Next Article in Journal
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization for Laser Cladding of H13 Die Steel with CFOA
Previous Article in Journal
Erosive Wear Mechanisms of Materials—A Review of Understanding and Progresses
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Nitrogen Alloying on the Microstructure and Properties of Cu-Bearing Antimicrobial Stainless Steel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distinguishing the Contribution of Extracellular Electron Transfer in the Desulfovibrio caledoniensis-Induced Total Corrosion of Q235 Carbon Steel

1
Department of Bioengineering, Qilu University of Technology, Jinan 250353, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Marine Materials, Institute of Oceanology Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
3
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Institute of Marine Corrosion Protection, Guangxi Academy of Sciences, 98 Daling Road, Nanning 530007, China
4
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Qilu University of Technology, Jinan 250353, China
5
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2025, 18(7), 1613; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071613
Submission received: 11 March 2025 / Revised: 24 March 2025 / Accepted: 27 March 2025 / Published: 2 April 2025

Highlights

  • Corrosion current induced by EMIC was distinguished from the total MIC.
  • The quotient of EMIC to total MIC is 27.69 % and 37.68 % in 100% and 1% CS media, respectively.
  • Attached biofilm mainly accounted for MIC and the cathodic current stimulation.

Abstract

:
Microbially influenced corrosion (MIC) in anaerobic environments accounts for many severe failures and losses in different industries. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) represent a typical class of corrosive microorganisms capable of acquiring electrons from steel through extracellular electron transfer processes, thereby inducing severe electrical microbially influenced corrosion (EMIC). Although prior research has underscored the significance of extracellular electron transfer, the contribution of EMIC to the whole MIC has not been comprehensively studied. In this study, Q235 steel coupons were employed in an H-shaped electrochemical cell to conduct electrochemical and coupon immersion experiments, aiming to determine the contribution of EMIC to the overall MIC. The experiments were conducted under two distinct carbon source conditions: 100% carbon source (CS) and 1% CS environments. It was observed that the biotic electrodes exhibited significantly higher cathodic currents, with the most pronounced biological cathodic activity detected in the 100% CS biotic medium. The voltammetric responses of the electrodes before and after changes in the medium confirmed the biocatalytic capability of the attached biofilm in stimulating the cathodic reaction. The proportion of EMIC in MIC was calculated using linear polarization resistance, revealing a trend over time. Additionally, weight loss tests indicated that the contribution of EMIC to the total MIC was approximately 27.69%. Furthermore, the results demonstrated that while the overall corrosion rate was lower in the 1% CS environment, the proportion of EMIC in MIC increased to approximately 37.68%.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) is a major cause of failures in engineering materials. MIC was discovered more than 100 years ago [1]; it is believed to account for ~20% of the corrosion of metals and building materials [2,3,4]. Further, 50% [5] of all pipeline failures and 40% [6] of all pipeline internal corrosion in the gas industry can be attributed to MIC. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are generally considered to be the main originators of MIC in marine facilities, such as harbor-wharf steel piles, seabed pipelines, and oil platforms, which are susceptible to severe corrosion [7]. Owing to their high-intensity and high-toughness properties, Q235 steels are widely employed for the long-distance transportation of oil and gases [8].
Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) represent a typical class of corrosive microorganisms capable of acquiring electrons from steel through extracellular electron transfer processes, thereby inducing severe electrical microbially influenced corrosion (EMIC). In addition, the metabolites of SRB could also attack iron chemically inducing chemical microbially influenced corrosion (CMIC) of steel [9]. Dinh et al. [10] revealed that SRB accelerate the cathodic reaction to promote metal corrosion through metabolites, such as hydrogen sulfide generated by SRB (Fe + H2S → FeS + H2). Since SRB generally consumes organic compounds, the net reaction of CMIC will be expressed as follows [10]:
6 CH 2 O + 4 Fe + 4 S O 4 2 + 2 H + 6 H C O 3 + 4 F e S + 4 H 2 O
During EMIC, the sessile cells in a biofilm employ an energetic metal, such as elemental iron, as an electron donor, which is expected to directly and effectively accelerate the corrosion. The resulting net reaction of direct corrosion is as follows:
4 Fe + S O 4 2 + 4 H 2 O S R B F e S + 3 Fe 2 + + 8 O H
EMIC applies to electrogenic biocorrosion [11], while CMIC can occur in most microorganisms.
The research conducted by Xu Dake’s [4,12] team demonstrated that SRB cell preferentially utilizes an organic carbon as the electron donor when there are sufficient carbon sources (CSs) in the environment. Moreover, Extracellular Electron Transfer (EET) is not required since the oxidation of organic carbon and the reduction in sulfate occur in the bacterial cytoplasm [13]. However, EET is required when Fe is utilized [14], especially when the organic carbon sources in the environment are limited.
The EET depends on an elaborate electron-transfer system to transport electrons across cell walls. The electrons that are obtained via the oxidation of metals or organic carbon were transferred to cytochrome c on the periplasm before they participate in redox reactions [15]. Electrically active SRB cells yielded electrons and accelerated metal corrosion via direct electron transfer (DET) or mediated electron transfer (MET) pathways [16].
DET employs the membrane-bound enzyme complex (mainly cytochrome c) or electrically conductive nanowires of the bacteria for electron transfer. The cytochrome protein contains multiple hemes, and the electrons can jump between the Fe atoms of the adjacent hemes, thereby ensuring that the protein could conduct electrons. Gu et al. [17] proposed the mechanism for the biological cathodic catalysis to reduce sulfate based on bioenergetics. Therein, SRB probably acted as the biocathode in the corrosion process. Further, the formation of putative nanowires was observed on carbon steel in the absence of the CS [18], which was responsible for the acquisition of energy from the carbon steel and the maintenance of the bacterial energy metabolism. Deng et al. [19] demonstrated that Desulfovi brioferrophilus strain IS5 could respire with extracellular solids by the direct uptake of electrons via the outer membrane cytochromes [20]. Moreover, those outer membrane cytochromes were highly expressed on the surface of the cells and nanofilaments to respond to the limitation of the electron donor, indicating that D. brioferrophilus IS5 accelerated the anaerobic corrosion of Fe via direct electron uptake from solid minerals in energy-poor marine.
MET depends on soluble carriers to transport electrons between a biofilm and electrodes. Several studies [21,22,23,24] confirmed the significant role of the electron-transfer media in MIC, indicating that the electron transfer process was the bottleneck of Desulfovibrio vulgaris-induced corrosion. Additionally, more efficient EET was achieved via the addition of electron mediators to the solution [25]. Scott H. Saunders et al. found that [26] demonstrated that the secreted electron mediators could be retained to mediate efficient EET among biofilms, thus enabling the redox cycling of the electron shuttles without losing them in the biofilm.
MIC involves the interaction between materials and microbes; it is accompanied by a series of chemical reactions and the formation of corrosion products [27,28]. However, the mechanisms of MIC vary with different metallic materials, bacterial strains, and environments. The corrosion of carbon steel caused by Desulfovibrio vulgaris (D. vulgaris) is mainly EMIC [29], while CMIC dominates that of copper alloys [30]. The study of corrosion due to Desulfovibrio caledoniensis (D. caledoniensis) revealed that EMIC and CMIC were the most probable corrosion mechanisms of the Al–Zn–In–Cd [31] and 5052 aluminum alloys, respectively [32]. However, only a few studies have reported the proportion of EMIC or CMIC in the MIC of metals.
Thus, summarizing the results of the previous studies, it was assumed that EMIC and CMIC might occur concomitantly throughout the whole MIC process induced by electroactive microorganisms. While EMIC and CMIC play different roles in MIC under different environmental conditions.
This study is aimed at gaining improved insight into the MIC of Q235 steel due to D. caledoniensis, as well as the significance of the attached biofilm on MIC, which encompasses the following aspects: (1) the proportion of EMIC in the whole MIC; (2) the change in the proportion with time, and (3) the change in the proportion when the SRB cells were exposed to different levels of carbon starvation. To distinguish EMIC from CMIC, a 0.22-µm filter membrane was introduced into an H-shaped electrochemical cell to prevent the passage of bacteria while allowing the metabolites to permeate. In this study, the differences in the EMIC ratios of the whole MIC availed new interpretations of the underlying EET mechanisms, as well as the interaction between D. caledoniensis and metal corrosion.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain, Growth Medium, and Culturing Conditions

In this study, the employed D. caledoniensis was obtained from the rust layers of carbon steel [33]. Previous studies demonstrated that a D. caledoniensis biofilm could conduct electrons from a polarized electrode [34,35]. Further, all the utilized solutions and culture media were prepared from analytical-grade chemicals. D. caledoniensis was cultured anaerobically in 100 mL penicillin bottles in a sterile Postgate C (PGC) medium [36], as well as an N2 headspace. The penicillin bottles were sealed and cultured at 30 °C after incubation with full carbon sources (100% CSs) and 1% CSs. In the starvation tests, 1% CSs was achieved by modifying the full medium minus 99% lactates and yeast creams, and the 100% CS condition (full medium) was employed as the control.

2.2. Electrochemical Cell and Bacterial Inoculation

The electrochemical measurements were conducted in the H-shaped electrochemical cell included by two 500 mL bottles (Scheme 1). Each bottle was filled with the PGB medium and accommodated three electrodes. Q235 steel coupons [37] were employed to prepare the working electrode, as previously described [38], while a platinum plate and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) served as the counter and reference electrodes, respectively. A 0.22-µm filter membrane was mounted between the two bottles. The electrochemical cell and electrodes were sterilized before the reactor was assembled. Next, a 1% inoculation of 5-day-old bacteria cell inoculum was injected into one of the bottles containing the H-shaped electrochemical cell, and the initial concentration of the cells was ~106 cells/mL [37]. In this study, four conditions were investigated employing different combinations of CS levels and bacterium additions in the PGB solution: 100% CS with SRB; 100% CS without SRB; 1% CS with SRB; and 1% CS without SRB. The reactor was kept at a constant temperature of 30 °C. After the incubation in different culture media for 15 days, the media were replaced by a sterile, deoxygenated phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-based medium [39].

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), linear polarization resistance (LPR), and LSV were conducted with an electrochemical analyzer Gamry (interface 1000; Warminster, PA, USA). The open-circuit potential (Eocp) shift was monitored and controlled at <5 mV in all the cases before the EIS and LPR measurements [40,41]. The parameters for the measurements were selected, as follows: EIS (frequencies, 105–10−2 Hz; sinusoidal perturbation, 5 mV) and LPR (scan rate, 0.33 mV/s, scanning range: −5 to 5 mV vs. Eocp. After the immersion for 15 days, the LSV was performed over a range of ΔE = −450 mV at a scan rate of 1 mV/s, starting from Eocp.

2.4. Weight Loss Determination

The weight losses of steels in different environments were determined from the difference in weights before and after removing corrosion products, following the standard practice ASTM G1-03 [42]. The corrosion rates were calculated according to the following formula [43]:
V = 8.76 × 10 4 × m ρ A t
where V, Δm, ρ, and A are corrosion rate (mm/y), weight loss (g), coupon density (g/cm3), and exposed coupon area (cm2), respectively, while t refers to the incubation time (h) in this study.

3. Results

3.1. Corrosion of the Q235 Steel in Different Culture Media

The values of the polarization resistance (Rp) were measured via the LPR tests during the 15-day incubation under different conditions. Figure 1 shows the changes in Rp in the culture media with the exposure time. On the first day, the highest Rp was observed in the system of abiotic 100% CS, followed by that biotic 100% CS. The lowest Rp were found in both abiotic and biotic 1% CS system. In the abiotic 100%-CS media, Rp decreased significantly with the exposure time during the incubation, while in the 100%-CS media inoculated with SRB, the Rp fluctuated with immersion time, which may be caused by the SRB metabolic activity and the process of deposition and destruction of corrosion products.
A slight increase on Rp was observed during the first 5 days for the SRB-inoculated coupon in the 1%-CS medium, followed by a decrease and fluctuation in the last 10 days. The Rp in the sterile medium without SRB fluctuated in a small range and generally exhibited an upward trend with time. On day 15 of immersion, the highest Rp was observed for the coupons in the sterile 100%-CS culture medium, and the lowest Rp was observed for the coupons in the SRB-inoculated 1%-CS medium, while the Rp in sterile 1%-CS medium and SRB-inoculated 100%-CS culture were similar. The results demonstrated that the steel in the 1% CS SRB-inoculated solution was more susceptible to MIC compared to that in the 100% CS solution. This finding aligns with previous studies, indicating that under moderate CS starvation conditions, SRB cells may alter their energy acquisition strategy, relying more heavily on electron uptake from steel to sustain survival [12].
EIS was measured in the electrochemical glass cells after the culture media were changed by sterile and deoxygenated PBS, excluding any influence from the depletion of the soluble redox mediators, a lack of other nutrients, and/or pH change in the solution. Thus, the difference between the EIS measurements in the abiotic and biotic environments under the same CS concentration was mainly caused by the attached biofilm. Thus, the role of the attached biofilm in the MIC and electron transfer could be determined by comparing the EIS measurements in the two environments. Moreover, starved SRB-inoculated biofilms were expected to obtain energy from the steel to conserve energy [29]. If the 1%-CS SRB solution having a more severe MIC than that of the 100% case was caused by the more efficient electron uptake by the attached bacterial cells, it would be evident via the smaller magnitude of the impedance, as well as highly efficient electron transfer in the 1% CS than in the 100%-CS SRB media.
Figure 2a shows the Nyquist plots of the Q235 steel in the sterile and deoxygenated PBS solution after immersion in different SRB solutions for 15 days; the experimental data (scatter dot) is consistent with the fitting line (straight line). The impedances, represented by the diameter of the semicircle, were significantly higher in the sterile media than in the SRB-inoculated media under the same concentration of CS, indicating that the biofilm decreased the corrosion resistance. The trend in the corrosion resistance correlated with that before the change in the media. In the sterile media, the impedance magnitude improved with the decreasing CS concentration. This might be caused by the difference in the corrosion deposits or layers that were formed on the surfaces of the steel. Bacterial metabolites might permeate the membrane and participate in the reactions with the electrodes. However, the largest and smallest impedance diameters were obtained for the coupons in the 1%-CS sterile and 100%- CS SRB media, respectively. Since the EIS measurements were conducted in the same PBS solutions, the difference in the impedances was caused by the attached biofilm and corrosion deposits on the surfaces of the electrode. Iron sulfide (FeS) has been reported to mediate electron transfer and induce severe metal corrosion [44] or protect metals from rapid corrosion [45].
The impedance spectra (Figure 2b) were fitted with equivalent electrical circuits employing a two-time constant circuit model [46,47]. Rs is the solution resistance. A constant phase element (Q) was employed instead of capacitance. Y and n are constant phase element parameters. Thus, Qf and Rf represent the capacitance and resistance of the corrosion product and biofilm, respectively; Qdl is the double-layer capacitance; and Rct is the charge-transfer resistance. The electrochemical kinetic parameters are listed in Table 1, and the results demonstrated that the values of Rs in all the electrochemical cells were similar. The abiotic coupons exhibited significantly higher Rct values compared to the coupons containing the SRB biofilm at the same CS concentration, indicating an increased charge transfer between the metal surface and biofilm, thus proving the facilitating effect of the attached biofilm in the MIC and electron transport. Regarding the biotic coupons containing the SRB biofilm, the steels in the 100%-CS medium exhibited a smaller Rct value than that in the 1%-CS medium. Similarly, regarding the abiotic coupons, those in the 100%-CS medium exhibited a much smaller Rct value than 1%-CS media. The difference in the Rct values of the abiotic coupons might correspond to the formation of a conductive ferrous sulfide layer [48].

3.2. Quotient of EMIC in the MIC of the Q235 Steel

The corrosion current density can be obtained via the following empirical formula:
i corr = B R p
where B (mV) is the empirical constant (26 mV) [49].
Regarding the coupons that were exposed in the SRB culture media, the steels suffered chemical attacks from the bacterial metabolites, such as H2S, and the direct uptake of electrons from the metals via the biofilm. Thus, the MIC of the biotic coupons comprised CMIC, EMIC, and the inherent corrosion in the aqueous solution. The current density of the corrosion of the steel in the SRB culture media (Icorr(SRB)) can be defined, as follows:
I c o r r ( S R B ) = I 0 + I c o r r ( C M I C ) + I c o r r ( E M I C )
where I0 represents the inherent corrosion current of the steel in the solution and Icorr(CMIC) and Icorr(EMIC) represent the corrosion currents of the steel due to the CMIC and EMIC mechanisms, respectively.
However, the abiotic and inoculated culture media were separated by the 0.22-µm membrane, which allowed only the passage of the metabolites while blocking that of the bacteria cells. Thus, the corrosion current density of the abiotic coupons comprised CMIC and the inherent corrosion, as expressed via the following equation:
I c o r r no   SRB = I 0 + I corr ( C M I C )
Therefore, a partition coefficient (the quotient) or contribution of EMIC to the whole MIC can be expressed, as follows:
Q ( E E T M I C ) = I c o r r ( EMIC ) I c o r r SRB × 100 % = I c o r r SRB - I c o r r no   SRB I c o r r SRB × 100 %
where Q(EMIC, 100% CS) and Q(EMIC, 1% CS) represent the quotients of Icorr(EMIC) in the total corrosion current (Icorr) at 100% and 1% CS concentrations, respectively.
Figure 3 shows the change in Q(EMIC) at different CS concentrations with time. Q(EMIC) fluctuated with time and varied with the CS concentration of the solution. It was found that the value of Q(EMIC, 100% CS) was higher during the first 5 days and then much smaller in the last few days than Q(EMIC, 100% CS). Q(EMIC, 100% CS) fluctuated and showed a downward trend during the 15-day experiment period. The value of Q(EMIC, 100% CS) was 52.8% on the first day, 32.8% on the third day, and 11.6% on the last day during the experiment period. The results obtained in the 100%-CS SRB culture medium indicated that CMIC was crucial to the total MIC of the metal during the whole 15-day experiment, and its effect increased gradually over time probably due to the accumulation SRB metabolic products. However, for the coupons in the 1%-CS SRB culture medium, Q(EMIC, 1% CS) increased rapidly during the first 9 days, reaching a value of 58.9% on the 9th day, followed by a decline in the last few days of incubation. The results obtained in the 1%-CS SRB solution are attributable to the low concentrations of the cells at the beginning of incubation owing to the low CS concentration, thus causing a slight difference between the corrosion rates in the sterile and bacterial environments. The difference between 1%-CS biotic and abiotic coupons increased with the attachment of SRB cells on steels and its accompanying metabolic activity. The results indicated that the MIC type varied with different CS concentrations and was controlled by the metabolic activity of the bacteria and soluble aqueous environment.

3.3. Weight Loss

The average weight loss data after the 15-day incubation period under different conditions are listed in Figure 4. For the coupons in SRB inoculated media, the weight loss in 1% CS media was much higher (0.039 ± 0.004 mm/y) than that in 100% CS media (0.027 ± 0.003 mm/y) (p-value = 0.001), which was consistent with the previous results [29]. The weight loss results showed a significant difference (p-value = 0.016) between the corrosion rate in 100% CS biotic and abiotic media (0.019 ± 0.003 mm/y). The corrosion rate of specimens in 1% CS biotic medium was 1.60 times higher than that in abiotic medium (p = 0.016). However, there were no significant differences between the coupons in 100% and 1% CS media without SRB inoculation (p-value = 0.075), although the weight loss results showed that the weight loss of coupons in 100% CS (0.019 ± 0.003 mm/y) was lower than that in 1% CS sterile media (0.24 ± 0.004 mm/y). The interesting phenomenon may be caused by the higher yeast concentration of in 100% CS than that in 1% CS solution, as the absorption of yeast on coupon surfaces may inhibited the further corrosion of metal in seawater [50,51].
A 0.22-µm filter membrane was mounted between the abiotic and biotic system to find the difference in corrosion rate between CMIC and EMIC. So, the mean partition coefficient (quotient) or contribution of EMIC to total MIC during the experiment period can be formulated as:
Q m e a n E M I C = V S R B V n o   S R B V S R B × 100 %
where VSRB and Vno SRB are the corrosion rate calculated from weight loss of coupons cultured with and without SRB inoculated, respectively.
The Qmean(EMIC) in 100% and 1% CS media were obtained via Formula (7) and shown in Figure 5. The quotient of EMIC to the total MIC is 27.69% and 37.68% in 100% and 1% CS media, respectively. It is not surprising to find that the Qmean(EMICT) increased when the carbon sources are limited. However, it was interesting to find that EMIC did not dominate in either 100% or 1% CS system.

3.4. Revealing the Cathodic Microbial Activity via LSV

After the incubation in different culture media for 15 days, the electrodes were transferred into the sterilized, deoxygenated PBS solution. Thus, all the measurements were conducted in electrolytes of similar compositions, which excluded the influence of the compositional changes in the electrolyte during the incubation. The contributions of the activity of the attached bacteria or deposited iron sulfides in catalyzing the cathodic current could be distinguished by employing the LSV curves. The LSV measurements were conducted before and after the media change at a selected scan rate (1 mV/s), which was sufficiently slow to ensure that the steady-state of the attached biofilm was achieved [52,53,54].
After transferring the electrodes from the different culture media into sterile PBS solutions, different degrees of differences were observed in the current responses of the cathodic currents. The replacement of the medium removed the planktonic cells and possible electron shuttles when the biofilm that was formed on the electrodes was moved from the SRB media into the PBS solution. Thus, for the SRB-cultured steels, the difference in the cathodic current responses before and after the media change reflected the contributions of the planktonic D. caledoniensis cells and soluble electron transfer mediators to the cathodic currents. Although for the steels that were cultured without SRB, the decreases in the currents before and after the changes in the media reflected the contribution of the soluble electron-transfer mediator, which could penetrate the membrane. This current pattern revealed the contribution of the suspended D. caledoniensis cells and/or soluble electron-transfer agents to the generation of current.
After the culturing in SRB media for 15 days, the electrodes were covered with the biofilm and corrosion products, and there was a distinguishing difference in the cathodic currents of all the coupons before and after the changes in the media, i.e., evident cathodic biological activity (Figure 6) [55]. The current drop was also observed in the cathodic currents in the abiotic environments before and after the replacement of the solution. The current drop in all coupons before and after media change reflected the contribution of MET in catalyzing current production. The current response in the 100%-CS SRB was higher than that in the 1% one when the measurements were conducted in identical electrolyte, indicating the increased electrocatalytic activity. The most significant cathodic current of the electrodes in the 100%-CS SRB medium might be caused by the biological activity of the biofilm, which conducted electrons from the electrode [18]. However, the modest cathodic biological activity in the 1%-CS media might be attributed to the low number of cells caused by the reduced concentration of CS. Since no biofilm was formed on the surface of the electrode in the aseptic environment, the difference in the current response before and after media change could be attributed to the differences in the soluble mediators and corrosion products on the electrodes. The smallest cathodic current was observed in the 1%-CS media, and it could be attributed to the limitation of the CS.
The electrodes that were cultured in the SRB-inoculated media were covered with the biofilm and a black precipitate, whereas those in the abiotic culture medium did not exhibit any biofilm. Here, it was assumed that the contributions of the corrosion products, such as iron sulfide on the surface of the electrode, to the cathode current was negligible compared with that of the biofilm [55]. Thus, the more significant cathodic currents of the biotic electrodes than those of the abiotic electrodes might be attributed to the cathodic biological activity of the attached biofilm (Figure 7). The results demonstrated that the significant differences between the cathodic currents before and after the changes in the media were observed in both the 100%- and 1%-CS media, respectively. These results indicated that the biofilm that was formed on the surface of the electrode in the 100%-CS media might exhibit higher bacterial activity and mediate the cathodic current more efficiently compared with those in the 1% ones. Certainly, the difference in compositions of the precipitates on the surfaces of the electrodes could undoubtedly distinguish their current responses [9,56].

3.5. Corrosion Product Analysis

Figure 8 shows the high resolution XPS spectra of Fe 2p of coupons in different environments. The results showed that FeS and FeOOH were detected in all the coupons, and the FeS was found to be the main corrosion product in all the specimens, which was a typical corrosion product of the SRB-induced corrosion of steels [13]. The Fe 2p spectra of Q235 steel in 100% CS media with SRB was fitted with three peaks, corresponding to FeS2 (707.2 eV), FeS (710.3 eV), and FeOOH (711.8 eV) [57]. For coupons in sterile 1% CS media, the compound of FeSO4 (707.2 eV) was also detected in addition to FeS and FeOOH. However, for the coupons in 100% abiotic and 1% CS biotic media, no other compounds were detected except for FeS and FeOOH. Sulfate was reduced to the sulfur ion and then deposited with ferric ions during SRB metabolic activity. The coupons in 1% CS sterile media seemed to have the lowest content of FeS among all the samples, which may be related to the low H2S concentration and the absence of bacteria.
The pit depths of steel coupons in different environments were analyzed using a CLSM after removing the corrosion product, as shown in Figure 9. The results showed that the pit depths in 1% CS media without SRB, 1% CS media with SRB, 100% CS media without SRB, and 100% CS media with SRB, were 14.01 ± 0.78, 14.304 ± 1.22, 14.49 ± 1.56, and 14.98 ± 1.36 μm, respectively. The surface roughness (Sa) in 1% CS media without SRB, 1% CS media with SRB, 100% CS media without SRB and 100% CS media with SRB, were 2.76, 2.82, 2.68, and 2.88 μm, respectively. There is no significant difference in the pit depth between 1% CS media with or without SRB (p = 0.68), nor is there a significant difference between 100% CS media with or without SRB (p = 0.50). In addition, there is no significant difference in the pit depth between 100% CS and 1% CS media with SRB (p = 0.30).

4. Discussion

MIC proceeds via the interaction between metallic materials, microorganisms, and the environment to facilitate the deterioration of the metal. In this present study, the SRB strain D. caledoniensis demonstrated its ability to conduct electrons from polarized electrodes in previous studies [34,35]. The evolution of hydrogen and oxidation might be crucial pathways for the transfer of the electrons between the SRB biofilm and solid electrode. The analyses of the corrosion rate revealed that the effect of EMIC on steel corrosion varied with the varying environments, as well as the growth of microorganisms.
In this present study, the weight loss and electrochemistry results showed that CMIC dominated in both the 100% and 1% CS SRB solutions. The quotient of EMIC to the total MIC is 27.69% and 37.68% in 100% and 1% CS media, respectively. It is not surprising to find that the Qmean(EMET) increases when the carbon sources are limited. However, it was interesting to find that EMIC did not dominate in either 100% or 1% CS system.
This finding is different from the previous report that EMIC dominated in the MIC by Enning [9]. Here, we need to point that both of the culture media and bacteria strain were largely different between this present study and that of Enning [9]. Firstly, it is well known that the culture media play a very important role MIC. The SRB would use lactate but not iron for energy acquisition according to the thermodynamics [9]. In the study of Enning [9], iron acts as the only electron donors, while in this present study, an abundance of CS was supplied.
There is another point that should be noted that there is an inevitable difference in corrosion rate between that valued via weight loss and electrochemical measurements. In addition, the corrosion rate changed with the immersion time, indicating the Q(EMIC) varied with time accordingly.
There is no significant difference in the pit depth between 1% CS media with or without SRB (p = 0.68), nor is there significant difference between 100% CS media with or without SRB (p = 0.50). This indicated that CMIC played a major role in MIC, so the presence of SRB or not caused a certain but insignificant increase in pitting depth. There is also no significant difference in the pit depth between 100% CS and 1% CS media with SRB (p = 0.30). This result indicated that the CS starvation does increase the corrosion rate significantly, but the pit depth was not enhanced significantly. This indicated that CMIC might be the primary form of corrosion.
The results obtained in the 1%-CS media indicated that CS starvation would increase the EMIC tendency of SRB, which might correspond to the changes in the metabolic patterns [29]. The bioenergetic theory of MIC indicated that the starved SRB biofilms would switch from organic carbon oxidation into iron oxidation, thereby acquiring energy to maintain metabolism [29]. Sherar et al. [18] observed that SRB generated organic filaments and was potentially interconnected via putative bacterial nanowires in the absence of CS, and the authors suspected that such nanowires were related to the direct electron-conducting process, which also promoted the cathode reaction. The analyses of Q(EMIC) in this study revealed that the sessile cells in the biofilms rather than the planktonic ones directly accounted for biocorrosion [46], and the replacement of the medium further confirmed the direct contact between the bacterial cells and electrodes in the electron transport, thus accelerating corrosion.
The contribution of the metabolites to MIC, as well as the stimulation of the cathodic current, was demonstrated by analyzing the results of the abiotic coupons. The effect of the metabolites on MIC might be mainly caused by hydrogen sulfide, which is corrosive, while the stimulation of the cathodic current could be mainly attributed to the soluble mediators in the solution. Microorganisms also secrete several redox compounds during metabolism. These secreted redox mediators are small, diffusible molecules, which act as electron mediators and signaling factors of the metabolic activities of bacteria, as well as biofilm communication [58]. Jian [53] observed that direct electron transfer through the outer membrane, cytochrome c, dominated the mediation of the electron transfer between Shewanella loihica PV-4 biofilms and polarized solid electrodes. However, the biocatalytic current decreased after the media were changed, confirming that the soluble redox mediators transferred the electrons between the biofilms and electrode [59]. In this study, it was demonstrated that the secreted electron mediators have contributed to the cathodic reaction and corrosion of the electrode in the abiotic solution by penetrating the membrane.
The LSV measurements were conducted to reveal the relationship between the biofilm and the production of biocatalytic currents in different environments. A similar trend was observed in the cathodic currents of all the coupons in the biotic environments before and after the media change, which confirmed the biocatalytic ability of the attached biofilm in stimulating the cathodic reaction. In addition, the increased bacterial activity in the 10%-CS SRB than in the 100%-CS SRB corresponded to the analyses of MIC. The higher bacterial activity in a modest CS environment leads to more severe corrosion and higher proportion of EMIC in the whole corrosion. Recent studies corroborated the direct contact between bacterial cells and the electrodes to facilitate electron transfer [60], and indicated that cytochrome c and outer membrane enzymes may be involved in the EET process between electrodes and biofilm [19,20,61,62].
EET pathways of the bacteria and metals varied with the environment [63]. All the conclusions are drawn based on the experimental data obtained in the laboratory using the specified culture medium and the H-chamber system. There are certain assumptions in the experiment. For example, it is assumed that the 0.22 μm membrane is not blocked and that all ions except microbe cells can pass through the membrane freely. There also might be some gene expression and regulation in extracellular membrane enzymes and cytochrome c, which would be explored in the next experiment.

5. Conclusions

D. caledoniensis induced both EMIC and CMIC in Q235 steel. Voltammetric responses revealed that biotic electrodes exhibited significantly higher cathodic currents compared to abiotic electrodes, demonstrating the effective role of attached SRB biofilms in accelerating MIC and enhancing cathodic current. Based on weight loss measurements, EMIC accounted for approximately 27.69% of the total MIC. This proportion varied with the solution environment, increasing to 37.68% when the carbon source concentration in the solution was reduced to 1%. This change was primarily driven by electron transfer facilitated by the biofilm attached to the electrode surface, rather than by metabolites or planktonic cells in the solution. No significant difference in pit depth was observed for Q235 steel in media with or without SRB, nor was pit depth influenced by changes in the carbon source concentration in the solution. The results indicate that D. caledoniensis induces MIC in Q235 steel, promoting corrosion, with CMIC being the primary contributor to MIC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.F. and Y.S.; methodology, F.G.; software, K.F. and G.J.; formal analysis, F.G. and X.Z.; investigation, F.G. and M.J.; resources, M.J. and X.Z.; data curation, J.D.; writing—original draft preparation, K.F. and F.G.; writing—review and editing, K.F. and F.G.; funding acquisition, F.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported financially by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2023MD024), the National Natural Science Fund of China (No. 42476209) and the Youth Science Foundation of Guangxi province (No. 2023GXNSFBA026252).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study did not involve humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

This study did not involve human participants.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gaines, R.H. Bacterial Activity as a Corrosive Influence in the Soil. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1910, 2, 128–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. AlAbbas, F.M.; Williamson, C.; Bhola, S.M.; Spear, J.R.; Olson, D.L.; Mishra, B.; Kakpovbia, A.E. Influence of sulfate reducing bacterial biofilm on corrosion behavior of low-alloy, high-strength steel (API-5L X80). Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2013, 78, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Javaherdashti, R. MIcrobiologically Influenced Corrosion—An Engineering Insight; Springer: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. Xu, D.; Gu, T.; Lovley, D.R. Microbially mediated metal corrosion. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Booth, G.H. Sulphur Bacteria in Relation to Corrosion. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1964, 27, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Graves, J.W.; Sullivan, E.H. Internal corrosion in gas gathering systems and transmission lines. Mater. Prot. 1966, 5, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacobson, G.A. Corrosion at Prudhoe Bay: A lesson on the line. Mater. Perform. 2007, 46, 26–34. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, L.J.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, F.H.; Zhang, J.Q.; Cao, C.N. Study of the X70 pipeline steel corroding in 3.0wt% NaCl solution using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy technique. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 2004, 17, 907–911. [Google Scholar]
  9. Enning, D.; Venzlaff, H.; Garrelfs, J.; Dinh, H.T.; Meyer, V.; Mayrhofer, K.; Hassel, A.W.; Stratmann, M.; Widdel, F. Marine sulfate-reducing bacteria cause serious corrosion of iron under electroconductive biogenic mineral crust. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 14, 1772–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dinh, H.T.; Kuever, J.; Muszmann, M.; Hassel, A.W.; Stratmann, M.; Widdel, F. Iron corrosion by novel anaerobic microorganisms. Nature 2004, 427, 829–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gu, T.; Xu, D. Why Are Some Microbes Corrosive And Some Not? In Proceedings of the CORROSION/2013, Orlando, FL, USA, 17–21 March 2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, Z.; Yang, J.; Guo, H.; Kumseranee, S.; Punpruk, S.; Mohamed, M.E.; Saleh, M.A.; Gu, T. Carbon Source Starvation of a Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium–Elevated MIC Deterioration of Tensile Strength and Strain of X80 Pipeline Steel. Front. Mater. 2021, 8, 794051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Xu, D.; Chen, C.; Li, X.; Jia, R.; Zhang, D.; Sand, W.; Wang, F.; Gu, T. Anaerobic microbiologically influenced corrosion mechanisms interpreted using bioenergetics and bioelectrochemistry: A review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2018, 34, 1713–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jin, Y.; Zhou, E.; Ueki, T.; Zhang, D.; Fan, Y.; Xu, D.; Wang, F.; Lovley, D.R. Accelerated Microbial Corrosion by Magnetite and Electrically Conductive Pili through Direct Fe0-to-Microbe Electron Transfer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202309005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guberman-Pfeffer, M.J.; Dorval Courchesne, N.-M.; Lovley, D.R. Microbial nanowires for sustainable electronics. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2024, 2, 869–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schröder, U. Anodic electron transfer mechanisms in microbial fuel cells and their energy efficiency. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. PCCP 2007, 9, 2619–2629. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gu, T. New Understandings of Biocorrosion Mechanisms and their Classifications. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2012, 4, iii–vi. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sherar, B.W.A.; Power, I.M.; Keech, P.G.; Mitlin, S.; Southam, G.; Shoesmith, D.W. Characterizing the effect of carbon steel exposure in sulfide containing solutions to microbially induced corrosion. Corros. Sci. 2011, 53, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deng, X.; Okamoto, A. Energy Acquisition via Electron Uptake by the Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium Desulfovibrio ferrophilus IS5. J. Jpn. Soc. Extrem. 2018, 16, 67–75. [Google Scholar]
  20. Deng, X.; Dohmae, N.; Nealson, K.H.; Hashimoto, K.; Okamoto, A. Multi-heme cytochromes provide a pathway for survival in energy-limited environments. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaao5682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Costa, N.L.; Clarke, T.A.; Philipp, L.-A.; Gescher, J.; Louro, R.O.; Paquete, C.M. Electron transfer process in microbial electrochemical technologies: The role of cell-surface exposed conductive proteins. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 255, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jia, R.; Yang, D.; Abd Rahman, H.B.; Gu, T. Laboratory testing of enhanced biocide mitigation of an oilfield biofilm and its microbiologically influenced corrosion of carbon steel in the presence of oilfield chemicals. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 125, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, D.; Liu, J.; Jia, R.; Dou, W.; Kumseranee, S.; Punpruk, S.; Li, X.; Gu, T. Distinguishing two different microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) mechanisms using an electron mediator and hydrogen evolution detection. Corros. Sci. 2020, 177, 108993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, P.; Xu, D.; Li, Y.; Yang, K.; Gu, T. Electron mediators accelerate the microbiologically influenced corrosion of 304 stainless steel by the Desulfovibrio vulgaris biofilm. Bioelectrochemistry 2015, 101, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, H.; Xu, D.; Li, Y.; Feng, H.; Liu, z.; Li, X.; Gu, T.; Yang, K. Extracellular Electron Transfer Is a Bottleneck in the Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion of C1018 Carbon Steel by the Biofilm of Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136183. [Google Scholar]
  26. Saunders, S.H.; Tse, E.C.M.; Yates, M.D.; Otero, F.J.; Trammell, S.A.; Stemp, E.D.A.; Barton, J.K.; Tender, L.M.; Newman, D.K. Extracellular DNA Promotes Efficient Extracellular Electron Transfer by Pyocyanin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Cell 2020, 182, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, Y.; Xu, D.; Huang, L.; Lou, Y.; Muhadesi, J.; Qian, H.; Zhou, E.; Wang, B.; Li, X.; Jiang, Z.; et al. Responses of soil microbiome to steel corrosion. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2021, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tang, H.; Yang, C.; Ueki, T.; Pittman, C.C.; Xu, D.; Woodard, T.L.; Holmes, D.E.; Gu, T.; Wang, F.; Lovley, D.R. Stainless steel corrosion via direct iron-to-microbe electron transfer by Geobacter species. ISME J. 2021, 15, 3084–3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, D.; Gu, T. Carbon source starvation triggered more aggressive corrosion against carbon steel by the Desulfovibrio vulgaris biofilm. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2014, 91, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dou, W.; Jia, R.; Jin, P.; Liu, J.; Chen, S.; Gu, T. Investigation of the mechanism and characteristics of copper corrosion by sulfate reducing bacteria. Corros. Sci. 2018, 144, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guan, F.; Duan, J.; Zhai, X.; Wang, N.; Zhang, J.; Lu, D.; Hou, B. Interaction between sulfate-reducing bacteria and aluminum alloys—Corrosion mechanisms of 5052 and Al-Zn-In-Cd aluminum alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 36, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guan, F.; Zhai, X.; Duan, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, K.; Hou, B. Influence of sulfate-reducing bacteria on the corrosion behavior of 5052 aluminum alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 316, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Duan, J.; Wu, S.; Zhang, X.; Huang, G.; Du, M.; Hou, B. Corrosion of carbon steel influenced by anaerobic biofilm in natural seawater. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 54, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yu, L.; Duan, J.; Du, X.; Huang, Y.; Hou, B. Accelerated anaerobic corrosion of electroactive sulfate-reducing bacteria by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and chronoamperometry. Electrochem. Commun. 2013, 26, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yu, L.; Duan, J.; Zhao, W.; Huang, Y.; Hou, B. Characteristics of hydrogen evolution and oxidation catalyzed by Desulfovibrio caledoniensis biofilm on pyrolytic graphite electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 9041–9047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Postgate, J. The Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: London, UK, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  37. Guan, F.; Liu, Z.; Dong, X.; Zhai, X.; Zhang, B.; Duan, J.; Wang, N.; Gao, Y.; Yang, L.; Hou, B. Synergistic effect of carbon starvation and exogenous redox mediators on corrosion of X70 pipeline steel induced by Desulfovibrio singaporenus. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 788, 147573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Guan, F.; Zhai, X.; Duan, J.; Zhang, M.; Hou, B. Influence of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria on the Corrosion Behavior of High Strength Steel EQ70 under Cathodic Polarization. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guan, F.; Yuan, X.; Duan, J.; Zhai, X.; Hou, B. Phenazine enables the anaerobic respiration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa via electron transfer with a polarised graphite electrode. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2019, 137, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, Y.; Moloney, J. Electrochemical Corrosion Rate Measurement Under Iron Sulfide Deposit. Corrosion 2016, 72, 704–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, Z.; Wang, W.; Guo, N.; Zeng, Z.; Liu, T.; Wang, X. Molybdenum-mediated chemotaxis of Pseudoalteromonas lipolytica enhances biofilm-induced mineralization on low alloy steel surface. Corros. Sci. 2019, 159, 108123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. ASTMG1-03; Standard Practice for Preparing, Cleaning, and Evaluating Corrosion Test Specimens. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2003.
  43. Liu, H.; Gu, T.; Lv, Y.; Asif, M.; Xiong, F.; Zhang, G.; Liu, H. Corrosion inhibition and anti-bacterial efficacy of benzalkonium chloride in artificial CO2-saturated oilfield produced water. Corros. Sci. 2017, 117, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hamilton, W.A. Microbially Influenced Corrosion as a Model System for the Study of Metal Microbe Interactions: A Unifying Electron Transfer Hypothesis. Biofouling 2003, 19, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, D.; Yang, C.; Saleh, M.A.; Alotaibi, M.D.; Mohamed, M.E.; Xu, D.; Gu, T. Conductive magnetite nanoparticles considerably accelerated carbon steel corrosion by electroactive Desulfovibrio vulgaris biofilm. Corros. Sci. 2022, 205, 110440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jia, R.; Tan, J.L.; Jin, P.; Blackwood, D.J.; Xu, D.; Gu, T. Effects of biogenic H2S on the microbiologically influenced corrosion of C1018 carbon steel by sulfate reducing Desulfovibrio vulgaris biofilm. Corros. Sci. 2018, 130, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. San, N.O.; Nazır, H.; Dönmez, G. Microbially influenced corrosion and inhibition of nickel–zinc and nickel–copper coatings by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Corros. Sci. 2014, 79, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Deng, X.; Dohmae, N.; Kaksonen, A.H.; Okamoto, A. Biogenic Iron Sulfide Nanoparticles to Enable Extracellular Electron Uptake in Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 5995–5999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cao, C.; Zhang, J. An Introduction of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Science; Science: Beijing, China, 2002; pp. 86–106. [Google Scholar]
  50. Little, B.J.; Lee, J.S.; Ray, R.I. The influence of marine biofilms on corrosion: A concise review. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 54, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Peme, T.; Olasunkanmi, L.O.; Bahadur, I.; Adekunle, A.S.; Kabanda, M.M.; Ebenso, E.E. Adsorption and Corrosion Inhibition Studies of Some Selected Dyes as Corrosion Inhibitors for Mild Steel in Acidic Medium: Gravimetric, Electrochemical, Quantum Chemical Studies and Synergistic Effect with Iodide Ions. Molecules 2015, 20, 16004–16029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jain, A.; Gazzola, G.; Panzera, A.; Zanoni, M.; Marsili, E. Visible spectroelectrochemical characterization of Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms on optically transparent indium tin oxide electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 10776–10785. [Google Scholar]
  53. Jain, A.; Zhang, X.; Pastorella, G.; Connolly, J.O.; Barry, N.; Woolley, R.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Marsili, E. Electron transfer mechanism in Shewanella loihica PV-4 biofilms formed at graphite electrode. Bioelectrochemistry 2012, 87, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Marsili, E.; Rollefson, J.B.; Baron, D.B.; Hozalski, R.M.; Bond, D.R. Microbial Biofilm Voltammetry: Direct Electrochemical Characterization of Catalytic Electrode-Attached Biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 7329–7337. [Google Scholar]
  55. Venzlaff, H.; Enning, D.; Srinivasan, J.; Mayrhofer, K.J.J.; Hassel, A.W.; Widdel, F.; Stratmann, M. Accelerated cathodic reaction in microbial corrosion of iron due to direct electron uptake by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Corros. Sci. 2013, 66, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Murugan, M.; Miran, W.; Masuda, T.; Lee, D.S.; Okamoto, A. Biosynthesized Iron Sulfide Nanocluster Enhanced Anodic Current Generation by Sulfate Reducing Bacteria in Microbial Fuel Cells. ChemElectroChem 2018, 5, 4015–4020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yuan, S.; Liang, B.; Zhao, Y.; Pehkonen, S.O. Surface chemistry and corrosion behaviour of 304 stainless steel in simulated seawater containing inorganic sulphide and sulphate-reducing bacteria. Corros. Sci. 2013, 74, 353–366. [Google Scholar]
  58. Dietrich, L.E.P.; Price-Whelan, A.; Petersen, A.; Whiteley, M.; Newman, D.K. The phenazine pyocyanin is a terminal signalling factor in the quorum sensing network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 61, 1308–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jain, A. Extracellular electron transfer mechanism in Shewanella loihica PV-4 biofilms formed at indium tin oxide and graphite electrodes. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 1778. [Google Scholar]
  60. Cordas, C.M.; Guerra, L.T.; Xavier, C.; Moura, J.J.G. Electroactive biofilms of sulphate reducing bacteria. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 54, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Beese-Vasbender, P.F.; Grote, J.-P.; Garrelfs, J.; Stratmann, M.; Mayrhofer, K.J.J. Selective microbial electrosynthesis of methane by a pure culture of a marine lithoautotrophic archaeon. Bioelectrochemistry 2015, 102, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rosenbaum, M.; Aulenta, F.; Villano, M.; Angenent, L.T. Cathodes as electron donors for microbial metabolism: Which extracellular electron transfer mechanisms are involved? Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Peng, L.; Zhang, X.; Yin, J.; Xu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, D.; Li, Z. Geobacter sulfurreducens adapts to low electrode potential for extracellular electron transfer. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 191, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of the H-shaped electrochemical cell. CE is Counter Electrode, WE is Working Electrode, RE is Reference Electrode. The balls are metabolites and the zeppelins are SRB cells.
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of the H-shaped electrochemical cell. CE is Counter Electrode, WE is Working Electrode, RE is Reference Electrode. The balls are metabolites and the zeppelins are SRB cells.
Materials 18 01613 sch001
Figure 1. Temporal variation of Rp values for Q235 steel in different SRB environments under different carbon source concentrations (100% CS and 1% CS). (The EIS tests were performed independently in duplicates, and the error bars represent the standard deviations).
Figure 1. Temporal variation of Rp values for Q235 steel in different SRB environments under different carbon source concentrations (100% CS and 1% CS). (The EIS tests were performed independently in duplicates, and the error bars represent the standard deviations).
Materials 18 01613 g001
Figure 2. (a) Nyquist plots of Q235 steel in sterile and deoxygenated PBS solution after 15 days’ immersion in SRB environments with different carbon source concentrations (100% CS and 1% CS), (b) The equivalent circuit used to fit the EIS spectrum.
Figure 2. (a) Nyquist plots of Q235 steel in sterile and deoxygenated PBS solution after 15 days’ immersion in SRB environments with different carbon source concentrations (100% CS and 1% CS), (b) The equivalent circuit used to fit the EIS spectrum.
Materials 18 01613 g002
Figure 3. Temporal variation in Q(EMIC) for Q235 steel induced by Desulfovibrio caledoniensis in environments with varying carbon source concentrations (100% CS and 1% CS).
Figure 3. Temporal variation in Q(EMIC) for Q235 steel induced by Desulfovibrio caledoniensis in environments with varying carbon source concentrations (100% CS and 1% CS).
Materials 18 01613 g003
Figure 4. Weight losses of Q235 steel coupons in 100% CS and 1% CS media with or without SRB over a 15-day immersion period. (Error bands represent the standard deviation of at least three independent replicate samples).
Figure 4. Weight losses of Q235 steel coupons in 100% CS and 1% CS media with or without SRB over a 15-day immersion period. (Error bands represent the standard deviation of at least three independent replicate samples).
Materials 18 01613 g004
Figure 5. The quotient of EMIC to the total MIC of Q235 steel induced by Desulfovibrio caledoniensis in (a) 100% CS and (b) 1% CS media.
Figure 5. The quotient of EMIC to the total MIC of Q235 steel induced by Desulfovibrio caledoniensis in (a) 100% CS and (b) 1% CS media.
Materials 18 01613 g005
Figure 6. Cathodic current densities (i) vs. applied potentials of the electrodes that were incubated in biotic (red) and abiotic (blue) culture media with different CS sources for 15 days. The measurements were conducted before (solid lines) and after (dash lines) media change.
Figure 6. Cathodic current densities (i) vs. applied potentials of the electrodes that were incubated in biotic (red) and abiotic (blue) culture media with different CS sources for 15 days. The measurements were conducted before (solid lines) and after (dash lines) media change.
Materials 18 01613 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of the voltammograms of the electrodes in the sterile, deoxygenated PBS after the incubation in the (a) 100%-CS culture medium and (b) 1%-CS culture medium with or without SRB for 15 days.
Figure 7. Comparison of the voltammograms of the electrodes in the sterile, deoxygenated PBS after the incubation in the (a) 100%-CS culture medium and (b) 1%-CS culture medium with or without SRB for 15 days.
Materials 18 01613 g007
Figure 8. Fe 2p spectra of Q235 carbon steel in (a) 100% CS media with SRB, (b) 100% CS media without SRB, (c) 1% CS media with SRB, and (d) 1% CS media without SRB.
Figure 8. Fe 2p spectra of Q235 carbon steel in (a) 100% CS media with SRB, (b) 100% CS media without SRB, (c) 1% CS media with SRB, and (d) 1% CS media without SRB.
Materials 18 01613 g008
Figure 9. Corrosion pit depth distribution on steel coupons across varied culture media.
Figure 9. Corrosion pit depth distribution on steel coupons across varied culture media.
Materials 18 01613 g009
Table 1. Electrochemical parameters of the Q235 steels in the sterile, deoxygenated PBS solution after they were immersed in different SRB solutions for 15 days.
Table 1. Electrochemical parameters of the Q235 steels in the sterile, deoxygenated PBS solution after they were immersed in different SRB solutions for 15 days.
ConditionsRs (Ohms cm2)QfRf (Ohms cm2)QdlRct (Ohms cm2)
Yf (×10−4 S cm−2 Sn)nfYdl (×10−4 S cm−2 Sn)ndl
1% CS with SRB21.66 ± 1.181.12 ± 0.150.75 ± 0.3515.10 ± 2.365.79 ± 2.800.80 ± 0.03412,850 ± 212.13
1% CS without SRB20.46 ± 5.543.67 ± 0.780.67 ± 0.2913.72 ± 2.792.10 ± 0.970.91 ± 0.007827,450 ± 70.71
100% CS with SRB11.34 ± 0.2164.1 ± 1.170.86 ± 0.00412.20 ± 0.8514.9 ± 0.800.97 ± 0.0310,410 ± 130
100% CS without SRB22.22 ± 2.6623.4 ± 5.040.97± 0.0317.80 ± 0.2260.7 ± 10.50.89 ± 0.0517,610 ± 390
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, K.; Guan, F.; Zhai, X.; Jiao, G.; Sang, Y.; Jing, M.; Duan, J. Distinguishing the Contribution of Extracellular Electron Transfer in the Desulfovibrio caledoniensis-Induced Total Corrosion of Q235 Carbon Steel. Materials 2025, 18, 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071613

AMA Style

Fan K, Guan F, Zhai X, Jiao G, Sang Y, Jing M, Duan J. Distinguishing the Contribution of Extracellular Electron Transfer in the Desulfovibrio caledoniensis-Induced Total Corrosion of Q235 Carbon Steel. Materials. 2025; 18(7):1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071613

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Keliang, Fang Guan, Xiaofan Zhai, Guanhua Jiao, Yugang Sang, Min Jing, and Jizhou Duan. 2025. "Distinguishing the Contribution of Extracellular Electron Transfer in the Desulfovibrio caledoniensis-Induced Total Corrosion of Q235 Carbon Steel" Materials 18, no. 7: 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071613

APA Style

Fan, K., Guan, F., Zhai, X., Jiao, G., Sang, Y., Jing, M., & Duan, J. (2025). Distinguishing the Contribution of Extracellular Electron Transfer in the Desulfovibrio caledoniensis-Induced Total Corrosion of Q235 Carbon Steel. Materials, 18(7), 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071613

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop