Next Article in Journal
Arc Jet Testing and Modeling Study for Ablation of SiFRP Composites in Shear Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Copper Alloying on Hydrogen Embrittlement of Fe-28Mn-10Al-1C Austenitic Low-Density Steel
Previous Article in Special Issue
First-Principles Study on the Electrical and Thermal Conductivities of Cu–Zn Binary Alloys
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Modelling and Simulation of Materials in Applied Sciences

by
Evaggelos Kaselouris
1,2
1
Physical Acoustics and Optoacoustics Laboratory, Department of Music Technology and Acoustics, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 74133 Rethymnon, Greece
2
Institute of Plasma Physics and Lasers-IPPL, University Research and Innovation Centre, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 74150 Rethymnon, Greece
Materials 2025, 18(17), 4141; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18174141
Submission received: 20 August 2025 / Revised: 27 August 2025 / Accepted: 1 September 2025 / Published: 4 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Modelling and Simulation of Materials in Applied Sciences)
Advances in materials science, engineering, and computer science have created new opportunities for physicists and engineers to develop novel methods for material processing and characterization. This has led to a greater need for advanced modeling and simulation techniques that can capture multiphysics phenomena across various spatial and temporal scales. As a result, modeling and simulation have become essential tools, working alongside experimental measurements to deepen our understanding of materials.
In recent years, significant progress has been achieved in computational approaches such as finite element simulations [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], multiphysics simulations [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], ab initio and molecular dynamics simulations [19,20,21,22,23,24,25], and structural optimization algorithms [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Applications span a wide spectrum of engineering fields, including mechanical and manufacturing engineering [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46], mechanical behavior and characterization of materials [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60], thermomechanics [16,17,18,61,62,63,64,65,66] and thermohydrodynamics [67,68,69], vibration and acoustics [70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77], and fluid dynamics [78,79,80,81,82,83,84]. Materials under study range from metals and alloys to composites, metamaterials, and multifunctional structures. This enlarged bibliography highlights the breadth of modelling and simulation approaches and highlights the effective integration of computational and experimental methods, showing that simulations are not just for predicting outcomes but also for guiding the design, processing, and optimization of materials.
Within this broad context, the contributions collected in this Special Issue (Refs. [85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94]) can be grouped into five specific topics that illustrate how these general advances are applied to cutting-edge problems in materials science. These are as follows:
(i)
Finite element simulations in mechanical and manufacturing engineering: Advanced roll forming of dual-phase steels [85] and optimization of corrugated tubes for crashworthiness [86].
(ii)
Mechanical behavior and characterization of materials: Integration of digital image correlation for accurate property determination [87]; fibrous material remodeling under stress [88]; lightweight and multifunctional structures, including TPMS sandwich cores [89] and tunable phononic crystals [90].
(iii)
Reliability and vibration performance of engineered systems: Fatigue life prediction of composite hydrogen storage vessels under random vibration [91].
(iv)
Thermohydrodynamic multiphysics modelling: Simulation of plasma arc melting for titanium alloys [92].
(v)
Ab initio, atomistic modelling of materials: Short-range ordering in gallium melts [93] and first principle calculations in Cu–Zn alloys [94].
Song and co-authors [85] performed finite element simulations using Abaqus to investigate the roll forming process of a wheel rim made from high-strength dual-phase steel DP590 following flash butt welding. The study modeled the flaring, three-roll forming, and expansion stages, incorporating weld- and heat-affected zone microstructural data to analyze stress–strain distribution, thickness reduction, and forming stability. Results showed stress and strain concentrations in welded and coarse- or fine-grained heat-affected zones, with significant thickness reduction in groove and flange sections due to softening in intercritical and subcritical HAZ regions. Microstructural features, such as layered martensite and coarse grains, played a decisive role in deformation behavior. Process optimization, including a recommended friction coefficient of 0.4 and an optimal feed-to-roll speed ratio of 15 mm/s to 1:1.2, improved forming quality. The findings highlight the need for careful application of DP590 in rim manufacturing and suggest broader potential in automotive, aerospace, and rail sectors, as well as opportunities for advanced simulation methods, parameter refinement, and microstructure control to enhance performance and durability.
To address the limitations of longitudinal corrugated tubes (LCTs) and circumferential corrugated tubes (CCTs) in crashworthiness, a novel bi-directional corrugated tube (BCT) was developed in the study of Zou and co-authors [86], combining the high specific energy absorption of CCTs with the stable platform force of LCTs. Formed by rolling a bi-directional corrugated structure into a circular tubular form, the BCT was evaluated through experiments and finite element simulations, with results showing strong agreement. Parametric studies and multi-objective optimization revealed that tailored geometric parameters significantly improve energy absorption and stability, with the BCT achieving up to 80% higher specific energy absorption than CCTs and 45% higher than LCTs, while reducing ultimate load capacity. These findings position the BCT as a promising energy absorber for applications in automotive crash boxes, aerospace structures, and other fields requiring enhanced crashworthiness, with future work focusing on high-speed impact and vibration behavior.
Accurate mechanical property parameters are essential for reliable finite element simulations, and the study of Wang and co-authors [87] compared strain gauge and digital image correlation (DIC) techniques in tensile testing of 316 L stainless steel used in pressurized water reactor pipelines. Results showed that while both methods yield nearly identical data within the strain gauge’s range, DIC offered a far broader measurement scope, capturing complete strain evolution and enhancing elastoplastic simulation accuracy. Finite element predictions calibrated with DIC data closely matched experimental strain distributions, validating DIC as a powerful tool for both parameter acquisition and simulation verification. Its wider applicability positions it as a promising method for characterizing complex, heterogeneous nuclear structures such as welded joints or defect-containing components, where traditional gauges face spatial limitations.
Rodella [88] presented a continuum model for fibrous materials, like those in biological tissues and composites, that undergo plastic remodeling under mechanical stress. The research identified three distinct classes of material behavior based on how their internal fibers reorient under tension. This reorientation led to complex and extreme responses, including phase segregation (where different regions of the material develop unique fiber alignments) and transitions between auxetic and non-auxetic properties. The findings, derived from a combination of analytical and numerical methods, offer significant implications for engineering new materials with tunable properties for applications ranging from soft robotics and protective equipment to biomedical implants.
Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) sandwich structures offer promising lightweight, high-strength, and energy-absorbing solutions, and the study of Vasile and co-authors [89] evaluated eight novel TPMS cores and a stochastic topology using finite element analysis, using Ansys, with both implicit and conventional modeling approaches. While implicit modeling proved as accurate as traditional CAD-based methods, it required up to four times greater computational effort. Sensitivity analyses identified optimal meshing parameters, and four material models for SLA-manufactured photopolymer parts were assessed, with the Multilinear model achieving the highest accuracy at only 2.54% deviation from experimental results. Numerical simulations closely matched experimental failure mechanisms for most cases, validating the predictive capability of the approach. The findings highlight implicit modeling as a viable tool for optimizing complex geometries before fabrication, offering valuable guidance for designing high-performance sandwich structures in engineering applications.
The study of Kaniolakis Kaloudis and co-authors [90] investigated how unit cell multiplicity influenced the acoustic response of phononic crystals (PCs), using a laser–plasma sound source characterization method combined with computational multiphysics simulations. Results revealed that increasing cell multiplicity deepened phononic bandgaps, exponentially attenuated acoustic energy in the first bandgap, and enhanced spectral flatness in passband regions, while also increasing the number of resonant peaks tied to spherical harmonics and standing wave modes. A methodology was proposed to determine the number of unit cells required to achieve a specific bandgap depth, especially with respect to the behavior of a structure with infinite length. These findings underscore the tunability of PCs for targeted sound control and noise insulation applications, and set the stage for future studies on defected cells, higher-order structures, and material density effects.
Xiong and co-authors [91] presented an experimental–numerical investigation of composite hydrogen storage vessels (CHSVs) under random vibration, a key reliability concern for fuel cell vehicle applications. Finite element models, validated against modal testing with <9% frequency deviation, were used to predict stress distribution and fatigue life via Steinberg’s and Dirlik’s methods. Results identified the head section as the critical fatigue zone, with initial maximum stresses of 469.4 MPa (winding layer) and 173.0 MPa (liner), corresponding to lifetimes of ~1.66 × 106 and 3.06 × 106 cycles. Optimization of ply parameters reduced stresses by 66% and 85%, respectively, and extended both components’ lifetimes to over 1 × 107 cycles, meeting high-cycle fatigue standards. The findings provide design and optimization guidelines applicable to a broad class of CFRP–metal or CFRP–polymer pressure vessels.
The study by Bellot and co-authors [92] combined advanced numerical modeling and pilot-scale experiments to evaluate inclusion removal in titanium alloys processed via Plasma Arc Melting–Cold Hearth Remelting (PAMCHR), a key route for producing aeronautical-grade materials. Using a custom PAM3D model on the Ansys-Fluent platform, the work simulated thermohydrodynamic behavior, melting rates, and high-density inclusion (HDI) trajectories in a 100–150 kg/h pilot furnace. Multiphysics simulations, validated by crucible bath profile and residence time measurements, revealed that over 50% of torch-supplied heat is lost through crucible cooling and that bath depth reached approximately one-third of the metal height in the crucible. Both modeling and HDI insemination tests confirmed efficient sedimentation-based removal of refractory inclusions—an advantage over processes like Vacuum Arc Remelting. These results provide a predictive tool for process optimization and highlight PAMCHR’s potential for reliably producing ultra-clean titanium alloys for critical aerospace applications.
Wang and co-authors [93] employed the Wulff cluster model (WCM) to elucidate the short-range ordering (SRO) structure of gallium melts, revealing clusters with Wulff-shaped exteriors and crystallographic symmetry interiors. High-temperature XRD measurements at 523 K, 623 K, and 723 K showed excellent agreement with Ab initio simulations in peak positions, widths, and relative intensities, even well above the melting point. Minor deviations at 523 K are linked to pre-nucleation onset. By integrating experimental data, DFT-derived surface energies, and structural modelling, the study confirms WCM’s capability to describe SRO in melts with partial covalent character, such as gallium, providing insight into melt structure–property relationships.
The study of Huang and co-authors [94] combined first-principles calculations with the Boltzmann transport equation to investigate electrical and thermal conductivities of Cu–Zn alloys across α, α + β′, and β′ phases with 0–50 at.% Zn. Results revealed a non-monotonic decrease–increase trend in both properties, consistent with experiments. Electronic structure analysis showed that Cu d-orbitals dominated near the Fermi level in the α-phase, with increasing Zn lowering the effective density of states and reducing electron transport. Thermal conductivity trends, validated via the Wiedemann–Franz law, aligned with measured data. These findings provide theoretical insight into transport mechanisms and optimization strategies for complex alloy systems.

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editor would like to thank all the contributing authors, the reviewers, and the editorial team of Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lee, J.-W.; Lee, M.-G.; Barlat, F. Finite Element Modeling Using Homogeneous Anisotropic Hardening and Application to Spring-Back Prediction. Int. J. Plast. 2012, 29, 13–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Johnsen, J.; Holmen, J.K.; Myhr, O.R.; Hopperstad, O.S.; Børvik, T. A Nano-Scale Material Model Applied in Finite Element Analysis of Aluminium Plates under Impact Loading. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2013, 79, 724–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kaushik, V.; Narasimhan, R.; Mishra, R.K. Finite Element Simulations of Notch Tip Fields in Magnesium Single Crystals. Acta Mater. 2014, 189, 195–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mazière, M.; Forest, S. Strain Gradient Plasticity Modeling and Finite Element Simulation of Lüders Band Formation and Propagation. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 2015, 27, 83–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Spanos, K.N.; Georgantzinos, S.K.; Anifantis, N.K. Mechanical Properties of Graphene Nanocomposites: A Multiscale Finite Element Prediction. Compos. Struct. 2015, 132, 536–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chatzopoulou, G.; Karamanos, S.A.; Varelis, G.E. Finite Element Analysis of UOE Manufacturing Process and Its Effect on Mechanical Behavior of Offshore Pipes. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2016, 83, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brilakis, E.V.; Kaselouris, E.; Markatos, K.; Mastrokalos, D.; Provatidis, C.; Efstathopoulos, N.; Chronopoulos, E. Mitchell’s Osteotomy Augmented with Bio-Absorbable Pins for the Treatment of Hallux Valgus: A Comparative Finite Element Study. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2019, 19, 234–244. [Google Scholar]
  8. Berardo, A.; Borasso, M.; Gallus, E.; Pugno, N.M. Finite Element Simulations and Statistical Analysis for the Tribological Design of Mutually Textured Surfaces and Related Experimental Validation. J. Tribol. 2025, 147, 031701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Langlet, A.; Petit, A.; Chaari, F.; Delille, R.; Drazetic, P. On the Response of Re-Entrant Auxetic Structures under Dynamic Crushing: Analytical Approach and Finite Element Simulations. Int. J. Crashworthin. 2025, 30, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nayak, A.S.; Prieto, A.; Fernández-Comesaña, D. Accuracy of Post-Processing Projections for Displacement Based Finite Element Simulations in Room Acoustics. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2025, 248, 104349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ionescu, V. Finite Element Method Modelling of a High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell. Rom. J. Phys. 2014, 59, 285–294. [Google Scholar]
  12. Massimino, G.; Colombo, A.; D’Alessandro, L.; Procopio, F.; Ardito, R.; Ferrera, M.; Corigliano, A. Multiphysics Modelling and Experimental Validation of an Air-Coupled Array of PMUTs with Residual Stresses. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2018, 28, 054005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kaselouris, E.; Dimitriou, V.; Fitilis, I.; Skoulakis, A.; Koundourakis, G.; Clark, E.L.; Chatzakis, J.; Bakarezos, M.; Nikolos, I.K.; Papadogiannis, N.A.; et al. Preliminary Investigation on the Use of Low Current Pulsed Power Z-Pinch Plasma Devices for the Study of Early Stage Plasma Instabilities. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2018, 60, 014031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ahmed, K.; Paul, B.K.; Jabin, M.A.; Biswas, B. FEM Analysis of Birefringence, Dispersion and Nonlinearity of Graphene Coated Photonic Crystal Fiber. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 15343–15347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, J.; Zhao, L.; Rosenkranz, A.; Song, C.; Yan, Y.; Sun, T. Nanosecond Pulsed Laser Ablation of Silicon—Finite Element Simulation and Experimental Validation. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2019, 29, 075009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Orphanos, Y.; Kosma, K.; Kaselouris, E.; Vainos, N.; Dimitriou, V.; Bakarezos, M.; Tatarakis, M.; Papadogiannis, N.A. Integrated Nanosecond Laser Full-Field Imaging for Femtosecond Laser-Generated Surface Acoustic Waves in Metal Film–Glass Substrate Multilayer Materials. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kaselouris, E.; Fitilis, I.; Skoulakis, A.; Orphanos, Y.; Koundourakis, G.; Clark, E.L.; Chatzakis, J.; Bakarezos, M.; Papadogiannis, N.A.; Dimitriou, V.; et al. The Importance of the Laser Pulse–Ablator Interaction Dynamics Prior to the Ablation Plasma Phase in Inertial Confinement Fusion Studies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2020, 378, 20200030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tserpes, K.; Kormpos, P. Detailed Finite Element Models for the Simulation of the Laser Shock Wave Response of 3D Woven Composites. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Scherer, C.; Schmid, F.; Letz, M.; Horbach, J. Structure and Dynamics of B${2}O{3}$ Melts and Glasses: From ab initio to Classical Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2019, 159, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chu, W.; Saidi, W.A.; Prezhdo, O.V. Long-Lived Hot Electron in a Metallic Particle for Plasmonics and Catalysis: Ab initio Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics with Machine Learning. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 10305–10313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, J.; He, X. Ab initio Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Liquid Water with Fragment-Based Quantum Mechanical Approach under Periodic Boundary Conditions. Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 34, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dinsdale, A.; Khvan, A.; Smirnova, E.A.; Ponomareva, A.V.; Abrikosov, I.A. Modelling the thermodynamic data for hcp Zn and Cu–Zn alloys—An ab initio and calphad approach. Calphad 2021, 72, 102253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, M.; Shukla, A.; Chakraborty, B. An Ab-initio Study of the Y Decorated 2D Holey Graphyne for Hydrogen Storage Application. Nanotechnology 2022, 33, 405406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dornheim, T.; Schwalbe, S.; Moldabekov, Z.A.; Vorberger, J.; Tolias, P. Ab initio Path Integral Monte Carlo Simulations of the Uniform Electron Gas on Large Length Scales. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2024, 15, 1406–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, N.Q.; Shi, Y.; Meng, Z.K.; Ban, Z.G. A unified photo-excited GaAs model from ab initio simulation in terahertz regime. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2024, 57, 265102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, H.-S.; Cao, Z.-J. Matlab Codes of Subset Simulation for Reliability Analysis and Structural Optimization. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2016, 54, 391–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rong, Z.; Yi, J.; Li, F.; Liu, Y.; Eckert, J. Thermal Stress Analysis and Structural Optimization of Ladle Nozzle Based on Finite Element Simulation. Mater. Res. Express 2022, 9, 045601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, J.; Liang, X.; Xu, P.; Yao, S. Crashworthiness Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimisation of Multi-Cell Windowed Structures under Dynamic Impact Loading. Shock Vib. 2022, 2022, 2263308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xie, C.; Wang, D.; Zong, L.; Kong, D. Crashworthiness analysis and multi-objective optimization of spatial lattice structure under dynamic compression. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2023, 180, 104713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, H.; Zhuang, S.; Zhao, B.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Y. Visualization of the Gas Permeation in Core–Shell MOF/Polyimide Mixed Matrix Membranes and Structural Optimization Based on Finite Element Equivalent Simulation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 305, 122504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rekatsinas, C.S.; Dimitriou, D.K.; Chrysochoidis, N.A. A Road Map to the Structural Optimization of a Type-C Composite UAV. Aerospace 2024, 11, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jin, H.; Jin, L. Stress Analysis and Structural Optimisation of Insulating Rods Under Dynamic and Static Loads. High Voltage 2025, 10, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kaselouris, E.; Papadoulis, T.; Variantza, E.; Baroutsos, A.; Dimitriou, V. A Study of Explicit Numerical Simulations in Orthogonal Metal Cutting. Solid State Phenom. 2017, 261, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Stender, M.E.; Beghini, L.L.; Sugar, J.D.; Veilleux, M.G.; Subia, S.R.; Smith, T.R.; San Marchi, C.W.; Brown, A.A.; Dagel, D.J. A Thermal–Mechanical Finite Element Workflow for Directed Energy Deposition Additive Manufacturing Process Modeling. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 21, 556–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. James, S.; De La Luz, L. Finite Element Analysis and Simulation Study of CFRP/Ti Stacks Using Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 104, 4421–4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ibrahim, M.M.; El Aghoury, I.M.; Ibrahim, S.A.-B. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Ultimate Shear Strength of Unstiffened Slender Web-Tapered Steel Members. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020, 148, 106601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Soliman, H.A.; Shash, A.Y.; El Hossainy, T.M.; Abd-Rabou, M. Investigation of Process Parameters in Orthogonal Cutting Using Finite Element Approaches. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Saddighi, A.; Mahbod, M.; Asgari, M. Bi-tubular corrugated composite conical–cylindrical tube for energy absorption in axial and oblique loading: Analysis and optimization. J. Compos. Mater. 2020, 54, 2399–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Xu, X.; Ren, B.; Liu, J.; Zhao, R. Effect of Geometrical Factors on Torsion in Cold Roll Forming of the Lower Side Beam of a Car. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Albak, E.I. Crashworthiness design and optimization of nested structures with a circumferentially corrugated circular outer wall and inner ribs. Thin-Walled Struct. 2021, 167, 108219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luo, Z.; Sun, M.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, C.; Zhang, G.; Fan, X. Finite element analysis of circle-to-rectangle roll forming of thick-walled rectangular tubes with small rounded corners. Int. J. Mater. Form. 2022, 15, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Abeyrathna, B.; Ghanei, S.; Rolfe, B.; Taube, R.; Weiss, M. Optimising part quality in the flexible roll forming of an automotive component. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 2022, 118, 3361–3373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pacana, J.; Siwiec, D.; Pacana, A. Numerical Analysis of the Kinematic Accuracy of the Hermetic Harmonic Drive in Space Vehicles. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yan, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Li, M. Experimental and Numerical Study on the Effect of Load Direction on the Bolt Loosening Failure. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2024, 163, 108574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, F.; Deng, X.; Wang, C. Analysis of energy absorption characteristics of a sinusoidal corrugated filled tube. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2024, 31, 7386–7403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rojas-Sola, J.I.; Sánchez-García, S. Mechanical Study of a Single-Cylinder High-Pressure Steam Engine with a Corliss Valve Gear Using Finite Element Method. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 4782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sadighi, M.; Hosseini, S.A. Finite Element Simulation and Experimental Study on Mechanical Behavior of 3D Woven Glass Fiber Composite Sandwich Panels. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 55, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sabuncuoglu, B.; Acar, M.; Silberschmidt, V.V. Finite Element Modelling of Fibrous Networks: Analysis of Strain Distribution in Fibres under Tensile Load. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2013, 79, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zimmermann, J.; Stommel, M. The Mechanical Behaviour of Rubber under Hydrostatic Compression and the Effect on the Results of Finite Element Analyses. Arch. Appl. Mech. 2013, 83, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Saxena, A.; Dwivedi, S.P.; Kumaraswamy, A.; Srivastava, A.K.; Maurya, N.K. Influence of SD Effect on Johnson–Cook Hardening Constitutive Material Model: Numerical and Experimental Investigation for Armor Steel. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2020, 29, 285–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kweon, H.D.; Kim, J.W.; Song, O.; Oh, D. Determination of true stress–strain curve of type 304 and 316 stainless steels using a typical tensile test and finite element analysis. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2021, 53, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Harris, A.; Lee, H.P. Finite element analysis and experimental investigation on the mechanical behaviours of multifunctional sandwich structures embedded with batteries. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2021, 31, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sudhagar, P.E.; Gunasegeran, M. Evaluation, optimization and prediction of the transverse shear modulus of biomimetic 3D printed sandwich core. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2022, 31, 854–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kladovasilakis, N.; Tsongas, K.; Kostavelis, I.; Tzovaras, D.; Tzetzis, D. Effective Mechanical Properties of Additive Manufactured Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces: Experimental and Finite Element Study. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 121, 7169–7189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lu, J.-F.; Cheng, J.; Feng, Q.-S. Plane wave finite element model for the 2-D phononic crystal under force loadings. Eur. J. Mech. A-Solids 2022, 91, 104426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Laly, Z.; Mechefske, C.; Ghinet, S.; Kone, C.T.; Atalla, N. Design and analysis of periodic acoustic metamaterial sound insulator using finite element method. Noise Control Eng. J. 2023, 71, 344–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Danielli, F.; Ciriello, L.; La Barbera, L.; Rodriguez Matas, J.F.; Pennati, G. On the need of a scale-dependent material characterization to describe the mechanical behavior of 3D printed Ti6Al4V custom prostheses using finite element models. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2023, 140, 105707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tonder, J.D.V.; Venter, M.P.; Venter, G. A New Method for Improving Inverse Finite Element Method Material Characterization for the Mooney–Rivlin Material Model through Constrained Optimization. Math. Comput. Appl. 2023, 28, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Koppisetti, S.B.; Nallu, R. Material characterization of A356-T6 aluminum alloy and correlation of wheel impact test results using finite element analysis. Int. J. Comp. Mat. Sci. Eng. 2024, 13, 2350025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Trindade, D.; Habiba, R.; Fernandes, C.; Costa, A.; Silva, R.; Alves, N.; Martins, R.; Malça, C.; Branco, R.; Moura, C. Material Performance Evaluation for Customized Orthoses: Compression, Flexural, and Tensile Tests Combined with Finite Element Analysis. Polymers 2024, 16, 2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kaselouris, E.; Nikolos, I.K.; Orphanos, Y.; Bakarezos, M.; Papadogiannis, N.A.; Tatarakis, M.; Dimitriou, V. Elastoplastic study of nanosecond-pulsed laser interaction with metallic films using 3D multiphysics fem modeling. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2016, 25, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kumar, K.K.; Samuel, G.L.; Shunmugam, M.S. Theoretical and experimental investigations of ultra-short pulse laser interaction on Ti6Al4V alloy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2019, 263, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Abali, B.E.; Zohdi, T.I. Multiphysics computation of thermal tissue damage as a consequence of electric power absorption. Comput. Mech. 2020, 65, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sakaev, I.; Linden, J.; Ichaaya, A.A. Dynamic fracture of SiO2 films due to laser-induced confined micro-explosion at the Si/SiO2 interface: Time-resolved imaging and finite-element simulation. Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 150, 107938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, Z.; Min, J.; Hu, J.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Tang, Z.; Liu, S. Femtosecond laser–acoustic modeling and simulation for AlCu nanofilm nondestructive testing. Front. Mech. Eng. 2024, 19, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Smart, T.J.; Abali, B.E.; Boschker, H.; Braun, W. Deposition rates in thermal laser epitaxy: Simulation and experiment. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2025, 58, 205303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bellot, J.-P.; Déculot, L.; Jardy, A.; Hans, S.; Doridot, E.; Delfosse, J.; McDonald, N. Numerical Simulation of the Plasma Arc Melting Cold Hearth Refining Process (PAMCHR). Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2020, 51, 1329–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kumar, N.; Shukla, A.; Bansal, S.; Khatri, C.B.; Thakre, G.D.; Yadav, S.K.; Sharma, S.C.; Harsha, S.P. Thermo-hydrodynamic simulation study of twin-groove elliptical (two-lobe) journal bearing of steam turbine with experimental investigations. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2021, 235, 1745–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Youcef, S.; Mokhefi, A.; Bouzit, M. Theoretical study of thermo-hydrodynamic performances inside an agitated tank equipped with modified two-blade design. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2024, 55, 102866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pegios, I.P.; Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. Finite element free and forced vibration analysis of gradient elastic beam structures. Acta Mech. 2018, 229, 4817–4830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zangeneh, S.; Lashgari, H.R.; Sharifi, H.R. Fitness-for-service assessment and failure analysis of AISI 304 demineralized-water (DM) pipeline weld crack. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2020, 107, 104210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fuad, M.F.I.A.; Mustafa, M.S.; Nazari, A.D.Z.A.; Rashid, Z.A. Gas Piping System Fatigue Life Estimation through Acoustic Induced Vibration (AIV) Analysis. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Robot. Res. 2021, 10, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liao, J.; Yu, Y.; Yan, J.; Hsu, S.-H. Simulation and modal analysis of marine diesel engine based on finite element model and vibration sensor data. Sens. Mater. 2021, 33, 1645–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Codina, R.; Türk, Ö. Modal analysis of elastic vibrations of incompressible materials using a pressure-stabilized finite element method. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2022, 206, 103760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kaselouris, E.; Alexandraki, C.; Bakarezos, M.; Tatarakis, M.; Papadogiannis, N.A.; Dimitriou, V. A detailed FEM study on the vibro-acoustic behaviour of crash and splash musical cymbals. Int. J. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 2022, 16, 948–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sha, Y.; Zhao, W.; Tang, X.; Zhao, F. Acoustic and Vibration Response and Fatigue Life Analysis of Thin-Walled Connection Structures under Heat Flow Conditions. Aerospace 2024, 11, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Luo, B.; Gallas, S.; Micallef, C.; Govaerts, J.; Gryllias, K.; Poortmans, J. Experimental and finite element modal analysis of photovoltaic modules for the design of next-generation vehicle-integrated PV applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2025, 290, 113683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bruchen, J.; Liu, Y.; Moulin, N. Finite element setting for fluid flow simulations with natural enforcement of the triple junction equilibrium. Comput. Fluids 2018, 171, 103–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Alsabery, A.I.; Sheremet, M.A.; Ghalambaz, M.; Chamkha, A.J.; Hashim, I. Fluid-structure interaction in natural convection heat transfer in an oblique cavity with a flexible oscillating fin and partial heating. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 145, 80–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Long, T.; Yang, P.; Liu, M. A novel coupling approach of smoothed finite element method with SPH for thermal fluid structure interaction problems. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2020, 174, 105558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Arif, M.S.; Shatanawi, W.; Nawaz, Y. Finite Element Study of Electrical MHD Williamson Nanofluid Flow under the Effects of Frictional Heating in the View of Viscous Dissipation. Energies 2023, 16, 2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Du, L.; Liang, W.-G.; Xu, G.-G.; Qin, Q.-H.; Li, D.-S. Finite Element Analysis and Computational Fluid Dynamics Verification of Molten Pool Characteristics During Selective Laser Melting of Ti-6Al-4V Plates. 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 2023, 10, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Weiss, A.G.; Zaidan, L.J.; Ahmad, M.T.H.B.; Abdoelatef, M.G.; Peterson, J.W.; Lindsay, A.D.; Kong, F.; Ahmed, K.; Kimber, M.L. Characterization of the Finite Element Computational Fluid Dynamics Capabilities in the Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment. ASME J. Nucl. Rad. Sci. 2023, 9, 021402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Esposito, G.; Tsamopoulos, J.; Villone, M.M.; D’Avino, G. Numerical simulations of the pressure-driven flow of pairs of rigid spheres in elastoviscoplastic fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 2025, 1011, A20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Song, J.; Lan, J.; Zhu, L.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Han, J.; Ma, C. Finite Element Simulation and Microstructural Analysis of Roll Forming for DP590 High-Strength Dual-Phase Steel Wheel Rims. Materials 2024, 17, 3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zou, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, R.; Huang, X.; Li, M.; Li, S.; Jiang, Z.; Yin, W. Crashworthiness Performance and Multi-Objective Optimization of Bi-Directional Corrugated Tubes under Quasi-Static Axial Crushing. Materials 2024, 17, 3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, S.; Wang, B.; Mu, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Gong, X. Study on the Approach to Obtaining Mechanical Properties Using Digital Image Correlation Technology. Materials 2025, 18, 1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rodella, A. Extreme Behaviors in Fibrous Material Remodeling: Auxetic to Non-Auxetic Transition and Phase Segregation. Materials 2025, 18, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Vasile, A.; Constantinescu, D.M.; Indreș, A.I.; Coropețchi, I.C.; Sorohan, Ș.; Apostol, D.A. Numerical Simulation of Compressive Testing of Sandwich Structures with Novel Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Cores. Materials 2025, 18, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kaniolakis Kaloudis, E.; Kaleris, K.; Aravantinos-Zafiris, N.; Sigalas, M.; Katerelos, D.T.G.; Dimitriou, V.; Bakarezos, M.; Tatarakis, M.; Papadogiannis, N.A. Evaluating the Role of Unit Cell Multiplicity in the Acoustic Response of Phononic Crystals Using Laser-Plasma Sound Sources. Materials 2025, 18, 1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Xiong, X.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Fan, F.; Zhou, J.; Chen, M. Prediction and Optimization of the Long-Term Fatigue Life of a Composite Hydrogen Storage Vessel Under Random Vibration. Materials 2025, 18, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bellot, J.-P.; Ayadh, W.; Kroll-Rabotin, J.-S.; Marin, R.; Delfosse, J.; Cardon, A.; Biagi, A.; Hans, S. Experimental and Numerical Study of the Plasma Arc Melting of Titanium Alloys: Application to the Removal of High Density Inclusions (HDIs). Materials 2025, 18, 2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Wang, C.; Hua, M.; Wang, L.; Wang, S.; Liu, J.; Liu, R.; Tian, X.; Lin, X. Theoretical and Experimental Research on the Short-Range Structure in Gallium Melts Based on the Wulff Cluster Model. Materials 2025, 18, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Huang, L.; Peng, B.; Yue, Q.; Huang, G.; Wang, C.; Wang, R.; Tian, N. First-Principles Study on the Electrical and Thermal Conductivities of Cu–Zn Binary Alloys. Materials 2025, 18, 2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaselouris, E. Advances in Modelling and Simulation of Materials in Applied Sciences. Materials 2025, 18, 4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18174141

AMA Style

Kaselouris E. Advances in Modelling and Simulation of Materials in Applied Sciences. Materials. 2025; 18(17):4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18174141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaselouris, Evaggelos. 2025. "Advances in Modelling and Simulation of Materials in Applied Sciences" Materials 18, no. 17: 4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18174141

APA Style

Kaselouris, E. (2025). Advances in Modelling and Simulation of Materials in Applied Sciences. Materials, 18(17), 4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18174141

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop