Next Article in Journal
Performance Evolution and Degradation Mechanism of Chemically Bonded Phosphate Ceramic Cement Under Freeze–Thaw Cycles
Previous Article in Journal
Flexural Strength Enhancement of Lightweight Concrete Beams Using Carbon Fiber and Epoxy Resin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Effects of Extrinsic Magnetized GaAs in One-Dimensional Ternary Photonic Crystals

Center of Excellence for Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202301, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(23), 5293; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18235293
Submission received: 4 November 2025 / Revised: 18 November 2025 / Accepted: 21 November 2025 / Published: 24 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Optical and Photonic Materials)

Abstract

This work focuses on the magneto-optical behavior of one-dimensional ternary photonic crystals that incorporate extrinsically magnetized GaAs as a functional layer. In this context, we investigate the effect of an applied transverse magnetic field on the optical response and photonic band gap characteristics of the proposed structure. The transfer matrix method is utilized to analyze the optical response of the ternary structure. The ternary photonic crystal with extrinsically magnetized GaAs exhibits strong magnetic tunability. The photonic band gap shifts from 0.32 THz to 0.38 THz under an applied external magnetic field up to 0.75 T with 100% band gap modulation. The polarization mode also shifts within the range of 0.32–0.36/0.38 THz due to the anisotropic response of the magnetized GaAs. These results confirm the effectiveness of extrinsic magnetization for compact, dynamically tunable photonic devices. The proposed configuration thus provides an effective framework for developing multichannel and broadband transmission filters that can be adjusted in the terahertz domain.

1. Introduction

The idea of photonic crystals (PCs), which control the travel of electromagnetic and optical waves, was initially proposed by Yablonovitch [1]. A defining property of PCs is the formation of photonic band gaps, frequencies in which light cannot propagate due to the periodic arrangement of dielectric materials [2,3,4,5]. Among them, PCs with one dimension (1D) serve as the simplest configuration and are widely regarded as fundamental structures for numerous applications, including light harvesting in solar cells [6], photovoltaic devices [7], high-reflectivity mirrors [8], Fabry–Perot resonators, quantum dot nanowires, and a variety of sensing platforms [9,10,11,12,13,14]. They are also used in hybrid multifunctional devices [15] and optical filters [16]. To tailor and expand the photonic band gap (PBG) over desired spectral ranges, researchers have explored various structural configurations of PCs, including periodic lattices [5], quasi-periodic designs [17,18], random distributions [19,20], and nonlinear nanostructured systems [21].
Over the past few decades, numerous photonic crystal structures have been proposed for diverse applications [22,23,24,25]. Among them, GaAs/AlAs-based PCs have gained particular attention because of their distinctive qualities, like their relocation of the infrared spectrum of frequencies (longitudinal optical (LO) and transverse optical (TO)) in the form of a relatively wide band gap [26,27]. The optical behavior of GaAs/AlAs compound superlattices with randomly distributed layer thicknesses was analyzed by Chen and Xiong [28] using the Wannier–Bloch mixing technique. Due to the small lattice mismatch of GaAs and A l x G a 1 x A s , this photonic structure is considered the basic concept for the development of advanced high-speed optoelectronic and electronic devices [29].
To achieve advanced multifunctional capabilities of PCs, it is essential to incorporate a controllable material into a perfectly periodic structure [30,31]. This is commonly realized by inserting a single layer into a 1D PC, leading to the emergence of wide-band transmission resonances around the PBG. Extensive research has been devoted to magnetized and disordered 1D PCs; as such, modifications significantly influence transmission characteristics [32]. However, from both fundamental and application-oriented perspectives, challenges remain in precisely engineering extrinsic magnetized PCs beyond the band gap. In particular, the design of externally magnetized states in the visible wavelength regime, where periodicity becomes comparable to optical wavelengths, remains critical for exploring phenomena such as transmission, reflection, and absorption [33,34].
In recent years, all-dielectric photonic crystals engineered with extrinsic materials have attracted significant attention due to their robustness and versatility in practical applications [35,36,37]. Ternary 1D structures are generally realized by continuing the periodic order of a conventional multilayered PC for various medical applications [38,39,40,41], most effectively inserting an extrinsic magnetized layer into each bundle of the periodic lattice [42,43,44]. Incorporating non-linear electro-optical dielectric materials further introduces tunability into such systems for the detection of cancer cells [45]. A notable example is the theoretical study by Taya [46], which demonstrated that adjusting the permittivity of dielectric materials through electro-optical effects can significantly influence the properties of left-handed materials, particularly by enhancing them for refractometric applications.
Most previous studies have focused primarily on analyzing the influence of a single/double layer on the transmission and absorption characteristics of 1D PCs. The proposed configuration exploits the cyclotron resonance–induced permittivity variation in GaAs under external transverse magnetic fields, providing a strong and controllable mechanism for PBG tuning without altering the device geometry, and the use of a ternary arrangement further enhances dispersion contrast, enabling pronounced magneto-optical effects even at moderate field strengths. The novelty of our contribution is in the extension and modification of such formulations for a 1D ternary PC containing an extrinsically magnetized GaAs layer. The transfer matrix method [47,48] is adapted to handle the anisotropic magneto-optical behavior of GaAs in order to compute the field propagation accurately in the presence of an applied transverse magnetic field. We propose a novel ternary structural configuration that is specifically designed to enhance the magneto-optical modulation, distinct from the binary and non-magnetic structures studied previously. We incorporate the field-dependent permittivity model into the optical dispersion relations, which allows us to analyze band gap shifts, as well as transmission modulation for the extrinsic magnetic field, electron density, and incident angle, with different mode splittings (TE and TM).
The structure of the manuscript is as follows: it includes a clear literature study in Section 1, whereas mathematical formulations, the ternary structure, and the transfer matrix method are described in Section 2. Section 3 discusses the numerical results in detail, while the conclusions of the present investigation are summarized in Section 4.

2. Methodology and Formulation

The schematic of the proposed one-dimensional ternary photonic crystal, composed of alternating GaAs/AlAs layers, incorporating the external magnetic field with GaAs as the third dielectric, is illustrated in Figure 1. Further, the incident light enters the structure at an angle θ 0 with respect to the z-axis and is assumed to propagate normally in both the transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) modes. In the TE mode, the magnetic field is aligned along the propagation direction, whereas in the TM mode, only the electric field exists in that direction [49]. Consequently, the TE and TM modes fully capture the behavior of any arbitrarily polarized wave, which may include circular polarization. Thus, circularly polarized waves do not bring in any extra physics beyond the TE/TM analysis for this 1D structure. The direction of the magnetic field is applied in xz-plane (Figure 1), which results only in diagonal elements of the dielectric tensor [43]. The applied magnetic field is spatially periodic, and therefore maximizes the tunability of the photonic band gap irrespective of the mode. The ternary photonic structure consists of GaAs, AlAs, and magnetized GaAs, whose respective thicknesses are d G , d A , and d M , and whose corresponding permittivities are ϵ G , ϵ A , and ϵ M , respectively.
The governing Maxwell equations and the basic transfer matrix framework are standard and widely used in PC analysis. However, the novelty of our contribution lies in the use of these formulations to extend and modify for the case of a 1D ternary PC containing an extrinsically magnetized GaAs layer. In the long-wavelength limit, the complex dielectric permittivity is formulated in Equation (1), as described by Adachi [29].
ϵ ( ω ) = ϵ 1 + ω l 2 ω t 2 ω t 2 ω 2 i ω γ ,
where the damping frequency ( γ ), static dielectric constant ( ϵ ), and longitudinal and transverse optical frequencies, ( ω l and ω t ), respectively, are known as the Reststrahlen parameters. The values of the Reststrahlen parameters for the GaAs semiconductor superlattice are ω l = 291.5 cm−1, ω t = 268.2 cm−1, γ = 2.3 cm−1, and ϵ = 11.1 , whereas ω l = 361.8 cm−1, ω t = 1.9 cm−1, γ = 8.0 cm−1, and ϵ = 8.2 are the Reststrahlen parameter values for AlAs (see in Adachi [29]).
In the present study, the transmittance characteristics of TE- and TM-polarized waves propagating through the ternary multilayered photonic structure are evaluated using the transfer matrix method. This method provides a systematic approach to relate the electromagnetic field amplitudes at the input and output interfaces of the multilayer system. For a symmetric 1D photonic structure, Equation (2) is the overall transfer matrix, and can be expressed as [47,48]
W = a 11 a 12 a 21 a 22 = ( W G W A W M ) N
Here, the transfer matrices corresponding to different layers are W G for GaAs, W A for AlAs, and W M for magnetized GaAs, respectively. In general, the transfer matrix for the jth layer in terms of TE polarization in Equation (3) is W j , written as [43]
W j = cos ( ( ω / c ) n j d j cos θ j ) ( i / p j ) sin ( ( ω / c ) n j d j cos θ j ) i p j sin ( ( ω / c ) n j d j cos θ j ) cos ( ( ω / c ) n j d j cos θ j ) ,
where c denotes the speed of light in vacuum, p j = ϵ j / μ j cos θ j , cos θ j = 1 ( n 0 / n j ) 2 sin 2 θ j , n 0 is the refractive index of the vacuum, and θ j is the ray angle inside the ith layer. Moreover, the refractive index, permeability, permittivity, and thickness of the jth layer are denoted by n j , μ j , ϵ j , and d j , respectively. The transmission coefficient in Equation (4) for the TE-polarized wave is derived by applying the outgoing radiation boundary condition, which can be expressed as
t = 2 p 0 ( a 11 + a 12 p j ) p 0 + ( a 21 + a 22 p j ) ,
where p j = n j cos θ j with p 0 = n 0 cos θ 0 . Finally, the transmittance and reflectance corresponding to the multilayered photonic crystal are expressed as T = | t | 2 and R = | r | 2 = 1 T , respectively, where vacuum is considered at both ends of the PC organization.
Conversely, the transmittance coefficient for the TM-polarized wave is acquired analogously, given by p j = cos θ j / n j and p 0 = cos θ 0 / n 0 [50]. The absorbance plays a secondary role in our simulations, as extrinsically magnetized GaAs exhibits field-dependent complex permittivity. The imaginary part of the permittivity accounts for material absorption, which influences the attenuation of electromagnetic waves and has negligible effects on the transmission and reflection spectra (as in [29]).

3. Numerical Results and Discussion

This section presents the numerical results illustrating the influence of various physical parameters on the propagation of electromagnetic waves through a one-dimensional ternary multilayer photonic structure. The parameter values adopted from Arregui et al. [20] and Adachi [29] remain constant throughout the computations unless otherwise specified. Table 1 represents the parametric values used for numerical simulation. In the present model, a total of N = 30 layers, including the externally magnetized GaAs, are chosen, as this allows for sufficient periodicity to obtain well-defined photonic band gaps and stable polarized modes without introducing unnecessary structural complexity, which keeps the computational cost efficient.
The analysis focuses primarily on the transmission coefficient, T, as a function of frequency, ω , for a 1D ternary photonic structure. The numerical results reveal a noticeable shift in the transverse optical ( ω t ) and longitudinal optical ( ω l ) mode frequencies induced by the presence of an external magnetic field. This study considers a periodic structure that incorporates layers of magnetized GaAs, which exhibit more band gaps in the near-infrared area.
The results are presented below, demonstrating that extrinsically magnetized GaAs allows for strong magnetic field-dependent tuning in the proposed ternary PC. The anisotropic permittivity of magnetized GaAs introduces band gap shifts, transmission modulation, and band gap mode splitting, which enhance refractive index contrast under an applied field. Compared with the earlier binary or non-magnetic structures, substantially improved tunability is obtained for the present design without any geometrical change. These results confirm the potential of magnetized GaAs for compact magnetically controlled photonic devices.

3.1. Transmission Spectra with and Without Ternary Layer

Figure 2a,b illustrate the transmittance spectra of the TE and TM modes for the 1D GaAs/AlAs-based ternary PC with and without magnetized GaAs layers. The analysis is performed for N = 30 layers under an externally applied magnetic field of B = 0.75 T, electron density of n e = 1.5 × 10 22 cm−3, and normal incident angle. In the absence of magnetized layers, a single PBG is observed throughout the range of frequency from 0.3 to 0.32 THz (red curve). When the magnetized GaAs layers are introduced, three distinct band gaps (black curves) emerge for both polarization modes. These three gaps exhibit complete transmission due to resonance-induced impedance matching [20,43], which occurs when the multilayer structure is assumed to be surrounded by air, resulting in total zero reflection. Hence, the presence of magnetized layers not only broadens the photonic band gaps but also introduces a frequency-dependent complete transmittance, making the structure highly suitable for designing tunable wide-band transmission filters. Such filters can be readily engineered for operation across various frequency ranges according to specific design requirements.

3.2. Effect of External Magnetic Field (B)

The permittivity of the material can be calculated by applying an external magnetic field (as in [43]).
ϵ A ( ω , B ) = ϵ s 1 ω p 2 ( ω 2 ω p 2 ) ω 2 ( ω 2 ω c 2 ω p 2 ) ,
where plasma frequency ω p = n e e 2 m ϵ 0 1 / 2 and the cyclotron frequency ω c = e B m * , considering the static dielectric constant ( ϵ s ), electron density ( n e ), electronic charge (e), free electron mass (m), effective mass of an electron ( m * ), and vacuum permittivity ( ϵ 0 ) [19].
Figure 3a,b illustrate the influence of the extrinsic magnetic field (B) on the transmittance spectra of the 1D GaAs/AlAs ternary PC. The application of B (in Equation (5)) alters the dielectric response of the entire multilayer structure, thus changing the resonances of various modes. As B increases from 0 T to 0.75 T, the resonance frequency for the TE mode shifts from approximately 0.30 THz to 0.38 THz, while that of the TM mode shifts from about 0.29 THz to 0.35 THz. In addition to this frequency blue-shift, higher magnetic field strengths introduce additional mini-gaps and broaden the overall photonic band gap region. These findings highlight the extrinsic magnetic field as a powerful external control parameter for dynamically tuning both the position and number of band gaps against the propagation modes. Such magnetically tunable responses are particularly attractive for designing reconfigurable magneto-optical devices, including isolators, switches, and frequency-selective filters.

3.3. Effect of Electron Density ( n e )

Figure 4a,b demonstrate the variation in the transmission spectrum of the 1D GaAs/AlAs ternary photonic structure with magnetized GaAs under different electron densities ( n e ). As n e increases, the plasma frequency of the magnetized GaAs layers shifts, which in turn alters the location of the propagation modes around the structure of the photonic band. Specifically, an increase in the electron density causes the localized-mode resonances associated with both TE and TM polarizations to shift toward higher frequencies, accompanied by a slight broadening of the band gaps. This trend is attributed to the stronger interaction between the incident electromagnetic wave and the free carriers at a higher n e . Consequently, the tunability of transmission characteristics through electron density adjustment provides a practical mechanism for controlling the spectral position and bandwidth of photonic band gaps, enabling the design of reconfigurable wide-band transmission filters.

3.4. Effect of Incident Angle ( θ 0 )

Figure 5a,b present the influence of the incident angle ( θ 0 ) on the transmittance spectra of the 1D GaAs/AlAs ternary PC under the action of an external magnetic field. As the incident angle increases from normal incidence ( 0 ) to 45 , the propagation-mode resonances shift noticeably. At normal incidence ( θ 0 = 0 ), the transmission spectra of the TE and TM waves overlap, showing no significant difference in their behavior. This is expected because, at normal incidence, both polarizations experience the same effective optical path, and the boundary conditions at each layer interface remain symmetric for electric and magnetic fields. However, as the incident angle increases, the effective refractive index experienced by the wave changes differently for the TE and TM polarizations due to the angular dependence of Snell’s law. This leads to a shift to the right (blue) in the PBG frequencies with increasing θ 0 . At the same time, the peak magnitudes remain unchanged, as the resonance condition still satisfies impedance matching at the externally magnetized layers. Such angle-dependent behavior is highly advantageous for designing polarization-sensitive and angularly selective photonic devices.
The results presented in Figure 5a,b are further validated by the contour plot in Figure 6, which depicts the transmittance as a function of the incident angle and frequency. The transmittance bar clearly reveals multiple band gaps for symmetric 1D PCs while an external magnetic field is applied. Similar observations are also analyzed in Figure 5a,b, where the PBGs exhibit a systematic rightward shift (blue) with an increasing incident angle, a behavior attributed to the change in the effective propagation constant with the angle. Furthermore, the PBGs under TM polarization appear sharper and more distinct than those in the TE case. This arises from the stronger coupling between the parallel electric field component (under TM polarization) and the external magnetic layer resonance, which enhances mode separation and visibility across the photonic band structure.

4. Conclusions

This paper presents an investigation of the magneto-optical response of a one-dimensional GaAs/AlAs ternary photonic crystal including an extrinsically magnetized GaAs layer. The applied magnetic field gives rise to a pronounced tunability of the photonic band structure, as was analyzed from the numerical results. Correspondingly, with an increase in the external magnetic field up to 0.75 T, the central photonic band gap shifts from 0.30 to 0.38 THz, showing strong magnetic field-induced modulation. The calculated transmission spectra demonstrate a modulation depth of nearly 100% (complete PBG), proving the great sensitivity of the structure to the magneto-optical variation in GaAs. In addition, it follows that the frequency of the modes clearly shifted; it increased from 0.30 to 0.36 THz or 0.38 THz under an applied field, with participation of anisotropic permittivity in producing the splitting of a localized mode. These quantitative results confirm that the mechanism of extrinsic magnetization provides an effective method for dynamic control over band gaps and defect states without geometrical structure reconfiguration; therefore, the proposed ternary configuration could be promising for compact tunable photonic components.
In general, these results confirm that extrinsic parameters provide effective mechanisms to engineer the spectral response of 1D photonic crystals. The observed tunability and polarization sensitivity make such structures promising candidates for the development of reconfigurable, wide-band transmission filters and advanced magneto-optical devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.; methodology, A.B. and H.B.; software, A.B.; validation, A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B.; writing—review and editing, A.B., H.B. and T.-W.H.; supervision, H.B., and T.-W.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

H.B. appreciates the financial support from the National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan under Grant No. NSTC 113-2222-E-019-003.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yablonovitch, E. Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 58, 2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. John, S. Strong localization of photons in certain disordered dielectric superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 58, 2486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Joannopoulos, J.D.; Meade, R.D.; Winn, J. Appendix D. In Photonic Crystals-Molding the Flow of Light; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  4. Soukoulis, C.M. Photonic band gap materials: The “semiconductors” of the future. Phys. Scr. 1996, 1996, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elsayed, H.A.; Aly, A.H. Terahertz frequency superconductor-nanocomposite photonic band gap. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2018, 32, 1850056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gong, Q.; Hu, X. Photonic Crystals: Principles and Applications; Jenny Stanford Publishing: Singapore, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vakhrushev, A. Theoretical Foundations and Application of Photonic Crystals; BoD–Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Shaban, S.M.; Mehaney, A.; Aly, A.H. Determination of 1-propanol, ethanol, and methanol concentrations in water based on a one-dimensional phoxonic crystal sensor. Appl. Opt. 2020, 59, 3878–3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Natesan, A.; Govindasamy, K.P.; Gopal, T.R.; Dhasarathan, V.; Aly, A.H. Tricore photonic crystal fibre based refractive index sensor for glucose detection. IET Optoelectron. 2018, 13, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Amiri, I.S.; Paul, B.K.; Ahmed, K.; Aly, A.H.; Zakaria, R.; Yupapin, P.; Vigneswaran, D. Tri-core photonic crystal fiber based refractive index dual sensor for salinity and temperature detection. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2019, 61, 847–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nouman, W.M.; Abd El-Ghany, S.E.S.; Sallam, S.M.; Dawood, A.F.B.; Aly, A.H. Biophotonic sensor for rapid detection of brain lesions using 1D photonic crystal. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2020, 52, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zaky, Z.A.; Aly, A.H. Theoretical study of a tunable low-temperature photonic crystal sensor using dielectric-superconductor nanocomposite layers. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2020, 33, 2983–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zaky, Z.A.; Aly, A.H. Modeling of a biosensor using Tamm resonance excited by graphene. Appl. Opt. 2021, 60, 1411–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rahimi, F.; Vahdani, M.R.K. Effects of external magnetic fields on the confined states and optical properties of conical quantum dot nanowire. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2024, 591, 171660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Awad, M.; Aly, A.H. Experimental and theoretical studies of hybrid multifunctional TiO2/TiN/TiO2. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 19036–19043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bazian, M. Photonic crystal add–drop filter: A review on principles and applications. Photonic Netw. Commun. 2021, 41, 57–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, S.; Hu, C.; Zhang, H. Unidirectional ultrabroadband and wide-angle absorption in graphene-embedded photonic crystals with the cascading structure comprising the Octonacci sequence. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2020, 37, 2678–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Biswal, A.; Kumar, R.; Nayak, C.; Samiappan, D. n-GaAs based extrinsic Dodecanacci photonic quasicrystal. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2020, 595, 412340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Biswal, A.; Kumar, R.; Nayak, C.; Samiappan, D. Photonic transmission spectra in an extrinsic semiconductor based Gaussian random multilayer. Opt. Mater. 2020, 102, 109799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arregui, G.; Lanzillotti-Kimura, N.D.; Sotomayor-Torres, C.M.; García, P.D. Anderson photon-phonon colocalization in certain random superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 043903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Torres-Torres, C.; García-Beltrán, G. Optical Nonlinearities in Nanostructured Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ilegems, M.; Pearson, G. Infrared Reflection Spectra of Ga1−xAlx As Mixed Crystals. Phys. Rev. B 1970, 1, 1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abadla, M.M.; Tabaza, N.A.; Tabaza, W.; Ramanujam, N.; Wilson, K.J.; Vigneswaran, D.; Taya, S.A. Properties of ternary photonic crystal consisting of dielectric/plasma/dielectric as a lattice period. Optik 2019, 185, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vincenti, M.; De Ceglia, D.; Grande, M.; D’Orazio, A.; Scalora, M. Nonlinear control of absorption in one-dimensional photonic crystal with graphene-based defect. Opt. Lett. 2013, 38, 3550–3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kumar, N.; Suthar, B.; Rostami, A. Novel optical behaviors of metamaterial and polymer-based ternary photonic crystal with lossless and lossy features. Opt. Commun. 2023, 529, 129073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Minden, H. Some Optical Properties of Aluminum Arsenide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1970, 17, 358–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Biswal, A.; Kumar, R.; Nayak, C.; Dhanalakshmi, S. Photonic bandgap characteristics of GaAs/AlAs-based one-dimensional quasi-periodic photonic crystal. Optik 2021, 234, 166597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, X.; Xiong, S. Optical properties of GaAs/AlAs superlattices with randomly distributed layer thicknesses. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 7146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Adachi, S. GaAs and Related Materials: Bulk Semiconducting and Superlattice Properties; World Scientific: Singapore, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  30. El-Khozondar, H.J.; Mahalakshmi, P.; El-Khozondar, R.J.; Ramanujam, N.; Amiri, I.; Yupapin, P. Design of one dimensional refractive index sensor using ternary photonic crystal waveguide for plasma blood samples applications. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2019, 111, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Aly, A.H.; Sayed, F.A. THz cutoff frequency and multifunction Ti2Ba2Ca2Cu3O10/GaAs photonic bandgap materials. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2020, 34, 2050091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Barati, M.; Aghajamali, A. Near-infrared tunable narrow filter properties in a 1D photonic crystal containing semiconductor metamaterial photonic quantum-well defect. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2016, 79, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mekis, A.; Fan, S.; Joannopoulos, J. Bound states in photonic crystal waveguides and waveguide bends. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 4809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bertolotti, J.; Gottardo, S.; Wiersma, D.S.; Ghulinyan, M.; Pavesi, L. Optical necklace states in Anderson localized 1D systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 113903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, H.-F.; Liu, S.-B.; Kong, X.-K.; Zou, L.; Li, C.-Z.; Qing, W.-s. Enhancement of omnidirectional photonic band gaps in one-dimensional dielectric plasma photonic crystals with a matching layer. Phys. Plasmas 2012, 19, 022103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Biswal, A.; Kumar, R.; Nayak, C.; Dhanalakshmi, S.; Behera, H.; Lyubchanskii, I. Analysis of transmission spectra in one-dimensional ternary photonic crystals with complex unit cell. Optik 2022, 261, 169169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kumar, N.; Kaliramna, S.; Singh, M. Design of cold plasma based ternary photonic crystal for microwave applications. Silicon 2022, 14, 6933–6944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dadoenkova, N.N.; Dadoenkova, Y.S.; Panyaev, I.S.; Sannikov, D.G.; Lyubchanskii, I.L. One-dimensional dielectric bi-periodic photonic structures based on ternary photonic crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 123, 043101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zaky, Z.A.; Sharma, A.; Alamri, S.; Saleh, N.; Aly, A.H. Detection of fat concentration in milk using ternary photonic crystal. Silicon 2022, 14, 6063–6073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Taya, S.A.; Sharma, A.; Doghmosh, N.; Colak, I. Detection of water concentration in ethanol solution using a ternary photonic crystal-based sensor. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 279, 125772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Molaei-Yeznabad, A.; Bahador, H. Refractive Index-Based Optimized Ternary Photonic Crystal Biosensor for Ultra Precise Detection of Cancer Cells. Sens. Imaging 2025, 26, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hughes, S.; Ramunno, L.; Young, J.F.; Sipe, J. Extrinsic Optical Scattering Loss in Photonic Crystal Waveguides: Role of Fabrication Disorder and Photon Group Velocity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 033903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. King, T.C.; Wang, C.C.; Kuo, W.K.; Wu, C.J. Analysis of effective plasma frequency in a magnetized extrinsic photonic crystal. IEEE Photon. J. 2013, 5, 2700706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. King, T.C.; Yang, C.C.; Hsieh, P.H.; Chang, T.W.; Wu, C.J. Analysis of tunable photonic band structure in an extrinsic plasma photonic crystal. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2015, 67, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Daher, M.G.; Taya, S.A.; Colak, I.; Vigneswaran, D.; Olaimat, M.M.; Patel, S.K.; Ramahi, O.M.; Almawgani, A.H. Design of a nano-sensor for cancer cell detection based on a ternary photonic crystal with high sensitivity and low detection limit. Chin. J. Phys. 2022, 77, 1168–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Taya, S. Ternary photonic crystal with left-handed material layer for refractometric application. Opto-Electron. Rev. 2018, 26, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yeh, P. Optical Waves in Layered Media; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1988; Volume 95. [Google Scholar]
  48. Born, M.; Wolf, E. Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chu, C.; Ohkawa, T. Transverse Electromagnetic Waves with E B . Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 48, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aghajamali, A.; Zare, A.; Wu, C.J. Analysis of defect mode in a one-dimensional symmetric double-negative photonic crystal containing magnetized cold plasma defect. Appl. Opt. 2015, 54, 8602–8606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of ternary 1D GaAs/AlAs-based photonic crystal containing magnetized GaAs as third layers for periodicity (N) with external magnetic field (B), electron density ( n e ), GaAs layer thickness ( d G ), AlAs layer thickness ( d A ), magnetized GaAs layer thickness ( d M ), vacuum refractive index ( n 0 ), and substrate refractive index ( n s ); the entire structure is suspended in air.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of ternary 1D GaAs/AlAs-based photonic crystal containing magnetized GaAs as third layers for periodicity (N) with external magnetic field (B), electron density ( n e ), GaAs layer thickness ( d G ), AlAs layer thickness ( d A ), magnetized GaAs layer thickness ( d M ), vacuum refractive index ( n 0 ), and substrate refractive index ( n s ); the entire structure is suspended in air.
Materials 18 05293 g001
Figure 2. Transmittance spectra of GaAs/AlAs-based 1D ternary multilayered PC for different modes of propagation for N = 30 with B = 0.75 T, n e = 1.5 × 10 22 cm−3, and θ 0 = 0 .
Figure 2. Transmittance spectra of GaAs/AlAs-based 1D ternary multilayered PC for different modes of propagation for N = 30 with B = 0.75 T, n e = 1.5 × 10 22 cm−3, and θ 0 = 0 .
Materials 18 05293 g002
Figure 3. Transmittance spectra of GaAs/AlAs-based 1D ternary multilayered PC for external magnetic field (B) with n e = 1.5 × 10 22 cm−3 and θ 0 = 0 in different modes of propagation.
Figure 3. Transmittance spectra of GaAs/AlAs-based 1D ternary multilayered PC for external magnetic field (B) with n e = 1.5 × 10 22 cm−3 and θ 0 = 0 in different modes of propagation.
Materials 18 05293 g003
Figure 4. Transmittance spectra of GaAs/AlAs-based 1D ternary multilayered photonic crystal for different values of electron density ( n e ) with B = 0.75 T and θ 0 = 0 in different modes of propagation.
Figure 4. Transmittance spectra of GaAs/AlAs-based 1D ternary multilayered photonic crystal for different values of electron density ( n e ) with B = 0.75 T and θ 0 = 0 in different modes of propagation.
Materials 18 05293 g004
Figure 5. Transmittance spectra of GaAs/AlAs-based 1D ternary multilayered PC for different values of incident angle ( θ 0 ) with B = 0.75 T and n e = 1.5 × 10 22 cm−3 in different modes of propagation.
Figure 5. Transmittance spectra of GaAs/AlAs-based 1D ternary multilayered PC for different values of incident angle ( θ 0 ) with B = 0.75 T and n e = 1.5 × 10 22 cm−3 in different modes of propagation.
Materials 18 05293 g005
Figure 6. Numerically simulated transmittance for GaAs/AlAs-based 1D ternary multilayered PC as a function of frequency and incident angle ( θ ) in different modes of propagation with B = 0.75 T and n e = 1.5 × 10 22 cm−3.
Figure 6. Numerically simulated transmittance for GaAs/AlAs-based 1D ternary multilayered PC as a function of frequency and incident angle ( θ ) in different modes of propagation with B = 0.75 T and n e = 1.5 × 10 22 cm−3.
Materials 18 05293 g006
Table 1. Numerical values used for the simulation.
Table 1. Numerical values used for the simulation.
ParametersValues
External magnetic field (B) 0.75 T
Electron concentration ( n e ) 1.5 × 10 22 cm−3
Static permittivity ( ϵ s ) 12.9
Angle of incident ( θ 0 ) 0
Electron mass ( m e ) 9.1 × 10 31 kg
Effective mass of electron ( m * )0.066 m
Vacuum permittivity ( ϵ 0 ) 8.854 × 10 12 C2N−1m−2
Spacial periodicity (N)30
GaAs ( d G )60 μ m
AlAs ( d A )100 μ m
Magnetized GaAs ( d M )110 μ m
Plasma frequency ( ω p ) 0.707 THz
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Biswal, A.; Behera, H.; Hsu, T.-W. Effects of Extrinsic Magnetized GaAs in One-Dimensional Ternary Photonic Crystals. Materials 2025, 18, 5293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18235293

AMA Style

Biswal A, Behera H, Hsu T-W. Effects of Extrinsic Magnetized GaAs in One-Dimensional Ternary Photonic Crystals. Materials. 2025; 18(23):5293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18235293

Chicago/Turabian Style

Biswal, Amita, Harekrushna Behera, and Tai-Wen Hsu. 2025. "Effects of Extrinsic Magnetized GaAs in One-Dimensional Ternary Photonic Crystals" Materials 18, no. 23: 5293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18235293

APA Style

Biswal, A., Behera, H., & Hsu, T.-W. (2025). Effects of Extrinsic Magnetized GaAs in One-Dimensional Ternary Photonic Crystals. Materials, 18(23), 5293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18235293

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop