Next Article in Journal
Magnetic Properties and Strengthening Mechanism of Cu-Bearing Non-Oriented Silicon Steel
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Optimization and Long-Term Strength of Basic Magnesium Sulfate Cement Prepared with Accelerated Carbonated Boron Mud
Previous Article in Special Issue
Copper Slag Cathodes for Eco-Friendly Hydrogen Generation: Corrosion and Electrochemical Insights for Saline Water Splitting
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Research on Electrocatalytic Materials for Hydrogen Evolution and Oxygen Evolution

U.S. Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD 20783, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(18), 4232; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184232
Submission received: 26 August 2025 / Revised: 3 September 2025 / Accepted: 5 September 2025 / Published: 9 September 2025
There is growing interest in pursuing more sustainable energy sources to replace traditional fossil fuels. Hydrogen stands out as a promising option because it can store and release energy efficiently and produces only water when used as fuel [1]. Conventional hydrogen production primarily relies on natural gas reformation, a process that demands substantial investment in infrastructure and transportation. As an alternative, water electrolysis using electricity offers a more adaptable alternative. This method splits water into hydrogen and oxygen, producing high-purity hydrogen suitable for applications such as fuel cells, where additional purification is unnecessary [2,3]. Furthermore, when driven by indigenous energy sources such as solar, wind, or hydropower, water electrolysis can strengthen energy resilience and provide capabilities that reduce—and potentially eliminate—reliance on fossil fuel supply. However, the inherent kinetic barriers to hydrogen evolution reactions (HERs) and oxygen evolution reactions (OERs) demand highly efficient and cost-effective electrocatalysts to make them viable at scale. To overcome this, researchers are working to develop advanced materials that can speed up these reactions efficiently and affordably, but this remains a major challenge in the field [1,2,3,4]. This Special Issue, ‘Research on Electrocatalytic Materials for Hydrogen Evolution and Oxygen Evolution’, gathers ten original research papers that highlight recent advances in catalyst design, synthesis, and evaluation for the HERs and OERs used in water splitting. The contributions span a range of strategies, from atomic-level surface modification and heterostructure engineering to waste valorization and electrolyte design, offering insights into our fundamental understanding of this topic, as well as practical implementations.
For large-scale applications, the cost of catalysts must be considered alongside their catalytic activity. Currently, state-of-the-art water-splitting catalysts still heavily rely on noble metals. Therefore, the development of efficient, non-precious metal catalysts is in high demand. In this Special Issue, Leiva-Guajardo et al. demonstrate the use of industrial copper slag waste as a HER electrode in saline water electrolysis. Its porous structure facilitates ion transport and enhances HER kinetics while offering environmental remediation through waste reuse. Bojîncă et al. compared Ni catalysts produced via pulsed current deposition from Watts and citrate baths. Ni deposited from citrate exhibits finer grains and superior HER performance, highlighting electrolyte control as a key synthesis lever. In cases where noble metals are used, developing strategies to minimize their loading is essential for reducing costs. Single-atom catalysts (SACs) have emerged as a promising solution, offering advantages such as uniform active sites, high atom utilization, and excellent catalytic activity. Wu et al. designed a sequential underpotential deposition approach to anchor Cu and Pt single atoms onto N-doped graphene, achieving high turnover frequencies in alkaline HERs due to maximized active site exposure. Zhang et al. construct Mo2C nanoparticles encapsulated in MoS2 layers to form synergistic interfaces, enhancing charge transport and hydrogen adsorption, resulting in robust acidic HER performance. To investigate the underlying mechanism, Li, Chu et al. employed XPS depth profiling, revealing that P-doping facilitates the reconstruction of sulfide catalysts into Ni-O species during alkaline HERs. This transformation boosts catalytic activity by modulating the electronic structure and d-band center. In addition to catalyst improvement, Perović et al. introduced Ni, Zn, and Mo ions into an alkaline electrolyte as ionic activators, resulting in enhanced HER activity. This in situ activation method reduces overpotentials and energy costs, showcasing a potential low-cost improvement route.
Regarding the alkaline oxygen evolution half-reaction, transition-metal-based layered double-hydroxides (LDH) represent one of the most active classes of OER catalysts. In this Special Issue, Li et al. investigate the effect of Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn doping on NiCo-layered double-hydroxides. Fe-doped catalysts exhibit the best OER performance due to their improved conductivity and nanosheet dispersion. This study offers significant contributions to the development of efficient electrocatalysts for OERs, advancing our understanding of key design principles for enhanced catalytic performance. Yang et al. fabricated composite catalysts using a short plasma process, forming a defect-rich interface between NiFe-LDH and PbO2 on reduced graphene oxide. This structure exhibits excellent OER activity with low overpotentials. Although an OER is thermodynamically more favorable in alkaline electrolytes, it remains a significant scientific challenge in acidic environments, especially when paired with a Pt cathode for acidic water splitting, due to issues related primarily to catalyst stability. Kuang et al. presented a CeO2-Ir hybrid catalyst with strong interfacial coupling on carbon nanotubes. This structure achieves high OER activity and durability in acidic media, using significantly reduced Ir content. Lastly, Sun et al. developed porous NiTiO3-BiOBr composites that exhibit efficient photocatalytic activity under visible light. A type-II heterojunction facilitates charge separation and extends photocatalytic lifetime.
The ten contributions showcased in this Special Issue illustrate the breadth and depth of current research efforts in the field of electrocatalyst development, from atomic-level design to large-scale waste reuse. They offer valuable insights into the structure–activity relationships, reaction mechanisms, and performance engineering concerns present in diverse electrochemical conditions. We thank all of the contributing authors, peer-reviewers, and the Materials editorial team for their dedication and support. We hope that this Special Issue will serve as a vital reference for researchers working to realize clean and efficient hydrogen technologies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yue, M.; Lambert, H.; Pahon, E.; Roche, R.; Jemei, S.; Hissel, D. Hydrogen energy systems: A critical review of technologies, applications, trends and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 146, 111180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Service, R.F. The parting of water. Science 2025, 387, 354–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Imran, S.; Hussain, M. Emerging trends in water splitting innovations for solar hydrogen production: Analysis, comparison, and economical insights. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 77, 975–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Perumal, S.; Pokhrel, I.; Muhammad, U.; Shao, X.; Han, Y.; Kim, M.; Lee, H. Recent advances in electrochemical water splitting electrocatalysts: Categorization by parameters and catalyst types. ACS Mater. Lett. 2024, 6, 3625–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Chu, D. Research on Electrocatalytic Materials for Hydrogen Evolution and Oxygen Evolution. Materials 2025, 18, 4232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184232

AMA Style

Li J, Chu D. Research on Electrocatalytic Materials for Hydrogen Evolution and Oxygen Evolution. Materials. 2025; 18(18):4232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184232

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jiangtian, and Deryn Chu. 2025. "Research on Electrocatalytic Materials for Hydrogen Evolution and Oxygen Evolution" Materials 18, no. 18: 4232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184232

APA Style

Li, J., & Chu, D. (2025). Research on Electrocatalytic Materials for Hydrogen Evolution and Oxygen Evolution. Materials, 18(18), 4232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184232

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop