Next Article in Journal
Advanced Thermal Imaging Processing and Deep Learning Integration for Enhanced Defect Detection in Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Laminates
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Dynamic Characteristics of Low-Frequency High-Stiffness Viscoelastic Damping Structures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Processing Parameters on Ti Schottky Contacts on 4H-SiC

1
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Microelettronica e Microsistemi (CNR-IMM), Strada VIII, n. 5—Zona Industriale, 95121 Catania, Italy
2
STMicroelectronics, Stradale Primosole 50, 95121 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(7), 1447; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071447
Submission received: 13 February 2025 / Revised: 16 March 2025 / Accepted: 21 March 2025 / Published: 25 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Electronic Materials)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we investigated the effects of the processing parameters, such as deposition methods, annealing temperature, and metal thickness, on the electrical characteristics of Ti/4H-SiC contacts. A reduction of the Schottky barrier height from 1.19 to 1.00 eV following an increase of the annealing temperature (475–700 °C) was observed for a reference contact with an 80 nm-thick Ti layer. The current transport mechanisms can be described according to the thermionic emission (TE) and thermionic field emission (TFE) models under forward and reverse biases, respectively. The comparison with an e-beam evaporated Ti(80 nm)/4H-SiC contact did not show significant differences for the forward characteristics, while an increase of the leakage current was observed under high reverse voltage (>500 V). Finally, a thickness variation from 10 to 80 nm induced a reduction of the Schottky barrier height, due to the reaction occurring at the interface with a Ti-Al region extended up to the 4H-SiC surface. In addition to a deeper understanding of the Schottky barrier properties, this work is useful for the development of Schottky barrier diodes with tailored characteristics.

1. Introduction

Today, the hexagonal polytype of silicon carbide (4H-SiC) is the most promising wide band gap semiconductor for the development of efficient power electronics devices [1]. In particular, the superior performance of 4H-SiC devices with respect to the traditional silicon (Si) ones arises from the outstanding electronic properties of the material, e.g., a wide bandgap (3.26 eV), high critical electrical field (>2 MV/cm), saturated drift velocity (>2 × 107 cm × s−1), and high thermal conductivity (4.9 W cm−1 K−1) [2]. In addition, the crystal quality and wafer size of the commercially available 4H-SiC material have steadily improved over the years, thus leading to the worldwide establishment of several 200 mm 4H-SiC device production fabs [3,4].
Currently, the metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) and Schottky barrier diodes (SBDs) are the most mature 4H-SiC devices on the technological level and are largely employed in several applications. In particular, the ideal choice for using 4H-SiC devices falls for operations in the medium- and high-voltage range (600–1700 V) [5], spacing from automotive, industrial motors up to transportation and power grids. In spite of the huge progresses recorded in 4H-SiC technology, the fine optimization of some crucial device processing steps is always among the objectives of both the academic and industrial worlds. For instance, one of the main concerns in 4H-SiC SBD technology is the control and full understanding of the electrical properties of metal/4H-SiC Schottky barrier height (ΦB) [6]. In fact, the precise control of the Schottky barrier properties is mandatory for achieving reproducible performance with tailored characteristics and more efficient electronic operations of the diodes [7].
In the last decades, several studies have investigated the electrical properties of a variety of metallization schemes for Schottky contacts to 4H-SiC and the current transport through these interfaces [6,8,9,10,11]. In fact, the choice of appropriate metal is related to the envisaged application. For instance, Ni is preferred for sensing or detection applications [12], as Ni-silicides featuring high Schottky barrier height (around 1.60 eV), which favor low level of leakage current. The high work-function of Ni also allows the effect of surface treatment on the Schottky barrier to be investigated [13]. On the other hand, low-work function metals, such as Mo [14,15,16,17], W [15,18,19,20], and Ti [21,22], have recently emerged thanks to the possibility to form low Schottky barriers, which entail a minimization of the diode power consumption [7]. Among them, Ti contacts are currently a well-established industrial solution for device manufacturing, offering a high reproducibility with barrier height values ranging between 0.78 and 1.33 eV for as-deposited and annealed contacts [7,22,23], with the ΦB tendentially higher after annealing of the Ti/4H-SiC contact. A survey of the Schottky barrier height derived from literature on annealed Ti/4H-SiC contacts is reported in Table 1.
However, an improved control on the ΦB variability range can be achieved by well-defined processing and an accurate evaluation of all the parameters involved in the contact fabrication. Additionally, performance improvement can be obtained also by operating on the device layout. For instance, the so-called junction barrier Schottky (JBS) diode is widely considered for the high level of rectifying performance. In practice, the JBS layout combines the advantage of the low forward voltage drop of a conventional Schottky diode with the hard breakdown and low leakage of a p-n junction system [28], thanks to the presence of p+-type regions embedded in an n-type epitaxial area [29,30]. The general schemes of an SBD and a JBS diode are depicted in Figure 1a and Figure 1b, respectively.
As for conventional SBDs, the core of JBS devices is the metal/4H-SiC interface, whose properties entail the electrical behavior of the entire device, and the optimization of this part is at the base for further development of SBD technology.
In this paper, we investigated the impact of some processing parameters (i.e., annealing temperature, deposition method and thickness) on the electrical characteristics of Ti Schottky contacts to 4H-SiC. The electrical behavior of the diodes was characterized under forward and reverse bias and correlated to a microstructural analysis of the metal/4H-SiC interface performed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In particular, the independence of the deposition methods (e-beam or sputtering) was highlighted for Ti/4H-SiC contact, whereas the temperature of the annealing treatment and the thickness of the film affect the Schottky barrier height of the diode.

2. Experimental

The material of our study was a “production grade” 9.5-μm thick 4H-SiC epitaxial layer, intentionally doped with nitrogen (n-type doping concentration of ND = 8 × 1015 cm−3), grown onto a heavily doped 4H-SiC (0001) substrate. On this sample, Schottky diodes with an area of 3.35 mm2 were fabricated. Ti was used as barrier metal and Schottky contacts of different thickness were defined on the front-side of the sample by optical lithography and lift-off processing steps. In particular, thick (80 nm) Ti contacts were deposited by DC magnetron sputtering, while e-beam evaporation was used for thinner Ti layers (ranging from 10 to 50 nm). A reference sample of 80-nm thick Ti/4H-SiC was also fabricated by e-beam evaporation for comparison with the sputtering deposition method. In order to prevent Ti oxidation when moving from the evaporation chamber to the sputtering chamber for the deposition of the final thick metal layer (an AlSiCu alloy), a few nanometers thin Al layer was evaporated on the Ti Schottky barrier layer. The contacts were then subjected to 10-min thermal annealing treatments in N2 atmosphere, at temperatures ranging from 475 °C to 800 °C. The electrical characterization of the contacts was performed by means of current–voltage (I–V) measurements in a Karl–Suss MicroTec probe station equipped with a parameter analyzer (B1505 A by Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) enabling to detect current levels in the order of pA. The electrical parameters featuring the contacts (ideality factor n and Schottky barrier height ΦB) were averaged over a set of measurements on a set of 20 equivalent diodes. Furthermore, the microscopic modifications that occurred at the metal/semiconductor interface were monitored through transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in cross-section using a 200 kV 2010F microscope by JEOL (Tokyo, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

Firstly, we characterized the devices fabricated with 80-nm-thick sputtered Ti Schottky barrier metal, and subjected to thermal annealing treatments at 475 °C, 600 °C, 700 °C and 800 °C. Here, the 475 °C is considered as the reference, since this process is adopted to stabilize the thick AlSiCu metal on the top of the Schottky metal. The forward and reverse current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of these diodes are reported in a semilog scale in Figure 2a and Figure 2b, respectively.
As can be observed in Figure 2a, up to the annealing temperature of 700 °C, the forward J-V characteristics of the Ti/4H-SiC diodes showed a wide linear region in a semilog scale, extending over 6–7 orders of magnitudes. However, a gradual shift of the forward characteristics towards lower turn-on voltages was observed with increasing annealing temperature. After annealing at 800 °C, the diode turn-on and the linear region were notably reduced.
When the diodes were polarized under reverse bias (Figure 2b), the leakage current increased from the noise level (reference 475 °C annealed contact) up to 10−6 A/cm2 at 100 V for the 800 °C annealed contact.
For a better understanding of the electrical behavior of the Schottky diodes, we studied the current transport mechanisms at the interface under both forward and reverse bias. In particular, the ideality factor n and Schottky barrier height ΦB were derived, applying the thermionic emission (TE) model when fitting the linear region in the semilog plot of the J-V curves [31]:
J F = A * T 2 e x p q Φ B k B T e x p q V F n k B T = 1 ,
where A* is the effective Richardson constant of 4H-SiC (146 A × cm−2 × K−2) [10], T is the absolute temperature, q is the elementary charge, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and VF is the applied forward voltage.
The values of n and ΦB extracted at each annealing temperature are reported in Figure 3a and Figure 3b, respectively. An almost ideal behavior was observed, with n values remaining below 1.10 after the annealing at of 475 °C, 600 °C, and 700 °C. Instead, the thermal treatment at 800 °C degraded the electrical characteristic for the contact, with a reduced linear region that made the extrapolation of the ideality factor and Schottky barrier height values more difficult. For the Ti/4H-SiC Schottky diodes presenting an extended linear region, i.e., those annealed in the range 475–700 °C, the barrier height ΦB decreased from 1.19 eV to 1.00 eV with increasing annealing temperature. This effectively tuned the Schottky barrier height in a range of 190 meV by varying the annealing temperature from 475 °C to 700 °C.
Under reverse bias, the leakage current of the diodes increased with increasing annealing temperature, with only the 700 °C and 800 °C annealed samples presenting leakage current above the sensitivity limit of our experimental set-up. Even when a degradation of the forward characteristic of the 800 °C annealed contact was observed, the leakage current remained on a level similar to the of the 700 °C annealed contact.
Here, the current transport under reverse bias was explained by taking into account a tunneling contribution to the current, according to the thermionic field emission (TFE) theory [32], using the following relation between reverse current density JR and voltage VR [33]:
J R = A * T 2 q π E 00 k T V R + Φ B c o s h q E 00 k T 2   e x p Φ B E 1 e x p V R E 2
with h the Planck constant, m* the effective mass of electron and εSiC the dielectric constant of the semiconductor. The E00, E1 and E2 functions are expressed as E 00 = ( h / 4 π ) N D / m ε S i C , E 1 = E 00 × tanh q E 00 / k T 1 and E 2 = E 00 × q E 00 / k T t a n h q E 00 / k T 1 , where an effective mass of 0.39 × m0 and a dielectric constant of 9.76 × ε0 were used (with m0 the free electron mass and ε0 the vacuum permittivity).
For the 700 °C and 800 °C annealed Ti/4H-SiC contacts, for which the current level was well above the sensitivity limit, the experimental and fitted reverse curves according to the TFE theory are reported in Figure 4.
For the Schottky barrier height, the ΦB values were derived from the fit of the experimental curves, according to the TFE model. Specifically, ΦB was 1.00 eV and 0.98 eV for the 700 °C and 800 °C–annealed Ti/4H-SiC contact, respectively. Then, the effect of the metal deposition technique on the electrical properties of the Ti/4H-SiC contact was also monitored. Specifically, the different mechanisms associated to metal deposition methods of our study, i.e., evaporation and sputtering, can affect the physical properties of the film and, ultimately, the electrical characteristics of the diodes.
To this aim, we compared the forward and reverse electrical behavior of the lowest temperature annealed Ti(80 nm)/4H-SiC Schottky diode fabricated by the two different deposition techniques. The forward and reverse electrical characteristics are reported in Figure 5a and Figure 5b, respectively.
The forward characteristics (Figure 5a) demonstrated an independence of the deposition method for the two contacts. Instead, under reverse bias (Figure 5b), the two contacts featured similar characteristics up to about 400 V, while above a sudden current increase was observed for the evaporated Ti/4H-SiC contact.
To better understand the Ti/4H-SiC interface formation, a microstructural analysis was carried out by TEM in cross-section on the two 80 nm Ti samples annealed at 475 °C, deposited either by sputtering (Figure 6a) or e-beam evaporation (Figure 6b).
In the Ti-sputtered/4H-SiC contact, a reaction between Ti and Al was observed in the upper part of the contact, with the Al coming from the AlSiCu protective layer. This reaction produced the Ti-Al grains, according to the solid-state reactions occurring in Ti/Al bilayers subjected to thermal annealing processes [34]. Additionally, we observed that only Ti was directly in contact with the 4H-SiC surface. Also, for Ti-layer deposited by evaporation, a Ti-Al reaction appeared, in this case probably due to the presence of the additional Al film evaporated sequentially to the Ti film with the aim to avoid the exposure to air of the Ti surface before AlSiCu layer sputtering. This Ti-Al region was very confined in the few tens of nanometers of the upper part of the contact, with the interfacial region between Ti and 4H-SiC similar in the two cases, i.e., a layer of unreacted Ti in contact to 4H-SiC. This can explain the origin of the same electrical characteristics observed under forward bias and under reverse bias up to 400 V in the sputtered and evaporated Ti/4H-SiC contacts.
Finally, we considered the effect of the Ti-film thickness on the Schottky barrier height of the contact. The Ti-layer from 80 nm down to 10 nm-thick Ti film, fabricated by the e-beam evaporation technique, which allowed good control for a thinner layer, was investigated. The ΦB values, extrapolated from the forward characteristics, varying from 0.9 eV for the 10 nm-thick Ti film, increased to about 1.20 eV for the 20, 40 nm, and 80 nm Ti contact, as shown in Figure 7.
The Ti-film thickness reduction was also considered in relation to a possible interaction of the AlSiCu layer directly with the 4H-SiC. In fact, the barrier lowering with metal layer thickness thinning could be related to the reactions occurred at the interface during the annealing treatments in processing. The microstructural analyses, performed by TEM analysis on the thickest and thinnest samples reported in Figure 8a (80-nm-thick Ti-layer) and Figure 8b (10-nm-thick Ti-layer), revealed that the reacted region Ti-Al extended up to the 4H-SiC surface for the thinnest Ti-layer (Figure 8b). This can be considered at the base of the barrier height reduction in this case.
Obviously, different reactions can occur in the contact region with higher annealing temperature (≥1000 °C), as discussed in previous papers [35,36,37], which detected the presence of a ternary phase (Ti3SiC2) by means of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) or X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis in contact with Ohmic characteristics.
The Ti/4H-SiC contacts characterized in this work present very good Schottky electrical behavior (extended linear region under forward bias and low level of the leakage current). With an appropriate choice of the processing conditions (annealing temperature, deposition method and thickness), it is possible to obtain accurate control of the Schottky barrier height over hundreds of meV). This work clearly demonstrates the relation between the Schottky barrier height value and the processing condition. Particularly, this kind of Ti-based contacts can be used in various applications, spacing from power electronics devices [23] to high-resolution alpha spectroscopy detectors [38].
Additional characterizations for studying the inhomogeneity at nanometric scale in the metal/semiconductor interface for instance based on fractional model [39,40] or the common adopted approach based on conventional current-voltage-temperature study [41,42] could be useful to highlight the effect of the local structure of the contact on the current transport mechanisms.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the role of the processing parameters is evaluated in controlling the electrical characteristics of the barrier in Ti/4H-SiC Schottky. Specifically, the annealing temperature, deposition method, and metal thickness were studied.
Regarding the temperature of the annealing treatment, a reduction of the Schottky barrier height was obtained following an increase of the annealing temperature for reference contact with an 80-nm-thick Ti layer. Specifically, the barrier height varied between 1.00 and 1.19 eV, with the ideality factor lower than 1.10. The current transport mechanisms can be described according to the TE and TFE models under forward and reverse biases, respectively. The comparison with an e-beam evaporated Ti (80 nm)/4H-SiC contact did not show differences for the forward characteristics, while an increase in the leakage current was observed under high reverse voltage (>500 V). The presence of an Al-film deposited to limit the air exposure of Ti film in the processing of Ti/4H-SiC evaporated contacts limited the formation of the Ti-Al phase (as observed in 80-nm-thick sputtered Ti contact) in only a few tens of nanometers of the upper part of the contact, while an unreacted Ti-layer remained in contact with the 4H-SiC surface. This can explain the similar behavior under forward bias in the two cases. Finally, a thickness variation from 10 to 80 nm induced variation in the Schottky barrier height, with the reacted Ti-Al region able to arrive in the 4H-SiC surface.
Besides a deeper understanding of the Schottky barrier properties, this study also provides useful insights for device manufacturers to optimize the diode’s layout and obtain the desired characteristics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.V. and G.B.; methodology, M.V., G.B., V.P., C.B., S.A. and S.R.; formal analysis, M.V., G.B. and C.B.; investigation, M.V., G.B. and C.B.; data curation, M.V.; writing—original draft preparation, M.V.; writing—review and editing, M.V., F.G. and F.R.; supervision, F.R.; funding acquisition, F.G. and F.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was carried out in the framework of the MicroTech_for_Green project, funded by Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy (MIMIT) under IPCEI Microelettronica 2, using the facilities of the Italian Infrastructure Beyond-Nano.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank P. Fiorenza and G. Greco for fruitful discussion and support during electrical measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Gabriele Bellocchi, Valeria Puglisi, Salvatore Adamo, and Simone Rascunà are employed by the company STMicroelectronics. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kimoto, T. Material science and device physics in SiC technology for high-voltage power devices. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 54, 040103. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kimoto, T.; Cooper, J.A. Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology; John Wiley & Sons Pte. Ltd.: Singapore, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, Y.; Liu, S.; Chen, S.; Yang, B. Diameter enlargement of SiC bulk single crystals based on simulation and experiment. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 2024, 178, 108414. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tsuchida, H.; Kanda, T. Advances in fast 4H–SiC crystal growth and defect reduction by high-temperature gas-source method. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 2024, 176, 108315. [Google Scholar]
  5. She, X.; Huang, A.Q.; She, X.; Huang, A.Q.; Lucía, Ó.; Ozpineci, B. Review of Silicon Carbide Power Devices and Their Applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron 2017, 64, 8193–8205. [Google Scholar]
  6. Roccaforte, F.; Brezeanu, G.; Gammon, P.M.; Giannazzo, F.; Rascunà, S.; Saggio, M. Schottky contacts to silicon carbide: Physics, technology and applications. In Advancing Silicon Carbide Electronics Technology I; Zekentes, K., Vasilevskiy, K., Eds.; Materials Research Foundations LLC: Millersville, PA, USA, 2018; Volume 37, pp. 127–190. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vivona, M.; Giannazzo, F.; Roccaforte, F. Materials and Processes for Schottky Contacts on Silicon Carbide. Materials 2022, 15, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yakimova, R.; Hemmingsson, C.; Macmillan, M.F.; Yakimov, T.; Janzén, E. Barrier height determination for n-type 4H-SiC Schottky contacts made using various metals. J. Electron. Mater. 1998, 27, 871–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Perrone, D.; Naretto, M.; Ferrero, S.; Scaltrito, L.; Pirri, C.F. 4H-SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes Using Mo-, Ti- and Ni-Based Contacts. Mater. Sci. Forum 2009, 615–617, 647–650. [Google Scholar]
  10. Roccaforte, F.; La Via, F.; Raineri, V.; Pierobon, R.; Zanoni, E. Richardson’s constant in inhomogeneous silicon carbide Schottky contacts. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 9137–9144. [Google Scholar]
  11. Vivona, M.; Greco, G.; Bellocchi, G.; Zumbo, L.; Di Franco, S.; Saggio, M.; Rascunà, S.; Roccaforte, F. Electrical properties of inhomogeneous tungsten carbide Schottky barrier on 4H-SiC. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2021, 54, 055101. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pristavu, G.; Brezeanu, G.; Pascu, R.; Drăghici, F.; Bădilă, M. Characterization of non-uniform Ni/4H-SiC Schottky diodes for improved responsivity in high-temperature sensing. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2019, 94, 64–69. [Google Scholar]
  13. Roccaforte, F.; Vivona, M.; Panasci, S.E.; Greco, G.; Fiorenza, P.; Sulyok, A.; Koos, A.; Bela, P.; Giannazzo, F. Schottky contacts on sulfurized silicon carbide (4H-SiC) surface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2024, 124, 102102. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rupp, R.; Elpelt, R.; Gerlach, R.; Schomer, R.; Draghici, M. A new SiC diode with significantly reduced threshold voltage. In Proceedings of the 2017 29th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and IC’s (ISPSD), Sapporo, Japan, 28 May–1 June 2017; pp. 355–358. [Google Scholar]
  15. Geib, K.M.; Wilson, C.; Long, R.G.; Wilmsen, C.W. Reaction between SiC and W, Mo, and Ta at elevated temperatures. J. Appl. Phys. 1990, 68, 2796–2800. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, T.; Raynaud, C.; Planson, D. Measure and analysis of 4H-SiC Schottky barrier height with Mo contacts. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 85, 10102. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ouennoughi, Z.; Toumi, S.; Weiss, R. Study of barrier inhomogeneities using I–V–T characteristics of Mo/4H–SiC Schottky diode. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2015, 456, 176–181. [Google Scholar]
  18. Berthou, M.; Godignon, P.; Montserrat, J.M.; Millan, J.D.R.; Planson, D. Study of 4H-SiC JBS Diodes Fabricated with Tungsten Schottky Barrier. J. Electron. Mater. 2011, 40, 2355–2362. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hamida, A.F.; Ouennoughi, Z.; Sellai, A.; Weiss, R.; Ryssel, H. Barrier inhomogeneities of tungsten Schottky diodes on 4H-SiC. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2008, 23, 045005. [Google Scholar]
  20. Vivona, M.; Bellocchi, G.; Nigro, R.L.; Rascunà, S.; Roccaforte, F. Electrical evolution of W and WC Schottky contacts on 4H-SiC at different annealing temperatures. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2022, 37, 015012. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bellocchi, G.; Vivona, M.; Bongiorno, C.; Badalà, P.; Bassi, A.; Rascuna, S.; Roccaforte, F. Barrier height tuning in Ti/4H-SiC Schottky diodes. Solid-State Electron. 2021, 186, 108042. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hara, M.; Kaneko, M.; Kimoto, T. Nearly Fermi-level-pinning-free interface in metal/heavily-doped SiC Schottky structures. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 60, SBBD14. [Google Scholar]
  23. Roccaforte, F.; Vivona, M.; Greco, G.; Lyle, L.A.M.; Sarkar, B.; Porter, L.M. Contacts to wide band gap (WBG) and ultra-wide band gap (UWBG) semiconductors for power electronics devices. In Comprehensive Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2nd ed.; Fornari, R., Ed.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2025; Volume 2, pp. 605–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nakamura, T.; Miyanagi, T.; Kamata, I.; Jikimoto, T.; Tsuchida, H. A 4.15 kV 9.07-Ω cm2 4H-SiC Schottky-barrier diode using Mo contact annealed at high temperature. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2005, 26, 99–101. [Google Scholar]
  25. Oder, T.N.; Kundeti, K.C.; Borucki, N.; Isukapati, S.B. Effects of deposition temperature on the electrical properties of Ti/SiC Schottky barrier diodes. AIP Adv. 2017, 7, 125311. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, D.H.; Lee, J.H.; Moon, J.H.; Oh, M.S.; Song, H.K.; Yim, J.H.; Lee, J.B.; Kim, H.J. Improvement of the reverse characteristics of Ti/4H-SiC Schottky barrier diodes by thermal treatments. Solid State Phenom. 2007, 124–126, 105–108. [Google Scholar]
  27. Vassilevski, K.V.; Horsfall, A.B.; Johnson, C.M.; Wright, N.G.; O’Neill, A.G. 4H-SiC Rectifiers with Dual Metal Planar Schottky Contacts. IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 2022, 49, 947–949. [Google Scholar]
  28. Alexandrov, P.; Wright, W.; Pan, M.; Weiner, M.; Jiao, L.; Zhao, J.H. Demonstration of high voltage (600–1300 V), high current (10–140 A), fast recovery 4H-SiC p-i-n/Schottky (MPS) barrier diodes. Solid-State Electron. 2003, 47, 263–269. [Google Scholar]
  29. Singh, R.; Capell, D.C.; Hefner, A.R.; Lai, J.; Palmour, J.W. High-power 4H-SiC JBS rectifiers. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2002, 49, 2054–2063. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dahlquist, F.; Lendenmann, H.; Östling, M. A High Performance JBS Rectifier—Design Considerations. Mater. Sci. Forum 2001, 353–356, 683–686. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sze, S.M.; Kwok, K.N. Physics of Semiconductor Devices; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  32. Treu, M.; Rupp, R.; Kapels, H.; Bartsch, W. Temperature Dependence of Forward and Reverse Characteristics of Ti, W, Ta and Ni Schottky Diodes on 4H-SiC. Mater. Sci. Forum 2001, 353–356, 679–682. [Google Scholar]
  33. Padovani, F.A.; Stratton, R. Field and thermionic-field emission in Schottky barriers. Solid-State Electron. 1966, 9, 695–707. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kocher, M.; Rommel, M.; Michalowski, P.; Erlbacher, T. Mechanisms of Ohmic Contact Formation of Ti/Al-Based Metal Stacks on p-Doped 4H-SiC. Materials 2022, 15, 50. [Google Scholar]
  35. Frazzetto, A.; Giannazzo, F.; Lo Nigro, R.; Di Franco, S.; Bongiorno, C.; Saggio, M.; Zanetti, E.; Raineri, V.; Roccaforte, F. Nanoscale electro-structural characterisation of ohmic contacts formed on p-type implanted 4H-SiC. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 158. [Google Scholar]
  36. Frazzetto, A.; Giannazzo, F.; Lo Nigro, R.; Raineri, V.; Roccaforte, F. Structural and transport properties in alloyed Ti/Al Ohmic contacts formed on p-type Al-implanted 4H-SiC annealed at high temperature. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 255302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abi-Tannous, T.; Soueidan, M.; Ferro, G.; Lazar, M.; Toury, B.; Beaufort, M.F.; Barbot, J.F.; Penuelas, J.F.; Planson, D. Parametric investigation of the formation of epitaxial Ti3SiC2 on4H-SiC from Al-Ti annealing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 347, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shilpa, A.; Murty, N.V.L.N. Alphavoltaic Performance of 4H-SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2024, 71, 2507–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hernández-Acosta, M.A.; Martínez-Gutiérrez, H.; Martínez-González, C.L.; Torres-SanMiguel, C.R.; Trejo-Valdez, M.; Torres-Torres, C. Fractional and chaotic electrical signatures exhibited by random carbon nanotube networks. Phys. Scr. 2018, 93, 125801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ramzan, M.W.; Riaz, K.; Mehmood, M.Q.; Zubair, M.; Massoud, Y. Generalized fractional Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin approximation for electron tunnelling across rough metal interface. Proc. R. Soc. A 2023, 479, 20220600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tung, R.T. Electron transport at metal-semiconductor interfaces: General theory. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 13509–13523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Werner, J.H.; Güttler, H.H. Barrier inhomogeneities at Schottky contacts. J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 69, 1522–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cross-section schemes of (a) 4H-SiC Schottky barrier diode (SBD) and (b) junction-Schottky barrier (JBS) diode.
Figure 1. Cross-section schemes of (a) 4H-SiC Schottky barrier diode (SBD) and (b) junction-Schottky barrier (JBS) diode.
Materials 18 01447 g001
Figure 2. (a) Forward and (b) reverse electrical characteristics of Schottky diodes with 80 nm-Ti Schottky contact, subjected to thermal annealing at various temperatures (475 °C, 600 °C, 700 °C, and 800 °C).
Figure 2. (a) Forward and (b) reverse electrical characteristics of Schottky diodes with 80 nm-Ti Schottky contact, subjected to thermal annealing at various temperatures (475 °C, 600 °C, 700 °C, and 800 °C).
Materials 18 01447 g002
Figure 3. Ideality factor (a) and Schottky barrier height (b) values derived by applying the TE model to the forward characteristics of the Ti/4H-SiC Schottky diodes subjected to thermal annealing treatment at temperatures of 475 °C, 600 °C, 700 °C, and 800 °C.
Figure 3. Ideality factor (a) and Schottky barrier height (b) values derived by applying the TE model to the forward characteristics of the Ti/4H-SiC Schottky diodes subjected to thermal annealing treatment at temperatures of 475 °C, 600 °C, 700 °C, and 800 °C.
Materials 18 01447 g003
Figure 4. Experimental and simulated (TFE model) reverse current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the Ti/4H-SiC Schottky diodes annealed at 700 °C and 800 °C.
Figure 4. Experimental and simulated (TFE model) reverse current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the Ti/4H-SiC Schottky diodes annealed at 700 °C and 800 °C.
Materials 18 01447 g004
Figure 5. (a) Forward and (b) reverse electrical characteristics of 475 °C annealed Ti (80 nm)/4H-SiC contact deposited by sputtering or e-beam evaporation.
Figure 5. (a) Forward and (b) reverse electrical characteristics of 475 °C annealed Ti (80 nm)/4H-SiC contact deposited by sputtering or e-beam evaporation.
Materials 18 01447 g005
Figure 6. Cross-section TEM micrographs related to the Ti/4H-SiC interface annealed at 475 °C for (a) sputtered and (b) evaporated 80 nm-Ti layer.
Figure 6. Cross-section TEM micrographs related to the Ti/4H-SiC interface annealed at 475 °C for (a) sputtered and (b) evaporated 80 nm-Ti layer.
Materials 18 01447 g006
Figure 7. Barrier height values extrapolated from the electrical characteristics of e-beam evaporated Ti-layer on 4H-SiC with a thickness of 10, 20, 40, and 80 nm.
Figure 7. Barrier height values extrapolated from the electrical characteristics of e-beam evaporated Ti-layer on 4H-SiC with a thickness of 10, 20, 40, and 80 nm.
Materials 18 01447 g007
Figure 8. (a,b) Cross-section TEM analyses related to the Ti/4H-SiC interface annealed at 475 °C for evaporated Ti-layer with a thickness of 80 nm and 10 nm, respectively.
Figure 8. (a,b) Cross-section TEM analyses related to the Ti/4H-SiC interface annealed at 475 °C for evaporated Ti-layer with a thickness of 80 nm and 10 nm, respectively.
Materials 18 01447 g008
Table 1. Survey of the Schottky barrier height derived from the Ti/n-type 4H-SiC Schottky contacts literature.
Table 1. Survey of the Schottky barrier height derived from the Ti/n-type 4H-SiC Schottky contacts literature.
Metal (Thickness)Contact Fabrication Conditions ΦBReference
Ti (n.r.)e-beam evaporation, annealing at 500 °C and 600 °C; for 10 min in Ar1.15–1.22 eV[24]
Ti (200 nm)Sputter deposition with substrate T ranging from 28 °C to 500 °C; annealing for 60 h at 500 °C in vacuum0.83–1.13 eV[25]
Ti (100 nm)e-gun evaporation, annealing at 500 °C and 750 °C for 2 min in N21.23–1.33 eV[26]
Ti (100 nm)Deposition, annealing at 450 °C and 650 °C for 0.5 and 1 h in vacuum1.27 eV[27]
n.r. = not reported.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vivona, M.; Bellocchi, G.; Puglisi, V.; Bongiorno, C.; Adamo, S.; Giannazzo, F.; Rascunà, S.; Roccaforte, F. Impact of Processing Parameters on Ti Schottky Contacts on 4H-SiC. Materials 2025, 18, 1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071447

AMA Style

Vivona M, Bellocchi G, Puglisi V, Bongiorno C, Adamo S, Giannazzo F, Rascunà S, Roccaforte F. Impact of Processing Parameters on Ti Schottky Contacts on 4H-SiC. Materials. 2025; 18(7):1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071447

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vivona, Marilena, Gabriele Bellocchi, Valeria Puglisi, Corrado Bongiorno, Salvatore Adamo, Filippo Giannazzo, Simone Rascunà, and Fabrizio Roccaforte. 2025. "Impact of Processing Parameters on Ti Schottky Contacts on 4H-SiC" Materials 18, no. 7: 1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071447

APA Style

Vivona, M., Bellocchi, G., Puglisi, V., Bongiorno, C., Adamo, S., Giannazzo, F., Rascunà, S., & Roccaforte, F. (2025). Impact of Processing Parameters on Ti Schottky Contacts on 4H-SiC. Materials, 18(7), 1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071447

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop