Next Article in Journal
Microstructural and Mechanical Property Variations in 316L Stainless Steel Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Under High-Density Processing Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Welding Technology and Heat Treatment Butt-Welded Joints of Thin-Walled Inconel 718 Alloy Tubes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synergistic Enhancement of Li-O2 Battery Capacity and Cycle Life Using Carbon Nanochain/Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Composites

Department of Chemistry, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(16), 3897; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18163897
Submission received: 19 July 2025 / Revised: 12 August 2025 / Accepted: 14 August 2025 / Published: 20 August 2025

Abstract

Multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) Li-O2 cathodes can achieve high gravimetric capacity. However, the macropores of these cathodes require a relatively large mass of electrolyte to fill, resulting in lower true gravimetric and volumetric capacities. Here we report a simple method to incorporate a mesoporous material, carbon nanochains (CNCs), into the macropores of MWCNTs, resulting in composite cathodes that fully utilize their pore structure to store Li2O2 product. The composite cathodes exhibit additional mesopores with an average diameter of ~100 nm. This results in dramatic increases in true gravimetric (21% to 870 mAh/g) and volumetric (>200% to 5664 mAh/cm3) capacities. The composite cathodes demonstrate improved electrochemical reversibility, increasing the cycle life by more than 50%.

1. Introduction

Li-O2 battery chemistry is of great interest due to its high theoretical energy densities (~3500 Wh/kg) [1,2,3,4], an order of magnitude larger than current Li-ion batteries (250–270 Wh/kg) [5]. The use of carbon cathodes also means that there is the potential for cheaper batteries than market dominate Li-ion batteries (LIBs), currently priced at approximately USD 150/Wh [6]. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) (both single-wall (SWCNTs) and multiwall (MWCNTs) structures) have established themselves as the most studied cathode material due to their large pore volumes, pore diameters, good electrical conductivity, and good chemical stability [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Previously, MWCNT cathodes were compared to those composed of a structurally similar material, carbon nanochains (CNCs) [16,17]. The former were found to possess large gravimetric capacities, averaging 5290 ± 630 mAh/g. However, due to their low cathode density (0.505 g/cm3), their volumetric capacity is rather low, averaging 2333 ± 256 mAh/g. SEM images of fully discharged MWCNT cathodes revealed that even after discharge they still possessed a large fraction of open pore volume, with the Li2O2 particles never exhibiting interparticle growth, remaining distinctly individual, and often relatively well distanced from each other. Thus, while MWCNTs possess good gravimetric capacity they make poor use of their pore volume to store Li2O2. CNC cathodes, like MWCNT cathodes, were found to possess large gravimetric capacities (4870 ± 450 mAh/g) but much larger volumetric capacities (5113 ± 580 mAh/g), due in part to their higher measured density (1.055 g/cm3). Importantly, Li2O2 toroidal particles form a dense film of interconnected, rather than isolated, particles on the CNC cathodes. The higher volumetric capacity and formation of dense discharge films yielded a significantly larger true gravimetric capacity [18] (845 ± 13 and 717 ± 42 mAh/g, respectively).
In this work, CNCs and MWCNTs were mixed together to make CNC/MWCNT composite cathodes at various mass fractions, filling the unutilized pore volume in the MWCNT cathodes with CNCs to improve their volumetric capacity. In addition, CNCs possess larger surface areas than MWCNTs (205.9 m2/g and 93.7, respectively), potentially giving the composite a high number of O2 reduction sites, while MWCNTs provide structural integrity and better electrical conductivity. It has been suggested that discharge in MWCNT cathodes is limited by surface passivation [19,20,21], stopping the formation of Li2O2 before the full pore volume of the MWCNT cathode is fully utilized. This might be overcome by increasing the number of available reaction sites present in the cathode, allowing for the formation of Li2O2 to progress further, resulting in larger discharge capacities. Finally, the addition of a primarily mesoporous carbon, CNCs, into the large macropores of MWCNT cathodes allows for the investigation of cell performance as a function of the density of the most Li-O2 active (>100 nm diameter) pores and cathode macroporosity. Two previous studies suggest that a bimodal combination of meso- and macropores can improve discharge capacity [22,23]. Here we show that the full depth of discharge capacities, both gravimetric and volumetric, and cycling lifetimes are highly dependent on the CNC/MWCNT cathode composition and the consequent pore structure, exhibiting performance that is significantly better than the cathodes of either pure material.

2. Experimental Section

All data points presented are an average of measurements made with three or more samples.

2.1. Materials

All materials were used as received unless stated otherwise. Cellulose (FMC BioPolymer, Philadelphia, PA, USA) was used as the biomass starting material. Iron (II) chloride tetrahydrate, used as the catalyst, was purchased from STREM (Newburyport, MA, USA, 99%, product no. 93-2632). Nitric acid purchased from Millipore Sigma (Burlington, MA, USA, GR ACS, product no. NX0409-2) was used for CNC purification. Isopropyl alcohol (IPA) used to create CNC and MWCNT suspensions was purchased from VWR Chemicals (Radnor, PA, USA, general lab use, product no. BDH113-19L). LiNO3 from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA, 99.98% metal basis, product no. 10985) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 99.9%, product no. D139-1) were used to make the electrolyte. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (>95wt%, SKU # 030103), 10–20 nm in diameter and 10–30 µm in length, were purchased from Cheaptubes.com (Grafton, VT, USA). Porous Carbon Foam (BCGDL1400S) and coin cells (CR2016 and CR2032) were purchased from MTI Inc. (Richmond, CA, USA). Whatman glass microfiber filters (Grade GF/D, CAT no. 1823-150) were purchased from Millipore Sigma.

2.2. CNC Preparation

CNCs were synthesized as previously reported [16]. Briefly, pellets of cellulose impregnated with 1 w% FeCl2·4H2O were heated to 1000 °C for 20 min. Following cooling, CNCs were purified by microwave digestion (PreeKem, Shanghai, China, CN, WX-6000) in nitric acid (10 mg/mL) for 120 min at 180 °C. The CNCs were isolated by vacuum filtration, rinsed with distilled water, and dried overnight at 120 °C.

2.3. CNC/MWCNT Cathode Preparation

CNC and MWCNTs were sonicated in IPA for 30 min to form a suspension with a concentration of 0.33 mg/mL. The suspension was then poured through carbon fiber paper (CFP), from which carbon black had been removed, stacked on top of a PTFE membrane filter (47 mm diameter, 0.45 µm pore size, Simsii Inc., Issaquah, WA, USA), leaving a layer of CNC and/or MWCNTs on top of the CFP. The sample was then dried at 120 °C overnight. Electrodes, 1.6 cm in diameter, were punched out of the film (MSK-T-07 Precision Disc Cutter, MTI Inc.) and pressed between two sheets of aluminum foil at 6000 lbs (19,400 PSI). The loading of the CNC and/or MWCNT cathodes was ~2 mg/cm2.

2.4. Characterization

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of pristine and discharged cathodes were obtained using an FEI Teneo LV FEG (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Discharged cathodes were prepared by disassembling Li-O2 cells under an argon atmosphere inside a glovebox. Cathodes were cleaned by rinsing in DMSO and then dried under vacuum.

2.5. Electrochemical Cell Assembly and Testing

Coin cells (CR2016, MTI Inc.) were modified by punching nine (1 mm diameter) holes into the cathode side to allow for oxygen flow. Cells were assembled in an Ar-filled glovebox using lithium metal disk (99.9%, 15.6 mm dia., 0.45 mm thick, MTI Inc.) anodes, a microfiber glass filter (Grade GF/D, Whatman Inc., Little Chalfont, UK) separator, and 200 µL of 0.1 molar LiNO3 (99.98%, Alfa Aesar) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 99.9%, Fisher Sci.) electrolyte.
Assembled Li-O2 cells were placed in air-tight custom-built PVC containers, purged with a flow of O2 (99.995%, Roberts Oxygen Company, Cockeysville, MD, USA) for 10 min, and then maintained at 5 psi. The cells were held for 4 h at OCV and then cycled at a current density of 0.2 mA/cm2. The assembled CR2016 cells were discharged from open circuit voltage (OCV) (~2.8–3.0 V) to 2.0 V to measure the maximum capacity that the CNC and MWCNT cathodes could achieve. Following the practice of previous studies [14,24,25], multicycle testing was performed with a limited depth of discharge (500 mAh/g discharge/charge) to avoid dendrite formation with CNC and MWCNT cathodes. CR2032 cells were used in multicycle testing. A bubbler filled with DMSO was used to saturate the O2 atmosphere inside the cycling container with DMSO to reduce the rate of electrolyte evaporation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. MWCNT Cathodes

As previously reported [16], MWNCT cathodes use a limited portion of their pore volume for Li2O2 storage in fully discharged cathodes. The fraction of the MWCNT cathode pore volume occupied by Li2O2 after fully discharging the cathode can be calculated as follows:
MWCNTPoreVolume   =   m ρ cathode     m ρ true
Li 2 O 2   Pore   Volume   = Q   Coulombs     6.24 × 10 18 e Coulomb MW 2   e Li 2 O 2 6 × 10 23   Li 2 O 2 mole ρ Li 2 O 2
% PoreVolumeUtilized   = Li 2 O 2 PoreVolume MWCNTPoreVolume × 100
where m is the mass of MWCNTs, ρ cathode is the cathode density of MWCNTs (0.505 g/cm3), ρ true is the true density of MWCNTs (2.1 g/cm3), Q is the charge the MWCNT cathode stores, MW is the molecular weight of Li2O2, and ρ Li 2 O 2 is the density of Li2O2. Using these three equations, the average percent of pore volume utilized in MWCNT cathodes to store Li2O2 was calculated to be 97%. However, this is clearly not the case as SEM images of fully discharged MWCNT cathodes (Figure 1 and Figure 2) show a high degree of porosity, including a myriad of small pores surrounding the product particles and, in addition, the presence of very large pores. The presence of significant porosity indicates that product formation causes cathode swelling during discharge, which is not accounted for in our calculations. Density measurements of fully discharged cathodes could potentially allow for better calculations; unfortunately, they are unreliable due to the reactivity of the product and difficulty in ensuring the removal of all of the electrolyte. Thus, although it is clear that the discharged MWCNT cathodes are highly porous, the degree of porosity is uncertain.

3.2. CNC/MWCNT Cathode Pore Structure

Compared to MWCNTs, CNCs are a much denser carbon material with smaller pores that appear to remain unblocked even after the cathode is fully discharged [16]. CNC and MWCNT cathodes both possess similar pore volumes from pores that are 100 nm in diameter or less (0.68 cm3/g for CNCs and 0.60 cm3/g for MWCNTs), a size range found to be the most effective for Li-O2 battery performance [19]. CNC cathodes, unlike those of MWCNTs, possess very few pores larger than 100 nm in diameter, pores that are thought to be too large to contribute significantly to Li-O2 capacity (Figure 3). Rather than storing Li2O2 in pores, CNC cathodes store it on the surface (Figure 4). A composite cathode can be created by mixing CNCs into MWCNTs, in which the CNCs fill in much of the unused pore volume in the MWCNTs. This increases the number of pores that are 100 nm or less in diameter, a size range that is believed to be important for the continuous diffusion of oxygen through the cathode during discharge [19,23], providing the composite cathode with additional reaction sites. The optimal filling of the MWCNT macropores with CNCs is that which maximizes the density of those active pores while maintaining sufficient macroporosity for Li2O2 storage.
The changing pore structure and morphology of the CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction can be seen in SEM images (Figure 5). Pristine MWCNT cathodes (Figure 5a) show a highly porous structure with pores that are approximately 1 µm in diameter created by the entanglement of the MWCNTs. As CNCs are mixed into the MWCNTs (Figure 5b, 50% of each by mass), they fill in the larger pores in the MWCNTs, decreasing the porosity and increasing the density of the cathode. When the cathode is entirely composed of CNCs (Figure 5c), pores larger than ~100 nm in diameter are almost completely gone, resulting in a highly dense and relatively uniform surface.
The CNC/MWCNT cathode surface area was found to increase linearly with increasing the CNC mass fraction (Figure 6, Table S1). CNCs possess larger surfaces areas (205.9 m2/g) than MWCNTs (93.7 m2/g). Therefore, as the CNC mass fraction increases, the total surface area of the composite cathodes increases linearly in agreement with the rule of mixtures [20].
S S A c o m p o s i t e = f × S S A C N C s + 1 f × S S A M W C N T s
where S S A c o m p o s i t e is the specific surface area of the CNC/MWCNT composite, and f is the CNC mass fraction. A linear least-squares fit of the CNC/MWCNT surface area as a function of mass fraction, weighted by the standard deviations, returns surface areas of 105.4 ± 13.4 m2/g and 201.3 ± 4.5 m2/g for MWCNTs and CNCs, respectively.
The pore volume of CNC/MWCNT cathodes increases with an increasing CNC mass fraction up to 0.2 and decreases at greater CNC mass fractions (Figure 7, Table S1). The vast majority of the macroporosity of MWCNTs consists of pores that are too large to be measured by nitrogen gas adsorption isotherms, in excess of 100 nm in diameter. Adding CNCs to MWCNTs increases the measured porosity because they occupy unmeasured macropores while providing additional mesoporosity. Based on the rule of mixtures, a linear increase in mesoporosity is expected, but clearly not observed. Instead, a sharp increase in mesoporosity occurs as the CNC mass fraction increases to 0.2 before decreasing more steadily as the CNC mass fraction approaches 1. The increase in mesoporosity in CNC/MWCNT cathodes beyond that of either of the constituents indicates that additional mesopores are formed, likely at contact points between the CNCs and the MWCNTs. The random manner in which contact points between CNCs and MWCNTs occur and the physical impossibility of negative pore volume combined with the shape of the peak indicate a log-normal distribution of pore volume as a function of the CNC mass fraction. Thus, the measured porosity was fit to the combination of the linear contribution of the rule of mixtures plus the log-normal contribution of the additional porosity given by
f x = b + m x + A x σ 2 π e l n x μ 2 2 σ 2
where b is the y-intercept and m the slope of the linear porosity contributions of the MWCNTs and CNCs, A is the peak amplitude of the log-normal contribution of the additional porosity, x is the CNC mass fraction, µ is the mean of the CNC mass fraction’s natural logarithm, and σ is the standard deviation of the CNC mass fraction’s natural logarithm. The results of the fits are shown in Figure 7, and the values determined for the parameters are listed in Table S2.
The CNC mass fraction at which the most additional mesoporosity occurs is approximately 0.2. When the CNC mass fraction is greater than 0.2, CNCs increasingly contact each other rather than making additional contacts, and, consequently, fewer mesopores are created between CNCs and MWCNTs. As the mass fraction increases further, the number of mesopores forming between CNCs and MWCNTs decreases until the mesoporosity of a pure CNC cathode is reached.
The CNC/MWCNT weighted average pore diameter decreases as a function of an increasing CNC mass fraction (Figure 8, Table S1). CNC/MWCNT cathodes with a 0.5 CNC mass fraction showed a 13% decrease in their weighted average pore diameters compared to MWCNT cathodes, decreasing from an average of 77 nm to 67 nm. As the CNC mass fraction increases from 0.5 to 1, a 30% decrease in pore diameter is seen, from 67 nm to 47 nm. This deviation from that linearity predicted by the rule of mixtures occurs because the size of the additional mesopores created between CNC and MWCNTs upon the addition of CNCs is larger than the mesopores of the CNCs. The addition of larger mesopores increases the weighted average pore diameter in CNC/MWCNT cathodes relative to what is predicted by the rule of mixtures, resulting in a negatively skewed distribution that can be reasonably fit by a Gaussian plus linear function (Equation (6)).
f x =   b + mx + A σ 2 π e ( ln x μ ) 2 2 σ 2
where b is the y-intercept of baseline, m is slope of baseline, A is the peak amplitude, x is the CNC mass fraction, µ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. Fit parameter values are listed in Table S2. The additional pores formed at a low CNC mass fraction are larger than those at a high mass fraction, peaking at a mass fraction of ~0.63, given by µ. The peak position occurs at a much higher mass fraction than that observed in the total porosity (Figure 7), indicating that while the size of the pores formed increases, their gravimetric number density decreases. This is consistent with a decrease in the number of contact points between CNCs and MWCNTs with a decreasing MWCNT mass fraction, as expected.
The pore size distribution of the additional mesopores created by mixing CNCs into MWCNTs shows that most of the additional mesopores are around 100 nm in diameter across all CNC mass fractions (Figure 9). These pore size distributions of the additional mesopores in CNC/MWCNT cathodes were determined by subtracting the predicted pore size distributions of CNC/MWCNTs cathodes (calculated using the rule of mixtures) from the pore size distributions measured from gas adsorption isotherms. At a CNC mass fraction of 0.25, additional mesopores with diameters between 40 and 80 nm are also present. As the CNC mass fraction increases to 0.5 and then 0.75, the number of additional pores ranging from less than ~80 nm and larger than 100 nm decreases and increases, respectively, increasing the weighted average pore diameter with a maximum value at ~0.63, as seen in the inset in Figure 8.

3.3. CNC/MWCNT Cathode Performance

CNC/MWCNT composite cathodes obtain larger full depth of discharge gravimetric capacities than those achieved by either pure MWCNTs or CNCs (Figure 10, Table S1), peaking at a CNC mass fraction of 0.375 with an average of ~6560 mAh/g. Some cells reached capacities as large as 7300 mAh/g, a 47% increase in gravimetric capacity compared to pure CNCs and a 37% increase in gravimetric capacity compared to pure MWCNTs (note, our finding are within the range of capacity values for pure MWCNTs found in previous studies) [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The measured gravimetric capacities follow a log-normal distribution as a function of CNC mass fraction and were fit using the log-normal plus a linear function shown in Equation (5) (dashed line in Figure 10) with fit parameter values listed in Table S2. The CNC mass fraction of the maximum gravimetric capacity obtained from the fit, 0.33, is only slightly larger than that found for the maximum pore volume (Figure 7) and near that found for the average pore diameter (Figure 8).
The functional form of the dependence of the gravimetric capacity on mass fraction is remarkably similar to that of the total additional mesoporosity, indicating their close relationship. Additionally, the gravimetric capacity decreases as a function of mesopore volume with increasing CNC mass fractions (Figure 11), corresponding to a decrease in average pore diameters (Figure 8). This indicates that while gravimetric capacity is largely determined by total mesopore volume, larger pores result in a higher capacity than smaller ones, given the equivalent mesopore volumes. Smaller pores confine the reaction intermediates, such as O2, closer to the cathode. This in turn increases the rate of parasitic reactions that coat and passivate the carbon cathode with Li2CO3, decreasing the capacity [21].
Volumetric capacities (Figure 12, Table S1) show a steady increase up to a mass fraction of 0.65 with little subsequent increase. This behavior can be understood by looking at the relationship between volumetric capacity, gravimetric capacity, and density given as
V o l u m e t r i c   C a p a c i t y m A h c m 3 = G r a v i m e t r i c   C a p a c i t y m A h g × D e n s i t y g c m 3
As the CNC mass fraction increases, the CNCs fill in the unused pore volume in the MWCNT cathodes, creating a denser cathode. The density of the CNC/MWCNT cathodes increases linearly with the CNC mass fraction in accordance with the rule of mixtures given in Equation (5) and shown in Figure 13. Multiplying the gravimetric capacity, displaying a log-normal distribution, with the CNC/MCWNT density, which is linearly increasing with the CNC mass fraction, results in volumetric capacities that increase monotonically. Thus, the volumetric capacity is best fit by multiplying a log-normal function by a linear function and adding a linear function, shown by the dashed line in Figure 12, and given by the function given in Equation (8). Fit parameter values are listed in Table S2.
f x =   b + mx + A σ 2 π e ( ln x μ ) 2 2 σ 2 + A x σ 2 π e ( ln x μ ) 2 2 σ 2
Gravimetric capacities based only on the mass of the storage material can greatly distort the capabilities of Li-O2 cathodes by neglecting the mass of the electrolyte that fills their pores and that of the Li2O2 product. Thus, comparisons of Li-O2 cathodes to each other or to cathodes of other battery chemistries (e.g., Li-ion) based on simple gravimetric capacities are generally invalid. True capacities [18], which take the mass of the electrolyte in the cathode pores and Li2O2 product into account, allow for valid comparisons. Here they show a steady increase with an increasing CNC mass fraction up to a CNC mass fraction of 0.25 with little or no increase at higher fractions (Figure 14, Table S1). MWCNTs possess large macropore volumes that require electrolyte to fill, and thus relatively low true capacities. As the CNC mass fraction increases, filling in the macropores, the contribution of the mass of electrolyte diminishes. At higher mass fractions, the decreasing gravimetric capacity is offset by further decreases in the pore volume, resulting in a relatively unchanged true capacity.
Li2O2 toroidal particles form inside pure MWCNT cathodes (Figure 15a), entangled in the MWCNTs. The discharged MWCNT cathode shows many large pores within which Li2O2 has not formed; the MWCNT cathode does not fully utilize its pore volume during discharge. CNC/MWCNT cathodes at a CNC mass fraction of 0.5 retain mesoporosity, but Li2O2 appears to fully occupy nearly all macropores, having formed almost entirely within the cathode (Figure 15b). In addition, cracks form in which Li2O2 particles can be seen, suggesting that the cathode expanded. In pure CNC cathodes, Li2O2 particles completely cover the surface in a thick film in which the toroidal Li2O2 particles have intergrown.
Cathode porosities as a function of CNC mass fraction are given in Table S3, as calculated using
%   P o r o s i t y = P V c a t h o d e m ρ T r u e P V c a t h o d e × 100
P V m a c r o = P V c a t h o d e P V m e s o
where PVcathode is the pore volume of the cathode (Equation (1)), m is the combined mass of MWCNTs and CNCs, and ρtrue is the true density of the cathode (2.1 g/cm3). PVmeso is the combined mesopore volume of CNCs and MWCNTs and calculated using the log-normal fit shown in Figure 7. PVmacro is the combined macropore volume of CNC and MWCNTs obtained from subtracting the calculated mesopore volume (PVmeso) from the cathode volume (PVcathode). The volume of the Li2O2 product of full discharge, calculated using Equation (2), greatly exceeds the macroporosity of the cathodes at all CNC mass fractions. While it is apparent that significant, perhaps even most or all, mesoporosity is retained after full discharge, its inclusion is not sufficient to account for the Li2O2 volume which exceeds total porosity for all formulations other than pure MWCNTs. The increase in capacity with the addition of CNCs is accompanied by a decrease in macroporosity, resulting in a product volume of greater than 500% of the macroporosity of cathodes with CNC mass fractions exceeding 0.375, the formulation with the largest observed capacity. Thus, it is clear that the growth of peroxide within the macropores causes cathode expansion; however, expansion greater than ~500% results in electrode cracking and surface deposition and a further decrease in the capacity as a function of mesoporosity.
Cycling lifetimes follow a Gaussian distribution with the CNC mass fraction displaying maximum cycling lifetimes at a mass fraction of 0.5 where an average of 71 cycles were achieved (Figure 16, Table S1), a 51% and 65% increase over that of pure MWCNT and CNC cathodes, respectively. The cycle life was fit using Equation (11):
f x   =   b + A σ 2 π e ( ln x μ ) 2 2 σ 2
where b is the baseline, A is the peak amplitude, x is the CNC mass fraction, µ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.
The pore structure plays a critical role not only in the gravimetric capacity but in the cycle life as well. The cycle life is enhanced for all composite compositions, implying that the additional pores display better reversibility. Furthermore, its functional dependence is the same as that of additional pore diameter (Figure 8, inset), peaking at similar mass fractions, suggesting that larger mesopores are responsible for the enhancement, perhaps due to reduced pore clogging.
Cycle life is optimized at a somewhat higher CNC mass fraction (0.5) than the full depth of discharge gravimetric capacity (0.375). The amount of Li2O2 that forms at this limited (500 mAh/g) depth of discharge occupies approximately 38% and 46% of the cathodes macropore volume at CNC mass fractions of 0.375 and 0.5, respectively. Therefore, cathode expansion may be avoided, with sufficient volume for product storage for either composition. The mesopore volume and average pore diameters of the samples are nearly identical; however, the longer cycling cathode has a larger surface area, implying that surface passivation is responsible for cell failure. Further increases to the mass fraction also increase surface area, but this is accompanied by a decreasing mesopore diameter and macroporosity and an increasing degree of macropore filling, indicating that pore clogging limits cycle life at high mass fractions.

4. Conclusions

MWCNT Li-O2 cathodes store Li2O2 in a fraction of their macropore volume, with the electrode swelling to accommodate the product rather than fully utilizing their porosity. Essentially, full utilization can be achieved by mixing CNCs into MWCNTs to create CNC/MWCNT composite cathodes, dramatically decreasing macroporosity while increasing mesoporosity and storage capacity. The maximum volumetric (5664 mAh/cm3) and true gravimetric (870 mAh/g) capacities are more than 200% and 21% greater than pure MWCNT cathodes, and approximately four times and an order of magnitude larger, respectively, than what is achievable by LIBs (150–210 mAh/g and 550–700 mAh/cm3) [26].
CNC occupation of the macropores between the loosely woven MWCNTs primarily creates larger-diameter (>80 nm) mesopores, presumably at the interfaces of the two materials. These larger mesopores are not only found to result in higher gravimetric capacities than smaller ones, given equivalent total mesopore volumes, but also show better electrochemical reversibility. This dramatically improves the cycle life, optimized at a CNC mass fraction of 0.5 with a 51% and 67% increase over pure MWCNT and CNC cathodes, respectively.
In summary, the composition of CNC/MWCNT composite cathodes can be optimized for lifetime, true gravimetric capacity, and volumetric capacity, although not simultaneously. CNC/MWCNT cathodes obtained their maximum cycle life at a CNC mass fraction to 0.5. The true gravimetric capacity is essentially maximized at that mass fraction, and the volumetric capacity is 77% greater than that obtained with pure MWCNT cathodes but 15% lower than its maximum value (5664 mAh/cm3). Further increases in the CNC mass fraction to 0.75 resulted in maximum volumetric capacity (5664 mAh/cm3), as the cathode density increased with the CNC mass fraction, but this resulted in a 35% decrease in the cycle life (relative to CNC mass fraction of 0.5) due to the decrease in both mesopore volume and average pore diameter.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma18163897/s1, Table S1: Summary of the surface areas, porosities and cycling characteristics of CNC/MWCNT cathodes; Table S2: Parameters determined from data fitting detailed in the manuscript.; Table S3: Total porosity, meso- and macroporosity of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction, and the volume of the Li2O2 as the result of full discharge for each formulation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization M.J.W.; methodology, M.J.W. and M.D.W.; investigation, M.D.W., C.A. and S.C.; resources M.J.W.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J.W. and M.D.W.; writing—review and editing, M.J.W.; supervision, M.J.W. and M.D.W.; project administration, M.J.W.; funding acquisition, M.J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Reconnaissance Office contract number NRO000-14-C-0335.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bruce, P.G.; Freunberger, S.A.; Hardwick, L.J.; Tarascon, J.-M. Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tan, P.; Jiang, H.R.; Zhu, X.B.; An, L.; Jung, C.Y.; Wu, M.C.; Shi, L.; Shyy, W.; Zhao, T.S. Advances and challenges in lithium-air batteries. Appl. Energy 2017, 204, 780–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aurbach, D.; McCloskey, B.D.; Nazar, L.F.; Bruce, P.G. Advances in understanding mechanisms underpinning lithium–air batteries. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cao, D.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, J.; Tan, G.; Wu, C. Irreplaceable Carbon Boosts LiO2 Batteries: From Mechanism Research to Practical Application. Nano Energy 2021, 89, 106464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Karabelli, D.; Birke, K.P. Feasible Energy Density Pushes of Li-Metal vs. Li-Ion Cells. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Global EV Outlook 2021; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2021.
  7. Bae, Y.; Yun, Y.S.; Lim, H.-D.; Lee, H.; Kim, Y.-J.; Kim, J.; Park, H.; Ko, Y.; Lee, S.; Kwon, H.J.; et al. Tuning the Carbon Crystallinity for Highly Stable Li–O2 Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 8160–8169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lim, H.D.; Park, K.Y.; Song, H.; Jang, E.Y.; Gwon, H.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.H.; Lima, M.D.; Robles, R.O.; Lepró, X.; et al. Enhanced Power and Rechargeability of a Li−O2 Battery Based on a Hierarchical-Fibril CNT Electrode. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1348–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jian, Z.; Liu, P.; Li, F.; He, P.; Guo, X.; Chen, M.; Zhou, H. Core-shell-structured CNT@RuO2 composite as a high-performance cathode catalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 442–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, H.; Lee, H.; Kim, M.; Bae, Y.; Baek, W.; Park, K.; Park, S.; Kim, T.; Kwon, H.; Choi, W.; et al. Flexible free-standing air electrode with bimodal pore architecture for long-cycling Li-O2 batteries. Carbon 2017, 117, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, H.; Lee, D.J.; Kim, M.; Kim, H.; Cho, Y.S.; Kwon, H.J.; Lee, H.C.; Park, C.R.; Im, D. High-Energy Density Li–O2 Battery with a Polymer Electrolyte-Coated CNT Electrode via the Layer-by-Layer Method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 17385–17395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, Y.; Bai, F.; Wang, A.; Cui, Z.; Wang, D.; Shi, S.; Zhang, T. Perfluorinated organics regulating Li2O2 formation and improving stability for Li–oxygen batteries. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 3030–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, S.; Fan, W.; Guo, X.; Meng, F.; Liu, X. Positive Role of Surface Defects on Carbon Nanotube Cathodes in Overpotential and Capacity Retention of Rechargeable Lithium–Oxygen Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 21567–21575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, Z.; Deng, Z.; Shen, Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, W.; Xie, M.; Li, Y.; Huang, Y. A Li–O2 battery cathode with vertical mass/charge transfer pathways. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 3000–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, R.; Fan, W.; Guo, X.; Dong, S. Highly ordered and ultra-long carbon nanotube arrays as air cathodes for high-energy-efficiency Li-oxygen batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 306, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Womble, M.D.; McKenzie, K.R.; Wagner, M.J. Thick film formation on Li-O2 cathodes—Breaking the true capacity barrier. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 5868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wagner, M.J.; Banek, N.A.; Abele, D.T.; McKenzie, K.R. Production of Carbon Nanochains and Nanotubes from Biomass. US Patent 11975970B2, 7 May 2024. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mahne, N.; Fontaine, O.; Thotiyl, M.O.; Wilkening, M.; Freunberger, S.A. Mechanism and performance of lithium–oxygen batteries—A perspective. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 6716–6729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ding, N.; Chien, S.W.; Hor, T.S.A.; Lum, R.; Zong, Y.; Liu, Z. Influence of carbon pore size on the discharge capacity of Li–O2 batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 12433–12441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Torquato, S. Modeling of physical properties of composite materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2000, 37, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Itkis, D.M.; Semenenko, D.A.; Kataev, E.Y.; Belova, A.I.; Neudachina, V.S.; Sirotina, A.P.; Hävecker, M.; Teschner, D.; Knop-Gericke, A.; Dudin, P.; et al. Reactivity of Carbon in Lithium–Oxygen Battery Positive Electrodes. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4697–4701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Olivares-Marín, M.; Aklalouch, M.; Tonti, D. Combined Influence of Meso- and Macroporosity of Soft-Hard Templated Carbon Electrodes on the Performance of Li-O2 Cells with Different Configurations. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, Y.; Yun, J.; Shin, H.-S.; Jung, K.-N.; Lee, J.-W. Synergistic nanoarchitecture of mesoporous carbon and carbon nanotubes for lithium–oxygen batteries. Nano Converg. 2021, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chawla, N.; Chamaani, A.; Safa, M.; El-Zahab, B. Palladium-Filled Carbon Nanotubes Cathode for Improved Electrolyte Stability and Cyclability Performance of Li-O2 Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, A6303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cho, Y.S.; Kim, H.; Byeon, M.; Kim, D.Y.; Park, H.; Jung, Y.; Bae, Y.; Kim, M.; Lee, D.; Park, J.; et al. Enhancing the cycle stability of Li–O2 batteries via functionalized carbon nanotube-based electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 4263–4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nitta, N.; Wu, F.; Lee, J.T.; Yushin, G. Li-ion battery materials: Present and future. Mater. Today 2015, 18, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM image of the surface of a fully discharged MWCNT cathode.
Figure 1. SEM image of the surface of a fully discharged MWCNT cathode.
Materials 18 03897 g001
Figure 2. Cross-section of a fully discharged MWCNT cathode.
Figure 2. Cross-section of a fully discharged MWCNT cathode.
Materials 18 03897 g002
Figure 3. SEM image of pristine CNC cathode.
Figure 3. SEM image of pristine CNC cathode.
Materials 18 03897 g003
Figure 4. SEM image of the surface of a fully discharged CNC cathode.
Figure 4. SEM image of the surface of a fully discharged CNC cathode.
Materials 18 03897 g004
Figure 5. SEM of pristine (a) MWCNT, (b) 50CNC/50MWCNT, and (c) CNC cathodes.
Figure 5. SEM of pristine (a) MWCNT, (b) 50CNC/50MWCNT, and (c) CNC cathodes.
Materials 18 03897 g005
Figure 6. Surface area of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction. The weighted linear least-squares fit to the rule of mixtures is shown as a dashed line.
Figure 6. Surface area of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction. The weighted linear least-squares fit to the rule of mixtures is shown as a dashed line.
Materials 18 03897 g006
Figure 7. Pore volume of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction. The weighted log-normal plus line least-squares fit is shown as a red dashed line. The log-normal least-squares fit to the additional porosity is shown in the inset.
Figure 7. Pore volume of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction. The weighted log-normal plus line least-squares fit is shown as a red dashed line. The log-normal least-squares fit to the additional porosity is shown in the inset.
Materials 18 03897 g007
Figure 8. Weighted average pore diameter of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction. The weighted log-normal plus line least-squares fit is shown as a dashed line. The Gaussian least-squares fit to the additional pore diameter beyond that predicted by the rule of mixtures is shown in the inset as a dashed dark green line.
Figure 8. Weighted average pore diameter of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction. The weighted log-normal plus line least-squares fit is shown as a dashed line. The Gaussian least-squares fit to the additional pore diameter beyond that predicted by the rule of mixtures is shown in the inset as a dashed dark green line.
Materials 18 03897 g008
Figure 9. Pore size distributions of additional mesopores in CNC/MWCNT cathodes. The data points are connected by lines to guide the eye.
Figure 9. Pore size distributions of additional mesopores in CNC/MWCNT cathodes. The data points are connected by lines to guide the eye.
Materials 18 03897 g009
Figure 10. Full depth of discharge gravimetric capacity of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction. The weighted least-squares log-normal fit is shown as a dashed line.
Figure 10. Full depth of discharge gravimetric capacity of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction. The weighted least-squares log-normal fit is shown as a dashed line.
Materials 18 03897 g010
Figure 11. Full depth of gravimetric capacity to mesopore volume ratio as a function of CNC mass fraction calculated from the log-normal fits of CNC/MWCNT mesopore volume and gravimetric capacities.
Figure 11. Full depth of gravimetric capacity to mesopore volume ratio as a function of CNC mass fraction calculated from the log-normal fits of CNC/MWCNT mesopore volume and gravimetric capacities.
Materials 18 03897 g011
Figure 12. Full depth of discharge volumetric capacity of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction. The weighted log-normal times line least-squares fit is shown as a dashed line.
Figure 12. Full depth of discharge volumetric capacity of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction. The weighted log-normal times line least-squares fit is shown as a dashed line.
Materials 18 03897 g012
Figure 13. Densities of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as function of CNC mass fraction. The fit to rule of mixtures is shown as a dashed line.
Figure 13. Densities of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as function of CNC mass fraction. The fit to rule of mixtures is shown as a dashed line.
Materials 18 03897 g013
Figure 14. Full depth of discharge true capacities of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction.
Figure 14. Full depth of discharge true capacities of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction.
Materials 18 03897 g014
Figure 15. SEM images of discharged (a) MWCNT, (b) 50/50 CNC/MWCNT, and (c) CNC cathodes.
Figure 15. SEM images of discharged (a) MWCNT, (b) 50/50 CNC/MWCNT, and (c) CNC cathodes.
Materials 18 03897 g015
Figure 16. Cycling lifetimes of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction. The weighted Gaussian least-squares fit is shown as a dashed line.
Figure 16. Cycling lifetimes of CNC/MWCNT cathodes as a function of CNC mass fraction. The weighted Gaussian least-squares fit is shown as a dashed line.
Materials 18 03897 g016
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Womble, M.D.; Adebayo, C.; Cascio, S.; Wagner, M.J. Synergistic Enhancement of Li-O2 Battery Capacity and Cycle Life Using Carbon Nanochain/Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Composites. Materials 2025, 18, 3897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18163897

AMA Style

Womble MD, Adebayo C, Cascio S, Wagner MJ. Synergistic Enhancement of Li-O2 Battery Capacity and Cycle Life Using Carbon Nanochain/Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Composites. Materials. 2025; 18(16):3897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18163897

Chicago/Turabian Style

Womble, Michael D., Cynthia Adebayo, Silas Cascio, and Michael J. Wagner. 2025. "Synergistic Enhancement of Li-O2 Battery Capacity and Cycle Life Using Carbon Nanochain/Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Composites" Materials 18, no. 16: 3897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18163897

APA Style

Womble, M. D., Adebayo, C., Cascio, S., & Wagner, M. J. (2025). Synergistic Enhancement of Li-O2 Battery Capacity and Cycle Life Using Carbon Nanochain/Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Composites. Materials, 18(16), 3897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18163897

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop