materials, 19(11), 2393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19112393

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop