Analysis of the Influence of the Outlet Slot on the Distribution of the Product as a Method of Assessing the Quality of Jaw Crusher Operation
Highlights
- A measurement system for jaw crusher plate wear assessment is presented.
- The system evaluates wear impact on crushed material characteristics.
- The investigated phenomenon was confirmed by experimental and numerical analyses.
- Combined studies validated the relationship between plate wear and product quality.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Laboratory Stand
2.2. Experimental Methodology


2.3. Product Grain Size, Grain Distribution
| Dimensions of the Sieve [mm] | Residue on Sieve (%) | Mean (%) | Standard Deviation (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 | Test 4 | Test 5 | Test 6 | Test7 | Test 8 | Test 9 | Test 10 | |||
| 0 | 7.57 | 6.97 | 7.74 | 7.04 | 7.27 | 7.55 | 7.26 | 6.91 | 7.14 | 6.84 | 7.36 | 5.9 |
| 1 | 5.64 | 5.34 | 5.88 | 5.34 | 5.54 | 5.82 | 5.74 | 5.34 | 5.50 | 5.04 | 5.59 | 4.9 |
| 2 | 10.38 | 10.07 | 10.62 | 9.83 | 10.52 | 10.58 | 10.55 | 9.84 | 9.97 | 9.38 | 10.33 | 7.9 |
| 4 | 16.50 | 15.25 | 17.61 | 16.29 | 16.08 | 16.72 | 17.19 | 16.20 | 16.50 | 15.92 | 16.41 | 12.8 |
| 6.3 | 16.48 | 14.86 | 15.66 | 16.31 | 15.19 | 15.21 | 15.10 | 14.46 | 16.93 | 14.90 | 15.62 | 14.9 |
| 8 | 20.85 | 21.53 | 20.09 | 23.02 | 22.38 | 20.09 | 19.74 | 21.41 | 21.73 | 21.73 | 21.33 | 19.8 |
| 10 | 18.33 | 19.04 | 17.11 | 16.41 | 17.23 | 17.71 | 18.56 | 18.99 | 16.84 | 18.56 | 17.64 | 17.9 |
| 12.5 | 4.26 | 6.93 | 5.29 | 5.78 | 5.79 | 6.32 | 5.86 | 6.86 | 5.39 | 7.62 | 5.73 | 18.2 |
2.4. Block Diagram of the Methodology Used
3. Results
3.1. Modeling Grain Size Distributions
3.2. Test Results Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Jankovic, A. Comminution and Classification Technologies of Iron Ore. In Iron Ore; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 269–308. ISBN 978-0-12-820226-5. [Google Scholar]
- Vasilyeva, N.; Golyshevskaia, U.; Sniatkova, A. Modeling and Improving the Efficiency of Crushing Equipment. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Güler, Ö.; Çakır, M.C. Enhancing Operational Efficiency in Crushers Through the Use of an Industry 4.0 Based Crusher Control System. Makina Tasarım İmalat Derg. 2024, 22, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mushtruk, M.; Rogovskii, I.; Illiashenko, I.; Melnyk, V.; Melnyk, V. Technological Solutions for Increasing the Resource of Crushers. In Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing VIII; Campilho, R.D., Ivanov, V., Pinto, G.F., Baptista, A., Silva, F.J.G., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 47–59. ISBN 978-3-031-95217-3. [Google Scholar]
- Köken, E.; Lawal, A.I. Investigating the Effects of Feeding Properties on Rock Breakage by Jaw Crusher Using Response Surface Method and Gene Expression Programming. Adv. Powder Technol. 2021, 32, 1521–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guimaraes, M.S.; Valdes, J.R.; Palomino, A.M.; Santamarina, J.C. Aggregate Production: Fines Generation during Rock Crushing. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2007, 81, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stempkowska, A.; Gawenda, T.; Smoroń, K. The Diatomite Grinding Technology Concept for the Protection of Diatomite Shells and the Control of Product Grading. Materials 2024, 17, 3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johansson, M.; Evertsson, M. A Time Dynamic Model of a High Pressure Grinding Rolls Crusher. Miner. Eng. 2019, 132, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamashita, A.S.; Thivierge, A.; Euzébio, T.A.M. A Review of Modeling and Control Strategies for Cone Crushers in the Mineral Processing and Quarrying Industries. Miner. Eng. 2021, 170, 107036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciężkowski, P.; Maciejewski, J.; Bąk, S.; Kwaśniewski, A. Application of The New Shape Crushing Plate in Machine Crushing Processes. Stud. Geotech. Mech. 2020, 42, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Legendre, D.; Zevenhoven, R. Assessing the Energy Efficiency of a Jaw Crusher. Energy 2014, 74, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tromans, D. Mineral Comminution: Energy Efficiency Considerations. Miner. Eng. 2008, 21, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Q.; Guo, Q.; Pan, Y.; Zhu, C.; Wei, Y. Experimental Research on Energy-Size Distribution Model of Coal Particle Bed Comminution. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2020, 56, 772–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruszelnicka, W.; Opielak, M.; Ambrose, K.; Pukalskas, S.; Tomporowski, A.; Walichnowska, P. Energy-Dependent Particle Size Distribution Models for Multi-Disc Mill. Materials 2022, 15, 6067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nedeljković, M.; Kamat, A.; Holthuizen, P.; Tošić, N.; Schlangen, E.; Fennis, S. Energy Consumption of a Laboratory Jaw Crusher during Normal and High Strength Concrete Recycling. Miner. Eng. 2023, 204, 108421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terva, J.; Kuokkala, V.-T.; Valtonen, K.; Siitonen, P. Effects of Compression and Sliding on the Wear and Energy Consumption in Mineral Crushing. Wear 2018, 398–399, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tosun, A.; Konak, G. Development of a Model Estimating Energy Consumption Values of Primary and Secondary Crushers. Arab. J. Geosci. 2015, 8, 1133–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikolov, S. A Performance Model for Impact Crushers. Miner. Eng. 2002, 15, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciężkowski, P.; Maciejewski, J. Study on Load Distribution in the Working Space of Lever Crusher. In Advances in Technical Diagnostics; Timofiejczuk, A., Łazarz, B.E., Chaari, F., Burdzik, R., Eds.; Applied Condition Monitoring; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 10, pp. 253–265. ISBN 978-3-319-62041-1. [Google Scholar]
- Dowding, C.H.; Lytwynyshyn, G. Point Load—Deformation Relationships and Design of Jaw Crusher Plates. Powder Technol. 1982, 31, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogdanovská, G.; Benková, M.; Bednárová, D. Analysis of Causes and Consequences of Failures in Process of Andesite Crushing by Jaw Crusher. Processes 2025, 13, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diógenes, L.M.; Bessa, I.S.; Castelo Branco, V.T.F.; Mahmoud, E. The Influence of Stone Crushing Processes on Aggregate Shape Properties. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2019, 20, 877–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Köken, E. Evaluation of Size Reduction Process for Rock Aggregates in Cone Crusher. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2020, 79, 4933–4946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miskovsky, K.; Taborda Duarte, M.; Kou, S.Q.; Lindqvist, P.-A. Influence of the Mineralogical Composition and Textural Properties on the Quality of Coarse Aggregates. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2004, 13, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heikkilä, P. Improving the Quality of Crushed Rock Aggregate; Acta polytechnica Scandinavica Ci; Finnish Academy of Technology: Espoo, Finland, 1991; ISBN 978-951-666-327-5. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, L.; Gu, W.; Song, T.; Qiu, F. Experimental Investigation of Particle Size Alteration and the Selective Crushing Phenomenon of Gangue during the Jaw Crushing Process. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitrev, R.; Savov, S. A Theoretical-Experimental Approach for Elasto-Damping Parameters Estimation of Cone Inertial Crusher Mounting. Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Eng. 2017, 15, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Numbi, B.P.; Zhang, J.; Xia, X. Optimal Energy Management for a Jaw Crushing Process in Deep Mines. Energy 2014, 68, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, H.; Yang, B.; Wu, D.; Gao, X.; Fei, X. Applications of Crushing and Grinding-Based Treatments for Typical Metal-Containing Solid Wastes: Detoxification and Resource Recovery Potentials. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 314, 120034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazak, I.; Sidorov, D. Improving the Design of a Jaw Shutter to Increase the Efficiency of Material Crushing. Technol. Audit. Prod. Reserves 2024, 2, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, C.; Gou, D.; Li, C.; Yu, G.; An, X.; Liu, J.; Long, Y. Wear Evolution of the Mantle Liner and Its Effect on the Crushing Characteristics of a Lab-Scale Cone Crusher: A Numerical Study. Adv. Powder Technol. 2024, 35, 104614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bengtsson, M. Empirical Energy and Size Distribution Model for Predicting Single Particle Breakage in Compression Crushing. Miner. Eng. 2021, 171, 107094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leon, L.G.; Bengtsson, M.; Evertsson, M. Analysis of the Concentration in Rare Metal Ores during Compression Crushing. Miner. Eng. 2018, 120, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kravchenko, O.; Bazhynov, O.; Dižo, J.; Haiek, Y.; Blatnický, M. Cleaning Dusty Air Flow with a Rotary Cyclone from Dispersed Particles. Komunikácie 2025, 27, B21–B29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farzanegan, A.; Ghalaei, A.E. Simulation-Assisted Evaluation of Grinding Circuit Flowsheet Design Alternatives: Aghdarreh Gold Ore Processing Plant. Arch. Min. Sci. 2015, 60, 123–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Wills, B.A.; Finch, J.A. Wills’ Mineral Processing Technology: An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; ISBN 9780080479477. [Google Scholar]
- Fuzhen, Y. Jaw Crusher. In The ECPH Encyclopedia of Mining and Metallurgy; Kuangdi, X., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2024; pp. 982–985. ISBN 978-981-99-2085-3. [Google Scholar]
- Okechukwu, C.; Dahunsi, O.; Oke, P.; Oladele, I.; Dauda, M.; Olaleye, B. Design and Operations Challenges of a Single Toggle Jaw Crusher: A Review. Nig. J. Tech. 2017, 36, 814–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurway, S.; Gadge, P. Stone Crushers: A Technical Review on Significant Part of Construction Industry. In Recent Advances in Civil Engineering; Kumar, P.G., Subramaniam, K.V.L., Santhakumar, S.M., Satyam, D.N., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2022; Volume 233, pp. 365–383. ISBN 978-981-19-0188-1. [Google Scholar]
- Macías-García, A.; Cuerda-Correa, E.M.; Díaz-Díez, M.A. Application of the Rosin–Rammler and Gates–Gaudin–Schuhmann Models to the Particle Size Distribution Analysis of Agglomerated Cork. Mater. Charact. 2004, 52, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tino, A.A.A.; Barrios, G.K.P.; Tavares, L.M. Modeling Iron Ore Breakage with the Tavares Model and DEM Simulation of a Laboratory Jaw Crusher. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2025, 48, e70082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez, V.A.; Alves, L.P.; Barrios, G.K.P.; Tavares, L.M. Simulation of Industrial Jaw Crushers in Primary Size Reduction of Iron Ore Using DEM. Miner. Eng. 2026, 237, 110034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciężkowski, P.; Bąk, S.; Caban, J.; Seńko, J.; Waśkowicz, M.A. Preliminary Research to Assess the Possibility of Grinding Selected Plastics Using Crushers. Polymers 2024, 16, 3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duthoit, V. Crushing and Grinding Balkema. In Aggregates; Primel, L., Tourenq, C., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000; Chapter 9. [Google Scholar]
- DeDiemar, R.B. New Concepts in Jaw Crusher Technology. Miner. Eng. 1990, 3, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johansson, M.; Bengtsson, M.; Evertsson, M.; Hulthén, E. A Fundamental Model of an Industrial-Scale Jaw Crusher. Miner. Eng. 2017, 105, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machado, P.C.; Pereira, J.I.; Penagos, J.J.; Yonamine, T.; Sinatora, A. The Effect of In-Service Work Hardening and Crystallographic Orientation on the Micro-Scratch Wear of Hadfield Steel. Wear 2017, 376–377, 1064–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, R.; Gupta, T.; Katayama, A. Finite Element Study on the Wear Performance of Movable Jaw Plates of Jaw Crushers after a Symmetrical Laser Cladding Path. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Z.C.; Ning, J.P.; Wang, J.; Zheng, K.H. Microstructure and Wear Properties of TiC-Strengthened High-Manganese Steel Matrix Composites Fabricated by Hypereutectic Solidification. Wear 2019, 432–433, 202970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machado, P.C.; Pereira, J.I.; Sinatora, A. Abrasion Wear of Austenitic Manganese Steels via Jaw Crusher Test. Wear 2021, 476, 203726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machado, P.C.; Pereira, J.I.; Sinatora, A. Subsurface Microstructural Dynamic Recrystallization in Multiscale Abrasive Wear. Wear 2021, 486–487, 204111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, A.; Yan, D.S. Mineral Processing Design and Operations: An Introduction, 7th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; ISBN 978-0-444-63589-1. [Google Scholar]
- Metso. Basics in Mineral Processing Handbook, 11th ed.; Metso: Helsinki, Finland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Berrocal, K. Crushing and Screening Handbook; Metso: Helsinki, Finland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Lindqvist, M.; Evertsson, C.M. Liner Wear in Jaw Crushers. Miner. Eng. 2003, 16, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altun, O.; Altun, D.; Toprak, N.A.; Tipici, C.V.; Dağtarla, Z.; Savaş, E. Crushing Operation from a Mineralogical Class Perspective: Insights from Comminution Parameters, Crusher Performance, and Liner Wear. Miner. Eng. 2026, 239, 110100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coloma, L.; Sucasaca, R.; Apaza, J.L.; Lester, Y.S.V.; Mendoza Quispe, A.J.; Diaz Arapa, C.A. Investigation Effect of Copper Particle Size and Jaw Geometric Configurations on Jaw Crusher Wear. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 2026, 20, 181–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Fan, X.; He, Q. Prediction of Cone Crusher Performance Considering Liner Wear. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Ren, T.; Cheng, J. Constant Wear Criterion for Optimization of the Crushing Chamber of Cone Crushers. Minerals 2022, 12, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quartey, G.; Simons, A.; Akintunde, M.A. The Impact of Passive Displacement Fixed Jaw Design on Liner Wear in Single Toggle Jaw Crushers. Eur. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2025, 3, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jaw Crusher Wear Liner Lifespan in High-Abrasion Applications. Available online: https://www.miningcrusherparts.com/blog/jaw-crusher-wear-liner-lifespan-in-high-abrasion-applications/?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 20 March 2026).
- Brzeziński, K.; Ciężkowski, P.; Bąk, S. Tricking the Fractal Nature of Granular Materials Subjected to Crushing. Powder Technol. 2023, 425, 118601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciężkowski, P.; Maciejewski, J.; Bąk, S. Analysis of Energy Consumption of Crushing Processes—Comparison of One-Stage and Two-Stage Processes. Stud. Geotech. Mech. 2017, 39, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- CEN-PREN 13043; Aggregates for Bituminous Mixtures and Surface Treatments for Roads, Airfields and Other Trafficked Areas. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2015.
- Fladvad, M.; Onnela, T. Influence of Jaw Crusher Parameters on the Quality of Primary Crushed Aggregates. Miner. Eng. 2020, 151, 106338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernlund, J.M.R. 3-D Image Analysis Size and Shape Method Applied to the Evaluation of the Los Angeles Test. Eng. Geol. 2005, 77, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofer, V.; Bach, H.; Latal, C.; Neubauer, A.-C. Impact of Geometric and Petrographic Characteristics on the Variability of LA Test Values for Railway Ballast. Math. Geosci. 2013, 45, 727–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajan, B.; Singh, D. Comparison of Shape Parameters and Laboratory Performance of Coarse Aggregates Produced from Different Types of Crushing Operations. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2017, 29, 04017044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajan, B.; Singh, D. Quantify Effects of Stage Crushing on Dimensional Distribution of Basaltic Aggregates Using Image Technique. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 2019, 12, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajan, B.; Singh, D. An Image-Based Approach to Capture Influence of Production Mechanism on Aggregate Dimension Distribution and Breakage Potential. Adv. Civ. Eng. Matls. 2020, 9, 20190197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Archard, J.F. Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 1953, 24, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deepak, B.B.V.L.; Bahubalendruni, M.V.A.R. Numerical Analysis for Force Distribution along the Swing Jaw Plate of a Single Toggle Jaw Crusher. World J. Eng. 2017, 14, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosnegutu, E.; Barsan, N.; Chitimus, D.; Ciubotariu, V.; Bibire, L.; Mirilă, D.; Jasiński, M.; Sporea, N.; Petre, I.C. Kinematic Analysis of the Jaw Crusher Drive Mechanism: A Different Mathematical Approach. Processes 2025, 13, 2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pershin, G.D.; Pshenichnaya, E.G.; Pytalev, I.A.; Kurochkin, A.I. Kinematic and Technological Possibilities of Enhancing Efficiency of Jaw Crushers in Mining Industry. Process. Complex Usage Miner. Raw Mater. 2025, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guler, O.; Çakır, M.C. Development of a New Generation High Crushing Capacity Jaw Crusher with an Automatically Adjusted Closed Side Settings. Eur. J. Res. Dev. 2023, 3, 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wills’ Mineral Processing Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; ISBN 978-0-08-097053-0.
- Duchnowska, M.; Strzałkowski, P.; Bakalarz, A.; Kaźmierczak, U.; Köken, E.; Karwowski, P.; Wolny, M.; Stępień, T. Influence of Basalt Aggregate Crushing Technology on Its Geometrical Properties—Preliminary Studies. Materials 2023, 16, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Žídek, M.; Nykles, F.; Sýkorová, V.; Vaněk, F. Effect of Changing Jaw Crusher Parameters on Granulometry and Static Angle of Repose of Crushed Aggregate. GeoSci. Eng. 2023, 69, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mineral Comminution Circuits: Their Operation and Optimisation; Napier-Munn, T.J., Ed.; JKMRC Monograph Series in Mining and Mineral Processing; Repr. with minor corr.; Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre: Indooroopilly, QLD, Australia, 2005; ISBN 978-0-646-28861-1.
- Zhang, X. Prediction of Productivity of Gyratory Crusher Based on Machine Learning Method. In Advanced Manufacturing and Automation XIV; Wang, Y., Yu, T., Wang, K., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2025; Volume 1364, pp. 496–504. ISBN 978-981-96-2624-3. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, K.; Luo, W.; Zhong, Y.; Ma, L.; Liu, W.; Li, H. Adversarial Spatio-Temporal Learning for Video Deblurring. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2019, 28, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Liang, K.; Loo, B.P.Y. Measuring Dynamic Accessibility by Metro System under Travel Time Uncertainty Based on Smart Card Data. J. Transp. Geogr. 2025, 127, 104294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, T.; Xia, W.; Shu, J.; Sang, C.; Feng, M.; Xu, X. Advances and Challenges in Machine Learning for RNA-Small Molecule Interaction Modeling: Review. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2025, 21, 8615–8633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, W.; Shu, J.; Sang, C.; Wang, K.; Wang, Y.; Sun, T.; Xu, X. The Prediction of RNA-Small-Molecule Ligand Binding Affinity Based on Geometric Deep Learning. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2025, 115, 108367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, C.; Meng, Z.; Yi, J.; Chen, C.Q. Auxetic Metamaterials with Double Re-Entrant Configuration. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2025, 301, 110505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Zeng, L.; Wang, Y.; Liang, H.; Xu, X.; White, M. From Neighborhoods to Streetscapes: Pandemic-Era Shifts in Built-Environment Effects on Pedestrian Mobility. Cities 2026, 170, 106685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Zhu, F.; Zheng, Z.; Ma, J.; Zhou, B. Guardnet: An Imbalance-Aware Graph Neural Network for Fraud Detection. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 2026, 40, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Zeng, L.; Su, Z.; He, X.; Su, Y.; Zhao, R.; Gan, X. Wet-Milling Disposal of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Demolition Waste—A Comparison with Classical Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Adv. Powder Technol. 2020, 31, 3736–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Hao, S.; Cai, G.; Fan, L. Research on Selective Crushing Characteristics of New Tooth Plates for Jaw Crushers. Eng. Res. Express 2026, 8, 045503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EN 933-1:2000; Tests for Geometrical Properties of Aggregates–Part 1: Determination of Particle Size Distribution-Sieving Method. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
- Guo, Q.; Zhou, C.; Wei, Y.; Sun, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C. Real-Time Segmentation and Sorting Method for Molybdenum Ore X-Ray Images Using Multi-Scale Attention SegNet. Measurement 2026, 266, 120428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molina-Gómez, F.; Bulla-Cruz, L.A.; Darghan Contreras, A.E. Profiles Analysis as a Modality of Repeated Measures for Comparing Grain Size Distributions in Granular Bases. Measurement 2019, 146, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuyama, T. Parametric and Non-Parametric Evaluation of Conversion of Number-Based Particle Size Distribution to Mass-Based Distribution. Adv. Powder Technol. 2024, 35, 104594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, V.K. Analysis of Ball Mill Grinding Kinetics for Materials with Uncommon Breakage Characteristics. Adv. Powder Technol. 2025, 36, 104889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Semsari Parapari, P.; Parian, M.; Rosenkranz, J. Breakage Process of Mineral Processing Comminution Machines—An Approach to Liberation. Adv. Powder Technol. 2020, 31, 3669–3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynch, A.J.; Bush, P.D. Mineral Crushing and Grinding Circuits: Their Simulation, Optimisation, Design, and Control; Developments in Mineral Processing; Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; New York, NY, USA, 1977; ISBN 978-0-444-41528-8. [Google Scholar]
- Arellano-Piña, R.; Sanchez-Ramirez, E.A.; Pérez-Garibay, R.; Gutiérrez-Pérez, V.H. Bond’s Work Index Estimation Using Non-Standard Ball Mills. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2023, 59, 172458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, Z.; Patterson, B.R.; Turner, M.E. Modeling Particle Size Distributions by the Weibull Distribution Function. Mater. Charact. 1993, 31, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, C. Verification for Particle Size Distribution of Ultrafine Powders by the SAXS Method. Mater. Charact. 2000, 44, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bond, F.C. Mineral Processing Handbook; SME American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 1985; pp. 16–27. [Google Scholar]
- Stamboltzis, G.A. Modification of Rosin–Rammler and Gates Gaudin–Schuhmann Equations in Repeated Single Fracture of Brittle Materials. Min Metall Ann. 1983, 54, 36–44. [Google Scholar]
- Stamboltzis, G.A. Calculation of Gates–Gaudin–Schuhmann and Rosin–Rammler Parameters from the Size Analysis of the Coarse Part of the Distribution. Min Metall Ann. 1989, 72, 29–38. [Google Scholar]
- Kolmogorov, A.N. On the Representations of Continuous Functions of Many Variables by Superposition of Continuous Functions of One Variable and Addition. Dokl. Akad. Nauk USSR 1957, 114, 953–956. [Google Scholar]
- Bayat, H.; Rastgo, M.; Mansouri Zadeh, M.; Vereecken, H. Particle Size Distribution Models, Their Characteristics and Fitting Capability. J. Hydrol. 2015, 529, 872–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nad, A.; Brożek, M. Application of Three-Parameter Distribution to Approximate the Particle Size Distribution Function of Comminution Products of Dolomitic Type of Copper Ore. Arch. Min. Sci. 2017, 62, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opielak, M. Investigation on the Dependence of a Quern Mill Output on the Size of Grinding Slot and Grain Moisture. Int. Agrophys. 1999, 13, 487–491. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, X.; Huang, C.; Tang, Y.; Fang, C.; Nie, Z.; Huang, Y. Investigation of Heterogeneous Particles on Mechanical Behavior and Crushing Characteristics: Experiment and Numerical Simulation. Adv. Powder Technol. 2025, 36, 104900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; An, X.; Wu, Y. Segregation Behavior of Particles with Gaussian Distributions in the Rotating Drum with Rolling Regime. Adv. Powder Technol. 2023, 34, 103953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zolfaghari, R.; Karamoozian, M. Crushing Analysis of the Industrial Cage Mill and the Laboratory Jaw Crusher. J. Part. Sci. Technol. 2017, 3, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, F. A Review of the Applications of the JK Size-Dependent Breakage Model Part 3: Comminution Equipment Modelling. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 157, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EN 933-3:2012; Tests for Geometrical Properties of Aggregates-Part 3: Determination of Particle Shape-Flakiness Index. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
- Maleki-Moghaddam, M.; Zare, S. Investigating the Chamber Filling Effect on the Jaw Crusher, Cone Crusher and HPGR Performance. Can. Metall. Q. 2025, 64, 1403–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindqvist, M.; Evertsson, C.M. Development of Wear Model for Cone Crushers. Wear 2006, 261, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kivikytö-Reponen, P.; Ala-Kleme, S.; Hellman, J.; Liimatainen, J.; Hannula, S.-P. The Correlation of Material Characteristics and Wear in a Laboratory Scale Cone Crusher. Wear 2009, 267, 568–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terva, J.; Valtonen, K.; Siitonen, P.; Kuokkala, V.-T. Correlation of Wear and Work in Dual Pivoted Jaw Crusher Tests. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2020, 234, 334–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Reference | Scope | Approach | Main Findings | Research Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luo et al. (2019) [49] | Wear-resistant materials | Microstructure analysis | Improved wear resistance using TiC-reinforced composites | No link between wear and crushing product characteristics |
| Machado et al. [47] | Wear mechanisms | Micro-scale tribological tests | Work hardening significantly influences wear behavior | No process-level analysis or PSD consideration |
| Chen et al. [88] | Jaw plate wear | FEM simulation | Surface modification improves wear resistance | No relation between wear and product granulometry |
| Terva et al. [16] | Wear–energy relationship | Instrumented crusher experiments | Wear is proportional to crushing work | No PSD analysis |
| Jiang et al. [31] | Wear evolution in crushers | DEM + Archard model | Wear reduces crusher efficiency and throughput | No direct modeling of PSD or product quality |
| Machado et al. [51] | Wear modeling | Numerical modeling (Archard-based approach) | Wear depends on contact parameters and modeling assumptions | No application to the crushing process or PSD |
| Lindqvist & Evertsson [55] | Liner wear in crushers | Experimental + wear modeling | Wear changes the crusher geometry and liner profile | No analysis of the resulting PSD |
| Machado et al. [50] | Wear in real crushing conditions | Experimental jaw crusher tests | Different wear mechanisms for jaws; higher wear in the stationary jaw | No relationship between wear and PSD or CSS |
| Coloma et al. [57] | Influence of feed size and geometry | DEM–MBD simulation | Optimized particle size and geometry reduce wear by up to 50% | No PSD or product quality analysis |
| Quartey et al. [60] | Crusher design influence on wear | Experimental study | Modified jaw design reduces liner wear by ~88% | No PSD or product granulometry analysis |
| This study | CSS–PSD relationship | Laboratory tests + Lorentzian modeling | Identification of non-sensitive CSS range (~9.23%) | Integrated wear–geometry–PSD analysis |
| Parameters of the Lorentzian Model | Parameters of the Gaussian Model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSS (mm) | A (-) | μ (mm) | σ (mm) | A (-) | μ (mm) | σ (mm) |
| 5.9 | 2.69 | 5.25 | 3.60 | 1.91 | 5.30 | 3.37 |
| 6.5 | 2.69 | 5.45 | 3.61 | 1.92 | 5.48 | 3.38 |
| 7.2 | 2.72 | 5.63 | 3.30 | 1.92 | 5.66 | 3.41 |
| 7.9 | 2.89 | 6.54 | 4.34 | 2.00 | 6.37 | 3.85 |
| 8.5 | 3.09 | 7.33 | 4.90 | 2.10 | 7.04 | 4.27 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ciężkowski, P.; Stankiewicz, J.; Bąk, S.; Chiliński, B.; Caban, J. Analysis of the Influence of the Outlet Slot on the Distribution of the Product as a Method of Assessing the Quality of Jaw Crusher Operation. Materials 2026, 19, 2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19112366
Ciężkowski P, Stankiewicz J, Bąk S, Chiliński B, Caban J. Analysis of the Influence of the Outlet Slot on the Distribution of the Product as a Method of Assessing the Quality of Jaw Crusher Operation. Materials. 2026; 19(11):2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19112366
Chicago/Turabian StyleCiężkowski, Paweł, Jarosław Stankiewicz, Sebastian Bąk, Bogumił Chiliński, and Jacek Caban. 2026. "Analysis of the Influence of the Outlet Slot on the Distribution of the Product as a Method of Assessing the Quality of Jaw Crusher Operation" Materials 19, no. 11: 2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19112366
APA StyleCiężkowski, P., Stankiewicz, J., Bąk, S., Chiliński, B., & Caban, J. (2026). Analysis of the Influence of the Outlet Slot on the Distribution of the Product as a Method of Assessing the Quality of Jaw Crusher Operation. Materials, 19(11), 2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19112366

