Next Article in Journal
Advances in Polymer Nanocomposites for Drilling Fluids: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Electrical Energy Storage from Low-Grade Heat Using Reduced Graphene Oxide–Carbon Nanotube Composite Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gleeble-Simulated Ultra-Fast Cooling Unlocks Strength–Ductility Synergy in Fully Martensitic Ti-6Al-4V
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Alloy Strengthening Mechanisms, Microstructure Control, and Performance Optimization

1
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
2
School of Mechanical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(20), 4808; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204808
Submission received: 17 October 2025 / Accepted: 17 October 2025 / Published: 21 October 2025

1. Introduction and Scope

Alloys and metal matrix composites (MMCs) are fundamental enablers of technological progress across critical engineering sectors, including aviation, aerospace, marine, automotive, and advanced electronics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The rapid evolution of these industries is driving an escalating demand for materials that exhibit superior mechanical properties, lightweight characteristics [11,12,13,14], and multifunctional performance, particularly for large-scale, geometrically complex structural components [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Accordingly, developing high-performance advanced alloys and MMCs has emerged as a pivotal research frontier, holding immense potential for next-generation engineering applications.
Once the primary composition of a material is determined, its key properties—such as density, strength [7,20,23,24], electrical/thermal conductivity [25,26,27,28], tensile performance, ductility [29,30], high-temperature stability, and corrosion resistance—are predominantly determined by its microstructure [20,31,32,33]. Therefore, a deep understanding of the fundamental strengthening mechanisms and the development of effective microstructure control strategies are essential for optimizing the performance of these structural and functional materials.
This Special Issue, entitled “Alloy Strengthening Mechanisms, Microstructure Control, and Performance Optimization”, showcases the latest breakthroughs in understanding of strengthening mechanisms, microstructure evolution, and performance enhancement in alloys and MMCs. This Special Issue emphasizes establishing quantitative relationships among processing parameters, microstructure evolution, and mechanical properties. It also highlights the development and application of innovative processing strategies, novel alloy design approaches, and emerging characterization techniques.
By compiling cutting-edge research in this field, this Special Issue aims to provide critical insights to advance the development of next-generation high-performance materials for extreme service environments and advanced engineering applications.

2. Contributions

This Special Issue comprises fourteen peer-reviewed articles, categorized by material systems: five contributions on Ti alloys, four on Al alloys, and five dedicated to other advanced alloys, including Mo alloys, W alloys, Ni3Al alloys, high-entropy alloys, and stainless steel. Choi et al. [34] investigated the natural aging (NA) and artificial aging (AA) effects on the precipitate formation and the corresponding strengthening and deformation behaviors of Al–Mg–Zn alloys. NA-treated alloys showed ~10% higher elongation at an equivalent strength compared to AA-treated ones, due to their enhanced work-hardening capacity and narrower precipitate-free zones. NA samples mainly formed GP zones and solute clusters with a coherent interface with the matrix, while AA samples contained incoherent η′/η phases. TEM and EBSD analyses revealed more uniform geometrically necessary dislocations distribution and higher anisotropy in NA-treated sheets, offering guidance for aging process optimization in lightweight applications.
Jiang et al. [35] investigated the effect of pre-deformation on the corrosion fatigue crack propagation (CFCG) of an Al–Mg–Zn alloy in 3.5% NaCl solution. Tensile tests and molecular dynamics simulations showed that higher pre-deformation increased dislocation density and tensile strength by 2.63% (5%) and 10.00% (10%). EBSD and TEM analyses revealed that 5% pre-deformation caused dislocation pile-ups, promoting crack propagation, while 10% led to non-uniform dislocation distribution, enhancing crack resistance.
Šmalc et al. [36] modified the eutectic Al–Ni alloy by adding 0.6 wt.% Zr to enhance its mechanical properties via precipitation strengthening. After T5 heat treatment and aging at 350 °C, the formation of fine, coherent L12-Al3Zr precipitates contributed to the increased microhardness by ~60% and doubled the yield strength to 213 MPa room temperature (RT). TEM analysis showed the precipitates maintained relatively good thermal stability after 30 days. However, the strength enhancement was not retained at 300 °C, where the yield strength dropped to 53 MPa. The results suggest that Al–Ni–Zr alloys offer promising room-temperature performance but limited high-temperature strength retention.
Ren et al. [37] investigated non-axisymmetric die-less spinning of 6063-O aluminum alloy tubes with right-angle grooves using finite element simulation and experiments. Multi-pass forming yielded more uniform wall thickness and lower stress than single-pass forming, with stress localized at the groove bottom and strain concentrated at the roller exit. The study demonstrates that optimized roller path design is critical for improving groove quality and process stability.
Gołasz et al. [38] investigated the biocompatibility and antibacterial properties of Ti13Nb13Zr alloys treated by etching, sandblasting, and plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO), followed by covering in silver nanoparticle (AgNP) suspension. The PEO-treated alloys showed good biocompatibility with human fibroblast cells, promoting cell growth. However, deposited AgNPs exhibited only slight and short-term antibacterial effects against E. coli and S. aureus within the first two hours. The study highlights the need to optimize the concentration of AgNP for the PEO treatment of metal alloys to improve long-term antibacterial performance.
Ji et al. [39] proposed a novel coupled treatment method (PDCT) combining deep cryogenic treatment (DCT) with a high pulsed magnetic field (PMT) to improve the mechanical properties of an as-cast TC4 titanium alloy. The optimized PDCT sample exhibited a tensile strength of 921.4 MPa, elongation of 7.6%, and fracture energy of 5.47 × 107 J/m3, improved by 4.9%, 28.8%, and 80.5%, respectively, compared to the untreated alloy. The enhanced strength–toughness resulted from combined texture, dislocation, precipitation, and grain refinement strengthening induced by the synergistic effects of DCT and PMT.
Löschner et al. [40] analyzed the influence of Johnson–Cook (JC) material model parameters on FEM simulations of orthogonal turning for Ti6Al4V alloy. Experimental tests of cutting force components, temperature, and chip geometry were used to validate the simulation. Results showed that A, B, and m had the strongest impact on cutting forces, temperature, stress, and chip morphology, while C and n had lesser effects. The study emphasizes the importance of precise parameter calibration to ensure accuracy in modeling machining processes, especially for difficult-to-machine alloys like Ti6Al4V.
Xiao et al. [41] employed a Gleeble thermal simulator to investigate the effect of cooling rate on the microstructure evolution and mechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V. Compression tests revealed that ultra-fast cooling (~7000 °C/s) produces a fully martensitic Ti-6Al-4V structure with enhanced strength and increased fracture strain, which, based on 3D microstructure reconstruction and EVP-FFT crystal plasticity analysis, is attributed to refined α′ laths and a higher fraction of high-angle boundaries that promote uniform strain distribution and reduced stress triaxiality. The study highlights extreme-rate martensitic transformation as a potential pathway to overcome the traditional strength–ductility trade-off in Ti-6Al-4V.
Huang et al. [42] analyzed the titanium chip crushing process using finite element simulation to optimize the titanium chip crushing process. Simulation results revealed that increasing the number of roller teeth led to the stresses on the chips changing more smoothly towards the sides and the stresses changing more stably, and also reduced the length of the broken titanium chip. The number of teeth was identified as the most influential parameter, with the optimal conditions being 27 teeth for the crushing roller, a roller speed of 22 r/min, and a cutting edge angle of 90°.
Li et al. [43] investigated the structural stability and mechanical properties of FeCoCrNiMox (x = 0–1.3) high-entropy alloys (HEAs) using first-principles calculations coupled with the special quasi-random structure (SQS) method. It was found that all examined alloys were thermodynamically and dynamically stable except FeCoCrNiMo1.3, and Mo addition increased ductility and anisotropy while slightly reducing strength and stiffness. FeCoCrNiMo0.5 HEA coatings were then fabricated via laser cladding and showed a surface hardness of 437.91 HV0.2.
Zang et al. [44] studied the effect of small Ti additions (2 and 5 at.%) on Mo-40V-9Si-8B alloys prepared via high-energy ball milling and subsequent heat treatment. The Ti-containing alloys formed supersaturated (Mo,V,Ti) solid solutions during milling, which decomposed into (Mo,V,Ti)ss, (Mo,V,Ti)3Si, and (Mo,V,Ti)5SiB2 phases after heat treatment. Ti additions slightly refined particle size, increased microstrain, and modestly improved microhardness. The results suggest that Ti- and V-modified Mo–Si–B alloys offer potential for high-temperature structural applications.
Cai et al. [45] prepared Cu-coated graphene (Cu@Gr)-reinforced W–Mo–Cu composites via vacuum infiltration sintering at 1300 °C for 1.5 h, and investigated the effects of Cu@Gr content (0.2–1.0 wt.%) and W–Mo skeleton relative density (73–85%). It was found that adding Cu@Gr promoted Mo2C formation and improved densification. At 0.6 wt.% Cu@Gr, the composite containing 0.6 wt.% Cu@Gr exhibits the highest relative density, thermal conductivity, and electrical conductivity, showing 8%, 64% and 73% increases, respectively, versus Cu@Gr-free samples. Adjusting skeleton density influenced conductivity and hardness, but did not hinder the densification.
Huang et al. [46] investigated the microstructural evolution and mechanical degradation mechanisms of cold-drawn 310S stainless steel under repeated thermal cycling between 900 °C and room temperature. The results revealed that the thermal cycling induced significant lattice distortion, dislocation accumulation, and recrystallization, leading to grain refinement and tensile strength improvement, but also caused subsurface cracking and ductility loss. These findings indicate that even short-term cyclic thermal exposure can markedly accelerate embrittlement.
Jóźwik et al. [47] explored the effects of the temperature and strain rate during the hot rolling process on the microstructural evolution of fine-grained Ni3Al intermetallic alloy doped with Zr and B. EBSD analysis revealed that dynamic recrystallization initiated at 1100 °C, with recrystallized grain fraction increasing at higher temperatures and strain rates. A non-stationary heat transfer model was developed, and it was found that higher strain rates led to higher material temperatures during deformation.

3. Outlook

This Special Issue of Materials has attracted a substantial number of submissions, culminating in the publication of 14 rigorously peer-reviewed, high-quality articles. The collected studies comprehensively showcase the latest advancements in strengthening mechanisms, microstructure control, and performance optimization of alloys and metal matrix composites. They provide critical insights into the interrelationships among processing techniques, microstructural evolution, and material properties. By employing innovative alloy design, advanced processing methods, and cutting-edge multi-dimensional, multi-scale characterization techniques, these works demonstrate effective pathways for enhancing overall material performance. Collectively, they offer valuable guidance for the development of next-generation high-performance materials targeted for critical applications in aerospace, the automotive industry, the energy industry, and advanced electronics.
As Guest Editors, we sincerely appreciate the exceptional contributions from all authors, the rigorous evaluations by the reviewers, and the dedicated support from the editorial team, which were instrumental in ensuring the scientific rigor and impact of this Special Issue.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52304380 and 51674171).

Acknowledgments

We extend our heartfelt thanks to all the authors and reviewers whose exceptional efforts made this Special Issue possible. We hope this Special Issue will serve as an informative and valuable reference for ongoing and future research in the field.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Choi, K.; Lee, S.; Bae, D. Natural and Artificial Aging Effects on the Deformation Behaviors of Al–Mg–Zn Alloy Sheets. Materials 2024, 17, 4478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17184478.
  • Gołasz, P.; Płoska, A.; Korniienko, V.; Diedkova, K.; Varava, Y.; Zieliński, R.; Pogorielov, M.; Simka, W. Modification of Ti13Nb13Zr Alloy Surface via Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation and Silver Nanoparticles Decorating. Materials 2025, 18, 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020349.
  • Jiang, H.; Jin, J.; Fang, Y.; Gou, G.; Lu, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, H.; Sun, H.; Feng, J.; Chen, J.; Fu, Z. Effects of Pre-Deformation in Corrosion Fatigue Crack Growth of Al-Mg-Zn Alloy. Materials 2025, 18, 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020365.
  • Ji, Z.; Nan, H.; Li, G.; Guo, S.; Ye, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, P. Synergistic Effects of Deep Cryogenic and Pulsed Magnetic Field Treatments on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Aero-TC4 Titanium Alloy. Materials 2025, 18, 817. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18040817.
  • Li, H.; Jin, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, J.; Sun, H.; Sun, S.; Tang, W.; Gou, G. Mechanical Properties and σ-Phase Precipitation in FeCoCrNiMox (x = 0, 0.4, 0.5, 0.8, 1.3) High-Entropy Alloys: Insights from First-Principles Study. Materials 2025, 18, 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061267.
  • Huang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Huang, X.; Liu, T.; Ji, H. Finite Element Simulation and Optimization of Process Parameters for Titanium Chip Crusher. Materials 2025, 18, 1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18091894.
  • Zang, D.; Becker, J.; Betke, U.; Hasemann, G.; Khanchych, K.; Gorr, B.; Krüger, M. Phase Evolution During High-Energy Ball Milling and Annealing of Ti-Doped Mo-V-Si-B Alloys. Materials 2025, 18, 2494. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112494.
  • Cai, J.; Jiang, Q.; Feng, K.; Zhou, H. Tailoring Microstructure and Properties of W-Mo-Cu Composites Fabricated via Infiltration Sintering: Effects of Graphene Addition and Skeleton Relative Density. Materials 2025, 18, 2539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112539.
  • Huang, Y.; Yen, Y.; Hung, F. A Study on Thermally Fatigued Phase Transformation and Bending Fracture Mechanisms of 310S Stainless Steel. Materials 2025, 18, 2654. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112654.
  • Jóźwik, P.; Polkowski, W.; Panas, A.; Bojar, Z. Microstructure Evolution of Ni3Al-Based Intermetallic Alloy Strips After Hot Rolling. Materials 2025, 18, 3016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18133016.
  • Šmalc, J.; Zaky, A.; Markoli, B.; Šturm, R. Microstructural Stability and High-Temperature Mechanical Behavior of Al–Ni–Zr Alloy Strengthened by L12-Al3Zr Precipitates. Materials 2025, 18, 3068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18133068.
  • Löschner, P.; Niesłony, P.; Kołodziej, S. Parameter Sensitivity Study of the Johnson–Cook Model in FEM Turning of Ti6Al4V Alloy. Materials 2025, 18, 3351. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18143351.
  • Ren, X.; Fan, Z.; Jia, Z.; Shen, Y.; You, H. Numerical Simulation Study on Non-Axisymmetric Die-Less Spinning with a Right-Angle Groove in the Tube. Materials 2025, 18, 3858. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18163858.
  • Xiao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Liu, P.; Chen, L. Gleeble-Simulated Ultra-Fast Cooling Unlocks Strength–Ductility Synergy in Fully Martensitic Ti-6Al-4V. Materials 2025, 18, 4572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18194572.

References

  1. Fan, Z.H.; Tian, Y.B.; Liu, Z.Q.; Shi, C.; Zhao, Y.G. Investigation of a novel finishing tool in magnetic field assisted finishing for titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. J. Manuf. Process. 2019, 43, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kang, L.M.; Yang, C. A Review on High-Strength Titanium Alloys: Microstructure, Strengthening, and Properties. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2019, 21, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fan, Z.H.; Tian, Y.B.; Zhou, Q.; Shi, C. Enhanced magnetic abrasive finishing of Ti-6Al-4V using shear thickening fluids additives. Precis. Eng.-J. Int. Soc. Precis. Eng. Nanotechnol. 2020, 64, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Carvalho, S.R.; Horovistiz, A.; Davim, J.P. The role of roughness parameters in grading the machined surface quality in Ti-alloys. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B-J. Eng. Manuf. 2024, 238, 1013–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kishore, K.; Sinha, M.K.; Chauhan, S.R. A comprehensive investigation of surface morphology during grinding of Inconel 625 using conventional grinding wheels. J. Manuf. Process. 2023, 97, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pan, H.C.; Kang, R.; Li, J.R.; Xie, H.B.; Zeng, Z.R.; Huang, Q.Y.; Yang, C.L.; Ren, Y.P.; Qin, G.W. Mechanistic investigation of a low-alloy Mg-Ca-based extrusion alloy with high strength-ductility synergy. Acta Mater. 2020, 186, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Z.; Xie, J.S.; Zhang, J.H.; Wu, R.Z.; Wang, J.; Yang, X.S. Ultra-strong and ductile magnesium alloy enabled by ultrafine grains with nano-spacing solute-enriched planar defects. Int. J. Plast. 2025, 189, 104348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, H.L.; Feng, K.Q.; Ke, S.X.; Liu, Y.F. Densification and properties investigation of W-Mo-Cu composites prepared by large current electric field sintering with different technologic parameter. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 767, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, H.L.; Feng, K.Q.; Xiao, Y.H.; Liu, Y.F.; Ke, S.X. Pressure effects on a novel W-Mo-Cu alloy by large current electric field sintering: Sintering behavior, microstructure and properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 785, 965–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, H.L.; Feng, K.Q.; Liu, Y.F. Densification, microstructure, and properties of W-Mo-Cu alloys prepared with nano-sized Cu powders via large electric current sintering. Adv. Powder Technol. 2022, 33, 103703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, L.; Yuan, Q.; Tan, J.; Dong, Q.; Lv, H.; Wang, F.L.; Tang, A.T.; Eckert, J.; Pan, F.S. Enhancing the room-temperature plasticity of magnesium alloys: Mechanisms and strategies. J. Magnes. Alloys 2024, 12, 4741–4767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shah, S.; Liu, M.P.; Khan, A.; Ahmad, F.; Chaudry, U.M.; Khan, M.Y.; Abdullah, M.R.; Xu, S.W.; Peng, Z. Recrystallization aspects and factors affecting their roles in Mg alloys: A comprehensive review. J. Magnes. Alloys 2025, 13, 1879–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Luo, S.; Li, F.; Bao, F.Y.; Zhang, J.Y.; Wang, H.B. Development and innovations in extrusion process of aluminum and magnesium alloys: A review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025, 254, 206–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, D.H.; Lee, G.M.; Park, S.H. Difference in extrusion temperature dependences of microstructure and mechanical properties between extruded AZ61 and AZ91 alloys. J. Magnes. Alloys 2023, 11, 1683–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, Y.F.; Li, J.Z.; Che, S.H.; Yang, Z.D.; Tian, Y.W. Chemical leveling mechanism and oxide film properties of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 13753–13766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, S.Y.; Yu, Y.C.; Wang, H.; Ren, L.; Yang, K. Study on mechanical behavior of Cu-bearing antibacterial titanium alloy implant. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2022, 125, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zha, M.; Zhang, H.M.; Meng, X.T.; Jia, H.L.; Jin, S.B.; Sha, G.; Wang, H.Y.; Li, Y.J.; Roven, H.J. Stabilizing a severely deformed Al-7Mg alloy with a multimodal grain structure via Mg solute segregation. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 89, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, Z.; Xu, W.; Zhao, D.Y.; Zhang, B. Improving the strength and SCC resistance of an Al-5Mg-3Zn alloy with low-angle grain boundary structure. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023, 161, 63–73. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, H.T.; Zhang, Q.D.; Wang, F.Y.; Guo, C.; Yang, D.H.; Wang, Z.; Tang, X.C.; Li, Z.P.; Nagaumi, H. Influence of Mo on microstructure, mechanical properties and intergranular corrosion properties of Al-Mg-Mn alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 1007, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guo, C.; Wang, H.; Guo, Y.Q.; Chen, Y.F.; Yang, D.H.; Fu, J.Y.; Wu, Z.B.; Zhang, H.T.; Liu, X.A.; Nagaumi, H. Understanding the strengthening mechanism and corrosion behavior of Al-Mg-Zn(-Ag) alloys treated by non-linear heating ageing. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1010, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, Z.C.; Xu, W.; Zhao, D.Y.; Zhang, B. Research Article Enhancing strength and stress corrosion cracking resistance in high-Mg Al-Mg alloys through nanostructuring and controlled annealing. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025, 224, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yao, C.Y.; Ji, Y.C.; Ding, F.; Wen, J.H.; Qin, W.T.; Xiao, F.L.; Wang, D.; Xiao, K.; Dong, C.F. Revealing the intergranular corrosion mechanism of AA5083 alloys through experiments and atomic-scale computation. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025, 216, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, H.; Zhang, D.; Qiu, C.; Chen, D. Cyclic deformation behavior of a high-strength low-alloy (HSLA) magnesium alloy with heterostructures. J. Magnes. Alloys 2024, 12, 4610–4621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shen, G.W.; Chen, X.L.; Yan, J.; Fan, L.Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Guan, R.G. Effects of heat treatment processes on the mechanical properties, microstructure evolution, and strengthening mechanisms of Al-Mg-Zn-Cu alloy. J. Mater. Res. Technol.-JmrT 2023, 27, 5380–5388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Han, Y.; Ma, Z.Y.; Yang, C.C.; Ding, Y.G.; Lu, P.B.; Tan, B.; Zheng, Q.L.; Liu, Z.W. Synchronized Enhancement of Electrical Conductivity and Mechanical Properties of A356 Alloy via Gd Alloying. Metall. Mater. Trans. A-Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 2025, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lunn, K.F.; Apelian, D. Thermal and Electrical Conductivity of Aluminum Alloys: Fundamentals, structure-property relationships, and pathways to enhance conductivity. Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process. 2025, 924, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Y.X.; Liu, Y.C.; Wang, P.Z.; He, Z.N.; Wang, L.Z.; Akhtar, S.; Lu, Z.D.; Jiao, X.Y.; Ge, S.J.; Zhang, Y.C.; et al. A newly-developed high-pressure die-cast Al-1.5Fe-1Ni alloy with high thermal conductivity: Design, microstructure, and properties. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025, 245, 130–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, Y.L.; Zhang, X.; Zhong, G.; Zhang, J.C.; Yang, Y.; Kang, D.; Li, H.T.; Jie, W.Q.; Schumacher, P.; Li, J.H. Elucidating thermal conductivity mechanism of Al-9Si based alloys with trace transition elements (Mn, Cr, V). J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 907, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, H.F.; Ding, Y.T.; Li, R.M.; Gao, Y.B. Enhanced strength-ductility synergy and activation of non-basal slip in as-extruded Mg-Zn-Ca alloy via heterostructure. J. Mater. Res. Technol.-JmrT 2024, 28, 1841–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jin, Z.Z.; Zha, M.; Wang, S.Q.; Wang, S.C.; Wang, C.; Jia, H.L.; Wang, H.Y. Alloying design and microstructural control strategies towards developing Mg alloys with enhanced ductility. J. Magnes. Alloys 2022, 10, 1191–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Gupta, R.K.; Sukiman, N.L.; Zhang, R.; Davies, C.H.J.; Birbilis, N. Influence of alloyed Nd content on the corrosion of an Al-5Mg alloy. Corros. Sci. 2013, 73, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zha, M.; Li, Y.J.; Mathiesen, R.H.; Bjorge, R.; Roven, H.J. Microstructure evolution and mechanical behavior of a binary Al-7Mg alloy processed by equal-channel angular pressing. Acta Mater. 2015, 84, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Stemper, L.; Mitas, B.; Kremmer, T.; Otterbach, S.; Uggowitzer, P.J.; Pogatscher, S. Age-hardening of high pressure die casting AlMg alloys with Zn and combined Zn and Cu additions. Mater. Des. 2019, 181, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Choi, K.; Lee, S.; Bae, D. Natural and Artificial Aging Effects on the Deformation Behaviors of Al-Mg-Zn Alloy Sheets. Materials 2024, 17, 4478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jiang, H.; Jin, J.; Fang, Y.; Gou, G.; Lu, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, H.; Sun, H.; Feng, J.; Chen, J.; et al. Effects of Pre-Deformation in Corrosion Fatigue Crack Growth of Al-Mg-Zn Alloy. Materials 2025, 18, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Šmalc, J.; Zaky, A.; Markoli, B.; Šturm, R. Microstructural Stability and High-Temperature Mechanical Behavior of Al–Ni–Zr Alloy Strengthened by L12-Al3Zr Precipitates. Materials 2025, 18, 3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ren, X.; Fan, Z.; Jia, Z.; Shen, Y.; You, H. Numerical Simulation Study on Non-Axisymmetric Die-Less Spinning with a Right-Angle Groove in the Tube. Materials 2025, 18, 3858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Golasz, P.; Ploska, A.; Korniienko, V.; Diedkova, K.; Varava, Y.; Zielinski, R.; Pogorielov, M.; Simka, W. Modification of Ti13Nb13Zr Alloy Surface via Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation and Silver Nanoparticles Decorating. Materials 2025, 18, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ji, Z.; Nan, H.; Li, G.; Guo, S.; Ye, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, P. Synergistic Effects of Deep Cryogenic and Pulsed Magnetic Field Treatments on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Aero-TC4 Titanium Alloy. Materials 2025, 18, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Löschner, P.; Niesłony, P.; Kołodziej, S. Parameter Sensitivity Study of the Johnson–Cook Model in FEM Turning of Ti6Al4V Alloy. Materials 2025, 18, 3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xiao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Liu, P.; Chen, L. Gleeble-Simulated Ultra-Fast Cooling Unlocks Strength–Ductility Synergy in Fully Martensitic Ti-6Al-4V. Materials 2025, 18, 4572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Huang, X.; Liu, T.; Ji, H. Finite Element Simulation and Optimization of Process Parameters for Titanium Chip Crusher. Materials 2025, 18, 1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, H.; Jin, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, J.; Sun, H.; Sun, S.; Tang, W.; Gou, G. Mechanical Properties and sigma-Phase Precipitation in FeCoCrNiMo(x) (x = 0, 0.4, 0.5, 0.8, 1.3) High-Entropy Alloys: Insights from First-Principles Study. Materials 2025, 18, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zang, D.; Becker, J.; Betke, U.; Hasemann, G.; Khanchych, K.; Gorr, B.; Kruger, M. Phase Evolution During High-Energy Ball Milling and Annealing of Ti-Doped Mo-V-Si-B Alloys. Materials 2025, 18, 2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cai, J.; Jiang, Q.; Feng, K.; Zhou, H. Tailoring Microstructure and Properties of W-Mo-Cu Composites Fabricated via Infiltration Sintering: Effects of Graphene Addition and Skeleton Relative Density. Materials 2025, 18, 2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Huang, Y.T.; Yen, Y.W.; Hung, F.Y. A Study on Thermally Fatigued Phase Transformation and Bending Fracture Mechanisms of 310S Stainless Steel. Materials 2025, 18, 2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jóźwik, P.; Polkowski, W.; Panas, A.J.; Bojar, Z. Microstructure Evolution of Ni3Al-Based Intermetallic Alloy Strips After Hot Rolling. Materials 2025, 18, 3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, H.; Feng, K. Alloy Strengthening Mechanisms, Microstructure Control, and Performance Optimization. Materials 2025, 18, 4808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204808

AMA Style

Zhou H, Feng K. Alloy Strengthening Mechanisms, Microstructure Control, and Performance Optimization. Materials. 2025; 18(20):4808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204808

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Hongling, and Keqin Feng. 2025. "Alloy Strengthening Mechanisms, Microstructure Control, and Performance Optimization" Materials 18, no. 20: 4808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204808

APA Style

Zhou, H., & Feng, K. (2025). Alloy Strengthening Mechanisms, Microstructure Control, and Performance Optimization. Materials, 18(20), 4808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204808

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop